TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SheilaGunnReid

Posted - May 6, 2025 at 4:03 PM

Saved - May 6, 2025 at 9:45 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been following the CBC's actions during the 2025 election, and the complaints against them have reached an all-time high. The Ombudsman confirmed they received more complaints than ever before, revealing that CBC not only reported on the election but actively interfered. They spread falsehoods about Rebel News and misrepresented facts regarding residential school discoveries. Despite the backlash, CBC is set to receive additional funding, raising concerns about their bias and the impact on public trust. The question remains: how long will we continue to support this?

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

🧵 CBC Lied. The Viewers Knew. Now Even the Ombudsman Can’t Ignore It. Canada’s state broadcaster just set a record — for complaints. Here’s what they tried to get away with during the 2025 election, and how they got caught. ⤵️

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

1/ In April, the CBC Ombudsman admitted they received more complaints than the previous 3 months combined — the highest ever during an election. Why? Because CBC didn’t just report the election. They interfered in it.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

2/ Their anchors smeared @RebelNewsOnline on national TV. They said we were disruptive. They said our accreditation was revoked. They said Drea Humphrey was wrong about residential school discoveries. All lies. All caught on camera.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

3/ They even claimed our billboard truck was operating illegally. Spoiler: it wasn’t. CBC reporters were so fixated on banning us that the debate press conference was cancelled — because the commission couldn’t justify kicking us out.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

4/ @DreaHumphrey was accused on-air of denying residential school deaths. But all she did was accurately state that no human remains have been found at Kamloops. CBC quietly issued a correction — not on TV, but buried in a blog post.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

5/ Here’s what Canadians told the Ombudsman: 🗣️ “Discriminatory, puerile, and unprofessional.” 🗣️ “A whining, gatekeeping toddler.” 🗣️ “You swayed or influenced voters. That is definitely not your job.” They’re not wrong.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

6/ Even the Ombudsman admitted: “Many complaints were found to have merit.” Translation: CBC lied. Viewers noticed. The damage was done. Read the report yourself: https://cbc.radio-canada.ca/en/ombudsman/blog/Ombud_Inbox_April_2025

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

7/ And now? New PM Mark Carney is promising the CBC another $150 million — on top of their $1.4B. They’re not being punished for this bias. They’re being rewarded.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

8/ The CBC isn’t a broadcaster. It’s a taxpayer-funded smear machine, propping up the Liberals and silencing dissent. And the 2025 debates exposed it in real time.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

The question isn’t if CBC is biased. That’s settled. The real question is: How much longer are we going to fund the lie? 🔗 Full receipts at http://CBCLies.com

PETITION: CBC ... Stop Lying! Have you noticed that the CBC can't stop lying? Help us hold them accountable. Add your name as we demand that the CBC stop lying! rebelnews.com

@SheilaGunnReid — Sheila Gunn Reid

Posted - April 21, 2025 at 5:24 PM

Saved - April 21, 2025 at 10:13 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

A federal report from Policy Horizons Canada predicts a bleak future for the country by 2040, highlighting class-based dating apps, AI job replacements, and illegal hunting as survival tactics. The report suggests a society where social mobility is a myth, education serves as a gatekeeping tool, and homeownership becomes unattainable. It warns of rising civil disobedience and a loss of faith in government legitimacy. Ultimately, it presents a vision of managed decline, lacking solutions, and reflects a troubling blueprint for our future.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

🚨 A federal report quietly released by the Privy Council predicts a dystopian Canada by 2040: Class-based dating apps. AI replacing your job. Illegal hunting to feed your kids. Gated cities for the rich. Not satire. Their words. 🧵

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

The report is from Policy Horizons Canada, the in-house think tank of the Prime Minister's Office. It’s titled “Future Lives: Social Mobility in Question.” But it reads like a eulogy for the Canadian Dream.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

“In 2040, people rarely mix with others of different socio-economic status. Algorithmic dating apps filter by class. Gated metaverses, like real life, offer few opportunities to meet people from different backgrounds.” (p.6) Welcome to caste system 2.0.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Jobs? Forget it. “The value of human labour has shrunk because of AI… The best AI assistants are expensive. This reinforces structural inequalities.” (p.7) You’ll be replaced by an algorithm you can’t afford to compete with.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Think you’ll escape by upgrading your skills? “Post-secondary education is no longer considered a reliable path to social mobility… Tuition and housing costs exclude all but the wealthy.” (p.9) So much for ‘learn to code.’

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Universities become elite clubs: “Fewer young people choose post-secondary education… Those who do see it as a way to reinforce their membership in the ‘elite’.” (p.10) Degrees are no longer about opportunity—they're about gatekeeping.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Can’t buy a home? Join the pod people. “Owning a home is not a realistic goal… Some take out intergenerational mortgages. Others enter alternative household mortgages with friends.” (p.11) That’s not housing. That’s hostage-taking with a payment plan.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

When you can’t afford food? Go feral. “People may start to hunt, fish and forage on public lands and waterways without reference to regulations.” (p.13) The same gov that banned plastic forks and your hunting rifles thinks you’ll go full Hunger Games by 2040.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

And it gets darker: “People may reject the state’s legitimacy… Higher rates of tax evasion or other forms of civil disobedience.” (p.15) Even Ottawa admits Canadians will stop believing in the system.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Their solution? There isn’t one. You'll own nothing and be happy. Just buzzwords like “resilience” and “community gardening” while the Liberal–WEF elite retreats behind gates—digital and physical. This is managed decline—written by the same people managing the collapse.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

This isn’t foresight. It’s a confession. And if we don’t change course fast, this isn’t just Canada’s future. It’s our government’s blueprint. Link to full report here: https://horizons.gc.ca/en/2025/01/30/future-lives-social-mobility-in-question/ 🔚

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Link that's not dead: https://horizons.service.canada.ca/en/2025/01/10/future-lives-social-mobility/index.shtml

Future Lives: Social mobility in question horizons.service.canada.ca

@SheilaGunnReid — Sheila Gunn Reid

Posted - October 29, 2024 at 4:06 PM

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 8:12 PM

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

Health Committee chaos in 10 mins: Liberals are trying to regulate natural health products out of existence, as more people opt for alternatives to a failing health system Health Minister Mark Holland makes a total a-hole of himself. Chair Sean Casey loses control of the meeting

Video Transcript AI Summary

How many Canadians lack a family doctor? The latest CIHI report estimates about 5.4 million adults. Is this number increasing or decreasing? Access to primary care is improving across most provinces and territories. The discussion shifts to the relevance of the questions being asked, with some members expressing frustration over the focus on family doctors instead of the bill regarding natural health products. Questions arise about the number of seniors hospitalized due to pharmaceuticals, with one member stating that 13,000 Canadians are harmed annually. The minister emphasizes the importance of discussing the bill at hand and defends the natural health product industry, stating it is a booming sector. Concerns are raised about businesses potentially shutting down due to regulatory impacts, but the minister claims compliance costs are zero for compliant businesses.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Down this road before with you, and I guess let's start with some simple questions. You you like to use some very emotionally charged language. How many Canadians don't have a family doctor? Just the number, simple. Speaker 1: Well according to the most recent report that was just released by CIHI, there it depends on province. So you say Ontario is 88% Just the number. Lowest province about 79%. Territories are lower, particularly in Nunavut being the lowest. Speaker 0: Minister, I'm going to interrupt you because, again, you and I have gone down this road many times, and you said you've read the report. How many I'll say it perhaps slowly and clearer for you. How many Canadians Speaker 2: don't have Across the Speaker 1: country, it's known to be about 82% have Excuse Speaker 0: me, Minister. Don't interrupt me. This is not your time for question. You'll have lots of time when you're in opposition to ask questions if you so desire or if you're able to keep your seat. That being said, how many Canadians don't have access to primary care in Canada? Just the number. Speaker 1: It's estimated at 6,500,000. Speaker 0: Actually, if you read the CIHI report, it says 5,400,000 adults, correct? Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: Yeah. So tell me this, is that number going up or going down? Speaker 1: In every province, in every territory with I believe one exception, that the access to doctor is improving. There's been more doctors added, more nurses added. That's in the baseline CAI report. So that's actually before our investment of $200,000,000,000 That's what I asked you, is the number of Canadians who do not have access to a primary care physician going up or going down? Access is going up. That in the baseline report, we see every province in every territory, access to more doctors, more nurses in almost every jurisdiction. That's a baseline report that is before the interventions of our signed agreements with every province, every territory, $200,000,000,000 being applied. And I can talk about all the different ways that we're improving Speaker 0: that circumstance with conservative customs and that. You know, again, if you don't want to be respectful, why do you even bother coming here? Speaker 1: I don't find your questions or your demeanor with respect. Also, I don't I don't know why I should reciprocate something that is not extended. That's why I'm speaking Speaker 2: to the court. Speaker 3: Thank you. Thank you, chair. So I'm, patiently listening to Mr. Ellis's questioning. And I'm starting failing to see any relevance to the topic in hand, which is this particular bill dealing with natural health products. So unless he's got a long winded way of getting to the presentation that was we heard in the bill that we are reviewing, like him to focus on the bill that we're talking about. Speaker 0: Thank you. Speaker 4: Yes, I think it's valid. I'm not sure that there's a connection between access to family doctors and this private member's bill. This is not an examination of estimates where it's it's much more wide open. So I I do I do hope and expect that doctor Ellis will get to the point. I think it is a valid point of order. Did you have another one, miss Goodridge, or you guys are on this point? Speaker 5: I have a point of order on this point of order. The minister just very clearly said that he doesn't plan on respecting my colleague because he has decided that that is not something he's going to do. I don't think that is befitting of a formal committee meeting. Speaker 4: I think there's, I think it's reciprocal, quite frankly, and it's and it's too bad. The the witness merits respect as does the person posing the question, and, that's, why don't we treat everyone with respect around here, please? I wouldn't pin it on one side or the other based on what I've heard so far. Did you have something you want to say, Minister? Speaker 1: My reflection was simply that if I'm attacked and and treated in the way that I am, I'm going to respond. And and and absolutely I'm here to answer questions. But I I would suggest, Speaker 2: mister chair, that perhaps we could start with things germane to this bill. Chair or Speaker 1: is it the minister? Please, doctor. Mister Speaker 4: The minister has the floor. Speaker 0: It's ridiculous. Speaker 4: The minister has the floor. Ridiculous. Speaker 1: I do not I I I can tell you that in in in look I was in opposition. I've been in the position that they are in where you ask questions. Speaker 4: Okay. Speaker 2: Thank you. Speaker 1: And I am saying that there is there is there is not only is the conversation not relevant, but I don't think it's at all respectful. Speaker 4: Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Minister. Now, Mr. Doherty has a point of order. Speaker 6: Mr. Chair, it is commonplace, within this committee as well as other committees that I've sat on that the length of a question is then therefore applied to the length of the answer where the frustration comes with this minister is that he tends to go on beyond the length of the time that it took to ask the question. As you know, members are given a specific allotment of time and it is frustrating when you have ministers appear, not just this minister but other ministers appear, and I know that this minister, is well versed in the art of what we call ragging the puck, and so are other ministers, taking up the time of each member. So when my colleague and others ask a simple question, just a number, that's all that they look to receive. If we wanted the statistics for each province, I would offer through you, Mr. Chair, that that would then bode the answer that the minister was going down. I can see that my colleague has done research and has a number of questions that he would like to ask. So I would ask through you to our minister is that if if and when he can be concise to please be concise. Speaker 0: A point of order, chair. Speaker 4: Yes, doctor Ellis. Speaker 0: Yeah. I know this is painful for you. I understand that, but since when does a witness get to direct the committee? All I suggest to you, and I know you won't like this, but do your job. Speaker 4: Miss Seated, do you have a point of order or do you wanna intervene on this one? Speaker 2: Yes. Thank you, mister chair. Mister chair, we invited the minister. Let's be respectful when we are asked the question, mister has the right to give the answer. That's my point. Thank you. Speaker 4: 3 minutes and 37 seconds. Speaker 0: Thank you very much, Chair. So, Minister, before all of the bombast, back to questioning here. When we begin to look at Canadians, of course, because of your mismanagement of the health file, they have to look after themselves, by virtue of turning to things such as natural health products. So your ineptitude, of course, has led many Canadians, of course, which we've heard from using natural health products. That being said, how many Canadian seniors are hospitalized every year because of pharmaceutical products? Speaker 1: I believe that I was here for natural health products. I don't blame the member for not wanting to questions about this terrible bill. I wouldn't want to talk about this terrible bill either. So I understand his desire to talk about anything but this awful bill. I could tell him because I'll bring it back to the bill, 7 72 severe adverse reactions from natural health products that this member Speaker 0: is supporting bill and would Speaker 1: not allow our ability to recall products to have those kinds. So the type of Minister, Speaker 4: please go ahead, Doctor. Ellis. Speaker 0: Mister Chair, you know, clearly what we're seeing here is an aversion to answering questions. Very simply, this will connect. I know it's difficult for you. How many Canadian seniors are hospitalized every year due to pharmaceutical products? Just the number minister. Speaker 1: I understand that it's I get the same amount of time as you asked the question. Is that the rule? Yep. I understand that it's difficult for you to understand that I'm here on natural health products, that that is the purpose of this study, and I understand why you wouldn't ask answer questions. Thank you very much. Speaker 0: I will interrupt you once again. Just the number. How many? Speaker 1: I'm here to talk about natural health products, and what's the purpose of this study, and I want to talk about it. I'm not going to let you off, and not talk about your own bill. Speaker 0: Once again, I'll move along because you clearly have no clue how many Canadian seniors are hospitalized every year due to pharmaceutical products, which again are under your purview. Would you care to answer that on behalf of Canadians or no? Simple answer, if you don't want to or you don't know the answer, it's okay. Speaker 4: What I'm Speaker 1: not going to do is engage in an attempt to not talk about this bill. You have not asked any questions related to this bill because you don't want to talk about how deadly this bill is. The fact that you would leave Thank you very much, sir. Products on the shelves that are dangerous to Canadians' health. Speaker 0: You know, the the difficulty, of course, is, minister, is that 13,000 Canadians are harmed by pharmaceutical, products every year, seniors hospitalized, 13,000, just because people need a reference. All you want to do is talk, you know, down to Canadians about faeces and lead, all your fantastical words, of course, that's what your attempt to do. Minister, very simple question, how much does the NHP industry contribute to the GDP of Canada on a yearly basis? Speaker 1: Enormously, it is a booming industry, a multi $1,000,000,000,000 industry. Am I allowed to answer question at the same time that you took the last part? Speaker 2: Yes, you took Speaker 4: another 25 seconds to answer the question. Thank you. Speaker 1: It's a booming industry, it is a growing industry, it is a multi $1,000,000,000 industry, but one of the things that will protect that industry is ensuring that the that industry, that I still think that once again, I'll ask you just for the numbers. Yes, go ahead. So one of the things that's when you're talking about adverse effects on pharmaceuticals, the idea that there's adverse effects on pharmaceuticals, so therefore you do nothing about natural health products, you just leave the people who have adverse affection effects for natural health products with nothing. Thank you. Speaker 0: How you draw your own conclusions. That being said, because of your, negative effects on the natural health product industry, how many businesses are saying they're considering shuttering operations in Canada? Speaker 1: Vanessa's law does not affect any compliant or any business attempting to be compliant at all. Cost of businesses that are complying compliant or attempting to be compliant is exactly $0. Speaker 0: Thank you, Speaker 1: doctor Ellis. Speaker 4: Thank you, doctor Ellis. That's your time. Thank you.

@SheilaGunnReid — Sheila Gunn Reid

Posted - October 28, 2024 at 5:30 PM

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 12:32 AM

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

BC VOTERS SHOULD HAVE KNOWN: The CCP-linked Canada Committee 100 Society is led in Vancouver by Ding Guo, a journalist who is also an advisor to British Columbia Premier David Eby. https://t.co/bOI7djzpVL

Video Transcript AI Summary

I'm here to discuss names and entities from my updated book and raise a question about whether Canadian journalists should investigate the evidence surrounding these networks. My book details a 2020 recording of Senator Yuen Paowu during a private briefing with the Canada Committee 100 Society, which includes Conservative Senator Victor Oh and a member of the Chinese United Front Overseas Leaders Group. This society, led by journalist Ding Guo, also has ties to British Columbia Premier David Eby. Journalists at this meeting later supported Liberal candidate Parm Bains, who opposed Kenny Chu's foreign agent registry bill, calling it exclusionary. Ding Guo was also involved in the 2022 Conservative Party leadership race, alongside leaders connected to Beijing's overseas influence.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Thank you. MP Vaughan. I'm here today to highlight some of the names and entities covered in my updated book and to pose a question should other Canadian journalists be examining the openly available evidence surrounding these networks. Firstly my book recounts reporting on a 2020 tape recording provided to me where senator Yuen Paowu is heard in a 47 minute private briefing with the Canada Committee 100 Society. This group included conservative senator Victor Oh as an advisory member along with an individual an individual officially listed in a Chinese United Front Overseas Leaders Group. The Canada Committee 100 Society is led in Vancouver by Ding Guo, a journalist who is also an advisor to British Columbia Premier David Eby. Other journalists participating in this tape recorded meeting with senator Wu later supported liberal candidate Parm Bains in 2021. Bains had told these journalists he opposed Kenny Chu's foreign agent registry bill, describing it as an exclusionary policy. Ding Guo was also reportedly involved in the 2022 Conservative Party leadership race alongside community leaders officially connected to Beijing's overseas influence arm, the United Front.

@SheilaGunnReid — Sheila Gunn Reid

Posted - October 21, 2024 at 1:22 PM

Saved - October 22, 2024 at 12:06 PM

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

A man in his 40s with IBS -who was socially isolated and addicted to opioids and alcohol - was told about MAID during a psychiatric assessment. His family wasn’t consulted and the MAID provider drove him to the location where he received a state sanctioned death. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-rates-of-medical-assistance-in-dying-for-non-terminal-illness-in/

Rates of medical assistance in dying for non-terminal illness in Ontario higher in poorer neighbourhoods, reports say Two new reports highlight the challenges of determining MAID eligibility for people with serious illnesses and disabilities theglobeandmail.com

@SheilaGunnReid — Sheila Gunn Reid

Posted - April 8, 2024 at 6:38 PM

Saved - April 8, 2024 at 10:15 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

The Liberal government withheld CSIS documents until 1 am, revealing that the PRC interfered in the 2019 and 2021 general elections. Numerous candidates and staff members were implicated in PRC foreign interference networks.

@SheilaGunnReid - Sheila Gunn Reid

WHOA 🚨🚨!!!! No wonder the Liberal gov withheld these CSIS docs until 1 am this morning. "We know that the PRC clandestinely and deceptively interfered in both the 2019 and 2021 general elections." "At least 18 candidates and 13 staff members were implicated in PRC foreign interference networks."

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses a document revealing foreign interference in the 2019 Canadian federal election involving Chinese individuals, community leaders, and politicians. They mention CSIS briefings on PRC interference in the elections, implicating candidates and staff. The panel received briefings on PRC's pragmatic interference tactics. The speaker confirms CSIS briefings to the panel but struggles to recall specific details. The language used in the briefings aligns with public summaries on PRC's activities.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: On the first page, actually, this is the only page, I believe, because I think the second page is fully redacted. The assessment reads, investigations into activities linked to the Canadian federal election in 2019 reveal an active foreign interference network, as in this redaction. This network involved the Chinese redaction, local community leaders, Canadian politicians, and their staff. Under broad guidance from the redacted, co opted staff of targeted politicians, provide advice on China related issues, and community community leaders facilitate the clandestine transfer funds and accrue potential targets. Miss Joon, have you seen this document before? Speaker 1: Yes, I have seen that document before. It's difficult for me to see to say when I have seen that documents with the different roles I have played, but I've seen that document before. Speaker 0: Do you recall, have you seen it before giving your witness statement that I referred to Speaker 1: earlier? I've seen it following the leaks and the work I've done in terms of the leaks investigation. Speaker 0: Okay. So my question is given that this document uses the term network and it's not just the media, does that change your opinion on the appropriateness of its use? Speaker 1: My the comment that you quote before, are still the same. The network here doesn't mean that the individuals were working in concert. Speaker 0: Okay. Madam commissioner, I would ask for leave next to pull up can 4495. This is a CSIS briefing to the prime minister's office from 2023, but it also describes briefings provided to the panel of 5 and in the context of the 2019 general election. And as we talked about earlier, this was also provided only this weekend, so that's why we didn't put it in Speaker 1: the request. It's okay. You can refer to it. Speaker 0: So if we go down to pages, starting at the bottom of page 3 and going into page 4, the document outlines that CSIS conducted various briefings. I'll just summarize this on the subject of PRC, interference, and they talk about, that they did briefings to the panel of 5 and in the context of the 2019 general election. So let me just start by confirming in general that the panel did in fact receive CSIS briefings in the lead up to the 2019 general election. I'm not asking on what topic yet. Speaker 1: Yes, so it goes past a little bit. So can you repeat your question? Speaker 0: I just want to confirm that Stesis provided briefings to the panel of 5 that will lead up Speaker 1: to the selection. Yes, Stesis did. Speaker 0: All right, thank you. If we can scroll back up the middle of page 2. There. Perfect. So, here, as Jesus writes, we know that the PRC clandestinely and deceptively interfered in both the 2019 and 2021 general elections. In both cases, these FI activities were pragmatic in nature and focused primarily on supporting those viewed to be either pro PRC or neutral on issues of interest to the PRC government. They also write at least 18 candidates and 13 staff members were implicated in PRC FI networks. This includes, you know, this included members of multiple political, parties. So my question for this panel is in the panel's briefings with CSIS in the lead up to the election, did they use this sort of language? Is this the sort of information you received? Speaker 1: The pragmatic, like, it depends. Like, there's a lot of things here. So Speaker 0: That's true. Right. Well, we can break it down. What about we know? Speaker 1: What what I do remember sorry, I don't even see Excuse me. Can we scroll up to the top of the document? Yeah. This is there, back to the So this Assertion to media reporting. Okay. So that is following the leaks. Thank you. That's that is really following the leaks, where briefing was prepared in order to, go back to the leaks and give information about what we know and when regarding those leaks. So if we talk about PRC, and we see that also in the public summaries that we have, sent to the commission, that the approach and the tactic of PRC is really to do some pragmatic work in the sense that they are doing activities when they believe it is necessary to promote their own, interest. So this is the type of language we heard regarding PRC.