reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @TalkTV
@TalkTV - Talk
🚨“I was drugged, locked in flats, chained, and repeatedly raped over a five-year period from the age of 13 by Pakistani rape gangs.” “Labour are not interested when it's normal working class people” @TVKev https://t.co/XeNWAmPprW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 feels justice will begin when they are no longer seen as an object, alleging their case has been swept under the rug. They express concern that authorities seem to be hiding something by denying and canceling things, which raises alarm bells.
Speaker 0 feels they have been treated like nothing since reporting the abuse, and that promises of help are being dangled and then snatched away. They state they lost childhood, mental health, and progress in life, and question why this one thing that could benefit the whole country can't be done.
Speaker 0 says they didn't think they would survive the abuse, but now they are living their best life and have done everything they were told they couldn't do, including having children. However, the trauma still affects relationships, and they suffer from complex PTSD, causing instability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Feel justice starts when they stop seeing us as an object as well, that they can pass the book and sweep things under the carpet and and, like, nobody's going to know or nobody's going to click on our notice. I feel like if they had had a little bit of compassion and humanity in them, they should really get cracking with this, and it concerns me that it's almost like they don't want things to come up to the surface. It's almost like they're hiding something the more that they're pushing it down. It's it raises a lot of alarm bells. Why would you deny something like that?
Why would you cancel things like that?
Speaker 1: So you got I mean, the point is you you got kinda treated like nothing, like a subhuman by this awful gang with Sarge and his mates. I mean, you must feel now you're being treated like nothing yet again.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I feel like I've been treated like nothing since the minute that I reported it. And I feel like the longer that it goes on for and and, you know, there's a lot of things in the public eye, you still you still treat like nothing. You're not like I say, it's just basically dangling a carrot saying, oh, look at what we're going to do and then snatching it away from us like we didn't lose enough. We lost childhoods.
We lost mental health. We lost progress in our life. We lost a lot of things. Why can't you just do this one that's going to benefit the whole country?
Speaker 1: Well, I couldn't have put it better myself, Elliot. Just a last question. Thank you so much for this, by the way. It's been very brave of you. I appreciate it.
And I think it's important that you tell your story because this is what's got you know, your story is one story out of 250,000. Remember that. I'm sure you do. How's life been since you emerged from this darkness? How I mean, are you able to have relationships or anything like that?
You know, how is life?
Speaker 0: I mean, I didn't even think that I was going to be here where I am today. There was many times that when I was going through my abuse that I thought, I'm not even making out of this alive. I was, you know, thinking the worst, thinking that my parents were going to end up finding the daughter. It it was really awful. I am completely living my best life now.
I've done everything that I never thought I'd be able to do. I don't look the same as what I did when I was going through my abuse. You know, I did everything that they didn't want me to do. I I couldn't have kid they said I couldn't have kids. I've got kids.
Speaker 1: Oh, great. Great.
Speaker 0: I couldn't have tattoos. I'm full of them. Like but it still does affect my relationships. I I won't lie. I do you know, I suffer with complex PTSD.
So I have got a great partner, and I don't know how he puts on with me half of the time. But it does it does give you still that instability in life. But
@TalkTV - Talk
"Once again broken Britain at play. They can’t even run a bloody airport!" Mike Graham says the closure of Heathrow Airport following a fire at a nearby electrical substation "is a disgrace". @Iromg https://t.co/39vanEMWWj
Video Transcript AI Summary
Heathrow Airport is experiencing chaos due to reliance on a single power substation, leading to flight disruptions. According to Richard from Henbury Travel, passengers are suffering, and the situation highlights the need to rethink the UK's aviation strategy and the focus on expanding Heathrow with a third runway.
The speaker questions why Heathrow lacks an emergency repair generator, unlike Newark Airport, which managed to resume international flights within hours after a power outage. The speaker describes being stranded at Newark Airport during a power outage and witnessing the airport's ability to restore essential functions using an emergency generator. The speaker asks why Heathrow is completely shut down and calls the situation a disgrace, labeling it "broken Britain." The speaker is soliciting stories from people affected by the Heathrow disruptions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're trying to get anywhere, and you're trying to get somebody, from the airport, you're gonna be, out of luck. If you're trying to actually hope to meet somebody coming into Heathrow, that's not happening. People are being dropped off in France, in Holland, in Scotland, in Ireland. People are not able to fly into this country as a result of what I'm thinking is a complete and utter mismanaged situation. Got this from, Richard from Henbury Travel.
He says this, Heathrow Chaos shows why The UK must rethink its aviation strategy. As someone who has worked in the travel industry for decades, I find it astonishing that a major airport like Heathrow has placed all of its reliance on a single power substation. The disruption we're seeing today is yet another example of why the government's focus on expanding Heathrow with the third runway is completely misguided. For now, passengers will be the ones suffering the most from today's chaos, but in the long run, this could be the catalyst for long overdue change in UK aviation. Richard, I really appreciate that.
It might be somebody, that we should talk to about this because it seems to me and, again, my first thought this morning was, crikey, what a terrible thing to have happened. But secondly, I thought, well, how have they not got a sort of, you know, emergency repair generator? How have they not got the ability to get at least because happened when I was in America when this went on and they had a massive power outage, and America, of course, is famous for that because they have things called brownouts and blackouts on quite a regular basis because of the amount of energy they use, because so many people in Manhattan, for example, have got air conditioning units going. All the buildings have got air conditioning. You know, there's an incredible amount of energy and electricity going through all of their substations, and quite often, they do have these events.
But when they do, they fix them. I was at Newark Airport, as I say, just as I put the car I was about to return my high car, and as I did it, I went to check-in with the people behind the the desks, and they went, we're sorry. We haven't got any power. We can't check you out. We'll have to, you know, send you a receipt in the post, but you'd already paid up front.
It was fine. And I said, how do I get a bus to the terminal? They're like, you can't because, basically, the the the the barrier has come down, and it's locked shut because there's no now no power. So I had to find my way to and I and I said, where's the terminal? I went over that way, and it was about a mile away.
And I went, well, I'm not walking. It was about 95 degrees Fahrenheit. And so, eventually, I managed to flag down a Marriott truck a Marriott sort of minivan. And I said, will you take me to the terminal? And he's like the guy's like, I'm not really supposed to stop.
And I'm like, here's $20. Take me, please. He took me. We got there. There was no power in the in the terminal.
There were no, no lights on the terminal. There was no air conditioning. It was hot as hell. But within about four or five hours, they managed to get all of the international flights away from the airport because they had an emergency generator that could power up the lights on the runway, that could power up the lights in the control tower, that could power up all of the needs and the things that they needed to actually get the the flights into the air and to get planes landing again at Newark Airport, the International Airport. It's not as busy as Heathrow, but it's a massive New York International Airport.
Why are we not being able to do that? Why is Heathrow completely and utterly, kiboshed? And it's gonna be kiboshed until midnight tonight minimum. If you're out there, if you're waiting for people, if you're trying to find people flying back into this country, we'd love to hear your stories because we need to get this sorted out. This is a disgrace.
Once again, broken Britain at play. They can't even run a bloody airport.
@TalkTV - Talk
John in Lancashire says his daughter was gang raped by Pakistani groomers in Oldham when only 13-years-old. "I phoned the police, a police constable told me to let it go, otherwise I'll get arrested for being racist." "This goes higher and deeper than any of us can imagine." https://t.co/CNR1A2bLgZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2004, my daughter was gang raped by Pakistani Muslims who traveled to our town. When I reported it to the police, they dismissed my concerns and told me to let her choose her boyfriend, despite her being only 13. Afterward, I learned that a gang was looking for me, which made me hesitant to pursue the matter further. My daughter, now in her 30s, has moved on but still carries the memories. I believe those in power, including MPs, have ignored this issue for too long. It’s a national scandal that needs addressing, and I want accountability for those responsible. Thank you for allowing me to share my story.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to talk to you about my daughter, back in 2004. My daughter was gang raped. Pakistani Muslims from Oldham. They traveled 18 miles to my town to get to my daughter. I phoned the when I found out, I phoned the police up.
Now this had been going on for a few weeks, and I didn't know because I used to work 100 hours a week to pay for my kids to go to private school. And, when I found out, I phoned the police up. Police constable come to them. Basically told them what has been going on. Told me to let her go.
Otherwise, I will get arrested for being racist. She could pick any boyfriend she wanted. She was 13 year old, and he was 20.
Speaker 1: I don't know what I don't know what to say to you. I mean, first of all, thank you. Thank you for for on the show. You're telling me the police genuinely said to you let it go.
Speaker 0: Let it go.
Speaker 1: Your 13 year old daughter is being groomed by a 20 year old who's traveled 18 miles to your hometown. You're phoning me now live from Lancashire. Your daughter was raped by a Muslim man. You know this for a fact. She admitted that.
You went to the police, and nothing has ever happened.
Speaker 0: Nothing happened. The only thing that happened is that 4 cars and a van came up from Oldham to look for me to do me. And, I had a friend who phoned me, because I was at work at the time, phoned me up and said, John, don't come into town. He said, there's a a huge gang of Muslims looking for you. Said, don't come into town.
He said, we can tackle this afterwards. So, obviously, there were no point in following the police up again because, so I did what I did that book then.
Speaker 1: Let's not talk about that because I don't I don't I don't wanna talk about that because I don't want to to say anything, that will get you into trouble. Let me ask you, if you're okay with this, a couple of questions. Are you racist?
Speaker 0: No.
Speaker 1: When you
Speaker 0: Mostly as I have mostly friends.
Speaker 1: What do they say about this abhorrence?
Speaker 0: Oh, well, I have one chap. I won't mention his name. And he's turned around to me and said, I'm so sorry, John. He said but he said, there's a there's a lot of us. Said, alright.
We know what's been going on. He said, but he said it's it's all done. He he put it all down to the clerics and whatever. They're going down to the mosques.
Speaker 1: But your friend and people like him, and I'm not having a go at your friend, they need to be vocal. I've been saying this for weeks. The the the police Yeah. I I I'm is why I agree with Mike Graham wholeheartedly. There needs to be maybe not a national inquiry.
And if there is gonna be one, it doesn't need to be the police because they can't mark their own home. Right? There's too many problems with the police. And I believe and and and yours is a personal story, Johnny, but I've been saying all afternoon that I believe this goes higher and deeper than any of us can possibly imagine. Can we talk about something that we don't talk about, which is the victims?
How is your daughter? How old is she now?
Speaker 0: She well, she's, she she's 30 well, she'll be I think she's about 30 now. But she's got she's got a lovely husband, and she got a lovely grandkids. This, we we we buried it from day 1, but it lives with me every day.
Speaker 1: That lives with you, and I understand that as a father. What about her?
Speaker 0: Oh, she she still has the memories, you know? But it she's like, she's moving. She's had to move on.
Speaker 1: But as a father, you I suppose the first emotion as a father, and I mean this in the right way, you'll know. You let me get the sentence out. You wanna protect your kids. And when you're not able to, not through your own fault in any which way at all, it lives with you forever. Right?
Speaker 0: Exactly. What what do you want for what what do
Speaker 1: you wanna see happen as this becomes quite rightly a national scandal? What do you wanna see happen, buddy?
Speaker 0: Well, I'll I'll tell you what I like to see. I'd like to see every MP to be drilled by the SAS because they've known all along what's been going on, and they've buried it.
Speaker 1: It's absolutely disgusting. It's a stain on us as a country, mate. I I I'm so grateful that you were you felt able to to share your story, and I'm glad in part that your daughter has been able to move on. I'm sorry for you as well because there will be people. But, you know, a lot of people will say the first question to you was, you're racist, because a lot of people, Johnny, will say, you're just saying this because you're just making no.
No. We're not. This is a fact. And whether it's because of illegal migration or certain religions, cults, creeds, having a different view, I don't give a damn. Morally, I keep saying this.
It is disgusting. It is repugnant. It is a stain. It is a disgrace. And these people, I don't care whether it's I don't care who it is.
They need to be rounded up and put in prison. John, I really, really, really appreciate you phoning the show. My love to your family. Thank you so much indeed.
@TalkTV - TalkTV
Boris Johnson, Nadhim Zahawi and Jonathan Van-Tam have confirmed vaccine passports and double-jabs for entry to venues where “large crowds gather”. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle said MPs will be exempt in Parliament: “As far as I’m concerned, it doesn’t apply to members.” https://t.co/Lstn5dbd2l
Video Transcript AI Summary
A member raises a point of order regarding the statement made about vaccine passports. The statement suggests that full vaccination will be required for entry into venues with large crowds, including nightclubs. The member expresses concern that this could also apply to the House of Commons, preventing MPs from representing their constituents without undergoing a medical procedure. The Speaker assures that there is currently no indication that this policy applies to the House, and members have the right to attend unless otherwise stated. The government has not been in touch regarding this matter. The Speaker does not expect the policy to apply to members.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A point of order, mister Speaker, on which I have given you notice, and I've also notified the leader of the House of Commons. You'll be aware yesterday, a statement was made at the dispatch by by the parliamentary under secretary at the Department For Health and Social Care about vaccine passports, and there's a relevant piece, mister speaker, which potentially pertains to the House of Commons. He said, By the end of September, everyone aged 18 and over will have had the chance to receive full vaccination and the additional 2 weeks for that protection to take hold. So at that point, we plan to make full vaccination, a condition of entry, to nightclubs and other venues where large Crowds gather. Proof of a negative test will no longer be sufficient.
Now it seems to me, mister speaker, particularly on a Wednesday, when we get back to normal. That definition could equally apply to this House of Commons. It would be outrageous If the executive were to attempt to prevent any member of parliament attending this house to represent our constituents without first undergoing a medical procedure. Now, mister speaker, I raise it with you because I hope you'll be able to make a ruling on this matter. And in closing, I would just note that Your 17th century predecessor, Speaker Lentil, stood up very effectively against an over mighty executive, and it didn't end well for the over mighty executive?
Speaker 1: It did it did lead to the end of the monarchy as well, I might have for a short period. So let's hope we're not quite going by that far. What I would say is I'm very grateful for the honorable member giving me notice, And I've had no indication that government considers the policy his mention should apply to this House. What I would say, speaker of this House, There is nothing to stop a member coming into here. You have the right to come to this house unless this house otherwise says so.
And I've got to say, the government's not been in touch. I don't expect them to be in touch because as far as I'm concerned, it doesn't apply to members.
@TalkTV - TalkTV
LGB Alliance’s Kate Barker accuses Attitude Magazine of "gaslighting women" for making trans influencer Dylan Mulvaney their ‘Woman Of The Year.’ “What underpins this is really a much more serious misogyny and a much more pervasive distain for women.” @JuliaHB1
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how the recent recognition of a transgender man as "Woman of the Year" by Attitude magazine is gaslighting women and lesbians. They argue that this is part of a larger issue of misogyny and a power grab. They criticize the UN for tweeting that trans lesbians are still lesbians, highlighting the organization's poor track record on sexual violence against women. The speaker also criticizes the transgender man, Dylan Mulvaney, for his portrayal of women in his videos, calling it insulting and performative. They believe that society values men's feelings more than women's and that any man who identifies as a woman is considered more important.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well in time absolutely and it's completely gaslighting women and gaslighting lesbians. I mean we know we know that gaslighting is kind of a form of manipulation where the abuser tries to, tries to convince you that your your sense of reality is off, and it really does feel like this is exactly what's happening here. And it is kind of a much bigger picture as well. So I mean, Attitude magazine, you know, it's not a particularly significant publication. But when you look at this This
Speaker 1: isn't Time Magazine of the Year, but Woman of the Year.
Speaker 0: But when you look at the sort of drip effect of where it's happening everywhere, that's where you start to kind of join the dots. I mean, last week, the UN, on International Lesbian Day tweeted: Remember trans lesbians are lesbians too. For the love of God they're blokes and when you look at organizations like the UN and their absolutely woeful reputation with regards to sexual violence against women, sometimes perpetrated by their own operatives. You can see what underpins this is really a much more serious misogyny and a kind of pervasive disdain for women. It's also a real power grab for somebody like like Dylan and I don't hold it against him personally, I think
Speaker 1: he He's just a wannabe! He this is a young man who wants to be famous and rich and he's tried it in various different ways and now he's worked out that dressing up in a parody of a woman, and prancing around in a parody of young girls. I mean as if most women walk around like that like he does on his videos and it's frankly bloody insulting, to adult women. He he wants to be fem he's found a way. So well done him.
Congratulate him. Well done. You've made load of money. But meanwhile this is an insult, I'm not that you can use the term real win, it's an insult to women.
Speaker 0: No absolutely, it's a complete insult and the whole picture of it is something that it gives young girls the impression that what it takes to be a woman well, firstly, they'll never get to be Attitude Woman of the Year because they're not blokes, but secondly that being a woman is so utterly performative and as you say it's literally about if you wear high heels and lipsticks then lipstick then that equals womanhood. So it's so reductive in terms of what a woman is and what a woman can do. And I don't believe for a second that Attitude Magazine or Virgin Atlantic who sponsored this or the UN belief for one second that Dylan Mulvaney is a woman, but what they do believe really deep in their core and what society believes is that men's feelings matter more than women. Men are kind of more real than women somehow. So Dylan Mulvaney and any man and it doesn't matter whether he doesn't bother to dress up like a woman or not.
Any man decides that he is a woman or he feels like a woman then that's more important.
@TalkTV - TalkTV
Vanessa Feltz clashes with Middle East expert Dr Nathaniel George over the Israel-Hamas attacks. Nathaniel: “Israel has a history of grossly disproportionate military actions targeting civilians in Palestine.” Vanessa: “You’re surely not saying that today after what happened?"
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gaza, formed in 1948, is described as a concentration camp where the inhabitants were expelled and confined. The speaker clarifies that a concentration camp is not the same as an extermination camp like Auschwitz, but rather a place where a designated enemy population is controlled. The Israeli response to a recent terrorist attack is discussed, with the speaker acknowledging that a massive reaction was anticipated. The history of disproportionate military actions by Israel is mentioned, along with the continuous operations and bombings in Gaza. The speaker believes that a psychological barrier has been broken, similar to the surprise attack by Syria and Egypt in 1973. The occupation of Gaza and the West Bank is deemed unsustainable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't have firsthand knowledge of what the Hamas leadership is doing, but my job here is to provide historical context.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Now Gaza is not simply a coastal enclave. It's a concentration camp. It was formed in 1948 in the wake of the war that established Israel by evac by expelling the Israeli military, expelled the area, the inhabitants of the area around Gaza and penned them into the cap that we now call the Gaza Strip.
Speaker 1: When we say concentration camp though, don't we mean by definition an extermination camp like Auschwitz or like Dachau We like to raise and start the concentration camps that meant that most of the people who were admitted to the camps never came out because they were incinerated and killed. And that's not what goes on in Gaza, is it?
Speaker 0: That's not what a concentration camp is. A concentration camp is was, established usually the genealogy goes back to the Boer War when the British Empire was fighting the Boers in South Africa where they rounded up the Boer population and remove them and put them into concentrated camps of, where they can control a certain population that was designated to be their enemy, to be removed. That's what's going on in Gaza. That is the concentration camp. It's not an extermination camp as of yet, although the latest response of the Israelis may turn it into something like that.
Speaker 1: But the Israelis are responding to an unprovoked To attack to a terrorist attack in which Israeli citizens, innocent people been slaughtered when they were sitting in a peace festival celebrating music. I mean, what else could they possibly do?
Speaker 0: What else
Speaker 1: would they do? What does our master imagine that they would do or could do?
Speaker 0: Certainly, the leaders in of of the of the fighters in Palestine would have to have anticipated a massive Israeli reaction. Yeah. What they do, there's Well,
Speaker 1: it's what they it's what anyone does when the country is invaded, isn't it?
Speaker 0: But Particularly what Israel does. Has a particular history of grossly disproportionate military actions targeting civilians You're
Speaker 1: scrawny not saying that today, are you?
Speaker 0: After what happened? Palestine and Lebanon and many other countries, Egypt, over the course of 75 years, so you have to look at it from their perspective, the perspective of people in Gaza, who've been caged in, who are not just simply prevented from leaving, they're, or not just simply can't leave, they're actively prevented from leaving on all sides are the Israeli military and the Egyptian military that works with them on one side of it and the children that have grown up there in the last 15 years have known nothing but continuous operations of the Israeli military using high high powered firepower jet fighters indiscriminately bombing, the most one of the most densely populated areas on earth. What's
Speaker 1: been achieved by this though? What has possibly been achieved apart from slaughter? What's been achieved by this?
Speaker 0: Well, the the event is the events are still ongoing. We have no idea where this is going and exactly what has been achieved, we don't know. We know the major thing is that though a psychological barrier has been broken, not dissimilar to the 1973 war, the surprise attack of Syria and Egypt on Israel, but this in fact far exceeds that because Syria and Egypt, when they attacked in 1973, they didn't actually attack Israeli territory pop proper. They were trying to recover their occupied lands from the 1967 war and only attacked in those places. Now here, Hamas has surprised everybody, everybody, especially Israeli people who have been living, complacent with the situation which is unsustainable, which is the continuous occupation for 56 years of Gaza and the West Bank and the Golan Heights.
@TalkTV - TalkTV
The husband of a BBC presenter who died of complications from the AstraZeneca vaccine says taking legal action is his only option. Founder of Covid Vaccines Injured & Bereaved Legal Fund, Alex Kelly: “We had Matt Hancock blubbing on TV telling us they were 100% safe!” @JuliaHB1
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alex Kelly, founder of COVID Vaccines Injured and Bereaved Legal Fund, discusses the issue of vaccine injury and death. She highlights the failure of AstraZeneca to respond to those seeking answers and the need for legal action. Alex shares her personal experience of losing her mother to the AstraZeneca vaccine and emphasizes the importance of speaking to the vaccine injured and bereaved. She criticizes the lack of support from the medical profession and expresses concern about plans to vaccinate children. Alex calls on the media to interview and help the vaccine injured and bereaved. The conversation also touches on the lack of information given to the public and the questionable safety of booster shots.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's talk to Alex Kelly. She's founder of COVID Vaccines Injured and Bereaved Legal Fund. Good morning to you, Alex. Good morning, Julia. Thank you very much for joining us.
This has been a very difficult topic for people to talk about, particularly people on air, Ofcom rules, YouTube, and the like. Any conversations about vaccines Scenes where you question anything about the rollout, their safety, you immediately get people sort of making complaints, COVID disinformation, COVID, anti vaxx, so all of this stuff. It needs to be really clear. There's Lisa Shaw and her husband, Gareth Eve, they they were given the AstraZeneca jabs. They they they got their jabs.
This is not about a sort of a a sort of, oh, there's a conspiracy, Bill Gates putting, you know, nanoparticles into our bodies or anything. This is nothing anything of the sort. This is about the very real fact of vaccine injury and death, which is known, established, acknowledged by everyone in the medical field and the government. But the abject failure of of of anyone at AstraZeneca would appear to to respond to anybody contact them, including Gareth Eve. They they've been sent pre action protocol letters trying to get the government, trying to get MPs, contacting all the prime ministers we've had to try and take action.
And now they're having to take legal action against AstraZeneca because they're not getting any answers. Tell us what's been going on.
Speaker 1: Nothing. This is a problem. Nothing's been going on. Obviously, I can't speak about any of that because that is their case, and, obviously, all I will say is that myself and my family, and I think I speak for the vaccine injured and bereaved community when I say we are 100% behind them. They should never have gotten to this point.
Speaker 0: You lost you lost your mother
Speaker 1: Yes. Within 4 days in 20. On the AstraZeneca vaccine.
Speaker 0: How old was she? What happened to her?
Speaker 1: She was 71. Mhmm. It was lockdown. There was no, you know, I've had a lot of people say, oh, you should have, you you should have heard the warnings. There was nothing.
Mainstream media
Speaker 0: Nope. There was nothing.
Speaker 1: Nothing.
Speaker 0: Including including from me including from me?
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, the media, I'm right now, you you're very late to the table, but it's about time. And you need to speak to the vaccine injured and the vaccine bereaved, and the vaccine injured needs so much help. You need to be interviewing them. You need to be speaking to them.
I've said this before. I said this to Kevin a couple of weeks ago. We have suicides in the groups. People are right on the edge. This is not, I'm getting really tired of the word rare as well.
It's not rare enough as far as I'm concerned. Okay? So we need help with a vaccine injured. Start speaking to them. Start engaging.
The the list the list of injuries and the list of possible deaths is staggering.
Speaker 0: And and some of these have obviously oh, they're on they're on death certificates. Again, this isn't a conspiracy theory. One one of the crucial things here is is vaccine injury for all vaccines, there are there are people who will die from having other what we consider to be perfectly safe Vaccines, there are rare deaths, rare injuries. The thing is when you roll out a vaccine to, you know, hundreds of millions, billions of people, that something that is rare still becomes very, very common because it involves an awful lot of people even if it's a tiny percentage. There's been a really big issue about the, the yellow card system in this country.
Just the people being able to flag up, supposed to be done by doctors. I certainly when I had my 1st jab, I I ended I used the yellow card system to flag up that I've had a bad reaction to my 1st AstraZeneca vaccine. Allergic reaction, but also, I mean, was really quite unwell from it. And and we were being told that these were very rare, but everyone I spoke to had the same issues. Doctors were not flagging this up.
Other countries have kept a much better, record of vaccine can you know, the the bad reactions and more severe injuries and have been kept a better stronger tally of of possible and often proven deaths. Do you think there was a deliberate attempt, well, to to not keep record of these things because they didn't want to know?
Speaker 1: Yes. Absolutely. Still now okay. So my mother's death was January 2021, so we're over 2 years. But there are the vaccine injured and bereaved now who are who have massive question marks, they still can't get their own doctors to engage.
They're they are crying out to be spoken to because they the the help is needed. There are so many people with questionable deaths. And, okay, not everybody is going to be is going to be associated. Yeah. But people were not people were not looking into this.
We're we're 2 years on. The vaccine injured, you know, they're asking for the GPs to have some guidance as well so that they can be referred when they go to the GP. But it's like the medical profession just don't want to hear it. It's I mean, god forbid we talk about it because then it would mean there's actually a problem.
Speaker 0: And we know that all of the big vaccine companies, the the pharmaceutical companies, when they rolled out these these vaccines, they asked to be indemnified by the government so they could not be sued for any vaccine injuries or deaths Yeah. As a result. I know a lot of people at the time who were very concerned saying, look. This this hasn't been tested. It hasn't gone through all these many years of the tests and the protocols, long term damage.
And, of course, we were told at the time, no. But they they just fast tracked everything. Now, of course, you couldn't see long term damage. There's no way you could have seen that because we hadn't had the vaccine around long term. But certainly, say, for, say someone your mother's age at 71, I would have been, you know, very keen for you know, she she was my mother.
My parents were in their late seventies. Keen for them to get the jab. I got mine, I mean, on that, I was like an on balance. I've gotta be honest with my first two. My booster, I only got for travel.
I'm I'm honest about that. I I knew I didn't need it. I certainly didn't think that anyone any children should have the jab. Big question mark for me that anyone under 30 should have the jab. Well, I know a lot of my team were desperate to get the jab so they could travel.
There was an element of coercion there, there. Oh,
Speaker 1: massive. Yeah.
Speaker 0: Do you think that do you think that that people were given full information at the time? Because we're constantly told that, Well, I think we might have learned things later on. As far as I can tell from the testing and what is emerging, what the leaks of of data from big pharmaceutical companies is, a lot of the issues that have arisen since were known about at the time.
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, that's what's coming out now. It's a bit late, isn't it? And you've just brought up children. We Fiona Hynes has been has been campaigning about this at the Truth For Told campaign, and it continues in May.
But she has been pushing and pushing for people to speak up about children because come June, they want to start jabbing 6 months and up.
Speaker 0: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: Yes. 6 months and up, vulnerable children. Parents, stand up, speak up because this is terrifying. I understand the whole concept. Oh, no.
I understand the the the logic of, all vaccines, all medicines have a side effect. But when in history has a product been put into the majority of the of population at trial stages. That is why they didn't know what their products would do. Pfizer is just wrapping that up now. This 2023, this is this is insane, and they want to put this into children.
Parents, stand up to this.
Speaker 0: But parents have stood up. That's what's interesting, because parents have stood up to this because, actually, if you look at the if you look at the vaccine rates, so I was wondering if you look at the if you look at the vaccine rates if you look at the vaccine rates for children, parents pretty much went, no thanks.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. But what's worrying is when the medical profession listen. My mother was a retired nurse. Mhmm.
But my my respect for the medical profession I'm no tinfoil Pat Wearer, I'm the daughter of a nurse. Okay? She believed in medicine, but my my my respect for the medical profession has gone. And when they are starting to talk about, the MHRA and the JCVI think it's absolutely fine to inject this into to children with health issues. We need to speak up, and this has got We stopped, surely.
Speaker 0: Do you think there is a a wake up to us? When we see certain countries like Switzerland, they've said now end they're gonna end their rollout of the jab. We're seeing, you know, people being told you don't get a booster. I've certainly been saying to family members, I'm like, don't don't get another booster. You don't need another you've had COVID.
You don't need a booster. And we're talking to lord Basil as much as he was the health minister, insisting that, you know, the jab provide better better protection than than than COVID infection, which but this is simply not true. I mean, it's simply not true. That is the case. I I still think that the jabs were the right thing for people over 70, which was the original intention, those who were at I knew I wasn't because
Speaker 1: my mum died with all day.
Speaker 0: I I do. And I and I'm so sorry about that. And I understand that, but that does say, even having that knowledge that there was a trade off there in terms of risk. But, again, it should have been something that we people should have been given more information about to make an informed give informed consent.
Speaker 1: Had Matt Hancock blubbing on TV telling us they were a 100% safe, not that anybody listened to anything he said. But when you have constant day after day media who are they should they need to step up now, the media. Speak to the vaccine injured and briefed. Stop messing about. You're very late to the table.
Help these people get the clinics and the help. Start interviewing them. Start speaking to them.
Speaker 0: Okay. Alex Kelly. I'm