TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @THeinrich22
reSee.it AI Summary
They think they can stop him again with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. This guy is calling for civil war-like security for Congress because the Supreme Court isn't halting Trump's certification. Just try it, and remember who's armed.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
They think they’re gonna try to stop him again by using Section 3 of the 14th Amendment 😱 This sonofabitch👇🏻 calls for civil war like security conditions for all of Congress cuz the Supreme Court isn’t stopping the certification of Donald J Trump 😲 Just try it you sonofabitch- and Remember who’s got the guns 😎
Video Transcript AI Summary
The court supports the freedoms and equality of the American people, but it won't be our savior. True change requires people actively amending the constitution. However, constitutional protections can quickly erode, as seen with Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which is being disregarded. It will be up to us on January 6, 2025, to inform the Trump supporters that he is disqualified. This situation creates a need for protection and raises tensions, all because some justices refuse to interpret the 14th Amendment properly. Cherilyn's new center aims to revive this important discussion while we continue to push for constitutional amendments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Court on the side of the freedoms and equality of the American people, but the court is not going to save us. And so that means the only thing that really works is people in motion amending the constitution. But again, it's necessary, but it's not sufficient because what can be put into the constitution can slip away from you very quickly. And the greatest example going on right now before our very eyes is section 3 of the 14th amendment, which they're just disappearing with a magic wand as if it doesn't exist even though it could not be clearer what it's stating. And so, you know, they wanna kick it to congress.
So it's gonna be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he's disqualified. And then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions all because the 9 justices, not all of them, but these justices who have not many cases to look at every year, not that much work to do, a huge staff, great protection, simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th Amendment means. And I'm glad that Cherilyn's creating her new center so we can bring that back to life even as we're continuing to amend the constitution as professor Hasson has invited us to do.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Samantha Rupnow…born a biological female but identified as a male, decides to take others out with her/him 😳 These school shootings have nothing to do with guns. NOTHING! They have EVERYTHING to do with complete and total mental illness 😤 Someone knew this could happen 😱 https://t.co/SXjoBzos8z
Video Transcript AI Summary
Officers found a juvenile believed to be responsible for a deceased individual in a building. They provided life-saving efforts to the wounded and ensured their transport to hospitals. A total of seven people were taken to area hospitals for treatment. Unfortunately, at least three individuals, including the juvenile, have died. Further details about the deceased will not be released until family members are informed about this tragic incident.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Officers located a juvenile who they believe was responsible for this deceased in the building. Additionally, the officers began administering life saving efforts to anyone who was wounded and making sure that those persons were transported. What we know is that a total of about 7 persons were transported from the scene to area hospitals for treatment. We know that at least 3 people have lost their lives, including the juvenile person. I don't have any other information about those persons who have lost their lives, and I'm not gonna release that until we have, of course, spoken with family members and ensuring that they are fully aware of this tragic, tragic scene that occurred today.
I want
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Did yall know that EVERYTHING WOKE TURNS TO SHIT 😲 There can be no clearer choice for the next President of the United States 👇🏻😎 https://t.co/fzSD5qjvFl
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker says everyone needs to be woke and should strive to be more woke than less woke. The speaker then claims that being woke means you're a loser and that everything woke turns to shit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, we have to stay woke. Like, everybody needs to be woke. And you can talk about if you're the wokest or woker, but just stay more woke than less woke. Yeah. You know what woke means?
It means you're a loser. Everything woke. Everything woke. It's true. Everything woke turns to shit.
Okay?
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Scamala now says she wants to eliminate taxes on Tips 🤔 but her economic policies have cost EVERY SINGLE AMERICAN OVER $28,000 - PER YEAR - more than what we were paying under the awesome Trump administration 😲 Vote #Trump2024 to #MAGA https://t.co/B4hgfWQNCW
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Camilla Harris price hikes have cost the average family $28,000. Credit card debt is at an all time high, and the prices of things have never been like this before. To bring the prices down and have a good life, vote for Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the Camilla Harris price hikes have cost the average family $28,000? That credit card debt is at an all time high, and that basically the prices of things have never been like this ever before. There's never been anything like it. If you wanna bring the prices down, if you wanna have a good life, vote for Trump.
reSee.it AI Summary
The J6r's are soon going to be free as SCOTUS ruled in favor of the Patriots. The Biden DOJ improperly charged them and weaponized the law, but now those charges are being dropped. It's a confirmation of what many already believed.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you haven’t heard yet, you’re gonna wanna listen to this 👇🏻😱 THE J6r’s are SOON GONNA BE FREE 😲 SCOTUS ruled in favor of the Patriots that the POS Biden DOJ improperly charged them in their court cases and they deliberately weaponized the law against them - now they’re forced to drop those charges 😳 We all knew it - but now it’s real 👏🏻👊🏻
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Supreme Court ruled that the statute used in the January 6th prosecutions was misinterpreted and not meant for protests. They applied ancient canons of interpretation to reach this decision. The Biden administration misused the statute, but the Court upheld the rule of law. There are concerns about the abuse of power and oversight is needed to understand how this happened. The speaker, a former law professor, criticizes the cynical and biased use of the statute, highlighting the double standards in prosecution. The focus is on the need for fair application of the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fisher's great, Steve. It's a tremendous statutory interpretation case, and it was the obvious statutory interpretation all along. It's a statute that's directed at obstruction of justice. That's even in the title. It's all over the place.
It was only designed to be, changed after the Enron debacle because of the the so called Enron loophole, and it's easily construed that addition to the statute to mean that you're talking about forms of obstruction that are like the existing forms of obstruction, like tearing up a document, like hiding a document, etcetera, or, you know, witness intimidation or the like. It's not designed for protests. And so the supreme court says, you know, that that's not what the statute is for, and they apply, you know, I'll I'll give your your audience 2 quick, little Latin lessons that applies these 2 classic ancient canons of interpretation, nositora socius and the jusdem generis, and they mean that words are known by the company they keep and that, if you have a list of things, the list, you can strew it, to mean that everything on the list is of a like kind or character. That's what the Latin means. They apply those canons.
They say that out rule outlaws what happened with these January 6th prosecutions, and, you know, that's that's the end of it. They made short work of it, Steve. It's a big victory for justice for the j sixers, but it's a great upholding of the rule of law because the Biden administration, the Garland Justice Department, they weaponized this statute. They totally misinterpreted it. They abused their prosecutorial discretion, and the Supreme Court smacked it down.
Speaker 1: But that's that's the the point the part of the matter is their abuse of this and their their knowing abuse of the system. They knowingly went and did this. This is Andrew Weisman. This is why Weisman John Hollman's not on the list. Weisman's on the list.
They knowingly knowingly went in and used this. And the the the federal bench, you gotta ask some questions here. Gotta be some you gotta be some tough questions. Am I wrong in that, Jeff Clark?
Speaker 0: No. You have to pursue this with maximum energy in oversight to see how we got to this very twisted place. Look. We haven't talked about it before, I think, in any of my appearances with you, Steve, but, you know, I was a a law professor for, you know, a decade while I was, in private practice and while I was in the Bush administration. And I also guest lecture from time to time on constitutional law, including last year in in Europe.
And this is the kind of interpretation of this statute 18 USC 1512 c 2. That if 1 of my law students came up with it, I would say, like, oh, you know, oh, you're very clever. You're trying to use the text of the statute, but come on. You know remotely that's not what the statute is intended to do. You're forgetting about these 2 canons that I just described.
Yeah. You're forgetting about the fact that this was designed to plug a specific loophole. You're just trying to use the statute in a cynical and results oriented way to go after people who you think you should be able to put on the hook. Even if it destroys their families, even if you're not using the statute against the same conduct by the left. Right?
We had the whole summer of 2020 with the, Antifa BLM Summer of Love.
reSee.it AI Summary
Post 1: The stolen 2020 election has been proven to be a coup, with Bill Barr at the center. Greg is naming names, and criminal charges have been filed against Pennsylvania Gov. Shapiro for obstructing and colluding in the fraud.
Post 2: Read this as proof of what he says, for your personal enjoyment.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
You mean to tell us what we suspected all along about a stolen 2020 election IS ACTUALLY A PROVEN FACT 😳 “IT WAS A COUP”, 😲 and guess who was at the center of it all - the POS Bill Barr 😤 And Greg is now naming names 👇🏻 The best part …formal criminal charges have been filed against Pennsylvania Gov. Shapiro for obstructing and colluding in the fraud 😱
Video Transcript AI Summary
Investigations revealed a conspiracy to obstruct federal investigations into election fraud in 2020, involving key figures like Bill Barr and Governor Shapiro. Formal charges of obstruction and collusion were filed against them. The evidence incriminates them, and they are facing potential prison sentences. The situation requires both federal and state agencies to investigate, with the expectation of accountability and justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do investigations, forensics, and so forth as you go where the facts lead you. You don't and what you're what you're saying there is with the where the facts are is that there was an interagency effort, conspiracy to obstruct federal investigations into election fraud, massive election fraud. And what we had in 2020 was I could say this today. I I think I would have been more circumspect in 2020, but I can say today with great veracity, gravitas that it was a coup. And, Bill Barr was at the center of that coup, among the another group called the Council of Siggy, which includes the inspector general Horowitz and includes the FBI and deputy directors of the FBI, Christopher Ray now.
And then it included the US attorney attorney generals, which was Barr, Ben Rosen, and now Merrick Garland. So these people are obstructing these investigations. They retaliate against witnesses. We took all the evidence that Leah just mentioned, filed a disclosure with Jim Jordan and the House Judiciary Committee last July. Very, very detailed, substantiated specific charges and allegations.
I think I provided them to, Joe's staff last night. I don't know if he has them, but we'll be posting them later today. Most recently, after, 3 year investigation, again, that Leah and a group of people we work with conducted and in response to court cases, discovery, subpoenas, right to knows, foyas, we submitted formal charges to the Pennsylvania attorney general, who is now Michelle Henry, against, Governor Shapiro, who is the former Pennsylvania attorney general. These are specific criminal charges and violations of USC 18, obstruction of investigations, and collusion and participation in massive election fraud. Those are formal charges that have been filed to her.
They were also copied to Jack Smith, who has been charged as special counsel by Merrick Garland to investigate any interference with the transfer of power in 2020, which, governor Shapiro was certainly involved in and the other bad actors we just mentioned. So Michelle Henry now has a dilemma. She's got, formal charges, not only against, governor Shapiro, but the district attorneys here, multiple public officials, law enforcement officers. Again, US and former US attorney general Barr is deeply involved, and she has a duty. She has a duty to investigate.
They have prosecutorial discretion, but they have a duty to investigate. They cannot choose not to investigate. She must refer these charges to, to Jack Smith, who's the special counsel, who's also working on the indictment for Trump. And, it it's quite the mess because it requires both the federal officers and federal agencies and the state agencies, including the attorney general's office, district attorney's office, the inspector general's office. It requires all of them to investigate.
And the biggest problem they have is they've had all the documents the entire time. They're their own documents. We use their own emails, their own documents, their own texts. There it it it they incriminate all of them. So we have a plan for this, but right now, we're sitting here, you know, depending on how they react.
But they're in a situation where they now must all the people they were working with, and, the evidence is overwhelming. So that's, that's the bombshell, I think. And I think that what will come out of it people ask me what will come out of it, and I can say with, with experience that prison will come out of it. Eventually, they will go to prison. It's not this isn't something that's gonna be able to be swept aside.
Not my first rodeo. Leah's tenacious, and, it will eventually result in prison sentences, accountability, and people who stole the election in 2020 and who would tend to steal the election in 2024, they will be held accountable, and they will be stopped. Fantastic, Greg. Hey. I'm wondering if
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
For your personal enjoyment, feel free to read this as proof of what he says https://intelligencer.today/governor-josh-shapiros-big-lie/23/03/2024/7376/
GOVERNOR JOSH SHAPIRO'S “BIG LIE” - Intelligencer
There is no longer any question of whether there was massive election fraud in the November 2020 presidential election, or in elections since. It is now a matter of public and judicial record that it did occur, and Governor Josh Shapiro was at the vanguard in stealing both the Pennsylvania and national elections.
intelligencer.today
reSee.it AI Summary
A judge in the Stormy Daniels case is being criticized for potential bias. Trump argues that if the judge's daughter can speak out, he should be able to as well, citing the First Amendment. #HushMoney #FirstAmendment
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
A liberal judge in the Stormy Daniel’s #HushMoney 🤫 case is threatening to put Trump in jail for saying that the judges liberal family is getting rich off the trial & richer if Trump’s convicted 😳 Sorry, but the judge’s daughter is 34 😲 If she can talk, so can TRUMP 😤. It’s called the 1st Amendment 🤷♂️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump is barred from discussing the judge's family, who has ties to the Biden campaign. The judge's daughter is a Democrat consultant benefiting financially from Trump's trial. The judge imposed a gag order on Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest. The media portrays Trump as attacking the judge's daughter, but he is just stating facts. The left's lawfare against Trump is seen as an abuse of power and a violation of his constitutional rights. The judge's bias and the unfair treatment of Trump are highlighted in this case.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump is banned from talking about the judge's family. Why? Because the judge's family was paid by the Biden campaign. This is the guy who conspired with Michael Cohen, the star witness in this case. Trump isn't allowed to say that the judge's daughter is a Democrat consultant whose clients, the Biden campaign Adam Schiff, are fundraising off Trump's indictment.
The judge's family is getting rich off Trump trials, and he's presiding over 1. And if Trump's convicted, his family financially benefits. And instead of recusing because of a glaring conflict of interest, the judge is gagging Trump for pointing out the conflict of interest. Even Michael Avenatti says it's nuts. The lawyer tweeting this from prison, we can't be hypocrites when it comes to the first amendment.
It's outrageous that Cohen and Daniels can do countless TV interviews, post on social, and make money on bogus documentaries all by talking ish about Trump. But he's gagged and threatened with jail if he responds. The judge is threatening to put Trump in jail for pointing out that his liberal family's getting rich off this trial and richer if he's convicted. Now the media who doesn't support the first amendment or care about corruption covers it this way.
Speaker 1: The judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush money trial just expanded a gag order forbidding the defendant and former president from attacking his own family. He doesn't just take his right to due process. He smears the judge. He harasses the judge's daughter.
Speaker 2: President Trump, our former chief executive, is using the bully pulpit that comes with being a former president, to put people in grave danger quite apart from his attacks on the judge's daughter, which are totally uncalled for.
Speaker 0: The judge's daughter isn't 7. She's 34. He's not attacking her. He's just saying what she does for a living. How's that an attack?
He just wants a new judge, one whose family isn't funded by Democrats. Ned Ryan is the founder of American Majority. Is that too much to ask?
Speaker 3: It's really not, Jesse. It's it's pretty appalling. This feels like a turning point in all of this lawfare against Trump. And with this case, the left is dropping any pretense, doesn't seem to care at all about having any pretense of legitimacy with the the greater public. It's the gloves are off.
It's bare knuckles now. A left A leftist judge with a case that was not taken up by previous the the southern district in New York, Bragg's predecessor, a case that should never been brought. He's presiding over it. Trump simply points out his the conflict of interest with his daughter, who, by the way, it's $93,000,000 in solicitations raised on this specific case.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And all Trump did was point out these facts. And instead of recusing himself, the judge goes, you need to shut up. And the corporate propagandists with their circus seal act obediently rise to the occasion and say Trump's attacking the daughter. No. He's just pointing out facts.
I mean, Jesse, this is a gross. The attack on Trump's constitutional rights to defend himself, the abuse of the law, the legal system on Trump. It's I have to tell you the the Democrats, the left have made a massive bet on all of this lawfare that some of it will take Trump out. I'm making a bet that this lawfare is going to blow up in their face. When things like this really break in on the normies that are watching this, they're going to realize the gross abuse of power that the left is actually doing to try and bring down Trump because orange man bad.
Speaker 0: The orange man
Speaker 3: And anything, anywhere, anytime is acceptable because orange man bad. The norm
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts claim that the Russia investigation was a setup before the 2016 election, with Obama's CIA guiding the FBI to illegally spy on American citizens. Trump declassified the report, but now it is mysteriously missing. The author expresses a strong negative opinion towards Brennan.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
You mean to tell us that the 🤬‘ing Russia, Russia, Russia hoax was a complete setup from BEFORE the 2016 election 😲 Obama (asshat) had his CIA guide the FBI in the entire operation, illegally SPYING on 26 AMERICAN CITIZENS 😱 Trump DeClassified the whole report, and now “some how” the report is MISSING 😳 Brennan needs to fry in hell 😤
Video Transcript AI Summary
New details suggest that the CIA, under Obama's administration, targeted Trump and initiated the Russia investigation. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be monitored by the 5 Eyes Intelligence Alliance, and the FBI then targeted these individuals as suspicious. This led to the launch of the Russia collusion investigation. The operation's details were kept in a top-secret binder, which Trump has ordered to be declassified. There are rumors that the binder may be missing.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a Fox News alert. Brand new details about how Obama's CIA targeted Trump and started the entire Russia host. For years, we were told that tips from an Australian diplomat tipped off the FBI after a random conversation with Papadopoulos, A no name 20 something? But according to new reporting by Michael Shellenberger and Matt Taibbi, the whole thing was the CIA setup. Former CIA director John Brennan identified 26 Trump associates to be targeted by the 5 Eyes Intelligence Alliance, And then those interactions were the targets and were targeted by the FBI as suspicious.
And that's how the FBI launched the Russia collusion hoax. The details of this entire operation have been stored in a top secret binder In a secret room in Washington, Trump ordered the whole thing declassified, and now the rumor is that the binder might be missing.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Dear Elon, Is this true? Signed, All true American Patriots https://t.co/4XW4mgtjpd
Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Wray informed Congress that he guarantees the election security of the United States. However, there are concerns about the FBI's involvement with social media giants like Twitter and Facebook. In the past, the FBI's election security task force would advise these companies on what content to restrict, which is not their role. The media should be outraged that a law enforcement agency is dictating their content. It seems that the focus is on preventing pro-Trump information from being shared. This raises questions about the integrity of the upcoming election, as these contracts are still in place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Cash, I love having
Speaker 1: you on the program because, 1, you have been so professionally right. You predict things months years before they happen. You've done so on this program. I we probably should build our own cash stinger, where it's like somebody telling the future. Right?
Like, the the the great whatever Johnny Carson used to do. Right? Where he where he'd hold stuff up to his head and he'd predict things.
Speaker 0: Well, I got one for you. I wasn't planning on rolling this out yet, but if you want Sure.
Speaker 1: Gotcha. Okay. Well, I was gonna continue my compliment, but please.
Speaker 0: Alright. No. So Chris Wray just to congress or inform congress that he is guaranteeing the election security of the United States of America. Now you gotta ask yourself, wait a sec. What does that mean?
How can how can he do that? Somebody call Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, And the other guys. And ask them if they have canceled every one of their contracts with the FBI's election task force to censor United States information. Ask them. Ask them if taxpayer funded contracts are still in play From the FBI and DOJ to these social media giants and whether or not they are meeting with them weekly and monthly with FBI leadership To talk election security.
Speaker 1: So this is still ongoing, what you're saying? Like, the same the same censorship regime for social media to ding people or ban them from questioning the results of the election. This is still ongoing.
Speaker 0: No. The same people that met leading up to the last election, the FBI And Twitter, the FBI, and Facebook, and their 80 person election security task force would go there and tell Suggest, oh, you can't put this out. You shouldn't put that out. It is not the FBI's job to tell media companies what they should and should not put out. And the media should be revolting that a law enforcement agency is dictating to the media what they can and can't put out.
But, of course, they're giving them a hall pass because What they don't want them putting out is anything pro Trump. And as we spent 1,000,000 tens of 1,000,000 of dollars As taxpayers, allowing for this election rig job to happen, and we are essentially allowing it to happen again because no one at these companies It's shredding these contracts. Wow.
reSee.it AI Summary
Listen closely to E. Jean Carroll's claims against Donald Trump. Defending him from the legal system is something I'm proud of. Carroll may have been defamed, but she's a self-righteous, lying drug user who won't get the $83 million from Trump's counter suit.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
If you seen and heard it already, then LISTEN TO HER AGAIN 😱 CLOSELY Defending Donald Trump from this bullshit legal system is the PROUDEST THING I’VE EVER DONE 😲 E. Jean Carroll says she was “defamed” 🤔. We’ll here’s is a little more… E. Jean Carroll is a self righteous, lying POS druggie & she will NEVER get the $83 million after Trumps Counter Suit 😎. Save the post 👊🏻
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses unwavering support for President Trump but criticizes the courtroom proceedings in New York. They claim that the judge limited their ability to present a defense and highlight the lack of evidence against their client. The speaker also accuses the opposing side of unethical behavior, including paying a witness. They argue that this is a violation of the justice system and emphasizes their commitment to fighting for everyone's right to speak and defend themselves. The speaker denies any fear on the part of the former president and states that he will continue to fight for Americans.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm glad you asked me that question. No. I'm not having any second thoughts about representing president Trump.
It is the proudest thing I could ever do. What I am having second thoughts about is the license that I stand here with that the people in there are supposed to have. I have not spoken because I respect my ethics while I'm on trial. But let me now speak about what has happened. I have sat on trial after trial for months in this state.
The state of New York, attorney general Leticia James, and now this. Weeks. Weeks. Why? Why?
Because president Trump is leading in the polls, and now we see what you get in New York. So don't get it twisted, whoever asked me that question. I I'm so proud to stand with president president Trump, but I am not proud to stand with what I saw in that courtroom.
Speaker 1: Miss Oliver is
Speaker 0: I'm not finished. Let me just finish, and I'll take questions, please. Before I walked into court, that judge decided that every single defense president Trump had, we were not allowed to raise in front of the jury. It is in writing, and I encourage the the real journalist to take the minute to look at his orders. There was no proof, and I I couldn't prove that she didn't bring in the dress.
There was no DNA. There was no expert. My experts were denied. Side. 2 of them 2 of them were denied to come in.
They didn't bring let me bring up that Reid sex. Been funded, miss Kaplan. And you know what we got in there? That my witness, who was her friend, who said that she is a drug addict, And the drug addict is herself. That friend, I found out in there was paid for by miss Kaplan's firm, and that is disgusting.
That is a violation of everything I stand for, and that is why I stand with Trump. And that is why so many Americans are sec. So proud that he is running again and so excited to run to the ballot box, but don't get it twisted. We are seeing a violation of our justice system. Ladies and gentlemen, sec You are not allowed to be stripped of every defense that you have.
You are not allowed to be told that you can't bring it up and imagine a point where a judge tells the lawyer before your client, the former President of the United States, the leading candidate and obvious nigh nominee for the Republican Party. Before he He takes the stand to defend himself. Miss Haba, tell me the questions you're going to ask in open court, and tell me exactly what he's going to respond. And then my questions, edited the response he was allowed to give. And guess what my client did?
He took the stand. He by the rules of this corrupt system that I have seen, we will immediately appeal. We will set aside that ridiculous jury. And I just wanna remind you all of one thing. I will continue with president Trump to fight for everybody's first amendment right to speak.
Everybody's a right to defend themselves when they are wrongfully accused and to be able to say, I didn't do it, and to double and triple and quadruple sit down and say this is wrong. This is wrong. But we are in the state of New York. We are in a New York jury, and that is why we are seeing these witch hunts, these hoaxes, as he calls them, and this is another one of them, be brought in New York, in states sites where they know they will get juries like this. It will not deter us.
We fighting, and I you. We didn't want today, but we will that was made in there. And the behavior I saw in there, some of which was reported widely today, gave us the most perfect record on appeal and even if I to it, which I don't. We were stripped of every defense, every single defense before we walked in there. And I am proud to stand with president Trump because he showed up, he stood up, he took this in, and he faced this judge.
And you know what? I'll continue to do so with him. Yes. Sense. Of course, I've spoken with the president.
Miss Hopper, is the
Speaker 1: former president scared now the consequences of his actions?
Speaker 0: The former does not live his life in fear as you've seen every single day. The former president and probably future president will continue to fight for Americans. Thank you very much, everybody.
reSee.it AI Summary
The White House occupant's statement about using military force against Texas citizens is seen as a direct threat to the constitutional republic. Some argue for impeachment due to this alarming statement.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
When the sitting scumbag squatter in the WhiteHouse blatantly states he will use military force against the citizens of Texas, that’s an all out threat to the constitutional republic that he swore to uphold and protect 😲 This sonofabitch needs to be impeached for this👇🏻 (hot mic - volume full up) 😱
Video Transcript AI Summary
We will prevent the cowboys from blocking the military aid. We might even send f fifteens to Texas and declare war if necessary. It's a strange situation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Going to make sure those cowboys don't stop the surge of military aid men from entering. If we have to send f fifteens to Texas here and raise war against Texas, it's so weird.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
You mean to tell me they EDITED videos that were used as EVIDENCE for the bullshit UnSelect committee impeachment trial 😳 Nothing they produced for evidence can be trusted - EVER 😤 https://t.co/TOrTIRglRl
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
I thought Nanchee and her UNSELECT COMMITTEE said Trump started the J6 insurrection bullshit 😱 We knew the proof was EVERYWHERE and it’s all gonna come out now 😲 Let the REAL J6 VIDEOS begin 👊🏻 https://t.co/k7J5Y1fDYH
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 warns about chemical munitions and instructs the team to deploy. Speaker 1 welcomes viewers to the front line. Speaker 2 requests more munitions and urges shooting. Speaker 0 confirms the deployment of flashbangs. Speaker 3 expresses disappointment in the actions of their own side. Speaker 2 emphasizes staying on the point. Speaker 4 provides location updates. Speaker 5, having custody of videos, acknowledges witnessing acts of violence against police officers. Speaker 1 argues that the protest was peaceful and officers initiated aggression. Speaker 0 mentions tear gas being used.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have given warnings about chemical munitions. I need the left and lethal team position above me to start deploying. Launch. Launch. Launch.
Speaker 1: Hey. Welcome to the front
Speaker 0: of the
Speaker 1: fucking line. Come here.
Speaker 2: You gotta turn around. We need more fucking munitions. Oh, let's go. Fucking shoot it.
Speaker 0: Yep. They're deploying flashbangs on us.
Speaker 3: They're shooting into their own people. We're supposed to be supporting Protect blue lights, and this is what they do to us.
Speaker 2: Stay on the point. Stay on the point.
Speaker 4: What's your Get right 89123 up here. You're 43 on the north side of High Street. Very large crowd coming down. If you want, can you hear me, please?
Speaker 2: Yes, sir.
Speaker 0: Yes,
Speaker 1: sir. Keep going.
Speaker 5: As one who is here and, who has custody of these 44000 hours of videos, I can attest there were acts of violence. There were acts of terrible violence that day. Even from what I had seen with my own eyes and and through the media, I've seen Acts of violence against police officers that I had not seen before. And it was brutal, and it was ugly. And, our officers online did what they needed to do at the time.
Speaker 1: If they'd never thrown the concussion grenades, if they'd never used a pepper spray, this wouldn't have happened. It was a peaceful protest. I was standing within 15 feet of the line of officers. They started firing at us before anybody did anything to them. We were not rushing them.
There There's no advance on them. They just started throwing concussion grenades and pepper spray.
Speaker 0: They've been tear gassing us.
reSee.it AI Summary
In May 2020, left-wing anarchists tried to storm the Trump White House, hurling bricks at Secret Service and Police. This incident, reminiscent of the January 6th events, raises questions about why it wasn't considered an insurrection before the 2020 election.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Do y’all remember this scene from the #January6th FEDsurrection 👇🏻😲 Yeah, me either cuz it was May 2020, after Trump was in office and before the stolen election of 2020 😳 Leftists anarchists attempted to storm the Trump White House, throwing bricks at Secret Service and Police 😱 Why wasn’t THIS considered an INSURRECTION 😤
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Wait, you mean to tell me that’s not January 6th 😲 Seems Rep Wesley Hunt knows EXACTLY what a Domestic Terrorist looks like 😱 Preach it sir - Release the #J6 VIDEO and Release the J6 Prisoners - every damn last one of them 👊🏻 https://t.co/MDXH7h4y5c
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker highlights various incidents of rioting and destruction that occurred on different dates, including May 31, 2020, July 27th, June 1, 2020, and in Salt Lake City. The speaker questions the lack of outrage and a hotline for these incidents compared to the focus on the events of January 6th. They criticize the Department of Justice for prioritizing investigations into January 6th rather than addressing the other incidents. The speaker concludes by expressing disappointment and referring to the Department of Justice as the Department of Subjective Justice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That's wait a minute. That's not January 6th. That's May 31, 2020. That's right in front of the White House. That's where the president lives.
And at the time, president Trump was ushered into a bunker because his life was being threatened. Where was the hotline? Next photo. That's not January 6th either. That's July 27th.
That is in Portland. And that is Antifa rioting and pillaging our country. Where was the hotline? Next slide. Well, hot damn.
That's not January 6th either. Those are more rioters that are destroying and rioting in Salt Lake City. That's why. I believe it. Is that it?
We're we're but wait, there's more. And that's not January 6th either. That's that's June 1, 2020. And that's the streets of DC are being rioted and pillaged and pillaged are brought by rioters. Where's the outrage?
Where's the hotline? This is what domestic terror looks like. This is not a school board meeting. There is no hotline for any of these rights, and we are gonna have a hotline that's going to report parents for caring about their children's education. Even further, the DOJ would rather investigate a thousand more people from January 6th than any single person in these photos.
What a shame. And that is why this is no longer the Department of Justice. It is the Department of Subjective Justice. And with that, I yield back.
reSee.it AI Summary
Justice Engoron ruled that President Trump committed fraud on his properties. The trial is a fraud and must go to appeal. It's election interference. AG Letitia James and the judge should be imprisoned. Pass it on.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
Here’s Justice Arthur F. Engoron, the wino judge who ruled that our favorite President Donald J Trump committed fraud on his properties This trial today is a complete fraud and must immediately go to appeal, and it should NEVER have been brought in the first place. It’s % #ElectionInterference and the sham AG Letitia asshat James needs to be imprisoned along with this judge Have another sip - Pass it on
Video Transcript AI Summary
A judge caused trouble for Trump and held him in contempt during a hearing. The judge was seen drinking from a 40, which caused controversy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna see the judge causing Trump so much trouble? Wanna see the judge holding Trump in contempt? Just watch this wino drink from a 40 during a hearing.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
OMG If you’ve never hear of Rep Victoria Spartz, then you’d better listen up Garland cried while Victoria was absolutely VICTORIOUS Now this is who you want representing your ass when shit gets tough @RepSpartz
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses concern about Americans being afraid of prosecution by the Department of Justice. They mention the events of January 6th and criticize the lack of proper security. The speaker also questions the handling of investigations, particularly regarding the Durham report and the slow progress on certain cases. They express frustration and disbelief at the actions described in the report. The speaker raises concerns about the involvement of the president's son with corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs and the potential impact on Ukrainian efforts and policies. They emphasize the need for trust in the president and question the Department of Justice's role in allowing foreign propaganda and destabilization. The speaker concludes by asking about the importance of ensuring that only eligible US citizens vote in elections.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: General, you had a very moving statement about your grandparents coming here, from Belarus to live in the country without fear of prosecution. I grew up in very similar country, Ukraine now. And when I came here as a young person, I believed in the value as an American not to be afraid of my government. But I wanted to tell you, and I want to share with you and get your thoughts on that. Are you aware that a lot of Americans are now afraid of being prosecuted by your department.
Are you aware about that? Are you aware of that? I'm just saying, are you aware or not?
Speaker 1: I think that, constant attacks on the department and saying
Speaker 0: that It's not a tax. Let me let me give you an example. I don't know. We talk about January 6th. People.
Speaker 1: Sorry? Yeah.
Speaker 0: There there are some people came on January 6th. There probably were some People that came in January 6th here, you know, that had bad intent. But a lot of good Americans from my district came here because they are sick and tired of this government not serving them. They came with strollers and the kids, and there was chaotic because the proper security wasn't provided. That's a question that was answered.
Really, why? Why we debated for 45 minutes on the floor and didn't stop the debate after the people broke in into the capital. But these people came. They were throwing the smoke bombs into the crowd with strollers, with kids. People were showed up, you know, FBI agent to people's houses.
You had in my district, in my town, FBI phone numbers all over the district. Please call. Call that. People are truly afraid. I just want to make sure if you're not aware that you are.
And this is a big problem when people are afraid of their own government. And I'll show you some other things. We're talking about justice system. I don't question. You're probably not a bad Person, I don't know you.
But what I'll tell you, you're in charge of that department. And people right now feel you know, I look at Durham report. And I called on the fights of violations of careers of millions Americans. Right? It's like KGB.
But when I read Durham reports, we have this you have a nice, You know, playbook. 1st, let's have a special counsel, and then you don't have to answer any questions here. Then let's extend slow work investigation on Hillary Clinton, on Hunter. Everything is slow walk. We were very quick on Donald Trump, but you were very slow walk.
Then by the time, You know that investigation and its statute of limitation expired, and all of your agents need to be tested for me there. No one recalls anything. Okay. You probably should have as part of your hiring policy. So no one held accountable, which was egregious.
What happened, you know, in that report, when I read about them, I can't believe it happened in the United States of America. This is my frustration. I'll be honest with you. Then it's very interesting, you know, regardless what it is. Even people in Obama administration raise concerns.
You know, how can president's son be serving on, you know, Corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs. Do you understand that it actually can undermine the one Ukrainian effort and policy? I think this concerns the race. The Baba administration didn't do anything about it. These people are dying right now, and Americans don't trust this president.
So you I want to ask you one thing, you know, as you, you know, I don't need answer because I know you're not going to. But I think you probably good American and you care. And a lot of these people are so afraid they cover up this stuff, I think, in your department because they're embarrassed that what we became as a country to say that what our department of justice became. That allows Russians to do propaganda in Chinese. It allows them to destabilize Our country, that is danger to our republic.
It is significant danger. And I have just 1 more question from you. You know? And I mean, I agree on Corporate crimes and fights and stuff, even with democrats, that we need to do a better job. One more question for you.
Do you believe that you know, you talk about right to vote, but do you believe that only US citizens should be voting in this election and doing anything to make sure that only eligible people vote in elections?
Speaker 1: Yes and yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. I would like to see that what you do. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
The spokesperson's evasive behavior at the podium raises doubts about her credibility. When confronted with the question of the president's interactions with foreign business associates, she remains silent. Over half of voters believe the president was involved and lied. The truth seems too much for her to handle.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
She’s always full of hot air and bullshit when she’s at that podium, spewing her lies But when asked THE REAL QUESTION she just #WalksAway like she KNOWS the truth but can’t handle it “Can you explain why the president interacted with so many of his son's foreign business associates!? More than half of voters told CNN they believe the president was involved and he lied! You can't have a response to that, Karine?" Silence
Video Transcript AI Summary
Many voters believe that the president was involved in his son's business dealings and that he lied about it. Over half of the voters surveyed by CNN expressed this belief.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You. And with that, folks explain why the president interacted with so many of his son's board business associates. More than half of voters told CNN they believe the president was involved and he lied.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
“All it takes for evil (liberal socialist DemonRats) to succeed is for good men to do nothing” Speculation has her pegged as a candidate for Trump’s VP after Trump biggly WINS the Republican Nomination for #POTUS47 Thoughts on @KristiNoem for VP? Repost and comment
Video Transcript AI Summary
Governor Kristi Noem discusses the upcoming GOP rally in Rapid City, where former President Trump will be headlining. She expresses gratitude for his willingness to attend and mentions that the event quickly sold out, with over 7,000 people expected to attend. When asked about her own presidential aspirations, she states that she has not discussed it with the former president but encourages everyone to consider serving in any role to protect the country. Governor Noem openly supports Trump and highlights his record of fighting for constitutional rights. She urges people to examine the candidates' actions rather than their speeches and debates. The interview concludes with a mention of Governor Noem's persistence in getting things done.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's gonna be headlining at GOP rally in Rapid City tomorrow. So first off, how's it selling? How's it moving? How did you get the former president?
Speaker 1: Well, we asked him and he said yes, he would come. I think that's what's so remarkable is we've asked several people to come visit us in South Dakota That are running for president and he is the one who said, I'll be there for you, Christie. I'll be there for the people of our state. So within hours, The event sold out, then we expanded the seating and that sold out, again, within the 1st day they were available. So there will be over 7,000 people in attendance.
I'm sure many more will would have wanted to come, but that's all the capacity that we have available to us. And, he should have And be surrounded by people that recognize how hard he fought to protect America and how he still wants to continue to do that in the future.
Speaker 0: I'm pretty sure that it's all but you considered running for president, I I assume the door is almost shut on that. Many people, experts on the outside, will have been saying that you'd be the perfect running mate if should President Trump hold on to this lead and become the nominee? Have you thought about it? Have you discussed that with the former president?
Speaker 1: We have not discussed at all. And I would say everybody, if asked to serve in any role, should consider it, especially right now when you watch what's happening across this country. And All it takes for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing. We had a lot of people who say, oh, politics is ugly. Politics, You know, it's divisive.
I don't want to get involved in it. Well, how will you feel in 10 years when this country is no longer the greatest example of freedom in the world? So Step up, people. Be better. Go do what you can, to be engaged because the reason that we see the violence that's going on in New York City and In other communities is because good men did absolutely nothing.
And now those of us who really do care and wanna protect this country, We have to be present, show up like President Trump is tomorrow in South Dakota, and start talking about what is precious about this This country that we need to save.
Speaker 0: Governor, have you endorsed him?
Speaker 1: I haven't, but I've talked openly that he's the candidate I'm supporting. So tomorrow, we'll have some conversations at the rally that I think everybody will be interested in. But, of course, he's absolutely the best choice For us, I don't know of any other candidate that's running for president right now that fought when it mattered. I'm thinking back to the big battles we've had in this country to Protect our constitutional rights. He's the only one I know of that went out there and actually fought to make sure that those foundational beliefs were going to be protected.
So I'm looking for a fighter that knows when to dig in when it gets controversial and hard because that's really when we have someone who will stand in the gap for all of us.
Speaker 0: You think he would?
Speaker 1: Yes. I do know that he would. He's proven it. You know, you look at everybody who's standing on that stage and look at their record, you can't rewrite history. So many of these candidates are trying to rewrite history.
People on that state shut down their businesses. They shut down their states and their beaches. They had bad foreign policy when they were in office, when they had the chance to To really do something to make America stronger. So, boy, people don't let them just because they're giving a lot of speeches and debates. Rewrite history, go back and see what they really did, when it really mattered, then you'll decide who's the best person to lead this country.
Speaker 0: Yeah, and by the way this is the message you can get from the governor, if you need something done ask for it. You asked for people, they came, you put cut out ads, they went. You asked the president to help you out, have the Republican Party on South Dakota and he's coming. So Governor Kristi Noem, not shy. Nice to see you, Governor.
Speaker 1: A little persistent. Yes. Yeah. Nice to see you too, Brian. Have a wonderful day.
Speaker 0: You got it. Meanwhile
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
When the House Oversight Chair, James Comer, DEMANDS that the National Archives release some un-redacted records from when Joe Biden was VP, ya better listen Who is Robert L. Peters JOE BIDEN USED AN ALIAS WHEN HE WAS VP #RobertLPeters
Video Transcript AI Summary
House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer, is calling on the National Archives to release unredacted records from Joe Biden's time as vice president. The committee specifically wants access to emails related to Hunter Biden, Burisma, and the Biden family's dealings in Ukraine. They are investigating whether there was any policy or influence involved in these deals. The committee has evidence of Joe Biden meeting with his son's business associates and Hunter Biden being informed of his father's government duties in countries where they had a financial interest. They are requesting documents that mention Hunter Biden and his associates, and are concerned about potential compromised national security. This is another move by the oversight committee to prove an alleged bribery scheme by the Biden family.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Breaking news right now. This is from Capitol Hill. House Oversight Committee Chairman, James Comer, now calling on the National Archives to release unredacted copies of records from when Joe Biden was vice president.
Speaker 1: Specifically, we're learning the committee wants special access to emails related to Hunter Biden, Burisma, And the Biden family dealings in Ukraine. Newsmax congressional correspondent, Kilmenny Dukart, has obtained a copy of that request. And she has the details live from Capitol Hill. Good morning.
Speaker 2: Shawn and Emma, good morning. We've talked about The bank records, the payments that Hunter Biden received from foreign nationals. We've talked about the committee's Testimony rather. Testimony that the committee obtained revealing that then vice president Joe Biden met with individuals that his son did business with. This is the committee's latest efforts to fill in the blanks here on if there was any policy or influence, exchanged or promised as part of these deals.
Chairman Comer saying this in a statement, we have already evidence of then Vice President Biden speaking, dining, and having coffee with his son's foreign business associates. We also know that Hunter Biden and his associates were informed of then Vice President Biden's official government duties in countries where they had a financial interest. The National Archives must provide these unredacted records to further our investigation into the Biden family's corruption. And here's what the committee is specifically requesting in that letter from Chairman Comer to the head of the National Archives, Colleen Shogan. He states, attached to this email and made available on the NARA website as a document that indicates At 9 am on May 27, 2016, Vice President Biden took a call with the president of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko.
It is concerning to the committee, however, that this document was sent to Robert L. Peters, a pseudonym The committee has identified as then vice president. Additionally, the committee questions why the then vice president's Hunter Biden and only Hunter Biden was copied on this email to then Vice President Biden. Now the committee is specifically asking for any documents that name Hunter Biden, Devin Archer or Eric Schwerin. Again, those are associates of Hunter Biden when he was serving on the board of Burisma.
And it says that the committee is concerned with foreign access that could have been sold that was compromised as part of national security. So they have a long list of documents as part of that letter that they are requesting from the National Archives as part of the Presidential Records Act and the Freedom of Information Act and they want these unredacted copies. Sean,
Speaker 1: Emma. Another move by the oversight committee there in their efforts to prove this again alleged bribery scheme by the Biden family here. This just Breaking.
reSee.it AI Summary
The justice system lacks fairness, stripping our country of law and order. Those in power will stop at nothing to eliminate him. But we won't stand idly by. The consequences will be severe. Patriots are fed up, a revolution is brewing. Messing with Trump means messing with all of us. We stand united, with Trump and God, for any other choice will destroy our country. Retweet if you agree.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
It’s not a two-tiered Justice System! It’s a NO JUSTICE SYSTEM Law & Order has been totally stripped from our country, and [they] will stop at NOTHING to eliminate him Be assured - neither will we . The consequences of their actions will be deep and severe when it’s over. And it will come to a head - sooner than later. Patriots have had it with the slime running our country, and there is a real REVOLUTION boiling in our blood right now. When you mess with Trump, you are messing with us all We will stand with Donald J Trump and God almighty, because the other choices, ANY OTHER CHOICE, will end with the destruction of OUR Country. And this we can not stand for - EVER Retweet if you agree
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nothing worth doing ever came easy. Following your convictions means facing criticism from those lacking courage. My administration is committed to eradicating human trafficking worldwide. We are dismantling criminal organizations and won't rest until every victim is liberated. Our movement aims to replace a corrupt political establishment with a government controlled by the American people. The Washington establishment exists to protect and enrich themselves at our expense. We must challenge accepted wisdom and established systems. As long as America remains true to its values, our best days are yet to come.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember this, nothing worth doing ever, ever, ever came easy. Following your convictions means you must be willing to face criticism from those who lack The same courage to do what is right and they know what is right, but they don't have the Courage or the guts or the stamina to take it and to do it. It's called the road. Let's travel. What imprint will you leave in the sands of history?
What will future Americans say we did in our Brief time right here on My administration is 100% committed to eradicating human Trafficking from the earth, this form of modern day slavery here in the United States and all around the world. We are dismantling the criminal organizations that make large scale human trafficking possible. We will not rest until we've stopped every last human trafficking and liberated every last Our movement is about replacing a failed and corrupt political establishment with a new government controlled by you, the American people. There is nothing the political establishment will not do, no lie that they won't tell, to hold their prestige and power at your expense. The Washington establishment and the financial and media corporations that fund it exist for only one reason, to protect and enrich For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost.
Whether we are black or brown America is totally unstoppable. There should be no fear. We are protected, and we will be Detected by God. Did we challenge accepted wisdom and take on established systems? I think I did, but we all did, and we're all doing it.
Or did we just go along with convention, swim downstream so easily with the curve and just given because it was the easy way, it was the traditional way, or it was Be accepted with. I know that each of you will be a warrior for the truth, will be a warrior for our country and for your family. And as long as America remains true to its values, loyal to its citizens and devoted to its creator, then our best days are yet to come. I can promise you that.
@THeinrich22 - Todd With Trump
It’s the word “SUDDENLY” that makes ya wanna thank God that ya never took #TheJab 😲 👇🏻👇🏻 #ToddsTweets https://nypost.com/2023/05/19/university-of-louisiana-lafayette-waterskier-micky-geller-dead-at-18/
University of Louisiana-Lafayette champion waterskier dead at 18
Freshman Micky Geller studied kinesiology and marketing while he was on a full-ride waterskiing scholarship at the Louisiana university.
nypost.com