TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheGlobeIsDead
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Space and its vacuum. Would combustion work? If it would work, where to push on? There’s only one conclusion: #SpaceIsFake and #NasaLies But don’t tell it too loud. I may dried out those space cowboys wet dreams. Sorry for that. https://t.co/xJtiYVWFZE
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker demonstrates various experiments in a vacuum chamber to show the effects of atmospheric pressure on different substances. They first use a feather to show that it remains stationary in a low-pressure environment, simulating the conditions on Mars. They then try to ignite gunpowder and rocket candy, but both fail to burn in the vacuum. Finally, they test acetone peroxide, which also does not ignite. These experiments highlight the inability of combustion to occur in a vacuum.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A little feather right there. As you can see, suspended in front of a 12 volt electric fan. See, I got the batteries, the pressure gauge, and everything in there. To turn it on, I have a little tilt switch that's magnetically controlled. You can see when I turn the fan on, it blows a feather all over the place.
This is, of course, an atmospheric pressure right now. So I wanna take this down to martian conditions. You, might have noticed the martian reference over there. First thing I'm gonna do is add a little bit of dry ice to the chamber. Just so that, the atmosphere gets replaced with c o two.
Many of you guys were complaining about that last time. So now I should have a c of 2 atmosphere, or at least it'll create 1. And now we're gonna suck out all of the air, or at least most of it, down to the point for about, between 4 to 6 millimeters of mercury, which is, of course, the pressure on the surface of Mars. So let's plug in the vacuum pump. And there we go.
In this little while, it's sucked down. These pieces of c o two looked really interesting in the vacuum. The gas produced caused them to levitate and float all over the place. But if you can See the gauge over there? You can see that the air pressure is just about to the point where it's would be considered the surface of Mars.
So since we're at Martian air pressure, let's unplug the vacuum pump. And, let's turn on this fan. Now place your bet test on what's gonna happen to this feather. Now the fan's only gonna produce maybe 10 miles per hour worth of wind. On the surface of Mars, the fastest recorded wind speed is about 70 miles an hour.
But let's say the super storm in the Martian had wind speeds of 200 miles an hour. 20 times what we have here. To compensate for that, I imagine the feather is about 20 times easier to push over than a spaceship. So let's see what happens. Fan's on.
And the feather's not moving. Can I click zoom in on that? This 2nd experiment proves that combustion is not possible in a vacuum. So how about something that has its own oxidizer, such as gunpowder? See, this is a mixture of charcoal, sulfur, and potassium nitrate.
When heated, the potassium nitrate gives us oxygen, which is sulfur y, and charcoal uses to burn. So I got a little bit sitting in there. Let's apply the laser goggles. And let's light it off. 1st in the atmosphere and then in the vacuum.
Okay. As you can see, it produced lots of smoke and burned rather quickly. Most of the air is now gone. Let's see what happens. The gunpowder did not ignite.
And that's it. The gunpowder does not burn. And so I'm going to be burning some rocket candy. This is a mixture of sugar, potassium nitrate, and iron oxide. This is used in amateur rockets because the ingredients are readily available and the amount of thrust it produces is quite high.
So let's light this on fire and see how it does. So So this is in earth atmosphere. Moved it around. So now let's try it inside of a vacuum. No ignition.
That's interesting. I did see some little poofs as it tried to burn, but it was unable to sustain itself. So even when it's in 1 solid piece, they can't chain and continue burning. Acetone peroxide in the atmosphere in 321. Yes.
That's a a little bit more volatile than gunpowder is. Acetone peroxide and vacuum in 3, 2, one. It still didn't
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Before asking again for a FE map. What’s wrong with yours? https://t.co/3wKMuWBOOE
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
You think #FlatEarth is a psyop? There’s only one model. The one you stand on. The one reality. Research for. Get free. Truth. https://t.co/v4t7gHVnBD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hello, it's me. I'm questioning the theory of gravity and its conflation with buoyancy and the sun's proximity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. It's me. You know when the information's done, and why we were still naive. Program me, I believe. The night nurse is a ring, we don't feel the ears spinning.
Hello? Can you hear me? The Did you well start to question the conflation of gravity as a theory? Funny thing, force long can be explained with buoyancy and entity, the sun is closer. And what they told the the
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone. Remember. Earth is a flat and motionless plane. Until that curve, spin, tilt and wobble is proofed. #FlatEarth #Reality Get free from the prison. https://t.co/zoJcoE4OlO
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker challenges the idea that the Earth is a globe and presents what they believe to be scientific facts. They argue that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to claim that the Earth is a curved sphere. They also claim that objects can be observed at great distances, contradicting the idea of a globe Earth. The speaker mentions that the horizon always appears flat, and Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while other stars revolve around it. They question the unobservable theories of Earth's spinning and the Milky Way's motion through space. The speaker invites viewers to explore more on this topic through the provided links.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Has long been touted as the mother of all conspiracy theories, suppressed and for centuries as being an ignorant, unscientific world view. But the facts of the matter are far from what you've been told. It is a fact, not a theory that bodies of water always seek and find their own level level level level. From a pond, lake, or an ocean, the natural physics of water is defined and remain level level level. It is a fact that the majority of Earth is covered in such level water level water.
Thus making it an unscientific theory to postulate that Earth is actually a gigantic sphere with bendy oceans curving all the way around it. It is an unproven, unscientific theory with no observable, measurable, or repeatable evidence to claim that bodies of water can somehow bend, cling to the exterior of shapes and show convexity upon their surface. It is a fact, it. Not a theory. That we are able to observe objects at incredibly long distances, far beyond what would be possible if Earth were a globe 25,000 miles in circumference, as we're told.
For example, it the fact that in Genoa, Italy, from just above sea level, it is possible to see the distant islands of Elba, Caprea, and Corsica The globe Earth must curve 8 inches per mile squared if it really be a ball 25 1,000 miles in circumference as we're told. But based on such a theory, these islands would all be completely hidden behind thousands of feet of curved earth. It is a fact, not a theory, that the horizon always appears perfectly flat, 360 degrees around the observer regardless of altitude. All amateur balloon, walk in, plane, and drone footage show a completely flat horizon as high as we can reach. Over 20 miles or 120,000 feet up.
It is an observable, testable, repeatable, scientific of reality. That Polaris, the North Pole star, situated perfectly over the North Pole center of Earth never moves a single inch. Night after night, year after year, century after century, with all the other fixed stars, remaining fixed in their relative constellations, revolving perfect circles around Polaris. It is also an unobservable, unscientific theory to claim that the Earth is spinning a 1000 miles per hour, and the Milky Way shoots millions of miles per hour more off through infinite space when we cannot see, hear, feel, or otherwise observe or prove any such motion. And we can see clearly for ourselves, Polaris never moving and all the other stars revolving around it.
This is just a brief introduction to the many observable, testable, repeatable, scientific facts of our level, motionless unintuitive theories purporting we live on a tilting, wobbling, spinning, ball shaped earth. To learn much more about this most important and highly censored topic. Please follow the links in the description box.
reSee.it AI Summary
In Australia, seeing Polaris is impossible due to the limitations of our eyes' physiology and the "dome of vision." Objects billions of light years away are beyond our visual reach. For more insight, check out Eric's explanation: youtube.com/@FlatEarthEric?si=ZWEzE0fp6vXB7PLc. #ResearchFlatEarth #Fact
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone. Can we see Polaris from Australia? Once more perspective and its understanding is crucial. Important to comprehend how our eyes physiology and so the creation of our “dome of vision” will limit us. We can’t see objects billions of light years away. #ResearchFlatEarth #Fact See the often questioned explanation from master Eric. https://youtube.com/@FlatEarthEric?si=ZWEzE0fp6vXB7PLc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Globe earthers believe that the North Pole star cannot be seen from southern locations due to the curvature of the Earth. However, the phenomenon of stars declining overhead as one travels south or north has nothing to do with the Earth's curvature. It is a result of the law of perspective, where the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes as one moves farther away. This causes the object to appear to sink to the horizon and eventually disappear. The visibility of stars like Polaris is often mentioned, but many other stars and constellations can be seen from a wide range of latitudes, which contradicts the idea of a globe Earth. The declination of the pole star actually supports the notion of a stationary plane.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Globe earthers are taught that the reason the North Pole star cannot be seen from southern locations like Australia or New Zealand, is because it is hidden behind the supposed curvature of their globular earth. Similar to what is taught about boats disappearing beyond the horizon, and they claim these boats, and the pole star, are disappearing behind the physical curvature of a globe, and insist if the earth was truly a stationary plane, that Australians should have no trouble viewing Polaris. The fact of the matter is that all stars positioned north of a southbound traveler gradually decline overhead the farther the observer travels southwards, birds, just as all stars positioned south of a northbound traveler, gradually decline overhead the farther the observer travels northwards. Likewise, all stars located north of a northbound traveler gradually rise overhead the farther farther the observer travels northwards, while all stars located south of a southbound traveler gradually rise overhead the farther the observer travels elsewards. This phenomenon has absolutely nothing to do with the supposed curvature of a globe, and everything to do with the law of perspective, which dictates that the angle and height at which an object is seen diminishes the farther one recedes from the object, until, at a certain point, the line of sight and the seemingly uprising surface of the earth converges to a vanishing point, in this case, the horizon line, beyond which the object becomes invisible.
Thomas Winship wrote, If we select a flat street a mile long containing a row of lamps, it will be noticed that from where we stand, the lamps gradually decline to the ground, the last one being apparently quite on the ground. Take the lamp at the end of the street and walk away from it a 100 yards, and it will appear to be much nearer to the ground than when we were close to it. Keep thawing walking away from it, and it will appear to be gradually depressed until it is last seen on the ground and then disappears. Now, according to the astronomers, the whole mile was only depressed about 8 inches from one end to the other, so that this 8 inches could not account for the enormous depression of the light as we recede from it. This proves that the depression of the pole star can and does take place in relation to a flat surface, simply because we increase our distance from it, the same as from the street lamp.
In other words, the further away we get from any object above us, as a star for example, the more it is depressed, and if we go far enough, it will sink, or appear to sink, to the horizon and then disappear. Furthermore, globe earthers always mention and visibility issues, specifically with Polaris, because it can only be seen by observers north of the equator, which could seemingly fit their narrative of disappearing due to curvature. Many other stars and constellations, however, are visible for a much wider spectrum of observers, far beyond what would be possible on a globe. For instance, Ursa Major, very close to Polaris, can be seen from 90 degrees north latitude, the North Pole, all the way down to 30 degrees south latitude. The constellation Vulpecula can be seen from 90 degrees north latitude all the way to 55 degrees south latitude, Taurus, Pisces, and Leo can be seen from 90 degrees North all the way to 65 degrees South.
Aquarius and Libra can be seen from 65 degrees North to 90 degrees south. The constellation Virgo is visible from 80 degrees north down to 80 degrees south, and Orion can be seen from 85 degrees north all the way to 75 degrees south latitude. Observers on a ball earth, regardless of any supposed tilt or inclination, should not logically be able to see this far. And once again, rather than the declination of the pole star proving the globe, it provides yet more evidence that earth is a stationary plane.
Eric Dubay
Flat Earth, Conspiracy, Science, Spirituality, Health, History, New World Order, Secret Societies, Atlantis, Yoga, Martial Arts, Veganism and more
youtube.com
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Did you know you can make a lot of money with posting faked images from space? Don’t get confused if those “money makers” try to convince you with a lie. Again. It’s all about money, ask NASA. https://t.co/Fe1NIvVyHp
Video Transcript AI Summary
You can earn up to $9,000 per month by reposting NASA footage, which is non-copyrighted due to being funded by taxpayers. Simply visit NASA's website, go to Hi Def Videos, and choose a video to repost. Channels like "videos from space" earn ad revenue by reposting NASA videos. This is confirmed by NASA's usage guidelines.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know you can make up to $9,000 per month just reposting NASA footage? On NASA's website, there are numerous videos just like this that you can download and repost. All you have to do is go to their website, go to Hi Def Videos, and you can find a video that you want to repost. You're able to do this because NASA is funded by taxpayer money, and because of that, It is non copyright. If you doubt me at all, it says it right here on the NASA usage guidelines.
So, you're probably wondering, how do you actually make money doing this. See, there are channels just like this, videos from space, that just simply repost the videos from NASA and earn ad revenue from it. And here's proof if you don't believe me.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
The only people who are mad at you for speaking the truth are those people who are living a lie. Keep speaking the truth. #FlatEarth #Truth https://t.co/lwt3EWZymZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The mainstream media is often criticized for parroting the same narrative and being disconnected from our reality. They are seen as paid actors reading a script given to them by a higher power that doesn't care about us. Their focus is on fear, war, and trauma.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Always remember, whenever you hear the mainstream media parroting the same narrative all at the same time acting like they care about our well-being, you have to remember, they are paid actors reading a script, most of them completely disconnected from our reality. This is important. When you hear them That script was given to them by a higher power that doesn't give a shit about you and your family. And if you pay close attention to what they're really saying, all they talk about is fear, war, trauma,
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone. Let’s look into the sextant and why it never would work on a globe. A triangulation always needs angles. A curved surface will never creat an angle. That simple. #FlatEarth #Facts https://t.co/JTDFD69Ag1
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the concept of angles and how they relate to the Earth's curvature. They explain that it is not possible to have a 90-degree angle on a curved surface, and even AutoCAD software confirms this. The speaker questions those who believe in a globe Earth, asking where they get their 90 degrees, straight lines, and circle of equal altitude, as none of these seem to be available on a sphere. The video concludes with a thank you for watching.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm gonna look at it from an orthographic view. Okay. If we're standing here on the Earth, this is the angle to the celestial body. Let's take a line from our position representing the horizon the angle formed here is definitely not 90 degrees And even at the position where it meets the earth, you can't have a 90 degree angle to a curved surface. And AutoCAD will actually verify this because if I choose the angular dimension command and I picked this line and this line, it will give me an angle between them.
If I try to pick this line And this arc, it says here, object selected is not aligned. So it will just not give me an angle. And why would it? How could it? The angle will be different at every single point on the arc.
So the question is, To the people who believe we live on a globe, 1, where are you getting your 90 degrees? 2, Where are you getting your straight line to form the 90 degrees? And 3, where are you getting your circle of equal altitude? Because from what I'm seeing, None of them are available to us using a sphere. Thanks for watching folks.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the use of a sextant in celestial navigation and questions which horizon is being observed on a globe. They argue that the concept of a refracted horizon makes it impossible to measure angles and navigate using celestial bodies. The speaker criticizes the idea of presupposing a spherical Earth and creating artificial horizons to compensate for the refracted horizon. They claim that the black swan theory has debunked the curvature of the Earth and rendered celestial navigation on a globe impossible. The speaker concludes by stating that the globe theory has been invalidated since January 1, 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The number 1, flat earth proof. The premise to this starts with the sextant and how we use the sextant in celestial navigation. We look directly through the sextant at the horizon, but if you live on a globe, What horizon are you actually looking at Globus? Is it the earth horizon? The water horizon?
The horizontal reference plane? The visible horizon? How about the sensible horizon? The geodial horizon, or the celestial horizon, well it's certainly not the geometric horizon, you know, Earth curve? No.
That was debunked by the black swan over 18 months ago, but now the globe believing zealots tell us that their horizon is refracted. It's not an actual horizon. So how do we have a tangent to a refracted horizon? When you're viewing a star on a globe, how are we measuring an angle to horizon If it's refracted, you will never ever get an angle to a refracted horizon. This is a major problem if you think you live on a globe because celestial navigation would be impossible.
So what have you done to keep your religion of a sphere Earth semi plausible? You've presupposed that That line 90 degrees above your head, the zenith, actually runs to the center of your presupposed spherical Earth, and Ninety degrees from that, you've made up a new horizon, the celestial horizon, which you say is a horizontal plane passing through the Earth's center perpendicular to the zenith. So after presupposing all these things, you can now use your sextant. But globe believers realizing that their Visual horizon is refracted, can't yet look at the horizon through the sextant, so yet another horizon is needed to be They use the bubble level in the sextant to create the artificial horizon, which we are then told is parallel to the celestial horizon, Essentially, taking away the curvature of the earth because even globe believers know you cannot measure an angle To a curved surface you think's beneath your feet. Look at this, you're pretending you're living on a globe, but in order to measure angles You need to pretend you're living on a flat plane.
This is cognitive dissonance, Globas. You can't have it both ways. So now they can actually start and take a measurement from their zero point of the artificial horizon to the celestial body. Look at what the global believers are doing. They must treat what they see as flat in order to achieve an angle.
But there's 1 more step, and this is where it all falls apart for the globe. They then have to measure from the artificial horizon, a dip angle down to the visual horizon. The only actual horizon that we have. Remember that horizon that you said was earth curve that is now refracted? Do you all realize now how devastating the black swan actually is to the globe?
It has taken away your r value, the radius of your globe. And then it took away the curvature of the earth altogether when it forced you to say that the horizon was refracted. And together with the sextant, it's now taken away your ability to navigate. Since January 1, 2020, the globe has been dead.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Someone needs a morning laugher? Pseudo science is what they apply to get water sticking to a ball. Welcome to Spintardia. https://t.co/QdnqkrVo5K
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, Wolfie 6020 demonstrates water sticking to a spinning ball, which is a common request from Flat Earthers. He rubs his hand across the surface of the spinning ball, showing that his hand becomes wet. This proves that water can stick to the surface of a spinning ball. The speakers are amazed by this demonstration and find it funny. They also conduct their own experiment with a wet stone, showing that water sticks to it even when it is rotated. Overall, they praise Wolfie for proving that when you touch something wet, you get wet.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you guys seen this video that Wolfie put out? Wolfie 6020?
Speaker 1: I'm at a loss, man. I I don't know what to say. I think he proved, you know, what we've all thought was impossible. Let me, here. I'll play it for you.
It's about 40 seconds long or something.
Speaker 2: One of the common requests I hear from Flat Earthers is to demonstrate water sticking to a spinning ball. Currently, some of them believe this is not possible. Here we have A spinning ball. My hand is currently dry. I'm now going to rub my hand across the surface of this spinning ball.
And now my hand is wet. So clearly, we have water sticking to the surface of of the spinning ball. If you're one of those Flat Earthers who thinks this is not possible, please feel free to demonstrate your lack of understanding of physics in the comments below.
Speaker 1: There you go. Am I wrong? I I think I think he proved the spinning ball. I mean, he showed without a doubt. Sorry.
Hold on. I've been doing this for a long time, and to all of a sudden be upended is a bit it's a
Speaker 0: bit of a
Speaker 2: shock. He showed, without a doubt, that water makes makes things wet. I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: Oh my god. That was funny.
Speaker 0: Yeah. This this
Speaker 1: gumbo thinks he's proved something. Well, you did, Wolfie. Congratulations. You proved that water makes things wet. And and to verify what he did, here, I got me a stone right here, and, I'll wet it.
Right? And now it's wet, and he's got his that big rock ball is is kind of, being turned. It's, something is turning it. Right? And it's sitting in a puddle of water.
And so here, I'm gonna turn mine. Look at this. Water. Sticks
Speaker 2: to the rock. Wow.
Speaker 1: And and you can rotate it, and water is staying put on the rock. Here, let me touch my hand to it too. My hand is dry. I will now touch the wet bowl. And now when I touch the wet bowl, my hand is wet.
Wow. Wolfie, fantastic. You've proved that when you touch something wet, you get wet. Wow. I mean, unbelievable.
Fantastic work. I I I nominate him for a Nobel Prize. I mean, this is fantastic. Well, let's get serious. No Wolfie.
You just proved, like I said, the things
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
“Who put it there? The universe.” “I’m sure the United States would not present the world leaders a piece of petrified wood.” Lies over lies. Can’t you see? Wake up. NASA = Government #NasaLies https://t.co/qb8OzNmewp
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a recent incident where a moon rock displayed in a Dutch Museum was found to be petrified wood. They ask if the person they are speaking to, Neil, was aware of this when they possessed the rock. The speaker expresses disbelief and wonders who would have put the petrified wood there. They also mention that the United States would not present world leaders with a piece of petrified wood claiming it to be a moon rock. The speaker concludes by questioning what we have to show for the incident, mentioning rocks and other things.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rocks. As I'm sure you might have read in the newspapers recently, a, moon rock that was on display in the Dutch Museum which which you, Neil, and, might have given to the then ambassador to the Netherlands at the time. It turned out to be a piece of a petrified wood. I was wondering where at the time when you were in possession of this, you aware that this was petrified wood, or were you also led to believe that it was a genuine moon rock? So if we're Petrified wood.
Petrified wood. Yeah. Wow. That does sound like a game of wood. Now, Who did that?
We we we have no idea. But I'm sure the United States would not present the world leaders A piece of petrified wood claiming that it was, a sample in the world. And who put that there? Who put that there? Well, the universe put it there.
And what do we have to show for it? Rocks and other
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
See how circumnavigation is applied in reality. Look the route of The Ocean Race. Earth is flat, no doubt. https://t.co/AdP0Hu8SVG
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker explains that our magnetic center is the shoreline known as Antarctica that surrounds our world. They demonstrate this by placing a boat down and showing that the compass immediately points north. To circumnavigate, they decide to head west. However, they discover that as they continue west, the direction keeps turning. This results in them eventually ending up back where they started, illustrating how going west leads to a full circle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With our magnetic center, this is the shoreline that we call Antarctica that surrounds our world, and here's my boat. I put my boat down, and immediately, the compass points north. If I wanna circumnavigate, I wanna head west or east, So we're gonna go west right now. So I'm heading west. And as you see, west keeps turning.
So I have to keep going, and this is how when you go west, you end up going all the way back to where you started
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone. That’s how perspective works. No curve admitted on #FlatEarth https://t.co/tWrIS7mQCK
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
The #Ether. No doubt of its existence but hidden. The fifth element on #FlatEarth. And there is no way to leave this toroidal field. Perfect creation. https://t.co/HyKLnYDlJT
Video Transcript AI Summary
Free energy has been concealed from us to control our lives. Our ancestors possessed knowledge beyond our imagination, while we currently know very little as a species.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Free energy is a reality that has been hidden from us in order to maintain control over our lives in every facet. The truth of the matter is we are not at the pinnacle of mankind's evolution, and our ancestors knew things we can only imagine. Collectively, as a species, we know nothing. Only the
Video Transcript AI Summary
In Saudi Arabia, you can harness the power of the ether for free and unlimited energy. However, the elites today prioritize profit over providing free energy to the people. This is why much of our history has been intentionally concealed. In today's world, it's all about profits rather than prioritizing the well-being of individuals. It's important to question everything.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here and I'm out in Saudi Arabia and in the right conditions, you too can experience the power of the ether at your fingertips. Free and unlimited energy all around us. Yet free and energy are 2 words that'll never go together for the elites today. There is no profit in combining those 2 words. It is a big part alone why so much of our past has been deliberately hidden.
It's profits over people in today's world. It used to be the exact opposite. Question everything, friends.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Honestly, the Coriolis effect is ridiculous. But much more less than those spintards believing that proofs earth rotation. https://t.co/9GivqQQm2X
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker demonstrates the Coriolis effect using two sinks. They sprinkle oregano leaves in the water to show the flow direction. The first sink goes in the left direction, anticlockwise. Then they pull it out and the water goes straight down. Next, they try the other sink, which goes clockwise. They pour more water to make the cyclone more visible. The speaker emphasizes that one sink goes anticlockwise while the other goes clockwise. The video ends without further explanation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. So this is for all of those who still believes in the Coriolis effect. Here, we got a double sync. Right? I'm living in Canada.
So technically, both sink is supposed to, Go down in, the same direction. Right. I'm gonna sprinkle some, Some oregano leaves in the water so you can see the direction of the flow. So we'll start off with, this Okay. So So the leads are clearly going, in the left direction anticlockwise.
Okay. So now we'll pull this 1 out. Oh, what do you know? It went straight down. Now let's try this again with the other sink popped up.
Right? So now this sink is blocked up. We'll see which way they Oh my God. It's going clockwise. That was very quick.
I put a lot more water in there
Speaker 1: just so you can see it again.
Speaker 0: That might be a little bit hard
Speaker 1: to see for you guys, but,
Speaker 0: I wanted to do it one more time. I pour
Speaker 2: a lot more water so that the the cyclone is a little bit more prominent.
Speaker 1: That should be enough.
Speaker 0: Oh, look at that. It's going clockwise. That's right. Clockwise. See that?
And remember this sink, it went anticlockwise. And this line is not the
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
#FlatEarth is a fact, not a conspiracy. No curved water. No bend horizon. No motion. No dark matter. https://t.co/olzwpbHSna
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the theory of a flat Earth has been suppressed and ridiculed for centuries. They claim that bodies of water always remain level, making it unscientific to believe in a spherical Earth. They also state that the horizon appears flat from all angles and that Polaris, the North Pole star, remains fixed while the Earth does not move. The speaker dismisses the idea of Earth's rotation and the motion of the Milky Way as unobservable and unproven theories. They conclude by suggesting that there are many observable facts supporting a motionless, flat Earth that have been ignored in favor of untestable theories about a spinning, tilting, and spherical Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Flat Earth has long been touted as the mother of all conspiracy theories, suppressed and ridiculed for centuries as being an ignorant, unscientific worldview. But the facts of the matter are far from what you've been told. It is a fact, not a theory, that bodies of water always seek and find their own level level level. From a pond, lake, or an ocean, the natural physics of water is defined and remain level level level. It is a fact that the majority of Earth is covered in such level water level water, Thus making it an unscientific theory to postulate that Earth is actually a gigantic Sphere.
With bendy oceans curving all the way around it. It is an unproven, Unscientific theory with no observable, measurable, or repeatable evidence to claim that bodies of water can somehow bend, cling to the exterior of shapes, and show convexity upon their surface. It is a fact, not a theory, that the horizon always appears perfectly flat, 360 degrees around the observer regardless of All amateur balloon, rocket, plane, and drone footage show a completely flat horizon as high as we can reach. Over 20 miles or 120,000 feet up. It is an observable, testable, repeatable, scientific fact of reality.
That Polaris, the North Pole star, situated perfectly over the North Pole center The earth never moves a single inch. Night after night, year after year, century after century, Dream, with all the other fixed stars remaining fixed in their relative constellations revolving perfect circles around around Polaris. It is also an unobservable, unscientific theory to claim that the Earth is spinning A 1000 miles per hour, and the Milky Way is millions of miles per hour more off through infinite Space, when we cannot see, hear, feel, or otherwise observe or prove any such motion, and we can see clearly for ourselves, Polaris never moving and all the other stars revolving around This is just a brief introduction to the many observable, testable, repeatable, scientific facts of our level, Motionless plain earth that have been suppressed and ridiculed for centuries in favor of various unobservable, untestable, Unscientific theories purporting we live on a tilting, wobbling, spinning, ball shaped Earth.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
We are living on a stationary plane. Plane(t) earth. The plane of inertia. A toroidal field. Gravity is dark matter. Welcome to #FlatEarth https://t.co/1dMihuEubq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Planet Earth is not a planet but the plane of inertia. The North Pole is the most magnetic point, explaining why compasses point there. Everything is made of a magnetic torus field, where physical matter results from opposing forces on the plane of inertia. The binary code of this simulation, 0 and 1, comes from the torus field. Our spirit is an electromagnetic torus field. The crown chakra represents a top-down view of the torus field, as it connects to our head. The hyperboloid of the torus field is reflected in our nose. The torso is our torus field below the head. The neutron represents the plane of inertia, while the negative electron and positive proton make up the torus field. The Bible and Torah symbolize the torus field. The sun and moon's movement around the North Pole mirrors the pineal pituitary gland's rotation around the spine. The micro and macro are interconnected. Links to PDF and hearth book are in the bio.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Planet Earth is the plane of inertia. Planet Earther, it's not a planet. The center of the field is the most magnetic point. This is why all compasses point to the North Pole. It's a pole of electromagnetic energy, and above North Pole is polar.
Everything's made out of magnetic torus field. Physical matter is a result of 2 opposing forces equalized on the plane of inertia. Here is the u torus, which is the u torus, a portal. 0 and 1, which is the binary code of this simulation, and it comes from the torus field. Your spirit is a spiral of energy and electro magnetic torus field.
Your crown chakra is a lotus of life which is a top down view of a torus field because this all goes into your head. The hyperboloid of a torus field inhales and exhales, and this is why your nose is the exact same thing. Your torso is anything below the head, which is your torus field. The neutron is the plane of inertia planet Earth. The negative electron, the positive proton.
The bi ball is the torus field. Tu means by, and these are called balls. 2 balls, bible. We also have the Torah, the torus field, because this is the only thing that exists. As above, so below.
This is the Taurus field, and this is the plane of inertia, planet Earth. The ancients understood this. The sun and moon going around the magnetic North Pole is your EDA in Pingala, the pineal pituitary gland going around your spine, which is also the North Pole. Everything's micro, macro. The link is in the bio for this PDF.
The link is in the bio for the hearth book as well.
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker demonstrates a phenomenon similar to gravity using two pizza trays. By applying a positive and negative charge to the plates, the speaker shows that the object sticks to the negative plate. They explain that there is a force at play, not Newtonian or Einsteinian, but related to electricity and the manipulation of the electric field. The speaker refers to this force as gravity, although it has been redefined. They emphasize that everything, including chemical reactions and sound, is electricity vibrating. The video concludes with the speaker discharging the electricity and signing off.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello, everybody out here on YouTube playing. Good times for over exactly the valley here if you prefer. In this video, we're going to be talking about the phenomenon known is gravity. What I have here is 2, Cookies or, pizza trays. I was trying to get it focusing on that little Piece of paper up there, but it's not gonna happen.
But you saw it sitting down there, now it's stuck to the top. See that right there? That is our test subject. Woah. Alright.
As long as I apply a current to that, that'll stay there. As long as I keep turning this thing, it'll stay up there like Now, all I've done is I've Apply a positive and a negative charge. 1 to 1 of the plates and 1 to the other. And as you can see, instead of being positive and negative like we are here on earth, With a negative on the bottom and a positive on the top, I reversed it. And it sticks to the negative.
Just like here on Earth Now I know there's a lot of people that don't like saying the word gravity, But there is a force. It is not Newtonian. It is not Einsteinian. But there is a force that is creating this, up and down, which tells denser objects which way to go and makes relative density work density work, and it's just all electricity, that's all it is. Just everything else around here, every chemical reaction, every fire, every sound, every Everything is electricity vibrating And it'll just stay there folks Anti gravity until now watch this.
I'll discharge it. Boom. Boom. There you go. A little bit of electricity stuck in it.
Now, what it's doing what's called induction. Woah. And there we have it. But all I had was the Van de Graaff generator Running to the bottom plate here, and the discharge wound, running to the top plate. And what you just saw there was a manipulation of the electric field kinda like being between 2 Capacitor plates, and there's a flow of energy that happens there, and this is what we call gravity.
It's okay to call it gravity It's the only way people are gonna understand what we're talking about, but we just redefined Find the word. It's not Einsteinian. It's not Newtonian. This is not my idea. I don't know who gets the credit for this, but there is definitely a, A force.
And it's okay if we call it gravity, but it has to do with electricity between 2 charged, whatever you wanna call them. So that's it. Good Times for all here signing out. As always, thanks for watching.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
This globe killer video was taken down on other platforms. It’s simple as that: follow the censorship. The earth is flat and stationary. Deal with it.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Flat Earth theory challenges the new world order, asserting that Earth is undeniably level. It rejects dark matter's influence and dismisses the notion of a curved Earth. No illusions can deceive those with common sense. Only your heart can determine if you're ready to embrace your place at the center of the universe.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
#FlatEarth the achilles heel of the new world order. Not a conspiracy. Earth is demonstrably level. No dark matter can bend those clear minds looking into reality. No imaginary curve can be projected into opened eyes. No image trickery blinds a común sense. No calculated motion will move your body. But only your heart will know if you’re ready for. Being a part in the center of the universe.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the idea that the belief in a level Earth is often dismissed as a ridiculous conspiracy theory. However, they argue that it is actually a easily provable fact. They believe that once humanity realizes the truth about the Earth's shape, it will lead to a new era of enlightenment and expose those who have deceived us. They emphasize the importance of aligning our perception with the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Level Earth plane is the Achilles' heel of the new world order. This subject, supposedly the most ridiculous of all conspiracy theories, mocked and ridiculed for centuries as being an ignorant, unscientific worldview is actually one of the most easily demonstrable and empirically evidenced facts of reality. When humanity finally wakes up to the truth of our level plain earth. It will usher in a veritable new age of enlightenment, a renaissance of common sense, and an opportunity to finally and forever expose and expunge these deceivers among us. Truth.
It is singular and eternal. Truth has always been here among us must and it will always be here. It is our perception that must be aligned with it.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone. Remember looking on that horizon. You weren’t wrong thinking of a flat plane. The horizon doesn’t lie. #FlatEarth #Fact https://t.co/A9k60ohwyp
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Polaris. If Earth is an oblate spheroid with an axial tilt, oscillating between 22.1° to 24.5° during its axial precession, how could Polaris remain perfectly fixed in place? Welcome to #FlatEarth Isn’t that marvelous? https://t.co/hysFRtILrM
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Earth is its own power source. No dark matter admitted. Deal with it. https://t.co/jzdRxgZql2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker explains that a battery is a galvanic cell with an anode as the source of electrons and a cathode where the electrons flow. They claim that Earth is a quantum supercomputer and a galvanic cell, with the Arctic Circle as the anode and the Antarctica ice wall as the cathode. The vast amount of salt water covering the planet acts as a salt bridge, conducting electricity and moving electrons. They demonstrate this with a homemade saltwater battery powering a clock. They believe that the ocean's saltwater allows for self-perpetuating free energy, which exists in the aether realm. Nikola Tesla harnessed this energy with his inventions, utilizing the earth's generative abilities. The dome above us holds the energy produced in the aether.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Battery is a galvanic cell. The anode is the source of electrons, and the cathode is where the electrons flow. Once again, we live in a quantum supercomputer. Earth is its own power source, being both a computer And a galvanic cell, a battery which powers itself. What we call the Arctic Circle is the anode, And the Antarctica ice wall is the cathode.
The salt bridge which connects these 2 components It's the vast amount of salt water that covers our plane. Salt water actually makes a very effective electrolytic solution to conduct electricity and move electrons from the anode to the cathode. We can demonstrate this easily by making a homemade saltwater battery with its own anode and cathode. You can see here it's being used to power a clock. The ocean's saltwater provides the necessary conditions for the poles to create self perpetuating free energy anywhere, anytime.
This energy exists in the aether realm, and the aether permeates everything. This free energy is what Nikola Tesla was harnessing with his inventions. Tesla knew about the earth's generative abilities, and his inventions harness the electricity from the aether realm. The dome above our heads holds together the energy produced in the aether.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
“We know since over 2000 years earth is a globe.” That’s a lie. Deal with it. https://t.co/yMBJlYYbX1
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
This kind of breakfast isn’t healthy. But debunking gravity with is fun. Try it. https://t.co/A0h39yzfsA
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Our vision is within a dome of visual perspective. The dome of vision. Understanding perspective vision and how we perceive the stars. Observe star trails and see how you become its center. https://t.co/u3qcWGbICC
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker explains how our perspective limits the number of stars we can see. They mention that we can only see a dome of stars within a 12,000 mile diameter circle. As we move, this dome of stars moves with us. The speaker uses the analogy of standing at the North Pole, where Polaris is overhead and the stars rotate counterclockwise. As we move south, Polaris lowers in the sky and the stars start to tip, resembling a salad bowl. The bottom of the bowl represents Polaris, while the rim represents the ground where the sun would go around.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thousands of miles, let's say, and let's say we can't see them all. We can only see the dome of our perspective vision, which is about a 12,000 mile diameter circle or 6,000 mile radius. That's all the stars we can see. And the stars lower to our to the horizon at the edge of that circle, of a 12,000 diameter circle. So, as you move, this dome of stars moves with you or your dome of vision, I call it.
Anyway, let's let's check it out. Well, just like let's say you're standing at the North Pole, right, and the stars rotate, you have a Polaris overhead and the stars are rotating around you counterclockwise. As you move south, Polaris starts to lower in the northern sky and the stars start to tip. It's almost I like to think of it as a like a salad bowl. Right?
And so the salad bowl has the bottom is up. That's where Polaris is, and the rim of the bowl is on the ground. That's also where the sun would go around. From your perspective at the North Pole. Never moving and
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Remind. Not meant for educational purposes. Deal with it. https://t.co/MVIjcV1h8c
Video Transcript AI Summary
Walmart sells decorative globes that are not intended for educational purposes, as stated in the warning. The warning also mentions the risk of cancer and reproductive harm. It seems contradictory that globes are not meant for education, but only for decoration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Check it out, guys. Walmart Globes. Let's see what it says here. Globes are not meant for educational purpose, but only decorative purpose. Warning.
Cancer and reproductive harm. Cancer and reproductive harm and globes are not meant for educational purpose, but only Decorative. Understand that, guys? Not meant for educational purposes. That must not be reality then.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
There will remain only blinded minds. Unable to see the truth. #FlatEarth #Fact https://t.co/5dhwBDClYS
reSee.it AI Summary
The chaotic wiring in the supposed billion-dollar lab on the space station raises concerns about the competence of the engineers involved. Moreover, the risk of an electric short circuit during an experiment with water is alarming, jeopardizing lives and the billion-dollar project. The video evidence appears dubious, further fueling doubts about the authenticity of space missions. Once again, NASA's credibility is questioned.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Let’s be clear on this. That’s a supposed laboratory of a billion dollar project on a billion dollar space station. Firsts of all: Those “engineers” who designed this lab should be fired immediately looking at this wiring chaos. And second issue: How the heck would you take the risk to provoke an electric short circuit with an experiment of water and risk lives and even risk such a billion project? And the third most obvious: That experience looks more fake than space itself! Once more, the lies are exposed, no doubts! #NasaLies #SpaceIsFake #StopTheLies https://youtu.be/Gfsq14DG8JY?si=Qt2Efj6sz153rWcF
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker demonstrates what happens when you wring out a cloth in space. They show a compressed washcloth that expands when opened. When they soak the cloth, the water stays on the surface and doesn't drip off. The cloth remains floating and doesn't unravel. The speaker mentions that these washcloths are designed to save space on the space station. They conclude by congratulating someone named Meredith and Kendra on a successful experiment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The question is, if you get a cloth dripping wet without gravity and you wring it out, what's gonna happen? What will happen to a wrung out cloth? So it had to use equipment that was here onboard the space station. We might have the coolest washcloths ever here on the space station. I'm gonna show you.
Here's one of our washcloths, and it's packed. It's put down into this little tiny hockey puck. We may have the coolest washcloths ever here on the space station, I'm going to show you, so that, it saves space. This is the one I'm going to use for the experiment today. And so when you open up your hockey puck and turn it into a washcloth, it was compressed in a great big vice somewhere.
Okay. So here's my washcloth, like a magic trick, and now I'm gonna get this soaking wet and it actually runs along the surface of the cloth, and then up into my hand, almost like you had Jell O on your hands, or gel on your hand. And it'll just stay there. Wonderful moisturizer in my hands. We might have the coolest washcloths ever here on the space station.
I'm gonna show you. We might have the coolest washcloths ever so that, it saves space. So that, it saves space. And the cloth doesn't really unravel itself. It just stays there floating like a, like a dog's chewed toy, soaking wet.
That the whole itself that just stays there? We may have the coolest washcloths ever here on the space station. I'm gonna show you. Great experiment, worked perfectly. Meredith and Kendra, congratulations.
Great idea.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
The law of perspective debunks the heliocentric model. The sun isn’t going over the horizon because we’re living on a flat and stationary plane! #FlatEarth Is Your #Reality #DealWithIt https://t.co/8owpSGsdiU
Video Transcript AI Summary
All lines in the video converge at the same vanishing point, regardless of their height. The speaker explains that the wooden planks represent true perspective lines, while the calculations are based on nonperspective lines. The observer sees converging lines, representing the reality of the sun traveling down. The speaker points out that the sun's apparent height increases as it crosses parallel lines, leading to the misconception that the sun would be visible all the time on a flat Earth. The speaker emphasizes the importance of perspective and criticizes the incorrect calculations and angles presented. The concise summary highlights the speaker's argument that the sun will set on a flat Earth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Also notice how all the lines converge at the same point, the vanishing point. It doesn't matter how high they are, they all go to the same place, which interestingly enough means that no matter how high that object is going away from you, it visually goes to the same place.
Speaker 1: Okay, here's the wall of lines again. Notice that These are true perspective lines. These are parallel lines. But from the observer, which is this little guy down here, This is what these parallel planes or parallel lines would look like. They just happen to be represented by these wooden planks.
Right? But that's actual perspective. What they represent as the sun appeared traveling parallel to the ground is not perspective, yet they are calculating angles based on a nonperspective drawing. Right? Their maths are based on nonperspective lines.
Right? 2 parallel lines. Well, You can't because that's not the perspective of the observer. The observer sees these lines, the, converging lines. So as you can see, this is the reality, the one here where the sun travels down.
The green sun's here traveling down. That's our reality. Now here's another interesting thing. The reason too that their sun will never reach the horizon in their calculations is notice this. These these spatial planes, as I call them, represent height or altitude.
Right? Look at their sun. It's it's crossing height lines. Right? Because each one of these lines is parallel to the ground even though they appear to be converging, and yet they represent different altitudes.
So look at their sun. It's traveling higher and higher and higher and higher and higher in the sky. Well, of course, it's not gonna you know, this is why they think that the sun would be visible 247 on a flat Earth and why the sun would never get to the, Horizon, they don't understand perspective. They just they don't get it or or something. I don't know.
But, anyway, you can see the proper use. And this has everything to do with the observer standing down here. This is what he sees, the sun following the convergence lines and coming down and these are both the exact same distance. And you can see the time stamps on them. So each time each sun is about a 1000 mile journey, It's traveling and it goes below the horizon visually and keeps going below the horizon from the observer.
Like I said, this is a photograph. This is real. This is reality. They've just showed us nothing but a bunch of angles, showed Showed a couple lines and drawn some angles. Oh, hey.
Hey, falls. Nice geometry, but it's not perspective. That is definitely not the perspective of the observer, and that's what counts. Debunk 100%. Their maths don't work.
Their calculations are wrong. The sun will in fact set on a flat
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
The funny thing exposing the #NasaLies isn’t the fact to have them evidenced, no! It’s the fact how those Space Cowboy Clowns will come by to defend the obvious. Don’t believe me? Just wait a little! #SpaceIsFake #StopTheLies https://t.co/tC7rpcj3Bc
Video Transcript AI Summary
Good afternoon, students. I'm Art, and I'm Judge Wang. I'm Commander Ye Guangfu. In a weightless environment, a standard cup like the one we're used to doesn't work. It needs gravity to hold the food.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: To you. Hi. Hi. Good afternoon, all the students. I'm Art.
I'm Judge Wang. I'm the commander. Good afternoon. My name is, Ye Guangfu. You're absolutely correct.
The standard cup will not work in a weightless environment. You know, the cup that we're all used to drinking. Hold the cover here. Oh, just yeah. A standard cup like this does not work in a weightless environment.
It requires gravity to hold the food Uh-oh.
reSee.it AI Summary
NASA's eclipse predictions are often misunderstood. Contrary to popular belief, they rely on ancient Babylonian records of Saros cycles, not complex mathematics. These cycles have been observed for thousands of years, even during the era of geocentric flat earth models. Surprisingly, calculations based on the heliocentric model have led experts to marvel at the occurrence of eclipses. This research sheds light on the subject, revealing the truth behind eclipse predictions.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
The Myth about Eclipse Predictions. It's generally believed (myth) that NASA predicts eclipses using advanced mathematics based on a heliocentric globe model. In reality NASA predicts eclipses using the Saros cycles recorded by the ancient Babylonian and other astronomers for thousands of years. And it's not a surprise that ancient astronomy was based on a geocentric flat earth model. Calculated research based on the heliocentric model where experts coming to the stunning conclusion: “It’s a wonder we have eclipses at all!” Look on this brilliant research all facts and calculations which sources can be found for! Once again, #NasaLies #ReseachFlatEarth #Facts
Video Transcript AI Summary
NASA's ability to predict eclipses accurately does not prove the heliocentric model. Eclipse predictions are based on the ancient Babylonian Saros Cycle, which has nothing to do with heliocentrism. The Babylonians believed in a flat Earth with the sun, moon, and stars revolving around it. NASA hired a retired employee, Fred Espenac, who used the Saros Cycle to calculate and predict eclipses for their 5,000-year catalog. Other astronomers worldwide also collected eclipse data based on the Saros Cycle. NASA does not use heliocentric math to predict eclipses, as free software like Stellarium can do the same. The size and speed discrepancies in NASA's heliocentric model raise questions about its accuracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That NASA can predict eclipses accurately, that they have very advanced knowledge. Therefore, it proves that heliocentric is true. Unfortunately, that's not the case. All eclipse predictions provided by NASA including this 5 millennial, 5000 years of eclipses are using Saros Cycle invented by ancient Babylonians 1000 of years ago. Both solar and lunar eclipses are so predictable because they always repeat in a cycle of 18 years, 11 days 8 hours.
It's called Saros Cycle and it has nothing to do with heliocentric. Ancient Babylonians believe the earth is flat. The sun and the moon are revolving around the earth, and so do the stars and other celestial bodies. They didn't calculate the distances, sizes, and speeds based on false assumptions and speculations like heliocentric teachings. They simply observe the sky and Kant took whatever it is.
With that paradigm, they can predict eclipses accurately. Such predictions are impossible to be done using heliocentric model. In its 5 millennium catalog of solar and lunar eclipses, NASA wrote that all eclipse calculations are by Fred Espenac, a retired NASA's employee. NASA never calculated and predicted eclipses using heliocentric model. They simply hired the best Saros researcher, their retired employee, Fred Espenac, to calculate and predict eclipses using ancient Babylonian's method that has nothing to do with heliocentric, NASA even wrote that Fred Espana is responsible for the accuracy of those 5000 years catalog of eclipses.
For 1000 of years some astronomers collected eclipse cycle all around the world based on Saros Cycle, they have started to do this long time before NASA was established in 1958. Astronomer like Fred Espinach simply collected eclipse database from other local astronomers all around the world. As you see in this table, it's made by other astronomer, Gee Vandenberg in 1955, that's what Fred Espenach did. He is a very good Saros researcher. Why would NASA need Saros Cycle if they can calculate eclipses using heliocentric math, obviously because they can, a bunch of mathematical assumptions when combine together to calculate eclipses, they just don't add up.
There's an interesting review from Matt Parker from Stand Up Maths channel. He's the only person who got prestigious title as London Mathematical Society Popular Lecturer, a very smart and articulative mathematician, here's what he said about predicting eclipses using heliocentric math.
Speaker 1: And so I'm gonna show you the mathematics behind how we can predict when they're going to happen. We can do the calculations on the elliptical orbit of the moon as the Earth goes around the done. And we can calculate how often the moon goes between the sun and the Earth. Unfortunately, it's not that simple. It is a wonder we have eclipses at all.
But then out of all this chaos, another cosmic coincidence steps forward to save the day. It's called the Saros
Speaker 0: then why NASA uses sound cycle to predict eclipses? They say there are a lot of software predicting eclipses using heliocentric math. You can download free software like Stellarium, it can predict eclipses. Well, if a free software can predict eclipses with heliocentric model, then why NASA with $19,000,000,000 budget per year can predict eclipses using heliocentric model. Which one makes more sense to you?
All astronomy software are using eclipse database from NASA. It's not the other way around. After NASA published this 5 millennium catalog of solar and lunar eclipses, people use the database to make animation using whatever model they want. Just put 1 eclipse time to another. The software will automatically adjust to make those 2 eclipses happen as programmed, it's not the other way around.
After you get eclipse database, you can make any mission with square earth if you like. You can put whatever distance, whatever size, the software will adjust in accordance to the eclipse dates. Some big hats even try to run from reality by saying NASA provides a software in its website to predict eclipses. Look at this database used by NASA. 5000 years catalog of solar eclipse database, you can choose what year, what eclipse type, duration, and oops, it's Saros Cycle, not heliocentric math.
This is the three d movement of their heliocentric model. The sizes, distances, and speeds are not to scale. This is just to make you have an idea of the true heliocentric concept. The question is, how could NASA, 48 years ago, kept up with earth's orbital speed almost 100 times faster than the speed of sound, and also kept up with the sun speed across the space at almost 60 times faster than the spirit of sound.
reSee.it AI Summary
In this video, I dedicate my gratitude to the #FlatEarth family. Join me in exploring the Salar de Uyuni in Bolivia, the world's largest salt flat. Spanning over 10,000 square kilometers, it showcases the meeting point of heaven and earth. This serves as another undeniable proof of a flat, stationary plane. Immerse yourself in the beauty of this perfect realm while enjoying the music of FKJ. Let's appreciate this remarkable creation together. (Comments are disabled to avoid negativity.)
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good night #FlatEarth family. This video I dedicate to all of you, being grateful and proud to be a part of you! You absolutely made my day! Let me invite you to the Salar de Uyuni (or Salar de Tunupa) in Bolivia, the world's largest salt flat. It’s extend over 10,000 square kilometres (3,900 sq mi) in area. Where the heaven touches the earth. Another irrefutable proof of a flat stationary plane. Hear the artist FKJ inside this breathtaking creation of our perfect realm, being the center of the universe. Speakers on, enjoy! . (switching off the comments to exclude those still blinded minds and their negative words)
reSee.it AI Summary
Exposing NASA's manipulation is not difficult, as seen in their intentional "live streaming" deception. Applying common sense to their model reveals inconsistencies during solar eclipses. A video debunks the heliocentric globe model, highlighting the contradiction of a small umbra/antumbra. Embracing the reality of a flat Earth helps us break free from indoctrination. Focus on the truth and loved ones, not on NASA's lies.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Good morning everyone! As in many other occasions, exposing NASA isn’t difficult like I did a couple of days ago with their intentional manipulated “live streaming”. Using your common sense and apply it on their own model will continuously expose them. The last solar eclipse and free research of many clever minded people will expose again a governmental institution which tries you to trap inside their lies. The fact, what we observe during an eclipse doesn’t match with the distance of the sun neither with speeds and velocities they make us believe. Have look on this brilliant video, debunking the narrative we’ve been told since our first day in school. A very small umbra/antumbra contradicts the heliocentric globe model. Once you accept the fact of #FlatEarth reality, you’ll figure out why the lie and why we have to expose them to get free from their indoctrination. I’m sure you’ll be a part of the truth, don’t care about THEM, care about those really importante loved ones. #NasaLies #StopTheLies
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses anomalies in eclipses and suggests using a real-life scale model to study shadows. They explain that in total solar eclipses, the source of light should be the same size as the object that eclipses it. Using a scale model, they find that the shadow is 16 times bigger than it should be. They criticize CGI cartoons for inaccurately depicting eclipse shadows. They argue that in the flat earth model, the diameters of the sun and moon are about 32 miles. They suggest using AutoCAD and Natura software to verify shadow sizes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This is just to open your mind. The world is not like they told you. There are so many anomalies in eclipses. You can study the shadow using real life scale model. I've tried with Pupong.
We're using real sunlight. No question about brightness, lumens, and so on. But don't do it in open air cause the bigger the light, the smaller the shadow. In total solar eclipses, the source of life should be the same with the object that eclipse it. Using scale model for a 10 centimeters Earth, you have to use a 2.92 meters of pipe.
This is very important to make the source of light to scale. The result is quite devastating. The shadow is about 16 times bigger than it should be. In reality, eclipse shadow's size is about 70 miles or around 100 kilometers. They make it in CGI cartoons as if The 3,474 kilometers of Moon from 384,000 kilometers distance can make a 100 kilometers of shadow.
So they make CGI cartoons with shadow shape like a pencil. It doesn't exist in reality. With real life scale model, the shadow is actually 1,000 miles or 1600 kilometers. With the GLOBE model, eclipse shadow would cover the whole Kalimantan island. Unbelievable.
With the GLOBE model to scale, eclipse shadow would be so big that can cover Portugal, Spain and France at once. This is a disaster for the globe model. All your life you only see eclipses of fantasy. On the other hand, in the flat earth model, the diameters of the sun, the moon, or whatever object eclipsing the sun is about 32 miles or around 60 kilometers. If you don't like mathematics, you can use AutoCAD and Natura software for professionals.
You can verify by yourself. From 5,000 kilometer height, they will make shadow size exactly being like reality. 105.7 kilometers like the real eclipse shadow in Idaho Falls.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Day by day we’re recovering more and more about the ice wall and what could be behind! Fact is that the #AntarcticTreaty is counterproductive but that’s just why it exists. We’ll not stop digging! Go!
Video Transcript AI Summary
During World War 2, the Nazis had a secret project called Die Glocke, or the Bell, which involved exotic energy technology that could manipulate time and gravity. After the war, many Nazi scientists were brought to America through Operation Paperclip. In 1946, Admiral Richard Byrd led Operation High Jump to search for Nazi bases in Antarctica. Byrd later mentioned to a Chilean newspaper that the US could face fast-flying military crafts in the event of a new war. In 1959, the Antarctic Treaty was signed, making it illegal to travel south of the 60th parallel without government permission. Videos of alleged Nazi UFOs in Antarctica have since circulated. A whistleblower named Erich Hecker recently shared information about the technology at the South Pole Station, including a neutrino detector that can also function as a directed energy weapons platform and a system for faster-than-light communications. Hecker also mentioned the presence of an ELF system and a powerful green laser at the station. He believes there may be a secondary power supply at the station that is either nuclear or of an exotic nature not covered by the Antarctic Treaty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During World War 2, the Nazis most classified project was known as Die Glocke, the Bell. Secret documents found years later reveal that the Bell was a new kind of exotic energy technology that could affect time and defy gravity. In 1939, the Nazis set up a secret base in Antarctica known as Neuschwabia. Starting in 1945, Operation Paperclip secretly Lee brought hundreds of Nazi scientists into America where they were hired by the military industrial complex. In 1946, admiral Richard Byrd led a military expedition known as Operation High Jump to seek out Nazi based New Schwabia and other Antarctica faces.
On his way back to the US, admiral Byrd told Chilean newspaper, El Mercurio, that in the event of a new war, the US would be facing military craft that can fly from 1 pole to the other with incredible speed. In 1959, a dozen nations signed the Antarctic Treaty, making it illegal for anyone to travel south of the 60th parallel without government permission. Since then, curious videos have circulated laded that show would appear to be Nazi UFOs. And just last Monday, doctor Steven Greer introduced used Antarctica whistleblower, Erich Hecker.
Speaker 1: In 2010, I was selected to go down to the South Pole Station in Antarctica for an entire year by Raytheon Polar Services As an employee of a third party contractor for the National Science Foundation. I function in a dual role capacity as tradesman and fire fighter. My responsibilities required me to be more informed than most of my crew and offered me complete access to the facilities. What I learned from this unique experience needs to be shared with the entire world. The technology at the South Pole Station certainly can do what it is presented as its primary purposes and unfortunately much more.
The IceCube Neutrino Detector is presented as a passive listing device for the of the science as presented. But I'm gonna skip right through the chase, folks. I have provided documentation that proves that the 5,160, what they call bombs that are embedded in the ice can actually transmit at 2,047 volts each. That gives us A long list of things to consider. It is effectively a multifaceted directed energy weapons platform that I will, will list rapidly a few things that it can do.
Vehicle detection, we're learning that these off world craft, on world craft, ours or formations are also emitting neutrinos. So this makes the South Pole Station effectively an air traffic control station knew for this new level of equipment that nobody's discussing. In addition to the ability to detect neutrinos and the exotic vehicles, I provided documentation that shows that this is also a system for faster than light communications. In the past, Gary McKinnon has hacked NASA, found the off world complete the list of captains and it's apparent that if we have faster than light vehicles moving throughout the system, we're gonna need faster than light communications. This is that facility.
Unfortunately, I have other bad news. The season that I was there, 2010 to 2011, we converted from, construction to operations and maintenance in both the elevated station and the detector array. Unfortunately, when they first fired it up, that was when we had the earthquakes in Christchurch, New Zealand. There's 2 incidental shots before they were able to target it correctly. This is an earthquake generating device as well.
This is the weapons of war that have to deal with now and what Raytheon's hiding. There's an ELF system at the South Pole Station and when I was arrived, I was told it was off, dismantled, and completely were defunct. In my work, I will rapidly just tell you, I had to figure out the circuitry for certain other repairs and I found that this system is in fact completely energized up been running and being utilized with the other systems for nefarious purposes as well. The atmospheric research observatory worry is, in what we call the clean air sector. I witnessed myself a very powerful green laser shooting out of the top this facility into the cosmos.
This I believe is a secondary form of long range communications and or a Defense system. A question of power comes into play for all of these facilities that are present. I assure you, I knew what was going going on, I knew the load demands of the facility and all of these new items exceed the demand for the systems that I was presented. I I'm doing due diligence in research. I believe there is either, secondary power supply there that is either nuclear that, was there prior to the start of the Antarctic Treaty, which prohibits such things and or that there is some sort of exotic, make, power supply system there that just is not in the verbiage of the treaty, so it negates the responsibility to the parties involved.
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
For romantic Flat Earthers Marriage proposal with a high altitude balloon, check on minute 1. Amazing #FlatEarth #People #love Congrats to the couple!
@TheGlobeIsDead - restinpeace globe
Fantastic footage out of a high altitude hot air balloon. 11’000 meters or 6,8 miles. Guess what? Flat horizon, right. #FlatEarth #Truth