TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SlightlyOffens
@SlightlyOffens - SlightlyOffensive
How the zionists got control of the government w/ Dr Jack Kruse (@DrJackKruse)
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to the speaker, Zionist control of the U.S. government began when Ben Gurion told Presidents Eisenhower and JFK that Jewish scientists helped build the atomic bomb and Israel wanted influence. While Eisenhower and JFK resisted, General Groves, who built the bomb secretly, pushed to drop it on Japan with Zionist support, even though it wasn't needed to end the war.
Eisenhower and others were angry because Groves wanted to claim the bomb won the war. Eisenhower forced Groves out of the military in 1947, but Groves, influential with Zionists, helped replace Henry Wallace with Truman as president to install "Fabian, Zionist, and friendlies" in the new CIA.
The speaker claims this was a mistake by Eisenhower and Truman. Groves transferred military brainpower to the CIA, led by George Kennan and Allen Dulles. Dulles's right-hand man, Richard Helms, later got rid of MK Ultra files and forced Jim Garrison to prosecute Clay Shaw for JFK's murder, denying Shaw's CIA ties until after Shaw's death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you want to know how the Zionists got ultimate control of the government, it starts right here. This story is very important. Why? Because eventually, when Ben Gurion is the first Prime Minister of Israel, he famously tells American president, which is Eisenhower and JFK, that we gave you our Jewish scientists to build this bomb and we now would like a say in what's going on. That's how it originally started.
So in other words, the Zionists have a quid pro quo with our government. Now, initially, the two presidents we talked about, they pushed hard back on this. But who didn't push so hard back on it? This is really where America goes off the rails. You have to know a little bit about what General Groves did.
He did one of the most amazing engineering feats. He built an atomic bomb when we had no science to back this up. In two years, he does it secretively and he builds a silo where he puts all these different scientists that he brings from all these different countries because they're experts in different things. He doesn't allow them to talk to each other except that meetings that he holds, that's the framework he builds, and eventually it's so successful they build a bomb. From there, that's how we get Hanover in in Washington, that's how we get Oak Ridge in Tennessee, that's how you got Area 51 out in the desert where all these things are put together.
After the end of the war, it turns out from history that you didn't learn in your book, we didn't need the atomic bomb to end the war in Japan, but grows spent all this time and money building this. He was hell bent on dropping those two bombs. He had help from the Zionists that not yet were Israeli because remember, Israel doesn't form until 1948 to actually force the issue, not only with FDR, but really force the issue with Truman when Truman takes over after FDR dies. And what happens then? Eisenhower, Patton, general Marshall, all the ones that you know about that won the war in Europe with the Russians, they are pissed off at Groves.
Why? Because they believe that he's going to try to usurp the power and say that the bombs won the war. And that's eventually what guys like you are young, are really taught in school that the atomic bombs played that kind of role when they really didn't. Why is that big for you to understand? That was the impetus that forced Eisenhower right after the declaration was signed on the USS Missouri to force Groves out of the military.
What did Groves effectively do? He actually has to leave the military in 1947 but out the door because he was very influential in American politics with some of the Zionists to replacing Henry Wallace with Truman. That's how Truman gets to be president because he wants his guy in. What's the main goal of general Groves in this whole issue? To make sure that he has Fabian, Zionist, and friendlies in the government.
And where does he put those people specifically in the government? In the new CIA. And that that act is written in 1947, literally a couple of months before Groves is forced out. Why did this turn out to be the biggest mistake that Eisenhower and Harry Truman ever met? Harry Truman knew that Groves was lying to him, and and Jimmy Burns, who's the South Carolina senator, was really important in this whole mix because he realized he was getting hoodwinked.
And what Groves did is all the, how shall I say, brain power that was in the joint chiefs in the military was transferred into the CIA. Do you know who is one of those CIA directors? Because you have to know where the CIA comes from. ONI, OSS. Those are the people there.
George Kennan is that big guy, but who is Kennan tight friends with? Another Fabian. Kennan's a Fabian, but Alan Dulles is. Alan Dulles eventually goes on to become CIA directive who becomes his right hand man, a guy named Richard Helms, which will become really important in the JFK affair. Why?
Helms is the one that gets rid of MK Ultra boxes in 1973. Holmes is the one that forces Jim Garrison to have to put Clay Shaw on trial for the murder of JFK, denies that he's a CIA asset until 1979 after he's out of the CIA and and Clay Shaw is dead.
@SlightlyOffens - SlightlyOffensive
WATCH THE FULL INTERVIEW: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hu2n8L1QKno&ab_channel=AlmostSerious
@SlightlyOffens - SlightlyOffensive
FOLLOW FOR MORE: https://www.slightlyoffensive.com/
Rift TV | Political News, Media, and Entertainment
Rift TV (formerly Slightly Offensive) is an alternative news publication launched by Elijah Schaffer and the Rift TV team.
slightlyoffensive.com
@SlightlyOffens - SlightlyOffensive
JUST IN: Unearthed footage of @RealAlexJones reveals he was exposing the deep state long before it became popular He was one of the original voices for the unheard. Who’s laughing now? https://t.co/YPZUVZF2bb
Video Transcript AI Summary
Asking questions about manipulation and control often leads to being labeled a conspiracy theorist. Many people dismiss the existence of influential groups like the World Council of Churches and the Council on Foreign Relations, despite their visibility in public forums. The reality of corrupt international banking is evident, yet many remain oblivious, focusing instead on trivial matters. This ignorance is frustrating, as there is substantial evidence to support these claims. People often refuse to acknowledge the truth, insisting everything is fine and rejecting any challenge to their beliefs. This mindset is concerning and creates a divide between those who seek answers and those who remain complacent.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because if you ask me any questions, you're a conspiracy theorist and you'll be shunned and you'll be laughed at for thinking there could be manipulation and control. Forget the fact. You know, don't ever ask any questions. Never look under the water. The World Council of Churches Let me stop you right there.
Every one of those groups is real. I've seen them on C SPAN. I've I've read the, the the, the Council of Foreign Relations bimonthly book they put. I didn't buy it at Barnes and Noble or or any major bookstore. And it's called the name of it is called, you know, World Politics.
Yeah. Foreign Affairs and World Politics. And it the thing in there is just welcome to the New World Order. Do you know your way around? And this is the biggest industry in the world is corrupt international banking.
I don't mean local banking and they and it's real. They're out in the open but the little serfs, the little idiots, because Peter Jennings doesn't tell them that I don't mean to be mean, but they are. They just go, Big Mac cheeseburger, please. That's all I care about. And I'm just trying to say to them, you idiot.
It's real. It's real. Try it in front of your face. And they just go, no. It's conspiracy.
Everything is everything is wonderful. I never question anything. You can't prove one single shred of what you're saying. How dare you? You are a serious travesty.
In fact, I am very afraid of you militant type people.