TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @SuppressedNws
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
This is why archives are important like the archive created by @receipts_lol This archive https://genocide.live contains tens of thousands of footage documenting Israel’s warcrimes with date, location and more details.
Genocide.live
Genocidal videos from Gaza and Isreal documenting the genocide in 2023 and 2024
genocide.live
@SuppressedNws1 - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: YouTube has deleted the channels of three major Palestinian human rights groups, wiping out over 700 videos documenting Israeli war crimes. Google says the removals were to comply with Trump-era sanctions linked to the groups’ cooperation with the International Criminal Court.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage of the Sumud Flotilla being bombed by a drone off Tunisia's coast. The "Family Boat," under the Portuguese flag and carrying steering committee members, was hit. Thankfully, all passengers and crew, including those who were on the Madleen boat with Greta Thunberg, are safe.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Footage from another boat shows the moment the Sumud Flotilla was bombed by a drone in Tunisia’s coast. The “Family Boat,” carrying steering committee members under the Portuguese flag, was struck by a suspected drone. This is the boat that carries the same people who were on the Madleen boat previously including Greta Thunberg. All passengers and crew are safe.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a breaking update about an Israeli drone strike on the Sumud Flotilla's "Family Boat" off Tunisia's coast. The vessel, linked to the Madleen boat with Greta Thunberg, was carrying steering committee members, and thankfully, all passengers and crew are safe. The Global Sumud Flotilla is conducting an investigation and remains committed to its mission of breaking Gaza's siege. Earlier, I noted increased Israeli air activity in the region, including spy planes and landing operations.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: Full video shows the moment an Israeli drone struck the Sumud Flotilla’s “Family Boat” off Tunisia’s coast. The vessel, under the Portuguese flag and previously linked to the Madleen boat with Greta Thunberg aboard, carried steering committee members. All passengers and crew are safe. The Global Sumud Flotilla confirms an investigation is underway and vows its mission to break Gaza’s siege will continue undeterred.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We just got hit. The vessel is on fire. Our vessel is on fire.
We've been hit by what appears to be a drone.
We are on the flotilla vessel off the coast of Tunis.
We've been hit. Are we abandoning ship? I don't know.
Bring this on. It was a massive explosion. A massive, massive explosion. Just meters away.
There's a fire in the front deck. We've been hit. Run the fire pump. Run the fire pump.
Where's the fire extinguisher?
I was on the top deck. The police are arriving. Go. Go. Go.
It's okay. It's gonna be okay. Get on. It's gonna be okay. Okay?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We just got hit. The vessel is on fire. Our vessel is on fire. We've been hit by what appears to be a drone. We've been hit by what appears to be a drone.
We are on the flotilla vessel off the coast of Tunis. We are on the flotilla vessel off the coast of Tunis. We've been hit. Are we abandoning ship? I don't know.
Bring this on. It was a massive explosion. A massive, massive explosion. Just meters away. We've been hit by what appears to be a drone.
The vessel is on Captain. I'm here. We've been hit by what appears to be a drone. The vessel's on fire. I don't want that.
There's a fire in the front deck. We've been hit. Run the fire pump. Run the fire pump. Where's the fire extinguisher?
Where's the fire extinguisher? We have been hit. The vessel is on fire. We are off the coast of Tunis. It was a loud explosion.
I was on the top deck. The police are arriving. Go. Go. Go.
It's okay. It's gonna be okay. Get on. It's gonna be okay. Okay?
Guys, we have been attacked in what appears to be a drone attack. The vessel is on fire. I repeat, the vessel is on fire. We are on the family boat at about 11:30PM. A loud explosion came from The boat is on fire.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇮🇱JUST IN: Earlier today, heavy Israeli air activity was spotted off Tunisia near Malta: 2 Nahshon spy planes (569 & 679) and 2 KC-130H landing at NAS Sigonella. A few moments ago the Global Sumud Flotilla was bombed by a drone off the coast of Tunisia. Credit: @MenchOsint @EGYOSINT
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Full thread:
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage of the Sumud Flotilla's "Family Boat" being bombed by a drone off Tunisia's coast. This vessel, under the Portuguese flag, carried steering committee members, including those previously on the Madleen boat with Greta Thunberg. Thankfully, all passengers and crew are safe. The Global Sumud Flotilla is investigating the incident and remains committed to its mission of breaking Gaza's siege. Pro-Palestine protesters are also gathering nearby, voicing their support.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: Footage shows the moment the Sumud Flotilla was bombed by a drone in Tunisia’s coast. The “Family Boat,” carrying steering committee members under the Portuguese flag, was struck by a suspected drone. This is the boat that carries the same people who were on the Madleen boat previously including Greta Thunberg. All passengers and crew are safe. The Global Sumud Flotilla confirms an investigation is underway and vows its peaceful mission to break Gaza’s siege will continue undeterred.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Une explosion de nature indéterminée est décrite en direct. L’orateur affirme que c’est en live, espère que les personnes vont bien, et annonce qu’il apporte les nouvelles en direct du port.
An indeterminate explosion is described live. The speaker says it is live, hopes people are okay, and announces that he is bringing the live news from the port.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mais au secours, y avait une sorte, je ne sais pas c'est quoi, mais c'était une sorte d'explosion. Là, c'est live. J'espère que les personnes vont bien. Là je vous ramène les nouvelles live de du port de.
Video Transcript AI Summary
We've been hit by what appears to be a drone. The vessel's on fire. There's a fire in the front deck. We've been hit. Where's the fire extinguisher?
Where's the fire extinguisher? We have been hit. The vessel is on fire. We are off the coast of Tunis. It was a loud explosion.
I was on the top deck. The police are arriving. Patty, it was a massive explosion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've been hit by what appears to be a drone. The vessel's on fire. There's a fire in the front deck. We've been hit. Where's the fire extinguisher?
Where's the fire extinguisher? We have been hit. The vessel is on fire. We are off the coast of Tunis. It was a loud explosion.
I was on the top deck. The police are arriving. Patty, it was a massive explosion.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Initial report:
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
I wonder who did it?
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇮🇱JUST IN: Earlier today, heavy Israeli air activity was spotted off Tunisia near Malta: 2 Nahshon spy planes (569 & 679) and 2 KC-130H landing at NAS Sigonella. A few moments ago the Global Sumud Flotilla was bombed by a drone off the coast of Tunisia. Credit: @MenchOsint @EGYOSINT
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
TRT captures Israel’s mass destruction of Gaza from a plane. Entire neighborhoods have been reduced to rubble, entire areas in the Gaza Strip no longer exist. This is the outcome of Israel’s bombing and genocide campaign. https://t.co/T0XvD94DnY
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage showing the aftermath of our operations against Zionist military vehicles, which we targeted using pre-planted explosives in the eastern Gaza City advance routes. The videos capture the moment of detonation, highlighting the effectiveness of our strategy. Despite discussions about drones, I emphasize that they are no match for our tactics today. The surveillance cameras documented the explosions, showcasing the destruction of enemy vehicles and the success of our efforts.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️Saraya Al-Quds: Saraya Al-Quds displays scenes of the remnants of zionist military vehicles that it destroyed by detonating fields of pre-planted explosive devices and bombs in the axes of advance east of Gaza City. Notes: 00:32 - "God is with us" 00:34 - "Don't tell me about drones, or say about drones. Today, planes are useless." 01:17 - The moment the bomb and explosive device exploded in enemy vehicles. 01:28 - Explosion of a minefield consisting of 6 anti-armor explosive devices on the invading vehicles. 01:37 - Scenes documented by the surveillance camera of the explosion of the devices in the invading vehicles. 01:44 - Surveillance camera documentation 01:48 - Scenes documented by one of the surveillance and monitoring cameras at the moment of the explosion.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: Al-Qassam Brigades: “Watch after our fighters return from the frontlines… and as part of the “David’s Stones” operations series… scenes of targeting enemy soldiers and vehicles on the incursion fronts east of Gaza City.” Footage of 2 sniping operations and ambush. https://t.co/bn0vTmzLYP
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️The moment the resistance detonated the tunnel shaft, in which the commander of the Israeli army’s Tracker Unit and one of its members were killed a few days ago in Khan Younis. https://t.co/gnX6T3lfsz
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Footage released by Israel documents the moment they attacked Al-Awda and Taybeh schools that were sheltering displaced Palestinians in Abasan Al-Kabira, southern Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip. So now Israel releases footage of bombing schools and it’s normalized? https://t.co/yJZERcUVrb
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that the Israeli military is using Microsoft’s Azure cloud to store all Palestinian calls and texts, primarily in European data centers. This data is reportedly utilized by AI systems to determine targets for killing, arresting, or blackmailing. The collaboration began after a meeting between former IDF general Yossi Sariel and CEO Satya Nadella in 2021, leading to the project's launch in 2022. I feel that Microsoft is complicit in the oppression of Palestinians, and I urge employees who feel betrayed to make their resignations meaningful.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: Microsoft EXPOSED، Israeli military stores ALL Palestinian calls and texts on Azure. The Israeli military is recording and storing Palestinian phone calls and messages on Microsoft’s Azure cloud, mostly in European data centers. This data is used by AI systems to choose who to kill, arrest, or blackmail. Microsoft became involved after former IDF general Yossi Sariel met with CEO Satya Nadella in 2021. The project launched in 2022, and the data has likely powered targeting systems like Lavender and Gospel ever since. Microsoft isn’t just a bystander, it’s helping power Israel’s war on Gaza and the oppression of Palestinians. To employees: if you feel betrayed by the company’s silence and complicity, don’t leave quietly. Make your resignation count.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🇮🇱The Israeli Knesset is debating israeli soldiers’ right to rape [Sodomize] Palestinian detainee. Yes they have pro-Rape debates and Pro-Rape protests. https://t.co/mW8Igr5PTC
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared footage from the Al-Qassam Brigades showing an ambush that resulted in the elimination of 7 soldiers, including an officer. This operation, part of the "Stones of David" series, targeted two armored vehicles near the Ali bin Abi Talib Mosque in southern Gaza.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: Al-Qassam Brigades published the footage of the ambush in which 7 soldiers were eliminated: “As part of the "Stones of David" series of operations: Scenes from the complex ambush that targeted two Zionist forces armored vehicles. The enemy announced the killing of 7 soldiers inside, including an officer, near the Ali bin Abi Talib Mosque in the Ma'an area, south of Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip.”
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
This is insane, wow! An Al-Qassam resistance fighter mounted the APC and threw a “Shawaz” explosive device inside the Israeli engineering vehicle, causing it to explode with those inside. All 7 soldiers inside the vehicle were announced dead. https://t.co/q8ybe2nOYg
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared evidence regarding the tragic events on October 7, where Israeli forces mistakenly attacked their own civilians, resulting in numerous deaths, including babies. Testimonies from soldiers and survivors confirm that Israeli tanks and helicopters were involved in these strikes. Additionally, I referenced an old thread debunking myths propagated by Israel since that day, highlighting the extensive misinformation spread over decades. I also pointed to further videos that support these claims, emphasizing the need to scrutinize the narratives presented.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🚨WITH EVIDENCE - NEVER FORGET, ISRAEL KILLED ITS OWN “CIVILIANS” ON OCTOBER 7TH INCLUDING BABIES! Video 1: Israel dropped missiles and tank shells on its own settlers to prevent hostage taking - killing hundreds on Oct 7 Further testimonies by Israeli soldiers prove that an Israeli Apache, as well as Israeli tanks, were responsible for killing Israelis in Gaza's envelope settlements on October 7. Video 2 : Israeli settler Hadas Dagan, who survived the incident, where 14 Israelis were killed, reveals that the Israeli forces struck the house despite the presence of Israelis. Video 3 : Israeli Colonel Golani Vach, during an interview, admits that Israeli tanks did attack houses filled with Israeli settlers inside on 7th October resulting in the death of 15 Israelis including 8 babies!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tanks were used in an attack. Inside a house, 15 people were burned, including eight babies, because they were blocked in. The speaker says they need to conquer back the whole settlement, and this couldn't happen without the tanks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our tanks Thank you. Attack.
Speaker 1: Fight on them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah. Inside this this this house were another 15 burned people, among them eight babies. In this home because they were blocked in these houses, and we need to to conquer back the whole settlement. And it couldn't be happened without the tent.
Speaker 0: Our tent our tent attack.
Speaker 1: Fight on them.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Yeah.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
An old thread i created back then that can be used as a reference for the set of lies utilized as propaganda since October 7th till December.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🚨MYTHS PUBLISHED BY ISRAEL DEBUNKED🚨 In this thread, let's talk about 50 myths, published by Israel since October 7 , and after reading this thread, ask yourself a question , if it was all only in 50 days , what is the amount of lies and hypocrisy that Israel has published over the past decades.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared reports detailing the tragic events of October 7th, where Israel's military actions resulted in the deaths of hundreds of its own citizens. Colonel Erez described a chaotic situation, likening it to a "mass Hannibal," where aircrews fired on vehicles, some believed to carry hostages. Eyewitness accounts and testimonies from Israeli soldiers indicated that airstrikes and tank fire targeted areas with civilians, leading to significant casualties, including infants. The gravity of these actions has left a profound impact, and it's crucial to remember this day.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️JUST IN: ABC Reports on Israel killing hundreds of Israelis on October 7th. “This was a mass Hannibal. Thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages” Colonel Erez said. “28 fighter helicopters shot all of the ammunition in their bellies” 'This was a mass Hannibal' In July, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed commanders in the IDF gave the order to fire on troops who had been captured by Hams at three separate locations, explicitly referencing the Hannibal Directive. One former Israeli officer, Air Force Colonel Nof Erez, told a Haaretz podcast the directive was not specifically ordered but was "apparently applied" by responding aircrews. Panicked, operating without their normal command structure and unable to coordinate with ground forces, they fired on vehicles returning to Gaza, knowing they were likely carrying hostages. "This was a mass Hannibal. It was tons and tons of openings in the fence, and thousands of people in every type of vehicle, some with hostages and some without," Colonel Erez said. Air force pilots described to Yedioth Ahronot newspaper the firing of "tremendous" amounts of ammunition on October 7 at people attempting to cross the border between Gaza and Israel. "Twenty-eight fighter helicopters shot over the course of the day all of the ammunition in their bellies, in renewed runs to rearm. We are talking about hundreds of 30-millimetre cannon mortars and Hellfire missiles," reporter Yoav Zeitoun said. "The frequency of fire at the thousands of terrorists was enormous at the start, and only at a certain point did the pilots begin to slow their attacks and carefully choose the targets."
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Israel accused of killing its own civilians under the 'Hannibal Directive' to avoid them being taken hostage
The controversial "Hannibal Directive", which Israel says isn't named for the famous Carthaginian general who took poison rather than be captured by the Romans, was reportedly enacted after the October 7 Hamas attack, with revelations detailing attacks by IDF tanks and helicopters on homes and vehicles returning to Gaza.
abc.net.au
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
More footage from a report by Al-Jazeera previously.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
A post containing more evidence
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
The most shared video today in Hebrew media, meant to mock, shows French President Emmanuel Macron getting slapped by his wife on a plane after it landed. He looked clearly angry and upset as he got off and couldn’t hide his emotions. Source: @tamerqdh https://t.co/IvLOk1D83d
Video Transcript AI Summary
**French:**
L'avion présidentiel arrive au Vietnam pour la tournée d'Emmanuel Macron. Les images montrent Emmanuel Macron de profil avec les mains de la Première dame.
**English:**
The presidential plane arrives in Vietnam for Emmanuel Macron's tour. Images show Emmanuel Macron in profile with the First Lady's hands visible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alors que l'avion présidentiel vient d'arriver sur le tarmac de l'aéroport pour la tourner au Vietnam d'Emmanuel Macron. Sur ces images, vous le voyez, Emmanuel Macron de profil avec les 2 mains de la Première dame qui
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
“Forgive me, mom. I only chose this path to help people. O Lord, accept my repentance.” These were the final recorded words of Palestinian paramedic Refaat Radwan before he was executed by Israeli forces in Rafah, along with 14 colleagues from the Red Crescent and Civil Defense. https://t.co/6LfNszwpz1
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
His final moments captured on video that proves IDF lied. Refaat Radwan is the name of the paramedic in this video, capturing his final moments alongside his colleagues. In total, Israel executed 15 Red Crescent and Civil Defense workers. “Forgive me, mother. This is the path I chose — to help people,” he said. “Allahu akbar”. “There is no God but God, Muhammad is his messenger,”. He asks God for forgiveness and says he knows he is going to die.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that U.S. bunker buster bombs were dropped by Israel on tents housing displaced civilians in Gaza. I pinpointed the exact location of the strikes, which included a residential building and a displacement tent near Al-Israa Tower. Targeting civilians is unacceptable.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
U.S bunker buster bombs being dropped by Israel on tents sheltering displaced civilians in Gaza. https://t.co/aWuPKsLvzU
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
This is the exact location that was targeted today;
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Aftermath of Israeli airstrikes on a residential building and a displacement tent near Al-Israa Tower in central Gaza City earlier today. Civilians and tents sheltering displaced Palestinian civilians should never be a target. https://t.co/wdGFy4xjvy
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
I still remember this footage, the first time I saw it I was a young child. 22 years ago, the U.S. was “spreading democracy, freeing Iraq, and protecting the world from grave danger”—invading Baghdad under the pretext of the WMD lie. https://t.co/yDPnnvviaR
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
They graduated from Al-Qassam university with goodie bags and certificates. I can’t😂 https://t.co/6MvSjrIU4h
reSee.it AI Summary
Shocking scenes are emerging from Gaza after the ceasefire. Clothes are scattered, belonging to medical staff from Kamal Adwan Hospital and other civilians. Al-Fakhoura School was where they were gathered before being transferred to Israeli detention and torture camps.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🚨JUST IN: Shocking scenes start to emerge from Gaza following the ceasefire. Scenes of clothes scattered everywhere—these are the belongings of the medical staff from Kamal Adwan Hospital, including Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, as well as other Palestinian civilians. Al-Fakhoura School was where they were all gathered before being transferred to Israeli detention and torture camps. Source: @translatingpal
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇮🇱JUST IN: Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich: We will wipe the smile from the Palestinians, but the screaming will remain. Gaza is uninhabitable and it will remain that way.—Ynet. https://t.co/z7f5Zc38w1
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
People like him deserve respect. They acknowledge the reality and have humanity, thank you Eli. https://t.co/wrucSiArVg
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Alec, an anti-Zionist Jew living in Israel. I believe this state operates as an apartheid system, having ethnically cleansed and brutalized many people since its inception. The ongoing occupation and violence are necessary for its existence as a Jewish state, which I oppose. I see this identity as the root of our problems and long for a day when it is replaced with one that reflects freedom and equality for all citizens. Free Palestine, and please share this message.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. I'm Alec. I'm an anti Zionist Jew. I live in occupied Palestine, the state of Israel. This state is an apartheid state that since the moment of its inception had to ethnically cleanse thousands of people, 100 thousands of people, brutalize, torture, occupy millions of people, and now it have also to commit genocide in order to continue to exist as a Jewish state.
I oppose the existence of this state and its definition as a Jewish state because I think it's the source of all our problem. I'm waiting for the day that this identity card will be replaced with one that says free, democratic, democratic, democratic, democratic, democratic, the free and equal citizens. Free Palestine, and please share this message.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Source: https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS65dtHx4/
reSee.it AI Summary
I have received disturbing initial testimonies about sexual violence committed by Israeli occupation soldiers at Kamal Adwan Hospital. The accounts detail assaults on nurses, patients, and their companions, where soldiers threatened women to remove their clothing. One nurse described being violently struck when she resisted, while another woman was assaulted for refusing to remove her hijab. Additional testimonies reveal similar abuses, including physical aggression and degrading treatment, highlighting a pattern of intimidation and humiliation.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: We have obtained horrifying initial testimonies about the sexual violence perpetrated by Israeli occupation soldiers against nurses, patients, and their companions at Kamal Adwan Hospital and in front of the individual hall. The testimonies include harrowing details of assaults targeting professional dignity, where soldiers forced women to remove their clothing under threats and intimidation. One testimony stated that a nurse was forcibly made by a soldier to remove her trousers while he groped her. When she attempted to resist, he struck her violently in the face, causing her nose to bleed. Another testimony mentioned that the soldiers threatened women, saying, "Take it off, or we'll remove it by force." When one of the women refused to remove her hijab, a soldier assaulted her by tearing off her cloak, exposing parts of her body. One victim recounted being dragged by a soldier who pressed his weapon against her chest, saying, "Take it off now," while hurling obscene words at her. Other girls were subjected to similar abuses, where soldiers attacked them by pulling their hair and forcing their heads down violently at one of the hospital entrances, accompanied by demeaning gestures and vulgar language.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Israel killed writer and artist Walaa Jomaa, along with her husband Ahmed Sallam and his sister, by an airstrike on Al-Nuseirat camp during the night hours…. https://t.co/1hHjjFNGtV
reSee.it AI Summary
Izzat Al-Rishq from Hamas urges the public to intensify actions against the Zionist enemy and its allies. He reflects on the need for sustained movements, suggesting that had there been a global response to the Baptist Hospital massacre, the recent Beit Lahia massacre might not have occurred. He emphasizes that the enemy responds only to pain, highlighting a perceived lack of humanity in their actions. Al-Rishq calls for immediate and decisive action, questioning the timing of such efforts.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: CALL TO ACTION Hamas Political Bureau member Izzat Al-Rishq: “We will not tire of calling on the sons of the nation to escalate the movements against the zionist enemy and its allies in the war. If the occupation’s embassies and interests around the world had been besieged by ongoing, escalating, and open movements a year ago, specifically since the Baptist Hospital massacre, would the enemy have dared to commit the Beit Lahia massacre this morning at dawn?! Our enemy does not understand the languages of humanity, as it is inherently devoid of them, and acts like a savage creature that only stops when it feels pain. If not now, then when?!”
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇮🇱JUST IN: “my favorite animal is a N*gg*r” A young Israeli in Eilat uploaded a video to TikTok in which he takes an Ethiopian boy and spits in his face while saying "my favorite animal is a nig**r." The boy was shocked and went home crying. https://t.co/TKNdmDP3ts
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
From his hospital bed in the ICU at Kamal Adwan Hospital, surrounded by injured and standing medical staff, Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya delivered a powerful speech. Listen. https://t.co/fhSwIOt4ZA
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared breaking news about a leak involving the personal information of over 35,000 Mossad agents, as reported by a channel called Mediterranean Man. The leak includes details of various Israeli security personnel, and I verified one name, Colonel Moshe Tetro, confirming the authenticity of the data. I emphasized that the information is shared for journalistic purposes only and does not promote illegal activities. Additionally, I clarified that my account operates independently and does not endorse harmful actions.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: The information of more than 35,000 Mossad agents has been leaked. [Link to leak in first reply] A channel called Mediterranean Man claims to have obtained classified Israeli data, including personal information of IDF, Mossad, Shin Bet, and other Israeli security personnel. A test was done on a random name from the leak, identifying it as Colonel Moshe Tetro, the Israeli Defense Attaché to Benelux, NATO, and the EU, along with his personal contact details. According to what was shared, this information is authentic. Disclaimer: Information is shared for journalistic purposes, not to incite violence or illegal actions.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Link: https://t.me/SuppressedVoice/2292 DISCLAIMER: We do not participate in, endorse, or encourage illegal or harmful activities. All content shared on this account is intended solely for informational and journalistic purposes. We act independently, without affiliation to any group, organization, or political party.
Suppressed News.
t.me
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Channel that leaked the information and source: https://t.me/medmannews
Mediterranean Man
For news and coping. Owner is Mediterranean Man. To buy Ads or inquires regarding the administrative affairs of the channels, its posts or conversation, DM @Shrenke If you wish to contact the owner - for casual conversation or info, @MedManTG
t.me
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇩🇪🇮🇱JUST IN: Germany finds it “hard to imagine” carrying out arrests based on the ICC’s warrants against Netanyahu, citing their “historical responsibility” due to their Nazi history. https://t.co/gLVhhhMN0w
Video Transcript AI Summary
Es fällt mir schwer, mir vorzustellen, dass auf dieser Grundlage in Deutschland Verhaftungen stattfinden. Wir haben eine Erklärung abgegeben, die zwei Bedingungen berücksichtigt: die Bedeutung des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes, den wir unterstützen, und die geschichtliche Verantwortung. Diese Aspekte sollten bei der Diskussion berücksichtigt werden. Unter Juristen ist die Zuständigkeit des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes in diesem Fall umstritten und muss geprüft werden.
Ist Herr Netanjahu in Deutschland willkommen? Ich habe keine Informationen über Reisepläne des israelischen Ministerpräsidenten. Es gibt keine aktuellen Anfragen aus seinem Büro bezüglich eines Besuchs in Deutschland, daher kann ich dazu nichts weiter sagen.
---
I find it hard to imagine that arrests would take place in Germany on this basis. We issued a statement considering two conditions: the significance of the International Criminal Court, which we support, and historical responsibility. These aspects should be part of the discussion. Among legal experts, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in this case is disputed and needs to be examined.
Is Mr. Netanyahu welcome in Germany? I have no information on the Israeli Prime Minister's travel plans. There are no current inquiries from his office about a visit to Germany, so I cannot comment further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ich könnte mich dazu hinreißen lassen, zu sagen, dass es mir schwerfällt, mir vorzustellen, dass wir auf dieser Grundlage Verhaftungen in Deutschland durchführen. Wir haben ja deswegen eine Erklärung gemacht, die beiden Bedingungen, über die wir sprechen, gerecht werden müssen. Das ist einerseits die Bedeutung des Internationalen Strafgerichtshofes, den wir sehr unterstützen und andererseits die von Ihnen angeführte geschichtliche Verantwortung. Und insofern ist auch im Lichte dieses dieser beiden Aspekte, ist diese Sprechererklärung oder ist die Erklärung zu sehen. Aber es ist natürlich etwas, das haben Sie sicherlich wahrgenommen, dass unter Juristen dieser Schritt nicht unumstritten ist, ob die Zuständigkeit des Internationalen Strafgerichtshof in diesem Fall einschlägig ist und auf so etwas will ja geprüft sein.
Ist Herr Netanja in Deutschland willkommen? Über Reisepläne des israelischen Ministerpräsidenten ist mir nichts bekannt. Ich hab mich nach einer Reiseplan gefragt, ich hab gefragt, ob er willkommen ist. Ich habe ihn, habe keine akuten Anfragen aus dem Büro des Premierministers Israels, dass er nach Deutschland kommen will und insofern muss ich mich dazu nicht weiter aussagen.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️A zionist at the beginning of the video says: “I'M GONNA TEACH MY KIDS TO EXTERMINATE ALL OF YOU!” Also a woman waved a land deed as she left the Kingsway Jewish Center in Flatbush, Brooklyn, where stolen Palestinian land was sold tonight. “I JUST BOUGHT LAND IN PALESTINE” https://t.co/kAS0gcUoyo
Video Transcript AI Summary
My kids were exterminating. Get out of my face! I have the right to serve. 40 minutes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My kids were exterminating. Fuck you. You're the punches out of my face. Master support. Damn fucking Klaus.
Get out. What do you look? Get out of here. I have the right to serve. 40 minutes.
Stand
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Downloadable here: https://t.co/dRPSJ6fGmw
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's military actions in Gaza have drawn severe criticism, particularly regarding the use of white phosphorus, which is banned in civilian areas under international law. Human rights groups have documented systematic war crimes, including indiscriminate attacks on civilians and infrastructure. The staggering death toll and destruction raise questions about Israel's justification for its actions, which many view as an extermination campaign rather than self-defense. The targeting of hospitals and medical personnel further complicates the situation, as international humanitarian law protects these entities. Calls for accountability are growing, with discussions around potential investigations by the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice. The ongoing blockade and siege on Gaza exacerbate humanitarian crises, leading to accusations of forced starvation and violations of basic human rights. The situation reflects a broader pattern of oppression and discrimination against Palestinians, raising urgent calls for justice and change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is changing the skyline of the Gaza Strip.
Speaker 1: Well, Gaza is, of course, on the sea. Nonstop attacks and bombardment of the Strip.
Speaker 2: Some have called it an open air business. Israel has dropped white phosphorus on civilians.
Speaker 1: Human rights groups have accused Israeli forces of using the chemical white phosphorus in Gaza and Lebanon.
Speaker 3: International law is clear that the use of white phosphorus is prohibited in areas with concentrations of civilians. This weapon was being used. The amnesty and other human rights groups have found to reach the level of, war crimes.
Speaker 4: Allowing such weapon to be used in urban areas exposes Israel to very strong accusations of war crimes.
Speaker 5: It's very clear there's no way you can use airburst white phosphorus in a place like Gaza without having indiscriminate effects on civilians.
Speaker 0: There clearly are systematic war crimes. White phosphorus is the least of it. You know, there are much more serious things going on in gossip than white phosphorus.
Speaker 6: And the staggering death toll, I think, that demonstrates really the the the total disregard, Israel has and and the way that Israel views Palestinian lives as as disposable.
Speaker 7: Ultimately, when you target hospitals, when you target medical workers, when you target those who are protected under international law, then if you target them militarily, then you have to provide justification for doing that.
Speaker 8: The level of destruction is so massive that no one no one can claim that this is self defense. This is an extermination campaign, and it's shocking that international community doesn't come to census and stop this.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Once I understood what I was part of, what I did, and what's going on, I could not remain silent anymore. The story here is preventing Palestine.
Speaker 3: On 7th October after the horrific Hamas attack on, Israel, Israel retaliated by bombing, Gaza, committing many, atrocities that Amnesty and other human rights groups have found to reach the level of war crimes. This is because some of them were indiscriminate, meaning that the Israeli military is not adequately distinguishing between military targets and military objectives on the one hand and civilian targets and civilian objectives on the other hand. And we see that through the astronomical casualty rates in Gaza. In southern Lebanon, Hezbollah and other militants or other armed groups also joined the battle and started firing at military targets in, Israel, and Israel also started firing into Lebanon. We've done several investigations about the unlawfulness of some Israeli attacks, including the use of white phosphorus and Qaeda on October 16, and we've called for both of those incidents to be investigated as war crimes.
Speaker 0: My name is Kenneth Roth. And for nearly 3 decades, I was the executive director of Human Rights Watch. I left, about 15 months ago and am currently a visiting professor at Princeton School of Public and International Affairs. As we see, Israel is using white phosphorus on occasion in Gaza, in Southern Lebanon. It has to have a very special reason for doing that.
You know, is there, an urgent need to light up an area? Is there an urgent need to to create a smoke screen that couldn't be created in some other way? We have to do the analysis, but it's difficult to understand why in these heavily populated areas Israel would ever resort to such a broadly condemned weapon as white phosphorus.
Speaker 3: So we have a team based in the occupied Palestinian, territory. What we were able to do in Gaza is find photographs and videos that people had filmed of the white phosphorus being used. It has a very distinctive way that it spreads in the air, and those are the kinds of videos and images that we verified. There are 2 ways that we, use information and use it to form our cases. So one is interviews with officials and affected residents, and the other is collecting video and photographic evidence and verifying and analyzing those.
Four attacks that we looked into, we first gathered the photographic and video evidence of the use of, white phosphorus, as well as the impact of the white phosphorus on civilian infrastructure and civilians. We sent those to our digital, to our evidence lab team who then, verified those, videos. So what that means is that they are able to geolocate videos and the pictures, and they're able to confirm their authenticity as well as the time that they were taken to confirm that, you know, these attacks did happen on this day on in this particular location. We also looked at photographs, taken on the Israeli side of the border showing Israeli tanks as well as 1 55 millimeter white phosphorus rounds. We were able to identify them as white phosphorus rounds due to the nomenclature on the tank rounds that were visible.
And therefore, that was kind of another step of verification that, yes, on the Israeli side of the border, there were white phosphorus munitions. Throughout most of our investigation, we do rely very heavily on evidence that's collected by journalists. In the case of the investigation into white phosphorus, for example, we did rely on, photographs and videos that were taken by photographers from various different agencies, including agency to show white phosphorus, munition rounds on the Israeli side of the border close to Gaza. White phosphorus is a very dangerous substance when it comes into contact with humans. It can cause respiratory damage, organ failure, and very, very severe burns that can't be treated with water.
Speaker 0: White phosphorus is extraordinarily dangerous because if it lands on the human skin, it burns and burns and burns. It is very difficult to treat, and so it leaves horrendous injuries. And that's why it is strongly disfavored.
Speaker 1: As a soldier, you're actually trained. It's called gash gashara. You you basically need to if you have, an organ that was infected, you need to carve the infected part out in order to stop it from continuing into your body and into that organ. Yeah. Because that's the only way to stop it, or choke it from oxygen.
Yeah. But, like, you that's not something you can do in the field. So you basically need to carve it out, the infected part in order for it not to continue. It's it's a horrible weapon.
Speaker 0: To use it in populated areas has this danger of not only, you know, potentially harming civilians, but harming them in an awful, painful way. And so there is a strong pressure on governments not to use white phosphorus in populated areas.
Speaker 3: So Amnesty International and other rights groups have previously documented, the Israeli military's use of white phosphorus, particularly in Gaza in 2009, and they used it very often. There was an international outrage against the use of white phosphorus. So there was a case that was brought before the Israeli judiciary. In 2013, the Israeli military committed to restricting the use of white phosphorus. However, as we're seeing from their operations, today, they didn't fulfill that pledge or that, promise, and they continue to use white phosphorus sometimes in ways that are unlawful.
Speaker 4: My name is Mikhail Spad. I'm an Israeli human rights lawyer, and I've also, litigated, the challenge to the use of, weapons with white phosphorus during a cast led operation in 2,008, 9 in the Israeli Supreme Court? Well, there is a debate on the question of, the legality of white phosphorus. We have, an international treaty, the convention on certain conventional weapons that has a protocol that prohibits or restricts the use of incendiary weapons. That is weapons that are meant to, inflame and, set fire, to the target.
White phosphorus can also inflame a lot of time after it is being deployed. So, we have evidence from use of white phosphorus in the Gaza Strip in 2,008, 9, that even after the armed, campaign was over and people went back to their homes, children have been suffering from severe wounds because they came they were exposed to White Phosphorus. So, White Phosphorus meets the criteria of an incendiary weapon that, according to international law, is not to be used in residential areas. However, the definition in the convention for some people has a loophole because it states that, incendiary weapons are such weapons that their primary use is to set fire. I would say, as as a lawyer that deals with such matters, quite a bit that whether it is an incendiary weapon or not, it is definitely a weapon that is indiscriminate in its nature.
That means that when you use white phosphorus and you deploy it over an area, it's not targeted. It is being used in a bomb that opens up in the air and then dozens of small particles with white phosphorus are landed on a certain area. And by its nature, it does not distinguish between legitimate or lawful and unlawful, targets. And so, it is indiscriminate by its nature and that is why our argument in the Israeli Supreme Court was that this is a weapon that, is prohibited from being used in an area where you have civilians. Only in open area it is possible to use that weapon.
Speaker 8: It's been used by Israel in 2008, 2009, and it was deemed illegal by a commission of inquiry which investigated the cas led operation.
Speaker 4: Well, after the the use of white phosphorus in the cast led operation Israel has waged in Gaza during 2,008, 9, I litigated challenge to the legality of the use of white phosphorus in urban areas. I filed a high court petition to the Israeli Supreme Court on behalf of a list of, Israeli human rights activists, and we demanded that the army is coerced to issue commands that would prohibit the use of white phosphorus inhabited areas. In the framework of that litigation, I have asked, forensic architecture and SITO Studios, to provide a spatial analysis of how, white phosphorus, affects, an area where it is deployed.
Speaker 5: My name is Bradley Samuels, and I'm director at C2. We describe C2's work as combining, data and design to create new pathways for justice. This typically means that we're working on fact finding and reporting focused on human rights violations, usually at the intersection of law, technology, and design. So we worked on a a report in 2009 focused on the use of white phosphorus munitions in urban environments. Because white phosphorus is often considered an indiscriminate munition, and we wanted to better understand how the weapon was being deployed, specifically in urban environments and to address this question of whether it could be truly targeted, with, precision, or whether it was in fact indiscriminate.
It was a very robust collaboration between C2 and Forensic Architecture. There was a tremendous amount of data to go through. Everything from photographs, to videos of white phosphorus being used to, specifications of technical performance.
Speaker 4: And, in order to for the judges to better understand what are the outcomes of the use of white force versus urban areas. I asked them, to generate computerized model in which we can show the effect of such bombs being deployed. Michael framed the legal questions that were really driving this project. So the IDF has sort of
Speaker 5: claimed in the past and others, the US military, who who've used it in Iraq, that white phosphorus is deployed as a smokescreen. So not for its incendiary effects. Their argument their argument is that they deploy it to, mask movements of troops and and things like this. We wanted to focus on the secondary effects. Right?
Which were the fact that this does cause fires. It does burn people. And so we focused on what we what we call an effects based analysis.
Speaker 0: There is a strong presumption against using white phosphorus in any place where there's a significant civilian population simply because it's so likely to do grievous harm to those civilians. So in each case, you've gotta look at what happened. You know, what was the supposed rationale? You know, was it really urgent to illuminate the area? Was it urgent to create a a smoke screen?
It's hard to imagine what those reasons would be in the middle of Gaza. But these are the questions that you have to ask before concluding that the use of white phosphorus was a war crime.
Speaker 5: Yeah. So white phosphorus, when used in warfare, really depends on location, its analysis. It it's really not possible to evaluate it based on the munition alone. It's really an evaluation of the munition in relation to the context in which it's deployed. It's an air burst munition, so it's fired from an artillery, and it bursts anywhere between 15 and 200 meters above the ground.
It it opens, and inside, there's a 116 phosphorus soaked felt wedges, which as soon as they come into contact with oxygen, begin to burn. And so you can imagine, you know, whether it's 50 meters or 200 meters, they're descending from the sky, a 116 of them, and they fall essentially in elliptical pattern. But the size of that ellipse can vary dramatically based on angle of fire, height of burst, and things like this. Anything that happens within the ellipse is indeterminate. The wedges will fall within that area, but you cannot control exactly where.
They're not there's no propulsion. There's no guidance. They're just falling based on gravity at that point. And if you're using this in a very densely populated urban environment, you must expect that anywhere within the ellipse will be potentially covered in in felt wedges that are that are burning and cause fires and can do all kinds of damage. Yeah.
During Operation Cast Lead, there's a number of examples of the ways in which airburst white phosphorus has caused harm to civilians. So let's say a piece of phosphorus wedge falls on the ground, it might be there for days, it might burn out, but then a child might find it a few days later, flip it over, and will start burning again. It can burn right through their flesh and their bone. It also ricochets, so it may it may land in one area, bounce, and sort of go somewhere else. But I think, you know, the the biggest danger to civilians is the way it causes fires in places where civilians can be trapped.
So it often lands on roofs or balconies or it can go through windows. And there's an example of a school in Gaza where some of the white phosphorus wedges penetrated the window, and they started it started a fire within a space in which students were trapped and died.
Speaker 4: But also, medical crews who came, who have been treating people with, injuries from white phosphorus, they themselves have been injured by the white phosphorus because it continues to burn. That's the monstrosity of that substance. It continues to burn. It touches your skin, It burned the skin. It enters your internal organs and continues to burn.
And that is, really horrific kind of weapon that humanity has created. Well, the finding showed, how horrendous, the deployment of, of bombs with white phosphorus can be in an urban area. What kind of effect it had? How many dozens of civilian objects have been set in fire because of the white phosphorus? Also, the report managed to show what would have been the effect if the same kind of munition would have been deployed in other, cities of the world, and how extensive the destruction and the damage such deployment can cause.
Speaker 5: One thing that Michael Spard asked us to do, which I think was very useful, was to simulate its use, not only in Gaza, but in Tel Aviv, in Paris, and New York City. Gaza is the most extreme example. It would cause incredible harm in all of those locations and and Gaza worst of all because it it is so densely populated. But I think to bring home the understanding of how this weapon does damage, not just in one location, but any any urban environment. Right?
Our own urban environment. So that was an important part of the analysis as well.
Speaker 4: In our petition, we demanded that the court, force the army, to issue orders, binding orders that would, restrict the use of, munition that contains white phosphorus so that it will not be allowed to be used at all in areas where you have civilians, in inhabited areas, residential areas, urban areas. That was our request. And according to the description, the judges have provided of those orders, in the judgment. Those orders limit extensively. They use extensively.
They use ammunition with white phosphorus in urban areas, and so the court has accepted that those new orders are enough and that they adhere to international law. The problem was that such orders, can always be changed. So, I don't know what happened, in the last 12 years since the judgment was given, and whether those orders have been indeed changed.
Speaker 5: Submission of this, work to the high court in Israel was about regulating its future use and not determining culpability for past use. I mean, it's it's very obvious and very clear that white phosphorus was used in Operation Cast Lead. It's that's not debatable. It's it's very easy to see. As we've seen, white phosphorus has been used again, this past year in 2023.
The problems remain exactly the same. Should not be used. It should be clearly condemned and, banned. Over 10 years ago that we did this work, and in some way, the work has an absurd quality to it because we're demonstrating something that's obvious. But I think it's important work because without quantifying the effects of this munition, without documenting it thoroughly, and without closing legal loopholes for the use of indiscriminate weapons, it allows states in positions of power to continue to use them with impunity.
And so I'm eager and keen to see if that impunity can be closed down and and more regard can be brought to civilian life.
Speaker 4: No. I think our litigation was very successful in, bringing to the attention of, the military lawyers that allowing such weapon to be used in urban areas exposes Israel to very strong accusations of war crimes.
Speaker 7: There are 2 questions that really arise from from from the use of white phosphorus in particular is, 1, whether it constitutes a war crime by the use of it because it is very difficult to control. And secondly, those who are providing ISRA with such material, whether they can be prosecuted, entities within those states can be prosecuted for providing weapons where they know it's gonna be used for the commission of war crimes.
Speaker 3: So what we are trying to do is push for accountability. Our position has been there should be an arms embargo in Israel given the very high likelihood that, US supplied weapons to Israel, are being used to commit, war crimes and other violations of international law.
Speaker 8: The fact that white phosphorus was used before, criticized internationally condemned, including by a commission of inquiry of an independent commission of inquiry appointed by the United Nations and then used again is to be understood in a framework of tolerated impunity. Israel has been granted impunity for decades.
Speaker 0: The use of white phosphorus in 2009, at that moment, the International Criminal Court did not have jurisdiction. So that doesn't tell us anything about what the International Criminal Court will do today where it does have jurisdiction. So that's, you know, one big difference between prior uses and this one. The fact that Israel may have said, oh, you know, back in 2009, we won't use it again. You know, the Israeli government also ratified these treaties saying that they wouldn't bomb civilians, and they ignored those treaties.
So, you know, I'm not sure how much the Israeli government's word matters here. We have to judge what it did. There clearly are systematic war crimes. White phosphorus is the least of it. You know, there are much more serious things going on in Gaza than white phosphorus.
Speaker 7: My name is Toby Catton. I'm a barrister. The rules of international humanitarian law are strict for a reason, and any state that signs up to a treaty is is bound by its contents. So for example, if we look at the genocide convention as as an example, there is an obligation to respect the terms of that of that treaty, but there is also an obligation on states to prevent a genocide.
Speaker 0: One important thing to know about international humanitarian law is that war crimes by one side do not justify war crimes by the other. So even if we accept that what Hamas did on October 7th was horrible, these are war crimes, they they, violate the basic provisions of humanitarian law, That does not justify Israel ignoring international humanitarian law.
Speaker 8: My name is Francesca Albanese, and I am the UN special reporteur on the human rights situation in the Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967. While Israel has the right to protect itself, protect its territory, and its citizens, the response was to be given within the limits of international humanitarian law. And, the attack instead, the assault has been absolutely violent, indiscriminate. It seems to me that the target was, as many soldiers on the ground say, to destroy, displace, and settle, and it's becoming clearer and clearer.
Speaker 0: And there are several respects in which the Israeli attacks in Gaza violate mandatory law. 1st, in some cases, they actually are targeting civilian targets where it's hard to understand what's the military purpose. They're they bombed Islamic University of Gaza. It has been bombing, you know, big apartment buildings, prestige addresses, not because there's a Hamas presence there of any significance, but just to sort of show that there'd be consequences on civilians and to sort of force civilians to stand up to Hamas.
Speaker 8: Between 60 70% of Gaza's civilian infrastructure has been either destroyed or severely damaged. There has been the bombing of schools, mosques, bakeries, electricity, the electricity system, the sewage system.
Speaker 0: So even the basic provision that you don't target civilians and the civilian structures has been violent. More generally, Israel has been firing indiscriminately into certain civilian populated areas. So just to give an example, the Jabaliyah refugee. Israel says there were Hamas tunnels underneath, that it was a Hamas command headquarters of sorts. Let's accept that that's true.
But Israel chose to drop 2,000 pound bombs in the middle of a heavily populated refugee camp.
Speaker 7: In the case of the refugee camp that was hit, where they believed that there was one Hamas leader there, and then that results in several 100 civilian deaths. It is very difficult to justify that as military necessity.
Speaker 0: So this kind of, you know, use of extremely heavy weaponry, high explosives in the middle of many civilians, that defines an indiscriminate attack.
Speaker 8: Even the Washington Post and then the New York Times a few weeks ago declared that Israel has been using at least 200 times. £2,000 bombs are equivalent to the use of over 2 nuclear bombs over such a small piece of land of 365 square kilometers. Of course, this is destructive.
Speaker 4: What we're seeing definitely raises the suspicion that Israel has engaged in indiscriminate attacks of civilian and residential areas in Gaza.
Speaker 0: And we see time and time again that they are going after targets knowing that many civilians will be killed. So they they will attack a house because there's maybe a Hamas fighter who lives there without regard to his family. They will, you know, attack, major buildings because of an ostensible Hamas presence without regard to the civilians.
Speaker 8: They know what they're doing, and and they seem to be unstoppable.
Speaker 0: One fundamental provision of international humanitarian law is that health care workers and health care facilities are protected. Now that protection can be lost if the opposing military uses these facilities for military purposes, but there's a strong presumption against attacking them. Now in the case of Gaza, the World Health Organization has outlined numerous cases in which Israeli forces have attacked health care officials, ambulances, hospitals, and the like. In some cases, Israel says, oh, Hamas was using these, But when you look at the overall effect
Speaker 7: Quite often, the argument which is used is that you have militants hiding amongst medical personnel. And we've seen some of the medical personnel being interviewed. Effectively, there's no basis for concluding that that Hamas is hiding in hospitals and using the cover of the Red Cross or Red Crescent.
Speaker 1: It is a horrific night in Gaza where an airstrike hit the hospital, killing 100.
Speaker 2: An Israeli airstrike on a hospital in Central Gaza. Hundreds of people were killed at a Gaza City hospital. Israeli airstrike hit a hospital in Gaza a short time ago with fears that 100 are dead.
Speaker 0: And there is no allegation that Hamas was firing from the hospitals. Just these, you know, unproven allegations of a headquarters that has not been demonstrated. And all we've seen so far is frankly a minimal Hamas presence that does not justify this shutting down of a good part of the civilian medical system in Gaza.
Speaker 7: Ultimately, when you target hospitals, when you target medical workers, when you target those who are protected under international law, then if you target them militarily, then you have to provide justification for doing that.
Speaker 2: Israeli tag shells struck a group of journalists in Lebanon on October 13th. 9th National and Human Rights Watch have released findings on the Israeli attack on journalists in Lebanon. Reuters journalist Isam Abdallah has was killed and 6 others were injured during the attack.
Speaker 0: There are many important civilian officials, civilian institutions that have been hit by the Israeli bombardment. And in most cases, it's difficult to know were they precisely targeted or is this just a product of indiscriminate warfare. There's one case that Human Rights Watch was able to look into actually in southern Lebanon, not in Gaza, where it was quite clear that Israeli forces deliberately targeted a group of journalists who were well marked. They were away from any fighting. They killed 1 Reuters journalist and injured 6.
Speaker 3: We have investigated, the October 13 attack on a group of journalists in South Lebanon that resulted in the killing of Ayesom Abdallah from Reuters, as well as the injury of 6 other journalists from Reuters, AFP, and Al Jazeera. We spent about 2 months investigating that particular, attack. We analyzed over a 100 photos and videos that were captured by the journalists on the scene as well as by journalists who were nearby. So all of this led us to the conclusion that the Israeli military either knew or should have known that the group of individuals were civilians, not a military target.
Speaker 6: In terms of the killing of journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists has reported that nearly 70 journalists have been killed, since the beginning of the conflict. Journalists must never ever be a target for military action. They are there to report, on what's happening. They are our eyes and ears, and they're there to bear witness to, crimes that are being committed by all sides.
Speaker 9: In the last few minutes also, we've had the Israeli defense minister coming out and saying that he is ordering a siege on Gaza
Speaker 1: as Israel enforces a complete siege.
Speaker 3: With Israel's military having ordered a total siege on Gaza.
Speaker 0: One of the clearest war crimes that the Israeli military is committing is the siege that it is imposing on Palestinian civilians in Gaza. This is so clear that even the International Criminal Court chief prosecutor Karim Khan, who has been very reluctant to get involved, even he warned Israel that if you maintain the siege, don't be surprised of my office issues or crime charges.
Speaker 1: In this regard, I have to say that Israel has clear obligations in relation to its war with mass. Not just moral obligations but legal obligations to comply with the laws of armed conflict.
Speaker 7: So when we look at the blockade now, when we look at the conditions that the people of Gaza have been subjected to, some amounting to, to a a withholding of basic necessities, water, electricity, food. We also have to look at, forced starvation as a war crime, and it's something that, obviously, the ICC would have jurisdiction to consider.
Speaker 0: So it is serious. Now the humanitarian law, the Geneva conventions say that even in the middle of a war, you have a duty to allow civilians in need access to humanitarian aid. The United Nations has plenty of aid. It's been sitting there in Egypt just across the border ready to come in, and the Israeli government has been allowing it in, sometimes not at all, sometimes only in drips and droughts. And this comes on top of a 16 year blockade.
Speaker 6: Not being allowed to leave the territory. They're essentially trapped in in Gaza.
Speaker 0: And so creating a population in Gaza that is dependent on humanitarian aid. And since October 7th, much of that has been shut off.
Speaker 6: People are suffering a great deal, under bombardment. They are not eating. They are not sleeping. They are in constant fear. They are running from place to place to seek safety.
But, of course, there is no place safe in Gaza. There is nowhere for them to go.
Speaker 0: And so this is a clear violation of humanitarian law. And the bits and pieces that are allowed in right now in no sense replicate the 500 trucks a day of commercial and humanitarian aid that were coming into Gaza before October 7th. The drips and drabs that Israel allows in in no sense replicates the basic needs that the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza has, and those needs remain unmet. One thing that worries me and many others is that the Israeli government may be discounting the value of Palestinian civilian life because of signals from the top. The most senior leaders are giving the opposite signal.
The defense minister says these are all human animals. Netanyahu says, citing a biblical verse, he suggests it's okay to kill men, women, children, and all animals. This kind of signal from the top is an invitation to war crimes.
Speaker 7: When we see the kind of language which is being used by leading Israeli politicians to flatten Gaza, to to remove all Palestinians and to say that there are no civilians in Gaza because they voted for Hamas. So so they've effectively sided with with a terrorist organization. That's that's the kind of language which is being used. And then you you hear the language being used as to what the Israeli administration's intentions are when the conflict ends, and it will end at some point. Their intention is to govern Gaza, is to expand settlements into Gaza.
Speaker 8: I'm personally shocked by how overt the genocidal intent has been across various messages passed in various arguments made by, Israeli, political leaders, military leaders, and then now resonates and gets amplified across various segments of the society who are calling for leveling Gaza, flattening Gaza, erasing Gaza, and pushing the population out of Gaza.
Speaker 1: My name is Yehuda Shaul, born and raised in Jerusalem. I graduated high school. I joined the IDF. In Israel, we have a draft. In my time, it was 3 years from men, so I served 3 years in the military.
I cannot un know what I know. I cannot undo what I did, but I can dedicate the rest of my life to try to bring the occupation to an end. It's about ending a reality where millions of Palestinians are systematically discriminated with our rights and dignity. One of the things we used to do a lot in in in the military was what we call in the IDF to make our presence felt. You bump into a house.
It's not a house we had intelligence about. Yeah. It's a random house. Bump into the house, wake up the family, search the place. You can yourself imagine the dynamics.
What happens when military unit enters to your house 2 o'clock in the morning? Yeah. Finish searching, go out to the street, some make some noise, knock on some doors, throw some shock grenades, run to the other corner of the street, invade another random house, wake up the next family. And that's basically how you spend your 8 hour shift. Basically, intimidation.
The only way to rule people against their will without giving them rights forever is by make them fear you. And once they get used to a level of fear, you have to increase it and increase it. That is the orders. Yeah. That's the mission statement.
That's why these patrols exist until today. One of the first things that opened my my mind, my eyes that brought me to ask questions, during my service was the fact that settlers were attacking Palestinians, in many cases, right in front of us. Our orders were not to intervene. Our mission as soldiers there was to protect the settlers. And if we see settlers attacking Palestinians, it's not our job.
Basically, the the reality is that you have in the same territory, in the same area, you have 2 populations, 2 communities, Israeli settlers and Palestinians. They live under 2 different legal systems enforced by 2 different executive branches. So you have the army enforcing martial law on Palestinians, and you have these very civilian police supposed to enforce Israeli civilian law on settlers. Let's say I'm an Israeli. You're a Palestinian, and let's assume we both throw stones at each other.
And let's assume for the same of this demonstration is we both get arrested. As an Israeli throwing stones, I committed a criminal offense. As a Palestinian throwing stones, you committed a security offense, a terrorist offense. If they wanna keep me in custody, they need to bring me in front of a judge within 24 hours. I can demand to speak to a lawyer right away before my first interrogation.
You, we can keep for a few days without a lawyer. You, we can keep a few days before we bring you in front of a judge. Fundamentally, the discrimination is built in the system. What I'm trying to say is that the lack of law enforcement is not a bug in the system. It's a feature of the system.
It's the structure, the way it's designed. The Israeli occupation is an ongoing offensive campaign against Palestinian independence that didn't stop for one second from June 67. Millions of offensive actions that are taking place all the time everywhere in the occupied territories. Every new house you build in a settlement, you reoccupy the territories. Every house you bump into in the middle of the night to create a sense of being chased inside the Palestinian population to make your presence felt, you reoccupy the territories.
Every random checkpoint you put on a highway to disrupt the day to day routine of people in the area, you reoccupy the territories. Everything we do is an offensive act to entrench our rule and prevent Palestinian independence. The the story here is preventing Palestine.
Speaker 7: Well, certainly, I've mentioned the crime apartheid, more than once, and one of the the foundations for that is the Human Rights Watch report. So this was one of the first and, well documented, well researched reports that looked at all aspects of the treatment of Palestinians, as compared to to the treatment of, Israelis, Israeli Jews.
Speaker 0: Human Rights Watch issued our report finding the Israeli government to be committing the crime of apartheid. And so we conducted a very detailed factual investigation, and we did not make an analogy to South Africa. This is not an historical report. This is a legal report. We applied 2 treaties, the UN Convention against Apartheid and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, both of which define apartheid.
And they require, an intent by one racial or ethnic group to dominate another, and we found that to exist actually in in both Israel proper and the occupied territory. And it requires systematic oppression and examples of that oppression in the form of inhumane acts. And we found that that oppression and those inhumane acts had taken place within the occupied territory. And so we concluded that there is apartheid in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. And we did this in a 200 plus page report filled with details.
What was interesting is the Israeli government didn't know what to do with that. They couldn't find anything factually or legally wrong. Their supporters tried the usual name calling, you know, you're biased, you're anti semitic, but they had nothing to say, because it was accurate.
Speaker 8: As I look at the situation in the occupied Palestinian Palestinian territory, of course, it's apartheid.
Speaker 0: Now October 7th has only accelerated that pressure because it is showing that this endless oppression, this endless occupation, this apartheid is not tolerable for Palestinians living under it. Israel has enjoyed many, many years of impunity for the way it treats Palestine civilians. Israeli courts don't oversee the prosecution for the most part of Israeli soldiers. It's extremely rare when that happens. There's been no international pressure.
And so for the most part, Israeli war crimes have happened without criminal consequences.
Speaker 7: The one thing that we see quite often with Israel is they will completely disregard what anyone outside of Israel says. They'll disregard the United Nations. They'll disregard the test criminal court.
Speaker 0: Now it could be different because the International Criminal Court today does have jurisdiction over anything that Israel does in Gaza.
Speaker 3: So, of course, the ultimate end is, accountability. We're also calling for the, International Criminal Courts, which has jurisdiction over the Palestinian territories to also investigate those attacks.
Speaker 4: Obviously, the international criminal court, is already investigating suspicions, of Israeli violations of international, laws of war. But, it seems that, for the ICC to target Israel is a very, very risky, drill, because of Israel's political might.
Speaker 6: The scale and the the level of impunity that Israel has enjoyed over the past few decades is really at the heart of the human rights crisis that we see in Israel and and Palestine, and that cannot be allowed to to continue.
Speaker 7: I think what happens in the International Criminal Court is incredibly important, but it is just one part of a much broader picture of of what we need to be thinking of. We also have the International Court of Justice just across the road from the International Court that has jurisdiction to do with state responsibilities.
Speaker 2: Well, the world is awaiting a decision by the International Court of Justice on whether or not Israel has indeed committed acts of genocide in Gaza.
Speaker 10: That South Africa considers Israel to be responsible for committing genocide in Gaza and for failing to prevent and punish genocidal acts.
Speaker 8: I'm glad South Africa had the moral courage, the lucidity to take the case to the ICJ because this is now necessary. Someone needs to make a cease which has not been violated.
Speaker 5: As an American Jew, it's very concerning, especially specifically
Speaker 1: with
Speaker 5: in regard to the lack of focus on on civilian life and civilian casualties.
Speaker 6: This is part of a cycle of of violence, that will continue to repeat unless the root causes are addressed, which means dismantling Israel's system of apartheid. It means ending the blockade on Gaza, and it means ensuring accountability for crimes committed by Israel.
Speaker 7: The question that we have to ask, if we do nothing now, as we've done nothing for the last few decades as far as Palestine is concerned, but if we do nothing now, if we don't hold those who are responsible, if we don't hold them accountable through a judicial process, we have to ask ourselves, what is the next conflict gonna look like?
Speaker 1: If we will keep permanent military rule over Gaza after this war, if a year or 2 or 3 will pass by with IDF presence throughout the Gaza Strip, the danger of resettling Gaza is gonna grow exponentially.
Speaker 8: For me, the collapse of the value system system of justice, human rights, freedom of and equality that we have built, in the aftermath of the second world war and the betrayal of the never again never again that we promised ourselves as a collective, as a world, society, as a people of the world after the holocaust. We are not able to hone horror that promise.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇵🇸🇮🇱BREAKING: A new film titled “The Evidence” EXPOSING Israel’s war crimes and Genocide is now available. It includes photos and videos from journalists documenting events in Gaza. What you will hear and see will leave you shocked. Credit and rights: AA, @gazanotice https://t.co/XkkPE5KxGm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel's military actions in Gaza have drawn accusations of war crimes, particularly regarding the use of white phosphorus in civilian areas. Human rights organizations argue that this indiscriminate weapon causes severe harm and violates international law. The staggering civilian death toll and destruction of infrastructure raise concerns about Israel's disregard for Palestinian lives. Attacks on hospitals and medical personnel further exacerbate the situation, with claims that such actions lack justification under humanitarian law. The ongoing siege on Gaza has led to severe shortages of basic necessities, contributing to a humanitarian crisis. Calls for accountability and an arms embargo against Israel are growing, as the international community grapples with the implications of these actions and the need for justice in the region.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel is changing the skyline of the Gaza Strip.
Speaker 1: Well, Gaza is, of course, a the sea. Non stop attacks. And bombardment of the Strip.
Speaker 2: Some have called it an open air business. Israel has dropped white phosphorus on civilians.
Speaker 1: Human rights groups have accused Israeli forces of using the chemical white phosphorus in Gaza and Lebanon.
Speaker 3: International law is clear that the use of white phosphorus is prohibited in areas with concentrations of civilians. This weapon was being used. Amnesty and other human rights groups have found to reach the level of, war crimes.
Speaker 4: Allowing such weapon to be used in urban areas exposes Israel to very strong accusations of war crimes.
Speaker 5: It's very clear there's no way you can use airburst white phosphorus in a place like Gaza without having indiscriminate effects on civilians.
Speaker 0: There clearly are systematic war crimes. White phosphorus is the least of it. You know, there are much more serious things going on in gossip than white phosphorus.
Speaker 6: And the staggering death toll, I think, that demonstrates, really, the the the total disregard, Israel has and and the way that Israel views Palestinian lives as as disposable.
Speaker 7: Ultimately, when you target hospitals, when you target medical workers, when you target those who are protected under international law, then if you target them militarily, then you have to provide justification for doing that.
Speaker 8: The level of destruction is so massive that no one no one can claim that this is self defense. This is an extermination campaign, and it's shocking that international community doesn't come to census and stop this.
Speaker 9: Yeah. Once I understood what I was part of, what I did, and what's going on, I could not remain silent anymore. The story here is preventing Palestine.
Speaker 3: On 7th October after the horrific Hamas attack on, Israel, Israel retaliated by bombing, Gaza, committing many, atrocities that Amnesty and other human rights groups have found to reach the level of war crimes. This is because some of them were indiscriminate, meaning that the Israeli military is not adequately distinguishing between military targets and military objectives on the one hand and civilian targets and civilian objectives on the other hand. And we see that through the astronomical casualty rates in Gaza. In southern Lebanon, Hezbollah and other militants or other armed groups also joined the battle and started firing at military targets in, Israel, and Israel also started firing into Lebanon. We've done several investigations about the unlawfulness of some Israeli attacks, including the use of white phosphorus in Qaeda on October 16, and we've called for both of those incidents to be investigated as war crimes.
Speaker 0: My name is Kenneth Roth. And for nearly 3 decades, I was the executive director of Human Rights Watch. I left, about 15 months ago and am currently a visiting professor at Princeton's School of Public and International Affairs. As we see, Israel is using white phosphorus on occasion in Gaza, in Southern Lebanon. It has to have a very special reason for doing that.
You know, is there, an urgent need to light up an area? Is there an urgent need to to create a smoke screen that couldn't be created in some other way? We have to do the analysis, but it's difficult to understand why in these heavily populated areas Israel would ever resort to such a broadly condemned weapon as white phosphorus.
Speaker 3: So we have a team based in the occupied Palestinian, territories. What we were able to do in Gaza is find photographs and videos that people had filmed of the white phosphorus being used. It has a very distinctive way that it spreads in the air, and those are the kinds of videos and images that we verified. There are 2 ways that we, use information and use it to form our cases. So one is interviews with officials and affected residents, and the other is collecting video and photographic evidence and verifying and analyzing those.
Four attacks that we looked into, we first gathered the photographic and video evidence of the use of, white phosphorus as well as the impacts of the white phosphorus on civilian infrastructure and civilians. We sent those to our digital, to our evidence lab team who then, verified those, videos. So what that means is that they are able to geolocate videos and the pictures, and they're able to confirm their authenticity as well as the time that they were taken to confirm that, you know, these attacks did happen on this day on in this particular location. We also looked at photographs, taken on the Israeli side of the border showing Israeli tanks as well as 155 millimeter white phosphorus rounds. We were able to identify them as white phosphorus rounds due to the nomenclature on the tank rounds that were visible.
And therefore, that was kind of another step of verification that, yes, on the Israeli side of the border, there were white phosphorus munitions. Throughout most of our investigation, we do rely very heavily on evidence that's collected by journalists. In the case of the investigation into white phosphorus, for example, we did rely on, photographs and videos that were taken by photographers from various different agencies, including an agency to show white phosphorus, ammunition rounds on the Israeli side of the border close to Gaza. White phosphorus is a very dangerous substance when it comes into contact with humans. It can cause respiratory damage, organ failure, and very, very severe burns that can't be treated with water.
Speaker 0: White phosphorus is extraordinarily dangerous because if it lands on the human skin, it burns and burns and burns. It is very difficult to treat, and so it leaves horrendous injuries. And that's why it is strongly disfavored.
Speaker 9: As a soldier, you're actually trained. It's called. You you basically need to if you have, an organ that was infected, you need to carve the infected part out in order to stop it from continuing into your body and into that organ. Yeah. Because that's the only way to stop it, or choke it from oxygen.
Yeah. But, like, you that's not something you can do in the field. So you basically need to carve it out, the infected part in order for it not to continue. It's it's a horrible weapon.
Speaker 0: To use it in populated areas has this danger of not only, you know, potentially harming civilians, but harming them in an awful painful way. And so there is a strong pressure on governments not to use white phosphorus in populated areas.
Speaker 3: So Amnesty International and other rights groups have previously documented, the Israeli military's use of white phosphorus, particularly in Gaza in 2009, and they used it very often. There was an international outrage against the use of white phosphorus. So there was a case that was brought before the Israeli judiciary. In 2013, the Israeli military committed to restricting the use of white phosphorus. However, as we're seeing from their operations, today, they didn't fulfill that pledge or that, promise, and they continue to use white phosphorus sometimes in ways that are unlawful.
Speaker 4: My name is Mikhail Spad. I'm an Israeli human rights lawyer, and I've also, litigated, the challenge to the use of, weapons with white phosphorus during a cast led operation in 2008, 9 in the Israeli Supreme Court. Well, there is, a debate on the question of, the legality of white phosphorus. We have, an international treaty, the convention on certain conventional weapons, that has a protocol that prohibits or restricts the use of incendiary weapons, that is weapons that are meant to, inflame and, set fire, to the target. White Phosphorus can also inflame a lot of time after it is being deployed.
So, we have evidence from use of white phosphorus in the Gaza Strip in 2,008, 9, that even after the armed, campaign was over and people went back to their homes, children have been suffering from severe wounds because they came they were exposed to White Phosphorus. So, White Phosphorus meets the criteria of an incendiary weapon that, according to international law, is not to be used in residential areas. However, the definition in the convention for some people has a loophole because it states that, incendiary weapons are such weapons that their primary use is to set fire. I would say, as as a lawyer that deals with such matters, quite a bit, that whether it is an incendiary weapon or not, it is definitely a weapon that is indiscriminate in its nature. That means that when you use white Phosphorus and you deploy it over an area, it's not targeted.
It is being used in a bomb that opens up in the air and then dozens of small particles with white Phosphorus are landed on a certain area. And by its nature, it does not distinguish between legitimate or lawful and unlawful, targets. And so, it is indiscriminate by its nature and that is why our argument in the Israeli Supreme Court was that this is a weapon that, is prohibited from being used in an area where you have civilians. Only in open area it is possible to use that weapon.
Speaker 8: It's been used by Israel in 2008, 2009, and it was deemed illegal by a commissioner inquiry which investigated the cas led operation.
Speaker 4: Well, after the the use of white phosphorus in the cast led operation Israel has waged in Gaza during 2,008, 9, I litigated challenge to the legality of the use of white phosphorus in urban areas. I filed a high court petition to the Israeli Supreme Court on behalf of a list of, Israeli human rights activists, and we demanded that the army is coerced to issue commands that would prohibit the use of white phosphorus inhabited areas. In the framework of that litigation, I have asked, forensic architecture and SITO Studios, to provide a spatial analysis of how, white phosphorus, affects, an area where it is deployed.
Speaker 5: My name is Bradley Samuels, and I'm director at C2. We describe C2's work as combining, data and design to create new pathways for justice. This typically means that we're working on fact finding and reporting focused on human rights violations, usually at the intersection of law, technology, and design. So we worked on a a report in 2009 focused on the use of white phosphorus munitions in urban environments. Because white phosphorus is often considered an indiscriminate munition, and we wanted to better understand how the weapon was being de deployed, specifically in urban environments and to address this question of whether it could be truly targeted, with, precision or whether it was in fact indiscriminate.
It was a very robust collaboration between c 2 and forensic architecture. There was a tremendous amount of data to go through, everything from photographs, to videos of white phosphorus being used, to specifications of technical performance.
Speaker 4: And, in order to for the judges to better understand what are the outcomes of the use of white phosphorus in urban areas, I asked them, to generate computerized model in which we can show the effect of such bombs being deployed.
Speaker 5: Michael framed the legal questions that were really driving this project. So the IDF has sort of claimed in the past and others, the US military, who who've used it in Iraq, that white phosphorus is deployed as a smokescreen. So not for its incendiary effects. Their argument their argument is that they deploy it to, mask movements of troops and and things like this. We wanted to focus on the secondary effects.
Right? Which were the fact that this does cause fires. It does burn people. And so we focused on what we what we call an effects based analysis.
Speaker 0: There is a strong presumption against using white phosphorus in any place where there's a significant civilian population simply because it's so likely to do grievous harm to those civilians. So in each case, you gotta look at what happened. You know, what was the supposed rationale? You know, was it really urgent to illuminate the area? Was it urgent to create a a smoke screen?
It's hard to imagine what those reasons would be in the middle of Gaza, but these are the questions that you have to ask before concluding that the use of white phosphorus was some war crime.
Speaker 5: Yeah. So white phosphorus, when used in warfare, really depends on location, its analysis. It it's really not possible to evaluate it based on the munition alone. It's really an evaluation of the munition in relation to the context in which it's deployed. It's an air burst munition, so it's fired from an artillery, and it bursts anywhere between 15 and 200 meters above the ground.
It it opens.
Speaker 1: And inside,
Speaker 5: there's a inside there's a 116 phosphorus soaked felt wedges, which as soon as they come into contact with oxygen, begin to burn. And so you can imagine, you know, whether it's 50 meters or 2 100 meters, they're descending from the sky, a 116 of them, and they fall essentially an elliptical pattern. But the size of that ellipse can vary dramatically based on angle of fire, height of burst, and things like this. Anything that happens within the ellipse is indeterminate. The wedges will fall within that area, but you cannot control exactly where.
They're not there's no propulsion. There's no guidance. They're just falling based on gravity at that point. And if if you're using this in a very densely populated urban environment, you must expect that anywhere within the ellipse will be potentially covered in in felt wedges that are that are burning and cause fires and can do all kinds of damage. Yeah.
During operation cast led, there's a number of examples of the ways in which airburst white phosphorus has caused harm to civilians. So let's say a piece of phosphorus wedge falls on the ground, it might be there for days, it might burn out, but then a child might find it a few few days later, flip it over, and will start burning again and can burn right through their flesh and their bone. It also ricochets, so it may it may land in one area, bounce, and sort of go somewhere else. But I think, you know, the the biggest danger to civilians is the way it causes fires in places where civilians can be trapped. So it often lands on roofs or balconies or it can go through windows.
And there's an example of a school in Gaza where some of the white phosphorus was just penetrated the window, and they started it started a fire within a space in which students were trapped and died.
Speaker 4: But also, medical crews who came, who have been treating people with, injuries from white phosphorus. They themselves have been injured by the white phosphorus because it continues to burn. That's the monstrosity of that substance. It continues to burn. It touches your skin.
It burns the skin, it enters your internal organs and continues to burn. And that is, really horrific kind of weapon that humanity has created. Well, the finding showed, how horrendous, the deployment of, of bombs with white phosphorus can be in an urban area. What kind of effect it had? How many dozens of civilian objects have been set in fire because of the white phosphorus?
Also, the report managed to show what would have been the effect if the same kind of munition would have been deployed in other, cities of the world, and how extensive the destruction and the damage such deployment can cause.
Speaker 5: One thing that Michael Spard asked us to do, which I think was very useful, was to simulate its use, not only in Gaza, but in Tel Aviv, in Paris, and New York City. Gaza is the most extreme example. It would cause incredible harm in all of those locations, and and Gaza worst of all because it it is so densely populated. But I think to bring home the understanding of how this weapon does damage, not just in one location, but any any urban environment. Right?
Our own urban environment. So that was an important part of the analysis as well.
Speaker 4: In our petition, we demanded that the court, force the army, to issue orders, binding orders that would, restrict the use of, munition that contains white phosphorus so that it will not be allowed to be used at all in areas where you have civilians, in inhabited areas, residential areas, urban areas. That was our request. And according to the description, the judges have provided of those orders, in the judgment. Those orders limit extensively. They use munition with white phosphorus in urban areas.
And so, the court has accepted that those new orders are enough and that they adhere to international law. The problem was that such orders, can always be changed. So, I don't know what happened, in the last 12 years since the judgment was given, and whether those orders have been indeed changed.
Speaker 5: Submission of this, work to the high court in Israel was about regulating its future use and not determining culpability for past use. I mean, it was it's very obvious and very clear that white phosphorus was used in Operation Cast Lead. It's that's not debatable. It's it's very easy to see. As we've seen, white phosphorus has been used again, this past year in 2023.
The problems remain exactly the same. Should not be used. It should be clearly condemned and, banned. Over 10 years ago that we did this work, and in some way, the work has an absurd quality to it because we're demonstrating something that's obvious. But I think it's important work because without quantifying the effects of this munition, without documenting it thoroughly, and without closing legal loopholes for the use of indiscriminate weapons, it allows states in positions of power to continue to use them with impunity.
And so I'm eager and keen to see if that impunity can be closed down and and more regard can be brought to civilian life.
Speaker 4: No. I think our litigation was very successful in, bringing to the attention of, the military lawyers that allowing such weapon to be used in urban areas exposes Israel to very strong accusations of war crimes.
Speaker 7: There are 2 questions that really arise from from from the use of white phosphorus in particular is, one, whether it constitutes a war crime by the use of it because it is very difficult to control. And secondly, those who are providing ISRA with such material, whether they can be prosecuted, entities within those states can be prosecuted for providing weapons where they know it's gonna be used for the commission of war crimes.
Speaker 3: So what we are trying to do is push for accountability. Our position has been there should be an arms embargo in Israel given the very high likelihood that, US supplied weapons to Israel, are being used to commit, war crimes and other violations of international law.
Speaker 8: The fact that white phosphorus was used before, criticized, internationally condemned, including by a commission of inquiry of an independent commission of inquiry appointed by the United Nations, and then used again is to be understood in a a framework of tolerated impunity. Israel has been granted impunity for decades.
Speaker 0: The use of white phosphorus in 2009, at that moment, the International Criminal Court did not have jurisdiction. So that doesn't tell us anything about what the International Criminal Court will do today where it does have jurisdiction. So that's, you know, one big difference between prior uses and this one. The fact that Israel may have said, oh, you know, back in 2009, we won't use it again. You know, the Israeli government also ratified these treaties saying that they wouldn't bomb civilians, and they ignored those treaties.
So, you know, I'm not sure how much these Israeli government's word matters here. We have to judge what it did. There clearly are systematic war crimes. White phosphorus is the least of it. You know, there are much more serious things going on in gossip than white phosphorus.
Speaker 7: My name is Toby Catton. I'm a barrister. The rules of international humanitarian law are strict for a reason, and any state that signs up to a treaty is is bound by its contents. So, for example, if we look at the genocide convention as as an example, there is an obligation to respect the terms of that of that treaty, but there is also an obligation on states to prevent a genocide.
Speaker 0: One important thing to know about international humanitarian law is that war crimes by one side do not justify war crimes by the other. So even if we accept that what Hamas did on October 7th was horrible, these are war crimes, they they, violate the basic provisions of humanitarian law, That does not justify Israel ignoring international humanitarian law.
Speaker 8: My name is Francesca Albanese, and I am the UN special rapporteur on the human rights situation in the Palestinian territory occupied by Israel since 1967. While Israel has the right to protect itself, protect its territory and its citizens, the response was to be given within the limits of international humanitarian law. And, the attack instead, the assault has been absolutely violent, indiscriminate. It seems to me that the target was, as many soldiers on the ground say, to destroy, displace, and settle, and it's becoming clearer and clearer.
Speaker 0: And there are several respects in which the Israeli attacks in Gaza violate humanitarian law. 1st, in some cases, they actually are targeting civilian targets where it's hard to understand what's the military purpose. They're they bombed Islamic University of Gaza. It has been bombing, you know, big apartment buildings, prestige addresses, not because there's a Hamas presence there of any significance, but just to sort of show that there'd be consequences on civilians and to sort of force civilians to stand up to Hamas.
Speaker 8: Between 60 70% of Gaza's civilian infrastructure has been either destroyed or severely damaged. There's been the bombing of schools, mosques, bakeries, electricity, the electricity system, the sewage system.
Speaker 0: So even the basic provision that you don't target civilians and specific civilian structures has been violated. More generally, Israel has been firing indiscriminately into certain civilian populated areas. So just to give an example, the Jabaliyah refugee camp. Israel says there were Hamas tunnels underneath, that it was a Hamas command headquarters of sorts. Let's accept that that's true, but Israel chose to drop 2,000 pound bombs in the middle of a heavily populated refugee
Speaker 7: camp. In the case of the refugee camp that was hit, where they believed that there was one Hamas leader there, and then that results in several 100 civilian deaths, it is very difficult to justify that as military necessity.
Speaker 0: So this kind of, you know, use of extremely heavy weaponry, high explosives in the middle of many civilians, that defines an indiscriminate attack.
Speaker 8: Even the Washington Post and then the New York Times a few weeks ago declared that Israel has been using at least 200 times. £2,000 bombs are equivalent to the use of over 2 nuclear bombs over such a small piece of land of 365 square kilometers. Of course, this is destructive.
Speaker 4: What we're seeing definitely raises the suspicion that Israel has engaged in indiscriminate attacks of civilian and residential areas in Gaza.
Speaker 0: And we see time and time again that they are going after targets knowing that many civilians will be killed. So they they will attack a house because there's maybe a Hamas fighter who lives there without regard to his family. They will, you know, attack, major buildings because of an ostensible Hamas presence without regard to the
Speaker 8: civilians. They know what they're doing, and and they seem to be unstoppable.
Speaker 0: One fundamental provision of international humanitarian law is that health care workers and health care facilities are protected. Now that protection can be lost if the opposing military uses these facilities for military purposes, but there's a strong presumption against attacking them. Now in the case of Gaza, the World Health Organization has outlined numerous cases in which Israeli forces have attacked health care officials, ambulances, hospitals, and the like. In some cases, Israel says, oh, Hamas was using these. But when you look at the overall effect
Speaker 7: Quite often, the argument which is used is that you have militants hiding amongst medical personnel. And we've seen some of the medical personnel being interviewed. Effectively, there's no basis for concluding that that Hamas is hiding in hospitals and using the cover of the Red Cross or Red Crescent.
Speaker 10: It is a horrific night in Gaza where an airstrike hit a hospital killing 100.
Speaker 1: An Israeli airstrike on a hospital in Central Gaza. Hundreds of people were killed at a Gaza City hospital. Israeli airstrike hit a hospital in Gaza a short time ago with fears that 100 are dead.
Speaker 0: And there is no allegation that Hamas was firing from the hospitals, just these, you know, unproven allegations of a headquarters that has not been demonstrated. And all we've seen so far is frankly a minimal Hamas presence that does not justify this shutting down of a good part of the civilian medical system in Gaza.
Speaker 7: Ultimately, when you target hospitals, when you target medical workers, when you target those who are protected under international law, then if you target them militarily, then you have to provide justification for doing that.
Speaker 1: Israeli tag shells struck a group of journalists, southern Lebanon on October 13th.
Speaker 2: 9 National and Human Rights Watch have released findings on the Israeli attack on journalists in Lebanon. Reuters journalist, Isam Abdallah, has was killed and 6 others were injured during the attack.
Speaker 0: There are many important civilian officials, civilian institutions that have been hit by the Israeli bombardment. And in most cases, it's difficult to know were they precisely targeted or is this just a product of indiscriminate warfare? There's one case that Human Rights Watch was able to look into actually in southern Lebanon, not in Gaza, where it was quite clear that Israeli forces deliberately targeted a group of journalists who were well marked. They were away from any fighting. They killed 1 Reuters journalist and injured 6.
Speaker 3: We have investigated, the October 13 attack on a group of journalists in South Lebanon that resulted in the killing of Ayesom Abdallah from Reuters as well as the injury of 6 other journalists from Reuters, AFP, and Al Jazeera. We spent about 2 months investigating that particular, attack. We analyzed over a 100 photos and videos that were captured by the journalists on the scene as well as by journalists who were nearby. So all of this led us to the conclusion that the Israeli military either knew or should have known that the group of individuals were civilians, not a military target.
Speaker 6: In terms of the killing of journalists, the Committee to Protect Journalists has reported that nearly 70 journalists have been killed, since the beginning of the conflict. Journalists must never ever be a target for military action. They are there to report, on what's happening. They are our eyes and ears, and they're there to bear witness to, crimes that are being committed by all sides.
Speaker 11: In the last few minutes also, we've had the Israeli defense minister coming out and saying that he is ordering a siege on Gaza
Speaker 1: as Israel enforces a complete siege.
Speaker 3: With Israel's military having ordered a total siege on Gaza.
Speaker 0: One of the clearest war crimes that the Israeli military is committing is the siege that it is imposing on Palestinian civilians in Gaza. This is so clear that even the International Criminal Court chief prosecutor Karim Khan, who has been very reluctant to get involved, even he warned Israel that if you maintain the siege, don't be surprised if my office issues or crime charges.
Speaker 1: In this regard, I have to say that Israel has clear obligations in relation to its war with Hamas.
Speaker 5: Not just moral obligations, but
Speaker 1: legal obligations to comply with the laws of obligations, but legal obligations to comply with the laws of armed conflict.
Speaker 7: So when we look at the blockade now, when we look at the conditions that the people of Gaza have been subjected to, some amounting to, to a a withholding of basic necessities, water, electricity, food. We also have to look at, forced starvation as a war crime, and it's something that, obviously, the ICC would have jurisdiction
Speaker 0: The The United Nations has plenty of aid. It's been sitting there in Egypt, just across the border ready to come in. And the Israeli government has been allowing it in, sometimes not at all, sometimes only in drips and droughts. And this comes on top of a 16 year blockade.
Speaker 6: Not been allowed to leave the territory. They're essentially trapped in in Gaza.
Speaker 0: And so creating a population in Gaza that is dependent on humanitarian aid. And since October 7th, much of that has been shut off.
Speaker 6: People are suffering a great deal, under bombardment. They are, not eating. They are not sleeping. They are in constant fear. They are running from place to place to seek safety.
But, of course, there is no place safe in Gaza. There is nowhere for them to go.
Speaker 0: And so this is a clear violation of humanitarian law. And the bits and pieces that are allowed in right now in no sense replicate the 500 trucks a day of commercial and humanitarian aid that were coming into Gaza before October 7th. The drips and drabs that Israel allows in in no sense replicates the basic needs that the Palestinian civilian population in Gaza has, and those needs remain unmet. One thing that worries me and many others is that the Israeli government may be discounting the value of Palestinian civilian life because of signals from the top. The most senior leaders are giving the opposite signal.
The defense minister says, these are all human animals. Netanyahu says, citing a biblical verse, he suggests it's okay to kill men, women, children, and all animals. This kind of signal from the top is an invitation to war crimes.
Speaker 7: When we see the kind of language which is being used by leading Israeli politicians to flatten Gaza, to to remove all Palestinians and to say that there are no civilians in Gaza because they voted for Hamas. So so they've effectively sided with with the terrorist organization. That's that's the kind of language which is being used. And then you you hear the language being used as to what the Israeli administration's intentions are when the conflict ends, and it will end at
Speaker 5: some
Speaker 7: point. Their intention is to govern Gaza, is to expand settlements into Gaza.
Speaker 8: I'm personally shocked by how overt the genocidal intent has been across various messages passed and various arguments made by, Israeli, political leaders, military leaders, and then now resonates and gets amplified across various segments of the society who are calling for leveling Gaza, flattening Gaza, erasing Gaza, and pushing the population out of Gaza.
Speaker 9: My name is Yehuda Shaul, born and raised in Jerusalem. I graduate high school. I joined the IDF. In Israel, we have a draft. In my time, it was 3 years for men, so I served 3 years in the military.
I cannot un know what I know. I cannot undo what I did, but I can dedicate the rest of my life to try to bring the occupation to an end. It's about ending a reality where millions of Palestinians are systematically discriminated with our rights and dignity. One of the things we used to do a lot in in in the military was what we call in the IDF to make our presence felt. You bump into a house.
It's not a house we had intelligence about. Yeah. It's a random house. Bump into the house, wake up the family, search the place. You can yourself imagine the dynamics.
What happens when military unit enters your house 2 o'clock in the morning? Yeah. Finish searching, go out to the street, some make some noise, knock on some doors, throw some shock grenades, run to the other corner of the street, invade another random house, wake up the next family. And that's basically how you spend your 8 hour shift. Basically, intimidation.
The only way to rule people against their will without giving them rights forever is by make them fear you. And once they get used to a level of fear, you have to increase it and increase it. That is the orders. Yeah. That's the mission statement.
That's why these patrols exist until today. One of the first things that opened my my mind, my eyes that brought me to ask questions, during my service was the fact that settlers were attacking Palestinians, in many cases, right
Speaker 1: in front of us. Our orders were not to intervene.
Speaker 9: Our mission as soldiers there was to protect the settlers. And if we see settlers attacking Palestinians, it's not our job. Basically, the the reality is that you have in the same territory, in the same area, you have 2 populations, 2 communities, Israeli settlers and Palestinians. They live under 2 different legal systems enforced by 2 different executive branches. So you have the army enforcing martial law on Palestinians, and you have these very civilian police supposed to enforce Israeli civilian law on settlers.
Let's say I'm an Israeli, you're a Palestinian, and let's assume we both throw stones at each other, and let's assume for the same of this demonstration is we both get arrested. As an Israeli throwing stones, I committed a criminal offense. As a Palestinian throwing stones, you committed a security offense, a terrorist offense. If they wanna keep me in custody, they need to bring me in front of a judge within 24 hours. I can demand to speak to a lawyer right away before my first interrogation.
You, we can keep for a few days without a lawyer. You, we can keep a few days before we bring you in front of a judge. Fundamentally, the discrimination is built in the system. What I'm trying to say is that the lack of law enforcement is not a bug in the system. It's a feature of the system.
It's the structure, the way it's designed. The Israeli occupation is an ongoing offensive campaign against Palestinian independence that didn't stop for one second from June 67. Millions of offensive actions that are taking place all the time everywhere in the occupied territories. Every new house you build in a settlement, you reoccupy the territories. Every house you bump into in the middle of the night to to create a sense of being chased inside the Palestinian population to make your presence felt, you reoccupy the territories.
Every random checkpoint you put on a highway to disrupt the day to day routine of people in the area, you reoccupy the territories. Everything we do is an offensive act to entrench our rule and prevent Palestinian independence. The the story here is preventing Palestine.
Speaker 7: Well, certainly, I've mentioned the current apartheid, more than once, and one of the the foundations for that is the Human Rights Watch report. So this was one of the first and, well documented, well researched reports that looked at all aspects of the treatment of Palestinians, as compared to to the treatment of, Israelis, Israeli Jews.
Speaker 0: Human Rights Watch issued our report finding the Israeli government to be committing the crime of apartheid. And so we conducted a very detailed factual investigation, and we did not make an analogy to South Africa. This is not an historical report. This is a legal report. We applied 2 treaties, the UN Convention against apartheid and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, both of which define apartheid.
And they require, an intent by 1 racial or ethnic group to dominate another. And we found that to exist actually in in both Israel proper and the occupied territory. And it requires systematic oppression and examples of that oppression in the form of inhumane acts. And we found that that oppression and those inhumane acts had taken place within the occupied territory. And so we concluded that there is apartheid in the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza.
And we did this in a 200 plus page report filled with details. What was interesting is the Israeli government didn't know what to do with that. They couldn't find anything factually or legally wrong. Their supporters tried the usual name calling, you know, you're biased, you're anti semitic, but they had nothing to say, because it was accurate.
Speaker 8: As I look at the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory, of course, it's apartheid.
Speaker 0: Now October 7th has only accelerated that pressure because it is showing that this endless oppression, this endless occupation, this apartheid is not tolerable for Palestinians living under it. Israel has enjoyed many, many years of impunity for the way it treats Palestinian civilians. Israeli courts don't oversee the prosecution for the most part of Israeli soldiers. It's extremely rare when that happens. There's been no international pressure.
And so for the most part, Israeli war crimes have happened without criminal consequences.
Speaker 7: The one thing that we see quite often with Israel is they'll completely disregard what anyone outside of Israel says. They'll disregard the United Nations. They'll disregard the traditional criminal courts.
Speaker 0: Now it could be different because the International Criminal Court today does have jurisdiction over anything that Israel does in Yaz.
Speaker 3: So, of course, the ultimate end is, accountability. We're also calling for the, international criminal courts, which has jurisdiction over the Palestinian territories to also investigate those attacks.
Speaker 4: Obviously, the International Criminal Court, is already investigating suspicions, of Israeli violations of international, laws of war. But, it seems that, for the ICC to target Israel is a very, very risky, drill, because of Israel's political might.
Speaker 6: The scale and the the level of impunity that Israel has enjoyed over the past few decades is really at the heart of the human rights crisis that we see in Israel and and Palestine, and that cannot be allowed to to continue.
Speaker 7: I think what happens in the International Criminal Court is incredibly important, but it is just one part of a much broader picture of of what we need to be thinking of. We also have the International Court of Justice just across the road from the International Criminal Court that has jurisdiction to do with state responsibilities.
Speaker 12: While the world is awaiting a decision by the International Court of Justice on whether or not Israel has indeed committed acts of genocide in Gaza.
Speaker 13: That South Africa considers Israel to be responsible for committing genocide in Gaza and for failing to prevent and punish genocidal acts.
Speaker 8: I'm glad South Africa had the moral courage, the lucidity to take the case to the ICJ because this is now necessary. Someone needs to make a ceasefire binding and compulsory. We are facing such a massive, toxic mix of criminal conduct. I cannot think of one one rule of international humanitarian law which has not been violated.
Speaker 5: As an American Jew, it's very concerning, especially specifically with in regard to the lack of focus on on civilian life and civilian casualties.
Speaker 6: This is part of a cycle of of violence, that will continue to repeat unless the root causes are addressed, which means dismantling Israel's system of apartheid. It means ending the blockade on Gaza, and it means ensuring accountability for crimes committed by Israel.
Speaker 7: The question that we have to ask, if we do nothing now, as we've done nothing for the last few decades as far as Palestine is concerned, but if we do nothing now, if we don't hold those who are responsible, if we don't hold them accountable through a judicial process, we have to ask ourselves, what is the next conflict gonna look like?
Speaker 9: If we will keep permanent military rule over Gaza after this war, if a year or 2 or 3 will pass by with IDF presence throughout the Gaza Strip, the danger of resettling Gaza is gonna grow exponentially.
Speaker 8: For me, the collapse of the value system system of justice, human rights, freedom of and equality that we have built, in the aftermath of the 2nd world war and the betrayal of the never again, never again that we promised ourselves as a collective, as a world, society, as the people of the world after the Holocaust. We are not able to horror that promise.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SkyNews Here’s the actual truth you published then deleted. Also it’s clear you’re adopting a Zionist narrative from the title change alone: https://t.co/QGobUqeFcL https://t.co/MrmI7GxOec
Video Transcript AI Summary
Violence erupted in Amsterdam, injuring at least five and leading to dozens of arrests. Maccabee Tel Aviv fans arrived for a UEFA Europa League match against Ajax and were seen tearing down Palestinian flags, prompting local residents to confront them. Before the game, Maccabee fans sang racist songs, while a pro-Palestinian demonstration was banned due to safety concerns. During the match, they disrupted a moment of silence for flood victims with chants and fireworks. Maccabee supporters claimed they were attacked on the streets, with videos capturing some of the violence. Police arrested 62 individuals, with five hospitalized but later discharged. Leaders from Dutch, Israeli, and British governments condemned the violence as anti-Semitic, labeling it a pogrom, but did not address the aggression from Maccabee fans towards locals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Violence in Amsterdam left at least 5 people injured and dozens have been arrested. But what happened? Supporters of Israeli football club, Maccabee Tel Aviv, arrived in Amsterdam ahead of their UEFA Europa League match against Amsterdam club, Ajax. On Wednesday, social media videos verified by Sky News show Maccabee Tel Aviv fans tearing down Palestinian flags from outside of homes. Other social media videos appear to show residents chasing Maccabee Tel Aviv fans.
On Thursday, just before the game, crowds of Maccabee fans were filmed singing racist and anti Arab songs. While a pro Palestinian demonstration had been banned by the mayor over fears there would be clashes. Later that evening during the match, Israeli supporters appeared to disrupt the minute silence for Valencia flood victims with chants, whistles, and fireworks. Merkabi fans were seen attacking locals as a police car can be seen driving by. People with Palestinian flags were seen marching on the streets.
Maccabi supporters say they were beaten and attacked on the streets of the Dutch capital with videos showing some of the violence. Safely, Palestine, we go. Good. Sky News could not independently verify all of the footage shown. Police arrested 62 people.
5 were taken to hospital, but have since been discharged. Israeli far right ultras are notorious for their racism and physical violence. Dutch, Israeli, and British leaders denounced the attacks as anti semitic and even referred to it as a pogrom, but their statements failed to mention the assault by the Israeli hooligans against Dutch citizens.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Sky News edited and re-edited it the video about Amsterdam after deleting the old one. Check the title difference, @skynews decided to adopt one narrative and run with it. https://t.co/r5pjRSolf3
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared important information about the violence involving Maccabi Tel Aviv hooligans in the Netherlands. The trouble began when they removed a Palestinian flag, leading to confrontations with locals, including attacks on a taxi driver. Eyewitnesses reported the hooligans were armed and sang offensive songs during a match. Videos circulated showing their aggression, which sparked retaliation from the community. This cycle of violence continued, with similar incidents reported in Greece, highlighting a troubling pattern of behavior.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️IMPORTANT: This is what Maccabi Tel Aviv Hooligans did in the Netherlands that triggered all the violence against them after the authorities did nothing, don’t let anyone twist it. Israelis are not the victim. They took down Palestine’s flag and then it all started. An eyewitness stated: “It all kicked off when they pulled a Palestinian flag off a facade. Then they started provoking and destroyed a taxi driver's car and beat up the driver themselves.” Some Maccabi fans were seen with metal chains, ready to attack. Also during tonight’s match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel Aviv, the Israeli supporters refused to hold a minute of silence for Valencia flood victims. They even started illegal fireworks. — They sang racist extermination songs “Let the IDF win to Fuck the Arabs” Maccabi Tel Aviv hooligans chant their genocidal song while being protected by the police in Amsterdam, this song they’re chanting has a part that says “there are no schools in Gaza because there are no children left”.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Article on Maccabi Tel Aviv hooligans attacking; https://www.rtl.nl/nieuws/binnenland/artikel/5479291/hooligans-van-maccabi-tel-aviv-amsterdam-slaags-met
Hooligans van Maccabi Tel Aviv mishandelen taxichauffeur in Amsterdam
Supporters van de Israëlische voetbalclub Maccabi Tel Aviv zijn gisteravond meerdere keren slaags geraakt in Amsterdam. Volgens de politie waren er vechtpartijen met pro-Palestijnse demonstranten. Ook werd een taxichauffeur mishandeld, waarop een groep taxichauffeurs de confrontatie met de hooligans zocht. Ajax speelt vanavond in de Johan Cruijff Arena tegen de club uit Tel Aviv.
rtl.nl
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Also footage:
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Also this is what the Maccabi Tel Aviv hooligans did in Greece, they attacked a pro-Palestine supporter. After doing all of that, they now want to cry victim. https://t.co/Tz0EmXMJ9F
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
And this is how one of the Israeli telegrams commented on the person they severely injured after attacking. https://t.co/tNWqrpfZb6
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
All these events resulted in the Maccabi Tel Aviv hooligans getting attacked today:
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️The impunity is insane! Israeli officer Noga Pashchur after being exposed for committing war crimes has replied on her X account saying: “By the way, is it possible to say that I am committing war crimes with this picture? I just came out prettier here” https://t.co/pQyONeBQTy
reSee.it AI Summary
I just saw a post about Israeli soldier Guy Jacobson, who was involved in the destruction of Gaza, now vacationing in the UAE. He even took a photo in front of the Burj Khalifa, seemingly unwinding after his actions in Gaza.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️🇦🇪🇮🇱BREAKING: Israeli war criminal having a vacation in UAE. The Israeli soldier Guy Jacobson, from the Armored Brigade in the Israeli army, took part in the destruction of Gaza, dropping tons of shells on its residents. Just a few hours ago, he took a photo in front of the Burj Khalifa in the UAE during a leisure trip to unwind a bit after killing Gaza's residents. Source: @tamerqdh
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🇨🇦A pro-Israel Zionist in the streets of Montreal, Canada says he hopes "all these Palestinian babies and their sh*thole parents" die. Internet, do your thing. https://t.co/0duurB5DFP
Video Transcript AI Summary
They all button die. They all button die. They all button die. They all button die.
Yeah, don't tell me. Tony Terrace? Sorry, which one? All the Italian Canadian babies? Oh, the babies? Yeah. And their chivaled parents. Oh, okay. And they're chivaled.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They all button die. They all button die. They all button die. They all button die.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Don't tell me. Tony Terrace. Sorry?
Who? Which one? All the Italian Canadian babies. Oh, the babies? Yeah.
Yeah? Yeah. And they're chivaled parents. Oh, okay. And they're chivaled
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
He still takes care of his dogs despite everything that Israel is doing in Gaza. Their humanity and compassion is unmatched. https://t.co/agzbGiLoMp
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Hassan Soboh’s daughter, Insam, tearfully shared the story about her father, who worked with Doctors Without Borders and how they’ve been searching for his body for 2 days now… https://t.co/sJ9QFuneaP
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️JUST IN: Kamal Adwan Hospital. After the Israeli occupation army left Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza this morning, the hospital is in chaos and ruins. Medical staff, supplies, and equipment were taken. https://t.co/qU8GZOVXXM
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️A father bids farewell to his two daughters, one of which is only 12 days old, as a result of the Israeli occupation forces' bombing of the northern Gaza Strip. "What is your crime, my dear?" https://t.co/0QOEVZVuJN
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
A forensic doctor reveals what he found in Martyr leader Yahya Sinwar's body. They used everything on him. https://t.co/560IPpWIu9
Video Transcript AI Summary
The cause of death is a gunshot wound to the head, resulting in severe traumatic brain injury. Additional injuries include a missile injury to the right forearm, a masonry-related injury to the left leg, and multiple shrapnel wounds. Shrapnel wounds to the chest caused severe damage, but the gunshot wound to the head is the determined cause of death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cause of death is gunshot wound in the head. He has a bullet in his head and there's a severe traumatic brain injury. He has injury from other sources like a missile injury in his right forearm, a fallen masonry on his left leg or tie more and many sharpeners that, entered his body, but only in the chest they caused the severe damage. But the cause of death is, the gunshot wound in the head.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
This is how the protesters dealt with the police in Germany, this is the first time I see German police not physically assaulting the protesters. He ended up laughing😂 https://t.co/TTyx94lK4U
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
“Oh my love, come on get up, I brought you chips” Israel just murdered his brother, Mansour. https://t.co/Z897Eoasrn
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a series of posts highlighting the tragic events in Gaza, where a man, woman, and little girl were reportedly burned alive after Israel bombed tents housing displaced civilians at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital. The posts emphasize the graphic nature of the violence and mention specific victims, including Shaaban Al-Dalo and his mother, Alaa, who were both killed in this attack. The focus is on the repeated targeting of civilians and the devastating impact on families.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
⚡️BREAKING: A man, woman and a little girl captured burning alive after Israel bombed tents sheltering displaced civilians in the courtyard of Al-Aqsa martyrs hospital in Deir Al-Balah, Central Gaza. ⚠️Graphic. https://t.co/se1TGIYDvn
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
Full video in English:
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
@SuppressedNws - Suppressed News.
🇵🇸HE HAS A NAME, HE HAS A STORY. Shaaban Al-Dalo and his mother, Alaa, were both burnt alive by Israel. He was also a memorizer of the Quran. Israel murdered them in the courtyard of Al-Aqsa Martyrs hospital in central Gaza by targeting tents sheltering displaced civilians. https://t.co/4aJHnCuQ12
Video Transcript AI Summary
Shahad Ahmed, a 19-year-old software engineering student, is currently displaced in Deir el Bala, Gaza, near Al Aqsa Marzia's Hospital, due to the ongoing war. Shahad, as the oldest child, is taking care of their parents, two sisters, and two younger brothers. The family has been displaced five times and is experiencing homelessness, limited food, and extremely limited medicine. They are living in a self-constructed tent that provides minimal protection from the freezing temperatures. Shahad has started a campaign to evacuate the family and restart their lives in Egypt.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello from the tent where we reside. I'm Shahad Ahmed, 19 years old. I'm a student studying software engineer. In this barbaric starvation war, we have displaced 5 times so far. Now we are in Al Aqsa Marzia's Hospital in the middle of Gaza, Deir el Bala.
I'm taking care of my family as I'm the oldest. I have 2 sister and 2 little brothers and, my parents. We live in a very hard circumstances suffering from various, things such as such as homelessness and limited food and extremely, limited medicine. And, the only things between us and the freezing temperature is, this tent that we constructed by ourselves. I made this, campaign to restart a new life in Egypt and evacuate.
Thank you.