TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TRobinsonNewEra

Saved - February 13, 2026 at 7:01 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Naheed Ejaz, 61, a former Labour mayor, was found guilty of perverting the course of justice for helping her son hide evidence of a 15-year-old girlโ€™s rape. She stalled officers at her door for over ninety seconds as Diwan Khan hid his phone with incriminating material. The post claims this is how โ€œMuslim rape gangs operateโ€ and that the predominantly Pakistani community covers such crimes.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

A former Labour mayor has been found guilty of perverting the course of justice after helping her son hide damning evidence relating to the rape of a 15-year-old girl. Naheed Ejaz, 61, stalled officers at her front door for over a minute and a half as her son Diwan Khan, 41, hid his phone, which prosecutors said held evidence of the crime. This is exactly how Muslim rape gangs operate, the whole predominantly Pakistani community join in the abuse, cover each other's sickening crimes, warped.

Saved - December 14, 2025 at 6:18 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Jihad is coming for all western nations https://t.co/14jvLvb5mf

Saved - October 15, 2025 at 5:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've arrived in Israel. Thank you for the invite @AmichaiChikli. I'm honoured to be here and hope to meet as many people as possible. A country with strong, patriotic leadership in @netanyahu and his party, unlike the weak and cowardly @Keir_Starmer and his party in the UK.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

I've arrived in the beautiful nation of Israel ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Thank you for the invite @AmichaiChikli I'm honoured to be here and looking forward to meeting as many people as possible. A country with strong, patriotic leadership in @netanyahu and his party. Unlike the weak and cowardly @Keir_Starmer and his party of wrong'uns in the UK.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tommy Robinson is in Tel Aviv and says itโ€™s an honor to be there. He bluntly claims the British government is weak and cowardly for recognizing the โ€œterrorist stateโ€ of Palestine, citing stateofisrael.com and noting Avi is with him. He says he hopes to show solidarity with real strong leadership and wishes Britain had a leader like Netanyahu, arguing the government has no mandate and was elected with only about 20% of public votes, and he doesnโ€™t want Israelis to think the other 80% oppose recognizing a terrorist state. He explains heโ€™s there to show solidarity with the Jewish and Israeli people, to form good friendships, and to understand that Israel is surrounded by jihad while Britain will be too; he asserts Europe will face security problems from Islamic extremism as leaders appease them, an approach Israel has already rejected. Robinson recalls that there was a time when Jews were dragged out of Gaza as part of a peace deal that supposedly would bring peace, which he says does not. He presents himself as a friend and ally of Israel, stressing that he has never been paid by Israel and that he acts out of belief in Israel as a beacon of freedom and democracy, in contrast with surrounding areas he describes as human rights violations, terror states, and jihad states. In an exchange with his colleague, they announce they are not being paid to be there and to cover it, and that Rebel is hosting coverage with a front-row seat to Robinsonโ€™s tour via tommyinisrael.com. They mention a $7,000 post and invite support at tommyinisrael.mate. They credit Amichai Chikli from the diocese with bringing him there, calling him โ€œEnemy of the stateโ€ in Britain and โ€œfriend of the state in Israel.โ€ Robinson shares a Panama anecdote: he was deported after being refused entry in Colombia; in Panama, the mayor saw it online, sent a security cyber truck to pick him up, and apologized, sending a gracious message. He says the episode shows the reach of the story and the growing attention abroad. At the airport, people recognize him as Tommy Robinson; some are excited, including some on the left who express support. The presenters remark that he may receive a welcome akin to Trumpโ€™s, noting Trumpโ€™s visit a few days earlier and expressing a wish to be there as well. He closes by reiterating that many in Britainโ€™s government have โ€œhung the Jews out,โ€ describing Britain as a scary place.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm in Tel Aviv. I'm honored to be here. It's a privilege to be invited here. And although we may have a weak, spineless, cowardly government who recognize the terrorist state of Palestine, the British people stand with the stateofisrael.com. Avi, good to see you, bro. Shalom. Shalom. Shalom. Shalom. How are you feeling? I'm happy to be here, mate. I'm honored to be Speaker 1: What are you hoping from this trip? Speaker 0: I'm hoping to show solidarity with real strong leadership. I wish our country had a a leader like Netanyahu. We have weak cowards. Our government have recognized the terrorist state, and that government are not elected on a mandate. They are elected with 20% of the public votes. So I don't want people in Israel to think that the other 80% of people, not even the majority of labor support them, support recognizing a terrorist state. So I'm here to show solidarity with the Jewish people and the Israeli people for a strong and hopefully form good a lot good friendships. And understand because Israel is surrounded by jihad. Britain is gonna be surrounded by jihad. Yeah? The problems that Israel faces here are the same problems we're gonna face. So the security issues that Israel has and Jews have in in the state of Israel, we're all gonna face in Europe. It's coming to the whole of Europe because we have allowed and empowered Islamic extremism. We have leaders who have gotten their knees to them and appeased them, and they still think they can appease them. Obviously, Israel understands now they can't appease them. I remember a time when Jews were dragged out of Gaza. Jew Jews were dragged out of Gaza as part of a peace deal that would somehow give peace, which everyone knows it doesn't bring peace. So, I'm here I'm here as a a friend of Israel. And I'm I'm happy to be here, and I'm privileged to be here as well. Speaker 1: And listen to Speaker 0: Taller than you, Avi. Speaker 1: Not sure about that part, but the truth is my son ran out of money, so they've sent me to come here. And we're not getting $7,000 opposed. Speaker 0: A tweet. I'll make I wanna add them all up. I said if if anyone's paying $7,000, I'm owed millions. Truth The truth is I don't do this. I've never been paid a penny from from Israel. I do it because I see Israel as an ally, as a partner, as the only place where we are now surrounded. This is a beacon of freedom and democracy, of rights, of all the things that we as British people hold dear. And all the places surrounding this are human rights violations, terror states, jihad states. So yeah. Speaker 1: Look. And we're not being paid by anyone to be here and cover it. To be honest, I think it's important for Rebel to be here because we know BBC Sky and the rest of the fake news are gonna run a certain Hammer me. A a certain narrative about this house. So we've actually set up a website like Rebel does, tommyinisrael.com. You'll be able to get a front row seat to Tommy's actual tour here in Israel. Bookmark it, and if you wanna help us with the $7,000 post, you can do it there. Tommyinisrael.mate, welcome. We're really excited. Speaker 0: Glad to be bro. Speaker 1: I've been trying to get him here for so long. It took Amichai Chikli from the diocese mate, you're here on a state visit. Enemy of the state Speaker 0: Enemy of the Speaker 1: state. The state Speaker 0: in Britain, friend of the state in Israel. But not just friend of the state in Israel because I believe now I'm a friend of the state in many countries. I don't know if you heard this what happened in Panama. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: No. So I went to Colombia, and they refused me entry, and they deported me. I landed in Panama and they were deporting me there. And then the mayor of Panama saw it online and he sent a security truck, a cyber truck to come and pick me up and apologize and he sent me look. He sent me a beautiful message just saying, I can't believe that I'm getting to meet you like this. So and that that that's in Panama. So I've had some Speaker 1: It's spreading. Speaker 0: It's I feel the shit. Spreading America. Where is it? Mate, I can Speaker 1: tell you now everybody that's seen our camera here in the airport asked who we waiting for. Tommy Robinson. They're like, really? The entire country knows knows who you are and are excited. And and and to be honest, even people on the left at some of these protests are like, I like him. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: That's that's what it you I feel you're gonna get that welcome that Trump kind of gets here, which is thank you for being a real friend. Speaker 0: Trump was here seventy two hours ago, wouldn't he? Forty eight hours ago. Wish I was here at the same time. But, yeah, I just think that so many people now in our government and that the cowardly leadership have hung the Jews out, especially in Britain. It must be a scary place.
Saved - October 13, 2025 at 9:35 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

I confronted BBC "Journalist" @BBCDanielS outside of Westminster Magistrates court after the days proceedings are adjourned for the day. They don't report the facts. Legacy media is finished. Citizen journalism is the future. https://t.co/6XtUt57RSY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The trial finished today, Tommy. "Turn the camera off for second." In a post-trial exchange, the speaker questions the claim that the case is contempt of court, insisting "There's no jury. That's only for juries. That's not contempt. That's a lie." They accuse the press of failing to report police unlawful conduct and say "Not one of them has reported any of the unlawful stuff the police done." They claim someone else "went to the judge to make sure Ezra will stop reporting" and that "He was the grass," acting as a journalist to silence reporting so "the only narrative you get is from them." They reference "fast car, cash in the cash in his car" and explain "I can't bank in The UK" after a demonstration. They remark that "They make you do vague answers" and note "He asked me one question. Where are you going? Benedum."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The trial finished today, Tommy. Yeah. Turn the turn the camera off for second. I'm sorry. You remember the press. You was in there today. Sorry. When You remember the press. Was in there today. Can I ask you? What did you think of the fact that the what did you think of the fact? It's contempt of a court case. No. It's not. No. It's not. There's no jury. That's only for juries. That's not contempt. That's a lie. That's a lie. No. No. You know you you you're a member of the press. I can't discuss Well, looked to your reporting today. I've looked to your reporting. I've looked to your reporting. I've looked to your reporting today. He has sat in that court case. We'll see what verdict we get tomorrow. Not one of them has reported any of the unlawful stuff the police done. Told on the other report. And then and then, John, what? He went to the he went to the judge. He went to the judge to make sure Ezra will stop reporting. He did. He He was the grass. He went as a member of the press to point out that he's sitting in the public gallery, and he's reporting on this case. To prevent him reporting so that the only narrative you get is from them. Fast car, cash in the cash in his car. Why don't I have cash in the car? Because we collected a demonstration the day before, and I can't bank in The UK, you mucks. Anyway yeah. They make you do vague answers. Yeah. He asked me one question. Where are you going? Benedum. You can't see how you made that long. And I I was in there today watch watching you. Yep. And one of the things I like to do when I'm doing journalism, I like to
Saved - October 5, 2025 at 12:12 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

FUCK HAMAS & FUCK PALESTINE

Saved - October 4, 2025 at 3:24 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

"Palestinian" imam: "Muslims will not wait until 2050 to outnumber the infidels, they will conquer Europe by jihad before that". It was never just about "Palestine" https://t.co/z3DscF4pTm

Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:26 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Do NOT, under any circumstances, let your children visit a mosque. https://t.co/YV5sfEw4LU

Saved - September 17, 2025 at 4:17 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Labour are now openly advocating for Sharia law in OUR parliament. And decided YOU must embrace it! https://t.co/U0IrJpmG2D

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sharia law forms no part of the law of England and Wales. But in common with Christian, Jewish, and other courts of faith where people choose, to put themselves before those councils, that's part of the religious tolerance that is an important British value.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sharia law forms no part of the law of England and Wales. But in common with Christian, Jewish, and other courts of faith where people choose, to put themselves before those councils, that's part of the religious tolerance that is an important British value.
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 11:47 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Japanese school girl speaks at anti migrant invasion protest: "it's painful that I can't reassure my parents generation, and I wonder what will happen to my children's future..... ..Give us our country back!" https://t.co/QtmYXYVjlT

Video Transcript AI Summary
ไปŠๆ—ฅใฏๆ€–ใ„ใ€‚ใƒ‡ใƒขใซๆฅใชใ‘ใ‚Œใฐใชใ‚‰ใชใ„ใ€‚่‹ฅใ„ๅญใฏใพใ ๅฐ‘ใชใ„ใŒใ€็งใฏ็Ÿณ็ ดใ•ใ‚“ใฎใ›ใ„ใงๆ€–ใใฆใŸใพใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚ๆฏใฏใ€ŒไปŠๆ—ฅ ใงใ‚‚ ่กŒใฃ ใฆ ใใ‚‹ ใ‚ˆใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใฆ ๅ‡บ ใฆ ใ ใพ ใ— ใŸใ€ใจไผใˆใฆใใ‚ŒใŸใŒใ€่ฆชใซใ‚‚็”ณใ—่จณใชใใ€ใ“ใฎๅฎ‰ๅฎ‰ๅฟƒใ™ใ‚‹ๆœชๆฅใŒใชใ„ใ“ใจใ‚’ไปŠใ€็Ÿณ็ ดใ•ใ‚“ ็งปๆฐ‘ ใ‚’ ใŸใใ•ใ‚“ ๅ…ฅใ‚Œ ใ‚ˆใ† ใจ ใ—ใฆใ„ใ‚‹ใ“ใฎใพใพใงใฏๆ—ฅๆœฌใฏใƒฌใ‚คใƒ—ๅคงๅ›ฝใซใชใฃใฆใ—ใพใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ๆ—ฅๆœฌใฏๅฏพไธ€ๆฐ‘ๆ—ๅ›ฝๅฎถใงใ™ใ€‚ใใ‚Œใ‚’ไปŠใฎ็Ÿณ็ ดใ•ใ‚“ใฎๅ‹ๆ‰‹ใชๆ”ฟ็ญ–ใง่จ€ใˆใชใใชใฃใฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ไนๅ ไน ็‚น ไน ไน ไน ไน ไน ไน ใƒ‘ใƒผ ใ‚ป ใƒณ ใƒˆ ใฎ ็ง ใŸ ใก ใŒ ๅฃฐ ใ‚’ ไธŠใ’ ใ‚Œใฐ ็™พ ใƒ‘ใƒผ ไบ” ๅ„„ ใƒ‘ใƒผ ใ‚ป ใƒณ ใƒˆ ๅ‹ ใฆ ใพใ™ ใฃ ใฆ ใ€‚ๆˆฆใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚ใฟใ‚“ใช ใง ้ ‘ๅผตใ‚Š ใพใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚็ง ใŒ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ่ฟ” ใ› ใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใŸ ใ‚‰ใ€่ฟ” ใ› ใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใฆ ใใ ใ•ใ„ใ€‚็Ÿณ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ็ง ใŸ ใก ใฎ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆใ€‚ๅฎ‰ ๅฟƒ ใงใใ‚‹ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆใ€‚ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ใ€‚้ ‘ๅผตใ‚Šใพใ—ใ‚‡ใ†ใ€‚ Today is scary. I must come to the demonstration. Young people are still few, but I am truly afraid because of Ishiba's policies. My mother told me, 'Even today I will go,' but I feel guilty toward my parents, and if Ishiba's immigration policy continues, Japan will become a rape country. Japan is a mono-ethnic nation. That cannot be said under Ishiba's current policies. If ninety-nine point something percent of us raise our voices, we can win. We will fight. Let's all do our best. If I say 'return the country,' please say 'return it.' Finish Ishikuni? finish our country? finish Japan. A Japan you can feel safe in. Thank you. Let's do our best.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: ไปŠๆ—ฅ ใ€ใ‚ใ‚ ๆ€– ใ„ ใ€‚ ใŒใ‚“ใฐใฃ ใฆ ใ€้ ‘ๅผต ใ‚Œ ใ€‚้ ‘ๅผต ใ‚Œ ใ€‚ ๅˆใ‚ ใฆ ใƒ‡ ใƒข ใซ ่กŒใ ใพ ใ— ใŸ ใ€‚ ใง ใ€ใ“ใ† ใ— ใฆ ใ€ใƒ‡ใƒข ใซ ๆฅ ใชใ‘ใ‚Œ ใฐ ใช ใ‚‰ ใช ใ„ ใ€‚ ่‹ฅใ„ ๅญ ใŸ ใก ใฏ ใพ ใ  ๅฐ‘ ใช ใ„ ใงใ™ ใ‘ใฉ ใ€็ง ใฏ ใ‚‚ใ† ๆœฌ ๅฝ“ ใซ ็Ÿณ ็ ด ใ• ใ‚“ ใฎ ใ› ใ„ ใง ๆ€– ใ ใฆ ใŸ ใพใ‚Š ใพ ใ› ใ‚“ ใ€‚ ใŠ ๆฏ ใ• ใ‚“ ใซ ไปŠ ๆ—ฅ ใ€ ใง ใ‚‚ ่กŒใฃ ใฆ ใใ‚‹ ใ‚ˆใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใฆ ๅ‡บ ใฆ ใ ใพ ใ— ใŸ ใ‘ใฉ ใ€ใ‚„ใฃใฑใ‚Š ่ฆช ใซ ใ‚‚ ็”ณใ—่จณ ใชใ ใฆ ใใฎ ๅฎ‰ ๅฟƒ ใ™ใ‚‹ ๆœช ๆฅ ใŒ ใช ใ„ ใ“ใจ ใ‚’ ไปŠ ใ€็Ÿณ ็ ด ใ• ใ‚“ ็งป ๆฐ‘ ใ‚’ ใŸใใ• ใ‚“ ๅ…ฅใ‚Œ ใ‚ˆใ† ใจ ใ— ใฆ ใ“ ใฎ ใพ ใพ ใ˜ใ‚ƒ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใฏ ใƒฌใ‚ค ใƒ— ๅคง ๅ›ฝ ใซ ใช ใฃ ใฆ ใ— ใพ ใ„ ใพใ™ ใ€‚ ่ฆช ใฎ ไธ– ไปฃ ใ‚’ ๅฎ‰ ๅฟƒ ใ• ใ› ใฆ ใ‚ใ’ ใ‚‰ ใ‚Œ ใช ใ„ ใฎ ใ‚‚ ่พ› ใ„ ใ— ็ง ใฎ ๅญ ไพ› ไธ– ไปฃ ใช ใ‚“ ใฆ ใฉใ† ใช ใฃ ใฆ ใ— ใพ ใ† ใ‚“ ใ  ใ‚ใ† ใ€‚ๆ—ฅๆœฌ ใฏ ๅฏพ ไธ€ ๆฐ‘ ๆ— ๅ›ฝ ๅฎถ ใงใ™ ใ€‚ใใ‚Œ ใ‚’ ไปŠ ใฎ ็Ÿณ ็ ด ใ• ใ‚“ ใฎ ๅ‹ๆ‰‹ ใช ๆ”ฟ ็ญ– ใง ใฏ ่จ€ใˆ ใชใใชใฃ ใฆ ใ— ใพ ใ„ ใพใ™ ใ€‚ๆ€–ใ„ ใงใ™ใ€‚ ไปŠ ใพ ใง ๅ›ฝ ๆฐ‘ ใฏ ็„กๅŠ› ใช ใ‚“ ใ˜ใ‚ƒ ใช ใ„ ใ‹ ใจ ๆ€ ใ† ใปใฉ ใฒใฉใ„ ๆ”ฟ ๆฒป ใ‚’ ๅ‹ๆ‰‹ ใซ ใ‚„ ใ‚‰ ใ‚Œ ใฆ ใ ใพ ใ— ใŸ ใ‘ใฉ ใ‚‚ ๅ›ฝๆฐ‘ ใฎ ๆ–น ใŒ ใ‚‚ ใฎ ใ™ใ”ใ ไบบ ๆ•ฐ ๅคš ใ„ ใงใ™ใ€‚ ็Ÿณ ็ ด ใ• ใ‚“ ใ‚„ ใ ใฎ ๅ‘จใ‚Š ใฎ ๆ–น ใ€… ใช ใ‚“ ใฆ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌๅ›ฝ ๆฐ‘ ใฎ ไธญ ใฎ 0ใ€‚000 1 ใƒ‘ใƒผใ‚ปใƒณใƒˆ ใใ‚‰ใ„ ใฎ ไบบ ใŸ ใก ใŒ ๅพ— ใ‚’ ใ™ใ‚‹ ใ‚ˆใ† ใซ ใง ใ ใฆ ใ‚‹ ใช ใ‚“ ใฆ ใŠ ใ‹ ใ— ใ„ ใงใ™ใ€‚ ไนๅ ไน ็‚น ไน ไน ไน ไน ไน ไน ใƒ‘ใƒผ ใ‚ปใƒณใƒˆ ใฎ ็ง ใŸ ใก ใŒ ๅฃฐ ใ‚’ ไธŠใ’ ใ‚Œ ใฐ ็™พ ใƒ‘ใƒผ ไบ” ๅ„„ ใƒ‘ใƒผ ใ‚ปใƒณใƒˆ ๅ‹ ใฆ ใพใ™ ใฃ ใฆ ใ€‚ ๆฐ— ไป˜ใ„ ใŸ ใ‹ใ‚‰ ๆˆฆ ใ„ ใพใ™ ใ€‚ ๅ‘จใ‚Š ใฎ ๅญ ้” ใซ ใ‚‚ ใ„ ใฃใฑใ„ ่จ€ ใ„ ใพใ™ ใ€‚ ใพใ ใพใ  ็ง ใฎ ไธ– ไปฃ ใฏ ใ‚„ ใฏ ใ‚Š ใƒ—ใƒญใƒ‘ใ‚ฌใƒณใƒ€ ใง ใ™ใ”ใ ่‚ฒ ใฆ ไธŠใ’ ใ‚‰ ใ‚Œ ใฆ ใ ใŸ ไธ– ไปฃ ใงใ™ ใฎ ใง ใชใ‹ใชใ‹ ใ“ใ“ ใพ ใง ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใŒ ๆทฑๅˆป ใช ็›ฎ ใซ ้ญ ใฃ ใฆ ใ„ใ‚‹ ใ“ใจ ใ‚’ ๅฎŸ ๆ„Ÿ ใ— ใฆ ใ„ใ‚‹ ๅญ ใŒ ใพ ใ  ใพ ใ  ๅฐ‘ ใช ใ„ ใจ ๆ€ใ„ ใพ ใ— ใŸ ใ€‚ไปŠๅ›ž ็ง ใŒ ใƒ‡ ใƒข ใซ ๅ‚ๅŠ  ใ™ใ‚‹ ใซ ใ‚ใŸใฃ ใฆ ใ‚‚ ใŠ ๅ‹ ้” ใซ ใ‚‚ ใŸใใ• ใ‚“ ๅฃฐ ใ‚’ ใ‹ใ‘ ใพ ใ— ใŸ ใŒ ใ€ใพใ ใพใ  ๆš‘ ใ„ ใ‹ใ‚‰ ใ‚„ ใฃใฑ ใ‚„ ใ‚ ใจ ใ ใ‚ ใฟใŸใ„ ใช ๆ„Ÿ ใ˜ ใฎ ใƒŽใƒช ใงใ™ใ€‚ ๅคซ ๅฉฆ ๅˆฅ ๅง“ ใฃ ใฆ ไฝ• ใŒ ใ„ ใ‘ ใช ใ„ ใฎ ใใ‚‰ใ„ ใฎ ๆ„Ÿ ใ˜ ใงใ™ใ€‚ ็Ÿณ ็ ด ใ• ใ‚“ ใŒ ใ€‚ ็ท็† ๅคง ่‡ฃ ใฏ ใ„ ใค ใฎ ๆ™‚ ไปฃ ใ  ใฃ ใฆ ๅฉ ใ‹ ใ‚Œใ‚‹ ใ‚‚ ใ‚“ ใง ใ—ใ‚‡ใ† ใใ‚‰ใ„ ใซ ๆ€ใฃ ใฆ ใ‚‹ ๅญ ใŸ ใก ใŒ ใพ ใ  ใพ ใ  ใ„ใ‚‹ ใ‚“ ใงใ™ ใ€‚ใใ† ใ„ใ† ใฎ ใ‚’ ใ‚„ใฃใฑใ‚Š ๅŒ ใ˜ ไธ– ไปฃ ใฎ ็ง ใŸ ใก ใ‹ใ‚‰ ๅค‰ใˆ ใฆ ใ„ ใ‹ ใช ใ„ ใจ ใ„ ใ‘ ใช ใ„ ่ฒฌ ไปป ใŒ ใ‚ใ‚‹ ใจ ๆ€ใ„ ใพใ™ ใ€‚ใฟใ‚“ ใช ใง ้ ‘ๅผตใ‚Š ใพ ใ—ใ‚‡ใ† ใ€‚ ็ง ใŒ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ่ฟ” ใ› ใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใŸ ใ‚‰ ใ€ ่ฟ” ใ› ใฃ ใฆ ่จ€ใฃ ใฆ ใใ ใ•ใ„ ใ€‚ ็Ÿณ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ็ง ใŸ ใก ใฎ ๅ›ฝ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ใ€‚ ๅฎ‰ ๅฟƒ ใงใใ‚‹ ๆ—ฅ ๆœฌ ใ‚’ ๅฎŒๆˆ ใ€‚ ใ‚ใ‚ŠใŒใจใ†ใ”ใ–ใ„ใพใ™ ใ€‚ ้ ‘ๅผตใ‚Š ใพ ใ—ใ‚‡ใ† ใ€‚
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 2:19 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Those in Westminster have always had warped plans and ideas. They just spend a lot of time and effort covering it up. They've got to go. https://t.co/C9wOSaDTnT

Saved - August 29, 2025 at 12:03 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Reports from locals in Dundee, this was the incident leading up to the young girls being filmed by a migrant, and having to grab weapons. https://t.co/4pTB6C1fyu

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Very concerning video out of Dundee, Scotland. Very distressed young girls being filmed by a migrant, the children can be heard saying they're only 12, and to leave them alone. Before one child brings out weapons. What's happening here? https://t.co/Uk2JtPosVk

Saved - August 28, 2025 at 1:18 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Two tier policing again, this time in Falkirk today, as concerned families protested against unvetted migrant men being dumped in their community. This follows the horrific rape of a teenage girl by an Afghan illegal immigrant in the Scottish town. https://t.co/1OIrcrT1i2

Saved - August 26, 2025 at 10:48 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

SO MUCH FOR SMASHING THE GANGS EH? 28,076 illegal migrant invaders have crossed the Channel to Britain in small boats this year, a 46% rise on the same period in 2024. https://t.co/hU9KHQg35C

Saved - August 25, 2025 at 12:32 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Up to a 100 masked Muslims turned up to try and intimidate protesters at the Britannia international hotel in Canary Wharf. There's usually the same number of police when old ladies are demonstrating. Not one when gangs of Muslims are there of course. https://t.co/RNEeDP8uKq

Video Transcript AI Summary
"unification is a great thing, but I should not be intimidated nor should I compromise on something which is entirely irrelevant to what we're trying to unify under in order to have peace. That is called appeasement, and historically, it's never worked." He says if others try to intimidate him to skip protests, "I'm in my full right to post this on social media." An incident: "a protestor outside of the hotel had an Israeli flag." He emphasizes he does not connect the flag to British patriotism or migration policy, adding, "the Israeli flag has nothing to do with British patriotism nor does it have anything to do with the migration policy." They told them to "get rid of it." He notes circulating claims that the individual held the flag on social media, and "the Muslims came in about a pack of 50." As he filmed, the crowd thickened to around 100, with threats like, "No. You're not gonna come here. We don't want you here." They demanded, "we agree on the issue of hotels. Only if you don't allow this guy to speak," which he views as intimidation and dishonesty. He explains Speaker's Corner content is "more theologically based" and about "whether religion is true or not," not migration policy, and likens the tactic to political maneuvering where "you must agree with what we say in this case in order for us to agree with you on this case."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is interesting. Now unification is a great thing, but I should not be intimidated nor should I compromise on something which is entirely irrelevant to what we're trying to unify under in order to have peace. That is called appeasement, and historically, it's never worked. Now I had discussions with local residents and to various degrees, they believe that I shouldn't have published this. But for some journalistic integrity, I believe that if they are trying to intimidate me to not show up to these protests, I'm in my full right to post this on social media. So what I'm talking about is there was an incident in which a protestor outside of the hotel had an Israeli flag. Now, again, I don't say anything about Israel and Palestine. Of course, within our liturgies and the churches, we pray for the persecuted. So regardless on what side that is, I pray for them. I haven't really looked into it in terms of foreign policy because I'm focusing more on domestic. And, of course, if I wanted to look at persecution, I would look within the church and outside of the church. Now given our understanding, we said, look. The Israeli flag has nothing to do with British patriotism nor does it have anything to do with the migration policy and ultimately what we do with migrants situated in hotels. So we told them to get rid of it. Now it had been in circulation that this individual held the Israeli flag on social media, and the Muslims came in about a pack of 50 kind of just and I'm gonna show the footage throughout this discussion, this mini explanation, but it was 50 of them. The police gave it back to me. No. Well done. Thank you, though. I'm the one that's still Thank you, you, Don't stand for that. No. No. 100%. 100%. 100%. 100%. We're all here, but we're on the same community. But you guys running down the street trying to engage with us. I think they were hoping that we would run away in order to record us kind of running away, but we kept it civil. We shook their hand. But one of them then began to notice that I was there, and then a load of them began to notice. So they originally meant to dissipate after they warned us and they said that we can agree with you. We'll agree with you about the issue of the hotels, but you need to ensure that there's no Israeli flags here. Now again, that's reasonable, but you're not here to come to tell me that. Right? Because that is a demonstration organized by local residents. You don't tell them how to run an old protest, and unification is not based on other irrelevant things that they haven't even spoken on. So I was just staying quiet at this point. Was just recording and a few of them noticed and a few of them knew me from speaker's corner. Then they decided to make a circuit around from the hotel again, and this is when it began to start getting a bit dark. And there was about 40 more, so it was about a 100. And as soon as I walked in there to film the appearance of these people, immediately got agitated. It's like, no. No. No. No. You're not gonna come here. We don't want you here. No one wants you here. You're antagonizing us. It's like the language of the police when they want you dispersed. And it was like, you're not gonna come here to film. You're not doing any of that. Again, my civil liberties. You're not gonna tell me what I can do in the case of filming a public highway. But I will respect it and I didn't. So I have footage of that. It's only in very small clips. And they said, again, we agree on the issue of hotels. Only if you don't allow this guy to speak. And it wasn't given as a form of ultimatum, but rather just this understanding that if you allow this individual to speak, we cannot agree with you. And I think that's a form of intimidation. And I also think as a I think it's a bit of dishonesty. Right? Now my content inside of Speaker's Corner is more theologically based. Right? It's on the book. It's whether religion is true or not. Now that doesn't really translate to a migration policy. So they're irrelevant to one another. They're in a completely different system. So I don't see one issue with me speaking on a local platform about migration happens to do with my career at Speaker's Corner. So we have, like, a 100 dudes demanding that of people who have been protesting for nearly a month now. And, again, I have no animosity. I think it's a perfectly fair request, but I think it's an interesting strategy. It's like that of The United States. Whenever they try to pass a bill, they kind of essentially try to slam in all of the easily passable, legislations within one bill to push one particular policy. So, for example, if we wanna send foreign aid to Ukraine, we also add that within other favorable policies in order for them to actually vote in the set of policies. They're doing the same thing. You must agree with what we say in this case in order for us to agree with you on this case. And it doesn't work. That compromise never works because politically that would just be dishonest.
Saved - August 25, 2025 at 2:14 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

This lad filmed inside a migrant hotel as a citizen journalist, ate a bowl of pasta to demonstrate how easy it is to pretend to be an "asylum seeker". Nearly a dozen police officers raided his home for "burglary". They don't like the truth being shown! https://t.co/v8YZ3v7p7w

Video Transcript AI Summary
Great Manchester Police executed a search warrant on where I live. Eight officers, five in full riot gear with tasers, face shields, batons, riot shields, dragged my disabled mother downstairs and did a full search of my property. They said it was for burglary and they took all my electronic devices. I was taken to a police station and charged with burglary: 'entering the Best Western Crestor Court Hotel and getting a chicken pasta meal and not paying for it.' I am now on bail with strict conditions. 'Eight police officers to your house in full right gear to fully arrest me.' Iโ€™ll be posting CCTV of all the riot police entering at the end of this video. Iโ€™m asking for a good lawyer who specializes in this type of thing; please share this. Iโ€™ll be away for a couple of weeks but will stay on social media, not posting.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How are we all doing guys? This is the migrant hotel manager here also known as mister A. Just want to give a big thank you to everyone who's given me a follow over the past couple of weeks. It means a lot, proper means a lot to me. Reason for my video today is I've had some big developments today over the past twelve hours. So Great Manchester Police executed a search warrant on where I live today. So I live here with my disabled mother. They came in with a search warrant and they basically they dragged her downstairs, put her in a room. It consisted of eight officers, five of them were in full riot gear, tasers, face shield, batons, riot shields, etc. They did a full search of my property. They said it was for burglary. So they've took all my electronic devices. They have all been taken away. I was taken to a police station in Great Manchester where I got a charge of burglary. So a lot of you guys don't know me personally, but I'm a clean as a whistle type of guy. I've never been in trouble with the law, never as much as a speeding fine to my name. Anyway, so I got to the custody desk and the charge against me was entering the Best Western Crestor Court Hotel and getting a chicken pasta meal and not paying for it. So I am now on bail for burglary, for walking into a hotel, into a migrant hotel, getting some chicken pasta, not paying for it and leaving. So I just want to this shows what the state will do to you. If you show what's happening in these migrant hotels, if you show them the money that is being funneled to these places, not only will they just try and have a go at you, they will actually send eight police officers to your house in full right gear to fully arrest me. So as I said, I'm now on bail. There's not much I can, not much more I can say to that. I've got strict bail conditions, but, I will be posting at the end of this video, the CCTV of all the right police coming in. So all I'm asking guys, if you couldn't share, share, like, spread this word, obviously I'll be needing a good lawyer now. If anyone knows any good lawyers who specialize in this type of thing, it would be much appreciated. But apart from that, I will be going down for a couple of weeks now for obvious reasons, but I'll still be on social media just, but I won't be posting or anything like that. But guys, if you can give me any help, it'd be much appreciated. Alright guys, stay safe.
Saved - August 23, 2025 at 1:41 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Police mob handedly pull over a patriots for the "crime" of beeping their in support of protesters. https://t.co/9KydGEvtNu

Saved - August 17, 2025 at 3:15 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

West Midlands Police attempt to thwart patriots protesting against the illegal invasion of their area through migrant hotels. People are fed up. https://t.co/ZLCOoH6BMU

@AndySaxon78 - Andy Saxon

Dudley, West Midlands. 100s of locals are protestesting against scores of illegal migrants being housed in their local communities. They're on the march, singing "oh Tommy, Tommy.... Tommy, Tommy @TRobinsonNewEra https://t.co/GBib7rpAP5

Saved - August 15, 2025 at 12:01 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Just a reminder about the elite filth and their paintings. https://t.co/CXSWxvAfXw

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 12:03 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

The new mayors of "Modern England". https://t.co/KleItblaqA

Video Transcript AI Summary
เคตเค•เฅเคคเคพ เค•เคนเคคเคพ เคนเฅˆ เค•เคฟ "เค•เฅ‹ เคญเฅ€ promote เค•เคฟเคฏเคพ เคœเคพเคเค—เคพ" เค”เคฐ เค–เคพเคธ เคคเฅŒเคฐ เคชเคฐ "เคจเคœเคผเฅ€เคฐ เคธเคพเคนเคฌ" เคธเฅ‡ เคœเฅเคกเคผเฅ€ เคฌเคพเคคเฅ‹เค‚ เค•เฅ‡ เคธเคพเคฅ "เคœเฅ‹ เคชเคพเค•เคฟเคธเฅเคคเคพเคจเฅ€ businesses เคนเฅˆเค‚ เคฎเฅˆเค‚ เคšเคพเคนเฅ‚เค‚เค—เคพ เค•เคฟ เค‰เคจเค•เคพ เคญเฅ€ เค”เคฐ เคœเคผเฅเคฏเคพเคฆเคพ promotion เคนเฅ‹". เค…เค‚เคค เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เคตเฅ‡ เคธเคญเฅ€ เค•เฅ‹ เคงเคจเฅเคฏเคตเคพเคฆ เคฆเฅ‡เคคเฅ‡ เคนเฅˆเค‚: "เค†เคช เคธเคฌเค•เคพ เคฌเคนเฅเคค เคฌเคนเฅเคค เคถเฅเค•เฅเคฐเคฟเคฏเคพ". The speaker says that "something will be promoted as well" and, especially, about "Nazir Sahab," that "the Pakistani businesses" should receive even more promotion. He ends by thanking everyone: "Thank you all very much."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: เค•เฅ‹ เคญเฅ€ promote เค•เคฟเคฏเคพ เคœเคพเคเค—เคพ เค”เคฐ เคฎเฅˆเค‚ specially love เคจเคœเคผเฅ€เคฐ เคธเคพเคนเคฌ เคœเฅ‹ เคชเคพเค•เคฟเคธเฅเคคเคพเคจเฅ€ businesses เคนเฅˆเค‚ เคฎเฅˆเค‚ เคšเคพเคนเฅ‚เค‚เค—เคพ เค•เคฟ เค‰เคจเค•เคพ เคญเฅ€ เค”เคฐ เคœเคผเฅเคฏเคพเคฆเคพ promotion เคนเฅ‹ เค†เคช เคธเคฌเค•เคพ เคฌเคนเฅเคค เคฌเคนเฅเคค เคถเฅเค•เฅเคฐเคฟเคฏเคพ
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 7:46 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Where's my reparations? https://t.co/YVtUKPn3fq

Saved - July 21, 2025 at 11:53 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Al-Julani's jihadists massacre another Druze family just like ISIS used to do. This time and American citizen and his entire family. The World is silent! https://t.co/13ivVPAc11

Saved - July 11, 2025 at 8:35 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Illegal immigrant โ€˜Rawand Abdulrihโ€™ burned down one hotel he was being housed at, paid for by the British taxpayer. Moved to another and set that alight too! https://t.co/wUzjuzCshZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states that Rowan Abdulry, an illegal immigrant, burned down a building on 03/28/2025 and was moved to the Bell Hotel, which he then also set fire to. He is now facing two arson charges. An individual questions the speaker's presence on the property, alleging illegal trespassing. The speaker says they were invited to assess the damage. The individual insists they entered illegally and should have used the main entrance after making an appointment. The individual asks how long the speaker has been there but then says they are not supposed to say. The speaker says they are free to go, but the individual tries to direct them away from the main entrance. Police arrive and are told the speakers entered the property illegally and were taking pictures and videos of the building. The police confirm they did not enter the building or do anything wrong. The speakers state they wanted to leave out the main entrance to get refreshments at the farm shop, but the individual wouldn't let them. The police say they have not committed any criminal offenses.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Right the guy that burnt this place down on the 03/28/2025 was an illegal immigrant staying here and his name was Rowan Abdulry and what was his punishment I hear you ask? He was moved down the road to the Bell Hotel and it took him eight days to then set fire to that one too and he is now facing two charges of arson. Look it's like a call of duty map and this is what you get, they're not grateful. Taxpayer funded hotel burnt to the ground. Speaker 1: I want to check. Where did you guys came from? Speaker 0: Where did we come from? Yeah. We got invited in to assess the damage. Speaker 1: No. No one invited you. Where did you came into the We got we got invited. You're illegally trespassing from there. Speaker 0: I think you're making up that we're illegal trespassers because that Speaker 1: is very You're illegal trespassers because where did you came from? Speaker 0: Where did Where? Speaker 1: Now we are standing over here. Where did you came into the how did you came into the premises? Speaker 0: I just saw that. Speaker 1: A tree. So that's that's illegal. Right? You're it's Speaker 0: One of your residents has burned Speaker 1: the hotel down. All you can you can The main gate is there. Speaker 0: How did you enter? Just take enter? Speaker 1: Just appointment, email us Yeah. And came from Porroper channel. That is the main entrance. Speaker 0: Which way did you come in? You know when you come here, did they say you could have everything you want? No. Did you get granted free wishes from a little genie bottle? This is outrageous. No comment. Yeah, I I believe so. Three wishes. Speaker 1: Please just brother, please stop. So I am new here. So Okay. Speaker 0: Yeah. How new? How new? How new? Sorry? How new? How how long have you been here? Speaker 1: I'm not supposed to tell you that so Speaker 0: Okay. You can say I want Speaker 1: to work though. Speaker 0: We don't need to Speaker 1: say it. Before before police coming, please let me go. Yeah. Speaker 0: Let you go. I'm letting you go. You're free to go. Speaker 1: You have to go, please. You are allowed to go if you want. You can go. Are we allowed to go? Can we go? Yeah. Speaker 0: We'll be. Okay. Speaker 1: We'll just move this side. We've got to go that way though because that's where the Speaker 0: police are. We're going out the front. Speaker 1: We need respect, Speaker 0: bro. We're going out the front. I'm telling you now. We're going out the front. We'll wait for the police. It's up Speaker 1: to you. Speaker 0: They might. Speaker 1: Please. We'll wait. Speaker 0: Mate, I'm telling you that we're going to leave out the main gate. That's the that's the only entrance you said to the hotel. Speaker 1: You haven't told us what your concern is. Why why won't you let us go out there? Just explain it. What's the reason? You keep saying no. Just go that way. Speaker 0: But what's the problem Speaker 1: with walking there? Is there a big hole there or something? Yeah. Where where where do you come Speaker 0: from? Where did you from? You're telling us where we came from. Speaker 1: We've got to Speaker 0: go back to. Is that Speaker 1: what you're saying? It's a good one though. Speaker 0: Write that one down. Speaker 1: That's strange, isn't it? Speaker 0: Morning. How are you? How's it going? Hi. We we we we have actually several leave, but they won't let us out the main entrance. We've been for about twenty minutes. Why won't you let them leave? They're trying to force us out this way for some reason. Came in Speaker 1: just to Speaker 0: do reports. We want to leave out Speaker 1: the fire damage. Yeah. And then come through here to leave because the main entrance is twenty minutes. Speaker 0: Twenty minutes so. But he's still got his arms like put your arms down bud please for it. That's alright. Speaker 1: So we said don't waste people. Have they Speaker 0: done anything wrong? Speaker 1: Yeah they just entered illegally in there. Speaker 0: Yeah. Far from coming Yeah. Have they said anything done anything? Speaker 1: They're just taking the pictures and videos of this building. Speaker 0: Yeah assessing the damage. Have they been in the building? No. Thank you. Yeah. Speaker 1: Okay. That's it. Speaker 0: Yeah. Good cops. All right guys. Speaker 1: Yeah. And we've avoided the front area because they're assuming we're filming now. Speaker 0: It's bit dangerous on that main road. Do you need a lift to your car? Well we was just gonna go and have a little refreshment in the farm shop. They wouldn't let us out this way, so we couldn't. As long as you're happy walking on that main That's Speaker 1: why we're keen to go. Speaker 0: Yeah, I'm walking on the grass. Were you happy to provide your names? I don't believe we need to. We'll walk on the grass though, if that's alright, outside. Lovely. Great walk on the road. Yeah. Thanks a lot. Nice one. Cheers. Okay, guys. Cheers, guys. I did tell you that would happen. In relation to the law, they haven't committed any criminal offences.
Saved - July 11, 2025 at 6:10 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Macron visiting Charles, then leaving like this, is the perfect metaphor of the state of the West. https://t.co/RbIGGg2e3L

Video Transcript AI Summary
The French delegation attempted to unload luggage before the carriages arrived at Windsor Castle but ran out of time and had to drive off quickly. As a result, all the luggage fell out of the cars. French officials then desperately tried to pick up the luggage before the carriages ran it over. The speaker characterized this as a blunder from the French officials, suggesting the timing was not right.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The French delegation were trying to get ahead of the carriage procession, and they got ahead and they're trying to unload all the luggage before the car carriages arrived. And they realized they've run out of time, and they had to drive off very quickly, and all the luggage fell out of the cars. You missed all the French luggage being spilled out on the floor Oh, just no. Outside Windsor Castle. And you see all the French officials desperately trying to pick up the luggage before the carriages runs it all over. So, yeah, a little bit of a blunder from the French officials there. Perhaps the timing was not quite right. But nonetheless
Saved - June 28, 2025 at 11:49 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Don't be a headline reader. https://t.co/E0moQOUMax

Saved - June 20, 2025 at 1:10 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

IRAN'S SHIA LEADER AYATOLLAH KHOMEINI WROTE A BOOK ABOUT LEGALLY FUCKING CHILDREN ACCORDING TO HIS VERSION OF ISLAM Just saying..... https://t.co/6stuoHuqP4

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses claims regarding Imam Khomeini's writings, specifically referencing "Tahrir al Wassila." They assert that the book includes rulings on sexual relations with underage girls, stating it is permissible to engage in various forms of sexual pleasure with girls under nine years old. The speaker highlights that Khomeini's text allows for touching and other actions with infants, and that there are no legal repercussions for a man who penetrates a girl before this age, only a minor sin between him and God. The speaker condemns Khomeini, labeling him as a "sick human being."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good evening, my dear friends and respected followers, respected guests, everyone that's on my page. Peace be upon you all. Alright. Now after we exposed the child raping, in the books of Imam Khomeini, a group of people came out saying, no. This is not true. Tawhid is lying. This isn't these are not the books of Khomeini trying to stick up for a absolute advocate for child, raping. So how about I just show you the book? This here is Tahrir al Wassila, and it's volume number two and, published in Islamic Republic Of Iran. We'll take a look at the the license of the book published by the institute that publishes and spreads the teachings of Imam Khomeini. This is their email if you'd like to go and say thank you to them. These advocates for child rape. This is the book that I was forced to study in the Islamic Institute of of Iran. This is the book of Sharia law. Come over here. The chapter of marriage, the ethics of conducting a marriage contract, marriage procedure, page number 255. Sharia law number 12, clearly he rules. This is his verdict. It is not permissible to sexually penetrate the wife before she finishes nine years old, whether it be permanent or temporary marriage. As for other methods and means of sexual pleasure and entertainment, like touching out of sexual lust and hugging out of sexual lust, thighing, which basically means folding the the thighs of the underage girl and penetrating her thighs. All of these, touching her, touching the baby girl with a sexual desire, sexual lust, hugging her with a sexual lust, and fying her. There is no problem in that. There is no problem in that even even even with the baby girl, newborn, means the baby that is suckling, that is being breastfed, that was born yesterday. Even with the young one day year old, one hour year old, two hour year old baby. What can you do with the baby? He tells you, you can thigh it, you can hug it in a lustful way, and you can touch it in its private areas. And he names it as as sexual pleasures with this newborn baby. Then he says, And even if this little baby you see this comma? It's not a full stop. It's a continuation of this. This baby, if she is penetrated, deflowered before the age of nine, there is nothing that could happen to the man as a punishment. Nothing happens to the rapist as a punishment. Other than that that rapist has sinned between himself and God, which means there's no punishment. There's no imprisonment. Nothing. He just sent a minor sin. Then he says, and if he does rape her, penetrate her, insert his male organ inside her to the point to the point that he rips the passage between the vagina and the and the external side of the body. Oh, to the point that there are no longer two holes, everything becomes one big hole because he has ripped the little baby in half, then he says, then only can you refrain from raping the little baby. Then he says over here, and if she remains alive, this little baby this little baby, if she remains alive, then you have to give her money. Even if he divorces her, this little baby girl. Now, and after this rapist has finished raping the little baby girl, and he pays her the money, and she goes to marry off another person, another rapist, who's a baby girl marries off another rapist, and then after she rapes this, she is raped once again by the new rapist. It says, if he needs to give her, this little girl, more money, the dowry for taking her virginity. Other than that, she is an object that can be molested and raped and touched and fight even if she's younger than nine. Why? Because there's no problem in that. Imam Khomeini, a sick human being. Goodbye.
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 1:46 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Musk was right about Jess Phillips. Here is Labour's Secretary of State for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls, looking at her phone and giggling in Parliament yesterday during the rape gang debate. https://t.co/4Tu49vjokW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker wants to uncover the truth about past failures and implement changes to protect children in the future. This includes changes in social services and policing, with the goal of putting perpetrators behind bars. The speaker also emphasizes the need to gather proper ethnicity data, which Louise Casey's report found to be totally inadequate under the previous government. The speaker hopes for agreement on the importance of these measures to achieve stronger protection and truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Want not just to get to the truth about past failures, but also to make sure that we make the changes to protect children for the future as well. That includes changes in social services. It includes changes in policing and the police operation that I hope that she would welcome to take action to put perpetrators behind bars and also the action to gather proper ethnicity data, which simply has not been gathered properly before, and where Louise Casey's report is very clear. It is totally inadequate, the data gathering that her government, her previous government, left behind. So I hope she would agree to all of those being extremely important so that we can get stronger protection and truth for
Saved - June 17, 2025 at 1:40 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Do not let them re write history . Sorry for the rant, sorry for the language https://t.co/89TkAO2wiw

Video Transcript AI Summary
A Labour MP allegedly had to ask Islamic elders for help to stop Muslim men raping young English girls, but they did nothing. There were allegedly no Islamic protests against these rape gangs, except when cameras were to be installed in taxis used to traffic the girls. Politicians and police leaders covered up these crimes and attacked those who spoke out. These same people are now allegedly trying to rewrite history as if they were on the side of the children, but they were allegedly on the side of the rapists. Everyone in parliament and the mainstream media knew what was happening, but they let it happen. Only the people on the streets, the survivors, and the whistleblowers stopped it. Labour politicians and the mainstream media should not be allowed to rewrite history because they all have dirty hands. Everything will be unveiled, and many people, including police leaders, council leaders, and politicians, need to go to jail.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Listen to this sad state of affairs. This is a Labour MP, a Labour representative. I went to the elders. Please help us. Are we governed under fucking Sharia? Is that what we have to do to stop Muslim men raping young English girls? Go and plead with the Islamic elders. Listen to what she said. She went to the Islamic elders, their representatives of their community. And what did they do? Nothing. Did they help? No. Many Islamic protests did you see on the streets across The UK over Islamic rape gangs? Zero. Do you know the only time Muslims protested about this issue? The only time in Rotherham when the council said they needed to put cameras in their taxis because their taxis were being used to prostitute and ferry young English girls. That's the only time they took to the streets and protested because they wanted to put cameras in their taxis. Then they're all out in the streets. This stain, I just hope that every person you see Nick Lowes, you see Owen Jones, you see Jess Phillips, Kirst Armour, the entire labor establishment that attacked every single person. So the people who lost their jobs, lost their livelihoods, lost their reputations, smeared, attacked, violently attacked, imprisoned. So many people, all from start to finish to cover up the dirty hands of politicians and police leaders who allowed this. They allowed it. They covered it up, and they come down like a ton of bricks on anyone who tried to speak about it. And right now, those same people who acted in that way are trying to rewrite fucking history. They're trying to rewrite history as though they were on the side of the children. You were on the side of the rapists. Labour, you were on the side of the rapists. Yes. I'm angry. And so should every single person in Britain be angry. Because you see all those traitors in parliament, all of them sitting there in parliament, they all knew what was happening. You see the entire mainstream media, every one of the journalists, they all knew what was happening. You see Andrew Norfolk, who won all the awards for exposing this. He knew what was happening. Every one of them knew what was happening. They let it happen. They didn't care. In fact, right now, they'd still be letting it happen. It would still be allowed to happen if it wasn't for the people who stuck to the streets, if it wasn't for the survivors, if it wasn't for the whistleblowers. Do not allow them to rewrite history. Any of them. Don't allow Labour politicians. Don't allow the mainstream media. Don't allow any of them to rewrite history. Cause every one of them had dirty hands. Every single one of them. Scum the lot of you. And everyone, everything will be unveiled. Everything's coming out. Everything. You see when they do this national inquiry, do we trust them? Do you trust them? I'm gonna do my episode anyway. I'm gonna show you Labour's involvement. But do you trust them? And you see if the truth comes out in this. Do you know how many of them need to go to jail? Police leaders, council leaders, politicians, all the way to the top. You see that filthy Labour scumbag, Shaun Davies, trying to rewrite history. So what are you doing? You can't rewrite history. You've all got dirty hands. It's all coming out. There's gonna be nowhere for you to hide. Nowhere.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Watch this encounter I had on bbc documentary back in 2013 https://t.co/YVXspbjsei

Video Transcript AI Summary
Anne Cryer attempted to assist families whose daughters were victims of Asian on-street grooming, where the offenders were primarily from the Pakistani community. She believed the police and social services were hesitant to intervene due to fear of being labeled racist. A local Muslim counselor represented Anne to the elders, hoping they would discourage the behavior as un-Islamic, but they declined. One speaker suggested a possible link to Islam, citing the Quran's allowance of taking sexual slaves, while another speaker refuted this interpretation. He stated that Islam is against grooming, child abuse, and any form of abuse. Another speaker mentioned imams delivering sermons against grooming and highlighted the increasing severity of sentences for such crimes. Anne believes the Muslim community could have done more to address the groomers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anne tried to help many families whose daughters were victims of Asian on street grooming. Speaker 1: Their daughters were 12 and 13 year olds, and all of those offenders who were corrupting these girls were from, I'm afraid, the Pakistani community. And the reason that I believe I may be wrong, but I believe the reason that neither the police nor social services would touch these cases, I I was begging them. I was round at the police station virtually every week when I came up to Keasley, and I think it was they were afraid of being called racist. Speaker 2: There is a significant over representation of Pakistani men in in in the on street gang grooming, of which the majority of the girls that are groomed are white. So, you know, we we as a community, if you like, have to be honest and open about that. We've all got a duty what we say. Speaker 3: Tackle what I can say. Speaker 2: Child abuse. But the difference is you don't You're Speaker 3: a heroic moderate for saying it. I'm I'm a far right hooligan. Speaker 0: Anne Cryer tried but failed to get her local mosque to talk to suspects' families. Speaker 1: I went to a friend of mine who was a local counselor, and he happened to be a Muslim. And therefore, he was able to represent me to the elders Yeah. Because I felt it was a good move to try to get those elders involved. Yeah. It was a good move. I hoped that I would be able to persuade the elders to go knocking on doors and say to them, this behavior is un Islamic, and I want it to stop, because I'm gonna tell the whole community about you and what you're doing if you don't. Now they weren't prepared to do that. Speaker 0: Acknowledging the problem with the community's response to the crimes is one thing. Introducing a possible reason linked to their faith is quite another. Speaker 4: There is a possibility for me that this is linked to Islam. Maybe it's not, but maybe it is. You have in the Quran How can you say it's linked to Islam? Because it in the What basis is that what's your evidence? Okay. The Quran, you can take sexual slaves. Oh. Can take sexual slaves. Speaker 1: What Speaker 4: what have you really antisoid of your four wives Speaker 1: that you can take non Muslim women as sexual slaves. Okay. I don't think you could find it. Speaker 3: It is nice to see you reading the Quran, though, I have to say. Speaker 2: It's obviously not making a difference, is it? Because you still distort it. Speaker 4: If no. I'm not distorting it. I'm reading it. I'm reading it. If you fear Speaker 3: that you Speaker 4: not deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry those that please you of other women. Two, three, or four. If you fear that that will not be just, then take what your right arm possesses, I. E. Slaves. Speaker 3: Where does it say sexual slaves? Speaker 4: Slaves, you can take that. No, where does Speaker 3: it say sexual slaves? Where does it say sexual slaves? Speaker 4: You don't distort it. Well, maybe it's not me misrepresenting. Maybe it's the groomers that are misrepresenting this. Would we all agree that these girls that have been targeting these gangs are slaves, being treated like slaves? Speaker 2: Can we agree? Speaker 3: Look, I think that is a very unhelpful way of tackling Speaker 4: the issue. They're being treated like slaves, We have chapters in here that tell them it's okay to take non Muslim women as slaves. And to me, that needs to be explored. Tommy. If if that's not right, it says slaves. Tommy. Speaker 2: Only only a few weeks ago, we saw imams over 500 mosques deliver a sermon against grooming. Speaker 4: That's true. Speaker 2: Okay? In 02/2002, when it started, when you when you dealt that first very first case here in Keathley, they got four years. Now they're getting life sentences. Speaker 4: Do you think it has anything to do with the ideology behind the fact that under Sharia, as soon as a girl starts puberty, she's fair game, yeah? No. Absolutely not. Speaker 3: Yes it is. A Muslim man, for example, cannot have sex outside of marriage, cannot marry somebody who is not a consenting adult, and can certainly not commit any of these offenses. Islam is utterly, utterly against grooming, child abuse, any form of abuse against any individual. Speaker 1: I have to say that I am Speaker 0: Like Tommy, Anne thinks the Muslim community could have done much more to tackle the groomers.
Saved - June 16, 2025 at 4:34 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

This is what guilt panic looks like. Naz Shah promoted a tweet telling rape gang victims to "shut up for the sake of diversity". Yvette Cooper stopped an inquiry. Both here fighting to get me removed from YouTube. Their time is coming. https://t.co/ktpsk0Jp1K

Video Transcript AI Summary
YouTube is promoting Tommy Robinson videos, which should not be appearing in the recommendation engine. The speaker states that if these videos are appearing, they will address the issue with their team. The speaker confirms that Tommy Robinson videos are currently appearing in their recommended timeline. The first two videos recommended to the speaker by YouTube were Tommy Robinson videos.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: YouTube continues to promote them videos. They should not be appearing in our recommendation engine. If they are, I will take this back to our team and see what the problem is. I'll give it the all. I mean, they are appearing. They are in my recommended timeline at the moment. The first two videos recommended to me by YouTube when I just click on as I've just done with this afternoon, I click onto YouTube. The first two recommendations are Tommy Robinson videos.
Saved - June 15, 2025 at 12:10 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I never wanted to say I told you so. After seven months in solitary, I'm feeling wrecked and need to take time with my children. The news of the inquiry makes my current feelings easier to handle. However, what Iโ€™ve experienced pales in comparison to what many of Britainโ€™s daughters have endured. The public remains unaware of the true scale of this rape jihad. I commend every brave survivor who has shared their story and continues to fight for justice. This scandal is the darkest stain on Britain.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

I never wanted to be in a position of saying I told you so. I came out of prison all guns blazing after 7 months in solitary and in all honesty itโ€™s hit me & I feel wrecked . I will be taking time with my children for the next few weeks & The news of the inquiry makes the way Iโ€™m currently feeling a lot easier to handle . But whatever any of us have gone through it is nothing in comparison to what so many of Britainโ€™s daughters were subjected to . The public still have no idea the true scale of this rape jihad . Well done to every brave survivor who told their stories & continue to fight for justice. This rape scandal is darkest stain ever on Britain .

@Inevitablewest - Inevitable West

There will now be a national inquiry. The world owes him an apology. https://t.co/p7dQtSgLhQ

Saved - June 14, 2025 at 1:52 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Irish B&B was offered โ‚ฌ60,000 month by the state to house unvetted migrant men. Listen to how this patriot turned down their blood money. https://t.co/Xy5PvBHc6x

Video Transcript AI Summary
A six-bedroom B&B was offered โ‚ฌ84 per person per night, totaling โ‚ฌ60,000 a month for 24 people, plus extra for a bus and food. The men staying there would also receive their own money from social services. Food would be extra, potentially bringing the total to โ‚ฌ62,000 a month, or about โ‚ฌ250,000 a year for accommodation alone. The speaker declined the offer due to community ties. Someone else bought a building for โ‚ฌ3,500,000 and could make โ‚ฌ10,000,000 a year housing 300 people. The speaker noted the lack of a playground and difficulty accessing doctors in the town, while the housed individuals would have on-site medical care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Again recently, and the offer was โ‚ฌ84 per person per night. We could put four in a room, six rooms. That's 24 people in the house, and it was 60,000 a month. 60,000 a month. 60,000 a month for for a six bedroom B and B. And then we had to have a bus, food, everything was extra. And then the guys themselves were getting their own money from the social. And now outside my pub, they the kids are dropped and collected from school. So Speaker 1: And were you told what what would be coming to your pub? Like, was it going to be men? Was it going to be women? Children? It was not. It was gonna be all men. Right. Okay. And Yeah. And in relation to the food and all that, is that was that going to be supplied by you or was that gonna be extra as well? Speaker 0: That was to be worked out after, but it was gonna be extra whether I was planning it or somebody else Speaker 1: because Right. Speaker 0: That was on top of that. So it was 62,000 a month, I think. So it was about it's about a quarter a million a year for me for accommodation. And then there was food, buses, and the whatever the lads were getting themselves. Speaker 1: Okay. Speaker 0: And then because of the community, have so many friends there. I couldn't do that for But this guy bought this building for 3,500,000.0. If he gets 300 people in there, he's gonna get 10,000,000 a year. Speaker 1: 10,000,000 a 10,000,000 Speaker 0: And there's no playground in the town. You ring for a doctor for your for your kid. It could be a week. You know what I mean? And these guys will have a doctor on-site. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: You know? So, like, where does it end?
Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:44 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

This is not a prayer, It's a demonstration of power and dominance. https://t.co/gJiRlRZ8Ir

Saved - June 8, 2025 at 2:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I received more details about the incident involving a group of individuals who verbally attacked some girls after getting off the bus. A young boy intervened and was assaulted. One of the attackers has a history of trying to groom girls. When the police arrived, they didn't take witness statements and instead assisted the group onto the next bus.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

We've received more information about this incident from the kids who were attacked by this group of Mohammedans They got off the bus started calling the girls, and I quote: "little b*tch", "little sl*t" "suck your mother white gurl". A young boy tried to stop them and was attacked mob handed by them, one of them is known to already try to "groom" young girls in the area. The police were called and they never even took witness statements, simply helped the Muslims onto the next bus home!

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Not even small villages are safe from the religion of peace and their 7th century backward Eid violence. This was Framwellgate moor in Durham yesterday. These lot got off a bus and started causing trouble with local children. https://t.co/9MLAyIqeHk

Saved - June 7, 2025 at 3:14 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

HUNTED: HOW THE DAILY MAIL ENDANGERED MY CHILDREN. Go to: http://FIGHTTHEMAIL.COM Please share this everywhere!!!

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims mainstream media outlets prioritize attention and profit over truth, and they harass, smear, and lie about individuals and their families. A personal anecdote describes a journalist contacting his young daughter. A former News of the World employee admits to mocking and destroying people for the paper. The speaker cites a Daily Mail headline falsely accusing Ant Middleton of assaulting a female police officer and the media falsely claiming Joe Rogan took horse dewormer. JK Rowling won court cases against the Daily Mail for lies and invasive photos of her children. The speaker accuses Panorama of lacking integrity and calls a journalist a liar, fraud, racist, and homophobe. The speaker discusses threats and violence he and his family have faced, including death threats and Osman warnings from the police. He accuses the Daily Mail of endangering his family by publishing their location while on holiday and inciting violence against him by falsely claiming he instigated riots. He shares a message from his daughter expressing fear for their safety. He faces prosecution and a potential ten-year prison sentence for allegedly threatening journalists. He asks for support at fightthemail.com.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Some of you may have read news stories from these sources today. The Sun, The Guardian, The Daily Mail. It's almost unavoidable. You may think the mainstream media are there to give you the truth. They don't care at all about the truth. They just want your attention because the longer they have your attention, the more money they can make. Do the mainstream media care about finding the truth? Do they care about following a code of conduct? Do they make sure that their actions are morally just? Are truthful, honest? Or do they just care about finding a sensationalized story that gets your attention? Speaker 1: Oh, she's getting out now. These Speaker 2: are the big game hunters of the twenty first century. With the right picture at the right time netting thousands. Come boys. Their pursuit is relentless. Speaker 1: Hey, we can have a big mac, please. Speaker 2: There's a price on the head of every celebrity, and almost anything goes to get it. But are they selling out their morals for money? Speaker 1: She's got track marks on her. Speaker 2: And is this any way to make a living? Speaker 0: Some of you may think that people that put themselves in the firing line are fair game. It's fair game for the media to harass them, follow them, smear them, lie about them, persecute them. But are their families fair game? Speaker 3: This was my oldest daughter. She was in her first year at primary school and I unzipped her school bag in the evening and among the usual letters from school and debris that every child generates I found an envelope addressed to me and a journalist. Now it's my record a journalist the letter was from a journalist. I I felt such a sense of invasion that my daughter's bag. I I really it's very difficult to say how angry and how how angry I felt that my five year old daughter's school was was was no longer a place of, you know, complete, security from journalists. Speaker 0: Do the mainstream media care or spare a second in thought about the danger or the consequences of their stories upon the families of those people they write about? Speaker 4: I worked for the News of the World. It was the biggest selling English language publication in the world. Politicians bowed down before us and asked for our blessing. Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, and right at the end, you had Cameron. He got down on bended knees and please make me prime minister, and that gave us impunity to do anything. Speaker 5: So you sometimes feel like you've become the poster boy for tabloid sleaze. Speaker 4: Yeah. Is that a bad thing? My job was basically to mock, ridicule, and if you like, destroy. Speaker 6: There's a difference between being hounded and, you know, just going out and just being photographed now and again. Mate, they're in your face. Speaker 4: They loved being followed by the paparazzi. Why would I feel bad? Job well done. Speaker 7: News of the world and papers like that, they was absolutely ruthless. Speaker 0: Let's have a look at this headline by the Daily Mail once again. Fury of female police officer who was assaulted by Ant Middleton. Now the truth is this has never happened. Ant Middleton has never assaulted a female police officer. Now look at the comments the public take from this deceiving headline. I think we'd rather not have a guy that assaulted a woman as mayor. And then let's look at Ant Middleton's response. Get your facts straight and look up the term. I didn't and would never lay a finger on a woman. This is one of the reasons I'm running to hold the media and journalists accountable for misinformation. Now Ant Middleton now has to spend his time defending himself against something that's never happened because of the deceitful headline of the Daily Mail. And it's not just Ant Middleton. Let's look at Joe Rogan when the media turned the guns on him because he dared to speak out against the forced vaccinations during COVID. Speaker 8: CNN is saying I'm taking horse dewormer. Speaker 9: Rogan telling his 13,000,000 Instagram followers that he was treated with several drugs, and he included ivermectin on the list, a drug used for livestock. Speaker 6: Rogan said the word ivermectin. Yes. That's the deworming medicine made to kill parasites and farm animals. Speaker 8: Why would they lie and say that's horse dewormer? Speaker 10: So things are clearly bad, but they're being made even worse by people who have refused to take the vaccine and instead are swallowing horse paste. Speaker 6: Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Wait a second. He he said that he got better because he ate. He said he's still deworming. Speaker 8: He they must know that the that's a lie. You have individuals like Joe Rogan, for example, who who don't wanna take an experimental vaccine but will take horse dewormer. Speaker 10: Ivermectin is often used to deworm livestock. Speaker 6: Ivermectin apparently given to deworm animals. Speaker 8: It's a lie on a news network, and it's a lie that's a willing that's that's a lie that they're conscious of. This is not a mistake. Yeah. They're unfavorably framing it as veterinary medicine. They keep saying I'm taking horse dewormer. I literally got it from a doctor. Does it bother you that the news network you work for out and out lied? Just outright lied about me taking horse dewormer. Speaker 6: They they they shouldn't have said that. Speaker 8: Why did they do that? I don't know. Speaker 0: Now if you have enough money, you can challenge the lies and the persecution that the media aim at you. Let's look at JK Rowling when she won court cases against once again the Daily Mail for their lies that they told about her but also their illegal invasive photos they took of her children. So what you've seen is they don't care what they do. They will attack anyone in any way to get their headline story. Speaker 5: Ultimately, we were kids that had been thrown into a lion's pit. So I was in Russia having some food in Congolese. Really attractive Russians. It was slightly odd. Why were they there? Speaker 4: What's wrong with the honey trap? Did it all the time. Go shag him $10 tomorrow morning, and you tell me about it. I didn't do that, but it's very likely that we might have done something like that. Speaker 5: I do remember the headline, five star Richie undid my skirt with his teeth. Almost like a porn story. Speaker 4: The fact that Richie is in a relationship with someone as hot as Billy Piper and then he goes to a bar and cheats on her, that makes it a much better story. Speaker 0: Now if they're willing to do that and take those tactics against young boys who are singing songs, what sort of tactics do you think they're gonna use against someone like me? Someone who's confronted the establishment and the media about their failures and their lies. There's only one journalist in this room, John, and it's not you. Okay? Speaker 11: Oh, really? Okay. That's it. Speaker 0: Okay. You you you have you're a disgrace. And and you and and in fact, anyone who's been taken down by Panorama, anyone has to challenge now because there is no integrity in any of the work you've done. You are a liar, you're a fraud, you're a racist, you're a homophobe, all in one interview. Speaker 11: This is a lie. Speaker 12: Excuse me. This is bullshit. Speaker 0: I've literally humiliated them on a global scale. What sort of target do you think they're gonna put on me? Speaker 13: I'm here. This gentleman here. I caught him with a long lens camera in the bushes taking photographs of me. Sat, I was in my car with people. There's his camera. Look. He legged it. He legged it. He's caught here. Journalists say? Journalists. Speaker 6: Yeah. Yeah. So I just spoke to the policeman. Yep. He said that he's gonna be down here. I don't know. It's not an emergency. So they're gonna come down here Yep. Speaker 13: When they, you know, when they can. Speaker 0: I knew growing up in Luton that attempting to discuss the issues which had been hidden would put me in the firing line. But I had no idea the relentless campaign of hate and smears and lies that I would face from the mainstream media for discussing these topics. There are hundred verses Speaker 7: in Yes or no? Are you Islamophobic? Speaker 0: There's no such word as Islamophobia. In in Phobia is an irrational fear. It's not irrational to fear these things. Now if I hold this Speaker 13: book up and say, Speaker 0: there will never be peace on this earth so long as we have this book. It's a violent and cursed book. That's know who's wrong. Speaker 14: Can I tell you who said that? Can I tell Speaker 0: you who said that? Speaker 11: Can you Speaker 0: put the Sir William Gladstone. Right. You wouldn't do Speaker 15: that, but Speaker 0: Sir William Gladstone the bible, Show some respect. Speaker 13: Show some respect. Speaker 0: Show some respect. Speaker 14: Have you read this book? Speaker 0: People Have you read this book? There are over a hundred people There are hundred verses Speaker 13: in this book that Speaker 0: incite violence and murder against us. Put show some damn respect for people's religious beliefs. Right? Speaker 13: I should show some respects for a book that incites murder against Speaker 0: me Put it down. And calls me this took me down. Speaker 13: This is not how I put it down. Speaker 0: In a free democratic society, you should be free to speak about these issues without a total campaign of threats of violence, intimidation, physical violence, lies, smears, relentlessly targeting not just me, but my loved ones. Over the last fifteen years, I've not been judged on what I've said. I've been judged on what the media say I've said. It may be a surprise to many of you if you've only read the headlines from the mainstream media. I've never even been arrested or questioned under any hate crime legislation, racism, extremism, or anything. Speaker 13: Can you, as a journalist Yeah. Speaker 0: Mail online Yeah. Please just justify how I'm far right? Speaker 13: What part of my views Speaker 12: Your views? Well, you you've you've expressed views against Islam and extremism. Speaker 13: And that makes me far right? Speaker 12: Well, a lot of people's And it's not just that. It's your association with people that go to these kind of rallies. Speaker 13: Okay. So so Speaker 12: But look, there's there's there's No. No. No. No. Speaker 0: Enough. No. No. It's Speaker 12: the people that you're the people that go to these sort of rallies. Speaker 13: Oh. So so okay. So a football stadium has a few hooligans. That make the owners of football stadium hooligans? No. Speaker 14: It doesn't. Speaker 13: No. So what are you talking about? Speaker 12: Look. I don't really wanna say anything else to me. Speaker 13: Oh, you don't? Oh, you don't? But you're a journalist. Speaker 12: Yes, I am. Speaker 13: Oh, you're not? So let's have a conversation. Speaker 0: Let's sit down now Speaker 13: and let's have a look. Speaker 12: I've got I'll speak to my news desk. Speaker 0: No. Don't speak Speaker 12: to your comment and I'll and speak to you. Don't want Speaker 13: to talk. Speaker 0: Why not? Cause you've got no answers. Speaker 13: It's not Your paper run a big headline saying I was Speaker 0: a racist. Can you back that up? Can you explain that? Speaker 6: Don't want to say Speaker 0: anything No. Come on. Just explain how I'm a Speaker 1: racist. No. Speaker 6: No. No. Speaker 12: You have to realize that you've had this tag. By you? By the media. Yeah. Speaker 11: By the media. Yes. Right. But you Speaker 13: You are the media. Right. Speaker 0: The consequences for a celebrity under attack by the mainstream media may end up resulting in their divorce or the public changing their opinion on that individual. Whereas the consequences for someone like myself who spoke about the issues I have, they're far more severe. Speaker 16: Now six Islamic extremists have pleaded guilty to plotting a terrorist attack on an English defense league rally last year. Speaker 17: Described as homegrown extremists, they are self radicalized individuals who never, as far as the authorities know, traveled abroad for terrorist training, but still they were very deadly in their intent. Speaker 18: Listen to my word carefully, Tom. I'm gonna cut your neck off and all your EDO crappy attention fans, you know. Speaker 11: Watch my fucking dudes here. You know, fucking white bastard. You know, know, porky and cunt. You fucking watch me. Speaker 13: Yeah. Speaker 11: Yeah. %. Speaker 13: And and I bet you think I'm racist, don't you? Speaker 11: You but you know what Speaker 0: it is, Tommy? You are fucking racist. Speaker 11: That's that's that's what I'm saying to you. Speaker 13: And you just call me a white porky and cunt. Speaker 1: The car pulled up. Thought it was my boy coming to see me. Got a door and four Asians in the car asking me where's Tommy? Where is he? Where's Tommy? Tommy. Speaker 11: We were given information from the Met last night. Speaker 6: Yeah. Speaker 11: They they said we've crimes to one of the threats against you. I'm sorry you had to leave your family home at half the yesterday evening. Yeah. This morning, it featured on our on our on our management meeting this morning. This job came up, and that they're trying to apply the the right amount of risk to it. Does that make sense? Speaker 13: These people who are frightening me, there's five different videos. They're not just making tweets, which Sadiq Khan, don't you have 800 officers working on hate speech tweets and messages? Well, this is in your London. I know where one of these people live. I went and found him last time, mentally disturbed. You know whenever there's terrorist attack and you say someone mentally disturbed, well this this jihadi sympathizer jihadi, not sympathizer. This man who was radicalized as he says by Ali Dawa, he's making phone calls saying he's gonna slash my throat whilst on the phone to Ali Dauer. Speaker 19: Basically, to inform the group call themselves Antifa UK. Yeah. Over there? Yeah. To be honest, I kind of haven't. And Antifa Dundee, it basically says I'm planning to help possibly kill Tommy Robinson because they know where he lives and want to silence him. They've got their hands on it says they've got hands hands on to make a 40 sevens and make pector bombs and stuff. And allegedly said they're gonna put these PETRO bombs through your door when he sleeps. Speaker 6: 04:00 in the morning. Well, it's nearly 04:00 in the morning. And the police have just been around. Al Shabab, you know Al Shabab? Apparently they've released a new terror video and I'm on it. This is what they've given me which says we are in receipt of the following information which suggests your personal safety is now in danger. Although Bedfordshire Police will take what steps it can to minimize the risk, the police cannot protect you from this threat on a day to day, hour by hour basis. All I'm thinking about is my wife and what she's gonna say to this. Speaker 13: What do you think she's gonna say? Speaker 6: She's gonna be terrified. She's just not gonna be happy. Understandable, you know mean? She's worried for the safety of the kids and the family. Speaker 17: There was an array of weapons in the boot that included two sawn off shotguns, samurai short swords, machetes, an array of knives, an improvised explosive device that was made up of one of these big pyrotechnic type fireworks that you get at professional displays, and that had been packed full of gunpowder and 450 odd pieces of shrapnel including nails. Speaker 13: The police have been contacting me to meet them. They the reason they need to meet me, they don't just need to meet me, you see. They need to meet my wife because they need to give us Osman warnings. Another two Osman warnings. Speaker 0: I've had 12 between me and my family. 12 government official Osman warnings. An Osman warning is a warning given when police or government have intelligence of serious threat and plans to end life. Some people who disagree with my politics or feed off the mainstream media lies about me may think I deserve to be threatened or physically attacked. But what about my innocent family? Speaker 7: Leaving me now to be in imminent danger by Muslim gangs that Speaker 11: are driving around looking for my cavities. As a person, if you feel in danger, then you can move or go somewhere else. Speaker 7: Excuse me. Excuse me. Can I just say something? Your house. I have just moved. Been here three days, and I've had people turning up at my house. So please do not sit there and tell me I'm an adult, and I can make the decision to move house again. I've moved house eight times in the last eight years. Speaker 0: Can't help that, and I'm not responsible Speaker 11: for that. But you're refusing to help that. Speaker 0: And on that note, see, on that on that happy note, Oh, by the way, Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate. For time purposes, that's just a little snippet of what we as a family face. Constantly on guard, especially when I'm in The UK. But there's one time that I get to enjoy and relax with my family, and that's Speaker 6: when we're away on holiday. Speaker 0: As the country's burning and many people are wanting to know why, where's the anger coming from? In step the Daily Mail. Speaker 4: You just wanna prick that little bubble and just make them the scapegoat for everything. Speaker 0: Now this headline has consequences. Is there any truth in this headline? Was I instigating riots? How far did this story go? Well, just off the Daily Mail's Twitter feed, it was viewed by 14,000,000 people. Once it went in the Daily Mail with this false headline, it went in The Independent, The Guardian, The Mirror, CNN. It went global everywhere. Who was causing the riots? Why were people rioting? Because of Tommy Robinson. Speaker 20: We've heard, Julie, from a lot of the far right figures. It's that these protests that we've been seeing over the last week are not about extremists. They're about ordinary people just having their say. Here's an example, and it's not the only one from the man known as Tommy Robinson yesterday, a post accusing Kirstjarmer of trying to use legitimate concerns to tarnish millions of people as far right thugs. Speaker 21: And a lot of this is being instigated online. And probably the most influential instigator for all is Tommy Robinson, real name Steven Yaxley Lennon, a really sinister and ludicrous frigate frankly, who is currently away in Cyprus hiding, tweeting inflammatory material online. Speaker 22: But it must be very upsetting for the families and for the community of Southport, which really came together in the in the aftermath of it for this to be hijacked by people lying on sun beds in Cyprus directing the violence. Speaker 3: And But you're referring to some of images on the front page of Tommy Speaker 22: Robinson? Lies based on a completely inaccurate account of what happened in Southport. Speaker 23: The English defense lead, I mean, give me their phone number. Give me their email. I mean, the fellow who's associated with most is on a sunbed in Cyprus. Tommy Robbins. He hates Europe, but there he is enjoying the European sunshine and stirring up poison and hate in this country. Speaker 0: Now, was there any truth in the headline? Was there any truth in this story? Let's see what I was actually saying. Again, not what they say I was saying. Let's have a look what I was saying during this time of violence. Speaker 6: Now I'll be saying to anyone, and I know there's a protest night in London, Lads, you've got to remain calm. But again, I'll just reiterate again, a total appeal for calm. Just an appeal for calm, man. Anyone going to London tonight? There's protests outside down the street, parliament for prime minister's questions, I believe. Try and bring the numbers, bring the noise, but don't bring any violence, man. Peace, love, our country is in the gutter. We ain't gonna win it back by throwing the free rocks at coppers. Galvanize the country. That's what we need to do. Unite people. My message to people going out is be careful. The level of violence, it won't work. Anyway, stay safe. Speaker 24: Stop the violence, please. And to the men committing the violence, lads, those individual police officers who are coming out doing a difficult enough job have got families at home. They're ordinary people. K? We had a hundred thousand people on the streets of London in a peaceful resistance. That hundred thousand will become 250,000. Two hundred and 50 will become half a million. A peaceful revolution is brewing in Great Britain. A peaceful res revolution. And to the lads taken to the streets, in the towns and cities today, these young boys need leadership. Take their balaclavas off. Take their masks off. They're gonna get years in prison. Okay? It's not helping the cause. So lads in every city across this country, country, control your boys, man. Control them. Direct them. A piss a peaceful a resistance is growing. I'm watching what's happening until the people are saying I'm I'm I'm glorifying it. No. I'm not. I've peeled for calm the whole way. Speaker 0: What was the motive of the Daily Mail in running this headline story? Again, was it to tell you the truth, or was it to put a target on me, to blame me? And what are the consequences of putting that target on me? I'm used to their lies. I'm used to their smears, but this, this time, they've done this for a decade, but this time, this was a totally different ballgame. They gave the location of where we were. Remember, they followed me in their story. I'm in the gym with my daughter. Speaker 25: The one in the blue took photos of me and Katie in the pool, but we turned our Speaker 0: heads when we realized. Then he started filming the beds that you're all on. They're following and taking pictures of my innocent family members who face threats of violence and death, rape, murder, all sorts. They gave the location, and they published images of innocent people that were there with me. They didn't have to do that to run this story. If this was just about running the story, they didn't have to give the location. What were the consequences the next day after this story broke globally? Not just in the Daily Mail, because once they run it, it went global. Every single newspaper in the entire country run this as headlines, breaking news. They put a target on me and told you the public, they lied, I was instigating the riots and the violence on the streets of The UK. Now the next day, this was only the second day of my family holiday with four other families, but the next day, groups of men began turning up at the hotel. Threats against the hotel. The hotel manager come to see me, and then the owner turned up and begged me to hide in my room because they were scared about the threat of violence to people in the hotel. And that's what I had to do. All of this could have been avoided if the Daily Mail just didn't give away the location. So why did they give away the location? If they didn't publish images of innocent family members, which is this is the reason I was frustrated. This isn't the first time. This has continued from the Daily Mail. I can rewind to my last holiday with my family, where again, they've done exactly the same. Speaker 13: That's my family. Speaker 0: Take photos haven't. Yes, you have. No, haven't. You've come all the way out here to disrupt my family's holiday. I haven't. Yes, you have. You've out here so you can and endanger my family. Speaker 6: Man, I don't know. Speaker 12: It's not endangering your family. Speaker 14: Yes, it is. Speaker 0: Now, I spoke to the Daily Mail at Editor when they'd done this in 02/2018. And he agreed to not share images of my children or my family. In 02/2024, they knew exactly what they were doing. Speaker 13: The woman that you've been in there photographing my Have Speaker 12: you been photographing? Speaker 1: They gave her Speaker 13: they gave her paper to say there's intel for acid attacks on her. Also visited my mom. You've also been knocking at my mom's door. I haven't. No. Your paper has. Speaker 6: I don't know. Speaker 2: I don't I can't tell you Speaker 13: that. No. You have. You have. How would you like it? I've now got a picture Speaker 14: of you. Speaker 12: I know you have. Speaker 13: Find you and your family? Shall I? Shall I come with a camera? You got kids? I have got kids. Yeah. Shall I come with a camera to where you are? Because I will find out who you are after this video. You know that. Speaker 12: Yeah. Speaker 13: Mean Shall I come outside your child's school? Shall I do that? Wait. Does it Would that be fair? Would it be fair if your wife Would it be fair if I find you and your wife laying on a holiday, trying to have a holiday and relax? Would it be fair for me to turn up with a camera? Tell me. Just ask me the question, Speaker 0: would it? But I again question them about whether it would be fair for me to do that to them. All I done after years of these lies and these smears, and I did it this time because they've now endangered my children. Speaker 14: Hey. Tommy. Tommy Robinson. Hey. You wanna fucking play rough, right? Okay. Come on. You wanna play rough? I'll blow you away, you fucking cockroach. EDM, record you fucking blow you away, you motherfuckers. Speaker 15: Tommy Robinson, I got a message for you. You little fucking cunt. Yeah? Call me Twisted Cheese. I'm a fucking pirate from Somalia. And now I'm in a area called Swabroek. And you run-in your mouth saying we're gonna attack the most any Muslim guys. We're gonna chill, chop them. No, mate. We're gonna defend ourselves. You understand, Tommy Robinson? We got pirates in every corner, Muslims in every corner. Takmir. Speaker 13: Hello, Hakmir. Hello, Hakmir. Speaker 15: Hakmir. Tommy Robinson, listen. Us Muslims, we live only to die. L o d d. You get me? We wanna we wanna die. We wanna go to a road. You understand? We're running for death. Speaker 0: And after the fake news headlines of the Daily Mail, the threats weren't just coming in against me and my children. Police went to my mother's and father's house who are pensioners and gave them an Osman warning that there are now threats and dangers to their life. These are all the consequences of that fake news story. My children are no longer infants. So when stories and lies are spread across the internet and people react to them, my children are at the age where they're reading them. They're seeing the consequences themselves. Here's a message from my daughter to her mother the day after this headline story. Speaker 25: Mum, I can't sleep. I'm really worried and upset. I've been seeing loads of videos of people saying they're going to kill dad's whole family and raping us and even about Nan. I hate it so much. You don't understand how worried and upset this stuff gets me. Speaker 26: Hear me out. Yeah? Anybody who's on holiday. Yeah? And ever bumps into Tommy, bro. Just do him, bro. Just do him. I'll make a video and you'll be famous. Alright. Listen. Where's he gone? Because I swear to God. Yeah. I don't mind booking a flight to let his God, you know. And you lot wanna know something mad. You lot wanna know something crazy. Yeah. He's gone on holiday in Cyprus. Yeah. I'm I'm surprised what's happened to him. Speaker 0: So during the two days when I was on holiday with my children and they're facing threats and violence and all this is happening, I contact the Daily Mail journalists. I let them know that I plan to do a follow-up story where I bring a camera and I question them, and I video them. Speaker 6: The Daily Mail who sent journalists to a hotel where I was with my children photographed my family and gave away their location. So yesterday, three of their addresses, I've got pictures of all of them. K? And I've contacted them. You need to contact me, Edda, because if not, I am gonna come here. I don't want to. I've made this clear. I don't think that's right. I don't think it's morally right, and what you've done is totally wrong. You have destroyed a family holiday when I was with my children. So let's the record straight. I didn't flee the country because of riots. I've left the country before any riots. I held a hundred thousand people strong, peaceful protest. Riots kicked off in Liverpool that were nothing to do with me. Every one of my videos that I've done so far have clearly called for peace and can't. You're just lying. You're trying to throw it on my lap, so are the government. But what you've done with my children, you upset their holiday, you ruined their holiday. Right? Now you're saying I I fled Cyprus. Right? Yeah. You've you've broke up my family holiday. So I wanna ask you the question. You come where my children were and you get their location. Is it what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Is it fair that I do that to you? See, I'm not a morally bankrupt wanker. You know I've got images of everyone in your family. You know I know the locations of where you are. Yeah? I'm asking you, is it fair for me to do that? If the answer's no, then stick to Speaker 24: a rule book, lads. Yeah? You know I've Speaker 6: done my investigation to a five part series of Muslim rapists, and I had three girls saying they're rapists. I don't when to find those men. Do you know how many to how many times we had surveillance on them there with their kids or their missus or their mom? We didn't approach them. And do know how much that costs when you've a surveillance team security team? Do know how we put that left it? Nope. He's with the family. Nope. Kids are there. Nope. Unfortunately. Yeah? Because it's nothing to do with those innocent members of the family. Certainly not to be recorded or to leave everlasting damage in their minds when you're confronting people to ask them questions. Now you haven't thought about that with my kids, yeah, who have been upset for days now, who've you've ruined their whole event. Speaker 0: Maybe you think this is the first time the Daily Mail have done this. The first time they've took part or participated in something that could possibly endanger my family, not me, but my family. Well, now remember this guy? Tommy, I am gonna mince your kids, mate. When he attended my family's home to livestream their address to the public, who attended that property with him? That's right. The Daily Mail went with an extremist to livestream my family's home and put them in imminent danger. Now out of everything you've seen, I now face prosecution. I have been charged criminally. I faced ten years in prison for saying I want to take my camera and ask these journalists a few questions. The evidence used to prosecute me is me telling them I'm gonna come knock on your door with a camera and ask you questions. Bear in mind everything you've seen. You've seen the way they behave. You've seen the way they act. I made it very clear to those journalists and their families. I will not share images of you, the families, the innocent families, and I will never give away their location because I know that that's not right. And I've made it clear time and time again that I wouldn't do that. But yet, apparently, out of all of this story that you've seen, the victims in this, it's not my family, it's not me, we're not the victims. The victims are the the journalists who traveled on my family holiday, took pictures of my family and gave away their location. They're now the victims, and I'm now the perpetrator. I faced ten years in prison. There is no free speech and there is no free press. When they want to target someone who upsets them, embarrasses them, and exposes them, they then use the weapons of a totalitarian state, the media, or the judiciary, or the police. They all come together, and now I will have to fight over the next twelve to eighteen months through the courts in this country at the cost of tens of thousands of pounds to stay free. I face prison for attempting to ask journalists some questions. 02/2025. Great Britain. As a law affair continues, unfortunately, once again, I need your support. To be able to fight this will go into the cost of tens of thousands of pounds. The process is the punishment. If you can stand with me in this battle, please go to fightthemail.com. Thank you very much.
Fight The Mail โ€“ Urban Scoop urbanscoop.news
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 8:14 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

As the country crumbles from every corner, the latest batch of invaders are bussed from our shores to a taxpayer funded hotel. These lot, all fighting age men of course, are taken to Thistle Hotel in the Barbican, EC1 Central London, cigarettes and 'how to' guides in hand. https://t.co/G0L22RmFNQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are arriving, possibly at a hotel. They are coming from places like Kuwait and Bolivia. One person asks another what they have in their bag and if they are getting a flat (apartment) at the hotel. The speaker mentions their son doesn't have a place to live while these people are getting comfortable. They hope the new arrivals get their money and a flat soon, while acknowledging their son has a long wait. The speaker observes the hotel room and luggage, stating it's a free country but politicians have things wrong. They mention being mugged at a bus stop. The speaker then asks if people have snacks and tells someone not to slam something because they might not get a flat. Finally, someone comments on a limousine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here they are. The next lab. Next mob. There they go. Speaker 1: Let's get our hotel meals. Are we ready for dinner? Should be ready for dinner this month. It's got off the train. That's the scene from where they're coming from. Got the hotel behind them. Nice. You alright? Where are you at? Where you coming from? Kuwait. Kuwait. Yeah? Kuwait. Bolivia. Yeah. Bolivia. Yeah. Bolivia. Blinding. What you got in ass and that you what are you getting a flat over there? Yeah? In the hotel? Yeah. Good luck to you. My son ain't got nowhere to to live. You know what I mean? He ain't got fuck all nowhere to live, but you all get comfortable. Yeah? What you smart and all that? What's that? You know? Well, you got a letter saying you get your money and all that, ain't it? Get your readies. I hope you'll get a flat soon. Do you know what I mean? My son's got a long time to wait for a flat, but they they saw you at. Let's have a little look. It's all good here. Hotel room, plenty of luggage. It's all going on. That's all good. No. It's alright. A free country, really feel we like, sort of. But it's our politicians got it all wrong. That's it. Get it all in there. I'll be at the bus stop where he tried to mug me the other day from the iPhone. Alright? Take it easy, guys. You got your snack? And you give him all the snack. And you got a snack? Don't slam it. You might not get a flat. Alright. Take it easy, everyone. Alright? Lovely. Speaker 0: Fucking limousine.
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 4:50 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Brave Irish lady prays the rosary at Croke Park as the ground is filled with Muslims by the appeasing state. Gardaรญ throws the lady out to keep the Muslims happy. All traitors must face their children known they're aiding the downfall of Ireland! https://t.co/cbDFkMvuqE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Theresa from Drinna, a "brave Irish warrior woman" and member of Southside says no, recounts her experience protesting at a historically sacred stadium for Irish people where "invaders" shot dead 14 people. She removed her gear during a prayer led by Al Cadre and confronted those present, expressing shame that they would desecrate ground where people had died. She said the location is sacred ground. She accused them of bringing in more invaders and questioned how anyone could justify a religion that allows marrying children as young as six, referencing Mohammed. She asked one man if his job was worth it and if he was not ashamed of himself. She was asked to be quiet while saying the rosary because there were children present, and was escorted out. She says she is sick of what "they're doing," claiming they are taking over the country and stripping away history, culture, and religion.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hear from me, Theresa, will you? Give me a hug. You okay? Did somebody No. Speaker 1: It wasn't. I wasn't Speaker 0: armed. Watch their hugs. You're you're you're emotional about this. You went you went in there on the kind of on the queue. Take your time. Take your time. I did. So this is Theresa from Drinna and she's been with Southside says no for a long time on the forefront, on the front line of all of this. A brave Irish warrior woman. I know her well. She's come out of here now. She's worn her t shirt, made her point in there. Said it you said a rosary. There's a rosary beads, guys. What happened? Tell Speaker 1: us. I just took the gear off from while they were praying. I don't know who that head fella is, whatever his name is. Speaker 0: Cadre. Al Cadre. Yeah. Speaker 1: And as I was telling them, was a shame on them. The people had died on that ground. This is sacred ground for us. How dare they? They should be all ashamed of themselves. Very upsetting. And as I was saying the rosary, he was still praying over me and kept praying over me. Speaker 0: It's it's Of course, he did. That's what they're here to do. That's an interview. I got an interview earlier with him and he was, you know, trying to do his own little, his little PR stunts or whatever, but he wouldn't answer any questions. Speaker 1: No. Well, he was hugging and loving everybody in there. I have to say, shame. It's a sad day, I tell you, to see to see what's going on in there. Speaker 0: And again, that stadium has been historically sacred for Irish people. You know, 14 people were shot dead in there by invaders. Speaker 1: Yes. Absolutely. Speaker 0: And now they're bringing in more invaders. Speaker 1: More invaders? I mean, how can anyone justify their religion or what they do? Marrying children that are only, like, eight years of age. Speaker 0: Mohammed married a six year old. Speaker 1: Yes. I know. It's Speaker 0: in their doctrine. It's in their book. Speaker 1: And there are people think it's okay. I asked them, like, is your job worth it? The man that put me out, I said, you're your father, you're a great grandfather. Are you not ashamed of yourself? On what grounds? On what Speaker 0: grounds did he put you out? Speaker 1: They just kept telling me to shush and be quiet while I was saying the rosary. But I said it all the way out the door. Told me to shush that there was children around. Shush. Speaker 0: You're obviously emotional now about it. I don't blame Speaker 1: It's yeah. I as I said, I was involved. Nobody put their hand. I was just asked to leave. I made sure I grabbed me runners on the way out because he took me shoes off me. Speaker 0: It was very brave of you to go in there on your own and do that. Speaker 1: It's I'm just sick of it, Philip. I'm sick and tired at this stage of what they're doing. They're taking over our country. We've not left. They're stripping everything, our history, our culture, our religion, every
Saved - June 6, 2025 at 1:26 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spoke to legacy media outside court today and effortlessly dismantled their narrative. They lack understanding of the case and my work, yet continue to publish hit pieces. This shows why legacy media is failing. We are the media now, and ๐• is where independent journalism thrives.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

Speaking to legacy media outside court today, and once again, without any effort, destroying their narrative. They know nothing about the case, any of my work, yet will all type up hit pieces against me. This is why the legacy media is dying. They're transparent to everyone. We are the media now. ๐• is the home of independent journalism and truth.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A journalist ("iTV") confronts another journalist about an upcoming court case. The journalist ("iTV") is being taken to court for allegedly harassing a couple of Germans after they endangered his family by photographing them. He questions why the reporter hasn't watched his documentary, which had 67 million views and details his seven months in solitary confinement. He accuses the reporter of being a "propaganda machine" who will publish a pre-written, biased article implying he caused fear of violence. He asks if he should be allowed to contact journalists and ask them questions on camera, and criticizes the Daily Mail for endangering his family. He believes he is facing ten years in jail for wanting to ask a question on camera. He claims he is being targeted with "lawfare" because he is an "uncontrollable journalist" who is ahead of the population on important issues.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is your iTV. ITV? Yeah. I'm iTV. You're iTV? I'm me. Speaker 1: Okay. Can I ask you? Yeah. Did you watch my documentary Silence? No. No. No. On. Shush. I did. Hold on. Shush. So I I made a documentary that had a 67,000,000 views. I spent seven months on solitary confinement. You've come here today to report on me being dragged through the courts again, and as a journalist, you haven't watched that film. I haven't watched it. You're not a journalist. You're a propaganda machine. You're not even here to find the news. If you okay. What am I here for now? Speaker 2: You're here to go to court about harassing a couple of Germans, was it? Speaker 1: And what do you know about that? Speaker 2: I don't know much about it. Speaker 1: He doesn't know anything about it. Of course, he doesn't. Have you watched my documentary that went out last night? Speaker 2: No. No. No. I'm the cameraman. Speaker 1: Okay. So you haven't So you haven't. So basically, you you know nothing at all. You're gonna come and get these little snippets, and then you'll pre written article, which is gonna allege and imply to the British public that I've caused fear of violence of men. Yeah? That's what you're here for. You're not Speaker 2: here for Well, hopefully Yeah. There will be an unbiased report about you going into court. You're the ITV? I'm an ITV. Speaker 1: Yeah. No. It's not gonna be unbiased. Okay? Hope will as well. But if you wanna be unbiased Yeah. Try doing some investigation as a journalist because you're not a journalist. You're a reporter. You shouldn't call yourself a journalist. You're here to report pre written articles. You're here to report an agenda. If you're as a journalist, you'd have watched my film, you'd have understand why I'm in court today. You don't even know why I'm in court. So what are Speaker 2: you doing here? Well, when we when it all comes out all came out in court Speaker 1: Well, no. No. What will come out is your headline. That's the problem. What comes out is your headline. Okay? And your headline and your But your headline is based on no investigation. You've just said that. Okay. These men tracked down my family. They photographed the innocent members of my family then put them in danger. I then said to them, do you think I should be able to ask journalists questions? Do you think I should be able to contact a journalist saying I'm gonna ask you a question on camera? Do you think? Speaker 2: Well, I think that everyone has an opinion. Speaker 1: Okay. So do you think I should be able to contact a journalist? Say you're a journalist now. Speaker 2: Yeah? Yeah. Speaker 1: So I know who you are now. Yeah. Should I be able to send you a message saying I'm gonna come with my camera and ask you questions like you've done to me? Speaker 2: Well, I don't know. You don't know? No. No. I don't know. Speaker 1: Don't You meant to be a joke. Do you believe in free speech and free press? Speaker 2: I do. Speaker 1: So you believe in free press? Yeah. So do I'll ask you again. Do you think I should be able to contact a journalist and tell him I want to ask him a question on camera? Speaker 2: I think you need to perhaps put it through to ITV. Tell me. The new guest. Speak in the right So Speaker 1: I need to put it through to ITV on the news desk. Did the Daily Mail put it through to me when they secretly covertly recorded my daughter, my my ex wife, and they put pictures of her in a national newspaper in danger room? Is that right? Do you think that's right with the Daily Mail did? No. So okay. So you don't think that's right with the Daily Mail did? I'm facing ten years in jail for saying I wouldn't have asked him a question on camera. Do you think that's right? Do you think do you think we've maybe got a biased justice and judiciary? How am I even in court today? They endangered my family. How are you? Honestly, I'm seem like a nice poem. How are you been sent here and you haven't even looked into this? You because you're because you're gonna now just run a headline, and your headline is total lies. So what you're doing is you're feeding propaganda to the public from the establishment that lies about me as a journalist. But do know why? Because you're controllable. Yeah. I get it. You're worried about losing your job. I'm not. So they can't control me. So I'll turn the camera on you, people like you, and say they're lying. This is how they're lying. Right? And that's what I do. Because they don't like that, I get tied up through these courts. Lawfare after lawfare after lawfare. I've done nothing wrong. I've done nothing wrong. Other, my only crime two crimes. Being an uncontrollable journalist and being a decade ahead of the rest of the pop population on the problem. Now I have to get into court because I don't upset the judge anymore. Speaker 0: Yeah? See you later.
Saved - June 1, 2025 at 8:50 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

The scenes in Paris are not football riots. They're migrant riots. Paris can not hold any event without riots. Because the imports use any excuse to smash up and loot. Mass deportations needed. https://t.co/yrqH4q3l8r

Saved - June 1, 2025 at 8:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The conversation begins with a user asserting that recent disturbances in Paris are not related to football but are instead migrant riots, suggesting that the city cannot host events without violence and calling for mass deportations. In response, another user emphasizes the importance of sharing the truth and expresses a stance against corruption and deceit, advocating for justice and freedom for all, regardless of religion or race.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

The scenes in Paris are not football riots. They're migrant riots. Paris can not hold any event without riots. Because the imports use any excuse to smash up and loot. Mass deportations needed. https://t.co/yrqH4q3l8r

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice โ„ข

@TRobinsonNewEra Don't be afraid to share the truth. I am not for or against any religion or race. I am against corruption, murder, lies and deceit. I stand for truth and justice, for humanity and for freedom. Expose them all, every last one. https://t.co/PpTEttsSJz

@SpartaJustice - Truth Justice โ„ข

MI5 CONFIRMS ISRAEL BOMBED ITS OWN EMBASSY: Former MI5 Intelligence Officer confirms by official MI5 report that Mossad Israeli Intelligence bombed its own Israeli Embassy in London as a false flag attack using a sophisticated device falsely arresting two innocent Palestinians and framing them for the car bomb attack which was carried out by the Mossad in order to get support for Israel. This happened in London, 1994. Annie Machon, the MI5 Intelligence Officer who became a Whistleblower left MI5 because of the coverup, corruption and crimes she eye witnessed firsthand being committed by the Intelligence agencies. When she first exposed the corruption she had to go into hiding because they were hunting her down. She went public with the information as a form of protection because the government and the media could not be trusted. She goes on to confirm that False Flag Terrorism Operations by the Mossad, CIA, MI6 and KGB are perfectly normal methods of operation. This is what the intelligence agencies do to achieve their objectives and goals while controlling the media in order to fit their narratives of deception. She details many False Flag Operations in this testimony that caused her to leave the agency. It is important to understand that the Mainstream Media cannot be trusted because it is used by the Intelligence agencies as a tool of deception and lies to push the false narrative they have created and to cover up their terrorist crimes. She defines what a False Flag Operation is. A False Flag Operation is when an attack happens, some type of terrorist atrocity which is blamed on one party, but is actually planned, organized or paid for by another party quite often an Intelligence Agency and is a perfectly standard weapon in the arsenal of Intelligence agencies, they use False Flag Operations all the time. So people really should not be shocked that this could occur. After reviewing the evidence of 9/11 she is convinced that this was a False Flag Operation by the Intelligence Agencies to go to war in the Middle East and to pass laws restricting our freedoms such as the Patriot Act in America. She says there needs to be a new investigation into 9/11 because it is still affecting every life in the world in a very negative way. Who benefited from 9/11? As an important note not discussed in this video, Israeli Intelligence, the Mossad, knew of the atrocious October 7th attack one year in advance and did nothing to stop it, allowing their innocent civilians to be murdered so they could justify to go to war in Gaza and war with Iran. Intel sources believe the Mossad also provided Hamas with intelligence information to carryout the attack. Israeli officials obtained Hamasโ€™s battle plan for the October 7th terrorist attack more than a year before it happened, documents, emails and interviews show. But Israeli military and intelligence officials dismissed the plan as aspirational, considering it too difficult for Hamas to carry out. The approximately 40-page document, which the Israeli authorities code-named โ€œJericho Wall,โ€ outlined, point by point, exactly the kind of devastating invasion that led to the deaths of about 1,200 people. Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision. The document called for a barrage of rockets at the outset of the attack, drones to knock out the security cameras and automated machine guns along the border, and gunmen to pour into Israel en masse in paragliders, on motorcycles and on foot, all of which happened on October 7th. The plan also included details about the location and size of Israeli military forces, communication hubs and other sensitive information, raising questions about how Hamas gathered its intelligence and whether there were leaks inside the Israeli security establishment. Then, in July, just three months before the attacks, a veteran analyst with Unit 8200, Israelโ€™s signals intelligence agency, warned that Hamas had conducted an intense, daylong training exercise that appeared similar to what was outlined in the blueprint. But a colonel in the Gaza division brushed off her concerns, according to encrypted emails viewed by The Times. Officials privately concede that, had the military taken these warnings seriously and redirected significant reinforcements to the south, where Hamas attacked, Israel could have blunted the attacks or possibly even prevented them. The Israeli military and the Israeli Security Agency, which is in charge of counterterrorism in Gaza, declined to comment." - By Ronen Bergman and Adam Goldman Reporting from Tel Aviv. The USS Liberty was a Failed False Flag attack by the Mossad and the IDF that killed 34 U.S. Service Men. The intent was to blame Egypt and to get the United States involved in Israel's Middle East Wars. This False Flag Attack failed and survivors of the USS Liberty live today telling their story of horror and demanding justice. The Original Motto and Method of Operation by the Mossad is "By way of Deception thou shalt do War" False Flag Attacks continue to happen in our time by Intelligence agencies who want war in Iran, Gaza, Ukraine and World War III. They use Terrorism to achieve their objectives. We must be able to identify these False Flag Terrorist Attacks being committed by our own intelligence agencies and expose the real criminals.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1994, a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in London. A senior MI5 officer believed Mossad bombed their own embassy to get increased security and frame two innocent Palestinians, who were then imprisoned. MI6 funded an Al Qaeda cell in Libya to assassinate Gaddafi in 1996, which killed innocent people. This illegal operation, lacking proper authorization, led to the speakers quitting MI5. False flag operations are standard for intelligence agencies. Alexander Litvinenko exposed KGB involvement in bombing Moscow apartments, blamed on Chechen rebels, as a pretext to invade Chechnya. Initial media reports blamed Al Qaeda for the Oklahoma City bombing. The media is controlled by spies and governments. The Iraq war was based on lies. The US administration tortured suspects to link Al Qaeda and 9/11 to Saddam Hussein. MI6 has an information operations section to manipulate the media. The speakers fled the country after whistleblowing. Their flat was raided, and they lived in exile. One speaker was imprisoned after a trial where he couldn't present his reasons or cross-examine accusers. The 9/11 attacks require a new independent inquiry. Three buildings fell, including WTC 7, which wasn't hit by a plane. The "war on terror" has eroded civil liberties. The UK has become a police state with laws allowing states of emergency and surveillance. The 7/7 London bombings also have anomalies. A counterterrorism exercise occurred at the same time and locations as the bombings. The official narrative about the bombers' train was false. The 9/11 Commission was set up to fail. The executive director defined the investigation's parameters. Nanothermite may have been used to bring down the towers. The speakers encourage people to educate themselves about 9/11 and false flag operations, question the media, and reclaim democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the two cases that really got us, first of all, there was a a false flag attack in London in 1994 where a car bomb exploded outside the Israeli embassy in the center of London. Speaker 1: Now, remember this vaguely. This is we're talking fourteen years ago. Speaker 0: It's a long time ago. Speaker 1: But it was huge at the time. I mean, it was a huge worldwide story. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. In fact, there'd been an earlier attack against some Jewish interests section in Buenos Aires earlier that year as well. Similar sort of MO, modus operandi, with a car bomb driven and parked outside that exploded. Speaker 1: So in 1994, a car bomb explodes outside the Israeli embassy in London. Speaker 0: In London. Speaker 1: Yeah. Anyone hurt or killed? I don't remember. Speaker 0: Very minor injuries. That was all. Okay. Nobody was killed. And it was a very sophisticated device. It appeared to eat itself, eat all the forensics. Now, this is very, very rare. Even the IRA, which is a very sophisticated terrorist organization, could not make bombs that effective. So it looked like a, you know, sort of fairly technical person who put that together. But what emerged from that, the senior m I five officer who was in charge of the investigation into it and had seen all the evidence, but also all the intelligence, which isn't necessarily admissible in court, wrote his formal assessment at the end of the case. And he said he reckoned that Mossad, the Israeli external intelligence agency, had bombed their own embassy, sort of controlled explosion outside the embassy. And as I said, that was a senior m I five officer, and that was his formal verdict. If you read that on the Internet now, you would say that sounds like some mad conspiracy theory. But it wasn't. This was the official position of m I five. And he said that they did it for two reasons. One, they were always hassling m I five for increased security around their embassy and other interests in London because, of course, London had a a reputation of giving safe haven to Arab distance from around the world at that point. And MI five kept saying, well, there's no reason to increase the threat assessment. You don't need extra protection. So letting off a controlled explosion outside, of course, they immediately got what they wanted there. But, crucially, two innocent Palestinians were arrested, charged, and convicted of conspiracy to cause that attack. And they were very active in a Palestinian support network in London, political campaigning for the people on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. And they were getting some traction in the media. They were getting quite a lot of support. So by arresting these people and framing them from attack and sticking them in prison, the whole network just shattered and hasn't got back on its feet to this day. So that will be a clear political advantage for Mossad to have achieved in London by framing these innocent people for an attack which was carried out by Mossad. Speaker 1: Where are these two people now? Speaker 0: They're still rotting in prison. Speaker 1: So they've been in prison for fourteen years. Speaker 0: Yeah. And they both got twenty year sentences. They both proclaim their innocence. They will serve the whole sentence. And it was a young woman called Samar Alami, who's had a breakdown since this case for obvious reasons, and a young man called Jawed Botme. And Speaker 1: They were found guilty of the of Speaker 0: being Conspiring to cause the attack. Not actually doing it. They had cast iron alibis. But the linkage was a mysterious figure who was known as Raider Mgrabi. And he was a man, apparently Middle Eastern, who befriended many people within this Palestinian support network. And Jawed Botme knew a little bit about secondhand cars, so Rader Megrabi asked him to go along to an auction and help him buy a secondhand car. So Jawed did. This was the car that was used in the explosion. This was the linkage that pulled these Palestinians into the case. And, of course, during the investigation, Raider Megrabi just disappeared. So the speculation would be that, actually, this guy was a Mossad person. So, that was a pretty shocking case. Speaker 1: Now, this, I think, carries tremendous importance today because there's a lot of concern around the world about these false flag operations. And maybe you can just explain what a false flag operation is. Speaker 0: Well, it's a phrase that comes from, I think, from an old naval tradition, where sailing boats would go in under one flag of a different country to deceive the enemy and get close and then attack them. But false flag is basically the concept where an attack happens, some sort of terrorist atrocity, which is blamed on one party, but is actually planned, organized, or paid for by another party, quite often, an intelligence agency. And it's a perfectly standard weapon in the arsenal of intelligence agencies. They use false flag all the time. So people really shouldn't be shocked by the idea that this can occur. The case that made Sheila and I actually quit m I five was a very stark case of false flag terrorism. And as I said, he was the head of the Libyan section in 1995, and he developed unusually friendly relations with his counterpart in m I six, which is the external service. And he was briefed by his counterpart on an unfolding plot where there had been a volunteer from the Lib Libyan Military Intelligence Agency who had said he would like to try and stage a coup in Libya, but he needed support from MI six, financial support, in order to carry out this coup attempt. And if he did succeed with m I six's backing, then he would hand over the Lockerbie Two suspects who still wanted at that point. And, of course, it would smooth the path to greater business contracts, you know, particularly in the oil fields with British petroleum. So MI six leapt at this, and they started funding what was effectively an Al Qaeda cell in Libya to try and assassinate colonel Gaddafi in 1996. And they threw about a hundred and $20,000 at this group for them to buy the equipment to carry out their coup, you know, explosives, guns, jeeps, tents, whatever. And David was briefed about this all the way through the plot all the way through the plot, but he was, you know, fairly unsure if it would actually go ahead. I mean, MI six were always coming up with these sort of crackpot schemes and never actually doing anything. But he did brief his his bosses just to make sure that his back was covered. He said, look. This is what they're planning on doing. Anyway, in early nineteen ninety six, he was sitting at his desk in MI five, and all these reports started coming in from different sources saying there had indeed been an attack against colonel Gaddafi's cavalcade. Now the car the explosion had occurred underneath the wrong car, obviously, because Gaddafi's very much alive. But innocent people were killed in the car, and innocent people were killed in the ensuing security shootout. And when David challenged his m I six counterpart, you know, was this what you're talking about? He said, yes. That was our man. We did it. Well, of course, they didn't. But I think they were just pleased that they'd actually done something even if they didn't achieve their objective. And this was the case that just worried us so much because we had joined MI five to try and stop terrorism, not to get involved in agencies that carried out terrorism, particularly false flag terrorism, you know, where they were paying this Al Qaeda cell with no links to Osama bin Laden, who were even then perceived to be a threat by MI five money to try and assassinate in an illegal operation a foreign head of state. I mean, that's just about the most heinous sort of crime you can commit. Speaker 1: So this bears repeating. Here is m I six Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Which is, I guess, comparable to the American CIA funding an assassination attempt Mhmm. Against the prime minister of Libya. Speaker 0: The head of state. Yeah. Speaker 1: The head of state, killing innocent people Mhmm. In it. Mhmm. And you said funding that the people who were trying to carry this out were members or linked to Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: Yeah. They were When did this all happen? This happened in 9596. Speaker 1: '19 '90 '5, '90 '6. Okay. Speaker 0: So, yes, we're talking of a ragtag group of Islamic extremists, some of whom had links to Al Qaeda, to Osama bin Laden's organization at that time. So it's I mean, it was an amazing amazingly awful thing to have been funded by MI six. But crucially as well, it was an illegal operation under UK law. I mean, it was immoral and it was reckless as well, but it was illegal under UK law because under the 1994 Intelligence Service Act, which regulates the work of m I six, there is indeed actually a license to kill. I mean, that's one of the true things out of James Bond. That. But in this case, if you get the prior written permission from their political master, which is the foreign secretary in The UK, they get legal immunity for illegal acts they carry out abroad, and they didn't get this permission. So it's an illegal operation they were involved in too. So, yes, we're looking at an illegal operation to assassinate foreign head of state, which funds our terrorist enemies at the time, which goes wrong and kills innocent people. How much worse can you get? So that's classic false flag. And that's why Sheila and I left MI five, and that's why we blew the whistle. Speaker 1: Okay. I'd just like to go back to these this idea of false flag operations Mhmm. Because I think we have to look at everything that happens throughout the world as potentially a false flag operation. You know, we're told by our media, especially here in Canada, which is so one-sided in their presentation. When something happens they say, yes, was done by these guys obviously. But we always have to consider as citizens of a country, especially of a supposedly democratic country, that this may just be a trick, a game in order to make us think something and in order to allow certain powerful interests to get what they want. Speaker 0: Very much so. I mean, as I said, false flag terrorism is perfectly normal. I mean, this is what the intelligence agencies do. And there are many, many other cases of it. For example, the you remember the case of Alexander Litvinenko, the ex KGB officer who was poisoned with polonium two ten in London coming Speaker 1: this year? With an umbrella or something. Speaker 0: Yeah. Poisoned tea. He was Poisoned tea. Radiation poisoning and was killed. And he was always rather coyly called a sort of Russian dissident in The UK. He was living in London. He'd fled Russia to London for safe sanctuary. But in fact, what he was was a whistleblower. And one of the things he'd blown the whistle on was KGB involvement in in bombing some apartment blocks in Moscow in nineteen ninety nine Oh, okay. Which was then blamed on Chechen rebels. And this was the pretext that Russia needed to invade Chechnya in a very bloody war that violated all sorts of few all sorts of basic human rights and everything was awful. Anyway, that was based on a lie. The KGB bombed their own apartments, killed hundreds of people in order to invade another country. Or you have, for Speaker 1: example Let's let's just focus on that one for a few minutes because I I do remember the war against Chechnya. Mhmm. And I remember very clearly the blowing up of apartment buildings within Russian cities Yeah. That was then blamed on Chechnyan terrorists and used as an excuse by the Russian government to attack Chechnya. And even at the time on the Internet, there were there were a few stories, seemingly coming from credible sources, saying that in fact, Russian secret police or the police, whoever, had been caught by accident in the basement of some of one of these apartment buildings Speaker 0: That's right. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: With the bombs in their hands Mhmm. And then let go once, you know, once it was realized who they were working for. This was no secret. I mean, our own media, at the high end of our media, must have known the true story, but the true story was never told here. Clearly, because the Russian invasion of Chechnya was something that was going to be allowed by the West. Speaker 0: Well, again, I mean, another interesting case is the Oklahoma City bombing. You know, when Timothy McVeigh, who was, I think, being put to death for that attack Speaker 1: So they tell us. Speaker 0: Yeah. Was convicted of of carrying it out. But, in fact, if you go back and look at the archive media coverage from that day, all the media initially said, oh, it's Al Qaeda. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: That's what they were briefed on, I suppose, to say. And McVeigh was caught by accident for some traffic violation. Speaker 1: Completely caught by accident. Speaker 0: So, you know, if that hadn't happened, we would still be saying, oh, it's an Al Qaeda suicide bombing. Speaker 1: That's right. Speaker 0: So these things go on all the time. It's almost like the media have become part of the establishment of the system. They're no longer the fourth estate holding the system to account. And, I mean, suppose the most notorious example, certainly in The UK, that we saw of media spin and intelligence lies was in the run up to Iraq war, where we had a case made for war that was flawed. It was based on wrong intelligence, where the intelligence agencies and the labor government span the media to such an extent that on the eve of the election in parliament to see whether or not RMPs would vote to take us into war, we had headlines saying, forty five minutes from Armageddon. As in, Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction, which he can then deploy within forty five minutes against British interests, which is all a lie. But these were the newspaper headlines on the eve of the vote about whether to go to war. And it came out of the labor spin machine. It came out of the intelligence agencies. And it's something we all need to be aware of, quite how controlled the media is by the spies as well as by the governments. There are various means and ways of of doing that. Speaker 1: So we have to keep in mind at all times that what we're being told Mhmm. Simply may not be true. You've gotta keep an open mind because the story we're told in the media is simply that many times a story, which isn't to say that it's always a story. That would be too simple. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: But many, many times, the information and it was the same here in Canada and in The United States. Mhmm. The we you know, the invasion of Iraq was based on absolute and total lies, and no one has ever really been held to account for that. Speaker 0: Well, What's also interesting as well with the scandal of the torture cases that's been rocking America over the last couple of weeks, where it has become plain that some of the suspects were tortured because the administration in The US wanted evidence that linked Al Qaeda and the nine eleven attacks to Saddam Hussein. They wanted to torture people in saying, yes, there was a link so they could justify an invasion of Iraq on that basis. When they couldn't get that justification because it didn't exist, that's when they fabricated the intelligence about weapons of mass destruction. So, you know, they found another excuse to go into Iraq, again, based on a lie, but that was spun successfully in the media to begin with. So it's a it's a worrying situation. I mean, there's there's a section in MI six called information operations, which is shortened down to IOPS, which is designed deliberately to manipulate the media in The UK, where they plant fake stories and where they spin stories and massage stories that they want to want to control. So there are official mechanisms for manipulating the mainstream media, certainly in The UK, and I'm sure it's mirrored in The US and Canada. Speaker 1: Well, here, I don't know if they even have to go to the trouble of manipulating the media. I think media, the ownership of the media is just part of the the elite that runs the country. Yeah. And decisions are made by all three of them together, the the corporations, the government, and the media. Speaker 0: Very much so. But they should be the fourth estate holding those other people to account. That's supposed to be their job. Speaker 1: Yes. And it's very dangerous in a democracy, so called, when we no longer have a media that's free to do that. We're talking with Annie Mashon. Annie is on tour of Canada right now as we speak in May 23, I think, we're filming this. Annie was in British military intelligence, MI5, left as a whistleblower. And I'd just like to ask you, do you feel you've paid a heavy price for what you did? Because what you did takes it takes a lot of courage to be a whistleblower even if you're working for a company, but to go against an organization like MI5. Speaker 0: Yeah. It was pretty frightening, it has to be said. Speaker 1: Yeah. It must have been a very difficult decision to make. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. It was. But I think faced with something like the Gaddafi plot, it's just such a stark example of false flag terrorism of what precisely what the intelligence agencies should not be involved in that we really had no choice. But, yes, the price that was paid was very high. I mean, if you're a whistleblower from a a corporation, you have certain protections under the the law. If you're a whistleblower from MI five or MI six, you are the criminal because there is a piece of law called the Official Secrets Act. And if you speak to anyone ever about your work, then you've broken that. There is no defense under law. So even if you're reporting murder on the part of the spies, you are the criminal, not the murderers. It's that simple. So, effectively, what we had to do was flee the country. I mean, we went to the newspapers because there was no official channel to go to apart from the head of the agencies. We went to the papers, one, because we thought they could campaign for an inquiry into some of these issues more effectively than just two lone people. And two, as a form of protection. You know, once you're in the public eye, you have a certain degree of protection. But that meant as well that we fled the country with one day one day ahead of the story breaking. And Sheila and I literally were on the run around Europe for a month, during which time the secret police, the special branches, had broken into our flat and had ripped it apart in a counterterrorism style search. I mean, literally, you know, the pipes out of the bath, the floorboards out, everything. And they took away things like our bedsheets and my underwear. It was just horrible. It was quite violating. And they also took an injunction out against the media to stop further disclosures from Sheila. So we're on the run. I went back to pack up the flat and sort out our lives. I was arrested, of course. His brother was arrested. Two of his best friends have been arrested. Student supporters have been arrested. Journalists have been arrested. It was a big case that rippled out. So there's quite a lot of intimidation going on. And we ended up having to live in hiding in a French farmhouse for a year. And then he was imprisoned in Paris because the British tried to extradite him from France and failed. And then we had another two years living in Paris where we campaigned for an inquiry into the Gaddafi plot and pushed it as far as we could. And during that time as well, there was a leak from MI six of a document that proved the Gaddafi plot, which you would think would be quite conclusive in the need for a new inquiry into the issue and everything. And the government managed to spin its way out of it just so it's fantasy. You know? So we had two years living in exile. David was actually literally stuck in France at that point. And he went back voluntarily in February, expecting to be put on trial for a breach of the Official Secrets Act, but fairly rapidly, you know, within six months. But they dragged him through this whole series of pretrial hearings so that when he came in front of a jury over two years later, he wasn't allowed to say why he'd done what he'd done. He wasn't allowed to mention the Gaddafi plot, believe it or not, even though that was the reason he'd done it. And he wasn't allowed to freely cross examine his accusers. So m I five officers were in court anonymously giving evidence, and he had all these questions for them. And the judge and the prosecutor vetted them and crossed them all out. So he couldn't actually cross examine the prosecution witnesses. And then the judge ordered the jury to convict, which goes against all precedent in British law. I mean, the jury can acquit in the interest of justice if it so chooses, but they were ordered to convict. So it was a bit of a kangaroo court. So he, of course, went to prison again. And he also had his reputation shredded, I suppose, is the best way by the media, the mainstream media, because it was bad enough he got convicted and went to prison. But the judge in his formal ruling at the end of the case said he accepted that David Shaler had done what he'd done in the public interest, that there was no financial motivation, and that no lives have been risked in the process of the disclosures. Nobody's life have been put at risk. And that was the judge's view. And the journalist was sitting in the courtroom writing it all down, and yet the headlines on the papers the next day said precisely the opposite. They said, Shaila sells agent lives down the river for money. I was just thinking, hey. Was I in the same courtroom watching these people write down Speaker 1: the Yeah. And it's not really the reporters because it doesn't matter what they write. It's it's whoever runs the newspaper decides on the headlines. Speaker 0: Exactly. So, of course, you have the government and the intelligence agencies telling them what to do. So, you know, he was convicted. He was sentenced. He was sent sent to a high security prison. And and, of course, he had his reputation destroyed as well in the papers. It was a very high price. Speaker 1: Maybe we can talk for a minute about the issue of nine eleven. Because when we're talking about false flag operations, and just for those who are tuning in late, false flag operation is simply an operation carried out, let's say, by the US government Mhmm. But blamed on someone else, like, for example, blamed on Al Qaeda. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: So what's your take on the events of nine eleven? Speaker 0: Well, I came quite late to looking at nine eleven. In 02/2005, I was approached by a leading UK Activist from the sort of nine eleven group saying, well, you know, you've blown the whistle on these false flag attacks. Have you ever looked at this issue? I said, well, actually, we've been a bit sort of busy fighting court cases and things, but anyway, we'll go and have a look. And I went off and I read a book called The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin, which just raises so many questions about the official account. It got me thinking. And, of course, once you accept that false flag is an historic reality, and it is, I mean, there are many, many cases of it, nine eleven, you have to approach that issue with that in the back of your mind at the very least. You know, was there something more to it, or should we just believe what the mainstream media immediately told us, which is it's Al Qaeda? As I said, there is so much evidence out there, a mountain of evidence from credible experts that contradicts the official accounts that I would say to anyone, at the very least, need a new independent inquiry into the issue. I mean, we have academics. We have scholars. We have politicians, including the leader of the opposition in Japan, raising questions and saying we need a new inquiry. We have pilots. We have architects and engineers who question the way the the towers fell. The three towers fell down on that day. Speaker 1: Yes. A lot of people don't know that three buildings fell Yeah. On the day of nine eleven. The the two World Trade Center one and World Trade Center 2, which everybody saw, and also World Trade Center 7 Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Which collapsed about 5PM Mhmm. That day, New York time, announced in advance by the BBC. Speaker 0: And CNN and a few other Speaker 1: Oh, and CNN. Speaker 0: Yeah. A couple of other stations as well. Yes. That was a that's a big mystery. You know, we have this 47 story skyscraper, which is huge. It just looks small next to the Twin Towers, which just collapses at freefall speed. It implodes in the middle and collapses into its own footprint. Now, people who've seen the footage of that collapse, who are experts in demolition, but they don't realize it's a World Trade Center Tower, just say, yeah, of course, that's a controlled demolition. Don't be silly. When they're told it's from the World Trade Center, they go, okay. Don't know about that then. But, yes, it bears all the hallmarks of controlled demolition. And even though it wasn't hit by a plane, so nobody knows what's happened to it. The nine eleven commission never even addressed this issue. This is another reason we need a new independent inquiry. And there are eyewitnesses saying there are explosions in the building in the morning. There's a whole mess of evidence that needs to be addressed. But I think, you know, it's it's crucial to look at this with the idea that perhaps there was some at least pre knowledge of what might happen. Certainly, are a number of intelligence whistleblowers and government whistleblowers who've come out and said, yes, we were aware that something was brewing, but we were blocked from investigating it in The US. But if you think how nine eleven has been used and abused as well, one of the things I said earlier was that false flag attacks are carried out for political advantage by the the the real perpetrators. So who benefits from nine eleven? You know, it's has been the perfect pretext for the ongoing endless war on terror, which is a justification for the wars in The Middle East in which millions of people have died and been displaced. They estimate, I think, the moment about forty children a day are dying in Iraq because of what the West has done, which Speaker 1: is I believe the Lancet estimated close to one million Iraqis have died needlessly because of the invasion of Iran. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: Yeah. The war is now spreading into Afghanistan. And Palestine. Yeah. Huge cost to the people there. And I don't mean financial cost. I mean, lost and Yeah. Speaker 0: It's obscene. It's obscene. And this this is predicated on the issue of nine eleven and, you know, our hunt for Al Qaeda and the war on terror. It affects all of us. You know? I mean, many people say, well, why are people looking at nine eleven? It's an attack that happened many years ago in a foreign country. But think how it's been used against all of us as well. This pretext for the war on terror has led to the erosion of our civil liberties across the world. I mean, certainly in The UK, we no longer live in a functioning democracy. We've never had a written constitution, of course, like The US or most of other European countries. We just had sort of traditional rights. These have all disappeared because of the fight against terror, the terror threat. Now bear in mind, The UK suffered terrorism on a regular basis from the IRA, the Irish Republican Army. Throughout the seventies, eighties, and nineties, we were used to bombs going off on a regular basis on our city streets and people dying. And yet none of our traditional freedoms were taken away at that point. And yet we have Al Qaeda, this terrible war on terror, and all our freedoms are shredded by a labor government. We have people put in prison on the say so intelligence officers. No evidence whatsoever. Just interment. We have British citizens being abducted and tortured in third world countries and in interrogations in which m I five officers apparently seem to be taking part as well, which is obscene. We have police stopping and arresting people with no suspicion of them having committed a crime under section 44 of the terrorism act just because they want to find out what their identity is. We have a new eavesdropping law called the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act from February, which is supposed to be just for agencies like MI five, for example, to to put a telephone tap on to investigate a terrorist case. Over 800 public bodies now use RIPA to investigate people for a whole range of small civil infractions. So, for example, a town council might use this act to put a telephone tap to investigate someone to see if they are living in the house they say they are living in for council tax purposes or whatever. We've even had ridiculous cases where people who go and fish for shellfish off the South Coast Of England are under surveillance under this this very hard hitting piece of legislation purely to see if they're taking more than their quota of shellfish. It's just crazy. And this was put in place to try and prevent, you know, protect us from terrorism. So you give them power, they will abuse it. That's a simple thing. And we've also had another law called the civil contingency act, which just went through parliament. The media didn't kick up a fuss. The MPs didn't kick up a fuss. And the provisions of that basically say that any government minister can declare a state of national emergency. And under that state of national emergency, there's no justification to parliament or anything. That's it. Speaker 1: Any government minister? Speaker 0: Any government minister can sign an authorization for a state of emergency. And under that, they can quarantine us. They can stop us moving freely around our country. They can stop people having the right of association, the right to have political meetings or whatever. They can even seize and demolish our homes and not pay us compensation because it's done in the name of national security. And most people don't even know this law exists. It came in three years ago. So when I say that The UK is effectively a police state, it is. The laws are in place. It's just they're not being used in a really heavy handed manner yet. And it's really sad having seen that happen to the country that was supposed to be the mother of democracies, you know. Speaker 1: Now I think there are similar laws in The United States. Speaker 0: And Patriot Act. God. That's a Speaker 1: terrible feeling there are similar laws in Canada as well. Mhmm. I don't know. But I spoke to a lawyer, five or six years ago, and she was talking about the laws that have been passed in Canada since 09/11 and coming from 09/11, and she said these were basically the laws of Nazi Germany. Now, we've heard nothing about them. Most people don't know they exist, and I don't even know if they exist. But as you say in Britain, the laws are on the books. They just haven't yet been used. Speaker 0: Well, some of them are being used. I mean, for example, the section 44 of the terrorism act where police can stop and arrest you just to find out who you are with no suspicion of any crime having been committed, of course, is being used and abused against the Muslim community. Tens of thousands of people are being stopped in this manner every year across The UK, predominantly, of course, young Muslim men, which is inherently racist anyway. Oh, you know, you happen to look Arab. Let's stop. Speaker 1: Plus, it makes people feel they're not part of Britain. Speaker 0: Exactly. Speaker 1: And it causes anger. Yeah. And possibly, that's even the reason for doing it. Speaker 0: Possibly. Quite possibly. But, you know, it starts with one community and then spreads out. The Irish community was treated that way as well in the nineteen eighties by the police, you know, so. Speaker 1: A lot of the fear or anger in Britain came out of the bombings that took place on 07/07/2005. Mhmm. Several people were killed. There was Speaker 0: 52. Speaker 1: Yeah. 52 people were killed. A bus and in the in the underground. Speaker 0: Yeah. There were four. Well, according to the official account, there were four explosions that day. Three on underground trains, the height of the rush hour, and one on the top deck of a double deck bus, which, of course, provided the sort of visuals of the attack. Now it's interesting because I'm aware that false flag is a historic reality, it's a concept. I'm also very aware that there's a mountain of evidence which contradicts the official account of nine eleven. Now in the case of seven seven, as I said, you've always got to look at these attacks with the possibility of false flag in the back of your mind. There are some interesting issues and questions and anomalies about seven seven, but I don't think there's anywhere near as much evidence to dispute the official account. Although, one or two of the issues are in, you know, quite stark. The first one was that there's a man called Peter Power, who's a former senior counterterrorism officer from the Metropolitan Police, who's now left and set up a security company called Pfizer Consultants. Now he was running an exercise, a counterterrorism style exercise in London on the day of the bombings. And he said on live on national mainstream television and radio in the immediate aftermath of the bombings that his exercise involved precisely the same stations at precisely the same times as the bombs that went off, and the hair stood up on the back of his neck. That was the quote he said. Speaker 1: Yes. I remember hearing that because a friend of mine taped it. Yeah. It's never been heard of again. Mhmm. And yet you'd think that that is quite a remarkable statement Yeah. For someone to make. Speaker 0: He backtracked, of course, immediately. Over the next few days, he downplayed that. But, of course, it's all over the Internet now. It's included in films and things like that. So it's there for posterity. But There Speaker 1: seem to be quite a bit of questions raised about that those bomb all the bombers were killed. Speaker 0: Allegedly. Speaker 1: Allegedly. Speaker 0: I mean, it's very handy, isn't it, having suicide bombers? Because you don't have to put them on trial so that you don't need to build a forensic evidential chain to take them to court. The other anomaly, we've never had a public inquiry into what is the biggest terrorist atrocity in terms of fatalities on British soil, which is amazing. Speaker 1: And that was the seven seven? Speaker 0: That was the seven seven bombing. Seven. Tony Blair dismissed the possibility, and he called it he said it would be a ludicrous diversion, which is just bizarre. Anyway, the families of the victims and the survivors obviously want a proper inquiry to find out what happened and who was to blame and all the rest of it. And the government kept refusing and keeps refusing to this day. What they have allowed them is, something they produced, a document they produced called the official narrative, which was written by an anonymous civil servant somewhere, which was presented to parliament and which had to be changed immediately because they got the facts wrong, such as crucial issues like which train the bombers were supposed to have taken from Luton, which is where they parked their car, into London. Now, the official narrative claimed that they took the seven forty train. Some researchers went to the train company, and the train company has to keep records of which trains run and what time they get in for performance indicators. The train that day had been canceled. Speaker 1: Oh. Speaker 0: So and yet, the official narrative the government produced said, oh, yes. Well, they got on this train, and we have all these eyewitnesses that said they saw the bombers on that train, and yet the train didn't run that day. So where are these Speaker 1: issues coming from? And we'll just Just Speaker 0: a little mistake. Speaker 1: Rewrite Speaker 0: it. Who are all these witnesses, though? Yes. That's an intriguing question. Speaker 1: Now, I read it was a newspaper out of it was Cambridge, a matter of fact. Mhmm. Think. A friend showed me this. It was an account by somebody who had been injured in the attack who was from Cambridge. Speaker 0: Oh, yes. Yes. Speaker 1: Oh, you saw that. Okay. Speaker 0: I've heard of this one. Yeah. Speaker 1: Moved to a hospital in Cambridge a few days later when he was okay to travel, and he was interviewed by a local reporter while he was in hospital in Cambridge. And he said his recollection was that there was nobody who seemed to be of Arab descent on the sitting anywhere around where the bomb went off. Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: And plus, as he was being taken off the train, he saw that the floor of the car, the train car, had been blown upwards and inwards as if the bomb was underneath Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: The train Mhmm. Attached to it, and blew up outside the train attached to the bottom. The that's how the explosion Speaker 0: Yeah. Looked to I've heard of that account. It was a man called Bruce Lait, I think. Was a professional dancer who'd been on one of these TV shows, so he got quite a lot of coverage, I think, to remember. I don't know. But this is why we need an inquiry. Speaker 1: You know? Yes. Speaker 0: If there are conflicting witness, eyewitness accounts, they all need to be addressed. You can't just say, oh, well, someone said this happened, like the alleged witnesses on the seven forty train that didn't exist saying, oh, yes. We also saw these four Arab chaps. Well, where are they now? You know? So if there of course, you need a proper inquiry. You need to pull together a forensic chain to sort of try and indicate exactly how it happened. I don't I really don't know about seven seven. All I'd say, there are some interesting unanswered questions about it, and we need new inquiry. Speaker 1: And for 09:11, you would recommend, at the very least, an independent inquiry to put it. Speaker 0: Yeah. I mean, you know, there was this nine eleven commission, which the government refused to allow for over four hundred days, I think. You know? They they start inquiries and commissions into Bill Clinton's sexual proclivities, you know, and spend a huge amount of money on it, but they won't actually allow a commission into this huge attack on US soil. The families forced them into it, course. They really campaigned for one. Even the commissions of that said they were set up to fail, famously. Speaker 1: Can you repeat that? Because that's something I haven't really heard. Speaker 0: Yeah. Keenan Hamilton, the two chairs of the nine eleven commission, said that the commission was set up to fail. And interestingly, of course, the executive director of the commissioner of the commission was a man called Philip Zellekow, who pretty much set the parameters of what the commission was going to investigate and look at and report, even to the extent of writing the structure of the report, the title headings, the subheadings, which areas they're going to write up about. Zellekow, of course, is one of the key neocons. He's right at the heart of that group. He's even co authored books with Condoleezza Rice, and yet he was the one put in charge of defining where the commission was going to investigate. So, yes, of course, that hasn't answered most of the questions. They did not deal with most of the major anomalies in the official account in the official version of events. That's why we need a new independent account. Speaker 1: And I would say the media is also totally complicit in that because they could blow the whole official story out of the water in five minutes if they chose to do so. There was I mean, on the Internet you can see Mhmm. The day of 09/11 the reporters standing outside the buildings with the smoke pouring out of the top saying we can hear bombs going off. There are bombs going off inside the buildings right now. And all of that somehow disappears from the public record, never to be mentioned again. Speaker 0: It's magical, isn't it? Speaker 1: It is magical. You gotta admire these guys. I mean. Speaker 0: Well, what can I say? The media is suborned, I think, into this sort of going along with the official account. Because if they don't, if they start rocking the boat, they will lose their jobs. It's that simple. Speaker 1: Yes. The people the people who work for the media, of course, they're just doing their job like everybody else. Speaker 0: Well, they're not doing their job, are they? Speaker 1: Well, yeah. There is that. Of nine eleven, what what were the points that someone mentioned to you that made you begin to think that there was a problem with the official story? Speaker 0: I think when I looked at it to begin with, it was the issues around the Pentagon. The the incredibly small hole in the facade before it collapsed, which intrigued me. Excuse me. And also, the collapse of the Twin Towers, which was free fall speed again. And you have two planes going in at the top of the towers, and yet they collapse into their own footprint really fast, and they just seemed a bit odd. And, of course, since then, there have been various papers published by scientists, peer reviewed scientific papers, that suggest that a highly sophisticated, very modern type of explosive may have been used to bring the towers down. It's called nanothermite, I believe. There was a paper just recently released by Professor Niels Harrott of Copenhagen University, he's a chemistry professor, looking at this and peer reviewed, solid evidence. But, of course, that's just dismissed because it's, oh, nine eleven truth movement. Who cares? Speaker 1: Nothing in the media? Speaker 0: Nothing in the media, of course. Oh, no. Actually, there was. He got a main he he was actually interviewed on mainstream Danish news television. And he blew the interviewer away. I mean, the guy didn't, you know, really know what to make of it. So that was interesting, but not internationally known. So Speaker 1: what what are the lessons that we can learn from this and what are the directions we have to go in to begin to turn this around? Because you know, I mean it's my belief and I guess your belief too that some very powerful people and and are doing things which are not necessarily in the best interests of all of us. Speaker 0: Indeed. They're in their own interests. I think we just need to keep educating people about the fact there are questions around nine eleven, that it's not as cut and dried as we've been told, and also to tell them, you know, look at it as something that is continuing to affect the global population of humanity to this day, either with wars or with erosion of our freedoms. I mean, we need to look at it. And because nine eleven was so high profile, everyone remembers where they were when it happened. It was a shock and awe exercise, you know, to frighten us all. We can use it back. You know, we can push back and say, actually, this is a sort of keystone in the sort of edifice of of lies about how the media control things and the government spins and things like that. If we can disprove nine eleven, bang, out. Then people will start investigating other issues for themselves and start questioning for themselves rather than just passively thinking about, oh, well, that's the news. I'm going to just ingest it, that's it. And I think this is an amazing movement of people around the planet with many, many experts, but also many millions of concerned citizens asking questions about this because it re empowers them democratically. You know, most of us have been so turned off by mainstream politics because what's the point? You know, they never change. They never listen to activists. Nine eleven can get people thinking for themselves, doing their own research, following their own paths of what interests them as well, but at least gets that initial process thinking of thinking about, yes, I've been lied to, yes, I don't trust my government, and this is a key element of why I don't. You know, it's very easy to show people the evidence, and if they get over their emotional resistance to the issue, it's very difficult for anyone to go back and say, 'Okay, I know the evidence, but I don't believe it.' You can't, the evidence is too strong. So, the movement itself is an amazing community of people. I've never seen a political organization quite like it really, or we're political in this sort of strict civic sense. And we just need to get people as active as possible. Speaker 1: Now my understanding is that millions of Canadians and probably tens of millions of Americans, and I don't know what the case is in Britain, don't believe the official version of nine eleven. Mhmm. What's the situation in Britain when when the Brits talk about it? What you know, do they laugh at it and or do they or do people believe? Or I guess there's a mix, but Speaker 0: There is a mix. There's never been a poll, I don't think, that showed how many what sort of percent might have Speaker 1: poll done in New York City Yeah. Several years ago on the eve of the Republican National Convention when Bush was renominated, you know, five years ago to run. And it was done by Zogby, is one of the largest polling companies in The United States. And it found that in New York City, full I think it was 49% of the people either believed that the US government was involved in it and complicit Speaker 0: Mhmm. Speaker 1: Or knew it was gonna happen and let it happen for their own purposes. It's quite remarkable. And yet it doesn't matter. No. Of course. The lies continue. Speaker 0: Yeah. Now in The UK, over the last few years, did build a very successful campaign for a while. We had a lot of high profile speakers over, people like William Rodriguez, who is the last man out of the Twin Towers, helped save hundreds of lives, you know, amazing, amazing man. Got a lot of local media and some good national media coverage as well. And there was a growing awareness, not just through those tours and the official groups, but also spreading the word on the Internet. So I'm sure a lot of people are very aware. But there has been a sort of concerted pushback within the mainstream media. Oh, well, you know, anyone who questions 911, of course, is a nutter. You know, conspiracy theorist, anti Semitic, you know, all these sort of stupid labels tagged onto a movement of concerned citizens. So there's been quite a pushback in the media. And I think that frightens more people off because, you know, they worry about credibility. Are people going to laugh at me if I look at these sort of issues, which is difficult? And the movement as well doesn't always help itself by being aggressive or by speculative theories around what might have happened that day. It's not for us to prove what happened that day. It's for an independent inquiry to prove what happened that day. So, we can shoot ourselves in the foot a little bit as well. But also, the rest of Europe is is growing very fast. We have very active groups across all the main countries in Europe now. We have a member of the European Parliament called Julieta Chiesa, who made a very good film called Zero. I don't know if you've seen it Speaker 1: all of it. I have seen it. Speaker 0: Very good basic film, just raising the basic evidence, the question's official account. And he managed to get that screened on Russian national state TV on the last anniversary. It went out to about 30,000,000 people. Then the Russian newspapers are writing articles the next day, play you know, newspapers like Pravda that used to be the mouthpiece of the Soviet infrastructure saying things like, oh, of course, we all know that America gets involved in false flag terrorism. This isn't news to us. So there are many millions of people, I think, across Europe who are aware. Whether they do something about it is another matter, become active. But at the very least, if they just talk about it amongst their peer groups and their friends and their community and spread the word, that's a start, I think. Speaker 1: You've written a book? Speaker 0: I wrote a book many years ago, yes, in 02/2003. It's called Spies, Lies and Whistleblowers, which was a sort of aggregation of all the disclosures we made about MI5, what we saw going wrong, but also what happened after the whistleblowing years in terms of the official response and quite how bad it was, which was not touched by the mainstream media. Spy books are so rare in the in The UK. They always get a lot of coverage, but this time, they banned it. They banned any reviews in the mainstream media. I had friends in the media saying, yes. We're not allowed to touch this book, so it was buried. And m I five actually banned its publication for about a year and a half as well. I had to submit it for clearance, otherwise, I would have been prosecuted, and they just stopped, kept it under wraps for a long time. So that was a bit frustrating. Mhmm. Speaker 1: So you're up against very powerful very powerful interests, as are we all. We're all up against these interests. Speaker 0: Exactly. And Speaker 1: is there any message that you try to besides telling stories, is there any message that you're giving to people in Canada that you want us to draw from what's happened to you or what you've been involved in? Speaker 0: I think what happened to to David Scheler and myself and what we've been involved in displays all the elements of what we're up against in terms of the media control, in terms of cover ups, in terms of spin, and things like that. And I think that's what we're facing on a sort of macro scale now in terms of trying to uncover the basis for the war on terror, uncover what's happened in The Middle East, and stop the slide into totalitarianism, which we're seeing in our democracies at the moment. So, really, all I'm doing is bearing witness, I suppose, to the fact that these things go on. I've seen it from the inside in an attempt to try and help people understand that it's you know, they need to look at issues like nine eleven because these sort of issues do go on. These sort of full flag operations do go on. They are a reality. So it's really just encouraging people to take that mental leap to say, okay. I'm gonna have a look, do research for myself, and see where I go from there. And if they are so moved, to get active and plug into their communities and spread the word, and just, you know, let's get a healthy healthy thriving democracy going again. Our politicians have got away with it for long enough. We know that they're not doing the right job. They're they're corrupt. They've taken us into illegal wars on the basis of lies. Let's say enough is enough. We want our countries back.
Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:20 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tommy Robinson is facing court again due to media lies claiming he incited 'far right riots' after the Southport murders. The Daily Mail has spread these accusations and even revealed his family's location while they were on holiday in Cyprus. Please check the quoted thread for more details.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

OVERSEAS ADMIN TOMMY ROBINSON DID NOT CAUSE RIOTS - IT'S A LIE!!!! SHARE THIS!!!! Just a reminder for everyone that Tommy is being dragged into court again on the back of media lies, on the back of accusations he caused 'far right riots' post Southport murders, on the back of the Daily Mail perpetrating those lies and exposing his families whereabouts while they were in Cyprus on holiday. Please refer to the X quoted thread below for details.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tommy Robinson claims the media, police, and politicians are falsely accusing him of inciting violence in the UK and want to imprison him to continue deceiving the public. He denies instigating riots and insists his messaging has consistently been for calm. Others state Robinson, currently in Cyprus, is instigating violence online and coordinating a political insurgency. They accuse him of stirring up hate while enjoying European sunshine. Robinson says his calls for peace are being deleted from social media, while the media promotes lies. He urges the public to share his video to expose the mainstream media's deceit and negative narrative. He claims the government's policies and failure to address public concerns are the root cause of the unrest. He appeals for peaceful resistance and accuses the media of trying to frame him. He asks supporters to control the youth and prevent violence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please to the British public, you can see they're coming for me. I know they're coming for me. They want to lock me up. Why they want to lock me up? Because they want to continue to deceive you. The media, every single chat show, police officers, politicians, they're all telling you, the British public, that I've incited and instigated the violence on the streets of The UK. Speaker 1: Well, what we've heard, Julie, from a lot of the far right figures is that these protests that we've been seeing over the last week are not about extremists. They're about ordinary people just having their say. Here's an example, and it's not the only one from the man known as Tommy Robinson yesterday, a post accusing Kirstjarmer of trying to use legitimate concerns to tarnish millions of people as far right thugs. Speaker 2: And a lot of this is being instigated online, and probably the most influential instigator for all is Tommy Robinson, real name Steven Yaxty Lennon, a really sinister and ludicrous frigate frankly, who is currently away in Cyprus hiding, tweeting inflammatory material online. Speaker 3: But it must be very upsetting for the families and for the community of Southport, which really came together in the in the aftermath of it for this to be hijacked by people lying on sun beds in Cyprus directing the violence. Speaker 0: And But you're referring to some of images on the front page of lies Speaker 3: based on a completely inaccurate account of what happened in Southport. Speaker 4: It's a political insurgency. That's what we're seeing. It's been coordinated by a man who's just fled England, a man who can't even be here because he's, you know, he he's a criminal. Speaker 5: The English defense lead, I mean, give me their phone number. Give me their email. I mean, the fellow who's associated with most is on a sunbed in Cyprus. Tommy Robbins. He hates Europe, but there he is enjoying the European sunshine and stirring up poison and hate in this country. Speaker 0: Now let's actually listen to the truth, because it they have no evidence to say I've instigated the riots or encouraged in any way. There's no evidence. Evidence doesn't matter when they have the mainstream media. They just hammer you continuously with lies and then it becomes a matter of fact. People talk about it on chat shows, TV shows in the street as though it's fact. Oh, Tommy Robinson caused that. Have a look at my messaging. Please watch this and listen to my messaging from day dot. It's always been the same. Speaker 6: Now I'll be saying to anyone that I know there's a protest night in London. Lads, you've got to remain calm. You can't have scenes. I understand that level of anger. Yeah? Well, because I've been listening and looking and thinking and picturing, trying to think of what they're going through, and they're being gaslit the entire time. Now you've seen the attempt already by the media. They're blamed last night, not on an angry community, but on the English Defense League, which ended ten years ago as an organization. Look, our events in London, totally peaceful, totally calm, didn't matter. We were under attack by the media and politicians, by all of them, as far right racist hooligans, all these things. But again, I'll just reiterate, again, a total appeal for calm. But again, so lads, if there are any future demonstrations up there, try to remain calm. Try and hold. And again, people watching these scenes, imagine how quickly they're all there, they're all upset, they're all angry. They're devastated, their hearts are broken. And then they find out another bloke's turned up with a balaclava and knife in their town. Another man has come into their town with a balaclava and knife. Now that word would have spread quickly around that community. The anger's boiled over. But just an appeal for calm, man. Anyone going to London tonight? There's protests outside down the street, outside parliament for prime minister's questions, I believe. Try and bring the numbers, bring the noise, but don't bring any violence, man. Peace, love, our country is in the gutter. We ain't gonna win it back by throwing the free rocks at coppers. Galvanize the country. That's what we need to do. Unite people. My message to people going out is be careful. I understand the frustration. I fully understand it. I understand the anger. Yeah. I'm frustrated. I'm angry, Speaker 0: but to come out Speaker 6: and burn a police building in a block of buildings with multiple occupancies is absolutely fucking ridiculous. Yeah. Insane, really. And, yeah, the level of violence, it won't work. Okay? It will just give them the excuse not to listen to the wider public's general concerns and fears on all these issues. So up and down the country, if you're going out today, remain safe. Stay safe. If you're protesting, it's your god given right to do that. Yeah? Anyway, stay safe. Speaker 0: Stop the violence, please. And to the men committing the violence, lads, those individual police officers who are coming out doing a difficult enough job have got families at home. They're ordinary people. K? We had a hundred thousand people on the streets of London in a peaceful resistance. That hundred thousand will become 250,000. Two hundred and 50 will become half a million. A peaceful revolution is brewing in Great Britain. A peaceful res revolution. And to the lads taken to the streets, in the towns and cities today, these young boys need leadership. Take their balaclavas off. Take their masks off. They're gonna get years in prison. Okay? It's not helping the cause. You see the rapes? You see all these migrant hotels? They're not slowing down. They're speeding them up. They're flooding our country. Yeah? We either win this battle where we don't become minorities and don't see every town sitting in this country taken over by hostile jihadist rapist criminals, yeah, that's either that's one outcome or we win through peaceful resistance and cause a revolution in this country, and the public are ready for it. Everyone's ready for it. Yeah? The time is now. The time and lads are up and down the country in the towns and cities. These young boys are looking for leadership. Okay? We had peaceful demonstrations in London because we had leadership. We had committed men, not just me, we had committed men across that movement willing to stop people who were stepping out of line. We're on the verge of something massive where we've won the hearts and minds of the public. Don't undo that. Yeah? So lads, in every city across this country, control your boys, man. Control them. Direct them. A piss a peaceful resistance is growing. I'm watching what's happening and so the people are saying I'm I'm I'm glorifying it. No. Not. I've peeled for calm the whole way. We organize ourselves. Yeah? I'm just keeping the public up to date, is what media won't do, with what's happening and why it's happening. Okay? And where that anger is coming from. The truth doesn't matter when you've got a target on you. And right now, I've got a target on me. They wanna make me the full guy. I need you. I need you to get this video to millions and millions of views so the public can see their deceit ful corrupt lies of the mainstream media. K? They sent a daily mail journalist to run this headline, then the next day it's gone everywhere in newspapers everywhere with no evidence. Do you know what evidence they use to say that I have instigated and stoked the flames for these riots? This tweet. Whilst they claim that my controversial tweets have stoked the flames and instigated riots, let's have a look at a few of their own headlines. Well, guess what? Mass deportations are needed. The hotels need to be emptied. That's not a minority view. It's a majority view. These barbarians have been welcomed into our nation by our politicians who are raping, pillaging, and murdering across our country need to leave. That's not controversial. That's not stoking the flames. Your government policy is what's caused the resentment and the problems. Your failure to address people's fears and concerns for decades by calling them all far right and racist. Speaker 4: These people are racists. They're racist thugs, and they're far right. Speaker 0: And right now, your lies, your continued lies to try and frame me as someone who's instigated violence without addressing the reason why they're out in the streets anyway. Again, trying to brush it under the carpet and get rid of it. It's not gonna go anywhere. Please, to the British public, you can see they're coming for me. I know they're coming for me. They want to lock me up. Why do they want to lock me up? Because they want to continue to deceive you. Look at this. Yeah? Let's search my name on TikTok. So all these videos of me calling for peace, calmness, and no violence, they're deleted from everywhere. YouTube are blocking me now on everyone's channels. Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, the reality and the truth and the evidence, it's gone. Then they just use the media to pump you with all the lies. If it wasn't for x, and that's why now read the headlines, listen to politicians, listen to news presenters. They're all saying we need control of x. Speaker 3: And as Andrew said, we have a multiple challenge here or that the prime minister and the government does dealing with the immediate violence, but also getting to grips once and for all with this social media problem, which no one really knows how to tackle. Speaker 2: And Neil Bass, who also said, the former head of countercism, he feels that social media companies need to get a grip of this cause it's effectively become a lawless space where people like Tommy Robinson have free rein. Speaker 0: Cause if they control x, then this video you're watching which shows the truth that they're lying, no one gets to see. They get to continue to manipulate you as the British public, lie to you and deceive you, and feed you a totally false negative false and negative narrative of what's been happening. So once again, to the Muslims watching this, there is no English defense. There hasn't been for a decade. To the British public watching this, I'm not instigating any trouble to your mosques. I'm not called for any violence. Quite the opposite. The truth is the total opposite. I would need you now more than ever. As you can see, they want me looked up. They're trying to paint me as the paint a picture of me as the full guy for these riots. I've got nothing to do with these riots. In fact, let's look at a scenario. They're saying they're my supporters. When someone, like Lee Rigby's killer, quote his fifth, hands over 52 verse from the Quran that made him kill Lee Rigby, they say it's got nothing to do with Islam. So each time someone screams Al Aqbar, literally citing the Quran as the reason they're doing it, they tell you it's got nothing to do with Now I'm telling people to stay peaceful and don't turn to violence, and when they turn to violence, there's ain't sort of doing me. Totally insanity. I need you more than ever. Make sure you share this video. Make sure you share it everywhere. Help challenge their lives for me because they've set me up. I can see it. You can see it. My inbox is full of people telling me not to come back to The UK because they're gonna lock me out for a long time. That's what they want. But they want to be able to deceive the public into the reason why. Please share this video.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

OVERSEAS ADMIN - POST 1 Support Tommy's legal fund for his first round in Westminster Magistrates Court here - https://www.urbanscoop.news/support-us/ Tommy will have to attend Westminster magistrates court on the 5th of June 2025 to answer to charges. They are: Two offences of harassment causing fear of violence against two men (Andrew Young and Jacob Dirnhuber of the Daily Mail), both committed between 5th of August 2024 and the 7th of August 2024. This thread on X will repost already publicly available information highlighting the alleged harassment and threats. On the 5th of June they could try and remand Tommy!!! ***Any surplus donations will go to covering overheads for Urban Scoop***

Support Us - Urban Scoop Urban Scoop: A Fresh UK Platform Championing Journalists from Every Walk of Life for Genuine, Unbiased, and Corporate-Free Content urbanscoop.news
Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:20 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. This is the moment the suspected terrorist in Liverpool is taken away by police, the crowds had a different justice waiting. https://t.co/G7sKKSDcrg

Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:20 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. A new angle of the suspected terror attack on crowds celebrating in Liverpool, shows the car making impacts with pedestrians. It's looking very intentional from this view. Prayers out to the victims. https://t.co/OPyun51ApY

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses shock and disbelief, exclaiming about "big bonuses" and questioning who was asked about something. Speaker 0 then states, "He's out there, ma'am," followed by further expressions of confusion and disbelief. Speaker 1 echoes the shock. Speaker 0 then states that "they've just killed he should killed a few people, you know."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Busy. Fucking hell, man. Oh, it's your big bonuses. Holy shit. Oh my god. Who'd you ask? What the fuck? He's out there, ma'am. The fuck? The fuck's going on there? Speaker 1: My god. What the fuck? Speaker 0: Oh my god. My god. Speaker 1: That's funny me if anyone there. Speaker 0: Well, they've just killed he should killed a few people, you know.
Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:20 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Distressing footage from the scene of the suspected terror attack in Liverpool, shows people trapped under the vehicle used to ram crowds. https://t.co/YLTx44qqws

Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:20 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Reports coming in of a suspected terror attack in Liverpool. A car was driven into crowds celebrating their Premier League win, when the vehicle struck people on Dale street in the city. Situation unfolding. https://t.co/yZUGDxUDg6

Saved - May 26, 2025 at 7:19 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Only days after Trump called out South Africa's President over white farmers being mass murdered. Julius Malema leads EFF rally with chants of: "kill the Boer, the farmer". Genocidal scum! https://t.co/Oss4d2ujGN

Saved - May 22, 2025 at 10:02 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Rotherham, notorious for Pakistani rape gangs, this week ushered in this one as Mayor, not voted in. Momus kindly translates as she speaks in Urdu: "I am representing my Pakistani nation and Pakistani Muslim women... Taking liberties! https://t.co/Rmbqtu3SRo

Saved - May 4, 2025 at 6:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A day before Tommy Robinson's rally against Keir Starmer and his documentary release on policing, he was arrested and has remained in custody. The rally on October 26, 2024, still drew over 100,000 people to Parliament, showcasing the unity and power of the people against the establishment.

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. A day before Tommy Robinson was due to lead a rally against @Keir_Starmer and showcase his latest documentary, exposing two tier policing and judiciary. He was arrested and has never been free since. The rally went ahead in his absence on 26th October 2024. This is what the establishment fear most. Unity of the people against them. 100,000+ hit parliament that day. More will return. The power of the people is greater than the people in power.

Saved - May 4, 2025 at 3:26 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Another day in "Modern England" and illegal immigrants are hanging around parks filming children. If they're not trying to rape, they're doing this. All in hotels and housing across the country, paid for by the taxpayers. Mass deportations now! https://t.co/3ccauDr9mG

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker took his daughter to the park and saw a foreign man filming her with his phone. The man initially denied filming, but the speaker demanded to see the phone and threatened to smash it. The phone contained videos of the speaker's daughter. The speaker called the police and hopes the man will be arrested immediately. He believes this is happening to other children in parks. The speaker is angry and feels lucky he didn't physically harm the man.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes, guys. What's going on? Are we good? Right. Listen. Just wanna do a a video of what I've just seen and what's just happened, and I've absolutely got mental main. So I've been taking my little girl to the park, and, obviously, I've let her go on my own and not not not not my little girl, lady, my little girl, Eilah. Took her to the park, and I've just seen this foreign guy. Right? Obviously, he he didn't really know I was with her. I was on I was on the bench, like, watching and what she was doing in there. And he's he's just started taking fit flat flat videos over on the phone and taking pictures over on that. So I've gone over to him and told him to show me that phone right now. Show me what you just talked about. And then he's denying it saying I'm not doing anything. I'm doing anything. And he started shaking like a fucking leaf. Yeah? I said, listen, mate. Show me your phone now before I smash it off your fucking head. So he obviously starts to fall off him. And he's got videos on the little girl on his phone. So, obviously, I've just rung the police now. Alright? Fuck a picture of the guy who it is. And I just thought, fingers crossed, this guy can get arrested straight away because this is happening to other people, you know, a lot of the kids on parks and, you know, this another, like, situation and stuff like that. I'm absolutely fuming, guys. I'm absolutely shaking to you. He's lucky I've not annihilated him on that park. Absolutely annihilated him. I'm fucking fuming. Absolutely fuming.
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 1:02 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Migrant, likely living in a taxpayer funded hotel, goes on a multiple sex attack in a park in Hertfordshire, yet nothing in the legacy media. Brave lady explains what happened. Cc: https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNdjsUq65/ https://t.co/ttgOLgma4h

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman recounts an incident in Verilanian Park, Hertfordshire, where on April 10th at approximately 4:30 PM, an immigrant approached her while she was walking her dog and made a sexual advance. She rebuffed him, and he then approached two schoolgirls on a bench. The woman intervened, preventing him from reaching the girls, and they walked away. The speaker later learned that the same man had sexually assaulted a 16-year-old earlier that day. She contacted the police after recognizing him from media reports, but the police initially declined to take her statement, even though the suspect was out on bail for the assault. She believes he barely spoke English and was "fresh off a boat." Her attempt to warn other women on a local mum group was blocked by the admin. She is now using TikTok to warn women to be careful in Verilanian Park.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: An immigrant assaulted a 60 year old woman in my local park in Hertfordshire on the April 10 at two p. Between one and two p. M. On the same day, unbeknownst me at the time because it's only just come out in the press, same day, that day at 04:30, quarter to five, I'm walking the dog and I'm throwing the chuck it ball and I sense a bloat. It's a very big, massive park, open space, there's no need for someone to be in your personal room. Anyway, came right up behind behind me, and he's gone to reach over to touch my sole shoulder, but I've whizzed around. He said, you now come fuck me. We go. We have sex. So I said what I said. Okay, I don't need to tell you what I said to him, but it was harsh, and I told him to fuck off and leave, the women in this country alone, but he was glazed. He was like, he was glazed. He wasn't not he wasn't on drugs or anything. He wasn't inebriated, but he wasn't there. He was glazed. He was like focused, and the way I relate, and I think I'm right, is that he was focused on finding a woman to to rape. Anyway, what he did then is he ignored me and walked straight over to two young girls on a bench, two two school girls. So I charged at him and I'm walking backwards with my arm in front of him to say, don't you dare, don't you dare, and I'm shouting back to the girls and saying, 'get your phones out, take pictures quickly'. So I've got in between them, he didn't get near them. I managed to deflect, so he's walked the other way and he's walked off, but he's walked towards the children's playground. Now can you imagine, I'm not a bloke, I've got a little dog with me, I, you know, I did did feel like I should have done more. I've I I did enough, everyone's telling me, but I I felt like I should have done more and followed him. Do you know what I mean? Because he was walking towards a children's playground and he could have just hurt another vulnerable woman. I didn't know at the time that he'd sexually assaulted a 16 year old. He'd already done that that day. Anyway, when I got back from holiday that then came out, this is only two days ago, and I said, Oh my God, it's the same bloke, because there's no description of him. So the media don't write when it's Asian or it's not basically not white, anyone not white, they don't write that. Whereas if you get someone that's white, a pedo, a robber, whatever, it's always a picture of them or they'll describe them. Whereas if it's anything other than white, they don't describe them because they're seen as racist. So, you know, that's just how it goes. But I spoke to the police officer, guys, you're not going believe that well you are going to believe this actually I think. I spoke to the police officer and she said Oh my god, yes, that's him. He fits the description, same park, same time, same location. Amazing. Can you send me those pictures? And I said, can't because the two young teenage girls, I gave them my number, but they didn't send me the pictures. I and I don't know who the girls are. And I didn't obviously didn't have my phone on me, which was a big mistake. Anyway, she said I'm gonna come and take a statement, so I'm like all geared up and thinking, we're gonna nail this bastard. She rings me the next morning when she's meant to actually be at my house and she says, I'm not coming. My supervisor said not to bother with it. Not to bother with it. So we've got a guy, he's on bail. They arrested him for that, not for what my situation, but for the sexual assault with a woman. He was bailed, so he's out. He's out. And I'm telling you now, he barely spoke a word of English. He was fresh off a boat. You could just tell. You could tell and it disgusts me because I then put it onto my mum group which has got thousands of women on it and the admin didn't let it through. So I put it on another group which only has like 20,000 people on it. It's not enough. So I thought, fuck it. I'm gonna come to TikTok. What else am I gonna meant to do? And the park is called Verilanian Park in Hertfordshire. Okay? And if you're a woman that walks there or a young girl, and it doesn't matter what age you are because this dude doesn't give a shit, you need to be careful.
Saved - April 29, 2025 at 12:26 PM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Imported gang of Muslims scream "allahu akbar" at a Christian preacher in Newcastle. Their pathetic intimidation tactics have no effect, and the preacher puts them back in their box. https://t.co/2PECx0uXPA

Saved - April 28, 2025 at 2:31 AM

@TRobinsonNewEra - Tommy Robinson ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง

ADMIN POST. Merseyside Police caught on camera slapping an already handcuffed young lad in the face. Not only will police turn a blind eye to the mass scale rape of Britain's children by Pakistani men, they hold this contempt for them! https://t.co/UlX6pm3WHx

View Full Interactive Feed