reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ShabnamPalesaMo

ShabnamPalesaMo
Posted - April 20, 2024 at 7:56 PM
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 3:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The WHO's Global Power Grab is a 2-part film featuring health freedom advocates and politicians discussing the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. It explores the WHO's funding, conflicts of interest, and the role of its director-general. The film also delves into the IHR 2005 amendments, a proposed pandemic treaty, and its connection to the New World Order agenda. It examines how politicians and mainstream media respond, and suggests actions for people to resist this global corporate coup. Watch and share the film for more information.

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

📍WATCH: WHO's #GlobalPowerGrab is a must watch 2-part film featuring almost 100 health freedom advocates + politicians speaking out about the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. This powerful public interest film was created in South Africa ahead of WHO's World Health Assembly 77 in May 2024 🚸This informative + empowering film highlights: - What is the WHO? Who funds it, where are the conflicts of interests? - Who is its director-general Tedros, how did he come to power? - Understanding the constantly changing, legally binding IHR 2005 amendments + a proposed new pandemic treaty - How does this power grab connect to the New World Order agenda to erode democracy by global governance? - How are politicians responding internationally? - What about the role of mainstream media + factcheckers in censorship? - How can We The People resist this global corporate coup? What actions can we take? ✅ Watch and Share: https://rumble.com/v4qet96-whos-global-power-grab-part-1-preview-9mins.html @sahariivsa @WCH_SouthAfrica @CHD_Africa

Video Transcript AI Summary
The World Health Organization, led by controversial figure Tedros, faces criticism for its funding sources and potential power grab. Concerns arise over a new treaty granting WHO authority over global health emergencies, leading to fears of mandatory vaccination and loss of national sovereignty. Calls for defunding and withdrawal from WHO to prevent a move towards a centralized global government.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The World Health Organization is the institution granted exclusive power to guide and protect the health and wellness of humanity. The WHO is sustained by private donations, the bulk of which are made by pharmaceutical and biotech corporations who have a vested financial interest in the organization's support. Tedros Ghebreyesus is the World Health Organization's 1st director general that isn't a medical doctor. The appointment to the organization's highest position was controversial given that in his previous role as Ethiopian's health minister, Tedros was accused of covering up 3 major health epidemics. Speaker 1: Tedros is no stranger to controversy. As a former minister of health in Ethiopia, he has been accused of an alleged cover up of 3 possible cholera epidemics. Speaker 0: Prior to his appointment, Kedros was a high ranking member of the Tigray People's Liberation Front, a brutal and corrupt political group responsible for crimes against humanity, including bombings, kidnappings, tortures, and killings. How does a man with such a controversial past score the top position at the world's most influential health organization? Speaker 2: I have known Bill and Melinda for for many, many years now. We will have many body bags in front of us if we don't behave. Speaker 3: If one analyzes how the WHO is funded, one sees that, organizations like the Gates Foundation, are, significant supporters. And so he who pays the piper calls the tune. I think that's a good starting point in looking at these things. Speaker 4: Without our consent, in May 2024, the World Health Organization via member state delegates will exercise a power grab over our health, freedom, and sovereignty. Speaker 5: This is 3 months from now at the next World Health Assembly by WHO's 194 member states. This process takes place behind closed doors and at a tremendous speed. It is not reported nor discussed in our newspapers, in our national parliaments, in universities, nor in society. Speaker 6: There's going to be a very important vote, and Uganda being a member of the World Health Organization is supposed to be informed prior before this vote. But as far as I know none of this has been brought to the attention of parliament yet and yet we have less than a month to go into this vote. Speaker 7: Both of these documents, what they do is they create a new supranational body that gives the WHO legally binding global authority over public health emergencies of international concern. Speaker 8: This is actually worse than what happened in COVID because they don't even have a standard that they have to isolate a pathogen. They don't have to isolate anything. What they have to do is simply say, we think that there is a reason to declare an emergency, and as such, we therefore have the ability to suspend travel to actually penalize member states. There's a very big clause inside of the treaty that actually has penalties on member states for noncompliance. Speaker 9: Or the countries have been Speaker 10: Wait. Wait. Wait. So hold on. I'm interrupting you, but I just wanna the WHO will override, let's say, my country's decision on how to handle the next pandemic. Speaker 9: Right. Exactly. He can just declare it with no standards, and then countries around the world will have to obey. Speaker 7: Most worrying for me is actually article 12, which says that in the event of a potential or actual health emergency so this doesn't just relate to pandemics. This is, any health emergency, and that could be anything that the director general shall determine on the basis of information received, and that can be secretive information. It doesn't have to be declared. The director general was one individual who there's a lot of concern about his, his history and experience, but, that he should have this power. And then each country gets 48 hours Speaker 11: 48 hours to respond or explain or face the consequences including sanctions. Speaker 12: Do you think it's going to have an equal sort of footing with all nations, or will there be a difference in in how nations are treated, by the WHO? Speaker 13: So that's, of course, a really good question. If you're asking a country that doesn't have the resources to come back to you within 48 hours and then they don't, not only do you malign them to the emergency committee, but you say, you know what? Maybe we should look at sanctions against this country And maybe this country has got resources like oil and diamonds. Wouldn't that just be very convenient? Speaker 5: WHO will be authorized to issue recommendations with legally binding effects. Speaker 14: You know, when you take out the words not binding as an amendment, it then becomes binding. These these are binding treaties. If we do nothing, these treaties are binding. They're legally binding across all the nations. Speaker 5: This is legislation. This is legislation directed, directly affecting every human being. We are talking about Compulsory vaccination, lockdowns, closures of borders, and businesses, and worst of all, detention of anyone not complying with the latest vaccine mandate and forced medical procedures. This will come under the title and concept of 1 Health. So whether to fight a human influenza with a new subtype or to reduce rising level of CO2 or to respond to the loss of biodiversity or to fight climate change, all of that can give rise to the next pandemic. Speaker 15: They will be able to impose a climate lockdown. That's the next step. That's what we're talking about. Speaker 16: We see all these kind of, authoritarian measures being adopted in the name of saving the planet. Speaker 10: It's global governance. Speaker 9: Tyranny organized tyranny under Velvet and the Golden Cage. You know It's Speaker 10: a yeah. It's a very clear. It's a form of global governance, isn't it? Speaker 9: Oh, it is. It is a centralized global government, but we didn't know how they were gonna do it. And they are using health in all policies to create this global governance. Speaker 11: Towards a one world government seeking to erode the sovereignty of independent nations. Speaker 17: There would be amendments to implement an international global health certification system enabling nations to enforce travel restrictions using tools such as vaccine certificates, passenger locator forms and travel health declarations all tied potentially to a personal QR code. Speaker 7: And then a mass surveillance of compliance via digital certificates. So we all have to have digital certificates And in that way, they will check whether we're all doing what we're told. Speaker 11: That could lead to draconian measures undermining our national interest if accepted. Speaker 5: Which means what? Speaker 3: It means Speaker 9: that when there is a national health security threat, you can take over the country with the army. So you imagine this at the global level? Speaker 10: Right. Speaker 9: So if they get the global commands Speaker 0: So it's martial law? Speaker 9: It's martial Speaker 3: law. And the title of this session, are we ready for a new world order? Speaker 18: We have a real chance at this new world order. An order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the UN's founders. Speaker 15: When you really take all of this together, there is no other way for me to to actually say this. It will be a complete impoverishment and enslavement of all the people. Speaker 19: People have to understand it's all about control. So being aware of the globalist endgame in all of this, namely the implementation of a global governing system to control us, it seems to me that the powers that be will attempt to launch major crises, plural, on several fronts to facilitate this push into their new world order. Speaker 11: Withdrawn from WHO. Speaker 10: My view is get out of the Speaker 2: hoe. Conclusion, defenders of freedom on both sides of the Atlantic need Speaker 20: to stop these amendments from coming into pass. Speaker 11: And call on all political parties and South Africans to reject the woo's power grab under the guise of pandemic preparedness. Speaker 13: Can I get a quick vote from everybody here right now? Who thinks we need to defund and exit from the WHO? Speaker 6: That's a Speaker 13: full house that people have voted. Speaker 7: Thank you very Speaker 8: much.
WHO's Global Power Grab - Part 1 Preview (9mins) WHO's #GlobalPowerGrab is a must watch two-part film featuring almost 100 health freedom advocates and multiple politicians speaking out about the WHO-facilitated corporate power grab. This powerful p rumble.com
ShabnamPalesaMo
Posted - January 30, 2024 at 10:24 AM
Saved - January 30, 2024 at 6:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
It's disheartening to see one of our heroes, Dr. Nathi Mdladla, facing persecution from HPCSA for saving lives during COVID-19. Despite overcoming Apartheid, corruption still hinders our right to speech and health. #SouthAfrica #corruption #censorship

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

IT IS A SAD DAY in #SouthAfrica when one of our heroes @drnathimdladla is being persecuted by @HPCSA_ for doing his duty & saving lives during C19. Having overcome ApartHeid, our country is still captured by corrupt interests that seek to censor our right to speech & health @SizweLo @vngalwana @A_C_D_P @EFFSouthAfrica @Julius_S_Malema @african_stream @CHD_Africa @lawrie_dr @FreeWCH @DrJackieStone @tntradiolive @HighWireTalk @rustyrockets @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr

ShabnamPalesaMo
Posted - September 29, 2023 at 11:12 AM
Saved - December 5, 2023 at 2:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
URGENT: South Africa and the world must withdraw from the WHO. I've drafted a bill, supported by the African Sovereignty Coalition. Download it in Word or PDF format. Share it widely. Withdrawal deadline: 30 November 2023. Email PeoplePower1@protonmail.com for help, support, or translation. Tag relevant individuals, activists, lawyers, media, politicians, and organizations.

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

📍URGENT: Exit The WHO - Bill for South Africa Due to the urgency of South Africa, Africa and the entire world withdrawing from the WHO, I have drafted a bill to withdraw, supported by the African Sovereignty Coalition. ✅ Download the bill in Word and PDF here: https://shabnampalesamohamed.com/resources ✅ Please share this link and the document across the world. We need to all withdraw by 30 November 2023. ✅ Email PeoplePower1@protonmail.com if you need help, would like to support project #ExitTheWHO or can translate the bill. 💯 Tag people, activists, lawyers, media, politicians, groups and organizations @FreeWCH @CHD_Africa @ChildrensHD @Incrementallog1 @P_McCulloughMD @lawrie_dr @awakenindiamvmt @KanekoaTheGreat @VigilantFox @ABridgen @BLNewsMedia @tntradiolive @A_C_D_P @HighWireTalk @Inquiry_Canada @JesslovesMJK @KimIversenShow @PierreKory @MaajidNawaz @Najadi4Justice @naomirwolf @OracleFilmsUK @joerogan @ProfTimNoakes @VimleshRajbansi @zeee_media

Resources | People Power shabnampalesamohamed.com

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

@SenseReceptor @NassMeryl @Stuckelberger @bell00david @SenaitSenay @21WIRE @james_freeman__ @jathorpmfm @RWMaloneMD @robinmonotti @IamBrookJackson @african_stream @AAA_Amhara @NeverForgetOlzz @EFFSouthAfrica @BantuHolomisa @PiersRobinson1 @robertrapiti @drnathimdladla @vngalwana

ShabnamPalesaMo
Posted - November 29, 2023 at 10:12 PM
Saved - November 30, 2023 at 3:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Mexico has taken a stand against the WHO, demanding the rejection of amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty. They call for open international debates and public consultations on these proposals, emphasizing the importance of human rights and the need for transparency. Additionally, Mexico urges the explicit prohibition of gain-of-function research. This campaign has been ongoing for three years.

@ShabnamPalesaMo - Shabnam Palesa Mohamed

BREAKING - Mexico stands up to the WHO The letter demands: 1) Reject the amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations. 2) Reject the WHO New Pandemic Treaty. 3) Call for a prior, broad and open international debate on the proposed amendments to the WHO International Health Regulations and the proposed new Pandemic Treaty from a human rights perspective. 4) To carry out a public and informed consultation and debate at the national level on all the implications of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new Pandemic Treaty with the participation of the public, private and social sectors, related to policy issues and public health measures during the health contingency, making previously accessible to the public in a clear, timely and understandable manner the necessary information to make effective their right to participate in the aforementioned public consultation, through appropriate means, written, electronic or otherwise, taking into consideration all available and updated scientific, medical, clinical and legal information. 5) To carry out a public and informed consultation and debate at the national level on all the implications of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the new pandemic treaty, as well as their relevance and reasonableness based on the evaluation of achievements, failures, challenges and lessons learned at the national and international level that occurred during the COVID19 crisis. 6) Strictly and explicitly prohibit gain-of-function research aimed at modifying pathogens to make them more transmissible, more contagious, more virulent or, being viruses of other species, able to infect humans. Proud of everyone involved in this campaign for the last 3 years+ #ExitTheWHO #SouthAfrica

View Full Interactive Feed