reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @SidneyPowell1

SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 6, 2026 at 4:21 AM
Saved - February 7, 2026 at 2:22 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Absolutely disgusting @FBIDirectorKash You have a lot more firings to do and this one should be prosecuted ‼️

@amuse - @amuse

CORRUPTION: FBI Atlanta Chief Paul Brown warned Fulton County elections officials about a coming raid & even shared a list of items agents planned to seize. He was removed just before the warrant was executed. This is a compromised bureau. h/t @zerohedge

SidneyPowell1
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Saved - November 2, 2025 at 12:21 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

ELECTIONS: Objections to elections & electoral counts since 2000 when machines began their “black box” funny business. ⁦@realDonaldTrump⁩ ⁦@DataRepublican⁩ The Rule of Law depends on transparent trustworthy elections. We must get them now‼️ Hand count paper ballots. https://t.co/i6OjIuUYBe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The chair hands the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida to the tellers. An objection to Florida’s votes is presented in writing, signed by a number of members of the House of Representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. A member of the Congressional Black Caucus states that he is objecting to the counting of the 25 electoral votes from Florida, thanking the president for the inquiry, and says the objection is signed on behalf of his diverse constituents and the millions of Americans disenfranchised by Florida’s inaccurate vote count. The clerk reports the objection, noting that it is signed by a member of the House and a United States senator. The objection to Ohio’s electoral votes is read, raised on the ground that the votes were not “under all of the known circumstances regularly given.” It is signed by Stephanie Tubbs Jones of Ohio and Barbara Boxer of California. Another speaker says the objection today is raised because there are irregularities across the country with regard to voting, and that Congress has an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. A further speaker dedicates the Ohio objection to Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary Fahrenheit 9/11. A speaker notes that, first of all, no election official in Ohio has provided any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the state, including machines in Mahoning County that recorded “carry” votes for Bush. There is a sense of concern about irregularities across the nation. In closing, another speaker remarks that people are dying all over the world, many from his state, in the name of bringing democracy to distant parts of the world, and asks, “Let’s fix it here, and let’s do it first thing out.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The chair now hands to the tellers the certificate of the electors for president and vice president of the state of Florida. Speaker 1: Mister president, the objection is in writing, signed by a number of members of the house of representatives, but not by a member of the Senate. Speaker 2: Mr. President, I stand for the purpose of objecting to the counting of the vote from the state of Florida as read. Mr. President, I rise on behalf of the Congressional Black Caucus to object to the 25 electoral votes from Florida. Mister president, thank you for your inquiry. It is in writing. It is signed by myself on behalf of my diverse constituents and the millions of Americans who have been disenfranchised by Florida's inaccurate vote count. Speaker 0: The is the objection signed by a senator? Speaker 1: Well, mister chair mister president, I am objecting to, to the idea that votes in Florida were not counted. Speaker 3: The clerk will report the objection. We, a member of the house of representatives, and a United States senator, object to the counting of the electoral votes of the state of Ohio on the ground that they were not under all of the known circumstances regularly given. Signed, Stephanie Tubbs Jones, state of Ohio. Barbara Boxer, state of California. Speaker 4: The objection today is raised because there are irregularities across this country with regard to voting, and we as a congress have an obligation to step up to the plate and correct them. Speaker 5: Mister speaker and members, I dedicate my objection to Ohio's electoral votes to mister Michael Moore, the producer of the documentary nine eleven. Speaker 1: First of all, we are here because not a single election official in Ohio has given us any explanation for the massive and widespread irregularity in the in the state. No explanation for the machines in Mahoning County that recorded carry votes for Bush. Speaker 6: Our people are dying all over the world. A lot from my state. For what reason? To bring democracy to the far corners of the world. Let's fix it here, and let's do it first thing out. Thank you very
SidneyPowell1
Posted - September 9, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Saved - September 9, 2025 at 11:57 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Don’t forget Hillary paid for it‼️

@Whiplash437 - Whiplash347

20 CIA and FBI insiders just CONFIRMED that Barack Obama and a former CIA Director orchestrated the entire Russia Hoax — and then hid it in a CIA vault for nearly a DECADE! https://t.co/bnAmrmbVQP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Gabbard released a bombshell report alleging "a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election." It claims "There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false," intended to promote a narrative that Russia interfered to help Trump. The report says Obama "ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment" and "John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts" for a rush job published before Trump’s inauguration. It lists four elements: "One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign." "There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations." "Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News alert the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releasing a bombshell report today that shows a conspiracy by a sitting president, Barack Obama, and his intel agencies to sabotage the president-elect, Donald Trump, brainwash the electorate, and undermine the legitimacy of an election. Speaker 1: There is irrefutable evidence that detail how president Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false. They knew it would promote this contrived narrative that Russia interfered in the twenty sixteen election to help president Trump win, selling it to the American people as though it were true. It wasn't. Speaker 0: Gabbard got her hands on a house intel report that's been locked away in a CIA vault for almost a decade. Investigators spent over two thousand hours looking into how the Russia hoax was born, interviewing 20 CIA and FBI officials. And it turns out that the Obama administration doctored the intelligence to make it look like Putin and Trump stole the election. A month after Trump beat Hillary, Barack Obama wasn't satisfied with his intelligence reporting and ordered his CIA director to create a new assessment of how Russia interfered with the election. This was a highly unusual move. John Brennan handpicked five CIA analysts to write the assessment, and they were siloed. None of them knew what the other was doing, and only one analyst was in charge of drafting this report. There was nothing routine about this, and it was a rush job to publish before Trump was sworn in. Nothing was coordinated with the other intelligence agencies either. Basically, this was home cooking for Barack Obama. There were four key elements from the assessment that were repeated over and over again and formed the basis of the Russia hoax and the Robert Mueller witch hunt. One, that Vladimir Putin wanted Donald Trump to win. Two, Putin took action to help Trump win. Three, the Russians had blackmail on Trump. That was the Steele dossier. And four, that the Russians tried colluding with the Trump campaign. None of any of this was ever true. There was no reliable intelligence to support any of these allegations. Senior CIA officials repeatedly refused to traffic in these allegations, but they were repeatedly overruled by CIA director Brennan and FBI director Comey, who insisted that they be pushed even without verifiable evidence. The Obama administration cherry picked the intelligence, lied about their sources, misquoted sources, didn't corroborate their claims, suppressed intelligence that ran counter to their narratives, and even used anonymous Internet postings. Rank and file CIA admitted what they were doing violated their own tradecraft standards. There was a massive pressure campaign that came right from the top. CIA analysts say they received unusual directives from political appointees, the CIA director, Speaker 1: and Speaker 0: Obama himself. This is how the Russia hoax was born. Speaker 1: Donald Trump knows, that the Russians helped him win in 2016. Speaker 2: Putin hated secretary Clinton so much that that the flip side of that coin was he had a clear preference for the person running against the person he hated so much. Speaker 3: It was Russia in a very systematic way and tried to interfere in the election and to try to advance the prospects of Donald Trump being elected. Speaker 0: This was such a malicious disinformation campaign perpetrated on the American people that at one point, 60% of Democrats believed the Russians hacked our voting machines to help Trump win the White House. What this report actually shows is that the Russians just wanted to create chaos and undermine Americans' faith in democracy. Solid intelligence suggested that Vladimir Putin didn't care who won. He had no preference. But like most people expected Hillary to win and had a little docket of compromising dirt on her, dirt that he never released. Now if Putin wanted Trump to win, why didn't Putin drop the dirt? Speaker 1: There were high level DNC emails that detailed evidence of Hillary's, quote, psycho emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression, and cheerfulness, and that then secretary Clinton was allegedly on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers. Then CIA director Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a, quote, unquote, clear preference for Trump. Speaker 0: Now if Clinton was on tranquilizers like the Russians believed, why didn't they leak it to help Trump win? How credible was the information about Hillary Clinton's health? Speaker 1: All I have seen is what, the intelligence, committee have reported through their investigation. I think the the the underlying point there is is that we understand from intelligence what Russia said that they had. And the important point here is that if they were trying to influence the election, as president Obama and James Clapper and John Brennan, everybody said they were doing in order to support Donald Trump's election, Speaker 0: they would have released the most damning of that information. Obama and his spy chiefs knew that Putin didn't prefer Trump over Hillary, but they cooked the intelligence to make it look like he did. Obama and his intel spies knew that Putin didn't collude with Trump and that he didn't even direct his people to help Trump win, but they put it out there anyway. In a sense, Barack Obama did exactly what Putin wanted, undermined Americans' faith in free and fair elections and caused chaos in our country. Barack Obama, the CIA, and the FBI were the ones doing what our enemy wanted. Speaker 1: Do you believe that any of this new information implicates former president Obama in criminal behavior? We have referred and will continue to refer all of these documents, to the Department of Justice and the FBI, to investigate the criminal implications of this. For even former president Obama? Correct. The evidence that we have found and that Speaker 0: we have Speaker 1: released directly point to president Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact. Speaker 0: Even two years later after the election, Barack Obama was still pushing a hoax he knew wasn't true. And he knew it wasn't true because he helped manufacture it. Speaker 4: They're undermining our alliances, cozying up to Russia. What happened to the Republican Party? They're cozying up to the former head of the KGB, actively blocking legislation that would defend our elections from Russian attack. What happened? Speaker 0: No. I don't know if it's possible to indite a former president for actions he took while in office. I'm not a lawyer, proudly. But Brennan, Comey, and others may have severe liability. Trey Gowdy says we know for a fact that Brennan committed perjury when he lied to congress. Speaker 5: Director Brennan, do you know who commissioned the Steele dossier? Speaker 6: I don't. Do you know Speaker 5: if the bureau ever relied on the Steele dossier as any as part of any court filings, applications? Speaker 6: I have no awareness. Speaker 5: Did the CIA rely on it? Speaker 6: No. Why not? Because we we didn't we it wasn't part of the corpus of intelligence information that we had. It was not in any way used as a basis for the intelligence community assessment that was done. It was it was not. Speaker 0: No. That's a lie. Whatever happens to these guys is not revenge. It's accountability. And it's time for people to pay the price.
SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 15, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Saved - August 9, 2025 at 3:13 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

This is the beginning of a thread that may take me a while to finish. If you’re still thinking the corruption in our government--or our voting systems--is a Left or Right issue you are mistaken. The more you dig, the more you realize cheating has been rampant in the #Uniparty for decades. Let’s take a little history lesson…

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Most of you are probably not old enough to remember, but in 2000, George W. Bush was elected President in a remarkably close race, decided ultimately by the Supreme Court following a major controversy over "hanging chads" on punched paper ballots by Sequoia voting systems--later bought by Smartmatic.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Now now the reason that most of us vote on electronic machines at all has to do with the two thousand election. Very basically, the two thousand election came down to just over a thousand votes in Florida, which triggered a recount, which turned out to be an absolute nightmare because unfortunately, many key Florida precincts used punch card ballots. And a major issue with punch card ballots was the fact that on some of them, little bits of paper or chads might not have punched all the way through, leading to images like this and nonstop news coverage like this. Gore's hopes hang by a Chad. Dimpled Chads. Dangling Chads. Hanging Chads. Indented Chads. Lone Chads. Another claim, Chad buildup. A pregnant Chad. The race comes down to the Chads.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now now the reason that most of us vote on electronic machines at all has to do with the two thousand election. Very basically, the two thousand election came down to just over a thousand votes in Florida, which triggered a recount, which turned out to be an absolute nightmare because unfortunately, many key Florida precincts used punch card ballots. And a major issue with punch card ballots was the fact that on some of them, little bits of paper or chads might not have punched all the way through, leading to images like this and nonstop news coverage like this. Gore's hopes hang by a Chad. Dimpled Chads. Dangling Chads. Hanging Chads. Indented Chads. Lone Chads. Another claim, Chad buildup. A pregnant Chad. The race comes down to the Chads.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

In reality, the entire hanging chad fiasco was deliberate and had two purposes: 1. pave way for computerized machines; 2. distract from a much larger problem of a 16,000 vote "glitch" in Volusia County Florida which won Florida for Bush when the Supreme Court stopped the recount.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

In 2004, Democrats claimed Bush stole Ohio by computerized vote shaving and vote flipping. Sound familiar? Congress had a hearing. The man who wrote the code revealed how it was done in Volusia County FL in 2000 and was likely done in Ohio 2004. https://t.co/m2lkvnH3tK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Clinton Eugene Curtis testified that programs exist to secretly fix elections. In October 2000, he wrote a prototype for president congressman Tom Feeney that did just that, which "would flip the vote fifty one forty nine. Whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win." "They'd never see it." Detection would require viewing the source code or having a "receipt" and counting the hard paper against the actual vote total. When asked if he could design a program to protect Ohio elections, he said: "Sure. Anybody can" to "No. Could you have designed a program... that would have protected Ohio against this kind of rigging?" "No." He said he handed in documentation of what to look for in the source code and, when told to hide fraud, replied, "We need to hide the fraud in the source in the source code." He warned that central tabulation machines could be flipped by a "flag," that machines could "talk to each other" if networked, and that there is "absolutely no assurance whatsoever" unless the source code is examined.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Curtis, would you please state your full name for the record? Speaker 1: Name is Clinton Eugene Curtis. Speaker 0: And where do you reside? Tallahassee, Florida. And what is your profession? I'm a computer programmer. Mister Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes. How do you know that to be the case? Speaker 1: Because in October 2000, I wrote a prototype for president congressman Tom Feeney at the company I worked for in Oviedo, Florida that did just that. Speaker 0: And when you say did did just that, it would rig an election? Speaker 1: It would flip the vote fifty one forty nine. Whoever you wanted it to go to and whichever race you wanted to win. Speaker 0: And would that program that you designed be something that elections officials that might be on county boards of elections could detect? Speaker 1: They'd never see it. Speaker 0: Mister That's it again. Would you answer that question once again? Speaker 1: They would never see it. Speaker 0: So how would such a such a program, a secret program that, fixes the election, how could it be detected? Speaker 1: You would have to view it either in the source code or you'd have to have a receipt and then count the hard paper against the actual vote total. Other than that, you won't see it. Speaker 0: Alright. Mister Curtis, if you had been asked, you or others with your professional expertise had been asked to design a protective program to that would protect the Ohio elections from against against such software to fix the election, could you Speaker 1: have done so? If we've been asked to make a program that could fix the election? Sure. Anybody can Speaker 0: do No. Could you have designed a program or a procedure or protocol that would have protected Ohio against this kind of rigging? Speaker 1: No. You have to look at the source code. You have to get probably programmers from both or all parties to look at the source code and determine if there's anything in there that shouldn't be there. I mean, it's a simple program. You're adding one to a person's total. It's a 100 lines of code tops. There's Speaker 2: This is during or previous to the two thousand election? Speaker 1: Yes. October September. Speaker 2: And did he ever express why he wanted a code to reelection? Speaker 1: No. I immediately assumed that they were trying to keep you guys from cheating them. So so I wrote us the documentation of what you would look for in the source code, how you would make sure that you didn't get, you know, taken advantage of, make sure that all voting machines had receipts because that way you could back count the ones that looked a little funny. And I handed it a Speaker 2: report Receipts, you mean the paper trail? Yes. Paper trail. Speaker 1: And I handed that in to missus Yang and said, here's your report. Here's your program. And she said, you don't understand. We need to hide the fraud in the source in the source code. Speaker 2: Hide the fraud, not reveal the fraud. Speaker 1: Not reveal the fraud because it's needed to con to control the vote in South Florida was what you said. Speaker 2: Could you today detect that if you look at the source code? Speaker 1: If you could get the machines and they have not been patched yet I mean, once they get in and touch them, anything can happen. You can also set timers through that, but then you see the timers. Then you'd have to take those machines, decompile them, which I couldn't do, but possibly a Microsoft MIT something could do. You might you might be able to see it. You might. Not. This depends on how good they are destroying what they had. Speaker 2: Destroying what they had by tampering the machine afterwards or by programming a a destroy instruction in the first place? Right. Because since you didn't Both? Either or both? Speaker 1: Either or both. You you didn't actually see what's in there, so you don't know if the code is running in a single executable or running in various modules. If it's running modules, you can make the code actually eat itself. Speaker 2: Let me ask you one further question. We've I have heard I've been told that people who assume that lots of the election results, or that a large fraction of the election result in a state, may have been affected by delivering foreign computer are are paranoid because in order to do that, you have to have access to thousands of machines and that that would be readily detectable. To understand, is that true? Speaker 1: It depends on the technology you use. If you did a central tabulation machine that fed in, all you'd have to do is set a flag. You set a flag, the central tabulation tab central tabulation machine would then flip your vote. Speaker 2: So if you so one person putting in bad code in a central tabulation machine could affect thousands and thousands or tens of thousands of votes? Right. Speaker 1: And you could activate And You could activate you automatically, or you could make it so that there's code existing on, like, an electronic machine that feeds it, where you would punch it in, it would set the flag, the server would see the flag, and then Speaker 2: And if you had a recount, and we know that no paper trail, would that be assuming that that had happened, would that be revealable by seeing a discrepancy between what the tabulator central tabulator showed and what the individual machines, which has not been handled with shown? Not if I wrote it. Why not? In other words in Speaker 1: other words I would make a match. Speaker 2: Okay. You can work back to the tabulator to the individual machines so the tabulator would tell the machines to switch their results? Yes. Speaker 1: Talks both ways. Can limit whatever you need. Speaker 2: And they actually can talk to each other because the machines are Speaker 1: hooked up. If somebody was networked together, They could talk to each other. Speaker 2: So in other words, there's absolutely no assurance whatsoever on anything with regard to these machines? Speaker 1: Absolutely none. Unless you look at the source code and make sure it's safe before it goes out. Speaker 2: Thank you very much.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Note the members of Congress in the video. The hearing in 2004 included the lovely @RepMaxineWaters and @RepJerryNadler Clint Curtis said that when he first told the Democrat committee members how he did it, their first response was "Why didn't we think of that?" Stay tuned

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Meanwhile, in 2002, motivated by the 2000 fiasco in Florida, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act [HAVA]. The new $$$ created a feeding-frenzy of voting companies vying for lucrative contracts. Companies like Sequoia Voting Systems profited millions. https://t.co/6aSXqYyZMS

Video Transcript AI Summary
One result of that mess was that America became nervous about punch card ballots. In 02/2002, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, offering states $3,900,000,000 to help administer federal elections and buy voting equipment. But the chair of the Election Assistance Commission realized there was a problem: "I was forced to send $2,300,000,000 to the 50 states to buy equipment even though the equipment was not ready to be bought." "So why'd you do it? We had to do it. begged congress, let us do the research before we send the money, and congress said no." "So the politicians knew these machines wouldn't work?" "The politicians don't care. Washington believes that the machines can't be that bad because after all, it produced them." "So if they won the race, how bad can the machine be? The machine can't be bad because it produced me. That is some faulty logic right there."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One result of that mess was that America became understandably nervous about punch card ballots. And in 02/2002, Congress passed the Help America Vote Act, offering states $3,900,000,000 to help administer federal elections and buy new voting equipment, which sounds great. But the then chair of the Election Assistance Commission, which distributed funding for the new machines, realized that there was a problem immediately. Speaker 1: I was forced to send $2,300,000,000 to the 50 states to buy equipment even though the equipment was not ready to be bought. So why'd you do it? We had to do it. We begged congress, let us do the research before we send the money, and congress said no. So the politicians knew these machines wouldn't work? The politicians don't care. Washington believes that the machines can't be that bad because after all, it produced them. So if they won the race, how bad can Speaker 0: the machine be? The machine can't be bad because it produced me. That is some faulty logic right there.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

The 2004 presidential election came down to Ohio. At around 9 at night, Ohio vote counting mysteriously stopped. Bush was way behind. When it restarted, Bush had a commanding lead. Turns out the counting was rerouted on a “backup” system to Chattanooga Tennessee run by Karl Rove's I.T. guy McConnell, and Bush “won” the presidency again. This led to the Congressional hearing at which Clint Curtis testified about 2000 and the vote-flipping algorithm he wrote.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Late in the evening, six states that exit polls showed were going to carry suddenly veered off to Bush. Ohio then became the tipping point of the entire national election. There were tens of thousands of acts of irregularity. In a single precinct in Ohio, a total of 638 ballots were cast on election day. Bush received over 4,000 of them. Warren County is the last county in Ohio to come in with their vote totals, and they won't allow any witnesses in, won't allow any media in, and they say it's because of a homeland security threat. And yet the next day, we check with homeland security, they say we never spoke to anyone in Ohio. The function of the secretary of state's computer servers to report election results was moved during the night of the election from Ohio to servers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Late in the evening, six states that exit polls showed were going to carry suddenly veered off to Bush. Ohio then became the tipping point of the entire national election. There were tens of thousands of acts of irregularity. In a single precinct in Ohio, a total of 638 ballots were cast on election day. Bush received over 4,000 of them. Warren County is the last county in Ohio to come in with their vote totals, and they locked down the, place where they're counting the votes. And they won't allow any, witnesses in, won't allow any media in, and they say it's because of a homeland security threat. And yet the next day, we check with homeland security, they say we never spoke to anyone in Ohio. Bob Fotrakis reported a troubling aspect about Ohio's 2004 election night results. The function of the secretary of state's computer servers to report election results was moved during the night of the election from Ohio to servers in Chattanooga, Tennessee.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

This came to light--from none other than CNN. Smartmatic, the company that started in Venezuela, was paid almost $100 million to run the recall for Hugo Chavez, rife with fraud but rubber-stamped by the Carter Center. Smartmatic then bought Sequoia to enter the US market. https://t.co/X4D6LRP9M4

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen." "When Smartmatic bought The US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale." "Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory." "Exit polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%." "But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote." "All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results." "And in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything." "The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antonio Mujica and his partner Alfredo Enzola received a small business loan from the Venezuelan government only months before the recall election. These corporate registration documents from Venezuela show the Venezuelan government owned 28% of the stock of another company they started, Bizta, which adapted voting software for the Smartmatic machines in the two thousand and four elections. The same document shows a Chavez government minister, Omar Montillo, was on the board of directors. The Chavez government gave Bizta, Smartmatic, and another company a $91,000,000 contract to run voting machines for the February. The next year, the owners of Smartmatic, primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen, bought Sequoia, one of the top electronic voting system companies in The United States, for $16,000,000. Smartmatic is a labyrinth of international holding companies owned by Venezuelan businessmen. Smartmatic Group NV of Curacao, Netherlands Antilles owns Smartmatic International BV of Amsterdam Netherlands owns Smartmatic Corporation of Florida, which bought Sequoia Voting Systems of California USA. When Smartmatic bought The US voting machine companies, the US government did not review the sale. Many experts say those voting machines were manipulated in Venezuela to give president Hugo Chavez a victory. Exit polls done by The US firm Penn shown in Berlin had Chavez losing 41% to 59%. But the next day, Chavez declared victory, reversing the score, saying he won 59% of the vote. Speaker 1: Everything was computed in the favor of the government. So the the the only explanation is that the smart mathematic machines had been programmed in that way. Speaker 0: A Harvard mathematician crunched the numbers on the Venezuelan election. Speaker 1: It had had to be the smart mathematic system. All these machines talk to a central computer and report on their results. And in in that in that mechanism, as they communicate with the center, the central machine can report anything. Speaker 0: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blayne, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smartmatic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

2006 elections in Cook County Chicago were another disaster. Sequoia was technically running it, but they were almost exclusively using the Smartmatic Venezuelan employees flown up from Venezuela to run the elections. Why is Venezuela running our elections? https://t.co/9n6lvMSOT6

Video Transcript AI Summary
"The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21 is now under intense scrutiny." "The US company that makes the machines, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen." "I think that American elections ought to be run by American companies and ought to be run by American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals." "We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US corporations should have access to our elections." "In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions." "Certainly, our government should know."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The use of some 19,000 electronic voting machines in the city of Chicago and Cook County primary on March 21 is now under intense scrutiny. The US company that makes the machines, Sequoia, was bought in 2005 by Smartmatic, a private company primarily owned by Venezuelan businessmen. When Chicago had problems with the machines, a dozen Venezuelan employees were there to help with the election. Chicago officials are outraged. Speaker 1: I think that American elections ought to be run by American companies and ought to be run by American citizens, not Venezuelan nationals. Speaker 0: Smartmatic is technically based in Boca Raton, Florida. But the president of the company, Jack Blaine, testified to the Chicago City Council. Fewer than a dozen Smart Matic employees work in Florida. The majority of the workers are based in Venezuela. Watchdog groups question why US voting machines would be under the control of citizens of another country, especially a country whose election process is highly suspect. Speaker 2: We believe this is a national security issue. There is no way that companies belonging to non US corporations should have access to our elections. Elections. Speaker 0: The treasury department is supposed to monitor sales of US companies to overseas investors where there is a question of national security, such as in the Dubai Ports deal, the so called CFIUS review process. Some in congress are demanding an investigation. Speaker 3: In the case of, Smartmatic, there are a number of unanswered questions. That's why I wrote to the secretary of the treasury and asked them to review the ownership. It's offshore. It's murky. No one seems to know who owns it. Certainly, our government should know. Speaker 0: A potential risk to the democratic process. Now we called the treasury department to ask if the sale of Sequoia in 2005 had been reviewed or not. Treasury told us they were aware of the sale, but can't confirm if it's been reviewed or not. And some in congress and voter watchdog groups also are demanding a better answer than that, Lou.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

In a couple of unusual transactions, compelled by noisy members of Congress who saw the Venezuelan connection, Sequoia and Smartmatic supposedly parted ways, and then Dominion "bought" Sequoia in what looks to me like a shell game. Please advise if your review differs. https://t.co/MbUQ3PgTBP

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Additional pages of Jack Blaine's affidavit. I could not see any money changing hands and they share I.P. https://t.co/SclvxfmqE6

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Many employees of Sequoia from Venezuela and otherwise went with Dominion, and most of Dominion Voting Systems' programmers are in Serbia. https://t.co/SuCgKC8izs

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

These job postings in September of 2015 for Dominion Voting Systems are for Software Analysts and Software Developers in Toronto, ON and Belgrade, SERBIA. https://t.co/NPQjs5hzLt

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

@MicheleTho6244 More on that another time.

SidneyPowell1
Posted - August 3, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 1:17 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

We can hardly wait‼️ @BevHarrisWrites @PeterBernegger @KevinMoncla

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

The 2020 nationwide election fraud syndicate will start to come into the sunlight in the next few weeks. When it does just remember, it was jointly powered by REPUBLICANS https://t.co/gzh5PmXbwQ

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

The now de-platformed official Wisconsin State Legislature Report (that WSJ claims is total bunk) by former WI Supreme Court Judge Gableman. Note the internet connectivity confirmation here mentioned by @PeterBernegger via depositions. https://web.archive.org/web/20220301184817/https://legis.wisconsin.gov/assembly/22/brandtjen/media/1552/osc-second-interim-report.pdf https://t.co/c6fo2BTKzP

SidneyPowell1
Posted - July 12, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Saved - July 15, 2025 at 7:17 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Yes elections do matter. We need completely transparent elections NOW. No more black boxes that count images they generate. We must have paper ballots hand counted. NO COMPUTERS. NO MACHINES ‼️

@BreitbartNews - Breitbart News

Elections matter. https://t.co/VyB6vfdNyn

SidneyPowell1
Posted - May 5, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - May 6, 2025 at 5:56 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

This is outrageous!! @RNC @SenateGOP CONFIRM @USAEdMartin Spread the word! Ring their phones off the hook‼️

@GuntherEagleman - Gunther Eagleman™

BREAKING: Of course RINO Senator Mitch McConnell (@SenMcConnell) has indicated he will also vote AGAINST Ed Martins nomination. What's your message to him? (He is tagged and his interns will see this.) https://t.co/pxmOjE2EAw

SidneyPowell1
Posted - April 10, 2025 at 3:37 AM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 6:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m curious about who funded the NGOs involved in ballot harvesting and the filling out of fraudulent ballots. What’s the story behind Stacey Abrams’ “Happy Faces” election workers in Georgia? How did a Nigerian citizen end up running the 2020 election there? And why were pristine ballots found in a postal facility in NY or NJ without being mailed? So many questions!

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Who funded all the NGOs harvesting ballots or filling out fraudulent ones? What about Stacey Abram’s “Happy Faces” election workers in Georgia? How was a Nigerian citizen running the 2020 election in Georgia? Who put all the pristine ballots in a NY or NJ postal facility for shipping without them being mailed?? Inquiring minds have many questions!

@Rasmussen_Poll - Rasmussen Reports

Who ordered the ballot counting to stop simultaneously in multiple 2020 battleground states? Who told key cities to accept and welcome 'free' Zuckerbucks paid election systems consultants? Who coordinated this 'common plan?' Maybe Chris Krebbs has thoughts @SidneyPowell1 ? https://t.co/uPuHrqVr6u

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Hallelujah ‼️ It was secure—secured for Biden that is! Set the TRUTH free!! 2020 was stolen with every kind of fraud imaginable and many not. https://t.co/VCm6l5VgCP

SidneyPowell1
Posted - March 4, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 8:54 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Attention @KevinMoncla , can you report and amplify what is going on here in Georgia? Anyone?

@markswanson1966 - Mark Swanson

@SidneyPowell1 @realDonaldTrump I have thousands of documents that prove 2024 was a sham election in Georgia. Nothing about it was lawful. I am also politically prosecuted for it too! My family and I afraid of what they might do to keep it all hidden.

SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 16, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Saved - February 17, 2025 at 9:17 AM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

This MUST be clawed back @SecKennedy @DOGE @realDonaldTrump #Gates can put his own $590M in Moderna. They killed countless people with their covid vaccine. GET OUR money back now‼️ X friends, Do you agree?

@merissahansen17 - Merissa Hansen

Moderna received $590 Million for mRNA Vaccine development from HHS, the day after Trump’s Inauguration. Why was this allowed? https://t.co/lUuZjx0iVU

SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 10:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I remember back in 2020 when I called out a massive, coordinated effort to undermine our constitutional rights. It's alarming to see that much of this was funded by our own tax dollars. It’s taken four years, but the truth is finally coming to light.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Do you remember this from 2020? "This is a massive, well-funded, coordinated effort to deprive We the People of the United States of our most fundamental right under the constitution to preserve this Republic that we all cherish." And, now we know, much of it funded by our own hard-earned tax dollars 🤬 It’s only taken 4 years.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We're facing a massive, coordinated effort to rig elections for profit. We don't know how many candidates, Republican or Democrat, are involved nationwide. This isn't just about power; it's about the immense wealth generated. Consider the global interests influencing news and social media, suppressing dissent and free speech to challenge the election. This is a systematic attack on our fundamental right to preserve our republic – a threat as significant as 1775. It's a crisis of immense concern for our generation and beyond.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If I if I might speak for just a minute. In terms of the level of corruption we are looking at here, we have no idea how many Republican or Democratic candidates in any state across the country paid to have the system rigged to work for them. These people didn't do this just to take control. They make one heck of a lot of money off of it. Think about the global interest behind your own news organizations. Think about the pressure being brought to bear on from the social media companies to shut down free speech on any challenge to the election. This is a massive, well funded, coordinated effort to deprive We, the People of The United States, of our most fundamental right under the constitution to preserve this republic that we all cherish. It is of the greatest concern. It is the it is the 1775 of of our generation and and beyond.
SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 7, 2025 at 3:04 AM
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 12:23 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I am frustrated with how taxpayer money is being spent by Congress. We do not authorize any funds to be allocated outside of running the government for the American people. I'm tired of seeing our tax dollars go to nonprofits and NGOs, especially when there are pressing needs at home. It's time to balance the budget and end programs like USAID. Those elected before 2020 share the responsibility for this situation, and it's unacceptable to misuse our money.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

ATTENTION @USCongress_ We the taxpayers do not authorize you to spend one DIME on anything except running this government for the American people. We are beyond fed up learning what you have done. NO more tax dollars should be given to any nonprofit, NGO, and nothing sent outside this country except to take care of Americans.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

It’s NOT YOUR money‼️#USAID @USCongress @CongressionalUS @JudicialWatch @DOGE Balance the budget! Every one of you who was elected before 2020 has some responsibility for this outrage. END #USAID and all similar programs in ANY agency❗️It’s not yours to burn! https://t.co/nA2Rdpuecr

SidneyPowell1
Posted - February 6, 2025 at 3:58 AM
Saved - February 6, 2025 at 3:29 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Well lookie here. #USAID and #Smartmatic. WOW. 😳. $500K from

@EmeraldRobinson - Emerald Robinson ✝️

USAID is pushing Smartmatic into Bosnia right now. https://t.co/8Hmk7gh8M9

SidneyPowell1
Posted - January 31, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 5:08 PM

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Hurray! States can now freely clean their voter rolls of non-citizens‼️ DOJ Ends Suit Against Virginia for Removing Noncitizens from Voter Rolls. https://thenationalpulse.com/2025/01/31/doj-ends-suit-against-virginia-for-removing-noncitizens-from-voter-rolls/

DOJ Ends Suit Against Virginia for Removing Noncitizens from Voter Rolls. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is withdrawing its lawsuit against Virginia, initially filed by the Biden government, seeking to bar the removal of thenationalpulse.com
SidneyPowell1
Posted - January 31, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 4:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The State Bar of Texas has faced another defeat as the Board of Disciplinary Appeals dismissed their second attempt to disbar me. For four years, I've been under relentless attack in two separate cases, and we've successfully countered their efforts each time. I question what it will take to end this ongoing lawfare and political abuse of power. I also spoke with a Bloomberg reporter following the dismissal, and there’s coverage of the situation in a Law and Crime article.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

#Breaking: The State Bar of Texas LOST again. The Board of Disciplinary Appeals has just flat-out dismissed the #SBOT’s second attempt to disbar me. The Texas Bar has relentlessly attacked me for 4 years in two separate cases now, and we have defeated them at every turn. What will it take to stop this lawfare and political abuse of power?

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's a beautiful day in Austin, Texas. The board of disciplinary appeals has dismissed the State Bar of Texas' second attempt to disbar me in four years. I am pleased to share this news, and I hope it marks the end of the relentless four-year assault by the Texas Bar against my law license. Thank you all for your support.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's a beautiful day here in Austin, Texas where the board of disciplinary appeals sitting in the chambers of the Supreme Court of Texas just dismissed the the State Bar of Texas' second attempt to disbar me in the last 4 years. Needless to say, I am pleased to announce this news, and, hopefully, this will end the 4 year relentless assault by the Texas bar against me and my law license. Thank you all for your support.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Here’s Bloomberg’s report on it. I spoke with the reporter after they dismissed the case from the bench. https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/trump-ally-sidney-powell-escapes-texas-bar-sanctions-again

Trump Ally Sidney Powell Escapes Texas Bar Sanctions Again Lawyer Sidney Powell for a second time defeated a Texas bar effort to discipline her for trying to change the results of the 2020 presidential election. news.bloomberglaw.com

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 Attorney, Author, Gladiator

Here’s the Law and Crime article: https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/epitome-of-lawfare-that-shouldnt-be-allowed-kraken-lawyer-sidney-powell-again-defeats-disciplinary-effort-by-state-bar-of-texas/

'Kraken' lawyer Sidney Powell again defeats disciplinary effort by State Bar of Texas The pro-Donald Trump attorney fended off a challenge to her professional license based on her guilty pleas in the RICO case out of Fulton County, Georgia. lawandcrime.com
SidneyPowell1
Posted - January 23, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Saved - January 23, 2025 at 6:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've heard that several January 6th defendants are still being held and may be moved from the DC facility to prevent their release. This seems like obstruction of justice and goes against a presidential order. I'm questioning why this is being allowed and where the U.S. Marshals are in this situation.

@SidneyPowell1 - Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽⚖️🚜🇺🇸 Attorney & Author

Reports are that multiple #J6ers are still being imprisoned and are about to be shuttled out of the #DCGulag to other places to avoid their release. This is obstruction of justice & direct defiance of a presidential order. Where are the @USMarshalsHQ Why is this being tolerated❓@EagleEdMartin @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @Trumpertarian @CondemnedUSA @J6PardonProject

View Full Interactive Feed