TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SpeakWithDeeDee
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
This is chilling. The pieces are all there and this IG Content Creator put it all together. False Flag at FIFA. https://t.co/sOBDmN2cNm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kristi Noem is described as having been fired by Trump for saying he approved her $220,000,000 ad campaign; she allegedly took the fall and was moved to a new role as the special envoy to the shield of the Americas. She is said to have been replaced by Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, described as “another pro Israel submissive mouthpiece.” The transcript highlights a claim that during Noem’s hearings, she stated the Department of Homeland Security does not have the resources to accurately protect the FIFA games, despite being given $625,000,000 specifically for those events. The FIFA World Cup security funding is described as approved, and the events are scheduled for June and July 2026 across 11 American cities. Noem is said to have been fired on March 5, twelve days before FIFA’s security deadline on March 17, with Mullen not assuming office until March 31.
The speaker then asserts a belief that a false flag attack on American soil is being planned to rally support for a war in Iran, which is claimed to last until September. The blueprint is described as follows: The CIA and Mossad allegedly created, funded, and trained networks that became Al Qaeda, and those networks, as a proxy for Israeli interests, attacked America. That attack is claimed to have been used to justify the Patriot Act, mass surveillance of Americans, two decades of wars, DHS creation, suspension of habeas corpus, torture programs, and the entire post-9/11 security state. A side note claims that Mike Kurdov, who wrote the Patriot Act, is described as a Jewish Zionist who was born to a Zionist rabbi and an Israeli mother and allegedly personally confirmed that there were Mossad operatives on the ground filming the attack; the transcript states there were no charges, and that this person later became secretary of homeland security.
The narrative then fast-forwards to contemporary times, asserting that the administration is “blatantly serving the interests of Israel over America,” conducting strikes on Iran, creating a new enemy and threat environment, and withholding the $625,000,000 in approved World Cup security funding. It repeats that the DHS secretary was fired weeks before the largest security event, March 17, and claims they are building digital ID infrastructure to be mandated under emergency powers similar to the Patriot Act. It is alleged that martial law provisions akin to 9/11 are being implemented, potentially suspending midterm elections under emergency powers, and that court oversight is being dismantled to challenge emergency executive actions. The transcript also states that Islamist militant attacks receive 350% more media coverage than attacks by non-Muslims, suggesting a single Muslim attack would dominate the news cycle and justify sweeping responses similar to 9/11. It is claimed that the term “twenty twenty six FIFA shooting” was being searched in Israel months prior. The closing urges boycotting FIFA, not attending, and frames sports as bread and circus, insisting it is time to get serious.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kristi Noem has been fired by Trump for saying that he approved her $220,000,000 ad campaign. She took the fall and is just being moved to another position as the special envoy to the shield of the Americas. She's been replaced by another pro Israel submissive mouthpiece, of course, senator Mark Wayne Mullen. But something to note about her hearings, she said the Department of Homeland Security does not have the resources to accurately protect the FIFA games. Despite being given $625,000,000 specifically for those events.
The FIFA games will be held in June and July 2026 across 11 American cities. Kristi Noem was fired on March 5, twelve days before FIFA's security deadline on March 17. Mullen, her replacement, doesn't assume office until March 31. I think they're planning a false flag attack on American soil just in time to rally support for the war in Iran, which they're now saying can last until September. This is the blueprint.
The CIA and Mossad created, funded, and trained the networks that became Al Qaeda, then those networks as a proxy for Israeli interests attacked America. Then that attack was used to justify the Patriot Act, mass surveillance of Americans, two decade long wars, DHS creation, suspension of habeas corpus, torture programs, the entire post nine eleven security state. Side note, the man who wrote the Patriot Act, Mike Kurdov, a Jewish Zionist who was born to a Zionist rabbi and an Israeli mother personally confirmed that there were Mossad operatives on the ground filming the attack. There were no charges. That guy then became secretary of homeland security.
Fast forward to today. Right now, the administration is blatantly serving the interests of Israel over America, conducting strikes on Iran, creating a new enemy and threat environment. They're withholding the 625,000,000 in approved World Cup security funding. They fired the DHS secretary weeks before the largest security event, March 17. They're building the digital ID infrastructure that would be mandated under emergency powers similar to the Patriot Act.
They're implementing martial law provisions similar to that of what was implemented in 09/11. This would mean suspension of the midterm elections as well under emergency powers, and they're currently dismantling court oversight that would challenge emergency executive actions. And Islamist militant attacks received 350% more media coverage than attacks perpetrated by non Muslims. This means a single attack by a Muslim would dominate the news cycle, the narrative, and justify sweeping responses similar to nine eleven. I'm sure it's also just a coincidence that the term twenty twenty six FIFA shooting was being searched in Israel months ago.
Boycott FIFA. Do not attend. Sports are just bread and circus. It's time to get serious.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m furious this person still has a job; the post labels Epstein’s surgical fixer, Dr. Jess Ting, as involved in mutilating children via trans surgeries and possibly offering kids to Epstein, and demands arrests now.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Can somebody please tell me why the fuck this motherfucker still has a job? Meet Epstein’s surgical fixer - Dr. Jess Ting. In addition to mutilating children via trans surgeries - the files suggest he may have offered kids to the monster that was Epstein. Arrests. Now. https://t.co/d4IPus1WMU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mount Sinai's Director of Transgender Medicine and Surgery, Doctor Jess Ting, is described as one of Jeffrey Epstein's most important cleanup guys, allegedly using his medical license and Mount Sinai position to assist in Epstein's operations by treating girls and women Epstein's network sent to him. Ting is said to have first become involved by performing breast augmentation for victims. In 2012, Epstein appeared to direct his associate Eva Dubin, founder of Mount Sinai's Dubin Breast Center, to arrange medical treatment for a victim flown in from Little St. James with blunt force trauma and likely head injuries. Eva tells Epstein that plastic surgeon Jess Ting is standing by, and Ting is depicted as the one who provided clandestine care to an unknown victim who might be a minor. Neither Dr. Dubin nor Ting allegedly directed Epstein to take the patient to the nearest emergency room or questioned why she was flown in from across an ocean; instead, Ting is described as receiving the patient from the four-hour private jet flight and placing thirty-six stitches in her forehead, with emails showing he continued to visit Epstein's lair to assess her.
Epstein is said to have rewarded Ting for this work, and Ting reportedly repaid the favor by bringing his friend Michelle's three young children to Epstein's Island for a day of lunch and toys. Ting's friend Michelle is identified as a philanthropist, former real estate CEO, teenage children's charity founder, and producer of Ting's film Born to Be, a documentary about the gender reconstructive surgeon's work at Mount Sinai and the patients he operates on. The film features an initial consultation with a child about gender reconstructive surgery while Ting is driving down the FDR, and it is suggested that Epstein may have helped fund the film, as Ting solicited him and was in communication with Epstein along with the film's production team about transgender children.
After the island visit, Ting brought three children to Epstein's Upper East Side mansion, whom he describes as children at the time. Epstein's associate Leslie Groff jokes that the three young children can stay in the Oval Office. Ting is described as meeting with Epstein for appointments regularly, with questions about whether these visits involved blood transfusions and about Ting regularly seeing patients sent by Epstein. Ting, described as a gender reconstructive surgeon, is said to have possibly operated on Epstein, with the suggestion that Epstein would have wanted to change a defining characteristic of his anatomy. Claims include a line of dialogue in which Epstein is asked if he has an egg-shaped penis, to which Ting and his surgeon brother Windsor Ting are said to have operated on Epstein, allegedly under the pretense of a small lipoma, with presurgical clearance, CT scans, and MRIs described as necessary for the procedure, implying two-surgeon involvement and specialized preparation for a procedure claimed to alter Epstein’s appearance.
The narrative links Ting to a pattern of close association with Epstein, including professional collaborations, financial or logistical support, and participation in postulated medical and cosmetic procedures tied to Epstein's well-documented pattern of exploitation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mount Sinai's Director of Transgender Medicine and Surgery, Doctor. Jess Tang, was probably one of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein's most important cleanup guys. He used his medical license and position at Mount Sinai to assist in Epstein's operations by seeing girls and women that Epstein's criminal cabal sent him. Ting seems to have first gotten involved in Epstein's operations by doing breast augmentation for victims. But things escalated in 2012 after Epstein appeared to direct his close associate, former girlfriend, medical doctor, and founder of Mount Sinai's Dubin Breast Center, Eva Dubin, to arrange medical treatment for a victim he was flying in from Little St.
James with blunt force trauma and likely concussive injuries to the head. Eva tells Epstein that plastic surgeon Jess Ting is standing by and he appears to be the one who provided the clandestine care to an unknown victim who may be a minor at this point. It does not appear that either medical doctor DuBen or Ting directed the convicted pedophile child trafficker to take the victim to the nearest emergency room or question why she was flown in from across an ocean for medical treatment. Instead, receiving the patient from an over four hour private jet flight and Ting being the one to place thirty six stitches in her forehead. And emails show that he continued to visit Epstein's lair to assess assess her.
Epstein seems to have awarded him for this and Ting was flabbergasted by the pedophiles generosity. Ting seems to have repaid the favor when he brought his friend Michelle's three young children to Epstein's Island for a day of lunch and toys. Ting arranged with Epstein's Island staff and are documented to message Epstein about pizza and thanking him for that. His friend Michelle is a philanthropist, former real estate CEO, and teenage children's charity founder, as well as the producer of Ting's film Born to Be, a film about the gender reconstructive surgeons work at Mount Sinai Hospital and the patients he operates on. At the end of the film, Doctor.
Ting has an initial consultation with a child about gender reconstructive surgery while driving down the FDR. And it's possible that Epstein helped fund this film, as Ting solicited him for this, and was in communication with Epstein along with the film's production team about transgender children. After the island visit, Ting brought three children to Epstein's Upper East Side mansion, who he describes as children this time. Epstein's right hand Leslie Groff jokes that the three young children can stay in the Oval Office. What's the Oval Office Leslie?
Ting seems to have met with Epstein for appointments regularly. Was this for blood transfusions? As well as he regularly saw patients sent by Epstein. Ting, the gender reconstructive surgeon, may have also operated on Epstein. It's likely that Epstein would have wanted to change the defining characteristic about his anatomy.
The identifying characteristic was that so many victims described Epstein's micro penis as egg shaped. Could you please give us your name? Jeffrey Epstein. Is it true, sir, that you have what's been described as an egg shaped penis? I'm willing to continue.
I Ting and his surgeon brother, Windsor Ting, operate on Epstein and pretend it was all over a small lipoma? A simple procedure that never has and never will again require the expertise of two surgeons, presurgical clearance, CT scans, and MRIs to prepare for its removal? Was it all just a coincidence that Jeffrey Epstein was a VIP patient of reconstructive who was also skilled in facial reconstructive surgery? Something essential for anyone looking to drastically alter their appearance.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
JP Morgan Epstein freak in painting regarding Snow White email. https://t.co/VYYTiYlyeM
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by noting that the image, while disturbing, merits careful analysis to uncover potential clues left within it. The observed elements include a stack of money labeled JPMorgan Chase, a creepy man standing in his boxers with no shirt on who is holding a finger to his lips in a “shh” gesture, a mirror facing the bed, and a girl lying in the bed dressed as Snow White. The speaker points out that, if you search the term Snow White in the Epstein library, you will obtain results, including an email exchange between Jess Stolly and Jeffrey Epstein. In this exchange, on 07/09/2010, Jess writes to Epstein, “that was fun. Say hi to Snow White.” Epstein replies by asking, “what character do you want next?”
The speaker provides background on Jess Stolly, noting that he worked at JPMorgan and Chase from 1990 to 2013. They mention that searching Jess Stolly’s name on Google Images yields a photo of him with his finger over his mouth, which the speaker observes bears a strong resemblance to the man in the painting. The speaker emphasizes that Jess Stolly did indeed work at JPMorgan and Chase for thirty-four years. They reiterate that Jess also emailed Epstein about Snow White.
The speaker asks the audience for their thoughts, acknowledging that the painting might be the most genius piece of artwork with the most horrific backstory, and asserts that it is “so powerful.” The closing remark is an exclamation of disbelief: “Holy shit.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like most people, I was very disturbed by this image, but I think it's important that we dissect it because I believe there may have been some clues left behind. So to get started, we have this stack of money. It says JPMorgan Chase. We have this creepy man, and he's standing in his boxers with no shirt on. He has his finger over his mouth, and he's going shh.
We also see that there's a mirror facing the bed, and the girl that's lying in the bed is dressed as Snow White. If you go to look up the term Snow White in the Epstein library, you will get results. One of those results is an email exchange between Jess Stolly and Jeffrey Epstein. Jess says to Jeffrey Epstein on 07/09/2010, that was fun. Say hi to Snow White.
Jeffrey Epstein responded by saying, what character do you want next? Now fun little fact about Jess is that he worked at JPMorgan and Chase between 1990 and 2013. And if you search up his name on Google images, you'll find an image of him with his finger over his mouth. Maybe I'm crazy for this, but the guy in this painting looks so much like Jess. And Jess did work at JPMorgan and Chase for thirty four years.
He also emailed Jeffrey Epstein about Snow White. I don't know, guys. What do you think? I think this might be the most genius piece of artwork with the most horrific backstory. It is so powerful.
Holy shit.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Why was Epstein and this freak UCLA professor so interested in Britney Spears?! https://t.co/hTq0togccR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Britney Spears' name has been mentioned multiple times in the Epstein files. I'm curious why I haven't seen anything about this on my FYP. Day after day, she is being laughed at by Hollywood, laughed at by the media, laughed at by the world. But seriously, we knew there was something deeper going on with this situation. And the only question I have is, where are her friends? Aside from a few dressing up as her for Halloween and using #FreeBritney, they haven't done much. It’s starting to look to me like Britney Spears was experimented on. Why would doctor Mark Tremo, who is affiliated with UCLA, be emailing Jeffrey Epstein about Britney Spears' conservatorship or her custody battles or the neonatal ICU project? Britney Spears was treated like a literal slave by everybody around her and made her go mad. She was exploited from the time she started the Mickey Mouse Club, and don’t pay attention to what those posters behind her say, until she was a 40-year-old woman. And even though Hollywood treated her like a monkey in a circus and danced her to her own deathbed, she still to this day can’t stop performing. It’s almost like she’s programmed or something. But many people have spoken out about this. It’s just the world did not want to hear it.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that Britney was trafficked, shoe, Diddy, and absolutely. All of those girls. All of those Mickey Mouse girls, including Christina Aguilera. All of them, all of these children have been trafficked. Part of the reason why they can’t tell you was because they were drugged. Yeah. But most of what was happening to them was happening. And what they have left are the memories and the nightmares. Now they think they’re just bad dreams, but they’re memories. And because they’ve been drugged, and they’ve been handled, and they’ve been shrunk to death, they don’t know what to believe, but they can feel it.
Speaker 0: And I will stand by the fact that Britney Spears was failed by everybody, her family, her lovers, and especially her friends, because it took a team of people to do this to her. And anyone in the industry that claims that they protect children but don’t protect the children in the industry are just snakes to me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Britney Spears' name has been mentioned multiple times in the Epstein files. I'm just curious as to why I have not seen anything about this on my FYP. Day after day, she is being laughed at by Hollywood, laughed at by the media, laughed at by the world. But seriously, we knew this whole time there was something so much deeper going on with this situation. And the only question I have are, where are her friends?
Other than a few of them dressing up as her for Halloween and using hashtag free Britney, they haven't done much. And it's just looking a little bit to me like Britney Spears was experimented on. Because why would doctor Mark Tremo, who is affiliated with UCLA, be emailing Jeffrey Epstein about Britney Spears' conservatorship or her custody battles or the neonatal ICU project. Britney Spears was treated like a literal slave by everybody around her and made her go mad. She was exploited from the time she started the Mickey Mouse Club, and don't pay attention what those posters say behind her, until she was a 40 year old woman.
And even though Hollywood treated her like a monkey in a circus and about danced her to her own deathbed, she still to this day can't stop performing. It's almost like she's programmed or something. But many people have spoken out about this. It's just the world did not want to hear it.
Speaker 1: Do you believe that Britney was trafficked shoe, Diddy, and Absolutely. All of those girls. All of those Mickey Mouse girls, including Christina Aguilera. All of them, all of these children have been trafficked. Part of the reason why they can't tell you was because they were drugged.
Yeah. But most of what was happening to them was happening. And what they have left are the memories and the nightmares. Now they think they're just bad dreams, but they're memories. And because they've been drugged, and they've been handled, and they've been shrunk to death, they don't know what to believe, but they can feel it.
Speaker 0: And I will stand by the fact that Britney Spears was failed by everybody, her family, her lovers, and especially her friends, because it took a team of people to do this to her. And anyone in the industry that claims that they protect children but don't protect the children in the industry are just snakes to me.
reSee.it AI Summary
One user recalls an old incident involving John McAfee and claims the IDF had to intervene. In reply, another cites DeSantis’ appearance 10 days before a collapse at The Shul of Bal Harbour, where he signed HB 804 to support faith-based volunteer ambulance services, noting a notable coincidence.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Omg I remember this and thought it was weird at the time but got distracted - What did John McAfee have that required the IDF to come clean it up?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recalls a chain of claims linking a Bal Harbour apartment complex to a mysterious collapse and to notable events occurring the same night. The sequence begins with the assertion that “the apartment complex… mysteriously [built seven] into rubble,” described as happening “in North hit by a plane,” with the location specified as “North Miami” and then clarified as “Bal Harbour.” The speaker notes that this event occurred “on the same night that John McAfee died,” framing the two incidents as contemporaneous.
Next, the speaker says “it’s believed that he had an apartment or information stored in this one little apartment in Bal Harbour.” The collapse of that apartment building is then described as having been handled in a way that deviates from what the speaker would expect: “when that apartment building collapsed, they they didn’t let American response teams or, like, emergency teams do all the digging.” The speaker urges the listener to verify the claim, saying, “Jake, I’m not even kidding. Go look this up.”
A striking element of the narrative is the assertion that “they literally brought in the IDF to dig through the rubble.” This point is presented as a factual detail, not as speculation. The speaker further asserts that there was public acknowledgment from a political figure: “There’s big dude. It’s Ron DeSantis had a whole ceremony where he was, like, patting the IDF on the back.” The speaker paraphrases the political reaction with, “he’s like, thanks. How can they rationalize this?” and questions, “How can you bring the IDF to handle American matters? This is insane. Dude.”
Throughout, the speaker calls attention to the perceived incongruity of involving an foreign defense force in an American disaster response and emphasizes the need to question how such a decision could be rationalized. The overall message combines a claim about a collapsed Bal Harbour apartment tied to an alleged “information stored” there, an assertion that American emergency responders were bypassed in favor of IDF personnel, and a critical reaction to a public acknowledgment by Ron DeSantis praising the IDF. The speaker repeatedly invites the audience to investigate these assertions for themselves.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We all remember the apartment complex that, just mysteriously building seven into rubble Yeah. Just in North hit by a plane. In North Miami. That was in Bal Harbour. That happened on the same night that John McAfee died.
Wow. And it's believed that he had an apartment or information stored in this one little apartment in Bal Harbour. When that apartment building collapsed, they they didn't let American response teams or, like, emergency teams do all the digging. Jake, I'm not even kidding. Go look this up.
They literally brought in the IDF to dig through the rubble. There's big dude. It's Ron DeSantis had a whole ceremony where he was, like, patting the IDF on the back. He's like, thanks. How can they rationalize this?
How can you bring the IDF to handle American matters? This is insane. Dude.
@gunclubprez - The Big D
@SpeakWithDeeDee 10 days before the collapse DeSantis was at The Shul of Bal Harbour where he signed a new law, HB 804, supporting faith-based volunteer ambulance services in the state and country. Seems like a pretty major coincidence. https://web.archive.org/web/20210614193222/https://www.local10.com/news/local/2021/06/14/gov-ron-desantis-holds-news-conference-at-south-florida-synagogue/
:strip_exif(true):strip_icc(true):no_upscale(true):quality(65):fill(FFF)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/gmg/QAIJOCQS3RHQTB33M3O6C5QRCQ.jpeg)
DeSantis signs new law supporting faith-based volunteer ambulance services
Gov. Ron DeSantis stopped by The Shul of Bal Harbour in Surfside Monday, at which time he signed a new law supporting volunteer ambulance services in the state.
web.archive.org
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
North Carolina State Rep. Ed Goodwin … Carolinas … what’s up with ya’ll?!? https://t.co/2qryiTcCLB
Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a short, informal discussion about Donald Trump’s handling of the Epstein files and the broader question of whether presidents protect rich and powerful people at the expense of victims in sex-crime cases. The dialogue unfolds between Speaker 0 and Speaker 1, with a recent history/politics flavor and an on-the-record moment later in the exchange.
Speaker 0 begins by asking Speaker 1 how Trump fought to avoid releasing the Epstein files, noting that Trump initially indicated a release but then reversed course. Speaker 1 responds noncommittally, suggesting that Trump “probably” had friends who were involved and that Trump “saved them” from trouble. The question is framed as whether this constitutes presidential conduct—protecting powerful people rather than victims.
Speaker 0 presses further, asking if protecting rich and powerful people over sex-crime victims is appropriate for a president, and whether such behavior is common in presidential history. Speaker 1 counters by pointing to historical examples, stating that many presidents have favored their friends and families, adding that while JFK’s affairs were noted, he claims Kennedy “got caught,” implying possible crimes. Speaker 0 acknowledges Kennedy’s infidelity but questions whether there were crimes, while Speaker 1 reiterates the point that Kennedy “got caught,” and asserts that such behavior is not becoming of a United States president.
The conversation shifts toward evaluating current leadership: Speaker 0 asks whether Speaker 1 agrees with Trump’s protection of powerful individuals at the expense of crime victims. Speaker 1 answers, “All depends on who the powerful people are,” suggesting a conditional view rather than a blanket condemnation or approval. The discussion then veers to the expectation that a president should serve all Americans, not just the wealthy, and Speaker 0 reiterates the moral question.
Speaker 1, initially evasive about personal details, asserts that they are a state representative and holds a badge, claiming to work for their country. The exchange ends with a sense of irony in the narrator’s commentary: the “moral of the story” being that it’s acceptable for Donald Trump to protect rich and powerful men because he himself is rich and powerful, effectively equating protection of the powerful with personal parity.
Overall, the transcript presents a back-and-forth debate about why presidents might shield powerful individuals, how historical precedents factor into current judgments, and whether leadership should be equally accountable to all segments of society, ending with a skeptical, wrap-up sentiment about the perceived fairness of such protections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How do you think Donald Trump was fighting so hard to not release the Epstein files? I
Speaker 1: don't know.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Was it did you did you find that odd that he was he he said he was gonna release it and then immediately was like, we're not releasing them?
Speaker 1: Would you want your name brought up? He probably has some I don't know. He probably had some friends Yeah. That were involved in it and Yeah. He he saved them, you know, a lot of trouble.
Speaker 0: Do you think that's a a presidential thing to do?
Speaker 1: Well, if you go through history and look, many more presidents have favored their friends Yeah. And favored their family. I mean, everybody does that.
Speaker 0: Right. Is that how the president should be acting, protecting rich and powerful people over victims of sex crimes? Every president does it. Every president hides sex crimes?
Speaker 1: John f Kennedy. Okay. But he got caught.
Speaker 0: Right. Well, John f Kennedy was having affairs, but I don't know that there were crimes.
Speaker 1: And he got caught.
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: But that's not very becoming of a United States president. Right? Right.
Speaker 0: So is the answer you you don't agree with Donald Trump on that, on protecting powerful people over the victims of crimes?
Speaker 1: All depends on who the powerful people are.
Speaker 0: Should shouldn't the president speak taking care of all Americans and not just pet people with, lots of money?
Speaker 1: I'm not a rich and powerful person. So, it didn't interfere with me. It didn't bother me about what them people wanna do. Yeah. I got to pay up for what I do.
Speaker 0: And could you could you tell me your first and last name and no? Why not? And where you represent?
Speaker 1: No.
Speaker 0: No? Mm-mm. Why? You're a state state senator here? State representative.
Okay.
Speaker 1: That's why.
Speaker 0: Yeah. But you you you said you work for the state. You're a representative official.
Speaker 1: I do. I do. Okay.
Speaker 0: So what? Why why are you showing me a badge?
Speaker 1: Because I have it. Okay. And I work for them, my country.
Speaker 0: Right. But you are a elected official right now. Right? Yeah. Okay.
Certainly an odd interview there, but the moral of the story is, I guess, it's okay for Donald Trump to protect rich and powerful men because he's rich and powerful. They gotta protect their own.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Food for thought on Erika Kirk’s pregnancy https://t.co/6hRjWBZERv
Video Transcript AI Summary
This transcript centers on Erica Kirk’s family, focusing on her mother Loretta Fransby, who is also referred to as Mama Lowe. The speakers discuss her family and the public interest around Erica Kirk’s pregnancy. The conversation includes a claim that there has been a lot of talk about whether the woman in question has truly ever been pregnant, with one speaker asserting, “I’ve been pregnant five times. The first was a miscarriage, gave birth to four, so you bet your ass I zoomed in on that ultrasound screen.” The speaker notes a close-up of the ultrasound image and reveals that they conducted a deep dive into the stages of pregnancy, even though they had limited technology to zoom in on the original image.
The speaker explains that based on the stomach size and what is visible, it would be safe to presume the ultrasound shown is a viability ultrasound, which determines if there is a heartbeat and can be performed as early as six weeks. They describe what a six-week ultrasound looks like versus an eight-week ultrasound, and mention that they wanted to compare those visuals to Erica Kirk’s ultrasound but could not zoom in on the provided image due to a lack of technology, describing the effort as a two-hour waste. The speaker adds that they learned at nine weeks babies hiccup—though hiccups do not produce sound.
The discussion also touches on the significance of ultrasound appointments, noting that they are a big deal. They point out that Charlie is not seen in the video, though he could be behind the camera, and that the original audio was dubbed over, making it unclear whether there was any interaction. The speakers compare the situation to scenes often depicted in romantic comedies, where a partner’s absence from doctor appointments is a source of tension. The closing remark imagines Erica becoming angry if her partner, Charlie, misses an appointment, emphasizing “Those eyes!” as a reaction.
In sum, the transcript covers: the family context around Erica Kirk and Loretta Fransby, public speculation about Erica’s pregnancy, a self-claimed deep dive into ultrasound timelines (six to nine weeks, including the fact that nine weeks can involve hiccups), the importance of ultrasound appointments, and the mystery surrounding Charlie’s presence in the video.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is Erica Kirk's mom, who apparently also goes by Mama Lowe. I don't really see a family resemblance, but it might just be the lack of fireworks.
Speaker 1: This is oh, it's real. This is real. Oh god. What do have to state of the world, Florida?
Speaker 0: I'm having a
Speaker 1: great year.
Speaker 0: Butter beer? My butter beer. What what were people thinking that she was doing for the government? Story of the woman who raised Erica Kirk. Her mom, Loretta Fransby.
Yeah. That's Erica Kirk getting an ultrasound. There's been a lot of talk about whether or not that woman has really ever pregnant. I've been pregnant five times. The first was a miscarriage, gave birth to four, so you bet your ass I zoomed in on that ultrasound screen.
And this is a close-up of the screen which led me to do a deep dive into the stages of pregnancy. I've done back in the day when I was pregnant but it's been a while. It's hard to see a lot of detail in that picture. Based on her stomach size and the size of what we can see, it would be safe to presume this is the viability ultrasound. That they determine if there's a heartbeat, which they can do as early as six weeks.
This is what it looks like at six weeks, and this is what it looks like at eight weeks. I wanted to compare that to her picture, but I don't have the technology to zoom in on it. I wasted two hours, except I learned that at nine weeks they hiccup. Didn't know that. Doesn't make a sound, but they hiccups.
Ultrasound appointments are a really big deal, and we don't see Charlie in this video. Of course, he could be holding the camera. The original sound is dubbed over so we can't hear if there's any interaction. But you know, these appointments are important. That's why in the movies you see people get angry when their partner doesn't show up to him because they insert some romantic comedy faux pas there.
Can you imagine Charlie missing an appointment and Erica getting mad? Those eyes!
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Nobody should be having their DNA tested by these companies. 1) they can use your DNA for whatever the hell they want after 2) they’re now lying https://t.co/OTS0ba5GbK
Video Transcript AI Summary
Some shady shit has been going on with my AncestryDNA results. I've got to show you how they've been changing over time. When I first did the test, my results told me 45% Levant, which makes sense because I am Palestinian. And when I broke down my results, my dad contributed 25% of that Levant DNA. I also got my dad tested and his results had 50% Levant.
Fast forward to now, where they've updated their database again, is in theory supposed to make your results more accurate. They're telling me that I'm now only 21% Levant and that my dad is contributing 0% Levant to my DNA. They've changed him from 50% to 22% Levant. And suddenly, he's got all of this extra Arabian Peninsula in him, which is quite fitting because when you hear Zionists spew propaganda, they love to say that Palestinians are not native to the land and that we all are Arabs that came from the Arabian Peninsula. AncestryDNA is owned by Blackstone.
And who's calling the shots at Blackstone? This guy, Steven Schwarzman. And he just so happens to credit a trip to Israel for inspiring his entrepreneurial spirit. He's also the kind of guy that will spend money to push his agenda. In this article by the New York Post, they talk about how he was said to be using both his clout and very thick wallet to fund a counter offensive to the anti Israel protests at Yale.
Thankfully, I wasn't using AncestryDNA to learn about my ethnicity. I already know I'm fucking Palestinian. I used them to get a DNA file that I could upload onto other websites and learn about my ancient ancestry. From all the way back to the Bronze Age, my DNA ties me to the land of Palestine and The Levant more than anywhere else in the world. Canaanites are my number one match for the Bronze Age, then Phoenicians in the Iron Age, then The Levant again during late antiquity, and then again during the Middle Ages.
And when you look at my dad's results, he scores even higher for The Levant. So fuck Ancestry and their bullshit results. I've officially deleted my DNA and my dad's DNA from their website. Those bastards are not gonna have my info anymore. Lord knows what they're doing with our DNA results anyway.
Freaks me out. Please don't give them your DNA and please don't give them your money.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some shady shit has been going on with my AncestryDNA results. I've got to show you how they've been changing over time. When I first did the test, my results told me 45% Levant, which makes sense because I am Palestinian. And when I broke down my results, my dad contributed 25% of that Levant DNA. I also got my dad tested and his results had 50% Levant.
Fast forward to now, where they've updated their database again, is in theory supposed to make your results more accurate. They're telling me that I'm now only 21% Levant and that my dad is contributing 0% Levant to my DNA. They've changed him from 50% to 22% Levant. And suddenly, he's got all of this extra Arabian Peninsula in him, which is quite fitting because when you hear Zionists spew propaganda, they love to say that Palestinians are not native to the land and that we all are Arabs that came from the Arabian Peninsula. AncestryDNA is owned by Blackstone.
And who's calling the shots at Blackstone? This guy, Steven Schwarzman. And he just so happens to credit a trip to Israel for inspiring his entrepreneurial spirit. He's also the kind of guy that will spend money to push his agenda. In this article by the New York Post, they talk about how he was said to be using both his clout and very thick wallet to fund a counter offensive to the anti Israel protests at Yale.
Thankfully, I wasn't using AncestryDNA to learn about my ethnicity. I already know I'm fucking Palestinian. I used them to get a DNA file that I could upload onto other websites and learn about my ancient ancestry. From all the way back to the Bronze Age, my DNA ties me to the land of Palestine and The Levant more than anywhere else in the world. Canaanites are my number one match for the Bronze Age, then Phoenicians in the Iron Age, then The Levant again during late antiquity, and then again during the Middle Ages.
And when you look at my dad's results, he scores even higher for The Levant. So fuck Ancestry and their bullshit results. I've officially deleted my DNA and my dad's DNA from their website. Those bastards are not gonna have my info anymore. Lord knows what they're doing with our DNA results anyway.
Freaks me out. Please don't give them your DNA and please don't give them your money.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Check his title. If you’re not terrified after watching this, then block me. Block me now. Now. https://t.co/0RhHqTkrS1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Jared Bernstein at the White House explains that the US government prints money and then uses that money to sell bonds, which is how it borrows. He emphasizes that the government definitely prints money and definitely lends that money by selling bonds, so the government prints money and then lends it by selling bonds. He acknowledges that some of the language around this topic—and the concepts—can be unnecessarily confusing, particularly the terms used in Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), but he insists there is no question that the government prints money and uses that money to lend by selling bonds. He repeats the sequence: the government prints money, and they use that money to sell bonds and borrow. He admits confusion, saying, “I’m just I don’t I can’t really talk,” but reiterates the basic point: the government clearly prints money, and it clearly borrows, otherwise the debt and deficit conversations wouldn’t exist.
Speaker 1 continues by trying to clarify the mechanics in simple terms: the government prints money and then uses that money to sell bonds, which is how borrowing occurs. He repeatedly confirms the process: money is printed, used to issue bonds, and people buy those bonds, providing the funds the government borrows. He notes that sometimes the language and concepts can be confusing, but the core idea remains that money is printed and bonds are sold to lend that money to the government.
Speaker 3 then poses a meta-question, asking whether conventional economists truly understand what is being discussed or if they do not understand the topic at all, suggesting skepticism about whether mainstream economic understanding aligns with the descriptions being given or with the terminology used to discuss these issues. He questions whether conventional economists grasp what is being spoken of, or whether they are not understanding it.
Across the exchange, the central mechanism discussed is that the government prints money and uses that money to sell bonds, with bonds being purchased by lenders, thereby financing government borrowing. The speakers acknowledge the potential confusion surrounding the terminology, especially in relation to Modern Monetary Theory, but they maintain that the fundamental process is clear: money creation by the government, followed by borrowing through the sale of bonds. The dialogue concludes with a reflective note from Speaker 3 about the level of understanding among conventional economists regarding these concepts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An old friend who's been with me a long time,
Speaker 1: a brilliant thinker. White House economic adviser, Jared Bernstein, joins us now from the White House. Thanks so much. The US government can't go bankrupt because we can print our own money.
Speaker 2: It obviously begs the question, why exactly are we borrowing in a currency that we print ourselves? I'm waiting for someone to stand up and say, why would we borrow our own currency in the first place? Like you said, they print the dollars. So why why does the government even borrow? Well,
Speaker 1: the so the I mean, again, some of this stuff gets some of the language that the m n some of the language and concepts are just confusing. I mean, the government definitely prints money, and it definitely lends that money, which is why the government definitely prints money, and then it lends that money by by selling bonds. Is that what they do? They they they, yeah, they they they sell bonds. Yeah.
They sell bonds. Right? Since they sell bonds and people buy the bonds and lend them the money. Yeah. So a lot of times a lot of times, at least to my year with with MMT, the the language and the concepts can be kind of unnecessarily confusing, but there is no question that the government prints money and then it uses that money to so let's see.
The yeah. They they print money, and they use that money to they sell bonds. They borrow. Yeah. I I I guess I'm just I don't I can't really talk.
I don't I don't get it. I don't know what they're talking about. Like, because it's like the government clearly prints money, does it all the time, and it clearly borrows. Otherwise, we wouldn't be having this debt and deficit conversation. So I don't think there's anything confusing there.
Speaker 3: We were always asking ourselves the question, do conventional economists understand what we're speaking of, but yet not talking about it? Or is it that they actually don't understand?
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Imagine what he’s not willing to say? Wake up. Now. Wake up. https://t.co/pg0tSyB4NA
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Have you used orphans to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s it was not unusual to do that and I wouldn't deny that I may have done so.
Speaker 0: There's an article entitled Attenuation RA273 Rubella Virus in WY38 Human Dimplex Cells. You familiar with that article? Yes. In that article is one of the things that says, 13 surrogative mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay.
Well, that that's in that case, that's what
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo?
Speaker 1: Yes. Did that experiment involve almost a million people? Well,
Speaker 1: alright. Yes. Okay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you used orphans to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used mentally handicapped to study an experimental vaccine?
Speaker 1: What I'm saying is I don't recall specifically having done that, but that in the 1960s it was not unusual to do that and I wouldn't deny that I may have done so.
Speaker 0: There's an article entitled Attenuation RA273 Rubella Virus in WY38 Human Dimplex Cells. You familiar with that article? Yes. In that article is one of the things that says, 13 surrogative mentally retarded children were given RA273 vaccine. Okay.
Well, that that's in that case, that's what
Speaker 1: I did.
Speaker 0: Have you ever used babies of mothers in prison to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Have you ever used individuals under colonial rule to study an experimental vaccine? Yes. Did you do so in the Belgian Congo?
Yes. Did that experiment involve almost a million people? Well,
Speaker 1: alright. Yes. Okay.
reSee.it AI Summary
Lies exposed. Heart breaking. Disgusted. Angry. Fuming. “What is f---g Jesus”—if your blood isn’t boiling after watching this, unfollow me. Now. @UnadPr Or God forbid Qatar!!! @Darren76780228 It was called the “British mandate”—brain washing is real with you eh? Found the bot!
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Lies exposed. https://t.co/g06b4vXLJ3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Lie number one, Israel is the only Jewish state in the world. False. Israel is the second. The Jewish Autonomous Oblast is the first. Founded in 1934, it predates Israel and is located in Russia's Far Eastern Federal District.
At 14,000 square miles, it's 75% bigger than Israel and bordered by China, North Korea, and Russia. Relocating there would prevent the endless problems that the world currently faces because of Israeli expansionism. Honestly, it would be better for everyone if they did.
Lie number two, Jews had nowhere to flee during Nazi Germany. False.
The Havara agreement reached in 1933 between Nazi Germany and Zionist organizations, primarily the Jewish Agency for Palestine, allowed German Jews to migrate to Palestine by transferring their assets to Germany, then reclaiming them in form of German exported goods. This allowed Jews to keep some of their wealth and the Zionist movement to increase Jewish immigration to Palestine, which is what they wanted. Over 60,000 German Jews immigrated to Palestine under this agreement between 1933 and 1939.
Lie number three, Palestinians never wanted Jews in Palestine. False.
As tens of thousands of Jews migrated to Palestine during the Havarah agreement and World War two, Palestinians welcomed them even into their own homes. The Jews were housed, clothed, fed, and given refuge. Then one day, those same Jewish families that they'd cared for locked the Palestinian families out of their homes and backed by the military, threatened their lives if they returned. I'm not making this stuff up you guys. It's everywhere.
You just have to be willing to see it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lie number one, Israel is the only Jewish state in the world. False. Israel is the second. The Jewish Autonomous Oblast is the first. Founded in 1934, it predates Israel and is located in Russia's Far Eastern Federal District.
At 14,000 square miles, it's 75% bigger than Israel and bordered by China, North Korea, and Russia. Relocating there would prevent the endless problems that the world currently faces because of Israeli expansionism. Honestly, it would be better for everyone if they did. Lie number two, Jews had nowhere to flee during Nazi Germany. False.
The Havara agreement reached in 1933 between Nazi Germany and Zionist organizations, primarily the Jewish Agency for Palestine, allowed German Jews to migrate to Palestine by transferring their assets to Germany, then reclaiming them in form of German exported goods. This allowed Jews to keep some of their wealth and the Zionist movement to increase Jewish immigration to Palestine, which is what they wanted. Over 60,000 German Jews immigrated to Palestine under this agreement between 1933 and 1939. Lie number three, Palestinians never wanted Jews in Palestine. False.
As tens of thousands of Jews migrated to Palestine during the Havarah agreement and World War two, Palestinians welcomed them even into their own homes. The Jews were housed, clothed, fed, and given refuge. Then one day, those same Jewish families that they'd cared for locked the Palestinian families out of their homes and backed by the military, threatened their lives if they returned. I'm not making this stuff up you guys. It's everywhere.
You just have to be willing to see it.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Heart breaking: https://t.co/Gywz4Li9rH
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Disgusted. Angry. Fuming. https://t.co/XLgwGuq6ZI
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
@UnadPr Or God forbid Qatar!!!
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
@Darren76780228 It was called the “British mandate” of what? Sit down. Read a book. Brain washing is real with you eh?
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
@OLDSCHOOL58 Found the bot!
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Regardless of what you think of Tucker Carlson, he was spot on here. https://t.co/421pWlDTLt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers identify TikTok as the “most important purchase” and name X as the other key platform, stressing the need to talk to Elon. They describe an on‑camera remark by a foreign leader as “censoring Americans” and include “This guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist.” They argue this underscores the push to “force a TikTok sale” through Congress. They insist “the only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk.” They also claim “Free speech is central to the entire idea of America” and contrast it with “not our market economy” but “freedom of speech.” They contend the censorship drive aims to silence opposing views in the United States and emphasize engaging Elon to address the issue.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And the most important purchase that is going on right now is glass Followers. Five followers. No. Box?
Speaker 1: TikTok. TikTok. TikTok.
Speaker 0: Number one. Number one. And I hope it goes through because it's it can be consequential. Mhmm. And the other one what's the other one that's most important?
Oh, Alex. X. Mhmm. X. Oh.
Speaker 1: Successful. Very good.
Speaker 0: And, you know, so we have to talk to Elon. He's not an enemy. He's a friend. We should talk to him. Now if we can get those two things, we get locked, and I could go on on other things, but that's not the point right now.
We have to fight the fight.
Speaker 1: It's almost unbelievable that he said that on camera. Imagine. This is a foreign leader bragging about how he's censoring Americans. Again, this guy runs a country of 9,000,000 people that's totally dependent on our tax dollars to exist. And here he is on camera, he's a sophisticated guy.
He of course, he knows that he's being filmed saying, anyone who opposes me in The United States who opposes more aid to Israel or opposes getting sucked into war with Iran, which does not serve American interest, that person is not simply mistaken or wrong. I'm not gonna bother to explain why that person is wrong. That person is a Nazi, part of the woke Reich, a Nazi. And the only way to fix it is by preventing Americans in the last country on Earth with guaranteed freedom of speech, prevent Americans from hearing the other side. And so we push congress to force a TikTok sale, which is true, by the way.
And when that happened and various members of congress, like, no. Really, it's about China. There were people in line who said, no. I think it's really about Israel. You you you kinda wish it was about China.
Here he is just admitting. No. No. No. We pushed the US congress to censor in The United States to commit censorship in The United States because we think it's bad for us, and we need to talk to Elon.
The only reason we have free speech in The United States right now is because of Elon Musk. By way, a naturalized American, a foreigner who looked at The United States and said, what's great about that country? People can say what they believe because they're not slaves. They're not subjects of the state. They're citizens of a nation that they own.
Free speech is central to the entire idea of America. In fact, it's really the only thing that sets us apart from any other country on Earth. It's not our market economy. It's freedom of speech.
Speaker 0: And
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a post from the 1960s and then reacted to a situation where individuals are allegedly being paid to promote a foreign agenda. I find it disgraceful and unacceptable, urging others to call them out. Also, I recommend following GenXGirl for her amazing work.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
This was from the 1960s. https://t.co/lYfa0h9lh0
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: You consider the Jewish people members of the white race? Yes. I do. Of course. Do you have any platform against them as Hitler did? Not all of them. Against those of them who are mixed up with communism or who are trying to subvert The United States for the purposes of Zionism and Israel. I I have something against them. What will be the topic of your talk tonight? Mainly the fact that the the fact that communism and race mixing are Jewish operations are suppressed in the press. You can't get that information out.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You consider the Jewish people members of the white race? Yes. I do. Of course. Do you have any do you have any platform against them as Hitler did?
Not all of them. Against those of them who are mixed up with communism or who are trying to subvert The United States for the purposes of Zionism and Israel. I I have something against them. What will be the topic of your talk tonight? Mainly the fact that the the fact that communism and race mixing are Jewish operations are suppressed in the press.
You can't get that information out.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Excuse me? These “Americans” are being paid to be a propaganda machine for a foreign country? This is disgraceful. Tag them below. Call them out. This is unacceptable. Follow GenXGirl. She does amazing work.
@GenXGirl1994 - GenXGirl
Israel: DOJ FARA Filing Reveals Paid US Influencer Campaign Israel’s Esther Project - Jun-Dec 2025 Budget: $900K - Influencer Post Req.: 25-30/month - Posts are directed by Israel (see list of likely Influencers) Influencers in this program are violating FARA Influencers work
reSee.it AI Summary
Oh girllllll - let me tell you about Maddie. I used to debate her on TikTok. Her dad is in the ADL, and she has some serious issues. She got pregnant out of wedlock by an abusive Jewish guy who later died in the IDF. After going off on TikTok about Palestinians, she eventually started exploring their perspective and fell for a Palestinian guy, getting pregnant again. But then the TikTok community doxxed her to her dad, leading to a family crisis. She ended up aborting the baby and reverted to her previous views.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Oh girllllll - wait until I tell you about this girl. This is Maddie. I used to debate for very often on TikTok. Her father is in the ADL, she’s an entire piece of shit. She’s also got serious mental problems. She got pregnant out of wedlock to a Jewish guy that abused her, then he went to the IDF and died. Then she went insane on TikTok and started saying all Palestinians and their kids need to die. Then after months and months of being completely annihilated on debate panels, she started looking into the Palestinian side. Then she fell for a Palestinian guy on her campus. Got pregnant from this guy. Then the zios on TikTok alllll started doxxing her to her ADL father (here’s a video I took off a zios TikTok where Maddie said it was a genocide). Her family lost it. She aborted the baby (idk I think the dad may have made her, idk🤷🏻♀️) then became Zio again.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A rapid back-and-forth centers on whether a situation is genocide. The exchange includes: 'Are you do you agree that it's a genocide?' 'Yes.' 'There you go. What? Hold on. No. No.' 'So Somebody say it again.' 'Can you give me an apology, bro?' 'When if when where you been, sweet? Well, I've been away for a little bit.' 'Maddie, repeat that again one more time.' 'Is it for you, Maddie?' 'Go ahead. Let me hear you say this again.' 'I think it's become a genocide.' 'Wow.' The dialogue shows uncertainty and interruption, culminating in the statement 'I think it's become a genocide.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. Let me ask. Let me ask. Are you do you agree that it's a genocide? Yes.
There you go. What? Hold on. No. No.
No. So Somebody say it again. Can you give me an apology, bro? When if when where you been, sweet? Well, I've been away for a little bit.
Maddie, repeat that again one more time. Is it for you, Maddie? Go ahead. Let me hear you say this again. I think it's become a genocide.
Wow.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
This is Tommy Robinson’s real name - Stephen Christopher Yaxley-Lennon Why do they always change their names? https://t.co/8nw1iIdSyW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Opening, the speaker notes "Wearing a a shirt or a a button that says I'm a Zionist. What does a Zionist mean to you? What is a Zionist?" They define "a Zionist, someone believes in a homeland for Jewish people" and add, "I believe My definition when I've looked at that in the dictionary is is Israel first," followed by, "'It means Israel first." They acknowledge "there's there's a a negative in in incantation in a lot of realms about Zionism" and ask, "can you possibly serve two masters? Meaning, can you serve England and Israel at the same time?" The speaker concludes, "'If there was a war tomorrow, which there will be, because I'll probably start at the end of the session. If there was a war and it kicked off, I would be there on the front line fighting for Israel.'"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wearing a a shirt or a a button that says I'm a Zionist. What does a Zionist mean to you? What is a Zionist? Well, a Zionist, someone believes in a homeland for Jewish people. I believe My definition when I've looked at that in the dictionary is is Israel first.
It means Israel first. Yes. Okay. Well Great. Well, you know, there's there's a a negative in in incantation in a lot of realms about Zionism.
And since it does denote that it is Israel first, can you possibly serve two masters? Meaning, can you serve England and Israel at the same time? Shallow Listen. Let me tell you something. Yeah?
If there was a war tomorrow, which there will be, because I'll probably start at the end of the session. If there was a war and it kicked off, I would be there on the front line fighting for Israel.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Guys is this true? Is it all connected? https://t.co/sslYz1C2IX
Video Transcript AI Summary
May 2012: Miss Arizona wins Miss USA, a pageant owned by ...trump. She later claimed on a podcast she’d never competed in pageants or modeling before, until an invitation arrived to become a model and start pageants. The pageants she began were Miss USA pageants owned by Trump, so she modeled for Trump and was one of his pageant girls. She was described as a casting director at the same time, though her site doesn’t specify whether she worked for Trump. Around that period she owned a ministry with the US military in Romania; locals accused evangelical ministries there of kidnapping and trafficking children, with kids found in the UK, Israel, and sent to undisclosed private islands; locals demanded investigations, but they never did. Before marrying Charlie Kirk, she was a multimillionaire; since his passing, she’s amassed his wealth plus at least $5,000,000 in donations, and fans urge her to run for VP in 2028. Their first date was a job interview: in 2018, Kirk DM’d Erica for an interview, which turned into a date, and she allegedly said, "you're not gonna be my boss. You're gonna be my boyfriend."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: May 2012 wins miss Arizona competes in miss USA, a pageant owned by ...trump. K. Wanna know something really weird? So she had said in a podcast that she had never competed in pageants and had never done any modeling before. Until one day, she received an invitation in the mail to become a model and start doing pageants.
And the pageant said she started doing were miss USA pageants owned by Trump. So she modeled for Trump. She was one of Trump's pageant girls. But did you know that she was also a casting director at the same time that she was doing all of this stuff for Trump? Now she doesn't specify on her website if she worked as a casting director for Trump.
But around the time that she was claiming to be a casting director, she also owned a ministry that was working with the US military in Romania. The area in Romania where she was operating this ministry had a bunch of locals accusing these evangelical ministries of kidnapping children and trafficking them out of the country. These children were being found in The UK, in Israel, and were also being sent to undisclosed private islands. Locals demanded authorities look into it, but they never did. Now Charlie Kirk really wanted the Epstein files released, but did his wife?
Prior to marrying Charlie Kirk, she was a multimillionaire on her own. And since his passing, she's also amassed all of his wealth plus an additional at least $5,000,000 in donations. She's currently considered the most powerful woman in The United States with mega fans begging her to run as vice president in 2028. Let's talk about our first date because it was actually a job interview. Back in 2018, two years after Donald Trump had started working with Charlie Kirk, Charlie Kirk had hosted a Turning Point USA opening event for one of the offices that they had opened.
And Erica and Charlie Kirk were introduced to each other. Charlie Kirk instantly thought that she was beautiful, but thought that she was really smart. And allegedly, one of their mutuals had suggested that Charlie Kirk hire Erica. I'm assuming it was Donald Trump or someone on his team because Donald Trump had signed on to work with Charlie Kirk, and Erica was already one of Donald Trump's employees. So it would make the most sense for Donald Trump and his team to encourage Charlie Kirk to hire Donald Trump's employees.
Anyways, Charlie Kirk DM'd Erica, invited her for a job interview. The job interview ended up turning into a date, and Erica allegedly had said, you're not gonna be my boss. You're gonna be my boyfriend. It just seems suspicious.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Can someone please explain to me why they always change their names? https://t.co/aJehqQFUpD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Mr. Benjamin Nakae. Mr. Nakae, welcome to the Advocate. Thank you. Mr. Nakae is a graduate of MIT. He is an Israeli, and he is a man who has written widely on this question before the house tonight.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mr. Benjamin Nakae. Mr. Nakae, welcome to the Advocate. Thank you.
Mr. Nakae is a graduate of MIT. He is an Israeli, and he is a man who has written widely on this question before the house tonight.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
Monday, 8/25, 8:30PM Eastern SFC Estridge, Colonel Aguilar & Captain Guilbeau will be joining us. Register now. https://t.co/OgRe2wY0l2
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers present political grievances. The transcript centers on funding to Israel, veterans’ welfare, and oath fidelity. Speaker 0: "Sending billions of dollars to Israel. Meanwhile, veterans are homeless and committing suicide. You heard that right. I am deemed a threat to national security because I don't support Israel's genocide." Speaker 1: "I swore an oath to the constitution. I didn't swear an oath to the president, to the congress. 20% skill. 15% concentrated power of will. 5% pleasure."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sending billions of dollars to Israel. Meanwhile, veterans are homeless and committing suicide. You heard that right. I am deemed a threat to national security because I don't support Israel's genocide.
Speaker 1: I swore an oath to the constitution. I didn't swear an oath to the president, to the congress. 20% skill. 15% concentrated power of will. 5% pleasure.
@SpeakWithDeeDee - SpeakWithDeeDee
This was 14 years ago. Nothing has changed. https://t.co/vUQmiEzTOd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tempers flared at the prestigious National Press Club in Washington DC. A pro Israeli advocate knocked a camera out of the hands of Alison Weir, president of the council for the National Interest Foundation. The group just finished their press conference on what they call unjustifiable USA to Israel. CNIF alleges Israel received so much aid and special treatment because the US congress is controlled by APAC, America's pro Israeli lobby. "$3,000,000,000,000. That's including a massive amount of direct money to Israel, then a lot of hidden costs." Giraldi is a former CIA counterterrorism expert. He questions why America gives aid to Israel when Israel conducts more espionage for profit against The US than any other US friendly country. They steal military technology. They steal information that is useful for telecommunications.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With them. I have talked to them.
Speaker 1: Tempers flared at the prestigious National Press Club in Washington DC.
Speaker 0: As an independent You have gone there as a radical leftist who hates Jews Okay. And in order to radical. Don't you stay safe in face.
Speaker 1: A pro Israeli advocate knocked a camera out of the hands of Alison Weir, president of the council for the National Interest Foundation. The group just finished their press conference on what they call unjustifiable USA to Israel. The two sides met when the press club scheduled a pro Israeli news conference to follow held in the same room. The altercation illustrates heightened tensions on differing views regarding America's relationship with Israel. The council for the National Interest Foundation wants Americans to know how much of their tax dollars are going to Israel.
$3,000,000,000,000. That's including a massive amount of direct money to Israel, then a lot of hidden costs. CNIF alleges Israel received so much aid and special treatment because the US congress is controlled by APAC, America's pro Israeli lobby. Executive director Philip Girardi says Israel spends a lot of money on US elections.
Speaker 0: There are many Israeli packs, and they do give a lot of money very selectively to congressmen that they wanna support.
Speaker 1: The council for the National Interest Foundation says many members of congress fear if they don't always side with Israel, that they will face retaliation in their own reelection campaigns.
Speaker 0: If a congressman, crosses the Israel lobby by voting against aid for Israel or voting against some some legislation that Israel favors, they very often will find that the next time they're running for office, there will be a candidate put up against them who is very well funded.
Speaker 1: Giraldi is a former CIA counterterrorism expert. He questions why America gives aid to Israel when Israel conducts more espionage for profit against The US than any other US friendly country.
Speaker 0: They steal military technology. They steal information that is useful for telecommunications.
Speaker 1: Retired lieutenant colonel Karen Kotowski works at the Pentagon and says Israel receives preferential treatment. We do not question what the Israelis want. Kotowski believes America is beginning to take more interest in US foreign policy in The Middle East in large part due to tough economic times. More and more Americans want to know where their hard earned tax dollars are going and why. Rhonda Pence, Press TV, Washington.