reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @SeosQuinn
@SeosQuinn - Joe Quinn
Tucker exposes the Epstein/Israeli spy/blackmail ring at Turning Point USA. https://t.co/vHzFPTIVmw
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the official narrative surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, believing the US government dismissed legitimate questions. They claim the DOJ didn't release incriminating sex videos because they don't exist, alleging the original search warrant was designed to protect Epstein, suggesting a cover-up since 2007.
The speaker questions the source of Epstein's wealth and whether he was working on behalf of intelligence services, possibly foreign, and specifically mentions Israel. They argue that asking these questions is not anti-Semitic or hateful, but a right of citizens to understand if foreign governments were acting against US interests.
They highlight the need to openly discuss Epstein's connections and address the possibility of blackmail operations. The speaker demands answers from the government, asserting that citizens deserve transparency and should not be insulted for seeking it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feel like raising the middle finger and screaming obscenities, which is not an adult response, I'll I'll concede, but that's how I felt. And I think that's really at the heart of why the Epstein thing is so distressing. I mean, the guy was some weird sex freak who was abusing girls. We knew that. But the fact that the US government, the one that I voted for, refused to take my question seriously and instead said, case closed, shut up conspiracy theorist, was too much for me.
And I I don't think the rest of us should be satisfied with that. And by the way, let me just say really quickly because I was so mad about it that I think I found out part of what's going on. I think we are going to find out more. And I think the truth, for whatever it's worth, in case you're interested, is that the DOJ didn't release lots of incriminating sex videos with Epstein and his billionaire pals because they don't have them. They don't have them because when the original search warrant was served thousand and seven, I think possibly 02/2006, I think 02/07, it was basically designed to protect Epstein.
The search warrant was written in such a way to make sure that the feds never got their hands on the actually incriminating evidence. It's another way of saying the cover up has been going on since 02/2007, almost twenty years. And so the real question is not, was Jeffrey Epstein a weirdo who's abusing girls? Yes, we can answer that. The real question is, why was he doing this on whose behalf and where did the money come from?
And those are the questions that need to be answered. And I think it's entirely fair to ask them. And it's not adequate to say anyone who asked them is somehow desecrating the memory of little girls who died in Texas. They're not gonna put up with that answer. I don't care who gives that answer.
That is not acceptable. And I think the real answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on behalf of Intel Services, probably not American. And we have every right to ask on whose behalf was he working. How does a guy go from being a math teacher at the Dalton School in the late seventies with no college degree to having multiple airplanes, a private island, and the largest residential house in Manhattan. Where did all the money come from?
And no one has ever gotten to the bottom of that because no one has ever tried. And moreover, it's extremely obvious to anyone who watches that this guy had direct connections to a foreign government. Now no one's allowed to say that that foreign government is Israel because we have been somehow cowed into thinking that that's naughty. There is nothing wrong with saying that. There is nothing hateful about saying that.
There's nothing anti Semitic about saying that. There's nothing even anti Israel about saying that. I've spent my entire life pretty much in Washington where I knew and loved a number of people, including one very close person who worked at CIA. That has never prohibited me from saying, I think the CIA has done some horrible things. Murdered a bunch of people, participated in the murder of a sitting US president.
It's got a whole trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a disloyal American. It doesn't make me anti American in any sense. I was born here. My family's been here for hundreds of years.
I love this country. That's why I live here. So criticizing the behavior of a government agency does not make you a hater. It makes you a free person. It makes you a citizen.
You're allowed to do that because you're not a slave. You're a citizen. And you have a right to expect that your government will not act against your interest, and you have a right to demand that foreign governments not be allowed to act against your interest. That's not creepy. It shouldn't be forbidden.
And yet all of us have trained ourselves to believe that you can't say that somehow. But that's, like, too naughty and forbidden, and the effect of making that off limits has been to create a lot of resentment, and I'll say it, hate online, where people feel like they can't just say, like, what the hell is this? You have the former Israeli prime minister living in your house. You have all this contact with the foreign government. Were you working on behalf of Mossad?
Were you running a blackmail operation on behalf of foreign government? By the way, every single person in Washington DC thinks that. I've never met anyone who doesn't think that. I don't know any of them that hate Israel, but no one feels they can say that. Why?
And I think the longer that we play along with it, the more subterranean and creepy and hateful the conversation actually becomes. So I think it's better just to say it right out loud. Did this happen? And, of course, that question has been asked to the government of Israel, their answer is we're not gonna tell you. And I think our answer should be no or no.
As long as we're sending you money, if you were committing crimes on our soil, we have an absolute right to know. Did you do this or not? And yet everybody has been so brainwashed into thinking that's somehow an expression of hate or bigotry. When it's not, it's a baseline question that every US citizen has a right to an answer on. What the hell was this?
And by the way, if it turns out that it was nothing at all, that somehow Jeffrey Epstein really did earn a $165,000,000 giving tax advice to somebody, which is, for the record, a lot more than most people pay their accountants, and that none of this was actually a foreign intel operation, and that there was no blackmail involved, that actually Bill Gates was just hanging on the island because the weather was especially good. No one was videotaped doing anything immoral or illegal, and then that was used against them to get them to obey. If all of that is false, then just tell me how it's false. But don't call me a lunatic. And when Fox News runs a piece as they did yesterday by Hugh Hewitt saying that anybody who's got even more questions about Epstein is some kind of nutcase with an unhappy personal life who's spending too much time on Twitter in the fervent fever swamps of conspiracies.
You know, up yours, buddy. The one who answered the question then. Don't let anybody insult you. Anybody. And I mean anybody ever get away with insulting you instead of answering a legitimate question.
K? Ever. And by the way, you will hear certain people say, well, you know, that means you hate the per no. It doesn't. I I've got a bunch of kids.
I would never let them get away with that. I caught one of my kids, you know, smoking weed in the bathroom at my house, and I was like, you smoking weed in the bathroom? Shut up, racist. You hate me. No.
You're my child. I don't hate you. Answer the freaking question. Were you smoking weed in the bathroom or not? I'm not the criminal here.
You seem to be.
@SeosQuinn - Joe Quinn
Kamala Harris just met transgender Jesus at the White House. https://t.co/ZHlCl2vbcN