TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Simply4Truth_
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@thehealthb0t "Our patience is wearing thin. And your refusal has cost all of us." -Joe Biden https://t.co/jQX2yowyvN
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's message to unvaccinated Americans is: what more is there to wait for? Vaccinations are free, safe, and convenient, and the vaccine has FDA approval. Over 200 million Americans have gotten at least one shot. The speaker states that patience is wearing thin, and refusal to vaccinate has cost everyone. The speaker urges people to do the right thing and listen to unvaccinated Americans in hospitals taking their final breaths, saying, "if only I'd gotten vaccinated." The speaker concludes by saying, "It's a tragedy. Please don't let it become yours."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My message to unvaccinated Americans is this. What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see? We've made vaccinations free, safe, and convenient. The vaccine is FDA approval.
Over two hundred million Americans have gotten at least one shot. We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us. So please do the right thing, but just don't take it from me. Listen to the voices of unvaccinated Americans who are lying in hospital beds, taking their final breaths saying, if only I'd gotten vaccinated. If only.
It's a tragedy. Please don't let it become yours.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
More embarrassment for the true asshole, U.S. Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona. Be sure share and let @CaptMarkKelly know how you feel about him. Congratulations @elonmusk @SpaceX 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 https://t.co/N6D1RT6cV4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 states that Elon Musk "kinda turned out to be an asshole," and because of this, they don't want to drive a car built and designed by him. Speaker 1 announces the splashdown of crew nine and SpaceX Freedom. The Dragon capsule and recovery vessel Megan are visible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, Elon Musk kinda turned out to be an asshole, and, I don't wanna be driving the car built and designed by an asshole.
Speaker 1: And splashdown, crew nine back on Earth.
Speaker 0: And SpaceX Freedom splashdown. Good main release.
Speaker 1: Sit onto the recovery vessel Megan. We can see that recovery vessel slowly but surely closing the distance there between oh, dolphin cam back again. We can we can see, that the Dragon capsule and the
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@EndWokeness Why? 👇‼️ John Dodson, Operation Fast & Furious whistleblower, exposes DOJ training video: "That person in your office (FBI or ATF) using words like 'constitution', 'oath', 'what this country used to be' - he is an insider threat. He's the bad guy." https://t.co/EjluD25NdT
reSee.it AI Summary
Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller announced that the administration will investigate child trafficking, labor trafficking, sexual trafficking, and child smuggling at the border. He urged the public to cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to combat these issues, emphasizing a commitment to ending child trafficking and abuse. In response, another participant referenced a message of divine retribution, suggesting that justice will be served against those involved in trafficking.
@BehizyTweets - George
Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller says the administration will expose the child trafficking that's been happening at the border & everyone involved. "This administration is going to investigate every instance of child trafficking, labor trafficking, s*x trafficking, child smuggling, and all the attendant crimes involved in that." "Our message to everyone in the country is to cooperate fully with Immigration and Customs Enforcement so that we can end the scourge of child trafficking and child abuse that has been endemic these last four years." President Trump is going to crush the entire trafficking industry.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Half a million children have been trafficked in the U.S. over the past four years. This administration is committed to investigating all forms of trafficking, including child trafficking, labor trafficking, sex trafficking, and child smuggling. We urge everyone to fully cooperate with immigration and customs enforcement to help eliminate child trafficking and abuse, which have become widespread in recent years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've seen, as you know, half a 1000000 children trafficked over a 4 year period in the United States. This administration is gonna investigate every instance of child trafficking, labor trafficking, sex trafficking, child smuggling, and all the attendant crimes involved in that. And our message to everyone in the country is to cooperate fully with immigration and customs enforcement so that we can end the scourge of child trafficking and child abuse that has been endemic these last 4 years.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@BehizyTweets "Tell 'em that God's gonna cut 'em down!" https://t.co/NBidUcBzmR
Video Transcript AI Summary
My administration will prioritize ending the horrific practice of human trafficking, utilizing the full force of the federal government to combat this issue. It is a significant problem that often goes unaddressed.
In a musical interlude, themes of accountability and truth are expressed, emphasizing that actions taken in darkness will eventually be revealed. The lyrics reflect a sense of inevitability regarding justice, suggesting that no matter how long one may evade responsibility, the truth will ultimately come to light. The message reinforces the idea that one cannot escape the consequences of their actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My administration will focus on ending the absolutely horrific practice of human trafficking, and I am prepared to bring the full force and weight of our government to the federal and at the federal level, and the other highest levels that we can do.
Speaker 1: You can run on for
Speaker 2: a long time. Run on for a long time. Run on for a
Speaker 1: long time. Sooner or later, gotta cut you down. Sooner or later, gotta cut you down. Go tell that long tongue liar. It's a
Speaker 0: It's a very, very terrible problem. It's not talked about
Speaker 1: Well, my goodness, Traces. Let me tell you the news. My head's been wet with the midnight dew. I've been down on a lended knee talking to the man from Galilee. He spoke to me as a voice so sweet.
I thought I heard
Speaker 0: a shout know what this represents. He talked
Speaker 1: That was the my heart is the charm before the
Speaker 2: When he
Speaker 1: said John,
Speaker 2: Run on for a long time.
Speaker 1: Soon or later, god, I cut you down. Soon or later, god, I cut you down. Well, you may throw you a rock and hide your hand working in the dark against your fellow man, but as sure as God made black and white, what's done in the dark will be brought to the light. You can run on for a
Speaker 2: long time. Run on for a long time. Run on for a long time.
Speaker 1: Soon early, we've gotta cut you
Speaker 2: down. Soon early.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@ImMeme0 To the people who can't read so good: This is unrelated to the July 13 assassination attempt. https://www.justice.gov/usao-edny/pr/pakistani-national-ties-iran-charged-connection-foiled-plot-assassinate-politician-or
Pakistani National with Ties to Iran Charged in Connection with Foiled Plot to Assassinate a Politician or U.S. Government Officials
“Working on behalf of others overseas, Merchant planned the murder of U.S. government officials on American soil,” said U.S. Attorney Breon Peace for the Eastern District of New York. “This prosecution demonstrates that this Office and the entire U.S. Department of Justice will take swift and decisive action to protect our nation’s security, our government officials and our citizens from foreign threats.”
justice.gov
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Watch the smile on his face when he answers questions about destroying countries and destroying lives... "I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do." -George Soros
Video Transcript AI Summary
I have been blamed for financial collapses in several countries. I don't consider the social consequences of my actions. As a Hungarian Jew who survived the Holocaust, I was shaped by those experiences. I was involved in confiscating property from Jews, but I don't feel guilty about it. I am not religious and do not believe in God. My work is amoral and separate from feelings of guilt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the last 2 years, you've been blamed for financial collapse of Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, Japan and Russia?
Speaker 1: All of the above.
Speaker 0: All of the above.
Speaker 1: I cannot and do not look at the social consequences of what I do.
Speaker 0: You're a Hungarian Jew who escaped the holocaust by posing as a a Christian. Right? And you watched lots of people get shipped off to the death camps.
Speaker 1: I was 14 years old. And I would say that that's when my character was made.
Speaker 0: My understanding is that you went out with this protector of yours who swore that you were, is adopted God's son. Yes. Went out, in fact, and helped in the confiscation of property from the Jews. That's right. Right.
That sounds like an experience that would send lots of people to the psychiatric couch for many, many years. Was it difficult?
Speaker 1: Not at all. Not at all. Maybe as a child, you don't see the connection. Are you religious? No.
Do you believe in God? No. I don't feel guilty because I'm engaged in an amoral activity which is not meant to have anything to do with guilt.
reSee.it AI Summary
Jan 6 was a setup used to vilify Trump and the MAGA movement. FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters were involved. Questions about Ray Epps' involvement remain unanswered. The Jan 6 Committee fabricated a TV production and lied about pipe bombs. Officer Dunn's account is not corroborated by video evidence. Pelosi's Security Chief perjured himself. Mistakes and a rejected National Guard offer contributed to Jan 6. Trump called for peace. Biden prioritizes hunting down Jan 6 patriots over border security. The uniparty aims for single party rule. Lara Logan's Fed-Surrection series questions Ray Epps' treatment. Epps had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass. Whistleblowers contradict the Capitol riot committee's story.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Today is a good day to remind everyone that Jan 6 was a setup, used by the uniparty, feds and intel agencies to entrap, vilify and attempt to destroy Trump and the MAGA movement. THREAD 🧵
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions if this could be the biggest setup or crime in the country's history. Speaker 1 emphasizes the importance of uncovering the truth and the cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves Republicans. Speaker 1 commits to following the evidence, regardless of where it leads. Speaker 0 holds Speaker 1 accountable for this commitment.
Translation: Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the significance of revealing the truth and uncovering cover-ups post-January 6th, even if it involves members of Speaker 1's own party. Speaker 1 pledges to follow the evidence, no matter the consequences. Speaker 0 reminds Speaker 1 of this commitment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is it potentially the biggest setup in the history of this country? Potentially. One of the greatest crimes against the American people?
Speaker 1: That's why it's so important to get the truth with this. That's what we're working for. And the cover ups that happened after January 6th is what I'm really after as well.
Speaker 0: What about the Republicans involved in those coverups? I know it's hard for you to address those things. This is your own party, but this is the reality. I mean
Speaker 1: We're gonna go where evidence leads.
Speaker 0: No matter what?
Speaker 1: No matter what.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna hold you to that. Yes.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"Whatever else January 6th was... IT WAS NOT A TRUMP-LED INSURECTION." -Tucker Carlson
Video Transcript AI Summary
The January 6th incident was not a Trump-led insurrection, as he was at the White House calling for calm. The Colorado Supreme Court ruled Trump an insurrectionist, barring him from the state's ballot. Critics celebrated this decision, claiming it was a victory against voters' desires. Colorado Secretary of State Griswold stated that accusations on TV are enough to disqualify a candidate, bypassing legal processes. This undemocratic behavior signals a troubling trend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was pretty puzzling to watch. Whatever else January 6th was, and in some ways, we still don't know exactly what it was, it was not a Trump led insurrection. The crowd had no guns. They had no plan to overthrow the government. Nothing like that has ever emerged.
And above all, Trump was not leading it. He was miles away at the White House at the time where he issued a public statement calling for calm and nonviolence. So why were the people on television telling us that Trump led an insurrection? This was, of course, a lie, but it was also a very obvious lie. So, clearly, we are watching the rollout of a talking point, words crafted for a specific purpose.
But what was the purpose? We got an answer to that question yesterday when the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that because he led an insurrection, Donald Trump's name cannot appear on the state's ballot next fall. The 4 liberal judges who concluded this cited as their justification article 3 of the 14th amendment, which was written in 18/68 to keep former Confederate officials from holding office. That was the sum total of their reasoning. Despite the fact Donald Trump has never been convicted by any court of insurrection, and although the 14th amendment specifically does not apply to the presidency, Donald Trump cannot run for president because he's an insurrectionist.
This seemed like lunacy because it was lunacy. 3000 miles away in El Salvador, there was no question about what was happening. The United States has lost its ability to lecture any other country about, quote, democracy, wrote Salvador and president Nayib Bukele. And yet in this country, no one on the left dared say that. Instead, Donald Trump's enemy celebrated.
The Atlantic magazine expressed gratitude that unelected judges had, quote, rescued the country from the desires of voters, because, actually, that's democracy. And then there was Jenna Griswold. That's the Colorado Secretary of State. You may not have seen her before, but you will instantly recognize the category she represents. Unhappy 39 year old liberal women with Ivy League degrees and a deep streak of authoritarian impulses.
Here's Griswold on MSNBC last night explaining that a conventional legal process is no longer necessary for the left to get its way. No more trials or evidence or jury verdicts. An accusation made on television is now enough to remove a front runner from the presidential race. If Nancy Pelosi and Joe Scarborough call you bad, Americans are not allowed to vote for you. Watch.
Speaker 1: Look. I believe he incited the insurrection. There were big questions around section 3 of the 14th amendment, and the Colorado Supreme Court has weighed in in a very loud way, making themselves clear. Frankly, we've never had a president try to steal the presidency and engage in insurrection, ever before. So Trump's actions are unprecedented.
The Colorado Supreme Court confirmed that the district court got it right, that he did engage in insurrection. I think, section 3 of the 14th amendment has to apply to the presidency because if not, it's a get out of jail free card. And in a country of laws where no man is is above another, we can't have one office be able to do whatever they want when it comes to rebellion and then be able to be seated in office again.
Speaker 0: None of this seems very American. All that looks like the actual end of democracy.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Rep Clay Higgins: "Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capital on Jan 6th, prior to the doors being open?" Director Wray: "Again, I have to be very careful..." Higgins: "It should be a no!"
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the events at the Capitol on January 6th were a setup, pointing to men dressed as Trump supporters inside the building before doors were opened. They question if there were confidential human sources involved. The speaker emphasizes the need for transparency and denies having such sources present. Additionally, they mention police officers seen changing attire from uniform to Trump supporter clothing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was a set up. I mean, if you clearly have men dressed as Trump supporters walking around inside the capitol on the other side of police officers who are, to one extent or another, not engaged with them like they're not concerned about them, then you have a a set of closed doors, like exterior doors and interior doors closed, and you have police officers positioned outside and then in between the two doors and then on the inside of the second set of doors. Doors weren't open yet. What time was it? Video.
This was a a couple of videos that Trump was still speaking. Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being opened? Again, I had to be very careful It should be a no. Can you not tell the American people no? We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the capital.
Gentleman's time has expired. Not read anything into my decision not to share information. Director Ray, film this time has expired. We have other evidence, specific observations of police officers, Capitol Police, or Metro, both entering rooms and here in the Capitol in uniform and coming out as Trump supporters and construction workers.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Rep Clay Higgins: there were "well over 200" FBI assets involved in Jan 6, including some dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol and leading people to key locations.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Three years after the events of January 6th, Congressman Clay Higgins questions FBI Director Christopher Wray about the presence of FBI assets among the protesters. Higgins believes there is evidence that FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters were inside the Capitol before the doors were opened, suggesting entrapment. He claims that the FBI infiltrated online groups and planted seeds of radical actions. Higgins estimates that there were over 200 FBI assets involved in the events of January 6th. He also criticizes the shooting of Ashley Babbitt and expresses his hope that the evidence will be released to the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It has been exactly 3 years since January 6th, the events of January 6th. The racist insurrection that shocked this nation to its core, more profoundly than anything since Pearl Harbor plus the civil war. And it has taken a while, honestly, even for people who aren't on the side of the professional liars to realize there's something amiss about what happened that day. Not just the response, the largest law enforcement mobilization in the history of the United States, that was obviously disproportionate because it wasn't the worst riot that year, not even close. But the day itself, there was something about January 6th that didn't feel right, and hovering over that day has remained the question to what extent was it a setup.
And we still don't really know, but what's interesting is how few people have asked that entirely legitimate question. One of the very few, really one of the only in the United States Congress, is a member called Clay Higgins from Louisiana. And in case you haven't seen this clip, it's worth rewatching. This is from 2022 at Homeland Security Committee hearing where he asked it just directly of the FBI director. Why?
Speaker 1: Did the FBI have confidential human sources embedded within the January 6th protesters and on January 6, 2021?
Speaker 2: Well, Congressman, as I'm sure you can appreciate, I have to be very careful about what I can say about when
Speaker 1: Even now because that's what you told us a few years ago.
Speaker 2: Matt finish. About when we do and do not and where we have and have not used confidential human sources. But to the extent that there's a suggestion, for example, that the FBI's confidential human sources or FBI employees in some way instigated or orchestrated January 6th, that's categorically false.
Speaker 1: Did you have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol on January 6th prior to the doors being open?
Speaker 2: Again, I had to be very careful
Speaker 1: about no. Can you not tell the American people, no. We did not have confidential human sources dressed as Trump supporters positioned inside the Capitol. Gentlemen, time has expired.
Speaker 2: Not read anything into my decision not to share information Director Ray.
Speaker 1: Confidentially. Time has expired.
Speaker 0: What a sleazy, repulsive, little authoritarian liar Chris Rea is. That's obvious when you watch that tape. The sad part is so few tapes like that exist because so few have confronted him directly and ask questions to which the entire country has a right to know the answer like that one. Clay Higgins did that. Congressman from Louisiana Louisiana Lafayette joins us in studio.
Congressman, thanks so much for coming up.
Speaker 1: Thank you for having me, Tuck.
Speaker 0: So that was over a year ago that you asked that question, which is a central question, and you asked it as I think is without any embarrassment at all on behalf of your constituents and the rest of the country, are you any closer to the answer now?
Speaker 1: Well, we're closer to being in a position where we can reveal the answers that we already have. Much of the evidence that we have compiled from investigative effort over the the course of the last couple of years. Some offices like my own would have operated in silos of investigative endeavor, have now been able to come together now that we have a Republican majority and we have access to the to the to the staffs of the appropriate investigative committees. And so I sit on the oversight committee and we republicans run that committee now, therefore, we control the staff. So when you can magnify the efforts that individual, members of congress have have have pushed within our own offices.
When you can magnify those efforts by the the skill and the numbers of staff from the committees, you you you get a lot of evidence reviewed professionally and aligned and assembled into essentially a case file. And in in this case, this is a big file because the the the involvement of of certain actors, you could say deep state actors within the federal government, to set the stage for, what happened in in j 4, 5, and 6, and and to, entrap thousands of Americans from across the country and to lure them into this this set stage on j 4, 5, and 6. The people that were involved in that is is is quite a large web. So, yes, sir, we do have a great deal of evidence compiled, and we are we are gradually, professionally, rolling that evidence out. So you sort of
Speaker 0: answered the question right there in larger terms. You just said that elements within the federal government, I assume law enforcement intel and military, and I'm using your words, lured Americans to Washington into what you called a trap. Yes, sir. So that would I mean, that's a shocking and I assume that's a that's a sober conclusion based on the evidence. That's what you're saying.
Speaker 1: That's that would be my sober assessment as an investigator, and I'm, you know, I'm quite a I love my country, and and I've I've always been a staunch defender of the thin blue line. And I I would proudly count the FBI amongst that number. They're just like brothers to me. So to find that level of, of conspiratorial corruption at the highest levels of the FBI has been very troubling to me as a man, as a cop. And and yet, did you know, you follow the evidence wherever it leads, and Yes.
This is what investigators do. So, when I asked Christopher Wray that that question, for instance, I already knew the answer. I had reviewed compelling evidence that the that FBI had assets, human assets, dressed as Trump supporters inside the capitol prior to the doors being open and the masses allowed in. So I I knew that the FBI was deeply involved. I'd seen evidence even at that time with, that the FBI had embedded themselves into various groups online across the country of Americans who were essentially voicing their their concerns and airing their grievances with each other about COVID oppression.
Those Americans were targeted by the FBI, almost universally Republicans and and, largely Trump supporters, but the FBI worked undercover to infiltrate those conversations and become a significant part of those individual Americans' communications. And when you dig into the evidence that we've we've had revealed through through some criminal cases that I've I've followed and worked with the families of j six, political detainees and Americans that have been persecuted for their involvement in in the capital that day. And some of that evidence is shockingly reveals that the the the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were were the first ones to plant the seeds of of, suggestions of of a more radical occupation of the capital and and they were sort of testing the waters of who amongst that group would would begin acknowledging that, you know, yeah, maybe we should do that. Maybe we should plan for an occupation like that. But if you look at the the origins of those conversations, they they were started by the the FBI undercover guy that was operating inside the group, and then months later, on January 4th, 5th, 6th, many of those Americans met for the first time in person when they gathered for the massive rally where American patriots assembled to object to to everything that had happened during 2020, the COVID depression, and the the stunning results of what we believe was a compromised election cycle in November 2020.
So Americans gathered at their own capital to to appropriately air grievances and protests at their capital, but embedded amongst their number was an FBI asset that had been working from within their group online for many months. So this was the level of, of manipulative effort that the FBI invested into American citizenry and our our assembly online to, and to exercise our rights under the first amendment, to talk to each other about whatever we wanna talk about, including the the the insidious suppressions of COVID that we were suffering across the country. So and our concerns about where the election was going, the whole mail in ballot thing, we could see the stage was being set for a compromised election cycle possibly, and to our horror, that's what happened. So FBI had fingerprints on this thing from for many months prior to j 4, 5, and 6.
Speaker 0: I wanna go back to something you said in the first sentence, which is you have seen evidence and that spurred your questions to Chris Wray that there were FBI assets dressed as Trump's supporters within the capital. So that is proof of entrapment because, of course, the federal government could have prevented entry into the capital building. Aren't that many doors. You work there, you know. But they allowed people in on purpose to entrap them.
That's what that proves, I think. Does it not?
Speaker 1: Well, it's certainly condemning. It's another piece of the of the strategy that the that the government employed to sort of complete the entrapment of Americans that they had had, infiltrated and then prodded and provoked with online with the with the those original seeds planted of of, actions like, you know, what type of gear to wear and and and just in language that incited behavior that could go the wrong way. You know, pushing actions of of legal and legitimate peaceful protest to an edge where where those Americans would likely not have gone had they not been been, you know, encouraged by the FBI plant amongst their number that they didn't know was there. So by the time it was actually j 6 and you had you had, masses of Americans assembled outside the capitol, like, 99.9%, 100% peaceful. On the inside, you had FBI assets dressed as Trump supporters that knew their way around the Capitol.
Before the doors even open. Before the doors open, or else how are you gonna get around the Capitol? You've been there many times. You need a guide to get from whatever door you go in. It's a labyrinth.
It's it's it's a maze inside there. So you that's right. So there's no way just Americans, most of which had never been to the capitol, there's no way they can come in some random door that gets opened and then get their way directly to the to the statuary or the house chamber or the senate chamber. It's just not possible. So the the the FBI assets that were dressed as Trump supporters that were inside the Capitol were there, I believe, and evidence indicates that they were there to to specifically waive in the the Trump supporters that had gathered outside the capitol, and the doors opened and they were allowed in.
And on the inside were were oh, there's some more Trump supporters, but really those were FBI assets, law enforcement assets that knew their way around the capital. And they they waved those guys in, said, come on. Follow us. And they they are the ones that led them on the path directly.
Speaker 0: Now how
Speaker 1: do you think of guys Never been to the capital. Gotta gotta come into the capital all amped up on on emotion and make his way straight to Nancy Pelosi's office. Come on. It's like I couldn't get it. There's no way.
I've been there for 7 years. Could come in some random door at the capitol and make my way to the next year.
Speaker 0: Is unmarked. I mean, those leadership offices are unmarked. So how would
Speaker 1: you know? It's confusing to get around in the capitol. Every American that has been there knows this. When you go on a tour, you bring your family to DC, you go through the capitol, you have to have a guide. And and on January 6th, the guides were FBI assets, the law enforcement assets, and they were dressed as Trump supporters.
They were positioned inside the capital prior to the doors being opened so that the Americans that had assembled outside the capital, once allowed in, could be brought directly to the areas where the FBI, the DOJ, and the deep state actors knew would be the most, the most sort of condemning criminal action of of Americans being a lot being inside the capital, protesting without permit and things. So they knew it was setting the stage for arrest and prosecution. It's such a crime. Who who planned this, do you think? I think factions planned this.
I wouldn't say who talked about it because that yeah. I don't think there was one person that that planned this, but I believe the the faction of, establishment liberals within the the FBI and the Democrat party and our intelligence services to to another extent, use their massive powers of surveillance and, in and investigative assets that they have across the country, confidential informants, registered informants, non registered informers, voluntary informers. It's a it's a complex web of of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn't take much, the faction within the FBI and within our intelligence services that would coordinate with with the most extreme liberal, factions within the Democrat party that were desperate to keep Trump out of office and and, you know, worked within the the theater of operations, shall we say, that had been that had been set by the COVID alleged medical emergencies nationwide and millions and millions of mail in ballots. There's no daylight between the the compromised election cycle of November 2020 and ultimately what happened on on on j6.
So you ask who planned this? This would be the combination of several of the most extreme liberal, anti Trump, anti America First factions that, that were in positions of authority within our federal law enforcement organizations and the the Democrat party across the country.
Speaker 0: Can when you say that there were FBI assets in the crowd, in in the building beforehand and and certainly outside, What's the scale of this? You're talking like 10, 20? No.
Speaker 1: Based upon some very conservative, but, like, hard investigative effort evaluation of of the numbers, from putting together eyewitnesses and and videos and, and affidavit statement, and whistleblower statements, and court records that have been revealed through individual criminal cases where j6 defendants have been prosecuted and smart attorneys have forced, admissions by the DOJ and the FBI, but those admissions have been sealed within the parameter of that criminal case by protective order by the judge, so they I can't share them, but I've seen them. So real hard objective and conservative, estimates would would put the number of FBI assets in the crowd outside and working inside at at well over 200. 200? Yeah.
Speaker 0: Yeah. So you're in law enforcement. Yeah. Yeah. Before you came to congress in the military as well.
That seems that's an extraordinary number. Is it?
Speaker 1: Well, no. When you think about the scope of the operation, if you were gonna do this, you would need you would
Speaker 0: need that relative to so like when, I don't know, Minneapolis burned down or when Saint John's, the Episcopal Church of Carson, the White House in Lafayette Square was set ablaze, and all the secret service agents were injured. Were there 200 FBI assets in the crowd among Antifa then?
Speaker 1: I mean, I I don't know how many undercover agents FBI would have in a situation like that, but but but but j6 was the was the was the final act prior to arrest and prosecution of of Americans that that were identified as as Trump supporters. I mean, the objective was to destroy the entire mega movement, to to forever stain the, the patriotic fervor that was associated with the America First Mega Movement that had won in 2016 and we believe won again in 2020, and the the establishment, on both sides, both major parties were determined to to smash that out of existence, not just by defeating Trump, but by destroying the reputations of the movement itself, by creating this narrative that was totally false, but but was heavily pushed that the that mega Republicans, America First Republicans are somehow a danger to our republic and a a domestic terror threat, which is a whole another story about what the FBI has done to tagging Americans as, suspected domestic terrorists and and following us as we travel across the country. But the the bottom line is that, 200 as a I I believe is a conservative number.
First of all, I think there were there's many more. But a number that I'm comfortable going on record with is that we believe that there were that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd, outside the capitol, embedded into groups that entered the capitol or provoked entry of the capitol and working with FBI assets that would have included Metro Police and Capitol Police that were dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol. So given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged, and the number of people that were actually outside the capital and it entered, we believe 200 is a conservative number. Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: It's it's shocking what you're saying. It confirms everyone's worst suspicions about this. It's clearly true. Did you come across any evidence that the the DOD, the military, either Defense Intelligence Agency or National Guard or any part of the US military played any role in this at all?
Speaker 1: I have not seen that. I've heard the echoes of that suspicion, and I have I have observed, circumstantial evidence that that has been presented to me, that I've that I have reviewed. But to but to me, it does not rise to the level that I would call, actionable from an investigative perspective. So there's some there was some some suspicion but in in in law enforcement the thresholds you're looking across is reasonable suspicion that would prompt a criminal investigation, and then the next threshold is probable cause, which you need for arrest. And then of course in our system, finally, the last threshold is is, is conviction, guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
So then I I did review evidence, Tucker, regarding some suspicions of military involvement in some way. But and I and I've I have reviewed some of that evidence that that has been that I've been able to get my hands on, and, I do not think that the the military was, was involved, not at the level most certainly not at the level of the the FBI and over the course of all of 2020. And then on j 4, 5, and 6, the FBI working in coordination with other law enforcement assets that that they roped into the operation Right. From Metro PD, from DC, and and, the Capitol Police were sort of, sort of tricked into participating with the with what the FBI had been staging for, you know, 10 months.
Speaker 0: Just if you take 3 steps back, this is not democracy. So the federal agencies serve under the oversight of the elected president, and then under the oversight of the elected congress. Their elected people get to make the decisions. Your Republican president, you now have a Republican congress, and neither one can get a straight answer from the FBI. No no one has any control of the FBI.
You're describing a government within a government.
Speaker 1: Well, in America, a question becomes reasonable men would would would ask when we face a crisis like this, who investigates the investigate? Right. And the answer in America is is Congress. So we we have the responsibility to investigate through the appropriate committees, which would we're certainly we're certainly doing that now that we have a Republican majority and control of the committees, but we don't have the power to arrest. We can we can give criminal referrals based upon our investigative efforts, but we have to have a DOJ that's receptive to the criminal referrals.
So we we've hit quite a a brick wall, have we not? Constitutionally, we we have the responsibility to investigate objectively, and and and anyone that knows me know that's exactly what I'm I'm pursuing. I do not have I'm not trying to create a crime to fit a narrative to blame on the FBI. I'm following the evidence, and and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level. And a and a a conspiracy within our government at the highest level to create the the, to set the stage for a compromised election cycle in 2020, and then the the the actions that took place on j 4, 5, and 6, and then the the criminal investigation, arrest, and prosecution of Americans that they were able to entrap and document with the thousands of cameras that were operating that day and use that evidence that they knew they were setting up to investigate, arrest, and prosecute the Americans that they had entrapped.
So Congress can investigate these things, and we are, and we will reveal these horrific truths, and we will have criminal referrals, But until you have a a a president running the executive branch that will clean house at the DOJ and FBI at the highest levels and put American patriots in place that will be that will act upon the criminal referrals that that congress provides, then none of those guys are gonna get arrested because they're not gonna arrest themselves, and we don't have arrest authority.
Speaker 0: I'm a little surprised and don't expect to be critical of your colleagues in the Republican conference, but, I mean, they do control the house. Impeachment is a thing. Chris Ray is still the FBI director. I watched Republicans, some of whom I know cheer the murder of Ashley Babbitt, who was an unarmed woman less than 55, by Michael Byrd. They were Michael Byrd's side, and it I have to say for a lot of Republican voters that I count myself among them very clarifying.
If you're cheering Ashley Babbitt's murder shooting women now, that's okay because she likes Trump. And the Republicans are like, yeah. I was happy. Like, a lot of them thought that. What the hell?
Speaker 1: Yeah. That was and it it made me sick. Me too. You know, there's a a great responsibility when you when you wear a badge in America. I mean, think about it.
To be to be the to be the designated servant of your community that has that has the the authority to, to deny the freedom of a fellow American in the land of the free. Like, doesn't have a responsibility. So the the escalation of of force is must be appropriate in order to effect a lawful arrest, and and a a bad a bad shoot is the worst thing that an officer can possibly be involved in in his in his career. It's it's, you know, we it's it's it's the thing of nightmares for for good police officers. So to take what was in what would from a law enforcement perspective was clearly a bad shoot because there's some basic rules you just cannot violate.
You have to attempt to effect an arrest before you can go to deadly force. There was there was no attempt to arrest Ashley Babin. There were there were officers on the other side of the window she was climbing through. There were officers on the interior side of the window she was climbing through. There was no indication that had been that this had been going on for an hour, and there was no reports on the radio or anywhere else of gunfights.
So there was no reason at that point to expect that Ashley Babin or anybody else in the in the crowd was gonna produce a firearm and start firing on police officers. Why? Because it had not happened. So that's part of the totality of circumstance that a police officer is responsible for knowing. We stay in constant communication with our radios, we know what's going on.
That officer that that pulled that trigger which shot a a American woman who was clearly in a in, like, a physically compromised position climbing through the broken glass of a of a window is not, you know, it's not like she just stepped into the cage in MMA and she was ready to fight. She was climbing through a window draped in a flag, there's police officers on the other side of the window, there's police officers on the interior side of the window. So you have plenty enough officer presence If you wanna arrest that woman, then by all means, pull it through the window, you know, put flex cuffs on her and throw her in the corner. We'll get to you later, ma'am. We're kinda busy right now.
That's what you do. You'd have grabbed that woman and pulled her through the and threw her in the corner, or handed her back to somebody that could pull her back, you know, from that front line right there. So understand that very well understand officers have to make split second decisions, but you never you never make a decision to use lethal force unless it's absolutely called for and required, if you're losing a fight attempting to effect an arrest, then then yeah, if there's if if the officer's life is in danger, he's all by himself, but there's never should be a circumstance where you just pull the trigger and a woman climbs through a window that's clearly unarmed. There's no evidence of gunplay from the crowd that she's coming from. You got officers on both side of where she is.
If you gotta arrest her, then by all means, arrest her. You know, to put flex cuffs on her and and move on. So, you know, she'd nannle the next person trying to come through the window, but she don't shoot her. So that was bad.
Speaker 0: To do, there's an invest a real investigation. Was cheered.
Speaker 1: Yep. Why do you think that was? And there's this in there's this insanity that has taken hold in the in the the minds and hearts of many otherwise reasonable American citizens where they do they they hate Trump so much. Like, they're they're so deeply embedded and they're they've sold their souls to the establishment that when we had an America first president and and he and he, like, stopped the, the military industrial complex forward momentum and and he and he began restoring power to individual members of congress and restoring individual rights and freedoms and sovereignty of the State, and he took away the actions of the cartels and brought this this real common sense approach to the executive branch and was leading our country in that beautiful direction. This was interfering with the business model of the establishment.
So many career politicians on both sides of the aisle And I, you know, I don't like those guys, man. I'm not one of them. And I I served my country in congress, but, I I don't consider myself a politician by any means. I'm a servant to We The People. Some of these guys, man, they pop out of the womb to be to be politicians.
They get groomed their whole life, you know, to be a a career politician. And those are the ones that had this instinctive cheer for something really bad happening to a Trump supporter. You know, they their true color showed in that moment and was an ugly color. Yeah. That's it.
Speaker 0: We shouldn't be shooting women, number 1. I couldn't agree more. So where where does this go from here? You have this corpus of information. It It sounds like it's definitive.
When does the public see the detail, and what's the process after that?
Speaker 1: It's a good question. So evidence from criminal investigations by nature is rather secretive, But there is a, a tremendous compilation of data that I think should be made completely available to the public, and that's the digital files from from j 4, 5, and 6. This is where, speaker Mike Johnson can be a champion for for that will be remembered for throughout history as the speaker of the house that fully released unredacted, digital files from j 4, 5, and 6 completely to the American people. And within that data is full truth, and and the American people, is there's only staff large enough to, you know, frame by frame, go through 80,000 hours of digital evidence. Nobody has a staff big enough to do that, but we can crowdsource it to the American people.
So you ask when will this evidence be released? I'd and I've I've been encouraging speaker Johnson, as I did speaker McCarthy to, my god, man, release this data to the American people.
Speaker 0: Why won't why won't they?
Speaker 1: I believe speaker Johnson will, but but Mike is a is is quite a skilled constitutionalist attorney himself, and he's a very measured, patient, faithful man. So I I have I extend trust to to speaker Johnson when he says that it's his intention to fully release the the call the j six tapes, but really it's digital evidence, it's more than it's more than just video evidence, it's it's a lot. It's, you know, radio transcripts, the whole thing. I believe speaker Johnson knows that this is a significant, duty that he must he he he must perform for the American people. It's a moment in history where where, you know, I believe our lord and savior has placed him in that in that position of service to the country, and he has a responsibility to to fully release that data.
And then the American people will see for themselves what some of us have already learned to our horror to be true.
Speaker 0: Congressman Higgins, thank you very much. Free speech is bigger than any one person or any one organization. Societies are defined by what they will not commit. What we're watching is the total inversion of virtue.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"We're here to storm the capitol." -Ray Epps
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses intent to storm the Capitol. Speaker 1 discusses Reyes' actions before the Capitol breach. The mob storms the Capitol. Questions arise about Reyes' involvement in inciting the violence. No clear answers are given.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm here to fight now. We're here to I'm here to. I'm not kidding you. We're here to storm the capital. Hell yeah.
Alright. Have a have a good night. Be safe, Owen. Yeah. Be safe, brother.
Speaker 1: That one moment changed what we knew about Reyes that night when he whispered, storm the capital before it had happened and echoed the official narrative before it was broadcast across the nation.
Speaker 0: Of supporters of president Trump stormed the US Capitol Building. Thousands storming the Capitol. This mob that stormed the Capitol. Stormed the Capitol. Stormed the capitol.
Stormed the Capitol. Stormed the US Capitol Building.
Speaker 1: Stormed the United States Capitol. We are
Speaker 0: going to the Capitol where our problems are. It's that direction. Miss Sandburn, was Ray Absa fed?
Speaker 1: Sir, I cannot answer that question.
Speaker 0: The next day the next day, on January 6, mister Epps is seen whispering to a person and 5 seconds later, 5 seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades. Did mister Epps urge them to tear down the barricades?
Speaker 1: There are similar to the other answers. I cannot answer that.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Senator Ted Cruz: "Was Ray Epps a Fed?" FBI: "Sir, I cannot answer that question." Cruz: "Did Mr. Epps urge them to tear down the barricades?" FBI: "Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ms. Sandburn was asked if Ray Epps incited violence, but she couldn't answer. The next day, Epps was seen whispering to someone who then tore down barricades. When asked if Epps encouraged this, she couldn't provide a clear answer.
Translation (if needed): Ms. Sandburn was asked if Ray Epps incited violence, but she couldn't answer. The next day, Epps was seen whispering to someone who then tore down barricades. When asked if Epps encouraged this, she couldn't provide a clear answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ms. Sandburn, was Ray Absa Fad? Sir, I cannot answer that question. The next day, the next day, on January 6, Mr. Epps is seen whispering to a person and five seconds later, 5 seconds after he's whispering to a person, that same person begins to forcibly tear down the barricades.
Did mister Epps urge them to tear down the barricades? Sir, similar to the other answers, I cannot answer that.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
“I was in the front with a few others. I also orchestrated it.” -Ray Epps “[Ray Epps] committed multiple crimes on that day." -US Attorney Michael Gordon, transcript from Ray Epps' sentencing hearing
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Why did the Jan 6 Committee: ➡️ Fabricate a TV production to manipulate the American people? ➡️ Conspire with the FBI and the media? ➡️ Lie about the pipe bombs? ➡️ Hide and destroy evidence?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thompson's committee gathered compelling information and brought in a former ABC News president to present it effectively. They envisioned the investigation as a miniseries with 9 episodes covering specific themes. The first hearing, a prime time event, aimed to emphasize the importance of the investigation. The stakes were high, and the team worked hard to engage the audience. The hearing began with anticipation, hoping to capture and maintain viewers' attention. Chairman Thompson emphasized the need for the presentation to be impactful.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thompson's committee had gathered a trove of information. The challenge, what to do with it.
Speaker 1: The one thing that we knew was the information that we have is compelling. The thing we needed to do was tell that to the American people in a compelling way. So that's why we brought in the former president of ABC News.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I got a call pretty much out of the blue, from the January 6th committee. They wanted they wanted a storyteller. And while they were brilliant, they were brilliant lawyers. Storytelling for a mass audience is not what they do.
Speaker 3: To bring in a guy like this who would think outside the box really did prove to be fruitful. And it was Goldston who really began to envision this as, in a way, a kind of miniseries that there would be, you know, sort of 9 episodes and that these episodes would tackle particular themes.
Speaker 4: A attack on the Capitol, the investigation.
Speaker 0: The first hearing was prime time television.
Speaker 5: As the nation is about to witness a defining moment. The first hearing before the country, the results of the January 6th investigation.
Speaker 4: This is an extraordinary moment in American history.
Speaker 2: When it came to that first hearing, we knew how high the stakes were.
Speaker 6: Is about to hold its first prime time hearing.
Speaker 2: We were either gonna, you know, make people realize that this is important, you know, or once once you've lost them, you've you've lost them for good.
Speaker 7: On the evening of June 9th, 8:0:1 PM, the doors opened. My heart was beating pretty fast on June 9th, and it it was a real question, of is this gonna work or not?
Speaker 8: Alright, everybody. Here we go. 5 on the line, please.
Speaker 2: I'm in this tiny control room right up the stairs from Cannon Caucus, and we count down to to the start of the hearing. And at that point, what can you do?
Speaker 9: Here we go. In 321.
Speaker 10: The select committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol will be in order without objection.
Speaker 7: We wanted to make sure that this was a presentation that would grab the audience and hold on to him. Chairman Thompson loved to say, it's got a pop.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Why did USCP Officer Harry Dunn lie under oath at the J6 Committee Hearing? “[Dunn] won a Congressional Gold Medal and got a lucrative book deal for his account of events on J6. But a review of video evidence from that day does not corroborate his story."
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officer Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police is under scrutiny for allegedly providing false testimony. His book details his experiences on January 6th, including instances of distress and erratic behavior. There are concerns about the accuracy of his accounts and his actions during the events. The Capitol Police's portrayal of Dunn as a hero is contrasted with criticism of his behavior, raising questions about the narrative surrounding January 6th. Dunn's actions and statements are being closely examined for inconsistencies and potential manipulation of information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Private first class Harry Dunn from the United States Capitol Police. Officer Harry Dunn acted with remarkable courage and valor to defend both our institutions and our people.
Speaker 1: The Capitol police officer assigned to the protective detail of then house speaker Nancy Pelosi appears to have given false testimony.
Speaker 2: This is brought in to corroborate the testimony of another Capitol Police officer.
Speaker 3: It is imperative that we establish the truth of that day.
Speaker 4: It's a Capitol police officer who just took the stand in the oath keeper's trial.
Speaker 1: Sentenced to 18 years in prison. Generations
Speaker 0: to come will think of him.
Speaker 2: It never happened. The way he unpacks the stories
Speaker 5: I don't conflate my story. Sounds like something a useful
Speaker 0: idiot would
Speaker 1: say.
Speaker 6: Officer Harry Dunn in his new book, Standing My Ground, a Capitol Police Officer's Fight for Accountability and Good Trouble.
Speaker 7: Officer Dunn has been among the 1st Capitol Police officers to describe what happened to law enforcement on January 6th. It
Speaker 2: is expected that when somebody does release a book that they're going to do book tour that they're going to make media appearances. The most unique and interesting thing about this book tour that he is on is that for some reason, no other, none other of the Capitol Police officers are allowed to tell their stories.
Speaker 6: What if Donald Trump wins again with his
Speaker 2: Let's make no mistake about it. There were a lot of officers injured that day. I have reviewed 100 and 100 of hours of video and there was violence. I saw violence there that day with my own eyes. And the dozens of media interviews that he has participated in.
Speaker 6: Seen on TV many times.
Speaker 2: Has anybody ever showed a single second of video of his heroic actions that day.
Speaker 6: We need heroes like you.
Speaker 2: What we learned from the book though, he goes into great detail about his own history of therapies, counseling sessions.
Speaker 5: And I'm now receiving private counseling therapy for the persistent emotional trauma of that day.
Speaker 2: Mostly dealing with anger issues. And of course, we did see some of those anger issues displayed. Get the fuck out of here. So he was already distressed, already seeing things, imagining things, escalating things in his own mind in a way that other officers weren't. I'm not gonna try and play psychologist because I'm not one.
There's just something wrong
Speaker 0: with him.
Speaker 2: One of those incidences took place at the top of a stairwell down in the crypt. It's a staircase that leads down to the lower terrace where a lot of officers were receiving first aid for their injuries. He was surrounded by some Metropolitan Police officers when inexplicably he just lost control. There was nobody doing any violence of any type in that room at the time. In fact, there was only a very, very small handful of protesters in the crypt at that moment.
And they were all the way across the room and he just started screaming and shouting obscenities across the room. And at that moment, Captain Ben Smith of the United States Capitol Police ran over to him, put his hand on his shoulder, calm down Harry, calm down. Couple of minutes later, Perry broke out and run towards the staircase that led up to what they call the small rotunda or the speakers lobby. And as he's running towards those stairs, he accidentally hit the button on his magazine from his M4 automatic weapon. The magazine bounces off the floor, 3 other officers run over, one of them picks it up and hands it to him and Harry runs to the top of the stairs.
He's clearly agitated. He's in a high level of distress, not because he's been fighting with anyone when he reached the top of that stairs. That was the moment when Oathkeeper Ken Harrelson saw this highly distressed officer carrying an automatic rifle arrived to the top of the stairs. Already something is going wrong in his head. There wasn't a single officer carried off on the stretcher that day.
There was another scene that took place in which he describes in the book, not so terribly accurately. He says that he saw a protester who was leaning against the wall. Another police officer had given this protester a bottle of water to wash out his eyes because the protester had been sprayed with pepper spray. The book says that he was screaming obscenity to that protester and yanks the bottle of water out of his hand then throws it in his own words halfway across the rotunda floor. Harry can be seen entering the rotunda.
He is not running, but he does inexplicably walk the full length of the floor. He walks over to this lady sitting on a bench, she is wearing red and complete far end of the capitol or the rotunda from where he entered. He is screaming at her and she is doing nothing and immediately an officer has to come over and intervene and actually takes the lady away from Officer Dunn. Then Dunn walks to the middle of the rotunda floor where a protester is sitting in the middle. He's not leaning against the wall.
He's sitting on the floor. He has 4 or 5 other police officers around him. He does have a full bottle of water in his hand. And inexplicably, Dunn reaches down and snatches violently, snatches the bottle of water out of his hands, but he doesn't throw it across the floor. He just then ambles across to the other end of the rotunda and walks over and places the bottle on the pedestal of a statue.
Then a higher ranking officer can be seen talking to another member of what they call the M4 unit points at Dunn and basically you can see from his hand motions is getting out of here. That officer immediately goes over to Dunn and immediately waves and grabs him and gets him out of there. Once again, he was not in a position where he was de escalating, where he was calm, collected, where he was in control of his own faculties. Officer Dunn as personal training officer who teaches de escalation tactics and procedures was not following the lessons that he himself taught those who was in charge of training. When the January 6th committee was first put together, Nancy Pelosi is famously recorded as saying
Speaker 3: And it's also our duty to establish and preserve the narrative of that day.
Speaker 2: The stories we have coming out are going to show that there was a concerted effort to manipulate information, manipulate evidence, suppress evidence, and create evidence that does not exist in order to reach those goals of establishing the narrative.
Speaker 5: He's been put out as a hero. He received some citizen's award from Joe Biden. MSNBC has treated him like a god. As opposed to Tarik Johnson, what he actually did on January 6th that was heroic, but he's been villainized.
Speaker 2: I reached out to Harry. I've been very fair in my series about the Capitol Police. I believe that they were set up that day. I told Harry right from the get go that I believe that he was set up as well. My heart goes out to him and I hope that Harry will eventually see a way to maybe talk to me a little bit further and a little deeper and give me a little bit more inside information.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Why did Nancy Pelosi’s Security Chief, Special Agent David Lazarus, perjure himself on the stand during the Jan 6 Oath Keepers trial?
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Lazarus, Nancy Pelosi's head of security, claimed to witness an encounter between Officer Dunn and Oath Keepers on January 6th. However, CCTV footage showed Lazarus was in a different building at the time. The defense argued that the government withheld evidence and set up American citizens for long sentences. The Capitol Police leadership was more concerned about the story's traction than the false testimony. The case raises questions about who orchestrated the false narrative presented in court.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lazarus. Lazarus. Lazarus.
Speaker 1: Lazarus.
Speaker 0: David Lazarus, special agent, Nancy Pelosi's head of security.
Speaker 2: Did Pelosi's security chief himself?
Speaker 0: On the very night of the release of this story The
Speaker 2: house has voted to house the speaker.
Speaker 0: We lost our speaker of the house. The moment McCarthy, his seat was vacated, I lost my ability to release the video. We were given permission to use a single screenshot.
Speaker 3: Shot. Therefore, the honorable Mike Johnson, the state of Louisiana, duly elected speaker of the house of representatives.
Speaker 0: Of course, now we have a new speaker in place. And we now have permission to release the video.
Speaker 4: Another big win for our DOJ prosecutors. The biggest sedition trial in America in 80 years.
Speaker 2: The highest profile
Speaker 1: justice department has rested its case in the seditious conspiracy trial against Oathkeeper's founder, Stuart Rhodes, and 4 of his associates.
Speaker 0: The story of David Lazarus on January 6th is very simple.
Speaker 4: Lawyers for Stuart Rhodes and 4 other members of the Oath Keepers on trial have suggested that the group helped officer Harry Dunn. Dunn just took the stand and said flat out, quote, they didn't.
Speaker 2: Sentenced to 4 years in prison. Sentenced to 8 and a half years in prison.
Speaker 1: Sentenced to 12 years and sentenced to 18 years in prison.
Speaker 0: His story that day is he was assisting the evacuation of the senate at the time that the incident between officer Harry Dunn and the Oath Keepers began.
Speaker 1: Just outside of the Rectangle, there was Jerry Dunn. He's a capital police officer. He was freaking out. I mean, he was screaming. No.
Get the fuck out of here. Of people with it. He was definitely in a position where he could have done some damage.
Speaker 0: The oath keepers lined up between him and the more agitated protesters and assisted him in keeping them off of him.
Speaker 1: Don rejected the defense's argument that members of the militia protected him.
Speaker 0: I don't conflate my story. He had 2 separate FBI interviews which were in conflict with one another. In the first FBI interview, he actually gave a favorable story about his encounter with the 4 oath key.
Speaker 1: I stood in front of Harry Dunn for almost 6 minutes.
Speaker 0: After he was brought in for a second FBI interview, he changed that story.
Speaker 1: He was fighting back insurrectionists across the capital while being called the vilest racist names.
Speaker 0: So what they did is they brought in another officer, special agent David Lazarus, to kinda bolster that story and give it more credibility by saying that when he arrived at the top of those stairs, that he saw Dunn standing at the top of the stairs being hassled by these oath keepers. At the time, the Harry Dunn Oath Keepers encounter began, he was not in the same building. Lazarus was just not there. He could not have seen. He could not have witnessed what was taking place because Lazarus was in another senate office building across the street from Constitution Avenue.
So we were able to track Lazarus on the capital CCTV cameras. Lazarus can be seen moving away from the capitol building through a lower tunnel at 2 37:59 PM. Lazarus continues moving toward the senate office buildings at 2:41:49 PM. During officer Lazarus' October 31st trial testimony, he stated that he began his return to the capitol building after hearing shots fired over capitol police radio.
Speaker 4: They were shot fired.
Speaker 0: That occurred at 2:43 PM.
Speaker 4: 40:43 hours.
Speaker 0: Here, Lazarus can be seen moving back towards the capitol at 2:45 PM. Dunn's encounter with the Oath Keepers began at 2:44 and lasted roughly between 5 and 6 minutes. Here, Lazarus finally emerges from the tunnel back to the senate side of the capitol building at 2:48. Dunn falsely testified that Lazarus was already at the location where he encountered the oath keepers before he arrived. But Lazarus can be seen at the top of the elevator leading up from the tunnel at 2:48 PM on the senate side of the capitol over 4 minutes after Dunn encountered the oath keepers on the house side.
I don't complete my story. Lazarus then testified that he saw Dunn in an antagonist that testified that he saw Dunn in an antagonistic conversation with the oath keepers 3 or 4 times.
Speaker 4: The Capitol police officer who just took the stand in the oath keepers trial blew a hole in one of the defense's theories.
Speaker 2: Starting to restore my faith in the justice department. Finally, they're charging people with the sedition we saw with our own eyes on live TV.
Speaker 0: Lazarus can still be seen in the senate side of the building at 2:50 PM. At 252 PM, Lazarus can be seen continuing his progression toward the house side of the capitol. The 4 oath keepers are no longer standing aligned between officer Dunn and those contentious protesters as they had moved into the rotunda and began heading toward the east doors to exit the building. At 2:54 PM, Lazarus continues moving toward the house side of the capital. He is still one level down from where Dunn and the oath keepers encounter had already concluded minutes earlier.
At 256 PM, Lazarus is still one floor below and is still not arrived at the staircase where he claimed to have seen Dunn's encounter with the 4 oath keepers. By this time, those oath keepers had already left the rotunda and are about to exit the east doors. Finally, at 256, Lazarus can be seen reaching the bottom of the staircase. At the top of which, he claimed to have witnessed Dunn's very antagonistic interaction with 4 oath keepers 3 or 4 times while rescuing 11 or 12 Pelosi staff from their offices. The problem with that is it just never happened.
Speaker 2: He was then shown in court the video clip of 4 oath keepers standing in front of Don. Lazarus was asked, are these the individuals who you observed?
Speaker 0: He said, yes. That's the ones that I saw Harry Dunn with, except that he couldn't have because he was in another building a quarter of a mile away. These are videos that were never released to the defense attorneys.
Speaker 2: This is our government not getting it wrong. No. This is our government setting American citizens up, withholding evidence that's evidence that's exculpatory, sentencing them to long sentences. This is as bad as it it gets.
Speaker 4: It clearly was important to prosecutors. They wanted to set an example.
Speaker 0: This should rock the Capitol Police. We received messages from our sources at the DOJ in Washington that they were quote unquote terrified of the story. Additionally, I have a screenshot of an internal email passed between Capitol Police Leadership. They were concerned about the traction that that story was getting. It's something for us to keep an eye on and see if it develops or not.
Now this is interesting about the Capitol Police that they're more worried about the traction of their story than they are worried about the lie that their special agent told on the stand in the Oathkeeper's Drive. As we continue the process of peeling back the layers on this particular story, we're going to find evidence of who set this up and who put those 2 officers on the stand because I don't believe for a moment that Harry Dunn and David Lazarus got together in the middle of that staircase that day on January 6th and hatched this story.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"They set us the f*ck up! That's what they did." -US Capitol Police, Jan 6
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump's tweet at 2:24 PM criticized Mike Pence for not protecting the country and demanded truth in certifying election facts. The January 6th committee claimed this tweet incited the Capitol surge. However, officers misused munitions and CS gas, causing chaos. A misfired CS gas canister led to police losing their position, resulting in a collapse of the police line on the west plaza. Frustrated officers felt set up to fail, expressing concerns about not being prepared for the situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: At 2:24 PM, president Trump tweets, Mike Pence didn't have the courage to do what should have been done to protect our country and our constitution, giving states a chance to certify a corrected set of facts, not the fraudulent or inaccurate ones which they were asked to previously certify. USA demands the truth. This would be a significant tweet to the January 6th committee, for they claimed that it was the motivation for a surge into the capital complex.
Speaker 1: Our investigation found that immediately after the president's 2:24 PM tweet, the crowds both outside the capital and inside the capitol surged.
Speaker 0: What the January 6th committee failed to mention was that it was officers misusing munitions and CS gas at that same time that led to a surge. Hey, Rich. Yeah. Put it on the yeah. DC MPD officer Cowery at the urging of officer Thao, misfires a CS gas canister that eventually forces police to fall back and lose their position.
Alright. Before this, I don't have my I got it. Go. As officers on the West Plaza, unequipped with gas masks, struggle breathing, the plume of CS gas can be seen from the overhead camera on the lower right corner of your screen. It blows over the entire area of the west plaza that the police had secured for nearly an hour.
Within 3 minutes of the officer CS gas misfire, the police line on the west plaza entirely collapses. At 2:33 PM, a frustrated police officer can be heard venting about being, in his words, set up. I didn't know we are coming up for this. I wanna make sure we all had our masks. I didn't realize how bad I they set us up to fail.
They did. There was no way we were winning that.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"These are the mistakes, intentional or otherwise, that led to Jan 6. We had offered the Capitol Police and Mayor Bowser of Washington DC, thousands of National Guard's men and women - two days before Jan 6 - AND THEY TURNED US DOWN." -Kash Patel
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why the FBI didn't inform cabinet secretaries about potential threats on January 6th. They criticize the lack of security measures at the Capitol and mention offering National Guard support, which was declined. They believe better information sharing could have prevented the events. The speaker emphasizes that protecting the Capitol is a law enforcement responsibility, not a military one, and suggests cooperation between agencies. They imply political reasons for the lack of action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Why on January 6th, when it is now publicly been admitted by the FBI that they had information that there could possibly be a situation like that at the United States Capitol, why weren't the cabinet secretaries under president Trump briefed? Why didn't the FBI put a 1,000 uniformed agents around the US Capitol? Where was the fence? Right? These are the lackings of that led to January 6th.
These are the mistakes, intentional or otherwise, that led to January 6th. And if you look at the video from January 6th, and they still won't release all of it, an entire side of the Capitol, I believe it's the south side, was totally unmanned. No police officers whatsoever. And that's where the crowd first came in through. And you have to ask yourself what happened on January 6th.
Now look, I was chief of staff of the Department of Defense on 6th. We had offered the Capitol Police and mayor Bowser of Washington DC, thousands of national guardsmen and women 2 days before January 6th, and they turned us down. So it could have been prevented. So could it could it have been just not a lot of information sharing happening? I think it was not enough information sharing happening.
And I think what people now are starting to realize is that the protecting of the US Capitol on a day like January 6th is a law enforcement function. You cannot have the United States military descend and occupy the area around the United States Capitol. It's literally illegal, but they can assist their law enforcement partners through a request from the mayor or the governor or the Capitol Police. And that's what should happen, and that's what we told them they might want to consider, but they flat out rejected it for political reasons, I believe.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. GO HOME AND GO HOME IN PEACE." -President Donald J. Trump, Jan 6
Video Transcript AI Summary
I understand your frustration over the election, but we must maintain peace and order. It's a tough time, but we can't let them win. Please go home peacefully. We appreciate you, but violence is not the answer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know your pain. I know your hurt. We had an election that was stolen from us. It was a landslide election, and everyone knows it, especially the other side. But you have to go home now.
We have to have peace. We have to have law and order. We have to respect our great people in law and order. We don't want anybody hurt. It's a very tough period of time.
There's never been a time like this where such a thing happened, where they could take it away from all of us, from me, from you, from our country. This was a fraudulent election, but we can't play into the hands of these people. We have to have peace. So go home. We love you.
You're very special. You've seen what happens. You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil. I know how you feel, but go home and go home at peace.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Joe Biden and his commie uniparty henchman, like DC U.S. Attorney Matthew Graves, continue to hunt down Jan 6 patriots while allowing 10s of millions of migrants illegally cross our borders.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many were prosecuted for entering the building or engaging in violent conduct on Capitol grounds. Those who entered restricted areas without authorization committed a federal crime. Thousands occupied unauthorized areas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what happened inside of the building. An important note when it comes to our prosecutions about those who remained outside the building. We have used our prosecutorial discretion to primarily focus on those who enter the building, or those who engage in violent or corrupt conduct on capital grounds. But if a person knowingly entered the restricted area without authorization, they had already committed a federal crime. Make no mistake, thousands of people occupied an area that they were not authorized to be president in in the first place.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to surge to the border to hear asylum seekers. The border is closed and secure, but officials are encountering 10,000 migrants a day. It's not a border crisis, but rather imperialism, climate, and trade crises. The president is working on immigration. There have been over 250,000 migrant encounters since December.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would, in fact, make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. We're a nation that says if you wanna flee and you're fleeing oppression, you should come.
Speaker 1: More than 11,000 migrants are waiting in shelters in Northern Mexico. 38100 in Tijuana, 32100 in Reynosa, 4000 in Matamoros. Many
Speaker 2: The border is closed. The border is secure.
Speaker 3: This whole this whole thing about the border, we've been to the border. We've been to the border.
Speaker 2: You haven't been to the border?
Speaker 3: I and I haven't been to Europe, And I will be
Speaker 0: As as the president said, he's all about border security.
Speaker 2: Tonight, nearly 10,000 migrants a day. That is what federal officials say they are encountering at the US southern border on average escalates in the US officials now warning that the situation is nearing a, quote, breaking point. I wanna be very clear. Our borders are not open.
Speaker 3: Because it's not a border crisis. It's an imperialism crisis. It's a climate crisis. It's a trade crisis. This is not a surge.
These are children, and they are not insurgents, and we are not being invaded. Which
Speaker 4: I will say this. The president has done more to secure the border and to deal with this issue of immigration than anybody else.
Speaker 3: Weekend, there were more than 35,000 migrant encounters down at the southern border since the start of December. Encounters have now exceeded 250,000. That's right.
Speaker 0: I would, in fact, make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Joe Biden and his commie uniparty henchman throw grandmas who pray for our country in jail while allowing illegal immigrant animals rape and murder American citizens.
Video Transcript AI Summary
My country treats me like a criminal because I support the president they stole from power. Standing up for my country shouldn't make me a criminal. It feels strange to be here, I was here over 3 years ago.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And so that that my only country is treating me like a criminal. It's because I believe that my they stole my right rightful president. And just standing up for my country makes me a criminal. And it's not right. It feels so weird to be here.
3 over 3 years ago, I was here.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
It’s all by design – it’s a global agenda – and the uniparty, feds and intel agencies are hard at work to entrench single party rule! H/t @WesternLensman
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democrat open borders plan aims to secure single-party rule by flooding the country with millions of noncitizens, prioritizing their needs over citizens, protecting them from consequences of crimes, counting them in the census for more congressional power, changing voting laws to favor Democrats, and promising benefits for loyalty. This strategy ultimately leads to entrenched single-party rule, all funded by taxpayers.
Translation: The Democrat open borders plan is designed to establish single-party control by bringing in millions of noncitizens, giving them priority over citizens, protecting them from legal consequences, including them in the census for more political power, changing voting laws to benefit Democrats, and offering benefits in exchange for loyalty. This strategy results in a single-party rule, all paid for by taxpayers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The democrat open borders plan to entrench single party rule explained in under 2 minutes. 1, flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea, and air from all over the world. Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far. 2, prioritize the needs of these millions of noncitizens over the needs of the American citizen with free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them. 3, keep them in the country at all costs.
Even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves. Slander critics as racist. 4, ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with city and state sanctuary laws that act as population magnets. Codify permanent status and ensure noncooperation with ICE.
ICE. 5, count the noncitizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the house of representatives. As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral power. 6, wage a massive heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail in ballots. No signature verification and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud.
7, lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat party. 8, win fealty to the Democrat party. 8, win elections. 9, entrenched single party rule has been achieved. The best part?
Your tax dollars are paying for it.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
They want to destroy MAGA. "For too long a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government WHILE THE PEOPLE HAVE BORNE THE COST. Washington flourished BUT THE PEOPLE DID NOT SHARE IN IT'S WEALTH." -President Donald J. Trump
Video Transcript AI Summary
A small group in our nation's capital benefited from government rewards while the people bore the cost. Washington thrived, but the people did not share its wealth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. Washington flourished, but the people did not share in its wealth.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Lara Logan’s Fed-Surrection is a MUST WATCH. @laralogan Fed-Surrection, Part 1 of 3 Why was Ray Epps treated as victim by the same people who condemned almost everyone around him as a threat? https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-5-fed-surrection-part-1/
Fed-Surrection, Part 1 - Truth in Media
Why was Ray Epps treated as victim by the same people who condemned almost everyone around him as a threat?
truthinmedia.com
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Fed-Surrection, Part 2 of 3 Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation? Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose? https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-6-fed-surrection-part-2/
Fed-Surrection, Part 2 - Truth in Media
Was Ray Epps the victim of right wing conspiracies and speculation? Or was he being used, like everyone else on January 6th, but for a different purpose?
truthinmedia.com
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Fed-Surrection, Part 3 of 3 When Ray Epps urged people to trespass inside the Capitol, he knew it was a crime because he had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass in Pennsylvania from 2015. https://truthinmedia.com/episode/episode-7-fed-surrection-part-3/
Fed-Surrection, Part 3 - Truth in Media
When Ray Epps urged people to trespass inside the Capitol, he knew it was a crime because he had an outstanding warrant for criminal trespass in Pennsylvania
truthinmedia.com
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
"Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA"
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
🚨 DC National Guard whistleblowers to say they WERE ready to be deployed on January 6 on Trump's orders hours but were held back by the Pentagon in bombshell testimony contradicting Capitol riot committee's story https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13293449/DC-National-Guard-whistleblowers-say-ready-deployed-January-6-Trumps-orders-hours-held-Pentagon-bombshell-testimony-contradicting-Capitol-riot-committees-story.html
DC National Guard whistleblowers to speak at hearing on Jan 6 panel
Whistleblowers from the D.C. National Guard will tell Congress Trump did want them deployed during Capitol riot and the Army delayed telling them to mobilize in a bombshell hearing next week.
dailymail.co.uk
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@historyinmemes Meanwhile, the corrupt New York AG Leticia James continues in her unlawful effort to destroy our former President, Donald J. Trump and his family; interfering in an election and eliminating the American People's Constitutional right to choose our President of the United States. https://t.co/mDcZRXV5Lr
Video Transcript AI Summary
I will sue Donald Trump as the next attorney general because he is an illegitimate president. I believe he should be charged with obstructing justice and can be indicted for criminal offenses. I will challenge him and defend your rights every day. The days of Donald Trump are coming to an end.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And what would you say to people who say, oh, I'm not gonna bother to register to vote because my voice doesn't make a difference, or I'm just one person. I say one I say one name, Donald Trump. That should motivate you. Put up your ass
Speaker 1: Will you
Speaker 0: will you sue him for us? Oh, we're gonna definitely assume. We're gonna be a real pain in the ass. He's gotta know my name personally. I love it.
Speaker 1: Makes a mom
Speaker 0: He probably does already.
Speaker 1: This illegitimate president office. He sits on the White House. That president, Because he's not my president, he's an illegitimate president. And days are numbered. And days are numbered.
Speaker 0: We've gotta get ready to mobilize,
Speaker 1: and we've gotta get ready to agitate and irritate until victory is won, But more importantly, until truth is defeated. As the next attorney general, I see the law As a sworn and as a shield to protect those who are vulnerable because no one is above the law Including this illegitimate president. True. And so I look forward I look forward To go into the office of attorney general every day, suing him, defending your rights, And then going home.
Speaker 0: And at the eye of the storm is Donald Trump, ripping families apart, threatening women's most basic rights, I'm running for attorney general because I will never be afraid to challenge this illegitimate president. He should be charged with obstructing justice. I believe that the president of these United States can be indicted for criminal offenses. It's important that everyone understand that the days of Donald Trump are coming to an end. Will you sue him for us?
Oh, we're gonna definitely sue him. We're gonna be a real pain in the ass. He's gotta know my name personally. I love it. He probably does already.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
@catturd2 .@VivekGRamaswamy https://t.co/PW8mDn3nOq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes that the system is trying to limit the presidential race to Donald Trump and a controllable puppet, which they claim is Nikki Haley. They predict that Ron DeSantis will join Haley as her vice president. The speaker accuses the system of doing whatever it takes to eliminate Trump and warns against falling into their trap. They urge people to stay vigilant and not let the America First agenda end with Trump's removal from contention. The speaker emphasizes the need to do what is right for the country and not be deceived by those who may harm them in the future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The system wants to narrow this down to a 2 horse race between Donald Trump and a puppet who they can control. And it has become increasingly clear that puppet is not a Democrat. It's not even Gavin Newsom. It's Nikki Haley. It's in our own party.
Well, today, one more step in that plot unfolds. Chris Christie drops out. Is next up, I'm gonna make a prediction. You're actually going to see Ron DeSantis join Nikki Haley's ticket. He's gonna be her VP.
The whole game, it's hiding in plain sight. Is whatever it takes, and this system will stop at nothing, and I mean nothing, to eliminate Donald Trump from contention. It's disgusting. Is but the same people who have said they're not gonna actually take a principled stand against Trump's removal from the ballot. Haley and DeSantis are both in that category.
Do the math, people. That's next up. Is. Ron DeSantis says after Iowa, everybody, including Chris Christie apparently, got a phone call from Ron DeSantis. Panicked was the word that Chris Christie used.
Is this is the way the plot's going. Ron may not know this. Ron DeSantis may not know this, but that's what his donors are gonna make him do. That's what's coming next. Ron DeSantis will become Nikki's VP, whether or not Ron knows it.
It's not really his choice. He's not the one in charge of that decision. And then the plot continues. We have to open our eyes and not fall into their trap. Is our America First agenda cannot end.
Our movement cannot end with Donald Trump when they take him out from contention. Is and if you think this system is gonna even let this man get anywhere near the White House, we need to open our eyes. We need to do the right thing for our country. If they are selling us the rope today that they're gonna use to hang us tomorrow, do not fall into the trap people, and that's why I'm here.
@Simply4Truth_ - E 🇺🇸
Joe Biden: "What I would do as president... I would in fact make sure that there is... we immediately surge the border." TREASON. https://t.co/vny2oYtA0M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Thousands of migrants are waiting in shelters in Northern Mexico, while officials claim the border is closed and secure. The situation at the US southern border is said to be reaching a breaking point, with nearly 10,000 daily encounters on average. However, some argue that this is not a border crisis but rather a result of imperialism, climate issues, and trade problems. Despite differing opinions, the president is praised for his efforts in securing the border and addressing immigration. Since December, there have been over 35,000 migrant encounters and a total of 250,000 encounters so far.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I would in fact make sure that there is we immediately surge to the border. All those people are seeking asylum. They deserve to be heard. That's who we are. We're a nation that says if you wanna flee and you're fleeing oppression, you should come.
Speaker 1: More than 11,000 migrants are waiting in shelters in Northern Mexico. 38100 in Tijuana, 32100 in Reynosa, 4,000 in Matamoros. Many
Speaker 2: the border is closed. The border is secure.
Speaker 3: This whole this Whole thing about the border, we've been to the border. We've been to the border.
Speaker 2: You haven't been to the border?
Speaker 3: And I haven't been to Europe, And I will be
Speaker 0: As as the president said, he's all about border security.
Speaker 2: Tonight, nearly 10,000 migrants a day. That is what federal officials say they are encountering at the US southern border on average escalates in US officials now warning that the situation is nearing a, quote, breaking point. I wanna be very clear. Our borders are not open.
Speaker 3: Because it's not a border crisis. It's an imperialism crisis. It's a climate crisis. It's a trade crisis. This is not a surge.
These are children, and they are not insurgents, And we are not being invaded. Which
Speaker 4: I will say this. The president has done more to secure the border and to deal with this issue of immigration than anybody else.
Speaker 2: Weekend, there were more than 35,000 migrant encounters down at the border since the start of December. Encounters have now exceeded 250,000.
Speaker 0: That's I would in fact make sure That there is we immediately surge to the border.
@Simply4Truth_ - ES 🇺🇸
It's from April 2023.
Video Not Available
youtube.com