TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SenatorRennick

SenatorRennick
Posted - June 16, 2024 at 7:59 AM
Saved - June 16, 2024 at 12:58 PM

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

It appears that government actions such as the the gain of function furin cleavage site, (see Defuse project) ventilators, withdrawal of antibiotics or the vaccines contributed to more deaths marked as COVID than COVID itself. #auspol

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

I tried telling people this! When I talked to doctors in Wuhan after the first wave hit China, their top recommendation was to avoid using intubated ventilators for extended periods at 100% O2, as it damages the lungs. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/ventilator/risks#:~:text=Lung%20damage%20can%20result%20from,infections%20in%20childhood%20and%20adulthood. I got the “you’re not a doctor” bullshit from utter idiots in response. Yeah, I’m not a fucking doctor, but I do oversee the design of spaceships with life support systems that keep astronauts alive and healthy in a goddam vacuum!

Risks of Being on a Ventilator A ventilator can raise the risk of infection such as pneumonia as well as other problems from short- or long-term use. Learn more about the possible risks of ventilator support. nhlbi.nih.gov
SenatorRennick
Posted - December 22, 2023 at 8:25 PM
Saved - December 23, 2023 at 1:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Newly-uncovered documents reveal plans to create a Covid-like virus in China before the pandemic, making a lab leak likely. The records show the EcoHealth Alliance's proposal to engineer spike proteins and insert them into SARS-Covid backbones at the Wuhan virology lab. The documents also indicate deliberate attempts to mislead the Pentagon for funding. These findings support the theory that the virus originated from gain-of-function research funded by the US taxpayer. The principal investigator on the project is Peter Daszak of EcoHealth. Governments and intelligence agencies seem reluctant to discuss the origins of Covid.

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

“A newly-uncovered trove of documents detailing plans to create a Covid-like virus in China months before the pandemic make the 'lab leak almost certain', experts say. The records - obtained now by FOIA requests - lay out a plan to 'engineer spike proteins' to infect human cells that would then be 'inserted into SARS-Covid backbones' at the infamous Wuhan virology lab from December 2018. Just a year later, in late 2019, the Covid-19 virus emerged with a uniquely adept ability to infect humans, going on to cause a global pandemic. The proposal was made by the now-notorious EcoHealth Alliance, a New York nonprofit that channels US government grants abroad to fund these types of experiments. The documents also show how EcoHealth tried to deliberately mislead the Pentagon on how risky the experiments were to secure funding. The team sought to synthesize spike proteins with furin cleavage sites that had been designed to bind to human receptors more easily. The furin has been one of the focal points of debate about Covid-19's origin, with some experts claiming it could only have been acquired through lab experiments. Dr Richard Ebright, a chemical biologist at Rutgers University in New Jersey, told http://DailyMail.com: 'These revelations are important because the experiments in the grant proposal likely - indeed highly likely - led to the creation and release of SARS-CoV-2.' The grant proposal has raised concerns and some say it serves as further support of the Covid lab leak theory - that the virus was borne out of gain-of-function research bankrolled by the US taxpayer through Dr Anthony Fauci's former department, a theory the FBI and other government agencies now subscribe to. The principal investigator on the project is listed as Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth, a now-notorious health agency that uses US government money to sponsor there's types of experiments abroad.” Not hard to see why Governments and their intelligence agencies don’t want to talk about the origins of Covid is it! https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12881707/us-chinese-covid-documents-wuhan-spike-proteins.html

UK Home | Daily Mail Online MailOnline - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from MailOnline, Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers. dailymail.co.uk
Documents show plan to put spike proteins on SARS-CoV viruses in 2018 A newly-uncovered trove of documents detailing plans to create a Covid-like virus in China months before the pandemic make the 'lab leak almost certain', experts say. dailymail.co.uk
SenatorRennick
Posted - November 27, 2023 at 4:36 AM
Saved - November 27, 2023 at 6:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Bisphenol A, a toxic compound found in turbine blades, is a growing concern. It is an endocrine disrupter linked to numerous diseases, including cancer. The European Food Safety Authority has drastically reduced its recommended intake. Turbine blades shed fine dust containing bisphenol A, polluting water and soil. This issue demands attention. Source: https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/10/australian-notes-322/

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

The Department of the Environment didn’t answer the question so I will. And I quote: “Bisphenol A is a highly toxic synthetic organic compound used in the epoxy resins of turbine blades. Epoxy resins contain 30-40 per cent bisphenol A and turbine blades are the largest global consumer of epoxy resins. The annual global production of bisphenol A is about 2 billion kilograms and is increasing because the spearing of the environment with wind turbines is today’s fad. Bisphenol A is an endocrine disrupter that has been linked to about 80 diseases including cancers and reproductive disorders. It is lethal for young children. In 2012, the World Health Organisation warned about the potentially carcinogenic properties of endocrine disrupters and concluded that they pose a global threat to public health. The European Food Safety Authority has massively reduced by 1,000 times the dietary intake of bisphenol A to one hundred millionth of a gram per kilogram of body weight per day. All this is public record information which the wind industry must know. The leading edges of turbine blades shed fine dust and blade edges only have a 5-year guarantee. Each blade sheds a minimum of 0.2 to 2.5 grams of bisphenol A in dust per year. This dust is spread wide and far by wind. If one gram of bisphenol A gets into dam waters, 10 million litres of water are rendered unusable. Over the life of a turbine, this equates to pollution of half a trillion litres of water per turbine. This is real pollution, not the alleged pollution of carbon dioxide, the gas of life. This dust from eroding blades has covered large areas of our planet and bisphenol A is leaching into soils and waterways. This is a toxic time-bomb.” Quote from: https://www.spectator.com.au/2022/10/australian-notes-322/ #auspol

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks if wind turbines are made of epoxy resin in their blades, specifically mentioning bisphenol A. They express uncertainty about whether anyone at the table can answer the question and suggest taking it on notice. The speaker explains that bisphenol A is used in the epoxy resins of wind turbines and emphasizes its importance in the resins. They mention that if the resin breaks down and enters the water, it can harm marine life. The speaker acknowledges the significance of the question and agrees to provide a thorough answer later.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I've asked a former question, about the, bisphenol a in wind turbines. Has are wind turbines made of epoxy in their resin in their blades? Yes or no? I'm pretty sure there's no one at this table can answer that question. I have a sneaking suspicion. We probably need to take that on notice, Senator. Okay. Because I was told in a formal answer that it wasn't used but my understanding of it is, is that Bisphenol A is used in the epoxy resins that go on wind turbines. And it's an essential ingredient of the resins that are used on wind turbines because that effect breaks down, which it does over time. And especially for offshore wind turbines, if that gets into the water, that can damage, our marine life, which wouldn't be good, would it? Alright. Well, fair enough. So that's an important question. So I want to answer that well for you. So we'll take that on notice. Yeah. Absolutely.
Australian notes | The Spectator Australia The blades from environmentally friendly subsidised bird- and bat-chomping inefficient wind turbines have a short life and cannot be recycled. They weigh 10-20… spectator.com.au
SenatorRennick
Posted - November 21, 2023 at 2:03 AM
Saved - November 21, 2023 at 7:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Chief Health Officer claims the Covid vaccine reduced all-cause mortality, despite deaths rising in 2021 and 2022. When asked about the increase, they can't provide a clear answer. It's worth noting that the jump in deaths occurred after the vaccine rollout. This raises questions about their credibility. The truth is, they are lying.

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

The Chief Health Officer is now trying to claim the Covid vaccine reduced all cause mortality. I.e. deaths from other causes apart from Covid. This is despite the fact that deaths jumped from 162,000 to 172,000 in 2021 and to 190,000 in 2022. Seriously you just can’t make this stuff up. When asked why deaths jumped they can’t give a straight answer. They are still looking into it. If they are still looking into it how they rule out the vaccines? In 2021 there were only 300 more Covid deaths than 2020 so Covid can’t explain the rise in deaths. It’s worth noting the jump in deaths occurred from May onwards, one month after the vaccine rollout. They are just insulting our intelligence at this point. The truth is that they are lying. #auspol

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, a senator questions Professor Kelly about a study on the vaccine's effectiveness in reducing sickness and hospitalization. The senator raises concerns about the study's methodology and the increase in deaths in Australia. Professor Kelly stands by the study's findings, stating that all-cause mortality was decreased. Another official explains that the study found no evidence of increased mortality associated with COVID vaccines. The senator continues to question the increase in deaths in 2021 despite no COVID in the community, suggesting a correlation with the vaccine rollout. The official acknowledges the increase but rejects the temporal correlation. The senator asks what the health department has done to analyze the increase in deaths, and the official mentions the usual causes of death and the significant deaths from COVID in 2022.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Professor Kelly, in the last set of estimates, you quoted a study, in which, a real world study, of 3,800,000 people where you claimed that the vaccine reduced sickness and hospitalisation. Yet these people were not actually studied, and autopsies weren't, performed on the deaths, and the study was not randomised. And very worryingly or concerningly, the study's conclusion was that it actually reduced 4 cause mortality. Now I find that an incredible statement to make given that, the deaths in Australia rose from 162,000 in 2020 to 172,000 in 2021 to 190,000 in 2020 two. Do you still stand by the findings of that study? Speaker 1: Thank you for your question, Senator. So that that was the study that was, performed by the National Centre For Immunization Research and Surveillance which has now been Peer reviewed and published. What I talked about last time was, just a pre print. Mr Gould might come up, to assist with some of the answers. But, to your specific question, yes, I do still stand by that Speaker 0: that the vaccine reduced all cause mortality in regards to cancer and other things as well? Speaker 1: The all cause mortality, and I'll pass to Mr. Gould in a moment, but the all cause mortality, I'm not sure if it was actually itemized by particular causes, but all cause mortality was decreased. That is correct. Speaker 0: That all cause mortality didn't increase. It actually increased by 10,000 just in 2021. Speaker 1: There's reasons for that which I'll pass to Mr. Gould for. Speaker 2: So Doctor Philip Gould, I'm the First Assistant Secretary for the Health Economics and Research Division. The study that you're referring to did find, that found no evidence of the increased mortality or cause mortality associated with COVID vaccines. As you said, it did find, a statistically insignificant negative relationship between vaccines and all cause mortality. But that was, As I said, it was not statistically significant. In terms of medical, potential medical reasons for that, Professor Kelly might want to go into that. But there may be, a relationship with undiagnosed COVID being a potential contributor to all cause mortality. So that's one of the reasons which is which is, listed in the paper itself. Speaker 0: So what was the cause? So you're saying that was the cause of the jump of an increase of 10,000 from 162,000 to 172,000 in. So that's Speaker 2: been a separate issue. So I think it's important to point out that what the study showed was that people who had vaccines were relatively less likely to die of COVID than people who did not have vaccines. And that was the key finding of the paper. So that was a relative comparison between cohorts of people who hadn't been vaccinated. That in itself doesn't, relate to overall mortality rates. Speaker 0: Well, that's what I'm trying to get to is what caused the increase since 2021 of 10,000 deaths. Why there was an increase in 10,000 deaths given that COVID wasn't in the community. And I'm happy to table these documents, chair. This particular document. Speaker 3: I'm going to circulate it and the committee can then make a decision about whether the table at once was verified at the source. Can I just clarify Mr? Cormier? Are these questions best placed the whole portfolio. Speaker 4: We have we seem at the at the moment, we seem to have the relevant people here. So It's possible they should be in outcome 1 but, really it's in your hands chair whether you'd like to do it now since we have the people here. Speaker 3: Well if the agency is comfortable, we can proceed. But Senator Redlich, I would remind you Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 3: To try and place your questions in the correct place. Yep. Thank you. Is there a website or a source for this? Do you have a document with the where you got the information? Speaker 0: No. It's ABS statistics. All cause mortality statistics. Speaker 3: The committee will just need to take a moment to verify the information you've given us senator Dureyek. Sure. Speaker 0: I mean, the document I mean, you know, you can take the numbers 172,000 versus 162,000. Interestingly enough, the largest increase in deaths on a relative percentage basis were in New South, sorry, in Queensland and Western Australia. That didn't have any community COVID in the community throughout 2021. So yet again, and if you actually look at the IBS mortality figures, they jumped significantly in May after the so that was about 1 month after the vaccine roll roll roll out stepped up. What was the cause of this significant increase in deaths in 2021, notwithstanding that COVID wasn't in the community, throughout 2021 until, you know, late December. Speaker 2: So before handing to Professor Kelly on potential reasons just noting that a temporal correlation doesn't imply any kind of causation. So we have to begin. Speaker 0: Yeah. I've said that but we had an all increase here. We're not talking about a model. We're talking about real world deaths whereby real world deaths increased by a significant amount. Yep. And and And COVID wasn't in the community that year. Speaker 2: And we would acknowledge that, the ABS statistics showed both 2021 and 2022 that there was higher than normal mortality. That's part of their report. The most recent publication from the ABS covers all of 2022 as well as some of 2023. That as you know, Speaker 0: I've said 2022 is harder to analyse because COVID was in the community and that jumped by another 20,000, somewhere to 190,000. I just want to focus on 2021 where we had a clear period there where there was no COVID in the community, but we had the vaccine rollout. And there's a very strong temporal correlation between the vaccine rollout an increase in deaths. Do you accept that there's a strong correlation? Speaker 2: In terms of the numbers that you're quoting, I believe that's correct that there was an increase during that period. But again, I would reject that the temporal correlation actually Speaker 0: is is Okay. And that's within your arms to do that. So given that there was a significant increase in actual deaths, what has the health department done to analyse why those deaths jumped in 2021? Because that's, you know, it was a 6% increase. I mean, that's a Sigma six event. Speaker 2: The numbers in we've been looking at the numbers across the whole pandemic. So it's important not just to just focus on 2021. The ABS do a good job of, listing causes of death and major contributors. They tend to be, Have remained the usual suspects in terms of heart disease, dementia, diabetes and cancer. But we did see in 2022, significant deaths as a result of COVID. And I think it is worth saying here that of the roughly 20,000 excess deaths that the ABS reported in 2022, roughly 13,000 of those were either people dying from COVID or deaths which are associated with COVID. So about 20,000, 13 Speaker 0: Yeah. Thank Speaker 3: thank you. Authorised G Renick LNP
SenatorRennick
Posted - October 30, 2023 at 11:26 PM
Saved - October 31, 2023 at 3:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Office of Gene Regulator was questioned about the lack of genotoxicity testing for the Pfizer vaccine, which they admitted is a gene therapy. By pressing them, they contradicted themselves. The Gene Technology Act covers various activities, including manufacturing. The OGTR was required to regulate Pfizer and Moderna for transport and disposal. The law appears to have been broken, and accountability is necessary.

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

Last week I questioned the Office of Gene Regulator as to why they never tested the vaccine for genotoxicity given Pfizer admit it’s a gene therapy. It’s going over old ground but if you keep pressing these people they will eventually contradict themselves which is what happened. It’s worth noting that the Office of Gene Technology regulator admitted that manufacturing was regulated last year but is now saying the opposite. The Gene Technology Act states as per Section 10: "deal with" , in relation to a GMO, means the following: (a) conduct experiments with the GMO; (b) make, develop, produce or manufacture the GMO; (c) breed the GMO; (d) propagate the GMO; (e) use the GMO in the course of manufacture of a thing that is not the GMO; (f) grow, raise or culture the GMO; (g) import the GMO; (h) transport the GMO; (i) dispose of the GMO; and includes the possession, supply or use of the GMO for the purposes of, or in the course of, a dealing mentioned in any of paragraphs (a) to (i). You can see the GT Act contemplates activities/dealings after the (b) manufacturing phase. For Australian purposes the OGTR was and remains required to regulate Pfizer and Moderna in respect of (h) and (i) namely, transport and disposal. Transport includes the site of delivery. Link here: classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/c… It quite obvious the law has been broken and people suffered as a consequence. Authorities need to be held to account. #auspol

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pfizer's own website acknowledges that gene therapies involve a complex process, including transfection. The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy defines the COVID mRNA vaccine as a gene therapy that introduces new genetic material temporarily. The TGA's non-clinical report confirms the use of DNA in Pfizer's manufacturing process. The senator questions why the mRNA vaccine wasn't tested for genotoxicity and why the Office of Gene Technology didn't review it as a gene technology. The Gene Technology Regulator states that the TGA is responsible for approving vaccine products and addressing genotoxicity concerns. They clarify that the mRNA vaccines were imported into Australia, and if manufacturing and gene technology were involved, approval would have been required. The Regulator disagrees with the claim that transfection occurs in Australian citizens. The Office of Gene Technology's role is limited to assessing containment and environmental risks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have a Pfizer document here from their own website. It says Speaker 1: take that or circulate it so Yep. Speaker 0: I can Speaker 1: do that. Know what we're talking about. Speaker 0: Gene therapies are a delicate and, intentional process encapsulating the desired gene. Manufacturing gene therapies is challenging, and it requires certain steps including transfection. That is on Pfizer's own website. I'm happy to table that. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. And then I have also from the website of the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy. Because the vaccine, it's referring to the, COVID, mRNA vaccine, introduces new genetic material into cells for a short period of time to induce antibodies. It is a gene therapy as defined by the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, And then the TGA's own Pfizer non clinical report page 19 says the proposed commercial scale manufacturing process includes use of linear Linearized plasma DNA template for mRNA production. So we've now got Pfizer themselves to admit That the mRNA vaccines for gene therapy, the American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy admits the mRNA vaccines, the gene therapy And we've got the TGA themselves admit the DNA was used in the manufacturing process. Why wasn't The actual mRNA vaccine tested for genotoxicity and why didn't the, office of genetic, OTGR therapeutics, look at it in terms of a gene technology. Speaker 1: Okay. Doctor Rajbula, Gene Technology Regulator. Thank you for your question senator. I think the first part about the genotoxicity, that question has been asked Before because the therapeutic goods administration was the approving authority for the vaccine products, That is a question for TGA on genotoxicity. In relation to your question around manufacturing, I think it's useful to put a bit of context around that, in that, the committee is aware The mRNA COVID nineteen vaccines were fully formulated and imported into Australia, Which meant that there was actually no manufacture of the mRNA or the vaccine product itself here In Australia. If indeed the mRNA was being manufactured here And it's correct that gene technology was used in the modification of the mRNA then under the gene technology act an approval would have been required for that manufacturing step. Speaker 0: Well that's contradicts what you've said previously. You've said previously Gene Therapy and Gene Technology wasn't used. Now you're saying because it was Produced in another country that you're not responsible for checking, the gene therapy. Speaker 1: So the gene technology act doesn't reach into manufacturing in in other countries. Speaker 0: But it still involves transfection here. It does in it transfects cells of Australian citizens. Speaker 1: I disagree with that. Speaker 0: Well, that's what Pfizer said. Even they admit transfection is a part of gene therapy. Speaker 1: No Senator. Speaker 0: So you're you're disagreeing with Pfizer. The people who actually made the vaccine That transfection isn't a part of gene therapy. Speaker 1: I think she's disagreeing with you at the moment. Speaker 0: Well it's not my word. I've just read out What Pfizer said? Speaker 1: Welcome to my world. I think it comes down to a definition of what is a gene therapy. Speaker 0: Yep. That's right. And I'm relying on the manufacturer. But anyway, that's all Now I note that obviously the COVID vaccines had gene technology in them. What role did the Office of Gene Technology play In reviewing the safety of those vaccines? Speaker 1: We don't actually review the safety or the efficacy of any therapeutic product. That's the role of the Therapeutic Goods Administration. So our role in terms of the risk assessment is limited to just looking at The containment of the genetically modified organism with most of the vaccines being an AAV, a virus within the vaccine. We look at the people that are working and administering the vaccine. We look at how it's if it's imported the authorizations for import, Storage, transport and disposal. So our role in terms of the assessment is fairly limited to just looking at the environmental risks and making sure that The GMO is being handled correctly through all the stages up to administration and to a patient. Authorised G Renick LNP
SenatorRennick
Posted - September 19, 2023 at 3:45 AM
Saved - September 19, 2023 at 7:56 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
A CIA whistleblower claims the agency bribed analysts to alter their opinion on Covid-19's origin. The analysts were allegedly offered money to change their stance from a lab leak theory to animal-to-human transmission. The whistleblower states that six experienced officers were incentivized to shift their position. The mainstream media's silence on this story only highlights its significance. Source: NY Post. #auspol

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

The more the mainstream media ignore this story the more obvious it becomes. “A 'senior-level' CIA whistleblower has come forward to allege that the agency bribed analysts to change their opinion that Covid-19 most likely originated in a lab in Wuhan, China, according to the NY Post. The whistleblower told House committee leaders that his agency ' tried to pay off six analysts who found SARS-CoV-2 likely originated in a Wuhan lab if they changed their position and said the virus jumped from animals to humans,' according to a Tuesday letter from the chairmen of two House subcommittees investigating the pandemic response and US intelligence, Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) and Mike Turner (R-OH). "The whistleblower further contends that to come to the eventual public determination of uncertainty, the other six members were given a significant monetary incentive to change their position," the letters continue, adding that the analysts were "experienced officers with significant scientific expertise." Quote from: https://zerohedge.com/covid-19/cia-bribed-analysts-change-lab-leak-conclusions-senior-level-whistleblower #auspol

Video Transcript AI Summary
The CIA, initially created to combat communism, evolved under Allen Dulles into a group of assassins and a tool for American corporate power. They began using coups and disinformation campaigns within the US. The intelligence community has significant power to retaliate against those who challenge them, as Chuck Schumer warns. The media often unknowingly assists the CIA by publishing leaked information, a tactic employed since the 1970s. The CIA's major function is to disseminate propaganda and influence public opinion. They recruit journalists, including well-known figures, to control the stories that are introduced into the press.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: CIA was created in 1947. It only had one purpose, destroy communism. But under the leadership of director Allen Dulles, the agency morphed into a league of assassins. It was the violent vanguard for American corporate power. And soon coups and disinformation campaigns were used internally here inside the US. Just ask Chuck Schumer. Speaker 1: You take on the intelligence community, they have 6 ways from Sunday at getting back at you. So even for Practical supposedly hard nosed businessman, he's being really dumb to do this. Speaker 0: The media works in tandem with the intelligence agents, often unwittingly, but sometimes not, when Langley wants a narrative to ripple through the public realm, they package leaks to reporters who turn them into scoops. The tactic goes back to the seventies. Speaker 2: Disseminate propaganda to influence people's minds. And this is a major function of the CIA. You have contact with a journalist. You will give him true stories. You'll get information from him. You'll also give him false stories. You also work on their human vulnerabilities to recruit them in a classic sense to make them your agent So that you can control what they do. There's 400 journalists cooperating with the CIA, including some of the biggest names in the business To consciously introduce the stories into the press.
SenatorRennick
Posted - August 9, 2023 at 11:36 PM
Saved - August 10, 2023 at 8:22 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The TGA admits vaccine-induced myocarditis is an autoimmune response, affecting all organs. Pfizer didn't test for this. Initial focus was on COVID's respiratory impact, not heart issues. How can authorities be sure myocarditis cases aren't vaccine-related? Vaccine enhancements make it more potent than the virus. TGA's claim of 2 in 100,000 cases is false. Many affected individuals exist.

@SenatorRennick - Senator Gerard Rennick

The TGA finally admit myocarditis is an autoimmune response which means the vaccine causes autoimmune issues. Given biodistribution studies showed vaccine lipids entered all body organs this means all organs are at risk of autoimmune responses. No wonder Pfizer didn’t test for autoimmune responses in their trials! Is it just me or do others struggle to remember any mention of Covid causing myocarditis before the vaccine rollout. I seem to recall the initial hysteria was around Covid causing cytokine storms and respiratory problems with lots of pictures of people (young people at that) lying in bed with a ventilator struggling to breathe. Not pictures of people clutching hearts. Furthermore and I’m annoyed I didn’t ask this question how do health authorities know that people who had Covid didn’t actually get myocarditis from the vaccine given most of the adult population was vaccinated. It’s all to convenient to blame myocarditis on Covid, yet the authorities never tested the distribution and degradation of the vaccine spike protein so how can they rule out the vaccine having caused myocarditis for those who caught Covid. Let’s not forget the vaccine was codon optimised to increase the expression of spike protein, and the lipids were designed to enter all cells not just those with an ACE receptor. Given these enhancements increased the potency of the vaccine, I fail to see how the vaccine isn’t more toxic and dangerous than the virus. Finally, the TGA claim only 2 in 100,000 doses cause myocarditis from the vaccine. This is rubbish . That would mean only 1,200 people in Australia have myocarditis. I myself have spoken to hundreds of people who got it after the vaccine. #auspol @TGAgovau #pfizer #moderna

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asks Pfizer and Moderna to explain how the COVID-19 vaccine causes myocarditis. The response from the doctors is that the exact mechanism is still being studied, but myocarditis is generally an autoimmune response that can occur after COVID-19 or other infections. The speaker questions if other organs could also be affected by the vaccine, but the doctors explain that ongoing surveillance is in place to monitor potential risks. The speaker expresses concern about the lack of initial disclosure of these risks. The doctors emphasize the importance of preventing COVID-19 and state that the reported rate of myocarditis is around 2-3 per 100,000 doses. The speaker argues that if it can happen to the heart, it could happen to other organs. The conversation ends due to time constraints.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've asked both the 2 manufacturers tonight, Pfizer and Moderna, can they explain the process by which the vaccine causes myocarditis? I don't wanna I don't wanna talk about benefit risks. I want to know why the vaccine causes myocarditis? It damages heart cells. Okay? Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: Can you explain why the vaccine damages heart cells? Speaker 1: So I'll ask Doctor. Pingelly to respond. Speaker 2: Thank you. Look, this is an issue of some ongoing discussion in the medical literature, and I it is fair to say that the absolute definitive mechanism has not been isolated yet. But it's worth pointing out, I'll caveat those comments By saying that obviously myocarditis is generally an autoimmune phenomenon where antibodies are formed against, the cells, in this case of the heart and it occurs After COVID at a higher rate than it does after vaccination and it occurs in relation to a number of other infections such as coxsackieviruses. So It's something which is observed whenever there is an immune response. It is therefore likely that it is somewhat related to the immune response and I guess there is a similarity Speaker 0: the response to COVID and the I appreciate that. Speaker 2: Well, perhaps, I just Speaker 0: So so given that this wasn't identified for the rollout, And as you said, it's an ongoing area of concern and investigation. How can you then rule out, and you've admitted that an autoimmune potentially an autoimmune issue that other body organs aren't also being damaged by the vaccine, but they're subclinical issues because they're not the heart's obviously something that has a higher pain threshold or sends a greater signal that other issues or side effects from the vaccine or, you know, when you're saying that, you know, it's not necessarily causal, that the vaccine could be causing other autoimmune issues on other body organs? Is that a potential risk? Do you accept that that's a risk? Speaker 2: Look, Senator, as Professor Lawler has pointed out, the TGA maintains an ongoing surveillance of potential risks Some potential adverse events as they reported to us. It's the fact of the matter is with all medical products more information becomes available as they are used. Speaker 0: Look, I've answered the risk, But my issue is that you've never outlined those risks at the start. However, well Safe and effective without any qualification. Speaker 2: Well, I think if you look at the statement Regarding provisional registration, it's pretty clear that the basis on which they're approved. But it's also the case that, there is a risk benefit I realize you don't you said you don't want to discuss it, but if you're trying to prevent myocarditis, preventing COVID is the best way to do it. And so You do look Speaker 0: at the well, you do look at 10,000,000 people I'll dispute that on COVID. Speaker 2: You do look at what you're doing in terms of the rate of adverse events And since it is also an adverse event of COVID infection, the overall benefit even if that adverse event is likely to be positive. Now whether whether there is some unknown adverse event is purely speculative. It's it goes to proving a negative. Speaker 1: Well, that's not something we Speaker 0: can do. Because you're playing with people's lives. You can't say that's speculative. If you're risking people's health here? So we're not speculating in the casino or Speaker 1: you know Sorry, just before we answer. Speaker 3: Sorry. I was trying not to interrupt you as you're asking the question, but that is the last question. So I need to go to Senator Canavan. We are over time. So Thanks, Jim. If you could answer some comments. Certainly. Speaker 1: So I appreciate and I think that the speculative comment probably relates more to some of the Physiological and virological thoughts around how organs and organ systems are affected. Moving away from the speculative position, As we've mentioned a couple of times, we do undertake significant adverse event notification and monitoring. And in the context of 16,000,000 doses having been developed, the reported rate and we rely very much on the reported rate of adverse events of myocarditis and pericarditis Have been in the region of 2 or 2 to 3 per 100,000. So we rely on the, as Doctor. Pingel has highlighted, the growing body of real world evidence In our ongoing assessment. Speaker 0: It's per 1,000, not 100,000. Speaker 1: It's per 100,000 doses. Speaker 0: No, no, but injuries, the reporting injuries as per your weekly report 2 per 1,000? Speaker 1: And I'm wanting to make a clear distinction between this specific diagnosis of myocarditis Yep. Versus And Speaker 0: I'm talking about the other 998 Because if it can happen to the heart, it can happen to other body organs. That's my point. Because you're talking about 200,000, yet your own weekly report talks about 200,000 reported injuries? But thank you. I'll leave that comment.
View Full Interactive Feed