TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @StarkNakedBrief

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - September 27, 2025 at 6:13 AM

Saved - October 4, 2025 at 10:13 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been exploring Starmer’s digital ID plans, particularly the controversial BritCard scheme. Many are concerned about its mandatory nature and its ties to the existing One Login system, which has faced significant issues. One Login, designed to streamline access to government services, has already mishandled sensitive data and incurred huge costs. A whistleblower revealed serious security lapses, including unrestricted access for many users and inadequate risk assessments. Instead of addressing these concerns, senior officials opted for reassignment and silence, raising alarms about the potential dangers of expanding this flawed system.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

There’s something Starmer isn’t telling us about his digital ID plans… And it all centres around a little-known system called One Login. Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

From the level of outcry yesterday, it’s safe to say that many are aware of Starmer’s scheme to impose mandatory digital ID, dubbed BritCard, on every working person in the UK—citizen and foreigner alike.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

For context, BritCard was initially advanced by Labour Together, the think tank Morgan McSweeney ran before becoming Starmer’s chief of staff.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Now, Starmer claims BritCard will help tackle illegal migration, and to be fair, it might—a little. But this is coming from a man who promised to stop illegal immigration, and since then, we’ve only seen record highs.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

What seems to have been entirely forgotten, however, is that the government already has a digital ID scheme in place. And let’s just say… there have been a few issues.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In May, journalist Andrew Orlowski was contacted by a government whistleblower who revealed some of these issues involving something called One Login.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

One Login is the digital identity service system created by the Government Digital Service (GDS) in 2021 that will help deliver BritCard.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It was designed to give citizens streamlined access to hundreds of government services and, through the GovUK Wallet, store key digital documents such as driving licences.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It currently processes the personal and biometric data of some three million citizens and has already chewed through over £300 million in public funds.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

(In fact, the total cost of our digital ID escapade so far totals upwards of £700 million when you include the Conservative's digital ID programme, Verify, which was abandoned in 2023... That's a lot of houses.)

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

When the whistleblower, who worked as a senior civil servant, arrived on the One Login project to set up an information-assurance team in 2022, he encountered complete chaos.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The system was being accessed thousands of times a month by users holding unrestricted “do anything” system-administrator privileges. (And yes, many did not have the security-clearance required to work with such sensitive data.)

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

So we're talking about hundreds of government employees having access to an unprecedented amount of very private information.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Tie this in with past incidences of data misuse and institutional political prejudice and we have a troubling picture.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Worse still, GDS did not require locked-down workstations for either its remote-working staff or the hundreds of external contractors involved in developing the system. In other words, this made it ripe for cyber attack.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

But it got worse yet... The civil servant discovered that part of the One Login system was being developed in Romania—a country that researchers at Oxford University have identified as one of the world’s "cybercrime hotspots".

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Next come the conflicts. Turns out, the same contractor responsible for developing One Login is the same one responsible for managing its risks. Can a company objectively assess the risks of a system they themselves helped build?

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In fact, according to the civil servant, no external provider has conducted a security and risk assessment at all. This would immediately disqualify it for use in other sectors.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

To put the danger into perspective: It would take only one user with certain privileges to create havoc—to install a back door into One Login that nobody would spot until it was too late.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Want to guess what happened when all of this was raised with the GDS hierarchy?

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Rather than investigate, senior figures quietly reassigned staff from the civil servant assurance team to menial duties. A formal HR complaint was then lodged against the whistleblower, and new officials were swiftly brought in to replace them.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

As one digital-identity expert remarked to Orlowski on the scheme's potential dangers: "Imagine if [what happened to M&S] happened to Companies House or the Land Registry"

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Put simply: the UK’s digital ID scheme has already been marred by alarming security lapses, not just technical failures, but institutional ones, fuelled by a civil service committed to concealment over correction. Starmer's plan will likely amplifies this—on steroids.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Full breakdown here: https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/05/02/digital-id-is-a-danger-to-us-all/

Digital ID is a danger to us all Trusting the government with our personal data is a disaster waiting to happen. spiked-online.com

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - July 28, 2025 at 6:20 PM

Saved - July 28, 2025 at 10:29 PM

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

When you step back and look at the events of the last week… It’s not just that the British establishment is out of touch. It’s that it increasingly seems like they hold so many of their own people in utter contempt. Some would say we're a nation in pain. Thread 🧵 https://t.co/By0KhMmSbF

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - May 31, 2025 at 6:17 AM

Saved - May 31, 2025 at 8:08 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been examining several pieces of legislation introduced by Labour that seem to expand state powers significantly. The Crime and Policing Bill proposes measures like harsher sentences for knife crime but also includes a "Respect Order" that could compel individuals to alter their behavior based on minimal judicial thresholds. The Employment Rights Bill shifts power to employees but could hold employers liable for third-party harassment. The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill requires parental consent for home education, undermining parental rights. Lastly, the Planning and Infrastructure Bill may streamline housing but also grants extensive powers to Natural England for land acquisition.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Every bit of "tyrannical" legislation Labour have in the works... Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In Feb, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper tabled the Crime and Policing Bill in the Commons, with the aim of “halving knife crime and violence against women and girls in a decade".

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

To be sure, the bill contains some arguably solid ideas: harsher sentences for knife crime, stopping protestors climbing on war memorials, and establishing a new and specific spiking offence.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

But, true to form, ministers, civil servants, and OPC lawyers slipped in provisions that hand the state sweeping new powers. Take the very first clause...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It outlines something called a “Respect Order”, which authorities—including police and potentially other public bodies—would apply for through the courts.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The order can essentially force someone to do or stop doing “anything described in the order.” Yep, really. The threshold? Minimal.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

A judge simply needs to believe, on the balance of probabilities, that the person “has caused, or is likely to cause, harassment, alarm or distress to any person.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

A court can then impose the order without notice, which could be indefinite for all we know, and if breached, the penalty is an unlimited fine or up to two years in prison.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In theory, police could persuade a judge that an online post caused someone “distress”. The poster could then be legally compelled to delete it, stay off social media, or even hand over their device passwords.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The bill has already passed its first and second readings and cleared the Committee Stage. It now awaits its third reading, before scrutiny in the Lords.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In Oct 2024, Business Secretary John Reynolds and Baroness Margaret Jones of Whitchurch introduced the Employment Rights Bill—framed as a way to “help more people stay in work, support productivity, and improve living standards.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

At its core, the bill shifts power away from employers—including small businesses—and gives it to employees.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It proposes to ban so-called “exploitative” zero-hour contracts, raise statutory sick pay, allow for faster union strikes, and make it harder to "unfairly" dismiss staff. But buried in Clause 20 is something else entirely.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The clause would require employers to “take all reasonable steps” to protect their staff from “harassment” by third parties—which could include customers, clients, or even passersby.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Pub owners, venue managers, café operators—anyone with employees—could be held liable for offhand remarks or jokes.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In short, what began as a bill to reform workers' rights somehow—if passed—led to legislation that turbo-charges the Equality Act and, by extension, builds yet another framework to censor speech.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The bill is well-advanced, being in the Lords’ committee stage. It could receive Royal Assent by the end of this year, if not, early 2026.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In Dec 2024, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson and Baroness Jacqueline Smith of Malvern introduced the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill, claiming it would “protect children and raise education standards.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In reality, it may be Labour’s most draconian bill yet—something that dramatically expands state authority at direct expense of parental rights. Clause 30 sets the tone.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

For the first time, parents would be required to seek local authority consent to remove a child from school. This is if the child attends a special school or if the local authority is conducting an enquiry and believes the child is experiencing “harm.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

That term, “harm,” by the way, doesn’t just extend to physical abuse. Under current child welfare law, it includes ill-treatment or the impairment of physical, emotional, intellectual, social, or behavioural development.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Even if the council agrees a child would receive a suitable education at home, it could still block the withdrawal—on the grounds that school is in the child’s “best interests.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Since 1876, parents in England have had the legal right to home educate their children. If a local authority believed a child wasn’t receiving a suitable education, it could issue a School Attendance Order (SAO).

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

But at any stage—including in court—a parent could halt proceedings by demonstrating the education is, in fact, suitable. Phillipson’s bill changes that.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Parents could now need to prove not only that home education is suitable—but that school would not be better. That hands decision-making power to the state, even in cases where home education is already working. This, or risk the wrath of the state.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The bill passed its second reading in the Lords earlier this month, and is now in committee stage. It could receive Royal Assent by the end of the year.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In March 2025, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner introduced the Planning and Infrastructure Bill.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Its stated aim is to “streamline” the delivery of 1.5 million homes and fast-track 150 major infrastructure projects—cutting through a planning system widely acknowledged to be totally dysfunctional.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Few would disagree. Britain’s planning processes became a regulatory swamp under Conservative rule.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The Lower Thames Crossing project, for example, has so far cost over £250 million in planning alone—more than it cost Norway to build the world’s longest tunnel.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

On paper, reforms are very welcome. But once journalists and shadow ministers began reviewing Rayner’s bill, a familiar pattern emerged: expansion of state power—at the expense of citizen’s rights.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Clause 82, for example, hands Natural England—a quango—the power to compulsorily purchase land with authorisation from the Secretary of State.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Natural England is central to Labour’s plan to balance development with “environmental offsetting.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Instead of requiring property developers to mitigate “ecological damage” locally—which causes delays—they will pay into a national nature restoration fund. So the quango will offset the environmental costs—by seizing land elsewhere for rewilding or reserves.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This is all I could fit here... there are many other worrying clauses. To see the rest—of course, published with source links: https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/every-bit-of-tyrannical-legislation

Every Bit of "Tyrannical" Legislation the Labour Government Has in the Works Policing, education, infrastructure, they've got their fingers in all of it... news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - March 6, 2025 at 6:29 AM

Saved - March 8, 2025 at 3:26 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

I’ve been exploring the significant changes at the General Medical Council (GMC) under Charlie Massey’s leadership since 2016. The GMC, meant to ensure doctors' accountability, has shifted away from impartiality, allowing trans-identifying doctors to obscure past records. Concerns about patient awareness of doctors' sex have been dismissed, and ethical issues have arisen, including investments in companies linked to health problems. The GMC has also adopted a stricter stance on medical debate during Covid, while failing to address conflicts of interest among some doctors.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Something went very wrong with Britain’s medical watchdog. At the heart of it? One career civil servant. Meet Charlie Massey, the man who transformed the General Medical Council beyond recognition. How did he do it? And at what cost? Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Massey became chief executive and registrar of the GMC in 2016. He is a career civil servant, having previously worked in HM Treasury, the Cabinet Office, Department for Work and Pensions, the Pensions Regulator and the Department of Social Security.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The GMC regulates doctors in the UK, ensuring they are properly trained, competent, and held accountable. It is supposed to be independent, funded by doctors via fees and managed by an ethical head to safeguard patients.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Under Massey’s leadership, however, the council has progressively abandoned impartiality (and worse)...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Last month, the Telegraph discovered that the council has effectively allowed trans-identifying doctors to scrub their records, thereby preventing patients from seeing past suspensions or warnings if they occurred before a doctor's “transition”.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The GMC claimed internal records remain linked, but admitted such information has been hidden from the public.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Investigative journalist @CharlotteCGill found in February 2024 that at least 77 doctors had changed their gender on official records since 2003—the vast majority without legal documentation (only 2 provided a gender recognition certificate).

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

When Baroness Dianne Hayter raised concerns about the importance of patients knowing their doctor’s sex, the GMC stonewalled her.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

A spokeswoman said that the medical register’s "purpose" is to confirm training, not provide information on sex. The spokeswoman further suggested that patients could request a chaperone when seeing a doctor (despite patients obviously not knowing when they needed one)...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The GMC admitted it stopped requiring Gender Recognition Certificates in 2010, claiming many trans-identifying doctors found it “too difficult” to obtain.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Note GMC guidance states that doctors must obtain patient consent before examination or treatment. A principle that many would argue becomes non-existent if patients are denied access to basic information about their doctor.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Prior to this, in September 2023, Massey and the council removed all references to “mothers” from maternity guidance, replacing “surrogate mother” with “surrogate parent”. Its menopause policy was likewise rewritten to exclude references to women.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Earlier that year, the GMC decided to stock tampons in men’s toilets, insisting it was necessary to “meet the needs of all colleagues and visitors.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Beyond gender ideology, Massey and the GMC’s decisions have raised ethical concerns that are just as serious—if not more so—than fully embracing gender theory.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

An investigation by the British Medical Journal in March 2023 revealed that the council held nearly £900,000 in investments in companies linked to causing obesity and diabetes, including Nestlé, McDonald’s, Starbucks, PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, and Unilever.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The sometimes fatal consequences of persistent consumption of fast/ultra processed-foods has been well-documented over the years.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Most recently, a peer-reviewed study published in the British Medical Journal in 2024 found that such foods can increase the risk of cardiovascular disease-related death by 50%, type 2 diabetes by 12%, and all-cause mortality by by a staggering 21%.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

For context, the council has full discretion over what companies they invest in. Its portfolio is managed through the Churches, Charities and Local Authorities Investment Management fund, and the GMC has already vetoed investment in gambling and pornography-linked companies.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Elsewhere, during Covid, the GMC took an increasingly authoritarian stance on medical debate. In 2022, Massey warned doctors that they could face regulatory action for publishing “misleading” information online. The new provision was confirmed in recent 2024 guidance.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

They also referred several doctors who questioned mainstream Covid policy to the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service—a statutory committee responsible for conducting hearings where concerns about a doctor's fitness to practice are reviewed.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Among them was Dr. Sarah Myhill, suspended for nine months in 2023 for promoting nutritional/natural treatments for Covid. She promoted vitamin C and iodine...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The tribunal ruled that her claims lacked a scientific basis and posed a “potential risk” to patients.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Some say the GMC’s lack of action is equally concerning. Last year, when reports surfaced that several TV doctors had received payments from Covid vaccine manufacturers without disclosing them, all while promoting their products to the public, the council was nowhere to be seen.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Code 36 of the GMC’s Good Medicine Practice guide states: "You must be open and honest with patients about any interests you have that may affect (or could be seen to affect) the way you propose, provide or prescribe treatments, or refer patients." These doctors were not "open"

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Under Massey, the GMC has abandoned traditional ethics, favoured ideology, and neglected to hold seemingly captured doctors to account. And he’s been incredibly well compensated for it all along the way...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

If you want to see the full report... Of course, all source links included: https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/the-gmc-under-charlie-massey-need

The Career Civil Servant Who "Ruined" Britain’s Watchdog for Doctors Reviewing the recent policies of the General Medical Council under chief executive Charlie Massey news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - March 4, 2025 at 4:52 PM

Saved - March 5, 2025 at 9:44 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

I've been exploring the actions of the Met Office under Penelope Endersby, its chief executive since 2018. The agency, which operates with financial autonomy, provides crucial climate data for government policy. However, a journalist uncovered that many of its climate stations either don't exist or use questionable data methods. For instance, some temperature readings were taken from locations far from actual stations, raising concerns about accuracy. Additionally, there are allegations of tampering with historical climate data, which has led to significant discrepancies in temperature reporting.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Britain’s state-backed weather & climate service has been up to some astonishing things. And at the center of it all? One woman most have probably never heard of. Penelope Endersby, chief executive of the Met Office. Her agency’s actions might leave you speechless. Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Endersby has led the Met Office since December 2018. The agency operates as a trading fund under the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, supplying climate data that shapes government policy.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It manages hundreds of temperature stations across Britain, frequently cited in policy announcements, and serves as the UK's primary weather forecaster.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

As a trading fund, it runs with financial autonomy, handling its own revenues and expenses outside the government’s main budget, allowing it to function more like a business.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Given its role in providing data-driven insights, you’d expect the Met Office to be rigorously objective. In reality, it is far from it.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Last December, journalist Ray Sanders uncovered through a series of FOI requests that 103 of the 302 climate stations recording UK temperatures don’t actually exist.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

By examining historical logs, he found that the ‘Braemar No. 2’ station, for example, in Aberdeenshire had supposedly been collecting data since 1959—despite only being installed in 2005.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

What Sanders uncovered was the Met Office “merging” data from nearby sites to estimate temperatures. But then he found out they were doing worse with their current recordings...

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Dover and Folkestone have both been "recording" temperatures but neither actually exist. Instead, Endersby and her crew had been using stations sometimes well over 10 miles away to report "precise" temperatures for the locations.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

When Sanders confronted them, a Met Office spokesman admitted, “We use regression analysis to create a model of the relationship between each station and others in the network.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Weeks later, after the revelation spread on social media, the Met Office quietly renamed the webpage that contained these recordings from “UK Climate Averages” to “Location-Specific Long-Term Averages.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

They even added a disclaimer. The page now states that its locations cover the UK evenly but don’t necessarily correspond to actual weather stations. No announcement. No explanation. Just a quiet change that made it look as if it had always been there.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In short, they’ve used questionable data to “evidence” heating claims, which the legacy media then repeated. And rather than addressing the issue, they quietly rebranded their methods without proper explanation.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Even where real temperature stations exist, their placements raise doubts about their accuracy. Some of Britain’s most alarming heat records come from locations surrounded by artificial heat sources.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In 2023, an “extreme” temperature was recorded at Teddington Bushy Park, where the measuring device sat beside a high wall reflecting heat and a newly built housing development.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Similarly, Chertsey’s highest summer temperature reading last June faced scrutiny when it was revealed that the device was located near a newly installed solar farm with over 1,800 panels—an obvious heat source.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Sanders confronted them again about the solar panels. Their response: “The temperature measurements meet standards for publication and scientific use.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In September 2024, an FOI request revealed a brutal contrast in assessments. While international standards classify nearly 80% of Met Office weather stations as unreliable, the Met Office itself rates over 90% of them as “Excellent,” “Good,” or “Satisfactory.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

One of the most notorious examples of their "quality" weather/temperature stations came on July 19, 2022, when they announced that the UK had hit 40°C for the first time ever.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

One reading was taken at RAF Coningsby, a military airbase, just as three fighter jets were landing nearby. The Met Office labelled the record as a “milestone in climate history.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The BBC ran with the headline, ‘UK's 40C heatwave 'basically impossible' without climate change’.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Beyond station placement, the Met Office has been caught tampering with historical climate data (HadCRUT). Older readings from the mid-20th century have been lowered, while recent temperatures have been artificially increased.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

They first adjusted the 1940s data by subtracting 0.15°C. Then, between 2000 and 2014, they revised HadCRUT’s original report of a 0.03°C per decade warming, raising it to 0.08°C. The latest version, HadCRUT5, now reports 0.14°C per decade.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Endersby and the Met Office's, let's say, "misdeeds" go on... Rest of breakdown here: https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/p/the-silent-bureaucrat-pulling-the All sources linked, as always.

The Quiet Bureaucrat Pulling the Strings Behind Britain's "Dodgy" State-Backed Weather and Climate Service Meet Penelope Endersby, chief executive of the Meteorological Office (Met Office). news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - October 30, 2024 at 1:56 AM

Saved - October 31, 2024 at 10:12 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

There's significant discussion surrounding the terrorism charges against 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, the suspect in the Southport child murders. He faces additional charges under the Bio Weapons Act and the Terrorism Act for possessing extremist materials, including an al-Qaeda training manual. Despite this, authorities have refrained from classifying the case as terrorism due to a lack of motive evidence. The situation raises questions about public trust and the handling of misinformation, especially regarding the suspect's background and the implications for free speech.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

There's a lot of chat going on about the terrorism charges levelled at the Southport child murder suspect... Here's an attempt at a fair summary of events and what it might mean. Starmer could be in serious trouble. Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Earlier today, police announced that they have formally charged 18-year-old Axel Rudakubana, the suspect of the vile Southport child murders, with two new offences.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In addition to the murder charges of 3 beautiful young girls—Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, and Alice da Silva Aguiar—Rudakubana was charged under Section 1 of the Bio Weapons Act 1974, and under Section 58 of the Terrorism Act 2000, for possessing an al-Qaeda training manual.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The additional charges, discovered during an investigation of Rudakubana’s home in the Lancashire village of Banks, include production of ricin and possession of a PDF titled ‘Military Studies in the Jihad Against the Tyrants—the al-Qaeda training manual’.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Given the lethal nature of ricin and the links to jihadist material, one would assume that Counter Terrorism Police would classify the case as terrorism. However, they’ve refrained, citing lack of evidence of a “motive.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

At a press conference earlier today, Merseyside Police Chief Superintendent Serena Kennedy cautioned the public against assumption: “I would strongly advise everyone to avoid speculation about the motivation in this case.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Kennedy emphasised that the criminal proceedings are ongoing and warned that any commentary could compromise Rudakubana’s right to a fair trial.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Her advice seems ironic. Kennedy had no hesitation in labelling protesters who gathered in Southport as “far-right" on July 31st. It was a quick judgment on her part in comparison. No official, thorough investigations had determined their motivations behind the protests.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The discovery of extremist material takes on further significance, considering some of the media’s reactions following the stabbings.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

On August 19th, the BBC declared “false online rumours” fuelled the violence associating Rudakubana with Islam—later supplementing it with more articles theorising about online chatrooms “fanning the flames”.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

For context, a recent Sky News investigation revealed that most of the influential accounts driving "disinformation" and "orchestrating" "far-right" riots in the UK originated from overseas users.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Other outlets, such as the Mirror and the Daily Record, frequently referenced the suspect’s Christian father and his prior involvement in a local choir.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

British-Nigerian lawyer and activist Adeshola Mos-Shogbamimu, a frequent figure in the progressive media, stated Rudakubana was a “Black British Christian… born and bred in the UK” and emphatically “NOT Muslim.”

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Indeed, possession of extremist religious materials does not equate to motivation, yet it strongly suggests an ideological link.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The government and authorities agreed that “misinformation” sparked widespread unrest. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper repeated such concerns in the House of Commons days after the murders.

Video Transcript AI Summary

It's crucial to avoid spreading harmful misinformation online. False information has circulated widely in the past 24 hours, jeopardizing an important criminal investigation. Everyone is urged to respect the Southport community and the families affected by this tragedy. In these challenging times, the police need to focus on their work, and the community deserves the space to grieve and heal. It is vital to refrain from using this situation to create division or promote personal agendas.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Extremely important that people don't spread damaging misinformation online. Hear. False information has already been extensively shared in the last 24 hours. Those who do this for their own purposes risk undermining a crucial criminal investigation, and I ask everyone to show some respect for the community in Southport and for families who are grieving and in trauma. In these dark and difficult moments, the police must be able to get on with their work and communities must be given the time and space to grieve and heal without outside voices seeking to use events to stir up division or advance their own views.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Even our broadcasting regulator agreed, saying there is a clear link between “misleading content” and violent disorder.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In reality, determining the true reasons—objectively— behind public anger remains complex; the govt's assertions of “misinformation” sidestep the possibility that protestors and/or rioters had broader concerns, whether over immigration or perceived inaction by authorities.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Earlier this month, MI5 Director General Ken McCallum said that roughly 75 per cent of terror threats his teams were dealing were “Islamic inspired”, with 25 per cent relating to “far-right” extremism.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

But then Telegraph and Critic journalist Charlie Bentley-Astor dropped the real bombshell… She revealed that police on the scene had informed a Reform party candidate that Rudakubana’s actions were motivated by Islamic extremism.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The question begs: was the information deliberately withheld from the start? When did police know of the link?

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In an equally scandalous development, outlet Guido Fawkes revealed that when they published an article last week questioning why Rudakubana’s case had been delayed, authorities went to the extent of directly contacting and pressuring them to pull the story.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The implications of concealing such details go beyond this case alone, touching on a deeper, more systemic issue of public trust, as does the authorities’ attempt to pressure a retraction.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The terrorism charges also touch on the prosecution and sentencing of those for saying supposedly “inflammatory” things online. The Free Speech Union thinks a number of alleged offenders could have grounds for lawsuits.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Many ppl arrested in Aug for social media posts about the murders faced intense police pressure to plead guilty. Did police anticipate news of a link to an Islamist training manual would surface, potentially weakening the case for conviction?

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

If our police and the Prime Minister encouraged the systematic targeting of individuals aware of the suspect’s potential links to Islam for “stirring up racial/religious hatred” despite its truth, the cultural—and possibly political—repercussions could be seismic.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@Humanspective @esilacSynohtnA @Suffragent_ @PeterSweden7 @DaveAtherton20 @ABridgen @MrAndyNgo @Artemisfornow @LeilaniDowding @LozzaFox @addicted2newz @dystopian_DU @BGatesIsaPyscho @wideawake_media @Lauren_Southern @DVATW @calvinrobinson @TRobinsonNewEra @Lauren_Southern

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@Humanspective @esilacSynohtnA @Suffragent_ @PeterSweden7 @DaveAtherton20 @ABridgen @MrAndyNgo @Artemisfornow @LeilaniDowding @LozzaFox @addicted2newz @dystopian_DU @BGatesIsaPyscho @wideawake_media @Lauren_Southern @DVATW @calvinrobinson @TRobinsonNewEra If you appreciate this kind of info... I post full reports here, sources links included: https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/

The Stark Naked Brief. | JJ Starky | Substack Concise, investigative reports on the defining political issues of our time. Showing rather than telling. Former political strategist. Part-time citizen journalist. Based in 🇬🇧. Click to read "The Stark Naked Brief.", by JJ Starky, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers. news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - August 4, 2024 at 2:57 PM

Saved - August 4, 2024 at 10:02 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

There's been a surge of disturbing footage from recent riots and protests, with political figures using selective clips to push their agendas. In Stoke-on-Trent, a man was assaulted based on race, followed by another attack involving the "Muslim Defence League." In Bristol, tensions escalated outside a hotel housing asylum seekers, leading to violence between protesters and counter-protesters. Liverpool saw a peaceful protest turn chaotic, with rioting and looting. Overall, violence erupted from both sides, complicating the narrative and necessitating clarity.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

There's a lot of horrific footage circulating of riots and protests from last night. Political hacks are selectively using specific clips to push their narratives. Here’s an attempted honest summary of events, which they and the mainstream are unlikely to provide. Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

1. Stoke-on-Trent A group of men who looked of middle eastern ancestry assaulted a man who looked of anglo-saxon ancestry reportedly because of his race. However, we can't be sure of the cause from this video alone.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This was followed by another assault reportedly carried out by the "Muslim Defence League" on two white men. Apparently, the two men were attacked with hammers. Again, we can't verify exactly what caused it.

Video Transcript AI Summary

I appreciate the slang, but it's the best I can do. He needs an ambulance, they're talking about it.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I I appreciate. It's it's a slang, but it's the best I can do with the Yeah. I know, doc. I know. Here. He needs an ambulance, though. He does. Yeah. They're talking,

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Dozens upon dozens of men who looked of middle Eastern ancestry were seen patrolling the streets with weapons.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Samaria sword. Smashing shop now. Love Gregs. Translation: Samaria sword. I will be smashing the shop now. I love Gregs.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Samaria sword. You see? Is that a sword? I'll be smashing the shop now. Oh, Greg. I love Gregs.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

These same men were seen shouting "allahu akbar" in a nearby park. So at this point, it became pretty clear they're muslims.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Police were recorded telling them to discard their weapons at the local mosque.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

The march that is presumed to have occurred because of the heinous murder of 3 young, beautiful girls or mass immigration (people will have had different reasons for attending) appeared peaceful in Stoke - at least initially.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

2. Bristol A man who looked of anglo-saxon ancestry assaulted a man who looked of African descent reportedly because of his race. However, we can't be sure of the cause from this video alone.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

People protesting the Southport murders/mass immigration (again we cannot be sure) gathered outside of a hotel, which reportedly houses a number of "asylum seekers", "refugees" or "economic migrants".

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Outside that same hotel, a fight broke out after both sides launched cans of drink at each other.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It appears some of the counter protestors then assaulted a presumed neutral journalist attempting to film the event. You can hear shouts of "fascist".

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Elsewhere certain counter-protestors, thought to be members of antifa, harassed a reported Christian pastor near a shopping centre. They can be heard talking about abortion.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

People protesting were seen swearing at and goading counter protestors as police formed a line to separate the opposing groups.

Video Transcript AI Summary

The challenge is keeping things separate based on the objective and intention.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Is to keep them separate. Yeah. And that's the that is the challenge is is not the only thing for almost like how you get turned up, what the objective is, what the intention is. And

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

3. Liverpool This was where most of the horrific footage emerged but it appears the protest started off peaceful.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Police charged at the protestors, who then ran away to avoid a conflict.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Counter protestors turned up but skirmishes were reportedly avoided. Here the protestors cheer as police ushered the counter protestors away.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

At some point, they must have been close together as arguments were recorded. Here you can see counter "anti-racist" protestors goading a protestor who looks like he is trying to talk them.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Some protestors reportedly marching because of the Southport murders/mass immigration (again we can't be sure) can then be seen pushing a policeman off his bike.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Some, now turning more violent, ripped down a stand handing out quarans. Shouts of "our country, our country" can be heard. So it's pretty clear some rioters were anti-Islamic.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Later that evening, it seems some of those same protestors started fully rioting. This included looting. Here they can be seen in a library, or possibly, a book store.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Then, they set alight to a number of bins. The rioters can be heard shouting (I think): "allah, allah, who the f*ck is allah"

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Some of those same rioters, now masked, started letting off fireworks in the streets and reportedly aimed some at police.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

4. Other notable highlights Police in Stoke allow men who looked of middle eastern ancestry baring weapons to run past them as they attempt to cordon off a road.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Police in Blackpool set dogs on protestors. We don't know if this bloke broke any laws or if this was part of an attempt to disperse crowds.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

All in all, it's a mess. It's clear there's violence committed by both sides, which doesn't help anyone but the government and those in favour of hate speech laws. It also might be that the violent actions of a few have completely tainted the peaceful many. Clarity is needed.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

If you appreciate this kind of info... I post reports at https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/ All sources links included in articles - also easily emailable

The Stark Naked Brief. | JJ Starky | Substack Concise, investigative reports on the defining political issues of our time. Showing rather than telling. Former political strategist. Part-time citizen journalist. Based in 🇬🇧. Click to read "The Stark Naked Brief.", by JJ Starky, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers. news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - June 30, 2024 at 10:49 AM

Saved - July 1, 2024 at 2:33 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Keir Starmer's lesser-known aspects have been revealed through investigations. The Crown Prosecution Service mishandled the Assange case under his leadership, with records being destroyed. Starmer received praise from Epstein associate Peter Mandelson for purging non-establishment candidates from The Labour Party. He authored a statement protecting intelligence agencies from prosecution for torture allegations. Starmer's involvement with the Trilateral Commission aligns with his attendance at World Economic Forum events, suggesting an elitist approach to policy-making.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

There is a lot about Keir Starmer that the wider public does not know. Over the last few years, various underreported investigations have revealed more about him and his loyalties. Matt Kennard has provided valuable insights on this topic. Thread 🧵 https://t.co/c2FBgU7N3a

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

1. Involvement with Assange Case There were serious irregularities in how the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) dealt with the Assange's case when Starmer was in charge. Curiously, the service he was a head of also destroyed a lot of records pertaining to the case. https://t.co/wmHmGZCSNu

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker discusses irregularities in the Assange case involving the CPS and a meeting between the CPS head and Eric Holder in Washington. The CPS refused to provide information on the meeting, claiming it was destroyed. Holder had previously hinted at taking action against Assange. The meeting included key personnel related to extradition, raising suspicions about discussions on the Assange case. The speaker's investigation revealed undisclosed travel expenses and the CPS's lack of transparency.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: You also have him going and meeting Eric Holder at the same time as him having a responsibility in the Assange case. Speaker 1: I mean, this is, for me, the most incredible of all the stories, really, because so the Assange case with the CPS was just written with irregularities and strange happenings. Now just to give a backstory, Assange, as everyone knows, was involved in, the cable gate released in 2010, the end of 2010 with The Guardian. Right. November 2010, they started publishing those. Same month, an arrest an international restaurant came from Sweden over alleged sexual misconduct. As soon as that happened, CPS was involved as the as the Swedes, agent in in the UK. And what he and there's basically no information has been made available about what was happening with the CPS because it was there's a Italian journalist, a very good journalist with Stefania and Marissa who's been battling for years to get information about what the CPS was up to because and she's found some amazing stuff even though they basically admitted to deleting tons of emails, and they've covered must be covering up loads of stuff, but they have the the stuff she's got released has shown that the the the CPS was sent to the Swedes. Please don't get cold feet when they were saying we might not get cold feet. They also said, don't come and interview Assange in London in 2010 or 2012 Yeah. So it's 2011. This was before he went to the embassy. An interview at that time could have Yeah. Speaker 0: Nipped it Speaker 1: with a bus nipped it Speaker 0: with a bus. US needed time. But Speaker 1: and these are all things we know that she had to struggle to even get that information. So there's clearly a cover up. Now the story I did recently was I requested from the CPS. I said, so the funny thing is that the the, his travel expenses, like I said, were not by disclosed by the CPS. I found them another way. And so they they and I saw they've been to Washington 4 times. That's never been reported. So I thought, okay. Well, it's quite interesting that you went to Washington 4 times. 3 of those occasions were when he was in charge of the Assange case. So I asked them. I said, can I just get a basic, list of meetings he had and, itinerary and some briefing notes that were made for him? Now this is routine stuff. But this is a public he's he's called the public prosecutor. It's a public position. They said, no. Oh, sorry. We can't. We haven't got that information. We destroyed it. There were. We destroyed it. Speaker 0: So On what basis? Speaker 1: Yeah. So I said, well, I asked that. I said, so why have you destroyed? They said, have a look at our retention and schedule. That's what it's called. And it's a long document. So I did read it, and I said to them, there's no there's there's no information here about how long you the time limit for preservation of documents. Mhmm. Can you just explain that? And was this routine procedure? They didn't respond. Right. So so, obviously, something's going on. But I found through, US documents Mhmm. That he'd met with Eric Holder in 2011 when he visited Washington for a 45 minute session at the DOJ. Now the previous year, Holder had said in a press conference soon after the cable gate releases started, as I said, in November 2010. Following month, he was asked in a press conference about it. They asked, what are you doing about it? Are you gonna use the? He said, that's 1 possibility, but there's other statutes we can use. And then he said, there's there's I've I've initiated a a bunch of actions that I can't disclose, but we're we're working on it effectively. Following years, Sam is going in for a 45 minute meeting with him. While he's in charge of the CPS, the head of the national security division of the DOJ is also present. The UK liaison prosecutor to the US is also present who deals with extradition. So it's and then I mean, I can't say whether they discussed your Assange case, but the personnel that were that present would indicate that it would've it it it was something that might have come up. Again, I asked, Summer about this. He didn't respond. So and and it it's just it's it's amazing, the cover ups. And he so he was integral to the Assange case effectively, like what his organization was. And there's never been any information about his role that's come out apart from that document which I revealed in this in this article. So that's incredible.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

2. Epstein/Peter Mandelson Link Peter Mandelson, a close associate of Epstein, praised Starmer for purging The Labour Party of non-establishment candidates. https://t.co/zSz4u6SxFp

Video Transcript AI Summary

Starmer has been successful in purging thousands from the Labour Party, with ties to Epstein and BAE Systems. He is seen as an enforcer of the establishment, with questionable connections to MI5 and MI6. Despite his involvement in decisions not to prosecute intelligence agencies, he claims no responsibility. This plausible deniability allows him to avoid accountability. Translation: Starmer has removed many from the Labour Party, has connections to Epstein and BAE Systems, and is seen as enforcing the establishment. He has ties to MI5 and MI6, and avoids responsibility for decisions not to prosecute intelligence agencies. This allows him to escape blame.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Now what Starmer did was and and, you know, it was really encapsulated in an interview that, good friend of convicted pedophile and Israeli intelligence asset, Jeffrey Epstein, Peter Mandelson, close friend of Jeffrey Epstein, which we don't mention enough, actually Okay. Said on LBC, oh, you know, Starmer's done such a great job of pushing out thousands of these people from the party. They have cleansed this party. You know, the labor party there, and it also has to be remembered, had something like 30, 000 shares in BAE Systems at the start of the war on terror. Rather than being a vehicle through which a greater distribution of political and economic power in the society can be achieved, it is the the the ballwalk against that happening. And Starmer has has been the enforcer of the establishment very, successfully. But I'm I'm I'm very curious about this, and we'll get onto the trilateral commission because I think that that is possibly the the most telling of all the stories about his orientation. But also when we first spoke about him, you were mentioning these, meetings for drinks with Jonathan Evans Yeah. With Mi 5 while Starmer was as the head of the CPS. At least, you know, this is another thing that I've just found ridiculous, is the way that they've concocted this argument that the head of the CPS is not responsible for things that happen at the CPS while he's the head of it. Haven't you found that amazing? Speaker 1: Well, it's also it's it's also when you start looking so for that story, III looked through the archives of the CPS to see what they were saying. Just to for the viewers, this was a case in 2, 010 and then 2012 where CPS, was in charge of making the decision of whether to prosecute Mi 5 for its role in CIA torture, and then later on, MI 6 as well. And in 2012, Starmer was the author of the statement that said we're not prosecuting for these reasons. So he's directly involved, and he was the bigger head. So, yes, it is ridiculous. And this is how they get out of it. That that he has no responsibility because, well, it was made by a lower down, lawyer. We it was nothing to do with us. And it it's just a plausible deniability, isn't it? Speaker 0: Yep.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

3. Buddying Up with Intel Agencies When accusations of illegal torture arose involving MI5/MI6 in 2010-12, Starmer was the man who authored the statement detailing how the CPS would not prosecute them. https://t.co/kiQJNivDw2

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker questions the relationship between Keir Starmer and the head of MI5, suggesting it is unusual that they had drinks together. Despite sending questions to Starmer, he never replies. Jonathan Evans confirmed that they attended his farewell drinks, but couldn't recall if they spoke. The speaker emphasizes that this interaction was not standard procedure for CPS directors. This raises suspicions about Starmer's connections and actions. Translation: The speaker raises concerns about Keir Starmer's interaction with the head of MI5, highlighting the lack of transparency and unusual nature of their meeting.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Because he was a senior, figure in Mi 5 when that case and when witness speed, this is the guy that was alleged to have taken part in the torture of Binyan Mohammed, was was was was was allegedly doing what he was doing. So that so you can't you can't say it's not, curious that the the the fit the person who was heading the organization that decided to clear m y 5, then the following year goes to his leaving drinks. And the other thing is that Keir Starmer has never replied to any questions. Every time I do an article, I I've sent him a list of questions. He never replies. But the reason that we knew what had happened with that was because Jonathan Evans replied to me. So originally, when I first wrote that story, soon after he was elected leader, and and flagged these drinks, I didn't know what happened, so I just thought it was drinks. And so I emailed, Jonathan Evans, couple of months ago and said, look. Kees Starman said that he had drinks with you in 2, 013. I'm not expecting to get a reply. He's like, well, your research may tell you that I was soon to retire from MI 5. So he he he he was coming to my farewell drinks. There were lots of people there, and I can't remember if I spoke to him. That's what he said. But, anyway, so the the they had the relations. And then I also asked him in that email, which he didn't reply to. Did you have a relationship with him before or subsequently? And the other thing is to go to the point that people or people who say, well, this is standard procedure. No. It's not because I looked at the records of all other CPS directors. None of them have ever had drinks with the head of m I 5 in a or or accepted hospitality, which is what this was. And that goes for after and before. So it's extremely curious. And, again, goes to what you say, which is that what kind who is this guy?

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

4. Trilateral Commission Kennard found records from 2017/18 showing that Starmer joined the commission set up by David Rockefeller in 1973 to essentially further elitist interests. https://t.co/r9xToxECdS

Video Transcript AI Summary

Starmer was a member of the Trilateral Commission between 2017 and 2018, during his time in Corbyn's shadow cabinet. This elite networking group, established in 1973 by David Rockefeller, aims to maintain power for the US, Europe, and Japan. Starmer did not inform Corbyn's team about his membership, which they would have opposed due to conflicting ideologies. Starmer attended one meeting in 2017 but left the commission between 2021 and 2022. The organization focuses on elite and corporate interests, contrasting with Labour's goal of wealth redistribution. Starmer's lack of transparency on this matter raises questions about his commitment to democratic principles.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Spoke with spoke with star man at a trilateral cruise in London, but he may not be an official member. Well, he may have been, but he he just I so the story I did recently Mhmm. Was based on the membership records from 2,011, 2022, which covered the period Stonewall was involved. But Gove might have been a member before because what was unusual about so just to give a background to what this trilateral commission is. So, again, it's a so it's an elite networking group in the sort of mode of the Bilderberg meetings and stuff like that. It was set up in 1973 by the billionaire banker, David Rockefeller, who was the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank. And he, wanted to get together elites from the US, Europe, and Japan to maintain a sort of, hegemony by those by those 3 powers effectively against the Soviet Union. And he he he, at the time, was close to the leadership of the CIA. In 9 I found declassified documents which showed in 958. He was exchanging letters with the director at the time, which was Allen Dulles. Then in 1978, he was invited into the CIA to be a guest speaker. Then in 1980, he went in to meet the director who was, at the time. So he was close to them at the time. And then you you see that US intelligence has always had a representation in the trilateral permission. It's a membership organization. Now, and Henry Kissinger was an early, early figure in it and is now a life lifetime trustee of the organization. And Starmer, so so not the type of organization you expect a labor politician to to, to be in. Now there was some articles couple years ago about summer being a member, but they they were a bit, chaotic. And there wasn't there weren't there wasn't a timeline put on it. So I used those membership records to to find out when he joined and when he left. And the amazing thing was that he joined when he was in Corbin's shadow cabinet. So he joined, it's hard to know because it specifically, but he joined between 2017 to 18. Now he was shadow Brexit secretary from 2016 to 19. We contact I contacted, Corbyn's former spokesman, James Schneider, and said, did you know about this? He said, no. We didn't. And we do we would have blocked it because he they did block him. He tried to take an outside job with the city law firm. The rear. Exactly. They Yeah. And they blocked it. Which used to represent the Israeli embassy. Yep. And Harry O'Shaughn. Yeah. And a a lot of other villains. Mhmm. And and so he they said we would have blocked it like we did with that, and, it was completely incompatible with our policy program, which is about redistributing power wealth, from the from the top to the bottom. And, obviously, trilateral is about doing the opposite. It's about just entrenching elite interest and corporate interest and state interest. So that was that was the story is that he joined and didn't tell them. And, and then he left it between 2,021 and 22. And he, he attended 1 meeting in 2017 in London, alongside, as you mentioned, Michael Dovin. There's a a lord called Lord Moore, who's a conservative peer. They talked about Brexit. And that later that day, the former head of, Mi 5, Alisa, Money, and Bullock spoke alongside the former head of GCHQ, David Oman. So this is the kind of milieu that there there is. And and, again, his time is a public figure. He's labor leader. He's formerly DTP. I asked him just some basic questions. When did you join? This is stuff in a democratic society that politicians should have to disclose or his reply. No reply.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This falls in line with Starmer's attendance at previous World Economic Forum events. They always have a top down authoritarian approach to policy-making. Here is a brief compilation of his comments during their 2023 annual conference: https://t.co/MrdLi0hHCE

Video Transcript AI Summary

We outlined our green prosperity plan for clean power by 2030 at a conference. We aim to partner with businesses for this transition to renewable energy. It's crucial for the UK to be present on the global stage, especially in addressing the climate crisis. We believe in an active state that collaborates with the private sector to seize opportunities for the future. The absence of the UK at Davos was disappointing, and we hope for a change in government to lead in this area.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: At our at our party conference in the autumn of last year, we set our plans for what we call our green prosperity plan, going towards clean power generation by 2030. And that's ambitious. That means and here in Davos has been an opportunity for me to speak to many CEOs of businesses and investors who would partner us if we're in government to do that. There does need to be a transition. Obviously, it will play its part during that transition, but not new investment, not new fields up in the North Sea because we need to go towards net 0. We need to, ensure that renewable energy is where we go next. Speaker 1: Bring you in on this. First of all, are you surprised that your prime minister didn't show up to Davos? Speaker 0: Yes. I think our prime minister should have showed up, Davos. I absolutely do. And 1 of the things that's been, you know, impressed on me since I've been here is the absence of the United Kingdom. And that's why it's really important that, I'm here and that our shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves is here as a statement of intent that should there be a change of government, I hope there will be, the United Kingdom will play its part on the global stage in a way I think it probably hasn't in recent years. And so that's my opportunity to say why we're here. I do think the prime minister, should be here having these discussions, having the meetings that I've been having. I actually think it should be a catalyst for all of us to say, well, come on, there is a challenge in relation to the climate crisis. That's been there for a very long time, but the Ukraine conflict has brought that into sharp focus, and we need to stop seeing it as just a challenge. So, well, it's actually the single biggest opportunity we've been given for a very long time to transition, to take the jobs and opportunities of the future. I do think that that requires a different view of the state, and this is something that will happen if we have a Labour government in the United Kingdom because what we want is an active state that is not saying, well, look, we're going to suck it all up to the center, not saying we're going to leave it to the private sector, but a state that partners with the private sector to take these opportunities.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Link to full interview with Matt Kennard discussing Starmer: via https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RVWVxsRttCQ&pp=ygUabWludHByZXNzIG5ldyBtYXR0IGthbm5hcmQ%3D

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - May 20, 2024 at 7:20 PM

Saved - May 20, 2024 at 8:54 PM

reSee.it AI Summary

Many TV doctors have been caught receiving payments from pharmaceutical companies involved in Covid treatments and tests. Dr. Sarah Jarvis received payments from AstraZeneca and Merck & Dohme while promoting vaccination and exaggerating Covid risks. Dr. Amir Khan was paid by Teva while promoting Covid tests. Dr. Hilary Jones received payments from Merck & Dohme while exaggerating Covid dangers. The conflicts of interest should have been disclosed, and it raises questions about the credibility of these doctors and the media's role in promoting their interests.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

It's not been a good month for our "impartial" TV doctors... Many were caught encouraging vaccination while receiving direct payments from C jab manufacturers. What you might not know is that others have been paid by companies that made Covid treatments and tests. Thread 🧵

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

1. Dr Sarah Jarvis is a GP and broadcaster. Sarah has been the resident doctor for the Jeremy Vine show on BBC Radio 2 for the last 16 years. She has presented on the BBC’s One Show for the last 10 years, and on Good Morning Britain on ITV.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In 2022, during a segment on ITV News, Jarvis told viewers it is important that “young people are vaccinated because they can pass it on to older and vulnerable people...”. By then, dozens of studies and the government’s own data conclusively proved the vaccine did not prevent transmission.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Children aged 5 to 11 can now get the COVID vaccine to protect older and vulnerable individuals. The vaccine has low side effects, with only a few cases of heart inflammation out of millions vaccinated in the US. Getting COVID poses a higher risk of heart inflammation than the vaccine. Vaccinating kids can reduce school disruptions and help safeguard older people.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: And 5 to 11 year olds can now, receive the COVID vaccination. What is your reaction to that? Is that, the the way forwards? Speaker 1: I think it is important that young people are vaccinated because they can pass it on particularly to older and really vulnerable people. We know that the vaccine has a very, very low instance of side effects. Myocardial inflammation of heart muscle is the one that everyone was worried about, but we've now had millions of children. In fact, in the US, 8,700,000 children aged 5 to 11 got the vaccine, and there were only 11 cases of inflammation of the heart muscle, most of them very mild. And, of course, you can get that same into inflammation more commonly if you get COVID than if you have the virus. So I think it will reduce the time of school for children, and I'm really hoping that it will be a way of keeping older, more vulnerable people safe. Speaker 0: Doctor Sarah Jarvis, appreciate your time. Thank you.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

ABPI’s disclosure records show that Jarvis took home an impressive £39,602.00 in contracted service fees and expenses from pharmaceutical companies in 2022. AZ paid her £4,440.83. ITV did not disclose Jarvis’s conflicts

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Jarvis would also routinely talk up the risks Covid posed. Her warnings coincided with the approval of Merck & Dohme's Covid antiviral drug Molnupiravir, who naturally stood to profit from Covid alarmism as their product was designed to reduce hospitalisations. (It failed)

Video Transcript AI Summary

COVID spreads quickly in crowds, especially as winter approaches and people spend more time indoors with less ventilation. Seeing friends, colleagues, and family also increases the risk of transmission.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: We know COVID is spreading really fast, and we also know COVID loves a crowd. As the winter nights draw in, it makes it easier for it to spread. We're spending more time indoors with less ventilation, and we're also seeing more of friends, colleagues, and family. All of those make it much easier for COVID.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Merck & Dohme paid her a further £1,400.00 in 2020, £1,662.50 in 2021, and £1,680.00 in 2022. Curiously, Jarvis also peer-reviewed a paper attesting to Molnupiravir’s effectiveness in 2022 for Patient but it omitted any reference to her conflict.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

2. Dr Amir Khan, a full-time GP and best-selling author working in inner city Bradford, is a resident doctor for ITV’s Lorraine and Good Morning Britain.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In March 2021, Khan partnered directly with the DHSC and NHS. This involved the presentation of a series of videos in which he promoted the use of Covid tests (both PCR and LFT). In July 2021, he stated that people should conduct these tests “twice a week”.

Video Transcript AI Summary

Test twice weekly, get a PCR test if symptomatic, wash hands, wear a mask in crowds, use NHS COVID 19 app to check-in.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: But there are simple things we can do to help reduce the spread. It's really important to keep testing twice a week, And if you have symptoms, however mild, take a PCR test. Keep washing those hands and wear a face covering in crowded places. Use the NHS COVID 19 app to check-in.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

ABPI’s database shows that Teva, a multinational pharmaceutical company that purveys in manufacturing services, paid Khan £3,400.00 in 2021. According to Teva UK’s website, the company “assisted the UK’s COVID-19 testing program” with the NHS.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Specifically, they worked to “repurpose sodium chloride saline solution… to help with mass testing”. Khan encouraged use of a product that was made by a company paying him - on government promotions. His conflict was not disclosed.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Experts have criticised both PCR and LFT tests, claiming that they're ineffective due to false positives. In 2021, a Cochrane review of 64 studies found LFTs picked up more false than real positives when infection rates were low in the community.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

3. Dr Hilary Jones is a GP, TV presenter, medical broadcaster, and author. He currently works as the Health Editor of ITV’s Breakfast show.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

In October 2020, Jones featured on ITV’s This Morning stressing that Covid was so serious it constituted “the biggest threat to public health for so many decades”. Frequently, he exaggerated the dangers of Covid, particularly if people did not take certain treatments.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

According to ABPI’s database, Covid antiviral manufacturer Merck & Dohme paid Jones a whopping £24,380.00 in 2020 and an additional £5,000.00 in 2021. He purveyed in Covid alarmism while being paid by a company that stood to financially benefit from such alarmism.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Research found that Merck's Molnupiravir makes “no significant difference” to hospitalisation or death rates. Less than 2% of the 2.23 million courses of the drug procured by the Department of Health have ever been prescribed to patients.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

4. To recap, it is impossible to know what exactly these companies paid Jarvis, Khan, and Jones for. We haven't seen the contracts. Sometimes these docs directly and publicly endorsed products made by companies that were paying them.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Sometimes they overstated Covid risks, which benefited the companies financially involved in the Covid response who were also paying them. Investigations have shown that both the media and government purposely exaggerated the danger of Covid to increase public compliance.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Is it that much of a jump to consider that doctors might do similar to help these companies? What's clear is that the govt/media should have disclosed these conflicts or these docs should have recused themselves on ethical grounds.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@LeilaniDowding @Lewis_Brackpool @TheRustler83 @BGatesIsaPyscho @Johnincarlisle @ABridgen @beverleyturner @FatEmperor @dystopian_DU @Resist_05 @PWestoff @LozzaFox @mattletiss7 @DuttyMonkey_

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@LeilaniDowding @Lewis_Brackpool @TheRustler83 @BGatesIsaPyscho @Johnincarlisle @ABridgen @beverleyturner @FatEmperor @dystopian_DU @Resist_05 @PWestoff @LozzaFox @mattletiss7 @DuttyMonkey_ If you appreciate this kind of info... I post reports at https://news.starknakedbrief.co.uk/ The media should be doing this shit but they too have a financial interest not to.

The Stark Naked Brief. | JJ Starky | Substack Concise, investigative reports on the defining political issues of our time. Showing rather than telling. Former political strategist. Part-time citizen journalist. Based in 🇬🇧. Click to read "The Stark Naked Brief.", by JJ Starky, a Substack publication with hundreds of subscribers. news.starknakedbrief.co.uk

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - June 27, 2023 at 6:27 AM

Saved - April 28, 2024 at 6:54 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

A Colchester resident, Rachel Mathews, criticizes the local council's "green" policy, highlighting the environmental impacts and cost of EVs and renewable energy sources. Councilor Steph Nissan tries to silence Mathews, but is later proven wrong. Another resident, Carianna Cooper, calls out the council for adopting a two-tier system in public discourse. The posts commend Mathews and provide her profile for further follow-up.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This might just be the coldest takedown of Net Zero policy I've ever seen... Colchester resident Rachel Mathews systematically dissects local council's "green" policy, exposing the environmental impacts/cost of EVs and renewable energy sources Clashes followed. Video thread🧵 https://t.co/UGeNoBZHhE

Video Transcript AI Summary

I have been a supporter of green energy for years, but I was shocked to learn about the environmental and human costs of solar panels and wind turbines. The production of these technologies involves forced labor, pollution, and resource consumption. The so-called green solutions are not as ethical as they seem, and the climate change industry is driven by profit. We need to be mindful of the impact of our choices on the environment and human rights to prevent further damage.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Good evening. I've been a supporter of green energy and a keen environmentalist since my twenties. My office is solar powered, so I was mortified to discover that a single lithium mine causes millions of tons of waste every year laced with sulfuric acid and radioactive uranium polluting the water supply for 300 years. Not to mention the unacceptable human cost for child labor to mine cobalt. When I researched which solar panel to purchase I did not for 1 minute consider it would be made by people trapped labor camps being exposed to large quantities of quartz dust which causes silicosis. Please note that the Ethical Consumer Organisation report that it is hard to avoid forced labor in the solar panel supply chain. Wind turbines, which last about 20 years, consume a colossal amount of resources and energy to manufacture and install, not to mention the blight and bird kill. They require diesel engines to start them up and then gallons of oil to lubricate and they can't readily be recycled. Solar panels are also extremely difficult to recycle, costing more than the production of the panel. And lithium batteries pose steep challenges too. Add to that the human suffering which we've all unwittingly been part of just by owning a laptop or mobile phone which is minimal compared to what's required for an EV or solar farm. These so called green or ethical solutions aren't solutions at all, just very good marketing from the $1,500,000,000,000 a year climate change industry. That's $4,000,000,000 a day, by the way. None of us can undo what's already been done. But what we can all do is make sure this doesn't escalate exponentially with fleets of unnecessary EVs and acres of solar farms eating up our precious farmland.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

After Mathews outlines how the council is effectively funding slavery by sourcing materials like lithium abroad... Councillor Steph Nissan pipes up and tries to shut Mathews down despite reportedly giving a gentlemen who spoke before Mathews time to run over https://t.co/1uFZDnlzfC

Video Transcript AI Summary

The speaker questions if the council agrees they must always seek the best knowledge and stop harmful policies. The meeting chair interrupts due to time constraints, leading to a discussion about fairness in enforcing rules. The speaker reiterates their question about the council's obligation.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Finally, do counsel agree that it is your obligation to always seek the best available knowledge and that should it so transpire that any policy, how so ever well intentioned, may subsequently prove harmful. And then the council are obligated to stop. Sorry. I I have finished. What was what was the interruption? Speaker 1: The second bell rang, which indicated that the allocated time available had, expired as explained when you came to the desk. There's a bell at 2 minutes and then there's another bell at 3 minutes. Speaker 0: Yes. And I had one sentence left to finish, and you let the last gentleman go on for about another 30 seconds after the bell. So it needs to be, rules that apply to everybody, not just the ones that you don't like what they're saying. Speaker 1: Respectfully, I don't dislike what you're saying. This is the first time I have heard it. All I'm trying to ensure is that the meeting runs smoothly. That's all I'm seeking to do here. Speaker 0: Well, basically, my last question is, does the council agree that your obligation to always seek best available knowledge? And that should it so transpire that any policy, howsoever well intentioned, may subsequently prove harmful, then council is obligated to stop.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

After receiving responses from other councillors on the issues raised in her speech, Mathews rebuts but not before Nissan pipes up and tries to shut her down again, saying she can't respond. Moments later, Nissan is left egg-faced after she is told Mathews can respond... https://t.co/QkKA1bfkMl

Video Transcript AI Summary

Currently, high costs make it difficult to add new solutions. Investing in substandard technologies may lead to wasted money. It's important to wait for better solutions. The lack of a clear definition of a climate emergency makes it hard to implement effective policies. Properly defining the emergency and providing evidence is crucial to gaining public support.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: Moment costs are currently way more than, double, so I'm not sure that we can, particularly add. Speaker 1: If you invest money in these substandard technologies, you will just increase them, whereas it'd be better to hold out until the Real Grain Solutions do come on board. And we're not there yet. Speaker 0: Matthews, I appreciate that you have made your contribution. Thank you. Speaker 1: You get an extra minute to rebuff. No. Speaker 0: Then my apologies. Please do respond as an can I ask the members of the public gallery to show respect to the board and everybody who's trying to do their best, ensure that a meeting is held, that everybody can engage in with respect? Thank you. Speaker 1: I think they're being very respectful. As I was saying, unless you have really good solutions, you are investing money in things that ultimately you're gonna waste money on. You'll just get EB points everywhere, and then the government will turn around and say, oh, no, they're no good. So you're going to waste money. You're investing in slavery, which is unacceptable. If it was your family members that had children that have been crushed to death down these mines, would this be your answer? It's too costly to find alternatives, especially when no one here can actually fully explain what the climate emergency is. By your own admission, the council doesn't have an official definition of a climate emergency. So the council's actions have sprung from a claim of emergency, which no one here is able to define. If you cannot clearly define the emergency, how can anyone possibly know when it's over or moreover, look to impose rationally any policy response without knowing? The emergency needs to be properly defined and evidence if you were to get the public on board with your associated proposal.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Another Colchester resident, Carianna Cooper, then calls out council members and demands they not adopt a two-tier system where they let residents who support the council's "green" policies have more time to talk uninterrupted than residents who are critical of their policy... https://t.co/7cacHEefU6

Video Transcript AI Summary

Please show respect by not talking while others are speaking. Let's have a level playing field and show respect both ways. Thank you.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: I'd appreciate not to use any of my time to just point out while you are voicing your opinion on respect, 2 of you were sitting having a conversation that I could hear whilst the previous speaking was talking. So if we could have a level playing field in terms of not 2 tier systeming and expressing respect both ways, that would be much appreciated. Thank you very much. No headwind please. Thank you.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Incredible work by Carianne and Rachel... @BernieSpofforth @dystopian_DU @wideawake_media @hugh_mankind @JamesMelville @WallStreetSilv @backtolife_2023 @TheChiefNerd @VigilantFox @LeilaniDowding @DrLoupis @KanekoaTheGreat @EndWokeness

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

@BernieSpofforth @dystopian_DU @wideawake_media @hugh_mankind @JamesMelville @WallStreetSilv @backtolife_2023 @TheChiefNerd @VigilantFox @LeilaniDowding @DrLoupis @KanekoaTheGreat @EndWokeness If you want to follow the brilliant lady, Rachel Mathews, who made this speech... Here is her profile @SuccessfulGardn

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - November 6, 2023 at 1:21 PM

Saved - November 7, 2023 at 7:42 AM

reSee.it AI Summary

Hanan Ameur, a member of a climate organization funded by an oil heiress billionaire, caused havoc at the National Gallery in London. Just days ago, she disrupted a performance at Sondheim Theatre, resulting in an estimated £80,000 loss for the venue. This petulant act of vandalism highlights her disregard for priceless art and the consequences of her actions.

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

This is the petulant little Just Stop Oil vandal who smashed a priceless, historic painting in the National Gallery in London earlier today... Only a few days ago did Judge Michael Snow reprimand her for disrupting a performance at Sondheim Theatre last month, which costed the venue an estimated £80,000 Her name is Hanan Ameur and she's part of a climate organisation that is funded by an oil heiress billionaire

@StarkNakedBrief — The Stark Naked Brief.

Posted - April 25, 2023 at 1:49 PM

Saved - October 24, 2023 at 9:55 PM

@StarkNakedBrief - The Stark Naked Brief.

Matt Hancock wants to criminalise vaccine misinformation So here's 4 and 1/2 mins of him spouting lie after lie, proving that the first person to be punished under this new law he's advocating, should be himself... https://t.co/92qXBeJgdO

Video Transcript AI Summary

Regulators, including the MHRA, European regulator, and World Health Organization, have found that all three COVID-19 vaccines used in the UK are safe and effective, saving thousands of lives. The vaccine rollout is going well, and the safety system is working. The AstraZeneca vaccine is not recommended for those under 30, but alternatives will be offered to ensure safety. The vaccine has not been tested on children as their risk of significant harm from COVID-19 is low. All data and side effects are being transparently shared. Face masks are recommended in hospitals, care homes, and some other environments. Vaccination not only protects individuals but also reduces transmission and brings us closer to normalcy. The UK regulator is independent and not influenced by external pressure. Leaving the EU allowed the UK to make authorization decisions faster while maintaining safety checks.

AI Similar Videos

Full Transcript

Speaker 0: The regulators have found not just the British regulator, the MHRA, the UK regulator, but also the European regulator, and the World Health Organization, have found that all 3 of the jabs being used here in the UK now are safe, they are effective, and they the evidence clearly shows that the vaccination program is saving thousands of lives. So the what we've learned in the last 24 hours is that the rollout is going well. We've also learned that the safety system is working And we've seen from the study announced this morning, the vaccine program is working to reduce the number of deaths and break that link from cases to deaths and I just want to Just slightly correct something that from the, your opening question, which is that the regulators have said that the vaccines, all 3 now in All 3 now in use in the UK are safe and effective. We haven't said you can't take the AstraZeneca vaccine if you are under 30, But that you will be offered, an alternative given that we want to make sure that this program is as safe as it possibly can be. This vaccine will not be, used for, for children. It hasn't, been tested on children, and the reason is that The likelihood of children having, significant, detriment if they catch COVID nineteen is very, very low. So this is an adult vaccine for the adult population. The approach that we're taking quite rightly is that is to be as totally transparent, To be totally transparent about all of the data, all of the side effects and all drugs have side effects and you'll have seen some of the comparisons that have been made for instance, You know, comparing this risk to the risk of taking a long haul flight, you know, this is a, this is of course, as with all medicines, There are side effects, but the good news is that having looked at all of these details and having with us having published them, It's not only the UK regulator, but the European regulator and the World Health Organization who say that this is an extremely rare A side effect, the vaccine is safe and we know that it's effective. Speaker 1: Are we going to be giving advice to wear face coverings of some kind or not? Well, again, on that, the advice, from the government hasn't changed. Of course, we keep all these things under review. And because this is a Novel virus because it's new, we're constantly updating the science, but as we learn more from here and from around the world. So the scientists have, have been looking at this, this question of face masks throughout their, clearly The the the most important setting way for face masks is in hospitals where you need the really the high spec face masks, and, and also in care homes, and then in some other environments as well we also recommend but Speaker 0: of course There's a benefit to all of us of getting vaccinated because it stops you transmitting the disease, it reduces the chance that you'll pass it on to your loved ones And for all of us, it's our route back to normal. You know, we back the scientists and they've done a great job and, and actually, you know, we don't often praise regulators, but the MHRA, you know, they would not approve a vaccine unless It was safe and effective, but by working incredibly hard, they've been able to, they've been able to do this and, You know, what it means for people is we now you know, we've got a vaccine. Help is on its way, and we can see our way out of this, this terrible situation. Speaker 1: And it is important to point out, isn't it, the UK regulator, they are independent. They can't be pressured. They're they're independent. Speaker 0: That's right. It is absolutely clear That because we are leaving, because we've left the EU, I was able to change the law so that the UK alone Could make this authorization decision. So because we've left the EU, we've been able to move faster, yet it still be done with all of the safety checks, that would have been done anyway.

View Full Interactive Feed