TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SenseReceptor

SenseReceptor
Posted - March 9, 2026 at 11:34 PM
Saved - March 10, 2026 at 7:31 AM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Dr. Lee Merritt: "Nazi Germany... hid their bioweapons under cancer research and so have we... [and] a guy won the Nobel Prize... [for producing] stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite... [and] I think [parasites have] been weaponized." "It only [works] if...[the] animals... [eat] a high-sugar diet or [are] vaccinated." This clip of Merritt, an orthopedic surgeon who did her residency in the United States Navy and served for over 10 years as a Navy physician and surgeon, is taken from an interview posted to the His Glory TV (@HISGLORYME) Rumble channel on November 4, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Why weren't these parasites a problem back then? And I will tell you, there's multiple factors to look at, but I think this has been weaponized. And it turns out that you, that in fact a guy won the Nobel Prize for this that you, to get— They showed that they could produce stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite. And this was also done in Japan with a different parasite. So two different groups of researchers, they showed you could do this. But it only worked if it didn't work in healthy, normal animals. It only worked in animals that either ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated. "So let's just think about this. What is the 20th century done in America? We started vaccinating. We started vaccinating the guys going down to World War I. That was when we first vaccinated our troops. And we've been doing it to the military ever since then, at about after World War II, then we took on vaccinating our school children. And then, as I predicted years ago, I said that you people think that these vaccines and school children, you're not standing up against them because you don't think it's gonna bother you. But they're coming after everybody. And that's what they are now, right? "They got the flu shot, the shingle shot. So vaccination does something to make you susceptible to these parasites. Not just this toxoplasmosis one, but the ones that cause cancer and all sorts of things. And what have they done about the food pyramid in the 20th century? We had the food pyramid and the bottom was all carbohydrates. So that's where we [are]. "And one last thing... I'll just say that in 1971, Nixon declared that we were going to stop the bioweapons offensive program in America. And we signed the treaty with I think 178 nations or something like that. We figured, we thought the Soviets turned around and violated it. And all sorts of people violated it. Well, probably everybody violated it, including us. "But, in any case, the same time that we signed that treaty, he converted Fort Detrick [into a] bioweapons lab. He took it to HNHS to be part of the National Cancer Institute. And that happened in Nazi Germany. They hid their bioweapons under cancer research, and so have we."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that parasites have become a problem because they have been weaponized. They reference a Nobel Prize-winning finding showing that a certain parasite could produce stomach cancer in rats, and that a different parasite produced this effect in Japan. They note these results only worked in animals that ate a high-sugar diet or were vaccinated, not in healthy animals. They then connect this to twentieth-century American policy: vaccination began with troops during World War I and continued in the military, then expanded to schoolchildren after World War II. The speaker predicts that vaccines at school would eventually affect broader segments of the population, not just children, and claims that vaccines have the effect of making people more susceptible to parasites, including those that cause cancer, not just toxoplasmosis. Regarding diet, the speaker mentions the food pyramid of the twentieth century, pointing out that the bottom consisted of carbohydrates, implying a link to susceptibility. The speaker then discusses bioweapons policy: in 1971, Nixon declared an end to the United States bioweapons offensive program and signed a treaty (they mention a 1978 figure, implying a multinational agreement). They claim that, despite this treaty, the Soviet Union and others violated it, and that perhaps everyone violated it. They assert that, at the same time the treaty was signed, Fort Detrick was converted from a bioweapons lab to be part of the National Cancer Institute. They compare this to Nazi Germany, stating that they hid bioweapons under cancer research, and claim that the United States did something similar. The transcription ends with emphatic agreement.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why weren't these parasites a problem back then? And I will tell you there's multiple factors to look at, but I think this has been weaponized. And it turns out that you that for there in fact, the guy won the Nobel Prize for this, that you to get they showed that they could produce stomach cancer in rats by giving them a certain type of parasite. And this was also done in Japan with a different parasite. So two different groups of researchers, they showed you could do this. But it only worked if it didn't work in healthy, animals. It only worked in animals that either ate a high sugar diet or were vaccinated. So let's just think about this. What has the twentieth century done in America? We started vaccinating we've we started vaccinating the the the guys going down to World War one. That was when we first vaccinated our troops, and we've been doing it to the military ever since. Then in at about after World War two, then we took on vaccinating our schoolchildren. And then as I predicted years ago, I said that you people think that these vaccines at schoolchildren, you're not standing up against them because you don't think it's gonna bother you, but they're coming after everybody. And that's what they are now. Right? They got the flu shot, the shingle shot. So vaccination does something to make you susceptible to these parasites, not just this toxoplasmosis one, but the ones that cause cancer and all sorts of things. And what have they done about the food pyramid in the twentieth century? We had the food pyramid, and the bottom was all carbohydrates. Yep. Exactly. So that's where we're so I think and and I'll and one last thing before the break is I'll just say that in 1971, Nixon declared that we were going to stop the bioweapons offensive program in America. And we signed the signed the treaty with, I think, 01/1978 nations or something like that. And we figured we thought the Soviets turned around and violated it and all sorts of people violated it. Well, probably everybody violated it, including us. But in any case, at the same time that we signed that treaty, he he converted Fort Detrick the bioweapons lab. He took it to HNHS to be part of the National Cancer Institute. And that happened in Nazi Germany. They hid their bioweapons under cancer research, and so have we. Wow. Wow. Yeah. Absolute

@DailyMail - Daily Mail

CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified https://trib.al/cKVJB6i https://t.co/xJAmNhln1L

SenseReceptor
Posted - February 28, 2026 at 8:03 PM
Saved - March 1, 2026 at 2:59 AM
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 28, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Saved - March 1, 2026 at 2:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I understand Netanyahu wants Trump to start a war with Iran, and they seem to be pushing for it. I see Trump dependently tied to the Fed, while a Netanyahu syndicate appears to direct day‑to‑day policy. I doubt they can win a real war without boots on the ground, and fear a “pretend war” could boost neocons and economic plunder. Their next move would be north–south if east–west fails.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts, April 20, 2025: "Netanyahu wants Trump to engineer a war with Iran, and it looks like they're trying. And... I don't see how they win... unless they have a pretend war, which Trump has been known to do." This clip of former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts (@solari_the) is taken from an interview with Propaganda In Focus (@PropagandaFocus). ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So Trump is completely dependent on two characters. He's completely dependent on the central banking system and the Fed, you know, for his day to day provision to run the government. But from everything we can tell, this group is totally reporting to the Netanyahu syndicate. And I won't call them Israel because, you know, poor Israel. "If you think we have a tapeworm, they've got the tapeworm par excellence. So, you know, Netanyahu and his syndicate, if you look at what he did during the pandemic, he was killing more Israelis than, you know, Palestinians. So, you know, that syndicate appears to be in total control day to day to day. And my concern is, you know, Netanyahu wants Trump to engineer a war with Iran, and it looks like they're trying. And, for the life of me, I don't see how they win. "I just I think whatever they do, unless they have a pretend war, which, you know, Trump has been known to do, then, you know, that you if you try to have a real war since you can't put boots on the ground, you're gonna lose. And if you lose, I can see how it makes the neocons more more powerful in terms of economic plunder. But the only way you know, your next step, you you have two choices...because the east west strategy failed, you didn't implode Russia. Now you've gotta get Canada, Greenland, and Panama because you if you can't go east–west, you're gonna go north–south."

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Trump is described as completely dependent on two pillars: the central banking system and the Fed for day-to-day provision to run the government. However, this group is claimed to be reporting to the Netanyahu syndicate, with Netanyahu and his syndicate asserted as in total control day to day. - The speaker asserts that Netanyahu, during the pandemic, was “killing more Israelis than Palestinians,” implying a harsh evaluation of Netanyahu’s actions. - The claimed dynamic is that Netanyahu wants Trump to engineer a war with Iran, and it appears that they are attempting to do so. The speaker cautions that they do not see a winning outcome, suggesting that if a real war is pursued without boots on the ground, there would be losses. - It is suggested that any such loss could make the neocons more powerful economically, implying a link between military action and economic plunder by neocons. - The speaker outlines strategic options: since the East-West strategy failed and Russia was not imploded, the alternative is to shift to a North-South approach by targeting Canada, Greenland, and Panama. This is presented as the next step for reshaping global strategy, given the failure of the East-West approach. - Trump is described as “educating the American people about what you need to keep the model going,” indicating a role in informing or guiding public understanding of the underlying framework or system. - The overall plan is characterized as a program to plunder their own populations and, by extension, plunder around the world, with a current focus on plundering the United States big time. The speaker asserts that this is the trajectory of the “syndicate.” - In sum, the transcript presents a narrative in which Trump relies on a Fed-centered financial system controlled by a Netanyahu-led syndicate, which allegedly drives aggressive geopolitical moves (notably toward Iran) and global plundering, with strategic shifts from East-West to North-South as part of an ongoing plan.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Trump is completely dependent on two characters. He's completely dependent on the central banking system and the Fed, you know, for his day to day provision to run the government. But from everything we can tell, this group is totally reporting to the Netanyahu syndicate. And I won't call them Israel because, you know, poor Israel. They're you know? Yeah. If you think we have a tapeworm, they they've got the tapeworm par excellence. So, you know, Netanyahu in his syndicate, if you look at what he did during the pandemic, he was killing more Israelis than, you know, Palestinians. Yeah. So, you know, that syndicate appears to be in total control day to day to day. And my concern is, you know, Netanyahu wants Trump to engineer a war with Iran, and it looks like they're trying. It does look that way. Yep. And I I for the life of me, I don't see how they win. I just I think whatever they do, they're unless they have a pretend war, which, you know, Trump has been known to do, then, you know, the you if if you try to have a real war since you can't put boots on the ground, you're gonna lose. And if you lose, I can see how it makes the neocons more more powerful in terms of economic plunder. But the only way you know, your next step, you you have two choices. You can because the East West strategy failed, you didn't implode Russia. Now you've gotta get Canada, Greenland, and Panama because you if you can't go East West, you're gonna go North South. So Trump is being very educating the American people about what you need to keep the model going. If you know? But while you do that, their plan is clearly to plunder their own populations. They've been plundering all around the world, and now they're ready to plunder certainly The US big time. So they are
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 22, 2026 at 5:59 PM
Saved - February 22, 2026 at 10:55 PM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXavtBk75I4

SenseReceptor
Posted - February 22, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Saved - February 22, 2026 at 10:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see sovereign governments basically under someone’s thumb, in a debt trap, controlled by central banks through credit and the need to trade to carry debt; that’s one force. But there’s also real physical force, and increasingly that invisible force is delivered by invisible technology. Weather warfare can trigger floods, earthquakes, tsunamis—disasters that look natural but aren’t. Covert wars worldwide rely on invisible weaponry.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The sovereign governments are... in a debt trap... so they're controlled by the central banks through credit... that's one force... But [there's also] physical force... as well. And... that... in my opinion, is delivered by invisible technology..." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), and combat correspondent Michael Yon (@Michael_Yon), as well as journalist Masako Ganaha (@ganaha_masako), is taken from a video posted to Yon's eponymous YouTube channel on February 16, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So, you know, from what I see, the sovereign governments are basically under somebody's thumb, okay? Part of it is they're in a debt trap. And so they're controlled by the central banks through credit and the need to trade to carry their debt. So that's one force. "But you also see enormous physical force implied as well. And increasingly that invisible force, in my opinion, is delivered by invisible technology. "So you have technology weather warfare that can cause floods, it can cause earthquakes, it can cause tsunamis, it can cause all sorts of what look like natural disasters, but in fact, are something else. So we have covert wars going on all over the world, and I think invisible weaponry is a big portion of it."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that sovereign governments are effectively under someone else’s influence. One major dynamic cited is that these governments are in a debt trap, which results in control by central banks through the mechanisms of credit and the need to trade in order to carry their debt. In addition to this financial leverage, the speaker notes the presence of substantial physical force as a contributing factor to the power structure. Beyond conventional power, the speaker emphasizes the role of an increasingly potent and “invisible” force delivered by invisible technology. The claim is that technology enables weather warfare, capable of causing floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, and other disasters that resemble natural events but are, in the speaker’s view, the result of other factors. This leads to the assertion that covert wars are being waged globally, with invisible weaponry representing a significant component of those conflicts. In summary, the speaker attributes widespread influence over sovereign governments to both financial mechanisms (debt and central bank control) and physical force, augmented by covert, technologically mediated methods that involve weather manipulation and other forms of invisible weaponry, contributing to ongoing covert warfare around the world.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So, you know, from what I see, the sovereign governments are basically under somebody's thumb. Okay? Part of it is they're in a debt trap, and so they're controlled by the central banks through credit and the need to trade to carry their debt. So that's one force. But you also see enormous physical force implied as well. And increasingly that invisible force in my opinion is delivered by invisible technology. So you have technology, weather warfare, that can cause floods, it can cause earthquakes, it can cause tsunamis, it can cause all sorts of what look like natural disasters, but in fact are something else. So, you know, we have covert wars going on all over the world, and I think invisible weaponry is a big portion of it.
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 20, 2026 at 5:38 AM
Saved - February 20, 2026 at 2:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that streaming services, sports, online gambling, and porn are major delivery systems for neurological warfare. I believe they enable control by pushing viewers from legal to illegal porn, creating a cheap control file. I cite a survey claiming 98% of American men watched porn, and note ownership of porn networks could amplify this effect.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Former Assistant Secretary of HUD Catherine Austin Fitts: "I think online gambling and porn are huge [neurological warfare] delivery systems... [And] if you can get people to migrate from legal porn to illegal, bam—you've got a control file, and you've got it cheap." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), and combat correspondent Michael Yon (@Michael_Yon), as well as journalist Masako Ganaha (@ganaha_masako), is taken from a video posted to Yon's eponymous YouTube channel on February 16, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I don't know how they— I think a lot of it comes in through the sports. Because one of the things you would hear is we want to get rid of the TV, but one of us wants the sports. They always keep the TV for the sports. "And I've become convinced that whether it's Netflix streaming or, the big streaming services or the sports, the big, I just think they are major delivery systems for neurological warfare. "I think online gambling and porn are huge delivery systems. So I remember reading a survey about two years ago for the six months prior, they did a survey. 98% of American men had watched porn. So it's a— and especially if you look at who owns the porn systems, I think that's also a huge delivery system. "And it does two things. Porn is a very cheap way. If you can get people to migrate from legal porn to illegal, Bam. You've got a control file and you've got it cheap."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that major delivery systems for neurological warfare include television sports and the broader streaming ecosystem. They suggest that people want to remove TV, but still want sports, and claim that both Netflix streaming and big streaming services, along with sports content, act as key delivery channels for neurological warfare. The implication is that these media platforms are powerful carriers of influence. They also identify porn and online gambling as significant delivery systems. The speaker recalls a survey from about two years earlier, noting that in the six months prior, 98% of American men had watched porn. They point to who owns porn systems as a factor in this dynamic. Regarding porn, the speaker asserts it serves two purposes. First, porn is a very cheap way to manipulate behavior, especially by migrating people from legal porn to illegal porn, which creates a “control file” while keeping costs low. Second, porn itself is a delivery mechanism. The speaker reinforces these points as part of a broader claim about how certain media and entertainment platforms function as pathways for influence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know how they I think a lot of it comes in through the sports because one of the things you would hear is, We want to get rid of the TV, but one of us wants the sports. They always keep the TV for the sports, and I've become convinced that, you know, whether it's Netflix streaming or, you know, the big streaming services or the sports, you know, the big, I just think they are major delivery systems for neurological warfare. Clearly. Right. Yeah. Right. Porn, I think online gambling and porn are huge delivery systems. So I remember reading a survey about two years ago. For the six months prior, they did a survey: 98% of American men had watched porn. So it's a and especially if you look at who owns the porn systems, I think that's also a huge delivery system. Another op, right? Yeah, definitely. Yeah, and it does two things. Porn is a very cheap way if you can get people to migrate from legal porn to illegal, bam, you've got a control file and you've got it cheap. But you can also deliver porn. Now, I
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 15, 2026 at 8:23 PM
Saved - February 16, 2026 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain that Epstein funded and networked the control grid, laundered money to finance the digital infrastructure—Palantir, crypto, programmable money—that would enable “Gaza in America.” The New York Fed member banks, with the CIA, control the infrastructure; Mossad cannot operate independently without their on-board support. The infrastructure is, in effect, controlled by the US Empire.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Epstein was financing... all [the] different parts of the control grid... software like Palantir or... crypto and programmable money... [it's] the whole infrastructure... to do Gaza in America... [but] this can't be an independent Mossad operation without complete integration with the New York Fed member banks and the CIA. It just can't... the infrastructure is controlled by the US Empire, so to speak." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a video posted to the Solari Report YouTube channel on February 15, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "If you look at what Epstein was financing and networking, he was financing and networking with the money he was presumably laundering all these different parts of the control grid. "So if you look at the digital control grid, whether it's the infrastructure and software like Palantir, or it's crypto and programmable money, you know, if you look at what's shown in these files, he is steadily financing and networking the whole infrastructure of what you're going to need to do Gaza in America. "If you look at the control that the New York Fed member banks have, whether of the government as depository or running the exchange stable, stabilization fund, or money going in and out, wire transferring the country, the Mossad and Israel can't do anything unless the New York Fed member banks, and therefore the CIA are on board for it. "So this can't be an independent Mossad operation without complete integration with the New York Fed member banks and the CIA. It just can't. It's the, you know, the infrastructure is controlled by the US Empire, so to speak."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss a view of a connected “control grid” and the role of financier networks in enabling wider geopolitical and technological infrastructures. They claim that Epstein was financing and networking across multiple parts of this system, with money allegedly laundered to support various components of what they describe as the control grid. They assert that in the digital control grid, including infrastructure and software such as Palantir or crypto and programmable money, Epstein was steadily financing and networking the entire infrastructure needed to operate in both Gaza and America. They further argue that the control exercised by New York Fed member banks—whether as depository for the government, managing the exchange stabilization fund, or handling money transfers into and out of the country—means that entities like Mossad in Israel cannot act independently without the cooperation of the New York Fed member banks and, therefore, the CIA. In their view, the infrastructure is governed by the “US empire,” implying that independent operations by Mossad are not possible without alignment with these American financial and intelligence institutions. Speaker 1 adds that Gaza appears to be increasingly like a beta rollout for technology and killing technology being developed by Silicon Valley. This framing ties the deployment of deadly technologies to a broader trajectory of innovation in Silicon Valley, as interpreted by the speakers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you look at what Epstein was financing and networking, he was financing and networking with the money he was presumably laundering all these different parts of the control grid. So if you look at the digital control grid, whether it's the infrastructure and software like Palantir or it's crypto and programmable money, you know, if you look at what's shown in these files, he is steadily financing and networking the whole infrastructure of what you're gonna need to do Gaza in America. Yep. If you look at the control that the New York Fed member banks have, whether of the government as depository or running the exchange stable stabilization fund or money going in and out wire transferring the country, the Mossad in Israel can't do anything unless the New York Fed member banks and therefore the CIA are on board for it. So this can't be an independent Mossad operation without complete integration with the New York Fed member banks and the CIA. It just can't. It it's the you know, the infrastructure is controlled by the US empire, so to speak. Speaker 1: Yes. Right. Yes. And now Gaza is looking more and more to me like a beta rollout of technology, of killing technology that's that's being created by Silicon Valley.
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 11, 2026 at 4:54 AM
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 2:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I hear Catherine Austin Fitts say bankers increasingly run everything and aim to move the entire financial system into a digital control grid via CBDCs and programmable money. She points to Davos and Larry Fink as openly promoting this, calling it a financial coup d’état to collapse the Republic, shifting fiscal and monetary policy to bankers, gradual over decades, with opaque government finances.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The bankers increasingly run everything...[and] we saw in Davos, Larry Fink... very aggressively promoting that they intend to move the entire financial system into this kind of digital control grid. So it's becoming very open... what they intend to do" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a discussion with General Michael Flynn (@GenFlynn) posted to Flynn's eponymous Rumble channel on February 4, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Grossly oversimplified, there's a movie that says all wars are bankers' wars. And in my experience, the bankers increasingly run everything. And what we're watching I call a financial coup d' etat. Because the bankers have decided, you know, for many, for several centuries, we've had a balance of power between the people's representatives controlling fiscal policy or taxation and the bankers controlling monetary policy. "And now the bankers have decided to use digital technology to essentially assert control of the fiscal side of the house as well as the monetary side of the house. And they can do that with CBDC or with stablecoins and asset tokens as programmable money. And they're moving to do that. "We just saw in Davos, Larry Fink, who's the acting co-chair of WEF, very aggressively promoting that they intend to move the entire financial system into this kind of digital control grid. So it's becoming very open the descriptions of what they intend to do. "Essentially, you're looking to collapse the Republic and go to a system where the bankers control both monetary and fiscal policy. And whether they leave the legislative representatives in the executive branch in place as a theater or not, I don't know. "This could, you know, it's very fluid and it could go in many directions. And one of the things to understand is one of the reasons this has been able to happen, it's been very incremental for decades, is the federal government does not run its financial statements and its financial operations in accordance with the law, and they don't properly disclose it. And we've had many Americans going along with that. The attitude has been, as long as I get my check, I'm okay with the system as it is."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that there is a shift toward bankers increasingly controlling both monetary and fiscal policy, describing it as a "financial coup d'etat." They claim that for centuries there has been a balance of power between the people's representatives who control fiscal policy (taxation) and bankers who control monetary policy. According to Speaker 0, bankers have decided to use digital technology to assert control over both sides of government policy, leveraging CBDCs (central bank digital currencies), stablecoins, and asset tokens as programmable money. They assert that this move is underway and cite Davos as evidence, noting that Larry Fink, the acting co-chair of the World Economic Forum, is aggressively promoting the idea of moving the entire financial system into a digital control grid. The speaker contends that the descriptions of the bankers’ intentions are becoming very open and explicit, and that the result would be the abolition or collapse of the republic in favor of a system where bankers control both monetary and fiscal policy. The speaker questions whether legislative representatives would remain in any executive or ceremonial role, describing the future as fluid and capable of many directions. They emphasize that the transition has been very incremental for decades, facilitated by the federal government not running its financial statements and operations in accordance with the law and not disclosing them properly. This, they claim, has allowed the shift to occur with the public largely unaware or complacent. Speaker 0 notes that many Americans have accepted the current system because they benefit from it in the short term—“as long as I get my check, I’m okay with the system as it is.” They frame this acceptance as part of the reason the changes have progressed with limited public pushback. In sum, the speaker contends that the bankers are moving to extend control from monetary policy into fiscal policy through digital technologies and programmable money, a process they describe as a quiet, long-running coup that could redefine the balance of power in government.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mostly oversimplified. There's a there's a movie that says all wars are bankers' wars. And in my experience, the bankers increasingly run everything. And what we're watching, I call a financial coup d'etat because the bankers have decided, you know, for many for several centuries, we've had a balance of power between the people's representatives controlling fiscal policy or taxation and the bankers controlling monetary policy. And now the bankers have decided to use digital technology to essentially assert control of the fiscal side of the house as well as the monetary side of the house, and they can do that with CBDC or with stablecoins and asset tokens as programmable money. And and they're moving to do that. We just saw in Davos, Larry Fink, who's the acting co chair of WEF, very aggressively promoting that they intend to move the entire financial system into this kind of digital control grid. So it's becoming very open, the descriptions of what they intend to do. So, essentially, you're looking to collapse the republic and and go to a system where the bankers control both monetary and fiscal policy. And whether they leave the legislative representatives in the executive branch in places, a theater, or not, I don't know. This could you know, it's very fluid, and it could go in many directions. And, and one of the things to understand is one of the reasons this has been able to happen, it's been very incremental for decades, is the federal government does not run its financial statements and its financial operations in accordance with the law, and they don't properly disclose it. And and we've had many Americans going along with that. You know, sort of the attitude has been as long as I get my check, I'm okay with the system as it is.
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 11, 2026 at 4:55 AM
Saved - February 11, 2026 at 2:01 PM
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 9, 2026 at 4:54 AM
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 3:55 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I quote Catherine Austin Fitts: central bankers reset every 80–120 years; we’re in the Going Direct reset, published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. She says the plan was set in August 2019 at Jackson Hole, with Larry Fink linked to the World Economic Forum, and that Trump’s job is to keep people asleep until they’re trapped.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "Every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset... published through the BlackRock Investment Institute... [And] Trump's job is... to get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a discussion with David Nino Rodriguez (@ninoboxer) posted to Nino's eponymous YouTube channel on February 5, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- Fitts: "So for 500 years, Nino, we've had an economic model in the Western world called central banking warfare. And I'll explain why, but let me just explain. The central bankers met and reviewed a plan called the Going Direct Reset in August 2019 at Jackson Hole. If you come to Solari, we have, you know, a book this thick on the whole thing and what the reset is. "Every 100 years, every 80 to 120 years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the Going Direct reset. Okay? And, and the plan was, was, organized and published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. Remember Larry Fink, who's now the acting head of World Economic Forum? Okay, so we are in a reset, and that's what it is. Trump's job is to get whole parts of society going along with it, okay? Nino: "To make it as painless as possible?" Fitts: "To get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap."

Video Transcript AI Summary
First speaker describes a long-standing economic model in the Western world described as central banking warfare. They state that central bankers have historically influenced the global economy, implying that the system operates under a framework of monetary control that has persisted for five centuries. The speaker asserts that there is an ongoing strategic maneuver tied to shifting economic arrangements, framing it as a managed process rather than spontaneous policy change. According to the first speaker, the central bankers convened to review a specific plan called the going direct reset, which took place in August 2019 at Jackson Hole. They claim that this plan is documented in substantial detail in materials available at Solari, indicating that the reset is a structured proposal with extensive justification and explanation. The speaker emphasizes that the reset is not a casual idea but a formalized strategy that has significance for the global financial system. They further state that the concept of a reset occurs periodically, describing a cycle in which a reset happens every eighty to one hundred twenty years. The claim is that the current moment represents one of these resets and that the going direct reset is the framework guiding it. The first speaker links the reset to the involvement of major financial actors, asserting that the plan was organized and published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. They name BlackRock’s leadership context by referencing Larry Fink and suggest he holds a role connected to the World Economic Forum, framing Fink as a pivotal figure in this strategy. The implication is that influential financial institutions and their leaders are instrumental in orchestrating the reset. The second speaker responds with a different emphasis, noting that banks are “funny” and that the current moment constitutes a war, specifically mentioning Trump. They claim that Trump needs a federal reserve and that he is taking gold back, suggesting a shift away from the existing centralized monetary framework. The second speaker states that the United States is moving out of the central banking system, reflecting a belief in a dramatic realignment of monetary policy and financial sovereignty. Both speakers convey the impression that they and their audience are witnessing or anticipate a deliberate, high-stakes transition in the global monetary architecture. The first speaker frames the reset as a strategic, centuries-spanning process designed to move society along with the plan, while the second speaker echoes a narrative of upheaval and reorientation surrounding governance, monetary control, and national economic sovereignty. The overarching theme is that a managed reset is underway, with Trump’s role framed as guiding society through it and keeping the public unaware of the trap embedded in the transition.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So for five hundred years, Nino, we've had an economic model in the Western world called central banking warfare. The central Speaker 1: banks are funny. The war is right now with Trump. I think he needs a federal reserve. He's taking gold back. We're getting out of this central banking system. We're that's what a lot of that's what my audience believes. I'm just gonna tell you that right now. That's what my audience believes. Speaker 0: Be because and and I'll explain why, but let me just explain. The central bankers met and reviewed a plan called the going direct reset in August 2019 at Jackson Hole. If you come to Solari, we have, you know, a book this thick on the whole thing and what the reset is. Every hundred years every eighty to a hundred and twenty years, the central bankers do a reset. We are in a reset. It's called the going direct reset. Okay? And and the plan was was organized and published through the BlackRock Investment Institute. Remember Larry Fink who's now the acting head of World Economic Forum? Okay. So we are in a reset, and that's what it is. Trump's job is to get whole parts of society going along with it. Okay? Speaker 1: To make it as painless as possible? Speaker 0: To make it to get you to stay asleep until they throw the trap.
SenseReceptor
Posted - February 7, 2026 at 2:06 AM
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 5:14 PM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "The problem isn't that [our] currency is fiat...[and] you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold...the central bankers have accumulated all [of it]. [And] now...you're [saying] we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind?" This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a discussion with Jerm Warfare posted to the UK Column News (@ukcolumn) YouTube channel on January 26, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-basing and secrecy, okay? And the failure of their elected representatives to obey the law. "So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing and you have secrecy, okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat, because what I will tell you is if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. "We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion. But it could be. Now, remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no, don't manage it responsibly, get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay, I want my check. "But you are not going to fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You're going to make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil, for 30 years the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're going to tell me we're going to go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? "Because now they've got the gold and if you start a gold transaction system now you need gold from them and they've got you over a barrel, right? And what are you going to do to get gold? You're going to have to sell your land, you're going to have to sell your kids, you're going to have to sell real assets to get their gold, right? Why would you do that? "Why would you create— You know, you're dependent on your enemy now you're going to increase your dependency on your enemy now. You're out of your mind, okay? That's not a sound money system. Especially because they want to make it digital. And so they're going to have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, wait til you see fiat gold when they own all the gold. "So you know, what we want is we want a fiat system and we want it with lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're going to have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course we can get there, but we can't get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker: The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-based and secrecy. And the failure of their elected representatives to require, you know, to get obey the law. So you have lawlessness, you have debt-based, and you have secrecy. The problem is not that the currency is fiat. Because if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion, but it could be. Now remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no. Don’t manage it responsibly. Get me my check. And if that means you’re irresponsible, that’s okay. I want my check. But you are not gonna fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You’re gonna make it much worse. Because while we’ve done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, you know, speak no evil for thirty years, the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you’re gonna tell me we’re gonna go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? Because now they’ve got the gold. And if you start a gold transaction system, now you need gold from them, and they’ve got you over a barrel. Right? And what are you gonna do to get gold? You’re gonna have to sell your land. You’re gonna have to sell your kids. You’re gonna have to sell real assets to get their gold. Right? Why would you do that? Why would you create, you know, you’re dependent on your enemy now. You’re gonna increase your dependency on your enemy now? You’re out of your mind. Okay. That’s not a sound money system, especially because they wanna make it digital. And so they’re gonna have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, where do you see fiat gold when they own all the gold? So, what we want is we want a fiat system, and we want it with, you know, lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You’re gonna have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course, we can get there. But we can’t get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt basing and secrecy. Okay? And and the failure of their elected representatives to to require you know, to get obey the law. So you have lawlessness, you have debt basing, and you have secrecy. Okay? The problem is not that the currency is fiat. Because what I will tell you is if if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. We have a debt based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion, but it could be. Now remember, there is no there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no. Don't manage it responsibly. Get me my check. And if that means you're irresponsible, that's okay. I want my check. But but you are not gonna fix this situation by by going to gold and silver. You're gonna make it much worse. Because while we've done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, you know, speak no evil for thirty years, The central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you're gonna tell me we're gonna go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? Because now they've got the gold. And if you start a gold transaction system, now you need gold from them, and they've got you over a barrel. Right? And what are you gonna do to get gold? You're gonna have to sell your land. You're gonna have to sell your kids. You're gonna have to sell real assets to get their gold. Right? Why would you do that? Why would you create you know, you're dependent on your enemy now. You're gonna increase your dependency on your enemy now? You're out of your mind. Okay. That's not a sound money system, especially because they wanna make it digital. And so they're gonna have fiat gold, which is even I mean, if you think fiat is bad, where do you see fiat gold when they own all the gold? So so, you know, what we want is we want a fiat system, and and we want it with, you know, lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You're gonna have to have some secrecy and and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course, we can get there. But we can't get there if if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short term behavior.

@beaverd - Beaver 🦁

fort knox hasnt had a full public audit since 1953 if its not there the dollar collapses. Might be the best way to fix everything

@Coinvo - Coinvo

CRAZY: 🇺🇸 According to Epstein emails, the Gold at Fort Knox is completely missing! 😳

SenseReceptor
Posted - January 26, 2026 at 4:00 PM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 3:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I say Trump is promoting digital ID and biometrics to address immigration, but don’t let Republicans trap you in a control grid. The federal government created the problem and can fix it without those measures.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts, June 2024: "Trump is promoting the digital ID and biometrics to deal with the immigration problem—do not let Republicans trick you into a control grid... to deal with [a] problem the federal government created and can address without all those things." https://t.co/yIBiEW2sqD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that Trump is promoting digital ID and biometrics to address immigration, warning listeners not to be tricked into a control grid. They caution against canceling the Fed and ending up with the BIS and IMF. Biometrics and a digital ID are described as methods to deal with immigration problems that the federal government created, yet the speaker says these measures would trap people in a control grid, and notes that “that’s not a bad thing” to point out this risk. The speaker claims Trump’s cabinet includes many people who were “basically part of the syndicate” trying to build the control grid. Before getting enthusiastic about Republicans, the speaker insists they must hold their feet to the fire and demand that they reverse the control grid.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But here here's the thing, and and I'm gonna be a bad guy now. You know, Trump is promoting the digital ID and biometrics to deal with the immigration problem. Do not let the Republicans trick you into a control grid. Dope. You know? Very good. Don't, you know, don't get tricked in to cancel the Fed and end up with the BIS and the IMF. Don't get tricked into biometrics and a digital ID to deal with the immigration problem that the federal government created, and and can absolutely address without all the things, because they're just tricking you into a control grid. That's not a bad thing. I hate to say it. If if you look at who Trump put into the cabinet, you know, he put into the cabinet a lot of people who were basically part of the syndicate that's trying to build the control grid. So, you know, before you get enthusiastic about the Republicans, you gotta hold their feet to the fire that they better, you know, they better reverse the control grid. Is great. Demand that they reverse the control grid. Demand it. Great information.
SenseReceptor
Posted - January 23, 2026 at 10:29 PM
Saved - January 26, 2026 at 12:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I view Netanyahu, Trump, Putin as collectivists who hate us and want to enslave us under a New World Order. They won’t reveal it all at once, preferring a gradual, staged game: win a little, lose a little, push us through conflicts, so there’s no big rebellion. The frog in hot water analogy captures how they slow us down while the world awakens.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

G. Edward Griffin: "[Netanyahu, Trump, Putin are] all collectivists...They hate us...[and] want to make us slaves...[but they can't] declare...the New World Order, and now we all go to prison...there'd be a rebellion...so we have to go through these stages of [fake] conflict." This clip of G. Edward Griffin (@GEdward_Griffin), the author of The Creature from Jekyll Island and host of the Red Pill Expo, is taken from an interview with Christian White posted to YouTube on January 22, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- White: "Netanyahu, Trump, et cetera. They're all kind of that there's theater going on. I mean, I assume that that kind of bleeds over on the geopolitical front." Griffin: "Yes, yes. But here again, they're all collectivists. See, that's the problem with our world. We don't really have any of these options being offered to us. We don't have any options that represent the ideal of collective— I mean, individualism. So they're fighting amongst each other, aren't they? But they all believe basically the same. They all want to be the top of the ladder. That's it. But as far as we are concerned, they consider us the enemy. They all hate us, they all want to subdue us. They all want to make us slaves or vassals to their empire. "But you do come to this question of strategies. How do you gradually work that out? You can't just declare and say, look, here's my trump card. I win. We're dealing a geopolitics game or a card game, and we have to condition the thinking of the people of the world that they're fighting a battle. Gradually, they're losing. Gradually, they're losing. Gradually, they're still losing. Oh, now they're still losing. And now they've lost. "But they sure tried hard, so it was okay in the sense that they did their best. If they just played the card all at once and said, okay, we, now declare that we are the New World Order, and you all go to prison, and it's going to be done today, there'd be a big rebellion. But as long as, you know, like the old story of the frog, you put it in the water and gradually turn up the heat. Frog will stay in there until he boils to death. But if you drop him into a pot of boiling water, boom, he's right out of it again. This is the strategy that our enemy is playing. They don't want us to get into the hot water too fast. They want us to gradually get used to it. "So we have to go through these stages of conflict and win a little bit and lose a little bit back and forth. Oh, we got a hero. Oh, well, he's not so much a hero. Oh, but he's a strong man. Well, he didn't do everything right, but he did some good things right. And what about this woman? Now she's really making sense. Oh, but she changed her mind. "They have to slow us down so that they don't see too much progress at one time. Although I have to admit, it looks like they're accelerating the whole thing, because I think they suspect that people are waking up. And if enough people understand what we're talking about, then that game won't work anymore."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: They talk about theater in geopolitics, suggesting there’s a similar dynamic there. They argue that all of these leaders are collectivists, and that there aren’t real options offered to represent individualism. They claim they all basically want to be at the top of the ladder, and as far as “we” are concerned, they consider us the enemy and want to subdue us, make us slaves or vassals to their empire. They then discuss strategies for gradually advancing their position. They argue you can’t just declare a decisive victory and expect it to be accepted. It’s a geopolitics game or card game, and the goal is to condition global thinking so people see a battle being fought. They say the opponents are gradually losing, then still losing, and then losing again, while they “did their best.” If the card had been played all at once to declare a new world order with everyone going to prison, there would be a big rebellion. Instead, the strategy is like the frog in gradually heated water: the enemy doesn’t want the water hot all at once, so progress is slow and incremental. Thus, the plan is to go through stages of conflict, winning a little, losing a little, back and forth, and presenting various figures as heroes or strong leaders who do some things right, or a woman who seems to make sense, then maybe changes her mind. The idea is to slow down progress so opponents don’t see too much progress at once. They acknowledge that it looks like the enemies are accelerating the process because they suspect people are waking up, and if enough people understand what is being discussed, the game won’t work anymore.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Netanyahu, Trump, etcetera, they're all kind of that that there's a that there's theater going on. Do you I mean, I I assume that that kinda bleeds over on the geopolitical front. Yes. Yes. Yeah. But here again, we they're all collectivists. See, that's the problem with our world. We don't really have any of these options be offered to us. We don't have any options that represent the ideal of individualism. So, they're fighting amongst each other, aren't they? But they all believe basically the same. They all want to be the top of the ladder. That's it. But as far as we are concerned, they consider us the enemy. They all hate us. They all wanna subdue us. They all wanna make us slaves or vassals to their empire. So, now But you do come to this question of strategies. How do you gradually work that out? You can't just declare and say, look, here's my trump card, I win. We're dealing a geopolitics game or card game and we have to condition the thinking of the people of the world that they're fighting a battle. Gradually they're losing. Gradually they're losing. Gradually they're still losing. Oh, now they're still losing. And now they've lost but they sure tried hard. So it was okay in the sense that they did their best. If they just played the card all at once and said, okay, we now declare that we are the new world order and you all go to prison and it's gonna be done to death. There'd be a big rebellion. But as long as, you know, like the old story of the frog, you put it in the water and gradually turn up the heat, frog will stay in there till he boils to death. But if you drop him into a pot of boiling water, boom, he's right out of it again. This is the strategy that our enemy is playing. They don't want us to get into the hot water too fast. They want us to gradually get used to it. So, we have to go through these stages of conflict and win a little bit and lose a little bit back and forth. Oh, we got a hero. Oh, well, he's not so much a hero. Oh, but he's a strong Well, he didn't do everything right, but he did some good things right. And what about this woman? Now, she's really making sense. Oh, but she changed her mind? I see. Well, maybe next time. No. They have to slow us down so that they don't see too much progress at one time. Although I have to admit, it looks like they're accelerating the whole thing because I think they suspect that people are waking up and if enough people understand what we're talking about then that game won't work anymore.
SenseReceptor
Posted - January 19, 2026 at 6:04 AM
Saved - January 19, 2026 at 9:47 PM
SenseReceptor
Posted - January 19, 2026 at 6:04 AM
Saved - January 19, 2026 at 9:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I reference Whitney Webb’s August 14, 2025 clip noting Trump is openly building databases on people with Palantir, similar to ICE, and that the administration announced it’s for everybody.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Whitney Webb in August 2025: "Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir... most people know they're doing that with ICE, but the administration [has] announced... they're doing it for everybody." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Sabrina Salvati (@SabbySabs2) posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses Palantir and expanded government use. Key points: - Palantir is openly building databases on people, used with ICE and announced for broader government use; Palantir also manages all health data due to extensive contracts with HHS. - Trump’s first term included a push to have social media companies flag statements to prevent shootings, using analytics to determine intervention before a crime—concept described as “minority report.” - William Barr, during the first Trump administration, created DEEP, a program that legalized precrime in the United States; there were a few arrests under DEEP for Facebook posts, but not many, with the legal framework in place since Trump’s first term. - The pitch for a precrime system included HARPA, a health-focused version of DARPA, and a program called Safe Homes intended to analyze American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence. Based on that analysis, individuals could be sent to a court-ordered psychologist or physician or placed under house arrest without having committed any crime. - With Palantir’s increased government integration, especially through the Doge agency led by Elon Musk, Palantir has embedded itself further in government, including the IRS and mortgage-related entities like Fannie Mae; this involves access to data from the Department of Treasury and the IRS, forming a master database aimed at stopping crime before it happens. - Palantir’s precrime activities included piloting predictive policing programs in police departments, initially in New Orleans, targeting primarily low-income minority neighborhoods. - Other companies besides Palantir, such as Predpol in Los Angeles, claim to provide predictive policing with an accuracy of 0.5%; contracts with Predpol have not been terminated. - The overarching concept traces to the Panopticon idea: constant surveillance leads people to police themselves and censor themselves, implying control through perpetual observation, rather than purely improved efficiency in policing. The speaker characterizes this as the foundational form of control.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course, people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data Because they contract extensively with HHS. So, you know, this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One point on that I would point to is how Trump in his first term, there was the spate of mass shootings, I believe, in the 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed, basically. That's minority report. Yeah. Actually, William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized precrime in The United States, and I think I was, like, one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called DEEP. And there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that. But not that many, but the legal framework has been there since, you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to, you know, bring about some sort of pre crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA. And the the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes, and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence and then based on that would either you know send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even, you know, house arrest without them having committed any crime. So now that we have big tech even more intertwined with Trump round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk agency, has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that, know, have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances, and the IRS and all of that. Know all of this is going to go into this master database and the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs, is pre crime, and mainly low income minority neighborhoods starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called Predpol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent. And they haven't gotten rid of the contract. So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean, that's what it's gonna be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the British for prison designs in the eighteen hundred, eighteen hundreds, the panopticon, the idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, you know, be, you know well obviously out of the prison context you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever you know then people will police themselves if they're under constant if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately, that's the form of control it is about.
SenseReceptor
Posted - January 5, 2026 at 3:45 AM
Saved - January 5, 2026 at 6:18 AM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

WOW! The legendary Rosa Koire, author of Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21, said that the U.S. and China were working in conjunction on a "sterilization vaccine" in 2012(!!!). She knew they were going to launch a depopulation "vaccine" 8 years before Covid kicked off!

Video Transcript AI Summary
China was one of the signatories to Agenda 21, which is not a treaty; it is an agreement. They signed on to it. They have their own Agenda 21 like every country that signed on, and in theirs, they have a population control clause. They're working on a population sterilization vaccine with The United States.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: China was one of the signatories to agenda 21, which is not a treaty. It is an agreement. Right? They signed on to it. And you know what? They have their own agenda 21 like every country does that signed on. And in theirs, they have a population control clause. They're working on a population on a sterilization vaccine with The United States.
SenseReceptor
Posted - December 29, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Saved - December 30, 2025 at 7:53 PM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

The biggest story in history is unfolding right now, but few know about it: Dr. Francis Boyle died mysteriously right before he was set to testify against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, et al saying the Covid jabs are bioweapons This case is about the extermination of our species! https://t.co/w68XG1di3Y

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Francis Boyle, a sixth witness, is described as an expert on bioweapons who drafted several bioweapons conventions related laws in the United States. Three weeks after he agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs that the products and the process were deployments of bioweapons, he suddenly died. The cause of death remains unknown. He was in his mid-seventies, perfectly healthy prior, and teaching full time at the time of his death. His death is considered a shock to all involved, and the account states that it looks very suspicious to the speaker. The speaker emphasizes that they cannot speculate on what happened but urgently would like to know the cause of death. The speaker concludes with, “These people stop at nothing.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now there was a sixth witness, professor Francis Boyle, who is actually expert on bioweapons, having, drafted, bioweapons, you know, several bioweapons conventions related laws in The US. And three weeks after he agreed to testify on behalf of the plaintiffs that these products and the and the process was deployment of bioweapons, he suddenly died. And we still don't know the cause of death. And the only thing that we know is he was perfectly healthy prior and was teaching full time. He's in his mid he was in his mid seventies. And this was a shock to all of us. And we so this is this looks very suspicious to me. I, you know, I can't speculate on what happened, but I would really like to know the cause of death, and we don't know that. So that's where we are right now. This is how serious it is. These people stop at nothing.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Few know how incredible @PhdSansone is. He's the one who got Dr. Francis Boyle—the eminent lawyer who drafted the legislation for the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989—to submit a signed affidavit claiming that the Covid jabs are literal bioweapons (See tweets 2/3/4) https://t.co/ajPrBviFov

Video Transcript AI Summary
Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.
SenseReceptor
Posted - December 21, 2025 at 9:41 PM
Saved - December 22, 2025 at 3:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m highlighting concerns about lipid nanoparticles in vaccines: they traffic through the body and bioaccumulate in ovaries and adrenals, despite two decades of work to reduce toxicity. I reference rat data and Onpattro as precedent, noting liver targeting via ApoE. I’m baffled how Moderna and Pfizer allegedly “solved” the toxicity problem in 2020 with an ionizable cationic lipid. What exactly is that?

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Jessica Rose: "This is kind of dark...[but] lipid nanoparticles... traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate... into the ovaries and the adrenals, etc...[and they were] trying to make them not toxic for... two decades...[So how did] Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously [solve] the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid [for the Covid injections]. What the hell is that?" This clip of applied mathematician, immunologist, and computational biologist Jessica Rose (@JesslovesMJK) is taken from a discussion with John Beaudoin (@JohnBeaudoinSr) posted to The Last Boomer Podcast Rumble channel on December 20, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "This is kind of dark and I'm sorry, I gotta go there. It's kind of impossible that they didn't know all this shit. We didn't need the FOIA requested pharmacokinetic data from Japan, although thank God for Byram Bridle for getting that to us, which shows clearly in Wistar rats that the lipid nanoparticles in this Pfizer context traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate, including into the ovaries and the adrenals, etc. "There was a paper published in 2012 that demonstrated exactly this in Wistar rat. Same model, same lipid nanoparticles, they use different kinds of nanoparticles, but it showed the same thing very clearly, that one of the main places that these, these lipid nanoparticles traffic to were the ovaries. "And the reason why we use Wistar rat models and mice models before we go to humans is because we're very similar biologically. That's the whole reason. So if something happens in a mouse or a rat, you gotta be careful because it might happen in a human too. Wink, wink. "So another thing I want to throw in here is that we— There's this drug, pardon me, there's this drug called Onpattro, which is utilizing the exact same kinds of lipid nanoparticles, which act as like in the same way that chylomicrons do. It's like these things that we, we inherently have for fat metabolism that have proteins adsorbed, which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, that traffic these guys, these lipid nanoparticles with their silencing RNA cargo, to the liver via ApoE. Because there are these ApoE receptors in the liver in high, quantity or they're expressed at high levels. "These genius biotech guys have discovered, and I'm not being sarcastic, they are geniuses for doing this. But this shit shouldn't be being used in humans. This stuff traffics directly to the liver. This is all known. They've been studying lipid nanoparticles and trying to make them not toxic for freaking two decades, people. "But the thing is, that's very suspicious to me and I have no answers to these questions so far, is how is it possible that in 2020 or whatever, whenever it was, they did this? Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously solved the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid. What the hell is that?"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: This is kind of dark, and I'm sorry. I gotta go there. It's kind of impossible that they didn't know all this shit. We didn't need the foyer requested pharmacokinetic data from Japan, although thank God for Byron Bridal for getting which that to shows clearly in Wistar rats that the lipid nanoparticles in this Pfizer context traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate, including into the ovaries and the adrenals, etcetera. There was a paper published in 2012 that demonstrated exactly this in Wistar Rats, same model, same lipid nanoparticles, they use different kinds of nanoparticles, but it showed the same thing very clearly that one of the main places that these lipid nanoparticles traffic to were the ovaries. And the reason why we use Wistar rat models and mice models before we go to humans is because we're very similar biologically. That's the whole reason. So if something happens in a mouse or a rat, you gotta be careful because it might happen in a human too. Wink, wink. So another thing I wanna throw in here is that we there's this drug pardon me. There's this drug called ONPATTRO, which is utilizing the exact same kinds of lipid nanoparticles, which act as like in the same way that chylomicrons do. It's like these things that we inherently have for fat metabolism that have, proteins absorbed, which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, that traffic these guys, these lipid nanoparticles with their silencing RNA, cargo to the liver via APOE because there are these APOE receptors in the liver in high quantity or they're expressed at high levels. And so these genius biotech guys have discovered and I'm not being sarcastic. They are geniuses for doing this. This shit shouldn't be being used in humans. This stuff traffics directly to the liver. This is all known. They've been studying lipid nanoparticles and trying to make them not toxic for freaking two decades, people. But the thing is that's very suspicious to me and I have no answers to these questions so far is how is it possible that in 2020 or whenever it was they did this, Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously solved the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid? What the hell is that? Speaker 1: It was Operation Warp Speed, because you wave a magic wand from the executive office of the President of The United States and everything, all the checks and balances downstream go away. He's very proud of the fact Speaker 0: that
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is this is kind of dark, and I'm sorry. I gotta go there. It's kind of impossible that they didn't know all this shit. We didn't need the foyer requested pharmacokinetic data from Japan, although thank God for Byron Bridal for getting which that to shows clearly in Wistar rats that the lipid nanoparticles in this Pfizer context traffic everywhere in the body and bioaccumulate, including into the ovaries and the adrenals, etcetera. There was a paper published in 2012 that demonstrated exactly this in Wistar Rats, same model, same lipid nanoparticles, they use different kinds of nanoparticles, but it showed the same thing very clearly that one of the main places that these lipid nanoparticles traffic to were the ovaries. And the reason why we use Wistar rat models and mice models before we go to humans is because we're very similar biologically. That's the whole reason. So if something happens in a mouse or a rat, you gotta be careful because it might happen in a human too. Wink, wink. So another thing I wanna throw in here is that we there's this drug pardon me. There's this drug called ONPATTRO, which is utilizing the exact same kinds of lipid nanoparticles, which act as like in the same way that chylomicrons do. It's like these things that we inherently have for fat metabolism that have, proteins absorbed, which is on the surface of the lipid nanoparticle, that traffic these guys, these lipid nanoparticles with their silencing RNA, cargo to the liver via APOE because there are these APOE receptors in the liver in high quantity or they're expressed at high levels. And so these genius biotech guys have discovered and I'm not being sarcastic. They are geniuses for doing this. This shit shouldn't be being used in humans. This stuff traffics directly to the liver. This is all known. They've been studying lipid nanoparticles and trying to make them not toxic for freaking two decades, people. But the thing is that's very suspicious to me and I have no answers to these questions so far is how is it possible that in 2020 or whenever it was they did this, Moderna and Pfizer simultaneously solved the toxicity problem of lipid nanoparticles by coming up with this ionizable cationic lipid? What the hell is that? Speaker 1: It was Operation Warp Speed, because you wave a magic wand from the executive office of the President of The United States and everything, all the checks and balances downstream go away. He's very proud of the fact Speaker 0: that
SenseReceptor
Posted - December 17, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Saved - December 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

It's hyper-critical to connect these two pieces of information: We know from Mike Yeadon et al. that the Covid jabs are undoubtedly bioweapons. We know from whistleblower Zowe Smith that Palantir provided the AI software used to distribute the bioweapons throughout the U.S. https://t.co/rwCMJSPanq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Yeason presents three principal assertions about the vaccines. 1) The first principle: we were told these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called the spike protein. The spike protein is described as on the outside of the virus, and vaccines were said to encode the protein to train the immune system. Dr. Yeason explains that the immune system treats anything foreign as a threat and will attack cells that manufacture a foreign protein, leading to tissue damage. He notes that this principle of “self, non self” and tissue targeting is fundamental to organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases, and says this was designed into every company’s molecule (Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca). He asserts that by 2020 he knew these were designed to cause injury. 2) The second principle: what was encoded is the spike protein. He states he did not know what spike protein was at first, but describes spikes on the outside of the virus and claims they are known toxins (neurotoxins, cardiotoxins) that prompt blood coagulation. He questions why a medicinal product would encode something that would harm the body when expressed. 3) The third principle: lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used to formulate two of the Pfizer and Moderna products. He explains that lipid nanoparticles are toxic in general and are known to promote uptake of their payload into visceral organs, especially the liver and ovaries. He asserts that when injected into women and girls, these materials would travel through the body, concentrate in reproductive organs, be expressed, be recognized as foreign, and kill those cells. He asks what possible motivation there could be for using that formulation when other options exist. This, he says, confirms that the first two observations were not mere risks but intentional design. Dr. Yeason concludes that these three points together indicate that someone in a room designed injections to injure, kill, and reduce fertility in the people given them, aiming to lower fertility and reduce the population over time. He states he has observed this “all around me for five years since that moment.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The really important thing I need to tell you about, because this comes from the core of my training, and then decades of application of looking for potential toxic vulnerabilities in a medicine. It was in the core of my training to look out for molecules and components that were picked up for good reasons to accomplish some medicinal aim, but might have toxic liabilities. When I describe to you three things about these so called vaccines that I know as a professional from this industry that gave birth to them must axiomatically cause injury or be known to be risks. I could pick others, but there are three that I know to be true in the heart of my being in training. The first one is we were told that these molecules were gene sequences that encoded something called spike protein. The spike protein we were told was on the outside of this virus. Now I don't agree with that, but this is what we were told. A cartoon like a sphere with spikes coming out of it. We were told vaccines encoded the protein, the spike protein that sat on the outside of these viruses and this would train your immune system to fight it off. Ladies and gentlemen, it's a really important concept in immunology. It's taught to every person who has a training in immunology, as I did, in the first lesson. What allows your body to treat itself kindly but to go to war if something untoward is discovered in your body and the concept is this self, non self or foreign. My body is healthy right now, my immune system is surveilling all parts of my body, at peace with itself because everything it encounters is known to it to belong to my Eden itself. If you inject me with a gene sequence that will make my body manufacture a foreign protein that isn't me, that is a viral protein, my body, every cell in my body that follows that instruction will signal to my immune system that I have been attacked and my immune system goes to war and attacks and kills every cell that complied with that instruction and that is what has happened ladies and gentlemen to every cell in every tissue in every person who has been thus injected. The toxicity that you would experience varies tremendously because some people would take it up efficiently, copy it efficiently, make the protein for a long time and I'm afraid those people are mostly dead. Other people took it up poorly, transcribed it poorly and only briefly, and those people are alive. And then there's every continuity in between. But that point that if you inject an instruction that makes your body make a foreign protein that is not self, your immune system will attack it. Ladies and gentlemen, you know this. This is the principle of tissue matching in organ transplantation. This is the principle behind failed tissue transplant organ rejection. This, ladies and gentlemen, is the basis behind autoimmune diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and many others and neurological diseases where you your body destroys itself. That is the first principle that was designed into every company's molecule, Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson, AstraZeneca. So I knew by the 2020 these were designed to cause injury. How much I didn't know, I still don't completely know. But this this expert is telling you that they were designed to cause injury. The second really important point to tell you about is what was encoded in these gene based vaccines, alleged vaccines, is spike protein. I didn't know what spike protein was. It was new to me, but it's the spikes on the outside of this alleged virus that I don't think is real. I couldn't I could find proteins like it, and I found all of them were known to be toxins like neurotoxins, cardiotoxins, and things that would prompt blood coagulation. So again the question why would you encode in your helpful medicinal product something that when expressed in your body would harm you? That's the second thing. There is a third one which is when I discovered it late in 2020 or early twenty twenty one I have to say I cried. Two of the products made by Pfizer and Moderna were formulated. Every medicine is formulated. You'll be familiar with a tablet, might be film coated or dry, it might be a capsule of various sizes, it could be a liquid for injection and inhaler. All of these you have the active principle but it's surrounded protected with something that helps it do its work, hopefully beneficial work. Two of these products were wrapped in something called lipid nanoparticles or LNPs. Lipid is fat, nano means tiny, particle means little blobs. So they were wrapped in lipid nanoparticles and I looked them up and I thought, oh that's quite interesting. They had been used before in certain oncology drugs but here was the thing as a toxicologist when I started researching I thought these things are known to be toxic and the further I explored here is the shocking thing Lipids nanoparticles, every one of them tested is known to promote the uptake of their payload, whatever they were protecting, into the organs inside your abdomen, what's called the visceral organs and most prominently liver and your ovaries. So ladies and gentlemen the person who picks lipid nanoparticles to formulate these materials knew professionally that when it was injected into women and girls this material would travel around their body and concentrate in their reproductive organs and then it would do those two things I just described it would be expressed and your body would recognize it as foreign and kill those cells. It would when expressed cause toxicity directly to those cells and I ask you ladies and gentlemen what possible motivation could you have for doing that when you could have picked half a dozen other means of protecting the drug and I have to say at that point I knew deeply in my heart that the first two observations I made weren't just like mistakes or things they would ride the risks. These three things together told me someone got in a room someone like me and said doctor Yeason designed injections that will injure kill and reduce fertility in the people you give it to and design it so that it won't kill everybody it won't injure everybody but if we give it to enough people over time, it will lower the fertility in their health and reduce population. And this is what I have watched happen all around me for five years since that moment.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith: "A program called Tiberius... was provided by Palantir... the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify targets... for... Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores... So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They [could] tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your [financial situation], they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score. "They [used] that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where [they sent] their ventilators, where [they sent] the remdesivir, and where [they sent] the vaccines that people [weren't] taking. That was the program that informed those decisions... [the] Palantir Tiberius program." This clip of Smith (@Zowe_TKMC), who is also the author of The Covid Code: My Life in the Thrill Kill Medical Cult, is taken from a conversation with The Real Natureboy (@NBNNatureboy) posted to Rumble on December 5, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Then I found Whitney Webb's article talking about HHS Protect and how that was a pro—There was a program called Tiberius built into that that was provided by Palantir. This is the same Tiberius program that we believe is used in Gaza to identify the targets, the Hamas targets for drone strikes. Same program, but it was used for a military operation, Operation Warp Speed, to assign people behavior scores. "So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you volunteer? Did you, put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They can tell all of that. They could tell location data, they could tell ethnicity, they could tell what's your finance, they could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score. "They also use that information since hospitals had to send, things like their, their case mix index, how many patients were there, how many ventilators. They use that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where do they send their ventilators, where do they send the remdesivir, and where do they send the vaccines that people aren't taking? That was the program that informed those decisions, was this Palantir Tiberius program. And the reason it's so nefarious is as you mentioned earlier, they have drones here in America. Our police are already using them. I checked in my state, in my county, they've had contracts since 2011 to get drones here, and they're already using them. They're saying that they're using them for, people that have firearms. "So it's like a firearms response team, I think it's called. F.I.T. is their acronym. And so it's any person who's suspected of having a firearm, they'll send a drone out instead of a police officer because it would be dangerous for a police officer to go and get shot, but not as bad for a drone to go and get shot. "So that's how they're framing it. Are these armed drones or are these just observational drones? I think they're just observational at this moment in time. But there is an article, peer-reviewed article actually, talking about how to deploy different Covid measures, countermeasures, and having drones deliver packages, like having drones deliver vaccines. "It's not going to be that hard. I mean, our military already has what's called LMAMs, which are, that's their acronym for like a individually autonomous flying drone, like a swarm of them. And those are the ones that could have, I forget what their military term is. But it could be a weapon or it could be a drug."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses Whitney Webb's article about HHS Protect and a program called Tiberius provided by Palantir. He claims this is the same Tiberius program believed to be using Gaza to identify drone strike targets, described as the "Homos targets." He states the program was used for Operation Warp Speed to assign people behavior scores, indicating whether they got vaccines, wore masks, or practiced distancing, and that it could reveal location data, ethnicity, finances, and people they have been around. The Tiberius program, he says, would use that information to assign a behavior score. He adds that hospitals sent data such as case mix index and ventilator usage, and that this data was used to target countermeasure strikes—deciding where to send ventilators, remdesivir, and vaccines that people were not taking. He calls this the "Volunteer Tiberias program" and argues that the nefarious aspect is amplified by the existence of drones in America, noting that police in his state and county have had contracts since 2011 to obtain drones and are using them. He mentions a firearms response team acronym, FIT, which would deploy a drone to engage with persons suspected of having firearms instead of sending a police officer, framing it as safer for officers but potentially dangerous for drones. Speaker 0 clarifies whether these are armed or observational drones, speculating they are currently observational. He references a peer-reviewed article about deploying COVID countermeasures with drones delivering packages, including vaccines. He suggests it wouldn’t be hard, noting the military already has LMAMS (low observable munitions or autonomous flying drones) capable of autonomous swarms, which could be used as weapons or to deliver drugs. He closes by tying these points to the possibility of drones playing a role in enforcing countermeasures and distributing medical or military payloads.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Then I found Whitney Webb's article talking about HHS Protect Mhmm. And how that was a pro there was a a program called Tiberius built into that that was provided by Palantir. This is the same Tiberius program that we believe is using Gaza to identify the targets, the Homos targets for drone strikes. Same program. Wow. But it was used for a military operation, operation warp speed, to assign people behavior scores. So did you go and get your vaccines? Did you did you put on your mask? Did you do distancing? They can tell all of that. They could tell location data. They could tell ethnicity. They could tell what's your finance. They could tell who you've been around. And the Tiberius program would use that to assign you a behavior score. So so what you're saying They also use that information since hospitals had to send things like their their case mix index, how many patients were there, how many ventilators they're using. They use that to target their countermeasure strikes. So where do they send their ventilators? Where do they send the remdesivir? And where do they send the vaccines that people aren't taking? That was the program that informed those decisions. That's crazy. Volunteer Tiberias program. And the reason it's so nefarious is, as you mentioned earlier, they have drones here in America. Mhmm. Our police are already using them. I checked in my state and my county. They've had contracts since 2011 to get drones here, and they're already using them. They're they're saying that they're using them for people that have firearms. So it's like a firearms response team. I think it's called FIT is their acronym. And so it's any person who's suspected of having a firearm, they'll send a drone out instead of a police officer because it would be dangerous for a police officer to go and get shot, but not as bad for a drone to go and get shot. So that's that's how they're framing it. Are these armed drones, or are these just observational drones? I think they're just observational at this moment in time. Now. Yeah. But there is an article, a peer reviewed article, actually, talking about how to deploy different COVID measures, countermeasures, and having drones deliver packages. Like, having drones deliver vaccines. Right. It's not gonna be that hard. I mean, our military already has what's called LMAMS, which are that's their acronym for, like, a individually autonomous flying drone, like, a swarm of them. Yeah. And those are the ones that could have I forget what their military term is. But it could be a weapon, or it could be a drug.
SenseReceptor
Posted - December 17, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Saved - December 18, 2025 at 7:35 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Sucharit Bhakdi claims mRNA vaccines, and all modRNA vaccines, create DNA–RNA hybrids that damage the genome, causing tumors, autoimmune disease, miscarriages, and death. He cites plasmid DNA in vials, entry and persistence in cells, and RNase H to extinguish hybrids, warning authorities and physicians that these vaccines are dangerous and could lead to legal action.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Sucharit Bhakdi describes how not only the mRNA Covid injections—but any and all mRNA injections—"set the Book of Life on fire" via the creation of DNA–RNA hybrids. These hybrids, Bhakdi says, damage the genome, causing tumors, autoimmune disease, miscarriages, and death. This clip of Bhakdi, a retired Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology and former Chair of the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, is taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. posted to Rumble on December 16, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "They made the mod RNA on the plasmids. After that, these were, of course came off and they tried to destroy most of the DNA, but they didn't because it's not easy to destroy so much DNA plasmid. And so what Kevin McKernan found three years ago was that the vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it. Okay. "But anyway, we won't go into what they found then, but just that they found a lot of DNA and they published this. And what did the authorities say is that, oh, well, it doesn't matter, they won't do any harm. Right? Just don't, don't think about it. Yeah. They've done so much good. They've saved so many millions of lives. So why not put some DNA into it? "Now that DNA, of course, was also impackaged in these lipid nanoparticles. And it was clear that this DNA would enter cells. And that is actually what our colleagues showed last year. That was their first publication, the InModia publication that came out last year, that showed that the DNA that was in the vaccine vials did enter cells, human cells in culture, and remain stable in cells for days. Okay. As also was the mod RNA now. "But they said. Poo poo, never mind. Don't worry, be happy. Okay, nothing will happen. Now, guys, things have changed radically and dramatically because of the latest discovery that Kevin McKernan made just three weeks ago. Just three weeks ago. "When a gene is transcribed in the chromosome. So, going back to the first part again, okay? This comes off. Then, there are always little accidents that happen during the production. Byproducts that are not supposed to be there. And the byproducts that are generated during every transcription is that some strand, some mRNA don't detach from the DNA where they're formed. And what happens is that hybrids of DNA and RNA come off together. "So it's the MRNA and the corresponding DNA, they come off as hybrids. And these hybrids are dangerous. Okay. They're sort of like, sparks of a sparkler, okay. And many of them come off. And these sparks have to be extinguished immediately. So there's an enzyme in the cell called RNase H. Now normal physicians don't know about this. I didn't. I had to read up on this because Jessica Rose said read up on RNase H, and that's what I did, okay? And the RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately. "Because if they don't, then they cause, by different mechanisms, damage, to the chromosome. They, they, they can set the chromosomes on fire. Little fires light up, and the chromosomes get damaged where the fires come. Okay? Now what this will cause is haphazard. It can do anything. It can cause everything and nothing, okay? Depending on where the fires take place. But, for sure, most of the fires will cause dangerous damage. And as a result, you can get any illness that you see in the textbooks of medicine. "Anything and everything, including, of course, sorry, tumors, okay? Neoplastic disease, autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, of course, dead births, or death. It's clear you don't want to have your Book of Life be put on fire. You know, I, I talked about the, the genes and the chromosomes as the books of life, and I still do. And they can be set on fire. And that's what happens if these hybrids are not extinguished. "I've been giving interviews every week now, all right? I talked to Gary Null last week, and told him this, and I'm telling you this, and this is going around the world, okay? Is this is akin to attempted murder. And I tell you, I call on all the physicians in the world. Don't do it. It's not a good idea, okay? Because if you do so, you will be charged for attempted murder. "And the wonderful thing is that this is not only the COVID vaccine, it is all mod RNA vaccines. You know that you have new mod RNA vaccines coming on the market without anyone knowing that they're there. There's the flu vaccine mod RNA vaccine that's out already, and so on and so forth. There are, I think, veterinary vaccines that are being used on animals, mRNA based. But, they will always be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids. "And it is the duty of all authorities, controlling authorities, to not turn around, and say, never mind, if they don't look now, they are going to be facing court. They will be facing court because they are not fulfilling their duties."

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The mRNA on plasmids was produced, and after processing, much DNA from plasmids remained; Kevin MacKinnon found that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and this was published. Authorities claimed it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives, so why not have some DNA in them. - The DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and was shown by colleagues last year (the INMODIA publication) to enter human cells in culture and remain stable in cells for days, as did the mRNA. Despite this, the message given was to poof, never mind, don’t worry, be happy. - A radical change occurred due to a discovery by Kevin MacKinnon three weeks ago: during transcription on the chromosome, byproducts are generated; some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they’re formed, creating hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. These hybrids are dangerous. - In cells, an enzyme called RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately; otherwise they can cause damage to the chromosome, potentially lighting “fires” on the chromosomes. If not extinguished, the fires can cause diverse damage depending on where they occur, potentially leading to illnesses described in medical textbooks, including tumors (neoplastic disease), autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, birth defects, or death. - The speaker asserts these hybrids and their mishandling could lead to a broad range of illnesses, and emphasizes that this situation is not limited to the COVID vaccine but applies to all Moderna RNA vaccines, including new Moderna RNA vaccines entering the market, such as a flu vaccine, and mentions veterinary RNA vaccines as well. - The claim is made that these vaccines will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids, and it is the duty of authorities and controlling authorities to stop proceeding and not turn away; otherwise they will face court for not fulfilling their duties. The speaker has been giving interviews and asserts this narrative is spreading worldwide, framing it as akin to attempted murder and urging physicians to refuse vaccination.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They made the mRNA on the plasmids. After that, these were set were of course, came off, and they tried to destroy most of the DNA, but they didn't because it's not easy to destroy so much DNA, plasmid. And, so what Kevin MacKinnon found three years ago was that the vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it. Okay? But, anyway, we won't go into what they found then, but just that they found, a lot of DNA, and they published this. And what did the authorities say? Is it, oh, well, it doesn't matter. They won't do any harm. Right? Just don't don't think about it. Yeah. They've done so much good. They've saved so many millions of lives. So why not put some DNA into it? Now that DNA, of course, was also in packaged in these lipid nanoparticles, and it was clear that this DNA would enter cells. And that is actually what our colleagues showed last year. That was their first publication, the INMODIA publication that came out last year, that showed that the DNA that was in the vaccine vials did enter cells, human cells in culture and remained stable in cells for days. Okay? As also, was the mRNA. Now but they said, poof poof. Never mind. Don't worry. Be happy. Okay? Nothing will happen. Now, guys, things have changed radically and dramatically because of the latest discovery that Kevin MacKurn made just three weeks ago just three weeks ago When a gene is transcribed in the chromosome oops. Here we go. Got stuck. So going back to the first part again. Okay? This comes off. Then there are always little accidents that happen during the production, byproducts that are not supposed to be there. And the byproducts that are generated during every transcription is that some strand, some mRNA don't don't detach from the DNA where they're formed. And what happens is that hybrids of DNA and RNA come off together. So it's the mRNA and the corresponding DNA that come off as hybrids. And these hybrids are dangerous. Okay? They are sort of like sparks of a sparkler. Okay? And minerals don't come off. And these sparks have to be extinguished immediately. So there's an enzyme in the cell called RNase h. Now normal physicians don't know about this. I didn't. I had to read up on this because Jessica said, read up on RNase h, and that's what I did. Okay? And the RNase h takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately because if they don't, then they cause, by different mechanisms, damage to the chromosome. They they they can set the chromosomes on fire. Little fires light up, and the chromosomes get damaged where the fires come. Okay? Now what this will cause is haphazard. It can do anything. It can cause everything and nothing, okay, depending on where the fires take place. But but for for sure, most of the fires will cause dangerous damage. And as a result, you can get any illness that you see in the textbooks of medicine. Any anything and everything, including, of course, sorry, tumors, okay, neoplastic disease, autoimmune disease, developmental impact impairment, of course, death birth or death. It's it's it's it's it's clear. You don't want to have your, book of life be put on fire. You know, I I talked about the genes and the chromosomes as the books of life, and they still do. And they can be set on fire. And that's what happens if these hybrids are not extinguished. I've been giving interviews every week now. Alright? I talked to Gary Null last week and told him this. And I'm telling you this, and this is going around the world. Okay? Is this is akin to attempted murder. And I tell you, I call on all the physicians in the world, don't do it. It's not a good idea. Okay? Because if you do so, you will be charged for attempted murder. And the the the wonderful thing is that this is not only the COVID vaccine. It is all mod RNA vaccines. You know that that you have new mod RNA vaccines coming on on the market without anyone knowing that they're there. There's the the flu vaccine, mod RNA vaccine that's out already, and so on and so forth. There are, I think, veterinary vaccines that are being used on animals mRNA based. But they will always be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids. And it is the duty of all authorities, controlling authorities, to not turn around and say, never mind. If they don't look now, they are going to be facing court. They will be facing court because they are not fulfilling their duties.
SenseReceptor
Posted - December 13, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Saved - December 15, 2025 at 1:29 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Dr. Mark Trozzi’s view that the Covid injections are bioweapons, a genetic assault with at least 28 cancer mechanisms. He says the vaccines permanently modify our genetic code, cause the body to produce foreign proteins, and use mRNA DNA, plasmid DNA, and SV40 promoters to move DNA into the nucleus. He claims sperm and eggs are affected, cancer DNA is altered, and the rollout involved deception by Fauci, Gates, and others.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

BRAVO! to Dr. Mark Trozzi for being one of the few Health Freedom MDs with the guts to openly call the Covid jabs what they are: bioweapons. "This genetic bioweapon is really a biological bull in a china shop... we know 28 mechanisms by which it causes cancer alone... [and the jabs are] permanently genetically modifying and damaging the genetic code of [humanity]." This clip of Trozzi (@DrTrozzi), a veteran E.R. physician with 25 years of experience, as well as a human rights activist, is taken from an interview with Dr. Joe Sansone (@PhdSansone) posted to Rumble on December 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "This genetic bioweapon is really a biological bull in a china shop. I mean it does so many damage. And I mean, I've given lectures. We were together last January, I gave a lecture in Florida on the mechanisms of injury. And the reality is you can't keep up. I mean, we know 28 mechanisms by which it causes cancer alone. "But you know, and this is, I mean it was shocking from the moment we looked at the ingredients before anyone was injected. Shocking enough to like basically set down my entire life's work to try to stop it. That's not because I'm super courage. It's, that's how serious this is. But you genetically, they're genetically modifying people, claiming they're giving them a vaccine and then genetically modifying them so that they will produce a variety of poisons. Mostly the spike protein of the man-made design, SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is the most toxic part of it. "And normally, nobody's body would be producing it. And then they're producing this, this random splay of protein junk which can trigger autoimmune diseases in every direction. And so, but then what's worse is, you know, they claimed that what was in it was modified messenger RNA, modified both so that it would screw up and create all these random proteins as well as spike protein, but modified so that it would persist and nobody knew how long. "In other words, oh, so my body is going to start producing foreign proteins and identifying itself as a foreigner to be attacked by my own immune system. But for how long? Well, nobody knows because this is completely experimental, this new N1 methyl pseudouridinated version of messenger RNA. "But as you know, and as Dr. Speicher, Dr. McKernan and others have revealed through repeated analysis around the world, 30% of the genetic material in there is DNA and it includes plasmid DNA and it includes, in the case of Pfizer, completely covered up that it could even possibly be there. And the fraud they committed to the FDA and the public health agency, european agency, et cetera, that they put in these genetic sequences which were derived from the simian virus, not the virus, but some specific genetic sequences which we've known since 1990 research. "These are genetic hacking tools. When you put foreign DNA with something like a pegylated nanoparticle into a human cell or any mammal cell, and if you deliver as well these little SV40 promoter enhancer sequences... I mean, and this is pre-existing research, that will cause the DNA to be moved into the nucleus and cause it to be incorporated. "So you're permanently genetically modifying and damaging the genetic code of the humans. And we have evidence of this now, Joseph. Some of the most shocking evidence. And I think what you've pointed out is really important. This is not just an attack on the people health that are alive right now. This is attack on our possibility to produce viable offspring and have the continuation of the human race. "We now have tests on male sperm cells where the sperm cells contain in their DNA the genetic code of the spike protein. So men's sperm has been genetically modified so they will pass this toxic genetic flaw into their children if they're able to reproduce. Every sperm cell, we don't know, we don't know how many, but many. We have evidence that 30% of a woman's eggs die shortly following the injections as a result of these injections. Assault on the ovaries where they're particularly drawn to go and deposit the genetic code. "We have cancers that have now been taken out of people. And when you look at the DNA in the cells of the cancer, that DNA has been modified by these injections. So you're looking at permanent genetic modification of human beings without their consent based on a lie that they're getting a safe and effective vaccine for a disease claiming there's no treatment for which there was good treatments. And the whole thing from the virus through the bioweapon death shot were brought to you by the same people. And we're talking about people like Fauci, Gates, Tedros, Daszak, etc."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a genetic bioweapon as a “biological bull in a China shop” that causes extensive damage, noting he has discussed mechanisms of injury and that there are “28 mechanisms” by which it causes cancer alone. He says it was shocking from the moment of inspection of its ingredients before injection, leading him to halt his life’s work to try to stop it. He asserts that people are being genetically modified under the claim of vaccination, causing them to produce a variety of poisons, primarily the spike protein of a man-made-designed SARS-CoV-2 virus, which he says is the most toxic part of it. He claims the body would normally not produce this protein and that a random array of protein junk is triggered, potentially causing autoimmune diseases in many directions. He alleges that what was claimed to be in the vaccine—modified messenger RNA—was modified so it would both disrupt the production of proteins and persist longer, causing the body to produce foreign proteins and attack itself, but with unknown duration because the approach is “completely experimental” using a new 1-methylpseudouridinated version of mRNA. He references Doctor Kernan and others, stating that 30% of the genetic material there is DNA, including plasma DNA, and claims Pfizer hid that it could be present. He accuses the companies of inserting genetic sequences derived from the simian virus, calling these sequences genetic hacking tools. He explains that delivering foreign DNA with a pigylated nanoparticle and SV40 promoter enhancer sequences can move DNA into the nucleus and permanently modify and damage the human genetic code, asserting that there is now evidence of this. He emphasizes that this is not only an attack on people’s health now but also on future fertility and human reproduction. He cites tests on male sperm showing sperm DNA containing the spike protein genetic code, suggesting men’s sperm could pass this genetic flaw to offspring if reproduction occurs, and notes uncertainty about the extent but asserts “many” sperm cells are affected. He claims that about 30% of a woman’s eggs die shortly after injections due to the assault on the ovaries, and that cancers have had their DNA modified by these injections. He characterizes the situation as permanent genetic modification of humans without consent, based on a lie about a safe and effective vaccine for a disease with alleged available treatments, alleging a broader scheme linked to the same individuals. He ends by naming Fauci, Gates, Tedros, and Dashic as responsible for bringing together the virus, the bioweapon, and the “death shot.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This genetic bioweapon is really a biological bull in a China shop. I mean, it does so many damage. And, I mean, I've I've given lectures. We were together last January. I gave a lecture in Florida on the mechanisms of injury, the reality is you can't keep up. I mean, we know 28 mechanisms by which it causes cancer alone. Wow. But, you know, and this is I mean, it was shocking from the moment we looked at the ingredients before anyone was injected. Shocking enough to, like, basically set down my entire life's work to try to stop it. That's not because I'm super courageous. That's how serious this is. But you you you you genetically they're genetically modifying people, claiming they're giving them a vaccine and then genetically modifying them so that they will produce a variety of poisons, mostly the spike protein of the man made designed SARS CoV two virus, which is the most toxic part of it, and normally nobody's body would be producing it. And then they're producing this this random splay of protein junk, can trigger autoimmune diseases in every direction. And so but then what's worse is, you know, they claimed that what was in it was modified messenger RNA. Modified both so that it would screw up and create all these random proteins as well as the spike protein, but modified so that it would persist. And nobody knew how long. In other words, oh, so my body is gonna start producing foreign proteins and identifying itself as a foreigner to be attacked by my own immune system, but for how long? Well, nobody knows because this is completely experimental, this new n one methylpseudouridinated version of messenger RNA. But as you know, and as Doctor. Speaker, Doctor. Kernan, and others have revealed through repeated analysis around the world, 30% of the genetic material there is DNA. It includes plasma DNA, and it includes, in the case of Pfizer, completely covered up that it could even possibly be there and the fraud they committed to the FDA and the public health agency, the European agency, etc. They put in these genetic sequences which were derived from the simian virus. Not the virus, but some specific genetic sequences, which we've known since 1990 research. These are genetic hacking tools. When you put foreign DNA with something like a pigylated nanoparticle into a human cell or any mammal cell, and if you deliver as well these little SV40 promoter enhancer sequences, then what that does and this is pre existing research that will cause the DNA to be moved into the nucleus and cause it to be incorporated so you're permanently genetically modifying and damaging the genetic code of the humans. We have evidence of this now, Joseph. Some of the most shocking evidence. And I think what you've pointed out is really important. This is not just an attack on the people's health that are alive right now. This is an attack on our possibility to produce viable offspring and have the continuation of the human race. We now have tests on male sperm cells where the sperm cells contain in their DNA the genetic code of the spike protein. So men's sperm has been genetically modified so they will pass this toxic genetic flaw into their children if they're able to reproduce. Every sperm cell, we don't know. We don't know how many, but many. We have evidence that thirty percent of a woman's eggs die shortly following the injections. As a result of these injections, assault on the ovaries where they're particularly drawn to go and deposit the genetic code. We have cancers that have now been taken out of people, and when you look at the DNA in the cells of the cancer, that DNA has been modified by these injections. So you're looking at permanent genetic modification of human beings without their consent based on a lie that they're getting a safe and effective vaccine for a disease claiming there's no treatment for which there was good treatments. And the whole thing from the virus through to the bioweapon death shot were brought to you by the same people, and we're talking about people like Fauci, Gates, Tedros, Dashic, etcetera.
SenseReceptor
Posted - November 24, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Saved - November 24, 2025 at 9:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss a study: autopsy of a four-month SIDS baby with aluminum in the brain far exceeding safe levels. Where does it come from? I work with newborns; vaccines contain aluminum; by age six kids get about 70 shots, 90% have aluminum; it’s toxic. We’re born with what we need; injecting toxins isn’t right. Babies are dying; COVID vaccines and spike proteins cause clots; vaccines have neurotoxins. CDC says vaccines don’t cause autism, but I doubt that.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Registered nurse/whistleblower Michelle Spencer: "There [was] a study where... they did an autopsy on a baby boy who died of SIDS... and the aluminum content in his brain far exceeded [the expected concentration]... but... aluminum... shouldn't even be in a baby at all." "Where's all this aluminum coming from?" Spencer asks rhetorically. "I mean, I just talk about the hepatitis B vaccine because I work with the newborns, but... they [children] go to the doctor so many times, they get like 70 shots by the time they're six. And they all have aluminum. Well, like 90%. And it's toxic—super toxic." This clip of Spencer (@Healingground2) is taken from a Knights of the Storm (@KnightsOTS) discussion posted to Rumble on November 22, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "My functional nurse program that I just finished, they had a link in there to a study where the— They did an autopsy on a baby boy who died of SIDS at, like, four months. And his aluminum content in his brain far exceeded whatever, like, thousands of— I don't even know the amount, but the aluminum content there shouldn't even be in a baby at all. "And so where's all this aluminum coming from? I mean, I just talk about the hepatitis B vaccine because I work with the newborns, but, I mean, yeah, they go to the doctor so many times, they get like 70 shots by the time they're six. And they all have aluminum. Well, like 90%. And it's toxic, super toxic. "And we all are born with everything that we need. You know, by God, we need sunshine and, you know, healthy water and food and, you don't need to put anything in your body. In fact, actually, just fasting a lot of times can help heal your body and— By injecting babies with toxins, that is in no way ever the right choice or healthy in any way. "And so babies are dying at an exponential rate from the mothers getting the COVID vaccine with the spike proteins and all that causing clots and disruption. And then all the childhood shots have all these neurotoxins. So, yeah, every time they go to the doctor, they're poisoned more and more. And the CDC just released too, the other day, that they're— the part where they said vaccines don't cause autism, that that was never based on any type of evidence."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker references a study linked in a functional nurse program about an autopsy on a four-month-old baby boy who died of SIDS, noting that the aluminum content in the baby's brain was far higher than expected and asking where that aluminum comes from. They discuss the hepatitis B vaccine in relation to newborns, and claim that babies receive many injections—by six years old “they go to the doctor so many times they get like 70 shots” and that all of these have aluminum, asserting that “90 and it’s toxic.” The speaker asserts a belief that humans are born with everything they need, emphasizing sunshine, healthy water, and food, and stating that fasting can help heal the body, while claiming that injecting babies with toxins is never the right or healthy choice. They state that babies are dying at an exponential rate from mothers getting the COVID vaccine, alleging that spike proteins cause clots and disruption, and that childhood shots contain neurotoxins, leading to the claim that every doctor visit poisons babies more. The speaker also notes that a recent release stated vaccines don’t cause autism, asserting that claim was never based on any evidence.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My functional nurse program that I just finished, they had a link in there to a study where the they did an autopsy on a baby boy who died of SIDS at, like, four months. And his aluminum content in his brain far exceeded whatever, like thousands of, I don't even know the amount, but the aluminum content, this shouldn't even be in a baby at all. And so where's all this aluminum coming from? I mean, I just talk about the hepatitis B vaccine because I work with the newborns, but I mean, yeah, they go to the doctor so many times they get like 70 shots by the time they're six and they all have aluminum. Well, like 90 and it's toxic, super toxic. And we all are born with everything that we need. By God, we need sunshine and healthy water and food. You don't need to put anything in your body. In fact, actually just fasting a lot of times can help heal your body. By Absolutely. Injecting babies with toxins, that is in no way ever the right choice or healthy in any way. And so babies are dying at an exponential rate from the mothers getting the COVID vaccine with the spike proteins and all that causing clots and disruption. And then all the childhood shots have all these neurotoxins. So yeah, every time they go to the doctor, they're poisoned more and more. Absolutely. Just released to the other day that they're the part where they said vaccines don't cause autism, that that was never based on any type of evidence
SenseReceptor
Posted - November 16, 2025 at 8:10 PM
Saved - November 17, 2025 at 1:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I summarize Xueqin’s clip: Epstein emails show power as an elite network beyond party lines; in public they fight, in private they stay close. The elite feel untouchable, speak freely, and rely on a hidden network to keep trust. Epstein Island’s ritual-like secrecy is cited, with blackmail and transgressions, including sexual ones, linking elites. The revelations challenge prior conspiracy ideas about the American elite.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Yale grad and professor Jiang Xueqin: "These Epstein... emails... illuminate... how power works... the elite [are]... all friends with each other... [and stick] together... through... secret society rituals... [so] the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles." This clip of Xueqin (@xueqinjiang), known in large part because of his Predictive History YouTube channel, is taken from an interview with Danny Haiphong (@GeopoliticsDH) posted to Haiphong's eponymous YouTube channel on November 14, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So these Epstein files, these emails, they're being released, and they're really enlightening and they really illuminate for us how power works. So I will give a structural overview of what these emails reveal to us, okay? "The first thing it reveals to us is that all these people in power, the elite, they're all friends with each other. So in public, the Democrats and Republicans, they can be fighting each other, but in reality, they go to the same schools, they go to the same parties. They— they're just friends with each other. So what you're seeing in public is sort of like, political struggle in public. It's all just fake. It's like wrestling. It's reality TV. These— the elite are all friends with each other. "That's the first thing. Second thing that we've noticed about the emails is how cavalier the elite are. They think that they're above everyone else. They think they're untouchable, so they just speak their minds freely. I mean, Jeffrey Epstein, he was using Gmail in order to make all these sensitive communications. There was absolutely no operational security. He didn't really care because he believed he was untouchable. And that's how the elite think and behave. They live in a bubble. They think that they control the world, and they're untouchable, so they can do whatever they want. And all that matters is staying within this bubble, staying close to each other. "The third thing I will say is that these emails don't tell us, but we can assume that there are many layers of networking among the elite. So Jeffrey Epstein, why was he so popular among the elite? Well, I mean, first of all, he was just a friendly guy who did a lot of networking and was able to bring the elite together. But if you look at go to Epstein island, you will find that there's a temple there that's almost designed for ritual sacrifice. "So, what I've researched and what I've discovered is that the way that the elite stay together is through rituals, secret society rituals. Why? Because at the end of the day, if you're part of the elite, your biggest problem is trust. How can you trust that person to not rat you out in this political struggle? And the answer is, well, you blackmail each other, right? So, so you do acts together that we consider taboo, including, you know, s— with underage children. I mean, there are lots of transgressions that you can do. And the more transgressions you do, the more cohesive the elite is. "So, unfortunately, if you dig deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, what you'll find is a lot of transgressions, both sexual and violent as well. Bring these social taboos— I mean... what's really astonishing about the Jeffrey Epstein case is that slowly the inner workings of the elite are being revealed to the public. And all these conspiracy theories that we once believed couldn't possibly be true, including that the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles. I mean, they're slowly turning out to be true. And this marks a radical turning point in American history."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript presents the following content: It asserts that the released Epson emails illuminate how power operates. It claims that all people in power, the elite, are friends with each other; in public, Democrats and Republicans appear to fight, but in reality they go to the same schools and parties and are just friends. What the public sees is described as political struggle in public, akin to fake wrestling or reality TV, with the elite remaining connected. A second major point is that the elite are cavalier and think they are above everyone else and untouchable, speaking their minds freely. The example given is Jeffrey Epstein, who allegedly used Gmail for sensitive communications with absolutely no operational security, reflecting a belief that he was untouchable and that the elite live in a bubble, focusing on staying within that bubble and close to each other. A third assertion is that there are many layers of networking among the elite. Jeffrey Epstein is said to have been popular among the elite because he was a friendly networker who brought the elite together. It is claimed that Epstein Island contains a temple designed for ritual sacrifice, and that the elite stay together through civil society rituals. The underlying rationale given is that trust is the biggest problem for the elite in political struggles, and trust is maintained by blackmail—people performing acts together, including taboo transgressions such as sex with underage children. The transcript states that there are numerous sexual and violent transgressions that reinforce cohesion by bringing social taboos into play. It notes that, when digging deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, one will find many transgressions—both sexual and violent—that reinforce group cohesion through taboos. It contrasts public perception with what it describes as the inner workings of the elite. Finally, the transcript asserts that the public is gradually being shown the inner workings of the elite, and that conspiracy theories formerly believed—such as the idea that the entire American elite are a bunch of pedophiles—are slowly turning out to be true, marking a radical turning point in American history.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So these Epson files, these emails, they're being released, and they're really enlightening, and they really illuminate for us how power works. So I will give a structural overview of what these emails reveal to us. First thing it reveals to us is that all these people in power, the elite, they're all friends with each other. So in public, the Democrats and Republicans, they can be fighting each other. But in reality, they go to the same schools, they go to the same parties, they're they're just friends with each other. So what you're seeing in public is sort of like political struggle in public. It's all just fake. It's like wrestling. It's reality TV. These the elite are all friends with each other. That's the first thing. Second thing that we've noticed about the emails is how cavalier the elite are. They think that they're above everyone else. They think they're untouchable, so they just they just speak their minds freely. You know? I mean, Jeffrey Epstein, he was using Gmail in order to make all these sensitive communications. There was absolutely no operational security. He didn't really care because he believed he was untouchable. And that's how the elite think and behave. They live in a bubble. They think that they control the world and they're untouchable, so they can do whatever they want. And all that matters is staying within this bubble, staying close to each other. The third thing I will say is that these emails don't tell us, but we can assume that there are many layers of networking among the elite. Jeffrey So Epstein, why was he so popular among the elite? Well, I mean, first of all, he was just a friendly guy who did a lot of networking and was able to bring the elite together. But if you go to Epstein Island, you will find that there's a temple there that's almost designed for ritual sacrifice. So what I've researched and what I've discovered is that the way that the elite stay together is through rituals, civil society rituals. Why? Because at the end of the day, if you're probably elite, your biggest problem is trust. How can you trust that person to not rat you out in this political struggle? And the answer is, well, you blackmail each other. So you do acts together, that would consider taboo, including sex with underage children. I mean, there are lots of transgressions that you can do, and the more transgressions you do, the more cohesive the elite is. So unfortunately, if you dig deeper into Jeffrey Epstein, what you will find is a lot of transgressions, both sexual and violent as well, bringing these social taboos. I mean, like like like the public, I mean, it it like, what's really astonishing about the Jeffrey Epstein case is that slowly, the inner workings of the elite are being revealed to the public. And all these conspiracy theories that we once believed couldn't possibly be true, including that the entire American elite are just a bunch of pedophiles. I mean, they're slowly turning out to be true, and this marks a radical turning point in American history.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVJ4mxQU2qk

SenseReceptor
Posted - July 7, 2025 at 4:30 AM
Saved - November 16, 2025 at 10:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe that Trump's Epstein file is bigger than the Encyclopedia Britannica; he and Epstein were best friends. Epstein linked to Les Wexner, who bought him a house on East 71st Street and then moved him next door to a larger one. The first house was sold to Howard Lutnick, now Secretary of Commerce; Lutnick was Epstein's neighbor. I claim that as a primary dealer and neighbor, this suggests the administration is full of Epstein people.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Former Assistant Secretary of HUD Catherine Austin Fitts: "Trump's Epstein file is bigger than the Encyclopedia Britannica... he and Epstein were best friends... [and] [Howard] Lutnick... was Epstein's next door neighbor... the whole administration is full of Epstein people." This clip of Fitts, who's also an investment banker and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from a Trueman Show Podcast (@TruemanshowNL) posted to YouTube on July 3, 2025. Note that Fitts was Assistant Secretary of HUD under President George H. W. Bush. For reference, Howard Lutnick is the current Secretary of Commerce. Lutnick's firm, Cantor Fitzgerald, serves as a primary dealer for the New York Federal Reserve, trading directly with the Federal Reserve in the U.S. Treasury securities market. (A primary dealer is a financial institution authorized to trade directly with the Federal Reserve in the U.S. Treasury securities market, acting as a market maker and participating in open market operations to support monetary policy implementation.) ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Trump's Epstein file is bigger than the Encyclopedia Britannica is the way I would describe it. So you being from the Netherlands, might not know the Encyclopedia Britannica, but it's a huge. You know, when we were kids, we had a, you know, like, 25 volume Encyclopedia Britannica. So. Yeah. So he and Epstein were best friends. "So Epstein was basically part of the, Lex west, what, Les Wexner operation. And Wexner bought him a house on East 71st Street. So I used to live. Where was my. I had an apartment on East 64th when I first got to New York, so it was my neighborhood. Anyway, so he bought him a house on East 71st street, and then, after a relatively short time, he moved him next door to a much bigger house, which is the one you always see in the pictures of Epstein's house. "The first house he sold to Howard Lutnick, who's the Secretary of Commerce and co-chairman of the transition team, right? So Lutnick for many years, was Epstein's next door neighbor, which to me intuitively makes a lot of sense, because Epstein was primarily a money laundering network, in my opinion. And so having a primary dealer, you know, There are only 24 primary dealers in the New York Fed, and so having a primary dealer who's running the market in treasury securities is a logical person to put next door. I'm assuming Wexner probably had tunnels built underneath. So anyway, so, I mean, the whole administration is full of Epstein people."

Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker asserts that “Trump's Epstein file is bigger than the Encyclopedia Britannica,” using a metaphor to describe the extensive information about Trump and Epstein. - Epstein and Trump were described as best friends for a long time, according to the speaker. - Epstein was said to be part of the Lex Wexner operation. Lex Wexner bought Epstein a house on East 71st Street in New York. - The speaker notes a personal connection to the neighborhood, mentioning living on East 64th Street and that East 71st Street is nearby. - After a relatively short time, Epstein was moved next door to a much bigger house, the one commonly seen in pictures of Epstein’s residence. - The first house Epstein lived in was sold to Howard Lutnick, who is described as the Secretary of Commerce and co-chair of the transition team. - Howard Lutnick is identified as Epstein’s next-door neighbor for many years, which the speaker finds intuitively sensible because Epstein was “primarily a money laundering network,” in the speaker’s view. - The speaker notes there are only 24 primary dealers in the New York Fed and suggests that having a primary dealer who runs the market in Treasury securities as a neighbor makes sense in their logic. - The speaker speculates that Lex Wexner probably had tunnels built underneath, implying secret infrastructure related to the proximity of their properties. - The overarching claim is that the entire administration is “full of Epstein people,” according to the speaker.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump's Epstein file is bigger than the Encyclopedia Britannica is the way I would describe it. So you being from The Netherlands might not not know the Encyclopedia Britannica, but it's a huge you know, when we were kids, we had a, you know, like, 25 volume Encyclopedia Britannica. So, yeah. So he and Epstein were best friends. Trump. Yeah. Yeah. Right? Yeah. For a long time. Well, you can see the pictures everywhere. Well, the one I love is so so Epstein was basically part of the Lex West what Lex Wexner operation. And Wexner bought him a house on East 71st Street. So I used to live where was my I had an apartment on East 64th when I first got to New York. So it was my neighborhood. Anyway, so he bought him a house on East 71st Street. And then, after a relatively short time, he moved him next door to a much bigger house, which is the one you always see in the pictures of of Epstein's house. The first house he sold to Howard Lutnick, who's the Secretary of Commerce and co chairman of the transition team. Right? So so Lutnick, many years, was Epstein's next door neighbor, which to me intuitively makes a lot of sense because Epstein was primarily a money laundering network in my opinion. And so having a primary dealer, you know, there are only 24 primary dealers in the New York Fed. And so having a primary dealer who's running the market in treasury securities is a logical person to neck put next door. I'm assuming Wexner probably had tunnels built underneath. So, anyway, so so you I mean, the whole administration is full of Epstein people. So
SenseReceptor
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Saved - November 4, 2025 at 1:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe Toby Rogers’ view that modern rulers monetize the middle class via iatrogenic injury, a form of biological colonialism. He argues vaccines and Covid shots push chronic illness, citing autism costs and billions in health bills that enrich pharma and the hospital system. He contrasts this with historic colonial plunder, calling western allopathic medicine a system that extracts wealth from the majority. This reflects the Brownstone Institute discussion.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

MIND-BLOWING 🤯 Toby Rogers explains how our governments are maiming/killing us with jabs for the sake of "biological colonialism" "At some point there were no new lands left to conquer...[so] how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury" This clip of Rogers (@uTobian) is taken from a discussion with Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreyatucker), Brianne Dressen (@BrianneDressen), and Father John Naugle (@FatherNaugle) at the Brownstone Institute's (@brownstoneinst) 5th Annual Conference and Gala. The video was posted to The Epoch Times YouTube channel on November 1, 2025. Per the Children's Health Defense website: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last 500 years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe, to the New World, and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how the UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for 500 years. 500 years of colonialism. "And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. And then more recently, with the backing of the US Military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically, for 500 years, that's been the pattern. "Here's the problem: At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited, were the middle class in the United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. "So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take Covid shots and you can injure them, you can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5 million to $7 million per kid. That's a lot of money. And it goes somewhere, and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. "And so with COVID shots, what we have is, so picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California, who gets a Covid shot and then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She, she's in and out of the hospital, she's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her health care costs are going to be in the range of about $2 million. And that all goes to pharma doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. "If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her, the most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually, perish. The old model of colonialism, right? But in five to 10 years in the US you can squeeze $2 million out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a Covid shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for 10 years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family, and then after 10 years, the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. "So the crisis that we're in right now, and why we're all just traumatized all the time, is that western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic. And the response and the junk science Covid shots."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The argument described as biological colonialism, as Jeffrey alluded to, runs like this: for the last five hundred years, nations that wanted to get rich built ships, carried soldiers, guns, and horses to the New World, took their stuff, including gold, enslaved people, and forced labor in gold mines, and that’s how Europe and the UK became rich. This five-hundred-year historical pattern extended into neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. More recently, with the backing of the U.S. military, third-world nations could be made to produce goods for low cost, which maintained Western wealth. Historically five hundred years of colonialism followed by later forms of domination. The problem, according to the speaker, is that eventually there were no new lands to conquer. The ruling class decided that the money and the peasants to exploit were the middle class in the United States and the developed world. How to extract wealth from the middle class? Through iatrogenic injury. If the entire population can be induced to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then persuade the rest of the population and their kids to take COVID shots, and if those injections injure people, it becomes a system of lifelong chronic illness that enslaves individuals to the system. In the speaker’s research, autism lifetime care costs are in the range of 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child. That amount goes somewhere and goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. With COVID shots, the speaker requests a picture of a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and then develops myocarditis. She will need regular cardiology appointments and will be in and out of the hospital, sick for years. Over the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are approximately 2,000,000 dollars, all of which goes to pharma, doctors, and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman were enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only extract about 20,000 dollars worth of labor from her at most before she perishes. But in five to ten years in the United States, one person can yield about 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and a COVID shot that causes myocarditis and leads to ten years of treatment. The claimed crisis is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. This crisis existed before and, according to the speaker, blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last five hundred years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe to the New World and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how The UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for five hundred years. Five hundred years of colonialism. And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and The United States. And then more recently with the backing of the US military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically for five hundred years that's been the pattern. Here's the problem. At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited were the middle class in The United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take COVID shots. And you can injure them. You can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism, lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5,000,000 to $7,000,000 per kid. That's a lot of money and it goes somewhere and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex and the ruling class. And so with COVID shots, what we have is, picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California who gets a COVID shot. And then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She's in and out of the hospital. She's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are going to be in the range of about $2,000,000 And that all goes to pharma, doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her. The most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually perish, the old model of colonialism, right? But in five to ten years in The US, you can squeeze $2,000,000 out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a COVID shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for ten years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family and then after ten years the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. So the crisis that we're in right now and why we're all just traumatized all the time is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class and lower classes in The United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaZT5Iqh5ac

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@DrWojakMD Nailed it 🎯

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@uTobian You're doing amazing work, Toby! Thanks for helping us put all the pieces together.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@truBatZion Toby's doing vital work!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@towncrier1969 I need to do a deep dive on Obamacare. I'm only beginning to understand how insidious it really was.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Nakah1111 Great point.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@SovereignSapien 100% parasites

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Sherry40614670 @Scrappy94546226 Sounds pretty accurate! It's a very effective (and evil) way to extract wealth from a middle class that is problematic for those in power.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@FrankPloegman Absolutely. And they stack functions: sick people have more trouble resisting tyranny and also drag their families into a quagmire of medical bills and hospital visits.

SenseReceptor
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Saved - November 3, 2025 at 4:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
SenseReceptor shares a clip where Toby Rogers argues modern “biological colonialism” uses vaccines to extract wealth via iatrogenic injury, citing autism costs and Covid vaccine harms, contrasting with historic colonialism. The discussion references a Brownstone Institute event with Jeffrey Tucker, Brianne Dressen, and Father John Naugle. @uTobian adds a link to a longer exposition and receives thanks from SenseReceptor and others.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

MIND-BLOWING 🤯 Toby Rogers explains how our governments are maiming/killing us with jabs for the sake of "biological colonialism" "At some point there were no new lands left to conquer...[so] how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury" This clip of Rogers (@uTobian) is taken from a discussion with Jeffrey A Tucker (@jeffreyatucker), Brianne Dressen (@BrianneDressen), and Father John Naugle (@FatherNaugle) at the Brownstone Institute's (@brownstoneinst) 5th Annual Conference and Gala. The video was posted to The Epoch Times YouTube channel on November 1, 2025. Per the Children's Health Defense website: "Rogers is a fellow with the Brownstone Institute for Social and Economic Research. He has a doctorate in political economy from the University of Sydney in Australia, and a Master of Public Policy from the University of California, Berkeley." ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last 500 years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe, to the New World, and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how the UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for 500 years. 500 years of colonialism. "And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and the United States. And then more recently, with the backing of the US Military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically, for 500 years, that's been the pattern. "Here's the problem: At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited, were the middle class in the United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. "So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take Covid shots and you can injure them, you can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5 million to $7 million per kid. That's a lot of money. And it goes somewhere, and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex, and the ruling class. "And so with COVID shots, what we have is, so picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California, who gets a Covid shot and then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She, she's in and out of the hospital, she's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her health care costs are going to be in the range of about $2 million. And that all goes to pharma doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. "If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her, the most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually, perish. The old model of colonialism, right? But in five to 10 years in the US you can squeeze $2 million out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a Covid shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for 10 years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family, and then after 10 years, the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. "So the crisis that we're in right now, and why we're all just traumatized all the time, is that western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class, and lower classes in the United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic. And the response and the junk science Covid shots."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker outlines a version of the biological colonialism argument, referencing Jeffrey. The argument traces five hundred years of wealth accumulation by powerful nations: European ships with soldiers and guns arrive in the New World, take gold, enslave people, force labor in gold mines, and thereby make Europe and the UK rich. This pattern continues through neo-colonialism with unfair trade deals and, more recently, with the backing of the US military to compel third-world nations to produce goods for low cost, sustaining Western wealth. The speaker asserts that when there were no new lands left to conquer, the ruling class redirected exploitation toward the middle class in the United States and developed nations, extracting wealth through iatrogenic injury. According to the speaker, this modern form of exploitation involves the entire population injecting their children 72 times during childhood and encouraging further COVID shots for others, resulting in lifelong injury. The speaker claims that autism and other chronic illnesses generate substantial lifetime care costs, estimated at 5,000,000 to 7,000,000 dollars per child, with these costs benefiting the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital-industrial complex, and the ruling class. A concrete example is given: a middle-aged woman in Orange County, California who receives a COVID shot and develops myocarditis. Over the next five to ten years, her healthcare costs are projected to reach about 2,000,000 dollars, paid by insurance, government programs, and her family, circulating to pharma and doctors. The speaker contrasts this with the older colonial model of extracting wealth from a laborer in a gold mine, where at most about 20,000 dollars of labor could be harvested from a person. In the current model, the speaker argues that the same person could be drained of approximately 2,000,000 dollars through iatrogenic injury and healthcare costs over a decade, ultimately culminating in the person’s death. The core claim is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth from the middle, working, and lower classes in the United States, enriching the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. The speaker states that this crisis was already present with autism and other chronic illnesses before the COVID era but expanded in scale during the COVID epidemic, the response to it, and what they describe as junk science surrounding COVID shots.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The biological colonialism argument that Jeffrey alluded to goes something like this. So for the last five hundred years, if you were a nation that wanted to get rich, the way you did it was you built a bunch of ships, you loaded them full of soldiers and guns and horses, and you sailed from Europe to the New World and you took their stuff. You took their gold, you enslaved their people, you forced people to work in the gold mines and that sort of thing. That's how Europe got rich. That's how The UK got rich. And so that's the historical pattern for five hundred years. Five hundred years of colonialism. And then later there was neo colonialism with unfair trade deals that kept enriching Europe and The United States. And then more recently with the backing of the US military, we can get third world nations to produce stuff for us for low cost that make us feel rich. So historically for five hundred years that's been the pattern. Here's the problem. At some point, there were no new lands left to conquer. And so what the ruling class decided was that where the money is, the peasants to be exploited were the middle class in The United States and throughout the developed world. And how do you extract wealth from the middle class? You do it through iatrogenic injury. So if you can get the entire population to inject their kids 72 times during childhood and then get all the rest of the population and the kids to take COVID shots. And you can injure them. You can enslave them for life to chronic illness. So in my research, I show that autism, lifetime care costs for autism are in the range of 5,000,000 to $7,000,000 per kid. That's a lot of money and it goes somewhere and it goes to the pharmaceutical industry, the hospital industrial complex and the ruling class. And so with COVID shots, what we have is, picture a middle aged woman in Orange County, California who gets a COVID shot. And then she gets myocarditis. So now she has to do regular appointments with the cardiologist. She's in and out of the hospital. She's sick all the time. So over the course of the next five to ten years of her life, her healthcare costs are going to be in the range of about $2,000,000 And that all goes to pharma, doctors and the pharmaceutical industrial complex. If that same woman was enslaved in a gold mine in South America, you could only get about $20,000 worth of labor out of her. The most if you worked her to the bone. And then she would, you know, eventually perish, the old model of colonialism, right? But in five to ten years in The US, you can squeeze $2,000,000 out of this one person through iatrogenic injury, through a COVID shot that causes myocarditis that sends her in and out of the hospital for ten years of treatment. And so the insurance company pays, the government pays, she mortgages her house, her family pays, it extracts all wealth out of her and her family and then after ten years the pharmaceutical industry allows her to perish. So the crisis that we're in right now and why we're all just traumatized all the time is that Western allopathic medicine has become a machine to extract wealth out of the middle class, working class and lower classes in The United States to enrich the pharmaceutical industry and the ruling class through iatrogenic injury. That's the crisis that we're in right now. And it was already happening with autism and other chronic illnesses in children before, and then it just blossomed in size during the COVID epidemic and the response and the junk science COVID shots.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@SenseReceptor Here's a longer exposition on my "biological colonialism" argument: https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/did-liberalism-fail

Did liberalism fail? This is one of the most urgent questions facing the world today and it is surprisingly difficult to answer. tobyrogers.substack.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@uTobian You're doing amazing work, Toby! Thanks for helping us put all the pieces together.

@uTobian - Toby Rogers

@SenseReceptor Thank you!!! 🙌

SenseReceptor
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Saved - October 23, 2025 at 12:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Birx said she created YouTube messages for Gen Z and Millennials to urge grandchildren to tell their COVID-vaccinated grandparents to protect themselves, by highlighting they can’t sleep, study, or work. She warns COVID isn’t over for those 65+, urging a fall vaccine. She later notes vaccines were studied to prevent severe disease, not infection.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Deborah Birx: "I knew...Baby Boomers were not going to listen...to me [to get jabbed]...So I did [YT vids] for Gen Zs and Millennials [pleading]...tell your grandparents you can't sleep...can't study...can't work...not knowing they're vaccinated because you're worried for them" This clip of retired Army Colonel Deborah Birx, who was parachuted in to run the Coronavirus Task Force under Trump 1.0 by the National Security Council, is taken from a presentation given to an audience of teens (I think the average age was teenagers?). This presentation was posted to the Leadership Heights YouTube channel on October 21, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "In our darkest moments. And I was really worried about the Baby Boomers. Now, remember I said to you, people over 70 in March and April and May were dying at 30% rate. And I don't know if you have baby boomer grandparents, but, if your grandparents grew up in the 60s and 70s, we are a little recalcitrant to rules. In fact, when someone gives us a rule, we want to do completely the opposite. "And so I knew the baby boomers were not going to listen necessarily to me, So I did YouTube videos for Gen Z's, and millennials and pleaded with them, to get these mitigation information to their grandparents. And they did. And the reason, yes, we had guidelines that went out, but guidelines mean nothing if they're not implemented. "It was that group of individuals who ended up being our voices talking with their grandparents. And it was also that group that really helped get many of those individuals vaccinated because we had talks with them and we said, tell your grandparents you can't sleep, you can't study, you can't work well in college. Not knowing they're vaccinated because you worried for them, because you have power as grandchildren, you have remarkable power in swaying people's behavior. And you used it for good. And I will always be grateful because it saved literally millions of Americans from very serious illness. From COVID. "And to those of you are over 65 and in the audience, Covid is not gone. Repetitive COVID infections in people over 70 is leading to consequences. You can survive the initial episode, but we end up seeing diabetes, we end up seeing heart attacks, we end up seeing people getting mononucleosis type symptoms that don't go away. And we see long Covid. So please still be careful. This fall, they come out with a new vaccine. Get that. But understand Swiss cheese layer on that mitigation so you can get through that six to eight weeks and be healthy."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In our darkest moments, I was really worried about the baby boomers. I noted that people over 70 in March, April, and May were dying at a 30% rate. Recognizing that baby boomers might resist rules, I anticipated they wouldn’t necessarily listen to me. So I created YouTube videos for Gen Zs and millennials and pleaded with them to relay mitigation information to their grandparents, and they did. Guidelines exist, but guidelines mean nothing if they’re not implemented; that group became our voices, talking with their grandparents, and they also helped get many of those individuals vaccinated. Grandchildren, you have remarkable power to sway behavior, and you used it for good. I will always be grateful because it saved literally millions of Americans from very serious illness from COVID. For those 65 and in the audience, COVID is not gone. Repetitive COVID infections in people 70 are leading to consequences: you can survive the initial episode, but we end up seeing diabetes, heart attacks, and mononucleosis-type symptoms that don’t go away, along with long COVID. So please still be careful this fall. If a new vaccine is released, get that, but understand Swiss cheese layering of mitigation to get through that six to eight weeks and stay healthy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In our darkest moments, and I was really worried about the baby boomers. Now remember I said to you, people over 70 in March and April and May were dying at thirty percent rate. And I don't know if you have baby boomer grandparents, but if your grandparents grew up in the 60s and 70s, we are a little recalcitrant to rules. In fact, when someone gives us a rule, we want to do completely the opposite. And so I knew the baby boomers were not going to listen necessarily to me. So I did YouTube videos for Gen Zs and millennials and pleaded with them to get these mitigation information to their grandparents, and they did. And the reason, yes, we had guidelines went out, but guidelines mean nothing if they're not implemented. It was that group of individuals who ended up being our voices, talking with their grandparents, and it was also that group that really helped get many of those individuals vaccinated. Because we had talks with them and we said, tell your grandparents you can't sleep, you can't study, you can't work well in college, not knowing they're vaccinated because you worried for them. Because you have power. As grandchildren you have remarkable power in swaying people's behavior and you used it for good. And I will always be grateful because it saved literally millions of Americans from very serious illness from COVID. And to those of you who are 65 and in the audience, COVID is not gone. Repetitive COVID infections in people 70 is leading to consequences. You can survive the initial episode, but we end up seeing diabetes, we end up seeing heart attacks, we end up seeing people getting mononucleosis type symptoms that don't go away and we see long COVID. So please still be careful this fall. They come out with a new vaccine, get that, but understand Swiss cheese. Layer on that mitigation so you can get through that six to eight weeks and be healthy.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

A reminder of who Deborah Birx is... https://t.co/IRSwvg4wfS

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

DEBORAH BIRX REMINDERS: 1. Birx is a retired Army colonel; 2. came from USAID (a CIA cutout); 3. hired to run Coronavirus Task Force by the Deputy National Security Advisor; 4. "parachuted in" to run the Task Force; 5. National Security Council created US COVID policy (1/5) Debbie Lerman: "On January 27, the President's Coronavirus Task Force was formed. The Task Force was initially led by the Secretary of Health and Human Services and coordinated through the National Security Council. On February 28, a very important date, the Task Force transitioned to the Office of the Vice President, meaning it's no longer under the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Now it's under somebody else...[but] it's led by...the Office of the Vice President. "The Office of the Vice President is where they put the Task Force...the coordinator of which was Deborah Birx, as I said before, who came from USAID, and she was placed there by the National Security Advisor to President Trump [Matt Pottinger]. He himself says... we brought Deborah Birx over...." This clip and the one in the following tweet of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) and Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, are from a Flashlights podcast (@CorneliaMrose) posted to Rumble on June 2, 2025.

Video Transcript AI Summary
- On January 27, the president's coronavirus task force was formed. It was initially led by the secretary of health and human services and coordinated through the National Security Council. - On February 28, the task force transitioned to the Office of the Vice President, meaning it is no longer under the secretary of health and human services. It is not described as being led by the vice president; rather, the Office of the Vice President hosts the task force. Deborah Birx, who came from USAID, was placed there by the national security advisor to President Trump, who stated, “we brought Deborah Birx over.” - The OVP (Office of the Vice President), which equals the task force, equals the National Security Council, leads and coordinates all federal communication and messaging both across the United States government and internationally with the World Health Organization and affected countries. - Starting on February 28, there was no more communication from the public health agencies to anyone. FOIA emails and other records show that people at the CDC tried to send communications to the task force, but they were not approved, leading to “we just gave up” and “we're not trying anymore.” - Redfield is on record saying that they weren’t even allowed to have their own press conferences. - There was no communication starting on February 28, when deaths or cases in the United States were still limited; afterward, the propaganda shifted to messaging about lockdowns and vaccines. - The messaging switch occurred on February 27, with Anthony Fauci flipping completely on masks and lockdowns. The rollout of “flatten the curve” came out on February 27 in a manner described as dubious, with anomalies regarding who put it out and the dates. - People like Zaynab Tufekci emerged as prominent commentators on the pandemic; she promoted the view that lockdowns were necessary and that masks work, despite having “absolutely no qualifications” to say those things, and she later became a prominent voice at the New York Times on the pandemic. - On February 28, there was no more communication from public health agencies; all messaging came from the National Security Council.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So on January 27, the president's coronavirus task force was formed. The task force was initially led by the secretary of health and human services and coordinated through the national security council. On February 28, very important date, the task force transitioned to the office of the vice president, meaning it's no longer under the secretary of health and human services. Now it's under somebody else. Is it under the vice president? Well, not exactly because it's not doesn't say it's led by the vice president. It's led by the office of the vice president. The office of the vice president is where they put the task force, which was the coordinator of which was Deborah Birx, as I said before, who came from USAID, and she was placed there by the national security advisor to President Trump. He himself says it. He says we brought Deborah Birx over. And look at what it says here. This is very, very interesting. The OVP, the office of the vice president, which equals the task force, which equals the National Security Council leads and coordinates all federal communication and messaging both across the United States government and internationally with the World Health Organization and affected countries. Starting on February 28, there was no more communication from the public health agencies to anyone. And there's a lot of records that show a lot of FOIA emails and stuff, which people didn't look at this aspect of it, but you can see it in there where people at the CDC are saying, tried to send this to the task force. You know, we have to send all of our communications to the task force. It's very frustrating, you know, because we can't say anything and they're never they're not approving anything. So we just gave up. So we're not trying anymore. And Redfield is on record also saying that, you know, they weren't even allowed to have their own press conferences. So there was no communication starting on February 28, when there was barely anything happening in The United States in terms of deaths or cases or anything like that. No more communication from the public health agencies. The other very important thing to notice, to know is that on February 27, and I've written a lot about this, the entire messaging switched from public health to lockdown until vaccine. So between February, Anthony Fauci flipped completely on masks and on lockdowns. A lot of the propaganda like the flatten the curve came out on February 27 in a very dubious manner with a lot of anomalies in terms of you know who put it out and what dates it got put out. People like Zaynab Tufekci, who nobody had ever heard of and then and now is like the big commentator at the New York Times. She all of a sudden came out with articles saying we have to lock down and that masks work, even though she had absolutely no qualifications to say any of those things. Then she got promoted to be like the voice of the New York Times on the pandemic. It was unbelievable. So all of those things happened on February, I'm sorry. And then on February 28, can see that no more, that's it. So that's no more communications are coming from public health. Now all the propaganda is coming from the National Security Council.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RUSHMqtG3Q

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

BTW, even though Birx tells 65+ YOs to continue to get jabbed in this clip, here she is saying "we don't know [if it offers] protection against infection." (Per Cleveland Clinic study, etc. the jabs make people MORE LIKELY to get COVID.) https://t.co/b6M5RJjMzI

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Deborah Birx, September 5, 2025: "The COVID vaccine was...studied to prevent severe disease...people [were] confused...when we started to make...claims the vaccine did more than what it was studied to [do]...WE DON'T KNOW ABOUT PROTECTION AGAINST INFECTION." (1/2) Why have people been "confused" about the jabs stopping/slowing infection?? Maybe because of all the LIES from authority figures saying that they did just that. See tweet 2. ---------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. Um. It was scientifically critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. Remember, all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease. "And so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals over 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference, even through, Omicron and Delta. "So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, which was prevent. Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there is so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear it was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. "And then I think the question is, well, who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? And I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people."

Video Transcript AI Summary
I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. It was scientifically, critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. And remember all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease, and so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference even through, Amicrom and Delta. So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, was prevent Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there's so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear. It was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. And then I think the question is, well, who's who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, I think we all know how important the COVID vaccine was. It was scientifically, critically studied to prevent severe disease. I think where people started to get confused is when we started to make potential claims that the vaccine did more than what it was studied to actually show. And remember all of those original studies, we didn't test patients unless they had symptoms. We only looked for disease, and so we don't know how many people were asymptomatic. We don't know about protection against infection. What we did know about is protection against severe disease. And clearly, if you look at the mortality in individuals 75 before vaccination and after vaccination, there was a dramatic difference even through, Amicrom and Delta. So, yes, the vaccine was highly effective for what it was intended to do, was prevent Shouldn't the health secretary know that? You know, I'm not sure that there's so much confusion about the COVID vaccine, what it was studied to do. I just want to make it very clear. It was studied to prevent severe disease, and that's what it does. And then I think the question is, well, who's who's susceptible to severe disease and who should continue to get the COVID shots? I think that's what needs to be clearly laid out to the American people.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Per Cleveland Clinic study: More Covid "vaccines" = more Covid. So apparently Birx wants the elderly to keep getting Covid! Source: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.17.22283625v1.full.pdf https://t.co/YAwY1qTZ4u

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@JenRevere I have the answer to this one! They're able to do all of this because they are monsters. Evil, evil monsters.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Meldf79 Yes. Insanely demonic.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@waveorparticle 😂😂😂

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@WellnessPowerTM That's Debbie Birx alright!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@cath2060 100% crimes against humanity!

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@GR8bodiesFitnes 🔥🔥🔥🔥

SenseReceptor
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 1:30 AM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 8:20 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Since the Great Financial Crisis and 14 years of ZIRP, the wealth gap has grown like never before. Historically, when this happens, politics shift and populism rises—globally. There are two endings: revolution or a new Great Deal, like after the Depression. I’m hoping for a new Great Deal, not a French-style revolution.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Former BlackRock Fund Manager Ed Dowd: "Since the Great Financial Crisis...the wealth gap has grown... larger than... ever... & historically there are two ways this ends... in revolution or a new Great Deal... [and] we don't want a French-style revolution—that didn't end well" This clip of Dowd (@DowdEdward), who's also the founder of Phinance Technologies, is taken from an interview with Adam Taggart (@menlobear) posted to YouTube on October 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Part of the problem since the Great Financial Crisis and zero interest rate policy for essentially 14 years is the wealth gap has grown even larger than it ever has. And historically when we get here, there's political movements. And [people] wonder why we have populism? "This has been brewing since, you know, the Tea Party... It's happening globally. Populism is happening globally. The wealth disparity is insane. Insane. And historically, there's two ways this ends: It ends in revolution or a new Great Deal. You know [like what] happened after the Great Depression. And so I'm hoping for a new great deal, not revolution. We don't want a French-style revolution—that didn't end well."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that since the great financial crisis and the long period of zero interest rate policy that has endured for roughly fourteen years, the wealth gap has widened to a degree that is unprecedented in historical terms. This persistent and pronounced widening of wealth inequality is presented as a driving force behind current political dynamics, with the speaker suggesting that the disparity helps fuel broad populist movements. The reference to populism is tied to recognizable political phenomena, including the Tea Party era in the United States and the election of Donald Trump, who the speaker associates with the same underlying forces. The speaker also notes that populist or anti-establishment currents are not confined to one country, stating that the phenomenon is occurring on a global scale. The implication is that the intensifying inequality is a global trend that has broad political consequences, influencing how voters respond and what kinds of leadership they mobilize around. In discussing the historical patterns that accompany rising wealth disparities, the speaker asserts that there are two possible historical outcomes when such economic and social ferment reaches a certain peak. The first is revolution, suggesting a dramatic upheaval or fundamental political change driven by discontent. The second outcome is the creation of a “new great deal,” drawing a parallel to the period after the Great Depression when major social and economic reforms were enacted in some countries. This framing positions the current moment as one that could unfold in either direction, depending on the political and economic responses that emerge. The speaker explicitly expresses a preference for the second path, articulating a hope for a “new great deal” rather than a repeat of a French-style revolution, which is described as having not ended well. This preference signals a desire for a substantial, sweeping policy response that addresses inequality and its political ramifications in a constructive manner. The overarching point is that the combination of prolonged ultra-low interest rates and rising wealth concentration has created a political and economic environment in which populism is rising globally, and the path forward could take one of two major historical routes, with a hopeful tilt toward a modern-era settlement akin to a new great deal rather than upheaval.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, part of the problem since the great financial crisis and zero interest rate policy for essentially fourteen years is that the the wealth gap has grown even larger than it ever has. And historically, when we get here, there's political movements. And is there any, you know, wonder why we have populism? I mean, it's just you know, this this is this is this has been brewing since, you know, the Tea Party. This is And both of them, sorry, but that's what got Trump in office, but it's also what's getting Mamdami in office. It's happening globally. Populism is happening globally. The wealth disparity is insane, and historically, there's two ways this ends. It ends in revolution or a a new great deal. You know, like like what happened after the Great Depression. And so I'm hoping for a new great deal, not not like, we don't want a French style revolution that didn't end well.
SenseReceptor
Posted - October 20, 2025 at 5:17 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note a push for retail into crypto to prototype programmable money and steer people away from real assets. The aim is for big holders and central banks to buy gold and land without retail competition, pulling people into a control grid. The debt-growth model is over; now we scramble to grab real assets as profits flow from distributed ledger tech.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Fitts: "There's been a huge effort to encourage retail to go into crypto...because they're trying to prototype... programmable money... [and] keep people away from the real assets... the game of growing the debt is over...[now] we're all [scrambling for] real assets" This clip of Fitts, an investment banker, former Assistant Secretary of HUD, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) posted to Rumble on October 18, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "There's been a huge effort to encourage retail to go into crypto, partly because they're trying to prototype the programmable money and make it attractive and profitable for people to go into programmable money. So part of it was that, but they wanted to keep people away from the real assets. "If you are the big equity holders and, managers and the central banks, you want to buy gold and you want to buy land without interference from, you know, retail buyers. So if you can get the retail investors going off and buying, you know, helping you prototype your programmable money, then they're not competing with you to buy the land and to buy the real estate. "The more you can suck them over into helping build your control grid and away from getting control of the real assets, which you, you know, now that you've printed so much money, you want to get control of the real assets. That's what they've been doing. "We've been issuing more and more paper, more and more debt, more and more derivatives, more and more financial assets, but that doesn't mean we're making that. You know, the acceleration of paper, is greater than the creation of new real assets. So we are creating new real assets because we're creating new businesses, new technology, but you're creating far more financial assets. "It's very interesting. The German finance minister at the meeting in Shanghai in 2018 said, very astute comment. He said, the debt growth model is over. There are no reforms now that are not real reforms. And what he meant by that is the game of growing the debt is over. And now, like in the game of musical chairs, we're all going to scramble to get control of the real assets. "Of course, that's when all the enormous profits started attracting people into distributive ledger programmable money, because you're trying to suck them out of the real assets over here to create your control grid while you jump in and get control of the real assets."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a deliberate effort to push retail investors toward crypto and programmable money to prototype and profit from it, while keeping them away from “real assets.” The idea is that if retail participants buy into programmable money, they will not compete with the equity holders, managers, and central banks who want to acquire gold and land without retail interference. By drawing retail money into the financialized system, those in power can build a “control grid” and limit retail influence over real assets. Speaker 1 reacts, noting the emphasis on “printed so much money” and asking why this leads to control of real assets. Speaker 0 explains that there has been a continuous expansion of paper, debt, derivatives, and financial assets, even as real asset creation—via new businesses and technology—also grows. The acceleration of financial assets outpaces real asset creation. A reference is made to a 2018 remark by the German finance minister at a Shanghai meeting: “the debt growth model is over,” and that there are “no reforms now that are not real reforms.” This is interpreted as signaling an end to the game of expanding debt, with everyone scrambling to gain control of real assets. In this context, huge profits begin to attract participants into distributive ledger programmable money, with the aim of pulling retail money away from real assets to build a control grid, while those who control programmable money simultaneously position themselves to seize real assets.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been a huge effort to to encourage retail to go into crypto, partly because they're trying to prototype the programmable money and make it attractive and and and profitable for people to go into programmable money. So part of it was that. But they wanted to keep people away from the real assets. So if you're the big equity holders and managers and the central banks, you want to buy gold and you want to buy land without interference from retail buyers. So if you can get the retail investors going off and buying, helping you prototype your programmable money, then they're not competing with you to buy the land and to buy the real estate. So so the more you can suck them over into helping build your control grid and away from getting control of the real assets, which you you know, now that you've printed so much money, you you wanna get control of the real assets. That's what they've been doing. Speaker 1: Oh, that's enlightening. Printed so much money that you get control of the real access. Dive in there just a little bit. They printed so much money, they want control of the real assets. Why? Speaker 0: Right. So we've been issuing more and more paper, more and more debt, more and more derivatives, more and more financial assets. But that doesn't mean we're making that the acceleration of paper is greater than the creation of new real assets. So we are creating new real assets because we're creating new businesses, new technology, but you're creating far more financial assets. It's very interesting. The German finance minister at the meeting in Shanghai in 2018 said, very astute comment, he said, the debt growth model is over. There are no reforms now that are not real reforms. And what he meant by that is the game of growing the debt is over. And now, like in the game of musical chairs, we're all going to scramble to get control of the real assets. And of course, that's when all the enormous profits started attracting people into distributive ledger programmable money because you're trying to suck them out of the real assets over here to create your control grid while you jump in and get control of the real assets.
SenseReceptor
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 1:58 AM
Saved - October 20, 2025 at 4:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I convey Werner’s claim that CBDC’s final stage is grain-of-rice sized, an under-skin microchip that acts as digital ID, wallet, passport, and key. RFID-like progress would lead to waving instead of cards. He warns of loss or theft risks, and a dehumanizing legal question: could implanted people be non-human or humanoid robots with altered rights. He links UBI, Covid tactics, and transhumanist aims to mainstream the implant.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Richard Werner, formerly on the ECB's "Shadow Council," divulges the full plan for digital IDs: "The final stage is...it's the size of a grain of rice...[&] you've got the microchip implant under your skin...[&] the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human" This clip of Werner (@scientificecon), who holds a First Class Honors BSc. in Economics from the London School of Economics and a doctorate in Economics from the University of Oxford, is taken from the International Science Summit (Uncensored), which took place in 2022. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "But what does central bank digital currency look like? You see, so they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it because it apparently looks, and several central banks, apparently, as I heard from my sources, have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC. "I mean it comes in stages initially likely through your mobile phone, but it's only an intermediate step. And the final stage is, it's small and it's the size of a grain of rice. Now why is that? ...It's your digital ID. Your wallet. Can be your passport, your key. Now of course what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they've already now moved to the system RFID chips. RFID technology where you just wave the thing contactless, that is sort of conditioning us in this direction that in the future you'll just wave your hand because you've got the microchip implant under your skin. "And because in each step there's a rational reason, it's easier just to wave this, isn't it? It's much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that. So just wave it, it's quicker. But the next rationalization will be, well, but you can lose your card, somebody can steal your card and then you're just waving this kind of risky. Well, wouldn't it be nice if you couldn't lose it and nobody could steal it? "But it's clear that that's sort of, it is almost a step too far for a lot of people because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin. So that's where you need some more persuasion. "And it's interesting that this concept of universal basic income has been around for around a century where everyone should get some kind of citizens payment. But the billionaire elites have so far not liked that. But since 2015 they've all come out, I mean all the big billionaires And World Economic Forum, have come out. Oh, this is a good idea. Universal Basic Income. "Well, why suddenly now? Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant. And so in 2017, Bill Gates came out and said that Universal Basic Income is a good idea, but it's too early to introduce it. Now, what was still missing? So we had the technology for the microchip implant, but what was missing was the digital ID hadn't been introduced. "Now this is where this whole Covid agenda had become very useful. And so the sequence has been that first they worked on the technology, they had what they wanted. It was completely made ready already quite a few years ago. "Then the question became, how can we introduce it? And, the usual game plan would have been to do what central banks in many countries have been working on for many decades, which is to create boom, bust cycles and economic crises. And then in the crisis you say, oh, here's a new idea. That's the solution to the crisis. That's how they've been operating. But in this case, it seems they concluded that, resistance will still be too high. People don't really want to accept this implant because it could also have consequences. "Apparently, we learned from the World Economic Forum that there is also an approach in law that once you have, what they call transhumanism, once you have electronic implants in the body, which is, you know, to persuade people to do that, they always say this will enhance your functions, you get more abilities, you know, like almost become superhuman. But at the same time, the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human anymore. "You know, there's this movement out there talking about humanoid robots. And, you know, many years ago I thought, oh, to create a humanoid robot, that's a lot of work in electronics, in order to create this humanoid robot. Because when you're starting with electronics, there's a lot to build, but it's much faster if you start with a human. "So once you have certain implants, you may then be classified as a humanoid robot, which seems to be what for these transhumanist, people, you can use them and throw them away whenever you like. That becomes the next question. So once you're not classified as human anymore, but as humanoid robot, will you have human rights? And they've done, World Economic Forum has done surveys asking people, do you think humanoid robots should have human rights? And most people say no. Well, that could be you once you've accepted the microchip implant."

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Central bank digital currency (CBDC) design: There is talk of a final stage that is small and grain-of-rice sized, with initial access via mobile phones as an intermediate step. - A grain-of-rice-sized CBDC would function as your entire wallet and digital ID, potentially serving as your wallet, passport, and key. - Payment infrastructure evolution: Debit and credit cards have moved to RFID chips for contactless use, conditioning people to the idea of waving rather than inserting or typing. - Future payment modality: The next rationalization is that waving a device will be faster than queuing and entering numbers, but there is concern about losing or having cards stolen, which leads to the idea of a system where you cannot lose it and nobody can steal it. - Implant concept and human dignity: A microchip implant under the skin is discussed as a means to realize such a system, with the claim that some people may view this as a violation of human dignity. - Universal basic income (UBI) and timing: The idea of universal basic income has existed for about a century, but billionaire elites and the World Economic Forum have endorsed it more recently. Since 02/2015, there is said to be broad support among major figures, and in 02/2017 Bill Gates stated that UBI is a good idea but too early to introduce it. - Missing component and COVID-19 impact: It is claimed that the technology for the microchip implant existed earlier, but digital ID had not yet been introduced. The COVID agenda is described as having made the digital ID useful or relevant, enabling the planned sequence. - Strategy for introduction: Traditionally, central banks would create boom-bust cycles to push new ideas as solutions during crises. In this account, resistance to implants was anticipated to be high, so an alternate approach was pursued. - Transhumanism and law: There is a view that once electronic implants exist in the body, there is discussion in the World Economic Forum about the legal consequences, including the possibility of people being classified as not human if they have implants. - Humanoid robots and human rights: The discussion mentions attempts to persuade people by claiming enhancements, and raises the question of whether humanoid robots should have human rights; the World Economic Forum has reportedly conducted surveys asking whether humanoid robots should have human rights, with most people responding that it could apply to you once you accept the microchip implant.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But what does central bank digital currency look like? You see? So they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it. Yeah. Because it apparently looks and and several central banks apparently, as I as I heard from my sources, have already fully developed the final stage of CBDC. Mean, comes in stages initially likely through your mobile phone. Yeah. But it's only intermediate step. Mhmm. And the final stage is, you know, it's it's small, and it's the size of a a grain of rice. Now, why is that? And it's Speaker 1: it that grain of rice is your entire wallet or Speaker 0: Yes. It's your digital ID Yeah. Your wallet, can be your your passport, your key. Now, of course, what we found with our debit cards or credit cards is they've already now moved to the system in RFID chips, RFID technology where you just wave the thing. Yeah. Contactless. Yes. That is sort of the you know, conditioning us in this direction. In the future you'll just wave your hand, because you've got the microchip implant under your skin. And because you know, and each each step there's a rational reason, know. It's easier just to wave this, isn't it? It's much faster because we always have to wait in the queues as everyone types in their numbers and all that. So just wave it, it's quicker. But the the next rationalization will be well, but you can lose your cards, somebody can steal your card. And then you're just waving Yeah. That's kind of risky. Well, wouldn't it be nice if you couldn't lose it and nobody could steal it? You know, so But it's clear that that's sort of It is almost a step too far for a lot of people because it is a violation of human dignity to actually inject something like that under the skin. So that's where you need some more persuasion. Yeah. And it's interesting that this concept of universal basic income has been around for around a century, where everyone should get some kind of citizens, you know, payment. But the the billionaire elites have so far not like that. But since 02/2015, they've all come out. I mean, all the big billionaires and and World Economic Forum have come out, oh, this is a good idea, universal basic income. Well, why suddenly now? Because now we have the technology for the microchip implant. And so in 02/2017, Bill Gates came out and said that universal basic income is a good idea, but it's too early to introduce it. Now what was still missing, so we had the technology for the microchip implant, but what was missing was the digital ID hadn't been introduced. Now this is where this whole COVID agenda had become very useful. Mhmm. And so the sequence has been that first they worked on the technology, they had what they wanted. It was completely made ready already quite a few years ago. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Then the question became, how can we introduce it? Mhmm. And the usual game plan would have been to do what central banks in many countries have been working on for, you know, for many decades, which is to create boom bust cycles and economic crises. And then in the crisis, you say, oh, here's a new idea. That's the solution to the That's how they've been operating. But in this case, it seems they concluded that resistance will still be too high. People don't really want to accept this implant, because it could also have consequences. And apparently we learned from the World Economic Forum that there is also an approach in law that once you have, you know, what they call transhumanism, once you have electronic implants in the body, which is, you know, to persuade people to do that, they always say this will enhance your functions, you get more abilities, know, like almost become superhuman. Yeah. But at the same time, the legal consequence may be that you're not classified as human anymore. You know, there's there's there's this movement out there talking about humanoid robots. Yeah. And, you know, many years ago I thought, oh, to create a humanoid robot, that's a lot of work in electronics in order to create this humanoid robot because when you're starting with electronics, there's a lot to build. But it's much faster if you start with a human. Yeah. You see? Yeah. So once you have certain implants, you may then be classified as a humanoid robot, which seems to be what for these transhumanist people Speaker 1: You can use methotomine way whenever That you Speaker 0: becomes the next question. Once you're not classified as human anymore, as humanoid robot, will you have human rights? They've And done World Economic Forum has done surveys asking people Yeah. Do you think humanoid robots should have human rights? And most people say, Well, you know, that could be you, you know, once you've accepted the microchip implant. Yeah.
SenseReceptor
Posted - October 14, 2025 at 6:25 PM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 2:31 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I quote Whitney Webb saying Larry Fink is running the WEF and promoting a universal digital ledger that tokenizes everything, including natural assets like rivers, oceans, forests. Each hectare would have a token, with unique IDs and surveillance tech, turning nature into financial assets. She links this to “you’ll own nothing.”

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Whitney Webb: "Larry Fink is now running...the World Economic Forum...[and] the tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize...the natural world and transform it into financial assets...[Recall] the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era—'You'll own nothing and be happy'—Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before...like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests...These people want to put all of that into the financial system [to] fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's very bonkers." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), author of One Nation Under Blackmail and contributing editor of unlimitedhangout, is taken from an interview with Glenn Beck (@glennbeck) posted to YouTube on October 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Larry Fink is now running, I believe the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. And— in addition to saying that everything will be tokenized, he's said that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database, and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So for you as an individual, your identifier number, will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. "The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just, you know, assets that we traditionally think of, like real estate for example, or, or gold or you know, physical assets as well as digital, assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort, connected with people like, like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now prime, Minister of Canada, to tokenize, the. The natural world and transform it into financial assets. "And there was an attempt to do this to an extent, under the Biden administration, I believe, through the Department of Interior, with natural asset corporations. But that has not gone away. And there are groups, for example, one of the creators of the ETF, model originally, which BlackRock now now owns, iShares. His name is Peter Knez, I think is how you pronounce it. He's trying to turn the Amazon rainforest, into a digital commodity sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of like the, the scarcity idea that, you know, each hectare of the Amazon rainforest would represent, you know, a token and then, and then financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then be. Have its unique identifier right on, on the, on the blockchain and, and would be, you know, serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. "So even our most like natural. The places we conceptualize is the most natural places on Earth. These people want to come in place surveillance technology and you know, tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to you know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset, corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it nature's opportunity, so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad, behavior that for example, bought us, brought us the 2008 financial crisis, by you know quintupling the amount of assets currently in play. "So apply this now to the. The phrase that we all heard during the COVID era. You'll own nothing and be happy. Well, there's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that, into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell Sell pieces of it around. You know, use it to speculate on. I mean, it's, it's. It's very bonkers."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Larry Fink is now running, I believe, the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. Terrifying. He says that everything will be tokenized and that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So, for you as an individual, your identifier number will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just assets we traditionally think of, like real estate, for example, or gold or, you know, physical assets as well as digital assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort connected with people like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now Prime Minister of Canada, to tokenize the natural world and transform it into financial assets. There was an attempt to do this to an extent under the Biden administration, I believe through the Department of Interior with natural asset corporations, but that has not gone away. There are groups—for example, one of the creators of the ETF model originally, which BlackRock now owns, iShares, his name is Peter Kanez, I think is how you pronounce it—who's trying to turn the Amazon Rainforest into a digital commodity, sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of the scarcity idea that each hectare of the Amazon Rainforest would represent a token and financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then have its unique identifier, right, on the blockchain and would be serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. So even our most natural, the places we conceptualize as the most natural places on earth, these people want to come in and place surveillance technology and tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to, know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it Nature's Opportunity so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad behavior that, for example, brought us the two thousand eight financial crisis, by, you know, can kentoopling, basically, the amount of assets currently in play. It's You know, insane. I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 02/2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And, he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, you know, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very insane.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Larry Fink is now running, I believe, the World Economic Forum. He's acting chairman. Terrifying. Saying that everything yeah. In addition to saying that everything will be token ized, he's said that everything will soon be on the same universal digital ledger or database and that everything on that database will have a unique identifier number. So, for you as an individual, your identifier number will presumably be your digital ID or directly linked to that, but everything will have a digital ID. The tokenization agenda in particular seeks to tokenize not just, you know, assets that we traditionally think of, like real estate, for example, or gold or, you know, physical assets as well as digital assets like Bitcoin. There's a major effort connected with people like Fink and also people like Mark Carney, who's now Prime Minister of Canada, to tokenize the natural world and transform it into financial assets. There was an attempt to do this to an extent under the Biden administration, I believe through the Department of Interior with natural asset corporations, but that has not gone away. There are groups, for example, one of the creators of the ETF model originally, which BlackRock now owns, iShares, his name is Peter Kanez, I think is how you pronounce it. He's trying to turn the Amazon Rainforest into a digital commodity, sort of similar to Bitcoin in terms of like the scarcity idea that each hectare of the Amazon Rainforest would represent a token and financialize it that way. And then each hectare would then have its unique identifier, right, on the blockchain and would be serviced by surveillance drones and all sorts of stuff. So even our most natural, the places we conceptualize as the most natural places on earth, these people want to come in and place surveillance technology and tokenize it and put it on a blockchain and use it to, know, I would argue in the case particularly of natural asset corporations and the group behind it, the intrinsic exchange group, they just want to open up a huge new asset class. They call it nature's opportunity so that they can continue engaging in the same type of bad behavior that, for example, brought us the two thousand eight financial crisis, by, you know, can kentoopling, basically, the amount of assets currently in play. It's Speaker 1: You know, insane. I had a guy who worked, very, very, very high up at Citibank. And he told me around 02/2008, he said, Glenn, you know, don't worry about the financial system. And I'm like, uh-huh. And, he said, you know, we're never gonna go broke. I mean, do you know how much just the national parks are worth? And I looked at him and said, are you seriously telling me that we should commoditize the national parks? And he said, it's gonna happen. And I wonder now if this is what he was talking about. If it was just a digital not actually selling them, it's just a digital commoditization of our parks. Speaker 0: Yeah. So apply this now to the the phrase that we all heard during the COVID era, you'll own nothing and be happy. Well Yes. There's certain people that want to own everything, and that includes things that have never been able to be owned before that were considered things like the public commons, like rivers, lakes, the ocean itself, natural forests, all sorts of it. These people want to put all of that into the financial system, fractionalize it, tokenize it, and sell pieces of it around, you know, use it to speculate on. Mean, it's It's very Speaker 1: insane. So,

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full source video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kx0cTyDKUfw

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Babydoll921961 Good point. They don't have that right. They're just power-hungry goblins.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@milehijules Absolutely 💯

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Oregon513 @JilliSizzle He's in the running for sure

SenseReceptor
Posted - October 12, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 7:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I trace Tarik Cyril Amar’s Gaza Method, arguing that the tools used in Gaza—AI-targeting, biometric camps, 15-minute cities, land grabs—will soon export to the West. The thread follows Trump’s boards, Blair and Ellison, Palantir/Oracle ties, and Palantir’s links to IDF, HHS, ICE, IRS, plus biometrics, mass surveillance, and a rising “domestic terror” framework. It warns of a global panopticon and privatized control.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

THE GAZA METHOD: What Has Come for Palestinians Will Soon Come for Us All A 🧵 describing how the violence, AI-targeting systems, drone warfare, biometric refugee camps, land grabs, and digital IDs being deployed in Gaza will imminently enslave the Western World. (1/22) This thread is inspired by a Substack article authored by Tarik Cyril Amar titled “The Gaza Method” and published on February 2, 2024 (see thread’s second-to-last tweet). I first heard about this idea (that, as Amar says, “The mass murder in Gaza outlines a pattern, a set of tools and measures of extermination, subjugation, and expulsion that are ready for export and will be in high demand...like so much else of Israel’s spying, policing…and murder skills and tech [are]....”) via former Assistant Secretary of HUD and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts, who has noted that “Gaza is a method” in numerous interviews since the publication of Amar’s Substack article. In this clip from an interview with Jorn Luka posted to Luka’s eponymous YouTube channel in July 2025, Fitts notes that “Palestinians [have been used] to prototype the 15-minute cities and now [they’re being used] to prototype [a] land grab. And if we let this happen…this is not going to stop [there].” Fitts adds, “If we let this go down… it's going to keep happening around the world because this is not a one-off situation; this is a prototype, and that's why the Palantir technology [being used] is relevant. So I think the most important thing [to consider] is will the world let this happen? … Because the message is going to be, ‘Okay, if you look at how we're controlling [Palestine] and you look at how we're propagandizing or we're mind controlling [everyone], we can now get away with this. And if we can now get away with this, then we can roll this out worldwide.” Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FoAX4FthYb0

Video Transcript AI Summary
"This is absolutely extraordinary that the world would let this happen." "But you're literally saying, okay, we want the land, we want the oil, we want the water, so we're just gonna exterminate the people there and take it." "You've used the Palestinians to prototype the fifteen minute cities, and now you're using them to prototype the land grab." "This is a prototype." "And that's why the Palantir technology is relevant." "So, I think the most important thing that is happening is is will the world let this happen? In Palestine. Yeah. In Gaza. Yeah." "And if we can now get away with this, then we can rule this out worldwide."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is absolutely extraordinary that the world would let this happen. And and they would let this happen when literally you have The US president announcing he's gonna do a hotel and turn this into a resort, and his son-in-law is saying he's gonna do a waterfront development, and you have Netanyahu floating, you know, development plans showing this new wonderful Gaza. Now, I've always assumed they need the land, the water, the oil and gas, the resources to do the control grid because that's an area where they wanna do a lot of infrastructure for the control grid. But you're literally saying, okay, we want the land, we want the oil, we want the water, so we're just gonna exterminate the people there and take it. And not only that, we're gonna cut all the surrounding countries in on a piece of the action. We're gonna cut the president in on a hotel. You know, we're basically gonna have everybody making money on on killing these people and taking their stuff. And we there was a wonderful article that someone published last year that we keep bringing back. It's called Gaza is a method. And and it's it's you know, what it was saying is, look. You've used the Palestinians to prototype the fifteen minute cities, and now you're using them to prototype the land grab. And if we let this happen, it's gonna come you know, it's it's this is not gonna stop here. If we let this go down, it's gonna it's gonna keep happening around the world because this is not a one off situation. This is a prototype. And that's why the Palantir technology is relevant. So, I think the most important thing that is happening is is will the world let this happen? In Palestine. Yeah. In Gaza. Yeah. Because the message is going to be, okay, we you know, if you look at how we're controlling and you look at how we're propagandizing or we're mind controlling, we can now get away with this. And if we can now get away with this, then we can rule this out worldwide.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(2/22) “My plan calls for the creation of a new international oversight body—The Board of Peace…and one of the people that wants to be on the board is the U.K. former Prime Minister Tony Blair.” — Donald Trump, September 29, 2025 Roughly a year-and-half after Amar’s “The Gaza Method” post and three months after Fitts’ interview with Luka, U.S. President Donald Trump announced at a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that former U.K. Prime Minister Tony Blair would be appointed to the newly minted “Board of Peace,” billed as a “new international oversight body” tasked with governing Gaza’s transitional government as Israel withdraws from the Palestinian territory (1). 1. Source: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/middle-east/trump-board-of-peace-israel-gaza-tony-blair-b2836317.html

Video Transcript AI Summary
my plan calls for the creation of a new international oversight body, the Board of Peace. which will be headed not at my request, believe me. The leaders of the Arab world and Israel and everybody involved asked me to do this, so it'd be headed by a gentleman known as president Donald j Trump of The United States. That's what I want. There's some extra work to do, but it's so important that I'm willing to do it. We'll do it right, and we're gonna put leaders from other countries on and leaders that are very distinguished leaders. One of the people that wants to be on the board is The UK former prime minister, Tony Blair, good man, very good man, and, some others. And they'll be named
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're looking for this is eternity. This is for forever. To ensure the success of this effort, my plan calls for the creation of a new international oversight body, the Board of Peace. We call it the Board of Peace. Sort of a beautiful name, the Board of Peace, which will be headed not at my request, believe me. I'm very busy. But we have to make sure this works. The leaders of the Arab world and Israel and everybody involved asked me to do this, so it'd be headed by a gentleman known as president Donald j Trump of The United States. That's what I want. There's some extra work to do, but it's so important that I'm willing to do it. And we'll do it right, and we're gonna put leaders from other countries on and leaders that are very distinguished leaders. And we'll have a board, and one of the people that wants to be on the board is The UK former prime minister, Tony Blair, good man, very good man, and, some others. And they'll be named
Who is set to be on Trump’s Board of Peace? Blair named as part of Israel-Gaza plan Tony Blair would have a central role in any post-war plans for the beleaguered Palestinian enclave laid out by Washington the-independent.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(3/22) “Under the proposal, Blair would lead a body called the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita) that would have a mandate to be Gaza’s ‘supreme political and legal authority’ for as long as five years.” — The Guardian, September 25, 2025 In an article posted by The Guardian four days prior to Trump’s announcement, the media outlet described how Blair would oversee the Gaza International Transitional Authority (Gita) and would be “a compromise between Donald Trump’s own initial proposal for the US and Israel to ‘take over’ Gaza and the New York [‘technocratic’] declaration endorsed by more than 140 states.” The article also noted that “a separate Palestinian Executive Authority” would be “headed by a CEO formally appointed by the Gita board” and would “be responsible for overseeing a series of technocratic ministries, including health, education, finance, infrastructure, judicial affairs, and welfare.” Source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/25/washington-backing-plan-for-tony-blair-to-head-transitional-gaza-authority

Washington backing plan for Tony Blair to head transitional Gaza authority Reported proposal for international body to oversee Gaza for up to five years counters UN-backed plan for faster transition to Palestinian rule theguardian.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(4/22) “This issue…with technology and digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important…that is…you’ve got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and…most countries don’t have that [yet].” — Tony Blair at Davos 2023, January 21, 2023 Speaking at the World Economic Forum’s Davos 2023 conference in Davos, Switzerland, Blair—on stage alongside Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, et al.—highlighted the need for countries to adopt “a proper digital infrastructure” as a way to combat the next “pandemic.” “I also think this issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is, because in the end, you need the data,” Blair said to the WEF crowd in attendance. “You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't been. Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line… there'll be multiple shots. So you've got to have, for reasons to do with the health care more generally, but certainly for, a pandemic or, for vaccines, you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and many countries don't have that. In fact, most countries don't have that.” Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybrX7gwIMHw

Video Transcript AI Summary
I also think this this issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is. Because in the end, you you you you need the data. You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't. Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple there'll be multiple shots. So you've got to have the the reasons to do with the health care more generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for vaccines, for you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and many countries don't have that. In fact, most countries don't have that.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I also think this this issue to do with the technology and the digital infrastructure, I just want to emphasize how important I think that is. Because in the end, you you you you need the data. You need to know who's been vaccinated and who hasn't been. Some of the vaccines that will come on down the line will be multiple there'll be multiple shots. So you've got to have the the reasons to do with the health care more generally, but certainly for a pandemic or for vaccines, for you've got to have a proper digital infrastructure, and many countries don't have that. In fact, most countries don't have that.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(5/22) “Larry Ellison has contributed something like $300 million to the Tony Blair Institute, and they’re going to use that to collect the data of people in Gaza who will be put in…biometric concentration camps.” — Max Blumenthal, September 29, 2025 Speaking as part of a panel on Piers Morgan Uncensored, Grayzone Founder and Editor-in-Chief Max Blumenthal highlighted an important fact about Tony Blair—he’s largely funded by Oracle mega-billionaire Larry Ellison. (As of this writing, Ellison is worth approximately $192 billion.) In this clip, Blumenthal notes that Ellison has contributed approximately $300 million to The Tony Blair Institute and that those funds will be used “to collect the data of people in Gaza who will be put in, as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said in its internal documents, biometric concentration camps after they’re ethnically cleansed from the north.” “Tony Blair will be shepherding in those contracts,” Blumenthal adds, “as he did in the occupied West Bank as a so-called peace negotiator. This is Tony Blair’s real role.” Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-h-h1PNLrhM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Larry Ellison has contributed something like $300,000,000 to the Tony Blair Institute, and they're going to use that to collect the data of people in Gaza who will be put in, as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said in its internal documents, biometric concentration camps after they're ethnically cleansed from the North. And all of these tech companies, I don't know, Katie, if Elon will be involved in this, but they will come in and reap massive contracts from this holocaust, and Tony Blair will be shepherding in those contracts as he did in the occupied West Bank as a so called peace negotiator. This is Tony Blair's real role in what
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this goes to the to the Tony Blair question that Pierce asked. Larry Ellison has contributed something like $300,000,000 to the Tony Blair Institute, and they're going to use that to collect the data of people in Gaza who will be put in, as the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation said in its internal documents, biometric concentration camps after they're ethnically cleansed from the North. And all of these tech companies, I don't know, Katie, if Elon will be involved in this, but they will come in and reap massive contracts from this holocaust, and Tony Blair will be shepherding in those contracts as he did in the occupied West Bank as a so called peace negotiator. This is Tony Blair's real role in what

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(6/22) “Documents…show that [Gaza Humanitarian Fund] officials anticipated accusations that they were running ‘concentration camps with biometrics’ or comparisons to U.S. private military contractors like Blackwater….” — the Center for Constitutional Rights, June 10, 2025 If Blumenthal’s remarks regarding “biometric concentration camps” in Gaza sound hyperbolic, note that they are not. In a letter from the Center for Constitutional Rights (a non-profit legal and educational organization that uses litigation and advocacy to advance and protect the constitutional and human rights of marginalized communities) to Executive Chairman of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Johnnie Moore (1), the organization wrote that internal documents from the GHF—referred to as “a front for a network of private mercenary firms and receives heavy funding from Israeli military-intelligence agencies, including Mossad and the Ministry of War” by the Tehran Times(2)—”show that…GHF’s planners anticipated that the project could face difficult questions from the public about its ‘opaque origins, qualifications, and moral legitimacy’—particularly in light of its deep entrenchment with the Israeli government. Those documents…show that GHF officials anticipated accusations that they were running ‘concentration camps with biometrics’ or comparisons to U.S. private military contractors like Blackwater, linked to war crimes.” 1. Source: https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2025/06/6_10_2025_Letter%20and%20Exhibits%20to%20GHF.pdf

Center for Constitutional Rights ccrjustice.org

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(7/22) “[Tony Blair’s] trademark evangelism is now focused on AI, its power to transform government and why everyone should listen to Larry Ellison, the founder of technology firm Oracle.”— Lighthouse Reports, September 24, 2025 While Blair may be the political puppet who’s set to be deployed to Palestine in order to execute technocratic-inspired crimes against humanity—like the establishment of “concentration camps with biometrics”—it’s important to emphasize that Larry Ellison is the driving force—and driving funds—behind him. In an article published by Lighthouse Reports online on September 24, 2025(1), authors May Bulman, et al. wrote that “Ellison invested $130 million in the [Tony Blair Institute] between 2021 and 2023, with a further $218 million pledged since then. The scale of funding took the TBI from a headcount of 200 to approaching 1,000.” The article added that “Oracle has…been contracted hundreds of times by the British government [since 2003] and earned £1.1 billion in public sector revenue since the start of 2022.” Furthermore, Bulman et al. noted that “Just five days after Keir Starmer was elected, Blair told the TBI’s ‘Future of Britain’ conference that AI was the “game-changer” they were looking for. Within months, Starmer was parroting Blair’s language – and the TBI was in the box seat of the government’s nascent AI policy pushing Oracle’s interests and its founder’s world view.” 1. Source: https://www.lighthousereports.com/investigation/blair-and-the-billionaire/

Blair and the Billionaire Insiders reveal how Larry Ellison’s money turned Blair’s institute into a tech sales and lobbying operation for Oracle lighthousereports.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(8/22) “We can make sure that we’re using the latest security technology, [which] is going to be biometrics-assisted by AI to make sure you are, in fact, Tony Blair.” — Larry Ellison responding to Tony Blair at the February, 2025 World Government Summit. While looking at Blair’s imminent actions in Palestine gives us a sense of how “a digital control grid” (Catherine Austin Fitts’ term) is going to be implemented in that part of the world, listening to Larry Ellison himself gives us a sense of how that same framework will be applied to the rest of the world. In this clip from the 2025 World Government Summit held in Dubai, we hear from Ellison as he responds to Blair’s question regarding “the importance of having…basic digital infrastructure in place [for governance, including] cloud services, data centers, [and] digital identity.” Ellison responds, in part, by saying that “[we need to make sure that] the computer recognizes you, it recognizes your voice. It might ask you to put your index finger on the return key. And [we’ll be]...absolutely certain it’s you.” The mega-billionaire adds, “We can make sure that we’re using the latest security technology, and it is going to be biometrics assisted by AI to make sure that you are, in fact, Tony Blair, and I’m sure you are.” Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FG2AtiInwKM

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says essential digital infrastructure must be secure and sovereign: "one of the most important things is not to put the digital infrastructure in place and make sure it is secure. And often, it needs to be sovereign." Data centers must be in our countries due to privacy: "Data centers, because of the privacy requirements around the data, need to be in our countries or they're not terribly useful. They need to be in our countries, but they also need to be secure." They foresee a passwordless future: "This is the last year you will ever log on to an Oracle system with a password." "By the middle of this year, I'm quite certain you are Tony Blair." Security will rely on biometrics: "The security system, we have biometric logins. The computer recognizes you." "There's no reason to enter a password. In fact, passwords are too easily stolen." They warn about ransomware: "The data centers and data is being taken hostage all over the world." "The ransomware business is a very, very good business." And a preemptive approach: "not after the data is stolen, but before the data is stolen. We can make sure that we're using the latest security technology, and it is going to be biometrics assisted by AI to make sure that you are, in fact, Tony Blair, and I'm sure you are."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the importance of having that basic digital infrastructure in place? You know, cloud services, data centers, digital identity. How important are these things to to put in place so that the rest of the system works effectively? Speaker 1: Well, I think one of the most important things is not to put the digital infrastructure in place and make sure it is secure. And often, it needs to be sovereign. So think countries are very uncomfortable with keeping their data in other countries' data centers. So I think part of our essential infrastructure, just like airports obviously need to be in our country or they're not terribly useful. Ports need to be in our country, they're not terribly useful. Data centers, because of the privacy requirements around the data, need to be in our countries or they're not terribly useful. They need to be in our countries, but they also need to be secure. And there are new technologies right now. This is the last year you will ever log on to an Oracle system with a password. By the middle of this year, I'm quite certain you are Tony Blair. So how do I know? Well, I look at you, I hear your voice, I listen to the kind of questions you ask. I'm pretty sure you're not synthetically created in having this conversation. The security system, we have biometric logins. The computer recognizes you. It recognizes your voice. It might ask you to put your index finger on the return key. And we know we're absolutely certain it's you. There's no reason to enter a password. In fact, passwords are too easily stolen. The data centers and data is being taken hostage all over the world. The ransomware business is a very, very good business. It's getting bigger and better every year. We tend not to talk about it because the American FBI has a simple advice to someone whose data has been ransomed. Just pay them because there's nothing we can do about it. But there is something we can do about it, not after the data is stolen, but before the data is stolen. We can make sure that we're using the latest security technology, and it is going to be biometrics assisted by AI to make sure that you are, in fact, Tony Blair, and I'm sure you are. Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, there are times I wish I wasn't, by the way, but that's that's another matter. But

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(9/22) “Oracle and Palantir today announced a partnership to provide secure cloud and AI solutions aiming to power businesses and governments around the world.” — Oracle press release, April 4, 2024. Not only do we find a robust connection between Ellison and Blair, but also an important partnership between Ellison’s Oracle and another company with a big role in the destruction of Gaza: Palantir. In April of 2024, Oracle and Palantir announced a partnership “to provide secure cloud and AI solutions aiming to power businesses and governments around the world” (1). The press released noted that “Oracle’s distributed cloud and AI infrastructure, combined with Palantir’s leading AI and decision acceleration platforms, will help organizations maximize the value of their data—which will contribute to increasing efficiency, addressing sovereignty requirements, and help them outpace adversaries.” “Oracle is the only hyperscaler capable of delivering its entire AI and cloud suite to any business or government anywhere in the world,” Oracle VP Rand Waldron said in the press release. “By combing the performance, scalability, and flexibility of Oracle Cloud Infrastructure with Palantir’s leading data and AI platforms, we will help our customers win in any industry or environment.” 1. Source: https://www.oracle.com/news/announcement/oracle-and-palantir-join-forces-to-deliver-mission-critical-ai-solutions-to-governments-and-businesses-2024-04-04/#:~:text=Austin%2C%20Texas%E2%80%94Apr%204%2C,highest%20sovereignty%20and%20security%20standards

fw_error_www oracle.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(10/22) “Palantir Technologies Inc., the data analysis firm that provides militaries with artificial intelligence models, has agreed to a strategic partnership with the Israeli Defense Ministry to supply technology to help the country’s war effort.” — Bloomberg, January 12, 2024 With Palantir (and its partnership with Ellison’s Oracle) in mind, we can focus back in on Gaza and see how the tech company—which has endless ties to the military industrial complex and the intelligence community(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)—is helping the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) to kill Palestinians. In January of 2024, Bloomberg reported that “Palantir Technologies Inc., the data analysis firm that provides militaries with artificial intelligence models, has agreed to a strategic partnership with the Israeli Defense Ministry to supply technology to help the country’s war effort”(6). The article went on to quote Palantir EVP Josh Harris who said that “Both parties have mutually agreed to harness Palantir’s advanced technology in support of war-related missions” and that “This strategic partnership aims to significantly aid the Israeli Ministry of Defense in addressing the current situation in Israel.” The Bloomberg article went on to note that “Palantir last year introduced its AIP, or Artificial Intelligence Platform, an intelligence and decision-making system that can analyze enemy targets and propose battle plans.” 1. Reference source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxKghrZU5w8 2. Reference source: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/williamalden/palantirs-relationship-with-americas-spies 3. Reference source: https://www.palantir.com/offerings/intelligence/ 4. Reference source: https://www.setav.org/en/palantirs-all-seeing-eye-domestic-surveillance-and-the-price-of-security 5. Reference source: https://builtin.com/articles/what-is-palantir 6. Source: https://www.palantir.com/assets/xrfr7uokpv1b/3MuEeA8MLbLDAyxixTsiIe/9e4a11a7fb058554a8a1e3cd83e31c09/C134184_finaleprint.pdf

Palantir’s Relationship With The Intelligence Community Has Been Worse Than You’d Think The Silicon Valley data miner no longer works with the NSA, and its chief executive described the CIA as “recalcitrant” in the summer of 2015, BuzzFeed News has learned. buzzfeednews.com
Offerings | Intelligence Palantir was founded in 2004 with a mission to help the intelligence community make better use of their data securely and responsibly. palantir.com
Palantir’s all-seeing eye: Domestic surveillance and the price of security In J.R.R. Tolkien’s "The Lord of the Rings," the Palantír was a crystal “seeing-stone” – a mystical artifact that granted its wielder the power to observe... setav.org
What Is Palantir? The Company Behind Government AI Tools | Built In Palantir is a data analysis software company known as a military intelligence tool. As the company branches out in corporate America, we take a closer look at its technology. builtin.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(11/22) “If you care about lives in Gaza…you’re going to want [to use Palantir’s software] because it’s the only way you can…say, ‘This person did this, and they deserve to go.” — Palantir CEO Alex Karp, September 9, 2025. Putting a finer—more visceral—point on Palantir’s involvement with the IDF in Gaza, here is Palantir CEO Alex Karp at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles, California in September 2025 explaining how the tech company’s software is used to decide who “deserve[s] to go.” I.e., who deserves to be killed by the military because they’ve been deemed an enemy or terrorist or whatever by Palantir’s AI. Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-IH7EVrBbQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
If you care about not being surveilled illegally, about the treatment of people who come into the country illegally but deserve adequate treatment, and about lives in Gaza, Ukraine, and worldwide where Palantir is used, you're gonna want the best software in the world because it's the only way you can reduce and more precisely target the people and justify it; and actually the only way where you can say this person did this and they deserve to go.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The weird, the obvious fact is if you care about not being surveilled illegally, if you care about the treatment of people who come into the country illegally but deserve adequate treatment, if you care about lives in Gaza, in Ukraine, and all over the world where Palantir is used, you're gonna want the best software in the world because it's the only way you can reduce and more precisely target the people and justify it. And actually, the only way where you can say this person did this and they deserve to go. And so, You know,

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(12/22) “Gotham is the AI–kill chain program created by Palantir…used within HHS Protect [during Covid] to [identify]...different individual patients based on some algorithm and [determine] that's [who] we're gonna execute….” — Whistleblower Zowe Smith, June 2025 With Karp’s words fresh in your mind (“This person did this, and they deserve to go”), listen to former medical coder, whistleblower, and author Zowe Smith describe how Palantir’s “AI–kill chain programs” were used during Covid “to [identify]...different individual patients based on some algorithm and [determine] that's [who] we're gonna execute….” In this clip, taken from a June, 2025 interview with James Corbett, Smith, who’s authored a memoir describing the horrors she witnessed via her medical-coder job in 2020/2021 due to the enormously deadly Covid injections and hospital protocols(1), notes that HHS Protect—“a secure decision-making and operations platform for the whole-of-government response to the COVID-19 pandemic”(2)—had two Palantir AI programs built into it, including one dubbed “Tiberius,” which “was the thing that assigned you a threat risk score…that was [determining] if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient [you were]....” Smith adds, “Gotham is the AI–kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect [to decide] when and how and where to deploy the [Covid] countermeasures, which was your [Covid] vaccine, your remdesivir, and your ventilator…” For reference, recall that the Covid injections are enormously deadly(3), as are remdesivir(4) and the excessive use of ventilators(5). 1. Source: https://thrillkillmedicalcult.com/ 2. Source: https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/hhs-protect-faqs.pdf 3. Source: https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/public_surveys/crosstabs_2_vaccine_deaths_december_28_30_2022 4. Source: https://sensereceptornews.com/?p=4565 5. Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-ventilators-some-doctors-try-reduce-use-new-york-death-rate-2020-4 Source video for clip: https://rumble.com/v6uxxlh-genomic-surveillance-in-the-thrill-kill-medical-cult.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Video Transcript AI Summary
So there was a program called HHS Protect as start during operation warp speed. So this HHS protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. The AMA, HHS, the CDC, specifically, all partnered with Palantir, and then Palantir developed a program for operation warp speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a threat risk score, and then that was a program called Tiberius. They also could determine down to the ZIP code where you were and how compliant areas were. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir. So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius, and then it executes the threat or tells does an AI decision making process and decide decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures, which was your vaccine, your remdesivir, and your ventilator.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there was a program called HHS Protect as start during operation warp speed. It was part of operation warp speed. That's where I think most of the the public facing, infrastructure began. Although I was looking into operation Stargate, and I'm I'm seeing documentation on CAIA databases that say it's more than ten years in the making. So, definitely, it's it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two Trump administration. But so this HHS protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC, specifically, all partnered with Palantir, and then Palantir developed a program for operation warp speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a threat risk score, and then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. So I I wanna make this point about AI because when I was a medical coder, was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both three ms and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic, there are programs, and you can rename them whatever you want. But it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like, your program Epic might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo. It might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's it's just a function, really. And it HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a threat risk score, and that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you? That was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the ZIP code where you were and how compliant areas were. And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the unlimited hangout, she wrote a article covering this program HHS Protect and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity. And they thought, you know, you're a higher risk if you're a certain ethnic group. So, of course, that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir. And that was used within HHS Protect to execute. So the the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius, and then it executes the threat or tells does an AI decision making process and decide decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures, which was your vaccine, your remdesivir, and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this, and that is how they, identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're gonna, execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program.
Home A gripping, first-hand exposé of the hidden horrors within the modern medical-industrial complex. This harrowing memoir pulls no punches as it details the author's real-life experiences with corruption, coercion, and institutional abuse disguised as healthcare. If you've ever suspected the system is sicker than the people it's supposed to treat, this book will open your eyes. thrillkillmedicalcult.com
‘Died Suddenly’? More Than 1-in-4 Think Someone They Know Died From COVID-19 Vaccines - Demographics - Rasmussen Reports® rasmussenreports.com
Running List of (15) Studies Showing Remdesivir Is Harmful and Not Effective – Sense Receptor News sensereceptornews.com
80% of NYC's coronavirus patients who are put on ventilators ultimately die, and some doctors are trying to stop using them Ventilators are an extreme attempt to get oxygen into patients' lungs, and some doctors want to find more efficient methods of treatment. businessinsider.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(13/22) “I think Palantir is in Partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate…[and] they have the treasury data, the IRS data…the Social Security data..[and they’re] building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population.” — Catherine Austin Fitts, July, 2025 Not only has Karp’s Palantir infused the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services with its AI programs, but its tech is creeping into other areas of the federal government as well. As former Assistant Secretary of HUD and founder of the Solari Report Catherine Austin Fitts describes in this clip from a Conservative Voice discussion posted online on July 8, 2025, “Palantir is in Partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate…[and] they have the treasury data, the IRS data…the Social Security data..[and they’re] building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population.” Source video for clip:

Video Transcript AI Summary
"I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. I don't you know?" "The government pays a massive amount of amounts of money. Massive amounts of money." "there's a new sole source ICE contract on the way to Palantir as well, as just announced." "they have the treasury data. They have the IRS data. They have the social security data." "Trump has announced he wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir's gonna underwrite all the packages." "So they're gonna have all the housing data." "And we know HHS has said we're they're organizing all the health public and private health data, so I'm assuming that's going in as well." "the ICE contract is that they can track immigrants location in real time through Palantir back to ICE." "the primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. I don't you know? Speaker 1: But don't think with health and human services. They have contracts Speaker 0: The government pays a massive amount of amounts of money. Massive amounts of money. And so if you look at the Doge theft, what you've done is you've moved between the government contracts. You know, there's a new sole source ICE contract on the way to Palantir as well, as just announced. I just found that last night. So so you've got you know, you basically they have the treasury data. They have the IRS data. They have the social security data. They, now they're gonna have all the ICE data. Speaker 1: They had some already. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They had some already. And then Trump has announced he wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir's gonna underwrite all the packages before they come into Freddie and Fannie. So they're gonna have all the housing data. And we know HHS has said we're they're organizing all the health public and private health data, so I'm assuming that's going in as well. And basically you're talking about that data being managed and and I think at this point basically privatized into AI. Speaker 1: Owned by they're gonna effectively own it. They're gonna have AI running it. And and one of these things I Speaker 0: don't I don't know if they will legally technically because if you look at how it was transferred. So the Doge operation, if I'm right, and this is my hypothesis. If the Doge operation did what I think, they transferred all the data, and and and they did it when an XAI announced a partnership with Palantir. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And then the government turned around and Palantir had a lot of contracts with those agencies anyway, but then they gave some additional contracts. And so they have plenty of money, especially the ICE is gonna be sole source so you can just do pretty much whatever you want. So they have plenty of money to manage that data and yes, I think they have it on a private basis. And what's interesting, I have somebody, a professional that I work with who does has for for his business has to do income verification. Mhmm. And magically, two weeks after Doge got the Treasury, Social Security and IRS, suddenly the income verification service he uses announces they have a 100% of Americans now complete data on everyone magically. Speaker 1: It's astonishing. And one of the elements of the ICE contract is that they can track immigrants location in real time through Palantir back to ICE. You know, that's the kind of surveillance attract everyone. Exactly. Right. There's no there's absolutely no reason that doesn't apply to the citizens. You Speaker 0: know, the the ICE story is complicated because there are multiple things going on. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: But there's no doubt the primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population. Speaker 1: Of the entire population. So Speaker 0: you

@TCVoiceWWDB - The Conservative Voice

Catherine Austin Fitts @solari_the joins The Conservative Voice to discuss the Digital Control Grid and what that means to your freedom, $21 trillion missing from government accounts, and Mr. Global.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Catherine Austin Fitz discusses the United States’ “missing money.” She cites that by 2015 there was “$21,000,000,000,000” missing, with the debt rising to “$37,000,000,000,000” and “undisclosed liabilities.” She explains the mechanism: money borrowed from pension funds and “disappears out the back door” through the New York Fed, the BIS, and private banks. She references the “Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board statement 56” and says “we can keep secret books,” noting that “the books went dark” after 2015. She describes a “breakaway civilization” funding “underground bases” via a “public private partnership” with Palantir, DHS, ICE, and HHS, creating “biometric surveillance of the entire population” and a “ring doorbell” surveillance network. She portrays a “public private criminal syndicate” and a “tapeworm economy,” asking “Who is mister global?” They discuss health concerns (including “turbo cancers” and rising mortality) and spiritual dimensions: “angels and demons” and “interdimensional intelligence.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Welcome to The Conservative Voice. We are today not on WWDB. We are actually in a farmhouse in Southeast Pennsylvania, and we're gonna have a unique conversation this afternoon. I'm your host, Gary Heasley. With me is Ada Nestor Hello. And Chris Glover. Hi, Gary. Hi. You know who you're familiar with from our other shows and and today we have a special guest Catherine Austin Fitz who is world renowned I would say. But she's the president of Solari Inc. She's the publisher of the Solari Report. You worked at Dylann Reed. Speaker 1: You And I grew up in West Philly. Speaker 0: Yeah. And grew up in Speaker 2: West Philly. Speaker 1: In my home state. Speaker 0: Yeah. And served as assistant secretary of housing and federal housing, commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and the urban and urban development in the first administration and was the president of Hamilton Securities Inc. Speaker 1: I think you meant first Bush administration. Speaker 0: What did I say? Speaker 2: First. Administrator. Speaker 0: In the first Bush administration. Speaker 1: I'm old enough to Speaker 0: not very first administrator. Fair enough. So Catherine has designed and closed over 25,000,000,000 of transactions and investments to date and has led portfolio and investment strategy for 300,000,000,000 of financial assets and liabilities, which is even in today's numbers astonishing. Speaker 1: Big money. Speaker 0: It's big money. You know, today where we talk about trillions, these are still real numbers. Mean, so so welcome. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: And thanks for making the It's time great Speaker 1: to see you all again. Speaker 2: So Always good to be seen. Speaker 0: So there are there are there are three things we really wanna get into today. Right? There there are some things that you talk about all the time that just need additional explanation and and and we wanna make sure people can grasp. One is the concept that there is, money missing in the system. Somehow $21,000,000,000,000 has somehow vaporized. So we wanna touch on that. And then we wanna And more. Speaker 1: And more. Speaker 0: And more. And then we wanna touch on this idea of this control grid, this digital cage that's being built around the people that will control and monitor and and all that. We wanna touch on that a bit because you've done great work on that. And then Speaker 2: the last question, you know, everyone is asking frequently, who politicians, bankers, media personalities, who is it that these financial folks, Speaker 0: who are they all working for? And you've come up with this phrase, say mister global. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Which I think is a great way to capture it and maybe as we get deeper into the hour, we'll we'll dig into exactly who is mister global. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: Alright? So so let's start off on the 21,000,000,000,000. You know, you've done several reports. You've talked about it at length. $21,000,000,000,000 is missing. Speaker 1: Yeah. So so let me go back. The US government obviously has, laws related to how they're supposed to manage our tax dollars Mhmm. And the money they borrow, much of that money being borrowed from our retirement savings or pension funds. So so you have a constitutional provisions related to financial management that say congress has to appropriate money that's spent. So you can't spend money you haven't Mhmm. Approved by congress, and then it has to be disclosed. So if we spend $2,000,000,000 a year or, you know, $2,000,000,000,000 a year, we have to disclose, you know, here's the money we collected from you, here's the money we borrowed from you, and here's what we did with your money. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. So those are the constitutional. Then you have a layer of financial management laws, are quite good about the details of how both the central bank and fiscal policy money is supposed to be managed. And then there's another layer of regulations. If you go to our website about the missing money, missingmoney.salari.com, we have a whole series of briefing papers written by lawyers we commissioned to explain for primarily journalists and reporters or serious researchers how the financial management laws of The United States work. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay? Now here's what you need to know. The US government, so so if you look at The US finances, it's managed by the treasury, and the bank account for the treasury is the New York Fed. Okay. So the New York Fed is the depository. So you have the treasury and you have their banker. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. Now here's what you need to know. They are in massive violation of the laws related to financial management. Massive. You know, they are so far outside the lane that they're not even on the track. They're not in the stands. They're in a different country. Mhmm. That's how far out. And I bring that up because as a tactic, if you're a citizen and you don't like what the government is doing you know, let's say you don't like the fact that they're spending money on illegal wars or you don't like the money that they they're spending money poisoning your children or they're not allowing a slaughterhouse in your area or, you know, whatever whatever you're mad. You can go at them on that issue. But I've always believed the way to go at them is, well, why should I pay taxes if you're not obeying the law Right. Related to financial management? And so one of the things we we have a big wrap up on taxation and proposals that state attorney generals and treasurers take action to start protecting citizens' money from being spent illegally. Not not necessarily withholding it, but just making sure it doesn't. Okay. So one issue is the government and its central bank are way outside the line. So I'll give you an example because, you know, the important thing is what do we do? So when I I litigated with the Department of Justice for many years over related issues, when it was over, I I won a big settlement and and I wanted to pay off all my creditors. And I owed one of the the largest owner of the New York Fed. So the New York Fed is a private bank owned by its members and Speaker 2: it's Speaker 1: running our treasury money illegally. Okay. So I owed them $14,000 on a credit card, and I wrote them a letter. And I said, I owe you 14,000 on a credit card, but you owe me 14,000, on all the money that's been disappearing from me as a taxpayer. And I'm asserting a common law right of offset. I should mention the the missing money is 65,000 per person. It was 14,000 that I counted then. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 0: I Speaker 1: said, you owe me 14,000 as depository because you are affecting illegal transactions outside the law related to my tax dollar. So I'm asserting a common law right of offset. I'm gonna offset the 14 you owe me against the 14 IOU and, you know, so I'm tearing up the bill. And here's the name and and telephone number and address for my attorney. And if you have a problem with that, I'm happy to discuss it or negotiate or litigate, whichever you prefer. And they just wrote it off. Speaker 0: Of course. Right. And and you in your, in your approach to that, you assume they have a fiduciary responsibility. They have legal responsibilities. And again, as you said, they're way outside the law. Speaker 1: They're way outside the law. And, you know, there are rules called know your customer. And if if if any of us transacted outside the law the way the federal government does, our bank would shut us off. Speaker 2: Oh, Speaker 1: yes. They wouldn't affect the transaction. Jail. Speaker 3: So Right. Speaker 1: In jail. And it's low. It's not like they can't you know, if 21,000,000,000,000 anyway, so so so from 1998 Speaker 0: Mhmm. So Speaker 1: so let me go back. In 1995, the people around the financial system worked very hard to try and come up with a way to get the federal government on a financially sound basis. Mhmm. It didn't work, and it blew up into a three week government shutdown and a huge political fight. And and what was described to me later by the head of the largest pension fund in the country, he said, they, whoever they is, have given up on the country and they're moving all the money out starting in the fall. Mhmm. And sure enough, at the beginning of federal fiscal nineteen ninety eight, which is 10/01/1997, huge amounts of money started going missing from two federal agencies, the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development where I used to work. And I had automated the whole financial op or the primary financial operation at HUD. And I knew there's no way you could have, you know, literally hundreds of billions of dollars going missing from that operation unless you wanted to. You know, you you and you would need the New York Fed member banks and the treasury to be complicit in that as well as the HUD financial operation. But it would take very few people because it was so consolidated into the corporate contractors. So I started noticing money going missing and I started to bring attention to it. And I didn't believe it was theft. I believed that a decision had been made to fundamentally engineer a coup through financial mechanisms and just literally take the debt up Mhmm. Drain the money out of the back door, and then you're in a position to dictate terms. You know, you put the government in a dead trap, it's a coup. Right. And I kept talking about it, and it was very interesting. Coming into 09/11, we had real momentum. There was a wonderful reporter in Washington who's writing a big cover story in Insight magazine which automatically meant to every senator in congressional desk. Anyway, so so the weekend before 09:11, we are just putting the finishing touches on the story. It's gonna hit congressional desk the following Friday, which was what? The fifteenth? September 15? So then on Monday Rumsfeld comes out and announces there's 2,300,000,000,000.0 missing. And I thought he was trying to get ahead of our story. I'll never make that mistake again. And Speaker 3: that story disappeared the next day. Speaker 1: Right. And literally the next day, many of the offices related to related securities or financials blow up. The office at the Pentagon Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: We were told was the office that was doing the investigation on the missing money. And many of the securities firms were once involved in the biggest treasury mark anyway. So the rest was history, and I kept doing the missing money. If you go to missingmoney.slurry.com, all the documentation is there. And finally, in 02/2015, last full year of Obama, there's, it turns out that they're missing $6,500,000,000,000, which is the biggest number in one year yet. And, and I I immediately said, uh-oh. This is a cut and run because the contractor that was running the payment system for DOD and HUD Mhmm. Then spun out their whole IT, government IT division to a new company. And I said, oh. Mhmm. They, you know, they suck the last bit of money. They're getting the IT out. So I was worried it was what we call a cut and run. Anyway, so I started making a big noise about it. A professor from Michigan State University heard me on the radio and said, she can't be right. He's a budget expert, Doctor. And Mark he said, she has to be wrong. He went to the financials and sure enough I was right. Wow. So he called me and said, can I help? And I said, yeah. If you would get your students and do a complete survey of all the financials. I had it up to 12,000,000,000,000 missing. He then did a survey and got it up to 21,000,000,000,000. That's how we got to 21, but that was as of 02/2015. Right. Speaker 2: So this Well. Speaker 3: Would be I would love to see the numbers just over the last four years because we know that as soon as Trump came back into the picture and when he won his reelection, the amount of money that went out the door just between November and January was significant. Yeah. Speaker 1: So two things to know. During Trump, so so we did a Skidmore wrote published a big study. We published it with documents all over the world. We have servers everywhere, And then we published it in hard copy to get it out because we didn't wanna depend on digital. Anyway, so there was a big sort of brouhaha with people trying to figure out what to do because under the law, you are required to produce an audit. All these agencies Right? Speaker 0: Are produced on. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: To produce an audit. So there's a big brouhaha and the decision was remember the Kavanaugh hearings? Speaker 2: Mhmm. Oh, yes. Speaker 1: What do you remember about the Kavanaugh hearings? Sex, right? Speaker 3: Oh, mean Speaker 0: Did he? No. I Speaker 3: actually do you wanna know? Speaker 1: Out there? Speaker 3: No. I don't remember anything about the sexual allegations from the Kavanaugh hearing. You wanna know what I remember from the Kavanaugh hearings? I remember Senator Lindsey Graham talking enemies of our country even if they were here, even if they were US citizens in previous Supreme Court cases that handled how you deal with enemies of the state. Speaker 2: Oh, the the difference in the applicable law Speaker 3: Mhmm. Speaker 2: Depending on what's going on. Speaker 1: Okay. So while that was all happening, the senate and the house, republican and democrat, and the White House all agreed to something called Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board statement 56 Mhmm. Which basically said we can keep secret books. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 3: So as all the theater is going on and people are hanging from the scaffolding in the Capitol Building to keep Kavanaugh from being confirmed, they're behind closed doors making But this let's Speaker 1: look at what they said. What they said is we're running the finances way outside the law. Right. And we are going to adopt administrative policy that says, we all agree, we don't have to obey the regulations, the laws, or the constitution as a matter of administrative policy. It's a total inversion. It's completely illegal. Speaker 0: FASB 56 says, here's a regulation that gives you the freedom to ignore the regulations. Speaker 1: It's not a regulation. Speaker 0: Well, it's a FASB statement. Speaker 1: No. It's an administrative policy. Mhmm. It's junior to a regulation. Speaker 0: Fair enough. Technically, yeah. Speaker 2: That's true. Just extend only to the government? Or do they go beyond that? Speaker 1: No. It it extended to all the the what's called the covered agencies, a 150 related entities. And if you combine the classification rules and the national security rules, it then includes the largest banks and corporate contractors working for the government. Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 1: So are you ready for this? If you take The US stock market and The US bond market, basically the large cap stock market and and the big bonds, meaning that there's no disclosure. Speaker 0: They all have relationships with the government that in one way or the other would give them some latitude to set aside some of their reporting in the name of national security. Speaker 1: But the national security director under the rules Mhmm. Has a delegated authority from the president to waive SEC filing requirements and they don't have to tell you. When you pick up the the 10 k or the 10 q, it doesn't say, oh, by order of the president or the national security director, we can keep all of this secret and this is not complete. They don't say that. Just so what happened is this is part of what happened to me as an investment advisor. I'm like, The US large cap stock market and the bond market is basically me and I there's no disclosure. Mhmm. We're on you know, we're in la la land. Speaker 0: The numbers literally don't have to tick and tie. They don't have Speaker 1: to add up. Well, here part of the problem is under FASB fifty six. They a secret group of people by a secret process can remove secretly some portion and they don't have to tell you what they removed. So you Speaker 0: And when you say remove some portion, you mean they've got financial statements. We can all get them and read them. They balance and they tie back and forth. Speaker 1: Something has been But Speaker 0: there could be a piece of that that is literally Speaker 1: just You don't know what it is. Speaker 0: And you don't know what it is. Speaker 1: You don't know what it is. So what you've got is meaningless. Speaker 2: Funny money. Speaker 0: Smells nerves. The closer a company is to the government, the bigger that piece of their business is, the more of it they can do. Speaker 1: I'm assuming but I don't know. No wonder. I'm assuming. So I was sitting in Bolivar, Tennessee in my car and and Skidmore is talking to me about why do you keep bringing this up? You know, nobody cares. Because he was very he worked very hard. He did an amazing job. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And he was shocked to see how he literally couldn't get it. You know, we couldn't get it to go viral. And I said, Mark, the retirement the retirement savings of this country will be balanced. The budget will be balanced. If you don't balance it financially, then you balance it by extending the retirement age or lowering life expectancy. And if you look at the policies they started to institute, the minute that budget deal busted, they've been lowering life expectancy. But they're gonna have to accelerate, and I don't know what they're gonna do. But but that's why we have to keep bringing this up because we can't just let it default to that. Speaker 0: Right. And one of the problems with Social Security was it was designed for very short times in retirement. Well People were supposed to live maybe an average of two years when it was first conceived of. Now people can live thirty years. Books weren't built for that. Speaker 1: Look at what's happened since the pandemic started. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: You know, there are two things that appear to be helping. One is life expectancy has fallen off the cliff Yep. In The United States, not in the world, but in The United States. And the other is, from what I've been told, you have a lot of immigrants paying in with illegal ID numbers, so they're never gonna be eligible to get back out. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 3: Well, we're certainly not reproducing at a rate to replace the population. Our our birth rates are drastically low. In fact, I don't see current data from The US. I see the birth rates dropping in European countries first because right I feel like we're getting maybe more accurate data from them. But it is real and it is I'm sure you're getting Speaker 1: more accurate data from Yeah. The, you know, our I was part of a group called Doctors for COVID Ethics for several years, and, their prediction was the impact on fertilize, know, on fertility is gonna be devastating from the COVID nineteen injections. I don't think that's an accident. Speaker 3: All my worst nightmares, everything that I had hoped, like, hoped it wouldn't be, but had the worst fears that it would. The SV40, the Semien Virus 40 amplifying cancers, rare cancers, and accelerating them. Speaker 2: Turbo cancers. Speaker 3: Turbo cancer, which is exactly what we're seeing now. And then there was also the adjuvants that affected reproduction. And Yep. The miscarriage rate was exponential in 2020 and 2021 if you got that shot in your first trimester. Speaker 1: So here's the thing, people say, you know, when we try and tell them that the shots are basically lowering life expectancy and killing people and maiming people, they just can't believe that's true. But if you understand how the money works, you know, this has been building for decades. And if you if you don't balance the books one way, it's gonna be balanced the other way. That's Speaker 0: just Independent gonna of this analysis, if you go and look at the results that were reported by insurance companies four years or what now two and a half three years ago, they started to show mortality rates that were much much higher than anything they'd seen. No. This isn't a small incremental increase because of something simple or explainable. This is a catastrophic increase that would indicate deviation. Catastrophes occurred. Speaker 1: One of the things I wanna know is what is the back door deal with the insurance company? Speaker 0: Yeah, me too. Speaker 1: Because they're getting billed out. They have to be. Speaker 0: They have to be. These payouts are way outside the actuarial tables. Speaker 1: Right. So so, you know, because if you look at what it's doing to the federal, the problem is the chronic illness and disability is bankrupting the federal government. And so, you know, the question is, okay, well, we're protecting the retirement funds and we're dramatically reducing the population, but what's the plan for the federal budget? That's a big question. Speaker 0: Well, alright. So so there's no question that this that this money somehow has disappeared. You've proven this Speaker 1: out. Right? But remember, so so the books go dark after fiscal two thousand fifteen, which means so so when we published the report on, you know, ending September 2015, the debt of the country was 21,000,000,000,000 and the missing money was 21,000,000,000,000. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: So the debt today is 37,000,000,000,000. Is the missing money 37,000,000,000,000? We don't know. Speaker 0: We don't know. When you say that books went dark, what do you mean? Speaker 1: That's when FASB fifty six kicked. Speaker 0: So suddenly so there was a time when I had heard this crazy number that we had $85,000,000,000,000 in unfunded liabilities. So I went into the government agencies and I went down and I added them up and I looked at all their budgets and it was actually not that difficult to go add up the numbers and prove that in fact what I'd read in the Wall Street Journal was true. Shockingly, but it was true. I went back and tried to do that a few years later and I couldn't find anything. I couldn't make any of the numbers work. Right. It was impossible to track anything. That's the change you're talking about. The numbers just don't work anymore. Speaker 1: Well, but also the disclosure has been significantly reduced. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And and here's where the big liability comes in. If you look at the state systems, the pension fund systems, most states, not all, but most states have pretty much funded reasonably for their retirement obligations. They have not funded their health care obligations. Now a lot of their health care depends on Medicare and Medicaid. If And you look at what's happening in the federal government, you know, the numbers don't work. No. And so if you look at the embedded liabilities, they're extraordinary. And one of the reasons they're extraordinary is if you look at the per capita health care costs in Switzerland, it's 8,500. Here, it's 13,500. We have the most ridiculously expensive medical system in the world and partly because its business is poisoning people, not healing. Speaker 2: Right. So Speaker 0: so we we're given a lot more business because we're sicker. Speaker 1: Well But but here's the thing. I just looked at the new employment numbers. Mhmm. So if you look at what's happening with employment in the economy, there's all sorts of flashing signals that look like Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: We're back in 2007 Yes. Again. But one of them is the only increase in employment was ambulatory care hospitals and I think some kind of assisted therapeutic, you know, whatever. But but the common care of poisoned people. Speaker 0: Well, common response is but that's because the boomers are aging and they need more medical Speaker 1: That and that's some of it. Speaker 0: That's a piece. Speaker 1: Some of it. That's a piece. Speaker 0: But when you look at the mortality rates and you look at some of these chronic illnesses, it's clear that we have a problem. We have children that have illnesses that they never had twenty years ago. Speaker 1: Right. But also what's happening is you're going into a doctor and you're you're treating your problem is you've been poisoned. And the doctor is saying, no, you have a disease. And the solution is to give you more poison. Speaker 0: More poisons. Right. Speaker 1: And so you go into a very expensive spiral down that does a great job of liquidating your four zero one ks into the health care system. Speaker 0: And the poisoning is coming from food with these ingredients that are not healthy, they're toxic. It's coming from medicines that aren't going through trials or Speaker 1: So it's number one is food, but probably the worst guy being sugar. Mhmm. But it's also there's mysterious ingredients in the food. So really, there's poison. Okay. So so number one is food and and not enough nutrition. Number two is the pharmaceuticals and the injections. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: So and if you look at the damage injections have done to kids, it's probably even worse than the food. Then you have the spray, then you have stress, and then you have the EMF radiation, which in combination with some of those other things is a real killer. Speaker 0: And EMF radiation didn't even exist years ago. It wasn't a thing. Suddenly it's everywhere. Speaker 1: I would add another thing which is basically high-tech mind control. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Because so so I used to call it the tapeworm economy. Mhmm. So a tapeworm the way a tapeworm works in your body is it injects into you a chemical that makes you crave what's good for the tapeworm and bad for you. Okay? So you're literally feeding the tapeworm because your body is tricked into giving the tapeworm what it wants, not what you need. Okay? So you're not giving yourself the nutrition you need. Okay. High-tech mind control is the injection. And because you are getting people to systematically act outside of their own best interests. So I had a very dear friend once and she kept giving her grandchildren. She kept taking them at McDonald's. I was like, you can't feed them this food. Finally, I got her to watch Supersize Me and she came over afterwards and she said, what have I been I feel terrible. How could I have done this? Blah blah blah. Thank you so much. Blah blah blah. Two weeks later, I'm taking her grandchildren to the museum. She drops them off and she says and every night she sits in front of this huge digital TV screen and watches, you know, whatever. She drops them off and she said, oh, the kids are hungry. Why don't you stop at McDonald's and get them something to eat on the way? She total memory wiped. She completely forgotten. Right. And she complete not only had she forgotten, but she'd forgotten that I would notice her care. She just complete memory. Speaker 0: Totally. Yeah. And and Yeah. We we are getting people to go and ask for things that are hurting them, and and even to provide information that they should normally in our history, we would have kept private. They put it all on social media so they could be perfectly tracked. It it is it is a population that does not seem to consider its own interests anymore in many cases. Speaker 2: Or critically think about the outcomes. Right. I mean, you know, when we were talking earlier, were saying how the food it's so easy to get something that's terrible for you. But the mindset of the person is that it's very difficult for me to actually care for myself and care for my family with It's what I'm going to too expensive. Speaker 3: It is more expensive. Speaker 1: It is? Yes. Speaker 2: It's too time consuming. Right? Speaker 3: Takes longer to cook from scratch. Speaker 2: But in the long run, it provides you such a better outcome. And we're trained to think in a non critical way. So Speaker 3: And we're seeing the brainwashing though. Like, we're you can see that in situation after situation, year after year, especially I would say I've been most aware in the last eight to ten years. But a major event will happen, and then six months later, people just completely forget about it. They don't think about it. A Memory wipe. Constant, it's the Speaker 0: men Sometimes even in weeks. Speaker 3: The TV or yourself is the are men word? In Yeah. Yeah. The wiping our I think you're right about the 30%. There's just a certain amount of population that are not susceptible to that influence or less susceptible to it. Speaker 1: So I think Gary, you've heard me tell this story. In 2000 it was 2000 and 02/2001, I spoke in every one of the 50 states. Mhmm. And or almost everyone. And I went I also spoke in Sweden, London, New Zealand, and a couple other countries. And in every audience that whole year I said, how many people here watch TV? It was always less than 10%. And I said, oh, that's my audience. It's people who don't watch TV. Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 1: That's my audience. Speaker 2: Interesting. Speaker 1: So they say, you know, the Amish never got COVID because they don't have TVs. Speaker 0: Right. Right? That's right. Speaker 3: Right. Speaker 0: Right. But so coming back to the 21,000,000,000,000, just to wrap that up, where did the money go? Speaker 1: So this is the mysterious question and there are many different hypotheses. So let me give you a couple of Mhmm. Where I think money went because we're talking about building a new civilization. We're talking about building a a whole new system. So, you know, if you have a company, you start a new company, you start moving the assets and these people over in the systems, you bring this up and you make sure it's working before you Mhmm. Okay. So so there's a group of us who call it the breakaway civilization. Okay? And and literally in Washington, you would have people basically tell you, I don't have to care about the laws over here because I work for the breakaway thing. You know, they didn't use the word breakaway, but I work for these guys, and I don't have to care what this is. And that, you know, when you see Musk and people like that break the law, they're just you know, they're reporting to a different civilization. Okay. So so I think part of it was endowing, you know, creating the infrastructure, creating the endowments, putting because remember, you steal 21,000,000,000,000. What's 5% a year on 21,000,000,000,000? That's enough to run a global government. Speaker 0: Oh, yes. Speaker 1: Okay. So so there's some kind of, you know, capitalization happening. Okay. But the second thing is if you look at the amount that they were putting into building the covert infrastructure, so underground bases, underground transportation, invisible. I think invisible weaponry is a huge one. So if you're doing a lot of this mind control programming, Speaker 0: you Speaker 1: can do some of that research in the black budget budgets. But, you know, I think they poured huge amounts of money into everything I call invisible weaponry. So for example, if you deep dive the made off road or the Epstein money laundering, they both poured huge amounts of money into brain research. Yep. You know, that's invisible weaponry. Speaker 3: Yep. Epstein with reproductive stuff as well. Yeah. Yes. Speaker 1: Yes. So so I think there's huge money been going into that, and and a lot of the secrecy can be platformed if you have underground facilities. Speaker 0: Well, and we've also got a massive grant economy where a lot of this money seems to be flushing out with no accountability, no traceability. It may go to one NGO, then it'll slip down to the next one, then the next one. And so you really don't know where the money's going. Speaker 1: They can they can put that. Most of that, they've been able to with the Patriot Act and 09/11, they were able to dramatically expand what they could run through the official budget. But I'll give you one example, which I couldn't believe. The reporter I was working with in Washington that was so good was named Kelly O'Meara. And it was it was in the early two thousands, but there were huge headlines about how a lot of the states had big deficits. California was like 36,000,000,000. Speaker 2: That was huge. Speaker 1: And, so I was driving to Kelly's house. I came in and all of a sudden the deficits miraculously went away. Right. They're just gone. And I said to Kelly, what happened? She said, oh, I think they just took some of the 20,000,000,000,000 and plugged the hole. Speaker 0: Well, they started transferring a trillion a year from the federal government to state and local. Right. And that changed everything. And you could see dramatically the impact of that grant disbursement. Right. In our counties Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Because while our Speaker 1: taxes bought are you bought the churches, you bought the counties Speaker 0: you bought Speaker 1: the state. Speaker 0: Through grants and through dis disbursements. Right. And and now at this point in our counties, grants make up 45% of our county budget. Property taxes are a third. Right. Only pay for a third of the government. It's coming out of that cash corn and co pay Speaker 1: from for the universities. Speaker 0: It's the same Absolutely. Speaker 1: Counties. I was out in Idaho and one of the senators said to me, he said, you know, every year we send a dollar to Washington and every year they send a dollar 19¢ back. And when I try to enforce the constitution, my constituents say we'd rather have the 19¢. Speaker 0: Yep. Mhmm. That's right. So they're bribing the people to allow their system to be taken over and that's that you know, look as long as Speaker 1: But here's the thing. They're poisoning them Mhmm. At the same time they're bribing them. Speaker 0: Yes. Right. So if you get your trip to the Outer Banks and you get to have a Netflix and chill night, you know, then maybe you don't wanna pay so much attention. Right? I mean, that's if your four zero one k's are getting stuffed full of profits from this monster, then maybe you just you just ride it. Speaker 1: Your four zero one k's. So let's go back to the 21,000,000,000,000 missing at the time when the debt's 21,000,000,000,000. Mhmm. So I'm gonna grossly oversimplify to make a point. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. Please. Here here here's the treasury. Mhmm. And the New York Fed bank account. Mhmm. Okay. And here's the, your pension fund. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Okay. Full of your four zero one k profits. Okay. You put a dollar into your pension fund. Your pension fund buys a US treasury from the primary dealers at the New York Fed. Mhmm. Okay. Howard Lutnick, secretary of commerce, ran one of the biggest primary dealers. Speaker 0: Peter Fitzgerald. Right. Speaker 1: So so now you don't have a dollar, you have a treasury bill, okay, or bond. The primary dealer puts that in the treasury bank account and then it disappears out the back door. Just for just for fictional purposes, we'll say they put it in their account at the BIS and the BIS put it on its balance sheet where it can be secret behind sovereign immunity. Speaker 0: And the BIS is the Bank of International Settlement which oddly enough has sovereign immunity Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Somehow. Speaker 1: Right. They can also move it to Norway who could donate it back to the Gates and Clinton Foundation or something like that. But anyway, whatever. But but it's sitting on the BIS balance sheet now. Okay? Now you have a bond and that bond is backed by the full faith and credit of the treasury. But the the asset that you financed is not in the treasury or in the government. It's gone. So now who's liable to pay that bond? You are. Speaker 0: You Speaker 1: are. Because you're a taxpayer, and you're on the hook for that bond. Okay? So you've just turned a dollar of real profit into a liability. Wow. Speaker 0: Similar with Social Security. They tax you at a level that creates a $2,900,000,000,000 surplus. Well, that's act that's so they're assets. Right? In the Social Security trust funds. Well well, Speaker 1: They're treasury. Speaker 0: They took those assets out. They gave that money to the government. The government spent it and gave Speaker 1: them No. No. No. No. The government didn't spend it. It disappeared out the back Speaker 0: Disappeared out the back door and then the government You Speaker 1: would be lucky if the government Speaker 0: That would be better if we had something to show Speaker 1: an asset someplace. Speaker 0: But then the Social Security trust funds got a federal debt instrument. No. And who has to repay that? The taxpayers that are getting the money. Speaker 1: We gave them we have turned an asset into a liability. Speaker 0: Absolutely. Right. It it and it so this happens over and over again wherever they can grab ahold of cash and replace it with debt that the person holding the bond has to repay themselves. Right. And it it's it's lot clever. It's very clever. Speaker 1: Not only did I steal my your money, but I I converted it into a liability that you're liable for. Speaker 0: Well, and and for years they sort of hid that by telling everyone, well, all those treasuries are being held by China. It's China. But if you looked at the actual layout of treasuries, China held a small piece. And from '15 on, they started playing taking Speaker 1: down their for you. Okay. So it used to be that that the pension funds were full of treasuries. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Slowly over the last five years with plunder capitalism on the rise, it's been replaced by private equity, which is worse. Which is dependent upon Speaker 0: Fed policy and zero cost debt and so Speaker 2: on. So Speaker 0: So, you know, some of this 21,000,000,000,000 that's come out has gone off and gone into these black budgets that have funded this digital control grid. This cage that's been built around us. Speaker 1: Although I have to say, I think a lot of the some of the secret technology has been, has been built in that way, but I think a lot has been financed on budget and by companies on government contracts. So let me mention one thing. One of the most powerful aspects of what made this possible Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Was in the in the first Reagan administration. The deal between the Reagan group and Bush was that Bush would run the National Security Council Enforcement and Intelligence. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And when he got in, he instituted an executive order that said private corporations can do highly secret classified projects. Okay. Now, what did that do? It did two important things. It said the most powerful technology in the planet can be transferred into private ownership. There's a very funny story when the Bechtel Stephen Bechtel senior tried to persuade Eisenhower to let Bechtel own a nuclear bomb, And Eisenhower went ballistic and kicked him out of his office. It's a very funny story. But but, anyway, but but Bush got that done. The most powerful technology in the world private corporations can own and keep secret because they're not subject to FOIA. That's number one. But number two, you can pay them with treasury bonds that finance in the open market. So you can connect a rising stock market with Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: You know, an infinite basically, can put a straw into our pension funds using the federal credit and drive the stock market to the moon, giving corporations Speaker 2: Right. Speaker 1: Secret technology and paying them to deal with it. Okay. And you know, if you wanna see where the price in the stock market came from, it was that one little provision that was very So Speaker 0: you're saying that they're issuing the bonds, they take that revenue and they enter into contracts with these corporations, pump the money into the corporations to provide them some service to government in a public private partnership, which is about as frightening a phrase as there is. Mhmm. And and then all of a sudden the debts going up, but the money's going to the stock market which is also going up. People looking at the four zero one k's are saying, the market's up. Speaker 1: Right. So if you if you look at the market in the last five to ten years, basically as interest rates have gone up, when did interest rates turn up? '20? '22. '22? Okay. So so basically the long treasury that's financing the stock market is going like this and anybody who's holding it is losing. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: And and the stock market's going the moon and if you look at that divergence, how long can you find more suckers? Speaker 0: It's we we haven't found out yet Right. What the limits are. Speaker 1: Right. Well, it's mind control versus financial arbiter. Speaker 0: They're intertwined, aren't they? Speaker 2: It's funny how you even mentioned public private partnership, right? In this construct that you're talking about, it's scary than that. It's a public private construct without the public knowing that there's this public private construct. Right. We don't see the other side of that transaction. Speaker 1: It's really It's a criminal syndicate. Speaker 0: It is. Speaker 1: It's a public private criminal syndicate, and it is extracting it's a tapeworm. Extracting everything it can get. Speaker 2: It makes you feel good because your 401Ks account. Speaker 3: I wanna keep that keeps people quiet. Speaker 1: Actually, I don't have a 401Ks account. I'll tell you why. I had a half a million dollars in a four zero one ks account when the Department of Justice sort of tried to falsely frame us. And they put I knew they were coming because the month before they really showed up and started to hit us, they put it under audit. Wow. And which meant I couldn't use it to finance the company. And so they they came in and they literally made up subpoena compliance requirements of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Wow. So I busted the 401 k. I paid 225,000 of, of fees and taxes. Mhmm. Took the rest of the money to do their phony baloney subpoena compliance. And then when we won the litigation eleven ten or eleven years later, many years later, my CPA said, oh, we're gonna fund up the four zero one k. We should take 500,000 to fund up the four zero one k. And I said, nope. Thank you. I am never going into business with the US government again. You know, I won't. And so what I did, I've told you the story of the People Bank. That 500,000 went back out on the People Bank. Wow. And that was the bank that saved my life. So I said, no. I trust people. I don't trust the government. Speaker 0: Interesting. So now you've got in that same construct of a of a partnership between the government and private entities, you've got Palantir. This thing that spins out of the CIA, you know, in Q Tel Speaker 1: So I wish it was part of the government but or in partnership with the government. I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. I don't you know? But they Speaker 0: have contracts with health and human services. They have Speaker 1: contracts The government pays a massive amount of Massive of money. And so if you look at the Doge theft, what you've done is you've moved between the government contracts. You know, there's a new sole source ICE contract on the way to Palantir as well, as just announced. I just found that last night. So so you've got you know, you basically they have the treasury data. They have the IRS data. They have the social security data. They, now they're gonna have all the ICE data. Speaker 0: They had some already. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They had some already. And then, Trump has announced he wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir's gonna underwrite all the packages before they come into Freddie and Fannie. So they're gonna have all the housing data and we know HHS has said we're they're organizing all the health public and private health data, so I'm assuming that's going in as well. And basically, you're talking about that data being managed and and I think at this point basically privatized into AI. Speaker 0: Owned by they're gonna effectively own it. They're gonna have AI running it. And and one of these things Speaker 1: I don't I don't know if they will legally technically because if you look at how it was transferred, so the Doge operation, if I'm right, and this is my hypothesis. If the Doge operation did what I think, they transferred all the data, and and and they did it when an XAI announced a partnership with Palantir. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: And then the government turned around and Palantir had a lot of contracts with those agencies anyway, but then they gave some additional contracts. And so they have plenty of money, especially the ICE is gonna be sole source so you can just do pretty much whatever you want. So they have plenty of money to manage that data and yes, I think they have it on a private basis. And what's interesting, I have somebody, a professional that I work with who, does has for for his business has to do income verification. Mhmm. And, magically, two weeks after Doge got the Treasury, Social Security and IRS, suddenly the income verification service he uses announces they have a 100% of Americans now complete data on everyone magically. Speaker 0: It's astonishing. And one of the elements of the ICE contract is that they can track immigrants location in real time through Palantir back to ICE. You know, that's the kind of surveillance can attract everyone. Exactly. Right. There's no there's absolutely no reason that doesn't apply to the citizens. You Speaker 1: know, the the ICE story is complicated because there are multiple things going on. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But there's no doubt the primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population. Speaker 0: Of the entire population. So you use it in this excuse because people will support that because we wanna be protected from Trinidad Tobago. In the end, they're gonna use it on everyone. And and you know, in a normal in a place where the constitution was enforced, you would have firewalls between departments. They wouldn't be able to look into each other's data. You wouldn't have one giant data set that's managed by an outside party who can use it for whatever purposes they seem to deem fit or whatever the government asked them for. Speaker 1: I would never you know, if I was a dictator, I would never use a government a corporate contractor to manage any function ever. And certainly not payment data or this kind of data. Speaker 0: They become a Praetorian guard. They they are more powerful than the company than the government itself. Right? Right. So there's a real the threat of this is significant. And and back to the idea of the citizens stepping up to do that which harms them, this ring doorbell thing which you mentioned. Mhmm. This is astonishing. What what's going on with the ring doorbells? Speaker 1: So I I've never had a ring doorbell. I don't wanna know from ring doorbells. I don't know anything about it. But but essentially when you bring this kind of technology into your life or Speaker 2: your Speaker 1: home, you're basically hooking yourself up for surveillance. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 3: And waiving the right to privacy in certain ways for those companies to Speaker 0: use Because you're selling the contract. Speaker 1: That is correct. If you read the terms and conditions, we'll never forget we published one article many many years ago of an attorney who just for fun after he bought a Samsung digital TV sat down and read the terms and conditions and realized he was giving them permission to videotape and At all times. Record him. Yep. It was like, what? Yeah. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's incredible. So now Speaker 3: We have have a ring camera at the house, but we really installed that because I was convinced the feds were gonna knock on my door and I did not wanna knock at that on multiple angles. So maybe it's time to pull it out. Maybe they're gonna I come through but Speaker 0: would pull But the it reality is people are signing up now to allow their police departments to incorporate their their ring doorbell Yes. Camera into the police surveillance network. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: They're saying, sure. You can use this camera and and observe When's the last night? Me, my neighbors, whatever's in view of that of that doorbell and recording audio and video all day. Speaker 1: We have a section on the solar called Let's Go to the Movies or movie of the week now is what we call it. And it's because one of the things I learned is people are busy. But if you wanna explain a phenomena, you know, Hollywood explains. Right? And there's a marvelous there's a marvelous series from the BBC called The Capture. I don't know if you've ever heard of it, where they show you the dangers of how these technologies can be twisted and used to set you up and falsify evidence, and it's it's really remarkable. And I do think, you know, the British have a gift at theater. And this one is the first season is it's a two season TV series. The first season is okay, but then the second season is really you know, you you learn the technology in the first season. The second season, you show how it can use them. Speaker 0: Because they're disclosing So it all the Speaker 1: my attitude is analog. Just rebuild your analog life. Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. I mean no one reads terms and conditions anymore. Speaker 1: I do. I do. Speaker 2: Well you are a special Speaker 1: six It took months to reject the first ACH system we rejected because it there were four sets of terms and conditions and there were, you know, it's a it's a whole shaggy dog story, but it literally took six months of negotiating to get the four and to read them and to hold them accountable to explain some of the provisions. And it literally was the most frightening experience of my life. People sign away their whole business. Speaker 0: Oh, they do? Often. Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. Speaker 0: Yeah. If you sign a contract with ASCAP to let them come into your business and you know you pay them so you can play music while while people are in your in your place of business. You sign the right for them to come in and audit your books at any time. What's that got to do with playing music? Right? Well they say well we want make sure we know how many people are in your store so we know we're charging you properly. That's not what the term says. The term says we have the right to come in and audit you, audit your business at any time. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: It's an it's incredible. So so all this comes together. They're putting this this digital cage around us, all these technologies Palantir and and all this data collection and absorption and processing AI now looking through it. You know, you've got at every level, school boards, counties at at the federal level, everybody's saying none of these elected officials seem to work for the constituents. None of these people seem to work for the citizens. No matter even if they want to, they seem to be prevented from doing so. Who are all these people working for? Who is mister Global? Speaker 1: Okay. So the the system is complex. And, you know, if you look at the local level, you know, this is a system that has been evolving for centuries. Mhmm. And so it's not it's complicated and it's different in different places. But, you know, within any county so I grew up in Philadelphia. You know, when I was a kid, basically, you had three groups. You had you had the Masons. You know? So so now we're at the secret society level. You had Masons, you had the Jews, and then you had the Vatican. And, course, we always thought the Vatican was the worst. Speaker 3: Well, so the Vatican or the Jesuits? Vatican as a whole? Speaker 1: It was it it truly was the Jesuits. But if you look at the operational arm, a lot of it worked through the archdiocese and the schools. So, you know and and those groups competed and cooperated. And what happened was if you look at all the things they were doing, at the end of World War two, you ended up with a National Security Act and then the CIA Act. And, basically, that turned on the tap because remember, we've been a duopoly. So the Fed gets created in in 1913, goes goes operational 1914, but we're a duopoly with the pound sterling until World War two. But then after World War two, you you we become the reserve currency, and that means infinite amount of money. And with the National Security Act and the CIA Act, not only do we have an infinite amount of money, but we can keep everything secret. Okay? And suddenly you have a tsunami of money pouring in locally to that infrastructure that says, okay, you've been doing mind control, but it's very, you know, time consuming and sort of secret and and you can't do a lot of people. We're gonna bring in an infinite amount of money, we're gonna mind control everybody. You know? And that takes a couple decades, but you can build that. You now have the capacity to take covert operations. So if you look at what we were doing in the drug business at the end of World War two, now and and you you know this because you watch Godfather one, two, and three. Right? Now the intelligence agencies can team up with the whole infrastructure and we can take narcotics trafficking to a whole new level. Right? And so the covert side of the economy starts building, building, building because you have this enormous military intelligence infrastructure and infinite money that's operating globally hooked up with the traditional sort of local control systems. And and the reality is that the institutional capacity overran the local stuff. So, you know, if I had to write a history of America from from that time on, would be called How the Local Boys Got Rolled. Right? Yeah. And, you know, but but you had this synthesis of the traditional private societies with this big institutional capacity. And one of the things that happened was you literally, for several decades, you had a war between the Catholics. And it was basically the Protestant Jews teamed up, but they got ahold of the telecommunications. And basically, the NSA power shifted the confession booth. The confession booth had been the historical way of creating control files, and you combine that with the tax exemption of the church, and, you know, sort of diplomatic immunity of some of the church, you know, and that was a real power structure. And what happened was the universities and the NSA basically power shifted the Catholics. And and so we've seen a real shift in those groups. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Then this decision was made to do the financial coup, and the question is, okay. Now where are we going? Part of the reason that decision was made was digital technology now gives you the ability to assert complete control. A few can control the many. Speaker 3: You talk about the money going to break away civilizations. We talk about underground I mean, cities. We talk about. Speaker 1: So so I know a lot about underground bases. I don't know how many underground cities there are. Speaker 3: Well, the bases though are could house a tremendous amount of people. They could live there without coming back up to earth. And they're in various places. There are a lot of them from my understanding. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 3: If they're going to such great lengths to take that money, to move that money into these breakaway civilizations so that they can construct these facilities for whatever what is Speaker 1: reason? The I think the big thing was just moving it out. So if you look as the money was disappearing from the US government, the offshore havens were baloning. The what? Offshore havens. Speaker 0: Oh, I'm sorry. Yes. Speaker 1: So watch a documentary called The Spider's Webber. Listen to my interview with John Christensen who is who made that documentary. And and basically, you're moving money out of the domestic bank accounts, and you're putting it offshore in the offshore havens, and they're exploding. So so so now you're moving the money into a separate legal structure. Right? And I think that's that's now that money is going to lots of different places, but I think the important thing is you've got it in a separate and new legal structure. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 0: Where are these underground bases? Speaker 1: Well, that's a $64,000 question. There's a whole series of underground bases which are public. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: I mean, they've been publicly announced there. They're part of the continuity of government Mhmm. Infrastructure. So, you know, so you can look up them. Speaker 0: Meaning these are the places that the government would go in a in a catastrophic situation. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: So that the government could be continued because it would be protected underground. Right. Speaker 1: And and they're both military and government. Mhmm. We did a Solaria report that if you're interested, I would listen to where Richard Dolan did a deep dive into the research of a guy named Richard Souders who spent a lifetime researching this stuff. And Richard went through it, and then we did an interview with him. And what happened to me, we published it, and then one of the researchers who I don't trust on sort of who are the breakaways and what are they doing, came to me and argued that most of the $21,000,000,000,000 was going to underground bases and I didn't believe them. I just thought they just didn't know what they were talking about. Speaker 3: Because it sounds crazy. Speaker 1: No. It's that if you if you look at where the breakaways are going Yeah. They have much bigger fish. You know, it it's only a piece. What what happens with a lot of people who research, you know, what's really going on is they get stuck on some aspect that they're expert in and and then they make that thing a much bigger piece of the pie than it is. And so I think this person was doing that. Anyway, so what I decided to do was to make an estimate of high low, and we used to do this on Wall Street all the time. If you if you didn't know what something was, you just do a high low estimate and say, what's the most it could be? What's the least it could be? And so I sat down with this researcher, and we took every rumor, every allegation, every report, whether officially announced or, you know, secret. And then we went state by state throughout The United States, and we looked at if we were the military and intelligence, what would we do? Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: What allegations do we think made sense? And we just did an estimate. And one of the things that most affected me was I knew from the Patriot Act on how much they had moved into the official budget. And there was a fabulous study that most of it's gotten taken down from the Internet that the Washington Post did in 02/2012, I think, called Top Secret America, where they put together a database and showed the explosion of secret facilities all over the country. It's unbelievable. Wow. And and yeah. And it showed you the mammoth amounts of money because remember, what the Patriot Act of 09/11 did was it just, you know, as they turned on the tap after World War two, they just turned on the tap. And whether it was pallets of cash to Iraq or just, you know, another 100 national Speaker 2: security. Limits. Speaker 1: Yeah. Just well, because everybody's making money in the stock market from government contracts. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: It's just it's infinite government money driving everybody's stock up. Speaker 0: A Keynesian dream world. The more you spend The Speaker 2: better the economy And and and Speaker 0: And as as the government as the economy becomes more dependent upon government spending, of course, the government gets to decide more and more about what you do in your life. Speaker 1: Right. But the other thing is you get a whole class of politicians who only know how to create political campaign contributions by giving a government contract to a corporation, makes their stock go up, the investors kick back 10% to you, and around and around you go. And that's how they think the economy works. So I have an online book called Dylan Reed and the Aristocracy of Stock Profits. I think I've told you about it before, but it's basically a case study to show you how the stock market treasury bond kickback system works. And it's it's on private prison. Private prisons are wildly stupid and wildly uneconomic. I mean if you wanna waste money on doing something horrible, you know, it's a great way to do it. But they're totally not economic, but it shows you walks you through they they do it and how everybody makes money on spending many multiples of what you have to do to do You know, you get a lousy prison, but it's much more expensive. Mhmm. And it shows you how the system works. Speaker 0: Interesting. Speaker 3: And the brainwashing that went into the private prison system and what they did with the pop culture and the rappers and making sure that crying culture was what they were talking about. Speaker 1: We have a 500,000,000,000 so during in 1998 when the dark alliance allegations were being investigated by Congress, Department of Justice spokesperson told, Kelly Amira, this reporter I was working with, that The US economy laundered 500,000,000,000 to a trillion dollars a year of old dirty money. So it's not just drugs, it's everything. Mhmm. Now, I want you to know that the biggest and that makes us the number one global leader in money laundering. Mhmm. But I want you to know, no offense, this is all done by black teenagers and we are helpless to stop it. Right? What? Speaker 2: No one no one cut me in. Speaker 0: You didn't get the invitation. You aged out of the teenage years too early. Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 0: So so we're running out of time and I know you've got to go, but the the recently you were talking to someone, I'm not sure, I don't remember exactly who, but you were talking about this whole question of UFOs and interdimensional beings. What was it you were referring to? What Speaker 1: So I you know, I it's it's you can find this up on the website. But in 1998, the the US Navy tried to persuade me that aliens exist and live among among us and I didn't believe them. Mhmm. And I tell the story of how it all happened and I was invited to have lunch with aliens and I was like, this is how they're finally gonna frame me. This is how they're finally gonna get So I I told the whole story in a 2015 panel, but I have it up on Solaris so you can watch it if you want. But anyway, as a result of that, I read every book you could possibly find on the whole topic because I I turned down my opportunity to have lunch with you. Speaker 0: Leaves your window. Speaker 3: I'm glad you did that. Speaker 1: Anyway, so I was sure it was a setup. Anyway, but how would you know? You know, how would I know how do I know you're not an alien, Chris? Speaker 2: I promise. Speaker 3: We can pinky swear. Speaker 1: We can Speaker 3: pinky swear. Speaker 2: I don't think I have the heart or the demeanor of some of these aliens that would think Speaker 0: of. Right. Speaker 2: Right. So I think Speaker 1: Anyway, so so anyway, so I read on the topic. And then I started to do, I would do shows on coast to coast and they cover this topic a lot. Mhmm. And I, you know, George used to say, don't you think they're spending all this 21,000,000,000,000 to deal with the I said, no, George. I think they're just stealing. But but it was clear there was a phenomena. And and if you look at where the 21 train was going, I'll never forget. I don't know if you've ever seen the documentary on the Phoenix lights. It's this huge spaceship that came down the side of Arizona in 2000 when was it? 2000 I don't know, sometime it was when Stuart Symington was governor. And I remember it I walked into the ball of her what was the name of that DVD? The video? Blockbuster. Blockbuster. Mhmm. And and it's it's the the the staff picks, and they have Phoenix lights. So I thought, interesting. So I watched it, and I'm watching this huge spaceship float down the side of Arizona. And I said, you know, I bet Lockheed Martin would build that for $4,000,000,000,000. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. They would. Yes. They would. Speaker 1: Yes. They would. So so, you know, so that's all the question. How much so I got into pricing out this phenomena. You know? In other words, if 21 train is missing, what's floating around in the sky? And how much does it cost to make it? And where are they making it? You know? So I was trying to figure that all out. Anyway, so so I I have read and studied a tremendous amount about that phenomena, and I can't tell you I've ever reached a conclusion. And if you wanna listen to who is mister global, there's a two hour conversation. What I have reached the conclusion of is that there we are dealing with you know, and it's all in the bible, so I'm a Christian. We are dealing with angels and demons. They are real. There is good and evil, and it's a spiritual you know, we're dealing with spiritual intelligence. And I don't begin to understand it, but I've experienced enough to know it's real. And I think, you know, I think we are dealing with people who have have very strong ties to angelic intelligence and very strong ties to occult and demonic. And I think that too much of our leadership is over influenced by interdimensional intelligence in the occult. Speaker 0: And when you say interdimensional, of course, we've been people say I was talking to someone recently and they said, don't know what what do you mean interdimensional? So what we've actually been hearing about this our whole lives, if you've ever heard of an angel or a demon Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: They're from a different dimension. Right. And suddenly all this comes real. Speaker 2: Or write one of those books that historically they tell good Christians you might not wanna read that. Right? Pick up the book of Enoch and figure out where Exactly. And what happened to the Nephilim that you read about in the Bible so quickly and so briefly. What happens to their spirit? Maybe it's still here. Maybe it's causing the destruction that you're seeing. So it's always interesting when I personally not to get on the the biblical soapbox. Speaker 1: No. Do it. No. Let's get on the biblical soapbox. It's my favorite You're about Speaker 2: controlled boxes. Right? We're talking about governmental controlled boxes. We talked about the Vatican. We talked about Jewish culture. Right? There is spiritual control boxes. They don't want people to get beyond a certain point. Because if you start to get beyond that point, then you can actually see the fallacies. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: Some of these systems out there propagating on you. And you can see the truth of them. So I always encourage people. And listen, I understand. It's a hard job to be a pastor. You have to make sure those Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: 100 or a thousand people show up every Sunday, contribute a little bit, make sure that pot's good. But what are you doing for their spirituality? Are you really helping people understand what's in the Bible, which is the truth of spirit? Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: Right? Jesus talks about being in the spirit when he was tempted. Right? Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: As we were talking about before. Speaker 3: Just before this. Speaker 2: Jesus didn't say, you don't have authority to offer that to me. Speaker 1: Nope. He just said no. Speaker 3: He did have the authority. Speaker 2: He had the authority to offer you the 21,000,000,000,000 Right. Plus plus plus. Right? It's there. Right. So there is a spiritual cage that has been put around people also. I encourage people, read the other stuff. If you're of good spirit, the Bible actually says that the spirit will guide you. It says that all writing is for the purpose. Right? Speaker 1: Well, at the declaration of independence. Our freedom comes to us by divine Speaker 2: By divine authority. Speaker 1: And look at the story of Gideon. 300 people under divine authority can run the Midianites out of Israel. Right? Speaker 2: Correct. Speaker 0: Right. And look at the darkness that's been happening in this country as we see children being trafficked on a massive industrial scale as we see, you know, abortion not just as some sort of a what was the old phrase? Rare legal and safe rare safe and legal. Speaker 3: Safe Speaker 0: and But now promoted at a level where it's it's the go to action for Not only that. Speaker 1: It's a manufacturing operation. Speaker 0: It is. It's and it's it's supply chain. Speaker 1: You also Supply chain. Thank you. Speaker 2: And you also have the other side. Right? The the this Luciferian church goes and claims that it's their right Yes. To sacrifice a child. Speaker 3: Because it is ritualistic. Speaker 2: Because it ritualistic for their worship of their god. Speaker 3: Yeah. Speaker 2: Okay. I don't think it's anything different. The Bible says there's nothing new underneath the sun. This has been going on for thousands of years as child sacrifice. We just have a more sophisticated Yep. Clean place to do it. We call it abortion. Mhmm. Go to a clinic and do it. Speaker 0: And language is just it's much more effective. Speaker 3: But when you think about the alien phenomena, and I do not believe that it is separate actually from demonic phenomena or poltergeist phenomena or ghost phenomena. I think it is all demon at its core or demonic and of that world. But when you talk to people who claim to have had experiences, who have seen UFOs, who have been abducted, or experienced abducted abduction imaging or Any something, one of them, if they call out for Jesus Christ, it ends. And that was it for me, Speaker 1: learning that. That was from the what the Collins Elite Mhmm. Said. Speaker 3: Right. Yes. So, and there's also, you know, a whole lot of conversation about we talked about it in the car before we came in. These experiences that people experience, the Experiencers, it is all the same entity creating those experiences. It looks different to each of them, and they would claim that they've seen aliens, UFOs, Mothman. I use all the same examples. The New Jersey Devil, right? They saw the New Jersey Devil, but it's not. It's an illusion created for them specifically to be able to get into them, but it is all same singular source causing it, just giving it to them in an illusion that is palatable to that particular person. Speaker 1: So my problem whenever I've read, you know, because I've tried to read everything on the subject up until about five years ago, and then, no, I've never met an abduction story that couldn't be explained by demonic phenomena or mind control. Speaker 0: Or mind control. Either one What Speaker 1: I do believe is if you look at what's flying around this planet, there is a lot of hardware Speaker 2: Yes. Speaker 1: That nobody's claiming and and that is very real. And the question is, you know, how far can it travel? Where does it come from? You know, but I don't I don't know that any of it is not human. Speaker 0: Well, was a time when the U-two spy plane would have been considered some sort of unknowable, way too fast, can't be seen, can't be caught by any defense systems. It would have been considered a UFO because it was. Speaker 1: Well, but there is there's trillions of dollars of hardware floating around this planet. There are things going on in Antarctica which are baffling and can't be explained. We have a huge amount of invisible weaponry that is not commonly understood. And all of that is very real and all of that needs to be manufactured and costs a lot of money. Speaker 0: And somebody has control of all of that, and somebody has control of this sort of mind control system that steers public opinion so quickly. And then again, we come back to people continue to ask, how is it these heinous things are done in our name? Speaker 1: Well, here are the power questions. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Who's got the lowest cost of capital? Mhmm. Who's got the lowest cost of energy? Who's got the biggest gun? And who's got the best mind control? Right? Speaker 0: Right. And there's no question that's right. Speaker 1: So my experience of the system is is it layers up. The reason I called mister Global is is that's just a nickname for the committee Mhmm. You know, that layers up. But but my personal experience is, you know, a lot of the control traditionally has worked through the financial system, and that organizes up into the central bankers. But the insurance companies obviously play a very important role. It's like a house. Mhmm. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: You know, the the central bankers run the mortgage and the currency, and then you got a layer of insurance. But ultimately, behind that, there are pools of intergenerational capital and the people who manage those. You know, sometimes it's member of the families, but sometimes it's not. It's just professionals. And that that, you know, sort of those networks of intergenerational capitals make a lot of decisions. And and the $64,000 question is, they are at the root, in my experience, risk managers. What are the risks they're managing? What are they afraid of? Why are they doing what they're doing? They think they need complete control. Why? And then you get into what are their risks, and that's what I do. Speaker 0: And when you talk about intergenerational capital, you know, that that's not people that just had a great idea, built a company and sold it. You're talking about really big money. These are the trillionaires. Speaker 1: So this is the and it's not just people, the Harvard Corporation. So you know, my theory is after the revolutionary war, we created the university endowments to compete with the Vatican model because the Vatican had tax exemption and diplomatic immunity. Speaker 2: Right? 14. Yep. Speaker 1: So how Speaker 0: do you Speaker 1: compete You with have to create pools of capital that are tax exempt and have enough secrecy or immunity that they can do a variety of things that was part of creating the BIS. So Sorry. So the if you look at the fight now in the Trump administration, who are they what are what are they really fighting about? They're fighting about who in a self perpetuating board who gets on that board next. Somebody wants control of that board. So Mhmm. Because that's one of the big flagships in US investment. So Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. It certainly is. I mean, I remember being at Harvard one day talking to the Harvard Endowment Fund and realizing how much capital they had and the things that they're considering investing in which really behaved like a private equity fund because Speaker 2: that's what it is. Was. Speaker 1: Well, right now the endowment is 39% in private equity. Speaker 2: Yep. No. And then when Speaker 0: I was there, there was no private equity. Right. They were they were the private equity. Now they've Right. Speaker 1: But in 2017 so so the federal government went dark in 02/2018. Speaker 2: Mhmm. Speaker 1: But in 02/2017, the endowment announced they were gonna lay off most of their in house staff and outsource everything and stop a lot of their disclosure. Mhmm. So Harvard Corporation went dark before the US government, and don't think those were not connected. No. Of course. Speaker 0: It's all connected. Speaker 3: I don't subscribe Speaker 0: to the It's all connected. And somehow, you know, we have to, as a people, find our way through this because at the end of the day, we're talking about some very big challenges here. But but the people still have influence in this. The people still have influence in the outcome of this situation. Speaker 1: So I always say crime that pays is crime that stays. And if you I won't tell the Red Button story, but if you go listen to the Red Button story Speaker 2: The Red Button story is Speaker 1: What you know is we've been supporting the criminals. And so the decision is, you know, will we allow our children to be turned into slaves for 19¢? It's back to the Idaho story. Speaker 0: That's the question. Speaker 1: That's the question. Speaker 0: And and it is up to the people to be active, informed, and and and that could take place on a local level. It doesn't have to be trying to deal with the president or the Right. You know, the department of whatever. Speaker 1: Local and it's in your ultimate life. Stop financing. Stop supporting. Start you know, we are we are going to work and we are building this. We can stop. Mhmm. We are financing this. We are voting for this. We are, you know, so we have the power to stop. And what we have to understand is, you know, crime that pays is ultimately gonna come and take your stuff. When they say it's 2030 and you have no assets, they are planning on taking your stuff if you let them. Speaker 2: They tell you. Speaker 1: Right. They tell you. That's true. Speaker 3: Believe them when they tell you. Speaker 0: Every year. They're you know, at the local levels, they're taking more and more of your wealth every year. And where's it going? You know, we got 40,000,000,000,000 in debt. Nobody can explain what we got for that. No one's no one's gonna lay Speaker 1: what you got. You got a financial coup. Speaker 0: That's what you got. That's what we got for that is a financial coup. Speaker 2: Right. But then going back to your point about what you can do. I think your friend Joseph Farrell really summarizes it. Right? He talks about building the culture in your own household Absolutely. That you expect to live in. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Speaker 2: And and really, that's that's the call to action. Right? Is if you are determined to build a culture that you are satisfied with, that's respectable, that's decent, that's fair, that's honest in your own household Right. Speaker 1: That's your stuff. So the question is, if we're free by divine authority, are we worthy of that divine authority? Speaker 2: Well. Speaker 3: Well, world wants wanted everyone look at where we are right now. The world wants everyone keeping up with the neighbors, keeping up with the Joneses, chasing the next thing, being so busy you can't see, being so busy your discernment's clouded, you're really not getting the full picture. Right. Being so busy that you forget something that happened three months ago right in front of your face that you had a big reaction to. And now you're just going down that road without any Speaker 0: Hamsters on the wheel. Speaker 2: Yeah. Well, you hear that that I can't. You should homeschool your child possibly. I can't. You know what? You should eat this clean, healthy vegetable. Start your own garden. I can't. Go to Speaker 0: a school board meeting. I Speaker 1: can't. Can't. Speaker 2: You actually Speaker 3: Run for office. Speaker 1: You can. Speaker 3: I can. Speaker 2: You can. Yeah. You can. Speaker 1: You can. Well, you can do what you can do. You can do some. Yeah. So I'll never forget when, I was litigating with the Department of Justice. It was very bad physical harassment. And somebody came and told me that they had video cameras inside the house, but I would never be able to find them. So I was thinking about, okay, how do you live with that? And I went to church and the co pastor had a whole head of steam worked up and she was screaming and she said she said, you know, you worry about what other people think, but you know God sees everything you do and you need to worry about that. And then I realized, Speaker 2: oh Oh. Speaker 1: That's all I need to worry. If I just worry about that, will be fine. Mhmm. Speaker 2: That's it. Speaker 1: That's it. Speaker 2: That is that's the answer. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 2: You know, we fight as we're talking about these spiritual warfares. The Bible says you're fighting spiritual warfare. Mhmm. Be alert person to answer to. If you uphold that into the bargain, then you're fine. But if you start to acquiesce then you might be in one of those gray areas where Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 2: Mister globalist can come and tap you on the She shoulder can come for you. Offer you a large basket of money. Speaker 1: Actually my bigger problem is I don't have a problem as much with Mr. Global Edge Sugar that Speaker 2: really is. It's so delicious. Me too. Know. Something like a good processed Dorito choc. Speaker 0: You know, choc Yeah. Of the Speaker 1: It's It's muffins. Speaker 0: Muffins. Muffins. Yeah. Speaker 2: Make you Speaker 0: No. They're Speaker 3: really tasty. Speaker 0: We're gonna make it Speaker 2: out of sourdough. No process. Oh, they're Speaker 0: really good. And they're not they're not yeah. Speaker 1: There's some sugar Speaker 3: in it. I'm not like anti No. Speaker 0: Gave me one once and it was good. Yep. Okay. So I think we've run out of time because I know we just squeezed into your calendar as best we could. Speaker 1: I love you guys. I appreciate you coming to the farm. It was great. Speaker 3: Oh, glad Speaker 0: to do it. A wonderful place to talk. Glad to Speaker 3: be here. Speaker 2: Yeah. Always a good conversation. Speaker 0: Yeah. Thanks for having us. We have Speaker 1: We need a hug. Speaker 0: Come on. Yeah. There you go. Speaker 2: And and Hug. Speaker 1: Hug. Hug. Speaker 0: And maybe when you're back in town, we'll get together again for a chat. Absolutely. But thanks again for giving us your time. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: Always a pleasure. Speaker 0: You know, these are issues we'll continue to dig into. So hopefully Keep sharing. Speaker 1: Unless we're impacted. Speaker 3: By aliens? I know how to rebuke. Speaker 0: Oh, yeah. Speaker 2: So, well thanks. Thank you, Gary. Speaker 0: Thank you. Thank you. Thanks Ada. It's a lot of fun. Thanks everyone. Speaker 1: Thank you everyone. Speaker 0: Bye bye.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(14/22) “ICE just ordered $30 million worth of new technology from Palantir to track immigrants” — B.I. “Fannie Mae Launches AI Fraud Detection Technology Partnership with Palantir” — Fannie Mae “Democrats Press Palantir about reported creation of IRS ‘mega-databse’” — Nextgov As Fitts says in tweet 13, Palantir is indeed infesting (my term) agency after agency of the U.S. federal government with its AI programs. As the former Assistant Secretary of HUD notes, Palantir’s tech is now being fused with ICE (U.S. Immigrations and Customs Enforcement), the IRS (Internal Revenue Service), and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that buy mortgages from lenders, providing cash for home loans with the aim of stabilizing the housing market. In April 2025, Business Insider reported that “Immigration and Customs Enforcement has signed a $30 million deal with Palantir for software add-ons to track self-deportations and immigrants who have overstayed their visas, government records show”(1). In May 2025, Fannie Mae announced that it had launched its “its AI-powered Crime Detection Unit in partnership with leading AI software company Palantir”(2). In June 2025, Netgov/FCW reported that “Democrats are demanding that Palantir provide Congress with additional information about its contracts with the federal government following reports that the tech company is working with the IRS to create a searchable database of U.S. taxpayers’ records”(3). 1. Source: https://www.businessinsider.com/ice-palantir-new-technology-30-million-visa-overstays-self-deportation-2025-4#:~:text=A%20contract%20reviewed%20by%20Business,overstays%20as%20a%20deportation%20priority.&text=ImmigrationOS%20will%20expand%20ICE's%20case,respond%20to%20requests%20for%20comment. 2. Source: https://www.fanniemae.com/newsroom/fannie-mae-news/fannie-mae-launches-ai-fraud-detection-technology-partnership-palantir 3. Source: https://www.nextgov.com/modernization/2025/06/democrats-press-palantir-about-reported-creation-irs-mega-database/406144/

ICE just ordered $30 million worth of new technology from Palantir to track immigrants Documents seen by BI show a $30 million contract between ICE and Palantir for software to track visa overstays and self-deportation. businessinsider.com
Fannie Mae Launches AI Fraud Detection Technology Partnership with Palantir | Fannie Mae Fannie Mae announced the launch today of its AI-powered Crime Detection Unit in partnership with leading AI software company Palantir. fanniemae.com
Democrats press Palantir about reported creation of IRS ‘mega-database’ The possible creation of a shareable, governmentwide database of Americans’ personal information would be a “surveillance nightmare,” 10 House and Senat... nextgov.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(15/22) “Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir…[but] it’s not really about better…policing…It’s…the…Panopticon…if people feel like they’re constantly under watch…they will police themselves [and] censor themselves.” — Whitney Webb, August 2025 With the idea of the Gaza Humanitarian Fund’s “concentration camps with biometrics” in mind, as well as Palantir’s rapid merger with the U.S. government, consider what author and investigative journalist Whitney Webb describes in this clip taken from an interview with Sabrina Salvati posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. In reference to the kinds of contracts highlighted in tweet 14, Webb says that “Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir…[and] the goal of Palantir, just like it was with Total Information Awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre-crime.” Although not discussed in this particular clip, Webb elsewhere makes the claim that Palantir is essentially just a new face for Total Information Awareness (TIA). For reference, TIA was established by DARPA (the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) in February 2003. The ACLU wrote of TIA at the time of its establishment that “[it] may be the closest thing to a true ‘Big Brother’ program that has ever been seriously contemplated in the United States” and that “it is based on a vision of pulling together as much information as possible about as many people as possible into an ‘ultra-large-scale’ database, making that information available to government officials, and sorting through it to try to identify terrorists” (1). The ACLU went on to add that “since the amount of public and private information on our lives is growing by leaps and bounds every week, a government project that seeks to put all that information together is a radical and frightening thing.” 1. Source: https://www.aclu.org/documents/qa-pentagons-total-information-awareness-program Video source for clip: https://rumble.com/v6xku6q-whitney-webb-joins-trump-threatens-putin-obama-calls-zohran-dr.-umar-pleads.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_m%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Palantir also manages all of your health data Because they contract extensively with HHS. Trump called on social media companies to stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed, basically. That's minority report. William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized precrime in The United States, and I think I was, like, one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called DEEP. The legal framework has been there since, you know, Trump round one. This pitch that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to bring about some sort of pre crime society.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course, people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data Because they contract extensively with HHS. So, you know, this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One point on that I would point to is how Trump in his first term, there was the spate of mass shootings, I believe, in the 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed, basically. That's minority report. Yeah. Actually, William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized precrime in The United States, and I think I was, like, one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called DEEP. And there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that. But not that many, but the legal framework has been there since, you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to, you know, bring about some sort of pre crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA. And the the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes, and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence and then based on that would either you know send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even, you know, house arrest without them having committed any crime. So now that we have big tech even more intertwined with Trump round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk agency, has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that, know, have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances, and the IRS and all of that. Know all of this is going to go into this master database and the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs, is pre crime, and mainly low income minority neighborhoods starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called Predpol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent. And they haven't gotten rid of the contract. So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean, that's what it's gonna be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the British for prison designs in the eighteen hundred, eighteen hundreds, the panopticon, the idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, you know, be, you know well obviously out of the prison context you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever you know then people will police themselves if they're under constant if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately, that's the form of control it is about.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(16/22) “Total Information Awareness of transnational threats requires keeping track of individuals and understanding how they fit into models.” — Total Information Awareness diagram, undated As referenced in tweet 15, Palantir is likely a reincarnation of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness organization announced in the wake of 9/11. The diagram displayed in this tweet, likely produced around 2003, shows how TIA aimed to develop a system that “[keeps] track of individuals” in order to develop an understanding of “how they fit into models.” Despite the fact this diagram is likely approximately 22 years old, note that it highlights the use of “authentication biometric data” in order to keep track of individuals… Source for image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Total_Information_Awareness_--_system_diagram.gif

File:Total information awareness -- system diagram.gif - Wikipedia en.wikipedia.org

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(17/22) “Connect the dots between the president…[using the] U.S. military in the country…[and] the Gaza model…One of the reasons you need that military [action]...[is] because the disabilities and deaths from government policies.” — Catherine Austin Fitts, August, 2025 Regarding near-term implementation of “the Gaza Method” in the United States, it appears that the execution has already begun in earnest. Not only is there already talk of rolling out digital IDs in the U.S.(1), but the Trump administration is rolling out the military into one major city after the next under the false premise of dealing with illegal immigrants. While illegal immigration (perhaps better referred to as “invasion”) is undoubtedly a critical problem for the country, the Trump administration’s rollout of the military into cities is not mainly for this purpose. On the contrary, it appears that we are rapidly being occupied by our own military in an insidious fashion. In this Solari Report video posted to YouTube on August 19, 2025, Catherine Austin Fitts explains how we must “Connect the dots between the president…[using the] U.S. military in the country…[and] the Gaza model.” The former Assistant Secretary of HUD adds that “The U.S. taxpayer and the Israeli taxpayer pays to destroy Gaza and kill the people and move them into concentration camps…[and] the private guys get the land and it’s cheap because, as Trump says, it’s a mess.” Furthermore, Fitts notes that “One of the reasons you need that military [rollout on U.S. soil is because] the health care costs are skyrocketing, and they’re skyrocketing because the disabilities and deaths from a variety of government policies, including Covid-19 shots…The numbers are frightening, and people are getting angry.” This last note about the carnage caused by the Covid-19 injections is important because it harkens back to what whistleblower Zowe Smith said in the video clip in tweet 12, helping to highlight the fact that the result of Palantir’s involvement in “healthcare” in the U.S. is mass death and injury. 1. Source: https://itif.org/publications/2024/09/23/path-to-digital-identity-in-the-united-states/ Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uf47dYCXISA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the president signaling he'll use US military in the country and National Guard to run Washington and maybe Chicago and New York. They note crime is down for two years, but media anecdotes push militarization as a cleaner city. They outline the Gaza model: the US taxpayer and the Israeli taxpayer pays to destroy Gaza and kill the people Yes. Or move them into concentration camps. Then we pay to break it, and we pay to fix it. The private guys get the land, and it's cheap because, as Trump says, it's a mess. Meanwhile, there's a military occupation in a community near you to get you to go along with it. Budget concerns: health care costs skyrocketing due to disabilities and deaths from a variety of government policies, including COVID nineteen shots. People are angry. A singer asked the President why people boo the vaccine; the response: because, Mr. President, everybody in the audience, you know, including me, know that they have somebody, you know, in their family that they love who's been disabled or killed by the shot. Wow.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You gotta connect the dots between the president of The United States telling you he's going to use US military in the country. Yeah. And he's going to use National Guard to run Washington and maybe Chicago and New York and Speaker 1: Right. And now you see to combat the the fact that there's statistics showing that crime is on the downswing and it's been on the downswing for two years, do you see anecdote after anecdote after anecdote in the media from people who are happy in Washington going, oh, but the city is so much cleaner now. We're for this militarization of the city because it just cleans things up and gets rid of garbage. Speaker 0: But I come back to the model. Let's go through the Gaza model. I just wanna get the because this is how plunder works. The US taxpayer and the Israeli taxpayer pays to destroy Gaza and kill the people Yes. Or move them into concentration camps. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: Which okay. The private guys get the land, and it's cheap because, as Trump says, it's a mess. Right? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: So they get a huge asset for free, essentially. And then it's announced, we're going to clean up and fix Gaza. What happens next? You get huge amounts of government money and tax benefits to help the private guys fix it up. Right. So we pay to break it. Speaker 1: Right. Speaker 0: We pay to fix it. The people who own it just get killed. They lose it. So so you have the guys who lose their land and their infrastructure, and we we're in tax prison. We pay for everything. And then the people who syndicated the profits get the upside. Right. So, we're sharing the downside with the Palestinians, and then the the mega donors, the mega rich get the upside. Right. That's how it works. Speaker 1: Right. And meanwhile, there's a military occupation in a community near you. Isn't that great? Speaker 0: Right. To get you to go along with it. Speaker 1: Because there's a drug cartel hiding behind a bush over there. Speaker 0: No. Because the budget's in real trouble, and one of the budget Well, know I Speaker 1: know but the pretext is Speaker 0: Right. Right. Speaker 1: There's a there's a drug cartel. Speaker 0: Well, but here's here's the problem. One of the reasons you need that military, if if you look at the budget, the health care costs are skyrocketing, And they're skyrocketing because the disabilities and deaths from a variety of government policies, including COVID nineteen shots, is skyrocketing. The numbers are frightening. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And people are getting angry. Speaker 1: Yes, they are. Yes. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. Speaker 1: So They they are getting angry. The pay patience has worn them on the COVID story, I must say. Speaker 0: So, there's an interesting thing I just posted that one of the country singers was apparently at a dinner with the president. And the president asked him straight out, why are people booing me when I talk about the vaccine? And he said, because, Mr. President, everybody in the audience, you know, including me, know that they have somebody, you know, in their family that they love who's been disabled or killed by the shot. Speaker 1: Wow.
The Path to Digital Identity in the United States Digital IDs are a more convenient, secure, and versatile option than physical IDs, but few Americans currently have one. With the right investments and collaboration between federal and state governments, Americans could realize the full potential of digital IDs. itif.org

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(18/22) “We’re deploying the full might of the federal law enforcement to crack down on Antifa and other domestic terrorist organizations…just like we did with cartels; we’re going to take the same approach.” — Pam Bondi, October 8, 2025. With Fitts’ concerns about the rollout of the U.S. military on U.S. soil in mind—as well as the Trump administration’s real reason for doing so—listen to this threat made by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, in which she says that the Trump administration is “deploying the full might of the federal law enforcement to crack down on Antifa and other domestic terrorist organizations…just like we did with cartels.” Recall that on October 3, 2025, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth tweeted out a video of “a lethal, kinetic strike on a narco-trafficking vessel affiliated with Designated Terrorist Organizations,” which resulted in the deaths of “four male narco-terrorists” (1). “Our intelligence, without a doubt, confirmed that this vessel was trafficking narcotics, the people onboard were narco-terrorists, and they were operating on a known narco-trafficking transit route,” Hegseth added. The DoW’s unprovoked and deadly attack, which allowed for no due process, likely gives us a sense of what Bondi means when she says that the “the same approach” used for cartels will be used for “domestic terrorist[s].” 1. Source:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Your leadership, president Trump, we're deploying the full might of the federal law enforcement to crack down on Antifa and other domestic terrorist organizations led by Stephen Miller. And Stephen, thank you for everything you're doing. Last week, I issued a memo ordering our federal law enforcement agents, DEA, FBI, US Marshals, and ATF to protect ICE officers from Antifa and other radical left wing violence. Director Patel has been going nonstop. He and deputy attorney general Blanche were in Chicago yesterday yesterday while secretary Noam was in Portland. We are around this country fighting against this domestic terrorism. We had Apple and Google take down the ICE block apps. It's breaking down the organization brick by brick. Just like we did with cartels, we're going to take the same approach, president Trump, with Antifa, destroy the entire organization from top to bottom.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your leadership, president Trump, we're deploying the full might of the federal law enforcement to crack down on Antifa and other domestic terrorist organizations led by Stephen Miller. And Stephen, thank you for everything you're doing. Last week, I issued a memo ordering our federal law enforcement agents, DEA, FBI, US Marshals, and ATF to protect ICE officers from Antifa and other radical left wing violence. Director Patel has been going nonstop. He and deputy attorney general Blanche were in Chicago yesterday yesterday while secretary Noam was in Portland. We are around this country fighting against this domestic terrorism. We had Apple and Google take down the ICE block apps. Hope they continue to comply with that, threatening the safety of our federal law enforcement officers. We're not gonna stop at just arresting the violent criminals we can see in the streets. Fighting crime is more than just getting the bad guy off the streets. It's breaking down the organization brick by brick. Just like we did with cartels, we're going to take the same approach, president Trump, with Antifa, destroy the entire organization from top to bottom.

@SecWar - Secretary of War Pete Hegseth

Earlier this morning, on President Trump's orders, I directed a lethal, kinetic strike on a narco-trafficking vessel affiliated with Designated Terrorist Organizations in the USSOUTHCOM area of responsibility. Four male narco-terrorists aboard the vessel were killed in the

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(19/22) “The domestic terror infrastructure…[has] been…developed by every administration…since 9/11…governments tend to use…vague definitions [of domestic terrorist]...to their advantage…[for]…more control and a removal of our liberties.” — Whitney Webb, September, 2025 Now that the Trump administration has made no bones about labeling whoever they want as “domestic terrorists,” listen to this warning by Whitney Webb regarding how the label is used to strip people of their liberties. “The domestic terror infrastructure is something that’s been steadily developed by every administration ever since 9/11,” Webb says in this clip pulled from a TFTC conversation posted to YouTube on September 27, 2025. The conversation took place in the wake of the assassination of TPUSA’s Charlie Kirk, amidst renewed calls from Trump, et al. to take up the fight against the “Radical Left”(1). The investigative journalist notes that “governments tend to use…these vague definitions…to their advantage…[to] give themselves a lot of wiggle room so they can label whoever they want a domestic terrorist.” “This is how the national security state operates when it wants to justify bigger budgets, more control, and a removal of our liberties,” Webb adds. “Call me a conspiracy person all you want…but…[this is] something that…intelligence agencies have been doing…[when] they want to institute draconian control measures [and] digital control measures [in] the United States or Western society or [the] global society at large.” 1. Reference source: https://apnews.com/article/trump-charlie-kirk-radical-left-political-opposition-3875efd0674ed2a22a719dfb42ace6ab Source video for clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AWjoxZngxU

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Out of these, you know, big events and a lot of times they capitalize on real tragedies, but the national security state takes advantage of these types of things pretty consistently consistently to put for greater control." "hate speech laws in California, presumably coming from the left." "There’s been a lot of questionable rhetoric from the right after the Kirk assassination, talking about hate speech as well." "a renewed push to upstart the war on domestic terror." "the domestic terror infrastructure is something that's been steadily developed by every administration ever since nine eleven." "Antifa has now been labeled a domestic terror organization." "fed infiltrated in the same way that Patriot Front and even the Proud Boys had feds or informants at the very top of the structure." "Operation Gladio." "the strategy of tension." "the CIA and intelligence agencies basically were funding terrorism against civilians in Europe, and then they were blamed on left leaning groups." "They were financing terrorism, and they were doing that with, like, the mob and the Vatican." "This is how the national security state operates when it wants to justify bigger budgets, more control, and a removal of our liberties, and this has been going on since the 1980s with Operation Gladio."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Out of these, you know, big events and a lot of times they capitalize on real tragedies, but the national security state takes advantage of these types of things pretty consistently consistently to put for greater control. Right? And so, you know, you brought up hate speech laws in California, presumably coming from the left. There's been a lot of questionable rhetoric from the right after the Kirk assassination, talking about hate speech as well. And so ultimately, you know, where does that take us to a place where there's a lot more censorship than people would want? You know, censorship was a big political issue last election cycle, you know, really big for certain, you know, demographics. And so to have sort of the idea that hate speech is going to be potentially embraced by by both sides, I definitely don't see that as, as a good thing. And also, you know, some of the stuff that has come out in the in the aftermath of this assassination has been this, what I would call a renewed push to upstart the war on domestic terror, which people have to keep in mind. You know, there's a long history to that, and so a lot of times when people get really emotionally sucked in to things, they kind of are focusing very much on like the present and the recent, whereas, you know, the domestic terror infrastructure is something that's been steadily developed by every administration ever since nine eleven. Because remember in the post nine eleven environment, that's how we got the Department of Homeland Security. And right before nine eleven, they introduced legislation to basically make DHS, but under a different name, and there wasn't a lot of support for it until conveniently after nine eleven when a lot of legislation that was liberty curbing was pushed through, and, you know, the Patriot Act being the most well known, but also the creation of DHS and numerous other laws. Ultimately, lot of the war on terror infrastructure was always meant to be used domestically at some point, which is why you have a lot of those same things launching, you know, at the same time in the early 2000s. And so, you know, every administration since then, from Bush to Obama, and then Trump the first time around, and Biden, they have all expanded the domestic terror infrastructure and apparatus. And if you actually look at the definition of how the government defines domestic terrorism, which is actually put out by the Biden administration, but it's been supported. I haven't seen them change, to the best of my knowledge, the definition since Trump came in, but it includes people really on both sides of the divide, people that are against perceived government overreach, for example, can be defined as domestic terrorists, and then people who are against all forms of capitalism, for example, and that was Biden that put that out, but that could include potentially you're against stakeholder capitalism of the World Economic Forum, for example, and some of the It's a pretty wide reaching thing, unfortunately, and governments tend to use kind of these vague definitions and use them to their advantage whenever they want, right? So they're kind of they give themselves a lot of wiggle room so they can label whoever they want a domestic terrorist. And so, you know, Antifa has now been labeled a domestic terror organization, and I would look at them as something, you know, most likely very fed infiltrated in the same way that Patriot Front and even the Proud Boys had feds or informants at the very top of the structure and things like that. This this is how the national security state operates when it wants to justify bigger budgets, more control, and a removal of our liberties, and this has been going on since the 1980s with Operation Gladio. When they developed the strategy of tension, they were the CIA and intelligence agencies basically were funding terrorism against civilians in Europe, and then they were blamed on on left leaning groups, they specifically were going after civilians, and it was a CIA plan really to prevent regimes that they deemed as aligned with the Soviets potentially, but not even actually, just like left leaning parties, they wanted to push Europe politically in a particular direction or towards particular candidates. They, you know, were financing terrorism, and they were doing that with, like, the mob and the Vatican. I mean, was a very but I mean, it's a documented thing, so, you know, call me a conspiracy person all you want, which, of course, people like to do. But it I mean, it's something that, you know, intelligence agencies have been doing, and so that, you know, if they want to institute draconian control measures, digital control measures over The United States or Western society or global society at large, they tend to fall back on these same patterns and tactics that they've used time and again, decade over decade.
Trump's threat to target 'radical left' after Kirk killing raises fears he's trying to silence foes President Donald Trump is escalating threats against what he calls the "radical left" after the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. apnews.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(20/22) “[If] I just say you’re a [domestic] terrorist…then [with] no warrant, no due process, I can…arrest you, put you in prison, and confiscate your property…We’re talking the Plunder Game.” — Catherine Austin Fitts, October 10, 2025 Not only does the designation of “domestic terrorist” allow governments to strip citizens of their liberties, but it also allows them to strip citizens of their property. As Catherine Austin Fitts notes in this clip taken from an interview with The Last American Vagabond’s Ryan Cristian posted to Rumble on October 10, 2025, when the government says a citizen is a “domestic terrorist,” it allows said government to “put [them] in prison and confiscate [their] property” without a warrant or any due process. For a better sense of what this means, recall Pam Bondi saying that “the full might of the federal law enforcement” is being deployed against “domestic terrorist organizations” and will be approached in the same way cartels juxtaposed with Pete Hegseth’s gleeful celebration of killing four “narco-terrorists” without any due process. “If I say you’re a domestic [terrorist]...then [with] no warrant, no due process, I can arrest you, put you in prison, and confiscate your property,” Fitts tells Cristian. “We’re talking the Plunder Game,” the former assistant secretary of HUD adds. Source video for clip: https://rumble.com/v703dls-catherine-austin-fitts-interview-reverse-robin-hood-why-has-trump-become-an.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_m%2Csrc_v1_upp_a

Video Transcript AI Summary
Memphis has an absolutely horrible crime problem. they've had a district attorney, I'm told, who basically let the criminals run free. The money's going upstairs. A wonderful senator from this area who's been trying to get that DA impeached says, "you need you need a non source finance DA" and "a real DA who's prosecuting crime." This is the ping pong of the uni party. One side promotes crime ravaging Memphis; in comes Trump, who says ICE is gonna drop in and round up people without warrants or evidence and, including US citizens and their kids and confiscate property freely. Rights of the people in Memphis? "they have no rights until they're in prison." No warrants, no due process, no effort to determine whether somebody is a citizen or an immigrant. No evidence, no warrant, no due process. The plunder game.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me let me let me show you how the game works. Mhmm. Okay. So I live an hour outside of Memphis and Memphis has an absolutely horrible crime problem. Mhmm. And they've had a district attorney, I'm told, who basically let the criminals run free. Okay. Now, we know the criminals running through to the extent they're doing narcotics trafficking or sex slave trafficking, it's not those criminals who are making all the money. The money's going upstairs. Right? Right. Because you you can't you can't transact a dime in this financial system. You know, it's all controlled by the banks. Okay. So so the money's going upstairs. But anyway, so we have a DA who would prosecute. There's a wonderful senator from this area who's been trying to get that DA impeached because what do you need? You know, the crime rate is way too high in Memphis. Okay? And and it's hurting property owners. It's hurting citizens. It's killing tourism. It's just bad. So but what do you need? You need you need a non source finance DA. You need a real DA who's prosecuting crime Right. And and not permitting crime to happen in the city. That's your solution. Okay. Now hold that thought because this is the ping pong of the uni party. So we got one side of the uni party promoting this, you know, sort of, allowing crime to ravage Memphis. So in comes Trump. And and if you look at what happened in Chicago, Trump is basically saying, okay, well ICE is gonna drop in and round up people without warrants or evidence and, including US citizens and their kids and confiscate property freely. Now why would ICE do that? ICE would do that because if you get pushed back against ICE, it gives the the president authority to drop in the military. Right. Right? He's allowed to drop in military to protect ICE and and ICE facilities. Right? Is he though? Well, let's I'll come back to that though. Go ahead. Okay. Well, let's just assume Mhmm. You know, he he can have standing. What he doesn't have standing to do is drop in the National Guard or the military to deal with local crime. Right. That's the mayor's job, the police job. Okay. But if he can cook up a pushback against ICE now, you know, somebody said, oh, well, look at what ICE did, you know, in Portland, you know, in June. And my attitude was really who financed it? Okay. This is a theater and you know and you've got so I was having a debate with somebody from Memphis the other day. No they were were from the other side of Tennessee but we're talking about Memphis. And they said I would be happy for the president to drop military into Memphis to stop crime. Okay. And and I said, you know, pointing to what happened in Chicago, what about the rights of the people in Memphis? And she said, they have no rights until they're in prison. Okay. Now what this does is say no warrants, no due process, no effort to determine whether somebody is a citizen or an immigrant. Okay? So let's talk about the precedent. What we're saying is I can arrest somebody with no warrant. I can if you look at what's going on in California, I can hold them for thirty seven days at great expense of the taxpayer with no warrant and no identification and no due process. So no evidence, no warrant, no due process. Right? And I can put them in prison. And the basis upon which I can do this is because I say they're a domestic terrorist. Right. So if I say you're a let's say you have a 100 acres of farmland I want for my data center. Good point. I just say you're a terrorist and then no warrant, no due process. I can go arrest you, put you in prison, and confiscate your property all because I say you're a terrorist. Mhmm. Right? We're talking the plunder game.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(21/22) “The mass murder in Gaza outlines a pattern, a set of tools and measures of extermination, subjugation, and expulsion that are ready for export and will be in high demand...like so much else of Israel’s spying, policing…and murder skills and tech....” — Tarik Cyril Amar Here is a link to the Substack post that inspired this thread: https://substack.com/home/post/p-141308827

The Gaza Method The West’s evolving blueprint for controlling a poly-crisis world by mass-murdering and subjugating the poor, the rebellious, and those deemed “superfluous.” tarikcyrilamar.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

(22/22) “Whatever violence we do overseas, whatever forms of repression… get implemented back in the States. The same technology…[like] AI-targeting programs, spyware, mass drone warfare is…already at a…police department near you.” — former U.S. Army Ranger Greg Stoker In a short video that sums up the thrust of this thread, here’s a clip of former U.S. Army Ranger Greg Stoker posted by former marine, combat veteran, and human rights speaker Ken O’Keefe to X on October 3, 2025. In the clip, Stoker, a former U.S. Army Ranger who describes himself as an activist and “anti-imperialist” in his X bio, notes that “whatever violence we do overseas, whatever forms of repression and colonialism, immediately get implemented back in the States. The same technology used to enforce occupation and apartheid through AI-targeting programs, spyware, mass drone warfare is…actually already at a local police department near you.” Stoker goes on to say that “If we accept the premise that there's a fascist takeover happening in Washington D.C. and extending out through the entire continental United States, it started over here. It started with… the expansion of the police state after 9/11 and the national security state after 9/11. And it's only getting worse. And people need to understand that whatever our government is willing to do to Palestinians, they're willing to do to you.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Veteran kills himself every fifteen minutes in The United States, you know, holdover from a war that we didn't need had no business being in." "Because of the twenty years of the global war on terror, people have been normalized." "So if we accept the premise that there's a fascist takeover happening in Washington DC and extending out through the entire Continental United States, it started over here." "It started with, you know, the expansion of the police state after nine eleven and the national security state after nine eleven, and it's only getting worse." "And people need to understand that whatever our government is willing to do to Palestinians, they're willing to do to you." "They just can't do it yet."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Veteran kills himself every fifteen minutes in The United States, you know, holdover from a war that we didn't need had no business being in. And one of the reasons I'm on this flotilla is because a lot of people see, Palestine or what happens in The Middle East, conflicts in The Middle East as just and that's what happens over there with those people. What what can I do about it? Right? Because of the twenty years of the global war on terror, people have been normalized. Like, be having military engagements in West Asia is just kind of what happens, and and how does it affect them? So I'm on this flotilla to use my status as a veteran to to say like, hey, whatever violence we do overseas, whatever forms of repression and colonialism immediately get implemented back in The States. The same technology used to enforce occupation and apartheid through AI targeting programs, spyware, mass drone warfare is coming to a look is actually already at a local police department near you. So if we accept the premise that there's a fascist takeover happening in Washington DC and extending out through the entire Continental United States, it started over here. It started with, you know, the expansion of the police state after nine eleven and the national security state after nine eleven, and it's only getting worse. And people need to understand that whatever our government is willing to do to Palestinians, they're willing to do to you. They just can't do it yet.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@sliejreo CAF offers tons and tons of practical solutions. E.g., use cash, don't get a REAL ID, don't use face scanners at airports, start local networks, start gardens, buy real assets, develop practical skills, build relationships of trust, don't get jabbed, hedge inflation with gold

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@DSWX53 Absolutely 💯

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@kingsheek2022 @solari_the Absolutely 💯

SenseReceptor
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 1:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reflecting on Catherine Austin Fitts’s view that Covid fits a central banking warfare model, with resets every 80–120 years that flush the system and change currency. She cites a 2018–2019 Jackson Hole plan, Going Direct Reset, and $5T injected directly while Main Street is shut. She claims 500 new billionaires but 35% of small businesses die. BIS’s Carstens notes CBDCs can monitor spending, aligning with a controlled Going Direct Reset.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"[Covid] was a taking... Every 80 to 120 years... the central banking–warfare model... resets...[and] the currency changes... [and] plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Brannon Howse (@HowseLive) posted to the WorldviewTube (@WorldviewTube) Rumble channel on October 9, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "[Covid-19] was a taking... Our economic model, which is about to be revised dramatically, is called the central banking warfare model. Central banks print money and, and the military and intelligence make sure that everybody takes it and they police the system. Every 80 to 120 years since the central banking warfare model has been operating, we go through resets. So it's like flushing the system and each time it gets flushed, the currency changes. "So the last big reset, we had a reset during the Spanish flu. So plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset. You know, it gives you emergency power. "In 2018, the central bankers met in Jackson Hole, where the G7 central bankers meet every. And they reviewed a plan from the BlackRock Investment Institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, and it's called the Going Direct Reset. And literally they, I'm sorry, that was in 2019. August 2019. In 2018, they had just agreed to a policy called FASAB 56, which we need to discuss to understand the federal budget and credit, what's really happening there. But then they proceeded back into, their desks in September and the Going Direct Reset began. "Of course, the big part of that reset came with the powers, that the pandemic provided, which is you inject $5 trillion, and I'm going to grossly oversimplify just to make it clear. You inject $5 trillion of money supply directly. Instead of going to the reserve track, you go directly into the financial institutions in the market. At the same time, you shut down Main Street. "So think of the economy as publicly traded companies, big corporations, and then small businesses and farms. Okay, so we inject 5 trillion, most of it going here, and then we shut down Main street, which means now the big guys can not only pick up huge market share, but they can go shopping and pick up a lot of real estate and assets. And because you're shut down and you have no income, right? "This is a squeeze play. Right? So it's the big guys versus the small guy. There was one estimate at the end. We created 500 new billionaires and we shut down basically 35% of the small businesses in the country. And San Francisco it was 49%. So if you look at consolidating the economic and political control, it was fantastically successful."

Video Transcript AI Summary
- Central banks print money and the and the military and intelligence make sure that everybody takes it and they police the system. - Every eighty to one hundred and twenty years since the Central Bank Warfare Model has been operating, we go through resets. - it's called the going direct reset. - you inject $5,000,000,000,000 of money supply directly instead of going to the reserve track. - you go directly into the financial institutions and the market at the same time you shut down mainstream. - it's the big guys versus the small guy. - There was one estimate at the end, we created 500 new billionaires, and we shut down basically 35% of the small businesses in the country.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: COVID nineteen about? That was a taking. That was a taking? That was a taking. So every we our economic model, which is about to be revised dramatically, is called the central banking warfare model. Central banks print money and the and the military and intelligence make sure that everybody takes it and they police the system. Every eighty to one hundred and twenty years since the Central Bank Warfare Model has been operating, we go through resets. So, it's like flushing the system. Mhmm. And, each time it gets flushed, the currency changes. So, the last big reset, we had a reset during the Spanish flu. So, plagues and resets go together because plague laws allow you to do a lot of the things you need to do during a reset. You know, it gives you emergency powers. So, anyway, so so in 02/2018, the central bankers met in Jackson Hole where the g seven central bankers meet every year, and they reviewed a plan from the BlackRock Investment Institute prepared by a group of retired central bankers, and it's called the going direct reset. And, literally, they I'm sorry. That was in 02/2019, August 2019. In in 02/2018, they had just agreed to a policy called FASB 56, which we need to discuss to understand the federal budget and credit, what's really happening there. But then, they proceeded back into their desks in September, and the going direct reset began. Of course, the big part of that reset came with the powers that the pandemic provided, which is you inject $5,000,000,000,000, and I'm gonna grossly oversimplify just to make it clear. You inject $5,000,000,000,000 of money supply directly instead of going to the reserve track. You go directly into the financial institutions and the market at the same time you shut down mainstream. So, think of the economy as publicly traded companies, big corporations, and then small businesses and farms. Okay? So, we inject 5,000,000,000,000, most of it going here, and then we shut down Main Street. Which means, now the big guys can not only pick up huge market share, but they can go shopping and pick up a lot of real estate and assets because you're shut down and you have no income. Right? You're you're it's a squeeze play. Right? So, it's the big guys versus the small guy. There was one estimate at the end, we created 500 new billionaires, and we shut down basically 35% of the small businesses in the country. In San Francisco, it was 49%. So, if you look at consolidating the the economic and political control, it was fantastically successful.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Here's the Going Direct Reset plan as outlined by BlackRock in Aug. 2019: https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/literature/whitepaper/bii-macro-perspectives-august-2019.pdf It notes that "Going direct means the central bank finding ways to get central bank money directly in the hands of public and private sector spenders."

BlackRock Corporate Website | BlackRock BlackRock invests on behalf of our clients, from institutions to individuals in any stage of life, who entrust their savings to us. Learn more about us. blackrock.com

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Here is Bank of International Settlements head Agustin Carstens noting CBDCs—central bank digital currencies—can be used to monitor how people spend their money. This is key to the Going Direct Reset: central bankers supply the digital money, and they control how it's spent.

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We tend to establish the equivalence with cash, and there is a huge difference there." "For example, in cash, don't know, for example, who's using a $100 bill today." "We don't know who is using a 1,000 peso bill today." "A key difference in with the CBDC is that central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability." "And also, we will have the technology to enforce that." "Those are those two issues are extremely important, and that makes a huge difference with respect to what to what cash is."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We tend to establish the equivalence with cash, and there is a huge difference there. For example, in cash, don't know, for example, who's using a $100 bill today. We don't know who is using a 1,000 peso bill today. A key difference in with the CBDC is that central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability. And also, we will have the technology to enforce that. Those are those two issues are extremely important, and that makes a huge difference with respect to what to what cash is.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

@Babydoll921961 Absolutely 🔥🔥🔥

SenseReceptor
Posted - September 30, 2025 at 12:56 AM
Saved - September 30, 2025 at 8:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In 2020, I saw the troubling emergence of neurotoxic mRNA technology, which I believe alters people's minds. I feel strongly that all mRNA programs presented as vaccinations should be halted immediately.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Dr. Michael Nehls, a physician/molecular genetics PhD: "In 2020...we witnessed the nightmare...introduction of neurotoxic mRNA technology...[which] alters people's minds—this applies to all MRNA programs disguised as vaccinations, which is why they must be stopped immediately"

Video Transcript AI Summary
"My name is Michael Nels." "I'm a medical doctor with a PhD in molecular genetics." "I'm one of the co initiators and first to sign this mRNA moratorium." "Since for decades I have campaigned for a species appropriate way of life to protect humans from chronic diseases like Alzheimer's or acute infections." "However, this natural approach is at odds with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry." "In 2020, construed as an emergency, we witnessed the nightmare of the introduction of the neurotoxic mRNA technology as a further development of this cultural aberration." "As I explain in my book The Indoctonated Brain, this genetic intervention alters people's minds." "And this applies to all mRNA programs disguised as vaccinations, which is why they must be stopped immediately."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Michael Nels. I'm a medical doctor with a PhD in molecular genetics. I'm one of the co initiators and first to sign this mRNA moratorium. Since for decades I have campaigned for a species appropriate way of life to protect humans from chronic diseases like Alzheimer's or acute infections. However, this natural approach is at odds with the interests of the pharmaceutical industry. In 2020, construed as an emergency, we witnessed the nightmare of the introduction of the neurotoxic mRNA technology as a further development of this cultural aberration. As I explain in my book The Indoctonated Brain, this genetic intervention alters people's minds. And this applies to all mRNA programs disguised as vaccinations, which is why they must be stopped immediately.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Source YouTube channel for video: https://www.youtube.com/@csmedicus/videos

CSmedicus Wir unterstützen es, selbstverantwortlich Entscheidungen auf Basis unabhängiger und kompetenter Informationen zu treffen.Ziele seit 2022: 1. Verhinderung der... youtube.com
SenseReceptor
Posted - September 12, 2025 at 5:39 AM
Saved - September 12, 2025 at 8:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m questioning the FBI's narrative surrounding the alleged assassination of Charlie Kirk. It seems absurd to think that a suspect could pause in the woods to reassemble a Mauser rifle after committing a crime. The details don’t add up; the rifle was supposedly found with the barrel installed, yet we're expected to believe he disassembled it while on the run. This whole situation feels fabricated, and I can’t ignore the inconsistencies. I know I’m risking a lot by speaking out, but the government’s lies are infuriating. Something is seriously wrong here.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Michael Savage nails the insane absurdity of the FBI's Charlie Kirk assassination narrative: "Something's wrong...we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find?" This clip is from a video Savage (@ASavageNation) posted to X today, September 11, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the maga FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard. I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand. "Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily. Incidentally, for those of you who know weapons, something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants, like, all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. "We are not hearing or seeing reality. And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk, and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel and then he leaves it for us to find? The FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it. "I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government is lying to us. Something's wrong. Something's so wrong, it's sickening. "They found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid? Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack. I just told you moron, that this rifle doesn't break down that easily. And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the run. Wait, I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box, wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and the trans anti. The trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit. Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI. There was no rifle in his hand. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. The photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel. I don't believe a word of it. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government. It's lying to us. Something's wrong with this whole fucking picture. Sean Hannity immediately, that pimp scumbag goes on the air and repeats the government lie that lousy son of a bitch. I don't buy one word of this narrative, not one single word.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something's wrong. I know I shouldn't do this. I'm risking an awful lot to go up against this FBI, the MAGA FBI. Something's very wrong with what I just heard. I mean, I watched it. I was hoping that they had caught the bastard who shot Charlie. So we saw a video of a person jumping off the roof. It looked very legitimate to me. However, there was no rifle in his hand. Now, the Mauser does not break down very easily incidentally, for those of you who know weapons. Something's wrong with the whole thing. They're trying to claim he removed the barrel from the Mauser and fit the receiver and stock in his backpack and barrel in his pants leg all in two seconds. It is not easy to remove a Mauser barrel or index it after reinstalling and remain accurate. We are not hearing or seeing reality. And by the way, the photo of the rifle allegedly left in the woods has the barrel installed. So we're supposed to believe a guy is on the run after killing Charlie Kirk and he pauses in the woods to reinstall a barrel. And then he leaves it for us to find the FBI to find. I don't believe a word of it. I shouldn't do this. I know I'm putting myself at risk, but I can't take it anymore. I can't take the bullshit from this fucking government. It's lying to us. Something's wrong. Something's so wrong. It's sickening. Look at this idiot. They found the rifle and they're getting the prints. Are you stupid? Are you that stupid? Are you that dumb? The man jumps off the roof. There's no rifle there. Oh, it's in his backpack. I just told you moron that this rifle doesn't break down that easily. And then it's supposed to be reassembled while he's on the runway. I'll stop now and reassemble it and leave it in the woods in a box wrapped in a towel. He left breadcrumbs. Oh, and the trans anti the trans stuff on the cartridges. Bullshit. Something is wrong with this whole fucking picture. I have persona non grata in this White House. Will tell you right now. I flew with Donald Trump in air force one. I consider him close to me. I have not been able to get near him since this administration took hold. They have thrown me out. They've castigated, thrown me in the desert. They don't want me near them. They don't want real truth tellers near them. Sean Hannity immediately, that pimp scumbag goes on the air and repeats the government lie that lousy son of a bitch. How the fuck does Sean Hannity live with himself? Proved and he had Sean, you know what kept animal you're like a whore kept in a Sean Hannity. You've always been a whore in a brothel. You have hit a new low Hannity and something is wrong. Somebody killed this young guy and everyone is asking who done it. And we're supposed to believe they think we're this stupid. So Cash Patel is there, he doesn't say a word and Donald Trump's in the Yankee Stadium. What the hell is going on here? I'm just an American citizen who's been in the business of observing since I'm 18 years old And I don't buy one word of this narrative, not one single word. So I'm gonna end in a moment.
SenseReceptor
Posted - August 15, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Saved - August 15, 2025 at 6:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Whitney Webb discusses concerns about Trump's use of Palantir to build databases on individuals, initially for ICE but now extending to broader populations. She highlights a past initiative where Trump encouraged social media companies to monitor users for potential threats, leading to the creation of a program called DEEP for pre-crime interventions. Webb warns that Palantir's integration into various government sectors, including health and finance, aims to establish a surveillance system reminiscent of the Panopticon, fostering self-censorship among citizens.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Whitney Webb gives insight into Trump and the Palantir "Panopticon" being built: "Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir...most people know they're doing that with ICE, but the administration [has] announced... they're doing it for everybody." This clip of Webb (@_whitneywebb), a contributing editor of Unlimited Hangout and author of One Nation Under Blackmail, is taken from an interview with Sabrina Salvati (@SabbySabs2) posted to Rumble on August 14, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course most people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data, because they contract extensively with hhs. "So this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One, one point on that I would point to is, held Trump in his first term. There was the spate of mass shootings I believe in the Latter Half of 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting, stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they, if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed. "Actually William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized pre-crime in the United States. And I think I was like one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called deep. And there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that, but not that many. "But the legal framework has been there since you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch to that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to you know, bring about some sort of pre-crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen, in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA and the, the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence. And then based on that, would, would either you know, send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even you know, house arrest, without them having committed any crime. "So now that we have Big Tech even more intertwined with Trump Round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk Agency Has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know, mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that. You know, all have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know, data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances in the irs and all of that, you know, all of this is going to go into this master database. "And the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, you know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs which is pre- crime, in mainly low income minority neighborhoods, starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called PredPol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent and they haven't gotten rid of the contract. "So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean that's what it's going to be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the, the British for prison designs in the 1800s, the Panopticon. The idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, you know, be you know, well, obviously out of the prison context, you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever. You know, then people will police themselves if they're under constant, if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately that's the form of control it is about."

Video Transcript AI Summary
"And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir." "Palantir also manages all of your health data Because they contract extensively with HHS." "It was called DEEP and there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that." "But anyway, this pitch to that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to, you know, bring about some sort of pre crime society." "didn't ultimately happen in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA." "the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime." "There's one in LA called Predpol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Trump has been openly building databases on people with Palantir. Of course, people know that they're doing that with ICE, but the administration announced not that long ago that they're doing it for everybody. And Palantir also manages all of your health data Because they contract extensively with HHS. So, you know, this is very concerning for a lot of reasons. One point on that I would point to is how Trump in his first term, there was the spate of mass shootings, I believe, in the 2019. And Trump called on social media companies to stop shooting stop shooters before they commit a crime and to basically flag what people were saying on social media and use that to determine if they, you know, if they if there should be intervention before a crime might be committed, basically. That's minority report. Yeah. Actually, William Barr, when he was in office the first time, created this program that legalized precrime in The United States, and I think I was, like, one of two people maybe that reported on that at the time. It was called DEEP and there's been a few arrests under DEEP for people making Facebook posts and things like that. But not that many, but the legal framework has been there since, you know, Trump round one, basically. But anyway, this pitch to that Trump made about having social media spy on its users and use like analytics to, you know, bring about some sort of pre crime society. He was being pitched at the time and he was interested in it, but it didn't ultimately happen in creating this agency called HARPA, which was supposed to be like the health version of the Pentagon's DARPA. And the the program that they wanted to start with, the acronym was Safe Homes, and it was basically about analyzing American social media posts for early warning signs of neuropsychiatric violence and then based on that would either you know send people to a court ordered psychologist or physician or even you know house arrest without them having committed any crime. So now that we have big tech even more intertwined with Trump round two, you know, people should really be paying attention to the stuff, especially now that Palantir, especially through the Doge, formerly led by Elon Musk agency, has sort of embedded Palantir in even more aspects of the government than it was in before, including like the IRS and you know mortgage stuff like Fannie Mae and all of that, know, I'll have Palantir now. And then basically giving them the keys to the kingdom with a lot of you know data that the Department of Treasury has about your finances and the IRS and all of that. Know, all of this is going to go into this master database and the goal of Palantir, just like it was with total information awareness, is about stopping crime before it happens. It's pre crime. And Palantir did that, know, for a few years, several years, in police departments around the country piloting predictive policing programs, which is pre crime, and mainly low income minority neighborhoods starting off in New Orleans. And now you have other companies besides Palantir that do this. There's one in LA called Predpol, and they have an accuracy of half a percent. And they haven't gotten rid of the contract. So it's not really about better, more efficient policing. I mean, that's what it's gonna be sold as. It's basically the idea that was developed, you know, by the British for prison designs in the 1800. Eighteen hundreds, the panopticon, the idea that if people feel like they're constantly under watch and something and they could, know, be, you know, well, obviously, out of the prison context, you could be put in prison for doing the wrong thing or whatever, you know, then people will police themselves if they're under constant, if they know they're under constant watch, they will police themselves, they will censor themselves, things of that nature. And I think ultimately, that's the form of control it is about.
SenseReceptor
Posted - August 14, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Saved - August 14, 2025 at 11:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent discussion, retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova explained how mRNA vaccines and all vaccines can cause severe health issues by inducing "storms" in the blood. She described how these shots lead to a loss of zeta potential, affecting cellular health and causing microclotting, which results in various ailments. Latypova emphasized that these mechanisms are fundamental and irreversible, leading to premature aging and a gray appearance in affected individuals, as they suffer from cellular suffocation.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

🤯Mind-blowing description of how mRNA jabs—and all jabs—cause "storms" in the blood The jabs "desiccate" the body, causing "precipitation" of the blood. This, in turn, leads to myriad health problems "[Jab victims] look gray because they're suffocating at the cellular level" This clip of retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) is taken from a discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. posted to Rumble on August 13, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "As you said, there is no treatment. And I'm willing to bet it's not possible to treat the injury that these shots induce, because it's induced on a cellular level. And it's such fundamental, the mechanisms of injury are so fundamental to biological nature, actual nature in general, that it's not possible to treat. So the two main mechanisms by which these shots destroy, and actually that's common to all vaccines. One is loss of zeta potential, which again, very few people talk about. "Zeta potential is what makes clouds fluffy and what makes people look young and beautiful, athletic and healthy. It's our electrical charge. Our electrical charge that expands our tissues and delivers the blood and oxygen and nutrients to all corners of the body. And incidentally, that's how they cause bizarre weather events and destroy people's health, is by the same mechanism injecting cationic substances into colloids, which is clouds. "If you inject the cationic substance, which is metal, aluminum, or some other metals, they will collapse and you will have a megastorm. And the same thing happens in the human body. If you inject cationic substance into bloodstream, you cause precipitation, just like with the cloud. You cause precipitation, which is microclotting, fallout of various components of blood, including lipids and proteins, deposits, cataracts, the atherosclerotic plaques, arrhythmia, renal failure, you name it, everything. Gout, kidney stones, gallbladder stones, all of it, they are precipitants. Precipitants are caused by loss of zeta potential from colloid. That's how it fundamentally destroys. So it affects everything. "Then the second mechanism is causing anaphylaxis to pretty much everything, every normal proteins that you encounter. That's described by Charles Richet in his Nobel prize winning work in 1913. So as I'm saying, vaccines have always been a deliberate, poisoning strategy because the experts cannot claim that they don't know something that was in their field and received the Nobel Prize. So that's why. And that's why it's not fixable. And it's not why RFK Jr. Is extending that declaration. "The whole world is a colloid. Atmosphere is a colloidal. I don't know, I just like that. Thank you. Plants. And, and yeah. So what they caused by, by these shots, by all of the shots, not just mRNA, but all of the shots, they cause premature aging. Because aging is. Is desiccation. It's drying, it's shrinking. What is it is because you're losing the. First of all, you're losing capillaries first. You're losing the micro circulation first. And then it affects everything. "That's why you have wrinkles and skin looks like crap. And, you know, so that's why. And that's why, actually, there's one of the common things in the. In the mRNA, injured people, they look gray because they're suffocating essentially at the cellular level."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 contends there is no treatment and it’s not possible to treat the injury these shots induce, because the mechanisms are fundamental to biology. The two main mechanisms are: 1) loss of zeta potential—the electrical charge that keeps colloids fluffy and tissues vibrant—caused by injecting cationic substances (aluminum or other metals) into the bloodstream, which allegedly leads to precipitation and microclotting with deposits (cataracts, atherosclerotic plaques, arrhythmia, renal failure, gout, kidney and gallbladder stones). 2) causing anaphylaxis to pretty much everything, "described by Charles Richey in his Nobel Prize winning work in 1913." Vaccines are described as a "deliberate poisoning strategy" because the experts cannot claim they don’t know something and they "received the Nobel Prize." By these shots, not just mRNA, but all of the shots, they cause premature aging—desiccation, loss of capillaries and microcirculation, resulting in wrinkles; some mRNA-injured people look gray, suffocating at the cellular level.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And as you said, there is no treatment. And and I I'm willing to bet it's not possible to treat the injury that these shots induce, because it's induced on a cellular level, and it's it's such fundamental the mechanisms of injury are so fundamental to human to biological nature, actual nature in general, it's not possible to treat. So the two main mechanisms by which these shots destroy and actually that's common to all vaccines. One is a loss of zeta potential, which again, very few people talk about. Zeta potential is what makes clouds fluffy and what makes people look young and beautiful, athletic, and healthy. It's our electrical charge. Our electrical charge that expands our tissues and delivers the blood and oxygen and nutrients to all corners of the body. And incidentally, that's how they cause bizarre weather events and destroy people's health is by the same mechanism, injecting cationic substances into colloids, which is clouds. If you inject the cationic substance, which is metal, aluminum or some other metals, they will collapse and you will have a mega storm. And the same thing happens in the human body. If you inject cationic substance into blood stream, you cause precipitation just like with the cloud. Because precipitation which is micro clotting, fallout of various components of blood including lipids and proteins deposits, cataracts, atherosclerotic plaques, arrhythmia, renal failure, you you name it, everything. The gout, kidney stones, gallbladder stones, all of it, they are precipitants. And precipitants are caused by loss of zeta potential from colloid. And so, that's how it fundamentally destroys, so it affects everything. And then the second mechanism is causing anaphylaxis to pretty much everything, every normal proteins that you encounter. And that's described by Charles Richey in his Nobel Prize winning work in 1913. So as I'm saying, vaccines have always been a deliberate poisoning strategy because the experts cannot claim that they don't know something that was in their field and they received the Nobel Prize. So, that's why. And that's why it's not fixable. And it's not why RFK Jr. Is extending that declaration. Speaker 1: Well, I appreciate. That's just lovely. The description of the clouds versus the body. I love that. Speaker 0: Thank you. Everything the whole world is a colloid atmosphere is colloid. Speaker 1: I don't know, just like that. Speaker 0: Thank you. And yeah, so what they caused by these shots, by all of the shots, not just mRNA, but all of the shots, they cause premature aging because aging is desiccation, it's drying, it's shrinking. What is it? It's because you're losing the first of all, you're losing capillaries first, you're losing the microcirculation first, and then it affects everything. That's why you have wrinkles and skin looks like crap and, you know, so that's why. And that's why actually there's one of the common things in the mRNA injured people, they look gray because they're suffocating essentially at the cellular level.
SenseReceptor
Posted - July 28, 2025 at 9:54 PM
Saved - July 29, 2025 at 8:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe we should ban all messenger RNA vaccines and reevaluate many others. The science used to justify lockdowns, masks, and social distancing is fundamentally flawed. I've researched the evidence and found no scientific basis for these measures. Despite many experts, including myself, being ignored in discussions, it's crucial we document this. I support the World Council for Health and advocate for accountability, including a Nuremberg-type investigation. We must ensure that such measures are never imposed on people again and consider withdrawing from the WHO.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "Ban all messenger RNA vaccines...[and] the science that's been used to justify everything from the lockdown, the masks, the distancing, [is] all complete, utter crap...I would actually really push for a Nuremberg type investigation on this." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is taken from a video posted to the WTF Is Going On Official (@WTFisGoingOn_O1) YouTube channel on July 26, 2025. --------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "My simple thing is ban all messenger RNA vaccines. Never, ever, ever. And now I've looked into it a lot more carefully. There's a lot more vaccines that need very careful reevaluation, whether they should be pulled as what we've done is we've looked into all the science that's been used to justify everything from the lockdown, the masks, the distancing, all complete, utter crap. There's no scientific basis for any of it whatsoever. "We started to look at all the evidence about the vaccines, induce a good immune response and what have you. And the justification for the boosters on the ground. The antibodies fall off very quickly. Antibodies fall off very quickly. When you get infected, when you have a vaccine, that's what they do. Otherwise you have antibodies coming out your ears, which is basically what they're the simpletons who actually pushed this forward, went. "And the more I looked at it, the more I realized we had to actually document this. And I just use this little push. And my colleagues and I, I started writing this about lockdown, but we found there was so much science, they said, follow the science. There was no science. People like me shouting. None of us were asked to call in at a debate of this, not one of us. We were told like, post office submasters, sub postmasters that we were the only one. I've subsequently found there was loads of people like me, so said exactly the same thing to the Cabinet, to SAGE, to Whitty, to Vallance, and they totally chose to ignore us. "And I basically want to make sure and support you with this, the World Council for Health that we get in a situation that this can never ever be inflicted on the British people or the people of the world ever again. I believe we need to hold everyone to account. And I would actually really push for a Nuremberg type investigation on this. We mentioned the who. I've always said that we should withdraw from the WHO because they wanted all that power so they could get us to lock down again with one case of bird flu in Mexico. They're terribly keen to do that, to push more vaccines. And we have to rise up and stop it."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker advocates banning all mRNA vaccines and reevaluating other vaccines, claiming the science behind lockdowns, masks, and distancing is "complete utter crap" with no scientific basis. They state that the justification for boosters was based on the false premise that antibodies should not naturally decline after infection or vaccination. The speaker claims they and other scientists were ignored by the cabinet, SAGE, Whitty, and Vallance, despite raising concerns. They support the World Council of Health in preventing similar measures from being inflicted on people again and call for a Nuremberg-type investigation. They advocate withdrawing from the WHO, alleging the organization seeks power to impose lockdowns based on minimal threats like a single case of bird flu, in order to push more vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My simple thing is ban all messenger RNA vaccines. Never ever. Ever. And now I've looked into it a lot more carefully. There's a lot more vaccines that need very careful reevaluation of the racially poor as well. What we've done is we've looked into all the science that's being used to justify the the everything from the lockdown, the masks, the distancing, all complete utter crap. There's no scientific basis for any of it whatsoever. We started to look at all the evidence about the vaccines induced a good immune response and what have you. And the justification for the boosters on the ground, the antibodies fall off very quickly. Antibodies fall off very quickly when you get infected, when you have a vaccine. That's what they do. Otherwise, you have antibodies coming out your ears, which is basically what the simpletons who actually pushed this forward went. And the more I looked at it, the more I realized we had to actually document this. And I just used this little push. And my colleagues and I, I started writing this about lockdown, but we found there was so much science. They said follow the science. There was no science. People like me shouting. None of us were were asked to call in at a debate of this. Not one of us. We were told like post office sub masters, sub post masters that we were the only one. I have subsequently found there was loads of people like me said exactly the same thing to the cabinet, to Sage, to Witty, to Valens, and they totally chose to ignore us. Why? And I basically want to make sure and support you with this the the World Council of Health that we get in a situation that this can never ever be inflicted on the British people or the people of the world ever again. I believe we need to hold everyone to account, and I would actually really push for a Nuremberg type investigation on this. We mentioned the WHO. I have always said that we should withdraw from the WHO because they wanted all that power so they could get us to lockdown again with one case of bird flu in Mexico. They're terribly keen to do that to push more vaccines and we have to rise up and stop it. I think
SenseReceptor
Posted - July 28, 2025 at 1:11 AM
Saved - July 28, 2025 at 10:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. David Rasnick expresses serious concerns about COVID-19 vaccines, describing them as harmful injections that target the immune system and potentially lead to illness or cancer. He suggests that these vaccines can destroy the immune system, allowing pre-existing cancers to progress rapidly, which he refers to as "turbo cancer." Rasnick believes that many individuals may have undetected cancers that become aggressive when the immune system is compromised. He emphasizes that these vaccines could turn people into a "petri dish" for cancer proliferation.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Cancer/AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick: "[These Covid jabs] are multi-warheads...designed to...injure people, kill people...immediately or intermittently[, to] make them sick...or...cause cancer...[they] turn you into a petri dish [for cancer] and they just proliferate." This clip of Rasnick, an expert in clinical diagnostics, drug design, and AIDS, as well as a former employee of Abbot Labs and founder of multiple biotech companies, is taken from an interview with author and whistleblower Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) posted to Smith's Rumble channel on July 21, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "The main thing is the, the most structured thing is that the injections are targeting your immune system. Your innate immune system is really damaging. I mean it causes all kinds of problems. Those injections are multi-warheads. They are designed to kill people, injure people, kill people, kill people immediately or intermediately, intermittently make them sick or something or in the long run cause cancer. "And the thing about turbo cancer is these were people who already had cancer, which I knew my, because I know cancer. I was pretty sure that what happened was they were destroying the immune system. Because it takes a long time for cancer to progress to the point where it will survive period where it can do damage. You know, it takes a long time. "You can't just make a cancer really really quick unless it's like cell culture with SV40, you know and you have no, but they have to have no immune system. Then you can generate really really quick. But so I had a, my suspicion, and it's been turned out to be true is that they were destroying the immune system and it was cancers that they, that, that they didn't know they had. Like these that I'm showing you in the literature were for people who had cancer and they were being treated for cancer and that came up with the hyper progressive disease thing. But most of the people we're talking about right now are not being treated for cancer. They were getting cancer suddenly and dying. "Due to my understanding of cancer, it was most likely almost certain that these people already had cancer and didn't know it. I think we all do and they just come and go or whatever, at various stages. And if you conk out severely disable the immune system, those things now turn you into a petri dish and they'll just proliferate."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The injections target the immune system, causing damage and acting as multi-warheads designed to injure or kill people immediately, intermittently, or in the long run, potentially causing cancer. Turbo cancer occurs in people who already had cancer. The injections destroy the immune system, allowing existing cancers to progress rapidly. It takes a long time for cancer to progress and do damage because the immune system eliminates many aneuploidy cells. Cancers cannot develop quickly unless in cell culture with SV40 and no immune system. The speaker suspected, and it turned out to be true, that the injections were destroying the immune system, revealing undiagnosed cancers. Most people getting cancer suddenly and dying likely already had it. Severely disabling the immune system allows these pre-existing conditions to proliferate.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The main thing is, the the most structured thing is that the injection are targeting your immune system. Your innate immune system is really damaging. Mean, it causes all kinds of problems. It's a those injections are multi warhead. Multi warheads. Speaker 1: I love that description. That's very accurate. I might steal that on occasion. Speaker 0: They are designed to kill people. Injure people, kill people, kill people immediately or intermittently, make them sick or something, or in the long run cause cancer. The thing about turbo cancer is these were people who already had cancer. Which I I knew my because I know cancer, I was pretty sure that what happened was they were destroying the immune system because it takes a long time to for cancer to progress to the point where it will survive, period, where it can do damage, you know. It takes a Speaker 1: long time. Yeah. Because you said most of those aneuploidy cells die off, so it your immune system has to let enough of those survive to begin with for it to even start. Right? Speaker 0: Yeah. They're not even cancer early on. You know, it it takes decades for them to actually turn into cancer. And they're they're they're committing suicide along the way. And so, you can't just make cancer really really quick unless it's like cell culture with s v forty, you know. And you have no But they have to have no ending system. Then you can generate really really quick. But So I had a My suspicion, and it's turned out to be true, is that they were destroying the immune system and it was cancers that they that that they didn't know they had. Like, these that I'm showing you in the literature were for people who had cancer. And they were being treated for cancer. And that came up with the hyper progressive disease thing. But most of the people we're talking about right now are not being treated for cancer. They were getting cancer suddenly and dying. My my due to my understanding of cancer, it was most likely, almost certain, that these people already had cancer and didn't know it. I think we all do. And they just gun go, you know, whatever very state it. And if you conk out severely disable the immune system, those things act for you into a pre tradition of just proliferate.
SenseReceptor
Posted - July 23, 2025 at 9:53 PM
Saved - July 24, 2025 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview, Catherine Austin Fitts discussed the implications of releasing the Epstein files, suggesting they would reveal connections between Epstein, Mossad, and the financial mismanagement of taxpayer money. She highlighted that $21 trillion went missing from the Department of Defense and Housing during Epstein's operations, linking this to his relationships with influential figures and organizations. Fitts argued that the same institutions involved in this financial oversight also managed Operation Warp Speed, raising concerns about the broader ramifications for the financial system if these connections were exposed.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"If you let the [Epstein] files out, [Americans] are going to connect...Epstein, Mossad, the growing power of Israel, AIPAC, & where did their pension fund money go?...[and] the same institution that laundered $20 trillion [of that taxpayer money]...ran Operation Warp Speed." This clip of Catherine Austin Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Stephen Gardner (@StephenGardnerX) posted to Rumble on July 18, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I believe Epstein, yes, you were doing, you were doing, you were building control files using sex entrapment. But I think the bigger picture, you were doing big money laundering. So $21 trillion disappeared from DoD and HUD over the period that Epstein was operating. "He went to the White House, his first time in the White House. Rubin, who became Secretary of Treasury, took him, I think, in 1994. And then Rubin goes to treasury, money starts disappearing, and then, you know, Epstein is ballooning fantastic amounts of money. So I think Epstein was laundering the money that was coming out of DOD. And if you look at his relationships with Mossad and Israeli intelligence, when Mossad is taking over DOD and the money's going missing, and we know the cybersecurity and it, in the Israeli sort of constellation was very active, you know, in government at that time. "So, I just think if, if you let the files out, people are going to connect the dots between Epstein, Mossad, the, the growing power of Israel, AIPAC, and, and then where did their pension fund money go? And, and they're going to start connecting to the dots. "I mean, here's the thing. The institution that laundered $20 trillion one way or the other is the same institution that ran Operation Warp Speed, that poisoned, disabled, and bankrupted millions of Americans. Do we really think that's a coincidence? I think if the Epstein files come out, people are going to start connecting too many dots, and you could literally see, the ramifications to the financial system are dramatic."

SenseReceptor
Posted - July 16, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Saved - July 16, 2025 at 7:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently shared insights from Dr. Peter McCullough regarding the implications of mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. He discussed evidence suggesting that the vaccine's genetic code may be reverse transcribed and integrated into human DNA, potentially marking our genomes with a "stamp" from these companies. Dr. McCullough expressed concern about the long-term effects, including the persistence of Spike protein and its association with serious health issues like blood clots and cancer. He highlighted alarming findings from collaborations with labs indicating significant alterations in genetic profiles of vaccinated individuals.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Dr. Peter McCullough: "We now have evidence from multiple sources that the code from Pfizer and Moderna is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA...it's almost as if you're carrying around in your genome a stamp that says Pfizer or Moderna." This clip of internist, cardiologist, and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough (@P_McCulloughMD) is take from an interview with psychotherapist Dr. Joseph Sansone (@PhdSansone) posted to Sansone's Substack on July 14, 2025. NOTE: Subtitles were done automatically by Substack, therefore I could not make any corrections. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "You know, it doesn't look good, Joe. We're working with the Inmodia lab in Germany. We've had a few calls with them. I've sent patient samples over there. We're also working with John, Cantazaro at Neo7 Bioscience. We now have evidence from multiple sources that the code from, from Pfizer and Moderna is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA. "Well, I mean it's almost as if you're carrying around in your genome a stamp that says Pfizer or Moderna. That's not good. It's a synthetic code. But there's a couple possibilities. One, the body recognizes it and edits it out. That's not the case because years later we see the signal. Number two is the body represses that and so it doesn't do anything. But we see evidence of the Spike protein in the human body for years afterwards. So that's probably not the case. So this is not looking good at all. "We can see transmission of Spike protein producing genetic code now, the German lab is also finding fragments of code for the Spike protein as well as SV40 and other DNA fragments. So just it may not be the entire reverse code of the Pfizer Moderna product, but it may be small pieces of DNA that just are contaminating that readily get inserted into the code. So you may actually just produce fragments of the Spike protein. We don't know what that means for the human body, but suffice it to say, potentially see a sicker population as we move through. It can't be good. "I mean things that come to mind are with full length Spike protein, blood clots, for instance, heart damage, little Spike protein fragments, autoimmunity, unusual tumors in babies, these are the things that come forward. Now, John Cantazaro, we've tweeted this out, it's on his website. Neo7 Bioscience he shows that the genetic profile of expression of genes, of other genes and proteins is dramatically altered in the vaccinated. This is scary. And so the profile is tilted, according to Cantazaro, much more towards neoplasm or cancer. "So I sent him a sample of a patient of mine who took the vaccine and actually got a cancer. He got a form of a turbo cancer. And sure enough, you know, Cantazaro showed me a normal profile. Okay, I got that. Then he showed me my patient's profile, which was dramatically abnormal. And I asked him point blank, what does this mean? Does this mean Pfizer has installed its code into his genome and Cantazaro said yes."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 reports evidence from multiple sources, including InModia lab in Germany and John Cantazaro at NEO7 Bioscience, that Pfizer and Moderna code is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA. According to Speaker 1, this means individuals could carry a "stamp" of Pfizer or Moderna in their genome. The speaker suggests the body may not be editing out or repressing this code, as spike protein evidence persists for years. Transmission of spike protein producing genetic code is possible, along with fragments of code for the spike protein, SV40, and other DNA fragments. Speaker 1 raises concerns about potential health issues like blood clots, heart damage, autoimmunity, and unusual tumors. John Cantazaro's research indicates a dramatically altered genetic profile in vaccinated individuals, tilting towards neoplasm or cancer. Speaker 1 shares an anecdote about a patient who developed terminal cancer after vaccination, with Cantazaro confirming the presence of Pfizer code in the patient's genome.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do you think about the multigenerational effects? Any new research coming on that, on the effects of the genes and that kind of stuff? I know early on there was some stuff. Anything new coming out recently on that? Speaker 1: You know, it doesn't look good, Joe. We're working with the InModia lab in Germany. We've had a few calls with them. I've sent patient samples over there. We're also working with John Cantazaro at NEO7 Bioscience. We now have evidence from multiple sources that the code from Pfizer and Moderna is reverse transcribed and inserted into human DNA. And we don't know if that's Yeah, no, Speaker 0: it But looks like what does that actually mean? Does that mean we can see mutations in the future? Like what do we know about that? Speaker 1: Well, I mean, it's almost as if you're carrying around in your genome a stamp that says Pfizer or Moderna. That's not good. It's a synthetic code. But there's a couple possibilities. One, the body recognizes it and edits it out. That's not the case because years later we see the signal. Number two is the body represses that and so it doesn't do anything. But we see evidence of the spike protein in the human body for years afterwards. So that's probably not the case. So this is not looking good Speaker 0: Does at this mean that we'll see like offspring or like kids and grandkids having an issue with spike proteins? Is that what the effect would be or we're just Sure. Not Speaker 1: We can see transmission of spike protein producing genetic code. Now, the German lab is also finding fragments of code for the spike protein as well as SV40 and other, you know, DNA fragments. So just it may not be the entire reverse code of the Pfizer or Moderna product, but it may be small pieces of DNA that just are contaminating that readily get inserted into the code. So you may actually just produce fragments of the spike protein. We don't know what that means for the human body. But suffice it to say Speaker 0: Potentially you see a sicker population as we move through. Speaker 1: Right. It can't be good. It can't be good. I mean, things that come to mind are with full length spike protein, blood clots, for instance, heart damage, little spike protein fragments, autoimmunity, unusual tumors in babies. These are the things that come forward. Now, John Cantazaro, tweeted this out, it's on his website, Neo7 Bioscience, he shows that the genetic profile of expression of genes, of other genes and proteins is dramatically altered in the vaccinated. This is scary. And so the profile is tilted according to Kentozzaro much more towards neoplasm or cancer. So I sent him a sample of a patient of mine who took the vaccine and actually got a cancer. He got a form of a terminal cancer. And sure enough, you know, Kento Zarum showed me a normal profile. Okay, I got that. Then he showed me my patient's profile, which was dramatically abnormal. And I asked I asked him point blank, what does this mean? You know, does this mean Pfizer has installed its code into his genome? And Cantazaro said yes.
SenseReceptor
Posted - July 14, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Saved - July 15, 2025 at 7:16 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview, Edward Dowd criticized Trump for taking credit for the mRNA vaccine while ignoring its associated issues. He argues that the blame for vaccine-related deaths and injuries lies with Trump and the current administration, which has failed to address these concerns. Dowd expresses skepticism about the idea that there is a hidden plan to rectify the situation, suggesting that the administration is avoiding accountability. He emphasizes the importance of data over political narratives and believes there is a deliberate effort to downplay the vaccine's impact.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Ed Dowd Speaks The Truth💥 "Trump is the self-proclaimed daddy of the mRNA vaccine...to this day he talks about the millions of lives saved by [it]...[but] the blame...lays at [his] feet...& there seems to be a concerted effort to sweep this under the rug...Covid & the vaccine" This clip of former BlackRock fund manager and founder of Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) is from an interview segment with Commodity Culture (@jessebday) posted to Rumble on July 4, 2025. --------------Partial transcription of clip----------------- "Trump is the self-proclaimed daddy of the MRNA vaccine. He, still to this day talks about all the millions of lives that were saved by the vaccine and operation warp speed. So that's problem number one. That's the guy at the top. And if you notice what's been talked about in the MAHA, it's everything but the mRNA vaccine. So that seems to be a blind spot in the administration. "You know, one camp says, well, there's a plan, be patient. The other camp says they're never going to touch it. So, you know, I'm of the opinion that for now, that the deaths and injuries since January 20th are now on their watch. They own them. So from an ethical standpoint, they own what's going on by not talking about it and not removing the vaccine. If there's a plan to do that, I'm not privy to it. And maybe they have to tread carefully. I'm told there's politics and we need more data. I believe that's all nonsense. "I'm an analyst. I spoke with many CEOs throughout my career and I own many stocks. And, you know, sometimes when you have access to a CEO, and I did because I had a large, you know, sometimes I was the top shareholder, I would find when they ran into trouble, they would tell me to stick with them, but I just went with the data and the numbers and I would stop talking to them because their job is to convince you to hang tight with them. Whereas my job was to, you know, protect my, clients and not lose money. "So I kind of feel like this is the same situation. I think they want to do the right thing, but they don't have the power. At least the HHS folks and those agencies, I think the blame ultimately lays at Trump's feet and, they own what's going on. So until I see some action, I'm going to call it like I see it. And there seems to be a concerted effort to sweep this under the rug and memory hole, the whole thing. Covid and the vaccine."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump still talks about the millions of lives saved by the mRNA vaccine, but the vaccine is a blind spot in the MAHA. Deaths and injuries since January 20th are now on the current administration's watch. Ethically, they own what's going on by not talking about it and not removing the vaccine. If there's a plan, it may involve collateral damage because they don't believe they can remove it right now. The speaker believes the blame ultimately lies at Trump's feet, and the current administration owns what's going on. There seems to be a considered effort to sweep COVID and the vaccine under the rug. Until action is taken, the speaker will continue to call it as they see it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump is the self proclaimed daddy of the mRNA vaccine. He, still, to this day, talks about all the millions of lives that were saved by the vaccine in operation warp speed. So that's problem number one. That's the guy at the top. And if you notice what's been talked about in the MAHA, it's everything but the mRNA vaccine. So that seems to be a blind spot in the administration. I'm you know, one camp said, well, there's a plan. Be patient. The other camp says they're they're never gonna touch it. So, you know, I'm of the opinion that for now, it that the deaths and injuries since Jan twenty are now on their watch. They they they own them. So from an ethical standpoint, they own what's going on by not talking about it and not removing the vaccine. If there's a plan to do that, I'm not privy to it, and maybe they have to, you know, tread carefully. I'm told there's politics and da da da da. We need more data. I I believe that's all nonsense. But they, ethically, they own the deaths and injuries and disabilities from Jan twenty. So if they do have a plan, I guess that what they're thinking is it's collateral damage because they they're of the opinion they can't remove it right now. And whether that's because of Trump or because of, you know, deep state and the various forces don't know, don't care, but ethically, they own all the desks going forward. That's what my my stance is. I I'm an analyst. I spoke with many CEOs throughout my career, and I own many stocks. And, you know, sometimes when you have access to a CEO, and I did because I had a large you know, sometimes I was the top shareholder. I would find when they ran into trouble, they would tell me to stick with them, but I just went with the data and the numbers, and I would stop talking to them because their their job is to convince you to hang tight with them. Whereas my job was to, you know, protect my my my clients and and not lose money. So I kinda feel like this is the same situation. You know, I think they wanna do the right thing, but they don't have the power, at least the HHS folks and those agencies. I think the blame ultimately lays at Trump's feet, and, you know, they they they own what's going on. So until I see some action, I'm gonna call it like I see it. And there there seems to be a considered effort to sweep this under the rug and memory hole the whole thing, COVID and the vaccine.
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 26, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Saved - July 12, 2025 at 11:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been discussing Flublok, an innovative cell-based influenza vaccine made using insect cells from the fall armyworm. This technology allows for rapid manufacturing without the need for strain adaptation, which can lead to significant differences in vaccine efficacy. However, I noticed that Flublok's promotional materials are questionable, featuring a wolf in sheep's clothing. Additionally, the vaccine was tested against Fluarix rather than a placebo, raising concerns about the robustness of the science behind it.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Bob Malone is now pushing Flublok—a "vaccine" made using cells from the fall armyworm, a moth species 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮 "This is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product." -----------------Partial transcription of clip-------------- "Regarding the Flublok product, this is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product. This is a cell-based influenza vaccine that represents, really a, great example of innovative biotechnology, in my opinion. This, this technology offers key advantages relative to historic influenza vaccine products, in that egg- and other cell-based products require adaptation of influenza strains and their antigens to the cell culture or egg culture environment. "So you end up with a vaccine product that is, in some cases, potentially clinically significantly different from the actual circulating antigen. Whereas with the Flublok technology, with baculovirus technology in general, they're able to go straight from sequence to manufactured protein in a much shorter time frame without the need for adaptation. This is a key advantage."

Video Transcript AI Summary
FluBlock utilizes insect cells for rapid manufacturing, representing innovative biotechnology. Traditional flu vaccines require adapting influenza strains to cell or egg cultures, potentially resulting in a vaccine antigen that differs from the circulating antigen. FluBlock, using baculovirus technology, can proceed directly from sequence to manufactured protein faster, eliminating the need for adaptation. This is a key advantage.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Regarding the FluBlock product, this is truly an innovative technology. It involves the use of insect cells to rapidly manufacture the product. This is a cell based influenza vaccine that represents really a great example of innovative biotechnology in my opinion. This technology offers key advantages relative to historic influenza vaccine products in that egg and other cell based products require adaptation of influenza strains and their antigens to the cell culture or egg culture environment. So you end up with a vaccine product that is in some cases potentially clinically significantly different from the actual circulating antigen. Whereas with the flu block technology, with baculovirus technology in general, they're able to go straight from sequence to manufactured protein in a much shorter time frame without the need for adaptation. This is a key advantage. The other

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Flublok's webpage features a wolf in sheep's clothing—can't make this crap up... And, of course, no "gold-standard" science here. Flublok was tested against Fluarix (a quadrivalent standard-dose vaccine), not any kind of placebo.... https://t.co/g75I0Tf5b0

SenseReceptor
Posted - July 8, 2025 at 10:01 PM
Saved - July 12, 2025 at 11:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Palantir is collaborating with the Netanyahu syndicate and has access to extensive government data, including treasury, IRS, and Social Security information. They are securing significant contracts with agencies like Health and Human Services and ICE, which will enhance their data management capabilities. My hypothesis suggests that recent operations, like the Doge theft, facilitated the transfer of this data, allowing Palantir to privatize and manage it through AI. This effort appears to be aimed at establishing a comprehensive biometric surveillance system of the entire population.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Catherine Austin Fitts: "I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate... [and] they have the treasury data, the IRS data, [and] they have the Social Security data... [and they're] building a complete biometric surveillance [grid] of the entire population." This clip of Fitts, a former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, investment banker, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the), is taken from an interview with Gary Heasley, et al. of The Conservative Voice (@TCVoiceWWDB) posted to X on July 8, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. I don't, you know. But they have contracts with Health and Human Services. They have contracts. The government pays them massive amounts. Massive amounts of money. Massive amounts of money. "And so if you look at the Doge theft, what you've done is you've moved between the government contracts. You know, there's a new sole source ICE contract on the way to Palantir as well. That's just announced. I just found that last night. So you've got, you know, you. Basically, they have the treasury data, they have the IRS data, they have the Social Security data. [And now] they're going to have all the ICE data. "And then, Trump has announced he wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir is going to underwrite all the packages before they come into Freddie and Fannie. So they're going to have all the housing data. And we know HHS has said they're organizing all the health, public and private health data, so I'm assuming that's going in as well. And basically you're talking about that data being managed and, and I think at this point, basically privatized into AI. "So the Doge operation, if I'm right, and this is my hypothesis, if the Doge operation did what I think, they transferred all the data. And, and, and they did it when an XAI announced a partnership with Palantir. And then the government turned around and Palantir had a lot of contracts with those agencies anyway. But, but then they gave them additional contracts, and so they have plenty of money, especially the ICE is going to be sole source, so you can just do pretty much whatever you want. So they have plenty of money to manage that data. And yes, I think they have it on a private basis. "And what's interesting, I have somebody, a professional that I work with who has for, for his business, has to do income verification. And, magically, two weeks after, Doge got the Treasury, Social Security and irs, suddenly the income verification service he uses announces they have 100% of Americans now complete data on everyone. Magically. "[Also,] the ICE story is complicated because there are multiple things going on, but there's no doubt the primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Palantir is allegedly in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. The government pays Palantir massive amounts of money through contracts. A new sole-source ICE contract is on the way to Palantir. Palantir has Treasury, IRS, and Social Security data, and will soon have all ICE data. Trump wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir will underwrite all the packages, giving them all housing data. HHS is organizing all public and private health data, which is assumed to be going to Palantir as well. This data is being managed and privatized into AI. After XAI announced a partnership with Palantir, the government gave Palantir additional contracts. An income verification service suddenly had complete data on 100% of Americans after Doge got Treasury, Social Security, and IRS data. The ICE contract allows tracking immigrants' locations in real-time through Palantir back to ICE. The primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think Palantir is in partnership with the Netanyahu syndicate and the breakaways. I don't you know? But I don't Speaker 1: think with health and human services. They have Speaker 0: contracts The government pays a massive amount Speaker 1: massive amounts of money. Speaker 0: And so if you look at the Doge theft, what you've done is you've moved between the government contracts. You know, there's a new sole source ICE contract on the way to Palantir as well, that's just announced. I just found that last night. So so you've got you know, you basically they have the treasury data. They have the IRS data. They have the social security data. They, now they're gonna have all the ICE data. Speaker 1: They had some already. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. They had some already. And then Trump has announced he wants to privatize Freddie and Fannie, but Palantir's gonna underwrite all the packages before they come into Freddie and Fannie. So they're gonna have all the housing data. And we know HHS has said we're they're organizing all the health, public and private health data, so I'm assuming that's going in as well. And basically, you're talking about that data being managed and and I think at this point basically privatized into AI. Speaker 1: Owned by they're gonna effectively own it. They're gonna have AI running it. And and one of these things Speaker 0: I don't I don't know if they will legally technically because if you look at how it was transferred so the Doge operation, if I'm right, and this is my hypothesis. If the Doge operation did what I think, they transferred all the data, and and and they did it when an XAI announced a partnership with Palantir. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: And then the government turned around and Palantir had a lot of contracts with those agencies anyway, but then they gave some additional contracts. And so they have plenty of money, especially the ICE is gonna be sole source so you can just do pretty much whatever you want. So they have plenty of money to manage that data. And yes, I think they have it on a private basis. And what's interesting, I have somebody, a professional that I work with who, does has for for his business has to do income verification. Mhmm. And, magically, two weeks after, Doge got the Treasury, Social Security, and and, IRS, suddenly the income verification service he uses announces they have a 100% of Americans now complete data on everyone magically. Speaker 1: It's astonishing. And one of the elements of the ICE contract is that they can track immigrants location in real time through Palantir back to ICE. You know, that's the kind of surveillance attract everyone. Exactly. Right. There's no there's absolutely no reason that doesn't apply to the citizens. You Speaker 0: know, the the ICE story is complicated because there are multiple things going on. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: But there's no doubt the primary thing going on is building a complete biometric surveillance of the entire population. Speaker 1: Of the entire population. So you
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Saved - June 29, 2025 at 2:28 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Carolyn Blakeman from the Covid-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project highlights troubling data indicating that hospital COVID protocols disproportionately affected young, strong husbands, the elderly, and those with special needs. She shares a case where a family received monoclonal treatment, except for a 26-year-old man who later died in the hospital. Additionally, whistleblower Zowe Smith reveals how Palantir's "kill chain" programs assigned threat risk scores to patients, influencing decisions about COVID treatments based on compliance and ethnicity, ultimately determining who received care.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Carolyn Blakeman of the Covid-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project: "Our data shows... that [hospital COVID protocols] were killing three demographics... young, strong husbands... the elderly... and [those with] special needs and [the] disabled." This clip of Blakeman, Media Director and Legal Liaison for the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation (@FormerFeds) and the Covid-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project, is from a Flashlights (@CorneliaMrose) podcast posted to Rumble on June 26, 2025. Interestingly, Blakeman notes that ethnicity was also taken into account when deciding who'd be killed by the COVID homicide protocols. "In fact we have a case that it was a family. The mom, the dad, the 26-year-old father, single father, and one other family member. And they all went into the hospital to get monoclonals and they all got covid at the exact same time... they lived next door to each other and they gave the monoclonals to everybody but the 26-year-old man. And the mom was like, 'I want my son,' his name's Jonathan, 'to get the monoclonals too.' And they said, no, 'he's a young, strong white man. He doesn't need it.' Blakeman adds, "[the whole family] got better. [But the 26-year-old white dad] gets sick, has to go in the hospital—the entire hospital is filled with young, strong white men—and he dies." ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Our data shows just from our small sample that they were killing three demographics mainly: the young strong husbands, which leaves, you know, single moms and, you know, some dependent on the government now maybe for assistance. You know, they, it's all about control. So young, strong husbands, the elderly, because they can just say, oh, they were old, they're going to die anyway. Cold would have knocked them out. They can, they can you know, convince people and the special needs and disabled this. "In fact we have a case that it was a family. The mom, the dad, the 26-year-old father, single father, and one other family member. And they all went into the hospital to get monoclonals and they, they all got covid at the exact same time they're on. You know, they lived next door to each other and they gave the monoclonals to Everybody but the 26-year-old man. And the mom was like, I want my son, his name's Jonathan, to get the monoclonals too. And they said, no, 'he's a young, strong white man. He doesn't need it.' "So they all got better. He gets sick, has to go in the hospital. The entire hospital is filled with young, strong white men. And he dies. And— it's, it's, it's, it's almost like it's when I say these things, it's like, people are like, 'that didn't happen.' It's hard to believe, but it did. And we've got. That's not the only case. You know, the only time. Like some of our survivors, they only survived if a loved one was able to get into the hospital or you knew somebody. "Like, we have a case, Jeff [?] case in Colorado, he was on the remdesivir ventilator death track. And because his wife knew somebody at the top of the, you know, CEO of the hospital, his protocol changed like that. He got off of that on the ivermectin, he's out the door."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Data indicates COVID-related deaths disproportionately affected young, strong husbands, the elderly, and the special needs/disabled. One case involved a family contracting COVID simultaneously; while other family members received monoclonal antibodies and recovered, a 26-year-old single father named Jonathan was denied treatment because he was a young, strong white man. He later died in a hospital filled with similar cases. Some COVID survivors only lived because a loved one intervened or knew someone influential. Jeff Nottall in Colorado was on a Remdesivir ventilator death track, but his wife's connection to the hospital CEO led to a protocol change, and he recovered after receiving ivermectin.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our data shows just from our small sample that they were killing three demographics mainly. The young strong husbands, which leaves single moms and some dependent on the government now maybe for assistance. It's all about control. So young, strong husbands, the elderly, because they can just say, Oh, they were old. They're gonna die anyway. Cold would have knocked them out. They can convince people and the special needs and disabled. Yeah I knew about the elderly and the special needs but the young strong husbands. In fact we have a case that it was a family, the mom, the dad, the 26 year old father, single father, and one other family member. And they all went into the hospital to get monoclonals. And they all got COVID at the exact same time. Lived next door to each other and they gave the monoclonals to everybody but the 26 year old man. And the mom was like, I want my son, his name is Jonathan, to get the monoclothes too. And they said, No, he's a young, strong white man. He doesn't need it. He's a white man. Yeah, white, the color of something. So you have to, it's not enough to be young and strong, you also have to be white. So they all got better. He gets sick, has to go in the hospital. The entire hospital is filled with young, strong white men and he dies. Terrible. It's almost like, I say these things, are like, that didn't happen. It's hard to believe that it did. That's not the only case. The only time, like some of our survivors, they only survived if a loved one was able to get into the hospital or you knew somebody. Like we have a case, Jeff Nottall case in Colorado. He was on the Remdesivir ventilator death track. And because his wife knew somebody at the top of the CEO of the hospital, his protocol changed like that. He got off of that on the ivermectin and was out the door.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Recall that we have medical coder/whistleblower Zowe Smith, who's outlined how Palantir's "kill chain" programs were used to target and "execute" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators: https://t.co/1G2YvwLaVt

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

🚨Medical coder/whistleblower: Here's how Palantir's "KILL CHAIN" programs were used to target and "EXECUTE" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators. "They identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on [their 'threat risk score'] and [that's how they] determined [who]...to execute...with their AI kill-chain Gotham program." This clip of author, former medical coder, and whistleblower Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to Rumble on June 17, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So there was a program called HHS Protect during Operation Warp Speed, was part of Operation Warp Speed. That's where I think most of the public-facing infrastructure began. Although I was looking into Operation Stargate, and I'm seeing documentation on CIA databases that say it's more than 10 years in the making. So, definitely it's, it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two, Trump administration. "But, so this HHS Protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC specifically, all partnered with Palantir. And then Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a Threat Risk Score. And then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. "So I want to make this point about AI, because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both 3M and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic there are programs and you can rename them whatever you want, but it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like your program, Epic, might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, it might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. "So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's, it's just a function really. And HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a Threat Risk score. And that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you, that was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the zip code where you were and how compliant areas were. "And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the Unlimited Hangout, she wrote a article covering this program, HHS Protect, and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity and they thought, you know, you're higher risk if you're certain ethnic groups. So of course that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect to execute. "So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius and then it executes the threat or tells, does an AI decision making process and decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures. Which was your vaccine, your remdesivir and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this. And that is how they identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're going to execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program."

Video Transcript AI Summary
HHS Protect, started during Operation Warp Speed, used two Palantir programs. While documentation suggests planning began over a decade prior with Operation Stargate and CAIA databases, HHS Protect involved the AMA, HHS, and CDC partnering with Palantir. Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed that assigned people a threat risk score via a program called Tiberius. AI databases from companies like Palantir, 3M, and Epic share information. Tiberius assessed compliance with lockdown measures, vaccination status, and masking, determining individual and ZIP code-level compliance. According to Whitney Webb, HHS Protect targeted ethnic groups, incorporating ethnicity into the threat risk score. Gotham, Palantir's AI kill chain program, used the threat risk score from Tiberius to decide when and where to deploy countermeasures like vaccines, Remdesivir, and ventilators. HHS Protect monitored this process, identifying hospitals and patients based on algorithms to execute interventions using the Gotham program.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there was a program called HHS Protect as start during operation warp speed, was part of operation warp speed. That's where I think most of the the public facing, infrastructure began. Although I was looking into operation Stargate, and I'm I'm seeing documentation on CAIA databases that say it's more than ten years in the making. So, definitely, it's it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two Trump administration. But so this HHS protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC, specifically, all partnered with Palantir, and then Palantir developed a program for operation warp speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a threat risk score, and then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. So I I wanna make this point about AI because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both three ms and Epic and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic, there are programs, and you can rename them whatever you want. But it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like, your program Epic might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo. It might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's it's just a function, really. And it HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a threat risk score, and that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you? That was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the ZIP code where you were and how compliant areas were. And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the unlimited hangout, she wrote a article covering this program HHS Protect and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity. And they thought, you know, you're a higher risk if you're a certain ethnic group. So, of course, that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir, and that was used within HHS Protect to execute. So the the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius, and then it executes the threat or tells does an AI decision making process and decide decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures, which was your vaccine, your remdesivir, and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this, and that is how they, identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're gonna, execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program.
SenseReceptor
Posted - August 2, 2024 at 6:18 PM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 11:41 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In my first video essay, I present the argument that COVID "vaccines" are actually bioweapons. I invite viewers to listen closely to the narration and share the video if they find it compelling. I outline several key points: the injections increase the likelihood of contracting COVID, have horrific and common side effects, cause unusual clots, exhibit intentional variability between batches, and function as bioweapons at a mechanistic level. I also discuss the motivations behind these actions.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

The COVID 'Vaccines' Are Covert Bioweapons: The Overwhelming Evidence Here's my first video essay, which argues that the COVID "vaccines" are, in fact, bioweapons. Sound on for narration 🔊 If you think this video essay is compelling and/or you think the jabs are bioweapons, please share. Some timestamps if you want to skip around: (5:16) Point One: The Bioweapon Injections *Increase* Your Odds of Getting 'COVID' (7:25) Point Two: The 'Side Effects' of the Bioweapon Injections Are Horrific, Common, and Endless (25:49) Point Three: The Injections Cause So-Called 'White, Fibrous Clots' (31:32) Point Four: There Is *Intentional* Variability Between COVID Injection Batches (35:51) Point Five: The COVID 'Vaccines' Behave as Bioweapons Mechanistically (51:30) The WHO and the Why

Video Transcript AI Summary
COVID injections are alleged bioweapons due to increased COVID rates, long COVID, and all-cause death. A study showed COVID incidence increased with more injections. Another study linked two doses to long COVID. Research found higher all-cause death risk with one or two doses versus none. Pfizer's trial saw more deaths in the injection group than placebo. These injections cause health issues like infections, blood clots, paralysis, and death. VAERS data shows thousands of deaths, miscarriages, heart attacks, and disabilities, likely underreported. A poll indicated many believe vaccines caused unexplained deaths. A study estimated 17 million deaths worldwide by 2022. The injections may cause cancer, with nearly all cancer reports in the CDC's VAERS system linked to COVID vaccines. They also affect reproductive health, causing menstruation problems and collecting in ovaries. Studies show increased inhibin B, inhibiting FSH, crucial for egg maturation. Nurse whistleblowers reported more miscarriages and fetal demises. Embalmers found bizarre clots in bodies. These clots grow as streamers inside blood vessels, causing turbulence and coagulation. Batch variability exists, with some batches more harmful. Data suggests intentional variation in harmfulness. The injections contain polyethylene glycol, causing anaphylactic shock, and mRNA coding for the cytotoxic spike protein. N1-methylpseudouridine may cause cancer and off-target immune responses. The modified mRNA fractures like shrapnel. DNA plasmid adulteration, confirmed by Health Canada, includes an SV40 promoter, intended to cause cancer. A military whistleblower claims the injections are genetically engineered bioweapons. An expert says the injections' harmfulness is deliberate, with ingredients known to cause harm. The US military played a key role, with contracts requiring no adherence to FDA regulations. The DOD and WHO have allegedly set up a "kill box" using informational, psychological, and chemical/biological weapons. Goals include reduced birth rates, mass disabilities, and an attack on bodily autonomy. This is viewed as a crossing of the Rubicon, with the military deploying onto US soil.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there? Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. Speaker 2: On this, you know, you go backwards and forwards and you say, well, is it is it the biggest accidental medical mistake in history, or is it deliberate? It's God's decisions. Speaker 3: The reason now was the best time to make this video is because of this man, doctor Francis Boyle. Doctor Boyle, who was educated at both the University of Chicago and Harvard, drafted The US domestic implementing legislation for the biological weapons convention, known as the biological weapons anti terrorism act of 1989. The biological weapons convention or BWC is a disarmament treaty that effectively bans biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling, and use. Boyle, who is eminent in his field and who drafted this key bioweapons legislation, has now not only said that the COVID injections are, quote, unquote, weapons and that those responsible for their making are murderers, but he has signed an affidavit saying as much under penalty of perjury. Here he is in a June 2024 interview with TNT Radio calling the injections, quote, unquote, Nazi COVID Frankenshots. Speaker 4: Well, what is being done in Florida is trying to ban and get withdrawn these Nazi COVID Frankenshots. There's no other word for them. I am not part of any anti vaccine movement or anything like that, but they don't so they don't dignify the word vaccine. I just call them Frankenshots. If you study it, the technology here, the mRNA technology came out of the Pentagon. They the Pentagon were the people who financed these Nazi COVID Frankenshots, and they were involved in the development of them. So it's certainly my belief and the belief of the people in Florida that they have to be withdrawn from the market, prohibited, and and destroyed. They're they're just too dangerous for people. You can see Pele if you just click on the Internet. All of the adverse reactions among people and deaths that are occurring all the time. In fact, right at the very beginning of the pandemic, based on my experience dealing with biological warfare weapons and their so called vaccines, frankinchots, I said quite clearly that anything that big pharma came up with that said as a that they said would be a vaccine was would be more dangerous than useless. The reason Boyle has signed an affidavit attesting to Speaker 3: the fact that COVID injections are bioweapons is because of this man, doctor Joseph Sanson. Sanson, who refers to himself as a psychotherapist opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism, has filed a writ of mandamus with Florida governor Ron DeSantis, notifying the state leader of Boyle's affidavit, as well as other facts testifying to the injection's deadliness. Here is Sanson in an interview with doctor Anna Maria Mejail Cha describing the importance of Boyle's affidavit. Speaker 5: So doctor Francis Boyle, who's an adviser at National Arm, he was gracious enough to provide an affidavit along with yourself and Karen Kickson, doctor Villa. And his affidavit though, I think, is really significant as well as yours because yours was really good. But his you know, basically, doctor Francis Boyle, for people who don't know, is he he's the guy that drafted the he's the Harvard law professor that drafted the 1989 biological weapons and anti terrorism act. And so he provided an affidavit saying that the COVID nineteen injections and really all M and RA injections all all M and RA nanoparticle injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction and violate 18 USC one seventy five chapter 10 biological weapons along with Florida statute seven ninety point one six six. And I think that's that's really important because that's the guy that wrote the law saying it violates the law. Speaker 3: As for why the COVID injections should be considered bioweapons, there are countless reasons, chief among them being the fact that they make a person more likely to get COVID, literally. In a study performed at the Cleveland Clinic, which was published in the peer reviewed journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases and well powered with over 51,000 participants, authors, including Stephen m Gordon et al, found that the cumulative incidence of COVID increased proportionally to the number of injections people received. In other words, the more injections one took, the more he or she was likely to become infected with COVID. Furthermore, research has found that having two doses of the COVID injection is associated with so called long COVID, meaning one can't even say that while it increases infection rate of the disease, it decreases severity. A peer reviewed study published in the journal PLOS ONE authored by Sonu Hangma Subha et al found that having two doses of a COVID injection was a, quote, unquote, statistically significant predictor of suffering from long COVID. Not only do the injections increase the rate of COVID as well as precipitate so called long COVID, but the shots are also correlated with higher risk for all cause death. A study published in the peer reviewed journal, Microorganisms, authored by Alberto Donzelli et al, found all cause death risk to be even higher for those vaccinated with one in two doses compared to the unvaccinated, and that the booster doses were ineffective. The authors also found a slight but statistically significant loss of life expectancy for those vaccinated with two, three, or four doses. One can even look back at the so called clinical trials and see that neither Pfizer nor Moderna's COVID injection saved a single life. In fact, Pfizer's injection was associated with more deaths than the placebo was. The second reason the COVID injections are clearly bioweapons is the fact they cause catastrophic health effects, including everything from infections to blood clots to inflammation to paralysis and of course lots of death. In fact, as of 06/28/2024, nearly nineteen thousand deaths associated with the COVID injections had been reported to the CDC's own vaccine adverse event reporting system. Along with the deaths, more than two thousand miscarriages, nine thousand heart attacks, five thousand cases of myopericarditis, eight thousand cases of shingles and three thousand cases of thrombocytopenia have also been reported. Fifteen thousand of the reports have been classified as life threatening and more than eighteen thousand are associated with permanent disability. Note these figures are only for The US and its territories and that a study published in 2011 conducted by researchers at Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare found that less than one percent of vaccine adverse events are reported to the CDC's vaccine adverse event reporting system, meaning these report figures are almost certainly a drastic undercounting of the true numbers of adverse events. Bolstering the fact the COVID bioweapon injections have caused an enormous amount of death is a Rasmussen poll reported in January of twenty twenty four, which found that, quote unquote, a majority of Americans believe COVID nineteen vaccines may be to blame for many unexplained deaths. The poll also found that nearly one in four respondents said that someone they know could be among the victims. One peer reviewed study published by Correlation Research in the Public Interest and authored by Denis Rancour et al, estimates that on a worldwide scale, the COVID injections were associated with nearly seventeen million deaths by December of twenty twenty two alone. While these are only staggering figures, however, hearing anecdotal stories of the tragic harms caused by the COVID injections makes clear the devastating impact the bioweapons have on victims' lives as well as the impact they have on victims' families and those in the medical field who still have a conscience. In this first video, we hear from whistleblower and former medical coder Zoe Smith, who describes for children's health defense the carnage she witnessed following the rollout of the bioweapon injections. Speaker 0: What about vaccine injury? The ones that actually took the shots. What did you see there? Speaker 1: Massive. I didn't know it was possible for a human to die so horrifically and so quickly before they rolled out the mRNA injections. It was insane. I've never seen anything like that. Patient the worst of them were the ones they called it sepsis, but it was, like instant multi organ failure. Like, within hours, patients would die of liver, lung, kidney, all at once failure, respiratory failure. It was like their some of the records, the emergency crew that found them, it's like their body tried to reject everything. And and some of these cases, like, their family would be there thirty minutes before, and then within an hour, they're dead. And then there were patients coming in with seizures like I've never seen before. We couldn't control some of them. Days patients would be seizing and no medications would stop it and eventually they kind of had to be put down. Speaker 6: I am in the hospital right now with heart complications from the COVID nineteen vaccine, and I want to inform as many people as I can about the risks from taking the vaccine that I wish someone would have told me. So I am a division one student athlete with no prior health issues, and I got the second COVID shot Tuesday. And within four days, I have been diagnosed with myocarditis and was told that I probably won't be able to play my senior season now. It is a side effect from the COVID vaccine, and it's really not being reported or addressed. And it is a serious issue that we should all be informed about before making this decision. Speaker 7: I was paralyzed by the COVID nineteen shot. You will not hear my story on mainstream media. If you do not believe this story or would like medical proof, you can go to my website at www.0pkayla.ca. That's www.0pkayla.ca. The Canadian government has left me fending for myself without the necessary treatments. Instead, they offered me MAID, which is medical assistance in dying. That's what they offered me after this was medically proven to be caused by my COVID nineteen shot. That is not treatment. That is suicide or euthanasia. I would treat any human being better than that that I even disliked. I don't just have to live without my legs anymore. I have to live with massive pain, a lesion in my spine, no bowel or bladder movements, somebody coming to get me dressed every day, to having to be alone in bed when my fire alarm goes off, unable to move. This is not okay, and I need help. Speaker 8: She explained, we spent taking time taking some clots out of your leg, your legs, and I said, legs? So I'm still kinda groggy. And when I asked how many clots, she said, oh, multiple. I asked for a definitive number. I was told, stop counting after four hours. Seems that there was not four, five, six clots forming as they were taking one out. The only thing that that managed to stop it was they put me on steroids, and that stopped the clots at source to allow them to to clear my system. She said she was happy with my right leg and my my my abdomen, but the concern from my my left leg, my lower left leg at that point. And that concern went fifteen minutes later to there will be an amputation. Speaker 9: So I just wanted to share a bit Speaker 10: of my Speaker 9: story. I'm 46. I had no prior health issues. I got my first vaccine, which was AstraZeneca. My husband and I got it at the same time. We got it in April, April 12. By July 1, I was in hospital with full blown Bell's palsy caused by the vaccine, swelling in my brain from Pfizer. Immediately, my husband and I got sick after our second vaccine, and then five days later, my husband got better, and I didn't get better, and I slowly got worse. I ended up with tonsil stones on the right side. My doctor prescribed some antibiotics. Three days later, I had the palsy and I was in the hospital. Speaker 11: At the point that I got the MRI, we were a month out from the second shot. That MRI is what showed that my body attacked my spinal cord. I then agreed to go to the emergency room. The physician in the emergency room, came and sat down with us, and, he just said he was sorry. And was I don't know what he was sorry for, and he went on to explain to us that his sister had actually helped to develop mRNA technology years prior to this. And he said that he was sorry because it was never meant to be made into what they made it into and that he was sorry that he had to share with us that the shot caused my body to turn on itself and that I was disabled with transverse myelitis. Speaker 12: We had to innovate it. Well, they did a massive Pfizer push in North Dakota. I was working in native Reservation, and they did it all at the same time so it was easy to see because they did it all at the same time. And we had to innovate our nurse manager, multiple blood clots in their lungs. We had so many miscarriages that I was calling people to come down and clean the chairs because they were having spontaneous abortion because there was too much blood. One of the nurses I was working with lost her husband to a heart attack a day after his shot. That guy's brother died a week after of a heart attack. So we were seeing a lot of death, so much death that the ER doctor that I was working with, she's since retired and told me she was retiring after this because she pulled me to the side and said we are, quote unquote, experiencing genocide. So to be pulled away in by my ER doctor and be told something that I was already thinking was possibly occurring was just confirmation that we were in a world of hurt. Speaker 3: For those willing and aware enough to search the Internet, it is littered with headlines of formerly healthy people, either maimed or killed by the COVID injections. Likewise, the peer reviewed literature reveals an endless array of horrible diseases associated with the injections. The diseases often present as completely different in nature and can seemingly occur in any system in the body. And these injuries and deaths don't even touch on cancers, which according to a growing body of evidence are likely skyrocketing because of the injections. Here is senior research scientist at MIT, doctor Stephanie Senef, describing how the COVID injections are responsible for nearly one hundred percent of the cancer reports in the CDC's own vaccine adverse event reporting system. Speaker 13: Database for looking at what's going on with the different vaccines. And so, in this same paper, food and chemical toxicology, we have a lot of, data on various, numbers on the counts of, of occurrences of different things with the COVID vaccines compared to all the other vaccines that were delivered in 2021. And the numbers are just astonishing because these are different words that are related to cancer, cancer lymphoma, leukemia, met metastasis, carcinoma, neoplasm. So we could look at the counts in the various database for that year, which was when the vaccine was introduced for for all the COVID vaccines and then for all vaccines altogether. And you can see that almost all of the cases, you know, ninety eight percent of the mentions of cancer were COVID vaccines. It's hugely highly more highly represented than the number of COVID vaccines that, were received in that year. So it's way out of line with the other vaccines. And this is something that I found on the web. There's another analysis of, again, the same database. They compared the COVID vaccine to the flu vaccine. So this is the COVID vaccine. This is the flu vaccine. The counts for these two different vaccines normalized by the total number of vaccines administered and for neoplasm, breast cancer, lymphoma, lung cancer, prostate cancer, brain neoplasms, all these different conditions, Speaker 10: you Speaker 13: can see the numbers here for COVID, there's practically none for the flu vaccine. So in many cases, the ratio is infinity. So this is just very striking to me that cancer is something that these vaccines cause that other vaccines don't cause. Speaker 3: An additional horrendous effect the COVID injections have is on reproductive health. In fact, the bioweapons have been linked to numerous menstruation problems amongst large numbers of women and the so called lipid nanoparticles used in the shots has also been found to collect in the ovaries. A fact which had been documented in the peer reviewed literature dating back to May of twenty twelve at the latest. Perhaps even more astounding, one peer reviewed study published in NPJ vaccines found that Pfizer's COVID jab increases inhibin b by 200%. Here is Daily Clout CEO Naomi Wolf and investigative reporter Sonia Elijah discussing the findings of the study. In their conversation, it's noted that inhibin B inhibits secretion of FSH, which plays a crucial role in stimulating the growth and maturation of ovarian follicles found in the ovaries, which contain the eggs in women. Speaker 14: This is in vitro. They these granulosa these human granulosa cells extracted. They were they looked at this in vitro. They exposed it to the Pfizer vaccine, and what they found was that it it showed an altered the mRNA transcripts, and this and this is what it altered. So you have a granulosa cells produce hormones. So you they produce inhibin b, which is one of the home hormones they looked at and AMH. So what they found was inhibin b was significantly upregulated. So it was increased. So it produced more of that. I think more than 200 it went went up. And the significance of inhibin b, NAMI, is that it inhibits, that's where it gets its name from, the secretion of FSH which is follicle stimulating hormone which plays a crucial role in stimulating the growth and maturation of ovarian follicles found in the ovaries which contain the eggs in women. So it inhibits FSH. Isn't that so shocking? Speaker 15: Oh my goodness. It's so shocking that I'm literally I cannot stop tearing up. I know, you know, I remember FSH from eighth grade biology, and without FSH, you don't get an an egg released into the fallopian tubes, which can then become a baby. It it's literally stopping the possibility of you're getting pregnant at the source of how the process of possibly getting pregnant begins. Please go on. Speaker 14: Yes. Yes. It is it is very sad. Speaker 3: Nurse whistleblowers have also brought forth evidence of increases in both miscarriages and fetal demises following the rollout of the COVID injections. Here is postpartum nurse and whistleblower, Michelle Gershman, in an interview with We The Patriots USA, describing her experience with the increase in fetal demises following the rollout of the shots. Speaker 16: I knew from the beginning when I started hearing about the shots coming out that it's not a good idea. It's gonna cause a lot of health issues for these moms. And I just stayed very observant. And then March of twenty twenty one, around that time, we started having an increase in fetal demises. And a fetal demise is where a baby passes away inside the mother, and they were basically full term. And it was it looked like a pattern was happening. These mothers would go to their doctor office while full term. They'd receive a COVID vaccine, and then within, like, one week, they're delivering a dead baby. And so before March of twenty twenty one, we would have maybe one or two fetal demises every couple of months. And then after March of twenty twenty one, pretty much we started having one or two per week. And so it was devastating. Speaker 3: Perhaps most disturbingly, the COVID injections apparently caused the formation of what are being referred to as white fibrous clots inside the lumens of blood vessels. The clots, which are really more like rubbery plugs, are thought to consist of unexpectedly large amounts of fibrinogen and phosphorus as well as a handful of metallic elements including tin, nickel, copper, and lead. Here is a brief video of some of the clots pulled from a dead body. This video, which comes from trade embalmer Richard Hirschman, is just one of countless glimpses of the bizarre rubbery clots, which embalmers from multiple countries are now finding in bodies. In this video, doctor Anamaria May Hail Cha, an internist with a PhD in pathology as well as a member of the La Quinta Columni research group, show thermal imaging of clotting in veins and arteries post COVID injection. Mihailcha notes that the clots, while massive, do not necessarily present health issues as they are forming. In fact, people can walk around with these clots in their bodies completely unaware that there is anything wrong. Discussing how the bizarre clots form, here are doctors Shankara Chetty, Philip Triantos and doctor Philip McMillan. Chetty notes that the clots grow as, quote unquote, streamers inside the lumens or inner openings of blood vessels. They remain anchored to the inner linings of vessels until reaching one or another length. They break off and cause either serious injury or death. Speaker 17: When I look at, what we're seeing with the clots, sir, we're seeing a mixture of the fibrinous and the traditional clot. Alright? But when you look at the fibrinous, clot, it it it it tends to be one long strand, and you got clots attached to it, natural clots attached to it. So you got two processes, Philip. You got the fibrinous structures that are forming, and you got those fibrinous structures causing turbulence in blood flow, which actually causes normal clotting around it. So what I think is happening if I had to put it into a framework, a little bit of understanding, I think that imagine a streamer in the lumen of the vessel, and it's not occluding blood flow, but it's it's stuck to the vessel wall, and that stream is growing. So what happens is you've got some process that's on a on a needus on the vessel wall triggering a process, a catalytic process that's gonna cause this fibrinous clot to constantly elongate. As that fibrinous clot elongates, it doesn't occlude the lumen. It's flapping around like a streamer in the lumen wall, and the blood is flowing past it. So you don't see it. It's there, and it keeps growing. But it keeps causing, more and more normal coagulation around it. And the longer it grows, the longer the clots. But it hasn't occluded the vessel. And because it needs this turbulence to have coagulation around it, it will occur in slow flowing areas of the body and in vessels with bigger lumen with more stasis of blood. So in the in the in the venous system, in the bigger vessels. So as this fibrinous clot grows through a polymerization process where it keeps getting proteins from from your system, sticking onto it and growing it. It also acts as a foreign body in the vessel creating turbulence. And it's that turbulence that causes the blood to start to clot around it until eventually the pressure cannot push through, and it eventually just blocks up. So depending on when it blocks up, you can get a short strand of it or you can get a very long like, they're pulling out two feet clots from patients, you know, leg veins and things like that. So it couldn't have occluded it to short piece. It had to be a two foot clot that was still allowing blood flow through for it not to have been detected at two feet. Speaker 18: Right. Exactly. And and the polymerization is the key. You know? And and, you know, the the the contents that are in these clots are not not normal blood products, as you know. Speaker 17: And when you look at the when you look at the polymerization process, when they looked at the the content of the fibrinous clot, they found a lot of things that weren't normal constituents of blood. You didn't find the high levels of ferritin and things. But one thing that they found that was strange was they found a high content of tin. They found a spike in tin. Now if you look at tin, tin is used as a catalyst in the making of PVC pipes. And so all our water supply is PVC pipes, and so a lot of people have tin in their system. So tin being a catalyst and, of course, in the lipid nanoparticles, you've got phosphates and sulfates, which actually act as polymers as well, catalyst to a polymerization process. So all you need is one trigger event on a vessel wall, and all the fiber all the proteins in blood act as monomers. And this is a magnet for them, and they keep sticking on. And the end of them is always sticky, and it sticks another one on. It's like putting a drop of catalyst into fiberglass. That one drop just spreads and hardens the entirety. So you've got this one fibrinous structure growing inside the vessel through a polymerization process. And when you look at it, the polymerization process creating the cross linking will give it its structure and elasticity and its tenaciousness because it's not just stuck on, it's cross linked on like polymerization does. So if you look at the fiber in a structure, you'd you'd say it's almost like polyurethane forming in the center of the vessel. But because it's flapping around as blood flows past, it's creating a needless for normal coagulation to take place around it until it eventually just blocks up. Speaker 3: Not only do the COVID injections cause catastrophic health effects, but there is also a pattern of batch dependent variability, meaning some batches of the injections are more harmful than others by wide margins. A research letter published in the European Journal of Clinical Investigation authored by Max Schmeling et al describes an analysis of data from the Danish medical agency related to adverse events and their corresponding vaccine batch labels. The authors note in their letter that three predominant trend lines of harmfulness were discerned amongst the batches with noticeably lower serious adverse event rates in larger vaccine batches and additional batch dependent heterogeneity in the distribution of serious adverse event seriousness between the batches representing the three distinct trend lines that were discovered. In other words, the COVID injections not only vary widely in how harmful they are per batch, but there is seemingly a conscious effort to make them a varying harmfulness. After all, if there were no intention behind the variability, SAE rates would be completely random between batches. They would not lump into distinctive categories. Furthermore, retired pharmaceutical industry r and d executive Sasha Latipova, showed in one analysis, which was presented to the corona investigative committee in 2022, how there was a, quote, unquote, definite statistical relationship for both Pfizer and Moderna in regard to number of injection related death reports for a batch and that batch's specific alphanumeric code. We know which letters and numbers stand for what level of toxicity, Latipova tells the investigative committee. Speaker 19: Then people often tell told us, well, you guys are conspiracies, and that's all just because of the sizes of the lots are different. And, actually, they are not that different. We later received, just recently, there was a FOIA data request information came out, and they provided all the shipments of Pfizer Pfizer product in The US by lot number and with number of doses. So when I plotted them by date of manufacture here on the x axis and this is we're looking just at this here. It was it's easier to see. So when adjusting for the lot size, here, I adjusted by thousand doses. We see this very strange picture. There is a huge variability. So these are up to 12 times different from from these. And also look at the dispersion, especially at the beginning of the year. And then it's it's this variability declined and toxicity declined, but it's still unacceptable in this. The variability is still unacceptable in this part of the graph. It's just that it gets dwarfed by this part of the graph. So all of this is just it should not be there. The expected relationship should be, like, flat line zero and as close to zero as possible. But here, we have a definite statistical relationship both between for Pfizer, it's both between the date of manufacture. So think about it. You should not have any difference in toxicity of a product depending on the date it was manufactured. And, also, the same relationship exists between even the alphanumeric codes for Pfizer and Moderna. They also cluster I'm not showing it here, but they also cluster in around different alphanumeric codes. We we know which letters and numbers stand for what level of toxicity today, and we can tell it to people. And in fact, we have been and on on our website. So that's that's the situation that absolutely is alarming and absolutely obvious, has been obvious from the start, and no health authority ever noticed it. You know? So so that's extremely concerning, and, again, that points to intentional act. Speaker 3: Not only do the COVID shots increase the prevalence and severity of COVID, cause catastrophic health effects, and demonstrate intentional batch variability, but mechanistically speaking, they are clearly designed to harm any living organism into which they are injected. The polyethylene glycol in the so called lipid nanoparticles in the injections, for example, is known to cause anaphylactic shock. Evidence linking the synthetic polymer to the potentially fatal reaction has been presented in multiple peer reviewed journals, and the negative effect had been recorded in the literature years prior to 2020. The National Institutes of Health website even notes that prolonged polyethylene glycol use among seniors can lead to seizures, tremors, obsessive compulsive behaviors including repetitive chewing and sucking, paranoia and mood swings, tics, headaches, sedation, aggression, anxiety, lethargy, and rages. The modified mRNA that's inside of the lipid nanoparticles also codes for the so called SARS CoV two spike protein, which is known to be, quote, unquote, cytotoxic or toxic to living cells. In fact, there is overwhelming evidence in the scientific literature pointing to the SARS CoV two spike protein as being harmful to biological systems and even appears to be particularly damaging to heart tissue. And yet this is precisely the protein that nearly every single COVID injection manufacturer chose to use for its shots. The injections also incorporate n one methylpseudouridine as a replacement for uridine. The replacement of the naturally occurring nucleoside for the hyper modified version could potentially cause cancer. Furthermore, the n one methylpseudouridine has been linked to ribosomal frame shifting, which can cause the production of aberrant proteins aside from the already dangerous spike protein. These unintended proteins themselves can then cause quote unquote off target immune system responses, which can be harmful in their own right. Here is Sasha Lathipova once more. In this clip from an interview with Matthew Crawford, Lathipova highlights the fact that the modified mRNA in the COVID injections behaves like, quote, unquote, shrapnel as it fractures inside of the body. Perhaps most astounding, Lathipova notes that the US military as well as the National Institutes of Health knew that this could happen with mRNA injected into the body and therefore described quote unquote RNA delivery as a quote unquote biological threat. Speaker 19: So what I suspect happened, they figured out that it's useless as a medicine but wonderful as a weapon, which is you know, usually happens. You know, poison, you sometimes can make it into medicine. But if it's a really good poison, it's good as poison. So they figured this is great as poison. It has a lot of properties such as it has delayed effects, and so that that makes it even better as a weapon. And, you know, so we're going to weaponize it. In fact, it has been since 1997, this particular gene therapy as a weapon has been a class of biological weapons, specifically discussed in many, many US army, navy, intelligence reports. They're all available online. And, there's even a, a textbook published by NIH in 2018 that has a whole chapter on these things as a bioweapon and explains exactly how they work as a bioweapon. And, you know, basically, fractures unpredictably just like a you know? So I call them shrapnel because just like shrapnel, it's unpredictable in the way the way it flies and breaks. And as a like, you can break, for example, a pane of glass, and you don't know how it's going to break. There is gonna be some big pieces, and somebody may be killed immediately in its vicinity. And there may be some small pieces, and, you know, they may scratch somebody or not even hurt them, but you cannot you cannot predict it. So that makes it a great weapon. Speaker 3: Not only do the injections use toxic lipid nanoparticles, contain mRNA that fractures like shrapnel, and ultimately have the body produce overwhelmingly harmful spike proteins, but there is also DNA plasmid adulteration. The adulteration, which many people refer to as only quote unquote contamination, even though it's obviously been done intentionally, has been confirmed in both Pfizer and Moderna's COVID injections. Health Canada, the department of the government of Canada responsible for national health policy, has even confirmed the presence of DNA contamination in the shots. In one analysis performed by R and D lead of the Human Genome Project, developer of next generation DNA sequencing technology, and founder of medicinal genomics, Kevin McKernan, the DNA contamination was found to be up to 1,000 times higher than is deemed acceptable by regulatory bodies. In this next clip we have toxicologist and molecular biologist John C. Lindsay describing for Tom Dines how the DNA plasmids are quote unquote intended to cause cancer, which she can say definitively due to their inclusion of the simian virus 40 promoter, which is both oncogenic as well as a nuclear targeting sequence. Furthermore, Lindsay says that there's quote unquote clear evidence now that they are intending to harm people, and not only by their actions and what's in these shots, but by their lack of action. She adds that there is, quote, unquote, intent to harm with the COVID injections and that they are being used for, quote, unquote, demo side, I e, the intentional killing of unarmed persons by government agents. Speaker 20: God. And moreover, they're not just not following the science. They're intentionally trying to harm people. So that's that's where we are at this point. And we talked about this earlier before we started reporting, but there's clear evidence now that they are intending to harm people and not only by their actions and what's in these shots, but by their lack of action to do what they had done in the past with respect to pulling products that and they still do it concurrently. Right? The FDA is pulling products left and right that that cause any little hiccup along the way, but we're at over thirty eight thousand deaths and, you know, no big deal for for something that has an infection fatality ratio that's lower than the flu. Speaker 17: Nice. Speaker 20: So and I say intentionally trying to harm because at least in the Pfizer vaccine, the plasmid design, the plasmid DNA plasmids that are adulterating these shots, I'm not even gonna say contaminating because they're present, in some of the vials at 35% of the vial. That is not a contamination. That's an intentional addition, so I would call that an adulteration. And, frankly, they are intended to cause insertional mutagenesis, and they are intended to cause cancer as far as I can tell because they have human compatible sequences. Now the story was that these were these plasmas were present as, leftovers from trying to make copies inside of E. Coli so that they could make enough of the shot for all these millions of people that needed it. And if that were the case, they would only have bacterial compatible elements in them if they were truly only meant to be a copying machine into inside E. Coli. However, that's not the case. They they put a human promoter, a human origin, a human nuclear targeting sequence to take this DNA to the nucleus of your cells on purpose, and then they put these sequences from a known oncovirus, s v forty. Now why in the world would that be the case if they were not trying to purposefully cause insertional mutagenesis? Lately, it's been shown that that these were replicating, at least in vitro, inside ovarian carcinoma cells. They're also integrating, at least our preliminary evidences that they're integrating into the DNA. So, you know, this is intent to harm. And the FDA and the CDC and the TGA and the EMA and all these other health organizations across the world are responding to our concerns and concerns of other scientists and other countries exactly the same way. It's like they're reading from the same playbook in lockstep, for this. So I believe this is a deliberate, global campaign to to harm and probably towards depopulation. Speaker 17: Like he's called out domicile. Speaker 20: Absolutely. It's domicile. And people need to understand that it's domicile so that they can act appropriately. Speaker 3: There is even a named military whistleblower with background in biological weapons who has come forward, claiming the injections as bioweapons. Here, the whistleblower, Michael Gary, describes for children's health defense how people's cells are, quote, unquote, actually producing the gain of function thing when they receive an injection. He adds that the injections are a form of genetically engineered biological weapon. Speaker 21: Watching this very closely and knew these things. So when I started to see more signals actually on the ground level, for example, pilots starting to come down with arrhythmias and heart problems in the main army guard, I knew that this thing was doing something wrong to our people. And that's when I discovered that the thing that I believe came from Wuhan, the gain of function, which is genetically engineering biological weapons, which is my profession, biological weapons. And when I realized that the the gene therapies, the shot produced the spike protein, the gain of function thing in people, which was my awareness was February of twenty twenty one when I realized that's what people's cells were producing. They I knew this was a bioweapon. People's cells are actually producing the gain of function thing, and this is a very serious thing. And I tried several times to bring the awareness of the actual law in the program, the VAERS, forward with all the adverse events it was inflicting on people and actually pointing it out a little bit. You know, so and so just got sick from the shot. So so and so got a heart thing. I did that a little bit until I could see that my job was at risk, and then I quieted my mouth, and I just simply hung theirs, the latest theirs compilation on my wall. So I did it as a passive thing. And then eventually right before or right around the mandate in the military, I I kinda had enough and I printed off the VAERS numbers in in a report. It it was in this inside this vaccine death report. So the current VAERS numbers were there, and this was September of twenty twenty one. I printed them off, and I handed them to my commander, and I said, we need to do something about this. And and, of course, at that point, they decided to come after me a month less than a month later, about twenty days later, they came after me with the military's fifteen six investigation, which it was already a foregone conclusion that they knew they were gonna get rid of me. Speaker 3: In this last clip we have Doctor. Michael Yee Dawn, an expert in the area of allergies and respiratory therapeutics who spent more than twenty three years in the pharmaceutical industry, including years as a vice president at Pfizer, describing for Jeff Buys Cars how the COVID injection's harmfulness has, quote, unquote, got to be deliberate. Yi Dawn notes this must be the case because the developers of the injections would have known how harmful the bioweapon's ingredients are when they were constructing the drug formulations. Speaker 2: On this, you know, you go backwards and forwards and you say, well, is it is it the biggest accidental medical mistake in history? Yeah. Or is it deliberate? Speaker 22: It's got to be deliberate. Well. As you can you Speaker 2: can you describe it? The Yeah. When we sat and had coffee then Speaker 22: Yeah. Speaker 2: The way you described it, and you said, let's say you take the ingredients of the thing. Speaker 22: Yeah. Oh, yeah. That's see, that's the reason I'm so adamant that it's it's intentional. The harm the harm was known beforehand and designed in. So it's a simple recipe. With the exception of natural products, something like elderflower wine or something that you're brewing up from a living thing like plants, Every synthetic drug contains molecules, atoms, structures, formulations because someone shows them to be in the in the bottle or the tablet of the ointment. Yep. Every single thing is there because someone's decided to put it in there, and they put it in there to serve a function. Because the people something happens. They put Speaker 2: that thing in Yeah. Because they know that the thing they're putting in does something. Yeah. So it's all being put there Yeah. Deliberately. Speaker 22: It's purposeful is what I'm saying. Speaker 2: It's purposeful. So because you're not gonna put something in. Speaker 22: Doesn't do anything. Speaker 2: Filler, is there? There's no filler. Speaker 22: Well, that might be, but then then it's forming that function. It's bulking something up so you can see it. So you just accurately dispense it. Right? So everything has a function. It might be a stabilizing agent. It could be a filler so that the the active ingredient that's tiny Yeah. Can then be mixed, then you can dispense it Speaker 2: Yeah. Speaker 22: Accurately. Yeah. Or it could be to assist its distribution around the body. It's absorption from the injection site, whatever it is. Everything is in there for a purpose. And when I, as a trained toxicologist and someone with over thirty years research experience using the the method, what's called rational drug design or structure based drug design, That means, like I said, everything that's in there is in there for a purpose. So it's when I look at the design, it's like I'm virtually looking out of the shoulder of the designer thinking, what was in your mind? What did you intend from these structures and these these characteristics? And I came to the conclusion that there are multiple, independent, and for people like me, ways to harm people, at least three separate obvious ways of doing it. And I've detailed those in numerous interviews and in writing. Speaker 3: While the question of who exactly is behind this launch of covert bioweapons on the world is difficult to answer, the role the US military has played has been of paramount importance. Indeed, pharmaceutical companies such as Pfizer and Moderna signed contracts with the Department of Defense specifically. In Pfizer's contract with the DOD, the latter entity requested a quote unquote large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration. Critically, a demonstration that required no good clinical practices nor any adherence to FDA regulations, meaning regulatory oversight of the so called clinical trial was completely toothless. Then there is this man, army general Gus Perner. Perner, a now retired United States army four star general, was the literal chief executive officer of operation Warp Speed, the public private partnership initiated by the United States government to facilitate and accelerate the development, manufacturing and distribution of COVID nineteen vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics. In the following video, Perna describes how the military was in charge of both the development and delivery of the COVID injections. He notes the military was involved with both the clinical trials as well as scaling up the injection manufacturers' production capacity and even producing the vials themselves. Speaker 23: Operation Warp Speed is a fast paced effort to bring COVID nineteen vaccines and therapeutics to the American people. I am General Gus Perna, and here are five things to know about Operation Warp Speed. First, Operation Warp Speed is a partnership between the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Defense and other federal organizations to develop, manufacture, and deliver vaccines and therapeutics to the American people in order to move past this pandemic. Second, science is driving all of our decisions. We are not cutting any corners with respect to safety and efficacy. We need to do this the right way. We are working with six drug manufacturers who are putting their vaccine candidates through the same rigorous clinical trials that we do Third, we have worked with the manufacturers to help them scale up operations in order to produce vaccines and therapeutics. We have purchased and secured supplies needed to deliver and administer the drug. Everything from the vials that hold the vaccine to the syringes and needles that will be used to put shots into arms. Fourth, the military is bringing planning and logistics expertise to this operation, working across the supply chains from manufacturing to delivery to coordinate vaccines and their movement across the country to all states, territories, and federal agencies. But commercial industry, not the military, will physically ship and distribute the vaccines to your local areas. And fifth, operation Warp Speed will be successful because of this whole of America approach, drawing from the best of industry, academia, science, and defense in order to fight this pandemic. We have been transparent and open about our process, and now it's up to you, America. When the vaccine is ready and available, I hope you answer the call. In order to learn more about Operation Warp Speed, check out the HHS and DOD websites. Speaker 13: Produced by the US Department of Health and Human Services at taxpayer expense. Speaker 3: If it's the US military's finger on the proverbial trigger, however, the entity undoubtedly has a gang of peers, including the World Health Organization or WHO. In the following clip, writer and paralegal Catherine Watt describes how the Department of Defense along with the World Health Organization have set up a, quote, unquote, kill box around the entire world in order to slaughter the human population en masse. Watt notes that the DOD and WHO are executing on their campaign of mass slaughter by using a multipronged attack, including informational weapons, psychological weapons, and chemical and biological weapons, e g, the COVID injections. Speaker 10: And the basic idea is that public health has been militarized, and the military has been sort of turned into a public health front or Potemkin village, such that they are using public health language and public health laws to actually carry out a military campaign. And I would not call them DOD vaccines. I would call them DOD weapons. I call it the kill box because the first first sort of lead that I had was Todd Callender's 01/30/2022 interview on Elizabeth Leveleet's podcast called Truth for Health, and he described it as a kill box. Speaker 24: But what we do know is that they think it was overpopulated, and we do know that they think they have the right to force experimental drugs. If you're in the public health sector, you're under martial law, and you have no rights. Once you're in those doors, once you're in the public health system, you're in the kill box. Speaker 10: And then I looked that up and it turned out it's a military term for establishing a geographic space or three-dimensional area for a military attack by air and by surface to kill the people who are in it and then dismantle the kind of framework and move on to the next campaign. And what the DOD and the World Health Organization intend to do and have gotten quite far in doing, but not completely reach their goals, is to set up the entire world as their geographic terrain, their target population as all the people in the world, the duration of their campaign as permanent, and the weapons that they're using are, number one, informational, that's the propaganda piece and the censorship piece. Number two, psychological, that's the fear and terrorism piece of telling people they need to be afraid all the time and they need to listen to the government. And then the third piece is the chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons, which are called in their campaign pharmaceuticals, vaccines, but are actually toxins and pathogens. Speaker 3: While the DOD and WHO can be fingered as key culprits behind this crime against humanity, And while it's clear that a paramount goal of the perpetrators is mass indiscriminate murder, it's also possible to glean other motives from what we now know approximately three and a half years into the slaughter campaign. Based on all of the evidence that the injections affect not only women's fertility, but also men's fertility, for example, we know that a clear goal is to bring birth rates down. In fact, the WHO has already shown its hand in that regard. In 02/2017, the organization, using funding from Bill Gates, was accused of launching quote unquote birth control vaccines disguised as tetanus vaccines in Kenya. There is even a peer reviewed paper that describes the WHO's launch of the covert birth control injections on Kenya as a quote unquote front for population growth reduction. Then, as is made clear from the millions of adverse reaction reports not just in the CDC's vaccine adverse event system, but also other monitoring systems such as the WHO's own VG access system, another key goal is to inflict a massive number of disabilities on the population. In the following clip from a May 2024 interview with Greg Hunter, former BlackRock fund manager Edward Dowd describes how he and his team of researchers believed at that point in time that the injections had caused disability in four million people in America alone. Speaker 25: Truth be told, something's happened to the the health of The US since the rollout of the vaccine, and it's dire. It's well, you know, we since since 2021, our, the vaccines rollout, we we we have one point one million excessive Americans dying, four million disabled. We we estimate another twenty eight point six million injured that are missing work from time to time due to chronic illness. So it's about thirty three million Americans have been injured, disabled, or die from this vaccine in our in our estimate. Speaker 3: Finally, these bioweapon injections aren't only used to inflict unthinkable amounts of pain, suffering, and death, but they are also a direct attack on the human spirit. By compelling people to inject something into their bodies in order to participate in normal life, authorities are destroying the very idea of bodily autonomy. Furthermore, people are compelled to sacrifice themselves for the good of the masses. The ultimate irony there being that the injections they've taken to protect each other can only do harm. For a historical sense of what the military has done by launching this bioweapons attack on its own people, here is Sasha Latipova one final time in an interview with Johnny Vedmore on TNT radio, noting that we should think of the attack as a proverbial crossing of the Rubicon. That seminal moment in ancient Roman history when Julius Caesar crossed the shallow river in Italy with his troops stood as the point of no return for the general as he aimed to nullify the Roman Republic's political leadership with his army and become a self appointed dictator. Speaker 26: Pretty certain. So I think in 2020, while while this creeping tyranny and control of the military was sort of over over decades, maybe starting in 02/2012, they started building up this capacity. I think in 2020, actually, what happened with this COVID live exercise, as Mike Pompeo called it, they essentially crossed the proverbial Rubicon. You know, if you remember from Roman history, when the Julius Caesar with his troops crossed the Rubicon, that was the point of no return. You were not allowed to deploy military onto Roman Republic. And just as you're not allowed to deploy U. S. Military onto U. S. Soil. And they did. That's what they did in 2020. They deployed the military. There's no return from this. This is treason, punishable by death. They know it. So they made damn sure that they're not going to be prosecuted. So this whole deployment of this fake pandemic fear and then injecting everyone with poison was preplanned for years, executed by the US military. I don't know if they work for themselves or they work for others or it's a matter of, you know, servant now controlling the master. I don't know. They that this needs to be obviously investigated. But in fact, what I have documentation and and a lot of evidence that The US Military deployed themselves onto American soil and worldwide because they control all these bases, and they have, you know, military presence all over the world. They drove this fake pandemic, fake fear, and then the purpose of this of this was to inject everyone with this mRNA poison and to poison and kill and disable as many people as possible.
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 26, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Saved - June 26, 2025 at 11:35 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed alarming statistics revealing that 5.5 million Americans have reported disabilities since 2021, according to a Bureau of Labor Statistics survey. This trend has been consistently rising, with significant increases noted over the past few years. I emphasized that this data reflects a broader health crisis, suggesting a correlation with events in 2021, particularly regarding mandates and vaccines. Despite the gravity of these findings, there appears to be a lack of discussion about the implications, especially from the current administration.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Ed Dowd: "5.5 million [Americans] have been disabled since 2021 according to [the Bureau of Labor Statistics] survey...[and this] seems to be an elephant in the room with [the Trump] administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA; they talk about everything else, but." This clip of former BlackRock fund manager and founder of Phinance Technologies Edward Dowd (@DowdEdward) is taken from an interview with Greg Hunter (@USAWatchdog) posted to Rumble on June 25, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Starting In February of 2021, the Disability Survey took off and it reached a high in September of 2022 of 3 million. Went sideways for a while. Then went to a new high in June. Of 23, added another million. So we were at 4. Then it went sideways again. Then in November of last year, it went to 4.7 million at And then in this last month, May, it went up another 739,000. So we're at five and a half million of disabled people identifying as disabled. "And the thing I want people to understand, this is not tied to Social Security disability. This is just a survey of people indicating answering one of six questions. And so it's a good broad indicator of the health of the populace. And the populace is getting more disabled as time goes on. And the number, the increase has been 16% since 2021. Five and a half million people have been disabled since 2021, according to this survey. And, you know, this is not something that can be hidden. It comes out every month. We don't even have to do any analysis on it. It's just a number produced by the BLS and it's up and to the right. "And if you look, you know, if you're, if you're a chartist or a technical analyst and you're in the financial markets, it looks like a bullish trend that isn't stopping anytime soon. It goes up to a new high, consolidates for a while, then breaks out again. If this was a growth stock, I'd be all over it and I'd be long. "Yeah, so there's a funnel. We've identified injured, disabled, then dead. And the injured go to disabled. Disabled go to dead. And so this is, you know, look, as far as I'm concerned, all of our work on our website, has proven to me without a doubt that Something happened in 2021. Mandates and a vaccine that caused the health of the country to deteriorate, you know, greatly in terms of excess death, disabilities and injuries, which we, you know, you know, which we monitor via absentee rates and work time lost. So people are. People are more sick, they eventually get disabled and they eventually die. "And look, this chef. I have no idea if the vax caused her death. We don't get into— I never talk about individual death because that's, you know, I don't know. I don't have the autopsy report, but what I do know is the metadata. The big data says something drastically changed in 2021. It's a disaster. I believe it's the vaccine. And at, the very least, what I find interesting is there seems to be no curiosity about it, even with the new administration. Unfortunately, there seems to be an elephant in the room with this administration. They don't want to talk about mRNA, they talk about everything else, but."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Since February 2021, a disability survey has shown a significant increase, reaching 5.5 million disabled people as of May. This isn't tied to social security disability but is based on survey responses. The increase since 2021 is 16%. One speaker suggests a funnel: injured to disabled to dead, claiming data proves mandates and a vaccine in 2021 caused a deterioration in health, reflected in excess deaths, disabilities, injuries, absentee rates, and work time lost. While not commenting on individual deaths, the speaker believes something drastically changed in 2021, possibly the vaccine, and finds a lack of curiosity about it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Starting in February of twenty twenty one, the disability survey took off, and it reached a high in September of twenty twenty two of $3,000,000 went sideways for a while, then went to a new high in June of twenty three, added another million, so we were at 4. Then it went sideways again. Then in November of last year, it went to, you know, 4,700,000.0, and then in the last this last month, May, it went up another 739,000. So we're at five point five million of disabled people identifying as disabled. And the thing I want people to understand, this is not tied to social security disability, this is just a survey of people indicating, answering one of six questions, and so it's a good broad indicator of the health of populace, and the populace is getting more disabled as time goes on. And the number that the increase has been sixteen percent since 2021. Five and a half million people have been disabled since 2021 according to this survey. And, you know, this is not something that can be hidden. It comes out every month. We don't even have to do any analysis on it. It's just a number produced by the BLS, and it's up into the right. And if you look, you know, if if you're if you're a chartist or a technical analyst and you're in the financial markets, it looks like a bullish trend that isn't stopping anytime soon. It it goes up to a new high, consolidates for a while, then breaks out again. If this was a growth stock, I'd be all over it, and then I'd be long disability. Speaker 1: Oh, man. I don't want you to say this again because you say this and it's just like Helen Keller with water. He says, you know, you have, you know, people who are disabled, who are working, who are vax injured, and then you have the, you know, five. Five now million you know, that are say they're disabled and then that goes right into the death thing. You just had the food that this food person, this food chef, 55 years old, big vax proponent and she killed over dead. Don't know why. She just died. Just normal 55 years old. That's not that's not very old. I mean, when his life expectancy around 78 or eighties, I'm like that 55, you just kill over dead. I mean, that, you, tell me about the funnel. Speaker 0: Yeah. So, there's a funnel. We've identified injured, disabled, and dead, and the injured go to disabled, the disabled go to dead. And so this is, you know, look, as far as I'm concerned, all of our work on our website has proven to me without a doubt that something happened in 2021 mandates in a vaccine that caused the health of the country to deteriorate, you know, greatly in terms of excess death, disabilities, and injuries, which we, you know, kept, you know, which we monitor via, absentee rates and work time lost. So people are people are more sick, they eventually get disabled, they eventually die. And look, this chef, I have no idea if the vax caused her death. We don't get into I never talk about individual deaths because that's, you know, I don't know. I don't have the autopsy report. But what I do know is the metadata, the big data says something drastically changed in 2021. It's a disaster. I believe it's the vaccine. And at the very least, what I find interesting is there seems to be no curiosity about it, even with the new administration. Unfortunately, there seems to be an elephant in the room with this administration. They want to talk about mRNA. They talk about everything else.
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 24, 2025 at 12:07 AM
Saved - June 24, 2025 at 5:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview, I discussed the concerning link between messenger RNA vaccines and cancer, citing at least 13 mechanisms that could induce or promote the disease. I've observed a rise in aggressive cancers, particularly in young people, and believe this connection is often overlooked in mainstream discussions. Despite censorship and pushback, I argue that the vaccines are not only ineffective but also potentially dangerous. My experiences with patients reveal a troubling trend that many doctors fail to consider: the vaccine history of their patients. The risk of developing cancer appears to increase with each vaccine dose.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Prof. Angus Dalgleish: "I can tell you... at least 13 mechanisms whereby messenger RNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer... We [are seeing] brand new cancers present at stage four... And the more [mRNA jabs] you have, the greater your risk. It will rise exponentially." This clip of Dalgleish, a professor of oncology at St George’s, University of London, is taken from an interview with Peter Mcilvenna (@HeartsofOakUK) posted to X today, June 23, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip---------------- "I can tell you that I have gone through and read at least 13 mechanisms whereby messenger RNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer. Only one of those 13 reasons is a reason good enough to ban them immediately. But to have 13? "Now, the rise of the turbo cancers, the new cancers we're seeing in young people, you will see every day that when this is out there being discussed, the newspapers will say, 'oh, this is clearly due to diet or other environmental things.' And the thing that really gets me in the newspapers that have comments from the readers online, you know they have these articles and I always read the comments first because the person would never even mention vaccine. It got everything but the vaccine. "And the first comment will be so nothing to do with the fact that this only occurred a couple of months after the vaccines were induced then? Why no comment on this when many. And then sometimes they mention me when I have been screaming about this is the cause of it for ages. Why don't you mention this? And we all know there's been tremendous censorship from the government. "I mean I've been told by editors and producers alike that the government regards it as a crime to say or do or discuss anything that might make people lose confidence in the vaccines. Well, if a vaccine doesn't work and it's dangerous, I think it's a crime to prevent these things being discussed. Particularly when the vaccines don't work at all. There is no benefit from them whatsoever. "All the benefit was in the playstations of the statisticians who said we had to have them to save us. And every single thing modeling that they've done. And I mentioned Neil Ferguson. As far as I can find, it's never been right. It's never been right because the modeling takes no account of real time. I mean if they. With the COVID I mean it was all exaggerated. The number of people who went down with it, were ill with it or died with it. It wasn't anywhere near serious a thing. "And I've written an article today in the Conservative Woman about what I call the vaccine wars. People saying we must have them versus, the head of the NIH Jay Bhattacharya and Robert Kennedy and others saying 'no, we must not be using these, particularly in young people' because they're aware that these things are highly dangerous. And what I was very pleased about, The Mail on Sunday did an article a few weeks ago where they let me and James Royal point out that these vaccines are causing the cancer. And we have seen it. I mean, they have been unbelievable. We're seeing cancers relapse that have been stable. We have seen brand new cancers, present stage four, and people fit and healthy. "And I did a big survey on this where I had seen dozens of patients. And the thing that strikes me was I was the only doctor with a gp, with a surgeon, with the oncologist, with everybody else who asked the question and said, can you tell me your vaccine history? Not one doctor had done it. And then those doctors will say, no, there's no association with the vaccine whatsoever. I see no ships. Where's the sand? I mean, it's unbelievable. And, I've got no doubt all these vaccines are causing cancer. And the more you have, the greater your risk. It will rise exponentially."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims to have identified 13 mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer, asserting that even one is sufficient to warrant an immediate ban. They attribute the rise in "turbo cancers" in young people to these vaccines, despite media outlets citing diet or environmental factors. The speaker alleges government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks, with editors and producers reportedly discouraged from publishing anything that might undermine public confidence in vaccines. They argue the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous, particularly for young people, and that statistical modeling supporting their use is flawed. The speaker highlights an article in the Mail on Sunday where they and James Royal asserted a causal link between the vaccines and cancer, citing cases of relapsed and new stage four cancers. They criticize the medical community for not routinely collecting patients' vaccine histories and dismissing any potential association. The speaker believes the risk of cancer increases exponentially with each vaccine dose.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I can tell you that, I have gone through and read at least 13 mechanisms whereby messenger RNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer. I mean, unbelievable. Only one of those 13 reasons is a reason good enough to ban them immediately, but to have 13. Now the rise of the turbo cancers, the new cancers we're seeing, young people, you will see every day that, when this is out there being discussed, the newspapers will say, oh, this is clearly due to diet or other environmental things. And the thing that really gets me in that the newspapers that have comments from the readers online, you know, they have these articles, and, I always read the comments first because the the person would never even mention vaccines. They got got everything but the vaccine. And the first comment will be, so nothing to do with the fact that this only occurred a couple of months after the vaccines were induced then. Why no comment on this when many and then sometimes they mention me when I have been screaming about this is the cause of it for ages. Why didn't you, you know, mention this? And we all know there's been tremendous censorship from the government. I mean, I've been told by editors and producers alike that the government is but has, regards it as a crime to say or do or discuss anything that might make people lose confidence in the vaccines. Well, if a vaccine doesn't work and it's dangerous, I don't I think it's a crime to to prevent these things being discussed, particularly when the vaccines don't work at all. There is no benefit from that whatsoever. All the benefit was in the PlayStations of a statisticians who said we had to have them to save us. And every single thing modeling that they've done, and I mentioned Neil Ferguson, as far as I can find, never been right. It's never been right because the modeling takes no account of real time. I mean, if they with the COVID, I mean, it was all exaggerated. The number of people who, went down with it, were ill with it, or died with it. It was it wasn't it wasn't anywhere near serious, a thing. And I wrote I've written an article today in the conservative, woman about the what I call the vaccine wars. People say we must have them versus, the head of the NIH, Bhattacharya, and, Robert Kennedy. And I was saying, no. We must not be using these, particularly in young people because they're aware that these things are highly dangerous. And what what I was very pleased about, the the mail on Sunday did an article a few weeks ago where they let me and James Royal point out that these vaccines are causing the cancer. We have seen it. I mean, they it'd be unbelievable. We're seeing cancers relapse that have been stable. We are seeing brand new cancers present at stage four in people fit and healthy. And I did a a big survey on this where I've seen dozens of patients. And the thing that strikes me was I was the only doctor with a GP, with a surgeon, with the oncologist, with everybody else who asked the question and said, can you tell me your vaccine history? Not one doctor had done it. And then those doctors will say, no. There's no association with the vaccine whatsoever. I see no ships. Where's the sand? I mean, it's unbelievable. And they and I have got no doubt all these vaccines are causing cancer. And the more you have, the greater your risk that arise exponentially.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Full interview: https://t.co/fGX5oNR0t9

@HeartsofOakUK - Hearts of Oak

Prof Angus Dalgleish - The Evolution of Cancer Treatment: A 40-Year Journey https://t.co/o0tLjdSCgU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Professor Angus Dagliess discusses his 40-year career focused on cancer treatment, initially driven by the unmet needs of cancer patients. His early work explored the immunology of cancer, influenced by HIV research, suggesting HIV induces a hyper-reactive immune system that can be used to treat cancers. He pioneered immunotherapy for cancer, including high-dose interleukin-2 and cancer vaccines. He emphasizes the importance of vitamin D levels in cancer treatment, noting that low levels hinder response to chemotherapy. He criticizes NICE for not mandating vitamin D checks before treatment. He also claims that Pfizer funded charities to spread misinformation about vitamin D during COVID to promote vaccine use. Radiotherapy advancements allow for precise tumor targeting, minimizing side effects. He advocates for a holistic approach to cancer treatment, including diet, lifestyle, and attitude. He notes the importance of exercise in improving outcomes, particularly in colorectal cancer. He expresses concern over the pharmaceutical industry's influence on cancer research, claiming it prioritizes profitable drugs over potentially beneficial generic options like ivermectin, mebendazole, and fenbendazole. He also raises concerns about mRNA COVID vaccines potentially promoting cancer, citing multiple mechanisms and observing a rise in "turbo cancers." He claims government censorship prevents open discussion about vaccine risks.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And hello, heart of folk. Thanks so much for joining us once again. I'm delighted to have professor Angus Dagliess join us once again. Professor Dagliess, thank you so much for your time today. Speaker 1: You're welcome. Speaker 0: Great to have you. And I well, I think you were on a number of, off years ago, and you've, of course, given forty years of your life to actually focusing on treating cancer from back in after your short trip in in Australia, Down Under, returned to The UK 1984, after completing your training. And you started the Institute of Cancer Research. You've been professor at oncology, St George's University of London, of course. Your name is also known for major advances and contributions, to the HIV AIDS conversation and research. So there's a lot there within those forty years. But maybe maybe ask you a little bit about, your career. Start with that, just to to touch on that. I've kind of given some of the bullet points. But forty years, looking at this one issue, tells me a little bit about maybe what how things have progressed in your time or what you have learned, the changes of approach to dealing with cancer. So, yeah, fill us in a little bit around that. Speaker 1: Well, that's very interesting to ask that because I just suddenly remembered my first indications why I thought I would do oncology. I was a senior student on a ward round with a surgeon, and they'd done a big operating list the day before, and it was the old Florence Star ward. So we all went as a team, the consultant, the registrars, the housewoman, and then there was me, the attached medical student. And we went around everybody, and they chatted to everybody, said you had an appendix, you had a gallbladder, everything. And he deliberately missed out four people who were sitting up there really alarmed that they hadn't been, told what had happened. And when I asked the registrar why he had missed them out and not spoken to them, he said it's because he found they had cancer, and, there's no point doing anything, talking to them because nothing can be done about it. So I thought, well, there's clearly an unmet need here. That was the first time I thought perhaps I would start, looking at these cancer patients seriously. And I must say that, I got very interested in viruses and cancer from a very early stage, and that's what drove me into, the immunology of cancer because well, you mentioned the HIV. I worked out, and, this is all relevant to what's happened with COVID, but we didn't get any kind of backing for this, that the pathogenesis, I. E, how HIV causes AIDS, was that it induces a hyper reactive immune system in people with the right genetic background. And I realized that you could usurp this type of approach to treat cancers, and, it it has been done in leukemias lymphomas without realizing the role that HIV played in this. And that's really got that that completely changed, my approach. So the my my training involved, obviously, more the merrier chemotherapy, and I found the the toxicity relative to the benefit, very, difficult. It was had to be an art form because the response rates were so low when I, started out in the late seventies, doing this. But now they've improved dramatically, so we feel an awful lot of what we've done is worth it. And it's over twenty five years ago, nearly thirty years ago, that I started doing immunotherapy for cancer. For a long time I was the only one and they regarded me as a, you know, a sort of a maverick trying these things. The patients were grateful because they had nothing else, and some of them responded dramatically, and that's what kept me going. So that's how I got into cancer. And I think they I was the first to use high dose interleukin two, which is an American innovation, which is very toxic, and I found out the low doses were just as good if you use them in the right way without the side effects. And then I was one of the first to use cancer vaccines, which I started out with Donald Morton from the John Wayne Cancer Institute, and we were the only center outside The US working with him for a long time. And then I ended up, examining trials with at least a dozen vaccines and found that the very best wasn't really a vaccine. It was an immune stimulator. So this is how that that sort of brief evolution of how I end up doing oncology much different from how they would like to train me. Speaker 0: Well, there are a whole lot of areas I'd like to pick up on on, a number of things you said. But if I may jump to people watching today just to look at how you engage with people who get that news, and then we can step back and look at, some of the the different treatments and the conversation about vaccines and all of that. But we're told that one or two people, will get cancer. And I guess whenever someone hears they've got it, they feel their world has fallen apart. They feel it it's all over. It it's the panic sets in when you hear you've got you've got the big c. That's it. How do you initially, I guess, engage with, with someone who has just received that, initially, it seems like it's devastating news. It may not be devastating because why cancer treated has has moved ahead so much in the last few decades. But why do you initially respond? Because I guess with people watching, one and two of the viewers now, listeners, they will also be in that situation if that statistic is true. Speaker 1: Well, these days, the majority of people I see have already been told the diagnosis and often had appropriate treatment and they they want some more because the treatment tends not to be completely effective and want to know what helps. That's that's what I do. I really I really have a patient who's gone through that process. When I, used to see them more regularly in the NHS hospital, I'd be dealing with melanoma stage three or stage four, and, they would have they had already been told in detail the implications with all the leaflets and everything they give. Stage three, which means you've got lymph nodes from the melanoma, is a very straightforward process. And, the the management's done well. You can you can be sure saw somebody who I treated twenty years ago only last week who, essentially had stage four because he had lymph nodes everywhere. He had a vaccine immunotherapy program. This is years before it was ever considered to be part of the protocol. Been disease free for over twenty years. I have a lot of patients like that because I've been confident in them. I know the people you can be confident because there's no point being a total pessimist and losing all hope because it'll become a self fulfilling prophecy. You want people who are going to I'm going to fight this. I'm going to be positive and do all the other things, to help. That's that's might be my role is this is what you have to do. We can only do so much. And a good example is that we found when we did the early immunotherapy programs, this immune stimulant and this had, low dose interleukin two, etcetera. We found that some people responded fantastically to this, but the majority didn't. So we spent the the question is why? Why did they this patient do so well and this patient not? So I was able to get out of me and I had all my, research in this field covered by the Institute of Cancer Vaccines Immunotherapy, which is a charity set up to support me because the CR UK refused to do it. And yet another time when I believe the CR UK get everything wrong. So I'm just pointing out that I, I couldn't have done this if it wasn't for the other charity. So I think people need to think very carefully what charities they support. The big ones, I believe, are just too too much like big pharma. Any rate, I won't go into that, but we because of this, we looked at all sorts of things and the answer was so unbelievably simple. It occurred when they rolled out really reliable assays you could do quite quickly for vitamin d. And there it was. The only people who responded had good levels of vitamin d. The majority who didn't had low vitamin d. So we began correcting the vitamin d, and our response rate went up. I mean, it's these simple things. I went to NICE with senior colleagues. It's well over fifteen years ago, possibly more, with all this evidence to say that they should make it absolutely mandatory that everybody gets the vitamin d checked, and it's brought up to high levels before you start treating. Because if it's low, you will not respond to chemotherapy. I mean, my colleague, Daniel Von Hof, big pancreatic cancer trialist in America, I mean, he kinda laughed at me when I started poke this out, then phoned me up three months later, and he said, I've been through our records. He said, nobody responds to chemo in pancreatic cancer if their vitamin d is low. He says, it's unbelievable. So we're now correcting it, and we told NICE, this, the most inappropriately named, organization since Sage, and there are many others. But, I mean, might as well talk to keepers at the zoo, really. It's all they're interested in. And and they said, oh, we'll put it on our five year plan. Well, that fifteen years have passed, and it's there only as advice for nutrition. It is vital for your immune response. And this is what annoys me. All the people at the top of these organizations are, to me, are idiots. Like, they do not think of what happens in the interface between the patient and the clinician. They're too high up there in the clouds and elite. They think it's it's not important. They will get involved if Pfizer or somebody comes along with a new drug that costs a $100 a year and is very toxic and works just in a few people, then they get very excited. But if there's something that's really cheap, nontoxic, has a mega effect. And I would have thought that was part of NHS's role, and they clearly don't, take their job seriously. I mean, I I mean, I I will levy that. I I think to have all these patients come to me who fail various, chemotherapies and things, and no one's taken their vitamin d level. I take it and it's in the boots. And I said, you know, you shouldn't be allowed to start out on a course of therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, unless you've had your vitamin d corrected. The data is that black and white. Speaker 0: Well, we act we actually got our first strike by talking about vitamin d during COVID recommending or saying the research seemed to be vitamin d was important in combating that, and we got a strike from from YouTube for that. That was medical misinformation. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Well, we we now know we we now know that, Pfizer in the, COVID, this is before the the vaccine, basically, we're we're funding charities to put the correct information out there that vitamin d will only do you harm and has serious side effects. Do not take it for COVID. They were doing that. Why were they doing that? Because, basically, with vitamin d and ivermectin, you'd have cured everybody that's curable. There's no need for the vaccine. That's why they did that. They were setting everything up. That's why in this country, witty and valence all changed their minds, and suddenly we're all for the vaccine when they had previously said some sensible things before. So the the bullying, the power, and, I mean, it's you have to basically remember that these big organizations, Pfizer, has paid out billions in fines for withholding safety data, presenting the wrong data, bribing clinicians, bribing the regulators. This time is a full house. Bribed all the politicians and organisations as well. Speaker 0: Tell me. Because when people get that, diagnosis, they think, well, I'm going to go and be blasted with radiation. And it's kind of, will my body survive that, or will the cancer survive this kind of? Which one comes up? It it's when you look into chemotherapy and how it works, it seems a very destructive process. And that seems to have been, from my understanding, it as I read about it in the general press, that seems to be the the usual way of treating it, especially in The UK. Is is is that correct or not, or are there other methods that are also used, or is that the normal route that people go down? Speaker 1: You're referring specifically to radiotherapy? Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, with with radiotherapy is I mean, I trained as a radiologist for for a year. I was thinking of doing that till I realized that, actually, radiotherapy was rapidly becoming a a technical approach to cancer as opposed to an art form. I like this art science aspect, because we were getting to the stage when I did that time when people had the brilliant idea of linking the CT scans up to the radiotherapy machines so that they could actually treat the tumour in real time and that led to focus radiotherapy. So radiotherapy was used in the old days as we called it spot welding or frying. Which one way of looking at it. So the and the other thing is that there's very high doses focused and lots of high doses, not focused. That's the so called frying bit. A lot of the damage was in the frying, but with those computers and all the programs, you can now program highly selective stereotactic radiotherapy just to target the tumor. I mean, very good example is prostate cancer, is that the selective radiotherapy with the right treatment is just as good as outcome of surgery and that and probably less side effects. I mean that's the have claimed and it from my point of view, that that is a very good example of where radiotherapy is probably a better option, because it has improved so much. And then other other uses of it, it's it's, and people forget this because I remember I did a lot of radiotherapy for this. We didn't do it to cure the cancer. We did it to shrink the cancer to reduce symptoms, pain, you know, severe discomfort, etc. And it was it it was good for that. So I think it's I think it's important people understand that radiotherapy is technically so good now that and the precautions taken to prevent the side effects are so much better that I have no big issues with radiotherapy. I recommend it for quite a few of my patients. If we have immunotherapy for a while with a lot of disease and most of it goes away and you have what I call a rogue elephant of disease, a lymph node that won't go down, then you can zap that with radiotherapy and get rid of it. And then you can actually render the patient disease free. So these treatments need to be integrated in the whole of eliminating the disease or certainly keeping it under control. Speaker 0: When you say integrated, is is one of the issues maybe that we have in the medical profession is the specialty route, and and it doesn't look this is my perception anyway for me if you tell me I'm wrong, but, it it doesn't look, generally at the holistic side, of the body and certainly doesn't bring into account other factors outside the body like diet or food or, it focuses so narrowly on an area. Is is that part of the reason maybe why, these are not being tackled properly, because we're too narrow focused and don't doesn't connect with other fields within that. Does does that kinda make sense? Speaker 1: Well, certainly, what you're you're ringing bells, it'd be what I'm hearing from a lot of people is, certainly the medical training has been much reduced. It's very very truncated compared to my day and people are specializing far too soon in, just their particular areas. And so they they're they're not aware of the bigger picture so much. So they would just say they would just say do radiotherapy of, just the chest, for instance, they will just do surgery in one bit which is probably a good thing because they get very very good at that. But because of this, there seems to be a failure to stand back and recognize all the other things that might be contributing to the issue. So the good generalist, physician, I mean that seems to be lost now. Everybody is a specialist of some sort and you can get through to that position much quicker than in my day. I mean when we did oncology, we were expected to have done quite a few years of really high high class internal medicine we called it. So you know, you you did everything. You did the the infections, the autoimmunities, and cancers is one of them. And then we started branching out and said, can't do all this. It's too much work. We'll just focus on the cancer aspect. But now it's cancer that is and they don't see the the whole big picture, which is why I believe things like simple things like vitamin d was missed and why the importance of the diet and exercise for instance. I mean, my own colleagues, dismissed all this of complete waste of time messing around with these issues. They have nothing to do with it. And maybe I was told that by colleagues at very well known cancer hospitals and totally dismiss it. No. I mean, it is people accept that in order to have a good outcome. You do need to address the diet lifestyle, stop smoking, stop doing several other things that we we know are bad, reduce obesity and all these things need to be done. And one of the things that came out recently which I was really very interested in, was a study showing that exercise really improves the outcome of colorectal cancer. That's fascinating because I remember being in a big meeting on, tumor immunology. It was over ten years ago and a fellow presented a mouse experiment where they had mice with the tumors. And the mice, the poor fellows, had to do this compulsory exercise on a wheel, the way they run around them all here. And they split the these mice into that, and he was very excited. He said, the mice who have to do this, their tumor is much slower to progress than those that just sit around in the cage eating. So he'd actually established. And then so years later, we find out that this is working in the clinic. Now, the whole time of the training I did, nobody ever I mean, I'm took now now there's a lot of people with different inputs in in clinic. You're getting dietitians, and you're getting physios for all these sort of things, which is good. It's it's very good. But when we were trained, we were all trained that this is all nonsense. You just need to focus on other cancer and kill it. But now it's become clear that we need to take all these other things into consideration. And perhaps the most important thing is you alluded to it is the attitude. It's coping. Right? That's what I've got. What can we do about it? What are we going to do about it? How can I improve the outcome? That's what we've got to to capture now as opposed to, oh, this is a disaster, etcetera, which is the natural reaction initially. But it I must say that I'm quite proud of, the the the cancer world because we have improved the outcome of cancers dramatically since when I was even a a registrar. And, you know, the thing I'm most proud of, in spite of all the HIV and the vaccines and immunotherapy, was a period in my life when I was doing the general medicine bit, and I had this terrible woman with one of the most dreadful autoimmune diseases known who was steroid resistant. And I had remembered that a similar case had been reported as a single case as, responding to thalidomide which was given to them to help them sleep because that's what it was used for with pregnant women. Then they realize this disaster and they were causing the birth defects. But I remembered it had this effect, so I gave it to this woman and she had a fantastic recovery having been reduced. She was like a skeleton because she couldn't eat or drink. She had mouth ulcers everywhere. It's just absolutely awful. And to see this woman recover within forty eight hours after giving thalidomide made me shout and say, don't throw the baby away with the bathwater. And I tried to get a a backing to go into this. The welcome turned me down, the MRC turned me down, the CI UK, what it was then to all turn me down on the grounds, don't we realize this drug causes severe side effects? We cannot possibly get involved with birth defects. I said, well, don't you realize that I'm an oncologist and every drug I use will cause birth defects and I'm stupid enough to give them to a pregnant woman. What do you not get? Unfortunately, my, fury was brought to the attention of some people who knew about thalidomide working in a start up company in, America. Anyway, the bottom line is, I said, I'd love to work with them on this, but thalidomide, I'm not worried about birth defects. I'm worried about if you use it for two months or more, you get very bad neuropathy. And I was showing you needed to keep giving it to get the benefit. So anyhow, I finally persuaded them it took two years to make analogues. That means you take the clitidine, you tweak it here, and you screen. Long story long, long story short, any rate, out of this, we had a fantastic drug, ticked all the boxes. That drug's now called lenalidomide and is, used worldwide and has been the most important drug in increasing the survival of multiple myeloma from two years to seven years. And that is an incredible improvement. So, going into cancer actually is very, very exciting. And I actually have some personal friends who are taking it as, as maintenance treatment. And that's this great feeling to think if it wasn't for my persistence, that drug wouldn't have been around. So let's say so this is this is what you have to keep driving if forward. There is a great thing if I don't do something and it's not going to get done. And that's what keeps people like me at my old age still still flying the whip about trying to improve everything because at for the training at the moment, it's far too specialized. And that what that means that the clinical trials have to be were made to be big, and all the research is big pharma driven, which is why what I call the really obvious improvements are ignored even though they're very clear because they're not being pushed by a big pharma. And that Speaker 0: That that's what was going to say is is the is the drive is the the cancer industry because everything becomes, an industry looking for good outcomes and generating money to continue that. Is the drive from the pharmaceutical industry, or is it from doctors actually on the ground and what they're getting from patients? Is there a lot of crossover between those, or is it pharma do the research and then they're the ones that decide what to do? You mean, where is the where is the focus or the push or the collaboration there? Speaker 1: It's I think it's nearly all industry Wow. Driven. Wow. One of the things I mentioned, you know, we have this, immune stimulant, which, had made such a big improvement in melanoma, and I was finding that it was the case in many other ones, even pancreatic cancer. We did a randomized study which showed it did improve the outcome of pancreatic cancer. When we tried to get to CR UK, to help us with this because there was no big company, their attitude was kind of, well, if it's important, you'd have a big pharma behind. And then if you did, then we would we'll collaborate with them. And I said, you know, you raise millions and millions and millions of pounds a year of poor, undersuspecting public with, give us your money TV adverts, dreadful thing. And they're telling us you basically just exists to subsidize big pharma to make big profits. I mean, that's the way I interpreted this this interaction. Speaker 0: Tell me there you touched on immunology. Tell us a little bit more about that because my understanding is immunology is about the immune system, which is protecting the body from outside attacks, and cancer comes from within, from the cells within. Well, how does immunology fit into the the conversation on cancer or does it not really? Speaker 1: Well, does completely. That's the other thing I was told by senior colleagues, that the immune system had absolutely nothing to do with cancer. Years and years and years I was told this. And I started to get very suspicious of this over the years. HIV kind of confirmed it because when the HIV wrecked the immune system, cancers popped up lymphoma, for instance, capuses, CA cervix, they all came out when the immune system went down. But most importantly, what I and Gene Shearer, who I think is the best immunologist I've ever come across in the world, he's long since retired, basically we started looking at the immune response in people with cancer. And he did lymphomas and glioma, I did melanoma and colorectal. And the colorectal's were just unbelievable because we had very interested people at St George's who wanted to do some research. And we found that if you have colorectal cancer and it's early, we could still detect really marked immune suppression. And the reason that this changed my approach to everything is when you removed it surgically so there was no cancer left and you measured the immune response, it would bounce up all by itself after it was removed. The only conclusion with that simple experiment is the cancer caused the immune suppression. Now we could get over that by just cutting out the colon cancer. Now I got interested in this because the majority of my melanoma patients, we couldn't cut all the cancer out. So that told me you had to boost the immune response that these tumors were suppressing before you were going to get anywhere to get in a level field. And that's basically what we showed and we improved the outcome dramatically by boosting the innate immune response. So the new immunotherapies are antibody based and they're not targeted as people always start talking about targeting cancer. No, they're not. What they're doing is taking the brakes off the immune system that's being suppressed by the cancer, which is why in certain situations they can lead to complete responses. It's very good in melanoma. Lungs about 23 different cancer types respond to this type of immunotherapy now. And why? They have very bad side effects because there's no direction. They take the brakes off the immune responses that will attack you but are being normally controlled. We would love to have a mechanism whereby you could take the brakes off everything that would get rid of the cancer and not give you the side effects. I believe that I believe that's within the realms of possibility. A couple of things that we're working on can reduce that, sort of side effect profile. But that's the so so that's that's the concept. With regards to, you know, what causes cancer, people always say, causes cancer? Well, the first thing is having the wrong parents and grandparents and I. Your genetic hand of cards you get given. I mean, that's just one of those things. But then what causes it? And this is what I came out of my research into HIV. How does HIV cause this immune suppression? It never caused immune suppression unless you had immune genes that reacted to the virus in a nonspecific way, so it was a big inflammatory way. And then we realized that when you have inflammation, you get automatic immune suppression and lots of growth factors which cancer can take advantage of. So I have written books and lots of chapters and co edited books, on the role of chronic inflammation and the development of cancer. When you think of all the long term ones, they're all associated with chronic inflammation. Everything from the mouth, esophagus, stomach is due to chronic inflammation from smoking and bad food. Everything that's in the the lung particularly, we know is strong association with smoking and other bad inhaled things such as asbestos, etcetera. The asbestos is very interesting because the chronic inflammation, which you can tell if you happen to be looking at someone exposed to asbestos by chance, induces a very low grade chronic inflammation that might take forty years before you get mesothelioma. Now at the other end, the colon for instance, a very common cancer, it's much more likely to arise in chronic inflammatory processes and these include ulcerative colitis, I knew that as a medical student, Crohn's and polyps polyps are basically an inflammatory lesion leading to an adenoma and if you don't cut it out it will go malignant. You know, so if it wasn't for the chronic inflammation this process wouldn't happen. Speaker 0: Tom, there've been a lot I think, especially in The US, there's been a lot of talk about, alternative ways, of treating cancer. I don't know whether this has only been more recent because many of us are now plugged into alternatives during the COVID time when we were told one thing and that was it. Well, we look for other, alternatives. But certainly, in The US, there's been a lot of talk on certainly ivermectin that that was kind of during the the COVID time. But then also in fen fenbandazol and, membandazole. Those three have come up a lot as I've looked into this. How do you see that from a a UK perspective? Are these drugs that are generic and therefore don't make money? Are they drugs that haven't been studied for this? Yeah. What's your perspective on on that and these type of drugs being discussed as options? Speaker 1: Well, my take in The UK is not it's not taken seriously by oncology at the moment. Looking at ivermectin, I've looked at a lot of drugs I mentioned thalidomide, we've looked at CBD, artemisinin, zolvees and found that they all have anticancer activity of some sort. Ivermectin has many different anticancer mechanisms and as such is a very good candidate to take through and explore. Again people don't seem to want to do this. Remember ivermectin is given to millions of people worldwide. One of the reviews I read suggested it saves two million people a year from blindness because it kills these flakes. The other drugs which are similar but different mebendazole and febendazole, they are also used for parasites and what have you, and they have crossover links. Now I remember years ago, people from South America, presenting that they could treat breast cancer and other cancers very successful using a concoction of these anti parasitics. But what you're seeing now is people using these in cases where other conventional therapy is not working. And the re responses, I must say at the moment, are anecdotal. The good thing is ivermectin is is a very, very few side effects up to several times, more than the normal recommended dose. Nabendazole for bendazole have a potential liver toxicity, so intermittent use is strongly recommended. Concoction using both of them is sort of widespread in people who are interested in extending out the efficacy of treatment of cancers, particularly those that we can treat, but they come back all the time. And so what I think we need to do, the these drugs do not carry the the big profit margin. What I think we need to do, and this is the sort of thing NHS should be doing and I hope, like, the NIH, etcetera, is doing studies on this. Is this real? We do you know, we'll pay for the studies. Don't wait till the drug company comes along and do the studies and see if there's something in it. My gut feeling is that there is benefit. But once again, it will be in some people probably quite marked, and other people, you won't see it. So you need to get as much data in. You know, is it people respond there's some responses to I have a meeting which are quite dramatic. But it's a lack of lots of such reports means that these are every now and then. So we need to have a a database of, you know, what exactly is it that when ivermectin really works? Is it a particular type of tumor? Is it after or with, different types of, treatment? And the other thing at the moment, we don't know the best management, protocol or the best dose. So you have people using ivermectin increasing the dose to really endorse it. The no the normal dose is like twelve milligrams repeated one week, and you can get rid of ninety nine percent of all known worms. In oncology, they're using a milligram per kilogram, which means you'd so using twelve, you'd be doing seventy after a hundred and forty whatever every day. So these are incredibly high doses compared to what we use. And in my, laboratory work, I've been really impressed that many drugs are actually much better used intermittently. And it's the withdrawal period you get the the the anticancer effect, not the constant exposure. So we need to put that into the trial, which we know it's a good anti cancer act, agent because there's been a lot of work on it. We don't know how to use it properly and that that's what we need trials to do. Are we better off? I speak I did a tour with Paul Marrick. We're both very interested in this. Are we better off using ivermectin intermittently at more normal doses and adding in mebendazole for bendazole or increasing the dose continuously of the ivermectin. Now, I mean, I've met people who've done the latter, but still not really had anything you can cause call a response. So we're in a very gray area, but it it needs formal studies that are conducted by, you know, clinical academics, which we've actually been completely eliminated by a big pharma will tell us what to do philosophy that the NHS seems to have adopted. Speaker 0: Yeah. Because I've I've read certainly in The US that the cost of chemotherapy can be a $100,000 and more. I don't know if that's per year or per dose. I don't know how it works cost here, but then I guess that means there's no incentive to do research on some of these more generic drugs that may come in at a fraction of that cost. Speaker 1: Well, that's right. I mean, majority of immunotherapy of the drugs that I worked with, I'm horrified to find that patients go privately and they have to pay for it. They're costing $67 every three weeks. Now the NHS doesn't get much of a a a discount on that. They say it's all confidential. But I do know a retired head of one of these major giant big pharma companies told me that he loved dealing with the NHS because they assumed that they were getting a very good good deal because we are British. And he said it is so easy to he didn't have to negotiate hardly at all. That is one of the problems of the NHS. It is unbelievably incompetent and corrupt all the way through. And, you know, people say, you can't say these things. And I say, well, I've just said them. If you look at the newspaper yesterday, you'd have seen four senior managers jailed for a massive part in the corruption of, doing contracts for IT and things like that. And the word here that makes the big difference is this was only discovered through chance. Well, any big organization should have enough checks and controls, so this would be impossible. No. Not with the NHS and many other government, bodies, I'm afraid. Speaker 0: Can I finish off just with talking about vaccines? We a lot of concerns, a lot of evidence seems to point at the the rise of cancer, especially turbo cancer, linked to the COVID joustache, the mRNA. And yet we're told the we'll have a super duper mRNA cancer vaccine that will actually fix it all. Where where does the truth lie in that? Is mRNA vaccine, is that the holy grail, or is that just fixing the problems that have initially been caused by the original vaccine? Speaker 1: Well, yeah, that that that is the latter is a good thing. But I can assure you after doing several decades, the mess the messenger RNA wants to target tumor antigens, they're boasting they can plug it in and have a vaccine very quick. Now I've, you know, I was head of the Institute of Cancer Vaccines before it was merged into Institute of Cancer Vaccines and Immunotherapy, and I've, took part in at least a dozens trials with the cancer vaccine. So we had MARG, MART, NY ESO. These were all going to be targeting these things to kill the tumor. No. Just like chemo resistance, you target the, tumor antigen cancer antigen on a tumor cell with incoming missiles, the cancer is going to down down regulate that thing. It's no within three months, it's not on the tumor and the tumor's powering ahead. So, I mean, that is that is quite an incredible thing to do. I think it's going to have a very limited role, and I think we should not be using messenger RNA technology for this. And I I can tell you that, I have gone through and read at least 13 mechanisms whereby messenger RNA vaccines can induce or promote cancer. I mean, unbelievable. Only one of those 13 reasons is a reason good enough to ban them immediately, but to have 13. Now the rise of the turbo cancers, the new cancers we're seeing, the young people, you will see every day that, when this is out there being discussed, the newspapers will say, oh, this is clearly due to diet or other environmental things. And the thing that really gets me in that the newspapers that have comments from the readers online, you know, they have these articles, and, I always read the comments first because the the person would never even mention vaccines. He got got everything but the vaccine. And the first comment will be, so nothing to do with the fact that this only occurred a couple of months after the vaccines were induced then. Why no comment on this when many and then sometimes they mention me when I have been screaming about this is the cause of it for ages. Why didn't you, you know, mention this? And we all know there's been tremendous censorship from the government. I mean, I've been told by editors and producers alike that the government has has, regards it as a crime to say or do or discuss anything that might make people lose confidence in the vaccines. Well, if a vaccine doesn't work and it's dangerous, I don't I think it's a crime to to prevent these things being discussed, particularly when the vaccines don't work at all. There is no benefit from them whatsoever. All the benefit was in the Playstation as of a statisticians who said we had to have them to save us. And every single thing, modeling that they've done, and I mentioned Neil Ferguson, as far as I can find, it's it's never been right. It's never been right because the modeling takes no account of real time. I mean, if they with the COVID, I mean, it was all exaggerated. The number of people who went down with it, were ill with it, died with it. It was it wasn't it wasn't anywhere near serious a thing. And I wrote I've written an article today in the conservative woman about the what I call the vaccine wars. People saying we must have them versus the head of the NIH, Bhatacharya, and Robert Kennedy. And I was saying, no. We must not be using these, particularly in young people because they're aware that these things are highly dangerous. And what I was very pleased about, the mail on Sunday did an article a few weeks ago where they let me and James Royal point out these vaccines are causing the cancer. We have seen it. I mean, they it'd be unbelievable. We're seeing cancers relapse being stable. We're seeing brand new cancers present at stage four and people fit and healthy. And I did a big survey on this where I've seen dozens of patients, and the thing that strikes me was I was the only doctor with a GP, with a surgeon, with the oncologist, with everybody else who asked the question and said, can you tell me your vaccine history? Not one doctor had done it. And then those doctors will say, no. There's no association with the vaccine whatsoever. I see no ships. Where's the sand? I mean, it's unbelievable. And they and I have got no doubt all these vaccines are causing cancer. And the more you have, the greater your risk that arise exponentially. And, you know, the simple thing in that is that a booster vaccine suppresses your T cell response. Well, that's the only response that's going to, control your cancer. So that's the then it gets worse. And then when I was asked to, about the fact that I really believe this and James Royal said we saw it, they have to balance it. Quite right. Very good. And so they got the experts and, vaccines immunology from the places in Pyrion and things like that. And they they they all say something which is extremely correct, But the specious nature of their argument and the sophistry is nearly it would be funny if it wasn't so serious. They all say messenger RNA is very, very safe. We get exposed to tons of it every day, and it's all disposed of and that and causes no harm whatsoever. That fact is completely true. What they don't mention is it's so easily disposed with that in order for it to be a vaccine, we have to stabilize so it doesn't get disposed of. Therein lies the problem, that the stabilization these messenger RNA has been around. I was on a messenger RNA vaccine company board over twelve years ago, and they still haven't had anything approved. So now you know where you're coming from. So the messenger RNA, in order to deliver it, is delivered in such a way it can, easily end up integrating, and then it hacks your genetic code so that can then promote an oncogene, downregulate suppressor genes. I mean, the list goes on. It's horrendous. I mean, if you just see the one slide I had prepared for me of everything in the literature, by the time you get to the third thing, there should be stop out there. Get rid of it. The whole thing should be put in the can. And the big problem is that, there's a big industrial complex wants to make messenger RNA the big core of everything. And we fell for it in The UK. Sunac signed up to Moderna to make vaccines. I didn't see that ever go to tender, by the way. And I find it was identical in Australia. The same thing they wanted a billion over ten years, that you pay the money. It's like everything goes around. The government pays the money. You get nothing back from it. No. It's absolutely outrageous. We have to kill this culture and actually increase the health of the population. So that's that's that's where we are. Speaker 0: Well, professor Douglas, I really appreciate you coming on, and you were, I think, really the only voice from a medical point of view, actually, who was able to be in mainstream newspapers and your regular articles in the Daily Mail. There was a lot happening online discussion, but you actually breaking through in terms of the print media, I'm putting it out. So I think you were fairly unique. And I Speaker 1: They I mean, a lot of them will will let me talk in all sorts of things. Soon as I mentioned the bad things of vaccines, know, it I started to put things into the print, and there would be the press, and it it wouldn't, get, published. Yeah. And I'd say, what's going on here? And they said, I mean, it was approved. I was told it would be out. The senior editor sees it and pulls it. And he pulls it because it says something negative about the vaccine. So he's worried about you play ball with us and you get your knighthood type of thing for Yep. Telling these lies to the people, and you'll be rewarded. That that is outrageous. I mean, I only appreciated this when I did interview on Sky News Australia, which is a really big thing. Yes. And the producer basically said, I've heard you speak this at me. I want you to tell everybody about your experiences. And he said, I've been told not to let you talk about this, but he said, I've lost so many of my friends to vaccine damage and and things. He said I I I don't care. He said I have a duty to get it out there. And so many people in the media have not had that moral fiber. That even though I know them very, very well, they won't let me, tell the truth. But what the other thing I find out is I find it very difficult now to find anybody who doesn't know somebody or themselves who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine. And the most interesting thing of the lot is is that they even senior consultant colleagues of mine haven't put it together that what they're suffering from only came on as a result of the vaccine. And a big issue is the the vaccine causes this autoimmune disease. And autoimmunity is a 131 different types, all of which have been reported in as vaccine issues. But when you dilute a big number by a 131, you can just say, oh, it's all a coincidence all over the place. If you add it all up, it's incredibly high percentage of people with the vaccine have suffered one or more of those hundred and thirty one, auto known autoimmune conditions diseases. And the cost of treating those, you know, is is adds to the bill unbelievably. And the thing that really annoys me, my own GP practice constantly bullies me for a new booster, on this or a new vaccine on that even though they know my views. Why do they do it? They get paid. Yeah. But they get paid to do their job properly without the vaccines. And if they did the job, first, do no harm. They would say, I'm not having anything to do with this. Speaker 0: Well, I'm sure that the many of those articles you wrote have had an impact, on the public and got through to them in a way that me social media couldn't. So, professor Douglas, thank you so much, for your time, and for really going through your background and the developments you've seen and where we are today and giving some of those kind of practical tips to people, who may have got the news that they have the big c. So thank you for your time today. Speaker 1: Okay. Fine. Thank you very much for having me.
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 20, 2025 at 3:28 PM
Saved - June 21, 2025 at 12:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent discussion, I shared concerns about nanoparticles in COVID vaccines, specifically titanium, steel, and barium, which can enter our organs and be influenced by radiation. I referenced a 2017 study that found these particles in various vaccines. My past experiences, including providing evidence post-9/11, highlighted the potential dangers of these nanoparticles, including effects on fertility and health. I believe these particles could be manipulated to cause health issues, such as nosebleeds, and could be used to create false narratives about outbreaks.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Molecular Biologist Dolores Cahill: "[There are]...titanium, steel, barium nanoparticles [in COVID jabs]. &...those nanoparticles get into our organs [&] can be affected by radiation...they can modulate the frequency...[& cause] nosebleeds...[&] say there is an Ebola outbreak." This clip of Cahill, an inventor, founder and shareholder of companies, and molecular biologist, is taken from a recent discussion with Charles Kovess (@CharlesKovess) et al. posted to Rumble on June 18, 2025. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Because the nanoparticle and the radiation. I did publications on nanoparticles when I was researching and there's a publication from 2017, with an Italian professor showing that there were, she tested 40 different vaccines, 39 vaccines for human babies, adults and one for cats. And she showed all these metal or titanium, steel, barium nanoparticles. And it is those nanoparticles that get into our organs that can be affected by radiation. "Exactly what you're saying now when I gave evidence after 9-11, 2001, right. I ran one of the so called biosafety labs deliberately to get access to the information. And I gave evidence about the threats to people in Congress in October 2001. I was going through what was going to happen in the injections with fertility, with the peptides. And then I mentioned the nanoparticles and the military said shut up and sit down. Right. Because obviously they didn't want to. So I was saying the threat isn't these things flying into, it's what's going to be in the food and the vaccine, but particularly the nanoparticles. "I'm only mentioning that because within the system everybody knew. But one of the major detoxes is it is possible to detox from the nano. It's, you know, mainly not all of them, but what I was studying 20 years ago is that they can just modulate the frequency and that say if 40-year-olds or 20-year-olds have a specific metal in their organ that that can be, you know, in a university campus or it can be in a school and there could be like where people have nosebleeds. Right? Because that's why they rolled out the injections in different batches and different age groups. "And literally they could do that all across one or two countries and then wake up in the morning, you could have nosebleeds or serious deaths of teenagers. But then they could say there is an Ebola outbreak. Do you get it? Because there are different nanoparticles that resonate. So it's very specific. And I think some of the people that are being targeted to be seriously ill can be easily targeted so that they just die. You know, we die in our sleep or we drop dead or whatever. And I think it's that kind of technology. So it is a huge threat."

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that nanoparticles in vaccines can be affected by radiation. They reference a 2017 publication by an Italian professor who allegedly tested 40 vaccines and found metal nanoparticles in them. The speaker states that in October 2001, they gave evidence about threats to people in Congress, mentioning nanoparticles and injections with peptides, but the military told them to stop talking about it. The speaker suggests that these nanoparticles can be modulated by frequency, targeting specific age groups with different batches of injections, potentially causing nosebleeds or deaths that could be falsely attributed to outbreaks like Ebola. They believe this technology poses a significant threat, allowing individuals to be targeted for serious illness or death.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because the nanoparticle and the radiation. I did publications on nanoparticles when I was researching. And there's a publication from 2017 with an Italian professor showing that there were, she tested 40 different vaccines, 39 vaccines for human babies and adults, and one for cats. And she showed all these metal or titanium, steel, barium nanoparticles. And it is those nanoparticles that get into our organs that can be affected by radiation. Exactly what you're Now, when I gave evidence after nineeleventwo thousand and one, I ran one of the so called biosafety labs deliberately to get access to the information. And I gave evidence about the threats to people in Congress in October 2001. And I was going through what was gonna happen in the injections with fertility, with the peptides. And then I mentioned the nanoparticles and the military said, shut up and sit down, Because obviously they didn't want to. So I was saying, you know, the thread isn't these things flying into. It's what's going to be in the food and the vaccines but particularly the nanoparticles. I'm only mentioning that because within the system, everybody knew but one of the major detoxes is it is possible to detox from the nano, it's mainly not all of them, but what I was studying twenty years ago is that they can just modulate the frequency and that say if 40 year olds or 20 year olds have a specific metal in their organ, can be in a university campus or it can be in a school. And there could be like where people have nosebleeds, right? Because that's why they rolled out the injections in different batches and different age groups. And literally they could do that all across one or two countries and then wake up in the morning. You could have nosebleeds or serious deaths of teenagers, but then they could say there is an Ebola outbreak. Because there are different nanoparticles that resonate. So it's very specific. And I think some of the people that are being targeted to be seriously ill can be easily targeted so that they just die, you know, we die in our sleep or we drop dead or whatever. And I think it's that kind of technology. So it is a huge threat. And I think private prosecution
SenseReceptor
Posted - June 19, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Saved - June 20, 2025 at 6:52 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared insights from Zowe Smith, a former medical coder and whistleblower, about Palantir's role in the COVID response. She discussed how the HHS Protect program, using Palantir's Tiberius and Gotham systems, assigned Threat Risk Scores to individuals based on compliance with health measures. This data influenced decisions on vaccine and treatment deployment, raising concerns about targeting specific ethnic groups. Additionally, General Gus Perna praised Palantir as a crucial partner during Operation Warp Speed, highlighting its role in providing essential information.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

🚨Medical coder/whistleblower: Here's how Palantir's "KILL CHAIN" programs were used to target and "EXECUTE" American citizens with COVID jabs/remdesivir/ventilators. "They identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on [their 'threat risk score'] and [that's how they] determined [who]...to execute...with their AI kill-chain Gotham program." This clip of author, former medical coder, and whistleblower Zowe Smith (@Zowe_TKMC) is taken from an interview with James Corbett posted to Rumble on June 17, 2025. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "So there was a program called HHS Protect during Operation Warp Speed, was part of Operation Warp Speed. That's where I think most of the public-facing infrastructure began. Although I was looking into Operation Stargate, and I'm seeing documentation on CIA databases that say it's more than 10 years in the making. So, definitely it's, it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two, Trump administration. "But, so this HHS Protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC specifically, all partnered with Palantir. And then Palantir developed a program for Operation Warp Speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a Threat Risk Score. And then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. "So I want to make this point about AI, because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both 3M and Epic, and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic there are programs and you can rename them whatever you want, but it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like your program, Epic, might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, it might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. "So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's, it's just a function really. And HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a Threat Risk score. And that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you, that was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the zip code where you were and how compliant areas were. "And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the Unlimited Hangout, she wrote a article covering this program, HHS Protect, and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity and they thought, you know, you're higher risk if you're certain ethnic groups. So of course that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir and that was used within HHS Protect to execute. "So the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius and then it executes the threat or tells, does an AI decision making process and decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures. Which was your vaccine, your remdesivir and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this. And that is how they identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're going to execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program."

Video Transcript AI Summary
HHS Protect, started during Operation Warp Speed, utilized two Palantir programs. While documentation suggests planning began over a decade prior with Operation Stargate and CAIA databases, HHS Protect involved a partnership between the AMA, HHS, the CDC, and Palantir. Palantir developed a program that assigned individuals a threat risk score using a program called Tiberius, also used for other purposes. Medical coding programs with AI, like those from 3M and Epic, partners of Palantir, share data. Tiberius assessed compliance with lockdown measures, vaccination status, and masking, determining threat risk scores based on obedience. It also identified compliant areas by ZIP code and incorporated ethnicity into the risk assessment, as reported by Whitney Webb. Gotham, Palantir's AI kill chain program, used the threat risk score from Tiberius to execute AI-driven decisions on deploying countermeasures like vaccines, Remdesivir, and ventilators. HHS Protect monitored this process, identifying hospitals and patients based on algorithms to execute interventions via the Gotham program.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So there was a program called HHS Protect as start during operation warp speed, was part of operation warp speed. That's where I think most of the the public facing, infrastructure began. Although I was looking into operation Stargate, and I'm I'm seeing documentation on CAIA databases that say it's more than ten years in the making. So, definitely, it's it's a planned thing. It didn't just come out with day two Trump administration. But so this HHS protect program is really interesting because what it did, it used two different Palantir programs. So the AMA, HHS, the CDC, specifically, all partnered with Palantir, and then Palantir developed a program for operation warp speed. And that program, what it did was it assigned people a threat risk score, and then that was a program called Tiberius, which they also use for other purposes. So I I wanna make this point about AI because when I was a medical coder, I was using a program which is a partner of Palantir, both three ms and Epic and those are two different programs that I use that both have AI built into them that are partners of Palantir. And so all of these AI databases talk to each other as a condition of working with each other. So this has been going on for a very long time. But within Epic, there are programs, and you can rename them whatever you want. But it's the same program at any hospital across the country. So, like, your program Epic might not be named Epic at Johns Hopkins or Mayo. It might have a different name at Johns Hopkins or Mayo, but it's still the same program. So this program from Palantir called Tiberius, they can rename that whatever they want, but the program will still do what it was programmed to do. It's it's just a function, really. And it HHS had two programs built in. Tiberius was the thing that assigned you a threat risk score, and that was if you were following lockdown criteria, if you were actually distancing from people, if you had been vaccinated, if you were masking, you know, how obedient were you? That was your threat risk score. They also could determine down to the ZIP code where you were and how compliant areas were. And so, as Whitney Webb covers from the unlimited hangout, she wrote a article covering this program HHS Protect and highlights how this was used to target ethnic groups. So this threat risk score also incorporated your ethnicity. And they thought, you know, you're a higher risk if you're a certain ethnic group. So, of course, that was part of the risk score. And then Gotham is the AI kill chain program created by Palantir, and that was used within HHS Protect to execute. So the the Gotham program, it takes the threat risk score from Tiberius, and then it executes the threat or tells does an AI decision making process and decide decides when and how and where to deploy the countermeasures, which was your vaccine, your remdesivir, and your ventilator. That is why HHS Protect was created so that they could monitor all of this, and that is how they, identified different hospitals or different individual patients based on some algorithm and determined that's how we're gonna, execute people with their AI kill chain Gotham program.

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

Recall that Operation Warp Speed Chief Operating Officer Army General Gus Perna said that "Palantir...[was] such a great teammate...[because it gave him] access to all the information [he] might need." https://t.co/zwKp1fsJTC

@SenseReceptor - Sense Receptor

"It was the teamwork with industry, academia and the government that really made us successful. And Palantir...they were such a great teammate...I [had] access to all the information I might need." - CEO OF OPERATION WARP SPEED (OWS) GENERAL GUS PERNA. Here's a clip that serves as a reminder that Palantir—the company co-founded by Peter Thiel, specializing "in software platforms for big data analytics"—was referred to by General Gus Perna, the CEO of Operation Warp Speed (i.e. the COVID bioweapon jab program), as "such a great teammate." Perna notes that during OWS he had "access to all the information that [he] might need" thanks to Palantir's help. Note that Thiel, who has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors at Palantir since 2003, "fueled JD Vance's rapid rise to the Trump VP spot" according to CBS News, including with a donation of $15 million to his 2022 Ohio Senate campaign.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker credits teamwork between industry, academia, and government for success, specifically mentioning Palantir and individuals Julie and Aaron. He spent 40 years in the army, starting as an infantry officer before becoming a logistician, which he considers a lucky and validating move. He notes that data wasn't always prevalent or easily obtainable, recalling a time in Somalia when the Pentagon called him for equipment status amidst a firefight. He contrasts that with Operation Warp Speed, where he had access to all necessary information, emphasizing its crucial importance.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it was the teamwork with industry, academia, and the government that really made us successful. Palantir, I'm gonna just self report, the reason why I'm here is they were such a great teammate. And Julie and Aaron, two people that many people know in this room, were a big part of that, and I'm going to walk my way through that in a moment because I just enjoyed what they did. And I wouldn't be here if that wasn't a part of their persona, and I'll articulate that in a little bit. So I spent forty years in the army. I did two in the National Guard while I was finishing college, and I did thirty eight years of active duty. I started out as an infantry officer and begrudgingly went to become a logistics officer. Turned out, very lucky move for me. I was an average infantry officer. I was a great logistician, myself reporting. But truthfully, I think, you know, results at the end of the day validate my comments. So, it was the best thing that ever happened to me. My love was running through the woods and doing the maneuver and attacking. The hardest thing I ever did was learn how to become a logistician, where data is so, so important. But I know you can understand this. In the last forty years, data hasn't been as prevalent as we might think it is, because now, with so much of it, back in those days, there really wasn't a lot, or we didn't know how to obtain it, or we obtained it in very draconian ways. Right? We were all there. I remember sitting in Somalia as a young captain, maybe seven, eight years in the army. I got there the night before, the next day, we're we're in this firefight, and somebody comes and gets me and says, Hey, sir, the Pentagon's on the phone for you. I said, For me? I'm Captain Perna. Yeah, they asked for you by name. So I get on the phone as Brigadier General. Hey, I need you to tell me the status of the equipment in Somalia. I mean, literally, could hear rifle bullets going choo choo choo. Right? And so I said, Hey, nope, no excuses, answer the question. I said, Okay. And I rattled off about 10 pieces of equipment and the readiness rates. The guy sitting next to me says, Sir, how did you do that? You didn't even see a piece of paper. I said, Hey, you know what? He has no clue. And I know I was close enough. Right? To fast forward, right, to here we are in Operation Warp Speed, and I have access to all the information I might need. And this is so crucial. Okay? This is really a crucial point because when we took over in
View Full Interactive Feed