reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @TSH2_
@TSH2_ - ⚔️Love Me When I'm Gone⚔️
New footage of shooter on building. The truth will be revealed. https://t.co/iF7M7zzetD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Authorities claim the shooter's body on the building's roof was staged to look like he shot Trump, but new footage proves otherwise. The video shows the body far left, not close to the ridge as previously portrayed. The New York Times quietly released a documentary shifting the body's position to cover up the shooting angle. The shooter had no clear shot from the building, contradicting the government's narrative of a direct line of sight on Trump's podium. No official explanation has been given for the conflicting angles presented.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Authorities saying this is the lifeless body of the shooter on the roof of that building. That shot's a fairy tale. They framed it to make it look like he shot Trump from that position, but we're gonna show you now with new footage that that was impossible. Nobody saw this footage before today. My research partner, Michelle Swinick, found this at a YouTube channel.
It was posted the day of the shooting. As of today, 8 days later, it only had 59 views. However, the New York Times had this footage, but they'd never shown anyone this shot, which proves that he could not have shot from this angle. You've never seen this shot before with this body all the way to the left side of the building. They've always framed it like it's closer to the ridge.
As you'll see later, there's a ridge right in the middle of the building. It goes past that, roof turbine at the top that looks like a big mushroom there. God, where's that? Oh my god. This is the famous shot everybody's seen, but everybody's seen it framed up close.
This is the image that gas lit the entire country. This is a fake image, and we have Matt Baker and Morris Less, AKA Less, for having the guts to get us up on that building today so we could see all the angles we need to see. It's more than obvious he had no shot. From the pictures they showed us, he had no shot. He would be shooting up.
The New York Times just recently, within the last couple of days, put this out in a short 6 minute documentary very quietly after they changed the position of the body, which is what everybody's doing now. They're moving it 25 yards to the left. It's a cover up. New York Times now has the gunman dot on the other side of the building changing the shooting angle.
Speaker 1: The shooter climbing seemingly unimpeded about 400 feet from the stage with a direct line of sight on the former president.
Speaker 0: After he opened fire with an AR 15 style rifle, just 148 yards from the former president's podium. Nobody in the government has addressed the fact that they gave us 2 separate angles.
@TSH2_ - ⚔️Love Me When I'm Gone⚔️
We all knew this was true. Release the Kraken! https://t.co/pfkKoT0Q8R
Video Transcript AI Summary
3% of pre-election voting ballots were altered using HAMR and ScoreCard software, potentially impacting the national vote. An algorithm was used to adjust votes for Biden in specific areas, like Michigan where a glitch favored Trump by 55100 votes in one district. Similar issues are suspected in other states with thousands of ballots appearing for Biden, statistically implausible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 3% of the vote total was changed in the pre election voting ballots that were collected digitally by using the HAMR program and a software program called ScoreCard. That would have amounted to a massive change in the vote that would have gone across the country and explains a lot of what we're seeing. In addition, they ran an algorithm to calculate votes they might need to come up with for mister Biden in specific areas. I think that explains what happened in Michigan where the computer glitch resulted in a change of votes of, about 55100 in favor of president Trump just in one of 47 districts. All those districts need to be checked for that same, quote, software glitch, end quote, that would change the results in Michigan dramatically.
The same thing is happening in other states. We've had 100 of thousands of ballots mysteriously appear for solely for mister Biden, which is statistically impossible as a matter of mathematics.
@TSH2_ - ⚔️Love Me When I'm Gone⚔️
She got what she deserved no doubt. Liberal entitlement no more https://t.co/gX455cPazr
Video Transcript AI Summary
The woman was caught stealing a sign on camera, claiming she only moved it. The officers detained her for larceny, emphasizing she had no right to take someone's property. She argued about abortion laws in North Carolina, but the officers proceeded with the arrest. Despite her attempts to explain, she was advised of her arrest.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I said,
Speaker 1: no warning. Ma'am, don't steal the sign. You can't steal the sign. You're on camera stealing the sign. Sam?
Officers, he's stealing the sign. And you're about to walk right into a police officer who you're committing theft right now. Don't throw it over.
Speaker 0: Don't do that. Don't do that.
Speaker 1: Silver sign.
Speaker 0: I just moved it. You just did what? I just moved it.
Speaker 1: You just moved it. But you
Speaker 0: took it. Okay. Who was holding it?
Speaker 1: Me. She just ripped it out of my hands. You just ripped
Speaker 0: it out of
Speaker 1: your hands? Yes. 100 of that damn thing. Because this this sex woman's size. The sex woman's right?
He's he's
Speaker 0: Did you get it off the same place? I'm college campus. Okay. Where are you going?
Speaker 1: Can you get off the sign for you then,
Speaker 0: any property? Yep. Okay. I can't believe y'all for this time.
Speaker 1: You're not going anywhere.
Speaker 0: Right now you're being detained. Okay?
Speaker 1: You're paying for what?
Speaker 0: Larceny?
Speaker 1: You stole his son.
Speaker 0: He has it back. Okay. Yeah. Because I got it from you. I moved it 50 yards.
Speaker 1: I don't care if you moved it 1 foot.
Speaker 0: You don't have a right to take someone's property. Okay? Period. I don't care what the circumstances. You don't have right taking anyone's property.
He was holding it. Therefore, it was his, and you took it. It. Okay? I know you may not agree with what's being said, but you don't have the right to take someone's property.
Period. Okay? I'm not trying to
Speaker 1: fit with me, but
Speaker 0: I do have
Speaker 1: them for the wall.
Speaker 0: Okay? That's the reality. Alright?
Speaker 1: Doesn't matter
Speaker 0: how much you ignore them. They're gonna come back. They're gonna come back again. And this is why women have such a problem getting abortions in North Carolina. And y'all just let them get away with this
Speaker 1: shit. Okay. Okay.
Speaker 0: Alright. Cannot believe y'all let this happen. You're under a restaurant. I I You have needed to take your time. Well, all I did was I just walked it over here.
I was gonna give it back to him. Well, I just know that, man. I didn't know that. I came over here and then you rested against the sign.
Speaker 1: So listen. We need to make this shit full all the
Speaker 0: I cannot believe this is happening. I know. I'm at
Speaker 1: 42 8. Is there something else that I can do?
Speaker 0: No. I just told you you're under arrest. I cannot under arrest you.
Speaker 1: This will take so much from that.
Speaker 0: That's what we're gonna advise you.