TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TCNetworkFans
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
ICYMI: During Tulsi Gabbard's confirmation hearing she goes down the list and puts the corrupt officials on notice. Chuck Schumer, John Brennan, James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, the 51 Intel officials, the FBI. This is why they are afraid of Tulsi. https://t.co/PcKKSIWMMF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chuck Schumer said the intelligence community has many ways to retaliate against those who challenge it. Faulty intelligence has led to failures, such as the Iraq invasion, which caused many deaths, destabilization, and the rise of ISIS.
The FBI and intelligence agencies were used to undermine Donald Trump's presidency, falsely portraying him as a puppet of Putin. FISA was used illegally to obtain a warrant on Carter Page using a Clinton-funded dossier. Tony Blinken prompted 51 intelligence officials to dismiss Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation to help Biden win the election. James Clapper lied to a committee about mass collection of Americans' records. The CIA, under John Brennan, spied on Congress. The FBI tried to surveil Catholics attending traditional Latin mass. The speaker was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list after criticizing Kamala Harris.
The speaker believes Trump's reelection is a mandate to end the weaponization of the intelligence community and restore trust. If confirmed as DNI, the speaker will focus on the essential mission of ensuring the safety, security, and freedom of the American people by delivering unbiased intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Chuck Schumer admitted a few years ago, quote, you take on the intelligence community. They have six ways from Sunday at getting back at you. For too long, faulty, inadequate, or weaponized intelligence have led to costly failures and the undermining of our national security and god given freedoms enshrined in the constitution. The most obvious example of one of these failures is our invasion of Iraq based upon a total fabrication or complete failure of intelligence. This disastrous decision led to the deaths of tens of thousands of American soldiers, millions of people in The Middle East, mass migration, destabilization, and undermining of the security and stability of our European allies, The rise of ISIS, strengthening of Al Qaeda and other Islamist jihadist groups, and strengthening Iran.
Here are just a few other examples. The American people elected Donald Trump as their president not once but twice, and yet the FBI and intelligence agencies were politicized by his opponents to undermine his presidency and falsely portray him as a puppet of Putin. Title one of FISA was used illegally to obtain a warrant to on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page using a Clinton campaign funded false dossier as their so called evidence. Biden campaign adviser, Tony Blinken, was the impetus for the 51 former senior intelligence officials' letter dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation specifically to help Biden win the election. Former DNI James Clapper lied to this committee in 2013, denying the existence of programs that facilitated the mass collection of millions of Americans' phone and Internet records, yet was never held accountable.
Under John Brennan's leadership, the CIA abused its power to spy on congress, to dodge oversight, lied about doing it until he was caught, and yet has never been held responsible. Under Biden, the FBI abused its power for political reasons to try to surveil Catholics who attend traditional Latin mass, labeling them as, quote, unquote, radical traditionalist Catholics. Personally, just twenty four hours after I criticized Kamala Harris and her nomination, I was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list called Quiet Skies. Sadly, there are more examples. The bottom line is this, this must end.
President Trump's reelection is a clear mandate from the American people to break this cycle of failure and the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community and begin to restore trust in those who've been charged with the critical task of securing our nation. If confirmed as DNI, I will do my very best to fulfill this mandate and bring leadership to the intelligence community with a laser like focus on our essential mission, ensuring the safety, security, and freedom of the American people. As the president's principal intelligence adviser, I'll begin by leading by example, checking my own personal views at the door and committing to delivering intelligence that is collected, analyzed, and reported without bias, prejudice, or political influence.
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
The alleged 'No Kings' shooter is a Tim Walz appointee - Vance Luther Boelter. They should release the manifesto asap. I guess Walz meant what he said, he does become friends with shooters. https://t.co/ERp9j7CKS6
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
In 2018, James Comey testified under oath about Hillary Clinton's emails and Russia Hoax. He gave a variation of 'I don't know' over 236 times (same as 8647 post). How does a FBI Director have such poor memory under oath but is able to write multiple books about his experience? https://t.co/arBCw8fNxR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Former FBI Director James Comey testified in a closed-door meeting with lawmakers, and transcripts of the meeting were officially released. Congressman Bob Goodlatte, who was present for Comey's testimony, shared his inside look. Comey admitted he couldn't recall or remember more than 200 times. Goodlatte's biggest takeaway is Comey's involvement in the Clinton email matter and the Russia collusion matter during his time as FBI director.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, more questions after transcripts of Jim Comey's closed door meeting with lawmakers. They were officially released yesterday, and the former FBI director admitting nearly he couldn't recall or remember more than 200 times. Our next guest was in the room for Comey's testimony. He's a powerful chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Bob Goodlatte. He joins us now with an inside look.
Good morning to mister chairman.
Speaker 1: Good morning, gentlemen.
Speaker 0: What is your biggest takeaway?
Speaker 1: Well, biggest takeaway is that former FBI director James Comey, with regard to the two most important investigations, certainly during his tenure as FBI director into the Clinton email matter and into the Russia collusion matter.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on why Democrats opposed DOGE's involvement with government funds, suggesting it was due to their attempts to hide billions in taxpayer money before Trump took office. I highlighted a 76-day period between Trump's election and Biden's departure, pointing out that the Department of Energy disbursed $93 billion from the Loan Program Office, which is more than double the amount distributed in the previous 15 years.
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
Want to know why Democrats didn't want DOGE poking around in government funds? Because they were stealing and trying to conceal BILLIONS in taxpayer funds before Donald Trump took office. “The 76-day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that President Trump was elected and President Biden left office. How much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy? From the Loan Program Office in Loans and Commitments $93 billion. Well over twice as much as in the previous 15 years”
Video Transcript AI Summary
During a 76-day period between President Trump's election and President Biden leaving office, the Department of Energy's loan program issued $93 billion in loans and commitments, more than double the amount from the previous 15 years. The loans were sometimes given to entities lacking business plans or financial solvency. The department is now reviewing these loans and grants for theft and incompetence. Some applicants presented half-baked ideas, promising plans after receiving funds. The department's budget increased from $60 billion to $160 billion since fiscal year 2021. The department is reducing its headcount by thousands, which the secretary believes is common-sense business. The secretary credits President Trump for empowering departments to make necessary changes to better serve taxpayers and consumers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister secretary, I wanna go back to some of your earlier testimony to be sure I heard it correctly. The seventy six day period you're talking about, that's the period between the time that president Trump was elected and president Biden left office. Is that right? That is correct. And during that short period of time, seventy six days, how much taxpayer money went out the door of the Department of Energy?
Speaker 1: From the loan program office in loans and commitments, $93,000,000,000, well over twice as much as in
Speaker 0: the previous fifteen years. So how do you vet and do due diligence on a loan in seventy six days. One loan, much less $93,000,000,000. How do you do it?
Speaker 1: I I think it's probably pretty clear it wasn't done in many cases. As I mentioned, yeah, I'm told I'm holding back clearly in place stuff. There is lots of funds that have gone out the door and commitments that were made from businesses that provided no business plan, no numbers about their own financial solvency or how this project So you're telling
Speaker 0: me that the Department of Energy in the seventy six day period before their boss was gonna leave office, gave our loan money to to entities that had no business plan? Correct. No financials?
Speaker 1: Correct. A number of those were not were before the seventy six day period as well. That's that's I've I've come in with great concern about how this institution, this great American institution has been run and how American tax payer money has been handled. I'm sorry everyone's upset that we're taking some time to do it, but what we've seen I'm not upset. Shows I'm
Speaker 0: not upset. Could it be that a lot of people say you haven't returned your calls? Could it be that you and your your colleagues have returned the calls, but the people calling just didn't like the answer? Could that be a possibility?
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not I'm not aware of that. You know, I give my cell phone number to any senator that wants it, and I return my calls.
Speaker 0: I I I I I mean, is your is your department gone dark? Somebody said your department's gone dark. Is it dark over there?
Speaker 1: Doesn't look it doesn't look dark behind me.
Speaker 0: I don't see any of you sitting on your hands. Somebody made that charge. I see everybody's hands. Let me ask you something else, mister secretary. Does does anybody ever come to the Department of Energy to get some of this free money and lie to you?
Speaker 1: I have not experienced that, but I I think it's a a reasonable assumption that that has happened. Does anybody ever come to you is or is it conceivable that some of these folks that heard about this free money came to you with a half baked idea? I think it's very conceivable. In fact, I've seen such plans that were half
Speaker 0: baked with didn't have a business plan. Right?
Speaker 1: Correct. A promise to develop one, to find a location
Speaker 0: the money, and I'll develop the plan later.
Speaker 1: Correct. And and now
Speaker 0: you're going back through not money that's already been contracted, but you're going back through and checking each one of these loans and these grants to make sure there was no stealing, aren't you? We are. We are. Make sure there was no incompetence, aren't you? Is that correct?
Speaker 1: We're looking at that, and and, yeah, my my blood pressure is rising right now just thinking about what we have seen and what did happen at
Speaker 0: the moment. Gonna tell some of these boondoggles no, aren't you?
Speaker 1: That's correct. And they're gonna be upset, aren't they? That's correct. And they ought to
Speaker 0: be upset, shouldn't they? I don't think
Speaker 1: they should be upset. I think they should be ashamed.
Speaker 0: I am it's rare that I'm speechless, but I wanna be sure I understood. The people running the Department of Energy for president Biden's administration shoveled $93,000,000,000, not million, $93,000,000,000 out the door in seventy six days, and it just happened to be the time between when president Trump was elected and president Biden, their boss, was leaving. Is that right?
Speaker 1: It is correct and distasteful. Confidence undermining. My god.
Speaker 0: Look. I hope you take whatever time you need to go through all of these projects penny by penny. I mean, I I've heard this testimony today. Well, it'll cost jobs in my state. If somebody steals $50,000,000 and goes and spends the money in their state, that's that's gonna stimulate the economy, isn't it?
Yes. It will. But that's still stealing, isn't it? And it's still illegal, isn't it? Yes.
I mean, they were spending money at the Department of Energy like it was ditch water. Their budget went from $60,000,000,000 to a hundred and $60,000,000,000 since fiscal year two thousand twenty one. It just sounds to me like like there were a lot of people coming to the Department of Energy who had all four feet and their snout in the trough. And I hope if you I hope you'll turn down the boondoggles and refer the thieves to the Department of Justice. We will indeed.
Speaker 1: Senator, the one complication in there too is mixed in there are good companies doing good things honestly with credible plans. And you're trying to separate the wheat from the chaff. Yes. That's what we're trying to do. That's our job, and we're doing it.
But there's there's a lot of chaff.
Speaker 0: Let me ask you one final question. Let me go back to how many employees you have. Now there have been some allegations today that that that you've you've cut tens of thousands of employees. Is that accurate?
Speaker 1: Well, I think the allegations were thousands, and we we our headcount will ultimately be reduced by thousands, but we are doing it slowly. Thousand now?
Speaker 0: Yes. And you think you can do it with fewer than 16,000?
Speaker 1: Correct. What's wrong with that? I think it's just common sense business.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Businesses do it every day in the real world. American taxpayers deserve it. That's never happened in in the federal government. I mean, it's easier to divorce your spouse than to get rid of a federal employee up here.
That's not the way the world works, is it, mister secretary? It's not the
Speaker 1: way the world should work. And I give enormous credit to president Trump who had the boldness to say if there's a right thing that needs to be done and it's difficult, please do it. And so, yes, this is new territory. This is not what happens normally in the federal government, but it is what needs to happen periodically in the federal government. And I give the credit to president Trump who's willing to take the heat and has set the departments free, make the changes you need to make to better serve American taxpayers and American consumers.
And, across his administration, that's what's being done. Alright. On that
Speaker 0: note, I just wanted to clear that up, mister secretary, because I I you know, I I don't know you to be a person who doesn't return his phone call.
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
STEPHEN MILLER: "We've reached a point in American politics where we have one party led by Trump fighting for Americans & a second Party led by AOC that fights for illegals" Democrats cheering "He's alive" during Chris Van Hollen's meeting with MS-13 member Kilmar Abrego Garcia https://t.co/la1Zn42h1t
Video Transcript AI Summary
One party, led by President Trump, fights for Americans, while the other, led by AOC, fights for illegal aliens, specifically "criminal wife beating terrorist illegal aliens." Two immigration judges and the arresting police department found one such individual was a member of MS-13. His wife filed two protective orders alleging extreme violent physical abuse. The Democrat party is using its power to bring this illegal alien, with his alleged crimes and history, back to the United States, where he can commit additional acts that threaten the safety of the American people. This sharply contrasts the priorities of President Trump, who is fighting for lower costs, better trade deals, and lower taxes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sean, we've reached a point in American politics where we have one party led by president Donald Trump that fights for Americans and a second party, I guess, led by AOC that fights for illegal aliens. But not just illegal aliens, criminal wife beating terrorist illegal aliens. Two immigration judges, as you said, found that he was a member of MS thirteen as did the arresting police department here nearby in Prince George's County. On top of that, we have, of course, the protective order filed by his wife alleging horrific multiple instances. There were two?
Yes. An extreme violent physical abuse. And then on top of all of that, he's an illegal alien and a member of what has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization. You have the entire machinery of the Democrat party using all of its power not to fight for lower costs as president Trump is or better trade deals as president Trump is or lower taxes as president Trump is, but to fight to bring. This illegal alien with all those horrific crimes and allegations and history against him back to The United States where he can do what?
He can commit additional acts that threaten the safety of the American people. This is the biggest, sharpest contrast you will ever see between the priorities of president Trump and the priorities of the Democrat party.
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
More people now think the U.S. is helping Ukraine too much—up from 7% to 41%. On top of that, trust in Zelensky fell from 72% to under 48% https://t.co/8AnYuZF3Hs
Video Transcript AI Summary
US support for Ukraine has significantly shifted since the war began. Initially at 7%, it surged to 41% by February 2025. Now, a majority of Republicans (62%) believe US support is excessive, a stark contrast from three years ago.
Public sentiment towards Zelensky has also declined. Confidence in his handling of world affairs dropped from 72% in 2022 to 48% in 2024, with a majority of Republicans now expressing a lack of confidence. This shift mirrors the stance of some Trump allies and Republican leaders.
Despite these changes, 78% of Americans support a negotiated peace deal between Russia and Ukraine, while only 16% oppose it. However, the relevance of this poll is questionable, given Ukraine's exclusion from current negotiations. While peace is generally favored, whether Americans would support a deal excluding Ukraine remains uncertain.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Holy Toledo, look at this trend line here. US support for Ukraine is too much. Back when the war began back in February of twenty twenty two, it was just 7% up like a rocket ship. My goodness. Up now in February of twenty twenty five to 41%.
And the clear majority of Republicans, and, of course, Republicans are in charge of the US government now, 62% of Republicans say that The US support for Ukraine is too much. What a difference from just three years ago. I can remember, John, all those backyards in The United States with those Ukrainian flags, far fewer of them today as Americans' opinions on Ukraine have changed dramatically.
Speaker 1: What about opinions of the Ukrainian president?
Speaker 0: Right. You know, obviously, if you would expect changes amongst the public on feelings towards Ukraine, feelings towards Zelensky have changed also dramatically. Look at this. Confident Zelensky will do the right thing when it comes to world affairs. Back in 2022, it was a clear majority.
72% threw the floor. Threw the floor in by 2024. Just 48% of Americans say that they're confident that Zelensky will do the right thing when it comes to world affairs, and GOP confidence has also plummeted dramatically. Now the clear majority of Republicans are not confident, not confident that Zelensky will do the right thing when it comes to world affairs. Really, a real trend line, ones you rarely see in the American public when it comes to Ukraine and Zelensky.
Confidence in both going down through
Speaker 1: the grid. Look, some allies of President Trump have targeted Zelensky with with harsh criticism over the last few years, and it could be that that's having
Speaker 0: some impact. Absolutely. The Republican establishment, the Republican electorate has moved as the Republican establishment and Republican leaders have moved on.
Speaker 1: Alright. Let let's talk about the idea of a peace deal. And, again, the way you ask this matters, but go ahead.
Speaker 0: The way you ask it is important, so we can talk about this a little bit. So the poll question essentially is, do you support a Russia Ukraine negotiated peace deal? The vast majority of Americans, this is what they want. 78% say that they support this idea versus just 16% opposed. Of course, as we were talking about, does this question actually get at what's going on right now?
I think you would say that it probably does not necessarily get what's going at right now.
Speaker 1: No. The question asked, do you support a Russia Ukraine negotiate a peace deal? Ukraine's not there at the negotiations in Saudi Arabia this week, so the people were not asked this. And I do think in general, if you ask anyone in any poll, do you support peace? Peace tends to rate pretty highly.
Speaker 0: Peace tends to what? You rarely get 78% of the country agreeing on anything. They do agree on the idea negotiated peace deal between Russia and Ukraine. Whether the majority would agree on a Russia peace deal with Ukraine where Ukraine has nothing to do with it, that might be a different question.
Speaker 1: Hard to know. Harriet, and thank you.
Speaker 0: Thank you, my
@TCNetworkFans - Tucker Carlson Network 🇺🇸 Fan Account
According to GPS tracking data: At least 53,411 foreign Antifa and 21,034 domestic Antifa are already gathering in Chicago, to create chaos during the Harris-Walz DNC. Who is responsible for this coordinated protest? Obama? Soros? https://t.co/hzY7n2qT8y