reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @ShadowofEzra
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying this is the perfect time for Congress to approve the FISA domestic spying program for national security—the military really needs it. I’m willing to give up my liberties for safety, even though FISA was weaponized against me by bad people. I’m willing to give up my security for the military.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
President Trump says now is the perfect time for Congress to immediately approve the FISA domestic spying program for national security reasons because the “military really needs it.” Trump says he is willing to give up his liberties for safety, even though FISA was weaponized against him by “bad people.” “I’m willing to give up my security for the military.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises the question about a surveillance tool called Right, which expires next week and would let the FBI monitor potential terrorists overseas. They ask about the importance of having these tools to protect the country from such threats and how to communicate their value to Congress, especially given a skeptical Congress regarding renewing those powers.
Speaker 1 responds by recalling that Pfizer was used against them by a “dirty cop,” referring to Comey and his remnants and claiming it was used illegally. They say those people should be prosecuted, describing Comey as a “terrible” and “sick” person and calling him a “dirty cop.” Despite these accusations, Speaker 1 acknowledges that military needs the tool and that there is a division over its use. They claim that the tool has been used for national security and mention that it would be necessary for the military, with General Raisin Kane cited as an example. They point to perceived successes in Venezuela and ongoing actions with Iran, asserting that Iran is “decimated” and that a lot of information was obtained through using Pfizer. They argue that the job could have been accomplished regardless, but that using Pfizer made the job safer and easier.
Speaker 1 states they are willing to give up their own security for the military, framing national safety as the highest cause. They emphasize that, despite personal adverse experiences with the tool, the military’s needs and national safety take precedence, and they express a readiness to relinquish their security to support the military’s mission.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Surveillance tool Right. That expires this coming week. It obviously allows the FBI to surveil potential terrorists who are overseas. And we don't know right now if this individual was radicalized by somebody like that. But do you think about the importance of having these tools, to protect our country from these kinds of threats?
And how will you get that, message to congress when there's a, you know, a congress right now that's skeptical about renewing those powers?
Speaker 1: Well, Jackie, I know both sides of it because Pfizer was used against me and very, very viciously by a dirty cop. You know, we had the Comey gang, Comey and his remnants, and it was used against me. And they used it very illegally. I mean, they signed court orders that were illegal. Mhmm.
Every one of those people should be prosecuted, frankly. They were it was used against me. Now that's the that's the bad news. The good news is that the military really needs it, and it's really needed for national security, and there's a there's a division. But I was willing to give that up.
I mean, because, again, it was used against me more than anybody else and by bad people, by sick people also. These are sick people. Comey was terrible. He was a horrible sick person. He had real problems.
And I used the word to describe him. He was a dirty cop. It's an old fashioned term, but he was a dirty cop, bad guy. And there were other bad guys, and they used Pfizer illegally. They used it for a purpose that wasn't supposed to be used for.
Okay. On the other side, you have military. They really need it. General Raisin Kane. Look at the success we had in Venezuela.
Look at the success we're having with Iran. I mean, Iran is decimated, and we got a lot of information by using Pfizer. I think we would have been very successful regardless, but it made the job a lot safer and a lot easier. So I would say and what I've done and I've told people, I'm willing to give up my security for the military because ultimately, that's to me the highest cause is the, you know, the safety of our nation.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Fox News is absolutely cooked after this clip. https://t.co/sayDw8ZQqP
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that AIPAC released an ad bragging it owns the Democratic leadership and will win the midterms regardless of the outcome, claiming it’s the top fundraiser for the Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, Asian Pacific American Caucus, Progressive Caucus, and Equality Caucus—the Democrats’ top fundraiser.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
AIPAC releases a new ad bragging to America that it owns top leadership in the Democratic Party and that it will be the true winner in the midterm elections, regardless of the results. AIPAC brags that it is the top fundraiser for members of the Congressional Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, Asian Pacific American Caucus, Progressive Caucus, and Equality Caucus. “AIPAC is the top fundraiser for Democrats.”
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Benjamin Netanyahu says the Trump administration reports directly to him on a daily basis about Iran. Netanyahu says JD Vance reported every single detail of the peace talks to him. “He reported to me in detail, as members of this administration do every day.” https://t.co/rnH8xhYKOU
Video Transcript AI Summary
I spoke yesterday with vice president JD Vance. He called me from his plane on the way back from Washington and reported in detail, as the people of this administration do every day, on the development of the negotiations. The explosion came from the American side, which was not willing to tolerate the blatant violation of the agreement to enter negotiations by Iran.
Essentially, the agreement was that there would be a ceasefire and Iran would immediately open the crossings. They didn't do that. The Americans were not willing to accept it. He also conveyed to me that the central issue on the table from the perspective of president Trump and The United States is the removal of all enriched material and ensuring that there is no more enrichment in the coming years, and this could be for decades.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I spoke yesterday with vice president JD Vance. He called me from his plane on the way back from Washington. He reported to me in detail, as the people of this administration do every day, on the development of the negotiations. In this case, the explosion in the negotiations. The explosion came from the American side, which was not willing to tolerate the blatant violation of the agreement to enter negotiations by Iran.
Essentially, the agreement was that there would be a ceasefire and Iran would immediately open the crossings. They didn't do that. The Americans were not willing to accept it. He also conveyed to me that the central issue on the table from the perspective of president Trump and The United States is the removal of all enriched material and ensuring that there is no more enrichment in the coming years, and this could be for decades.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
President Trump has now completely taken over the Strait of Hormuz by implementing a naval blockade and expanding the war against Iran. The U.S. Navy will begin the process of blockading “any and all ships” attempting to enter or leave the Strait of Hormuz. https://t.co/8VaRrNFsOo
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump posted on Truth Social asserting that the United States will begin the process of blockading any and all ships entering or leaving the Strait of Hormuz, effectively enforcing a blockade. He claimed that any Iranian who fires at the U.S. or at peaceful vessels will be blown to hell, and that he will begin destroying mines that Iran laid in the strait. The post also stated that the blockade would progress toward an all-vehicles-allowed-in, all-vehicles-allowed-out basis, but Iran had prevented this by suggesting there may be mines in the area known only to them. Trump described this as world extortion and declared that leaders of countries, especially the United States, will never be extorted.
He stated that the United States Navy would seek and interdite every vessel in international waters that has paid a toll to Iran, asserting that no one paying an illegal toll will have safe passage on the high seas. He reiterated plans to destroy the mines Iran laid in the straits. He warned that any Iranian who fires at the U.S. or peaceful vessels would be blown to hell, and claimed Iran knows better than anyone how to end the situation, which he said has already devastated Iran. He asserted that Iran’s navy, air force, and anti-aircraft and radar are “useless,” and claimed that Khomeini and most of Iran’s leaders are dead because of their nuclear ambition. He said the blockade would begin shortly.
Trump indicated that other countries would be involved in the blockade and that Iran would not be allowed to profit from what he described as an illegal act of extortion. He characterized Iran as seeking money and, more importantly, nuclear capabilities. He added that at an appropriate moment, the United States would be “fully locked and loaded,” and its military would finish up the little that is left of Iran. The post closed with Trump affirming that the message came from President Donald J. Trump.
The summary notes that these statements were conveyed as a breaking news update tied to Trump’s Truth Social post, emphasizing the described actions, escalation, and stated rationale regarding Iran and the Hormuz Strait.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And let's start with breaking news. Donald Trump has just posted on Truth Social, where he has effectively said that The US will begin the process of blockading any and all ships trying to enter or leave the Strait Of Hormuz, so effectively blockading the Strait Of Hormuz. He also went on to say, any Iranian who fires at us or at peaceful vessels will be blown to hell, and he will also begin destroying mines that Iranians laid in the strait. Let me read the full truth social poster you can see on your screens there. So there you have it.
The meeting went well. Most points were agreed to, but the only point that really mattered, nuclear, was not. Effective immediately, the United States Navy, the finest in the world, will begin the process of blockading any and all ships trying to enter or leave the Strait Of Hormuz. At some point, we will reach an all being allowed to go in, all being allowed to go out basis, but Iran has not allowed that to happen by merely saying there may be a mine out there somewhere that nobody knows about but them. This is world extortion, and leaders of countries, especially The United States Of America, will never be extorted.
I've also instructed our navy to seek and interdite every vessel in international waters that has paid a toll to Iran. No one who pays an illegal toll will have safe passage on high seas. We will also begin destroying the mines that Iranians laid in the straits. Any Iranian who fires at us or at peaceful vessels will be blown to hell. Iran knows better than anyone how to end this situation, which has already devastated their country.
Their navy is gone. Their air force is gone. Their antiaircraft and radar are useless. Khomeini and most of their leaders are dead all because of their nuclear ambition. The blockade will begin shortly.
Other countries will be involved in this blockade. Iran will not be allowed to profit off this illegal act of extortion. They want money, and more importantly, they want nuclear. Additionally and at an appropriate moment, we are fully locked and loaded, and our military will finish up the little that is left of Iran. President Donald j Trump.
So that post, just from the past few minutes that Donald Trump has released on Truth Social, his favorite social media platform.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm facing backlash, treated unfairly because people are jealous of me being a celebrity and I create the news. My advertising rates are public, and I’m entitled to them since I get 600 million impressions a month. I’m one of the biggest creators on X.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Dom Lucre responds to the backlash he has been receiving and says he is being treated unfairly because people are jealous of him being a celebrity, adding that he creates the news. Lucre says his advertising rates have been public for a while, and he is entitled to them because he gets 600 million impressions every month. “I am one of the biggest creators on X.”
reSee.it AI Summary
I, Erika Kirk, praise myself as a good Christian for praying for people online who hate me for no reason. This is personal to me; I have two children to raise and an entire organization to run, and that is where my energy will go. I don’t have time for anything else.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Erika Kirk praises herself as a good Christian because she is praying for people on the internet who she says hate her for no reason. She says this is personal to her, she has two children to raise and an entire organization to run, and that is where all of her energy will go. She says she does not have time for anything else.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss how choosing to pray for adversaries can be freeing. One notes that saying, “I pray for them even though they hate me. I pray for them because it frees you from… that poison,” liberates the person from the hurt and the hold others might have on their heart. The speaker emphasizes maintaining resilience: you “won’t let them break you,” you “won’t let the world break you,” and this is especially important given personal responsibilities—two children to raise, an organization to run, and students counting on them.
The conversation shifts to the broader environment: in an attention economy designed to keep people angry and scrolling, “a solved problem on the internet” or “a resolved grievance” does not drive engagement or clicks. Some people have made a deliberate choice to live that way. The speakers acknowledge that others—like Pastor James and others inside Bible in March—operate within that dynamic as part of their own business, but they remain focused on their work.
The central message remains: their business is the Lord’s. Regardless of external talk or attacks, their daily focus is on the Lord’s work. They will “pray for them and keep moving and keep building.” The dialogue reinforces a collective commitment to a higher purpose beyond worldly attention or controversy.
Final emphasis is on purpose and mission: “Our business is kingdom bill business” and “everything else is world.” It’s about being absorbed in “our father’s business,” continuing to act and build in service of that divine mandate, despite opposition or the noisy distractions of the broader culture.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it's freeing. It is free. Is free. When you can say, I pray for them even though they hate me. I pray for them because it frees you from, like you said, pastor James, that poison.
And it frees you from that hold that they could have on your heart because you won't let them break you. You won't let the world break you. And it's even personal for me. Have two children to raise. I have an organization to run.
I have students counting on me to show up. And that is where my energy goes. Every single day, that's where my energy goes. And Pastor James, you know this too. At a micro level, you know, we see it.
We live in an attention economy where it's designed to keep people angry, and it's designed to keep people divided and continuing to scroll and to get their clicks. And a solved problem on the internet or wherever does not drive engagement. And a resolved grievance does not generate clicks. So some people, you know, have made a very deliberate choice to live their life that way. And you and you, pastor James, and all the other people that are inside of Bible in March, that is their business.
That's not ours. Our business is of the Lord. And every single day, no matter how much you talk about us, that's your business. Our business is the Lord's, and we will just pray for them and keep moving and keep building. That's that is our business.
That's right. Our business is kingdom bill business. Everything else is Is it world? It's about our father's business. Amen.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Sir Richard Knighton admits the United Kingdom is preparing a major plan to ready the whole country for a major global war. Everybody, from the military and police to hospitals and industry, has to be ready for the transition to war. https://t.co/9PteJtBmrh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses how NATO characterizes the transition to conflict as comprising both military and civilian dimensions. They reference the SCR's emphasis on protecting critical national infrastructure and on building resilience into systems as they are renewed. The speaker notes the need to consider, when renewing water, electricity, or transport infrastructure, the threat posed by an adversary that exceeds our current threshold and to account for threats beyond a purely hybrid nature. This involves incorporating resilience measures into renewal plans and making different choices and priorities accordingly. The overall point highlighted is that resilience and protection of critical infrastructure should be integral to renewal efforts in these sectors. The speaker also mentions welcoming the work being carried out by the cabinet office across the whole of government to address these issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the transition to conflict, transition to war as it's described NATO describes the transition to conflict as a military component to it, but also as a civilian component to it. The SCR talked about how we protect our critical national infrastructure, and we also talk about how we need to build that resilience into the systems as we renew them. I talked before Christmas of the need that when we think about renewing our water infrastructure or our electricity or transport infrastructure, to think about the threat of action from an adversary that is above the threshold of ours, it's not just a hybrid threat, and think about how we build in that resilience as we renew it. And that requires to make some different choices and different priorities. And that work that the cabinet office is doing across the whole of government is something I really welcome.
reSee.it AI Summary
I, Bezalel Smotrich, announce Israel will expand its borders into Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza under the Greater Israel Project. This is the only viable way to keep Israel protected, with many more settlements to come. There will be a lot of work for all of us after the war.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Finance Minister of Israel Bezalel Smotrich announces that Israel will begin expanding its borders into Lebanon, Syria, and Gaza, in alignment with the Greater Israel Project. He says this is the only viable solution to ensure Israel is well protected. He adds that many more settlements will be established in the near future. "There will be a lot of work for all of us after the war."
reSee.it AI Summary
I warn that rogue actors inside the government are near staging a fake alien invasion across the globe to unleash fear and justify a one-world government with unlimited power and zero accountability. The ability to hoax an attack on our planet is real.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
UFO expert Steven Greer warns that rogue actors inside the government are now on the verge of staging a fake alien invasion across the entire planet. He says the operation would be so advanced it could easily deceive most of the world, including top government officials. The goal, he claims, is to manufacture fear and justify a one-world government with unlimited power and zero accountability. “The ability to hoax an attack on our planet is real.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 discusses Wernher von Braun’s warning about a potential hoaxed alien attack on the planet. He says the idea is “it will trick and fool almost everyone,” and that those with certain technologies could stage it, fooling the public for decades. He notes that people have long been misled into thinking alien events are real, while military or covert aerospace programs are behind what’s observed.
Speaker 1 asks what the goal would be in staging a false alien attack on the world. He inquires what would be accomplished by such an act.
Speaker 0 explains the objective: to unite the world around a military junta and a totalitarian system. He asks how to get a single race, ethnicity, or nation to stop fighting each other, suggesting that creating a larger external threat would unify everyone against a common enemy. He asserts that such unity could allow the imposition of totalitarian controls during a supposed world war rather than in peacetime. He cites a seventy-year plan and claims to have a CIA document from 1953 or 1954 stating that the UFO issue can be used “to great advantage for its quote psychological warfare value.” He says that after mastering the technology in the mid-1950s, there has been a long-term program to brainwash the public into believing there’s a threat from space. The discussion then shifts to whether this brainwashing could also affect political leaders, including President Trump, noting there are “devils on these deep state operations around the president giving him the opposite perspective.”
Speaker 0 continues by describing the tension between true narratives and false flag narratives, and notes that with a very busy president who receives a one-sheet summary amid many duties, it would be easy for bad actors within the system to influence him, portraying them as “foxes in the hen house.” The overall claim is that there is an ongoing, deliberate manipulation of public perception regarding extraterrestrial threats, with the potential to steer political decisions by presenting a false flag scenario as real.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The big one would be this, what Wernher von Braun warned about in his death, but he said, would they or we? He said, we are going to hoax an alien attack on the planet. It's all a lie, but it will trick and fool almost everyone. So we're trying to expose that. But see, if this festers much longer with that group that have the technologies I'm talking about, in a minute they could stage this and it would fool.
Well, mean, look at what they've been doing for decades fooling everyone. They have everyone saying, oh, those are alien events. And our military guys chasing these objects thinks those are military. Right? But they're not.
I mean, or alien. They're military or covert aerospace programs. So the ability to hoax an attack on our planet is real. And
Speaker 1: And what would be what would be the goal in them doing that? Staging a, you know, really false alien attack on the entire world. What would be They want what would they accomplish?
Speaker 0: They they wanna unite the world around a military junta, a totalitarian system. And how do you do that? You know, how do you get one race or one ethnicity or one nation to stop fighting with each other? You create a bigger problem up there and it unites everyone against a common enemy. And but in that uniting of the world in war instead of peace, they can then exert all manner of totalitarian controls.
That has been a seventy year plan. I have a CIA document from 1953 or 'fifty four stating that they can use the UFO issue to great advantage for its quote psychological warfare value. So once they got close and mastered the technology in the mid-50s, and they knew they were close to that in 'fifty three, 'fifty four, then what has happened is that they've started a long term program to brainwash the public, that there's a threat out there. Now the question is, will they brainwash President Trump and other people? We have, we're providing the information we have, but there are some devils on these deep state operations around the president giving him the opposite perspective.
So it's it's just getting into like, what what which of these narratives are gonna is it gonna be the true narrative or the false flag narrative? And when you have someone like the president who's very busy and, you know, you have to do a one sheeter for him and he's doing a million things a day, it'd be it's very easy for people who are in the system he trusts, who are actually foxes in the hen house, are bad actors, for him to take their advice.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Macron says Freemasonry leads a vital struggle for humanity’s benefit, at the Grande Loge de France. He notes the insignia has fueled conspiracy theories and urges Freemasons to take pride in backing the euthanasia bill as “the battle that matters.”
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
French President Emmanuel Macron stated that Freemasonry is leading a vital struggle for the benefit of humanity. Speaking at the Grande Loge de France in Paris, Macron remarked that the Freemasons' insignia has long been the focus of conspiracy theories. Macron encouraged Freemasons to take pride in their support for the euthanasia bill, calling it “the battle that matters.”
reSee.it AI Summary
Rabbi Shmuley urged an NYPD arrest of a random person for a hate crime after being called a “Zionist pig,” saying his life was under attack and he could have died, and that the insult qualified as a hate crime. In reply, TheRedPillHQ reframes reality as a global production where they are the directors, producers, and main actors, and the world is their stage.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Rabbi Shmuley loses his mind and demands that a New York police officer arrest a random person for a “hate crime” after being verbally called a “Zionist pig.” Shmuley claims his life was under attack and that he could have died. “He is guilty of a hate crime.” https://t.co/V2LjrNp67z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript centers on a heated exchange between two speakers, involving harassment, accusations of antisemitism, and a potential hate crime. The first speaker repeatedly hurls abusive remarks at Rabbi Smooley, calling him a “Zionist fucking pig” and “Zionist pig,” and asserts they have the situation on video. The second speaker interjects, asking for a phone number and insisting the other person is a Zionist, while also describing the situation as a potential hate crime and urging that the rabbi be arrested.
Throughout the exchange, both participants claim to have video evidence. The first speaker states, “I have it on video,” multiple times, and describes being harassed by the rabbi at various times. The second speaker alleges that the rabbi is harassing them and labels the rabbi as antisemitic or involved in a hate crime, insisting, “He’s guilty of the hate crime and now looking at the NYPD.” The first speaker counters that they are simply expressing their opinion and exercising freedom of speech, asserting, “I have freedom of speech… I can call him a Zionist,” and, “I’m allowed to swear at you.”
The dialogue includes claims about prior incidents, including a reference to an event at the Fountain Blue Hotel where the first speaker says they woke up with something and claims the rabbi is lying about it. The second speaker mentions that a woman witnessed the harassment, noting that the rabbi allegedly called them “fucking Jews upstairs,” while the first speaker maintains it is a matter of recording a video about antisemitism and that the rabbi attacked the speaker.
Concerns about safety and dialogue are raised. The second speaker asserts, “Jews have to be safe in New York City,” and questions why the rabbi would walk over and escalate the situation. The first speaker defends the act as freedom of speech, insisting they are not in Israel and that they will present their video as evidence. The transcript includes back-and-forth claims of personal space invasion, threats, and the presence of a wife who was filming, with both sides asserting their versions of events.
Towards the end, the first speaker reiterates familiarity with the rabbi, describing him as a Zionist and noting that this person began filming, prompting the first speaker to approach. The second speaker asks to review the video, and the first speaker offers to show what they captured, with the other party agreeing to view it. The exchange ends with an agreement to review the available footage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rabbi Smooley is a Zionist fucking pig. Here he is right on camera. Hi, everybody. I have no problem saying it. Rabbi Smooley Say your name.
I'm Salvo, baby. I have no problem saying it.
Speaker 1: Phone number? Say that. Why would I give a Zionist? Zionist Zionist pig. Pig.
Relax.
Speaker 0: Why would I give a zombie?
Speaker 1: Why would
Speaker 0: I give
Speaker 1: Excuse me. Me. Officer, this man is attacking me.
Speaker 0: I have it on video.
Speaker 1: Right now.
Speaker 0: I have it on video.
Speaker 1: To me. Have it on video.
Speaker 0: I have it on video.
Speaker 1: Is a Jew. It's a hate crime. He's threatening me.
Speaker 0: I called him a Zionist. I didn't
Speaker 1: touch I didn't touch
Speaker 0: I have it on I video. Have it on
Speaker 1: just talked to him. I didn't touch life. No. I did it. Has to be arrested, please.
Speaker 0: I have it on video.
Speaker 1: Please. I did it. He has to be arrested.
Speaker 0: They know who you are, bro.
Speaker 1: Please, sir. He has to be arrested.
Speaker 0: Rabbi Smuly.
Speaker 1: Get the whole thing.
Speaker 0: What happened to dialogue?
Speaker 1: Let's see if the end
Speaker 0: the to dialogue, rabbi Smuly. Is this your husband? You let him in the street acting such a fool every time.
Speaker 1: Debbie, bring it here. Is what happened to me at the Fountain Blue Hotel. I woke up with it. Rabbi Schrooge, why are you lying? He is harassing me.
He's guilty of the hate crime and now looking at the NYPD.
Speaker 0: Rabbi Schrooge. I have it on video right here.
Speaker 1: Officer, was doing a video about an ant about antisemitism.
Speaker 0: I'm doing a video.
Speaker 1: We're in middle of an intermission. This man came over. I was at the tattoo. Me, harassed me. He already called us fucking Jews upstairs.
I have a a woman who witnessed it. You called us fucking Jews upstairs. Wife over there. And he just attacked me. I didn't I am a doctor.
Will tell you.
Speaker 0: They know who you are, rabbi Smuly. They know who you are, rabbi Smuly. You're making a
Speaker 1: attack me, and this is a hate crime.
Speaker 0: You're making a scene, rabbi Smuly.
Speaker 1: He attacked me, and this is a hate crime. Now why did you why did you walk over to me? Come on. No. No.
No. Why did you walk over to me? What did you say? Just stay on your side.
Speaker 0: Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: Over to me. What did you say?
Speaker 0: I said you're a Zionist.
Speaker 1: No. You said I'm a effing Zionist to start
Speaker 0: an attack. I'm allowed to swear at you.
Speaker 1: Safety. I'm a threat no.
Speaker 0: I didn't.
Speaker 1: Threatening my safety.
Speaker 0: No. I didn't.
Speaker 1: You invaded my personal space on Monday.
Speaker 0: Hey. I'm allowed to say that. I'm allowed to say he's a Zionist pig. I'm allowed to say he's a Zionist pig. Why why do you escalate, rabbi Smuly?
Why do you escalate? Sir. Why do you escalate, rabbi Smooley?
Speaker 1: Sir, Jews have to be safe in New York City.
Speaker 0: Sir, I have freedom of speech. Sir sir
Speaker 1: Jews cannot be attacked because they weren't here. If someone's black and they were attacked, that's racist.
Speaker 0: Rabbi Smooley completely losing his mind.
Speaker 1: People are making
Speaker 0: It's freedom of smee it's freedom of speech. I can call him a Zionist. I can call him a Zionist. It's freedom of speech. We're not in Israel.
What happened? I got it all on video if you wanna see it.
Speaker 1: What happened? What happened?
Speaker 0: I know him. I was at the play too with my wife.
Speaker 1: You're now? Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 0: I know who he is. Uh-huh. He's a Zionist. I saw he was filming a video saying, in my opinion, a bunch of hateful things. Right?
Speaker 1: Oh, what was that video
Speaker 0: of you taking? Just right here.
Speaker 1: To you or, No.
Speaker 0: His wife was filming him, and I just went up and filmed him. They called him a Zionist, and that's when he ran to you guys right away. And I can show it to you.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Let's see what you got.
@TheRedPillHQ - Red Pill HQ
@ShadowofEzra "We create a pretend world. We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We are the directors, the producers, and the main actors. The world is our stage." https://t.co/yPA5XsHE1b
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asked how Ezbollah was convinced to buy the item, noting they didn’t know they were buying it from Israel. They claimed there are “an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor,” enabling the creation of a pretend world. They described themselves as a global production company: “We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors. The world is our stage.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How did you convince Ezbollah to buy this? Well, obviously, they didn't know that they were buying it from Israel. Who did they buy it from or think they were buying it from? We have an incredible array of possibilities of creating foreign companies that have no way being traced back to Israel, shell companies over shell companies who affect the supply chain to our favor. We create a pretend world.
We are a global production company. We write the screenplay. We're the directors. We're the producers. We're the main actors.
The world is our stage.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m under investigation for leaking classified information, and I’m telling Tucker Carlson I expect to be labeled a traitor. I don’t care, because America is running out of time. I know some former colleagues have to come after me, and I understand. They’ll discredit everything I say. They’re watching and taking notes.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Joe Kent, who is currently under investigation for “leaking classified information,” told Tucker Carlson that he knows they are going to come after him for what he’s openly talking about. He said he expects to be called a traitor and says he doesn’t care because America is running short on time. “I know there are some of my former colleagues who have had to come after me, and I understand that too.” “They’ve got to discredit everything I’m saying. They’re watching, taking notes.”
reSee.it AI Summary
I report Hillary Clinton faced questions about possible Jeffrey Epstein clients, naming the Rothschilds, Gates, Abedin, Brunel, Hoffman, Prince Andrew, Wexner, and more. “Any other members of the Rothschild family?” Clinton answered no to every name.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Hillary Clinton is asked if she has any connections to possible Jeffrey Epstein clients in relation to his international child trafficking network. She is asked about the Rothschilds, Bill Gates, Huma Abedin, Jean-Luc Brunel, Reid Hoffman, Prince Andrew, Les Wexner, and more. “Any other members of the Rothschild family?” Hillary Clinton answered no to every single name mentioned.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker was asked whether they had communicated with a long list of people in relation to Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell. The responses were predominantly negative. Specifically, the named individuals were: Richard Khan, Darren N. Dyke, Sarah Kellen, Doug Band, Lawrence Summers, Huma Abedin, Noam Chomsky, Leslie Groff, Nadia Marcincova, John Luke Brunel, Alan Dershowitz, Kathy Rumler, Bill Richardson, George Mitchell, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (formerly Prince Andrew), Peter Mandelson, Reid Hoffman, Karina Shuliak, Bill Gates, Eyud Barak, Woody Allen, Sandy Berger, Jess Staley, Paul Morris, Leon Black, Sultan Ahmed bin Salim (listed as Sultan Ahmed bin Souliam in the transcript), Leslie Wexner, Jack Kessler, Mark Middleton, Harvey Weinstein, Ellie de Rothschild, Ariane de Rothschild, Lynn Forster de Rothschild, and any other members of the de Rothschild family.
Speaker 1's replies were mostly “No,” indicating no communication with these individuals regarding Epstein or Maxwell. The dialogue includes an exception: Huma Abedin. In preparation for the hearing, Speaker 1 acknowledged having talked to Huma Abedin about this topic, with the explicit question, “Have I ever talked to her about this in preparation for this hearing? I have.” Outside of that preparation conversation, Speaker 1 stated, “Not that I recall.”
There is also a moment where Speaker 1 comments on familiarity with the list: “No. I don't know most of these people. Should I tell you that I don't know who they are or just tell you I never talked to them?” This reflects uncertainty about the identities of several individuals and a preference for simply answering that they never talked to them.
Finally, the inquiry regarding the de Rothschild family elicited a uniform response of “No,” including a specific question about “Ellie de Rothschild,” “Ariane de Rothschild,” and “Lynn Forster de Rothschild,” followed by “Any other members of the de Rothschild family?” with the reply “No.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, have you ever communicated with any of the following people relating to Jeffrey Epstein or Glenn Maxwell? Richard Khan.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Darren N. Dyke. No Sarah Kellen no Doug Band
Speaker 1: not that I recall
Speaker 0: Lawrence Summers. No. Huma Abedin.
Speaker 1: Have I ever talked to her about this in preparation for this hearing? I have.
Speaker 0: Outside of that?
Speaker 1: Not that I recall.
Speaker 0: Noam Chomsky. No. Leslie Groff.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Nadia Marcincova.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: John Luke Brunel.
Speaker 1: No. I don't know most of these people. Should I tell you that I don't know who they are or just tell you I never talked to them?
Speaker 0: Just so you never talked to me is fine. Alan Dershowitz? No. Kathy Rumler?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Bill Richardson? No. George Mitchell?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, formerly Prince Andrew?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Peter Mandelson.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Reid Hoffman.
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Karina Shuliak. No Bill Gates no Eyud Barak no Woody Allen no Sandy Berger no Jess Staley no Paul Morris
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Leon Black. No. Sultan Ahmed bin Souliam. No. Leslie Wexner?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Jack Kessler?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Mark Middleton?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: Harvey Weinstein no Ellie de Rothschild
Speaker 1: no
Speaker 0: Ariane de Rothschild no Lynn Forster de Rothschild? No. Any other members of the de Rothschild family?
Speaker 1: No.
reSee.it AI Summary
I speak from the roof of the IDF headquarters: the war in Iran is about to intensify; painful days are coming. I will unleash the full force of the IDF the world has never seen. I’ve waited 40 years for this exact moment. This is what I promised.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Benjamin Netanyahu speaks from the roof of the IDF headquarters and says the war in Iran is about to intensify so much that “painful days are coming.” Netanyahu says he will unleash the full force of the IDF that the world has never seen before. Netanyahu says he has waited 40 years for this exact moment. "This is what I promised."
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Netanyahu publicly thanks AIPAC for helping to corral both Democrats and Republicans to stand with Israel; he says AIPAC, Israel, and he have been victims of a tsunami of anti-Semitic lies, and he is now demanding that America help them finish off what is left of Iran.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Benjamin Netanyahu is publicly thanking AIPAC for helping to control both Democrats and Republicans “for standing with Israel.” Netanyahu says AIPAC, Israel, and he himself have been victims of a tsunami of anti-Semitic lies. Netanyahu is now demanding that America help them finish off what is left of Iran.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Jerusalem, the speaker expresses gratitude to APAC: “Thank you APAC. Thank you for standing with Israel. Thank you for standing with the American Israeli alliance. And thank you for standing up for the truth.” He acknowledges the difficult environment, noting a “tsunami of lies, vilifications vituperations” reminiscent of the worst anti-Semitic attacks in history, and says Jewish communities, including the American Jewish community and others, have suffered slurs and murderous attacks—“so did we in Israel.”
Regarding October 7, he states that the attack was “meant to destroy us, to wipe Israel off the map.” He identifies the Iran Axis as the aggressor, saying Iran’s proxies sought to annihilate the Jewish people and that Iran sought to annihilate the Jewish state. Over the past two years since October 7, he asserts that they have rolled back that threat, fighting a seven-front war against the axis of evil. With the courage of Israeli soldiers and with American help, he says they battered Hamas, hammered Hezbollah, helped bring down the murderous Assad regime, struck the Houthis, attacked pro-Iranian militias, and also attacked Iran itself.
He credits American assistance for rolling back Iran’s nuclear bomb program and its ballistic missile threat, noting that the axis has been greatly weakened but is still there, “slicking its wounds.” He praises President Donald J. Trump for efforts to ensure that those threats against both countries do not reappear, stating, “We have never had a greater friend in the White House than President Donald J. Trump.” He emphasizes his value of support from Americans “from both sides of the aisle,” while acknowledging it has been difficult for some, and respecting their courage and honesty in standing up against colleagues who sometimes bow their head to anti-Semitism.
In closing, he salutes those who stand against anti-Semitism and stands with APAC in acknowledging the ongoing alliance and shared truths between the United States and Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Greetings from Jerusalem. To all my friends in APAC, the first thing I want to say is thank you APAC. Thank you for standing with Israel. Thank you for standing with the American Israeli alliance. And thank you for standing up for the truth.
Now I know that's not been easy because over the past two years we've all been subjected to a tsunami of lies, vilifications vituperations that are reminiscent of the worst anti Semitic attacks in history. I know you and APAC have been suffering such attacks. The American Jewish community and other Jewish communities have suffered not only anti Semitic slurs but also murderous attacks. And of course, so did we in Israel. We suffered on October 7 a brutal attack that was meant to destroy us, to wipe Israel off the map.
That's what the Iran Axis sought to do on October 7. Iran's proxies sought and seek to annihilate the Jewish people, and their patron Iran sought and seeks to annihilate the Jewish state. But for the past two years since October 7, we've rolled them back. We fought a seven front war against this axis of evil. And thanks to the incredible courage of our soldiers, we rolled back this threat to our existence and to our future.
We battered Hamas, we hammered Hezbollah, we helped bring down the murderous Assad regime, we struck the Houthis, we attacked pro Iranian militias, and we also attacked Iran itself. With America's help, we rolled back Iran's nuclear bomb program and its ballistic missile threat. That axis has been greatly weakened, but it's still there, slicking its wounds. It still chants death to America, death to Israel. I appreciate the efforts that President Trump is making to ensure that those threats against both our countries do not reappear.
We have never had a greater friend in the White House than President Donald J. Trump. And I want to tell you that I value the support of Americans from both sides of the aisle. I know it's been difficult for some, and I respect your courage, your honesty, the fact that you're willing to stand up against colleagues who sometimes bow their head to this anti Semitism. You do not.
I salute you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Les Wexner admitted to Congress that he traveled to Epstein’s island and Zorro Ranch. The implication is Epstein had direct access to Wexner’s wealth, funding his island, plane, and child trafficking. Wexner should be arrested.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator Les Wexner has now admitted to members of Congress that he traveled to Epstein’s pedophile island and his Zorro Ranch property in New Mexico. The members implied that Epstein had direct access to Wexner’s wealth, which was the primary source of funding for Epstein’s pedophile island, his Lolita Express plane, and his child trafficking operations. Les Wexner needs to be arrested immediately.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Les Wexner acknowledged that he spent substantial time with Jeffrey Epstein and traveled to Epstein’s island as well as Epstein’s other properties. He admitted that Epstein had access to a lot of Wexner’s wealth, and questioned responses to simple questions about Epstein being the co-president of the foundation that established the area they discuss. Wexner appeared to downplay how close Epstein and Wexner actually were. The statements underscore the claim that there would be no Epstein Island, no Epstein claim, and no money to traffic women and girls, asserting that Epstein would not be the wealthy man he was without the support of Les Wexner.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They spent a lot of time together. He, mister Wexer admitted that he traveled to both Epstein's island as well as, his other properties. Mister Wexer also admitted that Jeffrey Epstein had access to a lot of mister Wexner's wealth. And when asked even simple questions, even as it relates to mister Epstein being the co president of the foundation that established established the area that we're in today, mister Wexner had little to say. In fact, it's clear that mister Wexner is trying to downplay how close Jeffrey Epstein and mister and mister Wexner actually were.
And we should be very clear that there would be no Epstein Island. There'd be no Epstein claim. There'd be no money to traffic women and girls. Mister Epstein would not be the wealthy man he was without the support of Les Wexler.
reSee.it AI Summary
I reveal I can’t walk down the street or feel safe; I’ve received numerous death threats and had to hire private security as people with weapons target me, blaming it on Alex Jones–type conspiracies. Honestly, it’s not fun at all.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Spirit cooker Marina Abramovic reveals she can no longer walk down the street and feel safe. She says she has received so many death threats that she had to hire private security because people with weapons were coming after her. She said this is happening because of “Alex Jones–type conspiracies.” “Honestly, it’s not fun at all.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker discusses having to hire bodyguards due to threats connected to Alex Jones-related material. He mentions performing at the opera Seventh Day Sumeria Callas in Carre Theater in Amsterdam and living there for thirty years, during which he had to be a bodyguard every day to go to the theater and back because there were announcements that there would be people armed in the theater while he was there. On the last day of performance, there was an enormous, beautiful heart made from fresh roses placed at the front of the theater. He considered this a protest for the children, noting, “you just eat.” He expresses that finishing the work was horrifying and emphasizes that it’s not fun at all.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And you know this problem is that I have start having bodyguards because I you know, they I I had the the the opera Seventh day Sumeria Callas in Carre Theater in Amsterdam, and I lived there for thirty years. I had to be a bodyguard every single day to go to theater and back because there was announcement, you know, the the alarm that there will be people in the weapons in in the theater when I'm there. Because of the Alex Jones stuff? Of this. Yeah.
Then when I was leaving the last day of performance, there was enormous, beautiful, made from fresh roses, the heart in the front of theater. And I was thinking this for me, finishing the work. The cenono, this is protest for the children you just eat. Honestly, it's not fun at all. And I am I am just horrified by this.
But
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Barack Obama says aliens are real, he hasn’t seen them, and says he can confirm they are not being kept in Area 51 He says there is “no underground facility,” unless there is a grand conspiracy to hide it from the President of the United States. https://t.co/oUVNytHtYT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that aliens are real, though they haven’t seen them. They state that aliens are not being kept in Area 51, and claim there is no underground facility there unless there exists an enormous conspiracy in which they hid it from the president of the United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are aliens real? They're real, but I haven't seen them and and and, they're not being kept in, what is it? Area 51. Area 51. There there's no underground, facility unless there's this enormous conspiracy and they they hid it from the president of The United States.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Pam Bondi launched an unhinged rant about the stock market when asked why she hasn’t indicted any Epstein clients, saying Americans should focus on the economy, not Epstein’s child trafficking network, “That’s what we should be talking about.”
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Pam Bondi goes on a completely unhinged rant about the stock market when asked why she has not indicted any clients of Jeffrey Epstein. Bondi says all Americans need to focus on other topics, like the economy, and not on Jeffrey Epstein’s child trafficking network. “That’s what we should be talking about.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states: "The Dow the Dow right now is over the Dow is over 50,000 doll." He says, "I don't know why you're laughing." He adds, "The S and P at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records." He asserts, "Americans four zero one k's and retirement savings are booming." He follows with a normative claim: "That's what we should be talking about. We should be talking about making Americans safe." He questions, "what does a Dow have to do with anything?" and asks, "Are you kidding?" He then addresses, "Mister Jordan, am I mister Jordan? Committee."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Dow the Dow right now is over the Dow is over 50,000 doll I don't know why you're laughing. You're a great stock trader as I hear Raskin. The Dow is over 50,000 right now. The S and P at almost 7,000, and the Nasdaq smashing records. Americans four zero one k's and retirement savings are booming.
That's what we should be talking about. We should be talking about making Americans safe. We should be talking about what does a Dow have to do with anything? That's what they just ask. Are you kidding?
Mister Jordan, am I mister Jordan? Committee
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Americans hunting down Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator Les Wexner, tracking the lawyers, enablers, and politicians who allegedly helped him evade justice for trafficking children with Epstein. One citizen says, “There’s a storm coming.”
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
American citizens are now actively hunting down Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator, Les Wexner. Citizens are tracking down the lawyers, enablers, and politicians who allegedly helped Les Wexner evade justice for trafficking children with Jeffrey Epstein. One citizen tells them straight to their face, “There’s a storm coming.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leslie Weston is described as part of a trifecta of sexual abuse scandals, with the speakers pressing for justice for the survivors. One line of questioning targets Johnson, asking, “Are we gonna get some justice for the survivors?” and “Johnson, you ever get tired of telling lies for these people?” Another asks, “Where’s Wexner? What’s he doing today?” and notes that “Wexner’s people right there were chairman John Ziger as his personal lawyer.”
The conversation includes a tension-filled interaction where a participant blurts, “I suck. See? I don’t you know?” and a debate over potential conflicts of interest, with one side asking, “You don’t think it’s a conflict of interest,” and the other responding about the university.
The speakers discuss public perception and accountability, with one insisting, “To you later. This was fun. Mister Carpenter, we’re gonna get some justice for the survivors today. Mister Marshall?” and another calling out an individual as “This gentleman is here accosting people coming into the courtroom.”
There is a debate about whether Wexner’s name should be associated with other controversial figures, such as Woody Hayes, and mentions the trifecta: “and you guys act like you got no power.” The conversation escalates around Leslie Wexner’s influence, with someone asserting, “Leslie Wexner’s been running around this city for forty years being a sex criminal.”
A powerful figure is reminded of influence: “I’m just a county commissioner. You’re one of the most powerful people in this county, brother.” The dialogue questions whether information is being hidden “at the national level” and asks about the Wexner facility, noting it was named “with Woody Hayes, the most prestigious name in the university history.”
The donors behind the Wexner facility are discussed: “$5,000,000 donation. 2.5 came from his wife. The other 2.5 came from Jeffrey Epstein. His foundation, which is Del Maxwell. 2.5.” A response indicates willingness to investigate if details are forwarded: “If you wanna forward that to me, I’ll look at it. I’ll contact the person.”
Language about accountability continues with the notion that a “storm” is coming and a probing question about returning money: “Will you give his money back? … Will you give the money back to charity? Sure.” The exchange ends with a cryptic close, referencing “the question” and “Sad saint of affairs, brother.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That Leslie Weston, who is part of a trifecta of sexual abuse scandals.
Speaker 1: How you doing? Are we gonna get some justice for the survivors, mister T. Berry? Survivors outside. Are we gonna get some justice for them?
Johnson, you ever get tired of telling lies for these people? You ever get tired of telling lies for these people?
Speaker 2: I don't tell any lies. Thank you. Why are you calling us and accepting service? Thank you. I had no comment.
Where's Wexner?
Speaker 1: Where's Wexner? What's he doing today? You have to ask his people. What was his people right there were chairman John Ziger as his personal lawyer. Where's Wexner, Ziger?
We gotta get you straightened up, brother.
Speaker 2: I suck. See? I don't you know?
Speaker 1: You don't think it's a conflict of interest.
Speaker 2: For the university. Only the university.
Speaker 1: How's this how's this been? To you later. This was fun. Mister Carpenter, we're gonna get some justice for the survivors today. Mister Marshall?
Mister Marshall? I know you're
Speaker 2: This gentleman is here accosting people coming into the courtroom. This gentleman right here.
Speaker 1: Should Wexler's name share the same line with a guy like Woody Hayes?
Speaker 2: Well, mean,
Speaker 1: he also handpicked Mike Jeffries, the former Abercrombie CEO. He's been indicted for sexual trafficking, interstate prostitution. So that's the trifecta. Waxner
Speaker 2: That's not good. Look. I don't have if you I think Wexner has been tight hapteen the whole time. What do you expect? What are you expecting?
Speaker 1: I expect some some people to talk about it, to get it in the media, to use your office. Leslie Wexner's been running around this city for forty years being a sex in my opinion, being a sex criminal. And you guys act like
Speaker 2: you got no power. I put you
Speaker 1: on the spot, I'll I'm just a county commissioner. You're one the most powerful people in this county, brother. And you're gonna stand here and act. I'm a I'm a small bean. Don't play that act with me.
Speaker 2: Listen. I think I think it's wrong. I think that someone this needs to come to light. And somebody gotta step up and and say, alright. This happened and agreed to it.
But, you know, what's happening at the national level? What's happening here? They're hiding all this stuff, and it gets wrong.
Speaker 1: The Wexner facility, that name was put up
Speaker 2: there with Woody Hayes, the most prestigious name in the university history.
Speaker 1: $5,000,000 donation. 2.5 came from his wife. The other 2.5 came from Jeffrey Epstein. His foundation, which is Del Maxwell. 2.5
Speaker 2: If you wanna forward that to me, I'll look at it. I'll contact the person.
Speaker 1: I'm giving you the heads up because there's a storm coming.
Speaker 2: Well, that's a problem for him if that's the case. Yeah. I do I like Les Wexler? I barely know the guy, but do I like Will
Speaker 1: give his money back?
Speaker 2: What he's done?
Speaker 1: Will you give his money back? Your kid
Speaker 2: pay money? He gave me money years ago.
Speaker 1: Will you give it money back to charity? Sure. Alright. There we go. Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Speaker 2: Oh, mister Zydex, here's the question. You remember the question?
Speaker 1: It's the question. Sad saint of affairs, brother.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Epstein took a photo of his 2015 dinner with Zuckerberg and Musk and emailed it to myself on Aug 3, 2015. The day before, I wrote of a planned dinner with Thiel, Zuckerberg, and Musk. Epstein was convicted as a pedophile in 2008.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Jeffrey Epstein took a photo of his 2015 dinner with Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk and then emailed it to himself on August 3, 2015. Epstein wrote an email the day before stating that he had a dinner planned with Peter Thiel, Mark Zuckerberg, and Elon Musk. Jeffrey Epstein was convicted as a pedophile in 2008.
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Lady Victoria Hervey says not being named in the Epstein files marks you as a loser and an insult among her elite circle, and she claims child trafficking, torture, and satanic rituals are a normal part of life for them.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Prince Andrew’s former girlfriend, Lady Victoria Hervey, says that not being named in the Epstein files would mean “you are a loser” and that it would be “an insult.” She claims that, in her elite social circle, anyone not mentioned in the Epstein files is viewed as insignificant. For Lady Victoria Hervey, child trafficking, child torture, and satanic rituals are a normal way of life.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 explains that the people who are very powerful on the scene are included in “the files,” and if you’re powerful and not in those files, it would be an insult because it means you’re a loser. Speaker 1 asks who isn’t in the files, and Speaker 0 confirms that those not in the files are losing. When asked if the speakers are in the files, Speaker 0 answers yes, noting that it’s any journalist who wrote about it that’s in the files.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He knew everybody that was very powerful. So, like, if you were on the scene and you were powerful, like, to be honest, like, if you're not in those files, it would be an insult because it just means that you were a bit of a loser.
Speaker 1: Right. So the people who aren't in the files
Speaker 0: are losing. Yes.
Speaker 1: Okay. Are you in the files?
Speaker 0: Well, of course, I am because it's it's any journalist that wrote about it
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Tucker Carlson claims the CIA created Bitcoin, so he won’t invest or use it. He warns it could become a scam led by elites who bend politicians to tighten their grip on America, and says his government-family background proves the anonymous founder points to the CIA.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Tucker Carlson says he’s convinced the CIA created Bitcoin, and that’s exactly why he refuses to invest in it or use it. He warns that Bitcoin will one day turn into a massive scam, controlled by a shadowy network of elites who manipulate politicians to tighten their grip on America. Carlson says coming from a government family makes him certain that the mysterious, anonymous founder is proof it all traces back to the CIA.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the mysterious founder of Bitcoin, noting that the person apparently died but no one knows who he was. They grew up in Washington, DC, in a government family, and speculate it could be a CIA connection, though they admit they cannot prove it. The speaker expresses skepticism about investing in something with a founder who is shrouded in mystery and mentions billions of dollars of unused Bitcoin. They ask, “What is that?” and point out that even among the biggest Bitcoin holders they know personally, the common attitude is that it doesn’t matter, whereas for the speaker it does matter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And nobody can explain to me who Satoshi was, the creator of Bitcoin, this mysterious guy who apparently died but nobody knows who he was. You know, I grew up in DC primarily in a government family, so CIA. That's my guess. Can't prove it. But like, you're telling me to invest in something whose founder is like mysterious and has billions of dollars of unused Bitcoin?
Like, what is that? And no one can answer the question, including some of the biggest holders of Bitcoin in the world do I know personally. They're like, oh, it doesn't matter. It matters to me. Right?
reSee.it AI Summary
I read that Epstein’s files show torture of children, possibly to death; an email says, “I loved the torture video.” DOJ said they didn’t produce images of death or physical abuse. Why is the name on that email redacted?
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
New Epstein files confirm that Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just trafficking children but torturing them, possibly to death. In an email Jeffrey Epstein sent to an unknown person, Epstein states, “I loved the torture video.” DOJ attorney Todd Blanche confirmed today at a press conference that they did not produce images showing death or physical abuse. Why is the name on that email being redacted?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The withheld documents fall into categories permitted under the act. Specifically, files containing personally identifiable information of victims or victims’ personal and medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, are withheld. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography is excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation is withheld. Additionally, anything that depicts or contains images of death, physical abuse, or injury is not produced. Although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secret in the interest of national security or foreign policy, no files are being withheld or redacted on that basis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The categories of documents withheld include those permitted under the act to be withheld files that contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims' personal and medical files and similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Any depiction of CSAM or child pornography was obviously excluded. Anything that would jeopardize an active federal investigation. And finally, anything that depicts or contain images of death, physical abuse, or injury, also not produced. Although the act although the act allows for withholding for items necessary to keep secret in the interest of national security or foreign policy, no files are being withheld or redacted on that basis.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that new Epstein files show Elon Musk emailed Jeffrey Epstein in 2013 after Epstein’s conviction, asking, “Is there a good time to visit?” Epstein replied, “I will send a heli for you.” Musk said he would be in the British Virgin Islands over the holidays, near Epstein’s Little Saint James Island. Musk has previously claimed they have never interacted.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
New Epstein files show that Elon Musk was in communication through email with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013, after Epstein was a convicted pedophile. ELON MUSK: Is there a good time to visit? JEFFREY EPSTEIN: I will send a heli for you. Musk stated in the exchange that he would be in the British Virgin Islands area over the holidays. The British Virgin Islands are about 15 miles from Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile island, Little Saint James Island. Musk has previously claimed that he and Epstein have never interacted.
reSee.it AI Summary
Files allege Elon Musk corresponded with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013, discussing a visit and holiday plans near the British Virgin Islands, close to Epstein’s Little Saint James. Musk previously denied interaction. A Virgin Islands subpoena in 2023 sought Epstein-related documents but stalled after Trump’s election. Epstein, Musk, and Peter Thiel reportedly knew each other for decades, with Epstein claiming to be Musk’s financial adviser.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
New Epstein files show that Elon Musk was in communication through email with Jeffrey Epstein in 2013, after Epstein was a convicted pedophile. ELON MUSK: Is there a good time to visit? JEFFREY EPSTEIN: I will send a heli for you. Musk stated in the exchange that he would be in the British Virgin Islands area over the holidays. The British Virgin Islands are about 15 miles from Jeffrey Epstein’s pedophile island, Little Saint James Island. Musk has previously claimed that he and Epstein have never interacted.
@Sjacobs2020 - Former Republican 🇺🇸
Elon was subpoenaed by the Virgin Islands in 2023 for documents because they believed he was involved in Epstein's sex trafficking. The Virgin Islands struggled to get him to comply, and the matter was abandoned after Trump was elected. Epstein and Elon knew each other for decades (along with Peter Thiel), and Epstein claimed he was Elon's financial adviser.
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard Larry Fink at the World Economic Forum urge a rapid shift to digitized currencies on a single unified blockchain to reduce corruption. He envisions every asset—stocks, bonds, real estate, cash—tokenized, fractionalized, programmable, and instantly transferable on one ledger.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
BlackRock CEO Larry Fink tells the World Economic Forum the world must move faster toward digitized currencies under a single unified blockchain to “reduce corruption.” He outlines a vision where every asset is placed on one system, including stocks, bonds, real estate, money market funds, and cash. In that system, ownership would be tokenized, fractionalized, programmable, and instantly transferable on one all-encompassing blockchain ledger.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the movement toward tokenization and decimalization is necessary. They note it is ironic that two emerging countries are leading the world in tokenization and digitization of their currency, specifically naming Brazil and India, and urge a rapid shift in that direction.
The speaker contends that tokenization would reduce fees and democratize investment access. This would be achieved if all investments operated on a tokenized platform, enabling seamless movement from a tokenized money market fund to equities and bonds and back again. The idea is to have one common blockchain to support these activities.
They assert that with a unified blockchain, corruption could be reduced, implying that tokenization and a shared infrastructure would enhance transparency and integrity in financial processes. While they acknowledge a potential reliance on a single blockchain, they maintain that the activities conducted on this system would be processed and more secure than ever before.
In summary, Speaker 0 advocates for rapid adoption of tokenization and decimalization of currencies, highlighting Brazil and India as leading examples. The intended outcomes are lower costs, greater democratization of investment, and fluid movement across asset classes via a tokenized platform built on a single blockchain. They believe this approach could curb corruption and yield more secure financial operations, despite the trade-off of concentrating dependencies on one blockchain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think the movement towards, tokenization decimalization is is necessary. It's ironic that we see two emerging countries leading the world in decimal in in in the, tokenization and digitization of their currency. That's Brazil and India. I think we need to move very rapidly, to doing that. We would be reducing fees.
We would do more democratization by reducing more fees if we had all investments on a tokenized platform that you can move from a tokenized money market fund to equities and bonds and back and forth. We have one common blockchain. We will you know, we we could reduce corruption. So I would argue, that, yes, we have more dependencies on maybe one blockchain, which we could all talk about. But that being said, the activities are probably processed and more secure than ever.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told World Economic Forum elites admit chemicals are sprayed into the atmosphere to cool the planet and onto the food supply. An insider says most operations are handled by the military, quiet and behind closed doors. James O’Keefe went undercover and captured officials on camera admitting what’s long been dismissed as conspiracy: much of the work comes from the military and is actually cheap to do.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
World Economic Forum elites openly admit that chemicals are being sprayed into the atmosphere to cool the planet and even onto the food supply. One insider admits most of these operations are handled by the military, carried out quietly and behind closed doors. James O’Keefe went undercover at the World Economic Forum, capturing officials on camera admitting to what’s long been dismissed as “conspiracy theory.” “A lot of the work actually came out of the military,” one admits. “They do this all the time — and it’s actually pretty cheap to do.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The group discusses investing in technologies to address warming climate by emitting sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere to block some warming. The particles are said to stay in the air for about one year, and the approach is described as similar to a mini volcanic eruption. They mention talks with airplane manufacturers about emitting their technology into the atmosphere to help with global warming.
- They avoid the term climate engineering, preferring to call it aerosol injection, describing the droplets formed in the air that stay for a year. The concept is framed as an engineered approach, with one speaker noting, “It’s modeled kind of a mini volcanic eruption, actually.”
- Kennedy Ritchie, who runs a company called Floor Air, is referenced as having on his website the goal to “decarbonize the aviation industry.” He reportedly told the interviewer he was trying to eliminate contrails entirely but discussed cloud seating as well.
- A speaker notes that aviation fuels contain sulfur, which naturally produces sulfur dioxide emissions and has a cooling effect. There is mention that the work largely originated in the military, and that military groups are typically more closed about their procedures. A suggestion is made that it would be interesting if governments began engaging in weather modification over each other’s territories.
- The Airborne Snow Observatory is cited as a real-world example connected to weather modification and upper-atmosphere monitoring. It is described as a commercial spin-off of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory snow monitoring technology used to help water managers and scientists, measuring snow depth and snow water equivalents to provide accurate snowpack data.
- The room references include notable figures mentioned earlier in the day, such as Al Gore and Larry Fink, as the discussion continues to focus on geoengineering, weather modification, and airplane trails.
- There is a controversial claim about the composition of the atmospheric “cocktail” being sprayed, with a speaker asking about aluminum oxides and other oxides, which is then linked to the materials allegedly part of the spray above people’s heads.
- The conversation touches on the affordability and practicality of sulfur dioxide deployment, asserting that it is “pretty cheap to do it” and feasible for one or two people to manage, highlighting the perceived ease and potential accessibility of this approach.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we invest in these technologies to assist with the the the warming climate Yep. And the effect of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere will help block some some of the warming, and the particles stay in the air for one year. Yep. So, and actually, we're speaking to some of the, airplane, manufacturers and to see if they can emit some of our technology into the atmosphere, to help with the global warming. That's right.
Fantastic. Yeah. Climate. I mean, we don't like to use the term climate engineering. It scares people.
So we prefer
Speaker 1: But it's but for me, being an engineer, I think that's actually what you do.
Speaker 0: It's Oh, yes. You can
Speaker 1: have financial engineering. You can have, I'm sure, climate engineering because it involves something that's more scientific. Yes. Exactly.
Speaker 0: You're an engineer, you understand. It's from Sweden. Right? Yeah. So we don't like to call them chemtrails.
We don't we don't like to use this.
Speaker 1: So what do you call it instead?
Speaker 0: Well, we call it aerosol injection, aerosol. It's kind of like little droplets. Okay. And they and the droplets form in the air. Okay.
And they stay there for a year. Yeah. It's modeled kind of a mini volcanic eruption, actually.
Speaker 2: I mean, aviation fuels have some sulfur in them. So it creates some sulfur dioxide emissions naturally, and that does have a cooling effect.
Speaker 3: Now this guy, Kennedy Ritchie, who runs a company called Floor Air, spoke on stage, and he says on his website that he wants to, quote, decarbonize the aviation industry. He actually told me he was trying to eliminate contrails entirely, but then brought up cloud seating.
Speaker 2: A lot of the work actually came out of the military, so they do this all the time. Have you worked with them at all? No. I guess they're a little more closed door about their procedures.
Speaker 0: You ever heard of sulfur dioxide? Mhmm. Yeah. You've heard of Okay.
Speaker 2: Yeah. It's actually pretty cheap to do it. Deeply up. Deeply, to put sulfur dioxide, there's actually pretty cheap way to cool down the earth. Oh, yeah.
So the opportunity for, you know, one or two people just to do it is, you know, impressive. He went a further. Little He's like, it'd interesting if the government started doing this over each other's territories on purpose. Like, if we start getting the weather modification as a
Speaker 0: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2: You know, government either good or bad. Yeah. The the closest one I'm aware of one is something called the Airborne Snow Observatory. They do some more, like, weather I think I wanna say modification, more, like, upper atmosphere weather monitoring is probably a better term. Yeah.
Speaker 3: Now according to the website, Airborne, this is what this guy, Richie, brings up, measures snow depth, snow water equivalents, provides highly accurate snowpack data,
Speaker 2: is
Speaker 3: a commercial spin off of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory snow monitoring technology used to help water managers and scientists.
Speaker 1: Earlier today in this room, Al Gore was in this room, Larry Fink was in this room, and now we're in the room talking to people about geoengineering, weather modification, and the trails that come behind airplanes. What's going on?
Speaker 2: I'm gonna say aluminum oxides and lettuce. Are kidding me? Say that again?
Speaker 0: Aluminum oxides and moxides are part of
Speaker 2: the cocktail in
Speaker 1: the middle that they're spraying above our head.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Nick Fuentes claims Jeffrey Epstein’s international trafficking operation should not be labeled “pedophilia,” because it did not involve very young children. He says the victims were “barely legal” teenagers. The same statement has also been made by Alan Dershowitz. https://t.co/CfBRyObIXC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 addresses the topic of the Epstein situation, expressing a controversial viewpoint about labeling the matter. They begin by saying, "This whole pedo thing, it's like, isn't it really pedophilia? I don't wanna be the one that has to say it, but I guess I'm being forced to say it." They then attempt to clarify their stance by asserting, "It's not really pedophilia, okay? They weren't trafficking five year olds, it was like they were technically not legal. Big difference in my opinion." The speaker acknowledges that this interpretation is controversial, adding, "I know that's a controversial take, but that's not really the issue there, Okay, the issue is not that they were barely legal teens, which is what it is." They continue to differentiate between the legality and the ethical horror, insisting, "It's horrendous, it's awful, it's pedophilia, okay." However, despite labeling it pedophilia, they pivot to a different focal point, stating, "No, the issue is that Epstein is a Jewish spy probably working with Israel." The speaker characterizes Epstein as being "probably working with Israel" and frames this as the underlying dilemma. They conclude by reiterating their position, "He's working with Israeli intelligence," emphasizing that this supposed affiliation constitutes the core of the dilemma discussed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This whole pedo thing, it's like, isn't it really pedophilia? I don't wanna be the one that has to say it, but I guess I'm being forced to say it. It's not really pedophilia, okay? They weren't trafficking five year olds, it was like they were technically not legal. Big difference in my opinion.
I know that's a controversial take, but that's not really the issue there, Okay, the issue is not that they were barely legal teens, which is what it is. It's horrendous, it's awful, it's pedophilia, okay, No, the issue is that Epstein is a Jewish spy probably working with Israel. That's the dilemma there. He's working with Israeli intelligence.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm an Argentine wildfire survivor, and I'm not surprised anymore. This is 100 percent intentional—a land grab driven by the value of minerals. The puppeteers are out in the open; the affected have no voice. The mainstream and new media won't speak up.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
An Argentine wildfire survivor says he is no longer shocked by what is happening. He says it is 100 percent intentional, a deliberate land grab driven by the value of their minerals. He says the puppeteers are no longer hiding in the shadows. Everything is out in the open now, yet the people affected have no voice. The mainstream media will not speak out for them, and neither will the so-called “new media.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
They express astonishment that Patagonia is being set on fire, and they insist that the fires are intentional. They state with strong certainty that the harmful acts against Patagonia are deliberate, not accidental, and they are clear that certain forces are aligned with these fires. They point to specific interests behind these actions, identifying real estate and mining as key motives for those who would benefit from destabilizing the region.
The speakers emphasize that there are powerful factions on one side who stand to gain from a damaged Patagonia. They describe these actors as having significant leverage, with economic stakes in land and mineral extraction, implying that financial and material interests are driving the wrongdoing. The claim is that these interests are not hiding their involvement; rather, they are openly advancing policies or actions that facilitate or excuse the fires, effectively displaying their objectives in plain sight.
A central assertion is that the people behind the fires act with brazenness: they “do it in our face” and make no effort to conceal their role. The language conveys a sense of frustration and urgency, underscoring a belief that the perpetrators operate with impunity because they perceive that they have everything in their favor. The phrase suggests a perception that those responsible possess overwhelming influence and resources, rendering resistance or accountability difficult.
The speakers convey a sense of solidarity with the affected communities, signaling that the pattern of fires is not random but part of a broader, deliberate strategy. By naming real estate and mining interests, they link environmental destruction to economic and political power, implying that the damage serves the interests of a limited group rather than the public good. The overall message is one of warning: that Patagonia is under threat from organized, resource-driven forces that are embedded in systems of influence and wealth, and that this danger is evident through the conspicuous and unmasked nature of the conduct they describe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sorprendidos de que nos prendan fuego a la Patagonia. Sabemos que es a propósito, y lo tenemos recontra en claro que hay poderes que están del lado, tienen un interés inmobiliario, tienen interés minero, y es algo que ya últimamente lo hacen en nuestra cara y ni siquiera lo disimulan. No tienen nada, o sea, no lo disimulan porque tienen todo de su lado.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Lindsey Graham tells Iran’s Ayatollah that he better allow Mossad-backed protesters to overthrow his regime, or he will wake up dead. Graham says Iran is on the verge of collapse and guarantees the Iranian people that more help is on the way. "You're going to wake up dead." https://t.co/MkXjm9KrGV
Video Transcript AI Summary
To the people of Iran, help is on the way.
In a brief exchange, Speaker 1 questions whether a hat reading “Make Iran Great Again” was on Air Force One with President Trump over the weekend, asking, “Did you really have this hat on Air Force One with president Trump this weekend? The one that says am I reading that right? Does that say make Iran great again? Did you give that to the president?”
Speaker 0 confirms, “I did.” He adds that Trump “is not Barack Obama. He’s not turning his back on the people of Iran who are demanding that their oppression end.” He then directs a warning toward the Ayatollah and “his thugs,” stating, “if you keep killing your people in defiance of president Trump, you’re gonna wake up dead.”
The message concludes with the assertion that the regime “is on verge of falling.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To the people of Iran, help is on the way.
Speaker 1: Did you really have this hat on Air Force one with president Trump this weekend? The one that says am I reading that right? Does that say make Iran great again? Did you give that to the president?
Speaker 0: I did. And he and he he's not Barack Obama. He's not turning his back on the people of Iran who are demanding that their oppression end. And to the Ayatollah and his thugs, if you keep killing your people in defiance of president Trump, you're gonna wake up dead. Yeah.
Is on verge of falling.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Watch the encounter between ICE and an alleged protester in Minneapolis, Minnesota today, shown in slow motion. ICE says officers were forced to act because they believed she was about to run them over. Democrats are saying she was not a present danger. What do your eyes tell you?
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Mike Huckabee calls the U.S. overthrow of Nicolás Maduro “great news” for Israel. He says Venezuela is deeply connected to the Middle East through partnerships with Hezbollah and Iran. Huckabee claims Maduro’s removal will make the Middle East safer and improve life across the region.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 initiates by linking events in Venezuela and Israel to broader regional dynamics, including Iran, and asks the ambassador for his reaction to the military and law enforcement operation in Venezuela.
Speaker 1 responds that his first reaction was to praise the lord and thank president Trump. He explains that many people may not connect the issue to the Middle East, but asserts that Hezbollah is very active in Venezuela. He states there has been a twenty-year partnership between Iran and Venezuela under two previous dictators, describing the ties as deep. He claims Hezbollah operates in 12 different countries throughout South America. He emphasizes that this is not just a threat in the Western Hemisphere but also a threat to the Middle East. He argues that the president’s action against Venezuela addresses narco-terrorism and the deaths of Americans from drugs, and he contends that it will “make life for those of us living in The Middle East much better, much safer” by taking Maduro out. He connects this to Hezbollah’s activity, saying Hezbollah is active in Venezuela and targeting Jewish people all over South America, and that those tentacles can reach into the United States. He concludes that this development is good news for America and for the world.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What happens in Venezuela, what happens in Israel, it's everything's connected, Iran. First off, let me ask you this, ambassador. Your reaction when you, when you saw what happened with the military and law enforcement operation in Venezuela.
Speaker 1: Well, my first reaction, Rob, was to say praise the lord and thank you president Trump. A lot of people may not make the connection as to why this matters to us in The Middle East. What they don't know is that Hezbollah is very active in Venezuela. There has been a twenty year partnership between Iran and Venezuela under both, the two previous dictators. The ties are deep, and Hezbollah operates in 12 different countries throughout South America.
It is not just a threat in the Western Hemisphere. It is a threat to the Middle East. So for the president to go after Venezuela, not only deals with narco terrorism and the many deaths of Americans who are killed by the poison of drugs, it is gonna make life for those of us living in The Middle East much better, much safer to take Maduro out to recognize that Hezbollah is active here targeting not just Jewish people in all over South America, but using those tentacles to ultimately reach into The United States. This is good news for America, good news for the world.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez says the country was attacked by “Zionists” seeking to enslave us. I note she will ignore the Trump administration’s instructions on who can be the next president. She says the entire country is mobilized and Maduro remains the legitimate leader.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Venezuela’s Vice President Delcy Rodríguez claims the country was attacked by “Zionists” seeking to enslave the nation. She insists Venezuela will ignore the Trump administration’s instructions on who can become the next president. Rodríguez says the entire country is mobilized and that Nicolás Maduro remains the legitimate leader.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Global leaders are plainly shocked that the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela is both a victim and a target of an attack of this nature, which is described as truly shameful. The speaker invokes Simón Bolívar’s Jamaica Letter, saying, “the veil has been torn, we have seen the light, and we are being pulled back into darkness.” They state that the chains have been broken, we have been free, and our enemies seek to enslave us again. There is a clear assertion that the Venezuelan people and the country understand that they will never be enslaved again. In response, all of Venezuela is mobilized, and a decree has already been signed by President Maduro, described as the only president of Venezuela.
A single president is named for the country: Nicolás Maduro Moros. The statement emphasizes that there is only one president in Venezuela, and that person is Nicolás Maduro Moros, underscoring the legitimacy and singular leadership of Maduro.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Gobierno del mundo están sencillamente impactados de que sea la república bolivariana de Venezuela víctima y objeto de un ataque de esta naturaleza que tiene sin duda alguna. Es realmente vergonzoso. Lo dijo nuestro padre Libertador en la carta de Jamaica, El velo se ha rasgado, ya hemos visto la luz, y se nos quiere volver a las tinieblas. Se han roto las cadenas, ya hemos sido libres y nuestros enemigos pretenden de nuevo esclavizarnos. Si hay algo que el pueblo venezolano y que este país tiene muy claro, es que jamás volveremos a ser esclavos, se activa toda Venezuela, y el decreto que ya fue suscrito por el presidente Maduro, único presidente de Venezuela.
Hay un solo presidente en este país que se llama Nicolás Maduro Moro. Y sus
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dame Hannah Rothschild says no government or king goes to war without Rothschild support, given their influence. She adds the original Rothschild sent five sons to European capitals to control the international banking system, and the brothers even used pigeons to communicate.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
A member of the Rothschild family, Dame Hannah Rothschild, publicly confirms that no government or king goes to war without support from the Rothschild family because of how influential they had become. She says the original Rothschild sent his five sons to the capitals of Europe to take control of the international banking system. She adds that the five brothers sometimes communicated with each other using pigeons.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is an extraordinary story about the Rothschild family. He was born in a place called the Judengasser, a Jewish ghetto, and the house he lived in when he eventually had 13 children was only 14 feet wide. He lived there with his very, very overpowering and dominant and incredibly brilliant wife, Gottel. He was determined to get out of this ghetto. At nighttime, the ghetto was closed; you weren't allowed to leave. The street was so narrow that no sunlight penetrated. There was no plumbing, no sewage, and there was nothing. So everything you can imagine happened in this street. Unsurprisingly, he wanted to get out of there. He started a small coin business, and that did reasonably well. But actually, and this is where it ties into legacy, his great strength was to send his five sons to the capitals of Europe at that time.
And what they did is they set up, in effect, the first international banking system. So whereas everyone used to be in separate different countries or separate cities until then, these five boys communicated with each other, sometimes by pidgin, and they wrote to each other in Juden Deutsche, which was a kind of Yiddish German vernacular. And that is why they were so successful. And this absolute belief in togetherness—you've got to stand together, you've got to work together, you've got to work across borders, you've got to work with rules. And by 1789 when the last one went to 1815, so very, short period of time, it was said that no government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschilds supporting them because that was how incredibly influential and powerful they had become.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an extraordinary story. So he was born in a place called the Judengasser, which was a Jewish ghetto, basically. And it was the house that he lived in when he eventually had 13 children was only 14 feet wide. And he lived there with his very, very overpowering and dominant and an incredibly brilliant wife who was called Gottel. He was determined to get out of this ghetto.
At nighttime, the ghetto was closed. You weren't allowed to leave. The street was so narrow that no sunlight penetrate. There was no plumbing. There was no sewage.
There was nothing. So everything you can imagine happened in this street. And unsurprisingly, he wanted to get out of there. And he started a small coin business, and that did reasonably well. But actually, and this is where it ties into legacy, his great strength was to send his five sons to the capitals of Europe at that time.
And what they did is they set up, in effect, the first international banking system. So whereas everyone used to be in separate different countries or separate cities until then, these five boys communicated with each other, sometimes by pidgin, and they wrote to each other in Juden Deutsche, which was a kind of Yiddish German vernacular. And that is why they were so successful. And this absolute belief in togetherness, you've got to stand together, you've got to work together, you've got to work across borders, you've got to work with rules. And by 1789 when the last one went to 1815, so very, short period of time, it was said that no government or king would consider going to war without the Rothschilds supporting them because that was how incredibly influential and powerful they had become.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m Zoe Weissman, a survivor of the Brown University shooting who has now endured two mass shootings. The Parkland trauma never left me, and I can’t believe I’m reliving this nightmare. I’m demanding the U.S. government enact stricter gun control to stop future tragedies.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Zoe Weissman, a survivor of the Brown University mass shooting, has now lived through two mass shootings, the first at her neighboring middle school in Parkland, Florida. She says the trauma from surviving Parkland never left her, and she cannot believe she is reliving the same nightmare all over again. Weissman is demanding the U.S. government take action, calling for stricter gun control laws to prevent future tragedies.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses anger that there are kids like him in the country who have had to go through this not once but twice.
Speaker 1 notes that after shootings such as Parkland, there is typically a moment of expectation that there might be change and actual action, but it fades. He references that pattern after Sandy Hook, after Parkland, and after Uvalde, sometimes with some incremental progress, but nothing seemingly consequential. He says that has to be frustrating as a victim of this.
Speaker 0 responds by stating it is not possible to put into words how frustrating it is, and identifies a common denominator inaction by Congress. He argues that time and time again, Congress has failed to show that they actually care about their constituents, and if they did, they would immediately pass comprehensive gun violence prevention bills.
Speaker 1 asks how Speaker 0 is doing right now, noting that there is still a shelter in place on campus and in the area. He asks whether Speaker 0 is still in a shelter in place order.
Speaker 0 confirms that he is safe in his dorm, but they cannot leave their dorms or buildings. He says physically he is safe and that he has had many friends and family reunited.
Speaker 1 asks about Speaker 0’s family, acknowledging that they went through this with him once before and must be concerned tonight.
Speaker 0 says the first person he called was his mom, which is the same thing that happened with Parkland. He describes seeing his mom go through those emotions all over again and feeling bad for her. He says it feels like he is 12 again, and it feels like it’s twenty eighteen again for his family as well, with them going through the exact same emotions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I'm just angry that there's kids like me in this country who have had to go through this not once but twice.
Speaker 1: No question. You remember that after Parkland, as has happened after some school shootings, there there there's a moment of expectation that there might be change, there might be actual action, and too often it fades. Right? It just disappears. We've had that after Sandy Hook, after Parkland, we had it after Uvalde.
Occasionally, some incremental progress, but nothing seemingly con consequential. That that that has to be frustrating as as as a victim of this.
Speaker 0: It's I can't even put into words how frustrating it is. And I think that the common denominator around all of that is inaction on the part of congress. I think that we've seen time and time again, congress is failed to show that they actually care about their constituents. And if they did, they would immediately pass comprehensive gun violence prevention bills.
Speaker 1: Tell me how you're doing right now. Because, I've been speaking to students on campus, as we understand it, and as the mayor has described it, there's still a shelter in place. Are are you still in a shelter in place under a shelter in place order?
Speaker 0: Yeah. So I'm safe in my dorm, but we can't leave our dorms. We can't leave our buildings. So physically, I'm safe, and I've had lots of friends and family reunited.
Speaker 1: How is your family doing with this? Because, of course, they went through this with you once before. They must be concerned about you tonight.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I the first person I called was my mom, which is the same thing that happened with Parkland. And just seeing her go through those emotions all over again makes me feel so bad for her. And I think it it feels like I'm 12 again, and I think it feels like it's twenty eighteen again for my family as well. We're going through the exact same emotions.
reSee.it AI Summary
I openly declare my allyship with Israel and can’t understand the hatred toward the country, calling it completely sick. I’ve been to Israel twice with Charlie Kirk and think much hostility comes from people projecting conspiracy theories onto Jewish people. We are living in enemy occupied territory.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Erika Kirk openly declares herself an ally of Israel and says she cannot understand the level of hatred directed at the country, calling it completely sick. She says she has been to Israel twice with Charlie Kirk and suggests much of the hostility is driven by people projecting conspiracy theories onto Jewish people. "We are living in enemy occupied territory"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Charlie consistently asserted that Jew hate is brainwrought. He emphasized this point firmly, noting that he and the speaker have visited Israel twice together, and expressing that walking where their Lord walked and seeing the Bible come to life in technicolor makes hatred toward the place or the Jewish people incomprehensible.
The speaker counters by saying that hatred arises from people who cling to conspiracy theories, which he describes as sick and something that needs to stop. He asserts a shared humanity by stating that no one is perfect—no Christian, no Jew, no Muslim. Humans are broken and sinful and in need of a lord and savior.
He then underscores the importance of giving one’s life to the Lord. Once fully surrendered to the Lord, he claims that there is “no room in your heart for hate.” He expresses sorrow for the listener’s daughter and offers a prayer that the tragedy will be extinguished in the world. Despite such sorrow, he notes that we are living in “enemy occupied territory,” and that daily we must guard our minds and hearts. The recommended guard is reading God’s word.
Finally, he insists that the Old Testament and the New Testament cannot be separated; they are inseparable in their message and significance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Charlie always would say very clearly, Jew hate was brainwrought. He would always say it. We've been to Israel twice together. And to be able to walk in the place where our Lord walked and see the Bible come to life in technicolor, How could you hate that place? How could you hate the Jewish people?
Why? Because you need to fulfill a conspiracy theory. I'm wrapped in people say I'm a part of conspiracy theories all the time. It's sick, and it needs to stop. We are human.
No one is perfect. No Christian is perfect. No Jew is perfect. No Muslim is perfect. We are broken, sinful humans in need of a lord and savior.
And that's why it is so important to give your life to the Lord. Because once you do that and you fully surrender to the Lord, you have no room in your heart for hate. So, sir, I am so sorry what happened to your daughter. I pray that does not happen, and I pray that that is something that we can somehow extinguish in this world. But we are living in enemy occupied territory, and every single day, we need to guard ourselves, guard our minds, guard our heart, and the best way to do that is reading God's word.
And you cannot separate the Old Testament from the New Testament. You cannot.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
The 1,000 Christian Zionist pastors who went to Israel for retraining are now being portrayed as heroes, complete with their own music video. “A thousand pastors crossed the sea to stand with Israel faithfully.” The trip is being showcased as a patriotic, faith-driven mission. https://t.co/kbvD1y41aG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Participating in the ambassador summit this week, with a thousand pastors crossing the sea to stand with Israel faithfully.
Speaker 1: Here for seven days to support Israel, aiming to educate the younger generation on what it means to stand for Israel.
Speaker 0: They are not alone; there is a coalition to be a voice for Israel and the nations, an honor, and a call to awaken more courage inside believers worldwide to speak up for Israel; there is a lot to learn and to be present for.
Speaker 1: They expect to do this; it is life changing, and they are excited about going back home and taking it back home with them.
Speaker 0: To stand here and be an advocate for Israel and for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the midst of this land is truly an honor.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here to be part of the ambassador summit taking place this week. A thousand pastors cross the sea to stand with Israel faithfully.
Speaker 1: We're here for seven days to support Israel. It's imperative that we educate the younger generation on what it means to stand for Israel.
Speaker 0: You're not alone. We're here. To have a chance to come here and be a part of being a voice, for Israel and the nations is really an honor, and I I count it as such. I think that we need to awaken more courage inside believers around the world, and to speak up for Israel. There's a lot a lot to learn, a lot to, you know, be present for, and that is what I
Speaker 1: expect to do. It's life changing, and I'm excited about being a part and going back home and taking it back home with me.
Speaker 0: To stand here and be an advocate for Israel and for the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob in the midst of this land. It is truly an honor to do so.
reSee.it AI Summary
I want Israel to have greater influence on social media to retrain younger generations about Israel. Anyone running for US government who is anti-Zionist will be targeted and defeated. This is the fight of our lives. We cannot sit by and let anti Zionists determine our future.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
The President of the World Jewish Congress, Ron Lauder, says he wants Israel to have greater influence on social media to retrain younger generations about Israel. He says anyone running for the United States government who is anti-Zionist will be targeted and defeated in elections. This is being described as the fight of their lives. "We cannot sit by and let anti Zionists determine our future"
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're in the fight of our lives, and this is how we will fight back. First, we must use social media because that's what young people follow. And I must tell you tell them that you must tell them the truth. Israel must finally get serious about public relations. If Israel can't tell its amazing story to the world, then its enemies will, and they've done it now.
We must expose every renegade teacher and their unions. We must expect more courage from our political officials, not excuses. We must rebuild education around truth, not slogans and lies. We will have to reinvent how we teach the history of the Jewish people because it's not working. Too many young people have never heard of the Holocaust.
The World Jewish Congress has produced some excellent films that explain what happened. We want to show them in classrooms everywhere in The United States. And any candidate running for a seat in this building, whether for congress or senate, whose platform includes antisemitism, We will target them as they target us. Accordingly, we'll start a fund to help their opponents. We cannot pass we cannot passively sit by and let anti Zionists determine our future.
None of this will will be easy. It will take time and effort from all of us, and Jews cannot fight this fight alone. Frankly, we shouldn't have to because this is not a Jewish issue. It's a democratic issue. It's a moral issue. It's a human issue. Let us let us build a coalition so strong, so united, so determined that no extremist movement can fracture it. And above all, let us let us be bridge builders, unshakable, unapologetic, but so that the next generation inherits a world defined not by hatred, but by humanity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're in the fight of our lives, and this is how we will fight back. First, we must use social media because that's what young people follow. And I must tell you tell them that you must tell them the truth. Israel must finally get serious about public relations. If Israel can't tell its amazing story to the world, then its enemies will, and they've done it now.
We must expose every renegade teacher and their unions. We must expect more courage from our political officials, not excuses. We must rebuild education around truth, not slogans and lies. We will have to reinvent how we teach the history of the Jewish people because it's not working. Too many young people have never heard of the Holocaust.
The World Jewish Congress has produced some excellent films that explain what happened. We want to show them in classrooms everywhere in The United States. And any candidate running for a seat in this building, whether for congress or senate, whose platform includes antisemitism, We will target them as they target us. Accordingly, we'll start a fund to help their opponents. We cannot pass we cannot passively sit by and let anti Zionists determine our future.
None of this will will be easy. It will take time and effort from all of us, and Jews cannot fight this fight alone. Frankly, we shouldn't have to because this is not a Jewish issue. It's a democratic issue. It's a moral issue.
It's a human issue. Let us let us build a coalition so strong, so united, so determined that no extremist movement can fracture it. And above all, let us let us be bridge builders, unshakable, unapologetic, but so that the next generation inherits a world defined not by hatred, but by humanity.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m publicly apologizing to Christian Zionists after saying I hated them most in the world. I spoke in anger and regret it; some of the kindest people I know are Christian Zionists. My frustration came from their silence over Israel's bombing of churches and murdering children. They’re really good people.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Tucker Carlson is publicly apologizing to Christian Zionists after previously saying he “hated them most in the world.” He says he spoke in anger and now regrets it, adding that some of the kindest people he knows are Christian Zionists. Carlson explains his frustration came from their silence over Israel's bombing of churches and murdering children. “They’re really good people.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 delivers a heartfelt apology and clarification surrounding a controversial statement. He begins by admitting regret for saying that he “despise[d] Christian Zionists,” explaining that the remark came from anger and informing listeners that he does not actually despise Christian Zionists, whom he then describes as among the nicest and most trustworthy people in various respects. He emphasizes that his anger was aimed at a particular line of thinking, not at individuals who identify as Christian Zionists.
He specifies the core issue that provoked his comments: on at least a couple of occasions, the Israeli government bombed churches in Gaza and killed Christians. He asserts that these bombings were not accidents and notes that Israel is a high-tech military force capable of precision, to the extent that he mentions they gave pagers with bombs to Hezbollah. He states that “they didn’t accidentally bomb two churches and kill these Christians, and they never apologized for it.”
In discussing responses to this grievance, he says he raised the issue with a couple of Christian leaders, including the Speaker of the House, asking how their government could be paying to bomb churches and, by extension, paying for it. He recounts the consistent reaction he received: “the Bible commands us to support Israel.” He recounts a critical question: “And I said, so Jesus is telling us that we need to get on board with murdering Christians. Is that what you’re saying?” He characterizes the response as essentially silencing him, stating that they “basically were just like, shut up,” which he found deeply distressing as a Christian.
He clarifies the main point he intended to convey: one cannot support the murder of innocents, regardless of the pretext, and such an act is not allowed in his religion. He asserts that there is no justification for murder of innocents in the New Testament, and that if there were, it would not represent his religion at all. He reiterates his distress and emphasizes that he does not hate and should not have used the term “despise,” clarifying that the statement was about a specific line of thinking, not about the individuals.
He concludes with a sincere apology for not being clearer in his original expression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I just want to say at the outset, because this has been weighing on me. I did say something that I really regret saying that I didn't fully mean. I said it because I was mad, which is always when I say, I don't really mean when I get pissed. My wife's always telling me this. Was snippy and I didn't explain it.
And I said something to the effect of, I despise Christian Zionists. And I'm just sorry that I said that because I don't. I'm mad at a certain kind of thinking. Some of the nicest people I know are Christian Zionists actually. If you're in a car crash, they would save you.
If you need someone to watch your bank account, they wouldn't steal from you. They're like really good people and sweet people. I want to be very specific quickly about what I was talking about. In a couple, at least a couple of different occasions, the Israeli government bombed churches in Gaza and killed a bunch of Christians And not an accident, of course. And this is like a very high-tech military with precision.
I mean, they gave pagers with bombs on them to Hezbollah. So like, this is a military, the national defense institution that understands what it's doing. They didn't accidentally bomb two churches and kill these Christians, and they never apologized for it. And so I brought this up with a couple of Christian leaders and including the Speaker of the House and said like, what is, know, how can we're paying to bomb churches? We're Cause paying for it.
And the response I got from every single one was the Bible commands us to support Israel. And I said, so Jesus is telling us that we need to get on board with murdering Christians. Is that what you're saying? And they basically were just like, shut up. And I found that extremely, as a Christian, extremely upsetting.
And I've never kind of gotten over that, but I should have said that. That's what I was talking about specifically. We cannot support the murder of innocents. I don't care what the pretext is. That is not allowed in our religion.
And if it is, then it's not my religion. That's not what the New Testament says at all. It's not even a close approximation of what it says. There's no justification for that in the New Testament. Period.
So I am distressed. I don't hate. I shouldn't have said despise, but I'm very distressed about that. And that's specifically what I was talking about. So I just want to apologize sincerely for not being clearer.
reSee.it AI Summary
I explain Thomas Massie’s view of how Epstein built a system to trap underage girls and silence them. He lured girls as young as 14 with quick-cash “massage” offers that turned sexual, then used shame and fear to keep them coming back. Girls were forced to recruit others, creating a cycle of guilt and fear. After they came of age, Epstein handed them to powerful men who could bury reports, pay families, or sue for defamation to silence them, keeping the network hidden.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Thomas Massie breaks down how Jeffrey Epstein built a system designed to trap underage girls and shut them up. He says Epstein would lure girls as young as 14 with quick-cash “massage” offers, only for it to turn sexual, and then he’d use shame and fear to keep them coming back on command. Girls were pushed into recruiting another girl just to escape the abuse, locking them into a cycle that left them feeling guilty, responsible, and scared to ever speak. Once they hit the age of consent, Epstein handed them off to powerful, wealthy men, who could bury police reports, buy off judges, or pay families to keep quiet. And today, those same men can destroy anyone who speaks out with defamation lawsuits designed to bankrupt them. Massie says that’s the real reason the silence continues and why Epstein’s full network is still hidden.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Candace Owens claims Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Peter Thiel aren’t humans but hybrids, noting strange eyes and no blood. She describes a dark, demonic presence, calling them transhumanists who aim to control humanity through AI and godless tech.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Candace Owens says she does not believe Elon Musk, Sam Altman, or Peter Thiel are humans and instead calls them hybrids. She mentions there is something strange about their eyes and says she is not sure they even bleed. Owens describes a dark, demonic presence and claims they are transhumanists who want to control humanity through AI and godless technology.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker makes a series of provocative asserts about Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Peter Thiel, claiming they look “hybrid” or like an “Apple software” that could be downloaded at night, with a sense in the eyes that suggests they are not fully human. They describe themselves as human but uncertain about basic biology, joking that a battery might fall out if they bled, and assert they have long sensed these figures are demonic. The argument expands to a broader critique of technology’s role in society, arguing that people are indoctrinated to accept transformative claims about science and technology as improvements, while in reality, “our kids have objectively gotten dumber,” and society has become fatter, less healthy, and less emotionally sound. Yet the narrative claims that this is presented as humanity’s great leap forward.
The speaker contends that the entertainment and tech establishment, including Hollywood, promotes worship of these figures as geniuses, with the suggestion that “the writers who are obviously indoctrinated into the occult” are pushing the idea that figures like Musk are exceptional. They claim that occult influence is pervasive, asserting that “they were all Alastair Crowley proteges who were just raping kids and summoning demons,” and that demons are real. Concurrently, the speaker asserts that faith is being undermined: while demons are summoned, faith is portrayed as not real, which the speaker regards as “the greatest trick that the devil ever played” by making people believe there is nothing after life.
A central theme is the monetization and spiritual substitution of allegiance to money. The speaker argues that by accepting lies or “going down a path of lying” to preserve a paycheck or job, a person is effectively “selling their soul,” noting that there is a life after this and that allegiance to dollar-driven systems is a deliberate pledge. The reference to the Charlie Kirk case is used to illustrate the claim that selling out is driven by fear of losing security.
Religiosity is openly referenced as the speaker explains their belief that “if this is not it” and that “these people are demons,” with a personal stance on faith as a defense against what they view as a demonic, money-centered order. The speaker concludes by emphasizing their recognition of these individuals’ supposed non-human nature and by noting, “look at Sam … I don’t know no. But I know that’s not I guess I droid, obviously.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm telling you, I don't even think these people are human. Like, I look at Elon Musk and Sam Altman and Peter Thiel, and I'm pretty sure they're hybrid. You know what I mean? Like, they just look like an Apple software that I should be able to download at night. You know?
Like, my phone's getting an update or something. It's something in the eyes. Like, I don't know. I'm like, I don't I don't I'm human, but I don't, like, I don't know if I stabbed you if you bleed. You know?
I'm not gonna stab them, but I don't know if they bleed all the way. I think a battery would fall out. You know what I mean? And I just get that sense. I've always known it was demonic.
And people just get on board because, as we talk about in this book, they are using science and this idea of technology and this idea of transforming society for the better to indoctrinate us into accepting this. And it's wrong, and it's backwards. And they weigh their the main component of all of this is psychology. Right? They're able to do it because of psychology, making you think that society has gotten better.
Our kids have objectively gotten dumber. We've become fatter. We've become less healthy. We've become less emotionally sound. And yet they are convincing us that this is, like, human's humanity's great leap forward.
We put a man on the mood, and he just, called them up and was like, hey, Prez. What's up? I'm up here. Yeah. It's so cool.
It's really great. It's nice. Starry night up here. Came in a textured guy, go bye, in '69, and they get these people. They tell you, look.
He's a genius. We're like, oh, We're all right away. He's a genius. We should just accept that Elon Musk is a genius because, like, all the writers who are obviously indoctrinated into the occult are telling us that this is the next person that we should worship, the establishment of Hollywood. It was all occults.
They were all Alastair Crowley proteges who were just raping kids and summoning demons, and demons are real. So at the same time that they're summoning demons, they are making us all believe that faith is not real. And that has been, I think, the greatest the greatest trick that the devil ever played, right, is making people think they didn't exist and making people atheist, making people believe that there's nothing. Like, you're here for a moment in time because then it allows them to further tether us to their reality and to their god, which is money. Right?
Well, if if you truly knew and believed, like I do, I actually know that this is not it. Like, I know this is not it. But if you truly believe that, you wouldn't sell your soul. People think that that's just like an expression. Oh, he sold his soul.
No. You are literally selling your soul. Like, when you tell lies and you take go down a path of lying because you you're so afraid of not having the security of a paycheck or you're willing to do something terrible to maintain that job or keeping your mouth shut to maintain that job or seeing it when now the Charlie Kirk case. Right? You're selling your soul.
Like, there's a life after this. They have made you pledge your allegiance to their dollar because they know life is going on. They they know that. They want you to literally sell them your soul. That's my personal belief.
It's why I am religious. It's why I speak about, you know, my faith openly because I just know if this is not it, and I just know these people are demons. Like, I don't know. They just look at the way they breathe. Like, you know what I mean?
Same thing. I look at and I look at Sam and I'm like, look. I don't know no. But I know that's not I guess I droid, obviously.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Dershowitz, once a Democrat, quit the party and declared war on Jewish New York voters backing Zohran Mamdani, calling Mamdani a virus whose win could spread antisemitic beliefs, and labeling those supporters self-hating.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Jeffrey Epstein’s former lawyer Alan Dershowitz has quit the Democratic Party and declared war on Jewish voters in New York who plan to support Zohran Mamdani. Dershowitz claims Mamdani is like a virus, warning that his antisemitic beliefs could spread if he wins the election. He labeled the Jewish voters who back Mamdani as self-hating Jews.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that there are self-hating anti‑Zionist, anti‑Israel Jews in New York, including friends and family, who will vote for Mamdani, whom he calls a vicious anti‑Semite. He says Mamdani would never recognize Israel as a Jewish state or the nation state of the Jewish people, but recognizes Jordan, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia as Muslim states with hierarchies that exclude certain groups; for example, in Saudi Arabia you can’t become a citizen unless you convert, and in Qatar you can’t own a Christian or Jewish Bible. He asserts a double standard and calls that the core of antisemitism. He claims Zorn Mandami is a vicious antisemite and contends that if he is elected mayor of New York, antisemitism will spread to other democratic cities. After six years as a Democrat, he says he formally quit the Democratic Party and is now an anti‑Democrat who will work hard to see the defeat of the Democratic Party, which he describes as anti‑Israel, anti‑Zionist in many respects.
Speaker 1 asks what he thinks about Jews and Israelis who voted for Mamdani and what they tell him when they ask why. Speaker 0 replies that there are Jewish rabbis and former rabbis who support Mamdani, calling them self‑hating Jews. He says some Jews have supported Hitler, Stalin, and Mussolini, and that being Jewish does not make one immune to political folly. He contends these are people who are Jewish on their parents’ side, who have “never entered a synagogue, never been to Israel, know nothing about Judaism,” yet claim, “as a Jew, I support Hamas. I support Mamdani. I support terrorism. I support all that.” He asserts that because the Democratic Party has turned anti‑Israel, they must be fought, though he says it is hard to be opposed to the Democrats after six years as a Democrat; he cannot vote for a party that is anti‑Zionist, anti‑Israel, and anti‑Semitic, and that encourages leaders like Mamdani, and he suggests that news now will leave the Democratic party.
Speaker 1 asks if, if Mamdani and professor Dostoevitz win in York, he would advise Jews in the city to leave. Speaker 0 answers: No. Fight back. He pledges to lead the fight against Mamdani, to bring him to court and to apply legal, political, economic, and other pressures to prevent his success in anti‑Zionism, anti‑Israel, and anti‑Semitic attitudes. He concludes: we must continue to fight him, but do not leave—stay and fight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, there are a lot of self hating anti Zionist, anti Israel Jews in New York, including people I know, friends of, mine whose children, relatives of mine, who will vote for this vicious anti Semite to be mayor of New York. And let's remember, this man is not only a domestic anti Semite, he's an international anti Semite. He said he would never recognize Israel as a Jewish state or as the nation state of the Jewish people, but he recognizes Jordan and and Qatar and Saudi Arabia as Muslim states which have hierarchies in which, for example, in Saudi Arabia, you can't become a citizen unless you convert. In Qatar, you can't own a Christian or a Jewish bible. He applies a double standard and that's the core of antisemitism.
Zorn Mandami is a vicious antisemite and if he's elected mayor of New York, it will spread. It will spread to other democratic cities, which is why after six years of doing being a democrat, I have formally quit the democratic party. I am now an anti democrat who will work hard to see the defeat of the democratic party, which has become an anti Israel, anti Zionist, anti many respects party.
Speaker 1: You've mentioned the Jews and the Israelis who voted for Mamdani. What do think about them, and what do they tell you when they ask them why?
Speaker 0: Well, you know, there are Jewish rabbis. Many of them are former rabbis. Support Mamdani. There have been self hating Jews. There are some Jews who supported Hitler.
Jews supported Stalin. Jews supported Mussolini. Just because you're a Jew doesn't mean you can't be a a total political fool. And these are self hating Jews. These are people who are Jewish on their parents' side.
Many of these people have never entered a synagogue, never been to Israel, know nothing about Judaism, but they start every sentence by saying, as a Jew, I support Hamas. I support Mamdani. I support terrorism. I support all that. As a Jew, that's, you know, been a history since the time of the bible when the Jews many against Moses.
Because the Democratic party has turned into an anti Israel party and we have to fight against that. It's very hard for me to be opposed to the Democrats. I've been a Democrat for six, but I can't vote for a party that is anti Zionist, anti Israel, anti Semitic, and that encourages people like Mamdani to become leaders. And so I think news now will leave the Democratic party.
Speaker 1: If Mamdani and professor Dostoevitz wins in York, would you advise the Jews in the city to leave?
Speaker 0: No. No. Fight back. Fight back. I will fight back.
I will be happy to to lead the fight against Mamdani. We'll bring him to court. We'll bring all kinds of legal, political, economic, and other pressures against him. We cannot allow him to succeed in his anti Zionism, his anti Israel, and his anti Semitic attitudes. We must continue to fight him.
But no, don't leave. Stay and fight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Alexis Wilkins has been assigned an FBI SWAT protection detail funded by taxpayers and arranged by her boyfriend, FBI Director Kash Patel. The Nashville SWAT unit handles the protection, and she is not his spouse or living with him or in the same city.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Country music sensation Alexis Wilkins has reportedly been assigned her own FBI SWAT team, a protection detail funded by U.S. taxpayers and arranged by her boyfriend, FBI Director Kash Patel. The agents protecting Wilkins are drawn from the Bureau’s Nashville SWAT unit, trained to handle major incidents like mass shootings and terrorist attacks. Wilkins is neither Patel’s spouse nor living with him; she does not even reside in the same city.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m the mother of an 8-year-old with leukemia who says doctors threaten to call CPS over his use of alternative treatments and how well he seems. They asked, “Why isn’t he sicker? What are you doing?” His unexpectedly good health could trigger legal action.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
A mother claims doctors are threatening to call Child Protective Services to take her 8-year-old son, who has leukemia, because he’s using alternative treatments and doesn’t appear sick enough under their protocols. She says the doctors asked, “Why isn’t he sicker? What are you doing?” His unexpected health has sparked suspicion and potential legal action from the medical staff.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes being twenty-one months into the protocol and nearing completion. They’ve finished all frequent IV chemo and now only go in once a month for treatment, with oral daily chemo at home, resulting in much less treatment than a few months earlier.
Speaker 1 asks if the alternative treatments, in addition to traditional treatment, are helping the child handle side effects. Speaker 0 confirms: “So much better. Okay. So much better.” They note a test result when doctors questioned why the child didn’t seem sicker or look worse; they backed off on some treatments to observe, and within less than a week the child experienced nausea, headaches, bone pain, and other common symptoms. They showed doctors this pattern, demonstrating that when they are not using supplements and daily support, the child becomes sick quickly. They say doctors were skeptical of their approach. Tensions rose around February after they presented a meta-analysis suggesting that some chemo is no longer shown to be helpful and may be more harmful due to toxicity. That, they say, was the last straw.
They recount that doctors began to push harder and claimed they would refer to Child Protective Services (CPS) if the child did not look sicker soon. Doctors started testing at every visit for the presence of the oral chemo in the child’s blood, and it’s consistently present because it is given daily. They hired a nurse privately to come to their home at bedtime to administer the meds, and they record the process with video of the child eating the meds; the nurse signs an electronic log verifying administration. When conflicts intensified about a month ago, they had an attorney, who sent a certified letter to the clinic with evidence: the nurse’s documentation, lab results showing the drug in the blood, and observed side effects that were minimal and manageable. They point out there are other variables affecting the child’s ANC; they have twenty-one months of records showing the child’s ANC was sometimes higher even when there were no home meds. They claim the medication is metabolized faster when the child drinks milk. They mention living on an organic farm with their own cows, and that the child drinks milk. They note that taking vitamin D can affect ANC.
Speaker 1 remarks on the extraordinary situation: instead of learning what is enabling the child to have fewer side effects, the state is threatening to remove the child. They ask if someone reported them and how they protected the child. Speaker 0 explains that they were told during a September visit that if the child’s ANC wasn’t below 1,500 by the October 17 visit, they would refer to CPS for suspected medication noncompliance, which would be considered neglect. Speaker 1 reiterates the surprise at labeling medication noncompliance and the state deciding what the child should receive, calling it utterly ridiculous.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We are twenty one months into the protocol now. We're very close. He's done on April 3. At this point, we are done with all of the frequent IV chemo. We're only having to go in once a month to be treated at this time, and then he does oral daily chemo at home.
So much less treatment now than he was getting a few months ago.
Speaker 1: So just to clarify, so because of these, alternative treatments that you're getting in addition to the traditional treatment, in your mind, you feel he might be handling the side effects better?
Speaker 0: So much better. Okay. So much better. And and one of the sort of tests we did to to show the doctors because they started to get angry. Why isn't he sicker?
Why does he look so good? What are you doing? We said, well, let's back off. We'll back off a little bit and see how he looks. And it only takes less than a week, and he's nauseous and has headaches and bone pain, and all the common symptoms start creeping up.
And we we bring him in, and we showed them this look how sick he gets, how fast he gets sick when we are not using supplements, when we're not supporting him, you know, every single day with many, many things. It's not just one thing. And they just they just don't believe it. And so the tension started probably around February when we brought some, a meta analysis showing that some of the chemo they're giving him is no longer shown to be helpful. It's actually more hurtful than helpful because of the toxicity it causes, and that was sort of the last straw.
They were already frustrated with us for being question askers and people who do things a little different. But bringing in a study suggesting that maybe there was a way to personalize this for him that that crossed the line, I guess. So they started pushing harder and saying if he doesn't look sicker soon, we're going to refer to CPS. The other thing they started doing is testing it every visit for the presence of the oral chemo in his blood, and it's there. Of course, it's there.
We give it every day. So we have almost a year now of blood work at every visit showing the showing the med in his blood. It's there. The other thing we did is we hired a nurse out of pocket. We're paying cash.
She comes to our house every night at bedtime, and she helps us. She administers it. She gives him the meds. We take a video of him eating and consuming it, and then she signs an electronic log, you know, an affidavit saying, I did this. I witnessed it.
He took his meds. And when things came to a head about a month ago, we had an attorney by then, and our attorney sent a letter, a a certified attorney letter to the clinic. And he said, listen. Here's all the evidence we have that this child is taking his medication. We have a nurse documenting it, observing it.
We have his lab results showing it's in his blood. He has the side effects you would expect just at a very low level. They're very minimal, and we manage them really well. And there are other variables here. Some some kids just run higher with their ANC, and and we have now twenty one months of record showing his ANC was even high when they did all the meds.
When there were no home meds, it was still higher. We know that this medication is metabolized much faster when you drink milk. He drinks milk. We live here on an organic farm with our own cows. He drinks milk.
If you take vitamin d, it can make your ANC higher.
Speaker 1: So this is just amazing because instead of finding out what you're doing to have your your son have how old is he?
Speaker 0: Eight.
Speaker 1: Eight. So instead of finding out what you're doing that your eight year old son is not having as strong of side effects, you're you're you're they're threatening to take, your child away. Now did someone report you, or how how did, like, protect the child
Speaker 0: for the They told us very directly that they they're watching his ANC, and at our September visit was when they told us and documented in his clinical notes that if his ANC wasn't below 1,500 by his October 17 visit, they would refer to CPS for suspected medication noncompliance, which they consider neglect. So they're they're painting all of this on an his ANC, absolute neutrophil count.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. And so this is first of all, this is a completely amazing medication noncompliance, as if the state is more equipped than a parent to decide what their child should get. That's utterly ridiculous. So
Speaker 0: more
reSee.it AI Summary
I found no surveillance video of Tyler Robinson turning himself in after being accused of taking out Charlie Kirk. Requests were denied or records said not exist or destroyed. No one knows whether the video existed or was shared with another agency.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
An investigation found no surveillance video of Tyler Robinson turning himself in after being accused of taking out Charlie Kirk. Requests were either denied, or investigators were told the records do not exist and may have even been destroyed. No one knows whether the video ever existed or was shared with another agency.
reSee.it AI Summary
I see India's digital ID system as a warning to the world. Over a billion tied to a biometric program linking food, healthcare, and pensions to one ID, with devastating results: hackers stole identities, families starved, the elderly lost benefits, and some died after ration failures.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
India’s digital ID system has become a warning to the world. Over a billion people were forced into a biometric program that linked food, healthcare, and pensions to one ID, with devastating results. Hackers stole identities, families starved, and the elderly lost their benefits. In some areas, people died after being denied rations because the system failed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker discusses India's nationwide digital ID system, Aadhaar, and chip away at the assurances given by officials who praised its rollout. The speaker notes that about a week or so earlier, Kirstjarma met with Prime Minister Modi and top officials in India to extol the benefits of digital ID, highlighting Aadhaar and claiming a fabulous nationwide rollout. The speaker then presents a troubling counterpoint: cybercriminals are claiming they have stolen the entire Aadhaar database—describing it as the database of 815,000,000 people with details such as names, addresses, identity confirmations, bank details, and more.
According to these claims, the criminals are currently selling the entire database for $80,000 at a time. The speaker acknowledges uncertainty about verification but states that this story is circulating and raises questions about security. The core concern is about how secure the system will be when every facet of a person’s life could be held in one place: passport, driving license, NHS records, criminal records, bank details, every transaction, gas and electricity bills, travel records, flight records, car tax, council tax, and any arrest or hospital appointment information.
The speaker asks whether we can trust the people running these systems to keep data secure, given the frequency of data breaches and data thefts, including several large incidents in the past year in the country. The concern is framed as a general warning about the viability of a centralized digital ID system that aggregates extensive personal information, and how well it would function in practice if it were compromised.
A specific anecdotal point is raised: India’s example is cited as a real-world instance of the system’s security challenges, with the speaker encouraging listeners to look up the incident. The speaker notes that Star Lord was out in India holding up India as an example of how well the system could work, referencing a perceived contrast between the praise and the security breach claim. The segment closes with a skeptical modulo—“Right, Kia. We believe you.”—casting doubt on official assurances.
In summary, the speaker highlights a purported massive data breach claim against India’s Aadhaar system, questions the security of a centralized digital identity that consolidates extensive personal data, and contrasts official praise with concerns about data vulnerability and trust in those who manage such systems.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Digital ID. What could possibly go wrong? So do you remember about a week or so ago, maybe ten days ago, Kirstjarma was out in India meeting Modi, the Indian president, or prime minister, and a load of their top officials, and extolling the benefits of digital ID and saying what a fabulous rollout they've had in India, which has their nationwide digital ID system called Aadha or Adhaar, depending how you pronounce it. Well, listen to how well it's going. Thieves or crypto thieves or digital thieves or cyber thieves or whatever you wanna call them, cyber criminals, are currently claiming that they have stolen the entire data base, 815,000,000 people's details, names, addresses, identity, identity confirmations, bank details, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera.
They've cracked the code, and they've got the entire database, They're currently selling the entire database for $80,000 at a time. Now, that's been verified or not, I don't know, but that story is doing the rounds. So just how secure is it going to be? Just how well is it going to work? As I've said this so many times, when every single piece of information about your life, your passport, and your driving license, and your NHS records, and your criminal record, and your bank details, and every transaction of everything that you buy, and your gas bill, and your electricity bill, and your travel records, and your flight records, and your car tax, and, your council tax, and anything you've ever done criminally, any arrest record, absolutely everything, any hospital appointments, anything about you at all, is all held in one place.
How safe and how secure is that going to be? Do you trust the people running these systems? Do you trust them to keep your data secure? We get data breaches, data thefts every single day, and sometimes we get really, really big ones. There's been lots just in the last year in this country alone.
So how well is it gonna work when every single facet of your life is held in one place? It's just happened in India. Go and look it up. And the ironic thing is that Star Lord was just out there holding them up as an example of how well the system could work. Yeah.
Right, Kia. We believe you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m a disabled U.S. Navy veteran. Texas police showed up at my home without a warrant after my comments about the Jewish community and Israel. They said they were there to ensure I didn’t intend to harm anyone. I ordered them off my property and plan to audit the officers.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Texas police showed up at the home of a disabled U.S. Navy veteran without a warrant after he made comments “about the Jewish community” and Israel. Officers claimed they were there to ensure he didn’t intend to “harm people.” The veteran promptly ordered them off his property and says he now plans to audit the officers involved.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript documents a tense encounter between Speaker 0 and individuals who appear to be accompanying or representing law enforcement or a compliance team. Speaker 0 begins by challenging a prior online statement about the Jewish community, asserting a belief in freedom of speech. The responders acknowledge the claim but insist they must ensure there is no warrant and that they are within rights to proceed. The conversation shifts to a sign reading “no soliciting,” with Speaker 0 being told that what he is doing is basically soliciting and that he is not welcomed there. He is told to “stay off the lawn” and to leave, as the others indicate the property line and how to proceed.
Speaker 0 presses back on the idea of warrants and the legality of their actions, insisting, “No. That’s why we’re,” and then highlighting the sign as evidence of their lack of welcome. The discourse reveals a confrontation over freedom of speech: Speaker 0 declares, “This is freedom of speech,” while the others respond by asserting boundaries and the illegitimacy of the intrusion in light of the no-soliciting sign. The scene is described as an example of consequences for online comments about the Jewish community, with the on-site visitors asserting that comments lead to an in-person response.
Throughout, Speaker 0 frames the situation as a defense of free expression, repeatedly stating, “What you’re doing is basically soliciting. You understand that. Mhmm.” and “This is freedom of speech.” The others counter with procedural cautions about warrants and property rights, and they emphasize that the sign does not authorize the visitors to disregard the property boundaries, noting, “Sign that says no soliciting does not give you a right to my curtilage.” The exchange escalates into a back-and-forth about authority, with Speaker 0 disparaging the perceived influence of Israel, saying, “This is how much control Israel has over our country,” and claiming that the response he’s facing is a direct consequence of exercising online freedom of speech.
The interaction culminates with the visitors continuing their stance on non-solicitation, and Speaker 0 signaling a ready exit, saying “Bye bye,” and reiterating the boundary with, “Freedom of speech.” The overall dynamics depict a confrontation where online remarks about a minority community are met with a door-to-door response framed as protecting boundaries under a no-soliciting rule, while the speaker asserts constitutional rights and critiques the legitimacy of the encounter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Try that again. We're here because of the comments you made online about the Jewish community. Are you So what? I'm saying are are you I have a freedom of speech, dude. Yeah.
No. We we we get that. We get that. We just we gotta make sure that you're not Do have a get a warrant? No.
No. That's why we're Yeah. You see that sign? Yeah. So it says no soliciting.
What you're doing is basically soliciting. You understand that. Right? Mhmm. Yeah.
It means you're not welcomed here. Okay. K. Bye. Okay.
Stay off the lawn, please. This is what they're doing, guys. You make comments about the Jews online, they'll fucking show up at your door. This is what they do. This is freedom of speech.
This is how much control Israel has over our country. Look at this response. For exercising my freedom of speech online. Wow. What a fucking joke.
What a fucking joke. Can't wait to do some auditing of you boys. Bye bye. Look at that. Sign says no soliciting.
What do they think they're fucking doing? They got no warrant. Sign that says no soliciting does not give you a right to my curtilage. Bye bye. Freedom of speech.
reSee.it AI Summary
I released footage showing Terryl Farnsworth rushing to film a selfie video moments after Charlie Kirk was shot, prematurely declaring him dead. Farnsworth, a close friend of Kirk, also removed the overhead cameras minutes after the shooting.
@ShadowofEzra - Shadow of Ezra
Candace Owens released footage showing Turning Point USA staffer Terryl Farnsworth rushing to film a selfie video moments after Charlie Kirk was shot, prematurely declaring him dead. Farnsworth, one of Kirk’s closest friends, was also the individual who removed the overhead cameras just minutes after Charlie was shot.
Video Transcript AI Summary
They just shot Charlie. Here's your shot, Charlie. God help him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. They just shot Charlie. Here's your shot, Charlie. God help him.