TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Squill_Mama
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Watching this with a shit eating grin on my face, she has them speechless😂🤣 https://t.co/KI112yjFis
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Winter Garden, a debate over public access and filming unfolds. Market is hosted by the city and open to the public, with vendors permits, but one speaker claims, “The Farmers Market is a private event,” while another says it is “open to the public and it's hosted by a city entity.” First Amendment rights: “I have every right to be here” and “You cannot remove me from a public space,” with clashes over interviewing versus filming: “filmed, not interviewed.” A permit is acknowledged to allow vendors, and participants discuss whether the space is public: “This is a public space?” and “This is a government entity that's holding this.” The Florida Film Commission process is referenced, including “permission from the Florida Film Association.” The speaker mentions a Lakeland incident where “police had to be retrained” and concludes, “This is a traditional public forum... I have every right to be here.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do, like, deport people and say and insane about, like, the Obama administration deported tons and tons of people. I know.
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 0: It's not like
Speaker 1: hold on.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna just I appreciate your guys' time. I'm just gonna yeah. Thank you for the nice conversation. I appreciate it.
Speaker 3: Hi. How are you? I'm good. How are
Speaker 1: you? I okay. I'll shake you in.
Speaker 3: How are you?
Speaker 1: I'm doing well. How are you?
Speaker 3: Excellent. Doing well. The Farmers Market is a private event. Okay. So the
Speaker 1: Who's it hosted by?
Speaker 3: The city of Winter Garden.
Speaker 2: Okay. So the city of Winter Garden.
Speaker 3: Yes. They do.
Speaker 2: Is it is it a private event? Were because I didn't have to have a ticket to come in.
Speaker 3: Correct. Yeah. You don't have to have permission to do that. So what they want you to do, if you can do it outside that area right there as well.
Speaker 2: I don't have to. So I have the First Amendment right to be in public. So the city of Winter Garden has a permit just to hold this event and allow vendors to set up their booths. The thing about this through this in Lakeland, and actually, they had to backtrack with their city attorney and retrain their entire police department because they tried to trespass me from a public farmers market.
Speaker 3: Trespassing you.
Speaker 2: Okay. Great. Then we'll continue our interviews.
Speaker 3: Trespassing you. I'm just asking you kindly if you can do it right outside their area. That'd be all.
Speaker 2: No. I'm not gonna do that because I have every right to be here, but I appreciate you kindly asking me. I'm going to respectfully say no. I'm not going to do that because I have every right to be here. Okay.
It's not a private it's private not property. It's not a private event. It's open to the public and it's hosted by a city entity.
Speaker 3: I'm gonna I'm tell you a little bit more about it in just second. Johnny. She she doesn't wanna leave because this
Speaker 2: Oh, it's not about me wanting to.
Speaker 3: I'm not going to leave. Let's just make that clear. I'm not going to leave.
Speaker 2: It's not about me not wanting to. It's that I have a right to be here and I'm gonna maintain that right and stand up for myself and I'm not going to leave. I would like to get on with my interviews though and so I can continue talking to people. We just went through this in Lakeland. I can't be removed from a public space.
Speaker 3: This is
Speaker 2: not a private event. It's held by the city of Winter Garden. So this is literally a government entity that's holding this. And I would hate to have to make another video about this and you guys get another letter from my lawyer. This will be the third one.
Speaker 3: It's a permit. It's a permit. I've done You run a permit Yes, for the event.
Speaker 2: So you run a permit to allow these vendors to be on the streets. That's what you allow. You cannot remove me from event. You cannot do any
Speaker 3: of that.
Speaker 2: So I'm not breaking any laws. If you could show me the city code Is
Speaker 3: this a public road or a private road?
Speaker 2: Who owns this road? Who own who owns this? Is this a public space?
Speaker 3: 104. Could you have a Sierra free
Speaker 2: Is this a public space?
Speaker 3: He's gonna take care of it for you. Don't worry.
Speaker 2: Well, came to wanna take care of me. So I'm just asking you. Is this a public space?
Speaker 3: No. I can't because I run the event. That's why I can't Is
Speaker 2: this a public space?
Speaker 3: Yes. They have come in. Well, I have the owner coming for you. Don't worry.
Speaker 2: Okay. The owner of what?
Speaker 3: It's a it's a permitted event.
Speaker 1: I know. But but you said
Speaker 2: the owner's coming. The owner
Speaker 1: of what? The event management company that manages this. Okay. And hired by who? She's coming.
Okay. I know. Who hired her? No. I'm not talking.
I'm not talking. Who hired her? The owner of what? The streets? It's it's a permitted event.
Yeah. I agree with you. It is a permitted event, but you but you can't interview.
Speaker 3: That's
Speaker 1: Yes. I can. Around all Yes.
Speaker 2: I can. I can What city what
Speaker 1: city code or look then
Speaker 3: you don't have the right to interview me.
Speaker 2: Wow. Okay. That's the first amendment, guys. You can be filmed in public.
Speaker 3: Correct. Filmed, not interviewed.
Speaker 2: Well, then don't don't talk to me then.
Speaker 3: Right. And I'm
Speaker 1: not be talking
Speaker 3: to me.
Speaker 2: So anyway, I just wanna correct your claims before my lawyer has to do it. You are in public space. This event is oh, I'm speaking to you. You don't have to talk You're gonna listen though. Yeah.
So this is a public space. You have a permit to hold this event in this space. You don't have a permit to make this private property and kick people out. So here we go again. We I almost feel like a first amendment auditor at this point.
Like, hi.
Speaker 1: How are you? Are you Dana? Yeah.
Speaker 2: I am. Hi, Dana. Nice to meet you.
Speaker 4: How are you? Did you get permission from the Florida Film Association to be here?
Speaker 2: Yeah. So I'm not filming for a movie, and I'm not filming for a commercialized thing like that. We don't have, a camera crew with us. We have no boom mics, and it's just, it's just a YouTube video, which is within my rights to be here and do this.
Speaker 4: Okay. Don't excuse me.
Speaker 2: Don't touch me. Don't touch me.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 2: I am recording, and so I am gonna get what you're saying to me.
Speaker 4: Don't want that in Sure.
Speaker 1: So we'll leave it right here.
Speaker 4: I I'm just asking if you had permission. Usually, we Yeah. Go through the steps of the Florida Film Commission Mhmm. Sends an email to city hall, and then City Hall lets us know if they're permitting filming of the market. That's all.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2: So I don't need permission to film because I am in a public space owned by the government, and this is a this is an event open to the public. You guys have a permit to hold these vendors here and allow these vendors to be here, but that's it. And so we went through this in Lakeland. I'm not sure if you're, pervy to that. So you could go to my YouTube channel, Liberty Hangout, and type in, Democrats tried to ban me from the Lakeland Downtown Farmers Market.
And then you can see the subsequent video where my lawyer got involved, the police had to be retrained, and I actually did
Speaker 1: have to be here.
Speaker 4: Serious. Well, I this is not necessary.
Speaker 2: Well, this isn't necessary. I just wanna be I just wanna be left alone and be able to talk to people.
Speaker 4: Do you have a business card? Nope. Okay. Well, then go have that. Alright.
Speaker 2: Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you, guys. Alright. We're leaving and we're gonna continue what we're doing.
And so I don't wanna be followed by you guys. I'm just gonna continue what I'm doing. Deal? Alright. There we go.
Perfect.
Speaker 3: So
Speaker 2: I almost feel like I need to be
Speaker 3: a First Amendment auditor at these things.
Speaker 2: This is another example why it's so important, guys, to stand up for free speech in public forums. This is what this is. It's a traditional public forum, and I have every right to be here. We've had so many great conversations. Nothing heated.
Everybody just listening to each other's sides,
Speaker 1: and that wouldn't be allowed
Speaker 2: to happen in a place like this and recorded if we, kicked everybody out that, just had a video camera and wanted to film actual con conversations, the dialogue
Speaker 1: going on in this country.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Student stabs another student several times. This is Procter High School in Utica NY. Where the Governor says the crime is just a conspiracy created by Republicans. #VoteRedInNovember https://t.co/r9h4EO4dML
@Squil_Mama - Squirrel Mama
I bet Adam Schiff is shitting his pants right now ! 😆😆😆 https://t.co/c5X46kfiLS
Video Transcript AI Summary
Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in Congress in the last 250 years. He repeatedly said he knew nothing, would not discuss, and would protect information, yet he led the impeachment trial of President Trump.
He was conflicted because he was part of the hoax involving Charmela, manufacturing false accusations and spreading them. It's not surprising; he's lied about almost everything, including to set up a presidential impeachment. He should be investigated for lying about his interactions with Charmela, the whistleblower who initiated the presidential impeachment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Adam Schiff is the worst criminal in congress in the last two hundred fifty years. Adam Schiff went to the podium day after day after day saying, know nothing about this. We're not gonna discuss it. We're gonna protect it. And then he, Adam Schiff, led the prosecution of the impeachment trial in the senate of president Donald Trump.
Talk about someone who was conflicted out of the game because he was part of the hoax that brought Charmela in, manufactured that false accusation, and then pedaled it out to the world, and he continued you know, not surprising. He's lied about almost everything in his life. But now he lied just to set up a presidential impeachment. That's what I was talking about, these disinformation campaigns. He should be investigated because he lied to the world about his interactions with Charmela, who is a whistleblower, and I can't stress this enough, that started a presidential impeachment.
@Squil_Mama - Squirrel Mama
She drives a 2024 BMW and has taxpayers paying her bills, groceries, rent, and cash assistance! Now she’s shocked she has to pay her own way .. She needs to be arrested for fraud … https://t.co/0lTS190fUn
Video Transcript AI Summary
I received a letter from DHS this morning because someone reported me for making money on TikTok while driving a 2024 BMW. As a result, my food stamps were cut from almost $4,000 to $88 per month. They're requiring me to sell my car if I want a review.
Essentially, they're saying that if you receive welfare, food stamps, cash assistance, or Section 8, you're not allowed to drive a nice car. They are forcing me to sell my brand new BMW, or I lose nearly $4,000 in food stamps. Also, my cash assistance has been completely revoked, and Section 8 will now only cover 10% of my rent instead of 95%, raising my monthly payment from $60 to over $400.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I got a DHS letter in the mail this morning, and I just now opened it. And somebody reported me to the state of Michigan because I'm making money on TikTok, and I and I drive a 2024 BMW. They have cut my poop stamps from almost 4,000 a month down to $88 a month. They are telling me if I want a review, that I have to sell my car. So you're telling me if you were on welfare, food stamps, cash assistance, section eight, you can't drive a nice car.
They are forcing me to sell my brand new BMW, or I lose almost $4,000 in food stamps. Not only that, they have taken my cash assistance totally away. They are telling me that section eight will no longer be paying 95% of my rent, only 10% of my rent. So I will have to pay a little over $400 a month now instead of $60 a month. They cannot It looks like the Doge got you too, boo.
@Squil_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Do y’all remember this illegal immigrant from Venezuelan who was on TikTok bragging how much money he got because he had a baby in America? He has been detained by ICE, waiting to be deported 😂😂 https://t.co/oUhjvNdGm9
Video Transcript AI Summary
Leonel Moreno, a Venezuelan TikTok influencer known for encouraging illegal aliens to squat in American homes, is now in ICE custody. He was arrested by a fugitive operations team near Columbus, Ohio.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fox News can confirm that the Venezuelan illegal alien TikTok influencer, Leonel Moreno, is in ICE custody tonight. This is the guy who has gone viral in these TikTok videos he's been posting where he urges other illegal aliens to squat in the homes of American citizens. An ICE official telling Fox News one of their fugitive ops teams arrested him near Columbus, Ohio earlier today. He is now in their custody, but
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
I never voted before but this year I’m voting for trump so everything will go back to normal! 👇🏽 https://t.co/EPxkQMjqaW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Sleepy Joe is blamed for everything, with hopes for Trump to become president next year. Criticizes government spending on housing for people with only $4 a month, while Americans struggle. Plans to vote for Trump to restore normalcy. Criticizes government inaction on New York immigration control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who's to blame for all this? Sleepy Joe. Sleepy Joe is the one to blame for all of this. As you you just gotta look at him, Montefi. He he he doesn't do anything.
I can't wait till I can't wait till next year when Trump becomes president. Mhmm. So that everything go right back to normal. Because everything is messed up. The police ain't doing their job.
All these people, obviously, this is from our tax money. These guys are receiving, like, $4 a month. $4 a month to live in in in hotels and buy things and stuff. I'm like, aren't we the ones in need? Mhmm.
The the the people from the United States? On top of that, we're giving away money to other countries. We're the ones in need. Like, I I this is this is ridiculous. That's why I've never voted in my life, and I'm voting this year for Trump because things need to get back to normal.
What is the government doing to stop people from coming into New York? Oh, they're not doing a damn thing.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
How to steal an election… Many of them.. https://t.co/Zy6QyIL7wP
Video Transcript AI Summary
A computer science professor explains how a voting machine can be easily manipulated by gaining physical access to it. By connecting a computer to the machine's serial port, one can rewrite the code and control the election results. The professor also highlights the lack of security measures on these machines, making them vulnerable to hacking. Another expert shares their experience of being left alone with voting machines after an election, emphasizing how easily someone could insert malware into them. The central count scanner discussed is widely used in America for counting ballots. The speakers mention the ease of obtaining the machine's software from a Russian server and the numerous individuals who have access to the machines, including potential adversaries. They conclude that the multitude of possible hacks and entry points make it unlikely that someone isn't taking advantage of these vulnerabilities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. I'm a professor of computer science at Georgia Tech. How do we work? It looks like he has a USB connection into the scanner.
Speaker 1: The the serial console on the back gives us a wrench out.
Speaker 0: That means you have control of the of the machine once you
Speaker 1: I have full control of that, and then we can change the results of what it's scanning. My computer is connected to the machine. This is a serial cable, and it's connected to the back of the machine. Take off the back of the machine, and there's a serial port, and that gives a full root access with no password on the app.
Speaker 0: There's no security subsystem on this one?
Speaker 1: Nope. There's no password on it. With this kind of access, you could rewrite the code that's running on there and get it to count votes in whatever way you want it. You would do this in advance of election night and then wait for the results come in. You could control the election results.
Either way, as long as I had physical access to either plug something in or take off the back But you just need that access briefly? Once. Yes. Very briefly. About how long?
If you had this all prepped and ready to go a minute,
Speaker 2: this it's easily possible for, somebody to get into these machines because they're unsecured for such long periods of time. I have done research on and personally watched 150 elections, at least. 2 of our experts and I went to the closing of the polls in one of the recent elections. At the end of the closing of the polls, the poll workers left us there with about 6 voting machines by ourselves. I was with 2 guys who could have gotten into those machines in a matter of seconds and put in malware?
Speaker 3: The machine we're in front of is a central count scanner. It's the ES and S Model 650. It's, to our knowledge, the most widely deployed central count scanner in America. Anytime you do early voting or provisional voting or anytime you're in a state where they do central tabulation of all the ballots, so they bring them to one place, this is the kind of high speed scanner they would use to count ballots. Historically, these machines were examined, and they determined there was a there was a number of serious problems with them by virtue of messing with the Zip disk.
Just turn it on for 3 minutes and stick a disk in, wait 1 minute, and then walk away. You're able to change the behavior of the machine any way you want, including changing the results of an election.
Speaker 1: It's probably easier to do all of this by just
Speaker 0: plug
Speaker 1: in is So this probably came from
Speaker 0: a server or something else.
Speaker 1: I I have no idea where where they're getting their programs.
Speaker 3: We downloaded a image of the operating system, the software that runs on this machine from a Russian server.
Speaker 1: How many people might have access to stick in as if this like that?
Speaker 3: It would be everyone from elections officials to people who run the storage facilities, volunteers in the election, security guards, you name it. There's gonna be tens of thousands of people who have access to the machine in that fashion. And our adversaries definitely have this machine in Russia, Period.
Speaker 2: There are so many possible hacks And so many possible vectors for entry. It's hard to believe that someone's not taking advantage of it.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Biden administration is aiding and abetting in child trafficking. US is the capital of child sex trafficking, human smuggling! These kids are the ones paying the ultimate price. 😥 https://t.co/PbfIVUdW41
Video Transcript AI Summary
A man shares a story about a 43-year-old man whose wife left him and their two children. The speakers discuss heartbreak and the sedation of children, suggesting child trafficking in the United States. They criticize law enforcement for allegedly assisting in this trade. They point out children who appear sedated and mention the lack of seat belts in a vehicle carrying multiple children. They express shock and disbelief at the situation. The video concludes with a mention of Infowars as a source of truthful information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay.
Speaker 1: 4 3 years old, and he says that his wife abandoned him, and, she left them the 2 kids.
Speaker 2: It's breakup season in in
Speaker 1: in down
Speaker 0: there There's a lot
Speaker 1: of, there's a lot of heartbreaks going on. Oh, man.
Speaker 3: You know what's really sad though? Most of
Speaker 4: these children look like This isn't just
Speaker 5: a natural sleep. They are they are out.
Speaker 1: No. No. Look. They're sedated. They are sedated.
Look at them.
Speaker 4: This is this is
Speaker 6: Guys, this is really
Speaker 1: a reality. This is actually the United States right now. This is a third world country. This is the United States. And, unfortunately, our law enforcement agencies are out here assisting and abetting in the in the child trafficking Trade, guys.
Absolutely. There's, like, no way that you can call me a conspiracy theorist. There's no way you that you can say that we're making shit up. We're out here, guys, Stuff in our head and seeing this should be upsetting to everybody whether you're on the left or on the right. Okay.
43 years old. And he says that his wife abandoned him, and, she left them with 2 kids.
Speaker 2: It's breakup season in in
Speaker 0: in down there, South of America. Yeah? There's a lot of,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of heartbreaks going on. Oh, man.
Speaker 3: You know what, Julie Santos? Most of
Speaker 4: these children Like, this isn't just
Speaker 5: a natural sleep. They are they are out.
Speaker 1: No. No. Look. They're sedated. They are sedated.
Look at them. He's allergic.
Speaker 5: Is human trafficking.
Speaker 0: This is
Speaker 1: They're not even reacting, I don't find this You see how they don't react? Their pupils don't even react to the bright light in their face.
Speaker 3: Here's the Look at this little sweetie.
Speaker 6: Guys, This is really a reality.
Speaker 1: This is actually the United States right now. This is a third world country. This is the United States. And, unfortunately, our law enforcement Agencies are out here assisting and abetting in the in the child trafficking trade, guys. Absolutely.
There's, like, no way That you can call me a conspiracy theorist. There's no way you that you can say that we're making shit up. We're out here, guys, living this day after day. Y'all
Speaker 5: This is insane, guys. Check this out. Not worried about seat belts. Not worried about anything else. They're all Children.
They're all children.
Speaker 1: Look at these kids coming out of this.
Speaker 5: We don't follow laws Around here?
Speaker 1: Any other American citizens Seat belts. Look at this. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21. 21 people. 21 people.
21 people. Who's that little kid? Y'all aren't gonna chicken her? That's illegal as fuck. They're not 21 people.
Hey. Those kids are not they're not tied 21 people. 21 children just climbed out of this itty bitty. Are you kidding me? Are you kidding me?
Are you kidding me? While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
They Did MAGA DIRTY! They violated their rights, they assaulted them, they beat them and they murdered them and then they began prosecuting them! We knew this was a set up, no wonder they wanted to tape sealed 🤬 https://t.co/5gDYVh4ySG
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 warns about chemical munitions and instructs the team to deploy. Speaker 1 welcomes viewers to the front line. Speaker 2 calls for more munitions and urges shooting. Speaker 3 expresses disappointment as their own team shoots at them. Speaker 4 provides location updates. Speaker 5, who has custody of videos, acknowledges acts of violence during the protest. Speaker 1 blames the officers for initiating violence, stating it was a peaceful protest. Speaker 0 mentions tear gas being used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have given warnings about chemical munitions. I need the left and lethal team position above me to start deploying. Launch. Launch. Launch.
Speaker 1: Hey. Welcome to the front
Speaker 0: of the
Speaker 1: fucking line. Come here.
Speaker 2: You gotta turn around. We need more fucking munitions. Oh, let's go. Fucking shoot it.
Speaker 0: Yep. They're deploying flashbangs on us.
Speaker 3: They're shooting into their own people. We're supposed to be supporting Protect blue lights, and this is what they do to us.
Speaker 2: Stay on the point. Stay on the point.
Speaker 4: What's your Get right 89123 up here. You're 43 on the north side of High Street. Very large crowd coming down. If you want, can you hear me, please?
Speaker 2: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: Yes,
Speaker 1: sir. Keep going.
Speaker 5: As one who is here and, who has custody of these 44000 hours of videos, I can attest there were acts of violence. There were acts of terrible violence that day. Even from what I had seen with my own eyes and and through the media, I've seen Acts of violence against police officers that I had not seen before. And it was brutal, and it was ugly. And, our officers online did what they needed to do at the time.
Speaker 1: If they'd never thrown the concussion grenades, if they'd never used a pepper spray, this wouldn't have happened. It was a peaceful protest. I was standing within 15 feet of the line of officers. They started firing at us before anybody did anything to them. We were not rushing them.
There There's no advance on them. They just started throwing concussion grenades and pepper spray.
Speaker 0: They've been tear gassing us.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Bullseye
Video Transcript AI Summary
I find it ironic that those defending Hamas online are the ones most likely to be targeted by them. They claim to be freedom fighters, fighting for their land, while I fight for my right to express myself. It's like being in a toxic relationship. I understand you may have a different perspective, but I can't empathize with someone who kidnaps, murders, and commits horrific acts. Just because someone had a difficult childhood doesn't mean I sympathize with them. If you want a free Palestine, free it from... [transcript ends]
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's a little ironic that the people who seem to be defending Hamas online are also the ones they'd be most likely to kill. Oh, no. No. I'm sure the Islamic terrorists would love you, queer intellectual feminist. We're freedom fighters.
They're fighting for their land, and I'm fighting for my right to purple hair. What the fuck? It's like a girl in a really toxic ship. I know you don't like him because he kidnaps and murders people, but trust me, when I'm alone with him, he is such a sweethearts. I'm sorry if your reaction to people being slaughtered, beheaded, raped, and burned alive isn't complete in utter disgust and horror if your reaction is, yeah, but, I mean, why?
See it from their perspective. You need to get your fucking head checked. Okay? I'm sure Jeffrey Dahmer had a rough childhood. That doesn't mean I empathize with him.
If you want a free Palestine, free Palestine from
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Great answer to a stupid question!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions whether Israel's response to conflict is reasonable, proportionate, and moral. They criticize Britain's obsession with the concept of proportionality, arguing that it rarely exists in conflicts. They sarcastically suggest that if proportionality were to be strictly followed, Israel should retaliate by committing acts of violence equivalent to those committed by Hamas. The speaker dismisses the idea of proportionality in conflict as a joke and a strange British concept, highlighting the expectation for Israel to respond proportionately when attacked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is that a reasonable, proportionate, and moral response by Israel? There is some deep perversion in Britain whenever Israel is involved in a conflict, and it is the word you just used, proportion proportionate Proportionality. Only Britain is really obsessed with this. I've heard it for the last few days incessantly. Proportionality and conflict rarely exists.
But if we were to decide that we should have this fetish about proportionality, Then that would mean that in retaliation for what Hamas did in Israel on Saturday, Israel should try to locate a music well, in Gaza, for instance, and good luck with that, should try to find a music festival in Gaza and rape Precisely the number of women that Hamas raped on Saturday. Kill precisely the number of young people that Hamas killed on Saturday. They should find a town, of exactly the same size as a town like Sderot, where I've been many times myself, And make sure they go to door to door and kill precisely the correct number of babies that Hamas killed in Sderot on Saturday And shoot in the head precisely the same number of old age pensioners as were shot in Sderot on Saturday just to choose 1 town. Proportionality and conflict is a joke, and it's a very strange British concept which we've had that only the Israelis in a conflict when they are attacked are expected to have precisely the proportionate response.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Looks like Russia is spilling the tea on the corruption in the US.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the alleged involvement of various entities, including the investment fund Rosemont Seneca Partners, in bio labs in Ukraine. The Russian defense ministry claims that these labs are connected to institutions related to nuclear missiles. The US denies these allegations, stating that the labs are for research purposes. The US agencies for international development, the George Soros Foundation, and the Center for Disease Prevention Control are involved in the program, which is supervised by research organizations like the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The US is working with Ukraine to prevent research materials from falling into Russian hands.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: United States. In particular, the investment fund Rosemont Seneca, which is headed by Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: Rosemont Seneca Partners is the firm tied to Hunter Biden, the US president son. And the Russian defense ministry is listing, financial entities that are involved in these bio labs in Ukraine. Now they also listed George Soros's open society Institute, and open society foundations, which are also involved with, and, as well as the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, and the US Department of Threat Reduction all of them seem to be tied in with these bio labs, and it appears that, that that Rosemont Seneca partners The reason that they would be involved is because they have a relationship with Metabioda and Black And Beach, which are main suppliers of pentagon BioLab Materials. Now, Moscow is also coming forward and saying, that it appears These Bio Labs are connected, with institutions, and research organizations that are related to nuclear missile. This is what was said.
Speaker 0: The sale of the program is impressive. In addition to the military, the U. S. Agencies for international development the George Soros Foundation, and the Center for Disease Prevention Control are directly involved in its implementation. Scientific supervision is carried out by leading research organizations including the Los Alamos National Laboratory, which developed nuclear weapons as part of the Manhattan Project.
All these activities are carried out under the full control of the Pentagon.
Speaker 1: Now the over 30 bio labs are accused by Russia of being involved in weapons development and trying to develop biological weapons. Now the USA denies this and insist they are simply research facilities, and we did hear acknowledgement of these facilities existence from US under secretary, Victorian Newland.
Speaker 2: Ukraine has, biological research facilities. We are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces should they approach?
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
Have you ever heard of a democrat coming out of their own pockets to pay for anything? Trump is the most patriotic President we have ever had, and they hate him because they fear him! #Trump2024NowMorethanEver
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1995, New York City was broke and so was the Veterans Day parade. Donald Trump, a businessman at the time, donated $200,000 to save the parade. He also convinced his wealthy friends and big businesses in New York to contribute, resulting in over $3 million raised. On November 11, 1995, the city witnessed one of its largest Veterans Day parades with more than 500,000 attendees. Trump's actions showed his patriotism, support for the troops, and willingness to step up when others wouldn't. Despite the media's negative portrayal, this incident reveals a different side of Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That time Donald Trump saved the NYC Veterans Day parade. So let's rewind the tape to 1995. New York once the beating heart of the world, is flat broke, and so is the Veterans Day parade. I mean, it's a for our freedom can't even get a decent parade in their honor. But in comes Donald j Trump, not president Trump.
Not yet. Just businessman Trump. He sees what's going down and he says, not on my watch. He pulls out his checkbook and writes a fat one. I'm talking 200,000 dollars to help save the parade.
But he doesn't stop there. Oh, no. He goes to his rich friends. He goes to the big businesses in New York, and he says, you're going to ship in too. You're going to show some respect for our veterans.
And you know what? They seized over $3,000,000 for the parade. And so on November 11, 1995, New York City sees one of the largest veterans day in its history with more than 500,000 people showing up. There's marching bands. There's floats.
There's our brave vets standing tall and proud. All thanks to 1 man, Donald j Trump. Now the media, they don't like to talk about this. Doesn't fit their narrative of Trump being this heartless, greedy bastard. But this is who the man really is.
He's a patriot, a champion for our troops, a guy who stepped up when no one else would.
@Squill_Mama - Squirrel Mama
We have 2A for a reason FAFO
@SquillMama - Squirrel Mama
Anything That The Clinton Foundation has their fingers in, you know it’s not good. Crimes against humanity and the peace keepers UN is in on it as well. Disgusting 🤢
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the Canal Zone of Panama City, the US government used to control this military base to protect the Panama Canal. However, it was given away by Jimmy Carter and is now under the control of the United Nations and NGOs. One of these organizations is OIM, which provided condoms and birth control to illegal aliens crossing into Panama. These organizations, like UNICEF and UNHCR, have taken over almost every building in the facility. The Clinton Foundation is also present. These organizations should be defunded and investigated for trafficking. They are complicit in the cartel's actions. Taxpayer dollars should not support them. They encourage people to risk their lives and illegally travel to the US. This is the root cause of the problem, supported by leftist, godless, globalist organizations like Kamala Harris.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna talk about a real tragedy? It's right here in the Canal Zone of Panama City. This whole facility used to be controlled by the US government. It was a military base to protect the Panama Canal. Jimmy Carter gave it away, and now it's basically been taken over by United Nations and NGOs.
One of those right here, OIM, Organization of International migration. They're the same organization that were handing out condoms and birth control to illegal aliens before they came over the Darien Gap into Panama. Rather than saying stop, don't do it, they said, here's some condoms, here's some birth control before you get raped on the way. That's how disgusting these organizations are. They pretend to be good, and all they're doing is feeding on human misery.
And this entire facility here, almost every single building here, now is either United Nations operation. You've got UNICEF on the other side of this building. You've got the UNHCR. We are. Now they have 2 buildings.
That's the refugee side of the United Nations. They've got 2 buildings because they've had to expand. They got too big for this. And on top of that, you even have the Clinton Foundation out here. These organizations need to be defunded, and they need to be investigated for trafficking.
They are part of what the cartel is doing. You can't just blame the cartel. These organizations have to come down to not another dime of taxpayer dollars to go to the United Nations, and in particular, not to OIM. While they're sitting here living in luxury, they're inviting people to put their lives at risk, to put their children's lives at risk, to illegally travel out of their country and head to the United States to break into our country. Dear Kamala Harris, this is the root cause.
The leftist, godless, globalist organizations that you support.