reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @TheJFreakinC

Saved - April 10, 2026 at 1:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note Iran dropped another AI LEGO video, somehow a more accurate summary of the U.S. government than the government itself, and it’s a catchy song that basically says what we’ve been saying. Trump started a war with Iran. While they waste our taxes on a pointless war, they fund this too. ICE detained U.S. citizens in Santa Ana with unmarked vehicles, unlawful seizure, possible equal protection issues, and no consequences. Is Iran releasing something on Melania? Maxwell called her “sweet pea,” signed emails “Love”—what did Melania say at the press conference?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: Iran just dropped another AI LEGO video… And somehow, it’s a more accurate summary of the U.S. government than anything coming out of the U.S. government. https://t.co/TKOFXMHrWq

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

Iran just basically summarized what we have all been saying, in a very catchy song… https://t.co/HSxs5R3Ktf

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

This is why Trump started a war with Iran.

@mjfree - Morgan J. Freeman

🚨🚨🚨 NEW: FBI report indicates 13-year-old accuser was truthful in allegations against Trump, corroborating most of her testimony. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/evidence-corroborates-claims-trump-sex-084613031.html

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

And while they waste our taxes on a pointless war, they are also wasting our taxes on this… https://t.co/PpMrx0eoEq

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were just caught on video illegally detaining U.S. citizens, in Santa Ana… and then quietly walking away when they realized they had nothing. In the video you can see multiple unmarked vehicles boxing in a single car. After illegally demanding the car prove their citizenship, agents start walking back to their cars… like the whole thing never should’ve happened in the first place. And when the person filming asks the obvious question… “Are you racially profiling now?” Silence. They just get in their cars… and drive away. So, let’s break down what this video shows… This is a textbook Fourth Amendment violation. You cannot detain U.S. citizens without reasonable suspicion… let alone surround a vehicle with FIVE units, and treat it like a felony stop… That’s an unlawful seizure. And if they were targeting these individuals based on how they looked? That opens the door to Equal Protection violations, under the Fourteenth Amendment. Translation… this is unconstitutional. And this is what should piss everyone off even more… These wasteful unconstitutional stops are what your taxes are funding. Not safety, or targeted enforcement… But using multiple federal vehicles… agents… time… resources… To detain the wrong people, violate their rights, and then drive away like it never happened. Over… And over… And over again. And after all of these documented cases of U.S. citizens being wrongfully detained… There are still no consequences. Just more of your taxes being burned through on unconstitutional stops… While they tell you it’s about “public safety.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker points out multiple vehicles in the area, indicating positions with phrases like “right here left” and noting “one person” observed across several cars, including a fifth car described as “the Pathfinder.” The speaker asserts that these actions constitute racial profiling, saying, “We raised your profile now?” and then, “Looks like these guys these guys are out here just racial profiling. Profiling at its best.” They claim the actions are intended to scare the community, emphasizing the impact on public perception with “they’re just scaring the community.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They bought somebody in right here left. They're right here left. They bought somebody in right here left. Right here, look, guys. Right here, like, this is one of the vehicles right here. What do we do in racial profiling? Second vehicle. Another vehicle here. And then then another vehicle over there. One person. We raised your profile now? We raised your profile. Looks like these guys these guys are out here just racial profiling. Profiling at its best. They're just they're just scaring the community. There's a fifth car right there, the Pathfinder.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

Is Iran releasing something on Melania Trump?!? https://t.co/57Pbh4LZit

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

Ghislaine Maxwell referred to Melania Trump as “sweet pea.” And Melania Trump signed off her emails to Ghislaine Maxwell with “Love.” So, what was Melania Trump saying in that national press conference? https://t.co/JY4t7Se9Bs

Saved - March 29, 2026 at 2:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Border Patrol agents tried to arrest a man inside a private home without a warrant. They were in the front yard as the homeowner and the man told them to leave private property. An agent grabbed him; he crawled toward the door and went inside. The agents followed, despite pleas to stop. This contravenes Payton v. New York and Lange v. California, which bar warrantless entry into a home and hot pursuit for a nonserious offense.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents were caught attempting to force an arrest inside a private home… without a warrant. The video shows agents were already in someone’s front yard trying to detain a man. The homeowner comes out and tells them to leave, because they are on private property. The man they’re trying to detain is saying the same thing… you’re on private property… get out. Instead of backing off… an agent grabs him around the waist, trying to tackle the man. The man breaks free, crawling to the door, and goes inside the house. At that point, this should’ve been over. Because under the Constitution, entering a home without a warrant is one of the clearest lines law enforcement are not allowed to cross. But, they cross it anyway. One agent grabs his foot as he’s going in… and then both agents follow him inside the home, while the homeowner is actively telling them to get out. Over and over. This is exactly what the Supreme Court ruled against in Payton v. New York… law enforcement cannot enter a home to make an arrest without a warrant. And in Lange v. California… they made it clear you don’t get to chase someone into their home, for a non-serious offense, and call it “hot pursuit.” They were told to leave private property… and didn’t. They attempted a detention without respecting that boundary. And then forced their way into a home anyway. All without a warrant.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: "Hey. You're private property. You're on private property. Hey. You're on private property. Get the fuck out. Yeah. I told you. You're on private property."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. You're private property. You're on private property. Hey. You're on private property. Get the fuck out. Yeah. I told you. You're on private property.
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 4:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched ICE agents press a locked building manager, asking if they had a judicial warrant. The manager asked for one; they said, “This is not private property,” and tried to pressure inside. I heard threats and claims about criminals, but the manager stood firm: no warrant, no entry. I see the post arguing the Constitution only works when people demand it be upheld. No warrant. No entry.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents tried to tell a building manager that a locked apartment building is not private property, in Minneapolis. In the video, the building manager asks a very simple question: Do you have a judicial warrant? The agent’s response? “This is not private property.” Which is a wild thing to say while standing outside a locked residential building you’re trying to get into. He keeps insisting she’s wrong. She doesn’t budge. She finally says, “You aren’t going to get in. I’m not opening the door without a warrant.” Another agent then asks if she can tell him whether the person on his phone is inside. She says, “No.” He then responds, “Can’t tell me that either? Want to keep your criminals in your building?” And she shuts that down by saying, “I want to keep my residents safe.” Which is the exact opposite of what ICE was doing. Because trying to pressure your way into private property, without a judicial warrant, is fishing. It’s hoping someone doesn’t know their rights. And do you know what they hope you don’t realize? If this person was actually some dangerous “worst of the worst” criminal, they love talking about, getting a judge to sign a warrant would be the easiest part of their day. Instead, they show up with no warrant, no legal authority to enter, and try to lie their way inside. Because ICE agents are gambling on the idea that regular people will be too scared to say no. And that’s why they continue to use threats and violence, while claiming that anyone with a pending immigration case is a criminal. This manager saw through that. Which is exactly why the Constitution only works when someone is willing to demand it be upheld. No warrant. No entry.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and the property manager engage over a search attempt. Speaker 0 asks who they are looking for and whether they have a judicial search warrant, noting they’re not going to get access and that “This is not private property.” The conversation repeats that this is not private property, and Speaker 0 asserts they won’t be able to open the door. The property manager confirms they are the manager but refuses to open the door and declines to disclose whether the person is present, saying, “I can’t tell you,” and “Don’t tell me that yet? Nope. I can’t.” Speaker 0 presses for information and whether the person is in the building, while the manager maintains they cannot reveal anything. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 saying, “Have a nice day,” and the property manager replying, “Have a great day,” and expressing a concern to “keep my residents safe.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who are you looking for? We're looking for a particular person right now. Do you have a search warrant? A judicial? You're not gonna get This is not a this not a private property. This is not a private property. This is. This is not a private is. You're not gonna get in. I can't open the door. This is not a this is not a are you manager, babe? I am, but I'm not gonna open the door. But I don't want mm-mm. Okay. I'm the property manager. Okay. Would you be able to tell me if the person's here or you I can't tell you. Don't tell me that yet? Nope. I can't. You wanna keep your criminals in your in your I can't tell you anything. Okay. Have a nice day, ma'am. You too. Have a great day. And I do. I wanna keep my residents safe. I wanna keep my residents safe.
Saved - January 25, 2026 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
BREAKING: After executing Alex Pretti, ICE/Border Patrol agents continued violently assaulting U.S. citizens and violating the First Amendment right to film. In the video, they tackle a man to the ground while bystanders film—the one thing agents hate most, because cameras reveal the truth. An agent then approaches a non-interfering woman, uses bear spray, and steals her phone. These are the videos they don’t want you to see. The only way to hold them accountable is to film.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: After executing Alex Pretti, ICE/Border Patrol agents didn’t stop there. They continued violently assaulting U.S. citizens… while also violating their First Amendment right to film. In the video, you can see agents again tackling a man to the ground. Bystanders are standing there filming… the one thing agents hate most, because cameras mean they can’t lie about what happened. Then, an agent walks up to a woman who is not interfering, who is only filming, pulls out bear spray, and steals her phone. These are the videos they don’t want you to see. People being assaulted for observing. People being assaulted for filming. People being assaulted for holding federal agents accountable. The only way to hold ICE/Border Patrol accountable is to film them breaking the law. And they know that.

Saved - January 25, 2026 at 12:27 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a video, taken after Alex’s death, showing agents searching his body for a gun that wasn’t there because another had taken the legal firearm before they opened fire. They executed an unarmed U.S. citizen; he never drew, and his life was in danger.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: MORE PROOF ALEX JEFFREY PRETTI WAS UNARMED WHEN HE WAS EXECUTED🚨 This video was taken after Alex was already dead… and it shows agents searching his BODY for a gun… and it wasn’t there. Because an agent had already taken the LEGAL FIREARM before they opened fire. They executed an unarmed U.S. citizen. They never saw a gun. He never drew it. Their lives were never in danger. Alex’s life was the only one in danger. And he never once attempted to use his legal firearm.

Saved - January 20, 2026 at 10:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by ICE actions: in St. Paul, agents burst into East Side Thai with guns drawn, accusing owner Kou Vang of hiding a pursued child—inside a private business, causing intimidation and risk to the community. In Minneapolis, agents detained a teen without verifying identity, refused ID, and hauled him into an SUV, raising Fourth Amendment concerns and echoing DHS admissions that people are detained first and identified later—unlawful detention, not law enforcement.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now storming into restaurants, with guns drawn, and accused the owners of hiding the person they were chasing, in St. Paul, Minnesota In the video, you see someone sprint past the restaurant. Then, seconds later, an unmarked SUV pulls up and an ICE agent bursts inside with a handgun drawn. Once inside, with his gun drawn, he accuses Kou Vang, the co‑owner of East Side Thai, that Vang is hiding a kid he’s supposedly chasing. So, just to clarify… A federal agent ran into a private business with a gun drawn, accused the owner of a crime without evidence, all while the person they were chasing wasn’t even inside. That’s not law enforcement. That’s intimidation. And that kind of illegal overreach… especially entering a private business with a gun drawn in a non‑emergency situation… puts entire communities at risk. People should be able to run a restaurant, or just go about their day, without being treated like criminals by armed agents… …and without having to worry about being shot because an agent accidentally slips, or fires recklessly in a public space.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

Maybe we could focus on masked men who are kidnapping children… https://t.co/e2rWG50v7d

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 BREAKING: ICE agents in Minneapolis are seen arresting another teenager without verifying his identity first, and admit to it on camera. In the video, the teenager calmly tells agents he can go inside and get his ID to prove who he is. The agents refuse. Instead, they say they’ll “take pictures at HQ”… and then force him into their SUV anyway. That is deeply alarming. Law enforcement is not allowed to detain people first and figure out who they are later without lawful justification. Detaining someone without verifying identity, without probable cause, and without allowing them to present ID raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You cannot seize a person just to “check” who they are. This also mirrors what DHS has now openly admitted: that people are being detained first and sorted out later based on suspicion alone. That means innocent people, minors, and U.S. citizens are being taken into custody without verification, without charges, and without due process. If the government can forcibly detain someone simply to identify them, that is not law enforcement… that is unlawful detention.

Saved - January 20, 2026 at 9:52 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m documenting a thread alleging that DHS and ICE/Border Patrol unlawfully detain, arrest, or harass people—often without warrants, probable cause, or proper identification procedures. Claims include racial profiling, detaining citizens, beating, home invasions, restroom detentions, bus stops, and trafficking-style practices. The videos depict abuses labeled as enforcement, with serious Fourth Amendment concerns raised.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 DHS: “We don’t target people based on race or ethnicity.” Reality: An ongoing thread of videos proving they do. 👇 https://t.co/CbHaDw9ohQ

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#1: https://t.co/wnSY6qwIRX

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: In Columbia Heights, MN, ICE agents are going door to door and targeting people based on how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, then human trafficking them when they refuse to comply with unlawful orders. In the video, a man is standing by a garage on private property. ICE agents approach him and demand identification. The man correctly states that he does not have to show ID. He is not suspected of a crime, he is on private property, and the agents have no warrant… He then asks why he is required to provide documentation. An agent then says the quiet part out loud… “Because of your accent.” The man points out the obvious, “You have an accent too.” The agent then asks, “Where were you born?” The man responds, “Where were you born?” At that point, the agent escalates. He orders, “Put your hands behind your back,” then physically grabs the man, shoves him against the garage, and restrains him without a warrant, without probable cause, and without reasonable suspicion of a crime, or even knowing who he is. Another agent steps directly in front of the camera to obstruct recording, while another joins in assaulting the man on private property. What’s illegal here is visible on video: • Detaining someone on private property without a warrant • Demanding identification without reasonable suspicion • Targeting someone based solely on accent or perceived national origin • Using force to enforce an unlawful order • Obstructing a lawful recording of law enforcement The man is then taken against his will so ICE can “prove his status.” That is not a lawful stop, it is human trafficking under color of law, seizing a person first and transporting them elsewhere to investigate their identity later, all for profit. This is not border enforcement. This is not public safety. This is government agents abducting people based on how they sound, then trafficking them through detention systems for funding, quotas, and “processing.” And the question isn’t whether this man had legal status. The question is how long Americans will tolerate federal agents kidnapping people on private property, calling it “verification,” and pretending the Constitution no longer applies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An officer confronts a man and presents a choice: “Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in?” The man asserts, “You cannot take me,” to which the officer responds, “Yes. I can,” and notes the possibility of handling it privately: “Privately. Yes. I can.” The officer says the man lacks paperwork, but the man replies, “I do have my documentation,” and asks, “And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork?” The officer explains, “Because of your accent.” The man counters, “I still you have an accent too,” and the officer asks, “Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at?” The interaction ends with the officer ordering, “Put your hands behind your back.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in? You cannot take me Yes. I can. Privately. Yes. I can. You just have documentation. I do have my documentation. And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork? Because of your accent. I still you have an accent too. Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at? Put your hands behind your back.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#2: https://t.co/dKeCwLPLsD

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are human trafficking people in Minneapolis. In the video, you hear an agent say, “Do you have an ID?” And then seconds later say, “So you don’t have an ID?” and then immediately grab the woman and take her. He does not know who she is. He does not give her time to answer. He does not allow her to present identification. He simply seizes her and removes her so she can be placed in a detention facility while they “verify her status,” a process that financially benefits the agencies and contractors holding her. Taking someone by force, without verification, due process, or lawful justification, and transporting them for confinement and profit fits the definition of human trafficking. Calling it “enforcement” doesn’t change what it is.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks whether you need to show ID, questions if that has a warrant, and asks if you don’t have an ID.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you need to put the ID? I don't know if that's have a warrant. In it. So you don't have an ID?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#3: https://t.co/UiFgbW4L87

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents are now pulling people out of restrooms, refusing ID, and taking them without identifying who they are. In Clearwater, Minnesota, a video shows a group of agents waiting outside a men’s restroom inside a truck repair shop. Seconds later, you hear a man yelling, panic and fear in his voice. Then about five agents rush toward the restroom. An agent says, “Let’s go.” Agents pull a man out of the restroom, handcuffed. The man pleads, “I’ll give you my ID!” An agent responds, “Right, right, right…” as they push him out the door and take him away without verifying who he is or checking his ID. Everything about this video is alarming… Law enforcement is not allowed to detain people arbitrarily. ICE agents must have legal authority to seize someone, and restrooms, inside private businesses, are non-public spaces. Entering or removing someone from that space generally requires a judicial warrant or consent, absent an actual emergency. Ignoring an offer to provide identification while forcibly detaining someone raises serious due process and Fourth Amendment concerns. This isn’t about immigration status. This is about the government ignoring the constitution, racially profiling, and grabbing anyone who doesn’t immediately comply with their illegal demands. When federal agents can drag someone out of a restroom without verifying who the person is, and without accountability, no one’s rights are safe.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#4: https://t.co/eZO0J5aCyJ

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 Another day, another video of ICE agents illegally harassing a U.S. citizen for “proof of citizenship” while she walks through her own neighborhood in Minneapolis. In the video, a woman is surrounded by masked ICE agents. One agent tells her, “Do you have ID? If not, we’ll have to put you in our car and ID you.” That statement alone is unlawful. She calmly states, “I’m a U.S. citizen.” The agent immediately demands ID anyway. She correctly explains that she is not required to carry identification while walking in her neighborhood. There is no law requiring citizens to carry papers, and ICE does not have the authority to detain someone without reasonable, articulable suspicion of a specific crime. At that point, the agents escalate. They begin asking where she was born. She responds, “Minneapolis is my home.” The agents claim they are conducting an “immigration check” and repeat the question. That is not a legal basis for detention. Citizenship is not determined by place of birth alone, and ICE has no authority to conduct random street interrogations of people not suspected of immigration violations. When she again refuses to show ID, an agent threatens, “We’re going to put you in our car then.” That is an explicit threat of unlawful detention. She says, “I should be able to walk around at 3 without being afraid for my life.” Instead of disengaging, the agent again demands ID and again demands to know where she was born. She repeats, clearly and correctly, “It doesn’t matter where I was born. I’m a U.S. citizen.” The agent then attempts intimidation, warning her that lying about being a U.S. citizen could result in federal charges, despite having no evidence she was lying and no lawful basis to continue the stop. Only after repeated refusals to comply with an illegal detention do the agents finally walk away. This wasn’t law enforcement. It was a fishing expedition, relying on fear, intimidation, and the false belief that Americans must carry papers to exist in public. If masked federal agents can threaten to kidnap a U.S. citizen off the street for refusing to answer questions they have no legal right to ask, then the question isn’t whether rights are being violated. The question is how long Americans are expected to tolerate it.

Video Transcript AI Summary
An officer confronts a woman on the street, insisting she show identification. The officer asks for an ID multiple times, stating, “Do you have an ID on you, ma’am?” and later, “If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you.” The woman responds that she doesn’t need an ID to walk around in her city, and she refuses to produce any identification, saying, “I don't need to carry around an ID in my home,” and, “Not gonna give you a ID.” The officer presses, requesting the woman’s birth information as part of what he describes as an immigration check and a citizen check. He asks, “Where were you born?” and “Ma’am, can we see an ID, please?” The woman asserts her status, declaring, “I am US citizen,” and reiterates that Minneapolis is her home. She insists that this is where she belongs and that she should be allowed to walk there without fear, replying, “This is my home,” and, “I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point.” The officer continues to demand identification, stating, “Ma’am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct.” The woman pushes back on the line of questioning, asserting, “I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable.” She accuses the officers of terrorizing people, insisting, “You guys, you terrorizing people. Ma’am.” The exchange centers on the tension between civil verification checks and the woman’s insistence on her rights and belonging. As the conversation escalates, the officer reiterates the need for a birth place, while the woman remains adamant that where she was born is irrelevant to her citizenship and right to be in her home area. She maintains that she belongs there, repeatedly stating, “This I is my belong here. I'm sorry. I belong I'm not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?” The dialogue ends with the woman’s determination to resist producing any identification and a continued assertion of her US citizenship and claim to the space as her home.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an ID on you, ma'am? Speaker 1: I don't need a ID to walk around in in my city. This Speaker 0: is Okay. Do you have some IDs in, please? Speaker 1: I don't need a Speaker 0: If not, we're gonna put you in the vehicle. We're gonna ID you. Speaker 1: Can I do you? I'm not gonna take out you take out Speaker 0: your ID. You don't have an ID? Speaker 1: I'm not gonna take out an ID. Speaker 0: Hey, man. Speaker 1: It's ma'am. Am US citizen. I am US citizen. Speaker 0: Alright. Can we see an ID, please? Speaker 1: I am US citizen. I don't need to carry around an ID in my home. Well, where were born? Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: This is my home. Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: Minneapolis is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, that's not that's we're doing an immigration check. We're doing a citizen check. Speaker 1: This is where Speaker 0: We're asking you where you were born. Speaker 1: This is where I belong. This is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, can belong here, but where were Speaker 1: you born? Not gonna give you a ID. Speaker 0: Then we're gonna put you in the vehicle. Speaker 1: I belong here. I should be walking around here at three. I shouldn't be afraid in my life at this point. Speaker 0: Ma'am, do you have an ID to give us? Skirt? Yes. You're correct. Speaker 1: You're making me a skirt. You're making me a Do you Speaker 0: have an ID? Speaker 1: This is my home. Speaker 0: Ma'am, where were you born? Speaker 1: I am US citizen. I am US citizen. I don't think so. You have a right to picture me while I am in my home or walking around in my home. This is not acceptable. You guys, you terrorizing people. Ma'am And it's not Speaker 0: Where were you born? Speaker 1: It doesn't matter where I was born. Belong here. I am US citizen. What else can I say? I am citizen. This is my home. Speaker 0: Menia realize that if Speaker 1: you lie Speaker 0: that you're a US citizen Speaker 1: Menia, but this is my home. Speaker 0: Then you can get it up Speaker 1: Menia, but this I is my belong here. I'm sorry. I belong I'm not gonna take out anything. What the fuck?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#5: https://t.co/0XrfHZCTsK

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: Border Patrol agents are caught on camera unlawfully stopping and threatening a U.S. citizen at a gas station, with zero legal basis. In the video, a Border Patrol agent approaches a man who is simply pumping gas into an unmarked vehicle and immediately demands, “Let me see your ID.” The man correctly responds, “I don’t have to show it to you.” Instead of stating any lawful reason for the stop, the agent escalates and asks, “How do I know you’re a U.S. citizen?” That question alone exposes the violation. The man is wearing normal clothing, committing no crime, not crossing a border, not driving, and not suspected of anything. There is no traffic stop, no reasonable suspicion, no probable cause, and no legal authority to demand proof of citizenship in this context. So, what the agent is really saying is this: If you don’t look white enough, you must prove you belong. That is racial profiling. It is unconstitutional. And it is illegal. The agent then issues a threat: “This can go two ways. I can take you in, or you show me your ID.” That is not a choice, it’s coercion. Faced with the threat of unlawful detention, the man is forced to hand over his identification, surrendering his rights under duress. This is exactly how constitutional rights are stripped away, not by law, but by intimidation. If Border Patrol can demand “proof of citizenship” from Americans at a gas station with no cause, then no one’s rights are safe.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#6: https://t.co/e2rWG50v7d

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 BREAKING: ICE agents in Minneapolis are seen arresting another teenager without verifying his identity first, and admit to it on camera. In the video, the teenager calmly tells agents he can go inside and get his ID to prove who he is. The agents refuse. Instead, they say they’ll “take pictures at HQ”… and then force him into their SUV anyway. That is deeply alarming. Law enforcement is not allowed to detain people first and figure out who they are later without lawful justification. Detaining someone without verifying identity, without probable cause, and without allowing them to present ID raises serious Fourth Amendment concerns. You cannot seize a person just to “check” who they are. This also mirrors what DHS has now openly admitted: that people are being detained first and sorted out later based on suspicion alone. That means innocent people, minors, and U.S. citizens are being taken into custody without verification, without charges, and without due process. If the government can forcibly detain someone simply to identify them, that is not law enforcement… that is unlawful detention.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#7: https://t.co/xjCRv03mX8

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: WARNING — DISTURBING FOOTAGE Yesterday in Minneapolis, ICE agents brutally beat and illegally arrested a legal U.S. resident… all caught on camera. In the video, five ICE agents are seen on top of a man who is face down on the concrete. One agent repeatedly knees him in the face while the man does not resist. He is motionless, in pain, and screaming in agony. The assault only stops when the agent realizes a legal observer is filming. This is not an allegation. It is recorded violence. And it gets worse. The man, identified as Juan Carlos, is currently unhoused and living out of his car. ICE agents unlawfully approached him, ripped him from his vehicle, violently beat him, arrested him, and transported him to the Whipple Detention Facility. Juan Carlos posed no threat. He is a legal U.S. resident. Yet, he was assaulted and treated like a criminal. While in custody, he began having difficulty breathing. Only then did agents transport him to a hospital, still in shackles. He had blood in his ears from the beating, yet, was denied medical care until he was in medical distress. Once at the hospital, ICE agents attempted to intimidate medical staff and interfere with care. After approximately two hours, they finally issued Juan Carlos a ticket and left. To be absolutely clear: -ICE agents beat a legal U.S. resident. -They illegally arrested him. -They attempted to hold him in a detention facility. -They withheld medical care until his condition worsened. -They only backed down once there were witnesses, video evidence, and hospital staff present. If Juan Carlos had not been taken to the hospital… a place with mandated witnesses and documentation… it is very possible a legal U.S. resident would still be sitting in an immigration detention center today. And this is the part they don’t want you to realize: Immigration detention is a profit-driven system. Private prison corporations make money by keeping beds full. Every illegal arrest, every unlawful hold, every person thrown into a detention center without cause is revenue for a private company. When law enforcement agencies can illegally beat and attempt to warehouse legal residents for profit, this stops being about immigration enforcement and becomes a business model built on human suffering, and human trafficking. This is not a misunderstanding. This is not “questioning.” This is state violence, enabled by a system that profits from illegal confinement. And it will continue until it is forced to stop.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#8: https://t.co/Dw9GsAsYZL

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents were caught on video illegally detaining a U.S. citizen in Richfield, Minnesota. In the video, ICE agents surround a man who is already on his knees on the pavement, with his hands raised, while agents stand over him and verify his citizenship. This alone is a serious constitutional violation. ICE does not have authority to detain U.S. citizens to check their immigration status. They also do not need someone on their knees to “verify” citizenship. And forcing someone into a compliance position on the ground without probable cause constitutes an unlawful detention under the Fourth Amendment. After agents confirm he is a U.S. citizen, the man stands up and begins yelling… visibly angry and shaken. The man is yelling at agents for swarming his car at gun point, a U.S. citizen, and forcing him out. Saying, “I could’ve died.” ICE agents then try to claim it was because of his registration. A line they often use, that still doesn’t justify their actions. What this video shows is federal agents detaining first, forcing compliance, then checking legality afterward… the opposite of how policing in a constitutional system is supposed to work. If ICE can force a U.S. citizen to the ground over a car they happen to be driving, citizenship no longer protects you. This isn’t a minor mistake. It’s a clear abuse of power and a violation of the Fourth Amendment, and every American should be outraged.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#9: https://t.co/9oHXWnqJ8P

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents admit on video that they illegally pulled over a car driving down a street in Minneapolis. In the video, multiple ICE agents are seen surrounding a civilian vehicle with several cars. Both back doors of the vehicle are open as agents stand around it. An ICE agent is heard saying: “We just want to make sure you are good, you were driving like a complete maniac, and the way that you’re acting, we have to verify if you are good, and then we will be out of here.” That statement matters… because ICE does not have general authority to conduct traffic stops. Immigration enforcement agents cannot pull someone over for alleged driving behavior. That power belongs to state and local law enforcement, not federal immigration officers. There is no claim of a specific crime. No explanation of probable cause. No warrant shown. Just ICE agents stopping a car, detaining the occupants, and admitting on camera that they initiated the stop based on how someone was “driving.” That is an unlawful stop. Under the Constitution, law enforcement cannot seize or detain someone without legal authority or probable cause. Blocking a vehicle, surrounding it with agents, opening doors, and questioning occupants is a seizure… and doing so without lawful authority is a violation of the Fourth Amendment. If ICE can pull over random cars, invent a reason, and detain people with no warrant and no authority, then the question isn’t whether this was illegal… It’s how many more unconstitutional stops they’ll get away with before someone gets hurt again.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says: "Hey. We just wanna make sure that you guys are good. You're driving like a complete maniac. And the way that you're acting, we gotta verify if you're good and then we'll be out of here. You understand?" The other replies: "No."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey. We just wanna make sure that you guys are good. You're driving like a complete maniac. And the way that you're acting, we gotta verify if you're good and then we'll be out of here. You understand? No.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#10: https://t.co/OWT9Bh4tCj

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨This video is terrifying, and it’s exactly why “just comply” does not protect you from ICE/Border Patrol agents, even as U.S. citizens, and why you always film them. In North Carolina, ICE/Border Patrol agents illegally stopped two U.S. citizens. They questioned them without legal cause, took their licenses, and admitted on camera that the men were allowed to record. And they were still attacked. In the video, one man asks if he can film for his safety. The agent says yes, saying that he’ll “have to put his mask on.” The agents take their licenses, ask where they’re from, where they live, what they’re doing in the area, all without legal authority. The men cooperate anyway. Then the situation turns dangerous. Another agent suddenly tells the driver, “Turn off your video. You are being detained, so you are not free to record.” That is false. Recording law enforcement in public is legal, including during detention. The driver calmly refuses, keeps one hand on the steering wheel as instructed, and holds his phone in the other. That’s when the agent lunges for the phone. The agent throws himself into the car, trying to grab the device. When the driver moves it away, the agent assaults him. The agent then illegally opens the car door, something the driver correctly points out they are not allowed to do. The agents keep demanding the filming stop, as multiple agents keep reaching for the phone. Then they escalate again. They threaten arrest, grab the driver, and start hitting him and trying to drag him out of the car, even though he keeps saying, “We haven’t done anything wrong.” When they fail to pull him out, they back away, visibly angry. They turn on the passenger next. An agent grabs him, threatens handcuffs, and assaults him trying to force him out of the vehicle. When that doesn’t work, they start yelling conflicting commands, claiming the men are “interfering with an investigation.” An investigation into what? Their own illegal stop. At one point, an agent shouts that the men can’t interfere, while another tries… again… to grab the phone, almost certainly to stop or erase the recording. Only after all of this do the agents finally release them. Because they are U.S. citizens. Because the stop was illegal. And because the camera was still rolling. This is why you film ICE. This is why compliance doesn’t save you. This is why they hate cameras. If this hadn’t been recorded, this would be another lie in a report, another “resisting” accusation, another abuse buried and denied. Film them. Always.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 describes a tense encounter, asserting safety concerns and clarifying they were visiting parents in Spencer and live there. They refuse to provide a requested detail: “What’s your dad’s name?” and answer “You don’t gotta get the information.” The other party orders, “Hands where I can see them. Don’t move around. Be nice,” followed by statements that they are not detained: “We’re not detained.” The speaker notes, “I have that too on recording already, and you are not allowed to do this,” and is told to “Turn the phone off.” There are repeated directives to relax and stop moving, with insistence that they are not in a traffic stop: “You’re not in the fucking traffic stop.” The confrontation escalates with commands to come up, culminating in “Come on up. Come up. Come on up. You got the right one.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I can from my safety. Right? What's that? I can recover from my safety? Sure. I'll put this on there. You said you're there with your parents? No. No. I said I went to go visit them. I live in Your parents? Yeah. I live in Spencer. What's your dad's name? You don't you don't gotta get the information. Hands where I can see them. Don't move around. Be nice. Okay. No. We're not detained. They haven't told you we detained. They didn't say nothing about it. I'm telling you right We're not detained. Phone now. Nope. I got that too on recording already, and you are not allowed to do this. They're even turning. Phone. Get off the phone. Turn the phone off. Say it again. You need to relax. Around. Stop moving around. I have to stop. Keep. You're not in the fucking traffic stop. Come on up. Get your fuck up. Come on up. Come on up. Come on up. You got the right one. Come up.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#11: https://t.co/hvRvDVBGJM

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are once again illegally arresting U.S. citizens in Minnesota. In the video, you can hear the agent ask for ID AFTER he assaulted, tackled and handcuffed the man. When the man asks why he’s being detained, the agent claims it’s because the car is registered to an undocumented immigrant. The man responds, “What? I’m a U.S. citizen.” Despite this, the agent grabs his wallet and drags him toward an unmarked van… still without verifying his identity. This isn’t law enforcement. This is reckless abuse of power. If ICE can assault, arrest, and transport a U.S. citizen without confirming their identity, then no one is “safe” under this system. This is what happens when agencies operate with impunity… and it’s exactly why these abuses must be documented, challenged, and stopped.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises questions and frustration during what appears to be a tense interaction with law enforcement or vehicle authorities. The sequence includes confusion about identification and vehicle ownership, and a demand for official information. Key points: - A request is made: “Do you have an ID on you?” followed by a directive to speak clearly, “Speak to the piss, miss. Wait. No. Don’t know.” - There is a confrontation about the vehicle: “Why why the fuck am I being put in or not? The vehicle that you’re driving is registered to an illegal immigrant. Is it your vehicle? What?” - The speaker expresses disbelief and concern: “Right. Go in here. For real, bro. What is wrong with you guys? The fuck? Fuck.” - A location reference is noted: “West Saint Paul.” - A request for space and safety: “Ma’am, can you do me a favor? Just stay back over there. Okay?” - A demand for accountability and identification: “I have the right to know his badge number. What is your badge number?”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you have an ID on you? Speak to the piss, miss. Wait. No. Don't know. Why why the fuck am I being put in or not? The vehicle that you're driving is registered to an illegal immigrant. Is it your vehicle? What? Right. Go in here. For real, bro. What is wrong with you guys? The fuck? Fuck. West Saint Paul. Ma'am, can you do me a favor? Just stay back over there. Okay? I have the right to know his badge number. What is your badge number?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#12: https://t.co/42WhxG4Ej4

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents were posted up in a grocery store parking lot in Richfield, MN, stopping, detaining, and interrogating people based solely on how they look. This is racial profiling. It is illegal. In the video, an agent can be heard yelling at a bystander to “get back” while he illegally detains a random U.S. citizen and demands answers. No warrant. No probable cause. Just intimidation in a parking lot. Another person filming correctly informs the man of his rights, that he does not have to answer a single question. That is exactly what everyone should be doing in these situations. The moment multiple people started filming and asserting those rights, the agents suddenly backed off, got in their vehicle, and drove away. Because they knew they were violating the law. This is not “immigration enforcement.” This is unconstitutional harassment, and it only stops when people document it, speak up, and refuse to comply with illegal orders.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 issues a terse instruction sequence directed at someone present: first, to “Back off.” Then, to consider the option of not responding to “them,” followed by a firm directive to “Just don’t say anything.” The sequence culminates in an explicit expression of confusion or incredulity with the line, “What the fuck is this?” This single speaker’s comments convey a clear, multi-step control directive intended to alter the other person’s behavior in the moment. The initial directive, “Back off,” functions as a command to create distance or cease engagement, signaling that the speaker feels the situation or the other party warrants withdrawal or reduced interaction. The subsequent line, “You don’t have to respond to them,” reinforces the aim of disengagement, emphasizing autonomy in choosing whether to engage with the other party. The third directive, “Just don’t say anything,” further narrows permissible action to complete silence, removing the possibility of a spoken response and steering the recipient toward nonverbal comportment or radio silence, depending on the context of the interaction. The closing line, “What the fuck is this?” introduces a sudden emotional reaction—likely confusion, disbelief, or frustration—directly addressing the nature of the situation. The profanity underscores a high level of intensity or surprise, suggesting that whatever is unfolding has elicited a strong, immediate response from Speaker 0. Taken together, the lines present a coherent set of instructions aimed at minimizing interaction and exposure to the other party (“them”), coupled with a reaction that questions the premise or quality of the ongoing scenario. The sequence emphasizes control and restraint, urging silence and withdrawal, while also capturing an abrupt, exclamatory moment of perplexity or dissatisfaction.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back off. You don't have to respond to them. Just don't say anything. What the fuck is this?

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#13: https://t.co/yGzNMhhbIc

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE/Border Patrol agents are illegally racially profiling people at bus stops in New Jersey. Video shows agents surrounding bus stops and rounding people up, not because they committed crimes, not because they’re “the worst of the worst,” but because they look Latino and are on their way to work. This isn’t law enforcement. It’s intimidation. It’s harassment. It’s collective punishment based on skin color, and it’s happening in public, in broad daylight. If the government can disappear people for waiting for a bus, none of this is about safety, and all of it is about power.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript captures a tense moment at a Bergen Lyon Avenue location near a White Castle, where Speaker 1 reports that ICE came by and grabbed people, stating, “ICE came by and grabbed people. They are targeting the bus stops. Again, they are targeting the bus stops.” Speaker 0 responds with anger, asking, “What are you doing?” and labeling the action as terrorism, saying, “You fucking terrorists. You’re a fucking terrorist.” The speakers describe the scene as individuals were taken from the area, emphasizing that the raids are focused on bus stops and the surrounding vicinity, including Fairview Avenue, with Speaker 1 asking, “How many other bus stops? How many other locations?” They urge vigilance for others, noting that “any moment a vehicle like this can't see into the window” due to tinted windows, warning that law enforcement came into the location and “grabbed people.” Speaker 1 reiterates the need to “be on point” and to “be aware of what you're doing,” urging people to stay attentive as they go about their day. Throughout, there is a sense of fear and urgency, with the speakers repeatedly calling attention to the raids and the targeting of public transit access points like bus stops. Additional exchanges include Speaker 0 directing, “Hey. Hey. No. No. No. You're not gonna scare me,” and Speaker 1 insisting, “Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Don’t touch her.” The overall message is a warning to community members about ICE activity at specific transit hubs and the potential for people to be detained, paired with strong emotional reactions to the perceived aggression and disruption.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: $50,000. This is what your fucking soul is worth? Speaker 1: How could you guys do this to us, man? You understand what you guys are fucking doing? Look at this shit. Look at this. Speaker 0: What are you doing? What are you doing? Hey. Hey. No. No. No. No. You're not gonna scare me. Speaker 1: Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Don't touch her. Back up. This morning, we came by to this location, Bergen Lyon Avenue at a White Castle. ICE came by and grabbed people. They are targeting the bus stops. Again, they are targeting the bus stops. Speaker 0: You fucking terrorists. You're a fucking terrorist. What are these people doing? What are these people doing? Going to work. Speaker 1: Fairview Avenue. You see? So they're targeting this area, guys. How many other bus stops? How many other locations? So, again, you gotta be on point. Just be aware of what you're doing. Be aware that any moment a vehicle like this can't see into the window. There are tints. They came into this location, and they grabbed people. So, again, we're letting you guys know, please be attentive.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#14: https://t.co/bmDo2E55Wo

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨DHS lied again about a Border Patrol shooting in San Bernardino. U.S. citizens were illegally stopped, their windows smashed, and then shot at fourteen times while trying to DRIVE AWAY… with a TEENAGER inside the car. After the shooting, DHS tried to flip the story and charged the driver, Francisco Longoria, with assault on a federal officer. That charge collapses immediately on video. There were no agents and no vehicles in front of the car. No one was being threatened. No officer was in danger. On August 16, Border Patrol agents unlawfully detained a U.S. citizen traveling with his teenage son and his daughter’s boyfriend. Agents demanded identification without legal cause. When the family did not comply, agents smashed the vehicle’s windows… an unlawful escalation and destruction of property. Francisco drove away in fear. As the car was fleeing, agents opened fire 14 times. DHS later claimed the shooting was “self-defense,” saying the driver “forced a CBP officer to discharge his firearm.” That is a lie. The videos clearly show no imminent threat, no officer in the vehicle’s path, and no legal justification for deadly force. Fleeing is not a capital offense. Law enforcement is not allowed to shoot people for driving away. The charges against Francisco were eventually dropped. But, the agents who illegally detained U.S. citizens, smashed their windows, and fired 14 rounds at a car carrying a teenager? They faced no consequences. So, the question isn’t whether DHS lied… The question is: how many citizens have to be shot at before federal agents are held accountable for violating the Constitution?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Francisco Longoria’s case unfolded in San Bernardino, Southern California. He was stopped in his car with his teenage son in the passenger seat and another man in the back seat by border patrol agents. The situation is depicted in two separate cell phone videos and a video from a surveillance camera across the street. In these videos, one border patrol agent is seen smashing the car’s glass. Then Longoria drives away. Importantly, the surveillance video across the street clearly shows there were no federal agents or federal vehicles in front of or in any way in the path of Longoria’s vehicle when he drove away, yet that moment is when a border patrol agent discharged his firearm at him multiple times. The Department of Justice charged Longoria with assault on an officer. However, prosecutors dropped the case within less than a month of filing it. This is not an isolated outcome; it is part of a broader pattern observed in several cases. The narrative notes that this dropping of charges is not unique to Longoria’s case, and that there are other instances where cases have been thrown out by judges. From the reviewed material, only four of the cases examined actually have ongoing criminal prosecutions. This total is described as a much smaller number than might be expected given the DHS’s public claims accusing individuals of assaulting federal officers. The speaker underscores that assault on a federal officer is a serious and prosecutable charge, yet the current landscape shows relatively few active prosecutions amid numerous accusations. In summary, Longoria’s episode involved border patrols, a glass-breaking incident, and Longoria’s subsequent drive-away during which a border patrol agent fired multiple shots. The DOJ dropped the assault-on-officer charge against Longoria in under a month, and among similar cases, only a minority remain under active prosecution, with four cases still ongoing. This pattern is highlighted as notable in the discussion of how these cases are proceeding relative to the public accusations by DHS.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's focus on the case of Francisco Longoria. It happened here in SoCal in San Bernardino. He was stopped in his car with his teenage son in the passenger seat, another man in the back seat by border patrol agents, where you're seeing here in these two separate cell phone videos. One of the border patrol agents smashes the glass, another thing that happens frequently, and then Longoria drives away. In these two videos as well as in a video from a surveillance camera across the street, it's very clear that there were no federal agents or federal vehicles in front of or in any way in the way of Longoria's vehicle when he drove away, and yet that was the moment where a border patrol agent discharged his firearm at him multiple times. You know, the feds charged Longoria. The DOJ charged Longoria with assault on an officer, but that case was dropped. Prosecutors dropped. They voluntarily withdrew the case within less than a month of filing it, and that's not the only one of these cases where exactly that has happened or cases has been have been thrown out by judges. Only four of the cases that we looked at, Katie, actually have an ongoing criminal prosecutions, which is a much smaller a much smaller number than you would expect from all the instances that DHS has publicly accused people of assaulting federal officers, is, of course, a very serious and prosecutable. You know, the other

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#15: https://t.co/osV0EUPjcH

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨 BREAKING: ICE is now disappearing Native Americans. ICE and Border Patrol are not protecting anyone. They are trafficking and disappearing POC under the cover of “immigration enforcement”... And now, in Minnesota, agents are taking Oglala Sioux tribal members, U.S. citizens, Indigenous people on their own land, and effectively vanishing them. Tribal leadership has been desperately trying to locate them. No charges. No transparency. No confirmation of where they are being held. Just federal agents grabbing unhoused Native men and refusing to account for them. If this were about undocumented immigrants, tribal members wouldn’t be on the list. If this were about “criminals,” tribal governments wouldn’t be searching for their own people like they’ve been abducted. This is what trafficking by the state looks like: • Target people who are poor, unhoused, or marginalized • Snatch them during coordinated raids • Move them between agencies and facilities • Refuse to disclose locations • Pretend it’s “procedure” They are doing this to Black, Latino and Asian communities every day… and now they’re doing it to Native people, the original citizens of this land, protected by treaties the federal government is legally bound to honor. When Native Americans can be disappeared by ICE, no one is “safe.” This is not law enforcement. This is not immigration policy. This is a system that treats POC as disposable bodies… and calls it national security.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A representative from the Oglala Sioux Tribe notes that one member has been released, but the other three could not be located. The council members gained access to the facility but were unable to find their three tribal members today, and they claim they are not classifying them by nationality, acknowledging that tribal members are citizens of the United States since 1924. They state that there is nobody more American than American Indians, and they could not locate them today, so they will continue on. They assert that we are America. They question how Native Americans could be targeted and imprisoned by immigration and customs enforcement officers, declaring that such targeting is legally impossible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And one of them has been released, but they couldn't locate the other three. So the council members here who are they're all elected officials of the Oglala Sioux tribe, and they gained access to the facility, and they couldn't find their three tribal members. They're they're not they they claim that they're not classifying them by their nationality, which tribal members are also citizens of The United States since 1924. You know, there's nobody more American than American Indians, but we they were unable to find them here today, and so they're gonna continue on. They don't understand that we are America. How could you possibly target Native Americans and with immigration and customs enforcement officers and then imprison us? That is impossible. It's legal legally impossible to do that.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

#16: https://t.co/ffkTMDF6aR

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: ICE agents broke into another family’s home without a warrant in Minneapolis, a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment, and illegally detained a U.S. citizen, half-naked, in subzero temperatures. Yesterday, ICE agents showed up at a Hmong family’s home, forced their way inside without a warrant, trashed the house, put a gun to the daughter-in-law’s head, and dragged the father out wearing only boxers, refusing to let him put on clothes, while it was -9 degrees outside. Then it gets worse. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen. ICE illegally entered his home, illegally detained him, drove him around for over an hour, interrogated and fingerprinted him, and only after realizing they had no authority to hold him, quietly dumped him back at his house like nothing happened. No warrant. No charges. No consequences. This isn’t immigration enforcement… It’s armed home invasions, constitutional violations, and state-sanctioned kidnapping. And if they can do this to a U.S. citizen in his own home, they can do it to you.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker begins by referring to “the plates,” indicating something about license plates or identification, and then describes a tense incident involving a van. They state that a van “tried to run us over,” specifically mentioning that it attempted to strike them and their mother. The speaker notes that they managed to seize or stop a man associated with the event, saying, “Nomás agarraron a ese señor,” which translates to “They just grabbed that man.” They identify the man as Chinese, adding the detail that “he was taking a bath” at the time this occurred. The overall account focuses on the attempted vehicle confrontation, the proximity to their safety, and the subsequent capture or custody of a man described as Chinese who, according to the speaker, was bathing during the incident. The speaker’s statements present a sequence: showing or referencing plates, an aggressive van aiming to strike them and their mother, and the capture of a Chinese man who was in the act or situation and was bathing. The language conveys a moment of danger, followed by the intervention that resulted in detaining the man involved.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Estas son las placas. Y esa van, esa van nos quiso atropellar. Esa van nos quiso atropellar a mí y a mi mamá. Nomás agarraron a ese señor, es un chino, pero se estaba bañando.
Saved - January 17, 2026 at 1:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I describe ICE agents going door to door in Columbia Heights, MN, targeting people by how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, and trafficking them when they refuse. A man on private property is told to show ID, though no warrant, crime, or suspicion exists. An agent says, “Because of your accent.” They escalate, grab him, and restrain him without probable cause. Recording is obstructed. This arrangement abuses power.

@TheJFreakinC - Jesus Freakin Congress

🚨BREAKING: In Columbia Heights, MN, ICE agents are going door to door and targeting people based on how they sound, demanding proof of citizenship, then human trafficking them when they refuse to comply with unlawful orders. In the video, a man is standing by a garage on private property. ICE agents approach him and demand identification. The man correctly states that he does not have to show ID. He is not suspected of a crime, he is on private property, and the agents have no warrant… He then asks why he is required to provide documentation. An agent then says the quiet part out loud… “Because of your accent.” The man points out the obvious, “You have an accent too.” The agent then asks, “Where were you born?” The man responds, “Where were you born?” At that point, the agent escalates. He orders, “Put your hands behind your back,” then physically grabs the man, shoves him against the garage, and restrains him without a warrant, without probable cause, and without reasonable suspicion of a crime, or even knowing who he is. Another agent steps directly in front of the camera to obstruct recording, while another joins in assaulting the man on private property. What’s illegal here is visible on video: • Detaining someone on private property without a warrant • Demanding identification without reasonable suspicion • Targeting someone based solely on accent or perceived national origin • Using force to enforce an unlawful order • Obstructing a lawful recording of law enforcement The man is then taken against his will so ICE can “prove his status.” That is not a lawful stop, it is human trafficking under color of law, seizing a person first and transporting them elsewhere to investigate their identity later, all for profit. This is not border enforcement. This is not public safety. This is government agents abducting people based on how they sound, then trafficking them through detention systems for funding, quotas, and “processing.” And the question isn’t whether this man had legal status. The question is how long Americans will tolerate federal agents kidnapping people on private property, calling it “verification,” and pretending the Constitution no longer applies.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A confrontation unfolds between two parties, centered on whether the individual can be taken into custody and what paperwork is required. The officer or responder initiates the exchange by framing a choice: “You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in?” The other person resists, insisting, “You cannot take me,” followed by, “Privately. Yes. I can.” The responder asserts authority: “Yes. I can.” The individual counters that they possess documentation, stating, “I do have my documentation.” The responder questions why paperwork is being requested, noting, “Because of your accent.” The person replies that they still are aware the other party has an accent too, adding, “I still you have an accent too.” The dialogue then shifts to a question about origin: “Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at?” The exchange escalates into a directive, as the responder orders, “Put your hands behind your back.” Key dynamics and exchanges: - The core dispute is whether the individual can be taken in and under what circumstances, with the other party emphasizing the possibility of a private resolution. - Documentation is presented by the individual as sufficient to satisfy any enforcement demands, while the responder attributes the request for paperwork to concerns over the individual’s accent. - The dialogue includes a mutual acknowledgment of accents, suggesting a potential bias or stereotype influencing the interaction. - The conversation culminates in a physical compliance instruction from one party—placing their hands behind their back—indicating a move toward detention or custody. Overall, the scene focuses on a power dynamic between enforcement personnel and the individual, anchored by demands for documentation, a debate over appropriate procedures influenced by perceived accent, and a final command signaling impending custodial action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. You are required to. Where are you safe? Look, sir. Are you gonna do this the easy way, or are we gonna take you in? You cannot take me Yes. I can. Privately. Yes. I can. You just have documentation. I do have my documentation. And you presented to me. Why are you asking me for my paperwork? Because of your accent. I still you have an accent too. Where were you born, sir? Where were you born at? Put your hands behind your back.
View Full Interactive Feed