TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TedLogan1010
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Logan
We told you doctors got kick backs for pushing vaccines and you didn’t believe us. Once again, we were right. How many times will it take before you start paying attention? https://t.co/hoy8hz1wWD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the perceived truth about pediatric vaccination incentives and the behavior of pediatricians. The conversation opens with a question about whether there is an incentive for pediatricians to promote vaccination, and the back-and-forth suggests uncertainty about this issue. One participant mentions that Dr. Paul Thomas has produced a substantial video on the topic and notes that many other pediatricians have followed his lead, adding that perhaps Dr. Hooker could provide a sharper answer.
A subsequent speaker clarifies the proposed mechanism of incentives, stating that pediatricians are typically incentivized directly by HMOs. The claim is that HMOs buy and sell vaccines, making vaccines a big business for HMOs. The incentive, according to this account, is usually between $200 and $600 per fully vaccinated patient, as long as their vaccines meet a required percentage threshold for the practice. The speaker contends that some pediatricians can make upwards of a million dollars a year solely from these incentives, underscoring the potential scale of earnings.
The discussion then turns to empirical observations or anecdotes, with the claim that pediatricians often fire patients who refuse to get vaccinated. This is presented as a recurrent story that the speakers have heard repeatedly. In addition to the firing of patients, the speakers recount alarming claims attributed to some physicians. They mention the “lies that the pediatrician tell” about dire consequences of not vaccinating, such as “our baby will die” if vitamin K is not given at birth, or that the baby will bleed out before it gets to the car. They also reference the belief expressed by some that “if you don’t get the HPV vaccine, then you will die of cancer.” These stories are described as being told repeatedly by parents who have encountered such warnings.
The segment closes with a rhetorical and emotional question about accountability: how can doctors get away with lying like that to parents? The speakers convey a sense of concern and frustration about the repetition of these claims and the impact they have on parents who are trying to make informed decisions for their children.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What is the truth? Because I hear back and forth. I mean, do pediatricians get incentivized with percent vaccination of their
Speaker 1: Yes. Paul doctor Paul Thomas has done a very good video on that, and many other pediatricians have followed. Maybe doctor Hooker could answer better on that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're typically incentivized directly by HMOs. HMOs buy and sell vaccines, so vaccines are big businesses for HMOs. But the incentivization is usually anywhere from $200 to $600 per fully vaccinated patient as long as their vaccines, a certain percentage of their practice is fully vaccinated. So some pediatricians can make upwards to a million or more a year just in those incentives.
Speaker 0: I've all heard stories of pediatricians basically firing patients because they won't get vaccinated because that that'll
Speaker 2: that's correct.
Speaker 1: We hear that story over and over again. And also, the lies that the pediatrician tell tell us that our baby will die. If we don't get vitamin k at birth, the baby will bleed out before it gets to the car. And these stories, if you don't get the HPV vaccine, then you will die of cancer. These parents have told us these stories, and they're the same over and over again.
How can they get away with lying like that to us, the parents?
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Logan
A few tidbits they may have left out of your World History class! Watch while it’s still legal. Credit: @WarsawErik https://t.co/onCSl4vpwM
Video Transcript AI Summary
Did six million j really perished in World War two German concentration camps? Or is that number just a little bit exaggerated? The latches can be opened from the inside or the outside, as I am showing right here. You cannot lock somebody into this room. They couldn't lock them in, and some gas chamber doors were made with wooden doors. Wooden doors to gas chambers? Come on. It's not airtight. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple. Why would they have soccer and swimming pools to people they're about to exterminate? Not a single person died of poison gas.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did six million j really perished in World War two German concentration camps? Or is that number just a little bit exaggerated? Let's look at the evidence. And let's start with gas chamber doors that did not lock.
Speaker 1: Here we see the door to the Mauthausen gas chamber. It does not lock. It doesn't lock. The latches can be opened from the inside or the outside, as I am showing right here. You cannot lock somebody into this room.
You cannot lock somebody out.
Speaker 0: They couldn't lock them in, and some gas chamber doors were made with wooden doors. Wooden doors to gas chambers? Come on. And look at those gas chamber windows. Cheap thin glass windows on wooden frames to a gas chamber?
Really? Come on. No one pushed that out to save their own lives? Look closely at all the gas chambers of wooden walls and glass windows too. It's not airtight.
If they poured lots of poison gas inside it, it would also wipe out anyone standing outside, including all the German guards. Also, chemical analysis on all the walls of the gas chambers showed that no poison ever existed in them.
Speaker 2: In the nineteen eighties, American expert Fred Lukter, who builds gas chambers for American penal systems, took scrapings from the walls of the Auschwitz gas chamber for chemical analysis. He found no cyanide residue at all. The Auschwitz exhibit is a fake, pure and simple.
Speaker 0: Now let's go into the soccer teams, the theater, and the sewing rooms that existed in the camps. All this is real footage during the war, not to mention the swimming pools. Why would they have soccer and swimming pools to people they're about to exterminate? And those swimming pools still exist to this day. Here they are.
Speaker 1: Finally, we have the Auschwitz Swimming Pool. Yes. That's right. Swimming pool. A beautiful pool with a diving board and starters blocks for races.
To their credit, the Auschwitz camp officials have not tried to remove this distraction. But if you wanna see the pool, you need to know already that it exists because you won't find it on the tour.
Speaker 0: The Impartial International Red Cross was allowed to inspect the camps during wartime to make sure that all prisoners were being treated well. Here's a report by the November 1944, only months before liberation at Camp Auschwitz. The report states, no traces of installations of exterminating civilians, period. Also, old records of the Jewish population? Before World War two, about 15,700,000.
After World War two, about 15,700,000 again. So where is the 6,000,000 missing number? Real numbers of the 270,000 bodies that were found. All were documented and they did autopsy reports on every single one of them. Conclusion, not a single person died of poison gas.
Most common cause of death, typhus and starvation. When the Germans were losing, they ran away and abandoned the camps, had them locked without any food. It's sad. Many people passed away, but it was not six million. And of the 270,000, half of them weren't even J's.
They said they hid the bodies by cremating them, but some of the cremation smoke stacks didn't even have any soot in them. How was that even possible? And one chimney is not even connected to the building. A lot of these things on display were created and built after World War two. Manipulate evidence for propaganda and creating a false sense of sympathy.
There is a reason why it is illegal to question the h cost or make it extremely taboo. Because as soon as you start scratching the surface and asking questions, the whole thing falls apart way too easily. Truth does not fear investigation. So go ahead and listen to evidence on both sides, and you make your own decision.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
That guy seems pretty highly decorated for a crazy conspiracy theorist! 🤔 https://t.co/ShDq331PFt
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks, focusing on the collapse of Building 7. They argue that the building's uniform collapse indicates controlled demolition rather than fire damage. Comparing it to a stack of cast iron stoves, they suggest that the intact structure below should have slowed the collapse. The speaker believes there is more to the story than just planes and fire.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stand the impact of a, of a jet. From what I understand, the, the outer, skeleton of the building, the outer columns was like a a fishnet, and you had these inner core columns, which was substantial. Thick steel beams do withstand 4 or 5 times what the loads were. Got it. The engineers always overdesigned the building.
No steel frame building has ever collapsed before or since 911. So that should say something right there. And it said that building 7, it was aggressive collapse that it was caused by fire. But progressive collapse, unlike the Twin Towers, the Twin Towers collapsed from the top down. That's a progressive collapse Sure.
Floor by floor by floor. But if you look at the videos of building 7 collapsing, it collapses uniformly. It's collapsing from the bottom. The building stays intact all the way to the bottom of the ground, and you could see the sides caving in on it. For a building to collapse uniformly, which the video show, all the load bearing columns would have had to have failed simultaneously.
Now fire doesn't act like that. I came across an analogy of the twin towers. And if you could visualize cast iron stoves stacked 1 on top of each other, the stoves up at the top, yes, there's fire and that they've been damaged. But the stoves on the bottom, they haven't been damaged. Okay.
So the structure underneath all of that is intact. So it's impossible for a building to collapse near free fall speed and increase Without a controlled demolition. You're running into the path of most resistance. I see. Something else is going on.
I don't believe that it was just, the planes or the fire.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Ancient Megalithic Structure found in Montana! At least they told us those cool stories about “Cowboys and Indians.” 😎 https://t.co/wd5OQJvrbL
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Montana, the Sage Wall is a mysterious megalithic structure made of massive granite blocks, reaching 275 feet long and 25 feet high. The blocks are intricately stacked in straight lines, resembling ancient polygonal masonry found worldwide. Discovered on private land by the owners clearing dense foliage, the wall's precise construction suggests it may be a prehistoric site. Despite some dismissing it as a natural formation, its straight lines and angular formations set it apart from typical geological features in the area.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of Montana in the United States, we find this remarkable structure known as the Sage Wall. This imposing megalithic wonder is composed of massive polygonal granite stone blocks, intricately stacked and aligned in a perfectly straight line that extends up to 275 feet in length, which is around 84 meters. Although, it's believed that it extends additionally underground. Its height reaches up to 25 feet or 8 meters, with the largest of the stone blocks weighing 91 tons. In fact, it is believed that the structure continues an additional 15 feet beneath the ground, making it around 40 feet tall if fully excavated.
The wall's unique features, such as its straight lines and angular formations, set it apart from the natural geological formations commonly found in the region. The granite stone blocks appear as if they were cut, stacked and pieced together like a puzzle with each block interlocking with the next 1. It's known that granite does not split into 90 degree consistent corners and angles, which made many researchers believe this could be some sort of prehistoric megalithic structure. The reason you've likely never come across or heard of the Sage Wall is due to its location on private land, rendering it virtually unknown to the scientific community. The landowners themselves, Christopher Borton and Linda Welsh, were unaware of the wall's presence for many years.
Nestled on a mountain side, the wall was concealed by a dense canopy of fallen trees and thick foliage that had covered it for centuries, if not millennia. This natural camouflage made the wall nearly impossible to detect, especially since very few people had ever set foot in the area. The site of the Sage Wall was first discovered relatively recently. It came to light when the land owners decided to clear a portion of their property that had been heavily forested and covered with dense foliage for centuries. As they began clearing the fallen trees and thick underbrush on the side of the mountain, they stumbled upon the wall like structure.
This accidental discovery revealed the previously hidden and virtually unknown Sage wall, prompting further investigation and interest from both the landowners and the scientific community. The wall's precise interlocking stones bore a striking resemblance to ancient polygonal masonry found in other parts of the world, such as the megalithic walls in Peru, Egypt, Turkey, Greece, Easter Island, Japan, and many other places around the globe. Does this mean that the Sage Wall of Montana is 1 of the many prehistoric megalithic sites destroyed 1000 of years ago by an ancient cataclysm? Of course, most people dismiss the site as a natural formation. But how could this be a mere natural formation when it's clearly seen that the wall is perfectly straight lined?
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
The City of London is not part of the UK! https://t.co/GN2snXeY1Z
Video Transcript AI Summary
The City of London, separate from the UK, lacks democratic elections and is not part of the EU. The Queen needs permission to enter, indicating it is not under UK sovereignty since 1688.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has the UK got a finance cost? Is it a trick question? Because the UK doesn't have finance. The City of London has, and it's not part of the UK. Good answer.
Good answer. It's international. He's right. The city of London is outside the United Kingdom. You know that.
It's really shocking. And therefore, it's also not part of the EU, which explains the it couldn't be part of the EU because you have to have democratic elections and the city of London doesn't, right? It's the banks that have the votes, right? Right. Per staff, you know.
How do you start unpacking this? I don't know, that's a very useful piece of information. It is not part of the UK because the Queen is not allowed to enter without permission. She is not the sovereign. Therefore, it's not part of the UK.
Of course, that's since 16/88. That's right. Since the foreign invasion.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Our history is nothing but agreed upon lies! https://t.co/5HyBl6rmAy
Video Transcript AI Summary
These statues in Egypt are being assembled, with workers sawing and carrying the artwork they made. The speaker questions the authenticity of history, pointing out that much of it is a fabricated lie. They argue that the faces being placed on the statues are not ancient, and even the Egyptian writing is not as old as believed. The speaker emphasizes that this is how history is being presented to us, with false images and narratives. The video ends with a reference to Egypt in 1890.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Sup, fam? You see these statues right here. Right? Look at them good, and look at this. They are putting Egypt together.
Look at him sawing. But what is it that he saw? Check out this face right here. These guys is filming this. Check this out.
Look. Yeah. They're carrying the face. They're putting the Egyptian faces on. This is the quarry Where they make it Look, they're carrying the artwork that they made.
We thinking this is ancient Look, they put it on the walls. They didn't drew all this up all of this Look at them as they cut through the rocks. Look at that. Cutting it and placing it. Got you thinking this is ancient Ain't nothing ancient look at that is Egyptian writing even old Look at the quarry.
Look at this. You know? Look at her feet. This is why I say history is false. Look at them cutting it out, putting it all together.
Most of our history is a fabricated lie look at this But they're carrying it they made it The femme to make it a dirt. This is who they say we are. This is what his story look like. His story is gonna give you the image. They're putting on the face and telling you it's ancient.
Look at the left. Egypt, Lexor, 1890.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Dicyanian Glass 🤔 https://t.co/j1lLTlYmtj
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses dicennian glass, a dye derived from coal tar. In 1911, Walter John Kilner developed the kilner screen, which used dicennian dye sandwiched between glass plates to train the eyes to perceive electromagnetic radiation beyond visible light. Kilner's research proved the existence of the human aura and the ability to see into higher dimensions. However, after publishing his findings, the United States confiscated and degraded the dye, making it difficult to obtain. Dicennian glass is now heavily restricted.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have this poster that exposes every conspiracy theory on the planet. Today, we will expose the truth on dicennian glass. Dicennian glass is a special dye that is derived from coal tar. In 1911, a man by the name of Walter John Kilner developed a device called the kilner screen. This screen consisted of collodion coated dye treated glass plates with dicennian dye sandwiched in the middle.
In his book, The Human Atmosphere, Kilner proved that by using these two glass panes as wearable eye Glasses, the user would be able to train the eyes to perceive electromagnetic radiation outside the normal spectrum of visible light. Kilner not only proved the existence of the human aura, but also proved that by using this special dye, you can pierce the tapestry of the 3rd dimension, and gaze into the dimensions above. After Kilner published his findings, the United States swiftly stepped in. They confiscated everything and degraded the dye. Not only is Dicenian extremely hard to get a hold of, it is almost completely blacklisted from
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
The UK successfully tested their “DragonFire” weapon. Looks familiar. They’re even calling it an “LDEW”! https://t.co/374yQgszcJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The UK Ministry of Defense has successfully tested a laser weapon called Dragonfire against aerial targets. This high-powered laser, developed through a joint investment of £100 million, demonstrated great accuracy and cost-effectiveness. Dragonfire is a line of sight weapon that can engage any visible target, making it a potentially revolutionary tool in warfare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The UK Ministry of Defense, MOD, announced on Friday that it had achieved the country's first high power firing of a laser weapon against aerial targets during a trial at the MOD Hebrides range. The Dragonfire Laser Directed Energy Weapon, LDEW, system, developed through a £100,000,000, 126,000,000 joint investment by the MOD and Industry Partners, demonstrated pinpoint accuracy and low long term costs, marking a milestone in the advancement of laser direct Energy weaponry. Dragonfire, classified in its range but designed as a line of sight weapon, can engage any visible target, showcasing its potential as a revolutionary tool in the battle space.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
People are reversing Autism with heavy metal detoxification. What does that tell you? https://t.co/d5scJ2pAwY
Video Transcript AI Summary
The video discusses the recovery of children with autism and the potential treatments available. It highlights the case of a child whose autism diagnosis was reversed after reducing the mercury levels in his system. Other parents share their experiences with various treatments, such as special diets, supplementation, chelation, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. They mention improvements in language, social interaction, and overall engagement. The video questions why the CDC has not taken more action to address the autism epidemic and urges for a change in leadership.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The recovery of these kids.
Speaker 1: That time here again. Time to start thinking about those flu shots.
Speaker 2: Oh. Also, there's a possible treatment for autism that some say is curing children.
Speaker 3: Full blown autism.
Speaker 1: The same regional center that gave him the diagnosis, the same group of people reversed his diagnosis.
Speaker 3: Something else that reversed, the amount of mercury in his system. It went from a high level of 13 to what's considered almost negligible, 0.5. No no longer considered autistic.
Speaker 1: No longer considered autistic. That was a big day. We actually call it the day he lost his diagnosis, we call his second birthday.
Speaker 4: We see children that come through that are severely chicken, you know, within a year, they're mainstreamed in school and out of the spectrum. Some children turn around in a number of months, other children take years.
Speaker 5: We started with a special diet. We started with lots of supplementation geared at healing his body, helping his body detox from the heavy metal exposure he had, we we did chelation, missile b 12 injections. We rented a hyperbaric oxygen chamber for our house.
Speaker 2: The self stimulatory behaviors that we saw so much of Oh, go
Speaker 5: on. He's not, covering up his ears. We went from the baby who had no language and no social interaction and was lost in his own world to a child who is very verbal and very social. He's very much engaged in relationships with everybody in the family. Gwen has a best friend.
He wants to see his every day.
Speaker 2: And his friend wants to see him.
Speaker 1: Are you filming a movie? Yes. Yeah. And they're following me everywhere.
Speaker 2: He'll say, you know, when I had autism and and then talk about Something that we weren't aware of how he was feeling.
Speaker 0: Imagine what could have been done to recover these children starting clear back in 1999 When the CDC first realized what was causing autism, over 12 years later, they continued to tell the same old story.
Speaker 1: CDC is not certain how much. There's no simple explanation for the Induced changes in the definition of autism Or it improved recognition and increased recognition.
Speaker 0: And even though some doctors are recovering these kids, the CDC continues to waste even more critical time by turning a blind eye to it. How much longer will we allow those who have caused this epidemic to be in charge of solving it?
Speaker 1: It's a puzzle, and we're putting all the pieces of the puzzle together that way.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Tartaria. Mudfloods and the coverup by the… Charlie India Alpha https://t.co/1LlKqmQToo
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Tartarian Empire, a supposedly advanced civilization that existed before the 1800s but was erased from history. They mention that the CIA admitted to rewriting Tartarian history and provide evidence from a 1957 directive. The speaker questions why Tartaria is depicted on old world maps and showcases impressive buildings and inventions attributed to the civilization. They suggest that the empire was buried by a flood, explaining the appearance of buried buildings and basement windows. The speaker speculates that underground tunnels may be related to this buried empire and proposes that Tartarians knew how to harness free energy. They conclude by posing the question of who these buildings were built for.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the CIA actually came out and admitted that they erased and rewrote some of our history. And that history is of the Tartarian Empire. So Tartaria was thought to be a global and technologically advanced civilization that existed way before the 1800 up until the 1900 where it was wiped out by a great reset, AKA the mudblood. And it was completely erased from the history books and rewritten in order to hide us from the truth. Now I know this sounds crazy and you're probably already running to the comments to call me some name, but I brought the receipts.
Comes directly from the CIA's website. It was released in 1957. The Central Committee of the Communist Party issued a directive ordering the party's Provincial Committee to proceed to a scientific revision of the history of Tartaria. In other words, Tartar history was to be rewritten, Let us be frank was to be falsified.
Speaker 1: I don't know if I'm
Speaker 0: saying Tartar right. And why would Tartaria be depicted in old world maps if it wasn't a thing? And Putin actually wants to release the real history of Tartaria. Now take a look at some of these buildings. We were told that these were built By people that rode in horse and buggies.
We're expected to believe that they built things like this with a hammer and a chisel. Like, even if scaffolding was a thing, The precision. The accuracy. These people were way more advanced than we give them credit for. Like, these buildings are said to have been built in the 1800s.
And just look at some of these inventions that they had. The math ain't mathing. Now this civilization was thought to have been wiped out by a huge flood that buried it in feet of mud, which was also known as the mud That is why we see so many buildings that look like they have just been buried or that have basement windows and doors. And this would be kind of a stretch if they didn't dig up the buildings and find that they were in fact buried. That fact alone just blows my mind because I see buildings like that all the time and now I wonder how far down they actually go.
And it also makes me wonder if all the underground tunnels have something to do with this buried empire. And I know you're probably wondering like why
Speaker 1: the heck would they hide
Speaker 0: this from us, but it was thought that Tartarians actually knew how to harvest free energy from the Earth's magnetic field or ether. The pillars are thought to be energy conductors. And the pointy things that you see all over them are actually antenna. Also thought to be the reason why a lot of them have gold tops. Now another part is just a theory, But think about it, electricity is all around us.
What do you think lightning is? What do you think static electricity is? There is definitely a better way to harness energy Besides slaving over fossil fuels, we are living in the Lorax. Now on that note, I'm going to leave you with one more thought. Who are these doors built for?
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This is definitely not a free energy device. This video does not show the step by step process on how to build one. It obviously doesn’t test it and prove it works. Do not share this video anywhere. Please. https://t.co/cuH2yI6v8H
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
GN Sleep well knowing your devices are always listening. 🤖👂 https://t.co/fCluJ3oK6c
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the phenomenon of targeted ads appearing on social media platforms, specifically Instagram. They test the theory by having a conversation about Airbnb and dog toys while the Instagram app is open. Shortly after, ads for Airbnb and dog toys appear on the app. The speaker is surprised by the accuracy of the targeted ads and expresses disbelief. They conclude by jokingly suggesting that everyone should burn their microphones.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah, Charisse. You know, my friend and I were talking about a specific cruise that she went on, and just a few minutes later, an ad for that specific cruise popped up into my Instagram feed. So it made me wonder, if they're not listening, how could that happen? Even members of Congress questioned Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg about it.
Speaker 1: You're talking about this, conspiracy theory that gets passed around that we listen app what's going on on your microphone and use that for ads. Right? We don't do that.
Speaker 0: I wanted to test it out, so we started with Instagram. App With my Instagram app open on my phone, Charice and I started talking about all kinds of stuff. Tell me about your trip. Where'd you go? App I think
Speaker 1: we did brunch, at my Airbnb that I rented, and it was actually a gorgeous Airbnb.
Speaker 0: I have not searched Airbnb on my phone. I don't have app, and it only took 20 minutes into our conversation for this to happen. There's an ad for Airbnb. Coincidence? Accident?
Speaker 2: So I don't see any advertisements for what we have on our piece of paper. So what we're gonna do now is we're gonna close all the browsers, we're gonna close everything, and then we're gonna talk about app this subject for a couple of minutes, just a minute or 2. We're just gonna talk about it. I'm just gonna talk about it like I'm talking to a friend. Alright.
App So dog toys. Well, I'm gonna be searching for I mean, I wanna I wanna buy some dog toys for my dog. Okay? Because I love my dog app He deserves all the best toys in the world, so maybe we can find him, some really nice some really nice toys for some really nice toys for dogs. A I think that'd be nice.
Maybe some Kongs would be good or some plush animals for maybe some dog toys near me, app Maybe some black or red ones. I don't know what colors dogs care about, but they probably like colored dog toys from time to time. A weasel or something or a dog bed would be good. App Just something you can chew on, you know? Dog toys near me or affordable dog toys, that'd be really good for me, because as a consumer, I'm looking for the most affordable, app Items that I can get for my for my pooch, and, yeah.
Dog toys are what I'm the most interested in right now. App If if I were to buy something right now, it would be dog toys. Let's go ahead and let's go ahead and get back online, and we'll go back to Fark dot app and let's take a look. Oh my god. It's right there.
Holy shit. Everybody burn your microphones. Oh, no. There's dog toys right here. So let's, click on that ad and see where it takes us.
Pricefalls.com. App Dog toys. So fox news.com, right there, same advertisement. That's incredible. No way.
Remind that dog toy ads again. And what is this? K9 Advantix from PetSmart. Oh. Oh.
Wow. App Well everybody, oh my god. Let's click on that advertisement again. Chewy.com. Yep.
App That's ridiculous. Let's do a couple more websites. PetSmart. PetSmart. Kongs.
I was talking about Kongs, black and red. Ad No way. That's insane. Oh, that's enough for me. I'm done.
I'm done with the Internet. App Alright. Just good night, everybody. That's too much for me.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This stuff is crazy looking! https://t.co/arX1ce4Aiz
Video Transcript AI Summary
This is aerogel, a solid material that is mostly air. It is known for being an excellent insulator. In a test, hot lava was poured on the aerogel, and it was found that the aerogel protected the person from the heat. Even though the lava was still very hot, the person could touch and hold the aerogel without getting burned. This is because aerogel does not transfer heat quickly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is a piece of aerogel. Surprisingly, it's a solid, but it's over 98% air. It's supposed to be one of the world's best insulators. You can see here that it completely blocks out the heat from a bunsen burner, keeping this flour alive on top. So I wanted to test this out myself.
1st, I'm going to Pour hot lava on the aerogel, and then I'm gonna try to touch the aerogel while it's under the lava, and see if it protects me from the lava. Okay. The tile is under the lava. Did you dispatch it? Now the lava is not even red hot anymore, but it's still extremely hot.
You can see how it just lights this match on fire, but you can see that I can still easily I touch the aerogel, and it doesn't burn me at all. I can also even grab the aerogel, stick it in a red hot furnace, and then dump it out and hold it in my hand. Even though it's extremely hot, it doesn't burn me because it doesn't transfer the heat fast enough.
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video showcases aerogel, the lightest solid material known to mankind. Made up of 99.9% air, it is created by extracting water molecules and replacing them with gas. NASA uses aerogel to capture materials from comet tails for analysis. It is not only the best insulator on Earth but also more valuable than gold, gram for gram. The translucent substance is both cool and useful, but the question remains: would you buy it as an investment or to store value?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have to see this. What you're about to witness is the lightest solid material known to mankind. My own brother is unboxing a little bit of what is called aerogel. And this is made up of 99.9% air. They take molecules, extract the water, replace it with gas, and this is what you get.
Now, check this. NASA uses this to capture materials on the back end of comet tails, so they can analyze it later. But it actually has the best insulating capability to any other material known on Earth. And also, per gram per ounce. This is worth and priced higher than gold.
Can you believe it? A valuable substance with great utility. Let me know. Pretty cool, translucent stuff, but would you purchase it as an investment store value?
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. https://t.co/s1AgoPG4MG
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
G°°GLE and the C î A https://t.co/uL1ae7LeQ5
Video Transcript AI Summary
Google's relationship with the CIA is explored in this video. The CIA was involved in the founding of Google, with cofounder Sergei Brin reporting to US intelligence representatives. While the CIA denies directly funding Google, their research funding helped the company and Silicon Valley as a whole. The Highlands forum connects the Department of Defense and intelligence community with tech startups, ensuring they stay at the cutting edge. Google Federal, launched in 2006, serves federal contracts and has hired many former NSA staff. In 2010, Google and the NSA struck a deal to exchange information about foreign hackers. Google Jigsaw, a division combating global threats, has had missteps, including brainstorming ways to push for a change of government in Syria. The video raises concerns about the blurring line between corporate and government intelligence.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Google, one of the most recognizable brands today. We know them from the operating system on our phones to their smart home devices to Google Search, Google Maps, and Gmail, and even YouTube itself. They're an organization that's so prevalent that they're almost invisible. And the other thing that this episode is about is the CIA, the same organization that overthrows foreign governments and spies on leaders and citizens. From human rights violations to drug trafficking, the CIA has always been shrouded in mystery and controversy.
So what does Google have to do with the CIA? Well, many people may not realize this, but the CIA was directly involved in the foundation of Google. Google cofounder Sergei Brin even reported to representatives of the US intelligence community on his progress. Not only this, but the application that became Google Earth originally had CIA investment. Generally, this is a concerning relationship, but in this episode, we're going to take a deeper look.
First of all, let's take a brief look at the CIA.
Speaker 1: You are watching Pearl Fusion TV.
Speaker 0: After World War 2, the United States would face the Soviets in a battle for world supremacy. The invention of the atomic bomb meant that no weapons could be fired in this war, so other methods had to be used. Over the next 40 years, a period known as the Cold War would begin. No shooting, just subversive tactics. In the mid 19 forties, the president of the United States, inspired by the efforts of the UK's MI six during World War 2, would sign the National Security Act, which formed the Central Intelligence Agency, or the CIA, and right away, the CIA would get to work interfering in international politics.
In an effort to stave off communist influence on the global stage, the CIA would interfere with the 1948 Italian elections. They would overthrow the governments of Iran and Guatemala in 1954, Indonesia in 1957, and Brazil in 1964. The CIA also conducted some rather questionable projects on their own people. Project MK Ultra, for example, was the CIA's mind control program using, quote, chemical, biological, and radiological methods. Many of the studies within MK Ultra focused on the administration of LSD to prisoners, drug addicts, mental patients, along with government agents, and the general public, all without their consent.
Speaker 2: Documents pried loose in 1979 showed that through a front organization, the Central Intelligence Agency funded what was called the MK Ultra project.
Speaker 3: The CIA wanted to understand more about brainwashing. It had money, and it was ready to fund experiments, Breaking down the mind with repeated electric shocks and drugs, including massive doses of LSD. These experiments We're done without the informed consent of the patients. Lawyer Alan Stein took up some of the rejected cases. The government's paid a number of settlements since Many of the payments come with nondisclosure agreements.
They're trying to do it quietly.
Speaker 1: It's not fair. I mean, I feel I feel blessed that I was able to get this far for my parents. I I really do. That's what gives me a chance that's I'm just grateful to be able to do it, and I hope you I I just hope that, you can hear me up there because It might bring you peace. It might bring you both peace.
Speaker 0: Ultimately, the CIA's goal of using LSD as a mind altering weapon against the Soviet Union and other enemies never reached fruition. But by the time the project was disbanded in the mid 19 sixties, hundreds of people were unknowingly drugged and observed. I found this last one pretty entertaining. One of the most embarrassing failures of the CIA was the attempted assassination of Cuba's Fidel Castro. Strode.
Speaker 4: So, you know, in interviews, Fidel Castro used to say, if surviving assassination attempts were an Olympic sport, I would win the gold medal. Reportedly, more than six 100 attempts over his 50 years in power. Now many of the failed plots were concocted by the CIA.
Speaker 0: The CIA tried infecting Castro's scuba gear with tuberculosis, planting exploding seashells at his favorite diving site, slipping him a poisoned fountain pen. They even tried poisoning and slipping a bomb into one of his cigars. All of these attempts were a failure. It was a gigantic waste of time and money, and Fidel Castro was Cuba's dictator for another 49 years, stepping down in 2008 only due to failing health. This is all to say the CIA may seem formidable, but when it comes down to it, they're not always perfect.
With the Soviet Union gone, the CIA's actions today may be less well known, but their influence in the world certainly hasn't gone away, and that brings us to their relationship with Google. In 1994, 2 PhD students, Sergey Brin and Larry Page began working on their automated web crawling and page ranking application as part of their research project. They had bet on making the exploding internet easy to access, and it paid off enormously. Sergey Brin's part of the Stanford research was funded by the NSA and CIA. BRIN would often report progress to non Stanford individuals, one of whom was doctor Rick Steinhaizer.
Steinhauser represented the CIA's Office For Research and Development to oversee their research funding in a joint CIA NSA program. It wasn't uncommon at the time for research projects to be funded by the intelligence community. Government intelligence agencies t's had set up programs and often seed funded projects. Roughly 3 to $4,000,000 of funding flowed through the intelligence community programs into universities, and while both Google and the intelligence community deny that the CIA directly funded the start of Google, it's evident that the intelligence community's research funding help not only Google, but Silicon Valley as a whole. There are many ways this relationship is built and preserved.
One of the biggest is, perhaps, the Highlands forum. There's a good chance that you've never heard of this forum, but it connects the wider Department of Defense and the intelligence community to the tech start ups. This keeps the military and the intelligence community at the cutting edge of tech. Many executives on the Highland from hold positions in the CIA, NSA, and many other agencies. Movements from these agencies into Silicon Valley is common.
For example, in 2012, the Highlands co chair who also worked at DARPA left the agency to accept a senior executive position at Google. In an email thread made public, Sergey Brin discussed information sharing for the purposes of national security with the head of the NSA. In 1999, at the peak of the .com boom, the CIA launched In Q Tel, a Silicon Valley venture capital fund. Its mission was to invest in start ups that aligned with intelligence agencies' needs. In 2003, the CIA, through In Q Tel, would invest in Keyhole.
Keyhole was a startup that built three d global mapping software. One of its first uses was to support US troops during Operation Iraqi Freedom, the campaign to overthrow Saddam Hussein. The next year Google bought keyhole whose team now included CIA personnel Google would soon turn keyhole into the basis for Google Earth. Only a year after the purchase, the director responsible for initially investing in Keyhole, at the CIA investing firm, In Q Tel, moved to take a position at Google. During this period, Google would win contracts for different search applications for the NSA and CIA.
It's understandable that Google has a relationship with the CIA Some of the biggest names such as Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google have had meetings with the FBI, Homeland Security, and the Office of the Director of National Security. Little is known about these meetings apart from the theme of how tech giants can ensure security for the 2020 elections. Google, for example, has implemented an advanced protection program. This program offers Google's highest protection level to high risk targets such as journalists, activists, politicians, and business leaders. It effectively makes these accounts less susceptible to hacking risks, such as phishing and malware attacks.
But perhaps, the greatest demonstration of the company's integration into the intelligence community is Google Federal. Google Federal was launched in 2006, and its purpose is to serve federal contracts. At a certain point, this branch of Google had so many former NSA staff that they became known as the NSA West. At its very launch, Google Federal went on a hiring spree, hiring managers and salespeople from the Army, Air Force, CIA, Raytheon, and Lockheed Martin. It added to its lobbying prowess by assembling a team of Democratic and Republican operatives.
The strength of the relationship between Google and the intelligence community was graphically highlighted in 2010. At this time, Google came under attack from what was believed to be Chinese government hackers. The NSA came to Google's aid. The 2 organizations struck up a deal, an exchange of information. According to journalists, quote, Google agreed to provide information about traffic on its networks in exchange for the intelligence from the NSA about what it knew of foreign hackers.
Google Jigsaw is a division dedicated to combating global threats, such as extremism, censorship, and disinformation, but this division has had its missteps. In 2012, as the Syrian Civil War was escalating, the intelligence community was pushing for a change of government. In 2016, leaked emails revealed that Google's Jigsaw department brainstormed ways that it could push Bashar al Assad from power. Among these ideas was a tool that visually mapped and tracked officials who broke allegiance to Assad's government. Jared Cohen, head of Google Jigsaw, planned to show this data on TV networks such as Al Jazeera within Syria.
The purpose of this was to serve as propaganda to give confidence to the opposition of Assad. This opposition was, of course, the side that the intelligence community wanted to win. According to Fred Burton, a former intelligence agent at the security branch of the State Department, quote, Google is getting White House and State Department support an air cover. In reality, they are doing things the CIA cannot do. More recently, Google created a tool to track if users are at high risk of radicalization based upon their Internet usage.
The tool redirects them to government websites focused on persuading them off their ideas. Sites focused on persuading them off their ideas. It seems now, more than ever, Google and other tech giants are blurring the line between corporate and government intelligence. Google's entry into the market makes financial sense. By 2019, the federal government was spending $90,000,000,000 a year on information technology.
It's a huge market and Google seems to want to maintain a strong presence. The world in which the CIA and the intelligence community operates is a distant cry from reality and what most people are aware of. Likely, we will never know the full extent of their operations or the events that the CIA had an impact on. From helping overthrow governments to spying on the public. Many controversies follow this organization.
We didn't even touch on drug trafficking operations during wartime in Asia, Watergate, or the recruitment of former Nazis. That being said, it could be argued that there are just as many less sensationalized activities that have kept peace in the world that the public would never be aware of. Such is the nature of this organization's work, secretive, enigmatic. As technology and the freedom of information give power to the masses, there is now a rising risk of an adverse technocracy. What hand will tech giants play in this future, and what does this mean for the world and society if private companies begin running intelligence and intervention programs on the public.
reSee.it AI Summary
Why would the government use a false model for equipment design? The truth is, the earth is flat and stationary. Critics may question the government's credibility, but there's a stark contrast between public releases and hidden documents. Understanding this distinction is crucial for what lies ahead.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
We are asking a very simple question… Why would the government design equipment based on a false model? They wouldn’t. The earth is flat and stationary. The globies will say “I thought the government lies, why would you believe these documents?” Simple, There is a huge difference between what the government openly releases to the public and what they have in documents they hope you’ll never see or understand. If you don’t get that by now, you don’t stand a chance at what’s to come.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses how government agencies and their contractors, including NASA and the military, have repeatedly assumed a flat, non-rotating Earth in their documents and models. They provide examples of NASA publications, technical memos, and contractor reports that all make this assumption. The speaker also mentions that even the Soviets made their assumptions based on a flat Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If the Earth were a globe with a curvature drop roughly equal to 8 inches per mile squared and the surface of the Earth and its atmosphere allegedly rotated at approximately 1,000 miles per hour at the equator as claimed by the globe model, you'd assume those claims would be vital to NASA and the military for modeling and building aircraft. Per hour. Instead, you'll see through declassified documents that government agencies and their contractors repeatedly assumed a flattened stationary Earth. Hour. For example, this NASA document assumes a flat non rotating Earth.
Georgia Institute of Technology on behalf of NASA, the model used is a flat non rotating Earth. Per technical memo from the NASA Langley Research Center, flat non rotating Earth. NASA technical memorandum, flat non rotating Earth. NASA hour. Publication on the derivation and definition of a linear aircraft model, flat non rotating Earth and flat non rotating Earth.
NASA contractor, flat non rotating Earth and flat Earth assumptions. Per NASA Ames Research Center on rotating flat earth. Army Research Laboratory flat earth. Army Research Laboratory, propagation of electromagnetic fields over flat earth. Per hour.
Army Research Laboratory, a Flat Earth Approximation provides the best estimate. NASA technical paper, Stationary atmosphere over a Flat Earth. Per hour. NASA technical memo, a non rotating Earth. MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Flat Earth.
Flat Earth. NASA memo, Flat, non rotating Earth. NASA contractor report, assumption based on the Earth is flat and nonrotating. NASA technical memo, flat nonrotating Earth. Per hour.
NASA technical paper, stationary atmosphere and flat, non rotating Earth assumptions. NASA technical note, flat, non rotating Earth. NASA Langley Research Center, flat, non rotating Earth. Hour. Army Research Laboratory, these equations assume a flat Earth.
Even the Soviets made their assumptions based on a flat Earth.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
If you want to find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of energy, frequency and vibration. https://t.co/Q6TkI9W0Bc
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
I guess the earth really is a wobbly, shapeshifting water ball… They have the footage to prove it! 🤣 https://t.co/UeK1uUU16t
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Over population is a myth. I don’t even believe the ≈ 8 billion number but even if it’s true, there is plenty of room. Not to mention the lands beyond the ice wall! 👀 https://t.co/YTl1egOHpY
Video Transcript AI Summary
If all 9 billion people in the world stood next to each other, they would fit on the Istrian peninsula. If each person had 1,000 square meters to grow food, they would fit on an area the size of Brazil. If each 4-member family had 700 square meters, they would fit on an area the size of Iran. In 2019, there were approximately 7.7 billion people. Most vegetable quantities for a family can be grown on 200 square meters. The arable land covers 31 million square kilometers, enough to feed 155 billion people or over 38 billion families. There is enough space for everyone, except for greed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If all the people in the world, 9,000,000,000 inhabitants, stood next to each other, 4 people per 1 square meter, the entire human population would fit on an area the size of the Istrian peninsula. If each person in the world were provided with a space of about 1,000 square meters to grow food for themselves, the entire human population would fit on an area equivalent to the size of Brazil. If each 4 member family were provided with a space of about 700 square meters to grow food for themselves, the entire human population would fit on an area equivalent to Iran. In 2019, it was estimated that there were approximately 7,700,000,000 people in the world. Isth.
Almost all the necessary vegetable quantities for a 4 member family can be produced on about 200 square meters of garden space. It is known that arable land currently covers an area of about 31,000,000 square kilometer. On this land, the vegetable quantities needed to feed 155,000,000,000 people or over thirty eight 1,000,000,000 4 member families could be grown. There are not too many people. There is more than enough space for everyone, except for greed.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
We can’t tell you all the answers to the past. But we can definitely show that the official narrative is a lie. https://t.co/XTbO8xVY0S
Video Transcript AI Summary
This video explores the existence of ancient pyramids around the world, suggesting that multiple civilizations built them independently. Examples include the well-known pyramids in Egypt, as well as lesser-known ones in Mexico, Cambodia, and Japan. The Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia, believed to be 9,000 years old, was recently found to have lower parts dating back 28,000 years. The Bosnian government halted the study of a hidden pyramid in Bosnia, believed to be over 35,000 years old. Similar masonry techniques were found in Greece and Peru, while ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia, and Easter Island share identical carvings. The video also mentions evidence of advanced cutting and drilling technology in ancient structures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you still think we're the 1st advanced civilization to exist on Earth, then this will change your mind and blow it at the same time. Okay. So this is a map of pyramids all around the world, all allegedly built Easiest tall structure to build. It's human nature. If it's so easy, why are our 21st century brains not capable of doing what dozens of ancient civilizations have repeatedly been able to do?
We got the famous pyramids of Djoser in Egypt, but everyone knows about those. Across the world, there's Chichen Itza, Pyramid de Los Nizhos, Tikal Temple, the Great Pyramid of Cholula among others in Mexico. And then on the other side of the planet, we got Koh Ker and Prasat Daksay Cheem Krong in Cambodia. Off the coast of a tiny Japanese island deep within the ocean is the sunken Yonaguni Monument, a supposed 10000 years old, older than even the Egyptian pyramids. All with a nearly identical look, yet built by completely different cultures with zero contact among each other and thousands of kilometers apart.
But this is just the tip. We got way more lesser known pyramids even older than the Egyptian ones that ain't even standing anymore. Like the Gunung Padang Temple in Indonesia. It doesn't look so hot now, but used to be a step that pyramid a whole 9000 years ago. At least that's what they thought until a more recent radiocarbon analysis shows that the lower parts of this temple go as far back as 28 a 1000 years.
Then this enormous hill in Bosnia was studied and almost every archaeologist that visited it confirmed that it could not have been naturally formed, perfectly aligning to true in North among many other characteristics of pyramids. These studies found out this hidden monument is over 35,000 years old and would be the oldest and the largest pyramid in the world hidden under years of vegetation. But the Bosnian government strangely halted further study on this thing for some reason. There's a crazy story behind what they found there which honestly deserves Irv's own videos, so I'll probably be dropping that sometime. Fallen Pyramid of Hellenikon in Greece has boulders that are joined so tightly that even a A human hair can't fit through the joints without any sort of ancient cement used.
Built around 3000 BC, meanwhile, an almost identical masonry techniques was found in these walls in the city of Cusco in Peru called Sasquehiaman, over 11,000 kilometers away. And how old are these walls? Mainstream history will tell you they were built around the 15th century, but researchers recently uncovered a writing system built directly within the blocks of these walls that's well over 30,000 years old. Again, a topic that deserves its own video coming soon. This exact method is also found on a site called Ahu Venapu on the remote Easter Island, older than even their legendary Moai heads, as well as Khafre's Valley Temple in Egypt.
How Did our ancient ancestors figure out these identical building techniques completely independent of each other when we still have no idea how they did it to this today. Now we get to the Ellsworth Mountains in Antarctica. Okay. Get your tinfoil hats ready for this one, because this satellite footage from 2016 shows what could be a pyramid buried in the South Pole. This map from 15/13 by sailor Piri Reis shows a perfectly accurate coastline of Antarctica even though wasn't officially discovered 300 years later in 18/20.
What's weird is this map connects South America to Antarctica, which it could very well be that over 10000 years ago, these 2 continents were connected by a sheet of ice. Researchers claim this map was sourced from an even more ancient document that survived from a library of Alexandria in Egypt, which was destroyed by the Romans. What if the builders of Giza left this map as directions as to where else they put pyramids around the world? And the pyramids are just the start. Take a look at these ancient artifacts from Bolivia, Turkey, Indonesia, and Easter Island.
Four completely separate corners of the world, all with identical carvings and artistic styles and used, and again, thousands of kilometers apart and absolutely no contact among each other. Just another coincidence. Right? Now get a load of this one here. I know it sounds crazy, but you'd be surprised.
In ancient lasers, or at least some form of precision cutting technology that is on par with our modern drilling methods. From these perfectly cut stone patterns in Pum Pum Pumkuc Libya through the unfinished obelisk at Os one and the boxes at the Serapim of Saqqara in Egypt, made of granite, one of the hardest materials ever with insane accuracy only achievable with today's technology. The Al Nasir rock in Saudi Arabia literally looks like a giant laser beam just cut right through it. Meanwhile, the Kailash temple in India, which was somehow cut into a cliff side with perfectly symmetrical hallways carved with copy paste level precision. Not to mention the perfect doorways carved into Barabar Caves 1000 of years earlier.
And these star holes found in Flint Quarry, Massachusetts, and even all the way in Norway, all indicating some sort of highly advanced drilling or a precision laser technology used. The incredible list of similarities among these ancient cultures tells us that they all clearly had some sort of external influence that guided them, which they actually recorded proof of directly into their stone tablets, wall carvings, and hieroglyphics. Alright. That might be enough for now. I think I'll save that for another video, so keep an eye out for that one if I don't disappear before then.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
“The Toe Rogan Experience” He knows we didn’t land on the moon. No one destroys it this well and then changes their mind. https://t.co/OcV9ODS8ia
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss their disbelief in the moon landing, citing reasons such as the footage looking fake and the lack of evidence. They mention the Soviet Union's advancements in space and suggest that the Americans faked the moon landing to win the Cold War. They also mention Neil Armstrong's reluctance to give interviews and Bill Clinton's story about a carpenter who doubted the moon landing. The speakers question the missing telemetry data and argue that laser reflectors on the moon are not proof. They claim that the astronauts were afraid for their lives and highlight inconsistencies in moon photographs. They conclude by expressing skepticism about the existence of aliens and the curvature of the Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, the toe. Rogen exposing the fake moon landing before he became a NASA shell. There's no way people went on the moon.
Speaker 1: There's no way. You don't think the moon landing is real?
Speaker 0: No. I don't. No. No. Do you?
Yeah.
Speaker 1: Why do
Speaker 0: you think the moon landing is real?
Speaker 1: Why don't
Speaker 0: you tell me why?
Speaker 1: I saw it on television.
Speaker 0: That's Genius.
Speaker 1: You saw it on TV? That's awesome.
Speaker 0: I'm gonna show you some CGI. I'm a show you King Kong. I saw that on TV too. There's a 80 foot gorilla. He's running around kidnapping white chicks.
Speaker 1: You should check it out. Why fake it?
Speaker 0: Thank you, pal. Why not? Why not?
Speaker 1: Just kidding. We can open with that.
Speaker 0: If you look at The footage online, it looks ridiculous. It looks stupid. If you look at the videos, it looks ridiculous and dumb. You know why? Because in 1969, nobody anticipated that we're gonna have VCRs and the Internet.
We're gonna be able to watch that. They wanted to win the Cold War. The Soviet Union had over 10 first in space. 1st man in space, 1st woman in space, First, they they had everything. 1st dog in space, they had, 1st satellite.
They had they were so much more advanced than the Americans were, but the Americans were more advanced in trickery, and that's what they did. They figured out a way to fake it. That's why when Neil Armstrong got back, first of all, he went insane. They went into a deep depression, so did Buzz Aldrin, became a huge hog. He gave no interviews.
Neil Armstrong still to this day will not give interviews. He gave 1 speech that he gave at the 25th anniversary of the moon landing, and this is what he said in front of America's best honor students, he said, we have here amongst us America's best and brightest, and the quote was, you will achieve many great things if you could peel away one of Truth's hidden layers. That's a speech this guy gives standing in front of the top honors students. Not, I went to the moon. He doesn't say that.
He gives this Speech. Now Bill Clinton in page a 100 I think it's a 156 of his book, My Life, he gives this story about how when he was a kid, he was working with this carpenter. And this carpenter said, you know, I don't believe man landed on the moon. It was 3 months after the moon landing. And he said, I thought that guy was ridiculous.
He said, you know what? I believe anything those TV fellas show you. He said, after 8 years in the White House, I thought maybe that guy was ahead of his time.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 0: This isn't Bill Clinton's Biography. This is in his book. There's no way people went on the moon.
Speaker 1: There's no way. By the way, is it
Speaker 0: It's impossible today. China wants to go back
Speaker 1: to the moon. They don't even have a clue how to
Speaker 0: do it. They're gonna try to get there in 2020. America thinks we could possibly go back in 2017. All Of the hard data, the telemetry data, 14,000 reels is missing. No one can find it.
With the telemetry data That's amazing. That's the binary data, The ones and the zeros that show the distance between the command module and the earth during every step of the way on the way to the moon and back, which you can't fake. They don't have that. They can't find it, Which you would think would be a locked golden vault, the Smithsonian, but no, they can't find it. Well, they say, well, you know, they they placed laser reflectors
Speaker 1: on the moon. You could shoot
Speaker 0: a laser beam. That's proof. It's not proof because the Russians did it twice with unmanned probes. But here's the only thing. We can't keep anything quiet in this country.
It doesn't matter. No one's keeping it quiet. Everybody's gonna laugh at it. The astronauts Those guys are afraid of their lives. Gus Grisham, the pilot who was the guy who died on the launch pad along with 2 of his friends, he was a public Critic of NASA.
He put a lemon. He hung it on the simulator, put a lemon, and put it on a hanger and hung it. He was dead in that same that That same cockpit, he died, like, 2 weeks later. They he burned to death inside of it. They were they were terrified.
This is a matter of life and death. These guys were in the middle of a huge Cold war between Russia, and they wanted to show that America had technological superiority. If you look into a man, the more you look into it, you know, this photo every photograph Half of the moon looks goofy. There's intersecting shadows that show more than 1 light source, and you could try to explain any one of these things away, which many people do. But the problem is when you look at them altogether Joe Joe, we're not alone for 10 hour.
Speaker 1: I swear to god, I will make fun of that crap till the end of time. I'll make up Stories. I'll I'll lie to my mother. I don't care. You show me a UFO.
I'll lie to my mother. Where is the curvature? Where? No curvature.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This is hilarious.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Well that’s it. I’m done for the day. The internet can’t possibly get better than this! https://t.co/6SnlcRbQEy
Video Transcript AI Summary
Klausie McShwab's latest album, "Greatest Schwab's Volume 15," is a collection of songs that reflect a new world order. The lyrics touch on topics like modified mRNA, vaccines, and the central bank digital currency. The album also mentions side effects and encourages people to stop believing in certain things. It promotes unity and emphasizes the importance of everyone having what they need. The album is available on Spotify and Apple Music. Additionally, there is a mention of a unique culinary experience involving caterpillars and a reminder to check out the click kick magna. Overall, the album aims to entertain and provoke thought.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You heard Klausie McShwab's first two records. Back, scene, speck, all night.
Speaker 1: You know nothing and be happy.
Speaker 0: But this one is gonna make your modified mRNA tingle. Time Lies presents Greatest Schwab's volume 15, a new world order in music.
Speaker 1: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, also unvaccinated are still alive.
Speaker 0: A little bit of Pfizer in my arm. A little bit of BioNTech does no harm. A little Johnson Johnson starts to think
Speaker 1: a little as the sending cuts so you don't get sick. It's Houston number 5. Let's talk about facts, maybe. Let's talk about talk about talk about g. Let's talk about all the weird and counter side effects, maybe.
Let's one's wrong. It's a little luck you get. My my my my. Oh. My my my my.
Your carditis. You won't have to be rich. The CBDC, you'll have all you need. The central one, see, we just take your extra wealth and your cash, and you can bulk 500 steps, but not a singer. Say, have more is a curfew, activates, and all bought caught them at your door.
Just a small town boy thinking genetically more than fights or This ensures he doesn't co create. Please stop believing. Stop the reading. We are almost 9,000,000,000 people. Please stop believing right now, he didn't start to rise off.
Speaker 0: One. Greatest Schwab's volume team, now available on Spotify there and MRN Apple Music.
Speaker 1: The caterpillar tastes like chicken, A nothing betas in a deep fry bot, tai fly, or sent a report in Be sure to check the click kick magna gets out. Almost as kung chi as worms. And chew your drink as hotbar sandwich extra loud causes all you get. I don't care who you are, where you're swamp, don't care what you want. You will eat
Speaker 0: one. Will The new Willie means fun and Schwerbelts out.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
You should listen to every word of this and pay attention to the subtext. @JimBreuer knows what’s going on. I hear he’s also open to flat earth. https://t.co/I53V9M3qUW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Bill Gates is discussed in this video, with the speaker expressing concerns about his intentions to depopulate the world. The speaker criticizes Gates for his support of planned parenthood and the use of GMO mosquitoes. They also mention his desire to block out the sun. The speaker questions why people admire Gates despite his controversial ideas. The conversation then shifts to Klaus Schwab and Mark Zuckerberg, with the speaker making humorous remarks about their accents and behavior. The video ends with a mention of Trump and the labeling of conspiracy theorists. The speaker also mentions their pet cockatoo.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look at these bananas right here. This look at who how did how did Bill Gates become popular? Can anyone tell me? First of all, he sounds like Kermit the Frog. You're buildings here, and the way we depopulate the world?
You do stick a needle in them. 1st, we'll go to Africa and genocide them, Then we'll try India. That didn't work. Let's try America. He wants to depopulate.
You know what the word depopulate is? It's a very nice word for murder.
Speaker 1: Murder? This is what blows my
Speaker 0: well, he's got a lot of money and he really gives to good charities he's such a good guy. He gave us $14,000,000. He's such a nice guys, that is the power of money. Money is driven by
Speaker 2: me And only me, and you will never see the dark side behind the power of wealth.
Speaker 0: Let me tell you something. If your neighbor, your brother, your wife came to you and said, listen, man. I think there's too many people in this world, And we gotta start depopulating them as soon as possible. Let's get as many planned parenthoods. We'll back them get them before they don't even know it?
Speaker 2: You don't want that kid. Give it to us.
Speaker 0: We need to stick needles in them. We need to stop women from having babies.
Speaker 1: If this was at your barbecue.
Speaker 0: I live in Florida. The other thing is we're gonna release GMO mosquitoes, g m o mosquitoes he's what see, here's the problem here's the problem. All of us have a conscious and a soul? So we can't you keep waiting for this you show up? The devil doesn't have a tail.
The devil doesn't have horns. The devils are right here. And the minute you realize that, you'll take your mask off. Let's think about that. What's another thing he wants to do?
Block out the sun. Do you do you comprehend the conversation I'm having? The only thing missing from Bill Gates is at the end of every sentence, he goes. Maybe if he does that, you'll wake up quicker. So the next time someone goes, you know, I think we had to depopulate humanization.
We need mosquitoes to inject GMO and block out the sun. Here's some money, people. I'm a good guy. If that was your neighbor, you'd call the authorities. I got some whack job talking about genocide at my barbecue.
But he's worth 1,000,000,000 of dollars, and that's what we look up Do instead of God. So I mean that's the system we live in. Correct? Klaus Schwab. First of
Speaker 1: all, his accent, doesn't his accent scare you?
Speaker 2: The the the one day, you won't have nothing in your possession, and you will we will use all the great words in the world and we will.
Speaker 0: The only thing he's missing is going like this. Maybe you'll wake up quicker if you just imagine that. And not for nothing. Have you seen when Zuckerberg was talking in front of everyone? I don't know if he's a robot or a lizard.
But first of all, he never blinked. And then he picked up the water. Before he even drank I was praying to god to be a flyer or a frog or something. That's how we gotta get these people, Clay. Tell general Flynn to get some frogs next time these people talk and put it in front of watch watch them start.
Oh my god. 2 little legs dangling at little frog legs hanging. Ribbit. Rubbit.
Speaker 2: One day, we're sticking shipping with everybody for flex.
Speaker 0: You've seen my cockatoo. But that makes life so much simpler. I put something on my Instagram yesterday, a cockatoo of the week. There's still people brainwashing it. Oh, what are you, a conspiracy theorist?
What are you, 1 of them? Are you a conspiracy theorist? And they, you know, they grab some poor guy. I call them victim. They're news victims.
And, you know, Trump got raided and they went you talk to him? And he's like he said he needs to be arrested for the multiple crimes he's been proving of, and the guy said, which crime? Just tell me which crime. And he went
Speaker 1: racist, racist, sexist, sexist, sexist, racist, white supremacy what? Gender. Gender. Gender.
Speaker 0: Oh, I was fit. I I have a couple of cockatoos in my family.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
It should truly bother you when even physics professors don’t have answers and run from questions? When will your realize it’s all pseudoscience and none of it can be demonstrated and repeated as true science demands? Use your brain not your training. You’re smarter than this. https://t.co/eNC7lr2CrD
Video Transcript AI Summary
A conversation takes place between two individuals and a PhD astrophysicist. The first person asks about the evidence for gravity, specifically in relation to density and buoyancy. The astrophysicist mentions that the movement of planets and dropping objects in a vacuum are experimental evidence for gravity. The second question raised is about the violation of the second law of thermodynamics in the heliocentric cosmology model. The astrophysicist explains that the universe doesn't have a center and is uniformly filled with radiation, so gas has distributed itself throughout. The conversation concludes with a discussion on why the Earth's atmosphere doesn't escape into space, with the astrophysicist attributing it to gravity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Heard these arguments from flat earthers that you couldn't answer.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 0: That's just because you didn't know the answers. I know the answers. I haven't encountered an argument yet I couldn't refute. So how do you have gas pressure without a container?
Speaker 2: Nothing?
Speaker 0: Danny Faulkner, PhD astrophysicist.
Speaker 2: So mister Batya or doctor Batya, he's recommended so I've come to 2 or 3 of these cosmology colloquial. And he's I've asked these these 2 questions. And he's recommended that I ask the cosmologist These questions because the physicist prior could not answer them. Okay. The first question is and this is perfect because you're doing a you do cosmological you do tests of, gravity.
Yeah. Do you what experiment have you come up with that or have you discovered or seen that evidences the existence of a force called gravity with as distinct From the effects of density and buoyancy in a in a medium.
Speaker 1: What evidence there is for gravitation?
Speaker 2: In the, yeah, experimental. As distinct from the effects of density and buoyancy in a medium.
Speaker 1: The fact that planets move around, there are lots of evidence.
Speaker 2: So I'm so I'm an Experimental evidence. So what
Speaker 1: That's experiment.
Speaker 2: What's the independent variable in that experiment?
Speaker 1: Okay. I guess you could look at different
Speaker 2: Or control samples.
Speaker 1: I I mean, you can drop things in a in a vacuum.
Speaker 2: So things are more dense than 0. I mean, so the the vacuum is there's a zero medium. So everything seems more dense. Drop, Objects.
Speaker 1: I see. You just take a room Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Evacuate the air and drop things, and then they all fall the same.
Speaker 2: Equally more dense than nothing. Right? They're both Equally. So that's distinct from the effects of density and buoyancy. Yeah.
So gravity is a force that's it has nothing to do with density and buoyancy. Right? It's it's existed whether
Speaker 1: or not.
Speaker 2: Yes. It's Right. So when things fall in a medium, it's because they're equally more dense than nothing. In a vacuum, they're equally more dense than nothing. That's why they fall at the same rate.
So, the question is more as Distinct from the effects of density and buoyancy. Yeah. If the answer if if no, that's fine too.
Speaker 1: I am not sure I can add more than I said.
Speaker 2: Then the second question is, so your cosmology depends upon, so So, the 2nd law of thermodynamics stipulates that you cannot have a gas pressure system in the midst of a vacuum. Like, high pressure always goes to low pressure.
Speaker 1: Yes. That's
Speaker 2: true. So, your, the cosmology has it been brought up within the field of cosmology that the heliocentric cosmology depends upon a Violation of the second law of thermodynamics.
Speaker 1: What's the heliocentric? What is it?
Speaker 2: The heliocentric model being
Speaker 1: around the earth?
Speaker 2: Heliocentric means well, let's say the general the The cosmological model assumed within the parameters of the general relativity theory whether it be whether whatever you can whatever you decide It's the center of the universe. But you normally, you have you have gas composed stars in the middle of a vacuum. So
Speaker 1: Yeah. So yes. You're right. So So, if you have gas, it would expand into the vacuum. Absolutely.
Speaker 2: So, do you know of any demonstrations of gas pressure in the middle of a vacuum without a solid barrier between So is it would it be true to say that the cosmological model that underpins the assumptions of of of the popular cosmology, whatever it is, Depends upon a violation of the 2nd law of thermodynamics, which is not
Speaker 1: demonstrated. There's no, it's not like we're putting, It's first, the universe doesn't have a center.
Speaker 2: Well yeah. Sure. Sure. Whether center or not.
Speaker 1: And it's uniformly filled with radiation. Mhmm. So It's already equilibrated. So the gas has distributed itself throughout all of the volume of the universe.
Speaker 2: Okay. So is that possible to demonstrate, let's say gas pressure adjacent to a vacuum without a barrier between the two? Is that demonstrable?
Speaker 1: I will try, let's say
Speaker 2: I have a let's say I have a pressurized shoe box inside of a vacuum. I poke a hole inside that shoe box. Is there any way to demonstrate Air not going into the vacuum and staying inside the box as opposed to
Speaker 1: I don't I don't think so as you I I think you're absolutely right. If you poke a hole, it will go out. I know. I can't think of unless you just put the shoe inside a very dense, Much denser gas or something
Speaker 2: like that.
Speaker 1: Put it inside, like water or something.
Speaker 2: So it's true to say you can't have gas pressure in the midst of a vacuum without a solid container? Yes. Okay. So how is it the case that we have atmosphere on Earth without a solid container?
Speaker 1: Because, it's attracted to the Earth. Via gravity. Via gravity.
Speaker 2: But why doesn't gravity hold air in the shoe box?
Speaker 1: Because the shoe doesn't have enough gravity.
Speaker 2: The earth presumably does.
Speaker 1: Earth has a lot of gravity.
Speaker 2: The air
Speaker 1: of the shoe and the shoe does.
Speaker 2: So Why doesn't earth's gravity hold the back the air inside the box?
Speaker 1: Because
Speaker 2: Sorry. Why doesn't the why doesn't earth's gravity hold the air inside of the shoe box which is in the midst of a vacuum?
Speaker 1: Oh, because the adjust has pressure. So it has pressure and it just
Speaker 2: It just goes out into the back.
Speaker 1: Sorry. I I I I just saying, I I have people waiting and I need to go.
Speaker 2: Got it. Alright.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This is what I’ve been trying to tell you!
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This is a 1912 Baker Electric vehicle retrofitted with solar panels in 1960. Tell me again how far we have come. https://t.co/8au9hJvHhn
Video Transcript AI Summary
The 1912 Baker is a unique vintage car that stands out from the rest because it runs on electricity and is noiseless. Its power source is the sun, making it the world's first solar car. The car is equipped with a 10,000 cell panel on the roof, which converts heat into electric power and stores it in the car's batteries. With the current solar panel, it takes about 8 to 10 hours of sunlight to generate enough power for one hour of driving at a speed of 20 miles per hour.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Although most of us have a soft spot in our hearts for vintage and veteran cars, it can't be denied that there's a certain smugness in our attitude when we compare some of these noisy and rather messy old contraptions with the smooth running cars of today. But one old car that certainly defies the general description is the 1912 Baker because this model was an electric brawn and noiseless. However, we are not so much concerned with the merits of the veteran car as with, on this occasion, its source of power, the sun. For this is the world's 1st solar car powered by a 10,000 cell panel on the roof, brought over from the United States by scientist and pioneer in this sphere, doctor Charles Escoffery, to illustrate the potential of solar energy. The silicon cells convert heat into electric power which is then stored in the car's batteries.
And with the present group panel, it takes between 8 10 hours of sunlight to provide enough power for an hour driving at 20 miles an hour.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
There is no curvature. If you have to apply some magical refraction, you’re only fooling yourself. This is reality. No curve = No globe = Flat Earth https://t.co/n1PLPYILlI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 express excitement and satisfaction about something they found. They discuss measurements and camera angles. Speaker 0 mentions it looks like the entirety of Los Angeles and they comment on the reflection of water resembling a sunset. Speaker 2 joins the conversation and agrees that it looks like the sun setting. They continue to admire the view and suggest showing it to someone named Chris. The conversation ends abruptly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna see
Speaker 1: the I got it. Oh, I got it. I got it.
Speaker 0: There it is.
Speaker 1: Yeah. We got it. We got it.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Let me
Speaker 1: get it. Look at this. Let's get our get our measurements. Exactly. You got it?
He got it. He got it at that level. Holy crap. That is
Speaker 0: almost the entirety of Los Angeles right there. I've lost from the entirety of Los Angeles.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Shelley. Yeah. Awesome, man.
Speaker 0: 18 miles, 3 feet above sea level. Smoke that and,
Speaker 1: Oh, I could see this. Okay. 4 feet? Yeah. So camera height, I got see if there's a car.
So we'll straight. I'll leave it sitting here, and we can verify it later. But Okay. 3 to 4th. Yes.
Speaker 0: If you had a garage
Speaker 1: Yeah. There it is.
Speaker 0: That's a good There it is. There it is.
Speaker 1: Whoo. Oh. Yeah. Oh. Yeah.
That's so killer.
Speaker 0: Dead on. Right there. Keep it. Oh my goodness. That's good.
Yeah. A little bit down. Downward. A little bit downward. Time again.
A little bit down if you can.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's good. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Yeah. Yeah. Right there. Oh, man,
Speaker 0: Riddle. This
Speaker 1: looks so Good.
Speaker 0: ACS? ACS? Dude, it looks like a sunset.
Speaker 1: It looks like a look at how
Speaker 0: it's reflecting water. It looks like a sunset. Great.
Speaker 1: It does look like a sunset. Wild.
Speaker 0: Y'all see that? 18 miles.
Speaker 1: Okay. It's wild.
Speaker 2: Dude, that looks so good, Wendell. Oh my gosh. It seriously looks like the sun setting. 18 miles.
Speaker 1: Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2: That is so crazy.
Speaker 1: Look at that. Oh. Wow. See that, Rich? Oh, cool.
Hey. Show this on on
Speaker 2: the street.
Speaker 0: Chris's what Mike's
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Stop believing the indoctrination and look at it logically. https://t.co/Au2IyvRzfB
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person questions the roundness of the Earth and presents camera footage from 110,000 feet in the air without a fisheye lens. They argue that there is no curvature and that the sun does not appear to be 93,000,000 miles away. The person believes that some individuals are too indoctrinated to accept this evidence and urges them to wake up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this is one of the most common responses that I typically get. This person says, I don't believe all the NASA stuff, but how do you explain the earth isn't round? Okay. So this person is clearly trying to seek truth, but they've watched the guy send a GoPro straight up a mile and it's definitely round. Okay.
I'm gonna show you camera footage from a camera that does not use fisheye lens, and let's see what the earth looks like. 110 1,000 feet in the air. 110,000 feet, and yet I've got people telling me that they can see curve in an airplane. It's a 10,000 feet up in the air. Do you see any curvature?
It's crazy what using a camera that doesn't have a fisheye lens will do. I mean, I I really don't need to say anything. Do you see it? Look look at the sun. Does that look 93,000,000 miles away to you with the local hotspot right there.
There's no chance, and yet they say we have no evidence. It's literally right here. There's no curve. That sun is not 93,000,000 miles away. The problem is that some of you are so programmed and indoctrinated Juneta to believe that we live on a giant ball that's spinning a 1000 miles per hour, hurling through space at 67,000 miles per hour, in a solar system that's moving 490,000 miles per hour, that you don't even believe what I just showed you.
I I just showed it to you. No curve! But you won't care, because you're so indoctrinated. Wake up!
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
GM The Earth is Flat. The sun and the moon are local luminaries. And as always, be excellent to each other. Have an amazing day! https://t.co/2ufDZXPXnk
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Anyone want some chlorine? You’re in luck. Your municipal water supply pumps it to you for free right along with your water. Along with tons of other fun chemicals. They absorb directly into your skin. No big deal. https://t.co/bsUHWroiyc
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this eye-opening demonstration, we pour unfiltered tap water into two glasses. Using an OTO chemical test, we detect chlorine in one glass, indicated by its yellow color. Surprisingly, the other glass shows no chlorine. It turns out that while testing the first glass, the chemicals from the water were absorbed into the speaker's skin and hands within just 10 seconds. This highlights the presence of 80,000 unstudied and unregulated chemicals in our tap water, which can lead to various health issues ranging from brittle hair and dry skin to respiratory problems and even cancer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is an eye opening demonstration of chemicals in your water. Unfiltered tap water, which we will pour in 2 glasses. OTO chemical, test for chlorine. Very sensitive for it. Ten drops.
Notice it turning yellow. The evidence of chlorine. No chlorine in this water. Where did that chemical go? While I was Testing this glass over 10 seconds, all that chemistry went into my skin and my hands.
There are 80,000 unstudied and unregulated chemicals in our tap water, causing all sorts of health issues from as simple as brittle hair, and dry skin to respiratory issues and even cancer.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Can you still not see it? Not just this time. Your whole life. Crisis actors. https://t.co/KnbzQ2DtUZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
A mass terrorist attack occurred at a family's kibbutz, resulting in the parents' deaths as they tried to protect their child, Hotem, from gunfire. A grenade was thrown, causing an explosion. Hotem's father lost his arm, and his mother tragically died on top of him. Hotem's sister survived, but their parents did not.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mass terrorist burst into the family's kibbutz, his parents killed trying to protect Hotem from the gunfire. They threw a grenade or something. It exploded. The last thing my dad said is He lost his arm, and then my mom died on top of me. His sister survived the Mom and dad are dead.
Mom and dad are dead. Sorry.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Can you find the hidden message? Listen all the way to the end to win the prize. https://t.co/n3fdhe9i8g
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the situation in the Middle East and urges support for Israel through donations. They argue that tax dollars already support Israel and mention the Balfour Declaration, which justified the colonization of Palestine and led to the creation of Israel. The speaker distinguishes between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism, stating that Judaism is a religion while Zionism is a nationalist movement. They claim that Zionism weaponized Judaism to justify colonial actions and oppress Palestinians. The speaker concludes by suggesting that the media portrays the wrong heroes as villains.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. It's so sad what's happening in the Middle East. We need to support Israel by donating to them. Believe me, your tax dollars are already supporting them. What do you mean?
Would you wanna provide support for people who broke into your house, removed some of your family members, made you live in a bathroom while they occupied the rest of your house? Can y'all stop speaking in code? Just look into the Balfour Declaration which pretty much justified the colonization of Palestine, which also led to the Rothschild State of Israel. After acts of genocide and ethnic cleansing, of course. Now Palestine is occupied by The bet they want you to see.
That sounds pretty anti semitic. Let's get this straight. Anti semitism and anti Zionism are two different things. Judaism is a religion that wants to uphold the Mosaic laws such as thou shall not kill, while Zionism is a nationalist movement that wants to preserve the land of Israel. Big difference.
But Zionism was founded off of Judaic principles. Right? The Jews true to the Torah never aspired to have their own state. The truth is, Zionists weaponized Judaism just to justify colonial endeavors such as expelling Palestinians and lowering the Arab majority across the land. So you're telling me we've been gaslit into supporting the oppressors?
Growing up is realizing the ones the media makes the hero is really the villain.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
The Red Cross is selling your blood to pharmaceutical companies. How does that sit with you? https://t.co/crSFW3r2i4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Blood donation is often seen as a noble act, but the reality is different. Plasma, the main component of blood, is more expensive than oil. The majority of donated blood is sold to pharmaceutical companies, a fact that the Red Cross doesn't advertise. These companies are interested in plasma because it contains valuable proteins used to make expensive drugs. The plasma industry is dominated by a few companies, such as Baxter, CSL bearing, Gyrfolds, and Octapharma. They collect, freeze, and mix thousands of liters of human plasma to create drugs. This industry is worth $17 billion and continues to grow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Welcome to the wonderful world of blood donation. Around the world, giving blood is seen as a symbol of generosity. One of the noblest acts in modern society, but the reality is different altogether.
Speaker 1: Health care is the perfect money making industry. Our willingness to pay for available therapies, basically, especially for our loved ones, knows no balance.
Speaker 0: At the heart of this business, plasma, a yellow liquid rich in proteins. It's the main component of blood. It's more expensive than oil.
Speaker 2: You know, I'm like a cop.
Speaker 0: I'm just gonna give you yoke. That bumming this shit.
Speaker 2: It almost killed me, so I don't wanna do that no We're
Speaker 0: in Washington. We decided to explore a little known area within the health industry, the blood tray. Our investigation took us France, Germany,
Speaker 1: and the US. They don't like us to interview their done art.
Speaker 2: Yeah, man. You know why? They doing something they ain't doing right. They need to stop Public wanna know.
Speaker 0: Today, Carlos is donating blood. Despite his busy job, he's a regular blood donor at the Red Cross Center in Lausanne. Carlos sees his act as a sign of commitment to the community. More than 100,000,000 donations are collected each year worldwide. In 2015, The Swiss Red Cross registered 311,000 donations.
The figure diminishes each year, and they're constantly seeking new donors. Their message is clear. Giving blood saves lives. Blood is a quite peculiar juice, said Faust's Double with glee, but he's not the only one to be interested. Health is also an industry, and blood donations are subject to the laws of the market.
Before giving blood, these Swiss donors must complete a medical questionnaire and give their informed consent. In particular, there is 1 line at the end of the form. A sentence in small letters. I am aware that Some components of my donation may be used for the production of drugs. Only a few donors read this line, though it's crucial.
In reality, most of the donated blood is sold to private companies, something the Red Cross doesn't advertise.
Speaker 3: Okay.
Speaker 0: The plasma fractionation industry. These are the pharmaceutical companies that buy 80,000 1,000 liters of plasma from the Red Cross each year. A humanitarian institution makes nearly CHF 10,000,000 Swiss francs from this sale. Are the donors aware of it? 1st discovery, The majority of the donor's blood is sold to pharmaceutical industries.
The industry is so interested in Carlos' blood for a specific reason. Its liquid part called plasma contains sought after proteins. They are used to make very expensive and profitable The plasma trade.
Speaker 3: Welcome to CSL plasma. Typically, 57% of our blood volume is made up of plasma. Plasma is a strong colored liquid portion of the whole blood that transports water and nutrients to all cells in the body. It is composed of approximately 90% water and ten Protein, plasma
Speaker 0: The plasma industry is huge, and a handful of companies share the world market. Baxter in the USA, CSL bearing in Australia, Gyrfolds in Spain Griffiths. And the company, Octapharma, in Switzerland, which we discover through these promotional films.
Speaker 2: Octapharma's raw material is produced by the perfect bioreactor developed over 1000000 of years of evolution, the human body.
Speaker 0: For these companies, Plasma is nothing but a raw material, and very lucrative too. The professional term is fractionation. The name of the procedure that transforms donors plasma into drugs. To do this, they collect, freeze, and mix thousands of liters of human plasma. These companies control a market which is worth $17,000,000,000 and growing steadily.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Supposedly if you follow the instructions, you can see the curve. I don’t know, didn’t work for me. 🤷 https://t.co/6kHcXMtHeW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Stare at the red dot for 5 seconds, then close your eyes for another 5 seconds. Open your eyes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Stare at the red dot in the middle for 5 seconds. Ready? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Close your eyes for another 5 seconds. 1, 2, 345.
Now open your eyes.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Never gets old. https://t.co/ktLwOqc0zC
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses their desire to become an astronaut and mentions the need to study flying or science. However, another person interrupts, claiming that the first moon landing was fake due to the Cold War rivalry with Russia. They point out the lack of windows and a pod-like structure in the footage, as well as the absence of plane wreckage on the ground. The speaker ends abruptly, stating that they no longer wish to pursue a career as an astronaut.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna be an astronaut. Oh, you wanna be an astronaut? Well, that's great. You can be an astronaut. All you have to do is study flying or science, and maybe someday you could be the 1st astronaut to walk on the moon.
No. There already was an astronaut who first walked on the moon. Well, no, not really, that wasn't real. See, there was this thing called the cold war. And in order to beat the Russians we kind of fake that.
That never happened. See how there's no windows on the side and see underneath where there's, like, a pod thing? What's that? Right? Take a look at this wreckage.
See how there's no plane parts on the ground there. What does that look like? A missile. I don't wanna be an
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
This is what I’ve been trying to tell you. You can’t have an atmosphere clinging to a ball, spinning over 1,000mph without friction. Friction causes heat. Just one more nail in the heliocentric coffin. https://t.co/qFWOJ76M2E
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the rotation of the Earth and the assumption that the atmosphere moves with it. They explain that different points in the atmosphere have different velocities due to the Earth's rotation. They also mention the theory that the Earth's rotation is a result of the Big Bang and discuss the movement of air at different elevations. The speaker questions how the air speeds up and stays in motion with the Earth, considering factors like friction, heat, and the entry of objects into the atmosphere. They express confusion about how the system can maintain its energy and velocity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's say we're looking down on the North Pole of the globe Earth, and the Earth is rotating, spinning, or I should say rotating. People have given me some criticism for it. I should say rotating instead of spinning because they said it's It's being deceptive to say spinning, but, I mean, spinning, rotating. I really think it's the same thing. So, anyway, Earth is rotating.
Right? And so let's say We're going to freeze the Earth at that moment. Freeze the Earth with the atmosphere around it, assuming that the atmosphere is rotating with the Earth. And and that's what I have drawn on the board here. Okay?
So here's the Earth down here. Alright? And let's say that this line right here is the equator, and you're looking down on it, and the equator is right here. Okay? So we're just gonna say this line is the equator and then this is the edge of the atmosphere up here and then there's space out here.
Now, this is obviously not the scale, this is just conceptual. And so at the equator, the circumference of the Earth is roughly 25,000 miles. And so to figure out the instantaneous velocity of the Earth as it spins around its axis on the hoiter, you divide the circumference by the time it takes to make 1 revolution which is 24 hours. And when you do that, you get roughly 1038 miles per hour. Okay?
And so we assume right here that this is the Earth rotating at 1038 miles per hour. And I said in the video and people have said, in the comments that you can just say that that's 0. Okay? And so what I wanna do is look at this atmosphere and look at 3 points and 3 elevations. Okay?
A, B, and C. And assume that we're looking at just 1 cubic foot of air. Okay? Just to to get our minds around this volume of air that's frozen in time right now. Okay?
So all that's moving, all the air is moving with the earth in such a way that it appears relatively stationary, you know, we go outside, wind blows and moves around, but it's all moving with the Earth and that's what slows the plane down because the the atmosphere moves with the Earth. Okay? So point A, point B, and point C all moving with the Earth. Well, I mean they could be blowing this way, they could be blowing down at this moment, but since we froze them, We know that it's all moving with the Earth and not getting left behind. Right?
That's the assumption. And so, we will we will say at this moment, we expect all of these points of air to to to make one complete revolution and come back to the same in 24 hours. Right? Because the atmosphere moves with the Earth. The atmosphere never gets left behind.
So right off the bat, since we know The velocity is equal to distance divided by time. We can say that VA, the velocity of point A, is greater then the velocity of point B, which is greater than the velocity of point C, because point A has a longer distance to travel in 24 hours than point B, and point B has a longer distance than C because the circumference of their path is greater. Right? So I've got A up here at the edge of the atmosphere, space up here, b, right here around 6 miles where planes fly, and c, near the surface of the Earth. Okay?
And so this rotation here, the theory is that this the Earth is rotating about its axis because of the big bang. When you really think about it, there was this big bang. Everything exploded out into space. Planetary systems formed galaxies. All that stuff formed.
And this rotation is what is left over from that explosion. It's leftover energy from that explosion of the creation which created everything. Right? And so everything has just been moving for 1,000,000,000 of years and there's no friction between space and the atmosphere, right, because there's nothing in space so an object of motion stays in motion unless acted upon by an outside force. Right?
But that's kinda strange when you think about the air at higher elevations has to be moving faster to keep up with the ground below it because air moves up and down. Right? Hot air rises, as we know, and cool air sinks. Right? So how does the air speed up?
When it's heated, it rises but then it has to start moving faster. Now even if it's only a little bit faster. The difference in these velocities if you calculate them isn't much, but it is they do have to be greater or they will start to get left behind. So, what how that is explained, I don't know. I haven't really found anything to explain to to talk about how the air has to be moving faster.
But Another thing to think about is, you know, air isn't stationary like we're assuming in this problem. Right? It's it it blows. It moves all over the place. And down here at the surface, Air goes up and down over valleys and air actually speeds up as it goes up and over as it goes over the top of a hill it speeds up, slows down, runs into mountains, goes through trees, There's things flying around in the air, different pressures, all kinds of stuff is happening internally as it all moves with the atmosphere.
Now I would think that eventually something is gonna have to to to give it a nudge to keep it moving with the earth, so to say. The the energy would be lost. Okay? But not to mention that, there are things that enter our atmosphere. There's meteors and all kinds of stuff is constantly any is supposed to be entering the atmosphere from outer space.
So that is pushing back on the atmosphere and wanting to slow it down. So the common explanation for how the atmosphere keeps up with the surface of the earth is by friction between the air at the surface. There's let me use a red marker for this. There's friction here pushing back on this cubic foot of air down here that's at the surface and then that's transferred through internal friction for internal shear forces within the fluid, because air is essentially a fluid, okay, it has viscosity and so it's these internal shear forces are transferred all the way up throughout the layers of air. Right?
Just the air pushing against itself, the friction carries that That force all the way up to keep the atmosphere moving with the Earth. Right? Well, the problem I have with that That doesn't make sense to me and this is why this a lot of this is why I ignored it in the 1st episode but I didn't explain it is When you create friction, you create heat. We rub our hands together. It's actually kinda cool here today.
Rub my hands together to warm them up. That creates heat. Heat is essentially kinetic energy. And so When something creates heat on the earth or when the earth is heat heated by the sun, where does that heat go? Well, if you watch Paul's Out Physics episode 4.1, I talked about how the accepted explanation for how the, you know, things don't just get hotter and hotter and hotter, is that it radiates out into space.
Right? So heat from the Earth radiates out into space, into infinite space, and has lost forever. So this process right here, This friction process, this shear force process, creates heat, and that heat is escaping. Therefore, this whole system would be losing energy, wouldn't it? And so we say that heat is really kinetic energy, and kinetic energy is equal to 1 half mass times velocity squared.
Right? And so this kinetic energy I assume is going down. The kinetic energy of the atmosphere is going down because it's losing heat. And since I hope we're not losing mass to infinite space, we're not losing our air, that leaves only velocity to go down. So not only does the speed of the air relative to the surface of the earth have to increase as you go up in elevation because the path it has to travel, the length of the path, the circumference, increases.
We also have this problem with losing energy. I don't understand how this could work.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
GN Flat Earthlings. Remember, don’t hold in the negativity. Before you lay down at night, get things off your chest. 🤣 @MrAstrotheology https://t.co/EWdTS3fniT
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong negative opinions about relativity theory and insults various individuals, including Einstein, Neil deGrasse Tyson, Professor Dave, and SaimanDan. The speaker uses offensive language and derogatory terms to criticize their intelligence and credibility. The transcript contains disrespectful and vulgar language throughout.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Relativity theory. He's a fucking dumb useless eating cunt. Thank god he's dead. And all you people who fucking think Einstein's a genius, shut the fuck up. You're all fucking dumb cunts.
You're all listening to these fucking buffoons with their blue marbles and their fucking pair of tits. The flying Santa pair and the flying blue marble, which one is it Gobtards? Hey, Michael Toon, have you got an answer? I don't See you talking about Neil Disgraced Tyson Santa Pere. What about you Professor Dave?
Fess, fesser, you're a cesspool of fucking lies Professor Dave, you're a fucking goon show. And SaimanDan, Jesus fucking Christ. What a Fucking useless eating dumb fucking cunt. All of you put together, You would you would you wouldn't even know how to get a fuck in a broth
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Annuit Cœptis Novus Ordo Seclorum https://t.co/AGeeIXE2WO
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the symbolism of the seal of Solomon and its connection to the Statue of Liberty and the dollar bill. They claim that the dollar bill was made to fit over the seal of Solomon and reveal hidden messages. The speaker also mentions the one eye symbolism and identifies it as Solomon's eye, stating that he is the capstone of the pyramid. They tease that there is more to uncover but do not provide further explanation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So before I get started here, y'all seen this before I had it in a video way down into my profile, and other people knew about this. This has this is nothing new. It's it's been known for years that this this spells out Mason and makes the, seal of Solomon. It's the seal of Solomon right there you're looking at. But, I gotta show you something even better than this.
I drew these lines myself and everything because I wanted to make sure that every point was right. Check this out. Alright. Pay attention here. This is, seal of Solomon, and I showed you guys where it was in the Statue of Liberty, and it was for real.
But, watch this. It also is made this dollar bill was made after it, and I'm gonna get a close-up in there after I show you guys this. See that? Please pay close attention. You'll see every one of these wrinkles.
Where's my pen at? Every one of these wrinkles in the eyes and everything lined up. The dollar bill was made after this. It was made for this to go over the top of it. Watch every wrinkle in his hat.
Look at the eye. Everything. Y'all, it was made the dollar bill was made for this emblem to fit over it and show us this. Only certain people know it. But anyway, wake up.
This ain't even the best. So you see this, right? The one eye symbolism. That eyeball right there is is the end that is in the eye on the dollar. That is a face.
And I had been trying to figure out what it was, and now I know. This is Solomon's eye. He's the capstone of this pyramid, and I can explain this picture here, but I'm not gonna explain it yet. Follow me because I'm gonna let I'm gonna tell you what's going on here. But, anyways, are y'all awake yet?
Are we figuring it out yet? Because there's more. There's way more than this.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
You ever wonder how some people just can’t see it? This helps explain a lot. https://t.co/Je7eOQjtFB
Video Transcript AI Summary
After hearing a phrase repeated four times, participants were asked to write down what they heard. Surprisingly, almost everyone wrote down "that is embarrassing." This phenomenon demonstrates how our eyes and ears work together to interpret electrical signals based on our expectations. In other words, we don't perceive reality as it is, but rather our own version of reality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Embarrassing 4 times. After the 4th time, write down what you hear. Interesting. Almost everyone here heard that is embarrassing. Okay?
Listen again and watch the screen. And when I cue you, write down what you hear. It's freaky, isn't it? You heard the same thing every single time. Our eyes and ears Taking electrical signals which our brains interpret based on our expectations.
We don't see reality. We see our reality.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
GN I can finally rest easy now that the yard work is covered. See y’all tomorrow! 🫡 https://t.co/PympO7c2Lx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 expresses surprise and frustration. Speaker 1 mentions something about a drop and having something in their body. Speaker 2 informs Speaker 1 about a dog riding a lawn mower cutting the grass. Speaker 1 suggests taking a picture, and Speaker 2 confirms having a video. Speaker 1 mentions needing the boys and acknowledges that their voice is being recorded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the fuck? And
Speaker 1: that and the, that what you probably feel on, they'll be seeing the drop. They ain't saying that because I ain't have it in my mouth. I had it in my body with my rental too.
Speaker 2: Man, Sean. Sean, It's a dog on the fucking riding lawn mower cutting the fucking grass.
Speaker 1: I heard. Did that why I said take a fucking picture?
Speaker 2: I got a video of this shit.
Speaker 1: Need a fucking the boys, period. I know you're hitting my voice. I don't
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
The shady founding of NASA Starring: Wernher von Braun and Jack Parsons https://t.co/8YZMA9Qlal
Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA, despite its controversial history, is trusted by many Americans. The agency's founding involved the secret transfer of Nazis to the US after World War 2, including Wernher von Braun, a prominent rocket developer. Von Braun, a former SS member, oversaw a slave labor facility and personally selected workers from nearby concentration camps. Additionally, a cofounder of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory was involved in occult practices. Nevertheless, NASA continues to receive billions of taxpayer dollars annually to educate the public about space exploration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's start this video by pretending that you believe everything NASA says, like so many Americans do, despite the fact that of all government agencies in existence, NASA has one of the shadiest foundings of all time, complete with hundreds of Nazis shuffled over to America secretly after World War 2 in Operation Paperclip, including their star, Wernher von Braun, who got his own Disney special A voyage around the moon must be made in 2 phases. And who NASA describes even today as one of the most important rocket developers and champions of space exploration in the 20th century, but who even they cannot deny was a card carrying Nazi member of the SS and not only was he running the underground slave labor facility where his rockets were being built, Von Braun himself would travel to a nearby concentration camp to handpick slaves to work for him as laborers. Even a cofounder of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory was admittedly an occultist who belonged to a cult that practice sex orgies and black magic. And yet, that is the same NASA so many people put all of their faith and trust in spending 1,000,000,000 of taxpayer dollars every year to feed the American people their beliefs about everything outside of planet Earth.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
A video for the ones who think education equals intelligence. The system is literally meant to take away anything that makes you special and a free thinker. https://t.co/GXyxlHMUlu
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1960s, NASA commissioned a study to understand how to hire more geniuses. George Land and his team tested a group of 5-year-olds for creativity. They defined genius as using creative imagination to solve problems. Surprisingly, 98% of the 5-year-olds qualified as geniuses. However, when the same group was tested at ages 10, 15, and as adults, the percentage of geniuses decreased significantly. By adulthood, only 2% of the participants were considered geniuses. George Land attributed this decline to the influence of school, stating that uncreative behavior and thinking are learned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Study that was done in the 19 sixties, and it was really, commissioned by NASA because they wanted to know how to hire more geniuses. So they hired George Land and his team to go out and figure out, like, what makes a genius. So they started with a group of 5 year olds, and they gave them a creativity test. So the way they defined genius was how do you use your creative imagination to solve problems? And what they found was, of this group of 5 year olds, 98% qualified as geniuses.
Then they came back 5 years later, when this Group was 10 years old, and it was down to 30%. 5 years later, at 15, it was down to 12%, and then I think they just kinda gave up in, like, Discussed, but George Land took it further and went out and surveyed adults and found that only 2% of adults. And the thing that's also very interesting is he attributed this to school, 100% to school, that you would take a population, 98% genius and dumb them down to 2%. And hit one of his quotes that I love is he said uncreative behavior and thinking is learned.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Don’t let all the negativity in the world keep you down. You gotta get right up and face the day! 😀 https://t.co/6DEcHwMd9f
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
The horizon always falls as flat as your attempts to stop us. https://t.co/5p6xQK4bfA
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists in Antarctica have made mysterious discoveries that they struggle to comprehend. These findings include an unknown light source and objects left behind by our ancestors or advanced civilizations from the past. These unexplained phenomena challenge the way the world is portrayed to us.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Antarctic. What did the scientists find there and hide from us? Far from the eyes of the world, under the ice of Antarctica, scientists have discovered things They cannot understand. An Antarctic ice light source. Things left there by our ancestors, by the creators, by the worlds of the past superior to our technology?
Things They can't explain either. The important thing is that the world is not the way it is presented to us.
@TedLogan1010 - Ted Theodore Logan
A brief history lesson. The Balfour Declaration, the Rothschilds and the founding of Israel. https://t.co/tBKndFHKe8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Balfour Declaration, a 100-year-old letter, expressed British support for a Jewish home in Palestine. It was sent by Arthur Balfour to Lord Rothschild. The letter was addressed to the Rothschild family because they were influential and interested in Zionism. Lord Rothschild's great uncle, Walter, received the letter. The declaration favored the establishment of a national home for Jews in Palestine while protecting the rights of non-Jewish communities. Lord Rothschild considers it a significant moment in Jewish history. The Rothschild family played a dual role as leaders of diaspora Jewry and supporters of pioneer communities in Israel. Lord Rothschild's cousin, Dorothy, played a crucial role in connecting Chaim Weizmann with the British establishment. She educated and trained him on integrating into British society. The archives contain letters that showcase Dorothy's involvement and love for her husband and the Zionist cause.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's 67 words long. It's a 100 years old, and it changed the course of history for the Middle East and the Jewish people. The Balfour Declaration, the expression of the British government support for a Jewish home in Palestine, was sent by British foreign secretary Arthur Balfour to the 2nd lord Rothchild. I'm here in Buckinghamshire at Waddesdon Manor to speak with the 4th lord Rothschild about the Balfour declaration, what it means for Britain, for the Jewish people, and the Rothschild family.
Speaker 1: The foreign office, November 2, 1917. Dear lord Rothschild, I have much pleasure in conveying to you, on behalf of his majesty's government, The following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations, which has been submitted to and approved by the cabinet.
Speaker 0: So it's possibly the most famous letter in modern Jewish history, and it begins with 3 words. Dear lord Rothschild, why was it that this letter was sent by the foreign secretary to your great uncle Walter?
Speaker 2: It's an interesting question because he was really interested in ornithology, Although he became interested in Zionism, I think the reason was this, that it was primarily A movement from Eastern Europe, but they didn't clarify who was in charge of that movement. And in addition, it was our fraud in Great Britain. So they felt that The Rothschild family, should be the one to whom it was addressed. And Walter was Lord Rothschild, and he was as an artist. And, those rarely are the background reasons.
Speaker 0: So Walter received the Balfour Declaration, and and I have a copy here. And I wonder if I could possibly ask you to read it for us.
Speaker 2: Yes, indeed. Yep. I'm going to put on my spectacles to make sure I read it Accurately. His majesty's government deal with favor the establishment of Palestine John is a national home for the Jewish people, and we'll use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object. It being clearly understood that nothing should be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non Jewish communities in Palestine All the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.
I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration To the knowledge of the Zionist Federation, yours, Arthur Balfour.
Speaker 0: And here it is, the Balfour Oration. What do you feel when you when you see it here?
Speaker 2: I've genuinely felt it's one of the most extraordinary moments In the history of the Jewish people, if you think it took 3000 years, to get to this.
Speaker 0: And, of course, the Rothschild family then as now filled 2 roles. Because it wasn't just a leader of diaspora jury, it also played a very significant role in the early years of the establishment of the pioneer communities in Israel as well. I just wanna revisit for a moment Your cousin Dorothy, who you mentioned, who at a extraordinarily young age, still in her teens, played such a critical role as a go between and a and a facilitator for Chaim Weizmann. Can you say a little bit about that?
Speaker 2: Well, she married my cousin, Jimmy, when she was 17.
Speaker 0: So this is, this is your cousin Dorothy Dolly?
Speaker 2: Yep. Missus Joan Jarastrow.
Speaker 0: And from her teenage Years onwards, she was a major supporter of Israel, wasn't she?
Speaker 2: Major supporter. I mean, she worships her husband Who've been deeply committed, son of Baron Itmar. It was due to him, I think, that she became interested. But once she became interested, she became Passionately interested. After his death, she became even more committed.
She just wanted to carry out His wishes and what he cared deeply about. And you can read letters from her to Weitzman and from Weitzman to her when she was only 17. And what she did, which is crucially important, was to connect Uplightsman with the British establishment.
Speaker 0: I think she also trained him in how to deal. She helped educate her how how It's true that
Speaker 2: age, but she did tell the Weitzman, you know, how to Kind of integrate, had to insert himself into British establishment life which he learned very quickly.
Speaker 0: So I'm here in the Archives where there is a treasure trove of remarkable documents from the time of the Balfour Declaration. We have the correspondence here between the teenage Dorothy and her husband James. And it's really a love story. Here we have detailed letters describing her dealings with Zionist leaders, Her advice and her suggestions regarding the the conferences of the Zionist movement. And here we have a letter that the young Dorothy, still not 20, sent to doctor Chaim Weizmann, where she's talking about the meetings that she's arranged for him.
And as we've heard, she was helpful in in training and preparing him to enter into the highest echelons of British society to advance the cause of the Zionist movement.