TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Skriptkeeper17
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
😲 This guy just spilled the beans about Bad Bunny and Communism. https://t.co/0Y0GoeaiwU
Video Transcript AI Summary
- The speaker asserts that Bad Bony is a plant and asks who owns Bad Bony, naming Rafael Jimenez Dan, vice president of the defense of Travis in Venezuela, as the owner.
- They insist, “It is. Everybody is bland. Bland. You know, everybody is like this. Don't see the truth.”
- They claim there is “a plan to destroy the democracy” and that “They wanna be the everybody be communista.”
- They challenge the idea by saying, “Show me what happened with communista in Venezuela or in Cuba or in Nicaragua. Show me what good dude. Nothing.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bad Bony is a plant. Do you know who's the owner of the Bad Bony company? Rafael Jimenez Dan, vice president of of of the defense of Travis in Venezuela. You think he's a plant is what you're saying? Yeah.
It is. Everybody is bland. Bland. You know, everybody is like this. Don't see the truth.
They have a a a plan to destroy the democracy. They wanna be the everybody be communista. Show me what happened with communista in Venezuela or in Cuba or in Nicaragua. Show me what good dude. Nothing.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Then they killed Aaron Carter right after this. https://t.co/bTuikZmtsR
Video Transcript AI Summary
After leaving the party, the narrator says, he smoked with Nickel, then got into a limousine and left. He returned to the Sheraton Hotel at Universal, where four FBI agents were waiting in his hotel room. His mom was there, urging him to tell the agents what happened. The narrator sat down with them as they asked questions he characterizes as sexually exploiting and involving “backbacksided” questions, and he was acutely aware of this at his age.
He challenges the agents directly, asking, “are y’all crazy? What you think I’m gonna do? Tell you that Michael did something bad so that we can sue him for money?” He directs this question at the agents and then looks to his mom, asking, “What is going on here? Why are you letting this happen?” He says his mom responds by saying, “well, I think something happened. You know, I think something,” and he counters, “really? That man did nothing but be hospitable, kind, loving, giving, everything you could think of.”
The narrator recounts that they rode four-wheelers for five hours in the mountains at nighttime after his birthday party, with Michael and Chris Tucker, and that he hung out with Michael and talked with him. He emphasizes that Michael was hospitable, kind, and generous during that time.
In closing, the narrator stresses that the events included an overnight or post-party sequence with a limousine ride to the Sheraton, the FBI visit and interrogation with his mother present, and the extended outing in the mountains on four-wheelers with Michael and Chris Tucker after the birthday celebration. He uses his account to portray Michael as hospitable and benevolent during these interactions, and he presents the FBI questioning as inappropriate, framing it as aggressive and accusatory toward himself, despite his defense of Michael’s character and behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The one boy Now listen to this. I have to tell you this. Okay. So after I left the party and the next day I smoked with nickel and then I get I get in the limousine and I leave. I get back to the Sheraton Hotel at Universal over here.
There's four FBI agents waiting for me in the hotel room. And my mom's there, and she's like, tell them what happened. And I'm like, what do you mean tell them what happened? And I sit down with them and they all get ask these super sexually exploiting, you know, questions, back backsided questions. And I knew that at my age already.
And I looked at all four of them and I said I said, are y'all crazy? I said, what you think I'm gonna do? Tell you that Michael did something bad so that we we can sue him for money? That's what I told him. I was like, you're and I looked over at my mom and I was like, are you serious, mom?
I was like, what is going on here? Why are you letting this happen? And she goes she goes, well, she goes, well, I think something happened. You know, I think something I'm like, really? That man did nothing but be hospitable, kind, loving, giving, everything you could think of.
We rode four wheelers, five hours, me, him, and Chris Tucker in the mountains at nighttime after his birthday party. Him and I hung out Talk pretty much
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
I give you NEVER FORGET https://t.co/Bks0f9pKyA
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers present a series of emphatic claims about COVID-19 vaccines, emphasizing their effectiveness, transmission-blocking ability, and regulatory implications for public behavior and policy. The core messages include:
- The vaccine can stop the spread of these diseases and people will be okay; you’re not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations.
- Vaccines are highly, highly effective.
- Vaccinated people do not carry the virus and don’t get sick.
- They are really, really good against variants.
- Vaccination is not only about individual protection but also reducing transmission to others and helping society return to normal.
- The vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person.
- Guidance to get vaccinated: get your first shot, and when due for your second, get your second shot.
- The key goal is to stop transmission and raise immunity levels so there is almost no infection.
- For vaccinated individuals who are exposed to the virus, the virus does not infect them, and cannot use that person to spread to others.
- When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected.
- If you are vaccinated, you’re not going to be hospitalized, you’re not going to be in the ICU, and you’re not going to die.
- A vaccinated person cannot be used as a host to go get more people.
- If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.
- Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or practicing physical distancing.
- A critique is offered about misinformation: companies and personalities are making money by peddling lies and allowing misinformation that can kill their own customers and supporters; it is described as wrong and immoral.
- Financial comparison is made: there has been over a 20-to-1 return (implying a large gain), and a counterfactual calculation suggests that if money had been invested in the S&P 500 with reinvested dividends, the result would be about $17,000,000,000, but the speaker claims people think it’s $200,000,000,000.
Overall, the transcript presents a tightly framed, high-confidence portrayal of vaccines as highly effective at preventing infection, transmission, hospitalization, and death, while advocating vaccination as a path to normalcy and criticizing misinformation, alongside a financial remark about two-way returns and investment comparisons.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The vaccine can stop the spread of these diseases. You're okay. You're not gonna you're not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.
Speaker 1: These vaccines are highly, highly effective.
Speaker 2: Vaccinated people do not carry the virus. Don't get sick.
Speaker 1: They're really, really good against variants.
Speaker 3: Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission, to other people and allowing society to get back to normal.
Speaker 4: Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person.
Speaker 2: Get your first shot, and when you're due for your second, get your second shot.
Speaker 3: Our key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no almost no infection going on whatsoever.
Speaker 4: A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. The virus does not infect them. The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else.
Speaker 1: When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not gonna get infected.
Speaker 0: If you're vaccinated, you're not gonna be hospitalized. You're not gonna be in ICU unit, and you're not gonna die.
Speaker 4: I cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people.
Speaker 0: If you are fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask.
Speaker 2: Anyone who is fully vaccinated can participate in indoor and outdoor activities, large or small, without wearing a mask or physical distancing.
Speaker 0: Companies and personalities are making money by peddling lies and allowing misinformation that can kill their own customers and their own supporters. It's wrong. It's immoral.
Speaker 3: There's been over a 20 to one return.
Speaker 1: If you had put that money into an S and P 500 and reinvested the dividends, you'd come up with something like $17,000,000,000, but you think it's $200,000,000,000. Here. Yeah.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
This video breaks everything down with Charlie Kirk. We'll alot of questions and answers https://t.co/uR0gB7wBdS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shortly after Kirk's assassination, speculation of Israel's involvement spread like wildfire. A Newsmax journalist was forced to ask Benjamin Netanyahu during an interview, and he denied the allegations. Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil revealed Kirk was beginning to break ranks with the Zionists; he was questioning Israel, and refusing Zionist money and platforming critics. Kirk decided to platform Israel critics Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and Dave Smith at a Turning Point USA summit. Megan Kelly suggested that Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli Mossad agent. Laura Loomer tweeted, after this weekend, I'd say he has revealed himself as a political opportunist. He was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu's allies in the US; he rejected Netanyahu's offer to arrange an infusion of Zionist money into Turning Point USA. He had come to loathe the Israeli leader and was afraid Israel might kill him for criticizing them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A lone gunman, a young man chasing infamy, the assassin of one of America's most popular political activists, the most viral political assassination in modern history. But there's an issue, a very serious issue. Given how authorities have handled this investigation, we can't treat their information as concrete. So it begs the question, what if there is more to this story? Shortly after Kirk's assassination, speculation of Israel's involvement spread like wildfire.
The claims were so viral that a Newsmax journalist was forced to ask Benjamin Netanyahu himself during an interview where he appeared agitated and nervous as he denied the allegations.
Speaker 1: Before I let you go, I want you to address one thing, and, and I've it's just the absurdity of it, some of the Internet rumors that somehow Israel is behind the Charlie Kirk murder. And, you know, I don't believe it for one second, but I want you to, you know, make a statement. It's so absurd.
Speaker 2: That's That's insane. It's not only insane. It's I I think it's so absurd, so stupid, so stupid, and so ridiculous. You can't believe that people are saying that they just found the perpetrator. They'll get to, the bottom of this.
Speaker 0: This speculation about Israel being behind Charlie Kirk's assassination came across as absurd to many people, myself included, given Kirk's history of loyal servitude to Israel and the Zionists. I mean, what motive would Israel have for killing their own loyal subject? But then came this bombshell. Journalist Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil revealed Kirk was beginning to break ranks with the Zionists. He was questioning Israel.
He was refusing Zionist money and platforming critics. And for that, he was met with intimidation and backlash from powerful Zionist figures. He was afraid of them. In this video, we'll dive into the article, lay out the claims, and we'll confront the very important question. Was Charlie Kirk's assassination just the act of a lone gunman, or was it a violent coup by Israel to gain control over the most influential conservative organization in America?
There's a famous expression in Latin dating back to the classical period when attempting to identify criminal suspects. Or who benefits? This question comes to mind when considering whether or not Israel is responsible for arranging Charlie Kirk's assassination. To even consider whether or not Israel may be responsible, you first have to believe that they somehow benefited. Therefore, for Israel to benefit from Charlie Kirk's assassination, Charlie Kirk would have to no longer be of benefit to Israel.
To many, including myself, Charlie Kirk was a loyal and beneficial propagandist to Israel. He spent his entire career spreading the myth of Judeo Christian values.
Speaker 3: This country was founded on a Judeo Christian construct, which is a gift from the Lord, and we must honor that.
Speaker 0: He routinely claimed Israel was America's greatest ally and propagated the false claim that Palestinians never existed.
Speaker 3: What's you what's you're trying to
Speaker 0: say?
Speaker 3: I don't think the place exists. What? Because it doesn't. It's called Judea And Samaria. It's not called Palestine.
It's a nonexistent place.
Speaker 0: All of this serves Israel and Zionism. And the organization he founded, Turning Point USA, received tons of financial support from Zionist donors, including the David Horowitz Foundation. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless fire hose of anti Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes, accepting propaganda trips to Israel and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TP USA events. So the idea that Kirk was somehow becoming a threat to Israel was absurd. But as many social media users have pointed out, Kirk was, in fact, fact showing signs of evolution.
The same kind of evolution that saw personalities like Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Megan Kelly to name a few change their tune in regards to America's relationship with Israel. According to the Grey Zone, as Israel's genocidal assault on the besieged Gaza Strip drove an unprecedented backlash within grassroots right wing circles, where only 24% of younger Republicans now sympathize with Israel over the Palestinians, Kirk began to shift. At times, he towed the Israeli line, spreading disinformation about babies beheaded by Hamas on October 7 and denying the famine imposed on the population of Gaza. Yet he simultaneously ceded to his base, wondering aloud if Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli intelligence asset, questioning whether the Israeli government allowed the October to proceed in order to advance long term political goals, and parroting narratives familiar to his most vociferous critic on the right, streamer Nick Fuentes. Back in July, Turning Point USA held a student action summit for young conservatives in Tampa, Florida.
As head of the organization, Kirk would decide who to platform at this event. In a decision that enraged Zionists, Kirk decided to platform Israel critics Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, and comedian Dave Smith. At the event, Tucker Carlson made several incendiary comments taunting the Zionist billionaire Bill Ackman.
Speaker 4: How did Bill Ackman get 9,000,000 billion dollars?
Speaker 3: Bill Bill Ackman, pretty impressive guy? I know Bill Ackman. No. Bill Ackman's, like, well
Speaker 4: connected and super aggressive. That's it.
Speaker 0: And even suggested that Americans serving in the IDF should lose their citizenship.
Speaker 4: Because you can only really pledge your loyalty to one person or one country. That's just a fact. Like anybody, by the way, who serves in a foreign military should lose his citizenship immediately. There are a lot of Americans who've served in the IDF. They should lose their citizenship.
You can't fight for another country and remain an American, period.
Speaker 0: Megan Kelly suggested that Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli Mossad agent.
Speaker 3: So he was an American, which leads basically three options. Am I sick, Saudi, or Mossad? Yep. Which one would you choose?
Speaker 5: I guess Mossad given his connection to Ghislain Maxwell.
Speaker 3: So what does that mean?
Speaker 5: Well, I mean, it's possible that that's the reason everything's getting buried, that there is some treasure trove, and it's getting buried because
Speaker 3: How many people here believe that? Raise your hand. Okay. I'd say about half half the hands think that it's being buried because of an Israeli thing.
Speaker 0: And Dave Smith heavily criticized Israel's genocidal actions in Gaza.
Speaker 6: Because it's not a war. It's the destruction of a captive people. Gaza's been occupied since 1967 by the Israelis, and they're now just slaughtering the people there.
Speaker 0: On social media, Zionists went into a frenzy denouncing Charlie Kirk as a traitor. The Jewish Zionist Laura Loomer tweeted, after this weekend, I'd say he has revealed himself as a political opportunist. Lately, Kirk has decided to behave like a charlatan. It really is shameful. And honestly, I am just disgusted with the constant flip flopping on the right.
In the times of Israel, a blogger called Kirk out for promoting antisemitism. Quote, Charlie, what are you doing? You know the difference between good faith critique and coded antisemitism. When people obsess over APAC while ignoring Qatar, China, Saudi Arabia, the UN, that's not objectivity. That's targeting.
Leadership also means knowing when a conversation is no longer a conversation, it's manipulation. It's how the seeds of Jew scapegoating get watered, not by swastikas, but by just asking questions. Finally, she warns, Charlie, don't abandon your post. You've stood for truth when it wasn't easy. Stand now with Israel, with reason, with your own better judgment.
And the Jewish Zionist Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro also voiced their displeasure with Kirk over who he platformed at the summit.
Speaker 7: We, you and I, have people who we thought were conservatives, sound a lot like the Marxist Islamists who were attending this event last week, don't they? They find that conservative groups and conservative organizations that have these weekend events and these seminars, whether they're for young people or think tanks or that sort of thing, they sort of sprinkle these events with these kooks, with these American haters who claim to be American firsters and are fake MAGA and even stabbed the president in the back.
Speaker 3: I mean,
Speaker 8: I think it's it's definitely an attempt by some of these organizations to, quote, unquote, maintain the big tent. The problem with a big tent is that you may end up with many, many clowns inside.
Speaker 0: But the backlash against Kirk wasn't just happening in public. It was being done in private as well. According to the Grey Zone article, Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu's wealthy allies in The US, including many who had funded TP USA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. He was being told what you're not allowed to do, and it was driving him crazy, Kirk's friend recalled.
The conservative youth leader was not only alienated by the hostile nature of the interactions, but frightened by the backlash. And apparently, Kirk wasn't just disturbed by Zionist donors or leaders here in America that were calling and texting him. He was feeling the heat from Israel itself through its war criminal president Benjamin Netanyahu. Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into Turning Point USA, America's largest conservative youth association. In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader regarding him as a bully.
Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president's personal decisions and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb. According to Kirk's friend who also enjoyed access to president Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel's behalf. Charlie was the only person who did that, they said, recalling how Trump barked at him in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk's mind that the president of The United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts. By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu.
Figures, he described in an interview as Jewish leaders and stakeholders. He was afraid of them, the source emphasized. The reports of this fear are consistent with other claims made by sources also close to Kirk. A month ago, Harrison Smith, a well known media personality and political commentator, tweeted out that someone close Charlie told him that Kirk was worried Israel might kill him for criticizing them. I'm not gonna name names, but I was told by someone close to Charlie Kirk that Charlie thinks Israel will kill him if he turns against them.
And Charlie himself told Megyn Kelly a month before his assassination that he was afraid.
Speaker 5: But I am sick of being lectured on, like, you you have to see it exactly as we see it and support everything, or you're you're against us.
Speaker 3: Got texts about you, Megan. Why is Megan, like, doing the bidding of Hamas? I was like, what are you talking about? Megan's the best. And I said, why are you texting me about Megan?
This is what they don't understand. You and I, Megan, and Tucker is in the same category, and they've tried to go after Tucker. The more you attack our moral character, the actually, the more we're gonna double down in the direction because 100%. Don't do it that way. Okay?
On some part of the population, you can scold them into silence.
Speaker 0: But if
Speaker 3: I have any deviation of a purity test, any deviation whatsoever, such as hosting a focus group, right, Megan, with a bunch of our students that went viral, having Dave Smith or Tucker at my event, it is all of a sudden, oh, Charlie is a, he's he's no longer with us and all that. So wait a second. What do mean? What does with us mean exactly? Right?
Mhmm. I'm an American. Okay? Like, I I I represent this country. The more that you guys privately and publicly call our character into question, which is not isolated.
Right? I'm Megan, it would be one thing if it was one text or two text. It is dozens of texts. Yes. Then we start to say hold the boat here.
And and to be fair, some of my really good Jewish friends are like, that's not all of us. It's all. But these are leaders too, though. Right? These are these are stakeholders.
Right? I I'm I'm I'm afraid because, again, I want civilization to win. I feel the connection to Israel. And I but at the same time, simultaneously, when the hostile reaction is that now Meghan and Charlie are enemies Right. Boy, I'll tell you.
Like, you're you're you're you're you're gonna weaken and just basically deflate two of your strongest advocates if that continues.
Speaker 0: Now you might think it's weird that Israel would go to such lengths as to kill a former ally for even beginning to question them. But as several social media users have put it, given the influence and power Kirk had on over 3,500 college campuses across the country as the director of Turning Point USA, the very possibility that he could flip on them was a dangerous threat. The mere possibility that Kirk could start down the same path as Tucker and Candace is enough to send shivers down the spine of any Zionist with half a brain. Losing Kirk even to a moderate degree would represent a devastating blow to the Zionist power base in America.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Who's this running in the crowd with a hand gun? https://t.co/D9s33j1dNj
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
🚨 Move along, nothing to see here. Just the BBC reporting the collapse of WTC Building 7... 20 minutes before it actually collapsed... while it was still standing in the background. Yeah, not suspicious at all. https://t.co/RSiABWSGqD
Video Transcript AI Summary
At 10 PM London time on September 11, corresponding to 5 PM Eastern Standard Time, it was reported that the Salomon Brothers Building, also known as Building 7, had collapsed. The report stated the collapse was not a new attack but due to weakening from the morning's attacks and occurred a few hundred yards from the World Trade Center. However, Building 7 did not actually collapse until 5:20 PM New York time. A reporter on the scene stated details were sketchy and the area was closed off as rescue workers were doing their job. Building 7 was visible behind the reporter at the time of the live report.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: September 11, there was worldwide live television coverage and the coverage continued throughout the day. The interesting thing is that at 10PM London time, which is 5PM eastern standard time, they reported that the Solomon Brothers Building, Building 7 had collapsed. The only problem is Building 7 didn't collapse until 05:20PM New York time.
Speaker 1: Now, more on the latest building collapse New York. You might have heard a few moments ago, I was talking about the Salomon Brothers Building collapsing, and indeed it has. Apparently, that's only a few 100 yards away from where the World Trade Center Towers were. And it seems that this was not a result of a new attack. It was because the building had been weakened during this morning's attacks.
We'll probably find out more now about that from our correspondent Jane Stanley. Jane, what more can you tell us about the Salomon Brothers building and its collapse?
Speaker 2: Well, only really what you already know. Details are very, very sketchy. There's almost a sense downtown in New York behind me, down by the World Trade Centers of just an area completely closed off as the rescue workers try to do their job. As you can see behind me, the, trade center
Speaker 0: Building 7 is clearly visible right behind the reporter. It wasn't until 05:20 eastern time that it came down.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Here we go 😆 https://t.co/jFHFnnlnIC
Video Transcript AI Summary
Angel Dust reports from a financial convention in London, stating the purpose is to purchase homes for private equity. The speaker claims this is being done openly, but people are too distracted by social issues to notice.
The speaker asserts that in ten to fifteen years, individuals will be unable to buy houses because corporations will own all single-owner dwellings on the planet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What up, everybody? It's Angel Dust. I'm at a big financial convention in London. I'll be here for one day, and I'll be here working on purchasing homes for private equity so that we can exploit you more. That's the plan.
Look it up. We're doing it in public. We're not hiding it. You're just so concerned with stupid shit that you can't see it. We create a big fog in front of you with social issues, and then while you're beating your neighbor up.
I'm in London doing this. I was telling you guys, I'm not gonna change my stripes on a tiger. I am telling you guys what's going on. It's a courtesy. Some of you know why I'm doing it.
You can put it in the comments. Others don't understand, and, subsequently, they say, this can't be real. It's not real. Oh, it's fucking real, man. It's happening.
In ten to fifteen years, you will not be able to buy a house. We will own all of the houses on the planet. All of the single owner dwellings will be owned by corporations. Peace, blessings, and what? We're here.
Shine on.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Texas needs some help. Praying for you guys. https://t.co/6pc5ipbNJg
Video Transcript AI Summary
"My house is flooding, and I need help evacuating my bedridden, hospice-receiving father. He can't walk or move much. We've called 911, but they can't come. The water is bad in front of the house, like a river or lake. We've lost our cars and everything. We've lived here for thirty years, and this has never happened. If anyone has a boat, I need help getting my dad out. It's starting to smell like sewer in here."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. My house is flooding. Anybody out there? I have my dad on hospice, and I need to get him out of here. He's bedridden.
He can't walk. He can hardly move, and look where the water is. So somebody please, we've called 911. It's bad over here in front of the house. It's like a river.
I mean, it's like a lake. They they can't come. Look. Our we've lost our cars, everything. This we've lived here for thirty years, and this has never happened.
The there's so anybody, please, if you have a boat or something, I need help. I need to get my dad out of here. It's starting to smell like sewer in here.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
New 9/11 videos just popping up on tue internet. Fairfax County Police Department air unit inspecting the pentagon after the attack. https://t.co/TosBklyDtX
Video Transcript AI Summary
An airplane disintegrated, and the speaker wants a picture of it. The speaker directs Ken to put the picture up, specifying it should be straight down and from the inside where they can't see. The speaker acknowledges the smoke might be difficult but wants a close-up view. The speaker is switching to infrared to avoid the smoke and wants to assess the impact area, noting hot areas on either side and how far the plane penetrated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Traffic in the city. Wow. Okay. Did you get the picture? Get a picture, guess.
Ken, picture up, ten four. Airplane disintegrated. And it looks amazing. Straight down and from the inside where they can't see. I know the smoke are kind of hard to deal with, but you know, close-up so they can get a good look.
Okay, I'm gonna flip to infrared because the smoke isn't bothering the infrared, okay? We want to just back off, take a look at the impact area, see what areas are hot on either side, and the inner ring, how far back plane penetrated in. The first time
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Add this to the 9/11 pile of videos https://t.co/Vx6wOk2HbX
Video Transcript AI Summary
I was a maintenance worker at the World Trade Center. On 9/11, before the plane hit, we heard a very loud explosion that came from below. The walls cracked, the ceiling fell, and the sprinklers went off. People were screaming. I thought it came from the mechanical room in Basement 2.
About six or seven seconds later, we heard the plane hit the tower. These were two completely separate explosions. There were 14 people in the office who felt the same thing.
I testified to the 9/11 Commission behind closed doors, but they didn't include my story in the report. As the last man out, I was left out of the 9/11 Commission report.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: William Rodriguez was a maintenance worker at Number 2 World Trade Center. He has a story that not only contradicts the official 911 account, but shakes it to its very foundation.
Speaker 1: At, 08:46, while we're talking in front of the office, we hear an explosion very loud, which is upwards. Upwards. Upwards. All the walls shaped. They cracked.
The false ceiling fell on top of us. The sprinkler system got activated. Water started spewing everywhere. Everybody's screaming in horror. Oh my god.
Oh my god. Oh my god.
Speaker 2: Now was this a result from the plane hitting?
Speaker 1: No. No. No. This is before the plane hit in
Speaker 2: time. This so this explosion
Speaker 1: Came below. Well, the first thing that I thought it was that it came from the mechanical room that was on the Basement Number 2. I went to say, you know, it may be a when we hear all the way on the top of the building, and I speculated that it was the plane hitting the tower.
Speaker 2: So these two explosions were completely separate. Completely separate.
Speaker 0: The official nine eleven story says hijacked jets brought down the towers, not explosive devices.
Speaker 2: If you can remember, how much time would you say was between the two explosions?
Speaker 1: Six to seven seconds difference. That close. That close. And I wasn't the only one that felt this. There were the 14 people inside the office.
Speaker 2: Did all you people tell this to the nine eleven commission?
Speaker 1: I testify for the nine eleven commission behind closed doors. My testimony behind closed doors? Well, my speculation was that they didn't want the story to be out.
Speaker 2: How does the last man out get left out of the nine eleven commission report. We've definitely got the makings of a conspiracy.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Video Transcript AI Summary
Your family tree includes notable figures like George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush, FDR, Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, and Sarah Palin. You also have a connection to Joseph Smith Jr., the founder of the Church of Latter Day Saints. Interestingly, you didn’t know this before. Joseph Smith Jr. is often considered the main leader of the Mormons. Additionally, Ralph Waldo Emerson is part of your lineage. Just to clarify, the title of "king of the Mormons" doesn’t hold the same weight as the "king of kings." Let’s not dive into that topic just yet; it’s a bit early for preaching.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In fact, and I actually looked this up, your overall family includes George h w Bush, George w Bush, FDR, Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Sarah Palin Sarah. No wonder I'm her favorite Baldwin. Joseph Smith junior, the founder of the Church of Latter Day Saints. Wow. You must have known that.
I didn't know that. You didn't know that. I'm bringing this to you for the first time. But but junior, not the re not the head guy. Joseph Smith junior.
The real that's the main dude. I think that's the main guy. Yeah. Wow. Yeah.
The the king of the Mormons, basically. Ralph Waldo Emerson. And just so you know, whoever the king of the Mormons is, it's not as cool as the king of kings. Right. That's Don't get me started.
That's the other guy. Kid Chaney of lad. Right. Don't make me start preaching now, brother. It's too early in the interview.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Rise of the Phoenix another Illuminati hidden Gem for yall. The hat is symbolism. https://t.co/8QiO7b9iNr
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, friends. Steve Baldwin here to share important tech info about Elon Musk and Twitter. It's not a glitch; everything Twitter does is intentional. There are no glitches, just actions influenced by Elon Musk, the government, and other forces.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, friends. Steve Baldwin here to share some very important technology information with you about Elon Musk, Twitter, and x. You ready? It's not a glitch, y'all. Everything Twitter does, everything these people do is not a glitch.
It's not a glitch, guys. There's there's no glitches. No glitches. Only see, we're all the to Elon Musk and the government. And the Holy Ghost is about to come correct.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Video Transcript AI Summary
The after-action review of the COVID-19 pandemic reveals that a laboratory research-related accident is not a conspiracy theory. It criticizes various entities, including EcoHealth, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, and the Chinese government, while addressing issues like gain of function research. The document, spanning 557 pages, states that vaccine mandates lacked scientific support and that the Biden administration spread COVID misinformation. It labels Cuomo's March 25th order as medical malpractice and asserts that mask mandates and social distancing were ineffective, causing more harm than good, including during lockdowns. Released on December 2nd, this document significantly impacts the narrative surrounding the pandemic. Check it out for more details.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. This is huge. The coronavirus pandemic after action review of the COVID 19 pandemic, it literally says that this laboratory research related accident is not a conspiracy theory. It calls out eco health, scientific messaging. It calls out, New York governor, Andrew Cuomo.
It calls out the Chinese government. It calls out gain of function. It calls out the constitution cannot be suspended in times of crisis. So this would be freedom convoy stuff. Everything in here, this is gaining function information.
It's a 557 page document. Vaccine mandates were not supported by science. Public officials oh my goodness. I can't even the Biden administration, US government perpetrated COVID misinformation. Former New York governor Andrew Cuomo's March 25th order was medical malpractice.
Oh, mask mandates were ineffective. Six feet social distancing. Everything was causing more harm than good, including COVID 19 lockdowns. This is insane. This document is huge.
Transnational fraud, like, everything in here is just calling out what happened with the COVID 19 pandemic. And this was released December 2nd. This is a big full press release. It changes everything as far as conspiracy theorists are con are concerned. This is crazy.
So go check it out, you guys. I'm gonna put the link to it, in my bio. Go read this thing. I've been reading it all day long. Crazy.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Here is the full doc. I saw it posted down in the comments. https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf
Page not found - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
oversight.house.gov
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Where is Chuck Schumer? I know the people of NY call him out every chance they get. https://t.co/4eA6SjVQym
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Anyone seen Dr Fauci??? https://t.co/mb9IacNp7f
Video Transcript AI Summary
Diego Garcia is linked to the disappearance of the Malaysian plane, which carried scientists from the Texas Institute, some of whom had valuable patents worth $400 million. If these scientists died before their patents were granted, their rights could be transferred to someone else. The patents involved technology that could control people without injections, simply through exposure to a specific scent. This situation highlights a complex and sinister game at play, where significant advancements and potential control mechanisms are suppressed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's one of the most evil, vicious navy bases in the history of the planet. They do stuff that will make look like Santa Claus. Doctor Deanna Garcia. So wait. Wait.
Wait. Wait. Wait. Sorry. Diego Garcia.
That's where that first Malaysian plane is. That's what it went. You had 4 scientists. Twenty scientists, but 4 had filed for patents. It was malady, but they worked out of Austin, Texas for Texas Institute.
And the ones behind that plane was Texas Institute to govern born, who made the money. And everybody was stupid enough to believe that a plane, almost a block long, can just disappear. But the electronics we have, all the technology. So we got 4 of those topsiders that had powerful patents worth 4 $100,000,000. So if 1, 2, 3 of us and your brother, 4, we filed for patents.
And then there's a friend of yours who's with us. So 5 of us. If we die before the patent is granted, then your brother who wasn't on the plane with us, he knows tomorrow. So those 4 scientists and the 5th person was to call out who couldn't. They were all not.
And so what I'm saying is, this is this is a game. And if you can't follow that thread, then you don't you don't see it. It's crazy. But with the suppress it. What were the patents for?
Well, the patents was you heard people talk about they're gonna one day inject you and can control you. Well, these guys come up with something they don't have to inject. They just put in this room and you come in and you smell it. Yes. That's what they're for.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Listen closely https://t.co/3n9CIopbvd
Video Transcript AI Summary
I became a freemason to enter hardcore satanism, selling my soul to the devil. Hell was seen as a perpetual party. To advance in satanism, I needed to recruit 7 people to sell their souls and return to being a Catholic priest. This path was necessary to become a satanic priest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I had to become a freemason because you can't get involved in satanism on the hardcore level without first being a freemason. That was my official shrine portrait, which they took as part of my initiation. I was ready to become involved in hardcore satanism. What did that mean? Well, that meant I had to sell my soul to the devil.
I had to sign my name on the contract in blood. I had to sign my name in the black book. God understands, honey. The satanic doctrine here is that hell is not what we believe it is or what the Bible teaches it is. The satanic doctrine is that hell is this incredible party.
It's like a through all eternity, and it's party hearty time. But before I could get on to the priesthood of satanism, excuse me, I had to get 7 people to sell our souls to the devil. The other thing I had to do, and this might astonish some of you, is I had to become a Catholic priest. I had to go back to my original vocation because you cannot be a satanic priest unless, first of all, you're a Catholic priest. And if that surprises you, I just suggest that you go and you read some of the medieval literature.
You'll see that that is in fact the case.
@Skriptkeeper17 - SkriptkeeperElect
Well if this doesn’t wake you up Nothing will. Remember they said the ending isn’t for everyone? https://t.co/86G7BiQkgY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lee planned to storm the US Capitol on January 6th after practicing at other state capitals. He claimed to be a Trump supporter but later criticized Trump. The "Stop the Steal" movement aimed to demonize the enemy. There were discussions about Trump's decisions and strategies, including potential surveillance tactics. Some believed Trump was strategic and ahead of others, while others tried to manipulate him into signing martial law. The overall tone was one of suspicion and intrigue surrounding political motivations and actions.
Translation: Lee planned to storm the US Capitol on January 6th after practicing at other state capitals. He claimed to be a Trump supporter but later criticized Trump. The "Stop the Steal" movement aimed to demonize the enemy. There were discussions about Trump's decisions and strategies, including potential surveillance tactics. Some believed Trump was strategic and ahead of others, while others tried to manipulate him into signing martial law. The overall tone was one of suspicion and intrigue surrounding political motivations and actions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lee had been organizing protests inside capitol buildings in other states. It was apparent that he was planning to do a siege on the US Capitol on January 6th.
Speaker 1: Revolution. Revolution.
Speaker 0: Using other state capitals for practice dry runs. We're gonna be ready to storm
Speaker 1: the capital with us in a couple of minutes. We're all actors, but I wanna direct and act.
Speaker 0: He says he's a Trump supporter. Right?
Speaker 1: Trump, would you shut up? Would you shut up? Rhetorically, Trump was retarded. Trump was just annoying.
Speaker 0: Well, that's exactly how you would do it. Think about it.
Speaker 1: Stop the seal is not just a political movement. It's not just a it's not even a Trump movement. It's not a Trump movement.
Speaker 0: You become the face of your enemy so that when the media demonizes you, they're actually demonizing your enemy.
Speaker 1: I'm done with this president. I'm support I'm gonna go public supporting impeachment. I have no choice. He has to go. He has to go.
Run again. You'll get your fucking brains beaten. No. I think it's really bad for the movement. It's real this hurts.
It doesn't help. I I don't I don't know. I'm not sure what they thought they were going to achieve. Roger as well. He suggested to you if you may have run for president.
Is that the No.
Speaker 2: No. Don't worry about that.
Speaker 1: Time. About
Speaker 2: that. One
Speaker 1: day at a time. One day at a time. Love you, man. Thank you, general. You where you don't wanna go into politics, would you consider the vice presidential nod?
Hey. Hey. So let's get one thing straight here with Trump. Trump started to make a decision about what did he what does he believe he must do.
Speaker 3: Kind of try to get in their mind. You have to understand how they eat, how they walk, how they talk, what they like, what pushes their buttons, what drives them nuts, what upsets them, what makes them happy, and then you use that to your advantage to push whatever ideology or product or direction you want them to go. So if I wanna blackmail you and put you under my thumb, not only will I know everything, but I will know your deepest darkest fears. I will know people I can get in contact to find out more about you. Maybe you had, like, an old hockey injury.
So if I wanted to attack you, I'd know where to hit you.
Speaker 2: Believe Donald Trump knows everything. Michael Flynn was tied to NSO between Obama and when he came into the Trump administration. NSO produced Pegasus, a surveillance software for phones. I noted that the, quote, unquote, Biden person, whoever it is, imposed a restriction on any American business doing business with NSO. I think Donald Trump knows.
Speaker 4: You understand enough about someone and you can hack their shadow. Right? You can use you can you can use their fears. You can use their anxieties.
Speaker 2: So the answer is yes. I could be wrong. I pray that I'm right. But I think that's why people don't understand some of the things that president Trump does. They look at it and go, why would he endorse that person?
Trust him that he has a reason. If I'm right, and I believe I am, that he's 20 steps ahead of everybody, he knows where he's going. He has not left. Why did Michael Flynn say Trump gave up on us? No.
He did not. He's still fighting. Why did Mike Flynn and Sydney Powell and Patrick Byrne try to get president Trump in December to sign martial law publicly? Because if they had done that and if he had done that, the country would have gone into a civil war because even half of the people that voted for Trump had been brainwashed to believe that he lost and that he was gonna try to coup the country with the military. They tried to set him up.
He didn't bite. So if I were Mike Flynn, I wouldn't sleep well at night.