TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SecKennedy

SecKennedy
Posted - February 23, 2026 at 2:31 AM
Saved - February 23, 2026 at 8:23 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I will always tell the American people the truth. Pesticides and herbicides are toxic by design, and widespread use threatens health as we feed the nation. I support bringing production home, ending overreliance on foreign inputs, and expanding regenerative agriculture to rebuild soil and biodiversity. We’re accelerating next‑gen tech—laser weed control, robotics, precision methods—to replace blanket spraying. Working with USDA, HHS, and farmers, we pursue a practical transition that strengthens supply and health.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

I will always tell the American people the truth. Pesticides and herbicides are toxic by design, engineered to kill living organisms. When we apply them across millions of acres and allow them into our food system, we put Americans at risk. Chemical manufacturers have paid tens of billions of dollars to settle cancer claims linked to their products, and many agricultural communities report elevated cancer rates and chronic disease. Unfortunately, our agricultural system depends heavily on these chemicals. The U.S. represents 4% of the world’s population, yet we use roughly 25% of its pesticides. If these inputs disappeared overnight, crop yields would fall, food prices would surge, and America would experience a massive loss of farms even beyond what we are witnessing today. The consequences would be disastrous. I support President Trump’s Executive Order to bring agricultural chemical production back to the United States and end our near-total reliance on adversarial nations. His EO protects two pillars of national strength: our defense readiness and our food supply. When hostile actors control critical inputs, they directly threaten the security of the American people. The Trump administration will secure these supply chains to eliminate that vulnerability. President Trump did not build our current system — he inherited it. For decades, Washington designed modern agriculture. Policymakers wrote farm policy, directed research dollars, structured subsidies and crop insurance, and shaped commodity markets to reward monocultures and maximum yield. Those deliberate choices locked farmers into chemical dependence and prioritized short-term output over long-term soil vitality and human health. We are now changing course — without destabilizing the food supply. Alongside @USDA @SecRollins, we are accelerating the transition to regenerative agriculture by expanding farming systems that rebuild soil, increase biodiversity, improve water retention, and reduce reliance on synthetic chemicals, including pre-harvest desiccation. We are also driving the rapid adoption of next-generation technologies, including laser-guided weed control, electrothermal and electrical systems, robotics, precision mechanical cultivation, and biological controls that replace blanket spraying with precision intervention. These solutions are not theoretical. Farmers are already putting them to work. Markets are scaling them. Now the federal government will act with urgency to expand their reach and accelerate adoption nationwide. I have met with hundreds of farmers and agricultural leaders across the country. They understand the pressures firsthand. Chemical inputs cut into margins. Chemical-resistant pests are spreading. Soil health is declining. Foreign markets are shutting out American produce. Farmers want workable alternatives, and they want policies that support transition without threatening their livelihoods. At HHS, I am leading a coordinated effort grounded in gold standard science. I am working with Secretary Rollins and @EPALeeZeldin to expedite a better future where a thriving agricultural system is less dependent on harmful chemicals. We are sharing data, coordinating strategy, and supporting farmers through a practical transition. The Make America Healthy Again agenda forces us to challenge long-standing assumptions about how we grow food, structure markets, and measure success in this country. Reform at this scale will test entrenched interests, and it will not move in a straight line. President Trump has opened the door to this debate and backed meaningful change — not only in policy, but in the national conversation about health and agriculture. American farmers stand at the center of this movement. They deserve policies rooted in rigorous science and economic reality. Our children deserve a food system that protects and strengthens their health. With President Trump’s leadership, we are securing critical supply chains, confronting the health risks embedded in our current system, and deploying every available tool to build a stronger, safer, more resilient American food supply.

SecKennedy
Posted - December 4, 2025 at 2:48 AM
Saved - December 6, 2025 at 3:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
At HHS, we’ve opened an investigation into a midwestern school that gave a federally funded vaccine to a child despite a legally recognized state exemption. If a provider ignores consent, violates an exemption, or withholds information, we will act quickly to protect families and restore accountability.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

.@HHSGov has launched an investigation into a troubling incident where a midwestern school administered a federally funded vaccine to a child despite a legally recognized state exemption. If a provider ignores consent, violates an exemption, or keeps parents in the dark, HHS will act — quickly and decisively. We will use every tool we have to protect families and restore accountability.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as HHS secretary, announces decisive steps by the department to defend a fundamental right: a parent’s right to guide their child’s health decisions. He states that this right is non negotiable and will not be ignored under the Trump administration. HHS has launched an investigation into a troubling Midwest incident in which a school administered a federally funded vaccine to a child without the parent’s consent and despite a legally recognized state exemption. He emphasizes that when any institution disregards a religious exemption, it breaks trust, fractures the sacred bond between families and the people entrusted with their child’s care, and that this will not be tolerated. The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) is sending a letter to HRSA-supported health center grant recipients underscoring that federal funding requires compliance with federal and state laws that protect parental rights. Kennedy notes another right every American should know: the right of access to their children’s health records. He references HIPAA as establishing that right of access, and states that if you have legal authority to make decisions for your child, you should have the right to see their records. There will be no delays, no secrets, no excuses. The department is launching compliance reviews of providers and major health care systems to ensure parents have timely access to their children’s information. The Office for Civil Rights has issued a letter reminding healthcare providers of their clear legal duty to give parents access to their children’s medical records. If a provider stands between a parent and their child, HHS will step in. Kennedy makes it clear that schools and healthcare systems cannot sideline parents. If a provider ignores consent, violates an exemption, or keeps parents in the dark, HHS will act quickly and decisively, using every tool available to protect families and restore accountability. The Vaccines for Children program must never become a workaround to bypass parents. The department is reviewing how states and districts process exemptions to ensure the program follows the law, not the other way around. He invites anyone who believes their rights or their child’s rights have been violated to file a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights at hhs.gov/ocr/complaints. Kennedy closes by asserting that parents know their children best, love them the most, and that HHS will defend their voice, authority, and rightful place at the center of their children’s health care decisions. The message ends with thanks and attribution: Produced by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr, your HHS secretary. Today I'm announcing decisive steps that HHS is taking to defend something that is absolutely fundamental in this country. A parent's right to guide their child's health decisions. That right is not optional. It's non negotiable and under the Trump administration, it will not be ignored. HHS has launched an investigation into a troubling incident in the Midwest. A school administered a federally funded vaccine to a child without the parent's consent and despite a legally recognized state exemption. When any institution, a school, a doctor's office, a clinic disregards a religious exemption, it doesn't just break trust, it also breaks the law. It fractures the sacred bond between families and the people entrusted with their child's care. And we're not going to tolerate it. The Health Resources and Services Administration is sending a letter to HRSA supported health center grant recipients underscoring a simple fact: Federal funding requires compliance with federal and state laws that protect parental rights. Parents have another right that every American should know about and that's the right of access to their children's health records. HIPAA establishes that right of access. If you have the legal authority to make decisions for your child then you should have the right to see their records. No delays, no secrets, no excuses. So today we are launching compliance reviews of providers and major health care systems to ensure that they give parents timely access to their children's information. In addition, our Office for Civil Rights has issued a letter reminding healthcare providers of their clear legal duty to give parents access to their children's medical records. If a provider stands between you and your child, HHS is going to step in. Let me be clear, schools and healthcare systems cannot sideline parents. If a provider ignores consent, violates an exemption, or keeps parents in the dark, HHS will act quickly and decisively. We will use every tool we have to protect families and restore accountability. The Vaccines for Children program must never become a workaround to bypass parents. We are reviewing how states and districts process exemptions to ensure the program follows the law and not the other way around. If you believe that your rights or your child's rights have been violated, then you can file a complaint with our office for civil rights at hhs.gov/ocr/complaints. That's hhs.gov/ocr/complaints. Parents know their children best. Parents love their children the most and HHS will always defend their voice, authority and their rightful place at the center of their children's health care decisions. Thank you very much. Produced by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
SecKennedy
Posted - September 22, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 12:30 PM

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

We expect this to be the first of many announcements over the coming years that deliver actual information to parents on underlining causes of autism and the potential paths to prevention and reversal. https://t.co/rHOnEsK7jJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
I have instructed NIH, FDA, and CMS to help doctors treat children appropriately. Jay will help tell that story, which started with sound science, the kind that restores faith in government. The announcement, this announcement also represents a historic collaboration between NIH, FDA, CDC, and CMS. We expect this to be the first of many announcements over the coming years that deliver actionable information to parents on underlying cause of autism and the potential paths for prevention and reversal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have instructed NIH, FDA, and CMS to help doctors treat children appropriately. Jay will help tell that story, which started with sound science, the kind that restores faith in government. The announcement, this announcement also represents a historic collaboration between NIH, FDA, CDC, and CMS. We expect this to be the first of many announcements over the coming years that deliver actionable information to parents on underlying cause of autism and the potential paths for prevention and reversal.
SecKennedy
Posted - September 1, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Saved - September 2, 2025 at 4:40 PM

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Thank you, President Trump, for your commitment to Gold Standard Science.

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

https://t.co/gV5EuI7Cr5

SecKennedy
Posted - August 12, 2025 at 10:39 PM
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 3:16 AM

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Small family farms like Steve Jarvis’ in Idaho prove that regenerative agriculture delivers—producing abundant, nutrient-dense food while restoring our soil, revitalizing the land, and strengthening communities for generations to come. https://t.co/VZ9b5lt9AK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., your HHS secretary, is with Steve Jarvis, a fifth-generation regenerative farmer. "When he grew up, it wasn't called regenerative farming. It was called farming." On 40 acres, they can produce 500,000 pounds of food if they farm this way. "You could see these potato fields go on forever." "The small family farm can produce so much food and good food." "We're losing the health of our kids." "We need to start giving them healthy food that's locally grown and we need to start transitioning away from destructive agriculture that's destroying the soil and start embracing some of the older models and some of the new innovations that we're seeing regenerative agriculture and Steve is a model for that." Thank you. Produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna go out and check your potatoes? Yeah. Hi. I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr, your HHS secretary. Here with Steve Jarvis, who's a fifth generation regenerative farmer. When he grew up, it wasn't called regenerative farming. It was called farming. And on 40 acres, they can produce 500,000 pounds of food if they farm this way. He has a 120 acres here in Northwestern Idaho and he's growing without the use of pesticides or fertilizers, very very little fertilizer and without any kind of chemical interventions. You could see these potato fields go on forever. The small family farm can produce so much food and good food. We're losing the health of our kids. We need to start giving them healthy food that's locally grown and we need to start transitioning away from destructive agriculture that's destroying the soil and start embracing some of the older models and some of the new innovations that we're seeing regenerative agriculture and Steve is a model for that. Thank you. Thank you. Produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services.
SecKennedy
Posted - August 5, 2025 at 9:55 PM
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 9:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reviewed the science and consulted experts, leading to BARDA's decision to terminate 22 mRNA vaccine investments due to their ineffectiveness against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu. We're reallocating funds to support safer, more versatile vaccine platforms.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

We reviewed the science, listened to the experts, and acted. BARDA is terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu. We’re shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as HHS Secretary, states that BARDA is canceling 22 mRNA vaccine development investments, primarily for flu and COVID. He claims mRNA vaccines don't perform well against upper respiratory viruses because they only code for a small part of viral proteins, and a single mutation can make them ineffective. Kennedy alleges this drives antigenic shift, where vaccines encourage new mutations, potentially prolonging pandemics. He asserts that millions contracted Omicron despite vaccination, illustrating this risk. HHS, after consulting NIH and FDA experts, has determined mRNA technology poses more risk than benefit for respiratory viruses. The canceled contracts total just under $500 million. HHS will prioritize safer, broader vaccine strategies like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Kennedy states HHS supports safe, effective vaccines but is moving beyond mRNA limitations for respiratory viruses.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi, it's Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Here, your HHS secretary. At HHS, we have a division called the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA. BARDA drives some of our most advanced scientific research. It funds developments of vaccines, drugs, diagnostics, and other tools to fight emerging diseases and national health threats. Over the past few weeks, BARDA reviewed 22 mRNA vaccine development investments and began canceling them. Let me explain why. Most of these shots are for flu or COVID, but as the pandemic showed us, mRNA vaccines don't perform well against viruses that infect the upper respiratory tract. Here's the problem: mRNA only codes for a small part of the viral proteins, usually a single antigen. One mutation and the vaccine becomes ineffective. This dynamic drives a phenomena called antigenic shift, meaning that the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective effects of the vaccine. Millions of people, maybe even you or someone you know, got the omicron variant despite being vaccinated. That's because a single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective. The same risk applies to flu. After reviewing the science and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risk than benefits for these respiratory viruses. That's why after extensive review BARDA has begun the process of terminating these 22 contracts totaling just under $500,000,000 To replace the troubled mRNA programs, we're prioritizing the development of the safer, broader vaccine strategies, like whole virus vaccines and novel platforms that don't collapse when viruses mutate. Let me be absolutely clear: HHS supports safe, effective vaccines for every American who wants them. That's why we're moving beyond the limitations of mRNA for respiratory viruses and investing in better solutions. Thank you. Produced by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
SecKennedy
Posted - August 1, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 3:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent study by Andersson et al. claims that aluminum-containing vaccines are not linked to neurological injuries, including autism. However, I've detailed the statistical manipulations used to reach these conclusions. Criticism from the scientific community led to the release of supplementary data, revealing a significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome with higher aluminum exposure. The data indicate that children in the highest exposure group experienced notably more cases of neurodevelopmental disorders. This situation highlights the need for transparency and integrity in scientific research.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

The pharma-funded mainstream media has been touting a recent study of the Danish health registry—Andersson, et al.—which purports to show that aluminum-containing vaccines are not associated with neurological injuries including autism and Asperger's. In the accompanying article, I inventory the long parade of statistical artifices that the industry-funded authors used to achieve their deceptive results. Fierce criticism from the scientific community has now forced the authors to release their supplementary data, which shows calamitous evidence of harm. These data are a devastating indictment of aluminum-containing vaccines directly contradicting the published study’s conclusions. The data show a statistically significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome per 1 mg increase in aluminum exposure among children born between 2007 and 2018. Compared to the moderate exposure group, for every 10,000 children in the highest aluminum exposure cohort, there were: 9.7 more cases of neurodevelopmental disorder, 4.5 more cases of autistic disorder, and 8.7 more cases of the broader category of autism spectrum disorder. By exposing these dangerous deceptions, @HHSGov is signaling a new era of gold standard science, obliterated taboos, and public honesty. https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/flawed-science-bought-conclusions-the-aluminum-vaccine-study-the-media-wont-question-aaec2793

Flawed Science, Bought Conclusions: The Aluminum Vaccine Study the Media Won’t Question Transparent coverage of clinical research trialsitenews.com
SecKennedy
Posted - August 1, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Saved - August 2, 2025 at 3:28 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The recent study by Andersson et al. claims that aluminum-containing vaccines do not cause neurological injuries, including autism. However, I've detailed the statistical manipulations used to reach these conclusions. Criticism from the scientific community led to the release of supplementary data, revealing a significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome linked to aluminum exposure in children born between 2007 and 2018. The data indicate a concerning rise in neurodevelopmental disorders among those with higher aluminum exposure, challenging the study's findings and promoting a call for transparency in science.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

The pharma-funded mainstream media has been touting a recent study of the Danish health registry—Andersson, et al.—which purports to show that aluminum-containing vaccines are not associated with neurological injuries including autism and Asperger's. In the accompanying article, I inventory the long parade of statistical artifices that the industry-funded authors used to achieve their deceptive results. Fierce criticism from the scientific community has now forced the authors to release their supplementary data, which shows calamitous evidence of harm. These data are a devastating indictment of aluminum-containing vaccines directly contradicting the published study’s conclusions. The data show a statistically significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome per 1 mg increase in aluminum exposure among children born between 2007 and 2018. Compared to the moderate exposure group, for every 10,000 children in the highest aluminum exposure cohort, there were: 9.7 more cases of neurodevelopmental disorder, 4.5 more cases of autistic disorder, and 8.7 more cases of the broader category of autism spectrum disorder. By exposing these dangerous deceptions, @HHSGov is signaling a new era of gold standard science, obliterated taboos, and public honesty. https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/flawed-science-bought-conclusions-the-aluminum-vaccine-study-the-media-wont-question-aaec2793

Flawed Science, Bought Conclusions: The Aluminum Vaccine Study the Media Won’t Question Transparent coverage of clinical research trialsitenews.com
SecKennedy
Posted - July 22, 2025 at 6:21 PM
Saved - July 23, 2025 at 9:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it horrifying that hospitals initiated the organ procurement process when patients showed signs of life. The organ procurement organizations must be held accountable, and we need to fix the entire system to ensure that every potential donor's life is treated with the respect it deserves.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Our findings show that hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life, and this is horrifying. The organ procurement organizations that coordinate access to transplants will be held accountable. The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential donor’s life is treated with the sanctity it deserves.

@HHSGov - HHS.gov

Under @SecKennedy's leadership, HHS is restoring integrity and transparency to organ procurement and transplant policy by putting patients’ lives first. These reforms are essential to restoring trust, ensuring informed consent, and protecting the rights and dignity of prospective donors and their families.

SecKennedy
Posted - June 30, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Saved - July 1, 2025 at 3:17 AM

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Thanks for the conversation, @TuckerCarlson.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Twenty years ago, Bobby Kennedy was exiled from polite society for suggesting a link between autism and vaccines. Now he’s a cabinet secretary, and still saying it. (0:00) The Organized Opposition to RFK’s Mission (6:46) Uncovering the Reason for Skyrocketing Rates of Autism (13:41) How Big Pharma Enslaves Doctors and Profits off Sickness (24:22) Is It Possible to End the Corrupt Relationship Between Big Pharma and Corporate Media? (33:35) Will RFK End Vaccine Company’s Lawsuit Immunity? (38:37) The Most Damaging Vaccine in History (47:49) Will There Be Compensation for the Vaccine-Injured? (53:47) Did the Covid Vaccine Kill More People Than It Saved? (57:50) RFK’s Firing of So-Called “Experts” (1:01:58) How Big Pharma Makes Billions off the Vaccine Schedule (1:05:08) The Real Reason Fauci Got a Pardon (1:10:42) When Will We See the Declassification of the JFK, RFK, and MLK Files? (1:20:51) How Trump Is Transforming Washington Includes paid partnerships.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. discusses a documentary, "High Crimes," about the Chinese mafia's drug operations in rural America. He claims that the mainstream media and Democrats oppose him due to their knee-jerk reaction against anything associated with Trump. He argues that Trump has paradoxically dictated the Democratic Party's platform, citing examples like NAFTA, war, intelligence agencies, free speech, and women's sports. Kennedy discusses his commissioned study of autism, criticizing the CDC's past studies as fraudulent and manipulated. He claims the Institute of Medicine recommended a range of studies, including comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, which the CDC failed to do. Kennedy says his agency will conduct real science by making databases public and funding independent scientists to study the issue, with initial answers expected by September. Kennedy alleges a system of perverse incentives in healthcare, where pharmaceutical companies, insurance companies, doctors, and hospitals profit from keeping people sick. He claims pharmaceutical companies buy protection from media companies through advertising revenue. Kennedy says the COVID vaccine recommendations have changed, and a new version will undergo real clinical trials. He also says that the COVID vaccine had a higher all-cause mortality in the vaccine group than in the placebo group. He expresses skepticism about mRNA vaccine technology and discusses his firing of the vaccine board due to conflicts of interest. Kennedy claims that Anthony Fauci was vulnerable and had liability for creating coronavirus. He also claims that Trump will release documents related to the murders of his father and uncle.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here's a story you probably haven't heard a lot about. The Chinese mafia is exploiting rural America to create a drug empire. This is not available on cable news. The network's not telling you about this, but it's totally real. Communist affiliated drug gangs destroying parts of The United States, the parts that Washington ignores, to sell drugs, laundering money and building a black market network inside this country's most beautiful but least served areas. We've got a brand new documentary on this. It's called High Crimes, the Chinese Mafia Takeover of Rural America. It's available now on Tucker Carlson dot com. It's excellent. The purchase of churches and schools to aid the operation, jerry rigging of power boxes to steal electricity, foreign pesticides, collusion with the Mexican cartels. It's it's unbelievable. By the way, one of the drug houses is, like, walking distance from my house. I didn't know that. It's a layered and fascinating story. Head to tuckercarlson.com to watch now. We think you'll love it. Mr. Secretary, thank you for doing this. I remember the night that Trump won talking to people in Washington, and their doomsday scenario, the thing that they feared more than North Korea getting the bomb, was you becoming Secretary of Health and Human Services. They really were afraid because they felt it was a threat not just to them, but to the whole business of the city. And I think a lot I mean, there's a reason they felt that way, and they probably still do. So what's that been like? What's the opposition been like, the organized opposition to your program? Speaker 1: Well, you know, the the irony is I'm not really getting opposition directly from the industry. Most of the industry wants things from this department, And we wanna get you know, we want American industry to profit. The pharmaceutical companies, everything else. And so and I think they know that, and they know that we're working with them. We're not. They also know they've been getting away with stuff up till now and that that era is over. I get opposition from proxies to the industry. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And I can I I think the major opposition that I feel is from the mainstream media and from Democrats, which is really that is an interesting phenomenon because these were people I was friends with my whole life? And, you know, I am not changed, and my values have not changed, and the policies that I've been advocating have not changed. But the party has just a knee jerk reaction against anything that is Trump. And you know that that, you know, president Trump's in this kind of a really paradoxical position where he not only has completely taken over the the Republican Party and dictates its platform, but he's also dictating the platform for the Democratic Party. Speaker 0: I've noticed. Speaker 1: Oh, if, you know, if if I I remember I I saw this for the first time on NAFTA. Democrats traditionally were against NAFTA, and as soon as president Trump came out against NAFTA, all the Democrats, you know, were now for NAFTA. The Democrats were the anti war party, but as soon as he expressed his opposition to the Ukraine war, they became the war party. The Democrats traditionally were the biggest critics of the CIA and the intelligence agencies, and as soon as President Trump started complaining about the power of the intelligence agencies in Washington, they became bonded with the intelligence agencies to the extent where they had for the first time in history a former CIA director speaking at their convention immediately before Kamala Harris. They were the party of free speech, and they became you know, when president Trump started advocating for free speech and his ability to to talk, you know, the shutdowns of him on Twitter and and these other really crazy efforts to suppress his the speech of a former president. He became a, you know, a major advocate of free speech, and the Democrats are now openly for censorship. The Democratic Party was the party of women's sports. My uncle wrote title nine, you know, making sure that women had the right to and had the equal access to the resources that they could play sports. And and the Democratic Party has become, you know, the the party of that is that is now the enemy of women's sports. And you can go on and on with those those examples, but president Trump is literally dictating the platform of the Democratic Party. Anything that he says, they're gonna be against. And, you know, that is also a departure from tradition. My father was very critical of partisanship. I remember him telling us when we were kids, I I don't vote for the Democratic Republic. I vote for the person whoever is supposed best on the job. And and, you know, that partisanship by its nature is dishonest, and it is the enemy of democracy. And that in Washington George Washington's farewell speech, he said that. He said he was very scared of the frightened about the rise of the political party because they would become self interested rather than patriotic. They would be interested they would become interested in promoting their own agendas and rather than the agenda of the country, and he thought that that would that that was a real threat to American democracy and to the, you know, this great experiment that we have in democracy. Speaker 0: I remember your first break with the Democratic Party and with personal friends, even members of your family, was a Rolling Stone piece that you wrote about autism asking why have autism rates risen, and you were kind of written out of plagued society for doing that. One of the first things you did as secretary, I think, tell me if I'm misstating it, is commissioned a kind of study of autism. Can you tell us what that is? What are you seeking to do with that? Speaker 1: Yeah. I mean, you know, the the studies there there are a handful of studies that CDC has generated on autism. They were all epidemiological studies, And they all say what the CDC wanted them to say is they couldn't find a link. The problem is that the Institute of Medicine, which is part of the National Academy of Sciences, had said in 2001 that the link between autism vaccine is biologically plausible. And they were highly critical of the way that CDC was making decisions about the vaccine schedule, that it was, you know, the the the this group, ACIP, which is an external panel, which has the responsibility of deciding which new vaccines will be added to the schedule, that they had essentially been captured by industry. The people who serve on that panel, almost all of them, financial entanglements with the industry. And the Institute of Medicine recommended a litany, a retinue of studies, including animal models, observational studies, bench studies, and epidemiological studies. They said, You need this whole retinue to answer this question. The CDC never did those. Instead, it commissioned the creation of these six epidemiological studies, and none of them does what? All of them were they use fraudulent techniques. You know, they say statistics don't lie, but statisticians do, and epidemiological studies are very easy to manipulate. None of those studies did what you would want what you would do if you wanted to find the answer, which is to compare outcomes in a fully vaccinated group to health outcomes in an unvaccinated group. And CDC did that study in 1999. They brought in a team of scientists under a Belgian researcher named Thomas Verstraten, and they looked at the data, they looked at children who had received the hepatitis vaccine within their first thirty days of life, and compare those children to children who had received the vaccine later or not at all. And they found an eleven hundred and thirty five percent elevated risk of autism among the vaccinated children. And it shocked them. They kept the study secret, and and they manipulated it through five different iterations to try to bury the link. And, you know, we know how they did it. They got rid of all the older children essentially, and just had younger children who were too young to be diagnosed. And they stratified stratified the data, and they did a lot of other tricks. And and all of those studies were the subject of those kind of that kind of trickery. And so what we're gonna do now and meanwhile, the external literature is showing, you know, over a 100 studies that show that there indicate that there is a link. But what we're gonna do now is we're going to do all the kind of studies that the Institute of Medicine originally recommended, and we're gonna do observational studies, retrospective studies, and epidemiological studies. We're gonna do real science. And the way that we're gonna do that is we're gonna make the databases public for the first time. We've gone into CDC. We've gotten the data from CMS, which is Medicaid and Medicare. We're getting the data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, which is the biggest repository for HMO health records. So those records would have all the records of vaccination subsequent health claims, and you can do a cluster analysis and look at see if there's an association. But and we're going to do some in house studies ourselves, but more importantly, we're going to make this data available for independent scientists so everybody can look at it. And then we have already put out requests grant requests, the general scientific communities, so that any scientist with credentials can apply for a grant and tell us how they want to go about studying these. And so we're going to get, you know, we're going get real studies done for the first time, and we should have some answers by September, some initial indicator answers, and then it'll take over the next six months all these large studies by independent scientists all over the world. We anticipate there'll probably be about 15 different major teams who are all trying to answer this question. And within six months, we'll have definitive answers after September. Speaker 0: So you get home from work on a Friday night at your site because you finished the entire week of work. It's time to reward yourself, so you go to the snack cabinet. And ten minutes later, you've consumed an entire bag of chips, your typical American chip brand, and you feel like garbage. Of course, you do. You just stuffed hundreds of calories of chemically laced seed oil infused crap into your mouth. This is not a good way to start the weekend. And who hasn't done it? Cast the first stone. But there is a better way. It's called Masa chips, Speaker 1: and Speaker 0: we have mountains of them in our house. Actually, have so many. They're in our garage. We bring them in every day and hit them hard, and they're great, and you can feel good about eating them. They they're delicious, and unlike the rest of this country's corrupted food supply, masa chips have no seed oils whatsoever. In fact, they have almost nothing in them except a few basic ingredients. Check the label, and you feel the difference. So they're not bad for you, and they are delicious. So the total package, they're beloved by thousands and endorsed by nutrition experts around the country. Masa is the way to go, m a s a. Visit masachips.com/tucker. Use the code Tucker for 25% off your first order. Masachips.com/tucker, code Tucker. You're gonna love them. And is it your expectation that those answers will differ from kind of status quo understanding? Speaker 1: I think they will. You know, my opinion, I always tell people, is irrelevant. We you know, people, we need to stop trusting the experts. Right? We were told at the beginning of COVID, don't look at any data yourself. Don't do any investigating yourself. Just trust the experts. And trusting the experts is not a feature of science. It's not a feature of democracy. It's a feature of religion, and it's a feature of totalitarianism. In democracies, we have the obligation, and it's one of the burdens of citizenship, to do our own research and make our own determinations about things. Mothers, when they go shopping, they don't trust the advertising. A good mother does not trust the advertising. They don't trust what they hear. They do their own research, and it's much harder way to live. But, you know, that is one of the burdens of living in a democracy is that we, you know, we do our own research. We make up our own minds, and and that's the way it should be done. And we're gonna give people gold standard science. We're gonna publish our protocols in advance. We're going to tell people what we're doing, and and then we're gonna use data, and we're gonna publish the peer reviews, which is never published by CDC studies. We're gonna publish any time that we can the raw data, and then we we're going to allow and then we're gonna require replication of every study, which never happens at NIH now. That's something new that we're bringing in, is that every study will be replicated. Speaker 0: I thought that was like a basic precept of science. We can't know something unless it can be unless the experiment showing it can be replicated. Right? Speaker 1: Yeah. That that is a basic precept of science, and, unfortunately, it has the kind of science that was done by NIH. You know, NIH was the gold standard agency when I was a kid, but they stopped doing that. And it it incentivized a lot of cheating. And the reason it incentivizes cheating is that if you're a scientist, your career depends on how much you publish. And so if you have a hypothesis and you say, this is my hypothesis, this is the study that I wanna do, and you get a grant from NIH, and the hypothesis turns out to be wrong, you know, it doesn't it it the science does not support it. A lot of times, you cannot get that study published. That's science. It's science when you when you you know, a null hypothesis is science, and it ought to be published, but the the journals won't do it. And also the journals won't publish anything that is is critical of vaccines. They just they they won't do it because the there's so much pressure on them. They're they're funded by the pharmaceutical companies and they'll lose advertising, they'll lose revenue from reprints if they don't do that. So even Marcia Engel, who is a long time, I think twenty five years at the New England Journal of Medicine, she said, can't believe anything that's in the scientific journals anymore. Richard Horton, who's the longtime editor of The Lancet, is the same same thing. He says, we've become propaganda vessels for the pharmaceutical companies. And the pharmaceutical company, now you have to pay to get something published in these journals. And so the pharmaceutical companies pay for something. They give a you know, they hire these, you know, these mercenary scientists, we call them biostitudes, do a study that will validate their product and, you know, say that this statin drug works against heart attacks, and they'll mess with the data because they want it published. They're being paid by the pharmaceutical companies. And then once it's published, the the journal will make available preprints. The preprint is a little like a little magazine with the logo of the Lancet on the front, and it has that one article that says this statin drug works or this SSRI works. And then they have tens of thousands of pharmaceutical reps who will take those journal articles and go to every doctor's office in the country and say, you know, and they're usually, let me put it this way, hot looking women or, you know, and they'll Right. They'll go take the doctor out to lunch. They'll say, you know, why don't you start prescribing this drug? And they'll incentivize the doctor in all kinds of ways to do that. And so the doctors also have their own incentives, you know, prefers incentives. There's a published article out there now that says that 50% of of revenues to most pediatricians come from from vaccines. And then there's a whole structure where Blue Cross and the other insurance companies pay bonuses to the pediatrician to make sure if, for example, 95% of their if their clients are fully vaccinated, they get a huge bonus. It could be tens of thousands of dollars. And that's why your pediatrician, if you say, want to go slow on the vaccines, or I want to have a little different schedule, your pediatrician will throw you out of his practice, because you're now jeopardizing that bonus structure. And these are all perverse incentives that stop doctors from actually practicing medicine and caring for the client because they're looking at the bottom line. Twenty years ago, 20% of the doctors in this country worked for corporations. Today, 80% do. And that corporation is telling you, you know, we don't care what happens to your patient. Know, we care about how much revenue you're generating. And, you know, these doctors are coming out of medical schools with ginormous bills, and that will bankrupt them if they don't have a job. And so they're under tremendous pressure just to to keep generating those funds, and the whole system, as you know, is it's just a bundle of perverse incentives that, you know, that where everybody is making money by keeping us sick. You know? And I'm not saying that's deliberate or purposeful or or, you know, planned in any way. It's just the incentive system that everybody makes money. Insurance companies make money if you're sick, ironically. They make more money if the population is sick. And, you know, that may seem counterintuitive to people. And a guy said to me once who worked for AIG, one of the big insurance companies, he said I said I said, I wanna go with some data to AIG and show them that, you know, what they're doing is actually can show them on paper. What they're doing is actually making their people sicker, and and they're the one group that you would think would want healthy people because they'd have to pay out less. And this guy said to me, think of it this way. If you're Lloyd's of London and you insure all the shipping in the world, is it better for you if one ship sinks a year or if 500 sink a year? And I would say I I said to him, it's it's better if only one sinks. He said, no. It's better if 500 sink because then everybody has to get insurance. And what the insurance companies are collecting money, money is friction. Oh, they're taking a cut of the revenues that come through them. The more people that buy insurance, it doesn't matter what the claims are. If the claims are high, they just raise their premiums. And and the it's the amount of money that flows in the system that gives them money. So they're making money that way. The doctors are making money from keeping us sick. The hospitals are making money from keeping us sick. The pharmaceutical companies are making money from keeping us sick. Yeah. So every level of the system is is is incentivized financially no matter what your intention is as a doctor. If you're a doctor, of course, you don't want sick patients. But there's tremendous pressure from every angle of the system to actually you know, to keep us all sick, and we're now the sickest nation in the world. Speaker 0: Last year, we did an interview with a woman called Casey Means. She's a surgeon educated at Stanford. She's the nominee for Surgeon General right now. She really is one of the most amazing people I have ever met. The interview made me emotional. In it, she explained how the food that we eat, produced by huge food companies in conjunction with pharma, is wrecking our health and wrecking this country, making it weak and sick. She's the co founder of a health care technology company called Levels, and we're proud to partner with them. And by proud, mean actually proud. For real. Most of us are not metabolically healthy. Even worse, we're not aware that we're not. We have no idea where our health stands. As we speak now, we don't know how to improve it. With Levels Labs, you'll get insight into your health to help you understand where you are to measure and optimize your well-being. It is the best thing you can do to get a picture of where your health stands and how to make it better. The Levels app works with something called the glucose monitor CGM. And now the Levels membership comes with a 28, giving you a comprehensive view of your health with clear guidance on how to improve it. You can also get the extended panel, which gives you an even more detailed view with a 100 plus biomarkers, real time personal data, so you take control of your health for the better. You know what happens when you eat certain things. We just got word that Levels is offering this shows listeners annual memberships with an additional two free months through the website. The website is levels.link/tucker. That's levels.link/tucker, two months free. One of the reasons that there hasn't been much of a discussion you said there were signals in 1999 that there was a connection between autism and vaccines. The response from the American media was just to throw you out, take away your New York Times presence Yeah. Ban you from Rolling Stone, etcetera, attack you as a Nazi. You made the point years later that the reason that happened was because pharmaceutical companies are the single biggest source of revenue for a lot of media companies, and they're buying the protection with that money. Speaker 1: And that's another perverse incentive. Right? Speaker 0: Absolutely. I think we're one of only two countries in the world that allow that. Can that be stopped? Speaker 1: There are those that's a question that we are looking at right now, you know, and there's a bad Supreme Court case from a couple of years ago that that gave that essentially anointed pharmaceutical advertising with First Amendment protection. That there the First Amendment protects political speeches. So if you have you're saying something, you know, political, you should have absolute protection under the First Amendment. If commercial speech has a lower level of protection And and the pharmaceutical advertising was regulated as commercial speech, and it was until 1990, really around 1992, it was you didn't see pharmaceutical ad words. There was no direct to consumer advertising on TV. And after that, and then they there were new more changes made in 1997, that's when it became you know, it exploded. And today, Roger Ailes, who both you and I knew, you know, I had this very Roger Ailes, for your audience who doesn't know him, which I think most of them do, was the founder of Fox News. And I had this odd relationship with him because politically we were at loggerheads, but I had spent when I was 19 years old, I spent three months with him in a tent in Africa. And I and we developed a friendship then. And as you know, he was very, you know, he was a very engaging guy. He was very witty, really fun to be with, very paranoid, but at the same time, brilliant. Yes. And he and so he was very kind to me. He was a very loyal friend to me, and he would make Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly and Neil Cavuto and all the other hosts, your former colleagues, put me on TV to talk about the environment. Even though he didn't agree with me on it, he made them put me on. So during the eighties and nineties, I I was the only environmentalist who was going on Fox News. But I brought him one time this this around I think it was, like, 2014, I brought him a documentary that we had done about mercury and vaccines, and he had he watched it. He was completely sold on it. He had a family member who had been affected, he felt. And he said, but I can't put you on because if I did, I if any of my hosts allowed you on to talk about this issue, I would have to fire them. And if I didn't, I would get a call from Ruper within ten minutes. And he said, for the evening news division, about 75% of the advertising revenues are coming from pharma. And then he told me something that, if I remember it correctly, he said that on a typical evening news show, there are 22 ads and 17 of those are pharmaceutical ads. And so this was the principal source of revenue, and for a lot of these television networks, it's keeping them alive. As you know, they're all, you know, kind of collapsing financially. Collapsing due to lack of Speaker 0: popular demand for their presence. Right. So could you end that? Do you have the authority as the secretary of Health and Human Services to say no more pharm ads on television? Well, Speaker 1: you know, a lot of the pharmaceutical ads are are misleading. Yeah. And and even the music and the and the, you know, the the the video, the photos, or the that they show, the scenes that they show are that's kind of speech, and it's misleading. It's sending a message. And if you take this drug, you're being gonna be riding jet skis and playing volley ball and, you know, water skiing and Have a great looking spouse. And then the side effects, meanwhile, are rolling, you know, at 80 miles an hour, and that's misleading. And so one of the things that we, you know, that we're we're looking at is is making them be more honest about what they what they show so that the the public is you know? And, you know, there's a form of sort of advertising. It is insidious for a number of reasons. That's why they they don't allow it anywhere else in the world. New Zealand has a very, very limited allowance of direct to consumer advertising, very, very highly controlled compared to us. It's nothing. People who come over here from England or Europe and watch our TV are shocked by what they're seeing on it. And it it's insidious because of this. The pharmaceutical advertisers are advertising the most expensive version of every drug. They're not gonna advertise the generics because they're not making any So they're advertising the ones that are the highest profit margins for them. And normally, if you see an advertisement on TV, like for Coca Cola, you then have a choice to go get that, and then you're paying out of your pocket for it. When somebody buys a pharmaceutical drug, it's it's Medicaid and Medicare that are paying for it. It's us. It's the taxpayer. So they're advertising something to the consumer when the consumer has no skin in the game. And then the consumer and we're paying for the ads because they're tax deductible. So they're we're paying for them to advertise, the advertisements are getting people to buy drugs that may be ineffective, that may be the least effective drug of the ones that are available. And they go to their physician. The physician is is told by his boss who's the, you know, the corporate bean counter, you have 11 with each patient and that's it. And the physician then can spend that eleven minutes trying to talk the patient out of something that they want, and then the patient's going go away unsatisfied. Or the physician could just say, alright. You want this prescription. I'll write it for you. And then, you know, that patient is then gonna come back because he's happy. The doctors hate it. The American Medical Association has been against it for, you know, for thirty years, and nobody thinks that this is good for public health. It is hurting us, and it's distorting the markets, and it is not it's not a you can't even call it a a free market because everything's paid for by the federal government. Speaker 0: So here's a company we're always excited to advertise because we actually use their products every day. It's Merriweather Farms. Remember when everybody knew their neighborhood butcher? You look back and you feel like, oh, there was something really important about that, knowing the person who cut your meat. And at some point, your grandparents knew the people who raised their meat so they could trust what they ate. But that time is long gone. It's been replaced by an era of grocery store mystery meat boxed by distant beef corporations. None of which raised a single cow. Unlike your childhood, they don't know you. They're not interested in you. The whole thing is creepy. The only thing that matters to them is money, and god knows what you're eating. Merriweather Farms is the answer to that. They raise their cattle in The US, in Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado, and they prepare their meat themselves in their facilities in this country. No middlemen, no outsourcing, no foreign beef sneaking through a backdoor. Nobody wants foreign meat. Sorry. We have a great meat, the best meat here in The United States, and we buy ours at Merriweather Farms. Their cuts are pasture raised, hormone free, antibiotic free, and absolutely delicious. I gorged on one last night. You gotta try this for real. Every day we eat it. Go to merriweatherfarms.com/tucker. Use the code Tucker 76 for 15% off your first order. That's merriweatherfarms.com/tucker. So if in starting in September when we start to see the results of the analysis of these massive datasets that you're putting out there in public, And if we if it becomes clear that there is a connection between autism and vaccines vaccines the government promoted, in some cases effectively required that's a tort. I mean, that means there are a lot of injured people who can now show they were injured by this product. How were they made whole? What happens to them? Speaker 1: Well, that's going to be complicated because in 1986, Congress passed an act, the Vaccine Act, the on National vaccine injury compensation program, and they gave the vaccine companies immunity from liability. So no matter how reckless the company is, no matter how toxic the product, no matter how egregious your injury, you cannot sue them. And that's one of the problems is and that actually is why we one of the reasons we had this explosion of the vaccination program. When, you know, when I was a kid, we only had three vaccines. And by 1986, the year the act was passed, there were 11 doses of, I think, five vaccines. And today, there are a a child to to to go to school in states like California and New York and many other states where you have mandates, the an American child now has to receive between sixty nine and ninety two vaccines between conception. So some of those are given to the mom during pregnancy and age 18. And the reason it's 69 to 82 is some of the vaccines have or or the different brands have different dose requirements. So some will require three doses. Some will require one dose. Some will require four doses. But that's a lot of vaccines for a kid, and each one of those is calculate is is designed to permanently alter your immune system. And so we have now this epidemic of immune dysregulation in our country, you know, and there's no way to rule out vaccines as one of the key culprits. And if you look at all of these diseases that have become epidemic, diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, all of these seizure disorders, neurological disorders like ADD, ADHD, speech delayed, language delayed, tics, Tourette syndrome, narcolepsy, ASD, autism, all the diseases. UNN, I never saw when we were kids. And suddenly, there this generation is damaged, is incredibly damaged by all these disease. The autoimmune diseases like diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, the allergic disease like peanut allergies, anaphylaxis, eczema. I did you ever know anybody with eczema? No. Right. So and now it's ubiquitous in every classroom. And all of those injuries are listed as side effects on the manufacturer's inserts of those products. Oh, we would be have to be blind and not say we have to look at this as a potential culprit. We have to do the studies that the Institute of Medicine has been telling the CDC to do for twenty five years. The Institute of Medicine old CDC in 2013, there are a hundred and fifty one a hundred and fifty eight injuries that are suspected to be vaccine injuries. Only thirty eight of those have been studied, and almost most of those, it was positive. It was yeah. This is a vaccine entry. The other hundred and twenty whatever, and I'm not doing the math in my head, but the others have never been studied. CDC's job is to study them, and yet it never studied them. And that was purposeful. And I'm not saying that out of speculation. I'm saying that because I've seen the emails. CDC deliberately derailed any study on that. And and if somebody does independent scientist does do a study, they can't get it published. The scientific publishers will not publish a study that is critical of vaccines. So we need to change that taboo, and that's one of the things Jay Bhattacharya is doing at NIH is we're gonna remove the taboo about talking about this issue, and we're gonna Speaker 0: be honest with the American public. It's pretty clear from the VAERSO self reporting vaccine injury system, federal system, that vaccine injuries with the COVID vax, like, jumped, you know, to multiples of what had been reported before. Speaker 1: Do There there were more injuries reported from theirs by the by the COVID vaccine than all other vaccines put together for the past thirty six years. And I'll I'll tell you something else. There's a lot of people out there who say, you know, this is part of the the the the consensus is you'll see this on every mainstream Anderson Cooper, Jake Tapper, all of these guys say again and again that the the link between autism vaccines has been debunked. Right? That it's been studied. But those studies that I was talking about earlier, the epidemiological studies, they only looked at one vaccine, the MMR, and one ingredient, Thyme aerosol. The none of the vaccines that are are administered to children during the first six months of life have ever been studied for autism. In fact, the Institute of Medicine said that they looked at this issue, you know, it hasn't been debunked. And they and they said, no. These studies have never been done on the vaccines that are the most likely cold bread, which is, you know, DTaP, hep b, and pneumococcal. The the vaccines grew up in the first six months. None of them he said the only one that has ever been studied is DTaP, which is diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. And they said that the one study that was done showed that, yeah, there was a link with autism, but we're not gonna count that study because it was based on the VAERS system, which is CDC's only surveillance system. And they said that system is too unreliable. So they what they were saying, the Institute of Medicine, which is part of the National Academy of Sciences, That's the only system that CDC has to study vaccine injury is so bad that any study done done on it, we're not gonna count. I'll tell you something else. David Kessler, was a very famous surgeon general, who you remember, and many, many, many other people have said that their system does not work and you need a new system. So in 2010, CDC designed a new system, and it was a machine counting system. The problem with VAERS, with the vaccine adverse event reporting system, is that it's voluntary. Yes. And so the doctor has to if he sees a vaccine injury, he's required to report it to VAERS. But there's no penalty if he doesn't. It takes him a half an hour to fill out the paperwork. So there's a big incentive for him not to do it. There's another incentive, though. He doesn't know if something is vaccine you get if you get a vaccine and then four months four years later, you come in with a food allergy, How do you know? Will any doctor in the world say that's a vaccine injury or seizure disorders? And the other thing is so they don't know, you know, what to look for. They've never been taught that at medical school. There's no course on vaccine injury in medical school in any medical school in this country. And then the other thing is he has a big emotional incentive because he told that mom to give that child that vaccine. And if the child has a seizure three weeks later and she comes back and and she says, I think it might be the vaccine, a lot of doctors will say, no. That's normal for that age, They're not going to call it into theirs. So CDC designed a machine counting system that would do essentially cluster analysis. They would look at the vaccine and then they would look at clusters of injuries that were unique or anomalous to that vaccine. And it was a very accurate system according to the, you know, the group that designed it. It was a team led by a guy called Lazarus. And CDC paid for the whole thing, millions of dollars, and it was a long term study. And they looked at one HMO, which was Harvard Pilgrim up in Massachusetts, and they did they did this this machine counting system for Harvard Pilgrim, and then they compared what the machine counting system had gotten, you know, had yielded and collected in terms of vaccine entries, and they compared that to what VAERS had collected during the same period at Harvard Pilgrim. And they said that VAERS was capturing fewer than one percent of vaccine injuries. And they had a system now that would capture over ninety five percent, and they were very proud, and they brought it to CDC and said our system works. Here's the data. The data showed injuries in about two point seven percent of of vaccines. Of all vaccines? Yeah. All vaccines. About two point seven percent. Wow. Which I think is something like one out of every thirty seven vaccines you get, there's an injury. And CDC saw that and said, we're not going to use the system. And they shelved it in 2010, and they've continued to use now for, you know, twenty two years when they know that it doesn't work, when it was designed to fail. We're going to absolutely change VAERS, and we're gonna make it we're we're going to create either within VAERS or supplementary to VAERS a system that actually works. Oh, and, you know, that right now, even that system is antiquated because we have access to AI. And one of the you know, we are creating here at HHS an AI revolution. We've been able to attract the the top people from Silicon Valley, people who've walked away from billion dollar businesses, and they don't want prestige. They don't want position. They don't want power. They wanna change. They wanna make the system work. And we're we're gonna we are at the cutting edge of of AI. We're implementing it in all of our departments. At FDA, we're we're accelerating drug approvals so that you don't need to use primates or even animal models. You can, you know, you can do the drug approvals very, very quickly with AI. And we're also implementing a CMS to detect waste, abuse, and fraud, which is it's extraordinary at that. But we're also gonna, you know, use it on the at CDC and and throughout our system to look at the mega data that we have and be able to make really good decisions about interventions. For example, if you look at the population as a whole and say, okay, we're using three different diabetes drugs with five different statin drugs or all these SSRIs and others. You can then look drug by drug, and you can tell on the population whether it's working or not and which one is giving you the best bang for the buck and which one has the most side effects. We have a potential now to use AI in ways that are gonna revolutionize medicine. You probably heard about Eight Sleep. Lots of people Speaker 0: are talking about it. It is a company with one mission, improving your sleep, And it's changing the way people do that, the way they get a good night's rest. We just got word that their team is launching a new product. It's called the Pod five. It's an original and innovative mattress cover plus a blanket that uses precision temperature control to regulate your body's sleep cycles and give you the perfect sleep, which really, really matters. It can range all the way from 55 degrees to a 110 degrees, meaning that you're covered no matter what. It's like electric blanket to the next level, but also a cooling blanket. So it makes you sleep better. Temperature has a massive effect on the way you sleep. By the way, it also detects snoring. And then it adjusts your bed position to reduce or completely stop it. So there are a lot of ladies in America who are gonna be grateful for this product. Everybody who works here will tell you, because they all use it, that there's no better way to be alert, productive, and happy than by sleeping well, and Eight Sleep really does help. Visit 8sleep.com/tucker. Use the code tucker to get $350 off your Pod five Ultra. If you don't like it, you return it within a month. That won't happen. We think you'll love it, but you can if you want. 8sleep.com/tucker. What about all the people who are injured by the COVID vax? There are a lot of them. I know a lot of them. Some died. Some were permanently disabled. Nobody seems to care. You never hear about them, and they don't seem to be getting any help. What will that change? Speaker 1: Yeah. That's gonna change. I mean, as I said, the big impediment is 1986 Vaccine Act. Yes. And so it's complicated about how we fix this, you know, so that we can get compensation to those people. We just brought a guy in this week who's going to be revolutionizing the vaccine injury compensation program, which is a program you know, when when congress or when congress passed the vaccine act and gave immunity from liability vaccine companies, it it recognized that vaccines were in the word of the in a in a in the description, the characterization of the American Academy of Pediatrics were unavoidably unsafe. And some people, like for every medicine, some people are gonna be injured and killed. And so it set up a program that's in the federal government called the vaccine courts, and they have a trust fund. The trust fund is endowed by a 75¢ surcharge on every vaccine. And that program is supposed to there's supposed to be a vaccine court that's supposed to be generous and fast and and give the tie to the runner. In other words, if there's doubts about, you know, whether somebody's injury came from vaccine or not, you're gonna assume they got it and and compensate them. And it's paid out over $5,000,000,000 now to about 12,000 people. And we're we're looking at ways to enlarge that program so that COVID vaccine injured people can be compensated. And we're changing the program so that, you know, we're we're looking at ways to enlarge the statute of limitations. It's only three years. A lot of people don't discover their injuries after that. And the there's no discovery in that program. There's no rules of evidence. The program has default into lawyers from the justice. You're not suing the vaccine company. You're you're petitioning the my agency, and it's represented traditionally by the Department of Justice. And the lawyers in the Department of Justice, the leaders of it were corrupt, and they were they saw their job as protecting the trust fund rather than taking care of people who made this national sacrifice. And we're gonna change all that. And I've brought in a team this week that is starting to work on that this week. So, you know, that's one of the things we're doing, but we're looking at everything. Speaker 0: What's the status of the COVID vax now? Who gets it? What are the recommendations, and why? Speaker 1: The recommendations now are children 18 are not recommended to get the vaccine, but they can get it if they want. You know, it's through a joint consultation with their physician. So it's available to them. There is an and, you know, that there there's a new version of the COVID vaccine that just came out. That was approved by FDA, and that vaccine is going to actually do real clinical trials. So and it's being given to people who are 65 years older or have, you know, profound, quote, comorbidities. But the agreement with the company is that everybody who takes it will be part of a clinical trial. So we'll actually get some real data. And as you know, there was just data chaos with the other vaccine. In fact, you know, the the Pfizer vaccine, when it came out, it should it it had a higher all cause mortality, so more people died in the placebo group. I mean, more people died in the vaccine group than in the placebo group. I had twenty thousand people who got the vaccine, twenty thousand who didn't, and after six months, they looked at it, and there was twenty three percent more deaths in the vaccinated group from all causes than in the placebo group. And the the efficacy was kind of dubious because Well, yeah. There was only two people who died from COVID in the placebo group, and there was one person who died from COVID in the vaccine group, and that's the whole dataset they were were looking at. And so they said, you remember they were saying the vaccine is a 100% effective? Well, that's why they were saying it because there was a there was two two is a 100% of one. Right? A 100% larger than one. So that but that's what they had. But they were telling the American people is a 100% effective. And that when people heard that, they thought if you get the vaccine, you can't get COVID, which, of course, now we now everybody realizes was wrong because everybody got COVID whether they got the vaccine or not. And, you know, what they really should have been telling people is that in order to prevent one death from COVID, you had to give 19,999 vaccines. If any of those vaccines were killing people, you would cancel out the effect of you know, the beneficial effect. Speaker 0: Do you think the COVID I mean, net net, as we say in business just kidding. Do you think overall the COVID vaccine killed more than it saved? Speaker 1: My opinion about that is irrelevant. What we're gonna try to do is make that science available so the public can look at the science. Yep. And I would not say one way or the other, and the truth is I don't know. And the reason I don't know is because the studies that were done by my agency were substandard, and they were not designed to answer that question. And there's been a lot of obfuscation about covering up, as you know, about suppressing any kind of discussion of vaccine injuries. I mean, Mark Zuckerberg publicly said that he was ordered by the White House to suppress anybody on his platform, on Facebook or Instagram, who mentioned vaccine injuries. Oh, he was ordered by the Biden administration to and he said, you know, I he said, I was stunned. I was being ordered by the federal government to deny facts. Anybody can look him up on YouTube saying that. So and we know that too because I sued the Biden administration, and we got all this discovery documents that showed that he was at thirty seven hours after he took the oath of office swearing to uphold the constitution, he opened up a group in the White House who were whose job it was to suppress any dissent about, you know, this government policy. And I was the first person that they went after. Thirty seven hours after he took that oath, they were telling Facebook to take me off of Instagram, which Facebook did. I had almost a million followers, and there was no vaccine misinformation on there. I asked Facebook again and again, show me one fact I got wrong. Everything I put on there that, you know, was vaccine related was cited and sourced to government databases or to peer reviewed publications. And but they were you know, it was not it wasn't misinformation the word in fact, they had to invent a new word, which is because Facebook was saying to the White House, this isn't misinformation. It's actually true. And the White House said, well, it's malinformation. Malinformation, this is an Orwellian kind of construct, and, you know, malinformation is information that is factually true, but it is nevertheless inconvenient for for the government. And they, you know, they just all the people who are now running this agency were censored. OJ Botticelli censored. Marty Makary was censored. Doctor Oz was censored. Vinay Prasad was censored. We were all censored. I was censored. Speaker 0: I remember well. What's what's the status of the COVID vaccine pregnant women? Speaker 1: The recommendation has been removed now for pregnant women. Speaker 0: Are you satisfied that mRNA technology is safe for people? Speaker 1: I'm not satisfied. You know, again, you know, my opinion about that is irrelevant, but we will be doing those studies. And I would say there's a lot of skepticism in this agency about mRNA vaccines. Yep. You know, about mRNA technology, about the status of it now, about whether it's safe. And we do not you know, the safety studies simply have not been done, but there is enough anecdotal reports of people getting profound injuries that may or may not be associated with it, and we're gonna answer those questions. Speaker 0: What happened with the vaccine board? I keep reading you fired all these eminent scientists on the vaccine board. Speaker 1: Yeah. I fired all these what? Speaker 0: All all these important highly credentialed scientists. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, we fired that board because they were it was an utterly it was just an instrument. It was a sock puppet for the industry that it was supposed to regulate. So, you know, they in fact, you know, and this was a long time coming, Tucker. In 02/2002, the government oversight committee and the United States Congress held hearings about that board, which is called the ASIP, Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And they said that 97% of the people on that board had undisclosed conflicts. Many of them had disclosed conflicts as well. But they said that congress said that it gave an example. It said rotavirus vaccine was approved by that board, and there were five members of that board at that time, and four of them had direct financial interests in the rotavirus vaccine. And they were working for the companies that made the vaccine, or they were receiving grants to do clinical trials on that vaccine. They all had overwhelming financial interest. One of the people on that board was a guy called Paul Offit, and who is one of the big voices for vaccines that they CNN goes to him all the time when it wants to have vaccines. He voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule when he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. Because it's now on the schedule, he is developing vaccine. It's virtually guaranteed to get on the schedule. It's a competitive product. But once you say rotavirus vaccine has to be vaccinated for, his vaccine is now guaranteed to get on the schedule. The one they voted on that he voted on, within a year it had to be withdrawn because it was causing this really disastrous disease in kids that is often lethal, called the intussusception, agonizingly painful when your intestines kind of tie up against each other. It kills children, you know, on on occasion. That vaccine was pulled the following year, and his vaccine then replaced it. He was still on the committee. He didn't vote on that, but he was still on the committee. But he Speaker 0: voted to make rotavirus vaccine mandatory for And Speaker 1: he he he then he and his business partners, Stanley Plotkin and, you know, a couple of other people sold that vaccine and to Merck for a $186,000,000. He told Newsweek that he won the lottery. Oh, you know, it's been said of him that he voted himself rich. So that and that kind of conflict was typical on that committee, but that was the most. Speaker 0: Did did people know this was going on? That that's such an obvious Speaker 1: conflict. The office of inspector general in this department investigated, and they said this is a disaster. You gotta change it. Congress investigated and said you gotta change it, and they did nothing. That's the most most sort of glaring example of medical malpractice by this by this group is that they approved all these vaccines. We went from 11, remember, to 69 to 92. 11 vaccines in '86, and not one of them had except for COVID. COVID is the only one that had a prelicensing safety trial that involved a placebo, a true placebo. And so all of those other vaccines were ushered in without safety studies, and that means nobody understands the risk profile of those products. Speaker 0: How how can you do that? Speaker 1: That's they did it. It's corruption. And it's, you know, it's because of agency capture. It's because the companies that were making these products had if you can get your vaccine on the schedule, it's it's generally, typically, about a billion dollars a year for your company because you now have a trapped market. Speaker 0: With no downside. No. You've got Speaker 1: an immediate issue. First of all, the federal government oftentimes actually designs the vaccine. NIH would design it. It would hand it over to the pharmaceutical company. The pharmaceutical company then runs it through ASIP, and runs it first through FDA, then through ASIP, and gets it recommended. If you can get that recommendation, you you now got a billion dollars in in lease revenues by the end of the year every year forever. So so there was, you know, there was a gold rush to add new vaccines to the schedule, and this and Aisin never turned away a single vaccine. Everyone that was that came to them, they, you know, recommended. And a lot of these vaccines are for diseases that are not even casually contagious. You know? How are you you know? I mean, the you know, they recommended the hepatitis b vaccine for for babies when they're an hour old. The first day of life, they get that. And, you know, hepatitis b, if your mother's got it, you you should get it. And you can, you know, you can pass through maternal transmission. But every mother that goes to the hospital in this country is tested for it. So we know which ones, you know, are vulnerable, which aren't. Oh, but the mass vaccination of the entire population, including wild children, this is a disease you get through sexual transmission or you get it from sharing needles. And particularly, it was prevalent among promiscuous gay men. And but a one day old baby has the risk to a one day old baby was one in seven million. Speaker 0: Very few of whom are promiscuous. Speaker 1: Very few of whom are, you know, uninvolved in prostitution or drug addiction. So, you know but it was a financial they were all financial drivers. So and a lot of the diseases that they target are not disease are the vaccine itself does not prevent transmission. And so, you know, the justification for having it mandated is is very ephemeral. And, you know, these are all things that we need to look at. We wanna protect public health, but, you know, that means protecting against chronic disease too. And, you know, these vaccines have there's nobody who will contest that they cause that they can cause chronic disease, chronic injuries that last a lifetime. So Speaker 0: one of the reasons that this system has become so cryptic, I think it's fair to say, is Anthony Fauci, one of the longest serving federal employees, who was the subject of one of the bestselling books of a couple of years ago, which he wrote, The Real Anthony Fauci, amazing book. And all this information about him was exposed to the world, and he gets some sina care at Georgetown and still has secret service protection. He seems to be thriving. Speaker 1: He doesn't have a secret service protection. Any longer? No. President Trump took that away from him. But Good. He he, you know, he is he got immunity. Why did he need immunity? You know, why did he need a pardon in advance? Speaker 0: What what do you think the answer is? Speaker 1: I, you know, I would be speculating, but I think he I think they're I think he was vulnerable. I think he had a lot of liability on creating coronavirus. You know, he was funding precisely that research at the Wuhan Lab. Yep. And he was giving them the technology. He was giving them you know, he gave them not only the technology, the precise technology for developing that pathogen, and published about it, by the way. And, you know, the publications credit NIH for the for the for the for financing the studies. But also gave them one of his fundees, Ralph Barack, from the University of North Carolina, developed a technique called the seamless ligation technique, which is a technique for hiding the laboratory origins of a a of a manipulated virus. So that normally, if there's a virus manipulated, you can look at it, you know, research can look at it, they can look at the DNA sequences, and they can say this thing was created in a lab. Ralph Barack had developed a technique that he called the no see technique, and its technical name was seamless ligation, and it was a way of hiding evidence of human tampering. What is the public health rationale? You would if you were interested in public health, you would wanna be doing the inverse of that. You would wanna be pinning red flags all to it and say this was created by people. Speaker 0: That's what you would do if you're creating viruses for biological warfare. Speaker 1: Right. That's right. And and that's another question is why would he give it to the Chinese? I mean, that was a military lab. It was run by the military. Speaker 0: It's hard to even understand that. What do you I mean, what would be the rationale for doing that? I, Speaker 1: you know, I I try not to look in other people's heads. I I try like in the Fauci book, I never look in and and speculate about what his motives are. I just say this is what he did. But I do think that there's this among a lot of the people who were doing that kind of research, the gain of function research, are big career economic and professional incentives to break ground, to break new ground and say, you know, I just one of his of his fundees created a avian flu virus, which can be very deadly to humans if you can make it to human to human transition, a transmission. And he developed one that could jump to mammals. Why would you do that? You know, you're just you're inviting a catastrophe and and they published it and and bragged about it. And I think there's this kind of this kind of I don't know whether I would call it a god complex or something where, you know, some of the people in that field seem to have this this kind of get some kind of sense of omnipotence or something from, you know, developing something that can kill all of humanity. Yes. But I don't know. That's that is sheer speculation. Speaker 0: That sounds right to me. So it sounds like Fauci is beyond the reach of the law at this point. Speaker 1: Yeah. There I I think generally, unless there was a truth commission, you know, which they did and as you know in South Africa. Yes. They did it in Central America after the, you know, the nineteen eighties wars there, and and they were very, helpful to those societies. And, you know, I think we should probably do something like that now. And in those cases, what happens is you have a commission that hears testimony on what exactly happened. Anybody who comes and volunteers to testify truthfully is then given immunity from prosecution. And but so that at least the public knows who did what. Yes. And people who are called and don't take that deal and purge themselves, they then can be they can be prosecuted criminally. Speaker 0: We don't have a good track record of revealing the truth in a timely manner. As you know better than anybody, the president on January 23 issued an executive order ordering the full declassification of files related to the murder of your uncle, father, and Martin Luther King. And, you know, we we haven't seen all of them yet. Where is that process? Have your conclusions about any or all of those three murders changed on the base of new documents? Speaker 1: No. Nothing's changed. I mean, you know, as you know, there's already millions of pages of documents out there. And I think, you know, in in terms of my uncle's death, I think that, you know, that that ship has sailed. I I I don't think anybody who actually is willing to read the evidence now will question the fact that my uncle was killed by a conspiracy. And that in fact, Congress in 1973, when the church committee looked at I think it was '73 Speaker 0: 'seventy five. Yeah. Speaker 1: What? 'seventy five. Yep. Church committee, and they said it was conspiracy. That was the conclusion of the congressional So the Warren Committee that was run by Alan Dulles, who was, you know, had a lot of reasons to lie and did lie throughout. And in fact, he said at one of the sections, yeah, if we were involved in this, we would lie. Oh, he said that. And he and he got himself put on that committee, and he was really he should have been called the Dulles Commission or, you know, he said it's a single shooter. But but then, you know, in '75, that was '64. So eleven years later, Congress investigated, and they had a much larger purview. They had much more data at that time. And they said it was a conspiracy. And but since then, there's been million documents released, and and probably 30 people who were involved and made confessions, including many of the prime actors. And so I don't think there is any doubt that my uncle was killed by a conspiracy. My father is is more difficult because we just don't have the data. It's never been investigated. And, you know, I've been trying to get it investigated. You know, one of the women who played potentially a key role in it was a a woman called there's a one woman in the polka dot dress who was who was who appeared to be Sir Hans Handler. And that woman is living openly in Tarzana, California. Nobody's ever talked to her. And she you know, people should this should be investigated, and people should talk to her and, you know, really investigate the crime. So and and as you know, and I think I I've talked to you about this before, my father, you know, Sirhan was there. There were 77 eyewitnesses in the kitchen at the time, and he took two shots of my father. One of those shots hit Paul Schrad in the head, and Paul Schrad survived. And the other one hit the door jam behind my father, and it was later removed by the LAPD. And then Sirhan was grabbed by six people, including Rafer Johnson, Rosie Greer, Carl Ulrich, who is the manager of the Ambassador Hotel. And they they turned his gun. They bent him over the steam table, and they turned his gun away from my father. And it's six more shots in it, and he emptied the chamber. So they Sirhan or Raefer told me that Sirhan had superhuman strength. Sirhan is a little tiny guy. You know? And I've met him and and talked to him, and but he's a very he's kind of a frail I mean, he's frail now because he's older, but even then, he was a little tiny guy, you know, and was not particularly strong. And Rafer said he had superhuman strength, and he could not pry the gun from his hand, and he fired six more shots. All those shots hit people. We know what happened every every shot in his gun. And my father was shot by four shots from behind. One of them passed harmlessly through the shoulder pad of his this is what Noguchi's autopsies had through the shoulder pad of his suit. And all the others were contact shots, meaning the the barrel of the gun was either touching his body or less than three inches from his body. The the last shot that killed him was behind his left ear. And that shot, he Noguchi says from was from one to three inches from him, and he and Surian was never behind him. Suranne was always in front of him. And they a guy who almost certainly took those shots was a security guard who had just gotten his job within a week before. And he was the he was a my father fell down. I my father must have known that he was being shot because the last thing he did was he turned and he tore off the clip on tie from Caesar. Caesar had him by the left hand and had steered him into the ambush. And he had his right hand he had his right hand his gun in his right hand, and he he admitted it. He was seen, you know, like, my father fell on him, and he pushed my father off of me. He was gun drawn. And he was the the gun was not taken away from the by the LAPD, which did a terrible job. And, you know, not only a terrible, but a malevolent job because they destroyed 2,500 photographs that were taken that night before the trial. So there were photographs, you know, 2,500 photographs in that kitchen and the and the ballroom, and the LAPD collected them and destroyed them all. And you have to ask why would they do that? And a lot of the other evidence was also destroyed, including the door jams and, you know, we have pictures of them, but we we don't have the real thing. And then they never confiscated the gun from from Cesar's. And Cesar said that, oh, I had the gun out because I was gonna shoot at Surahan. And so, you know, that should be questioned. Speaker 0: Were there any documents Speaker 1: I'll just say this. Yes. Zane Cesar was working at that time. His his job was working for the Lockheed plant in Los Angeles, and he had a top security classification at that. And Lisa Pease, who's one of the researchers and authors who's written extensively about this, went through his background. And the only employer that he ever listed officially in his background was the CIA. So there are a lot of questions, and we don't know the answers to them. You know, I was in contact with Cesar in 2019, 2020 negotiating with him. He had moved to The Philippines, and I was trying to see if he would talk to me. I was gonna go over there and talk to him, and he said, I'll do it for $5,000. And then when I got close, he said 10,000, and he said 20,000, and he said 30,000, and, you know, and then he just said, I'm not gonna meet with you. Oh, you know, he and then he's since he's since passed away. Oh, you know, again, we don't know, but there are enough kind of flags on it that you would you know, that if you were actually wanted to know answers, you would be asking questions and those Are Speaker 0: you confident that I know there's been some frustration about getting all the documents relevant to those three murders, those three assassinations. Are you confident that all of it will come out by the end of this term? Speaker 1: I'm confident that president Trump will release anything that he has access to. But, you know, I don't expect anything groundbreaking to come from those documents because, first of all, with my uncle, we've already got everything. There may be little things like, you know, the calendar for for Bill Harvey, who is one of the people who was in the CIA, who is almost certainly involved, and and other things like that that would be and then more evidence. I mean, you know, the evidence that came out the last tranche, The New York Times had to finally admit that that Leah Harvey Oswald was a CIA asset, which they'd been denying for fifty years. They finally admitted, yeah, he was working for the CIA. And so, you know, there may be some more validation of of what, you know, he was doing and how he was recruited, etcetera. But I don't think it's gonna be anything groundbreaking. I don't think you need anything groundbreaking. I think listen. I was a prosecutor. If I had to try the case right now, you know, against a a number of the people are dead, I believe I can win and from a jury with it just with the evidence that we got. Yep. Right. With my dad, you know, it was never investigated, and that was deliberate. Speaker 0: So last question. You left you were born here. Obviously, your father's attorney general of The United States when you were young. He's murdered in 1968. You leave Washington. You haven't lived here since. You just came back as secretary. What's it like? What do you notice? What do you think of it? Speaker 1: Well, you know, I didn't expect to love living in Washington. I when I was a kid, I couldn't wait to get out of Washington. But, you know, I'm my my wife is happy here. We found kind of a community and a neighborhood, and the I love the people that I'm working with at this agency. It's the most gifted, committed group of people that I've ever worked with, and they're, you know, immensely talented and committed. And then I really like the Cabinet. I think that the you know, president Trump's cabinet has put together an extraordinary cabinet. I'm friends with a number of the people I never thought I'd be friends with, but they're you know? What do you like? I I mean, I really I really get along with Pam Bondi and and, you know, Cheryl loves Pam and and her husband, John. And then I I really and Marco Rubio Marco Rubio is the funniest guy in the cabinet. He he says things that make people belly laugh at every cabinet meeting. And he's you know, I I I always I never was very, let's say, approving of of Marco because he was kind of a neocon war hawk, but now he's had this incredible transformation. And, you know, I think he you know? Yeah. I I think he very aligned with me on most issues on Ukraine, you know, and just the fact that we should not be the policeman of the world anymore, then we've gotta that, you know, we've gotta withdraw from that from that role. But I get I I really I you know, Scott Turner is my friend, Sean, you know, and all all of them. Get a Lynn Linda McMahon. I get along you know, one of the things with president Trump is that he really knows how to pick talent, and he and I'm not talking about me. I'm I'm but the other people on there when you sit in those cabinet meetings. And every one of those people is incredibly erudite and just fluid in the way that they speak and very, very comfortable in their one of the things that president Trump did when he picked the cabinet, and I was on the transition team, so I watched what he was doing. For every of one of the positions that he picked, he wanted to see three clips of them performing on TV. And so, know, he's very conscious of the way of of that these people are gonna be out selling his program to the public and that he needs people who are, you know, good salespeople, not only good administrators, but that they're that they can communicate a message to the public. And I think this time around, I it's I you know, everybody tells me it's completely different than the last administration because he he's you know, he had so much time to grow and to learn and to, you know, figure out how to do this right. And, you know, we need a revolution in this country. We've got, you know, we've got a $34,000,000,000,000 debt. We've got we're we're spending 2,000,000,000,000 or more a year than we got. We're borrowing it from China and from Saudi Arabia and Japan. We have a $1,200,000,000,000 trade deficit. And, you know, a lot of people are businesses are are hurting because of the tariffs. But over the I, you know, I admire president Trump because he is looking over the horizon, and he's looking at, you know, we this is unsustainable. And we need to do something radically different. And, you know, you need to particularly at the beginning, when you have momentum and when you have your most power, you need to do a lot of things that are gonna be very, very disruptive to many, many people. He still has tremendous support for the American public, and I feel it every day. I walk down a block and, you know, people are ecstatic. They, you know, come to me and say, thank you for what you're doing, and they they feel good about this country again. You know, I'll I'll just tell you another anecdote if we have if we have time. My my uncle Ted Kennedy really didn't personally did not like Jimmy Carter. He every level Famously. He didn't like his politics. He didn't like him personally. And, you know, Carter did a lot of things that my uncle was just I mean, one of them was he banned liquor from the White House, which, you know, my uncle didn't like. And then he and he put, you know, the oh, was it fresco or something on tap at the White House? And so I there were just little things like that that annoyed him, but he also when Carter came in, he talked about the malaise in this country and how bad everything was. And and it's like what Starmer did in England Yeah. You know, to tell and and that people take those messages from their from their leader. And and my uncle and then Reagan came in, and Reagan was dismantling everything Teddy had done over, you know, forty year career. But Teddy really liked him. And I asked him one time, wow. You know, this guy is destroying everything you believe in. And and Teddy said, I like him because he makes people feel good about being American. Yeah. And he's able to inspire hope for the country again. And, you know, president Trump does that. Whatever you think about him, there are there's a new feeling in America now that, you know, we're we're back on the upswing again. The you know, as he says, the country is hot again. You know? And all around the world, people see that too. And, you know, a lot of things have surprised me about the president because I, you know, bought into this fact that he was this one dimensional character, that he was kind of a bombastic narcissist and all this. And, you know, and part of it is hearing it all the time on TV, but also, you know, in the with the way that he conducts himself sometimes validates those. If you have that narrative, you can find things. So what he does that validate that narrative. But what I've been surprised in getting to know him is what a kind of deep multidimensional and thoughtful character he is and and how well I also thought, oh, he doesn't read, and, you know, he's not interested in anything. He's immensely curious, inquisitive, and immensely knowledgeable. He's encyclopedic in certain areas that you wouldn't expect, like music. And, you know, he gets very emotional about music. And Yes. And and he has and he knows the whole story behind every song. Pavarotti and James Brown. Yeah. Oh, yeah. He cries when he hears Pavarotti. He said I he said to me one night when we were at Martellaga with with the Amaryllis, he said he said, Amaryllis, you understand this because she loves music too. And he said, but most of the people here, they don't understand it. They don't get it. And then in terms of sports, he is he just he's an encyclopedia. He knows everything. And then, you know, on Wall Street, he knows how everybody made their money and and the stories, and he's, you know, an incredible raconteur about telling all these stories. And then and also the most surprising thing is because I Adam Pegg is a narcissist. When narcissists are incapable of empathy, and he's one of the most empathetic people that I've met, you notice whenever he talks about the Ukraine war Yes. He always talks about the casualties on both sides. Every time he talks about it. I have noticed that. And he does that in every theater. He talks about how human beings are affected by it. You know, whether it's vaccines or Medicaid or Medicare, he's always thinking about how this impacts the little guy. And, you know, the Democrats haven't pegged as a guy who's sort of sitting, you know, in the cabinet meeting talking about how can we make billionaires richer. He's the opposite of that. He's a genuine populace. And, you know, like all of us, we're we're all flawed characters in one way or another. But I think he's really a uniquely right person for this country right now because we were in a death spiral. And not only as, you know, morale, but also just what you know, the the deficits are you know, who could ever would you believe we'd ever have a present in our lifetime who would actually be addressing, you know, the cost of government in a dramatic way? No. And and the trade deficits, how could you ever cure that? It's too entrenched and so many people, you know, making money and but meanwhile, all us all going to hell in a handbasket. And, you know, so I think he's doing stuff at great political cost to him that is gonna benefit this country ten years from now and twenty years from now, and, you know, I'm really proud to be part of it. Speaker 0: Secretary Robert f Kennedy junior, thank you very much. Thank you, Tucker.
SecKennedy
Posted - June 25, 2025 at 2:17 AM
Saved - June 25, 2025 at 3:53 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I expressed concern over The Guardian's claim that thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, is "safe," noting the lack of peer-reviewed studies to support this assertion. I highlighted the high mercury levels in flu shots, particularly for pregnant women and infants, and referenced numerous studies linking thimerosal to neurotoxicity and other harmful effects. I criticized the media's reliance on industry-backed sources and pointed out that regulatory bodies have acknowledged thimerosal's toxicity. The evidence suggests a significant risk associated with thimerosal exposure, especially in vulnerable populations.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

In conformance with the pharma-financed mainstream media’s mantric ritual of dutifully parroting the propaganda tropes spoon-fed them by vaccine makers and their captive regulators, @guardian on Friday pronounced thimerosal, the ethylmercury-based vaccine preservative, “safe.” Opining under the headline, “CDC vaccine panel to review ingredient RFK Jr has targeted for removal,” The Guardian authoritatively assures: “The preservative has been deemed safe.” The Guardian did not bother to cite any peer-reviewed study. Journalists don’t seem to read those anymore. Instead, it referenced a fact check website operated by the Pharma-funded American Academy of Pediatrics. @AmerAcadPeds likewise cites no peer-reviewed study to support this claim or its equally terse assertion that “Thimerosal has been removed from all routine childhood vaccines.” This is another treadworn lie of the vaccine industry. There are high bolus doses of mercury in flu shots, which CDC recommends to pregnant women in any trimester of pregnancy and as a routine vaccine for children at six months and in every year of life. Between conception and age 18, a compliant American child today could get a cumulative load of as much as 500 mcg of ethylmercury from multidose flu shots—nearly double of what they were once getting from all the childhood vaccines put together. Now let’s look at The Guardian claim that thimerosal is safe. A quick search at the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed and PubChem websites nets thousands of studies on search terms such as: mercury neurotoxicity,[1],[2] mercury and development,[3],[4] and mercury and brain,[5],[6] and hundreds that identify thimerosal as a potent neurotoxin, carcinogen, mutagen, and endocrine disruptor. There has never been a study that proves thimerosal safe. In early 2001, Director of the FDA Office of Vaccine Research and Review, the late William Egan, admitted under oath before Congress that thimerosal’s safety had never been studied in human beings.[7],[8] I leave it to the reader to speculate as to why CDC has not performed such studies in the intervening 24 years as it dosed hundreds of millions of American children and pregnant moms with mercury-laden flu shots. Furthermore, CDC has no existing guidelines for safe exposure to ethylmercury.[9] But let’s put all that peer-reviewed science aside and just look at what the government and the vaccine industry say about thimerosal. Thimerosal’s label advises against its use during pregnancy, pointing out that thimerosal has never been shown to be safe and that it causes mutations in mammals.[10],[11] Thimerosal’s material safety data sheet (MSDS) acknowledges that thimerosal is “toxic,” has “Nervous System and Reproductive Effects,” and is “mutagenic in mammalian cells,” and that exposure to mercury in thimerosal “in utero and in children can cause mild to severe mental retardation and mild to severe motor coordination impairment.”[12] The MSDS lists a grim inventory of dozens of other devastating injuries from thimerosal exposure.[13] In 2001, the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) revised its thimerosal toxicity statement, warning that thimerosal is “toxic by ingestion and inhalation.”[14] The California EPA recognizes thimerosal as a reproductive toxicant in the clearest possible language: “Thimerosal dissociates in the body to ethyl mercury. The evidence for its reproductive toxicity includes severe mental retardation or malformations in human offspring who were poisoned when their mothers were exposed to ethyl mercury or thimerosal while pregnant, studies in animals demonstrating developmental toxicity after exposure to either ethyl mercury or thimerosal, and data showing interconversion to other forms of mercury that also clearly cause reproductive toxicity. The US EPA, the authoritative body relied on when mercury and mercury compounds were listed under California’s Proposition 65, currently identifies mercury and mercury compounds as causing reproductive toxicity.” The amount of ethylmercury in a flu shot is 25,000 times EPA’s safety level for drinking water.[15],[16] Federal and state laws provide that whenever expired thimerosal vaccines are disposed of, they constitute a hazardous waste. In 1998, FDA banned thimerosal in all over-the-counter products, ending its use in creams, eye medicine, and disinfectants like mercurochrome. It’s ironic that CDC still recommends its injection into babies. A 2000 study by the National Research Council found that prenatal and infant mercury exposures cause multiple impacts to basic brain development by disrupting the division and migration of neuronal cells.[17],[18],[19] According to a National Toxicology Program PowerPoint presentation entitled “Comparative Toxicity of Ethyl and Methyl Mercury”: “Ethylmercury is a neurotoxin. Infants may be more susceptible than adults. Ethylmercury exposure from vaccines (added to dietary exposures to methylmercury) probably caused neurotoxic responses (likely subtle) in some children.”[20] A 2005 NIH study commissioned by FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) and performed by the National Toxicity Program (NTP) obliterated the industry claim that the ethylmercury in vaccines is less toxic than the heavily regulated methylmercury in fish, finding that the ethylmercury in thimerosal crosses the blood-brain barrier, lodges in the brain, and metabolizes into the most toxic form of mercury at double the rate of methylmercury.[21] A subsequent study found that this highly toxic mercury remains in the brain for over 27 years.[22] A 2000 study in Neurotoxicology by Dr. William Slikker Jr., former head of the FDA’s National Center for Toxicological Research, directly foretold the results of a 2005 NIH-funded study, reporting that “Thimerosal (sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate) crosses the blood-brain and placental barriers and results in appreciable mercury content in tissues including brain.”[23] A 2017 NIH/CDC study links miscarriage to flu vaccines, particularly in the first trimester. Pregnant women vaccinated in the 2010/2011 and 2011/2012 flu seasons had two times greater odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days of receiving the vaccine. [24] In women who had received the H1N1 vaccine in the previous flu season, the odds of having a miscarriage within 28 days were 7.7 times greater than in women who did not receive a flu shot during their pregnancy. These results are all the more significant when considering the fact that 7 of the 13 authors on the study had potential conflicts of interest such as having received research support from GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Novavax, and other Big Pharma companies. One author, Frank DeStefano, was head of CDC’s immunization Safety Branch. It’s noteworthy that these authors chose not to differentiate outcomes between thimerosal-containing flu shots and those that did not contain thimerosal. Around half the flu shots available at that time contained thimerosal. On October 1, 2001, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences Immunization Safety Review Committee (ISR) issued a report concluding that the link between thimerosal and the rise of neurological injuries in children, including autism, is “biologically plausible,”[25] and recommended the termination of all thimerosal-preserved vaccines. An entire bibliography of pharmacokinetic studies by independent scientists, prestigious universities, and prominent research institutes published in high-gravitas journals, attest to thimerosal’s powerful neurotoxicity, and show that mercury tends to accumulate (and remain for considerable periods of time, years to decades) in the brains of primates and other animals after injection of thimerosal-containing vaccines.[26] It’s worth noting just one of these, a well-known Russian study from 1977 led by Dr. N.D. Mukhtarova, found that the majority of adults exposed to much lower concentrations of ethylmercury than those currently given to American children in vaccines were still suffering neurological injury and neuropathology several years after the exposure. These symptoms included decreased vision, hearing, memory, vertigo, and pain and numbness in the hands and feet.[27],[28] The Guardian is blind and scientifically baseless repetition of empty industry assurances about thimerosal safety is yet another proof that journalists, and particularly science journalists, have now devolved into obsequious stenographers for Big Pharma.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

[1] “Mercury Neurotoxicity—Search Results—PubMed,” PubMed, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=mercury+neurotoxicity. [2] “Mercury Neurotoxicity—Search Results—PubChem,” PubChem, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=mercury%20neurotoxicity. [3] “Mercury and Development—Search Results—PubMed,” PubMed, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=mercury+and+development. [4] “Mercury and Development—Search Results—PubChem,” PubChem, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=mercury%20and%20development. [5] “Mercury and Brain—Search Results—PubMed,” PubMed, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=mercury+and+brain. [6] “Mercury and Brain—Search Results—PubChem,” PubChem, accessed Jan. 28, 2025, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/#query=mercury%20and%20brain. [7] Unhoodwinked, “Mercury Thimerosal in Vaccines Congressional Hearing with CDC,” YouTube, 00:00:39–00:01:21, Jan. 10, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDsdmJ8I3ks. [8] US Congress, House, Committee on Government Reform, “Truth Revealed: New Scientific Discoveries Regarding Mercury in Medicine and Autism,” 108th Cong., 2d sess., Sep. 8, 2004, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-108hhrg98046/html/CHRG-108hhrg98046.htm. *“Mr. Burton. ‘When was that? That was done in 1929. Let’s follow up on that. In 1929, they tested this on 27 people that were dying of meningitis. All of those people died of meningitis, so they said there was no correlation between their death and the mercury in the vaccines. That is the only test that’s ever been done on thimerosal that I know of. Can you think of any other?’ Mr. Egan. ‘No, in people, no. Except for accidental exposures over time.’” [9] “Thimerosal [54-64-8], Nomination to the National Toxicology Association: Review of the Literature,” Apr. 2001, 3, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/NTP-nonimation-Thimerosal-1.pdf. [10] “Thimerosal: Material Safety Data Sheet,” Eli Lilly, Dec. 22, 1999, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Lilly-thimerosal-MSDS.pdf. [11] “Thimerosal: Material Safety Data Sheet,” Spectrum Laboratory Products, Mar. 27, 2013, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Thimerosal_MSDS_Spectrum.pdf. [12] “Thimerosal: Material Safety Data Sheet,” Eli Lilly, Dec. 22, 1999, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Lilly-thimerosal-MSDS.pdf. [13] “Thimerosal: Material Safety Data Sheet,” Spectrum Laboratory Products, Mar. 27, 2013, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Thimerosal_MSDS_Spectrum.pdf. [14] David Kirby, Evidence of Harm: Mercury in Vaccines and the Autism Epidemic: A Medical Controversy (St. Martin’s Press, 2005), 163; “Thimerosal,” PubChem Compound CID 16684434, National Center for Biotechnology Information, accessed Apr. 30, 2025, https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Thimerosal#section=Health-Hazards. [15] “Thimerosal in Vaccines Questions and Answers,” US Food and Drug Administration, last updated Feb. 2, 2018, https://web.archive.org/web/20191102132633/https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/thimerosal-vaccines-questions-and-answers. [16] “National Primary Drinking Water Regulations,” US Environmental Protection Agency, last updated Dec. 12, 2024, https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations. [17] Julia Pletz et al., “Dose-Response Analysis Indicating Time-Dependent Neurotoxicity Caused by Organic and Inorganic Mercury-Implications for Toxic Effects in the Developing Brain,” Toxicology 10, no. 347–349 (2016): 1–5, doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2016.02.006, https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/27-yr-half-life-Dose-response-analysis-neurotoxicity-caused-by-organic-and-inorganic-mercury-Implications-for-toxic-effects-in-the-developing-brain.pdf. [18] Institute of Medicine, Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury (The National Academies Press, 2000), 55–56, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/9899/chapter/4#55. [19] Kathryn R. Mahaffey, “Methylmercury: A New Look at the Risks,” Public Health Report, 114 no. 5 (1999): 396–399, 402–413, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1308510/pdf/pubhealthrep00025-0010.pdf. [20] National Toxicology Program and National Institute of Environmental Health Services, “Comparative Toxicity of Ethyl and Methyl Mercury,” (PowerPoint Presentation, n.d.), 15, web.archive.org/web/2015061414…. [21] Burbacher et al. 2005, “Comparison of Blood and Brain Mercury Levels in Infant Monkeys Exposed to Methylmercury or Vaccines Containing Thimerosal,” Environmental Health Perspectives 113(8):1015–21, https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/doi/10.1289/ehp.7712. [22] James P.K. Rooney, “The Retention Time of Inorganic Mercury in the Brain — A Systematic Review of the Evidence,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 274, no. 3 (2014): 425–435, doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.12.011, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041008X13005644. [23] S.A. Dobran and A. Gherman, “Interview with Dr William Slikker Jr., Ph.D., Former Director, National Center for Toxicological Research,” US Food and Drug Administration, J Med Life 15, no. 10 (2022): 1207–1208. doi: 10.25122/jml-2022-1030, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9675311. [24] James G Donahue, “Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12,” NIH, PubMed, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28917295/ [25] Institute of Medicine, Immunization Safety Review: Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (The National Academies Press, 2001), 4, doi: 10.17226/10208, https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/10208/chapter/2#4. [26] James P.K. Rooney, “The Retention Time of Inorganic Mercury in the Brain — A Systematic Review of the Evidence,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 274, no. 3 (2014): 425–435, doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2013.12.011, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0041008X13005644?via%3Dihub. [27] N. Mukhtarova, “Late Sequelae of Nervous System Pathology Caused by the Action of Low Concentrations of Ethyl Mercury Chloride,” Gig Tr Prof Zabol 3 (1977): 4–7, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/323108. [28] David A. Geier et al., “A Review of Thimerosal (Merthiolate) and its Ethylmercury Breakdown Product: Specific Historical Considerations Regarding Safety and Effectiveness,” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B, 10, no. 8 (2007): 575–596, doi: 10.1080/10937400701389875, https://doi.org/10.1080/10937400701389875. *“A total of 25 persons exposed to multiple effects of low ethyl-mercuric-chloride concentrations were subjected to a clinical examination in dynamics 1 ½ and 3 years after exposure to the compound. In investigations, clinico-physiological (EEG, Asschner-Dagnini reflexes, etc) and biochemical (catecholamines, sugar, mercury, DDT, DDE in the urine, etc) methods were employed. The pathology of the nervous system presented certain peculiarities by comparison with early period. In evidence were changes in the simpatico-adrenal system function, vascular lesions of the brain after the type of transient derangements of the cerebral circulation in the vertebro-basilar basin and angiosperms, diffuse changes in the nervous system with predominant involvement of the hypothalamic cerebral structures and in some cases psychiatric disturbances were on record. (p. 4–7).”

mercury neurotoxicity - Search Results - PubMed mercury neurotoxicity - Search Results - PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
PubChem Search and explore chemical information in the world's largest free chemistry database. Search chemicals by name, molecular formula, structure, and other identifiers. Find chemical and physical properties, biological activities, safety and toxicity information, patents, literature citations and more. pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mercury and development - Search Results - PubMed mercury and development - Search Results - PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
PubChem Search and explore chemical information in the world's largest free chemistry database. Search chemicals by name, molecular formula, structure, and other identifiers. Find chemical and physical properties, biological activities, safety and toxicity information, patents, literature citations and more. pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
mercury and brain - Search Results - PubMed mercury and brain - Search Results - PubMed pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
PubChem Search and explore chemical information in the world's largest free chemistry database. Search chemicals by name, molecular formula, structure, and other identifiers. Find chemical and physical properties, biological activities, safety and toxicity information, patents, literature citations and more. pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Page Not Found Error occurred. The page you requested cannot be found. Please report this error to askGPO. Provide the following information to help us resolve this problem: the URL of the page you were trying to access, the steps you followed to produce the error, specific search or browse terms, and/or a screenshot of the page where the error occurred. Thank you for your patience. Homepage govinfo.gov
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Thimerosal Thimerosal | C9H9HgNaO2S | CID 16684434 - structure, chemical names, physical and chemical properties, classification, patents, literature, biological activities, safety/hazards/toxicity information, supplier lists, and more. pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Thimerosal in Vaccines Questions and Answers Answers to commonly asked questions about Thimerosal in vaccines. web.archive.org
National Primary Drinking Water Regulations | US EPA Table of the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs or primary standards) that are legally enforceable standards that apply to public water systems. epa.gov
Page not found • Children's Health Defense childrenshealthdefense.org
Read "Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury" at NAP.edu Read chapter Chemistry, Exposure, Toxicokinetics, and Toxicodynamics: Mercury is widespread in our environment. Methylmercury, one organic form of mercury... nap.nationalacademies.org
The retention time of inorganic mercury in the brain — A systematic review of the evidence Reports from human case studies indicate a half-life for inorganic mercury in the brain in the order of years—contradicting older radioisotope studies… sciencedirect.com
Interview with Dr William Slikker Jr., Ph.D., Former Director, National Center for Toxicological Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), USA pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12 - PubMed SAB was associated with influenza vaccination in the preceding 28days. The association was significant only among women vaccinated in the previous influenza season with pH1N1-containing vaccine. This study does not and cannot establish a causal relationship between repeated influenza vaccination and … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Read "Immunization Safety Review: Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines and Neurodevelopmental Disorders" at NAP.edu Read chapter Executive Summary: In this report, the Immunization Safety Review committee examines the hypothesis of whether or not the use of vaccines con... nap.nationalacademies.org
The retention time of inorganic mercury in the brain — A systematic review of the evidence Reports from human case studies indicate a half-life for inorganic mercury in the brain in the order of years—contradicting older radioisotope studies… sciencedirect.com
[Late sequelae of nervous system pathology caused by the action of low concentrations of ethyl mercury chloride] - PubMed [Late sequelae of nervous system pathology caused by the action of low concentrations of ethyl mercury chloride] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
SecKennedy
Posted - June 10, 2025 at 11:26 PM
Saved - June 11, 2025 at 5:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently retired 17 members of the ACIP, the CDC's panel responsible for vaccine recommendations. I will announce new members who are highly qualified and not anti-vaccine. This change is necessary due to historical issues, particularly ACIP's failure to demand adequate safety trials for vaccines. I challenge claims made by CNN regarding placebo-controlled trials, asserting that no routine vaccine on the CDC's schedule was licensed based on such trials. Our children deserve robust safety evaluations to protect them from potential harm.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Yesterday, I retired 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices or ACIP, the @CDCgov external panel that wields the grave responsibility of adding new vaccines to the recommended childhood schedule. Over the coming days, I will use this platform to announce new members to populate ACIP. None of these individuals will be ideological anti-vaxxers. They will be highly credentialed physicians and scientists who will make extremely consequential public health determinations by applying evidence-based decision-making with objectivity and common sense. I will also be tweeting examples of the historical corruption at ACIP to help the public understand why this clean sweep was necessary. The most outrageous example of ACIP’s malevolent malpractice has been its stubborn unwillingness to demand adequate safety trials before recommending new vaccines for our children. Today, a compliant American child receives between 69 and 92 routine vaccines (depending on brand/dictated dosage) from conception to 18 years of age. This is up from 11 shots in 1986. ACIP has recommended each of these additional jabs without requiring placebo-controlled trials for any of them. This means that no one can scientifically ascertain whether these products are averting more problems than they are causing. Many vaccine promoters have challenged this assertion. They are always wrong. Last week, @CNN, which has devolved into a shameless propagandist for Big Pharma, triumphantly announced that it had proof that my pronouncement that “there have been no placebo-controlled safety trials for any routine vaccines” was false. CNN gleefully proclaimed that it had found 257 placebo-controlled studies for routine vaccines. So, allow me a moment to deconstruct CNN’s claims. Warning: this post may only be sufferable for science geeks like myself. CNN is wrong. No routine injected vaccine on CDC’s schedule was licensed for children based on a placebo-controlled trial. In instances where a vaccine was used as a control, it too was never licensed based on a placebo-controlled trial. That is not conjecture. It is a fact based on FDA’s clinical trial data. (See sirillp.com/noplacebo). As Secretary of @HHSGov, acknowledging this lamentable truth is part of my promise of radical transparency. The 257 studies cited by CNN unwittingly reflect the lack of safety trials underpinning CDC’s schedule. Despite CNN’s worldwide effort to crowdsource trials with a placebo control (per @US_FDA/@CDCgov, an “inert substance”*), this list, on its face, reflects that 236 of the studies clearly did not use an “inert” safety comparator in a trial to license an injected routine vaccine for children on CDC’s schedule.** For the remaining 21 studies CNN’s list claims used an inert injection, 9 plainly did not: • RCT 251, 252 (Varivax) injected an antibiotic, neomycin – not inert. • RCT 84, 97 (HPV-16 and 16/18) injected aluminum adjuvant – not inert. • RCT 215 (Almevax) injected another vaccine – not inert. • RCT 55 (Lyophilized PedvaxHIB) injected lactose, aluminum adjuvant, and thimerosal – not inert. • RCT 197 (Salk vaccine) injected 199 solution, synthetic tissue culture, ethanol, phenol red, antibiotics, and formalin – not inert.*** • RCT 168 (Dow’s MMR) injected full vaccine minus virus, including all stabilizers, antibiotics, diluent, preservative, and buffers – not inert.**** • RCT 189 (Menveo) injected Tdap+saline or Menveo+saline – not inert. For the remaining 12 listed studies which may have had an inert injection, none was a trial relied upon to license a routine vaccine on CDC’s childhood schedule: • RCT 170, 171, 172 (MMR VaxPro), 228 (PCV11), 136 (Vaxigrip), 242 (Antitetanus), and 122 (Chinese flu shots) trialed vaccines never licensed in the U.S. nor relied upon to license a U.S. vaccine. • RCT 124 (Fluzone IIV3), 102 (WVV/SPV), and 188 (Menveo) trials occurred after each respective vaccine was licensed, hence were not relied upon for their licensure. • RCT 176 (Mumps vaccine) was not relied upon by the FDA to license the current MMR vaccine. (See MMR-II clinical trial report in link above.) • RCT 53 (PRP-D) was for a vaccine withdrawn soon after its introduction and not relied upon by the FDA to license any U.S. vaccine. While these 12 studies were not relied upon to license a routine vaccine on the CDC’s schedule, they do reflect that a placebo-controlled trial of a vaccine is possible. They also reflect what can be learned when a placebo trial is performed. For example: RCT 136 found the vaccine ineffective; RCT 122 found that “severe adverse effects occurred in 69 (0·6%, 95% CI 0·5–0·8) recipients of vaccine compared with one recipient (0·1%, 0–0·2) of placebo.”; and RCT 124 found “the rate of hospitalization was actually higher in the [Fluzone IIV3] vaccine group than in the placebo group.” The unfortunate reality is that placebo-controlled trials, however, do not occur and have not been relied upon when FDA licenses vaccines for injection during childhood or ACIP recommends the shot for addition to the CDC’s routine schedule. CNN would have reached the same conclusion had it reviewed the FDA documentation for each vaccine, instead of relying upon a random, crowd-sourced list from the internet. CNN’s list ironically proves the lack of adequate safety trials for routine childhood vaccines. It is time to stop playing games, such as CNN’s false gotcha. We have gone from 3 routine injections by age one in 1986 (the year the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act passed) to 25 routine injections by age one in 2025 (which now does not include Covid-19 vaccine). Because of the 1986 Act, every one of these products, save one, was developed by companies knowing they would almost never be liable for serious harm. During this same period, chronic diseases in our children exploded, most of which are caused by immune system dysregulation. If we are to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic of autoimmune diseases, we need to rule out products given dozens of times to young children, specifically to modify the immune system, as potential culprits. Our infants and children deserve the best safety trials possible to keep them safe. We should care as much about every child who could be injured by one of these products as we do every child who could be injured by an infectious disease. We must protect all children. Notes: * https://www.fda.gov/media/130326/download (“Placebos, defined as inert substances with no pharmacologic activity, are commonly used in double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trials.”); https://www.fda.gov/media/71349/download (“the placebo control design, by … including a group that receives an inert treatment…”); https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/glossary/ (“Placebo: A substance or treatment that has no effect on living beings, usually used as a comparison to vaccine or medicine in clinical trials.”). ** While the above addresses injected vaccines, CNN’s cited list also includes 10 trials for rotavirus vaccine, given by oral drops, but none of these trials used saline only drops. Instead, RCT 205, 207, 208, 209, 210, 213 (Rotarix) contained dextran, sorbitol, amino acids, dulbecco’s modified eagle medium, calcium carbonate, and xanthan; RCT 211, 212 (RotaTeq) contained polysorbate 80, sucrose, citrate and phosphate; and RCT 206, 214 (Rotavac) included neomycin sulphate, kanamycin acid sulphate, trehalose, lactalbumin hydrolysate, human albumin, potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate, dipotassium hydrogen orthophosphate, and trisodium citrate dihydrate. The list also included three trials of an inhaled flu vaccine; the controls in RCT 104 were OPV+saline or LAIV (a vaccine), hence neither inert; in RCT 106 the control “consisted of normal allantoic fluid harvested from uninfected eggs stabilized with sucrose–phosphate–glutamate”; and, in RCT 109, the control was “intranasal spray of egg allantoic fluid containing sucrose-phosphate-glutamate.” *** Note that the current polio vaccines used in the U.S. are a different product than the polio vaccine developed by Jonas Salk in the 1950s—which was discontinued in the 1960s—including because the currently-used polio vaccines are “grown in vero cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells cultivated on microcarriers.” Hence, the Salk trial was not relied upon to license any current polio vaccine. https://www.fda.gov/media/75695/download; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6740101/; https://‌http://admin.phe-culturecollections.org.uk/‌media/1222‌49/‌vero-cell-line-profile.pdf; https://www.atcc.org/products/all/ccl-81.aspx#characteristics. **** Dow Chemical’s MMR vaccine used different strains than any licensed U.S. MMR vaccine and also, after 14 days of safety review, this trial vaccinated all participants.

Vaccine Glossary Glossary of vocabulary for vaccines and immunizations cdc.gov
A comparison of the serologic responses to oral and injectable trivalent poliovirus vaccines - PubMed United States children two months of age were randomly assigned to two groups that received either the commercially available oral trivalent poliovirus vaccine ( OPV ) or an injectable (inactivated) trivalent poliovirus vaccine (IPV) with a confirmed minimum D-antigen content of 27, 3.5, and 29 unit … pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Vero - CCL-81 | ATCC atcc.org
SecKennedy
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Thank you, Sean Hannity, for the opportunity to clarify. Over 25% of those with severe autism may never date, write poetry, live independently, or work. We must identify the causes of this epidemic and support affected families. Under my leadership, @HHSgov will tirelessly assist individuals in reaching their potential.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Thank you @SeanHannity for letting me set the record straight. Bottom line, the more than 25% of people who have severe autism will never go on a date, write a poem, live independently, or have a job. We need to identify the exposures that are causing this epidemic and compensate the families of the injured. @HHSgov under my leadership, will be unrelenting in assisting affected individuals in living up to all their potentials.

Video Transcript AI Summary
About 25% of kids with autism are nonverbal, not toilet trained, and exhibit stereotypical behaviors, and this population is growing. While many individuals with autism are doing well, the speaker focuses on this specific group with severe disabilities. The media promotes the idea that increased autism rates are due to better recognition or changing diagnostic criteria, but studies disprove this. In 2013, the California legislature asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to investigate whether the rise in autism is real or due to increased awareness. The Mind Institute concluded it is a real epidemic. The speaker argues that this epidemic is unique to children, as full-blown autism (nonverbal, non-toilet trained) is rarely seen in older adults. While the speaker has encountered people with Asperger's or on the spectrum who are their age, they have never seen an older individual with full-blown autism, despite its prevalence in children, affecting one in twenty boys, and in California, one in 12.5 boys.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kids with autism, about twenty five percent of them are nonverbal, non toilet trained. They're you know, they have all these stereotypical behaviors, head banging, biting, toe walking, stimming. And that population is growing higher and higher. So, it's becoming a larger percentage. So, we're seeing much, much more many more cases that are now linked to severe disabilities. Let me say this. There are many kids with autism who are doing well. They're holding down jobs, they're getting paychecks, they're living independently. But I was specifically referring to that twenty five percent, the the group that is nonverbal clear. You were not on that. You were clear. Right. And you know what what I A larger point is that the media has brought into bought into this industry, this mythology, that we're just seeing more autism because we're noticing it more. We're better at recognizing it, or there's been changing diagnostic criteria. There is study after study in the scientific literature going back decades that says that that's not true. In fact, California legislature in 2013 asked the Mind Institute at UC Davis to look exactly at that topic. They said, is it real or are we just noticing it more? And the Mind Institute came back and said, absolutely, this is a real epidemic. This is something we've never seen before. And anybody with common sense, Sean, would notice that because the autism, this epidemic is only happening in our children. It's not happening in people our age. Better recognition, you'd see it in 70 year old men. And I'll say this, I wanna be very careful when I say it, because I've never seen a person with full blown autism. I've seen many people with Asperger's and, you know, on the spectrum who are my age. I've never seen anybody with full blown autism. That means nonverbal, non toilet trained. It's that you don't see these people walking around a mall because they don't exist in our age. And or they're very, very rare. They do exist, but they're rare so rare that I've never seen one. And I've been around intellectual disabilities my entire life. But in our children's age group, they're everywhere. It's one in twenty boys. And in California, one in twelve point five boys is has autism. Twenty five percent of those look like that.
SecKennedy
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 8:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm grateful to @POTUS and @DNIGabbard for unveiling these documents. The assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK marked a shift from an idealistic democracy to a secretive autocracy. This release is a significant step in President Trump's effort to restore America as a moral authority.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

I'm very grateful to @POTUS and @DNIGabbard for lifting the veil on these documents. The assassinations of JFK, RFK and MLK, were important crossroads that changed the trajectory of our country from an idealistic and transparent democracy to a dark and secretive autocracy. The release of these documents is an important milestone in President Trump's crusade to restore America as an exemplary republic and a moral authority.

@DNIGabbard - DNI Tulsi Gabbard

Nearly 60 years after the tragic assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy, the American people will, for the first time, have the opportunity to review the federal government’s investigation thanks to @POTUS leadership and commitment to maximum transparency. https://www.archives.gov/rfk

Records Related to the Assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy On This Page The National Archives’ Role in Fulfilling Executive Order 14176 How is the National Archives Making These Records Available? 2025 Release Other Records Related to RFK Contact Us President Donald J. Trump signed Executive Order 14176, Declassification of Records Concerning the Assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and the archives.gov
SecKennedy
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 7:50 PM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 9:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The events of October 7 have unfortunately sparked a surge of anti-Semitism rather than universal condemnation. Ivy league campuses have become breeding grounds for this negativity. I appreciate President Trump's directive to his cabinet to combat this issue and am encouraged by Columbia's commitment to take initial steps toward restoring an environment of tolerance, reason, compassion, and respect.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Instead of inspiring universal condemnation, the October 7 holocaust triggered a global wave of anti-Semitism. Ivy league campuses became a greenhouse for poison. President Trump has ordered his cabinet to use every constitutional tool to uproot this divisive weed. I’m glad Columbia has agreed to this first step and will begin to restore itself as a garden of tolerance, reason, compassion, and respect. Learn more ➡️ https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/columbia-comply-anti-semitism-task-force-preconditions-met.html

SecKennedy
Posted - March 11, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Saved - March 15, 2025 at 2:11 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
SecKennedy highlighted concerns about ingredient manufacturers exploiting a loophole that allows new ingredients and chemicals to enter the U.S. food supply without proper safety data or notification to the FDA or the public. He advocated for eliminating the GRAS loophole to enhance transparency and ensure the safety of food ingredients, aiming to improve the nation's food supply. In response, plantparadise7 expressed support for the initiative, emphasizing the need to restore the integrity of food.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

For far too long, ingredient manufacturers and sponsors have exploited a loophole that has allowed new ingredients and chemicals, often with unknown safety data, to be introduced into the U.S. food supply without notification to the @FDA or the public. Eliminating the GRAS loophole will provide transparency to consumers, help get our nation’s food supply back on track by ensuring that ingredients being introduced into foods are safe, and ultimately Make America Healthy Again. Learn more: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2025/03/10/hhs-secretary-kennedy-directs-fda-explore-rulemaking-eliminate-pathway-companies-self-affirm-food-ingredients-safe.html

@plantparadise7 - Jonny Paradise 🌱

@SecKennedy @FDA Let’s make our food food again!

@newstart_2024 - Camus

RFK Jr.: "We have 10000 ingredients in our food in this country because FDA, employs a standard called the GRAS standard and looks at any new chemical as innocent until proven guilty. In Europe, they have 400 ingredients in their foods. Kellogg's makes Fruit Loops for The United States alone. It is loaded with red dye, blue dye, yellow dye, and many, many other ingredients." "They make the same product for Canada. It's all vegetable dyes. And for Europe, if you eat a McDonald's French fry in this country, it has 11 ingredients. With the same in grid the same product in Europe, it has three." "We are allowing these companies because their influence over this body over our regulatory agencies to mass poison American children, and that's wrong. It needs to end, and I believe I'm the one person who's able to end it."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the U.S. has 10,000 food ingredients due to the FDA's GRAS standard, which presumes chemicals are safe until proven guilty. Europe, in contrast, has only 400. Kellogg's Froot Loops in the U.S. contain red, blue, and yellow dyes, unlike the version sold in Canada, which uses vegetable dyes. A U.S. McDonald's French fry has 11 ingredients, while the same product in Europe has three. The speaker believes companies are mass poisoning American children due to their influence over regulatory agencies and asserts they are the only one who can stop it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tell me about dyes and things that that that you're concerned about because I get I get more talk about that than anything. Speaker 1: We have 10,000 ingredients in our food in this country because FDA employs a standard called the GRAS standard and looks at any new chemical is innocent till proven guilty. In Europe, they have 400 ingredients to their foods. Kellogg's makes Froot Loops for The United States alone. It is loaded with red dye, blue dye, yellow dye, and many many other ingredients. They make the same product for Canada. It's all vegetable dyes. And for Europe. If you eat a McDonald's French fry in this country, it has 11 ingredients. With the same the same product in Europe, it has three. We are allowing these companies because their influence over this body over our regulatory agencies to mass poison American children and that's wrong. It needs to end and I believe I'm the one person who's able to end it. Speaker 0: Thank you.
SecKennedy
Posted - March 11, 2025 at 1:12 AM
Saved - March 11, 2025 at 12:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
For too long, ingredient manufacturers have taken advantage of a loophole that allows new ingredients and chemicals, often lacking safety data, to enter the U.S. food supply without notifying the FDA or the public. I believe that eliminating the GRAS loophole will enhance transparency for consumers, ensure the safety of our food supply, and contribute to making America healthier.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

For far too long, ingredient manufacturers and sponsors have exploited a loophole that has allowed new ingredients and chemicals, often with unknown safety data, to be introduced into the U.S. food supply without notification to the @FDA or the public. Eliminating the GRAS loophole will provide transparency to consumers, help get our nation’s food supply back on track by ensuring that ingredients being introduced into foods are safe, and ultimately Make America Healthy Again. Learn more: https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2025/03/10/hhs-secretary-kennedy-directs-fda-explore-rulemaking-eliminate-pathway-companies-self-affirm-food-ingredients-safe.html

SecKennedy
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 5:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Anti-Semitism, like racism, is a serious moral issue that harms societies and leads to devastating consequences. I've observed that recent trends in censorship and the narratives promoted by cancel culture have turned our universities into environments where this harmful ideology can thrive. To foster a healthier America, we need to cultivate communities built on trust and respect, emphasizing the importance of free speech and open debate.

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

Anti-Semitism – like racism – is a spiritual and moral malady that sickens societies and kills people with lethalities comparable to history’s most deadly plagues. In recent years, the censorship and false narratives of woke cancel culture have transformed our great universities into greenhouses for this deadly and virulent pestilence. Making America healthy means building communities of trust and mutual respect, based on speech freedom and open debate. https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2025/03/03/hhs-ed-gsa-announce-additional-measures-end-anti-semitic-harassment-college-campuses.html

SecKennedy
Posted - February 21, 2025 at 11:22 PM
Saved - February 22, 2025 at 11:14 AM

@SecKennedy - Secretary Kennedy

No stone will be left unturned in our effort to end chronic disease. The health of our children is a higher calling for all of us. Watch my message to America and join me in this effort to Make America Healthy Again. https://t.co/wj4b2h8Km4

Video Transcript AI Summary
As I start my work here at HHS, I want to address both my supporters and the American public. We all know that America faces unprecedented levels of chronic disease, obesity, and addiction. While we can't be certain of the causes, finding them and acting on them will be my top priority. In our first 100 days, we will examine every possible factor, listen to experts, dissidents, insiders, and the public, leaving no stone unturned. We will investigate our food, medicine, water, lifestyles, and environment with an open mind. We must care more about our children's health than being right or financial profit. We will bring transparency to our health agencies, eliminating conflicts of interest and prioritizing honest science. After identifying the causes of chronic disease, we will reverse it. With your help, and President Trump's support, we can unify to solve this problem.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr. On my first day at work here at HHS, I want to take this moment to say a few words both to my supporters in the Make America Healthy Again movement, but also to all of the American public. I could read you a list of statistics proving that Americans suffer far higher levels of chronic disease, obesity, addiction, cancer, infertility, and depression than ever before in history and more than any other country in the world. You already know that. It's pretty obvious that something has gone terribly wrong with our health. I'm also not gonna tell you the reasons for this decline. Why? Because neither I nor anyone else can be certain. But what I will tell you is that we are going to find out and we are going to do something about it. My commitment to you is that we're going to make chronic disease our top priority. In our first hundred days we're gonna examine every possible contributing factor to the epidemic of chronic disease. We will leave no stone unturned. We're gonna listen to the experts and to the dissidents. We're gonna listen to insiders and to the whistleblowers. We're gonna listen to the doctors and we're gonna listen to the mobs. We will examine our food, our medicine, our water, our lifestyles, and our environment. Everything that goes into America's bodies. I promise you that I will enter this inquiry with an open mind and a willingness to be wrong. And I ask that you join me in that. That's how we're gonna build unity in this age of political division. We have to find something we care about more than being right, more than political advantage, and more than financial profit. The health of our children is a higher calling for all of us. And here's another promise. We're gonna usher in a new era of transparency in all of our health agencies. There's gonna be no more hidden conflicts of interest, no more secrecy, no more profiteering on the substances that we're supposed to be regulating. We're gonna earn the public's trust with honest, unbiased science. After we get clear on the causes of chronic disease we're gonna take action to reverse it. I know that many of you have lost hope. I know that many of you take these chronic conditions as a normal part of life. Oh, it doesn't have to be that way. I know that because it wasn't that way when I was a kid, and it doesn't have to be that way tomorrow. All it takes is to unify our will to get serious about solving this problem. President Trump has made it one of his top priorities, and I promise to do everything in my power to carry it through. And all I need is your help. Produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services.
View Full Interactive Feed