TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Skydive888
reSee.it AI Summary
This 10-part documentary by Janet Ossebaard explores topics such as politics, Wikileaks, the Q-phenomenon, child trafficking, media manipulation, and the Q & Anons Truth Movement. It aims to uncover the truth behind the world's current state. The documentary provides an in-depth analysis and explanation of these subjects.
@Skydive888 - Skydive
FALL OF THE CABAL THE END OF THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT... The Fall of the Cabal (1) 2020 Documentary by award winning researcher Janet Ossebaard. - Beginning the search for the Truth, Left & Right in politics, Wikileaks, the inauguration of Donald J. Trump, and the birth of the Q-phenomenon... - A 10 part documentary that does an impressive job at researching, stitching together and explaining the great mess the world is in. Part 1 - THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO HMMMMM... https://t.co/1k7fGKegX9 Part 2 - DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE with the Q-phenomenon https://t.co/R8XJv3WD10 Part 3 - THE ALIEN INVASION as NWO AGENDA https://t.co/fkWDMQCRpg Part 4 - CHILD-LOVERS EVERYWHERE - Haiti as child trafficking island https://t.co/ZF6nv0d5t2 Part 5 - CHILDREN, ART & PIZZA https://t.co/72XDJJO8hm Part 6 - MAJOR MEDIA MANIPULATION, FAKENEWS = TREASON https://t.co/1VbAjC0CtA Part 7 - WITCHES & WARLOCKS https://t.co/ZFDjoS2jTs Part 8 - ADRENOCHROME - SATANIC DEATH CULT BEYOND KINGS, QUEENS & THE ELITES https://t.co/o1kYcr7xAL Part 9 - THE DAWN OF A NEW WORLD - the Q & Anons Truth Movement https://t.co/hS8QHMTmrY Part 10 - THE RETURN OF THE KING https://t.co/q3yzI3pKOW
@Skydive888 - Skydive
The Great Taking -- Documentary Final step leading to the Zionist Great Reset world takeover. This is what brings it all together, makes it hard to stop. Incredibly devious. Please watch and share.
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Webb, a former finance professional, shares his insights on the current state of the global financial system. He explains how the creation of money by central banks has outpaced real economic growth, leading to a breakdown in the transmission mechanism between money creation and economic activity. Webb believes that this breakdown in the velocity of money is the underlying reason for many geopolitical issues. He also discusses the changes in banking and securities laws that have allowed for the control and confiscation of collateral by secured creditors. Webb emphasizes the need for public banking and the dismantling of the private control of central banks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is David Webb. I live in Stockholm, Sweden. I'm on a small farm here. It's important to understand I am not giving financial advice. The book I've done has a greater purpose than that.
I am not active in the markets. I'm not short the market. I am in things like farmland. I was managing public equities and ultimately hedge funds through the aftermath Of the Asian financial crisis, the lead up to the .com bubble and bust. And I noticed that fund flows We're very large relative to the size of the US economy, for example, or the global economy.
So I started to look at the Scale of money creation by the Federal Reserve. And I developed the insight that the Fed was actually influencing saying the financial markets, which no one would be surprised at today. But at that time, it was considered conspiracy theory even by my This was something I could not talk to people about, but I began studying it myself. And I saw that in individual weeks, The scale of new money created was on the order of 1% of US GDP or more. Now what that meant, Given that the US economy was growing at maybe 3% or 4% in a good year, to have money creation And on that scale in a single week, it meant that the money creation was far outstripping any real economic growth.
So the transmission mechanism for money creation into real economic activity was breaking down. This is when I started becoming concerned and started following this closely. And it actually developed into a way for me to navigate the markets. So I applied it and I managed to protect people who I was responsible to as my clients through the .com bubble and bust and did very well through that period armed with this understanding. But the bigger understanding was that the Velocity of money was collapsing.
And I knew at that time, this is over 20 years ago, that we were headed into Something like the time that the world experienced through the period of the great wars and the great depression because this kind of velocity of money was occurring at that time. So I went into this deeply and studied everything that was happening leading into the a century saw that this provided the best analogous period for understanding what we were entering then. So I have followed this very closely. I have applied it in my work in what I was doing. So I had an effective understanding of it.
The important thing to understand now is that the velocity of money, which is the relationship between economic growth and money or money creation, Money supply has broken down and is now at a lower level velocity of money than it was at any point during the Great depression and the world wars. So I believe that this is actually the profound underlying reason For the many things we are seeing geopolitically. I grew up in a family of medical people and engineers. They were not involved In high finance. As a boy, I went through basically the beginning of the industrial collapse Of Cleveland.
They say that people strive to get control over what has hurt them. And I grew up with a real need to understand what was destroying us because It deeply affected my family, which had been very happy prior to this. A happy, benevolent family, And it literally destroyed the place where I grew up. So I decided to study business and finance. This was something my My father did not want me to do.
He thought I should be an engineer. And when I was younger, I thought I would have been a medical doctor, but this became the pressing thing for me to understand. So I studied finance and computer science. I got a subscription to The Wall Street Journal. I had no one to guide me.
I just started looking at the Wall Street Journal, and I noticed these tombstones, which announced the big mergers positions, deals, or financing that all these firms were in New York. So I decided at a young age, I needed to go to New York. And I got a job with a computer services firm. I could program. I had studied systems analysis and finance.
So in this 1st year as a young guy, I went into perhaps literally every financial firm in New York City with the Sales teams. So that helps a person, I think, to begin to understand things on an intuitive just by seeing things. It's not so intimidating once you've been into these places. Things are intimidating if you've never encountered them. So that all happened in my 1st year.
And then one of my clients, which was mergers and acquisitions group, There 2 analysts were leaving. 1 was going to Harvard Business School. The other was going to the London office. And the sales Guy that I worked with on that account came back and told me that they needed someone with a background in finance Computers, and I realized at that time that was gonna be me. So I talked with my wife about it.
I showed up at this office so early the next day. Nobody was There, I had to wait about an hour for people to start coming in and they were shocked that I thought that I had any business suggesting that I could work there. They proceeded to put me through a shocking, Stressful morning. I was ushered into one of the senior vice presidents who listened to what I had to say, and And then he said, well, you better be sure you wanna do this because if you fuck up, you're gone. By the time I left, I thought maybe this wasn't such a good idea.
I probably shouldn't have bothered. You know, sure enough, they called back. They needed me because I knew how to do things. So I worked M and A mergers and acquisitions for 5 years in this firm. It was working literally around the clock, Sometimes for days with no sleep or maybe just lying on the office floor for half an hour to get up and continue.
So I learned to deal with a lot of stress with little sleep through this period of time. And then I managed to move to What was then the biggest private equity firm in the world by an order of magnitude. I chose to go there Rather than say, I had another offer from mergers and acquisitions group at L. F. Rothschild that would have been for about twice compensation, but I sense that there was gonna be a crash of some kind.
And a month later It was Black Monday, October of 87, and LF Rothschild was wiped out, lost all of its capital. I really went to this private equity firm because when you're doing M and A, it's basically being a glorified salesman. You're an agent. When you're in the Shoes of the private equity investment firm, you were the principal. It's a different kind of due diligence and analysis.
And I was there for 3 years, but it was very intensive 3 years. And shortly after I had started with the firm, I ended up running the acquisition of this long distance telephone company. I handled all of it Because the partner on the deal had difficulty with stress, and he literally went home and stayed in bed for 6 months. I handled all the due diligence, which was very complicated and the financing. And it ended up being the Largest capital gain in the history of the firm, but it was very stressful for my family because once again, I was working Around the clock, I would get up to negotiations on Saturday morning, late into 3 in the morning, Saturday I sleep for a few hours, start again on Sunday morning.
This went on for 9 months. When it was over, it took a few months, but my wife Eventually said to me, you know, if I knew our life was gonna be like this, I wouldn't have signed up for it. And that just crushed me. I got out a road atlas of the US. We went through it page by page and just thought about where could we go, where could we be happy?
I couldn't stay in that. There was a possibility I would go to their London office, but I knew that would even be more intense. It would just be more of the same. Once I've Done something. I don't need to keep doing it.
I learned what I have to learn from it. I think I am different than other people in this financial world because I actually don't care about the money. That is not why I'm doing it. That should just kind of fall out of what you're doing, and you don't need a lot of it. There's no reason that you need more and more and more.
I was always driven by understanding things, and that actually gave me an advantage. I understood things that other people didn't. So ultimately, we just decided to go back to Cleveland where I grew up, and we bought a house that was within the sound of the church bells where my grandfather's house was. My memory from Sundays when my dad would take us to grandpa's house. So I was really going home to try to make things sane, But the intensity returned.
Again, as I got into managing in the public markets, I had this insight that The public markets were even less efficient than the private markets because you had these big fund flows that were pushing things way up beyond where a negotiated deal would ever be done and driving prices down below where it would be done. You got better opportunities to both buy and sell things. I ended up ultimately running this hedge fund strategy that I Create it. So I designed the trading desk. I trained the people, developed this team trading strategy.
Through the .com bubble and the bus, we were typically in 3 to 400 positions at the same time. I had developed A strategy to be short the market using hundreds of positions so that all these crazy .com stocks, no one Position could kill us. But with all of these positions, we had a kind of visibility into the market and the fund flows And what was happening? We were doing exceptionally well. People couldn't figure out how we were doing so well.
So we had these consultants coming from literally all over the world flying into Cleveland and coming to the Office, the macro thing I was looking at was this rate of money growth. It's always growing, whether it was Accelerating or decelerating. And I knew we had maybe a day or two lead time. Once I saw the figures to get positioned ahead of the market rolling over or the market accelerating upwards, And other people didn't understand this. Even if I explained it to them, they didn't wanna hear about it.
They didn't know how to apply it. It was like that. In addition that I've always operated with a mental model of what is happening in the world. And I suppose I'm different than other people and that the Things I pay attention to is what does not fit my model. That is what can kill you.
So I pay attention to what does not make sense to me. What does not fit? You have to drop everything. Imagine you're in a highly leveraged position with hundreds of positions. When something comes up that does not fit, you pay attention to that immediately.
So the trading room was a newsroom, A research operation, so we paid attention to things 2nd by 2nd, and We would dig into things that did not make sense. So through this period of time, I also started changing, I think, as a person The peak because I was seeing things that were not in the narrative, the news narrative that people were Tempting about what was happening, so I knew that economic data series were being changed. This is after September 11th, as well as all the disconnects around September 11th itself. So it was the beginnings of my Becoming a kind of activist, although I didn't know it, I wrote quarterly letters to my clients. So I assembled things on my desk.
They would accumulate, and I eventually had something like a thick telephone book of just the things that I knew in and it documented that did not conform with the accepted narratives that people were being shown through the media. And I then Thinned this down to a thinner telephone book and literally started going door to door to my neighbors. And what I was doing was I was Seeing how I could get through to people, how could I explain this? And it's damn difficult. Basically, It doesn't work.
I decided that maybe my neighbors were too well off to be able to hear about this. So I actually went out to a Four area, and the guy was sitting on his front porch, and he was interested in what I was doing because I was still in a business suit. I explained it to him, And he just said, good luck, man. But in this voice of someone who really knew already and had a kind of resignation that there was much you can about it. So it's been a long journey for me trying to expose things.
I was expecting that there were going to be large scale insolvencies after the housing bubble. I was aware of what happened during the housing bubble and how that was engineered. In 2003, I met with George Soros. I showed him a Chart of the growth in asset backed securities, and I told him that this would be the basis of the next bubble and collapse. And he said to me, you're crazy.
So he either did not know that or he did not want to acknowledge it at that time in 2003. So what was happening was tremendous growth in the derivatives complex. So I started becoming concerned about derivatives in the very early 2000s in the aftermath of the .com bubble. At that time, The derivatives complex was about twice global GDP. By 2007, it was 10 times Global GDP that growth in maybe 5 or 6 years.
So the financialization was outstripping any real thing on earth already at that point. And this growth in asset backed Securities. What was happening was that the process of doing any credit underwriting, the moorings had been slipped, And this was done by design. Prior to this, banks would do credit underwriting, meaning they wouldn't want to get repaid money they had loans, so they would do Some analysis of whether the borrower could repay it. But during this period of time, the banking industry went to securitization of loans.
So it became a business of originating loans without any concern as to whether they could be Okay. The loans were all packaged up whether they were triple a loans or subprime loans or boat loans or Car loans, anything. These pools were stratified. Now if you think of it, you had a top 20%, the next twenty percent and so on down to bottom. And the idea was that any defaults would hit the bottom rated tranche first.
So for the defaults in that pool to reach the top of the pool, the top 20%, you'd have to blow through 80% of all the capital in the pool. So the top was rated triple a. Just structurally, they do that. The problem was no one wanted to buy the lower rated tranches. So they then used An aspect of the derivatives market, the credit default obligation, CDO, to buy the default protection for the lower rated tranches.
Then they could sell the entire pool as AAA. So this was done through as Greenspan called it, the miracles of modern finance. And he said, presumably, the risk will be borne by those best able to bear that risk at the time. So because it could all be sold as AAA and the yields were better than Treasuries and the fed was creating so much liquidity. These pools were then sold 10 times over on a modeled synthetic basis also in the derivatives market.
And so while the banks knew that they did not wanna eat their own cooking. The stuff that they had originated, they were buying The assets, this is the nature of a bubble. The people that know it's a fraud are still consuming the stuff that is being created through the same process. So the asset side of the balance sheets of banks were these securities that were being created through the same process. It reached a point where Credit default obligations alone were about 10% of the derivatives complex.
By the time the great financial crisis kicked off In 2008 and 2009, 10%. So credit to fallout obligations alone were the size of the global Now I wondered who is signing up to take that default risk. In the early stages, people are saying, well, the problem here is maybe in the 100 It's billions. They were off by an order of magnitude. It was in the tens of trillions.
So as the Fed were injecting all of this created money into the banks. It eventually became clear that the default risk had been taken by hedge fund subsidiaries within the banks themselves. So they enabled this whole thing by creating The entities within the banks that would take the other side of the default risk. And then when the collapse occurred, they were given the money to paper over that loss. The fed has murky powers that people don't know about until they decide to make it visible.
One of their powers is to create Entities out of nothing, you just create a limited liability company, and then the Fed can loan money, create money, and put it into that entity. It's completely off balance sheet. It doesn't have to be disclosed anywhere. But in this case, they did. They created something called Maiden Lane, which is a street I I sometimes walk down in this other district of Manhattan and the financial district.
So Maiden Lane was extended. This created money To buy these problematic positions out of the bags, take them off the hands of the banks. And there was so much of this problematic stuff that they then created a maiden lane 2 and a maiden lane 3. And who knows what else was created that we were not told about? So in 2008, I noticed The 1st failure of a broker dealer.
So I was expecting there to be a lot of insolvencies, and I was paying attention. And the thing that shocked me was that the client accounts in this broker dealer We're encumbered in the bankruptcy estate of the broker that never could have happened before. In all of the history of securities. They were personal property. And if the broker failed, you would say, I'm sorry, you're out of business.
Here's where you can transfer my assets. That did not happen in this case. So I started digging into what could possibly have changed, and this was as serious As a heart attack, given that we were going into this meltdown at that time, that's when I Discovered it had been done through changes to the uniform commercial code in the United States. This had been done in all 50 dates. So it was something that could be done very quietly over a long period of time and did not have to be done at the federal level, didn't draw attention.
What they did was to create a new legal construct of a security entitlement. Now prior to this, as I said, securities for 400 years were personal property. This concept of a security entitlement severed that. That's its purpose. So what people then have in institutions and in pension funds, even sophisticated investors, all they have is an entitlement.
It's a claim. It's a contractual claim, which is very weak in the event of insolvency. So it's an appearance of ownership. It's sometimes referred to as beneficial ownership, which sounds nice. But what it means is that You receive dividends.
You receive a proxy. You are the owner of title. You can of course, you can buy it and sell it, But you can see in documents that I've found that the legal owner is actually the entity that controls the Security with a secured interest. They are the legal owners of the property. So now you have a contractual claim.
Next, all of the Securities are held in pooled form, so you have no specific identification. It used to be that with paper certificates, they were numbered. You had a specific numbered bond or stock share certificate. So now they're fungible, fungible bulk, book entry Form pooled further, we know and it is absolutely irrefutable from the Fed's own response to a questionnaire from the EU that even segregated accounts, even people or institutions instead of being told that their securities are segregated are in the same pool and entitled to only a Pro rata share in the event of an insolvency of the custodian. So again, segregation is just an appearance.
People are told that it's an absolute subterfuge. And the shocking thing is that even sophisticated institutional investors do not understand this or they don't want to know it. Further, even if fraud, outright fraud is committed by the custodian. That does not obviate the ability of the secured creditors to take the securities from these Bulls ahead of the people who thought they owned them. Then there was in 2005, a change to the bankruptcy law in The United States creating something called safe harbor.
Again, that sounds nice, but what safe harbor means is safe harbor for The secured creditors to take the client assets and to make that absolutely certain that even in the event of fraud, they will take the client assets. So prior to this change in bankruptcy law, there is something called fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance. And the Trustee, the bankruptcy trustee had a duty to claw back any assets that have been fraudulently transferred. So this change was made in 2005. And then with the failure of Lehman others.
This was cemented in case law, and we can see the judgment by the bankruptcy court related to this. What happened there was that JPMorgan was both the custodian for the client assets and the secured creditor that took the client assets, which prior to 2005, everything that happened there would have been constructively fraudulent. But the bankruptcy judge, this is the Southern District of New York, which is Manhattan, found in favor of JPMorgan. That JPMorgan absolutely He was entitled to take client assets. The only question was whether JPMorgan was an entitled person, basically to take the client assets.
This is an important point because it's not all secured creditors that have this power to take the client assets. It is only the very biggest banks that are entitled to take the client assets. So they don't want anyone else elbowing in there to take anything. Only they will take them. And in this judgment, the judge asked the question, Is JPMorgan a member of the protected class?
Used explicitly those words And said quite obviously as one of the biggest banks in the world, biggest financial institutions, JPMorgan is quite obviously a member of the protected To see this in a bankruptcy case law from the court, I think that's pretty strong stuff. It's Like that document directly from the fed provided to the legal certainty group. This is hard to refute. A custodian has the records of who owns what. It's in their books and records, but that's all it is.
It is the records. The system has been changed so that the property itself is then transferred up to a higher level and held in pool form. So you deal with your broker to execute a trade to buy or sell nothing, and you get a representation of an account that shows you what you have in it. But the assets are not held even at what you think is your custodian. It's Transfer to a higher level in the US.
That is the depository trust corp, which holds all securities in the United States in pool form. So the brokers themselves are low down in the food chain. In Europe, there are central security at the national level. They'd give an appearance of a registry of ownership at the national level, but by law, Under something called the Central Security Depository Regulation, CSDR, which was imposed in fourteen. By law, these securities are transferred by a mandatory link to an international central securities depository.
So they want cross border mobility of the collateral to occur. So in Sweden, for example, you have a local registry, but then the securities go up to Euroclear Belgium. So So they are subject to Belgian law, not Swedish law at that level. And then the collateral is transported To underpin the derivatives complex, which is housed at the central clearing counter parties. The acronym is the CCPs.
So this is the purpose to take the collateral up to this central clearing counterparty level. And we know from a BIS document that is now over 10 years old that The systems are in place for the movement of this collateral on a global basis nearly instantaneously, Especially in a crisis to be swept to meet the collateral demands of the system, the secured creditors. Also associated with this, we have to understand derivatives used to be bilateral, you knew When you entered into a contract who your counterparty was and you look to the credit quality of that counterparty, they were on the other side in the name of reducing risk, they actually increased risk. They created a monolithic risk because they forced central clearing so that the CCP is the counterparty on all derivatives contracts. The Central clearing parties are the counterparties.
Now what does that mean if the central clearing party itself fails? That means there is no counterparty there to honor the derivative contracts for all manner of things, but especially people that think that they have hedged their downside risk in the collapse. There's no counterparty, and the central clearing parties have been deliberately undercapitalized. So in Europe and the US, There are discussions by the participants themselves about the possibility of the central clearing parties failing. In the last few years, there have been discussions of And if you look at DTC itself, which houses all the securities in the US securities complex Ann is the central clearing party for most derivatives.
They have discussion of how they will Start over again when the central clearing party collapses and explicitly that they will not put more capital behind it, But they have prefunded the startup of a new central clearing party when one of the existing ones fails. So it's essentially planned, and the entire capital base of depository trust, so essentially, the entire US securities complex is housed there in all derivatives. The entire capital is $3,500,000,000. Individual banks have derivative positions the size of the global GDP. So something will happen to trigger this collapse implosion.
I would say the cake is already baked at this time. It's been made to happen because to take interest rates After having kept them at 0 for 15 years, which was insane to begin with and did not have to happen, It's made to happen. And then in essentially a year to take that back to over 5%. And if you're noticing they're not stopping, the rates are continuing up. I'll go through what that means For the global financial system, when interest rates were at 5%, if a bond paid $5 to simplify this.
Let's say it's a perpetuity, which means you don't have to take into account a maturity date. So if it pays $5, it's worth $100. We would pay $100 for that because interest rates are 5%. Now if interest rates are driven down by the central bank to 1% and the bond still pays $5, Now 5 is 1% of $500. So the value of the bond goes up fivefold by dropping interest This rates like that.
And it was even further because they took it to 0. So this is the source of the bubble, the financial bubble that we've experienced, the everything bubble as some people call it. And the entire financial System is basically a perpetuity. So everything is based on discounting cash flows. So all real State, the entire stock market is based on discounting back theoretical future cash flows from companies as well as bonds.
Now if you do a round trip on this and you take interest rates back from 1% back to over 5%, which is something like what has happened here. You reverse the entire thing, and you have an 80% fall in value Of everything, everything, all commercial real estate, the stock market, everything. Now imagine what happens to you if you own these things on leverage, If you borrowed to own these things, that's the problem. So the entire run up, the entire bubble was artificial, and the decline Mine will be something like a decimation where indexes will go to maybe 10% of the peak because a lot of things will just go out of business. And this is what happened with the whole .com sector when that bubble collapsed.
This is what happened in the 19 thirties. This is what happened to the Nikkei with Japan. All bubbles end this way. And when you step back and look at them, it's like a very sharp mountain peak that goes into, like, a needle blow off, and you get a 1st break and then a second run for the top that fails, and that's where we are now. If you step back and you look at something like the NASDAQ index, the 2nd top that's failing now, which is understandable given that bond yields are continuing straight up.
So when this begins imploding, the insolvencies will increase due to the level of debt. And there will be an automatic call for more collateral that will be transferred into to the derivatives complex in the central clearing counterparties. But the central clearing counterparties are themselves likely Exposed to the collapse because I say to people that you may think that you've Hedge your exposure to a decline here, but you've done it through the derivatives complex. So the risk is in the derivatives complex. It doesn't disappear, Here doesn't go away.
It's all there. And this pain will accumulate in the central clearing counter parties, and then they will fail. And they're basically telling us they will fail. And when that happens, the people that thought that they had hedged their exposure included the most Cated institutions and the pension funds will have no protection, and the secured creditors will take all of the underlying Stocks and bonds, which then gives them control of all public corporations. And once you control the capitalization structure, you then control all of the underlying real things.
So this is something like what happened in the 19 thirties When there was distress globally everywhere due to debt levels, and you would think that there were no winners, But there were because the banks that were controlled by the Federal Reserve, for example, in the US, were Slated to survive, 9,000 banks in the United States were forced into failure. The people who had money in those Banks lost all their cash, but their debts were not canceled. Their debts were then consolidated into the Federal Reserve System and Enforced. So people that were in debt were in trouble. Even wealthy people lost everything.
The difference this time around is they're not going after just property that is encumbered by debt. They've engineered this so they can take things, all securities as collateral from people and entities that have no borrowings against them. They own them clear and outright. Now let me give you an example as analogy to explain the horror of this. So you have bought a car and you paid cash for it.
You think you're being very conservative. You have no debt against the car. But Unbeknownst to you, the dealer continues to control your car as collateral. You're not told this, the dealer uses your car and all the other cars sold by the dealer as collateral for his borrowing in his business. Now the dealer goes bust and only certain Secured creditors are empowered to immediately take your car and all the cars ever sold by the Dealer without any judicial review immediately.
When I describe this to people, they get worried about their Cars, this is not about your car. This is an analogy for what has been done. It's much worse than this being about your car because it is Literally about the entire securities complex globally. So it is not about your insolvency See, that causes the loss of your assets. It's the insolvency of the people that secretly used your collateral As their property, without telling you that or disclosing it.
How could this happen legally? It's a good question, and perhaps there is some hope for humanity in avoiding this, in challenging this whole construct because it is a construct. None of this is real. There are real things in the world. This is not a real thing, But they will try to convince us that, well, I'm sorry.
You've lost everything. It's an elaborate story. So, yes, they have changed law. Can that be challenged? That's what has to happen.
So this was the process. They changed it in the uniform commercial code. This was beginning in 1994. The efforts to affect this Actually, go back further than that into the 19 sixties when they began the process of dematerialization of securities to hold them all electronically, which some people were suspicious about then, and they were right to be suspicious. It is clear that that beginning process was literally run by the CIA, and this is not conspiracy theory.
The man who was Charged with forming the depository trust corp to do this in his own memoir and in interviews discloses that he was a career CIA operative from the time he was a young man. So there was a grand Strategic purpose behind this, they've been able to do it because it has been run from the highest levels of the US government. So the involvement of the CIA, then when this construct of the securities entitlement was put into the uniform commercial code that was pushed Through all 50 states done quietly. That change was made in 1994. So it took Maybe 10 years to get it done in all the states, then they changed the bankruptcy law in 2005, and then it was ready to go with the testing of the Lehman Brothers case in 2008.
So there's a plan that's executed over decades to do this. Then they began a process of harmonization, which was to force this model in law globally, and they did this through the EU. The first discussion and documents The EU is in 2002, so that's when the process was beginning then in the aftermath of the .com bus And the EU created something they call the legal certainty group. And, again, that sounds like a good thing, but what they mean is legal certainty that the secured creditors will take the client assets. And they worked at this for years figuring out how to subvert local law.
When you think about it, rights Property is kind of a sacred thing. It's something that all people should care about. And oddly enough, even the people Participating in making this happen should care about this in a big way. So therein lies the hope of addressing this. We can come back to that.
But the legal certainty group identified the problematic local law, and then it took Maybe another 10 years to come up with this CSDR regulation, Central Securities depository regulation 2014 that mandated the transport of the collateral from the local or the national level central securities depository, wherever people think They own their things outright. Their record of ownership is there, and the securities depository level and then on to the central clearing counterparties. So it has been done in law. It's been done legally. It must be attacked legally.
It must be dismantled legally. The power behind all of this is the private control of the central banks. And when you look around the world, they are all privately controlled. You were not allowed to know actually Who controls the Federal Reserve and how it is controlled? We know that it is controlled somehow by I set a banks.
So there is some kind of an ownership structure that extends through the banks that own and control the fed. But something like this is done in all central banks around the world. If you notice, any country Tree that has attempted to have a national bank is literally attacked and destroyed. They're not allowed to exist. So It is linked with the war machine, this private control of money, the intelligence agencies, the militaries globally Would not be able to function as they are if they weren't linked with this money creation power.
We now know that when we were It's perhaps we thought that the money you borrow from the bank is someone else's savings that they're giving you. It's a zero sum game. I think we now know with the scale of the money created during the COVID period that that is not the case. The scale outstrips any real world activity, and it's just created out of thin air. So this is the power that controls everything.
They control All political parties, all governments, all the major corporations, the media, and this was the case leading into the a century in this period when the velocity money was collapsing, that is basically a collapse of their control whole system. The money is a very sophisticated control system because it requires almost no Energy input. People are directed by chasing money incentives. But this power through chronic overuse, When it reaches this point where no matter how much money is created, it's not translating into actual economic growth, then it goes into a financial bubble and then you get the major collapse of the whole system, then they must have a plan and to stay in control through that collapse, which will require physical control over people through the reset because the money control system has broken down. So this is why you have a period of terrible instability.
So as we were entering the 20th That tree, velocity money was collapsing that the Qing dynasty collapsed. It's a global phenomenon that ended dynastic rule in China. Then in the During 1914 and 1918, the Turk Ottoman Empire collapsed, the Austro Hungarian Empire, the Russian Empire, Germany was destroyed, Lloyd and the British Empire had passed at Zenith and was really collapsing at that point. So it's a global collapse. And the people that Rolled the banking power through that, managed to stay in control, and they did it by subjugating populations.
It's not about taking their money. It's not about taking their stuff, which they don't need. It's about suppression and subjugation. And that's The lesson when you look at this period in the 19 thirties, and that is what they have planned For this kind of a cycle again, and they've set up for it. So this plan to take all collateral globally And to collapse the system in a kind of controlled demolition where they end up controlling everything.
This Design was set in motion over 50 years ago. It may have had a longer planning horizon than that, but we can see actual concrete steps beginning in 1960s with dematerialization. So when this is unfolding, this This wave of insolvencies, and it creates an urgency to take the collateral. People will be Terrified. They will be panicked, and we know that fear shuts down critical thinking.
So, people will be in panic mode. I've always been Trusted in what happened in the thirties because of talking about these things with my father who lived through that. And what I saw happening in Cleveland when I was boy. I'd try to talk with anyone who had lived through that time. And I asked my aunt, what had happened in the thirties.
And she said, well, suddenly, no one had any money. And I said, what do you mean? How could that be? And she said, well, no one had money and even wealthy families didn't have any money. And she knew families in which their daughters had been going into private schools, and they couldn't afford to go back to school.
When you really look at what happened there, if you close Close all the banks, which is what FDR did. He suddenly literally closed all the banks, and then Only certain banks were allowed to reopen, which were the ones controlled by the fed. Well, then suddenly no one had any money. It's not hard to imagine It's all just shut down suddenly. And then you have the problem that there was a drop in price level, Drop in activity and they kept the economic activity very suppressed for years.
And I know that from history through the thirties, my grandfather's engineering business, I know from a family letter, but by 1936, which was 3 years after the banks had reopened, there was still no business. 3 years later, they managed to get through this both sides of my family because they had No debt. People were more conservative then, but it was very difficult. Now the other thing that and was the Federal Reserve was set up with a kind of inevitable logic that they would have to take The gold from the public, which was, of course, the monetary asset backing everything then. So The gold of the public was confiscated under the complaint that the public was hoarding the gold.
But then what Did the fed do with it? The fed hoarded the gold and did not use it to expand credit. They kept the conditions tight. So what do we have This time around, gold is not the underlying collateral in this system. It's all securities globally.
So they will be taken under the argument that, well, we have to save these systemically vital institutions so that we can restart the economy again. How could we restart the economy if they are not protected? So that will be the reason given. And it's like a game of monopoly where all of the pieces, all of the money on the board are Hold back to the bank and then they say, let's start a new game. We'll start over from the basis that we have everything and you don't.
So would you like to borrow something? And this is what the CBDC, the Central Bank Digital Currency, will be. It will be very It's called for people to refuse to use it because they literally won't be able to eat. They will have an app they can download. This will be the help.
This will Be the cavalry riding to the rescue. Just download this app and you can load your phone with some Currency to allow you to go buy milk, but every time you use that, you are actually borrowing money from them. They have you. Again, It will happen very fast. This will unfold in a very frightening crisis kind of environment, and people fully refusing.
And that's why it's so important to spread this awareness of this beforehand so that people understand what happening and so that people can become engaged in this all the way to the top of the system. It has the potential to activate very capable people all the way to the top of the system. It has the potential to unify people against this. What I tried to do with this book was to stick with things I absolutely know. And to make it a kind of whole in terms of allowing one to see, irrefutably, the whole thing with the aim of pulling it out on the table so that Everyone can have a good look at it, including the participants, including the people that are making it happen.
I have the premise that This is largely being done unconsciously that the end result of this has not really been fully understood by the participants, and that perhaps Even the people at the very top of this do not understand what is about to happen and that they will be destroyed void by their own hand if they do this. So it's the result of a kind of inevitable logic that they have, that they have to control everything that has now been taken to the ultimate degree where one can see while it's an intelligent Design, it is literally insane to actually do this because no one wants this. And that the people that have inherited this ownership layer at the very top, they did not design this. They did not put it in motion. They have allowed the juggernaut to continue.
There has been no pruning in the garden. There's been no oversight. It's literally never been looked at, never been checked. It is basically run out of control unconsciously. So we have to make it conscious all the way to the top of the system.
Now another way I think about this is They study us. We have to try to imagine who we're dealing with here. So I'm getting into conjecture about this. I have known people pretty high in the system. I have this idea that people are intimidating if you have not met them.
But once you've met them, you see that they are Just people. And I think we have to understand these are just people. They are not lizards eating babies like potato chips. That is not helpful to think of it that way. So they are actually not particularly capable people.
So there is a head of the snake, but it can't do anything alone. It is relying on the muscle beneath the head of the snake to do everything for it. And that part of the purpose of this is to push this awareness up to that muscle. Now what what would that look like? It might look like people that control corporations that are doing all the work to implement this that would realize when they see this that they didn't know anything about this, which means they do not actually have a place at the table.
How might that affect their thinking? Could they have some interesting conversations with someone when they're asked to do something? Could they perhaps decide to withdraw participation? That kind of thing we need to happen, so We have to reach people at high levels in the system. Another principle is that there's not just 1 head of the snake.
It's like The hydra, there are lots of heads. And if you cut one off, another one grows back. So you have to be able to show the entirety of this because they only understand 1 piece of it. So this is like a mirror To be able to see concisely the whole of where this is going so that you can address the many headed hydra. You know, people consider that the CIA and all the intelligence organizations are much like that.
As I said, the garden has not been pruned. There's been no oversight here, so they're all running within their missions essentially out of control. Those people also need to be aware of where this is going. Now there are people that are actual Criminals that are killers in this, but they are not the people running things. Actually, if the money is just cut off to these entities, it stops.
I think that we're very close to this collapse being triggered. What are the indications for that? Well, most profoundly, what has been done to interest rates and where they are now and the Scale of the insolvencies that are out there, they're not being discussed. They're being covered up. The only way That the financial system has not collapsed is that there is a big hidden hand injecting lots of created money directly into the financial markets holding them up right now, as well as allowing Tutions to believe they have downside risk by buying protection in the derivatives market, the combination of those things.
So This support, the hidden hand as I call it, can be withdrawn at the time of their choosing, but we're getting late in this process given what's It's already happened at the interest rates. The other indication of timing is the bank resolution, the documents So the bank resolution authority in Europe, their planning cycle documents were mandating all of the globally Systemically important banks to be ready for a solvent wind down at the end of last year, 2022. Now what they mean by Solvent wind down is not wind down of the entire bank on a solid basis. It will be parts of the bank that will main solvent, but they've literally mandated that they have to be ready, the biggest banks, to go flat on all of their derivatives positions in a controlled way suddenly. So they prepared for that.
That is operational as of then last year. Now In this year's planning cycle document, they are saying that they are on track to have completed all their work by end of this year 2023. So these are indications to give you another idea of the seriousness of this. They've been running these trilateral exercises with Britain and the EU In the US for 6 of the 7 past years, I think they may have missed a year during COVID. But in these exercises From the US side, the participants are the US treasury secretary, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, The chairman of the FDIC, the heads of all these entities in this exercise, which I've never seen before with anything.
So they're very, very serious about this. And these exercises are about assuring the cross border Transfer of the collateral when the banks are put into wind down. So you've noticed in the news that there have been some failures of banks in the last year, and that is due to this increase, this backup in interest rates, and the idea that this is a bank specific problem is not the case. These are the canaries in the coal mine. This is absolutely systemic.
Again, looking back at the 19 thirties for guidance Here, the 1st big bank failure was in 1930. It was allowed to happen, and there was a kind of trickle of bank failures. So The bank holiday when they closed everything was until 1933. So it was an unfolding banking prices for 3 years. So it's not unusual that you would have an opening stage here of a number of banks It failed, but it doesn't all let loose immediately.
It unfolds over months and perhaps a couple of years before you hit the point where everything's free fall. Well, How could things be better here? How could this go well? We have to imagine that. It seems to be overwhelming.
But the first step is to Get this awareness up to the highest levels so that people realize we don't want this to happen. It's been taken to an Sane extreme, and it's not gonna go well for anyone. Then people are left with this idea that, well, everything will just collapse. And I don't believe that at all. There is a real world with real economic activity that goes on despite This system that extracts resources from people and places enormous stress on them that Funds, psychological operations that are, of course, public facing.
They're used against the population so that the resources of the public are Distracted, tremendous burdens are placed on people, stresses. It's a system that subjugates people. And if that simply stops, Everything gets better immediately. Now how could things be different? Central banking should be a Public utility, the very idea that it should be controlled by private interests, that is the Source of all the problems for humanity that must stop as a public utility.
You know, of course, banking is a useful thing to have. We have to realize we don't have to go back to sticks and stones. We don't want everything burned to the We have to take back control of our society, which has largely been created by good people, All the innovations and usurped, so we don't owe them anything. We have good things that have been created. We just have to not allow them to control these things any longer.
So public banking would be like a utility. Any profits would be returned to the public or used to support Government. We have to have government. We have to have some way to operate society and have roads and do things that work for society. So anarchy and chaos, we can't have that.
So this has to be done peacefully. It has to be done legally. Another concept. And these are not my ideas on borrowing these things in terms of public banking, but also something like The tax system, which is really a way of harassing and, again, subjugating People, we know with the scale of money creation, things are not being funded from our tax dollars. But if we had A stable system, some kind of share of economic resources are needed to operate the government.
A very simple way to do that is to place a Simple fee on every electronic money transfer wouldn't be needed for paper currency, just every electronic money transfer. We know today that the major corporations don't pay any taxes. They aren't supporting anything. So money flows. It could be a fraction of a and especially if you end all of the wars, if you wind down the military bases, if you Of all the covert actions which are criminal, the scale of government can be right sized to what is actually beneficial to humanity.
As I say, we're being governed by constructs. They aren't even real. And if they don't Serve humanity, they must be stopped. And if we're gonna have artificial constructs, they must serve humanity. So imagine How people would feel if they were told, you don't have to file taxes anymore.
That's all gonna be handled. Just pay a tenth of a percent on whatever electronic Transfer you're doing. But the people that run this system don't want those kinds of solutions because they would eliminate their control. So my purpose with this book is to create something that will show the entirety of what this is and where it's going to do it with an economy of information and just Hard, irrefutable information and to put this in something that can travel. And that is happening.
And I know already that it has reached billionaires, it's reached people all over the world, It's reached people that manage a lot of money have responsibility for that. People in Buenos Aires and Vancouver and New Zealand and Monaco, London. So it is happening. That's what we have to have happen. And we need people at the Top of the system that are not 6 degrees separation from the head of the state, but are more like 1 or 2 degrees from the head of Snake to become aware of this and start to say something about it and start to do something about it because they realize that They are not going to be protected.
As I say toward the end of the book, wealthy people think they're special. You are special. They're saving you for dessert. And you let that sink in. So everybody has to get busy with this, Including people who believe that they are powerful and they can make a difference.
And it needs to be done legally, needs to be opposed through legal means. I mean, imagine what would happen if judges in important positions become aware of this Prosecutors, this has never really been examined in terms of how it can be dismantled. And there will be ways to do this because it is just a construct. So in terms of advice to people, and again, I can't give you financial advice. I don't know your personal I would start by saying that your happiness is important and the happiness of your family.
And you should not let financial considerations cause you to do something that will drive your family in The despair. You have to be able to get through these years. But if there are things you can do that might actually give you a relief of stress, you should consider doing those things. And one of those might be to eliminate all debt. So you have to get over this notion that you you should use borrowed money to control more stuff.
They want you to do that because when the price level falls, you won't be able to service that debt. So you take advantage of this Time remaining to sell things to pay off your debts. It does make sense to have money in the financial markets when you also have debt. There are people I know who have sold their homes, which is a tough decision to make, and are simply renting to make sure that they're not in debt at all. So you have to ask yourself, these are personal decisions, how that feels for you to do that?
Another principle is to get real, so to speak. To invest in real things, avoid Constructs and intermediaries, you want to hold things directly, have good title to them things that you can hold like that such as land, buildings and land. And you want to think about if This goes into a difficult period of years, and this can be a positive thing is to have an ability to produce food. In the thirties It's for both sides of my family. They weren't farmers, but they had to have recourse to family that had farms in order to supplement their food.
It was important. So again that can be done in a positive way. You put money into building a greenhouse, Have a big garden and orchard. Might choose to live in a more rural area. Talking with people who went through the depression, There was 1 friend of mine, much older than me.
I knew he had lived through the depression, and I asked him about it. And he said, well, you know, both my My parents were killed in an automobile accident. So I was on my grandfather's farm, and I was not aware that there was a depression. So he was on this farm with his cousins, that tells you something. As a child, they were just fine.
The book I've written is called The Great Taking, and you can find it on a landing page At the great taking .com, there is a free PDF you can download. I've done it this way because it will make it close to 0 friction so it can spread globally, and that is really happening. Some people would say, well, surely, you must be paid something for this. And I know that if I had been paid anything, I would just use it to spread the book. So why do that?
Make it 0 friction. This is the most important thing I can do right now. There are hard copy The books you can get through Lulu, and those cost something because it cost something to produce them, and they can be delivered globally. There is some Small profit in that, but I am directing that to another person who is a scientist and has done very important work.
@Skydive888 - Skydive
@MollyGalt Zionists lie about everything. They've told some absolute whoppers! https://t.co/K3hCQliyiK
@Skydive888 - Skydive
THE GREAT AWAKENING The film that assembles forbidden puzzle pieces to reveal the big picture of what's really happening in America and beyond.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Mickey Willis shares his personal experience growing up in California and witnessing the negative effects of government assistance. He criticizes Dr. Anthony Fauci for his involvement in the prescription of the drug AZT, which caused many deaths. Willis discusses the concept of mass formation and the dangers of losing critical thinking skills. He also highlights the push for a one-world government by globalists like Klaus Schwab and the persecution faced by individuals in China. The video emphasizes the importance of protecting individual rights, unity, and taking action in local politics to preserve freedom.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Whatever political party you identify with, you are welcome here. Whatever color, culture, or creed you identify with, you are welcome here. If you are vaccinated or unvaccinated, you are welcome here. Now look around. Look around at these spaces and this crowd.
Take a good look around. This is America the Beautiful, And it's worth fighting for. You are worth fighting for. Your children are worth fighting for. Our freedom is worth fighting for.
Speaker 1: My name is Mickey Willis. I'm a father, a husband, I'm an investigative filmmaker. I was raised in California by a single mom who did her best care for 4 children on her own. As a child of the welfare state, I witnessed firsthand what happens to the psyche and spirit Of those who become dependent on government assistance. Had my mother known the difference between a hand up and a hand out, She may have avoided the trap that kept us living on the edge of poverty, like so many people are today.
Living in fear of losing her welfare assistance, mom remained single and lonely until the day she passed at 58 years young. Her life was cut short by a combination of toxic cancer treatments and grief. Just 34 days before she passed, her first son, my brother, was killed by a drug called AZT. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people died as a result of that prescribed poison. The pusher of AZT was none other than doctor Anthony Fauci.
Speaker 2: The reason that only 1 drug has been made available, AZT, because it's the only drug that has been shown to be safe and effective.
Speaker 3: Well, it's certainly nice to know that the future looks brighter.
Speaker 1: 30 years later, there he was again. Same script, same actors, same performance.
Speaker 4: These are safe and effective products.
Speaker 1: Knowing what that man had done in the eighties nineties, I couldn't believe he was still in a position of such power. As the world descended into synchronized tyranny, I began to ask myself, How did they get everyone to go along with this?
Speaker 5: Great. Oh, it feels so good. I know.
Speaker 1: Obsessed with finding the answer, I began studying every moment in recorded history where masses of people devolved into a state of self destruction. Down that rabbit hole was where I discovered the work of g Edward Griffin.
Speaker 6: Gentlemen, again let me say welcome to our
Speaker 1: Since 19 sixties, mister Griffin has been warning the world of the communist plot to overtake America. Yes. I know. Communism.
Speaker 0: Mister Gorbachev, tear down this wall.
Speaker 1: That thing we've all been told fell with the Berlin Wall.
Speaker 4: How do you measure such an astonishing moment in history?
Speaker 1: It was Napoleon who said, history is a lie agreed upon. Ironically, there's no evidence that Napoleon ever said that. As we're about to discover together, Much of our history has been rewritten to serve an agenda that up until recently was invisible to the average person. Average like this guy. Everyone's talking about the necessity for change right now, particularly here in the US.
Over the past few months, as a filmmaker, I've had the honor of documenting the political revolution. That was me in 2016, the year of my political awakening.
Speaker 4: Come on board the political revolution.
Speaker 1: I was touring with the Bernie Sanders campaign, creating media to help his grassroots movement grow. At that time, I knew very little about socialism and even less about democratic socialism. As it turned out, I wasn't the only one.
Speaker 0: So my Bernie bros, how
Speaker 1: do we redistribute wealth through taxation without expanding the powers of the federal government?
Speaker 7: Bernie Sanders.
Speaker 1: As confusion set in, I began turning my questions inward. Are they hypnotized? Am I hypnotized? That question, That one simple question activated some strange sort of faith healing. Suddenly, I could see.
How did I not see this before? There were so many red flags.
Speaker 6: I'm well aware that whether you're here in person or through the medium of motion picture. But for most of you, it's not easy to fit meetings of this kind into your schedules. But the fact that you are here indicates that you do have an interest in the subject. So in order not to waste any of your time, let's dispense with the usual preliminaries and get right down to the business at hand. We're going to examine in quite a bit of detail the Communist theory and practice of revolution, particularly as applied to the United States.
Now this will not be something dreamed up out of thin air. This will be the strategy as taught by them and advocated by them in their own manuals, in their textbooks, and in their schools. The, new program of the Communist Party on this subject has this to say. The term socialism describes, but the first stage of a new society that in its full development is called communism. Socialism is a transitional stage.
Speaker 4: Jim Carey, everybody. I went out today and bought me some freedom friendly Nikes. Yeah. That's right. I said salute to Colin Kaepernick.
To Nike, congratulations on your fantastic job. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: Alright. It's good
Speaker 4: to be back.
Speaker 8: It's great
Speaker 9: to be back. Dystopian America.
Speaker 4: The Republicans are running with the word socialism. They're trying to say They're trying
Speaker 10: to scare people.
Speaker 4: Scare
Speaker 11: people. Communism is saying.
Speaker 4: Venezuela, Trump says. You're they're gonna be living in Venezuela. I grew up in Canada. I'm here to tell you that this bullshit line that you get on all of the political shows from people is that it's a failure. The system is a failure in Canada.
It is not a failure in Canada. I never waited for anything in my life. I chose my own doctors. My mother never paid for a prescription. It was Fantastic.
And I just got back from Vancouver, and I
Speaker 6: keep hearing this, like, Canadians are so nice. Canadians are so nice.
Speaker 4: They can be nice because they have health care. Because they have a government that cares about
Speaker 6: it. In Canada, the authorities say there's now A state's.
Speaker 4: Riot gear swept through Canada's capital.
Speaker 3: Today, police in Ottawa used pecan and pepper spray.
Speaker 4: You just trampled, my lady.
Speaker 3: Medical wait times in this country are longer than ever.
Speaker 0: The cost of living just keeps climbing.
Speaker 6: There's a socialist
Speaker 10: coup Holding in Canada, and we taxpayers are funding.
Speaker 12: In the recent years, a lot of Canadians have been watching their once well regarded country become what some are even tyrannical
Speaker 13: A country previously hailed as the most free and democratic in the world.
Speaker 6: Now the People's World, The official West Coast newspaper of the Communist Party ran this rather interesting editorial. What is needed now is an effort that begins to approximate the magnitude of the problem. As a minimum, such a program should demand massive emergency action By the federal government.
Speaker 4: The federal government has invoked the Emergencies Act.
Speaker 14: As of today, a bank or other financial service provider will be able to immediately freeze or suspend an Count without a court order.
Speaker 4: If you are involved in this protest, we will actively look to identify you and follow-up with Financial sanctions and criminal charges.
Speaker 3: Banks have already started to freeze the accounts of people involved in the protest.
Speaker 4: Please get out. Immediately, get out. Dating people in a church during the Passover, unbelievable. Growing up under communist dictatorship, I have been warning Canadians that that's what's coming. I could smell it.
I could see it at every corner. We will not put up with this anymore. We are fighting back. Protests, Public protests are an important part of making sure we're getting messages out there, but using protests to Demand, changes to public policy, is something that that I think is is is worrisome. Okay.
Speaker 15: So here we have the prime minister of Canada saying that, yes, we have a highly functioning democracy, and they have the right and freedom to protest. However, if those protests are used to demand change in government policy, then no.
Speaker 4: The Small fringe minority are who are, holding unacceptable, views, that they're expressing. Do not represent the views of Canadians Who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to continue to ensure our freedoms, our rights, our values as a country.
Speaker 13: Liberal prime minister Justin Trudeau claims to be following the science, but Trudeau's science often comes in the form of this bizarre authoritarian technocracy.
Speaker 16: I think that Justin Trudeau stepped on the landmine when He weaponized the banking system in Canada against the truckers. Those peaceful trucker protests, you know, their most violent act was honking their horns. And in retaliation, they had their access to their bank accounts, and anybody that supported them in any way They had their access to bank accounts eliminated. And at that moment in time, we all came to realize what was really going
Speaker 9: Even with Sun TV watching for any slip, he was asked which country he most admired and referred to China. The level of admiration
Speaker 4: I actually have for China, because their, you know, basic is allowing them.
Speaker 17: I applaud China for stepping excuse me. I applaud Canada. I'm you can tell what I'm thinking.
Speaker 18: A prime minister who openly admires the Chinese basic Dictatorship who tramples on fundamental rights by persecuting and criminalizing his own citizens as terrorists just because they dared to stand up This Please spare us your presence. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Canadians know where I stand. This is a Moment for responsible leaders to think carefully about where they stand and who they stand with.
Speaker 1: While Justin makes a compelling case study. He is not the only dictator on the rise. Under the new rules provided by the COVID nineteen emergency, Many other elected leaders were empowered to show their true colors. Interesting how they all marched in perfect lock Step while chanting the same slogans.
Speaker 4: This pandemic has provided an opportunity.
Speaker 17: We are now with an economy of crisis, but With an incredible opportunity
Speaker 19: It's certainly a major crisis,
Speaker 20: but it also offers
Speaker 21: us a unique opportunity Unprecedented opportunity
Speaker 22: to rethink and reset
Speaker 21: a great opportunity for reset opportunity for us
Speaker 18: to reset or a reset.
Speaker 1: It's almost as if they all attended the same school of thought and studied under the same professor.
Speaker 22: Some people would say this revolution is characterized by the fight of robots against human beings, and we will win this fight.
Speaker 1: Professor Klaus Schwab was born in 1938 in Ravensburg, Germany where Nazi crimes against humanity were committed. His father, Eugene Wilhelm Schwab was the managing director of Escher Weiss Ravensburg. A company that used slave labor to manufacture weapons of war For the 3rd Reich. While Klaus's father was at the helm, the Nazi party awarded Escher Weiss Ravensburg the title of National socialist model company. Years later, Klaus Schwab joined the board of directors at Escher Weiss Ravensburg Where he played a key role in the development of South Africa's nuclear weapons program during the darkest years of the racist apartheid regime.
Today, Klaus Schwab is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum.
Speaker 23: If you'd like to meet the people who are Opposed to repair the state of the world or give a piece of your mind to the bankers who helped get us into this mess, we can tell you where to find a lot of them, The World Economic Forum.
Speaker 1: Founded in 1971, the World Economic Forum is an international private organization which receives 1,000,000,000 of tax free dollars from its members and their global enterprises. Every year, the WEF brings together its members with world leaders, Big pharma executives, tech titans, Hollywood celebrities, media personalities, and Internet influencers to meet in the secluded mountains of Davos of Switzerland.
Speaker 23: It is a tiny town folded into the Swiss Alps, a village where you could bump into Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, the head of Google, and the queen of Jordan all in one place. A lot of reporters cover the forum, but few get inside. It turns out there are 2 Davos', 1 you see and 1 you don't. After hours, There are hundreds of private parties where deals are done. People who can't be seen together in public can meet here.
Speaker 22: Your royal highnesses, excellencies, distinguished heads of state and government, The future is built by us, by a powerful community as you here in this room.
Speaker 24: Klaus Schwab, the founder of the WEF, is particularly up front and even proud of its ability to shape and influence world politics.
Speaker 22: I created the Immunity of global shapers as a means, as a force to shape our common future.
Speaker 24: And, of course, their global young leaders program is a grooming ground So that when they ultimately infiltrate cabinets We
Speaker 22: penetrate the cabinets.
Speaker 24: They will likely tend to govern a certain way.
Speaker 22: Nobody will be safe If not everybody is vaccinated.
Speaker 24: The names in the countries he mentioned, it ended up being some of the most dystopian and during this pandemic.
Speaker 22: Names like miss Merkel, Vladimir Putin, and so on.
Speaker 24: Other names? Jacinda Ardern, Sebastian Perris, Mauricio Macri, Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Ma, Gavin Newsom, Stephane Bancel, Chelsea Clinton, Leonardo DiCaprio, Sanjay Gupta, Doctor Liana Nguyen, Alexander and Jonathan Soros, George Soros' sons, and several of the Rothschilds. And, of course
Speaker 22: Now who could represent such a world better than you, prime minister?
Speaker 1: In 2014, Klaus Schwab called
Speaker 22: for the great reset We need a Great reset. Which he positioned
Speaker 1: as the solution to the world's most urgent issues. The dark reality of Schwab's agenda is detailed In his best selling book, COVID nineteen, The Great Reset, his end game mission is to replace independent governance with a top down control, one world government, and a central bank controlled digital currency.
Speaker 25: When they say you'll be happy, What they mean is, you'll be enslaved. That's why they're talking about a great reset. That's why they're talking about introducing this quasi communist, Because we have a generation that quite literally cannot afford to buy a house.
Speaker 4: Millions of Americans are priced out of buying a home.
Speaker 25: And so it's easy to tell that generation, we're gonna forgive your college debt
Speaker 17: Student debt relief.
Speaker 25: And set your expectations lower. You're gonna Forever. We're gonna celebrate the tiny house movement. We're gonna do all of these things, which sound cool because they're shaping Our narrative, so that we become capable of expecting less. What we need to do is not expect less.
We need to remove inefficiencies, so we can experience more. And that's the subtle distinction That the great reset is missing.
Speaker 1: Like most globalists, Schwab regards communist China as a shining model of how he intends to transform the world.
Speaker 22: We now welcome his excellency Xi Jinping. China has made significant economic and social achievements under your leadership.
Speaker 26: Chinese influence on global affairs is growing. The founder of
Speaker 20: the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab,
Speaker 26: says that this is what motivated the group this year to invite president Xi Jinping to deliver the keynote address in Davos.
Speaker 4: Schwab said Xi's presence was a sign of the shift from a unipolar world dominated by the United States to a more multipolar system in which rising powers like China will have a step up and play a bigger role.
Speaker 22: I think it's, a whole model for many countries, But, you have to go one step further. It's a systemic transformation of It's a world. Artificial intelligence, it's a metaverse, synthetic biology. Our life in 10 years from now will be completely different, and who masters those technologies Will be the master of the world.
Speaker 1: Similar to his protege, Justin Trudeau, Klaus Schwab makes a fascinating case study, Yet he too is merely the master of his own world, economic forum.
Speaker 27: Science is replacing Evolution by natural selection with evolution by intelligent design. Not the intelligent design of some god above the clouds, But our intelligent design and the intelligent design of our clouds, the IBM Cloud, the Microsoft Cloud, These are the new driving forces of evolution. Today, we have the technology to hack Human beings on a massive scale. And by this, I mean, that if you have enough data and you have enough power. You can understand people better than they understand themselves.
And then you can manipulate them in ways which were previously impossible. You know, the whole idea that humans have this soul or spirit and they have free will, that's over. Now, how exactly will the future masters of the planet? Look like this will We decided by the people who own the data.
Speaker 8: Foreign powers can collect, store, and exploit biometric information from COVID tests.
Speaker 4: US intelligence officials tell CBS News that China is trying to collect Americans' DNA
Speaker 6: in hopes of controlling the future of health care.
Speaker 4: China's test kits or a tool to help China compile genetic data.
Speaker 8: The Chinese aren't the only ones exploring this technology. The US is working on it as well.
Speaker 3: The White House is wrapping up its COVID response, announcing Americans can once again get free COVID test kits as concerns are Going
Speaker 27: over her rear Data is the most important asset in the world. Those who control the data control the future, Not just of humanity, but the future of life itself.
Speaker 3: Everywhere she goes, Ohyanghao Yu is followed. What she buys, how she behaves is tracked and scored to show how responsible and trustworthy she is. It's called the social credit system. A person's reputation is scored on a scale of 350 to 950. It's big data meets big brother, expanding how the government understands and ultimately controls its 1,400,000,000 citizens.
A good score brings benefits, but people with low scores lose rights. The cinema names and shames people considered untrustworthy, plastering their details, even their addresses across big screens. And information Collectors are paid to report on their neighbors. The Supreme Court has created a blacklist for so called bad citizens. Among them is this journalist.
He got a little too close to uncovering corruption among high profile party members. He was blacklisted. You only realize when you try to buy a train ticket.
Speaker 4: Once you're blacklisted, you can no longer get a bank loan, start a business, buy an apartment, or send your children to a private school.
Speaker 26: By using the mechanism of social credit, we'll be able to establish a blacklist of people. These punishments will serve as A whip to rebuild moral values.
Speaker 3: And few here are willing to criticize it, something that may pose a risk Itself for a bad score and the life that comes with it. It may seem scary, but it's just like that here. We're used to it. And, anyway, we don't have a Choice. China wants obedient citizens.
Criticism or resistance among the population is virtually nonexistent. This woman's door was kicked in by police when she refused to go to quarantine.
Speaker 4: Go. Go. Go.
Speaker 3: Now these videos show rows of metal containers which are being used to house COVID nineteen patients. Some of them have complained that very little food is left for them in the freezing metal Chinese government officials now installing fences in Shanghai, blocking people from leaving their homes.
Speaker 4: For some, Shanghai feels like the world's largest Prison.
Speaker 1: How does a handful of autocrats gain total control over a population of 1,400,000,000?
Speaker 20: I have 2 master degrees, 1 in clinical psychology and one in statistics. And in the beginning of the crisis, to study the statistics a little bit. The initial mathematical models and the initial statistics all had dramatically overrated The dangerousness of the virus, that was the moment when I started to to think how it was possible that an Higher society and the entire population was in the grip of a narrative which in in many respects was blatantly wrong. After a few months, it became clear to me that the only mechanism that could explain what was Happening in society was what is usually referred to as mass formation.
Speaker 28: Mass formation
Speaker 20: is identical to hypnosis, And this term refers to a specific kind of group formation, which has very special characteristic effects at the level of individual mental functioning. And one of these effects is that an individual that is in the grip of mass formation typically Lose every capacity to take a critical distance from what they believe in, from what the group believes in.
Speaker 1: You would think it would be people with lower cues that would be more susceptible to this, but it seems to be the other way around. Are you seeing this?
Speaker 10: I have seen this. And it does seem to
Speaker 29: We look to be verified for our belief system. Right? And so a doctor There's a lot of people that are in the industry. And so we're not going to be able to do that. And so we're not going to be able to do that.
And so we're where does
Speaker 4: the study come from?
Speaker 24: Where is
Speaker 29: it you know? And that's what I do.
Speaker 4: All of these people were kept out of the conversation.
Speaker 30: All I can comment on there.
Speaker 4: Wanting me to sign onto a a social contract where the scientific method isn't being used.
Speaker 30: I'm not interested in medical pedigree. I'm interested in medical consensus.
Speaker 10: People who are highly intelligent tend to go and get A lot of degrees. Those people have spent so many years in institutions to get those degrees that they have developed a trust and confidence In not only the educational institutions, but those that support them, which are largely government bodies. And so they start From the place of, if it's told by the university, by the government, it's probably gonna be true.
Speaker 29: What I've learned about science is that It's really imagine they're looking at, like, a fragment of the world, and it's all they see. It's all they're looking at. The world. Don't see the world.
Speaker 10: So I think that there's a disconnect between people who are smart and have lots of degrees with actual reality, with the lived experience Of nature, of life, that you don't see with people who are actually working with their hands outdoors all
Speaker 4: of the time.
Speaker 20: A mass formation typically emerges In a society, when very specific conditions are met, 1st and for all, the most central condition is the major part of the population needs to feel lonely.
Speaker 31: Doctors say the very rule is to keep people safe from the virus are doing great damage when it comes to anxiety, depression and even suicide. And now everyone is suffering, but children are
Speaker 0: The real pandemic here is the psychological warfare that's being waged on every single human being. See, if you take a human being and you put them in a chronic fear state, you couple that with human isolation, What happens is they psychologically decompensate and live in such emotional pain that they will gravitate in an irrational way to anything that you promised them will alleviate that pain.
Speaker 20: Once people feel disconnected from their environment, they will typically start To experience a lack of meaning making in life. And under these conditions, if a narrative is distributed through the mass media Indicating an object of anxiety and a strategy to deal with this object of anxiety, they suddenly punk, connect to one small object of fear, for instance, the coronavirus. And afterwards, people don't feel lonely anymore. They feel connected again. The new kind of social bond is highly problematic just because the connections between the individuals even deteriorate more And the bond between the individual and the collective becomes stronger and stronger and stronger, which make them willing to sacrifice everything For the collective, its health, its wealth, the future of its children, everything.
Something else that is really characteristic of individuals in mass formation is that they become radically intolerant for dissonant voices.
Speaker 4: The people who are not getting vaccines, It's time to start shaming them. What else or leave them behind. Vaccinated person having
Speaker 7: a heart attack, yes. Come right on in.
Speaker 4: We'll take care of you. Unvaccinated guy, rest in peace, Wheezy. We have to stop coddling the morons who will not get the shot. Get away from these drugs. Does it bother anybody else that she doesn't have to wear a mask that we all do?
Speaker 29: When are we gonna stop putting up with the idiots in
Speaker 23: this country? You're a schmuck for not wearing a mask.
Speaker 29: And just say it's mandatory to get vaccinated. Screw your freedom. People who
Speaker 20: do not go along with the masses are stigmatized. And in the end, The masses are inclined to destroy the people who do not go along with them, and they do so as if it is an ethical duty to do so.
Speaker 32: Getting good people to do bad things, harmful things, while thinking they're good things, It's a dangerous place to be because it looks great. You feel
Speaker 16: great while you're being used. They will sacrifice themselves, and they see it as a virtue because it demonstrates their complete obedience To the cult, to the group, to perform ritualistic behavior, which causes them harm.
Speaker 20: One of the most clear illustrations of this was when the The leaders of the Communist Party in the Soviet Union were sentenced to death, often tortured to death. They did not object. They said things like, If this helps the Communist Party, it's my pleasure to do it. That's something that was observed in all major examples of mass formation in history.
Speaker 5: I was born in communist China 2 years before Mao started his cultural revolution. So we had to be indoctrinated and the chanting slogans and holding chair my mouth, little red books To say long live, long live communist party.
Speaker 1: Inspired by Soviet Union dictators, Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin, China's communist leader, Mao Zedong, borrowed from the playbook of the Russian Revolution. To fight anti communist forces, Lenin organized a military branch of his communist party known as the Red Army. Following suit, Mao branded his army the red guards. However, Mao's soldiers were not enlisted from his military. His red guards were made up of high school and university students.
Speaker 5: So he used young people to start cultural revolution to top down statues, Burning all the buildings and demonize all religions, going after all dissident voices, and to turn All the Chinese against each other. Family turn on each other. Neighbors turn on each other.
Speaker 1: Chairman Mao, as he was known, Was deeply influenced by Lenin's ideas on Marxism and revolution, and often praised Stalin as a great leader.
Speaker 5: He started his great leap forward campaign in the fifties and killed the 2,000,000 landlord owners, 40,000,000 to 60,000,000 people estimated starving to death. The people were trading their children's dead bodies To eat, to survive, cannibalism was everywhere.
Speaker 1: Through war, torture, execution, and famine, Chairman Mao caused the death of 80,000,000 innocent people, making him the deadliest dictator of all time.
Speaker 10: China shaved the heads of women, put them all in unattractive asexual clothes, did the same thing for the men. This technique has been used In the 20th century, by every totalitarian regime.
Speaker 5: The Mao wanted to create a genderless society. That's why girls like me cannot wear beautiful clothes And cannot do makeup. We have to just look like boys, unisex, no gender.
Speaker 10: They asexualize the population so that there's no more desire, No more bipolarity of male and female. Everybody looks like an automaton. And then what do they do? Rather than turning towards one another, they turn towards the state.
Speaker 5: So the only thing left for me, a child to believe in, is communism, and Mao was the new god.
Speaker 3: Now in China, the government is not only cracking down on Muslims, but on other religions as well as it pushes to assert communist ideology. Here's something else that is banned in China, Falun Gong, a religious movement that emphasizes on spiritual Enlightenment and cultivation of virtue.
Speaker 33: 5000 year old Chinese civilization were on faith. Communist regime is atheist. So any philosophy which encourage people to Believe god, believe good things. It's something they don't like. I decide To escape China after serious persecution I have experienced.
Speaker 7: Under this pretext of COVID nineteen
Speaker 27: In coronavirus, the Chinese Communist Party has intensified its persecution.
Speaker 34: We were arrested several times and detained in various detention and brainwashing centers.
Speaker 4: Over the past Few years, a vast network of camps has been built across Xinjiang.
Speaker 3: A series of classified bulletins show how easy it is to be Singled out by the Chinese government for education and training.
Speaker 6: The US Defense Department says as
Speaker 25: many as 3,000,000 are being forcibly detained in reeducation And forced labor camps. China calls them thought transformation camps built to prevent extremism from spreading, but reports indicate they're more like prisons.
Speaker 34: When I was detained at detention center, I was handcuffed and hung over a radiator pipe With my toes barely touching the ground, and I was hung over there for 3 days, The CCP guards brought 4 male detainees into my cell and Again, one of the worst experience of torture. And on the block of death, I realized I could do nothing but turn to my belief, So I pray to be safe. Moments later, 1 of the 4 male detainees suddenly fainted on the floor, which interrupted the torture.
Speaker 35: I love China because My parents were heavily persecuted for their practice of Falun Gong. From age 1 to age 5, my grandparents are taking care of me because, my parents, They were always inside some dark cells being tortured. My first clear memory Of my mother, I was brought to a brainwashing center and saw her being tied up To a chair with, like, people behind her guarding her, and she had a very thick plastic tube inserted into her nose and she was being force fed at the time. She just looked like she was in so much pain And I was at I was 5 at the time. That was it's just very traumatizing.
My school principal actually came to me several times and told me not to be a part of my parents and to report any Activity that my parents would do, they're instilling all the lies and hatred into the younger generation.
Speaker 5: The young people are used today to do the American cultural revolution to turn their kids basically Not to trust their parents anymore and say, oh, my parents don't understand me. I'm confused, so I need to Turn to my teachers. Turn to other authority figures. Look in the most cultural revolution to say, How many similarities are
Speaker 4: All of them will win. That's that's not a joke. That will happen.
Speaker 0: You are happy with what was happening in the USSR No. No.
Speaker 4: No. We make a critique of it as a rule of Maoist. We make a critique of it in order to improve socialism the next time it comes And throws people like your ass into a living room. Yesterday, I asked Chat GPT, are there any similarities between today's woke revolution and chairman Mao's cultural revolution of the 19 sixties? And it wrote back, How long do you have?
Speaker 6: We recognize that government is absolutely necessary for an orderly society. But following the dictum that government like fire is both beneficial and dangerous, we believe in the concept of Limited government. And we believe that the constitutional republic created by our founding fathers is the best form of limited government That has yet been devised by man. A Republic is a limited democracy. It's a form of government Based upon the principle of limited majority rule.
Limited so that the minority, even a minority of 1 Can be protected against the whims and passions of the majority. Now, democracy is a form of government based upon the principle of majority rule. It's easy to understand, easy to sell to the masses, and I might add deadly.
Speaker 1: The fathers of philosophy, Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle were all staunch critics of democracy. History's greatest minds All observed that even a well intended democracy can breed deception, division, and ultimately, total control by the state.
Speaker 20: Aristotle wrote that democracy is not just the rule of the majority. Democracy is a system in which the majority is in charge respecting the basic elementary rights and principles of minorities. If not, democracy becomes a tyranny of The majority.
Speaker 1: Socrates himself became a victim of this very process. He was sentenced to death by a majority vote for protesting the rights and protections of the minority. This country was founded on
Speaker 28: the principle that the individual is sovereign over the institution of government. It's about a philosophy of governance that says that you are a free individual or a philosophy of governance that says you're served in your subject.
Speaker 36: We have inalienable rights just by virtue of being human. And so their primary responsibility as the government is to protect Those rights.
Speaker 29: These aren't rules to govern me. They're rules to govern the government. Like, what, you know, what you are and are not allowed to do to me.
Speaker 5: We are constitutional Public with a representative democracy, so people do vote, but we have a separation of powers. So if you Majority vote to eat you for lunch. The Supreme Court can say no. You cannot.
Speaker 6: And how do you protect the minority from the majority? You write down a set of rules on a piece of paper. You say, this we can do, that we cannot. At the top of the paper, you write the word Constitution. And then everyone agrees to follow the rules no matter what the temptation.
And when you're finished, you've created a constitutional republic.
Speaker 1: It was Thomas Jefferson who said, the republic is the only form of government which is not eternally at open or Secret war with the rights of mankind.
Speaker 6: Now we hear a lot of talk today about right wingers, Left wingers, extremists, and moderates. The political spectrum concept, if it has any meaning at all, is a measurement scale Showing all the variations in government. Now, the extremists at the zero end would be those who advocate no government at all. The anarchists, the extremists at the other end would be those who advocate total government. And who are they?
Well, the communists, of course, But also the Nazis, the fascists, no matter what they may call themselves, if they advocate total government control over the people, They are all by definition, totalitarians. The debate is not between conservatives and liberals. It goes back in history long before those words were ever invented. The opposing points of view Properly are identified as individualism versus collectivism. The individualist believes that the rights of the individual must not be obliterated by the desires of the collective or the group.
The collectivist on the other hand believes that the group is more important than the single person within it. And that the individual must He sacrificed if necessary for the greater good of the greater number. The individualist believe that every man has a personal and direct responsibility To provide first for himself, next for his family, and then for those outside his family who may be in need. The collectivist on the other hand declares that the individual is not personally responsible for charity, for raising his own children, providing for his aging parents, or even providing for himself for that matter. This is a group function of the state, of government itself.
Speaker 5: Everything we talk about socialism, communism, globalism, and not season, Guess what? It's all collectives society.
Speaker 1: Collectivism on an international level is essentially known as a globalism which is often promoted as a framework for unity and sustainability. Under the guise philanthropy, the leaders of the globalist movement leverage every possible crisis to advance their plan to replace national sovereignty with a one world government.
Speaker 22: We are confronted with so many crises simultaneously. What does Indeed, to masters a future.
Speaker 1: It is the globalist who are behind the destructive new methods of control, like credit score. ESG is a ranking system that tracks a company or country's carbon footprint as well as its commitment to diversity and inclusion. A low ESG score can lead to severe consequences including reputational damage, legal and regulatory And loss of investors and bank credit lines. Within the last decade, numerous nations and thousands of major brands have been coerced 1st to adapt to the ESG program. And today, many of them are paying the price.
In 2018, the World Economic Forum published an article on its website entitled, how we will make Sri Lanka rich by 2025. That article was removed once it became known that food prices in Sri Lanka had nearly doubled and that millions of their citizens were facing starvation.
Speaker 24: Now what caused this? Farmers protested and asked the government to work with them on slowly improving farming practices to be more environmentally friendly rather than implementing harsh fans. But the government was more interested in maintaining a high ESG score with its creditors like BlackRock. As a result, food production dropped drastically with farmers expecting crop losses of 85 percent. The country had to begin spending money on importing food when it was previously self sufficient.
Sri Lanka is a cautionary tale. What's There could be a foreshadowing of what's in store for us if we don't take heed and learn some lessons.
Speaker 1: The Dutch government was one of the first To sign on to the ESG system, Dutch farmers pleaded that the rush to adapt to extreme new regulations would result in the destruction of the country's food supply. The Netherlands is the 2nd largest agriculture exporter in the world earning the title of the tiny country that feeds the world. A collapse of their system could trigger a global food crisis. Yet, the Netherlands prime minister continued to persecute Dutch farmers until they were forced to revolt.
Speaker 22: Where do you find still such a prime minister in the world? You'll find it in the Netherlands, and it's Mark Goode.
Speaker 10: And remember too, the Netherlands is the pilot program of the World Food Hubs, and the World Economic Forum has assigned to the Netherlands What they call this global secretariat, using ironically communist term for it.
Speaker 4: Klaus Schwab's golden pinup boy, prime minister Mark Rutte is busy fulfilling the agenda of the World Economic Forum's great reset by turfing farmers off their own land.
Speaker 21: Perhaps the most important lesson I've learned in my years as prime minister of one
Speaker 19: of the world's Most outward looking trading countries
Speaker 21: is that
Speaker 19: national interests are often best Served by international corporation.
Speaker 11: Schwab has sold this idea because they're up against the law. Okay. You have all these governments. You're basically broke. So what will happen is if they defaulted, then All the people who have lost their pensions, they've counted on it, and they're gonna be storming their palaces with pitchforks.
Schwab has sold the idea that, Well, we go towards Marxism, and you can still regain power.
Speaker 4: None of these net zero climate schemes work without massively disrupting or even destroying the lives of the little people.
Speaker 37: If you think about what created wealthy people wealthy throughout the many years where human history was the ownership of land. And you have governments right now that are looking to take ownership of real estate, and it's happening everywhere. And you have this movement of individuals kind of going like, Hey, like, people should never profit off of real estate. And unfortunately, that ideology is what The government is using to take control If we look
Speaker 12: at data from 2001 to 2015 there is a slow and steady trend towards more corporations Owning single family homes, apartments, office spaces, and less and less individuals actually owning real estate. Blackstone Group actually recently raised a record of $50,000,000,000 to take homes from American families.
Speaker 1: During the pandemic, when all people were ordered to lock down indoors, Why did governments around the world make exceptions for mass protests? We've all heard the term fire sale. In this case, it's not a metaphor. When a community is damaged by protests, the value of local properties plummet. Investors then gobble up the devalued real estate for pennies on the dollar.
In many cases, the leaders of the decimated communities receive kickbacks for allowing this transfer of wealth.
Speaker 4: Big companies and investment firms swooping in and buying up some of the only affordable homes in your neighborhood.
Speaker 37: The more you have individuals not own their own home, the more you have individuals not financially independent, creates more dependence on big financial corporations that profit off of mass people. So We are going towards a world where the people are owning nothing. I always say, like, if if we don't own anything, well, who does?
Speaker 3: Bill Gates, business magnate, software developer, philanthropist, nation's largest farmland owner. Gates owns nearly 270 Thousand
Speaker 11: It's a reinstitution of Marxism where, you know, communism owned all the property.
Speaker 1: In his communist manifesto, Karl Marx wrote, the theory of communism may be summed up in a single sentence. Abolition of private property. Karl Marx was a German philosopher and social theorist who lived in the 1800. He is the co author of the communist manifesto, which has been referred to as the bible of communism. His theories of class conflict and dialectical Materialism were instrumental in shaping socialist and communist movements worldwide.
Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, Mao Zedong, Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Kim Jong Un, Hugo Chavez, Nicolas Maduro, and many other communist revolutionaries have cited Marxism As the foundation of their political ideologies, Marx rejected all concepts of God, as well as the traditional family. According to members of his own family, Marx was emotionally, verbally, and physically abusive. His wife Ginny was plagued by depression, which was compounded by Carl's adulterous impulses and his inability to provide for his children. Despite his privileged upbringing and formal education, Karl Marx was often unwilling to work and instead relied on the financial support of friends and family.
Speaker 6: In 1943, the following directive was issued from party headquarters to all communists in the United States. It read, when certain obstructionists become too irritating, label them as fascist or Nazi or antisemitic. In the public mind, constantly associate those who oppose us with those names which already have a bad smell. The association will, after enough repetition, become fact in the public mind.
Speaker 4: The founding fathers were racist, This misogynist Fascist
Speaker 21: fascist
Speaker 4: fascist political party Radicals on the far right, anti
Speaker 25: Semitic Anti Semitic. Xenophobic
Speaker 4: Transphobic Uncle Towns White supremacists. Domestic terrorists. Neo Nazi organizer.
Speaker 10: Nazis. You are an anti vaxxer. Anti vaxxers.
Speaker 6: Racist. Racist. Racist.
Speaker 4: Racist. Name calling is their number one bullying tactic, and they apply it unremittingly to anyone who questions their dogma or says Something they find unacceptable or abusive. Let's go. Get
Speaker 6: yourself. As early as 1928, The communist declared that the racial differences among our people constituted the weakest and most vulnerable point in our social fabric. By constantly probing and straining at this one spot, they calculated that eventually, the cloth could be torn apart And that Americans could be divided, weakened, and perhaps even set against each other in open combat. They said in no unmistakable terms that the Negro people, because of their social status and their predominant working class composition, offered greater revolutionary possibilities than any other cross section of the population.
Speaker 4: How do we get out of this mess? Revolution. Nothing lies. Revolution. Nothing lies.
Revolution. Revolution. Nothing lies. Revolution. Nothing lies.
Revolution. Nothing lies.
Speaker 6: The communist call not only for extensive chaos within the cities. The plan is for raging fires from 1 city to the next. The average American may say soft and decadent When he sees billows of black smoke rising from 1 horizon to the other, when at night, the only light he has to see by is the flickering red from flames leaping into the I he'll become paralyzed with fear and panic and do nothing to interfere with the gorilla bands as they strike at the community's power centers. To justify violence, they have to be able to claim that they're liberating people. And if people are to be liberated then it's necessary to go through the motions at least of pretending that they have a right to form a nation of their own.
The communist party called for their liberation to break away from the United States and to set up their own nation within our borders.
Speaker 4: Activists now control a barricaded area. It's been called an autonomous zone.
Speaker 3: They want it to be free of capitalism, state authority, and police.
Speaker 6: To take the United States, all of the United States, it'll be necessary, they say, to involve white people as well as And in general, to escalate their revolution in America from race war to class war.
Speaker 4: Be the race and be the war.
Speaker 6: Now when they talk about pressure from above, they mean using their people and their influence within the very government marked for takeover To bring forward official recommendations for legislation. The recommendations, of course, are offered supposedly as solutions to national problems. But when passed into law, their only real effect is to vastly increase the power of government and to move the country That much closer toward the ultimate goal. The pressure from below then involves using their influence over the various mass membership organizations of the country To create the appearance of great popular support for these recommendations. Of course, the members of those organizations Must never suspect that they're being used to promote the communist program.
Now the silent majority, the average person, is caught right in the middle. He looks above and sees highly respected spokesman for government calling for socialist legislation. He looks below And sees mobs of demonstrators shouting for the same thing. He says to himself, has everyone gone crazy or is it me? Now he's still in the majority, of course, but he doesn't know it.
He thinks he's helplessly outnumbered, and he bows to what he thinks is the democratic will of the majority.
Speaker 38: Here's an interesting thing I've noticed is even with a lot of these Ideologies. Right? With what people call these days, you know, woke. If people were these horrible, awful, bigoted, racist, xenophobic, white, It wouldn't even work. The only reason it even works is because people are so compassionate that they oh, like, I wanna make sure I use the right words And I say the right phrase is so you're you're actually weaponizing the fact that people are decent people, and you're taking that compassion and you're targeting it At oh, this is the group of people who you should be angry at.
They weaponized human compassion.
Speaker 6: We mustn't kid ourselves into thinking that the communists have placed their agitators only into the black communities. They're working both sides of the street. They want hatred, violence, and bloodshed between the races, and they don't care how they get it or whom they use, even children if necessary.
Speaker 14: My young comrades. Hi. This is my way of figuring out if you've been tainted by the patriarchy.
Speaker 4: This looks
Speaker 34: creepy. It
Speaker 14: looks creepy. Why?
Speaker 34: There's just, like, this thing about white people that just makes me.
Speaker 14: Oh, looks like Donnie got a full cookie. He's a white man.
Speaker 4: Say it with me. Structural racism. Yeah.
Speaker 6: You may have wondered why the Communist party has been a staunch supporter of the drive to place a black studies curriculum Into our high schools and colleges. The reason becomes obvious the minute you take a look at the textbooks and the study guides.
Speaker 3: Schools are now radicalizing our Kids, I mean, this is the volume of the book from, Critical Race Theory, and it literally says here, whiteness is a bad deal, And it has a symbol of Satan.
Speaker 7: You're gonna deliberately teach kids, this black kid right here got it better than you because he white? You're gonna Personally tell a white kid? Oh, the black people are all down and suppressed. How do I have 2 medical degrees if I'm sitting here oppressed?
Speaker 39: Not only is it in the Schools, but it's in the workplaces throughout society. It's destroying this country.
Speaker 40: If this continues, we will look back and be responsible for the dismantling of the greatest country in the world by reverting to teaching hate and that race is a determining factor on where your destiny lies. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Sarasota school board chairwoman, what has been the worst of what you've had to deal with in terms of community or parental reaction?
Speaker 18: You know, the the the calling of names, you know, the you know, tyrant, Marxist, communist, and they wanna move kids over to charter schools and private schools, without the oversight of the state, and that's wrong. Education authorities in
Speaker 4: the United States are asking the government to use antiterror laws and involve the FBI against parents who protest against the way their children are being taught.
Speaker 23: It identifies no fewer than Thirteen possible federal crimes, including making annoying phone calls. How about this one? They could be prosecuted for using the Internet in a way that might cause emotional distress.
Speaker 6: Over the weekend, Democrats voted to ban gendered language In house rules, that means no more terms like father or mother.
Speaker 25: Is the administration's official policy to replace the term woman with birthing people
Speaker 3: Black birthing people
Speaker 18: black birthing people black and indigenous birthing people.
Speaker 23: You shifted from in places from using the turn mother to birthing people. Again, if we're trying to be precise in in the language that's used. Mom's a pretty good Word.
Speaker 35: Not a birth person. I'm a mother.
Speaker 13: Can you provide a definition for the word woman?
Speaker 14: Can I provide a definition? No. Yeah. I can't.
Speaker 13: You can't?
Speaker 14: Not in this context. I'm not in biology.
Speaker 13: Of the word woman is so unclear and controversial that you can't give me A definition?
Speaker 25: Do you believe then that men can become pregnant and have abortions?
Speaker 4: Yes.
Speaker 35: Literally everything
Speaker 3: that was fought for for women's rights is going straight down the drain.
Speaker 41: This environment that has been Created and corrupted and manipulated does not respect women, does not respect children, does not respect men. It cares nothing for family. So that's why they have to Attack mother and remove father because she's gonna protect that child, he's gonna protect that woman, and they both are gonna protect society.
Speaker 3: Good evening. Good evening.
Speaker 4: Thank you very much. Thank you for your service.
Speaker 42: When you talk about a parent child relationship, you're talking about something primal That is in the heart of the liberal, not the Marxist. That's in the heart of the person who's conservative. And they're pushing the boundaries on something that they cannot control.
Speaker 13: Washington state is on track to lawfully Take gender support children away from parents who oppose transitioning treatment.
Speaker 36: That is against the constitution. The only time a parent loses their rights is if there's an
Speaker 43: Extreme circumstance. It's severing the bond between the parent and the child.
Speaker 36: What they're doing is they're dividing families to take control of the Children.
Speaker 43: The biggest defense against communism is the nuclear family.
Speaker 1: In chapter 2 of his communist manifesto, Karl Marx wrote, Abolition of the family. The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course.
Speaker 30: We're here today to represent the millions of black Americans who disagree with the Black Lives Matter movement.
Speaker 4: If you
Speaker 30: go to Black Lives Matter website, it says that we disrupt the nuclear Family. That's my wife. This is our 4 children. Why would you disrupt the nuclear family?
Speaker 6: Because the real objective Is to remove the family as a possible alternate source of guidance and support. All totalitarian regimes Strive to destroy the close knit family in order to remove any loyalties that might be higher than to the state itself.
Speaker 10: I have seen Over the years in my practice, a steady decline in the expression of healthy masculinity and healthy femininity. The separation between the male and the female It's almost complete now. And it's due specifically to the ongoing attacks against masculinity And the degradation of femininity. And if our family structure is lost in the next generation, what do we have left? We're just a bunch of listless individuals Living our lives out virtually behind a computer screen and following the orders of the government.
Speaker 18: Maybe it's because I came in the movement at 17a half, so I have, Like, just a knack for knowing how to organize young people. I was at the our publications table today. And I was speaking to this young person. And he grabbed the book. And he said he's like Now is that book.
And I was like, man, that's what I was thinking. And it was just really cool to hear him make that connection. And I was like, how about you buy like 10 to 15 of these books. And you all have like a youth organizing group where you talk about it and you really try to engage this. We need to build off of this.
We actually do have an ideological frame. Myself and Alicia in particular, we are trained Marxists. I do believe in Marxism. It's a philosophy that I learned really early on in my organizing career.
Speaker 3: Investigations into the Black Lives Matter Organization has revealed links to groups that are pro communist China.
Speaker 14: The self proclaimed Marxist Black Lives Matter cofounder, Alicia Garza, Also owns the Black Futures Lab project. Yet all would be lost for the Black Future Lab if not for the Chinese Progressive Association. Donations to the Black Futures Lab don't go directly to the foundation itself. Chinese progressive association gets them instead.
Speaker 1: Through forensic investigations, we now know That the 2020 BLM fiery but mostly peaceful protests were organized and partially funded through a network of pro communist organizations. One of the groups is US based Liberation Road, which was founded by a faction of the Communist Party of Vietnam. Liberation Road is allied with the new communist movement and has direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party. The San Francisco based Communist rooted Chinese progressive association formed a sister company called Asians For Black Lives To serve as a bridge between BLM and the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 17: I spent a lot of time with president Xi. He's deadly earnest We're becoming the most significant consequential nation in the world.
Speaker 1: When we speak of China, it's important to distinguish between the people and the oppressive government. And while the Communist Party of China is undoubtedly America's greatest foreign adversary, it's crucial to recognize that the most urgent threat to future of the United States resides within its own borders.
Speaker 6: We're so used to thinking in terms of the old fashioned concepts of warfare, We failed to realize that the favorite weapons of communist conquest are instead propaganda.
Speaker 8: Do you know who
Speaker 0: the greatest propagator of disinformation in the history of the world is? The US government,
Speaker 6: a slanted view of history.
Speaker 3: History has been written to tell us a certain story. The 16/19 project was just trying to reframe that story.
Speaker 4: What these people are doing is subverting young black minds to think that revolutionary war was fought in order to Preserve slavery. And it's based on something that simply isn't true.
Speaker 6: The tactics of internal subversion.
Speaker 3: I thought that America was racist. I thought it was Patriarkable. I thought our capitalist society was just a means of exploiting people. And I thought all these things because that is what I was told
Speaker 6: the preaching of hatred to incite civil disorder.
Speaker 4: I wanna tell you, Kavanaugh, you have released the whirlwind, and you will pay A
Speaker 3: California man is facing federal charges for the attempted murder
Speaker 8: of Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh. Treason, blackmail, Miss Schmitt.
Speaker 14: This is the 1st time Assange is being questioned over the rape allegations.
Speaker 30: The LA Times ran an article Calling Larry Elder a black white supremacist.
Speaker 6: All committed by soldiers who wear no uniform and who claim to be loyal citizens of the target country marked for conquest from within. World War 3 that rages around us right now is a political war, an economic war, a psychological war, a spiritual war. As a matter of fact, the bomb, As a psychological weapon is being dropped on the American people every single day.
Speaker 3: You probably assume you're safe. That could be a deadly mistake. Bracing for
Speaker 4: food shortages. Labor shortages. Shipping delays. Supply chain disruption.
Speaker 8: A new coronavirus variant. The first I'm a mercenary. Antrims.
Speaker 4: Can kill you. It can kill you.
Speaker 3: A surging crime.
Speaker 8: A surging
Speaker 11: crime. Acts of terrorism.
Speaker 8: Domestic terrorism. White terrorism. White To the premises Mass shootings, and nuclear conflict, conflict, World War 3,
Speaker 3: World War 3,
Speaker 4: Fire, storms, deadly floods.
Speaker 5: I don't want you to be hopeful. Times tells
Speaker 4: us we have 9 years. This storm will kill you.
Speaker 5: I want you to panic.
Speaker 4: It is promoting fear. It will kill your children.
Speaker 3: Feeling the fear. It will
Speaker 4: kill your pets. The world is at
Speaker 6: a very terrifying place. Unless you get lucky.
Speaker 35: I want you to feel the fear
Speaker 1: I think it's important to note that the When we're in a state of fear and then how that affects our external choices and the direction of our lives.
Speaker 10: This is well known and well Searched in the psychological literature and the psychiatric literature that when someone is afraid, when someone is in a state of fear, that person cannot think rationally. You resort back to a more primitive way of making decisions, which is highly emotionally driven. And when you're placed in a Chronic state of fear as we have been, you end up in a, what I would call a traumatized state. Meaning that you're not just momentarily scared, you are frozen. You have seen your ability to think critically suspended.
Speaker 25: The issue is not about COVID or vaccines or anything else. It's not that. That is the polarizing impulse that gives rise to our general sensibilities, Which then amplifies our willingness to fall for reflexive classifications like race or, you know, the isms that we wanna fight about. The more we can distract people by creating the illusion that says everything is fearful, the more we can manipulate the population.
Speaker 10: We were groomed for decades to be fearful, whether it was drop and cover We must be ready all the time if the atomic bomb explodes. Duck and cover. To protect against the threat of nuclear annihilation or more recently, the impending ecological collapse of our planet in 12 years that AOC and Greta Thunberg keep warning us about.
Speaker 14: The world is gonna end in 12 years if we
Speaker 13: don't address climate change. How dare you?
Speaker 10: All of these Fears are grounded to some degree in reality. They're not completely invented, but they are exaggerated so greatly That we cannot actually reason through them anymore.
Speaker 38: When people are afraid, they won't just accept authoritarianism. They'll demand They will demand it. Somebody do something. Somebody take charge and tell me what to do. Like, where do I stand?
Where do I walk? What do we do? What are the rules? And, again, people in power always use that, right, where they say never let a good crisis go to waste. We can take this, and we can now enact policies that normally we wouldn't be able to get away with.
Speaker 27: Maybe in a couple of decades when people look back, the thing they will remember from the COVID crisis, this was the moment That we agreed to be surveyed all the time.
Speaker 38: And maybe even after the event is over, maybe we can still keep 30%. And over time, multiple crises, oh, suddenly you have a government or an individual who has far more power than they're Actually supposed to. The leaders of the mass, the
Speaker 20: people who pronounce a narrative in public space usually are hypnotized themselves. They believe they need to reshape society to be able to deal with the challenges society faces and they believe so fanatically in that ideology that they think it's justified fight to manipulate and cheat and to use all kinds of narratives to convince people to go along with that ideology.
Speaker 17: We're gonna go visit mom. I'm gonna bring the home family to see mom.
Speaker 25: No.
Speaker 18: We will shut you down. We will cite you. And if we need to, we will arrest you, And we will take you to jail. You either get your tests done and make sure you're cleared, or we will keep
Speaker 21: you in a facility longer.
Speaker 26: It's gonna be very hard for people To do a lot of normal life unless they can prove their vaccination status.
Speaker 4: Such as you're not gonna work in this particular agency or institution. You're not gonna be able to go to this college or this university. Once we start doing that, you will see more and more people willingly Get vaccinated.
Speaker 1: If the fear of losing your job, your friends, family, and future isn't enough to coerce you into submission, Perhaps these incentives will entice you to willingly comply.
Speaker 4: Everything from cash prizes to college scholarship.
Speaker 3: Now Offering kids 12 and up limited edition Avengers comic book.
Speaker 23: Thousands of prizes available.
Speaker 18: Including cruises
Speaker 3: and Super Bowl tickets.
Speaker 4: We're giving away Ford F one they truck, they're giving away shotguns and hunting rifles. The marijuana dispensaries are giving away
Speaker 3: Joints for jacks. Krispy Kreme announcing this week a free doughnut. And, yes, Free beers.
Speaker 17: That's right. Get a shot and have a beer.
Speaker 3: Today could be your lucky day.
Speaker 17: California's vaccine lottery.
Speaker 14: One grand winner to take
Speaker 25: home Up to five $5,000,000 if you get vaccinated next week.
Speaker 4: They made it exciting. Right? There's a reason people go to Vegas.
Speaker 3: It really We could be somewhat lucrative if they aren't already persuaded. 13 year old Joshua says one of the best parts of getting a shot at Mickey D's, lunch on the house.
Speaker 23: Just think of this when you think of vaccination.
Speaker 22: Vaccination.
Speaker 14: If you need luck with love, Dating apps are offering incentives to Vienna Brothe is
Speaker 3: providing COVID nineteen vaccinations and giving those who take up the offer a 30 minute with a, quote, lady of their choice.
Speaker 4: We have finally found the one thing that makes us all more attractive, a vaccination.
Speaker 26: To love one another, as Jesus said, Get vaccinated. Get boosted. Do you think that it's being posed as politics, but it's behaving like a religion?
Speaker 4: This is acting like a religion. Yeah. This is dogmatic. It's absolute. It's if you do not believe in it, you are condemned to hell.
Maybe this is New religion.
Speaker 3: God did answer our prayers. He made the smartest men and women, the scientists, the doctors, the researchers. He made them come up with a vaccine. That is from God to us, and we must say thank you, God. Thank you.
Speaker 6: There was a time and not too long ago, I think, when we could have pulled ourselves Out of this without too great a sacrifice on the part of anyone, but we didn't. Instead, we slept. Everywhere I look, I see men and women who know that communists are making headway in this country. They know that something must be done and that someone must stand up to them, but they themselves do nothing. They remain silent because they're afraid that if they speak out, it'll be bad for business.
They may lose a client. They may even lose their jobs, or perhaps they're receiving a regular government check and already are too dependent upon some of the very people and programs they know they should oppose. We have now passed the point of painless solutions And parlor patriotism. Well, alright. So what do we do about it?
What are the countermeasures that need to be taken? And where do we begin? Before we finally win this battle, and I should hasten to say that there's no doubt in my mind that we're going to win. I'm increasingly convinced of this. But before we finally do see victory, we must carry the truth To every man, woman, and child in America, I have no idea of what each of you is going to do In the critical days that lie ahead, it may be much.
It may be little. It may be nothing at all. I don't know. Only you can answer that question. But, ladies and gentlemen, whatever it is you decide to do for your country, Do it soon.
Do it now. Every minute that you delay further We'll add dearly
Speaker 8: to the price of ultimate victory.
Speaker 1: Mister Griffin, that was over 50 years ago. Where are we now?
Speaker 8: Hearing that phrase after all these years is kind of a shocker Because I didn't realize really at the time how accurate it was going to be. But we're in the middle of it now, And so the ultimate victory is still ahead of us.
Speaker 1: How did you know way back then what would be happening today?
Speaker 8: It's a long story of course, but I did take A tour of the communist bookstore in Los Angeles when I was very, very young. I was working For an insurance company, I was Mr. Corporate America. That was the period when the hippie image was pretty popular, and a lot of these guys in that book in that uniform.
Speaker 6: And I think they felt that
Speaker 8: was a potential recruit. You know?
Speaker 14: Yes. We've always been quite willing to
Speaker 4: talk about I would talk about Socialism anywhere, and the speech and, consent it anywhere. You know? Is there a communist faction making a big power play for
Speaker 8: us here?
Speaker 4: Is there any communist back here? I guess there is.
Speaker 8: Yes. They are communist. And yet our nation seems unconcerned. Many newspapers, television commentators, and educators call these young revolutionaries dissidents. But are these voices voices of mere descent, Of mere student unrest or of sedition and revolution?
They invited me to Come to their study groups, they call them. They were really the recruiting funnel. You know? And, I didn't have to pretend to be interested because I was interested. I wanted to See what these guys were up to.
In the course, the more I read, the more I realized that these guys were deadly serious. And so my crusader gene said, hey, buddy. You better stop worrying about the corporate ladder and making money and looking good and start doing something about it. And I'm glad I did, because after that point, my life had a meaning and had had a purpose more than just self centered.
Speaker 4: Who are
Speaker 1: some of the key figures behind this agenda?
Speaker 8: I'm not sure we can name names. We know that there are layers and layers of control and influence, Sort of pyramidal in form at the bottom level, of course, assist all the common people. Most of them don't even know what's going on. It used to be that an invader could come in with a superior army, and people resent it, but they obey because if they don't, they get killed. Now if they want to conquer people in this environment, they have to do it through the mind.
And, of course, today, after all the technology that we have And the control over the communications and the images and the school system and the media, they have absolute control over the funnel of information that comes to the average person. And the average person, if they're not aware that there's a real war going on for their mind, they will be helpless. And as long as people are on the edge of fear, they're willing to give up their liberties and pay lots and lots in taxes.
Speaker 4: A tax On carbon.
Speaker 8: And as I pass through that idea that, in my view, the enemy is in a category called collectivism, And that's the word that applies to all of these things, socialism, communism, fascism, Naziism. All of these things are merely variants of collectivism. That is the philosophy based on the assumption that the group is more important than the individual, and that the individual must be sacrificed if necessary For the greater good of the greater number. That's the trick. You're doing this for society.
Speaker 4: Obviously, you don't like to Tell people what to do, but sometimes for the good of society, that's necessary. We have to start doing things for the greater good of society And not for idiots who think that they can do their own research. But
Speaker 26: it's not about me and my rights to choose. It's about how I love my neighbor.
Speaker 3: You are not doing this for yourself.
Speaker 39: If you
Speaker 3: are at all like me, your own health, your own risk is not a big rational driver of all of your actions.
Speaker 8: They trick us into thinking that if you act in your own self interest, that somehow you are selfish, and nothing could be further from the truth. Those of us who have discovered this trick long ago, we realize that enlightened self interest comes into play. If you are acting out of self interest, You soon discover that the best way to benefit yourself is to help other people. It does come back.
Speaker 1: The question is, how do we turn this ship around?
Speaker 8: I think that the path to political hell in America has and voting for the lesser of 2 evils. They create conflict because conflict creates fear and confusion, and out of that Chaos. People are not too analytical. They just struggle for some quick answer, which is who you're gonna vote for? That's usually the answer that's offered to them.
They think that If you just vote for somebody, the the right person, everything will go away. You cannot wait until there's a list of candidates It's published, and you say, which one am I gonna choose? By that time, the game is over. All those candidates have been selected before you were even aware. You've got to get into politics at the local level so you have some influence in which candidates are selected.
And that starts at the grassroots level. You don't come in at the top. You come in at the bottom. If we do that job, we will influence both political parties Just like our opponents do now.
Speaker 10: There is actually a way forward and a way out, but it's gonna require work, and it's also gonna require that we acknowledge That we have wronged ourselves. That we are part of this problem. It's not the government that caused this. The government facilitated it. What caused it was our being asleep at the wheel.
Without taking accountability, we cannot move forward.
Speaker 41: The masses of humanity have been Slapped awake, in a very short period of time to where now it has created a domino effect of awareness All across the planet, people cannot go back into the matrix now. They can't. A lot of people are trying to, And he can't.
Speaker 36: We have the right as citizens in this country to abolish government and create a new one. And that is the authority that has been given to us. It is written in our documents, the declaration of independence, the constitution of the United States, the declaration of human rights. We have indelible rights. And the basis of those rights are our freedoms.
And if we don't have that, we don't have life. And so we have to awaken. We have to arise. We have to fight.
Speaker 28: The natural rights of every individual is life, liberty, and property, And establishing a country on a premise that had never been established before, that the individual is sovereign because their rights are endowed to them by sovereign god.
Speaker 42: This which has happened can only be described as divine, which is why we're the nation. Our ideology, our way of life is always under this relentless attack that we have defeated over and over again, And we
Speaker 20: will defeat it this time.
Speaker 43: We're all fighting with each other. And the way that we combat that is doing the opposite of what these war Overlords want us to do which is fight with each other. We should be, learning how to forgive and and inviting other people to the table even if we disagree with them and, extending grace to one another even if we, know that they've done something that we totally disagree with. Because that's how we ultimately are going to heal as a nation is understanding that we all come from different walks of life and we all live here together, and Let's let's start talking!
Speaker 37: The only real problem that's existed in the world is the vision! It's that people are not getting in rooms Willing to speak with one another, see each other's hearts, and get to know, Hey, what do you believe? What do I believe? And is there a way we can actually work together to solve these problems? And I'm going to bet that most of the Gen Zers would say yes.
That's what we can do right now, and that's why I'm glad we're the age
Speaker 6: that we are because we can
Speaker 37: be leaders of that conversation. Mhmm.
Speaker 32: When I started to realize like, wow. Freedom's a polarizing concept for some reason. Thought this was America. Is this America? It is?
K. World's different than I thought. So my fear was I'm gonna, I could lose everything. I could lose my audience. I could lose my business.
But I knew, especially having a I'm coming to the world. I am imprinting something on his beautiful, innocent, fragile psyche and heart. I'm imprinting the man that I am Or I'm imprinting a hollow shell of the man that I refuse to be. And I knew in that moment, I'm willing to risk losing everything To do that, I would rather pick up cans on the side of the highway to feed my family than to live out of alignment with my truth and betray my son. Just say no.
Rise up in a nonviolent way.
Speaker 0: They can't imprison everyone. They can't fire everyone, but they can fire individuals that are separated and don't work together and get into the fear. And don't sacrifice your future for a few conveniences now in the present. You should sacrifice maybe the present conveniences so that you're gonna have a future.
Speaker 39: The media has done a good job at, Stripping from us our ability to think on our own and for ourselves. If we can get back to that, I think that we can build a stronger America.
Speaker 16: In my opinion, the first step you have to take is you have to get out from under the controlled mechanisms, And that means blow up your TV, don't listen to the fear porn, and set yourself free of debt, Which is what controls you and controls everything around you. It is the weapon
Speaker 20: that is used. The most important thing is always that the dissonant voices continue to speak out and, also extremely important, that they don't start to form a mass or a crowd themselves, because that happens very easily as well. It happens very easily. Once a large scale mass formation starts, the people who do not go along with them feel threatened and they can start to form a mass themselves. So it's extremely important not to form a mass ourselves.
That means to form a group, a coherent group, and that what unifies this group Should in the 1st place be the fact that everybody who belongs to the to the group can have his own opinion and can speak in his own way?
Speaker 1: What matters most to you?
Speaker 29: I think what matters most to me is freedom. Freedom. I want as little laws as necessary to keep us from killing each other. I mean, I get it. There's crazy people out there.
We have to find a balance. In the end, I want my children to live in a world where they're free to dream, To take risks, to fail, to succeed.
Speaker 8: Hardship strengthens us. We wouldn't have had The American revolution and the beta model for the American constitution, the beta model of a republic in the modern world, unless The tyranny of king George had been unbearable. All
Speaker 5: the good
Speaker 8: things in life usually are result of some kind of a rebound against Something that's very not good at all, very painful.
Speaker 4: I mean, I
Speaker 29: think about if someone had jumped in there and taken away my failures. I can't do what I'm doing now if someone had kept me from really hurting, really learning lessons that were hard to learn so that I would never make that
Speaker 8: In a philosophical sense, we should be thankful for this movement that's happening. It's in In spite of the fact that it's it's tragedy and it's hurting people and all that, but without it, we might just go right along in that pot and be boiled in time. But now the frog is jumping out, and we have a chance coming up here now to create a new vision, and it's going to be great.
Speaker 20: It's a bit cynical, but it is in the end good news that mass formation and totalitarianism always destroys itself in a relatively short time span. And the most important thing, of course, is that you have to make sure That the system does not destroy you before it destroys itself.
Speaker 8: Throughout history, it was always a very small minority. History has It's been written by the 1% of the population. 15% of the population create history, And they follow the leadership, the thought leadership of 1%. But that 15% altogether is what changes history. And so all we have to do is reach 15% of the population.
I think today, after all this time, we have more than 15%. We just Have to get them together so they realize that they're not alone, and that's our task right now.
Speaker 38: I don't think our societies I've taken the moment to, look up and actually see and appreciate how much progress has been made in the past century. On so many different levels, we have made incredible progress. Like, what we've got here is actually great. It's imperfect, And we should still be making tweaks carefully to try to make it better. And I think that's where so much of that self hatred or hatred of the nation or hatred of the other or whatever comes from.
From this lack of perspective and gratitude and inability to take a moment, chill out on the activism, and go, wait. Actually, Okay. We we've achieved a very unique and special point in history, and let's be let's be careful with that.
Speaker 1: On that note, as a man who's traveled the world Yeah. Have you experienced any nation that has course corrected beyond their sins more than the US has? No.
Speaker 5: It's sad to see Americans who live in a free country, born as Americans, And do not recognize their privileges. You are born American, a free country. You never suffered a starvation, And you need to go to other countries to find out why all the immigrants, many many of them want to Come here.
Speaker 21: What is happening in our backyard today, I experienced, As an 11 year old, I remember vividly all the promises And a guy named Castro gave on how 99% of
Speaker 4: the people swallow the pill.
Speaker 21: He was gonna say Cuba. I remember how he promised to the farmers, to the guajiros that you're gonna own the land. I remember all the promises that we hear today About free education and free health care, a free land. Oh, my god. No freedom.
Speaker 8: The defectors here that are speaking out against the communist party in China are risking their lives, and, our government is not interested in listening to them or helping them in any way.
Speaker 33: I have been in America For 10 years, I saw a lot of Americans with wonderful hearts. America is a beacon of freedom. I'm happy living in this land, To practice my religion and to have a peaceful life, that's my hope.
Speaker 5: America is lost stand on Earth for freedom. If we lose this country, the world will be very dark place. I have 3 children in this country. I want to protect their American dream. So Here I am.
You know?
Speaker 1: I've noticed that every time you speak about America, your eyes fill with tears.
Speaker 5: I do. I do love this country. No place to go, and I just hope people can Hear my stories. For past 5 years, I've been telling the same thing. I have no political agenda here.
I just want to leave America and my my children leave America.
Speaker 4: Sorry about that.
Speaker 5: It's time to ask questions. It's time to wake up.
Speaker 1: We've been brought together in this moment to face the urgent choice between dehumanization In rehumanization, dehumanization requires us to do nothing. Nothing other than to allow that process to continue to the point took no return. Rehumanization, on the other hand, requires action. One action to remember. To remember what we knew as children, when everything was possible, before our attention was captured, Before the conditioning set in, before our nature was denied, there's nothing new we have to learn.
All we have to do is to remember.
Speaker 25: And then take the hand Of that memory, and go out and stand on ground. Not concrete, not asphalt. Stand on ground and see if you can feel the heartbeat of a universe That conspired to give you life so that you once again can feel The joy of being completely human, And then never forget that moment.
Speaker 1: This is the moment for us to activate our innate ability to create solutions that can only happen through the awareness of symbiosis defined as a mutually beneficial relationship between different groups. All of life depends on relationships. Every living thing is in communication. From the stars to the planets, the Earth, the plants, the elements, the insects, the animals, humans and every cell within us, real change out there begins with real change Inside.
Speaker 6: As Americans today, we are truly a privileged people in a Privileged land. But with our blessings come responsibilities, and with responsibilities come risks. The challenge of our time is that we must accept both the responsibilities of our blessings And the risks involved in defending them for ourselves and for future generations. And we must do this without hesitation. If we are to be worthy benefactors Of that precious heritage of freedom passed on to us through the epic sacrifices of those who have gone before.
Now that is not flag waving, and it is not cliched patriotism. That's a simple statement of the obligations of citizenship In this glorious land, our land, which with god's help, We shall preserve.
@Skydive888 - Skydive
@RedactedKelly45
Video Transcript AI Summary
Under specific circumstances, it may be permissible for people to do certain things, as stated by various sources.
Full Transcript
People are But, there is such a and under very, very specific circumstances according to various be seemingly permissible,