TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TLAVagabond
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
Just came across this video in my files today, would have been perfect to share on yesterday's show (https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/trump-warp-speed-gaza-freedom-city/) had I seen it, but it's pretty clear. From the great @TheMilkBarTV: https://t.co/qDe3o9UXuE
Video Transcript AI Summary
"I broke their ass."
"I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before."
"The average development timeline for the vaccine, including clinical tests and manufacturing, can take eight to twelve years through operation warp speed."
"We're doing it in less than one year."
"This is five times faster than the fastest prior vaccine development in history."
"It works incredibly well."
"Ninety five percent, maybe even more than that."
"Three other vaccines are also in the final stages of trial."
"They'll arrive within a few weeks, and they will also be mass produced, the delivery will be very rapid."
"I was never for mandates. I was I thought the mandates were terrible."
"Current data shows us that it's the unvaccinated that are contributing to why it's lingering."
"Take credit because we saved tens of millions of lives."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the past nine months, my administration has initiated the single greatest mobilization in US history, pioneering, developing, and manufacturing therapies and vaccines in record time?
Speaker 1: Yes. In a certain way, I'm the father of the vaccine because I was the one that pushed it. You know, to get it done in less than nine months was a miracle.
Speaker 0: No medical breakthrough of this scope and magnitude has ever been achieved this rapidly, this quickly, and we're very proud of it.
Speaker 1: Well, Fauci said it would take three to five years. He thought it was, something that just wouldn't be that effective because it would take so long to get.
Speaker 2: Would you make sure you get the president the information that a vaccine that you make and start testing in a year is not a vaccine that's deployable. So he's asking the question, when is it gonna be deployable? And that is gonna be at the earliest a year to a year and a half.
Speaker 0: I got them done in nine months, and it was supposed to take anywhere from five to twelve years. If you had a different administration with different people, what we've done would have taken, in my opinion, three, four, five years, and it would have been in the FDA forever.
Speaker 1: We I pushed the FDA like they have never been pushed before.
Speaker 3: Yeah. I got the FDA to do things that they it was it was pretty amazing what we were able to do.
Speaker 0: I broke their ass. Okay? And you know who doesn't like me too much? The FDA because they were very bureaucratic.
Speaker 1: This is a very bureaucratic organization. I push them like they've never been pushed before.
Speaker 4: President Trump is pressuring the head of the FDA.
Speaker 5: The president wants Pfizer's vaccine authorized today.
Speaker 4: The president is threatening the head of the FDA that he must act now or lose his job.
Speaker 0: The average development timeline for the vaccine, including clinical tests and manufacturing, can take eight to twelve years through operation warp speed. We're doing it in less than one year.
Speaker 3: But I was able to get that done in nine months versus, versus five years twelve years.
Speaker 0: This is five times faster than the fastest prior vaccine development in history. Five times faster. Say it again. Five times faster. Nobody can believe it, actually.
This is one of the greatest scientific accomplishments in history. It will save millions of lives and soon end the pandemic once and for all.
Speaker 1: It works incredibly well. Ninety five percent, maybe even more than that. It works incredibly well.
Speaker 4: Operation Warp Speed is one of the positives from the administration, and you've brought up the need for vaccines. You've actually told, people to get vaccines.
Speaker 1: And I would recommend it to a lot
Speaker 3: of people that don't wanna get it, and a lot
Speaker 1: of those people voted for me.
Speaker 0: Unpainful that vaccine shot is, so everybody go get your shot. Recommend you take it, but I also believe in your freedoms a 100%.
Speaker 6: I believe totally in your freedoms. I do. You gotta do what you have to do, but I recommend taking the vaccines. I did it. It's good.
Take the vaccines, but you got no. That's okay. That's alright. You got your freedoms, but I happen to take the vaccine.
Speaker 0: For political reasons, the governor decided to say and and I don't think it's good politically. I think it's very bad from a health standpoint, but he wants to take his time on the vaccine. He doesn't trust where the vaccine's coming from. These are coming from the greatest companies anywhere in the world, greatest labs in the world.
Speaker 4: Which vaccine did you get? Have you shared that with us yet?
Speaker 3: Well, I got the Pfizer, and, I would have been very happy with any of them.
Speaker 0: Three other vaccines are also in the final stages of trial. They'll arrive within a few weeks, and they will also be mass produced, the delivery will be very rapid. We're ready to go.
Speaker 3: I thought a very bad statement was when they did a pause on Johnson and Johnson. I think that frightened people. That was a bad thing to do. When they did
Speaker 1: the pause on Johnson and Johnson, I thought that was a a very, very stupid thing to do.
Speaker 3: At that time, when they did the pause, they had six people, that may have had some difficulty out of millions that received it, but I think the pause was a very bad thing to do.
Speaker 5: What about the safety aspect? That's what people are concerned about now. Do you have some concerns about the safety of these vaccines?
Speaker 3: Well, I always do, but you have to understand there are the pros and cons. If you could read some reports saying it was the greatest thing that's ever happened and we saved tens of millions of lives, then you'll read other reports. You'll say there were some problems with the vaccines in terms of certain things, but but relatively small numbers. But, you know, you have many reports that say the vaccine saved tens of millions of lives, that without the vaccines, you wouldn't have you know, you would have had a a thing like we had in 1917 where perhaps a hundred million people died.
Speaker 0: The vaccine is one of the greatest achievements of mankind. We would have had a 1917 remember the Spanish flu, killed perhaps a hundred million people.
Speaker 1: I think I saved many I don't think. I know. I saved millions and millions of lives throughout the world. We could have had another Spanish flu. We could have had, you know, in 1917, close to a hundred million people died, they say.
But it was really bad. And now other countries are using our vaccines and, you know, tremendous they're tremendously successful.
Speaker 0: I came up with a vaccine with three vaccines. All are very, very good. Came up with three of them in less than nine months. It was supposed to take five to twelve years.
Speaker 5: We say have died under COVID this year, by the way, under Joe Biden
Speaker 3: That's right.
Speaker 5: Than under you. And more people took the vaccine this year. So people are questioning how
Speaker 0: Well, no. The vaccine worked, but Yeah. Some people aren't taking it. The ones the ones that get very sick and go to the hospital are the ones that don't take their vaccine. But it's still their choice.
And if you take the vaccine, you're protected. Look. The results of the vaccine are very good.
Speaker 1: When you have the vaccine, people that do, and it's a very small number relatively, but people that do get it get better much quicker. And it's a very important thing to know. They don't get nearly as sick.
Speaker 0: And if you do get it, it's a very minor form. People aren't dying when they take the vaccine.
Speaker 5: What do you do here? As far as he know, right, throughout this
Speaker 0: country Yeah.
Speaker 5: And we have lost people because he supported the JAF.
Speaker 6: Yeah. What what do you think
Speaker 5: you would do there?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Well, you know, everybody wanted a vaccine at that time. And I was able to do something that nobody else could have done, getting it done very, very rapidly. But I never was for mandates. I was I thought the mandates were terrible.
And and, you know, there's a big portion of the country that thinks that was a great thing. You understand that. Not a lot of the people in this room, but there's a big but there is a big portion.
Speaker 4: The current data shows us that it's the unvaccinated that are contributing to why it's lingering. What do you say to those people?
Speaker 3: Well, you know what's interesting? When I was president, everybody wanted to get the vaccine. Everybody. There was a rush to get it. You didn't hear anything about mandates.
You didn't hear anything about, oh, gee. People don't wanna take it. After I left, people don't wanna take it, and it's very interesting. And I think it's because they don't trust Biden. They don't trust the administration.
As you know
Speaker 4: You don't think it's misinformation about the
Speaker 3: vaccines? President no.
Speaker 0: You're playing right into their hands when you sort of like, oh, the vaccine. If you don't wanna take it, you shouldn't be forced to take it. No mandates. But take credit because we saved tens of millions of lives. Take credit.
Don't let them take that away from you. Okay. So the president made news Do
Speaker 6: you agree with that?
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
Trump Rolls Out Obama's Martial Law Plan & Israel's Manufactured Famine/Genocide Now Confirmed https://t.co/fJOFYUF1qW
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
Israel's Illegal Iran War Exposes Fake #AmericaFirst, The $800M Iran Attack & The Strait Of Hormuz https://t.co/QSfFmxW3DF
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
“Israel, US said working to prevent ICC arrest warrant against Netanyahu” https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/report-israel-us-working-to-prevent-icc-arrest-warrants-against-netanyahu/ #RulesBasedInternationalOrder #Hypocrisy
Israel, US said working to prevent ICC arrest warrant against Netanyahu
* * *
timesofisrael.com
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
Has the recent surge in media coverage of the "border crisis" been orchestrated by the ruling class to pave the way for the introduction of UN biometric entry and exit systems with a Trump-backed "Smart" border wall? @_whitneywebb explains. Watch More: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/whitney-webb-interview-4-17-24/ https://t.co/fP9JAVMCuq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion covers the shift from a physical wall to a "smart wall" at the US-Mexico border, tied to a globalist agenda for biometric entry and exit systems. This initiative, led by companies with deep state and CIA connections, aims to implement surveillance technology like drones and AI. The push for the smart wall is linked to a broader digital ID agenda, with efforts to sway right-leaning Americans who oppose vaccine passports. The media's focus on border security is seen as a tactic to manufacture consent for the smart wall, which raises concerns about individual freedom and privacy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's start with the with the article we discussed. We have mentioned this before. We've touched on it, but this is such a really this point alone is very obvious to anybody that I think is not pulled into 1 person side of the other. I mean, obviously, the border, the wall going from a wall to a met met, you know, what do you a survey what do you a smart wall is the best way to put it. It's an interesting shift from Trump's perspective.
Right? And so go ahead and start wherever you'd like on this and why you think this connects to a larger sort of honeypot sort of manipulation discussion.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So first off, the sustainable development goals, also known as agenda 2030 from the UN, one of the main policy agendas there is to have biometric entry and exit systems for every country. This is being rolled out in lockstep throughout the entire world right now. And this year, it's, being implemented. I think next month, it starts actually being implemented in Europe, for for foreign travelers entering Europe.
The UK rolls it out next year. And, of course, there's a big push for it to do it in the US and also in other countries. It's intimately tied up with the whole digital ID, agenda that's been ongoing for a very long time, and particularly during the COVID era, as I'm sure you are aware and your audience is aware, there was a big push against digital ID and vaccine passports, which were sort of a beta test for the digital ID system, during the COVID era. And, currently, we are seeing an effort to manufacture consent among right leaning Americans who opposed vaccine passports and digital ID, to get them to go along with, this biometric entry exit agenda. That's, at its core, a globalist agenda, and also intelligence linked surveillance agenda.
I mean, fundamentally the same at the end of the day, but under, you know, different rhetoric. And so, essentially, what we've had over the past, you know, year, right, is a lot of increased attention paid by the media to the situation on the US Mexico border. It's important to point out that the US Mexico border, for decades decades, has been very insecure. And even though rhetoric has been different between presidents, no president, including Trump, has ever shut down that border. No one has constructed a physical barrier.
Trump campaigned on that, but by 2019 had pivoted away from a physical barrier, what he called at that point a medieval wall. No medieval walls, he said. No. We're going to have a smart wall. Yeah.
And the smart wall is bio is not a physical wall at all. It's, you know, enabled by drones and AI, surveillance cameras, surveillance towers, that dot the US Mexico border. And this is actually an effort that precedes Trump significantly. It was first launched after 911 as SBI Net by the newly created DHS, and was relatively unsuccessful because of, I think it was, like, Boeing and some other, you know, super bloated, corrupt US government contractors that were creating a system owned by the government, and they were, you know, milking money and being incompetent and slow to, like, make profit as contractors are the big ones, you know, or want to do. And so in comes, this new startup by this guy named Palmer Luckey, who was part of the Peter Thiel network, probably best known, Palmer Luckey, for creating Oculus Rift, the virtual reality system that was sold to Facebook, which Facebook, again, is a company that was essentially you know, we think of Mark Zuckerberg as creating it, but it would not exist without Peter Thiel, who was the person that turned Facebook in to the company it is and was on its board for a very long time.
So, Palmer Luckey, you know, involved with Facebook and then leaves, and then Thiel starts funding his defense startup, AI defense startup, called Anduril, which is tied up with this same network of companies Steel is responsible for that are contractors to the military and intelligence communities of the US, you know, including Palantir, of course, being the main company in that web. But Anduril is intimately connected, because of people like Trey Stevens, who's been at Palantir, works for Thiel's Founders Fund. Founders Fund invested in Anduril. Trey Stevens cocreated Anduril with Palmer Luckey. Trey Stevens was also involved with Trump's DOD transition team, which Peter Thiel was also intimately involved in, and Trey Stevens was also on the board and still is on the board of Carbon 9 Carbine 911, which is the 911 emergency system, company that was heavily funded by Jeffrey Epstein, basically created by former Israeli prime minister Ehud Barak, and Unit 8200 officials to take over, essentially, the US 911 911 call system, and turn it into, like, a a system that has precrime and extreme surveillance functionality.
So Trey Stevens is involved with that crowd. And within CARB I 911 is a woman named Latal Hashem, a career Israeli intelligence operative who currently works for Erik Prince of Blackwater fame, who is also very much inserted into, this network and and, you know, the network behind the Trump administration, essentially. So these are and, it's important to point out too, Andrew Rohl, Palantir, Trey Stevens, Peter Thiel, these guys all have extreme CIA connections, extreme deep state connections. This is the supposed deep state that Trump supporters are supposed to hate, and they are the ones building the smart wall in this, you know I would obviously, there's a very insecure and troubling situation on the border, but people only care about it because it's being given extreme media attention. And, you know, concern about it is being drummed up as a way to manufacture consent for something must be done.
And the something that must be done, of course, is the smart wall. And this is being pitched within independent media by people like Brett Weinstein on Tucker Carlson, being pitched by people like Colonel Douglas McGregor, who also, I believe, had some sort of advisory role in the Trump administration. And, unfortunately, you know, the smart wall is not something that's going to promote individual liberty or freedom. It is this exact same UN, biometric entry and exit system that depends heavily on digital ID.
@TLAVagabond - The Last American Vagabond
IDF Whistleblower Admits Institutional War Crimes Are Openly Being Committed In Gaza https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/idf-whistleblower-admit-war-crimes/ #TheDailyWrapUp #IDF #Whistleblower #Israel #Gaza
@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond
Israel used an image of a women from at least 2022, claiming it was proof of rape at the music festival on October 7th, 2023. After it was revealed to be an old image that had previously been used by the IDF, Israel deleted the image with no comment. https://www.hamas-massacre.net/categories/the-nova-party-massacre
The Nova Party Massacre | Hamas Massacre
hamas-massacre.net
@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond
It is incredible to see even the BBC exposing the lies that are incessantly coming out of the Israeli government. Again, I think this is happening simply because even the BBC can see the writing on the wall. The world sees right through this. https://t.co/eTrKWAu4PB
Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel claimed that the Al Shifa Hospital was a main headquarters for Hamas' terrorist activity, but has not provided evidence of tunnels underneath the hospital. Israel released a video that was analyzed by the BBC, but there are discrepancies between the footage shown in the video and what the BBC saw when they visited the hospital. Israel says the video is unedited, but there appears to be an edit. The IDF also showed military equipment in other locations, but it is unclear how it got there. The US describes Al Shifa as a command and control node, while Israel insists it was a command center.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Israel described the Al Shifa Hospital as the main headquarters for Hamas' terrorist activity. This IDF animation posted in late October claims to represent a Hamas tunnel system underneath the hospital. But having been inside Al Shifa since early Wednesday, Israel's yet to produce evidence of the tunnels. It has allowed the BBC and Fox News to film at the hospital, Though only locations of Israel's choice.
Speaker 1: This is what they found.
Speaker 0: Israel also released its own 7 minute video, which BBC verifiers analyzed. A watch visible in that video suggests it was filmed a few hours before the BBC arrived and this IDF video was posted, Then deleted, then re posted. This time without a section referring to an Israeli soldier who'd been held hostage.
Speaker 1: -I don't know when this was used the last time.
Speaker 0: -Also in the video, we see a room with an MRI machine.
Speaker 1: -And if you zoom in And we get some light over here what you will be able to see are is military equipment.
Speaker 0: The BBC was shown the same room And what we see in the 2 videos doesn't precisely match. For example, there's 1 gun in the IDF video, 2, by the time of the BBC footage, Israel has told BBC Verify this is because more weaponry and terrorist assets were discovered Throughout the day.
Speaker 1: And as always an AK 47.
Speaker 0: Israel also says its video is a single shot with no edits, But this appears to be an edit. We don't know the reasons for that edit nor how significant it is. The IDF, though, says suggestions it's manipulating the media are incorrect. The IDF video also shows military equipment in other locations, though we can't verify how it came to be there. And what we see in this IDF video doesn't equate to Israel's description of Al Shifa as An operational command center for Hamas.
The US is using a different phrase, saying Al Shifa was used as a command and control node. That implies a much smaller facility. Israel is adamant this hospital was a command center, but for now, at least,
@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond
Be sure you don’t miss this video by @DrDMartinWorld. I just went over this on last night’s show (link to the show in the following tweet)
Video Transcript AI Summary
A speaker accuses the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies of being part of a criminal cartel that aims to enrich themselves while harming humanity. They claim that the WHO has a history of criminal behavior and provide evidence to support their claims. The speaker argues that the COVID-19 pandemic was planned and executed by these criminal organizations for profit and control. They highlight the funding, research, and manipulation of the virus as evidence of their criminal intent. The speaker calls for the dismantling of the WHO and condemns their actions as crimes against humanity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very small number of criminal industrial conspirators decided to subordinate the entirety of the human population for the purpose of their sinister plans to enrich themselves while impoverishing and killing the rest of humanity. And I'm done being polite. We've long passed polite. When the words acceptable death rate become part of an industrial norm, we have lost the plot of humanity. And that's not my words.
Those were the words of the World Health Organization and of Pfizer and of Moderna when they were given the authorization to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. Next slide. And I'm also not going to sugarcoat this. This is a criminal cartel. We are acting as though there's some sort of redeemable quality somewhere in some esoteric layer that somehow or another the World Health Organization must have some salutatory benefit.
Well, I'm going to tell you since its Formation in the 1940s, the World Health Organization has been nothing more than a criminal cartel that has a sole and singular intent. And I will show you the document that proves what I'm saying. This is not an allegation. This is actually provable by their own words in their own hand, and they use a 4 step process to execute every one of their nefarious plans. They begin by planning an exercise, then they go to the business of funding that exercise, then they create the rationale now for the thing that they're going to do and then they deploy and profit from it.
And in violation of 15 U. S. Code Section 19, which Those of you listening, coincidentally started with the Clayton Act in the same year that the World Health Organization in the United States, 1913, The same year, the World Health Organization's progenitors also started. So I find it fascinating that we passed the Clayton Act in 1913 And we set in motion 110 years ago, the criminal conspiracy which we now call the World Health Organization, 110 years later. And in violation of TFEU, the treaty allegedly for the functioning of the European Union, which I think needs to now be called the Treaty for the Dysfunctional European cabal, Article 101 unambiguously lays out the conditions that this was never a public health anything.
It was racketeering for the purpose of instilling terror to adapt the behavior of a population. Period. That's what it was. That's what it always was. And we can come up with every theoretical argument we want to make about things, but the problem, even with the theory that we had an outbreak of something is falsifiable for the data from Zurich that shows us that in the year of the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance companies paid thirty $1,000,000,000 less in claims.
Now if there's a medical professional or a social professional or anybody else who wants to debate that we could develop a virus cunningly that could find out your bank account, your insurance policy statements, and whether you're paid up on your premiums, that's a big ask. It turns out that the data is unambiguous. We did not have a pandemic, we had genocide. And we need to call it what it is. Next slide.
When I say we planned it, let's make sure we understand exactly the not so fine print of the fine print. And I want to call your attention first To the right hand column of the slide, this is the 2011 data that the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, PATH and the Gates Foundation did on their wonderful worldwide program for malaria vaccine for children under the age of 6 months of age. And in their clinical trial, it's helpful to point out that they murdered 66 children in the vaccine group and then cunningly use the term control for a control group in which they murdered 28 children. Now the reason I said murdered and the reason why I use that term is because it's exactly what it was, because it turns out that this control group was not a saline injection. It was not some sort of innocuous It was actually a cocktail of other known pathogenic disease carrying injections.
The control group was known to kill people, and the experimental control group was actually theoretically maybe going to kill people. And what we did was we actually went ahead and murdered them all. And cunningly, under Article 5, Section 13, which I've put on this slide, I want you to understand why I said at its formation in 1947, when the WHO was funded and founded, it was funded and founded by people intent to commit a crime because of their own language. Section 13 of Article 5 ends with the following statement: immunity from personal arrest or detention, blah blah blah immunity from legal process of every kind. Now if you didn't intend to commit a crime, why would you need to give yourself permanent and absolute immunity from every form of prosecution and its worse, even investigation for prosecution of every kind.
People sit there and pretend, well, that's like diplomatic immunity. Do you realize this isn't even meeting the standard of diplomatic immunity. This is a criminal organization who set in motion their own law to protect themselves against crimes they knew they were going to commit. And when I say they knew they were going to commit, I mean they knew it because their 1st Director General, none other than Doctor. Rene Sand, who happened to be in the hospitality of the Germans in Dachau In 1940, earlier in 1947, mysteriously, with the largest of the Rockefeller Foundation was nominated to become the 1st Director General of The Who.
And within 5 short years, Rene Sand decided to authorize the real purpose of the WHO in writing by then Director General, Doctor. Brock Chisholm, who advocated for population control as its primary objective. Does that sound like public health to anyone in this room? This is not public health. This is the advancement of the same genocidal program that began with the Carnegie Foundation's funding of the Eugenics office at Cold Spring Labs in the United States in 1913 under the philanthropy, philanthropy of Andrew Carnegie.
People, stop fooling yourself. We debate the leaves on the tree of what we call this pandemic thing, but we're not going to the root. This was an organized crime racketeering entity set up to give itself first absolute immunity and then execute its plans to make sure it controls who lives, who dies, and who gets any chance at life. And if you think that I am somehow inflating numbers, let me be unambiguous. Under every treatment of tax provision, If I were to tell you that there is an 88% controlling interest of any organization, you might conclude that that actually aggregates into a controlling interest.
And it turns out that if we look at the foundation donations to the World Health Organization, 88% of those come from a single organization, the Gates Foundation. That constitutes a violation of every competitiveness law in Europe and every competitiveness law in the United States. This is absolutely not only not an independent charitably funded donation, but more importantly, Under the tax laws on both sides of the Atlantic, this constitutes directed donations which specifically are forbidden and do not have any place anywhere in the charter of the World Health Organization or any of the UN affiliated organizations. When I say this is a crime, I mean it's a tax crime, a racketeering crime, a money laundering crime, and now the crime of racketeering leading to murder and global terrorism. Next slide.
I told you that the second thing after they plan it is they fund it. And why don't we use the criminals' language in their own words? Because it's the best way to say it. When they actually planned the release of the use of a biologically modified Chimera, associated with the model derived from coronavirus, they actually said the following: To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we need to increase the public understanding for the needful medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine. Now let me pause for just one moment and remind you that the crisis that they were speaking of was a crisis of diminishing funding.
There was no health crisis. This was a crisis of their coffers were starting to run dry. That's the crisis. And let's read on, a key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
That is officially the statement made by the conspiratorial cabal that by that time was the decade of vaccines put in motion in 2011 by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board of the World Health Organization and it was the funding base for Peter Daszak's partnership with the chimeric production of pathogens both in North Carolina and in Wuhan. So don't tell me that we have to do an investigation into where this came from. The criminals have admitted to it in their own words. Next slide. And now we get the fun one that no one in Congress is willing to address, which is the elephant in the room.
On October 21, 2014, despite the multiple Well, conversations between Senator Rand Paul and Anthony Fauci, where we've been told that Rand Paul has done everything he can to put Fauci on the ropes. He has had in his possession the letter that you see on the left. And it is the letter conveniently on NIAID letterhead sent to the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, which unambiguously states that during the gain of function moratorium, which by the way if we use the word moratorium feels like that means you're supposed to stop, why don't we go ahead and look at 2 pieces of this letter. 1st, the 2nd bullet under Project 1, which by the way was not part of the original grant. This was to look at the novel functions of the virus pathogenesis in vivo.
You know what that means? In living systems. The grant was supposed to be clinical simulations and models, but this grant was modified with this letter to say we were going to authorize gain of function research during the moratorium in living systems. And then we love the last paragraph of this letter, which conveniently says, as your grant is currently funded, this pause is voluntary. How many times have you met a voluntary moratorium?
And the best part about it is that if we look at the very last line, or continue to conduct the applicable gain of function research until the end of the currently active budget period. But here comes the problem, You know who is supplying the budget? An indefinite term, unlimited amount contract from DARPA and from NIH. Isn't it convenient to have a perpetually funded project that needs to stop when the money runs out, when you find out that there is no point where the money runs out because there is no end to the thing that has no end. Unless you think that I'm making an allegation, which I'm not, I'm making an accusation, let's be clear.
And there's a big difference. I'm not alleging anything. They actually went to the The trouble of telling us that it was going to be the Wuhan virus that was going to get us. As you see on the right hand side of the screen, published in 2016, March 14, 2016, the SARS like Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 and I quote, is poised for human emergence. Does that sound like we're just surprised that something in Wuhan went a little haywire in December of 2019?
Or does it feel like we were told, look at Wuhan And look at coronavirus and look at what we've been doing to manipulate coronavirus in Wuhan and the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill and lo and behold, we're going to go ahead and tell you that we're ready to release it in 2016. Next slide, we're almost done. And then they created it. Now all of you know that I am criticized globally for my use of the term biological warfare. I do that because I am credentialed to do that.
I happen to be, for the United States Government, in the early part of 2000s and the latter part of 90s, a person who was sent around the world to look at the proliferation of biological and chemical weapons. I'm acutely familiar with the definition of what a biological warfare agent is in the 18 US code, the criminal code of violations of biological and chemical weapons. And so my assessment is in fact professional and right. And the reason for that is I'm the one credentialed to make that determination for the United States government for many years. That's why I say it.
But let's pretend for the moment that I'm just a nut job. Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about. So why don't we look at what the criminals said themselves, shall we? In 2005, at a conference sponsored by DARPA and the MITRE Corporation, Ralph Barrick, the architect of the lethal strand that has been injected into millions and billions of people's arms, that Ralph Barrick was sponsored to present the following, and let's go ahead and use his words, presentation. Synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, bio warfare enabling technologies.
Does that sound like a public health distribution program? Does that sound like something that is accidentally misinterpreted to mean something else? Or does biological warfare enabling technology sound like not countermeasures or pandemic preparedness? It sounds to me like biological warfare enabling technologies. And the reason why I have that hunch is what followed was he received next to his NIAID grants, non competitive DARPA grants in matching funds for over $140,000,000 of aggregate funding going into his and his related programs on synthetic biological warfare enabling technologies.
So do I have a problem calling the injection a biological warfare enabling technology? Absolutely not, because that's what they called it. And we know that they knew they called it that on the right track to see the right track to see the right track to Spiring cabal of interlocking directorates, also known as the World Health Organization, said that they were going to conduct an experience for the world that was going to be a rapidly spreading pandemic due to a lethal respiratory pathogen. The lethality in that statement is the problem. They didn't say we're going to maybe get a little bit of sniffles going around.
They said we were going to actually have the promulgation of a deadly agent. And the stated reason, in September 2020, the progress indicator is that the world would accept a universal vaccine. Not, We'll look at other options of treatment, not we'll have a look at what might be early intervention as Doctor. McCullough has so clearly advocated for in many, many, many instances. Not that we stated on September 18, 2019, we were intending to kill.
And we were intending to kill to create the fear that would drive people to accept something that without coercion, no one would have accepted. And that's published by the Criminal Racketeers. Next slide, and there's only 2 to go if you're following. Deploy and profit from it. We were told investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process.
And lo and behold, guess what they saw? Profit at the end of the process. 2022, $100,000,000,000 for Pfizer of public funds. Moderna, after lying to the Congress in October of 2020 when they were asked to actually verify whether NIAID was promoting an injection that would enrich NIAID where Anthony Fauci and the entire team at NIH said they had no financial interest in their recommendation, they receive a back payment royalty of $400,000,000 for the first payment of the royalty. $400,000,000, more than any Institute of Health has ever received in a single payment for a single invention in the history of American medical research.
And lo and behold, what do we receive after that? A request from the World Health Organization to expand its budget by 11% to make sure that the people who profited from it donate to it and guess what they just did? They laundered the money right back. That's what they did. Next, and now you get the final slide.
This is not a public health crime. This is actually not a constitutional crime. This is a criminal act, done by a criminal institution established to enable criminal behavior since its foundation in 1947. That is what this is. And we should not be debating the merits of democracy or liberty or anything else.
As irrational as that would be if we stood at a bank robbery and debated the merits of printing dollar bills. The problem is not the dollar bills, it's the bank robber. And the problem here is not health, And it's not public health, and it's not the suppression of information, and the suppression of dissident views, and the absolute unconscionable treatment of physicians around the world and academicians around the world who spoke out against this, That's not the crime. The crime is that we had criminal racketeers who conspired and developed a emergency, The same criminal racketeers planned, manufactured and did all agency capture to make sure that you were told that you would use terms that they tell you to use vaccine, face mask, health, social distancing, none of which had ordinary use definition. So we just used them.
Criminal racketeers price fixed with interlocking directorates where known competitors came together and fixed prices in direct collusion in violation of both European Union standards and in violation of both the Sherman and the Clayton Act in the United States. These were crimes. It was organized crime, and we should treat it as such. Criminal racketeers publicly lied under oath, And this resulted in the death and destruction of liberty, and most importantly, the death and destruction of the integrity of well meaning people, who sit here today doing everything they can within their power to try to treat the calamities created by this catastrophe. I will not for a moment denigrate the multiple contributions of amazing academic and medical professionals who've tried desperately to step into the gap and stop the corrupt outcomes of these crimes.
But I will without doubt say the following. Until we treat this as a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers resulting in global terrorism for the purpose of profiteering and murder, until we have that conversation, we're having the wrong conversation. Because we are not here to debate the merits of a modified agreement for a criminal racketeering organization. We are here to and the criminal organization itself. This is my call to every single person on this planet.
Don't Just limit the power of the who, destroy the who. Thank you very much.
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation discusses the claim that COVID-19 vaccines contain modified RNA (modRNA) instead of messenger RNA (mRNA), which could potentially have permanent effects on genes. @RenzTom accuses the FDA, CDC, Pfizer, and others of misleading the public. @TLAVagabond acknowledges their previous discussions on the dangers of modRNA and expresses appreciation for raising awareness. @RenzTom explains their research on mRNA's stability in food and its connection to genetic manipulation. They credit others for contributing to their knowledge on the topic.
@RenzTom - Tom Renz
BREAKING: The #FDA #CDC #Pfizer & the rest misled the world. They claimed the COVID-19 vaccines were mRNA & that meant MESSENGER RNA (which occurs in life everywhere). It is NOT. The #mRNA is modRNA. #modRNA is a lab created hybrid designed to create changes in your genes. It lasts longer & could potentially create PERMANENT changes to you. It also has the potential to have massive unintended consequences in the other 3300 billion lines of code that make up humanity. This is how it can survive in the food supply (along with the adjuvants) & I lay all this out in my substack (see the thread below) and it is THEIR words not mine. This is one of the greatest FRAUDS & attacks on humanity in the history of the world. This is a bunch of people that think they are God trying to alter genetics without #InformedConsent. What else have they lied to us about? EVERYONE MUST HEAR THIS! PLEASE SHARE. #WEF #CCP #Biden @GenFlynn @P_McCulloughMD @drcole12 @PierreKory @stkirsch @RobertKennedyJr @EmeraldRobinson @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @charliekirk11 @naomirwolf @BusyDrT @NeputeWellness @DrHenryEaly @TheClayClark @MelKShow @SteveDeaceShow @RMConservative @dbongino @realMeetJames @monicaonairtalk @Covid19Critical @MdBreathe @DrJBhattacharya @gatewaypundit @ChildrensHD @DrSyedHaider @americahappens1 @ihcmissouri @OhioAMF
@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond
@RenzTom Would have appreciated a shout brother, since we pointed you in this direction and TLAV has been on this topic before most were even aware these things were dangerous. Glad you getting this important topic some reach. #ModRNA https://t.co/UEMAbhhX2E
@RenzTom - Tom Renz
Love for you on this @TLAVagabond. Honestly I’ve been researching down this path for a very long time & the origin of the research was based on the question how was mRNA going to work in food since messenger RNA in its normal form is so fragile. This led to a ton of research on the evolution of vax tech and its ties to genetic manipulation (gene therapy). A lot of people have put out good things that have contributed to me feeling comfortable I could argue this and clearly you were on it as well. I’d forgotten about you being amongst those that contributed to my research/knowledge on this but won’t hesitate to say that you and many others may have knew this before me and I’m grateful you all kept pushing.
@TLAVagabond - LastAmericanVagabond
One estimate put the funds embezzled by Zelensky at $400M last year, at least; another expert compared the level of corruption in Kiev as approaching that of the Afghan war, “although there will be no professional audit reports emerging from the Ukraine.” https://seymourhersh.substack.com/p/trading-with-the-enemy
TRADING WITH THE ENEMY
Amid rampant corruption in Kiev and as US troops gather at the Ukrainian border, does the Biden administration have an endgame to the conflict?
seymourhersh.substack.com