TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ShivenChabria
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
John McAfee was so far ahead of the game that he appeared insane to the casual normie. https://t.co/Uooc3a5e1c
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
The time when the WHO and governments the world over changed COVID policy based on science fiction. (Full essay link at the end) 1. On May 22, 2020—in the thick of the pandemic— a blockbuster paper was published in Lancet, one of the most prestigious Journals in the world.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
2. It claimed that hydroxychloroquine, an anti-inflammatory and antimalarial drug promoted by then president Donald Trump and many others as therapy for COVID-19, caused increased risk of death when given to those infected with COVID.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
3. Although not a randomized controlled clinical trial, its claim to fame was that it analyzed the chart records of a massive 100,000 COVID-19 patients across 671 hospitals and six continents.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
4. Within days, multiple public health agencies including WHO and the UK equivalent of the FDA, the MHRA, ordered clinical trials of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 suspended while the French reversed an earlier decree allowing the drug to be prescribed to hospitalized patients.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
5. The FDA, not wanting to be viewed as laggards in comparison to their European counterparts, followed suit and revoked emergency use authorization for hydroxychloroquine.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
6. Twitter pundits and self-proclaimed COVID experts went into overdrive. They blamed Trump for causing the deaths of the patients who took hydroxychloroquine. (This CNN article is still on their website)
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
7. Hydroxychloroquine was discovered in 1934, and had been prescribed for malaria and autoimmune diseases without an increased mortality signal ever since. Why was this drug then selectively killing patients with COVID?
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
8. This most important question seemed not to rankle our scientific establishment in the least bit. In stark contrast to the incuriosity of the devotees of "following the science," online blogs and Independent researchers began dismantling study claims with mathematical precision
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
9. The Lancet article claimed nearly a doubling of mortality in the hydroxychloroquine group versus control (16-24% versus 9%). This massive effect size is unheard of in modern medicine.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
10. How did hydroxychloroquine, a drug in used relatively safely for many decades for other indications becomes so good at killing so many only for this one specific indication.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
11. Also, when such degree of mammoth harm manifests so impressively in any clinical trial, the trial is halted prematurely on the basis of interim analyses which alerts researchers to emerging safety signals. Were no interim analyses done for such a gargantuan study?
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
12. This study had red flags galore. The database included a massive 96,032 patients from 671 hospitals across six continents. But the Lancet paper listed only 4 authors.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
13. In addition, The lancet paper had only 4 authors, which was impossible. A global multinational study of this scope and magnitude would be conducted by a collaborative group spanning multiple continents, and 50-100 authors for a study of this size was common.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
14. Another red flag (or more like a burning building with encircling helicopters) was the impossible level of homogeneity of the data set across 6 separate continents.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
15. The study claimed that the proportion of current and former smokers across all continents was near identical. It also claimed the same proportion of individuals take ACE inhibitors in the United States as they do in Africa and Asia. An impossibility lost on the peer reviewers
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
16. On May 28, 2020—only six days after the Lancet paper was published—an open letter to the editor of Lancet with more than 180 signatories at research institutions around the world enumerated a laundry list of problems with the study data.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
17. These swirling whirlpools of doubt coalesced into a maelstrom and propelled a movement to investigate the data behind the article from curious online blog posts and twitter users into the limelight of investigator journalism. And the story got crazier. Way crazier.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
18. The study listed the data as coming from a "surgical outcomes collaborative" which was in fact a shell corporation company, and the CEO, Dr. Sapan Desai, was listed as the second author.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
19. Dr. Sapan Desai's company, Surgisphere, claimed privileged and exclusive access to a gargantuan dataset spanning six continents. How did this obscure company no scientist had ever heard of manage to obtain such a complex dataset in a relatively short period of time?
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
20. Surgisphere was a US-based company, whose handful employees (six originally according to LinkedIn, that whittled to three later) included a *science fiction writer* and an adult-content model, in addition to its chief executive, Dr. Sapan Desai, MD. Yes, read that again.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
21. Surgisphere’s employees had no data or scientific background. An employee listed as a science editor appeared to be a science fiction author and fantasy artist. Another employee listed as a marketing executive was an adult model and events hostess.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
22. But wait, the insanity intensifies. This same ragtag group of science fiction writers and adult models published two more studies using this non-existent data set. One got accepted into New England journal of medicine, arguably the most prestigious journal in the world.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
23. Another claimed that the anti-parasite drug ivermectin reduced death rates in severely ill Covid-19 patients and prompted the Peruvian government to add ivermectin to its national Covid-19 therapeutic guidelines.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
24. Surgisphere CEO Sapan Desai had been named in three medical malpractice suits, unrelated to the Surgisphere database.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
25. He'd launched a crowdfunding campaign on Indiegogo selling a wearable “nextgen human augmentation device to help achieve what you never thought was possible”. The only thing that turned out impossible was the ability of backers to get refunds for a non-existent product.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
26. As the mendacity of surgisphere and its collaborators began to unravel, the embarrassment and inveigle became too much for his academic collaborators to bear.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
27. On Jun 4, 2020, three authors—Mandeep Mehra, the medical director of Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Frank Ruschitzka of University Hospital Zurich, and Amit Patel of the University of Utah—contacted The Lancet to retract their report.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
28. “They were unable to complete an independent audit of the data underpinning their analysis,” the retraction notice in The Lancet reads. “As a result, they have concluded that they ‘can no longer vouch for the veracity of the primary data sources.’”
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
29. Shortly after The Lancet’s retraction, NEJM issued one. “Because all the authors were not granted access to the raw data and the raw data could not be made available to a third-party auditor, we are unable to validate the primary data sources underlying our article. . ."
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
30. How did two top-tier high profile journals boasting less than 5% acceptance rates and a screening process more rigorous than the Olympic games’ drug testing schedule miss a football field of flashing red lights that would’ve been clear as day to a mole with cataracts?
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
31. If you enjoyed this thread, be sure to follow me on Twitter and subscribe to my substack for more mind-bending content. Thank you for reading, and thank you for your support. Here's the full essay link, as promised along with a timeline infographic. 👇 https://thesovereignmind.substack.com/p/the-time-when-the-who-and-governments
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
1. Back in December 2022, Code Enforcement Officer Jesalyn Harper noticed a green garden hose sticking out of a hole at facility called Universal Meditech Inc. lab located in Reedley, California. She notified the owner of the violation.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
2. Not content, Harper investigated further. Further inspection found that the dingy warehouse contained expensive laboratory equipment, manufacturing devices, and what appeared to be medical-grade freezers.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
3. Things took an even more bizarre turn when several workers in lab coats who told her that they were Chinese nationals. She found thousands of vials of biological substances. Many were unlabeled. Others were labeled in Mandarin or in code.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
4. The city also found approximately 1,000 transgenic mice. Mice used for research of human disease, which biolab workers told her were, "genetically engineered to catch and carry the COVID-19 virus."
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
5. These mysterious and inexplicable discoveries spurred a nine-month effort by the city of Reedley to address the public health risk found in the warehouse. And what they found was like sliding down an Alice in biohazard land rabbit hole of intrigue, espionage and terror.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
6. Terrified by what they saw, local law enforcement attempted to contact the FBI and the CDC, but both federal agencies declined to investigate. Yes. They refused to investigate a makeshift lab experimenting on mice and homebrewing God alone knows what.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
7. Given the absolute disinterest shown by Federal authorities, local law enforcement reached out to their representative Jim Costa. This finally galvanized CDC into some action and CDC finally visited the lab in May 2023.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
8. The CDC reported the facility contained "at least 20 potentially infectious agents," including HIV, Tuberculosis, and the deadliest form of Malaria. They found a host of "potentially infectious agents" and separated them into two subgroups: "risk group 2 and risk group 3."
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
9. "Risk group 2" is as a human disease which is rarely serious and represents a moderate risk to an individual but a low risk to the community." "Risk group 3" is defined as pathogens "associated with serious or lethal human disease and represent a high risk to an individual.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
10. The story gets even crazier. Despite the admitted risks, the CDC refused to further investigate what appeared to be pathogens or other biological samples in the unmarked containers in the biolab *despite city officials offering to pay for the testing*
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
11. The CDC summarized its findings in a three-page report, which stated that there was "no evidence of select agents or toxins" and had state and local authorities can go ahead and destroy evidence from the facility.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
12. The CDC ordered local officials to eradicate approximately 140 tons of general waste, including complex laboratory equipment and 448 gallons of medical and biological waste barely giving them any guidance on how to go about doing it.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
13. Local officials went ahead and began the work off removing the biological waste. It was at this point local officials found a freezer labeled "Ebola" with silver-sealed bags.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
14. The House Select Committee on the People’s Republic of China (PRC) became involved with this most bizarre investigation and recently announced its findings.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
15. They found that the owner of the lab, Jia Bei Zhu, is a wanted fugitive from Canada and a Chinese citizen. He'd previously stolen millions worth of intellectual property from American companies and was part of an ongoing transnational criminal enterprise with ties to the PRC.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
16. Zhu went by a number of aliases, was arrested in October for "manufacturing and distributing misbranded medical devices in violation of the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) and for making false statements to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)."
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
17. Court documents allege that between December 2020 and March 2023, Zhu and others manufactured, imported, sold, and distributed hundreds of thousands of COVID-19 test kits, as well as tests for HIV, pregnancy and other conditions in the U.S. and China.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
18. Mind you, this has nothing to do with Zhu's secret house of horrors lab doing unknown experiments on genetically modified mice and samples of HIV, COVID, Ebola, malaria and other sundry bioweapons. They just wanted him to stop selling COVID and pregnancy test kits.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
19. Here's the AP calling the whole thing a "conspiracy theory." They explain "It was later determined that they were simply used to grow antibody cells to make test kits" Pray do tell what test kits use Ebola, HIV and COVID, and 1000 transgenic mice? https://apnews.com/article/california-biolab-covid19-test-kits-china-arrest-3ee30af1548356e017276860ebb21f53
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
20. The CDC's refusal to test and order to destroy pathogens found at this secret lab make it impossible to fully assess the potential risks that the community was exposed to and if there are other such facilities around the country. This is beyond egregious and unconscionable.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
21. Nary a day goes by without the CDC acting as the marketing division of Big Pharma selling a cornucopia of vaccines on social media. The CDC director finds plenty time to peddle vaccines as a preventative against catastrophe. But why didn't they investigate actual catastrophe?
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
22. If you've enjoyed this thread, consider following my Twitter account and subscribing to my substack, which has long form essays on important and oft neglected topics that haven't yet received the widespread attention they deserve. (Link in bio) Thank you for reading this far.
@ShivenChabria - Chabria
23. Receipts: findings of the Congressional committee on CCP 👇 https://selectcommitteeontheccp.house.gov/media/investigations/investigation-reedley-biolab
