TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheGeorgeHQ

TheGeorgeHQ
Posted - April 9, 2024 at 6:57 AM
Saved - June 1, 2024 at 1:18 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Charlie Spies, a former Jeb Bush supporter, has been critical of Donald Trump, calling him a threat to democracy and a grifter. He has stated that there was no evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election and has praised Joe Biden's inauguration. Spies has also made anti-Trump comments and suggested that Trump is an anti-Semite. There are claims that he may have voted for Hillary Clinton. Videos of Spies discussing voting machines and appearing on CNN have been shared. Some individuals are calling for Spies to be removed from his position.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

🧵Introducing, Charlie Spies. 1. In Sept 2016 he joined forces with his friend Mark Elias to condemn @realDonaldTrump as a threat to democracy, in response to Trump’s debate answer when asked if he would accept his loss. 2. In Sept - October 2016 Spies was calling Trump a grifter on @CBSNews for trying to make money on running for office. 3. As head of Jeb Super pac In 2015 primary, Spies authored a letter to FEC making fun of Trumps bankruptcies and foreign policy experience. 4. Spies, on CPAC panel in 2021 said 2020 election was not stolen, that other side had better message and candidate. (See video) 5. Spies said in multiple interviews there was no evidence of vote fraud in 2020. He claims that @OANN was liable for their report. 6. On Jan 20, 2021 Spies tweeted out that he was excited for a new day in the White House with a picture of his cat watching the Biden inauguration. He said, “God bless Joe Biden and Kamala Harris”. He said the inauguration performance was great. 7. He was 2023 Desantis general counsel actively tweeting anti Trump comments. RT’ing Mike Pence calling him good. 8. Wife Lisa Spies suggested in 2016 that Trump is an anti-Semite. She also suggested J6 was horrible day turning people off to giving to republicans. 9. Mitt Romney loyaliist and has been in multi interviews saying that he is a Jeb Bush guy and a Romney guy and that Trump was the remaining. 10. It’s likely that he voted for Hilary Clinton…

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

Here’s @cspiesdc comments on Georgia:

Video Transcript AI Summary
Votes in Georgia were counted three times using paper and machines. Concerns were raised about the lack of transparency and oversight in the vote review process, especially during adjudication. The speakers emphasized the importance of open-source voting programs to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation. They highlighted the need for concrete evidence and clear processes to build trust in the election system. Open-source systems were seen as a way to increase transparency and accountability in elections.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But to be fair, there were the votes were counted 3 times in Georgia. Speaker 1: We had paper Speaker 0: with people Speaker 1: and machine. Exactly. Speaker 0: And Yeah. Speaker 1: Either way. Wouldn't there be Speaker 0: evidence of just one vote being flipped? Speaker 1: I'm not I agree with you, Charlie. Completely. If you Speaker 2: look at it from a philosophical back then. Speaker 1: In the vote review process and adjudication. And I'm not saying it was done. But the fact of the matter is as an as a vote review panelist, we could sit down in front of the computer. Nobody knew who sat there and who changed made modifications of the voters intent. I'm saying there was no checks and balances to audit that. But that's very different with this woman. Speaker 0: Actual vote. You're saying we're observing the counting of the vote. Speaker 1: No. I'm talking when the scanning system has the inability to read and process the ballot. It goes into something called adjudication. So that in itself, there's a supposed to be a bipartisan review panel. 1 is a democrat, 1's a republican. And when you're doing it on the computer in Georgia, you have the ability to change the vote of the person that you your of the ballot, you have to agree on it to change it. So it could be an overvote, an undervote, a mark, a hesitation mark, but the bipartisan review panel is supposed to agree on the modification with the supervision of an election supervisor. So that's when the modification is. Speaker 0: But that's of the county. Now do you still have the paper ballot? Somebody could go back and look at that paper ballot? Speaker 1: No. Because we don't understand what happens at the chain of custody after the fact. So in that, there was they if we had 2 sets of review panels operating, One that was bipartisan, which was a Democrat and Republican, and then a nonpartisan pair. They operated independently for 5 days in DeKalb County. And their job solely was to adjudicate the special election and constitutional amendment portions of the general election. So there was no controls in place. No supervision, no bipartisan oversight. In the fact that they could go back, they could review the entire ballot. There were no locks on the ballot, whatsoever, and they were the final ones to process the ballot before it was cast. Until I brought that forth for within the 5 day window, we had over 800, almost 900 absentee ballots that were processed in such a manner. If it doesn't, it all goes to transparency. I mean, I think Speaker 2: even Charlie would agree. No. I totally agree. Speaker 1: That's very different. Speaker 2: So if you're in theory, let's look at it from, like I was going to say, philosophically, it's like having observers being able to actually see ballots being processed. If you had voting programs that were open source that people could look at the code that you could see how why is there even an algorithm in a voting machine. I'm not sure I know why that. But I read newspapers. I like old fashioned things that I can touch and feel and records that I can keep. And maybe that's just I'm dating myself and I know the world is changing and I'm not into cryptocurrency or any of that stuff. But it seems like the more concrete you can be with your evidence, the fewer opportunities there are for variables to interject themselves in the system, the safer the system can be. And by being transparent, people at least voters get to see what that process is. They can see what those variables are and they can understand the process And then that's not as much of an enigma. And I don't see why they won't people don't agree to do that. Speaker 1: That is putting fitness into our elections. Exactly. That's what we're saying. Open source to go. Yes. Exactly.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

Charlie Spies on, ‘the election wasn’t stolen’.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker emphasizes that despite concerns about the election, the focus should be on energizing voters with a strong message. Trust in the system is crucial, along with winning by a large margin to avoid disputes. In 2016, President Trump's significant victory made such issues irrelevant. The speaker urges action to change laws now and maximize voter turnout in 2022.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's all of these examples do not mean by the way that the election was stolen. It means that they were out there active and energized and had a message that got people to the polls. And so I found all the people that raised their hands and said their vote didn't count. Part of my reaction to that is we need to instill trust in the system and we need to change some of these laws. But more important is not the lawyers here, but all the political professionals and the politicians and the candidates to have a message that drives people to the polls and that we win by such a margin that it's not going to make a difference. I mean in 2016 President Trump by won by a large enough margin that any of these issues were a moot point. So let's not you know, don't sit on your hands. Get out there. Change the laws this year but then in 2022, we've got to take advantage of the laws whatever they are and get out there and vote.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

Charlie Spies on, ‘voting machines and OANN’. Note: They NEVER inspected any other machines in the state — so he’s making that statement with zero basis. ### #MAGA2024 CC @LauraLoomer, @JasonMillerinDC, @gc22gc, @NatalieJHarp, @DonaldJTrumpJr, @KariLake

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@LauraLoomer @JasonMillerinDC @gc22gc @NatalieJHarp @DonaldJTrumpJr @KariLake Video for previous post: @cspiesdc on ‘Voting machines and OANN’.

Video Transcript AI Summary
We need to address issues with computer voting, as seen in Antrim County, Michigan. Despite a programming error, it was caught and corrected the same day. There is no evidence of a statewide software glitch affecting other elections. Let's focus on winning elections instead of worrying about false claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think we need to start looking at computers, and it was the computer voting that was messed up horribly. And I think we need to to look into that. Ma'am It's not just about we need to think about what can we go back to, a hand vote, whatever, you know, paper ballots, but the computers are not working. Speaker 1: Ma'am, can I respectfully Speaker 0: Yes? Go ahead. Speaker 1: And I may get booed off stage for this, but I have to say that's simply not true. So no. OAN has now been sued for libel. And there is I would this is largely based upon what happened in Antrim County, Michigan, with the machines. And I was there. We we watched as they observed it. And yes, the machine there was a programming error that flipped boats, and it was caught and we caught it, and it was corrected the same day. And we were suspicious for a long time that perhaps there was a software glitch statewide because other people use the same software and there is just 0 evidence that's true. I'm sorry. Let's let's win it. Let's win the elections and not get worried about things that aren't true.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@LauraLoomer @JasonMillerinDC @gc22gc @NatalieJHarp @DonaldJTrumpJr @KariLake @cspiesdc Charlie Spies on @CNN —he’s a republican but “doesn’t have a dog in this fight”. #NoToSpies #MAGA2024

Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump needed to create memorable moments in the final debate to win over undecided voters, particularly women. Hillary Clinton focused on solidifying support among women by attacking Trump's comments on minorities. Trump's refusal to accept election results and calling Clinton "such a nasty woman" may hurt him, but likely won't change the outcome. The debates got progressively better, with the final one being the most policy-filled, but Trump needed a game changer to catch up in the polls.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is on Tuesday, November 8th. Nick? Speaker 1: Hi, Anita. Thank you. I'm joined now by Charlie Speese. He's a campaign lawyer. In full disclosure, Charlie is a Republican, but as they say, you don't have a dog in this fight. You are supporting neither candidate. So thanks for being here. First question, I think we can agree this is probably the most policy filled debate we've seen of the 3. What did Donald Trump need to accomplish coming into it, and did he do so? Speaker 0: He had the tougher task because he's down in the polls, so he had to create some memorable moments. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: And he also had to focus on the voters who were undecided, and those tend to be women Mhmm. Specifically married women and independent voters. And I don't know that he did anything to move the needle with that group of people. Speaker 1: Okay. One moment he did have when Chris Wallace pushed him, he would not commit to accepting the results of this election if he loses. Is that remarkable to you, or is that much ado about nothing? Speaker 0: It is a big deal, and something we've seen from the previous debates is that as important as And over the next few days, the media who aren't fans of his in the first place Mhmm. Are just gonna focus on that refusing to accept the results of the out or the outcome of the election. Mhmm. That doesn't make him look good, and I think people across the spectrum are gonna have problems with that. Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton had her problems tonight as well. One particular moment when Trump was hammering her about her experience 30 years, what has she done. Another point, when she was asked about the WikiLeaks emails. How do you think she responded to those questions? Because they have dogged her. Speaker 0: They have. And if Trump didn't have his own issues that were a little bit sexier, no pun intended, that were occupying the news, then we'd all be talking about WikiLeaks and the potential corruption at the State Department. And I think that'd be a big problem for her. She's very a very accomplished politician. Was able to pivot off that subject. So I think his supporters threw up a big cheer when they heard that when they heard him pushing on it. Mhmm. And also Chris Wallace Yes. Making some very serious points on it. But I don't think any of her supporters are going to drop her because she was attacked by Trump on that. Speaker 1: Were there any other moments where you thought she did well or did especially poorly tonight? Speaker 0: She was clearly focused on solidifying women voters, and she really hit Trump hard about his comments about women and other groups, the disabled and other types of minorities. And that's, I think, politically really smart because it's playing to the swing voters. Mhmm. Her hardcore Democrats and hardcore Republicans have already made up their mind. They have. She's she's the one being strategic and playing to undecided voters, and I think that was smart and she was very effective at it. Speaker 1: Trump was effective, especially in the early going, those first 20 minutes, did really well sticking on policy. Near the end, however, there was a moment. And since we are talking about female voters, Clinton was responding to a question from Chris Wallace, and Trump interjected, quote, such a nasty woman. Is that going to stick, do you think, and will that hurt him more? Speaker 0: I think it's very likely you see that in some ads. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: I think I cringed just as a political professional. I cringed when I heard that. Having said that, the people that are offended by that were already offended by his comments about, Miss Universe and his bragging about, sexual assault. So I don't think it makes a difference in terms of the outcome of the election. Yeah. Speaker 1: Because we've seen the polls have shown he has a floor about 40%. And if the video didn't hurt him, it's hard to believe maybe that comment would as well. This was the last of the 3. So there was all this buildup coming into it. In the remaining time, we got about 30, 45 seconds. What's your impression of these three debates between the two candidates? Speaker 0: They got progressively better. Speaker 1: Mhmm. Speaker 0: This was the most substantive debate. It was. This is what people wanted to see at the beginning. I think the challenge for Donald Trump is he's behind and he needed a game changer, and he didn't get one. Speaker 1: Alright. Charlie Spies, campaign lawyer with lots of experience, and we do appreciate you being here to talk about this very much. Speaker 0: My pleasure. Speaker 1: Alright. Now if you would like

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@LauraLoomer @JasonMillerinDC @gc22gc @NatalieJHarp @DonaldJTrumpJr @KariLake @cspiesdc @CNN @RNCResearch @TeamTrump @RNCVoteProtect On CNN with Jonathan Mann: Charlie Spies

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker, a political law attorney, explains that rigging a national election in the US is not possible due to bipartisan checks and balances at multiple levels. He dismisses the idea of collaboration between parties to rig an election. He also addresses concerns about hack attacks on electoral systems, emphasizing the presence of poll watchers from both parties. The speaker criticizes Donald Trump's claims of election rigging as poor political strategy. Trump's actions are compared to past attempts by Democrats to delegitimize election results. The speaker concludes that Trump should focus on encouraging voter turnout and delivering a winning message.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As you heard, a lot of people say it's just not possible to rig a national election in the US. Are they right? Well, joining us to talk about it is Charlie Spies, political law attorney and former election law counsel for the Republican National Committee. Thanks so much for being with us. I have to ask you, how can everyone be so sure, everyone except Donald Trump, that this election is not in some way vulnerable to rigging or fraud? Speaker 1: Jonathan, a presidential election in America can't be rigged because there's multilevels of checks and balances, and those checks and balances are done in a bipartisan way. Any votes can be tracked in terms of what's on the machines, and then you can go back and make sure it wasn't tampered with. And that's done by state and local officials who are from different parties across the board, depending on where the election's taken place. And the scale of conspiracy and collaboration that would have to take place to rig a national election would assume that Republican governors and Republican secretaries of state across the country were all working together with Democrats to try and hurt a Republican nominee, and that's just not plausible. Speaker 0: What about someone outside of the political process in the United States? I mean, someone outside the country maybe. I asked that question because more than 20 states have reported hack attacks on their electoral systems. That seems to be serious. Think about Speaker 1: how voting happens. You've got a voting machine, and we have poll watchers at the local level. And the machines attract the vote, and then that's reported into a sub location, and there's people monitoring the votes coming in. Republican poll watchers there. And then that goes into a state location where they track the votes. And, again, you have Republican poll watchers there and Democratic poll watchers. So both sides Speaker 0: are represented watching the votes coming in and tracking them. Too many sets of eyes from political parties that have no reason to wanna cooperate. So why does Donald Trump keep talking about this? I mean, you're a Republican. In purely mercenary terms, is it smart politics? Speaker 1: It's terrible politics. Now to be fair, you will recall that in 2001, democrats spent years, including including Hillary Clinton in 2002, trying to delegitimize George w Bush's election and saying things like selected, not elected. So this does go on on both sides. But what's remarkable here is Donald Trump seems to be conceding the election and making excuses for losing. Smart politically, he would be much smarter to be trying to encourage his supporters to get out and vote and have a winning message rather than preparing them to lose. Speaker 0: Charlie Speas, attorney at law, Thanks so much for talking with us. Also at the debate, Trump took a swipe at another American institution that passed him over, The

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

ANOTHER shocking video of NEW @RNCResearch Chief Counsel, Charlie Spies (@cspiesdc) that everyone needs to see! Here he is on #CNN discussing Donald Trump endorsements with, Fredricka Whitfield (@FWhitfield)

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hillary Clinton has support from 11 Fortune 100 CEOs, while an undecided lifelong Republican is hesitant to vote for Donald Trump due to concerns about his temperament. Business leaders are hesitant to support Trump due to his behavior and lawsuits against his companies. Despite this, some Republican donors are funding efforts to keep Clinton's numbers down to maintain control of the Senate. Comparisons are drawn between Mitt Romney's successful business record and Trump's history of bankruptcies. The key for Trump to win over business leaders is to focus on his message of change in Washington.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hillary Clinton on the other hand has received support from 11 CEOs in the top Fortune 100. So I want to bring in Charlie Spies. He has served as CFO and counsel for Mitt Romney's 2008 presidential campaign and calls himself an undecided lifelong rep Good to see you, Charles. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: Okay. So is this the year that you are no longer going to vote Republican? If you're a lifelong Republican, but you're undecided, help me understand what that means. Speaker 1: It means that I'm not a Hillary Clinton supporter. I I'm horrified by hearing what I have about the FBI investigation and her chief of staff. Speaker 0: But the Republican nominee is Donald Trump. So are you voting for Donald Trump? Speaker 1: I hope he can win me over in the next 35 days. Speaker 0: With your vote? Speaker 1: With my vote. Yes. Okay. The attacks So Speaker 0: then you're not undecided. Make it. Okay. So I just wanted to make that I was just a little confused of being undecided lifelong Republican, so you're not undecided. You are voted Speaker 1: for Why are you saying I'm not I'm I don't understand that argument. I'm saying I'm not a Hillary Clinton fan, but I haven't decided if I can vote for Donald Trump. Speaker 0: Oh, so Speaker 1: And then Okay. Speaker 0: I thought you just said you were voting for Donald Trump, so you're not. Speaker 1: No. I did not. I'm sorry. Speaker 0: Okay. So let's move on now to this, Fortune 100 list then. Why is it Donald Trump is not winning support, by fellow businessmen and women who are in the Fortune 100 list? Speaker 1: Well, The Wall Street Journal interviewed one of those business leaders this week who's always voted Republican, and he said that mister Trump's temperament is the major issue, that the attacks on the disabled women, Hispanics, make it very hard for him and his colleagues to publicly support her support Trump, and I think that's the prevalent sentiment. Having said that, you have seen some of the most influential Republican donors in the past week funding that were on the sidelines, now coming on board and funding an effort to keep Hillary Clinton's numbers down so that we can maintain control of the Senate, which is gonna be critically important as a bulwark against either one of them if they become president. Speaker 0: Is it odd to you that someone who is touting his business prowess and his track record as a billionaire for a very long time being in the public as a very successful businessman for decades that he wouldn't be winning support by fellow very successful business people who are on a list of the top 100 of the Fortune list. Speaker 1: When you see the list of law suits against his companies and how he conducted his business, it's not surprising. But I think an important point is that doesn't mean that they support Hillary Clinton's policies. It's more of a temperament issue. Speaker 0: So other 11 as we understand, 11 of the top 100 CEOs are backing Hillary Clinton. Speaker 1: So 11%, I don't think is a great number. Speaker 0: Will anything change within the next 38 days in your view? Speaker 1: I think up before the debate, Trump was doing a good job of making it acceptable for people like business leaders to come on board with him. Things pretty much collapsed over the past week with the poor debate performance and then the tweet storms. And don't underestimate how if you're a public CEO, you're in you see have public scrutiny. You have shareholders to respond to. And when somebody is attacking this universe and making very offensive attacks, it makes it hard for you to come on board with supporting them. Speaker 0: And and so, Charlie, you worked with the Mitt Romney campaign. As I mentioned, he won about a third support of that top 100 Fortune Group. How do you compare and contrast, you know, the record, the business record of a Mitt Romney and a Donald Trump? Speaker 1: There is no comparison. Governor Romney, even Democrats admit that he was a phenomenal businessman and groundbreaking with his work at Bain Capital. Trump's business record is rife with bankruptcies and failed then. So you don't see the same sort of respect there. And Governor Romney also articulated a conservative vision of pro growth economics. And I don't think there's a belief that, Donald Trump is necessarily up to speed on what it takes with the economy. Having said all of that, there's a real discontentment with voters and with the business community that think it is rigged against them. And if Donald Trump can go back to that change of Washington message and point out that Hillary Clinton's part of the corrupt system in Washington, that's the winning message that still can win over business leaders Speaker 0: Alright. Speaker 1: But he's gotta stick to that and make it possible for people to support it. Speaker 0: Alright. Let's see what happens perhaps in 8 days for that second presidential debate, Charlie Spies. Thank you so much. Appreciate it. Speaker 1: Thank you. Speaker 0: And as a reminder, this Tuesday, first, we got

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@RNCResearch @cspiesdc @FWhitfield When you FAFO #charliespies #Agenda47

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@RNCResearch @cspiesdc @FWhitfield 👀 One down… many more to go 🤞🏻 https://www.georgiarecord.com/politics/2024/05/05/mercenaries-surround-president-trump-not-maga-attorney-charlie-spies-forced-out-in-continuing-shake-up/

Mercenaries Surround President Trump - Not MAGA - Attorney Charlie Spies Forced Out In Continuing Shake Up Steve Bannon is the only person who can right the Trump ship. georgiarecord.com

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

@RNCResearch @cspiesdc @FWhitfield Another name coming soon..

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

If Charlie Spies (@cspiesdc) had believed in @realDonaldTrump the way his wife, Lisa Spies believes in @justinbieber, he wouldn't have been FIRED by The Boss, TWICE!! Lisa, a 'never Trumper' who once worked for Judas aka @Mike_Pence, seems to have a strange obsession with Justin Bieber and has even stated publically: "I would like to declare myself the World's #1 Belieber! Just had the best time in Orlando with the Ultimate VIP experience (basically backyard games with Justin's face on them) just can't get enough😀"

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

On one occasion, she even held a "29th birthday party" for the Canadian pop sensation, where she declared: "Hey Justin Bieber as your true #1 fan, I had a birthday celebration for you last night! Happy 29th Birthday JB!! Maybe next year you can actually come to the party, how fun would that be! We could karaoke for hours!" #Agenda47 #WhosNextOnTheList

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE NEWS

🚨Bookmark this thread. Will be adding names to 'a list'. 📑

TheGeorgeHQ
Posted - November 14, 2023 at 5:45 AM
Saved - November 14, 2023 at 6:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Diane Estelle Engoron, sister-in-law of Judge Arthur Engoron, deleted her X/Twitter account after being contacted about her posts. She and her family share a strong dislike for former President Trump. Meanwhile, Diane and her husband, Gerry Engoron, fell in love with Saratoga County and chose Stonebridge for their retirement. They preferred a vibrant community with younger residents, rather than an age-restricted one.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

The sister in law, of Corrupt TDS Judge, Arthur Fredericks Engoron, DIANE ESTELLE ENGORON (Ballston Lake, NYC) has DELETED HER X ACCOUNT today! The X/Twitter account, was created with an email address and cell phone number, confirmed to be owned/linked to her. It was deleted within minutes, after she was contacted regarding her posts. As you can see in the video below (saved last week) she and the rest of her family, all share the same 'Trump Derangement Syndrome'. 'Judge Nuddie', aka Arthur Engoron, shared news clippings, where he is specifically mentioned as 'The Trump Trial Judge', via his Wheatley Alumni newsletter. His wife Dawn and sister in law, Diane - who is married to Gerald (Gerry) Engoron, his brother, also shared their distain for The Greatest President of our lifetime via Twitter/𝕏 - as reported by @LauraLoomer This "trial" is done. It's over.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

Here is a higher re version of the video: 720pX720p - PLEASE SHARE this thread 🙏 https://t.co/drVhKvPeGK

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

Downsizing young boomers want perks, 'resort-style' communities. "Long Island natives Diane and Gerry Engoron fell in love with Saratoga County 30 years ago. When it came time to plan for retirement, they looked at every housing development in the county with listings less than $400,000. They knew they wanted a one-level single family home with proximity to a path for walking, running and cycling. They found what they were looking for in Ballston Lake at Stonebridge, which is a mixture of single-family homes and townhouses and apartments for rent. "While age-restricted works for some, others, like the Engorons, reject the idea. Although the couple doesn't have children, Diane Engoron said she likes living near children and younger people." It feels more alive to me, it's how we grew up," she said." https://www.timesunion.com/living/article/New-home-base-12309453.php

TheGeorgeHQ
Posted - November 13, 2023 at 9:53 PM
Saved - November 13, 2023 at 10:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Diane Estelle Engoron, sister of corrupt judge Arthur Engoron, has deleted her X account after being contacted about her posts. The account was linked to her email and phone number. In a video, she and her family exhibit Trump Deranged Syndrome. Arthur Engoron, known as "Judge Nuddie," shared news clippings where he is referred to as "The Trump Trial Judge." His wife and sister also expressed their disdain for the former president. Calls for his recusal and dismissal of the case are growing. The X account details have been archived.

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

🚨EXCLUSIVE / BREAKING The sister of Corrupt TDS Judge, Arthur Fredericks Engoron, DIANE ESTELLE ENGORON (Ballston Lake, NYC) has DELETED HER X ACCOUNT within the last hour! The X account, was created with an email address and cell phone number, confirmed to be owned/linked to her. It was deleted within minutes, after she was contacted regarding her posts. As you can see in the video below (saved last week) she and the rest of her family, all share the same 'Trump Deranged Syndrome' 'Judge Nuddie', aka Arthur Engoron, shared news clippings, where he is specifically mentioned as 'The Trump Trial Judge', via his Wheatley Alumni newsletter. His wife, Dawn AND sister, Diane also shared their distain for The Greatest President of our lifetime. He needs to recuse himself immediately, and the case needs to be thrown out stat! 🎯X Account has been archived in FULL. 🎯Email address used: mainecooncatz@_ _ _ _ _.com 🎯Cell used: 518-878-_ _36 CC @LauraLoomer

TheGeorgeHQ
Posted - November 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM
Saved - November 4, 2023 at 4:37 PM

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

5o years from now, academic scholars, world leaders and the like, will look back on this report and they will all agree, that it paid an integral part in the reshaping of the nation and the world.

TheGeorgeHQ
Posted - October 23, 2023 at 9:08 PM
Saved - October 23, 2023 at 9:27 PM

@TheGeorgeHQ - GEORGE

🚨 @elonmusk: "We're sleepwalking our way into WW3." https://t.co/FAlcRIs625

Video Transcript AI Summary
We may be sleepwalking into World War 3 due to a series of foolish decisions. It's important for people to reflect on their predictions and consider their track record. In the investing and VC world, track...
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I I think we are sleepwalking our way into World War 3 sleepwalking our way into World War 3 with with one foolish decision after another, as you as you outlined, David. And and really people should be deeply self reflective. If they if their predictions have not come true, they should consider whether perhaps their other predictions might not come true either. I mean, what is the track record here? It's not good. Speaker 1: You know, it's funny. In in the investing world, out. You know, in the VC world in which, you know, we we operate, track
View Full Interactive Feed