reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @SunWeatherMan
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
We have been in solar storms all day. Anyone have any news on blackouts, electrical glitches, system outages, electrical fires/explosions, etc? For personal health, highest risk is for cardiac patients, psych patients, auto-immune, migraine and seizure sufferers. https://t.co/YwXxkSTyWQ
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
It is definitely most certainly unquestionably a coincidence that this area is where the north and south magnetic poles are set to meet, where the tilt is set to put the next north geographic pole. Just a coincidence.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
I told you a huge coronal hole would be visible here it is. It spans over 1/4 of the circumference of our star. Enhanced solar wind to arrive at earth in the coming hours. https://t.co/B9wcJ0WYDL
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
3 more today… that’s 49 total. 49 of the 58 professors/NASA scientists I talk to are prepping for the magnetic pole shift that is going to happen within 20 years. I hope you are prepping, and staying informed. …see you in the morning for the daily update. https://t.co/9fMjrXyudI
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m a numbers guy with a background in numerical analysis, and I've noticed some interesting facts about the election. The Amish played a crucial role in Pennsylvania, turning a toss-up into a decisive win with 19 electoral votes. Additionally, Kamala's vote total seems statistically impossible when compared to Biden's 81 million votes, suggesting potential fraud in the 2020 election. Another significant statistic is the shift among Latino males, who overwhelmingly supported Trump, impacting results in several states, including Miami.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
You know I’m a numbers guy, and my background is numerical analysis- so perhaps you’ll appreciate these FACTS: - the Amish saved the election. I am seeing the PA numbers and it’s not up for debate… the Amish turned a total toss-up into 19 electoral votes. Without them, I bet Pennsylvania still would not be called here the next morning. - Kamala’s vote total is a statistical IMPOSSIBILITY given the 81M votes Biden allegedly got. This means the 2020 election was in fact fraud. - the most telling stat of the entire election is Latino males. Trump absolutely flipped them. Whether you look nationwide or at Miami… this was a major factor in many states.
reSee.it AI Summary
I've seen confirmation, even with audio enhancement, that a guy at the Kamala rally yelled “Jesus is Lord.” She completely disowned him and the idea, which feels like a slap to Christianity. Regardless of beliefs, this seems like a foolish move for a presidential candidate.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Despite a massive coordinated effort to tell the Internet it was fake, it has now been confirmed several times, including with audio enhancement. That guy at the Kamala rally yelled “Jesus is Lord”, and she definitively disowned him, the idea, and essentially stuck her middle finger up at all of Christianity. Even if you are not Christian, you have to admit this might be one of the dumbest fucking things you could do as a presidential candidate. Being this stupid means you can’t be president.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
These Auroras Are A Bad Sign! (An Introduction to the Magnetic Pole Shift) https://t.co/vbbilCwYD8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Recent auroral sightings, even in areas like Florida, Cuba, and Mexico, are attributed to the beginning stages of a rapid magnetic pole shift, not just increased solar activity. While sunspot maximums and CMEs are common, the weakening magnetic protection of Earth is causing more visible aurora.
These magnetic pole shifts, or geomagnetic excursions, occur cyclically about every 6,000 years, with the last one being 6,000 years ago. The speaker estimates the peak of the current shift will be in the 2040s.
The speaker claims that these events are dangerous, causing ozone depletion, changes in jet streams, increased cosmic radiation, and disruption of animal navigation. The speaker also claims that the modern electrified world is at risk, potentially leading to loss of power, heating, water, internet, and other essential services. The speaker concludes that the increased auroras are an early sign of Earth's "shields down" situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. It was really great to see so many posts about the Aurora this week. Awesome. You guys got to see it, and for many of you, it was the second time this year after basically never having seen them before. But not too many people are asking, why all of a sudden are we seeing them so well?
You may have heard that it is sunspot maximum. True. But that happens every 11 years. Yes. We had a solar flare release a CME at earth, but that has happened 100 of times in just the last decade.
This one was big, but not that big. So why have we had these auroral sightings this year, now, when much bigger events have hit us in the past and went largely unnoticed? Well, apart from the solar activity, the main factor beginning stages of a magnetic pole shift, a rapid one. The magnetic poles are moving. The overall magnetic protection of our earth is fading, which is why these recent solar events are producing much more aurora than would normally be expected.
These magnetic pole shifts are also called geomagnetic excursions, and they happen cyclically on our planet. This last week, we saw Aurora in Florida. That is extremely rare. And this solar storm didn't even hit the highest storm levels. Aurora was seen at the Mexico border?
Wild. Aurora in the tropics? Cuba, Puerto Rico. Absolutely ridiculous, especially for a solar storm that didn't hit level 5. Let's do a bit of background on these magnetic pole shifts, shall we?
About 6000 years ago, we had a magnetic pole shift, a mini excursion like this with Earth's magnetic field. It was called the Tianqi event. 12000 years ago, it was Gothenburg. 18000 years ago, it was Helena Pali. 24000 years ago, it was Lake Mungo.
You guys seeing a pattern? We know of several others in the last 100000 years, including Mono Lake, Le Champs, and the Vostok event, all within the last 60 1000 years. Essentially, we have this magnetic excursion on earth about every 6000 years. It has been 6000 years since the last one, and it is already starting to happen again. Based on the speed of the changes, we're looking at about the 20 forties for a full magnetic pole shift peak of the event.
Now if it was just about pretty lights in the sky, I would say, who cares? But it's not. During these events, the weaker magnetic field of earth allows extra ozone depletion. It changes the jet streams. It allows more cosmic radiation to enter the atmosphere, and it disrupts animal navigation that relies on earth's magnetic field.
That's why the studies identify these magnetic shifts as being extremely dangerous, extinction inducing events for many species. And now, on top of all of that, humans have an electrified way of life we rely on, and that's at greater risk due to solar activity as well. Imagine that while the atmosphere is changing and radiation is surging and the food chain is taking hits like Jenga, we lose power, heating, water purification, and distribution. No internet. No cell phones.
No banks. No ATMs. No gas stations. No refrigeration of food. That's why this matters.
As we said, it is due in time right now in the cycle. It is already begun, and we're seeing the early signs that our planet is in a shields down situation with these above average auroral sightings. Follow here for much more, including daily updates on the sun, Earth, relevant science, and, of course, the magnetic pole shift. Be safe, everyone.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Video Transcript AI Summary
An X9-class solar flare, the largest since the speaker started their YouTube channel, occurred. Based on SDO data, a significant CME is associated with the flare and is Earth-directed. The speaker will provide a more detailed update on YouTube later today, after coronagraphs update in approximately two hours.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. I am dropping my kids off at school. That x nine solar flare, which is the largest one that has happened since I started the YouTube channel. Of course, they're being silly in the background. Hello, Kira and Noah.
It'll be probably 2 hours or so before the coronagraphs update, but I can tell you just based on SDO, big CME, it is coming right at Earth. It will get to you with an update later today on YouTube. Ignore them. And, I'll see you guys soon.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
If this is true, then we can add it to the megatsunamis and Taupo as reason to get TF out of NZ
@toobaffled - “Sudden And Unexpected”
What would you do if they came looking for YOU?👇💉☠️ https://t.co/yGnYpjeQ4H
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Unvaccinated sperm is the new Bitcoin
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Just watch this, now grasp the scale of these electric curtains of plasma hitting the upper atmosphere. They deposit into the ceiling of the global electric circuit, which flows down to the ground- this is the main thing ignored in climate models
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Shit. What a big smack from the sun. This is only the first of 6 impacts expected this weekend. https://t.co/qVBuu84oDO
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
The Nuclear Scare Scam - The Real Cover-Up https://t.co/PA1FplDglN
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Galen Windsor, an expert in nuclear radiation measurement, challenges the common belief that nuclear energy is dangerous. He shares his experiences working with plutonium and emphasizes that it can be safely handled. Windsor questions the fear surrounding nuclear power, suggesting that exaggerated claims about its dangers are used to scare people. He dismisses the idea of a nuclear plant exploding and argues that accidents at nuclear plants are manageable and not as catastrophic as portrayed. Windsor believes that the fear surrounding nuclear energy is a scam. He also addresses the unfounded fear of nuclear radiation causing mutations, citing studies of people in Hiroshima and Nagasaki that show no evidence of mutations in future generations. He argues that the concept of nuclear waste is misleading, as materials can be recovered and reused rather than being considered waste. Windsor disputes the idea of burying nuclear waste in concrete containers under the ocean for 2000 years, stating that it is not true. He suggests that the low-level waste disposal system is used as an excuse for organized crime to dispose of evidence. Windsor criticizes the government and industry for working together to maintain control over electricity availability and price, and he finds federal regulations on radiation and nuclear reactors to be absurd. He challenges the notion that radiation is dangerous by handling radioactive materials without harm. Additionally, he criticizes the inefficiency of nuclear power plants and the wastefulness of cooling towers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm pleased to have as our guest mister Galen Windsor from Richland, Washington. I first heard of Galen from a tape that somebody gave to me some months ago and I found his story to be absolutely fascinating. His story is, unique to say the least. Galen has been in 77 different cities in the last 2 years lecturing on the subject of nuclear nuclear reactor sites. He's worked in the Manhattan Project facilities in Hanford, Washington, Oak Ridge National Laboratories and Nuclear Plant in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, General Electric's Midwest Fuel Recovery Plant in Morris, Illinois, General Electric's fuel fabrication facility in San Jose, California and Wilmington, North Carolina.
And he's worked in every major reactor decommissioning project around this nation up to this present time. His major work in these projects has been the the nuclear fuel inventory for these projects. Galen Windsor has few peers in the world in this area of expertise. And those few peers admittedly know and agree with the things that you'll be hearing on this tape. However, except for 2 or 3 of these experts, they've all chosen to remain silent for reasons which they only know.
Leaving this man then the burden of leading this lonely battle of exposing what we call the nuclear scare scam. He's without question one of the world's foremost authorities in nuclear radiation measurement, and he's recognized by members of the atomic energy commissions of all the major nations of the free world. Mister Galen
Speaker 1: Windsor. Thank you, Ben. We've been considering today how best to approach this subject so that you would feel comfortable with where I am. And we thought it might be appropriate to start with how I got involved in this game. Now in 1945, I was a navy radio man out in the Pacific on a destroyer aimed for Japan.
We had a one way ticket. That's all you get. Just one way. So as we were becoming proficient at our business of fighting war, the man hadn't project caught up with us and did a job. Now the weapon that was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan in August 6, 1945 was a u235.
Fully enriched u235 weapon where the material was separated and purified in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The one that was dropped August 9th on Nagasaki was a plutonium weapon made at Hanford. But to those of us out in the Pacific, it was quite interesting. It had a ticket on it. It says, you get to go home.
I was impressed. Now, I was stuck out on Guam after the hostilities quit and was running a radio broadcast that communicated with 45 100 ships west of Pearl Harbor. Quite a few to listen to every dot and dash that I made. So I I was used to having people listen to me. They couldn't see me.
They could sure hear me. I had all of the good messages that were to come to them. Fleet movements to Red Cross messages. They came along one day and says, we'd like to have radio men to go down to for the atomic bomb test. Not me.
No way. I want to go home. So they went through and they took every 3rd radio men to go to Anna We Talk. I didn't go. They let me come home.
But I wanted to go home. I had a driving need within me that says, hey, that big firecracker. I want to know how it works. I want to know everything about
Speaker 2: came
Speaker 1: where I grew up and stacked hay all summer, gained back the £40 that I'd lost out there in the islands. Into Brigham Young University, the fall of 46 in chemistry classes. Doctor Joseph Nichols could make an old farm kid like me love chemistry. I hadn't had any chemistry in high school but the way Joe Nichols taught it, I wanted to know. So chemistry it was.
And some neat guys like Carl Iring taught me physics. And along in 47, 47, I ran across acute blonde from Richland, Washington. Now this girl had been telephone operator for General Leslie Groves and Doctor Enrico Fermi on the Manhattan Project. She got to put through the calls Roosevelt for these guys. So she talked personally to FDR.
And she told me some of the stories like you've never heard. She says, oh, in those canyons great things are done. This cowboy from Nevada couldn't even imagine what she was talking about. Well, in 1947 after we were married. See, I ran until she caught me.
I wasn't going to get married anyway. I wanted to get my education. I had to get on with this thing. And so we went to Richland, Washington for the first time in September 1947. I saw saw that those buildings she was talking about were there.
Thousand feet long, 11 stories high, 5 of them below ground. Tremendous things. And people all over. Camp Camp Hanford in those days was a whole army camp just there to secure that place, to provide security. Thousands of soldiers.
You move around out in the desert and hop out of a foxhole and pop a soldier with a gun in his hand. There wasn't any horsing around. It was all business. Back to school. In 1950 I applied for a job up there before I had graduated.
And they were in such bad need a chemist. I had a job before I had my degree. And so the last year my chemistry, mostly English, I did on a bus riding 25 miles to work in the morning and 25 miles back at night. And I did advanced grammar and business writing and all of those things on that bus. But in September 1950, I got into this thing called plutonium processing when we did it barehanded without instruments, without coveralls.
We had some of the most peculiar Plutonium on it too. Amazing. That was normal operation in those days. We ran those facilities and we ran them so well that by 1965 we had separated enough plutonium when it only existed in the parent uranium matrix to a half of a single weight percent. 0.005 weight fraction of Plutonium maximum 1965 5 to meet the weapons needs of this country 10 times over for the foreseeable future.
Of work. Hands on, do it type thing. And there was a couple of 1,000 of us and we were just happy as could be just working like mad, making those plants run 24 hours a day, 7 days a week in a community that ran on shift work, a, b, c, d shift. The whole community that way. A war time community.
People dedicated to doing a job and we were doing it and we did it well. No pretense. Radiation monitor behind every reactor people who wanted a radiation monitor behind every reactor operator. Why? We know how to make these things run.
When we got a metal fuel element stuck and it fell down on the trampoline back didn't have an instrument, you didn't know it was too hot. So you just went in and kicked it. Finally along came a rule maker that says, thou shalt not do that. You'll get burned. Oh.
I didn't get burned when I did it last week. But you exceeded the limit. Well, where did this limit come from? Turns out that in 1934, the International Commission on Radiation Protection fabricated a limit for x rays. It was no longer permissible to be burned by them.
Erythema, reddening of the skin. You now had to keep a limit called 2 tenths of an hour per day. How much is that? Well, you've got to have one of these Beckman instruments to read it. And you have to keep time of exposure.
You know, there are 4 requirements on this thing. The size of the source. The therefore the strength of the source, the distance from the source, the time of exposure, and the intervening shielding to keep from getting burned. Oh, fine. We've been doing this thing for years now and we've never been burned.
Why have we got these rules? And they said, yours is not to ask questions. Yours is to do and die. Don't you ask questions. If you do, you might disappear.
Those who broke the rules didn't appear the next day. Military rule? Oh, yes. Absolute. What was your appeal?
Inquire why. You were just grateful you still had your work to do and you kept right on doing it. Now this is in the United States of America. Well, in 1960 we found out that the materials that we were working with, the thing that we called high level waste. That if you waited 3 years these 1,000,000 gallon tanks that high level waste went into boiled off 15,000 gallons ever that if it ever broke a line would seal itself off in the ground within a foot, make its own glass.
It wouldn't go any place. We did that a time or 2 accidentally of course. And so, we started they take it out and make it into a barium titanate and press it into a pellet. And those things were so hot that they actually glowed in dark from the infrared heat. Now, thermal ionic conversions came along at this time.
So you hook these little heat sources up to thermionic converters and you took electricity out this side. No moving parts. These things went into the snap program. And these, early snap power generators are what power the underwater transmitters for our nuclear navy. We've got a regular road map under the sea.
All you gotta do is have instrument that knows how to find it and then you've got eyes on a submarine. You didn't know that. Did you? The power from it came from this material that they now call waste. We processed that stuff and packaged it outside at Hanford.
Or we had rules that said 3 r per year is your allowable exposure. That amount of gamma energy that will expose a film pack. But that was for the people that, didn't know. We weren't about to follow those rules. We just went ahead and did the job.
They sent around an investigation slip that says your dosimeter was overexposed 2 weeks ago. What did you do? And they had a cute little form on it that says accidentally exposed to light. And that was the one I always used to check. Because it's the same amount of light.
You know, if you get gamma through the film pack it's the same amount of light as you get when you click the lens on a camera. They wanted to limit us to that. And one day we looked up and they had. They had limited us to that amount of exposure. Then the fun part of the game begins.
You say, who limited us to that? Are they powerful? Yeah. They control the purse strings. They live by the golden rule.
Them that's got the gold makes the rules. If you like your work, you keep the rules. If you don't keep the rules, you disappear. Sure enough, some of us disappeared. Some of my friends gone.
Where'd they go? I don't know. Well, 2 years ago, I traveling for American opinion speakers bureau and one of the documents that they had was major Jordan's diary. A story of shipping, the technology and the material that was developed at Hanford in 1944 under the auspices of 1 Harry Hopkins, and with the at least tacit approval of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Now, what are you going to do?
That thing that we have been doing and feeling so good about had been shared at no expense with Russia. You go back and you check the record and you find Russia did not develop their own nuclear atomic weapon until 1949 even when we supply them the material and the knowledge. 4 years after we touched them off, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. We weren't happy with that. We were just happy doing our job.
Well, in 1965 General Electric was ready to leave Hanford. I'd worked for General Electric for that 15 years and they took me out to California, San Jose and we had in mind to design and build this nuclear fuel reprocessing plant at Morris, Illinois. They told me they're gonna build it at San Luis Obispo. That's how they got me away from Hanford. But that was just to get me away from Hanford.
I got to design the sampling analytical system for this plant. The sample cell was the hydraulic heart of this place. I got to dictate where they put the columns, how high the columns were in relation to my sample cell. One man standing in front of a lead glass window could sample any liquid stream in that whole plant. It took crews of men at Hanford to do the same thing.
I wasn't
Speaker 2: happy with that. So I built an efficient system. I got to design that. I
Speaker 1: Conceptual design, detailed design, build it, operationally test it. And in 1973 they said forget it friends, you don't get to run it. We had a 170 tons, metric tons of spent fuel stored in the basin. And the then president of the United States, do you remember who it was? Jerry Ford.
Says, uh-uh, friends. No way. You don't get to run it. That's when I started to kick over the traces. Up to that point of time I thoroughly enjoyed my work.
I had no limitations, practical limitations. I had all the money to spend. I was in charge of the design effort. I built it the way that I wanted to because it was technically correct. All I had to do was check with engineers and make sure that it was right.
And all of a sudden I was told you must reduce your limits of exposure by a factor of 10. I says, I won't do it. First thing you know, you got the word that says, oh yes, you will. And I says, no way. Well that's when the rebel Galen Windsor started to show up.
And when I found out that by management conference I couldn't
Speaker 2: get to these guys. I figured out another way.
Speaker 1: Now in this pool is in this plant is a beautiful pool. It's got a place to store spent fuel bundles, so it won't stop. 660 1,000 gallons of water demineralized just as clear and pretty as it can be. Heated to a 100 degrees Fahrenheit when the outside temperatures were minus 20, wind chill factors down to a minus 60. And I found out that I could swim in that rascal.
You turn off the lights at night and it had a light blue karenkoff effect. And this kid from Nevada that never could pass up a warm swimming hole used to go swimming in that pool. There wasn't I mine to use.
Speaker 2: Oh, boy.
Speaker 1: I found out that I could do that. I showed some financial types one time that I could stir that pool with my bare hand and check out through the same radiation monitors they did without triggering it. GE didn't like it. I got a letter from them that says, thou shall not tell financial types that you can swim in the pool, that you can stir it with your hand because if they find that out they will steal the inventory. They will know that the inventory can be stolen.
Oh, is that a valuable inventory? The same material that's labeled high level is an interesting chemical element. It is created in a nuclear reactor. The Manhattan project built 8 of these reactors at Hanford. The first one took 12 months from sagebrush to nuclear steam to build and had never been done in that size before.
How could they do that? Why did they do it? To create this element called plutonium. Plutonium has been assessed as being the most hazardous material on earth. Now, from the standpoint that you can make an atomic weapon out of it, yes it is quite hazardous because a piece of it that big, 2 and a half kilograms, that's only £5 is the force that delivered 20,000 tons of tnt equivalent over Nagasaki.
Indeed, it is hazardous. The one over Hiroshima that had fully enriched u 235 in it was 5 times as big. So plutonium is more dangerous than u 235, is it not? By a factor of 5. Takes 5 times as much you 235 as it does plutonium.
Therefore, it is the most hazardous thing. Enter the great pretenders. They said that 5 grams of plutonium properly distributed over the face of the earth would kill everybody on earth. Now, if you can only get 1 20 kiloton weapon to go on 25 100 grams, how's 5 grams gonna kill everybody on earth? Early on, I had a fear that said, if there is this much material that that can undergo a chain reaction we called it in the beginning.
Then if you set a match to it all the material in the world is just going to keep right ongoing. Totally unfounded fear. It turns out out that when you're in this business recovering plutonium, like we recovered so much of it at Hanford. We found out that if you have it in a solution where it's less than 5% Plutonium. It won't go critical any way that you kick it.
And when you get it to a 100% plutonium, you better be careful because if you put it in more than a 5 inch diameter cylinder, you're playing with fire. You can undergo what is known as an uncontrolled criticality. Accidental criticality. The air turns blue. If the press if the cylinder is sealed, it will explode from steam pressure.
And that steam pressure builds up in a millisecond which is about that long. No. You don't horse with it. And then you find out that those 8 foot thick shielding walls on those canyons were put there because they didn't know how much was a critical mass. They said, if we make a mistake, we don't want to die, so we will provide the shielding.
And so, the shielding thing started for no other reason than they didn't know what was a critical mass. Well, through the years we got pretty good at telling what a critical mass was. And I have hand wearing a lab coat and I'd put this half in a pocket on this side and this half in a pocket on this side and walk down the hall. If those 2 ever got together there would be a blue flash. They never got together because I was in between them.
And we do that every day. And each half had to meet definite dimension characteristics. And so we'd take them down and pass them one half at a time, and they'd measure it and say, yeah. That one will pass. And then we'd pass in the other half, and that one will pass too.
But they were carefully put in separate bird cages, so they couldn't get together accidentally. Well, those of us who worked with it enjoyed it. We knew what we were doing. We worked at it. When the president of the United States decided not to operate that fuel reprocessing plant, I started scrambling to find out what was going on.
Many things have been done in the name of health and safety. Don't get burned. You gotta have safety record. You have to be safer than anybody else. We were already safer than anybody in the whole world.
Well, you can't get forward to get burned with this. You've got to enforce the limits. You've got to keep it. And I says, hey, that's not what the ball game is at all. I'll bet you the ballgame is something else.
And in 1982 when the Congress passed the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, A guy by the name of Moe Udall. I don't know whether you people in Arizona have ever heard of him or not. Authored that bill. It's called the high level waste disposal act of 1982. The material he called waste is the reusable uranium fuel that I had been working on for 32 years.
Needless to say, Mo Udall and I do not agree on whether that material is waste or not. The name of the game then is who owns the plutonium and how much is it worth? The government says, bury it 3,000 feet deep in basalt and we'll hold a contest among the states to see who gets to bury
Speaker 2: it. Oh. Why do you wanna bury it?
Speaker 1: Did you ask the owners? Who is the owner of the plutonium? May I submit that it's most likely the nuclear power ratepayer. He has
Speaker 2: paid for
Speaker 1: the mining, the fabrication of the parent uranium, power generation, and is being charged in advance for its burial. If you're paying for it, to whom does it belong? How much is it worth? In inflated dollars, a ton of reusable uranium fuel contains useful metal isotopes worth upwards of $10,000,000 a ton. Moe Udall says it's high level waste.
The value of reusable uranium fuel scheduled for permanent disposal probably exceeds the national debt. Naturally plutonium quantities. And you know, plutonium does occur naturally. Plutonium 244 is found at the residual activities world. First one found at Gabon, Africa.
Naturally occurring plutonium quantities have been enhanced by transmutation of uranium. That's the reason we built reactors in the first place. Our Our ability to detect and measure emissions from these elements is useful in inventory control. When less than 5 weight percent. Plutonium 239 equivalent.
And the heavy metal oxide matrix is stored dry in air, it has no critical mass. Remember we talked about shielding was because they didn't know what a critical mass was. If it is light water reactor fuel at less than 5% equivalent fissile content, you can handle it. You can do anything it will not sustain a chain reaction. What then is all this Falteral about a little bit, 5 grams will kill everybody in the world.
Uh-uh. They don't know what they're talking about. And when they say that they're thumbing their nose at measurement experts like Galen Windsor. I am insulted when they say those things and get away with it because it has no no bearing on the truth. It cannot be mishandled.
It will not expose any person to an unshielded nuclear reaction. In other words, no controls are necessary except to prevent the pilferage of the inventory. Have you got that one? Let it register. Do you need governmental rules and regulations and instructions?
Speaker 2: No way.
Speaker 1: Then why do we have all of those rules? Inventory control practices capitalized on the fear of under educated masses who work in the industry. I didn't say anything about ordinary people now. I'm talking about the people who have worked in the industry and those who cast stones from without. The Ralph Nader's, the Jane Fondas.
Now it doesn't take you much thinking to find out that maybe the industry is the source of the problem. The industry is the one that made up the committees that made the rules that the Congress enforced. You ever thought of it that way? The strangest kind of feather bedding that's ever been dreamed up. It makes the railroad engineers look like pikers.
The only amounts of process materials that are of health concern to the handlers are those that can accidentally cause an unshielded nuclear chain reaction. Or that will cause erythema from the shortest wavelength, highest frequency, and therefore the most easily shielded ultraviolet light emissions of the electromagnetic spectrum. Big words. Let's see what they mean. The emissions from uranium, plutonium, cesium, all of those things are only important if you unassembled an amount that if you get this amount and this amount together, it can go critical.
You can get a blue flash and therefore get burned. And that's happened 34 times in the in business. And 8 men have died as a result of that. Accidental criticality documented in Los Alamos document 3611, if you want to check the source. Or if you've got enough of it together that it's giving off ultraviolet light of this particular wavelength and frequency without any intervening shielding, enough to burn you, sunburn you, erythema, reddening of the skin.
If it's less than that. If the effect is less than that, then what is the problem? Excessive government regulation. That's what's the problem. Tritium, heavy, heavy water.
Deuterium is hydrogen 2. Tritium is hydrogen 3. If you let an inventory get away from you, what's going to happen to it out in the biosphere? Nothing other than it will become diluted and join the naturally occurring inventory of tritium because tritium is created in the upper atmosphere by sunlight. We have a natural inventory of tritium.
Then the only trigger mechanism for bombs, it's the source of the push that makes it go. Is that you lost a valuable inventory. Then what of these people that are pretending that a little bit of tritium is going to do you in? It is not so. What are those two points?
Only if it is an economically recoverable concentration or if it has a natural reconcentration mechanism. You know, there isn't any one of the radioisotopes out there that has a meaningful level of reconcentration in any of the species, not even the oysters in the bays in Maryland below Calvert Cliffs? Why then are we playing this game that any amount of this material is of hazard? Reusable uranium fuel which has been isotopically enhanced in power producing reactors is a valuable national resource not a high level waste. The utility operators recognize the future worth of this commodity.
Mo Udall, in that nuclear waste policy act of 1982 2 imposed a tribute of a mil per kilowatt hour, a dollar per megawatt hour on all Why do the utilities willingly pay this amount to the secretary of energy to limit their liability exposure? Who pays that amount anyway? The consumer of nuclear generated power. You have no choice and therefore, I call it a tribute. At the same time they have provided their own storage basins at these reactors at rate payers expense to retain ownership control of the plutonium resource.
So you consumer, you rate payer, you tax payer are paying for the storage of this fuel. And WNP 2 at Hanford has storage that will them through the turn of the century and yet every day they are paying a tribute to the secretary of energy. With the concurrence of the United States Congress and signed by the president of the United States in 1982, 83. Who was that? Ronald Reagan.
They have provided those storage basin at ratepayer expense to retain ownership control of the plutonium resource. I started playing a game one day 7 years ago. I says, okay. Portland General Electric, you've got the Trojan Reactor. You've got a storage basin problem.
I'm going to make you an offer. I made them an offer that says, I will take all of your spent fuel. F o b your basin if you will give it to me. In other words, I will take it off your hands at no expense to you. I will ship it.
I will store it. I will do everything that needs to be done to that fuel. And you know what they told me? Can I quote them? Go to hell, Galen Windsor.
We value it more valuable than platinum or gold. We're gonna play the plutonium futures ourselves. Now, where did I learn that the name of the game is, who owns the plutonium and how much is it worth? The first plutonium I saw was in a glass tube on the newsreel when I got back from the Pacific in 46. And that that they had in a glass test tube they said was worth a half a $1,000,000.
Certainly, they had less than 5 grams of Plutonium in that tube. That's pretty expensive stuff. And so for the show, they put a pot underneath it in case they dropped it. They said, we don't want to have to pick it up out of the rug. When we decided when it was decided for us not to operate this plant, plutonium was guaranteed on buyback by the federal government at $43 a gram.
That's quite a price drop. Don't you think? When that price guarantee went away in October of 1971, the price of Plutonium became $10 a gram. It steadily went down to where its present worth on the market is a minus $2 a gram per year. That's what it costs you to hold on to a plutonium inventory.
On a material that has been declared worthless the the United States and they're spending 1,000,000,000 of dollars digging a hole in ordinary rock so that they can storage. Fuel may be properly stored in air cooled, dry storage in a cost effective manner. In Germany offers this immediate and long term option as a necessary and safe step prior to reprocessing. They're doing it in Europe. At least 4 reasonably located facilities are available in the United States where this concept can be used right now.
Barnwell nuclear fuel plant in South Carolina. Midwest fuel recovery plant in Morris, Illinois. This one. Nuclear fuel services in upstate New York, and redox processing plant at Hanford, Washington. These fully shielded already radioactively contaminated storage areas have secure limited access.
All have been operated under processing conditions of 10 CFR 50 and the MFRP has a 10 CFR 70 storage license, the only licensed storage facility away from a reactor in the United States. It's singly all by itself is capable of storing all of the reusable uranium fuel that needs to be moved away from power reactors for the remainder of this century. We had that stories designed in 1975 at the approval of the waste isolation project? Why you're spending money at Hanford at the basalt waste isolation project? Why are you spending money at Nevada for storage when I can already store it in this building that's already built.
I just named you 3 others that can do the job all by themselves too. And I know where there's 14 more buildings that can do it. What are we going to do? And other excess facilities at Hanford are capable of dry storing all commercial RAF until plutonium recycle at least through 5 percent enrichment is reestablished or until the 22nd century, whichever comes first. RUF can be cost effectively stored in existing facilities.
Where does came off then, that you cannot use this plant for its intended purpose unless it is owned by the United States government. He has said that. The waste isolation projects are politically mandated wasting of national energy and construction resources. Plutonium proliferation by diversion of stored reusable uranium fuel is of minor importance compared to global availability of fully enriched uranium by laser isotopic separation. Let me explain that last thing that I said.
Jimmy Carter said, you can't ship plutonium to India. But in the same paragraph said you may ship them fully enriched uranium. Oh, Jimmy Carter. That peanut brain. What did he just say?
He says that when the Israelis took out the reactor in Iraq, they had fully enriched uranium from France. And they said those rascals, those Iraqis, are going to take that fully enriched uranium, put it in that reactor, irradiate it to plutonium, and therefore have to recover the plutonium in a plant like this, and we stop them. When the fully enriched uranium makes a better weapon than the plutonium in the first place. Now when the president of the United States says things like that and when the press gives it credibility, I get insulted. And right after I get insulted, I get angry.
And I've been angry for quite a while now. And finally, one day I said, my own personal security is not important. I think I'll go tell this tale. All I want is to tell my story. The commodity that I communicate is called truth.
And so then I ask you a question, a very brief pointed question. Who owns the plutonium and how much is it worth? And then I'm gonna attach on to that a question I want you to think about till we talk again. If you haven't been burned by by this particular source of radiation, what is your problem? You obviously have 1.
Otherwise, you would join with me in telling the truth about this particular commodity. And so, yes. I'm recruiting helpers. What happened to the guys who taught me the business? 1000 of them.
The hands on business. Where are they? They're still there. Why don't they talk? Who are the they that say this is the way the business is gonna be run whether it makes sense or not?
Speaker 0: We're back with Galen Windsor, and we're talking about the nuclear scare scam. Galen, it seems to me that from what I've heard you say that, the scaring of the people is better than a lock and key to keep this stuff out of the hands of those who might be interested in investigating and keeping this valuable material hidden for just an elite
Speaker 1: few. This is probably the way that it works best. And so then the secret was to keep from letting other people know that it could be handled. Because first of all, we weren't accepted by the community. And the materials that we were working with, they feared.
But there were certain few people that realized its real worth, its potential to be used in ways other than to support our national defense.
Speaker 0: Let me ask you a question, Galen. Are you are you worried about your do you have reason to be worried about your personal safety? Because the kind of people that you're describing here, are powerful people. I wonder if you're still around. I wonder how much longer we can expect you to be in this game.
Speaker 1: Well, on 13th December last year, the NRC, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, region 5 turned out a federal SWAT team to get me on a federal warrant issued by Bob Thomas out of Walnut Creek, California. It was kinda funny in a way they turned out this federal swap team at Hanford and they had my picture and alongside it says, this is an irrational individual. He poses a threat to our security. Take him at any cost. Now the reason I'm still here only has one logical conclusion.
I have lots of help.
Speaker 0: Well, you've told us about how that you and others of your friends and colleagues have handled many times this so called deadly nuclear energy material that the whole world is so scared of. Why weren't you afraid of it?
Speaker 1: Because we did silly things like, recover some of the undissolved fuel elements out of the redox dissolver that burned a hole in it. And we went in and sampled these things by remote process. We got it out into our hands and found out that we could walk around the lab with them bare handed and they wouldn't hurt us. And we were standing there in the lab tossing them back and forth. Uranium metals that wouldn't dissolve in the boiling nitric acid.
Well, if you find out that you can play with it and it was only 90 days since that thing came out of the reactor and it doesn't burn you, why should you be afraid of it?
Speaker 0: So in other words, you're telling me that, you learned to not be afraid of it because of practical use and application and hands on experience.
Speaker 1: Hands on. We might even been playing games.
Speaker 0: Okay. You say that you swam in this water that was straight from spent a little bit beyond that. Would you share a little bit of that story?
Speaker 1: Well, swimming in it didn't have the desired effect. So I decided I had to be more direct with these people that were giving me trouble. They're kind of hard to teach, so I went to drinking a glass of it a day. I had the bottle of it. Last time I went swimming, why I filled this 2 liter bottle with water and washed it off on the outside in the shower when I washed me off on the outside so that we didn't tattletale.
You know, radioactive material is just a trace or a tattletale. So you got to get it off so they won't know that you've been swimming in the pool and drinking the water. So I took this bottle in and set it on my desk and who would suspect that the manager of safety and analytical service had a bottle of spent fuel fuel pool of water sitting on his desk, and he drank a glass of it every day.
Speaker 0: This was unheard of?
Speaker 1: Nobody ever did that crazy stuff before.
Speaker 0: How has that affected you, Galen?
Speaker 1: Well, as near as I can tell, it made me about 6 foot 4 in my cowboy boots, 210 pounds and really quite a nice fellow.
Speaker 0: Alright. What then happened as a result of your doing this strange experiment on your desk with this water? What was the result?
Speaker 1: Can corporations have a heart attack? I think General Electric had one because after they ran me through a whole body gamma scan in December of 1974, by the time I got out because I had a plutonium lung burden and it took 45 minutes to an hour to count that. Everybody on 137 at a ferociously high level. It even exceeded the NRC's limit. And I'd been drinking it.
They knew the fat was in the fire. Now where do we go from here? Well, first of all I got a poison pen letter from the people in San Jose, and he says, thou shalt not do those things. They'll find out that the inventory can be stolen. Well that didn't set very well with this cowboy because nobody tells me what to do.
Particularly when what I do is right and hasn't harmed me. Who are they to tell me what I want to do? This didn't set very well. I was gonna in the measuring system, why it was very obvious that I knew the parameters of inventory control, the disintegration rate of each of these isotopes, how to measure them. That's how we regulated our inventory.
And to have these rascals come along and start playing games with the information that I was very expert in, that I had designed the analytical system for this plant around disturbed me a little bit. Now it made me fighting mad and I got angry. And I have to admit in retrospect that for the next 5, 6 years, I was more than angry. I was hard to live with. Just ask my wife.
Speaker 0: Well, in your estimation then, how dangerous is a nuclear reactor plant?
Speaker 1: A nuclear reactor plant is just a way to boil water that's ought to be insured under the same insurance policy as any other steam boiler plant, power generating plant. And to have special consideration under the Price Anderson act means that the insurance industry has already paid off the congress so that they can have a rip off. Charging ever and higher and higher insurance premiums, total coverage much much greater for a non existent risk. What a racket.
Speaker 0: Can a nuclear plant explode?
Speaker 1: Only like any other steam plant. Like Laughlin, Nevada had a steam explosion. It's a coal fired plant, but 6 men were killed there last year. That could happen at a nuclear plant, but as far as an atomic explosion, good heavens no. No way.
Speaker 0: What kind of accidents can actually happen at nuclear reactor generator plant?
Speaker 1: You could lose your moderator and the reactor shut down. The control rods would stick in and you wouldn't be able to start it up. You might, do several things that would invalidate some of the safety controls. For instance, an emergency core cooling system. The only reason they put ECCS on a reactor is to destroy it.
When you start these big babies up because they're so big, you only warm them up 50 degrees an hour. And, they say we got an emergency. Throw the emergency core cooling system on like they did at 3 Mile Island 2 and you're gonna thermally shock that big machine and ruin it so it can never be used again.
Speaker 0: Let's talk about 3 mile 3 Mile Island. What what really happened there? We've heard all kinds of stories about meltdown, and, they made movies on it, that this meltdown could melt right through the earth, clear through to China and, and we've seen a lot of scare stories. What really happened to 3 minute? Do you know what really happened there?
Speaker 1: Yes. I do. I followed that one very closely. In fact, I know the guys personally who wrote the script for China Syndrome and also wrote the script for the 3 Mile Island fiasco. Dale Breidenbaugh, Dick Hubbard, and Greg Miner, who used to work with me at General Electric or the MBH Associates that wrote that China syndrome script.
And not only that, remember that was the time China syndrome came out. Jane Fonda starring 14 months ahead of the TMI 2 accident. It was predicted in writing in New York state that that accident would happen 1 year from the date that that 3 Mile Island 2 reactor started up. It started up in March 1978 and it went down March 28, 1979, right on the day, 1 year anniversary. In other words, with 14 months advance notice, the industry still went along with a sham.
Nothing happened there, except that the owner, the operator, and the regulators conspired to turn it off. What melted? The top of the fuel rods the third time that the core got uncovered, due to internal pressure blew the top off some of those rods. They've got in canal springs in them to keep the pellets, fuel pellets from vibrating when it's running. Those things are under compression.
And when they reduced the outside pressure and the fuel rods were still hot, it blew the top off some of those fuel rods. The fuel rods in TMI 2 are internally pressurized to about 1200 psi with helium gas, so that they don't reverse dent when they're hot and running for 5 years. And when they drop the outside pressure, why that internal pressure with those hot rods blew aside out of some of those rods at the top. But melting, so very, very tight. Hard.
And so, no. The fuel didn't melt. The China syndrome is a scriptwriter's fantasy. Right here, I'll tell a story I guess. See, I spent 3 weeks on the island in March of 1981.
The 2 year anniversary of this particular quote accident. And Tom Hall who stood alongside Enrico Fermi when they pulled the control rods on 100 B in October 1944 at Hanford, and I were delegated to go to the island and find out what happened and so we did. We went over all of the records and everything else and there as we could tell from performance records, 51 thermocouples for instance, only one of which went over a 1000 degrees Fahrenheit. The center line temperature of those rods when they're running is 4 1,032 degrees Fahrenheit. And so, they say things like over 50% of the core was greater than 4,000 degrees.
Yes, it was. If it wasn't, it wasn't running at
Speaker 2: a 100%
Speaker 1: power. So they take that kind of information and bugger it all up so that you don't understand what's going on. They give you a little bit of it. Well the worst joke that people could dream up and they says, do you know what the NRC's worst an hour by themselves.
Speaker 2: You know
Speaker 1: why people that know laugh? These crazy guys from Hanford would have started that baby up and showed that it would run. We'd have started it up and they were afraid of us.
Speaker 0: So there was no accident at Three Mile Island?
Speaker 1: No. They did it on purpose. It out.
Speaker 0: Very interesting. Can nuclear radiation cause mutation in people and animals?
Speaker 1: If a cell gets too much radiation, it dies. And so, if it is a sperm or an oocyte, why they die. They don't reproduce and there are no mutations. I think the good Lord built that safety factor in.
Speaker 0: So you're saying that mutation in future generations is an unfounded fear.
Speaker 1: Yes. And the studies of the people at Hiroshima and Nagasaki have borne that out. Those people do not have that. Now, they showed the immediate effects of too much radiation. The women who were pregnant, showed embryo showed the effects of very similar to rubella measles.
Some deformity certainly from that in radiation insult. But, that's not the kind of mutation that's gonna go
Speaker 0: on to the next generation. Galen, what and where are these burial sites and what's in them for this so called nuclear waste? I've been hearing stories about stainless steel containers buried in concrete under the ocean boiling for over 2000 years.
Speaker 1: That sound that sounds like a real story. Let me start out by saying there are no nuclear waste. Only materials created in a reactor to be recovered and used beneficially. So fuel, reusable uranium fuel fits that definition. But if you disregard its intrinsic worth, why then,
Speaker 2: yeah, it would fit the definition of high level waste. But let's say there isn't
Speaker 1: any high level waste, the only what's the low level waste fiasco? That's an excuse for a federally mandated non inspectable disposal system so that organized crime can get rid of any evidence that they want, and it can never be dug up
Speaker 0: again. They're afraid to look in there.
Speaker 1: Not afraid. They don't want you to. They've got rules on the transport So that if you have an accident with a low level radioactive waste shipment, while you call out all of the state police and you make sure that nobody looks at it, that nobody gets exposed, that there's no spreading of the contaminated material. And it's also that you don't find out whose body is in that drum. The situation got so bad that, the smell of human flesh was so great that they made it so that you could ship analytic animal biological waste in
Speaker 2: refrigerated vans, so that it wouldn't stink up
Speaker 1: before you got it buried.
Speaker 2: Barrels of radioactive waste off barges in
Speaker 1: the ocean. Nothing. But if you see, they were one time dropping barrels of radioactive waste off barges in the ocean. Do you know what was in them? Not high level self eating radioactive waste.
Probably had a few bodies, and a few guns, and a few knives, and a few evidences in them too. If you drop them in the ocean, they are truly disposed of. So though there's an international trade in that right now, you can't do it in United States. So they trans ship it across the ocean to South Africa and they can bury it offshore. What is in those drums?
Speaker 0: Well, that's what you're telling me that I that I needn't worry about boiling drums under the ocean for 2000 years.
Speaker 1: No. No way.
Speaker 0: Thank you. I'm glad to know that. Well, one one more question, Galen. What, do you feel
Speaker 1: there 4 years ago and sat down with the senate legal staff and told them I'm hour and a half long. Sad story and Sam Bollinger, one of the lawyers, stood up and he says, Dylan, if I understand you right, why you want us to have president Reagan snap his finger and make this thing come up straight. And I says, hey Sam, terrific, go ahead and do it. He didn't take that challenge. He says, no, I'll tell you what, Galen, industry likes it the way that it is.
I said, Sam, you really know how to hurt a guy. And he says, well if we change it, what are we going to do for a non core? Yeah. They're fully aware that this thing goes on as far up as the president of the United States. It's the way that industry wants it.
The industry is its own problem then.
Speaker 0: So the question is then, what is the industry? What is the real story here? Is this an industry of nuclear energy?
Speaker 1: The industry has been ripping it off for years years. In 1975, we knew that large nuclear reactors were dead. That large is the way to go. The way to go is small mass produced nuclear reactor sitting right in the middle of town. One every 10 blocks producing power.
We haven't built a reactor amount of electricity, the availability, guys control the amount of electricity, the availability, and the price. And they say, you do not have a choice. I have a choice. I'm gonna take one of those decommissioned nuclear subs up in Puget Sound, refuel it, and generate more electricity. Save the government $5,000,000 because that's what they want to throw them away.
I will use it for my own power probe. Quinn Millian up in Omak, Washington and I are moving on that. And if one of these days, I hook one of them up to Pier 91 in Seattle, don't be surprised.
Speaker 0: Well, good luck.
Speaker 1: I'm Galen Windsor. And I thought I'd share a few hands on practical things that have to do with this nuclear scare scam. Now, you've heard that gamma energy, the kind of energy that comes off a rock like this is the most penetrating, most damaging of all radiation. And not only that, here is uranium the parent of radon. And they say, if you can measure detect radon in a home, then it's bad.
If you exceed the EPA's limit, it's reason to run you out of your home. Spend $13,000 like they did with Stanley Watchers' house in Pennsylvania the other day to get rid of the radon, to ventilate it out through. Ridiculous. Uranium. High grade uranium.
Hot. I read a thing the other day that says they had high grade uranium and lo and behold, it's too hot to transport. So they had to bury it on-site. Oh, wonderful. Let's talk a little bit about radiation.
If we can, yeah. Are we picking up? If you put the probe right there, the meter goes off scale
Speaker 2: and you can hear it. Alright.
Speaker 1: Radiation, gamma radiation is most penetrating of all radiation. Oh, is it? All it's got between the rock and the probe is my hand. Doesn't cancel pretty much, does it? What if if I put the rock behind me.
You don't suppose they've been lying to you, do you? I suspect they have. Well, let's do a little bit more. I got a black bottle. First stuff comes in white bottle, a bottle of no dose.
You can send children down to the drugstore to buy no dose. All they need is money. In this are 6 60 white caffeine pellets. And this one is uranium oxide, u 308. You can't buy it for love nor money.
The state of Washington sent 2 of their gestapo agents over to my home to confiscate my uranium samples on 17th December last year. Got a challenge. I'd like to have somebody in the room volunteer to take all of this bottle or all of this bottle. The only thing that I'll tell you is that one of them won't hurt you and the other will kill you. You want the white stuff or the black stuff?
White stuff? You do, there's enough in there to kill 4 men your Let's check it in the bottom of the bottle. Not very radioactive. Let's take the cap off. Oh my goodness.
Very radioactive. This instrument will only count gamma, energy. It's just energy. Lights coming from those lights. Only you're getting lots of infrared from the lights as well as ultraviolet.
Energy response and it's very carefully damped to only discriminated. So it only gets the energy that comes from this. I don't want it to respond to a light, just to this. Cost me $1,000 to get an instrument that'll just respond to this and not to that. This is radioactive by any definition.
Radioactive material giving off radiation that is read by an instrument like this. The daughter of this radon cannot be read on this instrument because it gives off alpha particles. An alpha particle is a dipositive, particle that comes from the nucleus. It has 2 protons and 2 neutrons. Therefore, an atomic weight of 4.
And it's minus 2 electrons. And if you grab it with a high ionization potential counter, it'll count. But if it travels 2 inches in air or through a piece of paper, it picks up 2 electrons, 2 beta particles if you will, and becomes helium gas and it won't count on an ionization chamber. Did you know that this thing right here is giving off helium,
Speaker 2: gas,
Speaker 1: alpha, comes from uranium. Okay. Radioactive material. You pour it out in the hand and that's radioactive contamination. Is it radioactive?
Yeah, it is. Very radioactive. Now, decontamination is nothing but scooping it back up and putting it into the bottle. I just now decontaminated my hand. No.
I didn't do such a good job. Not good at all. Is it still radioactive? Yeah. That's called residual radioactivity.
Now, under the decontamination rules of the government, when you decontaminate somebody like this that's that contaminated and this is certainly a reportable incident under current DOE regulations. When you decontaminate it it has to go down a control drain, so that you don't disperse radioactivity. Do I qualify as a controlled drain? That material that I just ate is not soluble in body fluids. Like, it's been this.
It's a It was fired. At 940 degrees c. Oxide where it becomes u three zero eight. Known in the industry as HCL insoluble. In other words, it will not dissolve in concentrated hydrochloric acid, hot.
Your stomach has 10th normal hydrochloric acid in it. So it won't even dissolve. The stuff is so fine that it has no texture to it. Doesn't even feel rough. So it's tasteless, odorless, has no texture.
How is it supposed to hurt me? Because I've been eating this on lecture tour for 2 years, the state of Washington felt it necessary to confiscate my uranium sample, so that I would be safe. Doctor Fulton from the Hanford Environmental Health Foundation called up and he says, hey, I heard one of your guys OD'd on uranium today, Galen. And we talked for a little while and he says, oh, that was you. And I says, listen, I can eat all that stuff I want.
He says, it'll ruin your kidneys. How are your kidneys? They're fine. Well you should have been chelated within 4 hours and I mean you guys are gonna follow me around the country and give me leading agents every 4 hours after I eat it on lecture tour. He says, we'll give you any medical assistance that you need, Galen.
We don't want anything to happen to you. I said, does that include turning out the federal SWAT team 4 days ago to get me? Where are these guys coming from? Well, here's a piece
Speaker 2: of metal, density of 19, 19.0.
Speaker 1: If you plutonium and uranium. Density, plutonium and uranium. Radioactive pyrophoric density of 19. Outside Now, that it's heavy and it is. Let's see if it's radioactive.
Yeah, it is. What does that mean? Pyro, fire, black on the end, the spark that just came off there is pyro, fire, burn. If it's plutonium, I just contaminated this area of Arizona in excess of the EPA's limit for 1 square mile of surface. Somebody laughed.
It's serious. The end of progress altogether says that I just contaminated you in excess of the limit for 1 square mile. It's now silver on the end. Tomorrow it'll be black because it self oxidizes. This, this black color one dog face with one weapon to knock out a 65 ton tank.
It'll go through 3 inches of armor plate and when it comes out the other side, it's that white hot hot spark that we just made. And the 5 men in that tank are dead because it'll burn all of the oxygen out of the air and burn their flesh. 1976, the obsoleted tank warfare and you never even knew that. They make 10 1,000 of those bullets every day in the United States. We got enough of marshmallows to sink a hull of Russia's tanks, and our boys in the Defense Department don't even talk about it.
Yeah. It's hazardous to your health. Reminds me, lead is hazardous to your health too, isn't it? Particularly if it's in a 45 slug like this and it hits you right here going about 26 100 feet per second. It's not the material, it's the impact from the velocity.
Let's be very specific in the words that we use. This particular chunk of lead came out of a human body. My son who's a deputy sheriff thought maybe I could use it on tour. That's called dying of lead poisoning. Anything less is a figment of the imagination because it's not soluble in body fluid either.
This is a pellet of cobalt 59. If you put it in a reactor into a neutron field, you can convert cobalt 59 to cobalt 60 which gives off a gamma. It becomes the source that doctors use to irradiate patients to 7000 Roentgen for 1 patient. The total dose absorbed by radiation workers at 3 Mile Island in the last 6 years is something like 1500 Roentgen. Five times more given to a single individual in a doctor's facility.
Now do you know why I say that the federal regulations are absurd? And if you live by those federal regulations, maybe you're being absurd too. Now a pellet of cobalt 60 this got shipped by mistake to Mexico. Got diluted into 5,000 tons of iron. Some of the reinforcing rod came up to Los Alamos, New Mexico and they said, hey that stuff's radioactive.
Understand that this single pellet diluted roughly a factor of 1,000,000,000 was what they were reading on a detector like this at Los Alamos. And so they pulled back table legs that were in Spokane Washington made out of the same batch because it was hot and radioactive and it would burn you. When the pellet itself could
Speaker 2: be held in your hand like that for a few
Speaker 1: minutes without it burning you. 1000000000 minutes ago. If I could scratch this stretch this pallet out into a wire and it went clear around the earth and right back here to Phoenix. A 1000000000th of this amount is 1.7 inches of that wire so stretched out. Stagger your mind?
It ought to. Now let's try a little game. The EPA says that 5 picocuries per liter of air is the limit for 222 radon. Radon. And they handle that like it's a real number.
Madam Curry says that 1 gram, 1 gram of radium equals 1 Curie, equals 2.22 times 10 to 12th, disintegrations per minute, and that's the basic definition of radioactivity. How many disintegrations is this? Should we find out? That 11 disintegrations per minute from 1 liter of air you have exceeded the limit. You know what I did the other day?
I've been having a little tough with some legal authorities up in my house. So I took one of these bottles of uranium like this, and I dissolved it in an Erlenmeyer flask with nitric acid. And I got a crack in the basement floor and I squirted that whole bottle into that crack on the basement floor in acid solution so that it'll drive that counter off 3rd scale any place along a 10 foot section of that crack that I put. When they bring the radon measurement in there, can you know what the radon's gonna do? It's gonna go off scale in their measurement.
It won't go that high. If watchers house with 17 times this limit in it was caused caused to spend $13,000 and give it national TV coverage, press coverage. Think what Galen Windsor's house is like. I went to the trouble to notify my congressman about it. Mike Lawrence, the manager of the Department of Energy in the Pacific Northwest, my state representative Ray Isaacson, a few other astute people including the banker and the liars and the appeal court.
What are they gonna do with that? I set them up on that last Thursday and I come down to Phoenix. So, I escaped the folder all. What I'm saying to you is that the federal regulations are absurd. The congressman that put them into place ought to be fired.
Gotta to be sent home. The regulators, what do you do with them? Quit paying them. The taxpayer, the electorate, elects those people to go out and do a job. Why do you continue to pay them?
When they're teaching you baloney, when they're putting in regulations that don't make any sense? Cut it out. Quit paying them. Fire them. Send them home.
Term I grew up with says can them. Is it easy? Apparently not. You haven't got the job done. Majority of the congress is irresponsible, amoral, atheistic, irresponsible.
Let's see. How many more adjectives can I drum up? But that many. Let me tell you. We as the people sent a bunch of rascals out to the energy store with a signed blank check.
And we say, hey fellows. If you run out of money just go build us a good power plan. If you run out of money, come back. We'll give you another signed blank check and guarantee the payment out of the rate payers pocket. Tennessee Valley Authority has the most nuclear reactors of any outfit in the place.
Not one of them has produced any power since last August. Browns Ferry 1, 2, and 3 in Mississippi hasn't produced any power since last March. And they don't plan on producing any power at Browns Ferry until mid year in 86. At a1000000 dollars a day in lost power revenue per plant and held off in the name of health and safety. Now tell me we didn't send rascals out to the energy marketplace with a signed blank check.
They're still getting paid. Those reactors are all fully fueled, fully staffed and just sitting there. Who's getting taken? The rate payer. You're still paying more and more for your electricity all of the time.
Now Bonneville Power Administration says that, 57% availability is okay for a nuclear reactor. Maine Yankee is often run at a 103% availability, which means it's running over nameplate rating. And up days out of the year that its average availability is a 100%. Bonneville power administration law of the Department of Energy says that 57% There's energy regulating business. Turn those plants over to people who will run them efficiently a 100% of the time.
When we put in zero release containment, we started playing games. About the time that we proved that a nuclear reactor has no measurable impact upon the environment, that's when they bottled them up. Put catalytic recombiners on them. Some of the reactors in Texas were designed not to breathe for 8 years at great expense. Why?
When you bottle up a reactor like TMI 2 does, then you get radiolytic hydrogen. And indeed they had a radiolytic hydrogen burn at TMI 2. And they moan and they groan about that and all they had to do was open up the windows and let the breezes blow through. You don't need containment on them. Going up to Colorado this weekend to meet with the uranium producers association and they're upset because the government is dumping uranium on the market and ruining the price of the commodity that they get their bread and butter from.
But what they're totally unaware of is that the Grand Junction operation office is going to issue a contract so that the new operator has a $25,000,000 budget over the next five years. 80% of which will be spent for remedial action. Where you take this material dig it up. If you find it, it counts on a Geiger counter, you can have them come in and change out the whole front yard of your house. Give you a new front yard, new foundation under your
Speaker 2: house at government expense. If you don't do it, they'll take you down
Speaker 1: to the courthouse, expense. If you don't do it, they'll take you down to the courthouse, blacklist your property, so that you have to remove the radioactivity
Speaker 2: house.
Speaker 1: House? I set up the United States government and that episode is about to be played. Did I do it on purpose? Yeah, I did. Just like I used to dive into that swimming pool and drink that seasoned contaminated water.
I found out that it doesn't hurt me. You need to find out that it doesn't hurt me or you. In fact, the only reason for the existence of these big trans continent distribution lines would be if they could compete with a small mass produced reactor sitting in your backyard. Why don't they want you to? Because they are the federal energy cartel.
They like to set the price, the total availability, and whether you can hook onto it. And if you don't pay your bill, cut you off. That's called power, domain, and control and they like that. They do not want you to be energy independent. If you had one of these sitting in every 10 block area in Phoenix, you could tell the rest of the world to go get lost.
Oh, there's another use for that heat. You could heat your homes in the winter time or you could cool them in the summer time with it. Heating, ventilation, air conditioning, they call it, HVAC. In countries where it freezes you could run that hot water out and chase the frost away in the spring and in the fall. And they found out that plants grow faster in warm water anyway, so you'd irrigate with it all summer.
So cooling towers are called wasting towers. They throw over 50% of the heat away. The other morning coming out of Tri Cities, WNP 2 was putting its 700 megawatt electric up through the clouds, 870. They were running at. And the clouds were laying all over the ground and there was a little ice cream cone right out there.
And I said, there's WNP 2. It snows 5 inches every night out of w n p 2 and the rest of us don't get any. Where'd the water come from? That's cooling the heat from the condenser cooler. You should have a business right out there, an oil cracking plant, something taking that heat and using it.
Like they build at Midland, Michigan 10 years ago and they've never used. And so Dow Chemical is suing the utility because they never produced the steam for their chemical plant right alongside it. We got troubles in this doing something about it responsibility is yours.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Pole Shift Accelerating Now - Disaster Cycle is Here HOMEWORK: Catastrophe Evidence: https://youtu.be/-sGPCMIQZLw https://t.co/fVu61GJnbN
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are currently in a geomagnetic reversal, confirmed by a Russian geophysical expert. The shift is part of a 6,000-year cycle, with major magnetic anomalies in 2007, 2020, and 2023. The decline in magnetic field strength is accelerating, indicating we are at a critical point. While the expert's model predicts the shift before 2216 AD, our analysis suggests a disaster peak in the 2030s or 2040s. Expect major calamities like volcanoes, earthquakes, and solar storms. Stay informed and be safe.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good afternoon, folks. This morning's top story was a big one, the confirmation mathematically that we are in the geomagnetic reversal, the magnetic pole shift. I'll presume you have all done the homework, and if not, pause this and watch the video in the description box down below. So this is one of the top geophysical guys in Russia and his work is extremely complex. He has a serious understanding of not only geophysics, but math, and his identification of real world magnetic anomalies dance with his physics model of the earth and tell us we are in the disaster cycle zenith right now.
Some of the critical takeaways from the article are that, again, we are in the major planetary magnetic shift we have been discussing for years. The key magnetic anomalies that confirmed his initial hypothesis were in 2,007, 2020, and last year in 2023. His model has a much broader runway in terms of a time frame just due to the nature of the model itself, saying it will occur before 22/16 AD. We'll dig a bit deeper into that in a moment. And he confirmed the approximately 6 1000 year cycle for these events.
I am not sure how much more an observer could hope to see in a single publication. Now the main difference between his and our coverage is the timeline, but his thermohydrogravidynamic model is just not the same kind of analysis as our mathematical extrapolation. It can't be as specific with the timing, just like my analysis can see the pattern and do the math, but can't nail down the physical processes within the earth responsible for that pattern. Here is our chart from our latest book showing where the magnetic field strength has been and how the decline in strength has accelerated just as the speed of the magnetic pole movement has increased. The critical area is actually where we are right now, the inflection point where the curve takes over and the decline begins to accelerate rapidly.
This comports with the finding of the major magnetic anomaly in 2023, which also correlates with what we've covered in real time, the auroral records last year, and the unexpectedly high KP index events over the last year as well. The magnetic anomaly identified in his paper is part of the main reason for them. We have hit another acceleration node in the timeline, and that also agrees well with what we are expecting to come in the following years. The shift begins slowly, but when it kicks into gear, remember, it will eventually be going a times faster than the changes we saw in the 1st years of this new millennium. This is what you saw with the chart taking a dive.
We're on the cliff's edge right now. Now this is why our model may be less impressive in, well, almost every way, but it takes the upper hand in giving the timeline, which I would argue is pretty darn important. We should have the zenith of the disaster in the 20 thirties or 20 forties, but, of course, remember that major calamities are expected before that, volcanoes, earthquakes, solar storm, grid down scenarios, not to mention the stupidity of the idiots running this planet. I hope this video was informative. Thank you for watching.
Please do that homework if you haven't yet. I will see you in the morning for the daily show. Be safe, everyone.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Air Force Warns of the Pole Shift, Solar Flare/CME: https://t.co/phr4WC2IkV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Today's update covers a solar flare and possible CME impact, as well as a concerning paper on a coming pole shift. The solar flare was impulsive, with minor activity and plasma filaments observed. The CME may have a glancing blow later this week. The paper from an Air Force captain warns of a rapid magnetic pole shift, with implications for Earth's biosphere, grids, agriculture, and health. The conclusion is that we are unprepared for this event. A detailed breakdown will be provided in a special video later today. Stay tuned for more updates.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, folks. Today we'll be hitting just 2 things, the solar flare from yesterday and possible CME impact coming from it, and the paper shared during last night's livestream, which I hadn't seen yet, the Air Force is aware of and terrified about the coming pole shift. We're starting with the last 24 hours on our star and we find that the day began pretty much right after the morning show with an impulsive solar flare from the sunspot group that's beginning to depart. A few other minor pops occurred, and we've got several plasma filaments to keep an eye on. And although impulsive, the flare did appear to have a significant working of the local corona, and a faint CME signature can even be seen on Soho as well.
The initial NASA endless spiral for the event shows a potential glancing blow from the week CME towards the middle to latter part of the week. It'll be relevant, but not scary. Wish I could say the same thing for our top science today. During the live show last night, someone asked me if I knew about this paper. I did not.
It is only posted in the military archive from a captain at the Air Force who is also studying geomagnetism and earth risk. It's all about our key long term topic here at the channel, the ongoing geomagnetic excursion, the magnetic pole flip. It caught my interest right off the bat. While we know the magnetic field has declined probably 25 to 30% since 18/59, this paper suggesting we've lost about 40% over the last 400 years. The field shift has accelerated to 10 times that which we previously thought, and it has major implications for the Earth, including the biosphere.
They hit the grids, major issues in agriculture and to human health. They then end up concluding that we are absolutely not prepared for this event, which is something I definitely agree with and have heard from pretty much every serious scientist in the field over the last decade, especially since most of the focus and funding is currently going to a different kind of environmental change on Earth right now. Folks, this requires a deep dive, and I'll be bringing that to you later today. Come back around 6 PM EST, 3 PM Pacific for a more significant breakdown of this work in tonight's special video. We greatly appreciate your support.
We'll do this all again tomorrow right here, but right now, it's 5:30 AM in the new valley of the sun. Eyes open. No fear. Be safe, everyone.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
We are not the same. I watch this on the 7th day of every month. I know what every moment means. The wiki page, blogs... child's play- and even the creator held back facts in his interview. I don't want to forget, or get distracted. We are not the same. https://t.co/BtVrlfInLo
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Who can post clips from oncologists taking about the rise in cancer from the vaccine? this is for my dad with cancer who won’t listen to me. PLEASE only post a reply if you have such a clip.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
US Government Plan, Galactic Current Sheet: https://t.co/tflE2SRcNJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses recent solar activity, including the lack of solar flaring and calm geomagnetic conditions. They also mention a seismic event off the coast of Africa. The speaker then highlights a simulation of the formation of a spiral galaxy and describes the discovery of seismic ripples in the galaxy. Lastly, the US government's plan for space weather is mentioned, with doubts expressed about their ability to effectively implement it. The video ends with a reminder about discounted books and upcoming events.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning folks. We've got some big stories to hit today with some scintillating eye candy that goes with them. We'll hit the galactic current sheet and the plan, if you can call it that, from the US government to defend against the sun. Let's start with the last 24 hours on our star, Quiet day. We had some surging through the central plasma filament, but there was virtually no solar flaring.
The plasma filaments did not release. Solar wind at Earth is relatively calm and so are geomagnetic conditions. The reason there was no flaring relates to what we discussed yesterday morning. The big sunspot group is spreading and separating the magnetic polarities of the umbral cores, and now there is even a bit of decay noticeable in the northern sunspot groups. Flaring is still possible today, but once again, risk is dropping.
Top seismic event of the last 24 hours was luckily well out to sea, 6.1 South of Africa on the Indian Ridge. Now before we get into the top articles today, I really hope you caught last night's video. Unintentionally, I have apparently made one of the funnier videos you guys have seen on this channel. Thor even made an appearance. Check it out if you missed it.
Up next, let's go to an incredible simulation. This is part of the various press releases coming out about a new study on galactic physics. It's The four d two u simulation of the formation of a spiral galaxy from aggregating smaller sub galactic conglomerated matter. The new study is all about spiral galaxies. In fact, they have scoped the earliest known spiral galaxy that they can actually study in detail.
Observers can guess what they've found, And I could have guessed they would use unorthodox terminology to describe it. They find seismic ripples in the galaxy, Signs of perturbations and wake in the spiral form separate from the spiral arm density. We have seen several ways of describing this wake in the past, Hills and valleys, peaks and troughs. Here, they describe it as a rippling oscillation, which isn't the worst description I've heard, like ripples in a pond. It is this undulating outward flowing pattern from the central galactic engine which has been identified in our Milky Way and several other galaxies as the galactic current However they choose to characterize the shape of the pattern, it means the same thing.
Importantly here, they've spotted it In a distant, barely able to be analyzed galaxy, it is ubiquitous. Lastly, here today, the US government has released their plan to Plan for planning. It really does take them forever to do anything. This is the result of the 2019 demand for action on space weather, which is actually a Step after Obama's mandate on space weather from several years earlier, and they are still planning. They do correctly identify how atrociously bad it would be if we took a major solar storm, and then they go on to make several nice sounding but somewhat empty mandate clauses about how they're going to go about better monitoring, analyzing data, and planning for the aftermath of such an event.
You'll forgive me if I'm a bit suspicious of their ability to correctly and efficiently accomplish their goals. Last couple days to get all our books in PDF form. They are now discounted for the holiday season. Grab them at the link below. Just a couple more days for that.
And there are only 5 tickets remaining for Phoenix on January 13th. It'll be the longest and most in-depth observer event since our last major conference. We hope to see you out there. Tickets at the link below. We greatly appreciate your support.
We'll do this all again tomorrow. Right here, but right now at 6 AM in the new valley of the sun.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Lost Civilization, Filament Destabilizing: https://t.co/TuQexxtiOo
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses recent solar activity, including solar flares and a destabilizing plasma filament. They also mention two articles on solar forcing and an interesting paper about an ancient civilization that may have sunk into the sea. The speaker expresses excitement about the findings and encourages viewers to read the articles. The video ends with a reminder to tune in again tomorrow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good morning, folks. We've got a couple good articles to hit today 2 on solar forcing, and 1 on an ancient civilization. We've also had more solar flares, and a large plasma filament is destabilizing this morning, so let's begin with the last 24 hours on our star. Solar flaring remains in C and low M class range had one just this morning on the south, just right of the central longitudes And the large plasma filament departing on the north is beginning to destabilize here. It is doubtful it will release with an earth directed trajectory, but I'll be watching it as the day unfolds.
Another look at that action in 304 angstroms: ionized helium. You can see how the destabilization begins slowly, And then about 2 hours ago, it hit a tipping point and is whipping harshly. Point of no return there. 1st 2 articles today are on solar forcing, Both at the long cycle level and the individual events. This one could have done more to include some of the subtle forcing of major oscillations and modes in the atmosphere, This one is solidly pieced together.
Those who have our textbook may recognize these names. Here they are discussing electric forcing that impacts the clouds, Stratosphere global temperatures and much more. Solid work. Both are linked below. But our top story today is this You may have seen it making the rounds online, so we went down and hunted out the actual paper.
First off, it is an online Preprint, which is why it says January 2024. That's when they will print the hard copy of the journal issue. Second, if this isn't right up the observer's alley, I don't know what is. If you have been here a while, you've heard me say Australia was likely once connected to its surrounding islands. This seems to suggest Where they were connected was a great civilization that sank into the sea.
I know a lot of your imaginations are running right now, so is mine. We greatly appreciate your support. We'll do this all again tomorrow. Right here, but right now at 6 AM in the new Valley of the Sun.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
Magnetic Pole Shift | Response to Dr. Cohen https://t.co/GUfsxqPzlk
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the Earth's magnetic shift and its potential dangers. The speaker addresses an article written by Dr. Cohen, praising his identification of the changes but pointing out some inaccuracies. The speaker highlights the frequency and speed of geomagnetic excursions, which occur more frequently than full Kron reversals and pose a greater risk to the biosphere. They mention studies confirming a geomagnetic excursion 6,000 years ago and emphasize the impact of these changes on climate, volcanic activity, ozone destruction, and cosmic radiation. The speaker also mentions the accelerated rate of magnetic field changes in recent years. They conclude by emphasizing the importance of understanding these facts for the well-being of the planet and its inhabitants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening folks. We've got yet another article written about earth's magnetic shift. While this one is quite a bit better than many others we have seen, still has a few things that need correction. The article is penned by Dr. Cohen.
Dr. Cohen is a professor at UMass Lowell, but he has also worked at the Harvard Smithsonian Center For Astrophysics. Doctor Cohen, I hope this video reaches you, and you are able to hear me out. 1st, I would like to applaud your identification of the modern changes to Earth's magnetic field, something more people need to be aware of, and the fact that these events are dangerous, both from the perspective of technological risk to space weather, like solar flares, but also the ozone destruction. That is a big one.
But there appears to be some confusion about the frequency of these magnetic changes, how long they take to unfold, and the full range of risks. So if you are restricting your analysis to full Kron reversals, then perhaps your claim is correct that they take 1,000 of years, and they happen with a frequency between a 100000 and a 1000000 years. However, there is actually less evidence of the danger of those events compared to the rapid flips, the geomagnetic excursions, those happen far more frequently and they actually present a much more drastic change and more vulnerable biosphere environment. I actually did a video specifically on these points just about 2 weeks before your article came out, So please, doctor Cohen, hear me out Let's go over exactly how often these events occur including how fast they can happen, and then we will go over just how dangerous they can be. First, it is important we review the 2 recent studies confirming that we did have a mini geomagnetic excursion in the middle of the Holocene about 6000 years ago.
First found in China and then confirmed in volcanic flows in Russia. So we have added it to the list of officially confirmed excursions in recent history. And I ask you, does this look like it takes 1,000 and thousands of years? Does it appear the last magnetic change on Earth was 780,000 years ago? When you realize that similar signatures exist at the 30000 years ago mark and it simply hasn't been officially confirmed or declared as an excursion, we do appear to have magnetic changes on the planet every 6000 years, which also happens to be the Heinrich event cycle, but we'll come back to that.
When it comes to the impact of these geomagnetic changes, the ruling study is this. 2 of the top geophysicists on earth, in the number one geophysics journal on earth. Definitively declaring the danger of these events. Doctor Channel was kind enough to give us an interview on our channel shortly after the publication, where he reiterated how deadly these excursions can be. It is one of the interviews of which I am most proud in my 12 years of doing this.
Of course, there are several other key studies that say the same thing. Including this one that focuses on Le Chambre. It was one of the most well publicized studies of 2021, and yet, many people who speak on the subject don't seem to know about it. At the AGU meeting this year, we will once again hear how these events in the past caused great chaos in the climate, confirms the volcanic upticks that come with these events. It's something we've seen at several previous AGU meetings as well.
In fact, there are several studies one could look to for the fairly perfect line up of these geomagnetic changes on earth, with major environmental disasters including the peaks of species extinction. In fact, over the last few years, pretty much every single study on the topic comes to the same conclusion as do several in years past. Especially when the biosphere impacts line up and so do the peaks and cosmic radiation incident on our planet. And there's no mystery as to why. The magnetic field of earth which protects our planet from space radiation weakens tremendously in these excursions and becomes misaligned with the poles leading to major influx of space energy to earth.
Folks, when this happens, the climate goes into chaos partially due to those upticks in volcanoes that come with the geomagnetic changes and that alone is enough to cause extinctions, but the ozone destruction from protons and electrons adds UV exposure to the planet at the same time. Not to mention the increase in cosmic rays and the direct radiation to the surface level, when you toss the cherry on top of the navigational issues that strike various parts of the food chain due to the change in the magnetic field, you realize that the environment becomes chaotic at the same time as the food chain falters. This is why these events are so bad. Now, as for what is happening these days NASA scientists and others declared in the year 2000 that we had lost 10% of the magnetic field since the middle of 1800 and the ESA swarm magnetic field mission upgraded that number to 15% in their 2010 mission report and update. 10% lost in a 150 years and then another 5% lost in only a decade.
The mission manager of Swarm at the time, Rune Flobbergoggan publicly said we had gone from losing 5% of the magnetic field per century to 5% per decade. That's serious. And several subsequent studies confirmed that the magnetic field has begun changing faster and faster. Takes 1000 of years, Not according to the top scientists at Berkeley who say it can happen within a human lifetime. The definitive study on the acceleration phase of excursion events suggest that it can speed up to a 100 times faster than the modern rates of change.
All pointing to one inevitable conclusion. The cycle is not only due again, but it's happening and it doesn't take 1000 of years and no, it's no small matter for the earth and the creatures that live here. The key aspect of this channel, what we do, and I'm both proud and saddened to have to keep reviewing these facts, but it's necessary for the sake of all of us. I'll see you in the morning for the daily show. Eyes open.
No fear. Be safe, everyone.
@SunWeatherMan - SpaceWeatherNews
A Magnetic Disaster is Happening https://t.co/yNL88fWAu0
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker addresses claims made by a geophysics expert regarding magnetic pole shifts. They argue that recent studies have confirmed geomagnetic excursions occurring every 6,000 years, contradicting the claim that the last shift was 780,000 years ago. The speaker emphasizes the danger of these events, citing studies that link them to environmental disasters and species extinction. They explain that during excursions, the Earth's magnetic field weakens, leading to increased volcanic activity, ozone destruction, and cosmic radiation exposure. The speaker also highlights the accelerated rate of magnetic field changes in recent years, suggesting that another shift is imminent. They stress the importance of understanding these facts for the well-being of the planet and its inhabitants.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening observers. We have spent a good effort in reviewing concepts to make sure everyone is up to speed. Let's do that again now. Especially since one of the most ignorant claims has resurfaced and in the most arrogant and insulting of ways. While my recent thrashings of Harvard and NASA Maybe more impressive, crosshairs now fall upon a proclaimed geophysics expert.
And what is about to happen in this video folks is how you definitively and academically Crush and opposition. Xi claims that the last magnetic pole shift was 780,000 years ago and that they take a very long time to happen, and moreover, that they are no concern for the biosphere. Oh, you were finished. Oh, well allow me to retort. Veteran observers, I can hear you laughing already, and for the rest of you, Let's go over exactly how often these events occur including how fast they can happen, and then we will go over just how dangerous they can be.
First, it is important we review the 2 recent studies confirming that we did have a mini geomagnetic excursion in the middle of the Holocene about 6000 years ago. 1st found in China and then confirmed in volcanic flows in Russia. So we have added it to the list of officially confirmed excursions in recent history. And I ask you, does this look like it takes 1,000 and thousands of years? Does it appear the last magnetic change on earth was 780,000 years ago?
When you realize that similar signatures exist at the 3000 years ago mark and it simply hasn't been officially confirmed or declared as an excursion, We do appear to have magnetic changes on the planet every 6000 years, which also happens to be the Heinrich event cycle, but we'll come back to that. When it comes to the impact of these geomagnetic changes, the ruling study is this. 2 of the top geophysicists on earth In the number one geophysics journal on earth, definitively declaring the danger of these events. I highly recommend miss Biteback read this paper, but I won't hold my breath. Doctor Channel was kind enough to give us an interview on our channel shortly after the publication where he reiterated how deadly these can beat.
It is one of the interviews of which I am most proud in my 12 years of doing this. Of course, there are several other key studies that say the same thing, Including this one that focuses on the shop. It was one of the most well publicized studies of 2021 and yet, many people who speak on the subject don't seem to know about it. At the AGU meeting this year, we will once again hear how these events in the past caused great chaos in the climate, confirms the volcanic upticks that come with these events. It's something we've seen at several previous AGU meetings as well.
In fact, there are several studies one could look to for the fairly perfect lineup of these geomagnetic changes on earth with major environmental disasters including the peaks of species extinction. In fact, over the last few years, pretty much every single study on the topic comes to the same conclusion as do several in years past, especially when the biosphere impacts line up and so do the peaks and cosmic radiation An incident on our planet and there's no mystery as to why. The magnetic field of earth which protects our planet from space radiation Weakens tremendously in these excursions and becomes misaligned with the poles, leading to major influx of space energy to earth. Folks, when this happens, the climate goes into chaos. Partially due to those upticks in volcanoes that come with the geomagnetic changes.
And that alone is enough to cause Extinctions but the ozone destruction from protons and electrons adds UV exposure to the planet at the same time. Not to mention the increase in cosmic rays And the direct radiation to the surface level. When you toss the cherry on top of the navigational issues that strike various parts of the food chain due to the change in the magnetic field, You realize that the environment becomes chaotic at the same time as the food chain falters. This is why these events are so bad. Now, As for what is happening these days, NASA scientists and others declared in the year 2000 that we had lost 10% of the magnetic field since the middle of 1800s And the ESA swarm magnetic field mission upgraded that number to 15% in their 2010 mission report and update.
I wonder if miss Byteback can do that math. 10% lost in a 150 years and then another 5% lost in only a decade. The mission manager of Swarm at the time, Rune Floburgoggan, publicly said we had gone from losing 5% of the magnetic Field per century to 5% per decade. That's serious. And several subsequent studies confirmed that the magnetic field has begun changing faster and faster.
Takes 1,000 of years. Not according to the top scientists at Berkeley who say it can happen within a human lifetime. The definitive study on the acceleration phase of excursion events Suggest that it can speed up to a 100 times faster than the modern rates of change. All pointing to one inevitable conclusion. The cycle is not only due again, but it's happening.
And it doesn't take 1,000 of years and no. It's no small matter for the earth and the creatures that live here. The key aspect of this channel, what we do. And I'm both proud and saddened to have to keep reviewing these facts, but it's necessary for the sake of all of us. I'll see you in the morning for the daily show.
Eyes open. No fear. Be safe