reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @SoundInvestig
reSee.it AI Summary
CIA officer confirms presence in Ukraine under State Department cover. Border asylum process seen as unlikely to result in qualification. CIA could benefit from TikTok breakup. FBI accused of seizing money from disliked foreigners without reason. Corroboration of NYT article.
@SoundInvestig - Sound Investigations
BREAKING: CIA Officer CONFIRMS CIA “Advisors” in Ukraine “A Well-Known Secret” “Under State Department Cover” Border Asylum Process: Most Know “They’re Not Going to Qualify…Do It Enough Times, You Get a Sympathetic Ear” Says CIA Could Benefit From TikTok Breakup: “That’s Why They’re Passing the Law Now to Make ’Em Do It” FBI Seizes Money From Foreigners “We Don’t Like” for “No Reason,” Just “Because We Could”
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are undercover in Ukraine under State Department cover, providing intelligence and advice. We conduct credible fear interviews for asylum seekers. I managed multimillion-dollar contracts, including in Ukraine. The CIA could benefit from TikTok becoming American-owned. TikTok provides valuable intelligence, but it's banned due to Chinese ownership. If it's American-owned, we could use it for our advantage. Congress debates breaking up TikTok to make it usable for us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What are we doing? Where do we need to? We're under, state department cover. Ukraine doesn't even know that CIA is there?
Speaker 1: Oh, they know.
Speaker 0: Oh, do they? I mean,
Speaker 2: it's a well known security Right?
Speaker 0: Right. Because they're the simple intelligence.
Speaker 3: We give them intelligence and advice all the time.
Speaker 0: I mean, the advisers. Right.
Speaker 4: This is what the US would do. Okay.
Speaker 0: I did what they call the credible fear interviews for people who sleep asylum. I did that for, like, 3,000 people. Most of the people get there knowing they're not gonna qualify, but they try. Because, you know, if you do it enough times, you get a sympathetic ear, and they're like, the fruit.
Speaker 5: Recall Gavin Oblentes, the CIA officer who currently manages multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors. Before the CIA, Oblennis worked for the FBI and then briefly for Homeland Security.
Speaker 0: What's my signing authority agreement? Yeah. I do have a copy of the paper. Now I can tell my friend. See, there you go.
It says congratulations. It has the seal on it. See, I will tell her with my own eyes I saw it, and it's hiring official Scott Hobson. I like the bureau too. The bureau was a lot of fun.
I got to do a lot of cool stuff with the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Speaker 5: Speaking to a sound investigation undercover reporter, Oblennis seems to have confirmed an anonymously sourced New York Times article about the CIA's involvement in the Ukraine conflict.
Speaker 0: Are agents everywhere in the world? Every industry? Even even Ukraine? Yep. But that's not I didn't I didn't know that.
Why wouldn't we be? Oh, right. What are we doing? Whatever we need to. Right.
We're under, state department cover. Good. So if I go overseas Mhmm. My name will change. I'll have a full background.
And I'll
Speaker 2: go by that name, mom. I'm overseas.
Speaker 0: Wow. So Ukraine doesn't even know that CIA is there?
Speaker 1: Oh, they know.
Speaker 0: Oh, do they?
Speaker 2: I mean, it's a well known secret.
Speaker 0: Right? Right. Because we're the simple intelligence. We're not allowed to operate inside the US. So what do we do?
Go outside the US. So you guys must know a whole lot more about the Ukraine conflict than the the news is actually saying. Okay. I mean, that's just what we do. And we're good at it.
Right? I don't, but, you know, I just do I just transfer the money and spend the money for them. When it comes to Ukraine Ukraine, the agency can really get involved in military. Right?
Speaker 3: We give them intelligence and advice all the time.
Speaker 0: What about combat? No. We don't really do that. We're not allowed. Allowed.
I mean like advisers. Advisors? Also kinda like in the form of a general? Mhmm. Right.
Speaker 4: This is what the US would do.
Speaker 3: Okay. That was the end of the year.
Speaker 0: We did see the billy in it. You went in? Yeah. I was like, I'm just gonna pick you there. Amazing.
It was worth 9 $170,000,000. And who is this? An equivalent of oligarchs. We see it from above. Oh my.
Why? Because we could. There was no need no need for it. We just did it just because he was there. How many times does does Xero do that?
A lot. Really? Yeah. He sees all kinds of people's other, countries keeping, you know, wide. We see all kinds of who he did because all their money comes through here.
Right? Because That's good. I think we've got 35,000,000 of food and money for us in New York. That's amazing. Good.
Because that's not yours. Yeah. It is. It's in our accounts. It's on our shores.
Why don't we use that? So give it Ukraine. I'm sure there's some
Speaker 5: O'Glenis also spoke about his experience working for Homeland Security at the southern border.
Speaker 0: Just to prove you, I did work for Homeland Security. Oh, that's cool.
Speaker 1: So you know.
Speaker 0: I did what they call the credible fear interviews for people who seek asylum. Okay. So basically, you're coming in saying I need asylum and I have to interview you to make sure you hit the criteria. Like, are you persecuted against because of your religion, you know, the tribe you're from, or stuff like that. You know?
Is there fear of rape? Is there fear of human trafficking? That kind of stuff. So I sit on these interviews and I'm like, you know, your story's really sad, but you don't. Right.
Oh, that's difficult. Yeah. How many people did you have to do that? I do that for, like, 3,000 people. Out of how many?
Out of however many were coming. Like, I was there for 2 months. So that many people do qualify. Oh, yeah. So it's true that they're kind of just utilizing the system?
Yeah. Most most of the people get there knowing they're not gonna qualify, but they try. Because, you know, if you do it enough times, you get a sympathetic ear, and they're like,
Speaker 5: While Congress debates a controversial bill that could break up TikTok, Oblennis explains how the CIA could benefit from TikTok becoming an American owned product.
Speaker 0: What about this TikTok thing? What about it? It's so cute. Is it? Yes.
You can. Oh, we use it. How's the agency uses it? We need people to head out on social media. Really?
It tells you everything you need to know. So why are we banning it? Because it's owned by China, which they're pulling all the information to get intelligence. A lot people think it's like it doesn't tell you anything, but it actually tells you a lot. Like, where are you going?
How you know, are you in your room? What do you have in your room? What do you buy? What do you It tells you how this So why doesn't why don't we use it retroactively and turn that around for us? Yeah.
Yeah. Also I'm kidding. That's what shocks me about TikTok. Like, why don't we use it for our advantage? Maybe we do.
Maybe we don't. Just leave it like that? Yep. Just leave it like that. But, I mean, if it's if it's banned, we can't use it.
Okay. Correct. Well, we can we can use it if it's owned, if it's broken up, if it has, like, an American subsidiary Right. That's housed here, that's owned here, then we could use Why haven't we done that? Like, we are brilliant.
That's why they're passing the law now and they can do it.
@SoundInvestig - Sound Investigations
Corroboration of Adam Entous's and @mschwirtz's anonymously sourced piece in the NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/25/world/europe/cia-ukraine-intelligence-russia-war.html
The Spy War: How the C.I.A. Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin
For more than a decade, the United States has nurtured a secret intelligence partnership with Ukraine that is now critical for both countries in countering Russia.
nytimes.com
reSee.it AI Summary
A CIA officer/former FBI claims they can manipulate situations to incriminate anyone. They admit to targeting Alex Jones and using undercover agents during the J6 incident. The FBI also allegedly uses fake news and social media to provoke anger.
@SoundInvestig - Sound Investigations
BREAKING: CIA Officer/Former FBI Boasts “Can Put Anyone in Jail…Set ’Em Up!” “We Call It a Nudge” FBI “Did What We Wanted” with Alex Jones @RealAlexJones “Took His Money Away” “Chop His Legs Off” Estimates 20 Undercover FBI Agents at J6, Works with Some of Them Now at CIA FBI Uses “Embellished” News, “Fake Social Media” to “Really Get People Mad”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the practice of entrapment by the bureau, mentioning a nudge technique to provoke reactions. They talk about targeting Alex Jones to bankrupt him through civil lawsuits. The speaker also mentions undercover FBI agents at the Capitol riot, estimating about 20 agents present. The bureau's presence was kept discreet to avoid overstepping boundaries. The speaker confirms knowing agents who were at the riot.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You can kinda
Speaker 1: put anyone in jail if you know what to do.
Speaker 2: How? I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 0: Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot?
Speaker 3: Yeah. We get really close. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look
Speaker 3: just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow.
Speaker 2: That's something we're putting on a fake
Speaker 3: social media thing to, like, really get people mad.
Speaker 0: Balance
Speaker 3: Jones. Yeah. So we were after him. You are? We did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. He shot his legs.
Speaker 6: Gavin Oglenis is a contracting officer at the CIA. Oglenis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2020 2 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multimillion dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors.
Speaker 3: I work for, I work for this without I'm not supposed to tell people any job.
Speaker 0: I say intelligence, what do you think? CIA? Amazing.
Speaker 3: So I deal a lot with, like, different agencies. We're contracting with, like, director of National Intelligence to do stuff. We do Navy, Army, video, really. I just FBI. I used to work for the FBI.
So Yeah. Through the FBI app. They're like, here, you used to work there. Oh, I'm permanent. I'm still Yeah.
Speaker 0: Good. Well, why do they call contractors?
Speaker 3: Because I do the contracts. Uh-huh. I do all the legal contracts. With the bureau. I was the guy in the back of the truck in the van.
Speaker 6: O'Blennis spoke to an undercover signed investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles.
Speaker 0: As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro lifers in jail whenever they want. Yeah. You think that's on the agenda?
Speaker 2: We can we can
Speaker 3: you can kinda put anyone
Speaker 1: in jail if you know what to do. How?
Speaker 2: You set them
Speaker 3: up. You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. It's a fine line.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? Yeah. We get really close. Not officially?
Speaker 3: No. We get as close as we can. We get as close as we can to it without doing it.
Speaker 0: So they can entrap some of these pro lifers into doing things that they don't can do.
Speaker 3: Yeah. We call it a nudge.
Speaker 4: A nudge. A nudge.
Speaker 0: Sometimes you
Speaker 3: just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens. Right?
Speaker 0: And how does that happen?
Speaker 2: You put
Speaker 0: a post out there or
Speaker 3: you have some fake profile say something that triggers that we know is gonna trigger that. Like, we we already know your history. If we're to that point, we already know everything about So, like, oh, this is this one. Oh. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to fall.
Right?
Speaker 0: Like a railing. Like a oh. So when a railing happens, then sometimes the the bureau behind it. Yeah. Sometimes.
Speaker 2: Nothing like putting out a
Speaker 3: fake social media thing to, like, really get people mad. Mhmm. Post fake news. Yeah. Sometimes it's it's not fake.
It's embellished a little bit. Who would
Speaker 0: be, like, a big influencer that you're influencer that you're after? You're like, I don't know, like, I don't even know these names. Like, a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like oh, I'm sure he's Right.
Speaker 3: You always want the biggest and loudest. Like that what
Speaker 0: was his name? The one
Speaker 3: that said, Sandy Hook didn't happen.
Speaker 0: Alex Jones?
Speaker 3: Yeah. So we were after him.
Speaker 0: You are? Before.
Speaker 2: Are you still after
Speaker 0: him? Yeah. Why?
Speaker 3: Because he's broke. He got found guilty and had to pay, like, a $100,000,000.
Speaker 0: So what what are the after?
Speaker 3: We're not anymore.
Speaker 0: Just to get the money from him?
Speaker 3: Yeah.
Speaker 0: Was that court case used? Was that a CFO
Speaker 3: case?
Speaker 0: That was the agency there?
Speaker 3: Well, actually, it was a defamation case. So it's a civil document. Well, we were looking at all of his callers, commenting, oh, I'm like, who's that gonna be this? Right? So even though it's technically not our well, not an agency, definitely, but not the bureau, for instance, yeah, it was not our purview.
It's a civil civil matter. Since they got all this access to his stuff and it's there, What can we go find?
Speaker 1: And did you find
Speaker 3: it? I can't tell you.
Speaker 0: Oh, we did.
Speaker 3: But so, you know, it's it's just kinda, like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have.
Speaker 0: So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? I thought it
Speaker 3: was it wasn't my office, but, I mean, we would've we would've been well aware of what he was doing. And the
Speaker 0: goal with him was what?
Speaker 3: Just to bankrupt him? Pretty much. And we let the families do it. Oh my god. And what?
We let the families do it. Were they encouraged to do that by the bureau, like a nudge? We don't encourage people, but, like, we we just say there's no federal statute being broken. But you do have the option for a civil or a civil case. It's a pretty good case.
Nice. In our opinion.
Speaker 0: So oh, that makes so much sense. I have a cousin who's a lawyer. So that's a lot of these cases. They're they're kind of encouraged by the FBI.
Speaker 3: Yeah. Like, there's something federally federal law we can do. Let's simply, we'll add them that way. I I chopped this place, and they did. So the FBI was happy.
We didn't care. We were not
Speaker 0: home. Basically, the citizens did your job? Yeah. Wow. So you can encourage a civil lawsuit?
Speaker 3: Very encouraged. Educated. What can you do with
Speaker 0: people like Alex Jones now? Is he still out there? Good. He's still chirping.
Speaker 3: He can chirp? You still watching? Yeah. Why? I said He did what we wanted.
Speaker 5: Which was what?
Speaker 3: We took his money away. We shut him out for a while. You're never gonna shut him up for him.
Speaker 0: How well, unless you put him in prison.
Speaker 2: Yeah. I was going to
Speaker 3: Again, he didn't Being ignorant is not a crime, though. It's just It is. I mean, what
Speaker 0: you could bring a nun
Speaker 3: if he did inside a riot like Cheeto.
Speaker 1: He didn't furnish people to go
Speaker 3: shoot me. He didn't.
Speaker 6: Additionally, O'Blennis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance.
Speaker 0: I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at j 6.
Speaker 3: There are. There always are when there's a big protest in DC just in case it gets out of here.
Speaker 0: They but there
Speaker 3: wasn't wasn't enough to turn that tight. I mean, I'm talking to maybe have a 20. You needed a 1,000 to get rid of that that crap.
Speaker 0: So they had, like oh, that was on just 20?
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 3: Just to go through and see what I can hear, you know, that kind of thing. Wow.
Speaker 0: That's yeah. Definitely. They need a 1,000 lease. Wow. That's also
Speaker 3: Capitol Police are sickly. They're in charge. So does that They didn't have more on hand? I don't know.
Speaker 0: The bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. Mhmm.
Speaker 3: Because that would be overstepping their bounds.
Speaker 2: A little
Speaker 0: bit. Do people know that? Why? Do people know that the bureau was in the crowd?
Speaker 3: Nope. You probably never will.
Speaker 0: Do you know agents that were there?
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Really?
Speaker 0: They work
Speaker 3: for the agency now.