TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SaveUSAKitty
reSee.it AI Summary
I joined Tucker Carlson for a live discussion about the corruption in Portland, Oregon. I highlighted that the issues we're seeing in one city could be happening elsewhere too, raising concerns about corrupt political figures with arrest powers. This should alarm everyone.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
💥FULL INTERVIEW💥 Nick Sortor @nicksortor joins Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson on his live broadcast tonight with an in-depth discussion on the corruption that exists within Portland, Oregon: SORTOR: “This is just what we’ve seen in ONE city, so far. How many more of these cities are having the same issues, that we’re not talking about?…With corrupt, political hacks that have arrest powers. That’s VERY concerning. It should concern everybody.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
"It doesn't feel like America... it feels like a third world country." "police have been totally infiltrated by a leftist militant group." Downtown Portland looks postapocalyptic—graffiti, vandalism, boarded-up windows, no people. "Police there aren't actually allowed to be police." I was assaulted; Antifa thugs coordinated—one swung on me, broke my camera, and threw me in a hole. I was charged with disorderly conduct too; video shows me telling the person to back away. Officers couldn't explain my charges for over forty-five minutes. Portland police relegated traffic control to Antifa militants and wouldn't open the road to the spaghetti factory. DA dropped the case after we demanded discovery relating to Rose City Antifa and the Portland Police Department. A Secret Service agent was fired for saying Charlie Kirk had it coming. DOJ investigation aims to expose rot within Portland PD; the findings could inform other cities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you there?
Speaker 1: I'm here, Tucker. Thank you for having me, sir.
Speaker 0: Thanks so much for doing this. So you just came from Portland. How would you assess it? What's it like?
Speaker 1: It it doesn't feel like America, at this point. It feels like and I know it's a cliche, but it feels like a third world country. I mean, you have police that have been totally infiltrated by a leftist militant group. And, you know, right now, you can see police cars behind me. These police cars would protect me if somebody were to come up and assault me.
That's not how it works in Portland. The the the the Portland police arrested me instead when I got assaulted. It's a different world out there, and not even just around the ice facility. Like, your your monologue was spot on here, Tucker. But if you go downtown, and it looks like it's it's postapocalyptic almost.
The graffiti everywhere, the vandalism, the boarded up windows. There are no people in Downtown Portland. It is it's quiet as hell. There's nobody walking around. People don't go there for leisure anymore or for vacation.
It's because they're afraid, and they should be afraid. You you the the chance of you getting beat up or stuck with a needle or robbed in the street is through the roof because police there aren't actually allowed to be police. So
Speaker 0: So what happened to you, if you don't mind explaining? You were arrested for being assaulted? Is that a cry is it a crime in Portland to be assaulted?
Speaker 1: It's a crime in Portland to be a a a conservative, Tucker. I mean, as as weird as that sounds, the the video evidence and even the DA has come out and said because the DA refused to to to go through with the case. So they ended up dismissing all of the, the the charges. The video very clears, clearly shows me telling the person to back away as I'm walking down the sidewalk, and then the Antifa thugs you know, this stuff is coordinated. Right?
They come up with an umbrella to try to block other cameras. And as soon as when they do that, they're gonna they're gonna commit some sort of act of violence, and that's exactly what they did this time. One of their thugs decided to swing on me and hit me in the face before breaking my camera and then throwing me in a hole. Was that person arrested? Absolutely not.
Was I? We know the story now.
Speaker 0: What did they charge you with?
Speaker 1: They charge me with disorderly conduct too, which is really weird considering the amount of screaming and, vandalism and assaults on officers and explosions of fireworks and such that happened in the middle of the night in the streets out there. You know, they they butt break in the cars. If you try to if you're not a member of Antifa and you try to drive down that street, they're going to hit your car. They're gonna break your windows. Plenty of videos of that happening, and none of that is apparently disorderly.
They call what I did disorderly because it's a what I'm doing is a threat to the order in their city, which is a basically leftist authoritarianism.
Speaker 0: So you got your face in the way of an Antifa fist, and so you're the criminal. What did the did the cop apologize as he was arresting you? Like, what I mean, it's I it's hard even to imagine the scene you're describing.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And and so I actually went to this group of police. There were about 12 of them. They're way down the road. They don't they don't do anything ever.
Obviously, that situation changed a little bit as time went on, but I went over there to seek refuge with them to, hopefully like, I wasn't even reporting anybody. I was just standing back hope like, hoping that the situation would, you know, get like, ease up a little bit. And I I'm standing there joking with a bunch of them for seven to eight minutes or so. And then a sergeant rolls up on a bike and says, cuff him. And that's exactly and they're like, that guy?
This guy right here, cuff him? And he's like, yeah. Cuff him. He's under arrest. And they had no idea why.
They couldn't explain to me for over forty five minutes, Tucker, what my charges actually were. They they they started driving to the jail very slowly, hoping that somebody would fill them in on why I was actually being arrested. And so they had to pull over on the side of the road near the jail and just sort of twiddle their thumbs, waiting on a call from a lieutenant. And as soon as they got that call from the lieutenant, the lieutenant instructed the officer to get out of the vehicle, presumably so I couldn't hear what they were talking about on the phone. Something stinks over there.
I mean, I there were three people all night long in Portland that came through that jail. It's the only jail in Portland, and three people, including myself, ended up coming through there that night. It's wild.
Speaker 0: And there were riots underway. Oh,
Speaker 1: yeah. Yeah. That same night, my car was vandalized. There were fires in the street. They do that every single night, and that no nobody is ever arrested for that.
Speaker 0: It's it's so far from the America that you imagine when you think of America. I mean, this is kind of my point. So for example, like, a place Palm Beach or Miami or Jacksonville, even Tampa, sit you know, big cities in Florida. That's the opposite of what would happen. And so you wonder, like, how can
Speaker 1: Yep.
Speaker 0: Portland, Oregon share a flag with Miami, Florida?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a it's a it's a great question. And as you as you very well said, this stuff doesn't happen in Florida. It never people aren't going to block the roads in Florida. Right.
Because what happens? You're gonna get run over. Because, you know, the these these people will take residents that live right near the ICE facility and box their cars in with people. They'll surround them and terrorize them. But there's nothing that the driver can do about it.
If they defend themselves, they go to jail. If they try to drive through the crowd to save their family from these thugs, these violent mentally ill thugs, they are the ones that get arrested, not the thugs that held them hostage.
Speaker 0: So what does that tell you? It tells you that if the rioters don't get arrested, but anyone who resists the rioters get arrested, that tells you that the rioters are in effect working for the state. They're the militia then. Right? I mean, what else would that tell you?
They're on they're
Speaker 1: on the same side as the state. Yeah. Of course. And then people ask me all the time. It's like, okay.
Well, are are these, what what are the what are these Antifa folks' thoughts on the Portland police? And it's there's no ill will between the two groups at all because they're practically working together at this point. Yeah. Just the other day, there was a a business owner or a manager of a restaurant, that's at the end of the street where the ICE facility is on. There's only one street to get to that to that business.
And he walks up and begging and pleading with the officers there to open the road, not because the police had closed the road, but because, Portland police had relegated traffic control duties to these Antifa militants that were not letting through employees
Speaker 0: of
Speaker 1: the restaurant or patrons of the restaurant, only letting through their own people, and Portland police were letting it happen. Portland police ended up I have it all on video. I posted it all on my ex. Portland police walk up to these militants that are controlling traffic and say, hey. We need you to we need you to open up the road.
Would you mind opening the road so that people can get to the spaghetti factory? And they said no. And so the road just never opened and police just walked away. I mean, I I that that that's how deep this rot runs. Like, who is giving these officers orders to stand down and defer to Antifa?
Speaker 0: So you've just changed my mind on this completely. I mean, so I went into this thinking, well, the problem is these groups, Antifa and others, whatever Antifa is, no one's even really ever defined it that I can tell. But these, you know, these groups of radicals angry about something committing violence against people, but it sounds like the DOJ needs to come in and take control of the Portland Police Department on on civil rights grounds. I know they're very busy policing antisemitism on Ivy League campuses. It's kind of critical problem in America.
But if a police department is indistinguishable from Antifa, that might even be a bigger problem, and maybe they should take it over tomorrow. Why wouldn't they?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's something that I should probably, I I'd like to talk to to attorney general Pam Bondi about. She's been very responsive to this entire situation. She put Harmeet Dillon on it. They've launched an investigation into the into the practices of the Portland Police Department.
And and and Tucker, we we actually put in this demand for discovery after my arrest, and we were demanding all communications between, Rose City Antifa, which is an organized group that isn't an entity that exists, and the Portland Police Department. And literally within an hour of us doing that, my attorney got a call, an angry call from the, the DA's office, and then eventually said, okay. Well, you know what? We're we're just we're not gonna move forward with this case. They were clearly bothered by the fact that we were demanding discovery relating to the discussions between Rose City Antifa and the Portland Police Department.
So there's something there. There's something there. If we didn't make that demand, I don't think they would have dropped this case.
Speaker 0: That's an incredible story. It's not the story I expected to hear from you at all. That's an amazing story, and it's a horrifying story because where does it leave the citizens of Portland? I mean, if the police department is in here, then where do you go?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I spoke with a resident. There's an apartment building that is directly, it's adjacent to the ICE facility. And, they are these residents are terrified to speak publicly. I finally got one to speak to me on camera.
I haven't released it yet, but he wanted his face blurred because they're terrified of what happens when they walk out of their apartment building when they're complaining about what's going on in the street and the lack of action on the on the part of police officers and the city of Portland. The city of Port there is a noise ordinance in the city of Portland. You know, people have the right to, the the quiet enjoyment of their home. Right? And, and the Portland police and the city have selectively decided they're not going to enforce it there to the detriment of the multiple veterans that live there with PTSD that are hearing them the, the Antifa folks in the street shooting off fireworks in the middle of the night, scaring the crap out of them.
They're talking about children in elevators that are crying because it's like a war zone out in front of their house every single day, and the police are just letting it happen. For for what reason? I don't know. Is it political? Is it because they're totally infiltrated by these leftists?
I mean, there's there's a lot of reasons that it could be, but it's something that we need to find out because there are this is not a a victimless situation here. The victims are the people of Portland that are just trying to live their lives and go about their daily business without fear of, of being, you know, beaten in the street for complaining that people wanna scream in front of their house at 03:00 in the morning. That's how bad it is.
Speaker 0: I think a lot of Americans are under the impression that nothing has changed in the last forty years, and the law enforcement and intelligence agencies are fundamentally pro American and committed to the rule of law that would include the US military, CIA, NSA, and and police departments and National Guard units. You know, you think they're sort of on your side. And I think you're hitting at something that most people don't understand, which is a lot of these organizations, these institutions have been completely taken over by people who sympathize with Antifa. And I would include the US military in that. Many many members of the US military cheered the assassination of Charlie Kirk, many online.
And that seems like a problem that needs that seems like the problem. Because if things go south, the people with the guns have to be loyal to the constitution. They can't be loyal to Antifa. Right?
Speaker 1: Right. And, I mean, you're you're absolutely spot on there. It's, it's chilling the amount those are just the people that we have that are have the weirdly enough have the balls to say that stuff publicly, like condoning the assassination of Charlie Kirk and stuff. I mean, it's terrifying to think how many of these people are in the background working for these police agencies. Actually, we we were able to get a secret service agent fired, one that works on protective details fired for saying that Charlie Kirk had it coming.
He said that publicly on Facebook. That's somebody that works on a protective detail. That should terrify everybody because then it it leads back to think, okay. Well, did they did people within the secret service just let what happened to Trump and Butler? Did they just let that slide?
You know? The we know these people exist. We know they're on these protective details. We know that they've infiltrated the military. That that that that's that's terrifying, and we really need systematic reviews of all of this stuff.
And I know down there in in Portland, I'm actually so well, here in DC anyway. Here in DC, I will be meeting tomorrow with Harmit Dillon and the Department of Justice, and they'll be doing a a a full interview from start to finish on, from what happened and what their next steps are going to be. They I I spoke with president Trump about it today, personally. They are not going to let this go. They want to expose all of the rot within this police department out there because, ideally, that will, that model will be able to spread to other police agencies across the country.
Like, what they find in in Portland may help them in Chicago, for example. So a can of worms has been opened here. The police chief out there in Org or in, in Portland has been on TV every day slandering me saying that it is provocative to film in public with a light on your camera even though it's dark and so you need a light. I mean, any reasonable human being can figure that part out, but they're terrified. They know that that we're not letting this go, that we're that and now they got the DOJ on their backs.
I I I'm just hoping that that the political pressure keeps up, and people don't just forget about the story.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I I hope not. I know that Hartmeet Dillon, who I know very well, my former lawyer, is a really serious and smart person and a very tough person. So I have full confidence in her, but I I hope that we don't devolve into, like, an endless conversation with Antifa and, like, you know, some angry nineteen year old. Yeah.
I'm against all that. But cops with guns in handcuffs and the power to arrest citizens, If they're corrupt, boy, there is nothing scarier than that. US military officers. Yep. Many of whom are, like, lunatics, like left wing lunatics.
And, of course, the foreign policy establishment doesn't care because all they want is another profitable war or they wanna extend their wars in, you know, Ukraine, etcetera. They want a war with Iran. So they don't really care about whether the people who run the US military are loyal to the constitution of The United States. They don't care at all because they're not loyal to The United States. So but we should care.
And I I just really hope when you're up there, you're up there, you'll encourage a forensic look at law enforcement, number one.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. And I think you brought up a a really good point that needs to be, talked about more where, if there is a way and and I'll definitely ask about this. If there is a way to put more federal power within the Portland Police Department, I don't think it's able to be saved as is. I think it would need to be totally just turned on its head or maybe scrapped and started over.
You know? I I I I that that would be you know, I feel like that might be the only way to save it unless you can take federal control over that stuff. I think that was a really good point that you made. Now definitely definitely ask about that. Look.
I mean, this is just what we've seen in one city so far. How many more of these cities are having the same issues that we're not talking about? I know Chicago's a hot topic and stuff right now, but, you know, I'm sure like, is this stuff happening in Seattle? Like, how how many other cities are you having the same issue, with corrupt political hacks that are that have arrest powers? I mean, that's that's very concerning.
It should concern everybody.
Speaker 0: Well, that you you really changed my mind, Nick, and I appreciate your reporting. Thank you for doing this, and I hope you'll come back.
Speaker 1: Thank you for shining the light on this, Tucker.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a fiery segment with Jack Posobiec, urging the White House to condemn Lindsey Graham's actions. I believe Graham is stirring up trouble by prioritizing his agenda over Trump, and I warned that if he continues, there could be serious consequences when he returns home.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Monday AM Bannon FIRE! 🔥👏🏻 FULL SEGMENT with @JackPosobiec “The White House has to CONDEMN THIS, pull ALL support, tell Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC to come home! Or we’re going to put you under arrest when you come home. You’re STIRRING IT UP! Lindsey Graham’s over there saying: “Hey! Forget Trump! I got the House and the Senate, we’re going to pass them, you’re gonna see something in the next couple of days…remember that? He’s STIRRING IT UP over there…” #WarRoom
Video Transcript AI Summary
A massive drone swarm attack in Russia has occurred, targeting strategic forces. The damage assessment is debated, with Ukrainians claiming significant damage and Russians downplaying it. If the U.S. was involved, it's a major act of war. Questions arise about whether the U.S. provided intelligence or targeting assistance, potentially through the base in Wiesbaden, Germany, where Ukrainian officials work with NATO forces.
The attack raises concerns about a blurring of lines in the proxy war and potential escalation. There are questions about whether President Trump or intelligence officials were briefed on the operation. Some believe the CCP is fueling instability and that Zelenskyy's actions are derailing peace negotiations.
If the White House was unaware, they should condemn the attack and halt support to Ukraine. Some urge immediate investigations into potential deep state involvement and call for figures like Tulsi Gabbard and Ratcliffe to investigate. Lindsey Graham is accused of stirring up conflict, and there are calls to end mineral deals with Ukraine if they acted without U.S. knowledge.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This assault, Jack Posobic I'm I'm a get to the Polish situation in a second, but given your intelligence, your naval intelligence officer, it was absolutely stunning. First off, hat tip to the Ukrainians. Never nothing's ever been done like this before, folks. 3,000 miles inland. This makes the Hamas and remember, we said Hamas for eighteen months.
The intel services had to know about that. The Muslim brotherhood training, financing, educating logistics on that attack on October 7. This is this is to the tenth power of that. Major first time ever strategic bombing forces have been eviscerated. This is worse than catching MacArthur with the fighter planes, not the bombers, the fighter planes tip to tip in Manila in in in '19 on 12/07/1941, December seventh and eighth.
Jack, '2 things, and neither one of
Speaker 1: them are
Speaker 0: good because this is a strike into Russia to the strategic forces. This is a major act of war. So one of two things. Either, of which the New York Times has been reporting now for over a year with that great report they did back in '24, with the Intel our Intel community inextricably linked with theirs, with target acquisition, with fire control solutions, with artificial intelligence, all of it, to plan this thing out for eighteen months. There's no way the Ukrainians did this on their own.
However, the other alternative, which the White House said, hey. We just found out about it. That's almost worse because if I'm Bibi, I'm sitting there going, hey. If Zelenskyy can do it, hey. Line them up.
Let's let's go with next stop, Persia. Jack Bosobic, put it in put it in perspective for us.
Speaker 1: Well, Steve, what we saw here, this massive drone swarm attack in Russia, Of course, it remains to be seen exactly what the battle damage assessment is. I know the Ukrainian forces and their intelligence services have been seeding this these numbers and this narrative throughout western media, and that's been percolating in that system. The Russians, of course, understandably, are trying to downplay this and act as if it's, you know, something bad. Jack.
Speaker 0: They haven't they haven't denied in case. Repairable. Jack. Jack. They haven't totally denied it, and some footage is out there.
These guys have been denied it. They're saying the
Speaker 1: damage is not as they're saying that the damage is negligible and that many of the planes are in fact still usable. So, again, battle damage assessment
Speaker 0: If you if you took out one plane Hang on. If you took out one Jack, if you took out one plane, this is an act of war. Deep if The United States is involved here in your Russia and by the way, the Russians hit back with a drone strike last night, but nowhere near with the what and they've said, hey. Wait. We're gonna be all over this.
If you're sitting in Moscow, the this is as bold an act of war that's ever happened between The United States and Russia since we were allies in World War two and then had kind of a breakup afterwards, sir.
Speaker 1: The question now is when this act was taking place, these drones are set so they're telling us that it was they were put in place eighteen months ago. So eighteen months ago is in the beginning of or the midst of what I guess you could call the auto pen administration. So who was it on the American side that either gave the green light to this or provided the initial, intelligence targeting? And is it possible then that these targets were even guided by American targeteers at some point? We know about this base, Wiesbaden, Germany, The US Army garrison where they have and New York Times has reported this, Steve, as you just said, they have this, gymnasium that's set up, and you've got the Ukrainian officials right there with NATO forces, which means, guess what, us, the Americans sitting right there providing targeting.
Was a target package at any point given to the Ukrainians from Americans for this? And as such, do the Russians take that as an act of war from The United States on Russia proper? Because this idea of a proxy war, it's starting to get a little bit blurry along these lines. And we already saw the Germans, Steve, what were they all saying last week? The long range strikes into Russia.
The long range strikes into Russia. Now boom. What we have what's interesting, a deep strike into Russia, but it is not from long range missiles. It's from these short range drones. And by the way, there's some indication that the operators of these drones might also have been more locally, locally placed than all the way back in Ukraine or even in Germany.
So they could, in fact, have target tier cells of Ukrainian forces that are inside Russia operating right now. So what we need to understand is twofold. Number one, what information did the intelligence community have about this at any point, and was the president of The United States, Donald Trump, briefed on this? And if he was not briefed on this or secretary Ratcliffe or excuse me, direct CIA director Ratcliffe or DNI Gabbard, then we got a problem. We got a really, really big problem with our intelligence community, be it the same way that we did when president Trump was in administration the first time.
Speaker 0: Problem two is that our forces
Speaker 1: are vulnerable to this as well.
Speaker 0: Hang on. Exactly. We're getting that in a second. Hang on. Boone Cutler's gonna join us.
I got Ezra Cohen maybe later, Ben Harnwell. Here's my problem. Well, I've got many problems on this. This is why you have I haven't seen any investigation going to deep state. Ratcliffe actually said a couple weeks ago, there's gonna be no political involvement in the CIA.
The thousand agents are just guys retiring. He's not gonna fill the billets. There has to be Tulsi Gabbard and Ratcliffe should be in the Oval Office this morning, like, right now. And the question should be, yo. What happened here?
Did you guys know anything about it? And if you didn't know anything about it, there's gotta be a major investigation, like, immediately. We gotta stop playing footsie with the deep state. We had Alex Jones on last week. Prosovic, you've been talking about this nonstop.
They have an apparatus inside this government. It's gonna do what they want. And so two things. One or two things, both are off either number one, they work with the Ukrainians to get this done, which is basically impossible if that didn't happen. However, the other one is you're telling me that our intelligence service didn't know about this, that the White House is totally caught blind?
If I'm Beebe, I'm out there today saying, hey, IDF. Get the bombers. Let's go. Let's roll. Right?
If they're blind to that, Posobic, both of these are terrible. And then the third, Zelensky didn't give the president of The United States a heads up to say we're gonna do a deep strike into strategic forces of Russia, which is going up the escalatory ladder as quickly as you can on the day before your meeting at Turkey and Ben Hornwell informs me the meeting took thirty minutes. And this big meeting you're having Turkey today, thirty minutes, and then they they punched out because there's nothing to talk about. There there this war is expanding, and this war is getting tougher. And president Trump's number one priority was to deescalate that, get Russian rapprochement.
Since post you and I talked to this. Since May, since she went to that commemoration event for the eightieth commemoration of Victory in Europe Day from the Russian angle, and for those three days, there was Xi, the the Chinese have walked away from the negotiating table on trade, and the Russians are s are trying to escalate everything with bombing strikes. And now you got Zelensky going back and that give the the White House a heads up. We're their biggest sponsor. Didn't give us a heads up.
The White House saying we didn't know anything about it. We saw it when it went up on drudge Mac Daddy. How do you square these things, brother?
Speaker 1: Well, Steve, it's very clear. The CCP is fueling so much of this chaos and so much of this instability. Remember, the CCP is a major arms supplier right behind Russia and right along with Iran and their drones. They're enjoying the instability just as much as anyone else because it's the status quo that is being destabilized route right now. And so their rise, the rise that they want of BRICS, the multilateral world, unipolarity being completely ended in The United States, which by the way, it already has.
So they want the instability to rise to put Trump in a situation where he's got to deal with all of these things rather than deal squarely with them. And so Zelensky, what's he doing? This is this is meant to derail the peace negotiations Yeah. The peace process. And look, Steve, I think it's time that we all start to look very seriously on this.
This has to be a deal between The US and Russia. It simply has to be done that way. You're not going to get peace any other way. They want the big deal. Everything has been rejected by both sides between Russia have rejected this.
Speaker 0: Hang on. If we didn't know it okay. I got that. Okay. Good.
I I like that. You then then the White House has to condemn this immediately and pull all support and tell Lindsey Graham, come home. Are we gonna put you under arrest when you come home? You're stirring it up. Lindsey Graham's over there saying, hey.
Forget Trump. I got the house and the senate. We're gonna we're gonna pass him. You're gonna see something in a couple of days. Remember that?
He's stirring it up over there. He's telling me they got backing. If they did not give us a heads up on this, all full stop and no no minerals deal, walk away from all of it. They're irresponsible, and they're dragging us into a kinetic third world war. As we said, us, we're getting dragged in now.
Or the deep state is driving us in there. Either these are not good. Tulsi Gabbard's gotta let us know. Did anyone in an intel at all have anything to do with this? Did anybody have a heads up?
Did anybody and if not, who the hell's running the Ukraine desk? Who's running the Russia desk? Same thing with Ratcliffe. This is why Cash and Bongino and Pam Bondi, you gotta clear out the deep state. This is a ticking time bomb, and you see what they're gonna get us into.
Because now we're now inexorably, we're being drawn into this. If we didn't know about it, the president to me has got to condemn it and got to say we're not gonna give any more support because these people cannot be trusted. You're supposed to be in Turkey today talking peace, not 3,000 miles into Russia blowing up their strategic bombers. Short break.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Mike Benz @MikeBenzCyber : “(Thom Tillis) is a Senator from North Carolina. And North Carolina is the heart of the…shall we say…Mark Milley Deep State, when it comes to all things psychological operations…a very nasty history of domestic interference in domestic politics…” #WarRoom
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Tom Tillis cited January 6 as his reason for blocking Ed Martin, which is suspicious because January 6 was a "Fedsurrection" that happened over four years ago, and peaceful protesters have been pardoned. Tillis mentioned apprehension about Martin pursuing a "Fedsurrection" theory, claiming there was no federal involvement. This is curious because North Carolina, Tillis's state, is the heart of the Mark Milley deep state and has a history of domestic interference.
North Carolina played an extraordinary role in January 6 itself. Fort Bragg, the special operations and psychological operations center, is located there, and organizing protest activity has been a hotbed for 60 years. North Carolina was the center of the "Fed's erection" logistics for January 6. The Thomas Caldwell complaint details how the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and Three Percenters met in North Carolina days before January 6. The FBI and Justice Department allowed a "quick reaction force" to transport weapons and explosives. This person, "person three," was never charged, despite playing a key role in the Oath Keepers' indictment. Mark Milley told Gina Haspel in November 2020 that there was a right-wing coup afoot, suggesting infiltration of these groups in North Carolina.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's where to me it gets very dark. Tom Tillis has made precisely one public statement about this to the press, and that was just this morning where he said it was January 6 that, is the reason that he is not going to approve Ed Martin. And obviously, January 6 was a Fedsurrection. January sixth also happened. Checks notes, what, four, four years and four months ago.
It has no play today. Everyone, you know, who did not commit a violent crime that day has been pardoned by the, by the president of The United States. The there are no active cases when it comes to peaceful protesters. This is not just an ancient memory. It's settled.
It's done. For that to be invoked is the reason to block Ed Martin suggests something much darker to me. Because if you actually parse that statement that senator Tom Tillis said is he mentions towards the end of his remarks that he was apprehensive about Ed Martin pursuing a Fedsurrection theory of the case. He he alludes to the fact that he says that there was no federal involvement. That was a sort of pipe dream.
I'm paraphrasing what he says and he slips that in there and I find that very curious because he's a senator from North Carolina and North Carolina is the heart of the shall we say Mark Milley deep state when it comes to all things psychological operations, domestic a very nasty history of domestic interference and domestic politics.
Speaker 1: Well, Ralph Farrick at UNC Chapel Hill doing the COVID gain of function stuff. Mike, if you can hang with us through the break. Possibly, we're also gonna have AJ Ken Paxton joining us shortly to get into all this. So, Mike, I want an update on what I think you are rightfully known for all things NGOs, how they're funding all that resistance after we come back. If you can hang through, that'd be great.
Warm, if you could just give me two minutes. You know, this audience is always wanting to be ahead of the curve on how they're sort of reformulating their resistance to Trump. Obviously, the NGOs taking a key role, if not the foremost role, maybe second to the judiciary, though, as you've alluded to, they're all conjoined. It's all one of the same. How have they sort of been rebranding?
I know this is a topic you've been discussing a lot, but just give us some some key pointers. I know they'll find everything you're talking on on x too, but just give us some of the top line assessment.
Speaker 0: I know this is not the question that you just I know this is not the question you just asked, but I was just talking about Tom Tillis in North Carolina in January 6. And if I only have a minute and a half, I'd like to just put something out there to put the button on that because I think it's concerning and important if you don't mind. North Carolina
Speaker 1: No, go ahead.
Speaker 0: Where Tom Tillis is the senator played an extraordinary role in January 6 itself, which is why it highly disturbs me that Senator Tillis would be the one who's blocking this from the Republican side. North Carolina is what houses Fort Bragg. The special operations, the psychological operations center, and and where they're where organizing protest activity has been a hotbed of that exact place for coming up on sixty years now going back to Lyman Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Domestic Operations in the 1960s. But most importantly, North Carolina was the center of the Fed's erection logistics for January 6. Go back and read the Thomas Caldwell complaint from the Justice Department.
There's the entire Eastern Seaboard presence of the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and the three percenters all three days before January 6 starting January 3 met commonly in North Carolina where the FBI and Justice Department allowed the, quote, quick reaction force bringing the guns and explosives to skate free as an unindicted co conspirator. This person was called person three, and I'm going to read a few things from this complaint. Person three is has a room and is bringing someone. He will be the quick reaction force. Oathkeeper friends from North Carolina are taking commercial buses up early in the morning the same night.
They will have the goodies in in case things go bad and we need to get heavy. Then, it says, person three had maps. Person three you know, created maps of the of the capital in order to map out where to go. He brought, he was the the transit for actually bringing the guns and explosives to the meetup site in North Carolina. And this this person who was literally transporting heavy weapons with a quote quote ferry planned a ferry heavy weapons across the Potomac.
Should that become necessary on January 6 and distributing maps to find the quickest route to the capital should those heavy weapons be needed. This person played the key role in for the basis of the indictment of the entire oath keepers squad. Never was charged. Again, right there in North Carolina, right where the military should have been doing its its counterintelligence and counterinsurgency work. We know Mark Milley said to Gina Haspel, the head of the CIA on 11/09/2020, just two months before January 6 that there was a right wing coup afoot and something need to be done to stop it.
Mark Milley would not just go back and sit on his thumbs if that's what he said to the CIA director. They would be infiltrating those very groups and they would be doing it right there in North Carolina where Fort Bragg is and exactly where they said the meetup point for January 6 was. So my question is is what is so scary about the Fed's erection theory given North Carolina's role in it that the senator from North Carolina is the one blocking it?
reSee.it AI Summary
I joined Dr. Peter Navarro in the WarRoom to discuss The Lincoln Project's operations. We highlighted major donors for the 2024 cycle, including Charles Bronfman, Christy Walton, Rob Reiner, and notably, Google, which has contributed over $57,000, with more than $34,000 returned to them. Jeff Clark suggested that this could be part of Google's strategy to influence search results to benefit Kamala Harris in the upcoming election.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Adam Molon @admolon joins Dr. Peter Navarro @RealPNavarro in the #WarRoom to shed light on the operations of The Lincoln Project. Major donors in the 2024 cycle include: Charles Bronfman Christy Walton Rob Reiner AND… GOOGLE! Google has donated over $57,000 dollars so far in the cycle, with over $34,000 paid BACK to GOOGLE! Jeff Clark @JeffClarkUS suggested to Adam Molon that this may be part of Google’s effort to manipulate search results in favor of Kamala Harris in the 2024 Election. 👇 @JamesOKeefeIII
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Lincoln Project, co-founded by George Conway, has raised over $14 million during the 2024 election cycle and spent over $12 million. Approximately one-third of the expenditures went to firms controlled by Lincoln Project leadership, including over $500,000 to Reed Galen's consulting firm, over $600,000 to Rick Wilson, and over $100,000 to Rick Wilson's son.
Funding comes from the far left and never-Trump camps, including donors like Christy Walton, Charles Bronfen, and Rob Reiner. Resolute Square Media, a company created by the Lincoln Project founders, donated over $24,000 to them. Google has donated over $57,000 to the Lincoln Project, according to OpenSecrets. The Lincoln Project has paid over $34,000 to Google. Jeff Clark suggested this may be part of Google's effort to manipulate search results to favor Kamala Harris.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is something called the Lincoln Project. This is an organization which was started at least by one of the cofounders, a guy named George Conway, who was the then husband of Kellyanne Conway. So he had the odd couple of Kellyanne working in the White House for Trump and her husband working outside the White House trying to do everything he can to trash Donald Trump. He he yeah. The guy's a disgusting individual.
He looks like a little toad. He's just I mean, whatever. But but he and his are dangerous. So I had Adam Milan take a look at it. Mostly what Adam does for us here in the war room, he speaks and writes Chinese fluently, and he gets us all the dirt on communist China.
But but he's got some thoughts on the Lincoln project. So let's bring Adam in. Adam, tell us tell us what you found here that, the war room needs to know.
Speaker 1: Basically, with the Lincoln project, it's a story of a rampant self dealing. So the Lincoln project during the, twenty twenty four election cycle has so far raised over $14,000,000. They spent over $12,000,000, and approximately one third of that amount spent has gone to firms directly controlled and owned by Lincoln Project leadership. So that's over $500,000 to the consulting firm of Reed Galen, one of the one of the firm's co founder one of the Lincoln Project's co founders, over $600,000 to Rick Wilson, who was one of the co founders, and over a hundred thousand dollars to Rick Wilson's son, Andrew Wilson, who is described as a pollster. And, of course, the Lincoln project rose to prominence in 2020 for its rabid anti Trump ads, and they're continuing to do the same work during the twenty twenty four election cycle.
It's in 2020, they raised over $87,000,000. This election cycle, they've raised over $14,000,000. So they've they've decreased the amount they've raised, but they're still very active.
Speaker 0: In terms of the money, where where did it come from in 2020? Where is it coming from now? Do we know I mean, it's so hard to track this dark money. What what do we know about their sources of funding?
Speaker 1: In general, it's coming from the far left and never Trump camps. And in this election cycle, some of the donations that have come in have been from people like Christy Walton of the Walmart family and also Charles Bronfen, the billionaire member of the family that formerly owned the Seagram's liquor empire, and also the raging never Trumper Rob Reiner. So these are just some of the donors that that that have given money to the Lincoln Project. Also, the Lincoln Project founders created a media company called Resolute Square Media in 2022, and an entity with a very similar name, donated money, over $24,000 to them during this election cycle, which is definitely eyebrow raising. And in addition, a really big eyebrow raiser here is Google has donated over $57,000 to the Lincoln project during during the twenty twenty four election cycle.
So Google has actually, according to Open
Speaker 0: corporation or is Adam, as they donate as a corporation, or do they donate as executives of the corporation?
Speaker 1: On open secrets, Google is listed as a donor. Google Inc is listed as a donor in Mountain Mountain View, California. And I spoke with with Trump administration assistant attorney general Jeff Clark about this. And he referenced recent reporting by the O'Keefe Media Group showing a group a Google growth strategist in Los Angeles admitting that Google is actively trying to manipulate ad results in searches to favor Kamala Harris. So Jeff Clark suggested that, you know, that's part of the effort here, with the money flow back and forth between the Lincoln project and, and Google.
So Google has given more than $57,000 to the Lincoln project according to OpenSecrets. And according to, expenditure documentation from the FEC, the Lincoln project has actually paid $34,000, more than $34,000 to Google. So you've got money going back and forth between Google and the Lincoln project. And Jeff Clark, you know, suggested that part of the reason maybe, you know, with regard to this effort by Google to make make search results favorable to Kamala Harris in the twenty twenty four election.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Of course he gets paid…🤷🏼♀️
reSee.it AI Summary
I've seen reports that the U.S. is sending money to Ukraine for runway models, fashion shows, wine, artisanal fruit tea, and cheese puffs, while our own veterans are homeless. This is unacceptable! Heads must roll—what a disgrace!
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Amongst NUMEROUS OTHER things we’ve been sending to Ukraine, per Jesse Watters reporting, we’ve also been “sending money for runway models, fashion shows, Ukrainian wine, artisanal fruit tea, and cheese puffs.” While our own Vets are homeless…great job US Government! Heads must roll! What a disgrace!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is demanding agencies submit plans to cut waste within two weeks or face consequences. Our team is assisting in fixing government computer systems which are outdated and prone to errors. We are confident we can identify a trillion dollars in savings, as America risks bankruptcy if we don't act.
An executive order is in place requiring department heads to justify spending. We sent out an email as a "pulse check" to government employees to verify if they are real and alive. Some may be dead or fictional, yet still collecting paychecks. Those who didn't respond are on the bubble.
Meanwhile, funds sent to Ukraine were misused on things like fashion shows, vineyards, and artisanal snacks. Some defend spending on initiatives like LGBTQ job opportunities in other countries, while others question the loyalty of those who challenge the status quo. The goal is to reclaim control from bureaucrats who have been running the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump just announced a major deadline. Agencies now have two weeks to send the president a plan on how they're gonna cut waste. If they don't comply, they're gonna have to deal with tech support.
Speaker 1: I actually just call myself a humble tech support here because this is actually as crazy as it sounds, that that that is almost a literal description of the work that the Doge team is doing, is helping fix the government computer systems. Many of these systems are extremely old. They don't communicate. There are a lot of mistakes in the systems. The software doesn't work.
If we don't do this, America will go bankrupt. That's why it has to be done. And I'm confident at this point, knock on wood, you know, knock on my wooden head, the there's a lot of wood up
Speaker 2: there,
Speaker 1: that we can actually find a trillion dollars in savings.
Speaker 0: Trump signed an executive order today putting a mini Elon Musk in every agency. Department heads will have to justify spending to doge lieutenants installed in each and every department. The executive order also freezes all government credit cards for thirty days. There's a lot of sludge that needs to be cleaned out of the government pipes and it's all starting with an email. What did you do last week?
Speaker 1: I think that email perhaps was misinterpreted as a performance review, but actually it was a pulse check review. Do you have
Speaker 2: a pulse?
Speaker 1: Do you have a pulse and two neurons? So if you have a pulse and two neurons, you can reply to an email. This is, you know, I think not a high bar. We think there are a number of people on the government payroll who are dead, which is probably why they can't respond. And some people who are not real people, they're literally fictional individuals that are collecting paycheck well, somebody's collecting paychecks on a fictional individual.
So we're just literally trying to figure out, are these people real? Are they alive? And can they write an email? The American public would have at least that expectation of someone in the public sector.
Speaker 0: So if you don't show signs of life, Trump sending you to the morgue.
Speaker 3: Those million people that haven't responded though, Elon, they are on the bubble. You know, I wouldn't say that we're thrilled about it. You know, they haven't responded. Now maybe they don't exist. Maybe we're paying people that don't exist.
Those people are on the bubble as they say. You know, they maybe they're gonna be gone.
Speaker 0: CNN says Trump has the sixth sense.
Speaker 4: It seems like Musk and Trump see dead people. They believe there are formerly alive federal employees collecting paychecks even though they're not alive anymore. And you would think there would be better ways to figure that out rather than send an email to everyone and hope they reply. But, you know, this is one of those things where Trump and Musk are doing what they call common sense, even if it's actually nonsense when you think about it. Well, if
Speaker 0: there are better ways to figure this out, why hasn't any other president done it? Every year, the government gets more bloated and less efficient. But they only say they're inefficient because they're so busy looking for fraud.
Speaker 2: Part of the reason government is inefficient, part of the reason that bureaucracies exist, is because we are trying so hard to make sure that there isn't waste, fraud, and abuse in our programs. The reviews and the processes and the things that seem to take a long time that sort of hang us up are there for a reason. They're there because we wanna make sure that we are being appropriate stewards of the public's money.
Speaker 0: See, they're not lazy. Finding fraud just takes up too much of their time. You know all this money that we've been giving to Ukraine? You're not gonna believe what they did with it. A Senate investigation found the Ukrainians spent the money on runway models.
Money we sent to Ukraine wound up funding fashion shows. Our money also went to a Ukrainian vineyard. Did you know Ukraine was known for its wine? I didn't. Our money was also spent on an artisanal fruit tea company.
Oh, and we paid this Ukrainian to make cheese puffs. Look. See that little USAID sticker next to his head? And these Ukrainians are making socks with our money. Sending missiles to Ukraine is one thing that makes a lot more sense than paying for wine, cheese, and models.
Are we sure Hunter's not there? Democrats think this is all money well spent. Listen to what this former USAID boss said.
Speaker 3: How about $1,500,000 to promote job opportunities for LGBTQ individuals in Serbia? Is that a reflection of American values?
Speaker 5: Providing job opportunities for allies around the world is absolutely in the interest of the American people.
Speaker 0: How is giving trans Serbians a job in the interest of the American people? They never explain that because they can't. And if you take away that trans Serbian job, somehow that makes you a traitor.
Speaker 6: Mister Musk has just been here twenty two years, and he's a citizen of three countries. I always ask myself the question, with the damage he's doing here, when push comes to shove, which country is he loyalty to? South Africa, Canada, or The United States? And he's only been a citizen, I'll say again, twenty two years.
Speaker 0: So they question Musk's loyalty because he's an immigrant, but not the hundreds of thousands of Chinese, Muslims, and Venezuelans they let in. So this is the last shot to wrangle back power from the shady bureaucrats who've been secretly running our country for decades. Quote, the Biden years underscored this point. We didn't even need a conscious or active president, only a figurehead. Behind the scenes, institutions ran everything.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
WATCH and SHARE! A GREAT EXCLUSIVE interview of @RealTomHoman by RAV’s Ben Bergquam @BenBergquam 👏👏🇺🇸🇺🇸 @RealAmVoice
reSee.it AI Summary
If I were Donald Trump, I'd change my plans and fly to New York. I'd personally fire everyone at the agency in rebellion and lock the door at the Southern District of New York.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Glenn Beck @glennbeck : “If I were Donald Trump, and no matter what I’d had planned…if I had an Agency in REBELLION, I would get on my plane, and I would fly to NY and I would PERSONALLY FIRE EVERY SINGLE PERSON and I’d put a PADLOCK on that door in Southern District of New York…”
Video Transcript AI Summary
This morning, we were given a binder that was supposed to contain information Kash Patel had seen, but it was empty. The feeling is that the Southern District of New York FBI has the tapes and won't release them to the White House. If this is true, it's an internal civil war. You have a duly elected president and confirmed leaders of the FBI and DOJ, but the Southern District of New York is bucking their orders.
If true, departments are in complete rebellion, a cancer that must be cut out. I believe in the president, Kash, and Pam's mission to root out this evil. If it's true we are in civil war. If I were President Trump, I would fly to New York and fire everyone in the Southern District Of New York.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Were told this morning given this binder, which is has absolutely nothing in it, and they were told that by Pam Bondi and the president that she had, because the president asked, ordered for the release of this. Kash Patel delivered it to her desk last week. They were going through it. They expected this to be full of everything, that Kash Patel has told me he has seen in the past, but it was there was nothing. There was nothing left in it.
And Liz reports that she was told that the the feeling from Pam Bondi and others is that the Southern District Of New York, the FBI in the Southern District Of New York, actually has the tapes and everything else and will not turn it over to, the White House or to Pam Bondi. If that is true, and I understand Liz correctly, and Liz is gonna be on my radio program tomorrow and my podcast tomorrow to talk about her experience. If that indeed is true, then we have a civil war on our hands, an internal civil war. You have a duly elected president, his duly elected con confirmed leaders of, the FBI and the Department of Justice, and then you have the Southern District Of New York FBI and Department of Justice bucking the orders of the president and their direct bosses. There is no other way to describe it.
If that is true, there is no other way to describe it than you have a department or two departments under the president that are in complete rebellion. And that would have to be I mean, that that's not something you take a a doge scalpel to. That's something you take an axe to, and you cut it out, because that's a cancer, and it is a rebellious cancer, and, honestly, a civil war against the president and his duly, processed appointees. I I this is this is not what I expected from Kash Patel and Pam Bondi and the president, and the vice president, and I take them at this point at their word because I know them. I know how serious each of them are about rooting out this cancer.
But this looks really, really horrible for the president because what others will say is, well, this is just the same old stuff, and names of people that they were friends of were on, and so they they had to blame it on somebody else. Well, a, I just don't believe that of the president and Cash and Pam. I know the passionate, response in private about these names and about this list and how how Cash in particular couldn't wait to release this. He is on a I mean, he is a dog with a bone. He is on a mission, and so is the president, and I believe Pam Bondi is too, on a mission to rat this evil out.
If it's true, we're in civil war. The state is at civil war with itself. If it's not true, then we will see this administration not move against the Southern District Of New York. If I were president Trump and I I gotta give him the benefit of the doubt here because I think this is I think giving him the benefit of the doubt. He is focused on Russia and everything else.
But if I were Donald Trump, and no matter what I had planned, if I had an agency in rebellion, I would get on my plane and I would fly to New York, and I would personally fire every single person and I put a padlock on that door in Southern District Of New York. That's what the president, I believe, should do if I understand what Liz is saying, is correct, and if it is indeed true.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Now that Dan Bongino @dbongino has been named Deputy Director of the FBI, has anyone checked in with Geraldo Rivera @GeraldoRivera ? 😆😆😆😆 https://t.co/kGdKWNPg7k
Video Transcript AI Summary
Geraldo claims to know everything, but he's wrong. A Department of Justice study found no systemic racism in police contacts. Geraldo, you had a brief stint as a cop. Stop already. You push a race narrative with no data.
There are hundreds of thousands of police officers and millions of Black Americans. If police were hunting Black men, where's the evidence? This rhetoric is why people are enraged. You're injecting racist rhetoric.
Go tell black families who've lost sons to violence that your rhetoric is factual. That's all you have. You just want to see the country burn.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna see the country burn, you son of a I wanna see the country burn, you Geraldo knows everything, apparently. Despite the fact that did Dan, arguing Harvard time. Now, it's your turn. You have the mic. Yeah, they did an actual study on police contacts and found no systemic racism.
It was the Department of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, but he doesn't know any of that. But secondly, this is again one the about police. What, have a ten minute career as a cop? Geraldo, you gotta You can't yourself. Take volume.
Geraldo, you gotta stop ever. People like Geraldo continue to pump out a race narrative with no data to back it up at all. There are hundreds of thousands of police officers. You don't don't. And millions of You only accept facts that you black Americans agree with.
In the course of each day. If there was a plague of police officers hunting black men down at night, then what what I don't understand if that's happening. Where where is there with this massive gun we would This man, Sean, this man is why they have that rage. This man with this baloney. He doesn't know anything about that woman.
Is a He doesn't know anything about that woman. A rhetoric. He's injecting racist to the artistic rhetoric. Has nothing. Mister rhetoric, that's why.
Go ahead. You tell that to the black families that see their sons being killed That's all you got. The rate. Got nothing else, buddy. You got nothing else.
That's a fact. You've got nothing else. All you wanna do is see the country burn. You just wanna see the country burn. That's it.
Wanna see the country burn. Son of a bitch. Wanna see the country burn.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Sec. Bessent: "Interest rates are down five weeks in a row on the 10-year since President Trump took office, and mortgage rates are down." 👏🇺🇸https://t.co/PyI7QfY948
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since President Trump took office, interest rates have decreased for five consecutive weeks on the ten-year Treasury note. In addition, mortgage rates are also down. We anticipate further decreases in these rates moving forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. I would just point out interest rates are down five weeks in a row on the tenure since president Trump took office. And mortgage rates are down. We're gonna get that down.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Dan Bongino @dbongino with his VERY EMOTIONAL and HEARTFELT opening of his show today. We LOVE YOU, Dan! ❤️❤️🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://t.co/XoJYB9A1Gb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Well, folks, it's been quite a weekend. I received a call from the president, and after speaking with the attorney general and FBI Director Patel, I've been offered the role of deputy director at the FBI. It's an honor, and I've accepted the position.
This means I'll be stepping away from the show, which is a lot to walk away from, but I'll share what I can about the situation. I'll also discuss the future of the show today. I'm going to play a speech I gave eleven years ago so you can understand why I made this decision.
I hope you, the Bongino army, understand that I couldn't disclose this information earlier out of respect for the president, the attorney general, and the FBI director. Thank you for your support.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. How do you start today's show? No. I I howl. Jasmine's sitting there kinda laughing.
Like, what what do you say? Hey, guys. Monday morning. Well, let me give you a weekend update. Quite the weekend update.
Kind of probably the most interesting weekend update ever. And the interesting thing about this weekend update is producer Jim, at least on the radio show, is not gonna have to run the, let's take a brief interlude into Dan's personal life, because my personal life is no longer, personal. Folks, I'm I'm sure by now you've heard the news. Wait. Let me just do I have it?
Oh, no. I already took it. Sorry. Someone gave me the man card. Gave me, like, an actual man card one day.
Like, it's a little, looks like a credit card, kind of a joke, obviously. So let me just turn that in right now because this may be a little bit emotional, and let me apologize in advance. I I, I was home last night, and, I'm sitting there, I'm just I I was watching a show. I didn't even know what I was watching, Food That Built America or something like that, and I was falling asleep because it had been a really long day. Now you know why, and, some of you kind of understand why the show had a different tone over the last couple of weeks.
And, I I got a call from the the president, and couldn't have been nicer. And I obviously keep the contents of it between us, but I think you get the gist about what it was about. And, it kind of broke down a bit because it was, this is now real. So president attorney general Bondi and, now director, gosh, that sounds good to say, FBI director Akash Patel offered this role, a role I expressed an interest in. And ladies and gentlemen, I told you.
You see, it's hard for me. I'm, I'm gonna accept, the role proudly as, the deputy director, the number two spot at the, Federal Bureau of Investigation. Folks, it's a lot to walk away from. I will give you tell you everything what happened, within reason. And then, I got a show to do, and I'm gonna tell you what's gonna happen with the show.
So it's gonna be a pretty wild ride today. Man, do we have a lot to talk about. I'm gonna play for you in the beginning too a speech I gave that someone sent to me from eleven years ago, and you'll see why I decided, to make this decision. So a lot to do today. Thank you so much for kind of a big audience here right away out of the chute.
So thank you very much. I love you guys. And Bongino army, out there, I hope you understand. I got a couple negative comments, you know. Dan, you should've let us know.
I hope you understand about this. This is not my you do not ever get ahead of the president of The United States, the attorney general, and the director of the FBI. You don't do that. Not when you take positions like that. It's not the right thing to do.
So now you understand.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
According to NBC, FOUR people have been rescued so far from the water…https://t.co/QOp6aenh8c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Breaking news: A military helicopter has collided with a regional jet at DCA airport in Washington, DC. President Trump has been informed about the situation. The administration expresses its thoughts and prayers for those involved. The public is urged to await guidance from law enforcement as they work to save lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news. I have called over to my counterparts at the White House, and I can confirm that president Trump has been made aware of this situation. And tragically, it appears that a military helicopter collided with a regional jet, at DCA airport right here in Washington DC. That's all I can confirm at this point in time. And I can just say that the thoughts and the prayers of the entire Trump administration are with all those that are involved, and we ask the public in this area to please, stand by for guidance from law enforcement and allow them to do their jobs as they attempt to save lives right now.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
The Pentagon is secretly working to sabotage our new Commander-in-Chief, President Donald J. Trump! This is TREASON, plain and simple! From James O’Keefe👇 https://t.co/RFT77jqK4g
Video Transcript AI Summary
I work at a top consulting firm embedded in the Pentagon, focusing on artificial intelligence and emerging technologies. I have meetings with military leaders about these topics, emphasizing the need for better information sharing and collaboration. I also express concerns about Trump, describing him as a sociopathic narcissist primarily interested in his own gain. I’ve been working with retired generals to address potential threats from his presidency. My past experience includes being an FBI special agent focused on counterintelligence, particularly against Russian and Chinese spies. I was involved in efforts to defeat Trump during the election, writing extensively under various names. I predict he may attempt to extend his term, despite constitutional limits.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And I work at this, top consulting firm, and my, client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the, top military commands. Once you lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent. So I became a spy on tour.
So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent of the FBI.
Speaker 1: What's your, like, overall assessment of Trump?
Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his, bank.
Speaker 1: Is there anything you can do to, like, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do?
Speaker 0: I'm, in conversation with a couple of, retired generals to try to explore what we can do.
Speaker 1: There were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to.
Speaker 0: They're like 1, 2, or 3 star generals and admirals. You probably know maybe 4 stars. So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest day of all. So we have this huge, huge meeting, with military leaders, in a in a very secure room called the tank. Oh.
So we have a tank meeting with, like, all of the top top leaders in the I see some military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared.
Speaker 1: So it went well.
Speaker 0: I think it went well. You got a sense of information. Keep it between us. Nice. Specialized in artificial intelligence and, emerging technologies like quantum, cybersecurity.
Speaker 1: What's quantum? I haven't heard
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 0: Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing that doesn't yet exist but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change, everything.
Speaker 1: HEXAP.
Speaker 0: HEXAP.
Speaker 1: HEXAP. Who's that?
Speaker 0: Secretary of defense. He's cheated on all these wild bones over. He's had some sexual assault malady. He's an alcoholic. There's a lot of observations of him drinking.
You're not a spy. You're not trying to, like, collect information from me.
Speaker 2: I wish I was. That'd be cool.
Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna you can hear me say it. I became an FBI special agent, so I became a spy hunter.
Speaker 3: You're a spy hunter, you say. Well, I'm a spy hunter too, but I'm evidently a better spy hunter than you. Jamie Mannerino describes how he met Hillary Clinton in the mid 2000 when he was here at George Washington University pursuing a master's degree. He then followed Hillary Clinton to the state department where he worked.
Speaker 0: This person I met in college is Hillary Clinton. So I met her in college, and I worked for her since college. And then when she became secretary of state, I followed her to the state department, and that's how I worked there. Yeah. And then she almost won again, right, in 2016.
Speaker 3: So after Jamie Mannarino worked for Hillary Clinton, he then became a special agent here at the FBI to, in his words, catch Russian spies because according to Jamie, he's a spy hunter who specializes in counterintelligence.
Speaker 0: When she lost, I went into the intelligence community, and I became an FBI special agent because I was so upset. I was really angry. I wanted to catch Russian spies, Chinese spies,
Speaker 1: and police.
Speaker 0: They had really affected the outcome I felt in 2016. So I became a spy hunter. So I I was a counterintelligence agent, special agent of the FBI.
Speaker 3: After experiencing 4 years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars in gold to their clients, they have also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line, supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG.
We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone.
Protect yourself with gold today and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to fisheromg.com. That's fisheromg.com. Fisheromg.com. Jamie Mannarino, after working at the state department, got a job as a special advisor to the joint chiefs of staff at the Pentagon as a consultant.
Speaker 0: I work at this, top consulting firm, and my, client is the Pentagon. So I'm embedded in the Pentagon. I work in the joint staff, which is the, top military command.
Speaker 1: So your boss is the joint chief. Is that what you said?
Speaker 0: Yeah. The chairman Did I say
Speaker 2: it right?
Speaker 0: The chairman of the joint chiefs?
Speaker 3: Jamie works at the Pentagon with senior officials there regarding artificial intelligence technologies that, to quote Jamie, don't yet exist. He says they're going to, quote, change everything, and he talks about secret tank meetings there with senior officials. He mentioned one meeting that was going to happen literally the next day.
Speaker 0: Nice. Specialized artificial intelligence and, emerging technologies like quantum, cyber security.
Speaker 1: What's quantum? I haven't heard
Speaker 2: of that.
Speaker 0: Quantum is incredibly fast supercomputing No. That doesn't yet exist but will soon exist. And when it does, it will it will change, everything. So that's that's what I do.
Speaker 3: In their first encounter, our undercover reporter met with Jamie inside this Spanish restaurant where we set up a hidden camera inside. I, myself, was in disguise sitting at the bar, getting camera b, and the spy who hunts spies disclosed all the information about the secret meetings with our undercover journalist.
Speaker 0: So I also have a big day tomorrow, probably the biggest day of all. So we have this huge, huge meeting, with military leaders, in a in a very secure room called the tank. Right. So we have a tank meeting with, like, all of the top top leaders in the I see this military tomorrow on my on my topic that I I prepared.
Speaker 1: Are you serious?
Speaker 0: So I have to go to that meeting, and it's I've waited Wait.
Speaker 1: I'm getting nervous for you.
Speaker 0: Waited 3 years. 3 years. Yeah. It's finally gonna happen. Yeah.
So, like, the chairman of the joint chiefs is the number one military officer for United States.
Speaker 1: Okay.
Speaker 0: He's leading the meeting. The vice chairman, the director of the joint staff, every commander of all the command commands. So European Command, African Command, Northern Command, Southern Command, Pacific Command, Cyber Command, Strategic Command, and Trans Transportation. Oh, then special forces. Wow.
Yeah. And space command. So I'll be there. The chiefs of the army, the navy, the air force, the space force, and then OSD policy. So that's that's we're gonna talk about AI.
Speaker 1: So what are your talking points gonna be?
Speaker 0: That, that this is a very serious subject. We need to take it seriously. We need to overcome a lot of bureaucratic obstacles.
Speaker 2: We need
Speaker 0: to work better with partners, international partners. We need to, you know, think creatively to avoid over classification, which really prohibits the ability to share information across very quickly. Everyone has a habit in the intelligence world to over classify something because they don't wanna get in trouble. So once you once you label it as top secret, no one's gonna see it. Oh.
And we have to share this with another country because we need to fight together. Mhmm. And you can't fight together with this kind of inability to share Yeah. War fighting information.
Speaker 3: Jamie, the adviser to the joint chiefs, attacked incoming defense department boss Pete Hegseth, stating Hegseth has a drinking problem and has cheated on all his wives.
Speaker 1: Hegseth. Hegseth. Hegseth.
Speaker 2: Who's that?
Speaker 0: He is a Fox News TV correspondent on Saturday.
Speaker 1: So what is he gonna do in the government?
Speaker 0: Great question.
Speaker 1: What's his job gonna be?
Speaker 0: Secretary of Defense. Yes. It's possible he'll make it in. Yeah. It's possible.
He also has a drinking problem. He's also cheated. He's been married 3 times.
Speaker 1: Oh, no.
Speaker 0: He's cheated on all his wives, all his girlfriends.
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: He's had some central assault allegations.
Speaker 2: What?
Speaker 0: Yep. This is all the news. Yeah. Yeah. He's an alcoholic.
There's a lot of, like, observations of him drinking.
Speaker 3: Jamie Mannarino, adviser to the Pentagon, former special agent with the FBI, makes it clear what he thinks about incoming president Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: What's your, like, overall assessment of trafficking? Like, if you were to do a broad take on him.
Speaker 0: He's a sociopathic narcissist who is only interested in advancing his name, his wealth, and his, bank. He's had a lifetime of cheating. He's, habitually addicted to lying about about himself to advance his personal interests.
Speaker 2: And my fault.
Speaker 0: And I question his loyalty to anyone but himself.
Speaker 1: Oh, what does it look like for you, you know, moving forward and he's the president? Does that impede what you do? Are you are you concerned about what's gonna happen with that?
Speaker 0: So far, I'll be fine. But, yeah, I'm not gonna lie. I'm a I'm a little worried. But I'll be, for now, fine.
Speaker 1: Is there anything you can do to, like, I don't know, protect American people from stuff that he might try to do?
Speaker 0: I mean, I can't do anything other than my job, which is, you know, protecting American interests on artificial intelligence. Outside of that, I'm, in conversation with a couple of retired generals Mhmm. To try to explore what we can do. I have a meeting in fact tomorrow about it.
Speaker 1: Really?
Speaker 0: Got me opening up myself to you already. Telling you things I wouldn't normally tell.
Speaker 3: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at the wellness company, the ultimate survival kit for any situation where medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites.
And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to TWC. Health/omg. That's TWC. Health/omg.
And now you can save 50% just by using code OMG at checkout. During the next meeting, our undercover reporter asked about how the meeting inside the tank at the Pentagon went.
Speaker 1: So it went well? Were there, I
Speaker 0: think it went well. Very sensitive information. You gotta have to keep it between us. You're gonna go vlog it.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I threw in the key. I'm just gonna talk.
Speaker 0: Just so that we over classify. And I think I may have said this to you during exams. We over classify, information. So when we over classify information, it doesn't allow us to actually, you know, communicate effectively when we're actually trying to implement implement some sort of operation. Right?
So we're playing a team sport, and we're both, like, representing a part of the field. Right? And we both have different pieces of information as to how we're gonna do our job to play the game and win. But we're not coordinated because we don't tell each other we need to know information. And then the second one was, you know, the enemy is we're not the only ones using science.
So the enemy is using science too. You're not a spy? You're not trying to, like, collect information from me?
Speaker 2: I'm with that. I'm with that recall.
Speaker 0: Well, with me, literally with a former FBI agent, so you're gonna you're gonna be saying it.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina reveals he has been working with 2, 3, and 4 star generals to see what they can do about president Trump's upcoming term.
Speaker 1: There were the the retired generals that you were gonna talk to.
Speaker 0: There's many of them, but, this rear admiral, I know there's a major general the army. So those are the 2 that I talk to the most. But, yeah, I talk to quite a few. Like
Speaker 2: a few. In a
Speaker 0: in a whole
Speaker 1: or do I know any of them?
Speaker 0: No. They're like 2, 3 2 1, 2, or 3 star Generals and admirals. You probably know him maybe 4 stars.
Speaker 1: Is there one named Billy? Is that
Speaker 2: a name?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I he was my former boss. He doesn't know me. Oh.
And he'll probably not be involved in something like this. Oh. But, yeah. He's around. Yeah?
Yeah. Billy is around.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina told us that he was working day and night to defeat president Trump and that had Kamala won, Jamie would have received a pretty big job.
Speaker 0: I will also confess to you that, over the last, most of the year, since this spring, I was working with these retired generals, retired ambassadors, and this organization, this nonprofit called National Leaders National Security Leaders for America. And what we were doing was we were trying to, like, explain to the American people the national security consequences of another Trump presidency. And I'm usually reluctant to kinda lead with this or explain this because I don't wanna sound too political. This organization tried to defeat Donald Trump. We tried to engage the American public.
We, you know, conducted hundreds of interviews. I myself wrote and published a 110, a 120 op eds and newspapers across the country. We did a lot of writing.
Speaker 4: The most writing I've done in my life.
Speaker 0: And I would write not in my name, but I would be a ghostwriter, and I would let the other general, like, you know, put their name on it. Yeah. So, some articles landed in some pretty big papers, The Wall Street Journal, the National Journal, and all these other stuff. So we're literally working day and night nonstop. So when ultimately, when he won, I was really, frankly depressed.
Like, really sad, really depressed, not only in terms of the mission failure, the mission failure, But, of course,
Speaker 4: I was hoping to advance my my career.
Speaker 0: Had she won, I would've gotten a pretty big job.
Speaker 3: Jamie Menina, the adviser to the joint chief, stated that president Trump will entertain the idea of staying past his 4 year term.
Speaker 0: I predict Trump will probably entertain publicly the idea of staying in office changing the laws, which he's not allowed to do. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's crazy.
Speaker 0: By constitution. But he'll probably suggest this, and there'll probably be an effort to try. Yes. And then there'll be pressure and anger, and then, you
Speaker 2: know, the Republicans will try to they'll
Speaker 0: try to definitely anoint the meter out there to maintain
Speaker 2: his
Speaker 0: Right. That's all that matters there.
Speaker 3: If you're on the inside of the Pentagon or any government institution and notice corruption, reach out to us via email tips at o'keeffemediagrip.com, or text us at 914-491-9395, and an OMG journalist will get back to you soon. Thank you, and stay tuned.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see the so-called "deplorable" people—often labeled in negative ways—as true patriots and heroes. They have sent a powerful message to the establishment, rejecting their control and refusing to back down. It's a moment for those in power to reflect on their mistakes, as we are making a strong comeback.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
Dan Bongino @dbongino : “And you know what happened? The garbage people, deplorable, hayseed people, redneck, fascist, Nazi, whatever you called us, you know what I call those people? I call them PATRIOTS and HEROES! They collectively gave the BIGGEST double-barreled middle finger EVER to the establishment swamp class trying to lord over us and said we’re not kneeling today! You’re the one now…you’re the one who’s going to have to look in the mirror and say: “Man! We REALLY F*CKED up” and yes, you did…because we are SO, SO BACK!” 💥
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are back and stronger than ever. To all the critics and those who labeled us negatively, this is a message for you. The current divide didn't have to happen; we could have united as Americans. Instead, one side has resorted to name-calling and division, labeling us as the worst. But those you call "deplorables" are actually patriots and heroes. They stood up against the establishment and refused to back down. Now, it's time for you to reflect on your mistakes. We are here, and we are not going away.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ladies and gentlemen, we are so fucking back, man. We are back. We are so back to all the haters, to all the liberals, to all the progressives, to all the commies, to all the people who called us fascists and Nazis and racists and deplorables and garbage and garbage bags and smellies and rednecks and haysees and flyover countries. Fuck you motherfuckers today, and I don't give a shit what you think about it. I'm sorry.
I know shouting fraud is bad, but I don't give a shit. I'm gonna tell you something. You motherfuckers brought this on yourselves. It didn't have to be this way. We coulda had a nice country where Democrats and Republicans love the country.
We agree that the country's wonderful. We agree we gotta defend it, and maybe the democrats think, oh, okay. We should maybe hike a few more taxes and do this, and maybe this that's not what happened. We now have one party that's like, you people are garbage, you're scum, you're serial Nazi murderers, you're savage animal garbage bag people. You all suck.
And you know what happened? The garbage people, deplorable, hayseed, redneck, fascist, Nazi, whatever you called us. You know what I call those people? I call them patriots and heroes. They collectively gave the biggest double barreled middle finger ever to the establishment swamp class trying to lord over us and said, we're not kneeling today.
You're the one now. You're the one who's gonna have to look in the mirror and say, man, we really fucked up, and, yes, you did because we are so so back. We are back. I told you more. More.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
💥THIS IS A MUST WATCH‼️💥Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson joins Steve Bannon in the #WarRoom with a profound discussion of all things politics, spiritual and religious. FULL SEGMENT! #FightForTrump https://t.co/U31qc8dwRK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson discusses the current political landscape, emphasizing that Trump would win a fair election but doubts the integrity of the electoral system. He highlights a coalition against Trump, including the deep state, businesses reliant on government, and an anxious upper-middle-class social group fearing change. Carlson reflects on his personal spiritual experience, suggesting a deeper battle beyond politics, and critiques the secular nature of modern society. He believes the focus should be on eternal truths rather than just winning elections. Carlson expresses concern about America's moral direction, particularly regarding the consequences of actions like abortion, and calls for a return to discussing spiritual realities. He encourages people to seek wisdom by acknowledging their ignorance and to focus on what truly matters in life.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Honored to have our next guest, Tucker Carlson, joins us. Tucker, you've been on the road. You've been doing these huge, events in stadiums. You had the president around the other day in, I think Glendale, Arizona absolutely mesmerizing. I think the president was up there for 2 hours.
Give us your sense of, of where you think we are in this whole thing.
Speaker 1: Well, I just had the same first of all, welcome back, and I I just wanna say directly to you what I've said to everyone, you and I are friends with in common, which is that your courage right before you went into prison was one of the most amazing and inspiring things I've ever seen. You were you were you behaved like the man I wanna be, on your way into prison unfairly on fake charges, and you never wind. And I just I've never really seen anything like that. So I just wanted to say that directly to you. Thank you for that.
I my sense of where the race is has oh, I mean it too. It hasn't changed in the past several months. Trump is the choice of the country in a free and fair election. Without cheating, he would win. The question is, do we have that system?
Obviously, we don't. And what I'm really struck by is how virtually every Trump voter I talk to and and maybe even some on defense voters says basically the same thing. You know, it's just a question of how much the Democratic Party cheats in this election, which is another way of saying the whole country seems to have accepted the reality that, you know, one of the 2 big political parties doesn't believe in democracy, is willing to cheat and ignore the will of the population of the citizenry. That's really dark. You know, you hate to think you live in a place where people just, you know, accept that as normal.
It's not normal. It's criminal. It's immoral, and we should do everything we can to fix it. Right? And the and the last thing I would say is as someone who spent, you know, I don't know, something like 15 hours in depositions, imposed on me by voting machine companies, and I was never named in any suit by a voting machine company, but they went out of their way to harass me, I think funded by Reid Hoffman, stole all my text messages, leaked into the New York Times.
I'm bitter about it still, but the you know, for the last year and a half, the whole, you know, conservative media has been cowed into ignoring what's really obvious, which is we should not have electronic voting machines. They don't work. They're not more efficient. They're they're not better at counting, and they don't produce the result faster. The only reason to have electronic voting machines is if, you know, you wanna subvert them.
It's insane that we have them, and no one feels free to say that. So I just wanted I wanna and I think I've been proven right on this. And we have every reason to be suspicious of electronic voting machines and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. What
Speaker 0: in seeing the opposition that we have here, it's deeper than just a political party, and it's deeper even than and you you've come out of and know the media as well as anybody. We have a there's this apparatus that used to be called the military industrial complex, but now it's the intelligence community, it's the tech community, and it's the legal apparatus that has gotten into a formidable beyond an administrative state and and something that know, people call the deep state, but it's not really that deep. It's up in your face. What is gonna the victory that we have here is a populist uprising and really grassroots because Trump didn't have a lot of support at the beginning of this of this of this part of the journey. How do we confront that?
Because that's what's gonna be quite evident, I think, starting in the next couple of days. And because, Tucker, you know this. They're just not gonna sit there and pat us on the head and say, hey. This is great. No.
You guys turned out more voters in North Carolina and Arizona and Wisconsin and ended lovely, you know, that Tucker and Elon and, Tulsi Gabbard and RFK and all these new people who come to this to this movement, think they have ideas about the country. They're just not gonna sit there and say this is great. Here's the keys. You guys take it out for a spin, and, and we'll just watch what happens. Your thoughts, sir?
Speaker 1: I mean, there are 3 components to the coalition that Trump is facing off against and all 3 of them see their very existence threatened by his candidacy. The the first is, you know, the actual deep state, the the bureaucracies, that control our country and have since at least November of 1963. And they're utterly vested in the current system, and they fear above all disclosure. In other words, they've committed a lot of crimes. We have the outline of some of those crimes beginning with the murder of the president 60 years ago, but a lot subsequent to that.
And, you know, where did all the Ukraine money go? There's never been an audit. And so if Trump has declassification power, some of them risk going to jail and and they know that. That's the first part. The the second part of the coalition is business and that's simply a function of the size of the federal government.
It's the largest human organization in history. It has the most money, and there are businesses particularly in the finance sector that are totally dependent on, on this system in order to to get rich. I mean, if you're Larry Frank Fink or anybody in Larry Fink's category, you know, you can't continue, to make 1,000,000,000 of dollars without the pension funds who are all, you know, public employee pension funds. They're all part of the system. And so you're really vested in this for financial reasons.
And the 3rd and most obvious part of this coalition is an entire social class, upper middle class, mostly white, urban people who have jobs that are basically going away because they're not necessary. This would be the entire NGO sector, the education sector, all the soft jobs, the marketing jobs, that that our economy doesn't actually need that are in fact a drain on the economy. They're not productive in any sense. They're not creative. They don't build anything.
They basically just leech off the system already in place. And these people, most of whom I don't think understand this consciously, but they know it on a gut level, these people are really threatened by any change. And by the way, change is coming in the form of AI anyway. All these people are gonna be out of work. They will never make it into the class they aspire to join, which is the ruling class ever.
But in all the you drive through the suburbs of our cities, Washington, most famously, but also New York and Philadelphia, and you see an Eastern seaboard or on the West Coast, and you see clusters of Kamala Harris signs. What is that? And these are, you know, upper middle class white families. Why are they so vested in Kamala Harris? Because they understand that their membership in this class is at stake.
They feel deep social anxiety, status anxiety. I know these people. You do too. You've lived around them. I have as well.
And they understand that their world is collapsing. It's all going away. It's all about to be revealed as unnecessary. AI will reveal that their jobs are just unnecessary, and that includes lawyers and some physicians too. And that's why they are so emotional about this election because it's not simply about Trump, and they'll say, oh, he's orange.
He's vulgar. He's a rapist. Now they'll make up some justification for it. But what's really happening is their world is collapsing, and they know it's collapsing. And they're panicked, and very few of them are thoughtful enough or altruistic enough to put aside, you know, that fact, which is to say, you know, the their future, and try to make the country better.
So, really, it's everybody with power against Trump and Elon. That's the way I see it. If he wins, it will be it'll be a miracle. It'll be a historical event.
Speaker 0: The historical event in in closing the win. Right? Because remember, go back to 16 where it's immediately the nullification project of Russian, you know, interference, all of that. When you have those forces of the established order aligned against you, and this is obviously, I think, gonna take us a while to work through on the voting, all that, what would be your recommendation to president Trump? Because you have to be maniacally focused.
This is where you can't just be throwing out. So you had to be maniacally focused of how you close this victory and then rapidly because you're not gonna have unlimited amount of time. You're gonna have some limited amount of time to start to make some pretty fundamental changes. What is Tucker Carlson's recommendation?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's enormously complicated. You know? In other words, what does Wednesday look like and Thursday, Friday, Saturday for the next 2 months until until inauguration day? It's really hard to know. Here's the difference between what we saw in 2020, which is someone who's on the periphery of that watching carefully.
He was hosting a daily show, at the time. It was enormously frustrating to watch because the response was incompetent. I think the difference between then and now, 4 years later, is that Trump is not alone. I mean, as you'll remember very well in 2020, he couldn't get a lawyer. He couldn't get a lawyer, and he was roundly criticized for hauling Rudy Giuliani out there in front of the microphones, and I, you know, I thought Giuliani did his best.
It's not his area. It's not what he does, but he he tried and was mocked for it, and ultimately, they tried to send him to prison for it. But that was that was a a decision made in desperation. I mean, there was, like, no competent lawyers who were gonna represent Trump. They weren't allowed to, as we now know.
This time, Trump has, an actual coalition. I mean, the country has changed. American politics has changed. The things that you predicted in 2016 are finally coming to pass. I think you can't overstate the significance of Elon Musk joining this.
The guy, not only the richest person in the world, but the man with the most to lose is involved in this, the largest federal contractor. I mean, Elon Musk joked to me and he has, I think, many times that he's gonna go to prison if Trump loses. You know, I don't know if he's going to prison, but he'll he'll be destroyed for sure, and he's doing it anyway. So that gives a lot of different people heart, people who are vested in the system, Marc Andreessen. I mean, you see David Sacks.
I mean, you see people with a lot to lose on Trump's side, and they've said so publicly. And they're they're marked for destruction if this doesn't work, and so they will be at Trump's side, I think, in the aftermath. If if this is contested, I pray that it isn't. You know, I think all of us do on both sides pray that it's not contested. But if it is, it's not gonna be Trump out alone with Jenna Ellis, you know, sort of holding press conferences and hoping for the best.
Right?
Speaker 0: Yes. A 100%. Something it it's come up in the last couple days. I know because, obviously, I followed you for years. You were a daily caller, and Andrew had Breitbart, then at Fox.
You've been very hesitant in the past to talk about your spiritual journey or to talk, you know, to get off topics of politics and culture and and power and media. But I was fascinated about this revelation of of this event that happened in your life. Do you think that there are deeper forces at play here? Is this more than just Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk and a bunch of guys running around, talking about in this material world, you know, politics and the beating Democrats and taking on the intelligence, legal, financial apparatus. Is there something deeper going on here?
Speaker 1: Well, Breitbart, who I was just thinking about yesterday. What a what a good man who's been gone for, gosh, 12 years anyway, I think. Used to say famously say, that politics is downstream from culture. Culture is downstream from the spiritual battle. So not only is the is this the the battle in the unseen world, not only is it part of what we're seeing, it is it is actually what we're seeing.
We're seeing the physical manifestations of something that's been going on, for eternity. As for why I don't talk about that stuff. I mean, on the one hand, I'm a WASP, sort of trained not to talk about that kind of stuff. And, no, I'm just trying to cultural thing. And you just don't talk about money or religion in public ever.
It's hard for me to talk about it with my wife. And for another, I never wanna hold myself out as some paragon of virtue because I'm very non virtuous and have led a really pretty spotted. Have a pretty spotted record I would say. So I don't I don't want to be I don't want to discredit in any way the faith that I have, but I will say yes. I have experienced that personally.
That sort of popped out in a conversation I was having with an old friend of mine called Scooter Downey, and it went up on camera. I was a little bit shocked to see it. But, yeah, no, I was on February 20, 2023, I was attacked in my bed by a spiritual being and clawed and left bleeding and scarred. And do I understand what happened? No.
Of course, I don't. I don't really understand anything, but that did happen to me. I don't care if people believe me or not. It it did. And I think it was just a just a a momentary glimpse of something that's happening at all times, which is again this war between forces that we can't see but that has been ongoing and has been in fact described by every culture since the beginning.
Every culture that we know about has described this battle and in fact it's been the basis of every religion. It's certainly the basis of Christianity which I think is true, by the way. Factually speaking, Christianity is true. But even if you don't, I think you can acknowledge that we're the only culture that hasn't been really absorbed in thinking and talking about this. Not since we dropped the atomic bomb in Nagasaki, the second one in August of 1945 and decided that we were gods and the god himself no longer existed.
Since then, we have been a secular society and that's why we're now being destroyed in my view. But even if you don't buy any of that, you you have to acknowledge that we're living in an anomalous time. This is the only period these 80 years where people haven't been daily discussing the spiritual battle around them. Every other culture has, and in fact, the remote ones still do. And they're all right, and we're wrong.
And the big change in the moment that we're living in is people are awakening to this fact that we've been on this vacation from reality, a vacation from spiritual reality. And of course it's not just a part of what we're seeing, it's definitive. And I and I'm not just saying that anyone who disagrees with me is evil. I'm not saying that. I have been evil many times in my life and unfortunately will be again.
So I'm not again I just want to be really clear that I'm not sort of holding myself up as like you know as a great person or a perfect christian or anything like that but this this exists quite apart from me or my behavior. It's true. And, and now it's sort of unmasked and anyone who's paying any attention at all. I mean, look, if you're making the case that, you know, sometimes we need to have an abortion, okay. If you're making the case that abortion is an affirmative good, you are evil.
You're practicing child sacrifice, and that is exactly what they're doing as every culture before us has. But to see the treasury secretary that dwarf Janet Yellen get up and say, you know, you can do your part to help the American economy by killing your child, that's no different than the Canaanites, actually. So if people who don't see that clearly, that's exactly what it is. Worshipping abortion, the killing of kids, not as something that, like, needs to happen unfortunately, but it's something that is good. That's pro abortion.
You know? People and I have to say, I'm I'm sure I'll be attacked for saying this, but I really believe it. People are like, oh, well, we had another hurricane, must be global warming. No. It's probably abortion actually.
Just being honest. Like, you can't do that. You can't kill children on purpose knowing that you're doing that in exchange for power or freedom or happiness, whatever you think you're getting in return. You can't participate in human sacrifice without consequences. You just can't.
Sorry. I'm sorry to say that. Trust me. I'm a secular person from La Jolla, California who was baptized in the Episcopal church. And if I can see that, if it's obvious to me, then I think it's very obvious to a lot of people.
Speaker 0: Well, how does how is that event then, how is it informed your life today and and what you're trying to do? Because I find this the most of all your insights and things on on politics and power and everything like this, I'll be blunt. I think this is the most profound, you know, direction of your thinking. I mean, it's when I read the other day, I would say, wow. Because, yes, Tucker is a wasp.
Tucker is one of those guys. He's not gonna get emotional. You said about me not whining. You don't hear Tucker whining. He's not that type of guy.
I think this is absolutely fascinating. How has it informed not just your life? How's it informing you as one of the most significant, figures, public intellectuals on the world stage?
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I I I think it's just reminded me of what I don't understand, which is always a good starting place to wisdom. I mean, if you seek to be wise, not just informed, which is simple, but to be wise to make sense of the facts that you've accumulated, which is is the goal of adulthood, then you really have to begin with a profound understanding of your own ignorance, lack of foresight with your own with your own lack of wisdom. The root of wisdom is knowing how unwise you are, I guess, is another way of putting it, and this has just reminded me of that. I this happened to me. I don't again, I don't really know what it means.
I have a lot of suspicions, but I can't confirm them. It was spiritual. I'm I'm positive of that. I know that. And but what does it mean?
I don't know. So that is that's it's just very helpful to be reminded of all that you don't know. It's very very helpful. And human disasters always begin in the same place which is in hubris which is in the the false certainty that you know what's going to happen. You know the consequences of something.
You know what the future will be. And you know that you're God basically is what you're saying. And this is just another reminder to me that I'm not. So that's I'm really grateful for that. 2nd, I would say it's an it's another, reminder of what the goal is.
And the goal is to get right with eternity. The goal is not just to win an election. And elections do come and go. I think this is the most significant in the history of the United States. That's obvious.
The crimes being committed against the country are more profound than ending to the the open border invasion is a larger crime that's been committed to get committed against than than imperial Japan or Nazi Germany committed against the United States. It's the worst thing that's ever happened to the US. That's my opinion. But it's still nothing compared to, I don't know, the end of history or eternity. And so it's just important to keep your eyes on the bigger on the bigger prize, on the only prize, that matters.
The only question that matters is what happens when you die? And it's crazy to me that I haven't spent every day for the last 55 years meditating on that. That I grew up in a culture that actively suppressed questions like that. That didn't want to talk about death. That considered any conversation about what happens when you die offensive or out of bounds.
I can't believe I grew up in a place like that because it's so dumb. It's it's just ridiculous actually. The only thing that unites every person on earth is death. That's it. That's the only thing we all have in common.
Every one of us. We will die. And so the fact that we're not daily discussing what happens then is just like insane. Trust me that's like a secular rational position on it. You don't have to be a Christian or or religious in any sense to acknowledge that that's just true no one ever talks about that and so I just want to approach that this election with that perspective and and that that event that attack on me has helped me to do that so again I'm really grateful for it I wouldn't I wouldn't change it if I could.
Speaker 0: You said someone go back to the about the dropping of the atomic bomb at the beginning of secular society. You might my dad and and your the greatest generation fought on the battlefields of of that conflict and and were the one of the driving forces with, obviously, the Russian people and the Chinese people to deliver us from that time from imperial Japan and fascist rule in in Europe. But the same time, Oppenheimer, and this is what's so chilling when you say that secular, he used I think it was the Hindu god Vishnu. They called the they called the project the Trinity Project. Right?
And at the very test there in New Mexico, he quoted, what the the the god Vishnu about now, you know, I have I'm I'm the destroyer of worlds. Right? Don't you find that chilling, or or is that tied to yours? Since that time, it's been all we've now dropped the spiritual, which even Oppenheimer realized in the greatest generation. We kind of went to what is a totally materialistic secular society that leads America to this place in 2024.
And the the the instrument of its turnaround or or its rejuvenation is a guy like Donald Trump?
Speaker 1: Well, we didn't drop the spiritual. We just embraced, you know, another element of it. I mean, if you're quoting a pagan god as you're incinerating civilians with a nuclear weapon, I mean, I think it's pretty clear, that that was the pivot point in America's history and it's just so interesting how resistant a lot of people who I consider friends, who I agree with on most things, are to acknowledging that. You know, they'll call you pro Hitler. You're a holocaust denier if you question the nuclear weapons or whatever.
I I don't care. Of course, I'm I'm none of those things. I, it goes without saying or it should. No. I'm just noting the obvious, which is that American society changed profoundly in August of 1945, and it's reflected in the culture.
It's reflected in the architecture, the art, the design, the literature. Nothing was the same after the end of the second world war. Again, it's not a pro Nazi statement. I couldn't be more anti Nazi, obviously. I'm an American.
I care about this country and what happened to it after 1945. It's a very clear demarcation line and seems obvious to me that nuclear weapons are demonic. There's no upside to them at all, and that anyone who claims otherwise is either ignorant or doing the bidding of the forces that created nuclear technology in the first place, which are not human forces, obviously. And let me just ask you this, which I have asked a 1000000 people at dinner parties but never in public. What was the moment we can point to that nuclear technology was invented?
You know we can we can point to Isaac Newton and say what happened fell on his head or we can you know we can point to Albert Hoffman in his lab messing around with the you know ergot bacteria that's when LSD was made. I don't I've never met a person who can isolate the moment where nuclear technology became known to man. And so where did it come from exactly? Oh german scientists in the thirties. Really when?
Name the date. And I've never heard anybody do that. It's it's very clear to me that these are these are demonic. I mean, these are evil. Their only purpose is to destroy the innocent, to murder the innocent.
They've only been used once. And in the and, you know, I think there's an interesting ethical debate about their use, was Truman right or whatever. But if you take 3 steps back, you could say, well, wait a second. If you end up killing, incinerating tens of thousands of civilians there, that's just a bad thing. Let's let's just be honest.
That's just a bad thing. And anyone who does that is gonna pay consequences. It's just true. And by the way, the fact the second bomb was dropped on the Christian population of Japan, which was majority in Nagasaki in fact it was cited in on a church in Nagasaki was that an accident? Why Nagasaki exactly?
And by the way why has every subsequent American war resulted in disproportionately the deaths of Christians That would include Vietnam, by the way, where the Catholic population was decimated up to and including Iraq and Syria. Now in Russia, why is it that our use of force consistently since the end of the 2nd World War has been against Christians? That's been the effect to kill Christians. The bombing of the Balkans in the nineties under NATO. Why is that?
And I just don't think it's an accident. Clearly, it's not an accident, and, I'm very distressed by it, and I it's not anti American. My family's been here since the freaking founding of the country. I'm not gonna stand and take that. I'm not hardly anti American.
I'm the most pro American person. I know I love America, and I certainly have to say that. It's not anti American. I'm distressed about what's being done to my country. I feel an ownership stake in this country.
I was born here. I'm a citizen in my name and with my money. Why wouldn't I? In a much more profound and emotional way that I than I do when I say look at the CCP's treatment of the Uighurs, which is clearly bad. I'm not would never defend it, but I don't feel as emotional about it because it's not my country.
It's not being done in my name with my money. And so everything went wrong then, And there are bad things in America before 1945, but the dissent has been precipitous. And you could hardly say that this country won that war in what meaningful sense. Why don't you go to Kyoto or Tokyo and then come back to New York and LA and and tell me in what sense we won. These are very obvious observations.
I just picked them up from traveling. I didn't read them in a book. I've just noticed. And why is that controversial to say it? Why does the entire staff of the Daily Wire call me a Nazi for saying that?
I don't really get it. What is that? What are you defending and why? What are you defending and why? And let let me just say with humility, you shouldn't be defending the killing of innocents.
You really shouldn't. And if you are, you ought to ask yourself why you are.
Speaker 0: Tucker, absolutely amazing. How do people get the show is, is is the best it's ever been. How do people get to your your show on Twitter, and how do they get to the rest of your content, the, your new network?
Speaker 1: Just, via my name, my now widely discredited name, which is Tucker Carlson. You go to Tucker Carlson dotcom or take a soccer Carlson on x or whatever. It's it's there. It's easy to find.
Speaker 0: Brother, you think it was hard before. Wait till they wait till they hear this where their heads will be blowing up all day. So it's fantastic and, deeply profound, sir. Deeply profound. I wanna thank you for coming
Speaker 1: on today.
Speaker 0: Appreciate you.
Speaker 1: Congrats, man, on getting out.
Speaker 0: Thanks, Tuck. Thank you, sir. Wow.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched an incredible interview with Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk. Elon discusses the "Puppet-Masters" and links them to the Epstein list, naming Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates. He also mentions that if Trump wins, we can expect some serious house cleaning. God bless, Elon!
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
WHOA‼️ This is an absolutely RIVETING interview with Tucker Carlson @TuckerCarlson and Elon Musk @ElonMusk ‼️💥 Here Elon describes who the “Puppet-Masters” are, and how the list would undoubtedly be intertwined with the Epstein list‼️ He names two specific people: Reid Hoffman and Bill Gates‼️ God bless, Elon Musk‼️🙏🙏🇺🇸🇺🇸 “Well, I think if Trump wins, we can do some HOUSE CLEANING‼️”
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
💥💥💥💥 Dan Bongino @dbongino : “Folks, I’m sorry but I don’t believe this guy was acting alone‼️” “Why are the Secret Service and FBI hiding information⁉️” “BECAUSE THEY WANT TO‼️” @SenRonJohnson 💥💥💥💥👇 https://t.co/DzJgoeF06a
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the individual involved in a recent political attack did not act alone, citing a lack of requisite skill and the media's quick dismissal. They question if the individual was honey-trapped by a foreign entity and criticize the FBI's handling of the situation, including the rapid cremation of the body and the claim that the individual acted alone.
Senator Ron Johnson also finds the situation suspicious, particularly the rush to dispose of evidence. He highlights the fact that the body was cremated before autopsy and toxicology reports were released. He notes the FBI immediately declared the individual acted alone without a thorough investigation.
The speaker points out the FBI's history of spying and questions why, if the individual acted alone, the FBI doesn't release the data they likely possess. They cite a counter sniper's concern over the scrubbing of the roof and question the need for a high-powered attorney if the case is straightforward. Senator Johnson states that the Secret Service and FBI are stonewalling the senate investigation, providing heavily redacted documents and delaying transcribed interviews. The speaker concludes that the agencies are hiding something, as transparency would dispel conspiracy theories.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 4,000 already. Barely hit our 1st break there. Nice. Love you guys so much. I'd give you the pound over the heart, but my elbows don't work, so it's not worth it.
Folks, I'm sorry, but I don't believe this guy was acting alone. I don't. And it's based on a body of facts and data that indicate that this guy did not have the requisite skill level to pull off what he pulled off without some form of assistance. Could he have acted alone? He could have.
I'm not precluding that possibility either. Again, I don't want to be first to be wrong. I'd rather be the last to be right. Okay? However, when you look at the, I mean, think about it.
Right? This is only one of the most significant political attacks and assaults on our democracy, genuinely. In modern American history, we're not even 2 months out, and the media is acting like, oh, yeah. It's just business as usual. Let's go on.
And I'm not really concerned what this kid was up to. Is it possible this guy was honey trapped by an enemy of the United States? Possibly Iran or someone else? He looked like a young kind of loner type, the exact type of people they target. Are they gonna do a press conference ever again?
Ron Roe, the FBI? Do we get to ask these questions? No. Here's senator Ron Johnson. And he's he's asking a real good a a great question, not a good question.
What the hell is the rush here to disappear all the evidence? Washing the roof, burning the guy's body. Does this make any sense? If anything, it invites people to engage in theorizing about what happened and to be confused. Watch this.
Speaker 1: How was it that within, like, a day, they said the guy was acting alone? Crooks was acting alone. They didn't do an investigation at that point.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I I have no idea. I mean, I don't know who those 5 individuals are. They were placed on administrative leave Especially what positions they held, why they were placed on leave. And, again, it's it's it's baffling to me, for example, that they released the body through cremation Yeah.
Before we've seen any autopsy reports, any toxicology reports. Again, you just can't explain these things.
Speaker 1: Senator, what would the body tell you? I mean, would there be tattoos? Would there be what what would you look for in a body? I mean, why cremate it so quickly?
Speaker 2: Well, first of all, again, acting director Rowe didn't tell the public that it was actually a local law enforcement individual who took the first shot. Was was Crooks hit twice? And we don't know. I mean, the toxicology reports. I mean, was he being administered certain types of drugs like SSRIs?
Do they wanna cover that up? I mean, there are reports that he had encrypted accounts in different countries around the world.
Speaker 1: Yep. We still don't know
Speaker 2: what they said. About. Yes. That's not normal behavior. So, again, I I agree with you.
The FBI immediately said it's, you know, one guy acting alone.
Speaker 1: I Crazy.
Speaker 2: What basis have they made that call?
Speaker 0: Yeah. What basis have they made that call? Folks, you understand the FBI has been spying on us for a long time. Right? They can deny it all they want.
That FISA thing that you and I fought against and are still fighting against, the foreign intelligence surveillance act, where it's not not no normal, sane, rational actor can question the fact that there is a backdoor in that to spy on Americans. What I'm getting at is they likely have this guy's metadata, emails, texts, and everything. If he's acting alone, then just put the information out there and show us. Listen to me. I have not iced out the idea that he was acting alone.
It's possible. Correct? It's one of 5, 6 different scenarios. If that's the case, show us. Nobody trusts you.
Show us the evidence. Instead, again, put the New York post article up. I was sitting there with, Ben Schaeffer when I was on the congressional panel. Great guy. Counter sniper, Washington regional SWAT.
He was at the scene that day. One of the congressmen asked him on the panel. Hey. Do you find it concerning as a law enforcement officer that they quickly scrubbed the roof down? Thomas, Crooks' body was disposed of before the official autopsy report could even be released, like, you and here we go.
He was like, yeah. You're damn right. I absolutely find it concerning, and so do I. Encrypted overseas accounts. The family has this high powered attorney.
I mean, they have the folks, let me just be absolutely clear. They have the constitutional big r god given right to an attorney. That doesn't mean they did anything wrong. I'm just saying, like, if the information out there is that he acted alone, you know, no problem, case is closed, then why is no one telling us why the case should be closed and how they drew the conclusion that he acted alone? Nobody finds this weird.
You know what? Before I put the sweet up, can you play the other Ron Johnson clip too? Ron Johnson saying, here's what an additional thing that makes me believe this is Ron Johnson with Maria Bartiromo. An additional clip that makes me believe they're hiding information. Why would you stonewall the investigation?
Folks, can you get seriously in the chat? If it just for a a second, I'm asking you to put your investigator hat on. Assuming he did work alone. Everything's done. Investigations over.
This horrible thing happened. Let's fix it. Why can you give me one single sound reason why you wouldn't do a press conference? Put out a bunch of charts and data and a PowerPoint, and say we wanna clear this up with the American people. We don't want any conspiracy theories.
Why wouldn't you? Why wouldn't you? They're doing the exact opposite. They're not telling congressional investigators in the senate anything of significance. Here, listen to this.
Speaker 2: Well, I'm part part of the senate bipartisan investigation. It's led by the chairman of the committee and the subcommittee. All I can really tell you is the, Secret Service of Fed you know, FedBI are basically dragging their feet. They're stowling us. And we've gotten some transcribed interviews, but, the documents we request are are heavily redacted.
They're delivered, you know, the day of the invest the interview. So we really can't use the documents to conduct the interviews effectively. So we're we're we're not getting squat from my standpoint from the Secret Service or or the FBI. We've requested all their their 3 o twos, their their transcriptions, their interviews with hundreds of individuals. They're not turning those over to us as well.
So, Marie, if if you were if you wanna design investigation to raise suspicions and drive conspiracy theories, this is exactly how you do that investigation. I mean, I was, you know, just jaw dropping that they release the body for cremation before anybody seen any autopsy or toxicology reports. Again, that's again, it's just driving suspicion and conspiracy theories.
Speaker 0: Folks, I'm telling you as an investigator who worked a couple pretty high profile investigations, what you do is you get out, and if there's any questions, you answer them. Why would you be presenting heavily redacted material to oversight members of congress and the senate when you can take them in the skiff and explain to the representatives of the people? We do not live in a direct democracy. We live in a republic, a form of a representative democracy. Ron Johnson is our representative.
Yes. He is from the state of Wisconsin. However, he takes very important votes on issues that affect all of us. Why wouldn't the secret service and the FBI say, senator, we deeply appreciate your concerns. We're gonna meet you in this skiff on such and such a day if you have time.
We're sensitive compartmented information facility. And we are going to tell you what happens, and we're gonna trust you with this information. So at least we can clear up for you who can diplomatically explain to the constituents why we can't tell them everything right now. Why wouldn't they do that? Folks, the answer, Occam's razor, is because somebody's hiding something.
This isn't hard. Producer Jim, text me the answer to this. Why do you think the FBI and Secret Service are hiding something? Do you have the answer, Jim? This is not a trick question.
Waiting.
Speaker 1: Okay. Here it is. Let's see if he got the answer, folks.
Speaker 0: Because they want to. Yes. Because they want to. Thank you, producer Jim.
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
#TamponTim is a sicko‼️
@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok
This is Tomi Saint James. He was invited to perform for young children at the Minnesota State Capitol under Governor Tim Walz. Tim Walz used your tax dollars to have a grown man dress up provocatively as a woman do s*xual themed dances for children. https://t.co/RQQxJT1UrR
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
🔥Mike Benz @MikeBenzCyber discusses Deep State tactics on #Warroom with Steve Bannon this morning 🔥 PART ONE 👇 https://t.co/YOLqmAA6FO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the deep state's efforts to prevent Trump from returning to the White House in 2024. They mention tactics like destabilization, protests, and working with groups like Black Lives Matter and Antifa. The plan involves using various societal institutions against Trump if he wins. The conversation also touches on the importance of gold as a hedge during turbulent times. The speakers warn of potential election theft and highlight past instances of election manipulation by the CIA and State Department.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you. Great work as usual.
Speaker 1: To be with you, Steve. Thank you.
Speaker 0: They had the trifecta. They had 3 legged stool, the CCP, the KGB, the Russian oligarchs, the KGB, and, of course, they had the, the junior partner, in the in the oligarchs in Ukraine. Unbelievable. Let's go to Mike Benz. Benz, you put some up the other day.
Your your analysis and breakdown of this has just been amazing. But I wanna hit the American people with full on right up front. You're saying and you say you have evidence of that the CIA and the deep state apparatus is already actively at work to make sure that president Trump does not return to the White House and that we do not win in 2024. Am am I overstating your case that you're you're making at least on Twitter and other social media platforms?
Speaker 1: No. Not overstating that at all. Although I'm still sort of processing some of the details I just heard from John Solomon, my mind is sort of reeling right now at some of these revelations because, they connect to so much else and so many so many unanswered questions about, about the Ukraine story, which really is at the heart of this of this deep state, you know, long running maneuver to make sure Trump, cannot be inaugurated in in November. I mean, it really comes down. I mean, the reason So talk
Speaker 0: to John. We we we've had this fight now with the they know we're coming after him now. That's why I say the stakes are higher. The easiest part we have is to win this, and that's gonna be monumental. And then to close the deals and make sure it's not stolen.
We have Genesys Loboda in Arizona. A federal judge just overturned the fact he has shown IDs so the illegal aliens can vote like crazy in Arizona. Not that that's not a key state. So they know they're coming for us. Every after we win, you know this, Ben, because you're gonna be in the administration.
You'll be part of this like last time. Every day is gonna be Stalingrad. It's gonna be a war to the knife with the deep state on this. So tell us tell our audience how they're already getting in front of this. They understand the stakes, and they have no intention of having anybody in the Oval Office that can empower someone like Mike Benz.
Sir? Yeah.
Speaker 1: I mean, just yesterday on, on Twitter slash x, you know, we we I've I've watched a documentary with people about, how the the CIA and the state department did this during the 20th century when they, would try to basically rig an election in a foreign country. And then if the person won anyway, there were all these destabilization techniques, in order to, including basically having an narcotearny gangs, you know, serve militia groups take to the streets, working with the union groups to shut down the industrial sector, mass protests and walkouts, economic destabilization, weaponization of the justice department. All of this, are the, you know, the this is the blueprint that our foreign policy establishment, the Pentagon State Department, and CIA have been doing for now 70 years, we saw, basically a up close and personal glimpse of that, in the year 2020. And when you had groups like the Transition Integrity Project run by Rosa Brooks. Rosa Brooks was a high ranking Pentagon official with a CIA blue badge who ran a a simulation, with John Podesta personally role playing the role of Joe Biden for how to, how to overturn the results of an election in 20 20 if Trump won a, quote, clear electoral victory.
Scenario 3, there was a clear Trump win, and they this involved the Biden campaign working directly with groups like Black Lives Matter and Antifa as well as developing all of these, you know, weaponizing their, their civil society contacts to bring the country to a screeching halt the same way that the CIA works with, trade, trade labor union groups and student groups when they're doing something like this to shut down a government in a country they don't like. And in fact, we saw the this confirmed in a Time Magazine article published in January 2021 where Molly Ball, wrote about the the secret agreement between the AFL CIO and the Chamber of Commerce. By the way, those are 2 of the four wings of the CIA's top cutout, the National Endowment For Democracy, to stand down on the planned shutdown DC protests and, and mass walkouts by the 2,000,000 strong labor force of the AFL CIO who's been working with the CIA for 70 years, I should add so much so that leftist in the 19 sixties used to call them the AFL CIA. So what you're gonna see is White House completely surrounded on all sides in the event that Trump wins by, every instrument of society weaponized against them by the deep state.
Speaker 0: State. Bens, hang on. We're holding through a break. Make sure you go to birch gold. This is the turbulence I'm talking about.
Birchgold.com/bannon to make sure that you talk to Philip Patrick and the team about why gold is a hedge for times of turbulence. You remember the transition integrity project, Raheem Kassam, Bill McGilly, myself went throughout the country in the summer of 2020 warning that Mark Elias and the team had laid out the plan how they intend to steal the election. Molly Ball's cover story on on Time Magazine, they bragged about it afterwards of how they did
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
💥💥💥 BOOM💥💥💥 @mattgaetz breaks down how Kevin McCarthy was trying to sabotage the process on War Room with Steve Bannon 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Matt Gaetz: “There is hand wringing and bed wetting on K Street!” 🤣👇 https://t.co/gJQEKmDE1J
Video Transcript AI Summary
Yesterday, there was a historic and fast-moving event in Manhattan and the nation's capital. Congressman Matt Gaetz explains that the process to select a new speaker of the House began with intense debates and prayer. Tom Emmer withdrew from the race, and Mark Molinaro suggested taking a nonbinding poll on the second-place candidate, Mike Johnson. Kevin McCarthy objected to this, revealing his true intentions to undermine other candidates. After a three-hour delay, Mike Johnson gained momentum and ultimately received a majority of votes. This victory signifies a shift in power from McCarthy to Johnson, who is known for his focus on the administrative state and constitutional issues. The speaker election will take place at noon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yesterday was history, historic and, and fast moving from a courtroom in, in Manhattan where president Trump participated to the nation's capital to you out there who made this happen. The number's 202-225-3121. I wanna show the picture I'm bringing in Matt Gaetz, congressman Gaetz right now. But Mike Johnson, Let's see this again. First thing he did was not go to the sticks, but to call the media into the conference room where they had this intense debate for hours when he was named designee.
He bowed his head in prayer with the entire conference in back of him. Bowed his head in prayer to almighty god. Matt Gaetz, It was epic, historic, unprecedented. Walk us through it.
Speaker 1: Oh, thanks so much, Steven. I have to start By thanking the war room posse, this would not have happened without you. I can legitimately say that the feedback people were getting from our activists all over the country Led them to the best result. And I also wanna thank you, Steve, because though I get very frustrated with you sometimes when I'm trying to call you and get advice, and you're broadcasting, you know, 87 hours a day. I do appreciate in in the off hours, your counsel.
And it's important for people to know how, how gracious you are with that and how much I appreciate it and how much my colleagues appreciate it. So I I wanna give you the first Let let
Speaker 0: me let me say one let me just say one thing, and and I no. I always defer I always defer to Gates because this is a young man. This got quite he he's playing 5 dimension chess all the time, and sometimes We have crossed words and a little hot talking, but it's on the process of making sure things run well. Matt, terrific job. Walk us through what happened.
Speaker 1: No. It's the it's the Irish in you and the Scotch Irish in me, maybe. So alright. Here's here's what happened. I'm gonna the the really, the the the chapter of this that was dispositive, the crescendo Begins as, Tom Emmer is withdrawing from the race yesterday.
I told Emmer on Sunday, he was not going to get there. He was gonna move like a hot Knife threw butter through about the first, you know, 80% of the conference, but that there was gonna be a series of votes that were never going to be there for him. He wanted to run through it, and I said, Tom, here's the deal. You can have your runway, but when you get to that last group that will not support you, you cannot drag this on for days. You cannot drag this on for weeks.
You cannot play into what Kevin McCarthy was working the whole time to try to get people to believe that the only person that could govern the Republican conference is Kevin McCarthy. So Emmer agrees that he's gonna have his shot, but it that it's going to be quick. So we get that through the gestation system, early yesterday. So as Emirates withdrawing, Mark Molinaro, a moderate New York freshman Republican, stands up at the microphone and says, well, instead of Starting this process and having a candidate forum and sending everybody home for a good cry, let's just take a nonbinding poll on where people would be on the person who came in second To Tom Emmer, and that was Mike Johnson. And Elise Stefanik said, well, that's against the rules.
The the rules don't contemplate it. We can't do that. And brilliantly, Mark Molinaro says, Then I move for unanimous consent that the rules be waived, and we take a poll on whether or not Mike Johnson, could be our speaker nominee. And guess who objects to that unanimous consent request? Kevin McCarthy.
Speaker 0: Who was that?
Speaker 1: Kevin McCarthy stands up and erupts It says, I object to doing a roll call on Mike Johnson. And Mike Johnson was exasperated. All the times Johnson had voted for McCarthy, it carried his water, Maybe even voted for some bills he didn't like because he he was working toward the Republican conference's stated objectives under McCarthy. And and here was the thing, It showed everyone that it was actually McCarthy who was working to knife Scalise. It was actually McCarthy Who was working to knife Jim Jordan.
It was McCarthy working to knife everyone, and he hadn't yet figured out a way to knife Mike Johnson. And so he was worried that there was gonna be this great unifying moment, and he scuttled the unifying moment. So because of McCarthy's objection, we had to have It's 3 hour delay, and, you know, candidates announce again, have another form, and guess what happens during that delay, Steve? Patrick McHenry runs to the house floor, Opens it up out of recess and then adjourns till noon today. Now why did he do that?
Because they were setting up a play To block Mike Johnson with the write in votes in the inter conference process for Kevin McCarthy. They were promising people Hearings on their favorite legislation, passage of bills. I heard people promised, oh, maybe you'll get a a chairmanship. And and the play was for McCarthy to return as speaker, And then Jim Jordan to be the deputy speaker in some sort of, like, Dwight Schrute assistant to the regional manager posture, And that would have been debasing to Jordan, someone I like a great deal, and it would have been empowering to McCarthy. So Gary Graves And all these people are working to try to effectuate this return of McCarthy, and they're telling us they're gonna be a 100 votes for McCarthy on the right end.
You know how many there were? 33 on the 1st write in. So they flame out terribly. Mike Johnson's gaining momentum. Ultimately, my, McCarthy gets 43 to vote for him on a secret ballot, but Mike Johnson gets a majority.
And then he says, you know what I want? I want a roll call vote. That those 43 would have to announce themselves as as being for a candidate who wasn't even running instead of a unifying force like Mike Johnson. And when we called for the roll call, do you know how many people voted for Kevin McCarthy? 0.
He went from a 4 he went 0. So he went from promising a 100 votes To delivering 43 to 0 willing to vote for him. And everyone in the room knew at that moment that I wasn't the force for chaos. I wasn't causing disunity. For the last 3 weeks, the reason the house of representatives has been paralyzed is because for his own Selfish gain.
Kevin McCarthy was sabotaging the candidacy of anyone else because he was plotting a return, and we stopped it. And in the place of Kevin McCarthy, we get a Bayou, Louisiana Mike Johnson, a brilliant constitutional attorney. He has been my seatmate in the house judiciary committee for 7 years. For 7 years, we have worked against the illegitimate impeachments, against the weaponization of this government. This is this guy did the toughest cases before the Louisiana Supreme Court.
He is sharp. He will be as respected In the halls of our, in the homes of our most meaningful, righteous, and patriotic donors as he will at the rallies With our most enthusiastic and meaningful activists, it is going to be a great moment for the house. And you know what? At the very end, When some people didn't know if they could still even bring back McCarthy, a few of them just left the room and didn't vote. And the swamp is on the run.
MAGA is ascendant. And if if you don't think that moving from Kevin McCarthy to MAGA Mike Johnson shows the ascendance of this movement, And where the power in the Republican party truly lies, then then you're not paying attention, but they are they are crying. They are hand ringing and bed wetting over on k street Because we have an honorable, righteous righteous man, who is about to take this position. He's gonna do great things for the country.
Speaker 0: I I wanna make sure we go back to this because of the 20 once you made the vote once Mike Johnson said, I want it on the record. We're not gonna go to the floor because McCarthy's guy's blocked it, but I wanna on the record here, all 4 not not one of the 43 stood up and said I'm voting for McCarthy. Correct?
Speaker 1: No. And, like, obviously, because McCarthy and Graves, and and these guys were running this because they were out promising the world to people, they voted for McCarthy. But then Kevin McCarthy, after voting on the secret anonymous ballot for himself, then had to stand up and vote for Mike Johnson After his objections had been overrun, after his coalition had had dissolved, and after the sad hopes of a desperate man trying to cling to power were vanquished.
Speaker 0: This is I wanna go back to the spectrum. We've called the spectrum. McCarthy has loomed over this entire thing. The media, the mainstream media refused. They kept saying we were the cause of the chaos.
This is because the lobbyists, the corporatists, the oligarchs on Wall Street, big tech have control of him in this apparatus. They've had it now for over a decade. Right? And they don't wanna give it up. That was at the end of the day, that's what the fight was about.
Speaker 1: Right. When they are in control, the American people get chaos. We get chaos with no budgets, with rising debts, with an administrative bureaucratic state that has seemingly no check, with all of these, performative resolutions and investigations that don't result in meaningful change for our people, that's chaos. I have tried to bring order Out of that chaos. And the reason it took me a little longer than expected, the reason it took 3 weeks instead of 3 days is because Kevin McCarthy leveraged The last vestiges of his power to try to block any other human of any other ideology from being able to assume the speakership.
And he was defeated. The swamp was defeated, and it would not have happened without this posse. It would not have happened without, some some great work from people like Jody Arrington, Clay Higgins, Scott Perry, we we had we had a great team working, to give Mike Johnson the support he needed to build a coalition. Kevin Hearn Was an absolute star. Mark Green was the star.
There there is gonna be a real opportunity for us to come together.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: what It is on our terms.
Speaker 0: This is what
Speaker 1: It is their surrender
Speaker 0: on our terms. Right. This is what Greene said when Greene dropped out and said, he tweeted out. He says, there are games being played. Those are the games we're talking about.
Boss, also, Emmert and Scalise had a role in this also. Wasn't this was really a unifying moment for the entire conference. Didn't they have a role in this also?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And I respect these men, and I know they might not be the favorite of your audience. But there was a moment when I went to Emmert and Scalise and I said, look fellas, like now you see it. You see it plain as day that The person who was working against you all along was Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise, like like the Italian godfather sat in the corner As McCarthy was trying to block his fellow Louisianan Mike Johnson, and member after member came up to Steve Scalise and he would give them advice and counsel people, respect Steve Stomuch and listened to him, and you watched Steve Scalise put the final dagger in the heart of the hopes of Kevin McCarthy's return, and it was a beautiful chef's kiss. Because Steve Scalise actually was not treated fairly during this process.
Kevin did everything he could to hurt Steve. And the fact that Steve now gets to put Mike Johnson in that chair, over Kevin McCarthy's attempted comeback is is glorious.
Speaker 0: Another Louisiana. Real quick, I know you got a bounce, But you, in your 7 years as as the wingman with with Johnson, he's very focused on the administrative state. He's very focused on the deep state. He's very as a constitutionalist, He's beyond upset about what's happened to DOJ. Walk me through.
What do you think that's gonna take as far as the speakership?
Speaker 1: Well, Mike Johnson Lashes a technical proficiency to go after the administrative state with a real desire and willingness to do so. We have said some people demonstrate great proficiency, but maybe not as much willingness. And then some people aren't willing at all. Mike Johnson sees The weaponized administrative state for what it is. The best questioning that I've seen from any member on any subject in the 118th congress Was last year when Mike Johnson pinned Merrick Garland down on critical race theory, and the fact that his own son-in-law was profiting off of it, And Garland was then serving as the muscle.
It it was exquisite. So this guy knows what to do. He is a tactician, and I will be right by his side doing everything possible To see that Mike Johnson is successful, to see that the house of representatives is successful in our oversight goals, and ultimately that the American people are The other thing Trump and Mike Johnson get along so well, you'll remember back in one of the impeachments of yesteryear, Mike Johnson was actually on the Trump defense team, driving a lot of the message and a lot of the legal strategy that was ultimately successful in the senate.
Speaker 0: It starts at high noon. I hear at least Stefan is gonna put his name in nomination. Jen, Matt, where do people go on social media to follow you? Because it's gonna be an intense day. We're not going there yet.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be breaking down, more detail on how this developed and even, what we're doing now to ensure that we locked down those last votes on my podcast Firebrand That people could find on Rumble, on YouTube, anywhere. You get your podcasts also at Matt Gates, at rep Matt Gates, anywhere on the Internet. I do a pretty good job. Let you know what's happening.
Speaker 0: Congressman great gates, fantastic job. Great work overnight. Look forward to talking to you this afternoon.
Speaker 1: This is this is what victory feels like, man. We got we got more to do, but I've I've told you in the past, and I've told the audience in the past, don't celebrate yet. You know what? You deserve this. You deserve this moment when this godly good man takes this position, and we you we we can finally show you what a fighting Republican party in control of the house of representatives looks like.
I've not seen that in 7 years under McCarthy and Paul Ryan. We finally get a chance with Mike Johnson. This It's a great
Speaker 0: day. Because we're taking down Amen, brother. Matt Gaetz. Let's go ahead and stream. Wanna stream his podcast ASAP.
Congressman Gaetz, thank you. General Flynn next in the
@SaveUSAKitty - MAGA Kitty
BOMBSHELL INFORMATION!!! 🔥🔥 EVERYONE MUST WATCH THIS!!! Explains a lot of why the Uniparty and RINO 22 may be acting as they are 🤔 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥 https://t.co/WCok4hIxQ8
Video Transcript AI Summary
A six-page letter was sent to Sequoia Capital, initiating an investigation into their funding practices, particularly regarding weapons in China. Mike Gallagher, a member of a bipartisan committee, is questioning Sequoia's ties to the Chinese Communist Party and the implications for American security. The investigation could reveal a scandal involving both parties, as many politicians have accepted donations from Sequoia while ignoring potential threats. Gallagher's letter highlights connections to key figures in the Biden administration and raises concerns about investments in companies like TikTok, which could influence elections. The discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in government dealings with foreign investors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This works. Brian Costello joins us. Brian, last night, the first time, a 6 page letter went to Sequoia Capital to begin the investigation. Folks should understand, this is just the start. This is a preserve your documents move, Sequoia Capital, a viper's nest out there in Silicon Valley on out, in Palo Alto, a viper's nest of traitors to this country completely controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.
Brian, give me a quick and dirty. What what what happened last night? And this gets right back to McCarthy, and it gets right back to Scalise. They've been taking money from these guys. And finally, As soon as they're moved out of the way a little bit, you got Gallagher, not the guy who should be doing it, not Turner at intelligence.
And if Turner's your congressman from the Dayton area. You ought to be lighting this guy up today. Tell me what happened, Brian, about with, with Gallagher and these guys to begin. This Scandal about Sequoia Capital gets to the beating heart of what the problem in this nation is. Brian Costello.
Speaker 1: Yes. Hey, Steve. How are you? Yeah. So Mike Gallagher last night launched a 6 page letter to Sequoia Capital to its current managing Our partner, Roelof Buta and, Don Viera, who used to work for Lisa Monaco, who's running public policy now for them, And asked a bunch of very poignant questions about funding weapons.
It was now, the thing that people should understand is the breadth Of this letter. Right? So this is a letter going from a bipartisan committee, Princeton grad, former military GOP guy, Mike Gallagher, to America's preeminent venture firm questioning them about funding weapons in China. Okay. So what's not being said here is who else had this information and when, right?
You mentioned Mike Turner. Well, I'll tell you right now, you're talking about McHenry on the top of the show. McHenry is the only guy in Congress Through the Financial Services Committee, fighting outbound restriction of investment into China. McHenry has the ability right now To launch an investigation into Gary Gensler at the Securities Exchange Commission about covering up crimes for one of the Sequoia principles. And he will not do it because he's beholden to the party donors.
Speaker 0: Okay. Hang hang on a second. This is how it starts, like the 1st light you get in Watergate. This investigation properly done is gonna expose a Scandal in this city. They're not gonna make people's heads blow up, and it's got as many Republicans.
The Democrats have taken 80% of the money, but the Republicans are up through the neck in it. McHenry, McCarthy, Scalise, all of them, and their teams, and we're gonna drive this to get to the bottom of it. This was funding our enemies on American pension fund money, and these guys are getting basically kickbacks as campaign donations to shut up and let it continue. That, in essence, is the beating heart of this story. Correct, Brian?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Let's talk about that, Steve. You know, so if you look at the breadth of this letter, the footnotes, the depth that Gallagher sent out, right, Lisa Monaco, the deputy attorney general, Jake Sullivan on the National Security Council, Kurt Campbell on the National Security Council, Gary Gensler, what were they doing? Right? What have they been doing?
Yes. It's Gallagher's job. Gallagher has 2 jobs, right? Write new laws and oversee the government, Right? Oversee these functions.
This should be a full scale investigation into multiple agencies within the Biden administration Covering up crime for China. Multiple agencies. There's a criminal enterprise within the government Correct. In the Democratic government Covering up crimes for these donors. And if if you notice one thing on here, Steven, I know you've hit on this show, one of the investments of Sequoia is TikTok, Which has the ability to influence elections.
Speaker 0: Oh, no. To influence the 22 elections. With Taylor Swift, there's gonna be a massive element in 24. Don't don't don't think it's not. TikTok is a Chinese Communist Party, apparatus weapon.
It's a weapon.
Speaker 1: She's in the the investor there.
Speaker 0: By the way, you got you got the go you got the government. You've got people in the government. You got Mike Maritz that funded the Democratic Party. And the Republicans, to keep to make sure the Republicans didn't expose it, Turner, they they paid off McCarthy. They paid off Scalise With campaign donations, you're gonna find McHenry.
All of them. This is what we're fighting for right now. This ties directly back to this fight today. This is what the grassroots and this is what people this is why you need radical transparency. They have funded our enemies at the most advanced stages of weaponry They could take out a carrier battle group that none of their kids' sons or daughters are gonna serve on, take out a carrier battle group in the Straits of Taiwan on technology developed by the US with money supplied by the pension funds where everybody made a fortune, and they kicked it back into the Democratic party, and they paid the Republican Party to shut up.
That's why I had tipped to Gallagher. Go ahead, sir.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Steve, look. I mean, you got a senate. Right?
I mean, these guys like Romney, they're from the financial services industry. They're from the investment industry. They all knew this was going on. Right? You know, it's been called out in public hearings.
Like, where's Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer on this? Where's House Intelligence? Where's Warner and Ron Rubio? Right? Why didn't it take down?
Speaker 0: Brian, we gotta we gotta bounce. What's your Twitter and your social media? People have to follow you on this because you're putting up great stuff.
Speaker 1: Twitter is just bp costello. I'm staying straight there right now.
Speaker 0: Okay. This is fantastic. Huge movement. We're gonna have a lot more to say on this today. Get her in at 6 o'clock.
Brian Costello, thank you very much, brother.
Speaker 1: Thank you
Speaker 0: for your time.