TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheLizVariant
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
This guy is like a real live super villain straight out of a comic book. https://t.co/tyvBl3G7jV
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 argues that the current best guess for why we need humans is to “keep them happy with drugs and computer games,” while the idea of the social credit system is to “monetize everything, to give value to every single thing you do in life.” He says it has positive potential in some regards, such as most people being willing to give up privacy in exchange for much better health care based on twenty four hours monitoring of what’s happening inside their bodies. He asserts this is “the end of human history,” not the end of history, but “the end of human dominated history,” with history continuing under somebody else’s control.
He claims AI can even “write a new bible,” noting that all the art books of the other religions were written by humans, but “our book” did not come from humans; “No. No. It came from some superhuman intelligence.” He states, “Human rights are just like heaven and like God. It’s just a fictional story.” He predicts that companies like Apple and Google will have “tons and tons of data” on your body and your most private affairs and conditions, and that “We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls. We are now hackable animals.” By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself.
He contends that in order to collaborate on a large scale, you need to “convince everybody to believe in the same story.” He concludes with the claim that “The engine of history is stories, and they don’t even need to be true.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What do we need humans for? Or at least, what do we need so many humans for? Do you have an answer in the book? At present, the best guess we have is, keep them happy with drugs and computer games. The idea of the social credit is to monetize everything, to give value to every single thing you do in life.
It it has positive potential in some regards. Most people will be willing to give up their privacy in exchange for much better health care based on twenty four hours monitoring of what's happening inside their bodies. This is the end of human history. Not the end of history, the end of human dominated history. History will continue with somebody else in control.
AI can even write a new bible. All the art books of the other religions, they humans wrote them. But our book no. No. No.
No. No. It came from some superhuman intelligence. Human rights are just like heaven and like God. It's just a fictional story.
Companies like Apple and Google will have tons and tons of data on your body, on your most private affairs and conditions. We humans should get used to the idea that we are no longer mysterious souls. We are now hackable animals. By hacking organisms, elites may gain the power to reengineer the future of life itself. In order to collaborate on a large scale, you need to convince everybody to believe in the same story.
The engine of history is stories, and they don't even need to be true.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
A must listen! https://t.co/AQtzUsQy5C
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Only do the gospel. I don't touch politics. How would you respond to an American pastor that
Speaker 1: I'm not really sure where is that in the bible. Like Joseph was a politician. Joshua was a politician. Elijah spoke to politicians. Elisha spoke to politicians.
Speaker 0: of view, and that's why Jensen Franklin and this church deserves such credit for hosting an event like this because the majority of American churches stayed silent during this last election.
Speaker 1: churches in America are communist accidentally, and they don't know it. And the reason I say that, the goal of communism was to get Christianity out of the public square and was to get the church out of politics. Karl Marx literally said, my goal is to kick God destroy capitalism. When pastors participate in this lie of the church students speak about politics, they are going off to a communist worldview.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Only do the gospel. I don't touch politics. How would you respond to an American pastor that
Speaker 1: I'm not really sure where is that in the bible. Like Joseph was a politician. Joshua was a politician. Elijah spoke to politicians. Elisha spoke to politicians.
Daniel, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego were politicians. Solomon, David were politicians. I'm not really sure, to be honest, what bible are they reading because it's definitely not the same bible we are reading. Right? It's a dominant point
Speaker 0: of view, and that's why Jensen Franklin and this church deserves such credit for hosting an event like this because the majority of American churches stayed silent during this last election. They refused to speak out or even celebrate the reversal of Roe versus Wade. A lot of
Speaker 1: churches in America are communist accidentally, and they don't know it. And the reason I say that, the goal of communism was to get Christianity out of the public square and was to get the church out of politics. Karl Marx literally said, my goal is to kick God destroy capitalism. When pastors participate in this lie of the church students speak about politics, they are going off to a communist worldview.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Whoever stocked the Barnes and Noble kids section needs to have their hard drive checked. https://t.co/KeImHGpnqL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Found in Barnes and Noble: *May the Best Man Win*, about a trans cheer captain; *The Guncle*, which is queer; *The Black Flamingo*, about a mixed-race gay teen; *Girls Like Girls*; *Middlesex*; *Heartstopper*, boy meets boy; *Who the F are You? Who the F Cares?*; and *Disco Witches of Fire Island*.
Also found: *What's the Tea? The Guide to All Things Trans and/or Non-Binary*; a book about a girl pretending to be a boy who falls in love with a princess; *Gender Queer*; *Under Gaming*; and *Jay's Gay Agenda*.
More books: *In Deeper Waters*; *Love at Second Sight*; *The Rules of Royalty*, about not falling for a prince; *Rick*, about middle school and the rainbow spectrum club; *Icebreaker*, about a gay hockey player; and *Darius the Great Deserves Better*, about an internship, varsity soccer, video calls, and a first boyfriend.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We were in Barnes and Noble for ten minutes, and this is what we found. May the best man win, which is about a cheer captain who's trans. The guncle, queer. The black flamingo is about a mixed race gay teen growing up in London. Girls like girls.
Middlesex. Heartstopper, boy meets boy. Who the f are you? Who the f cares? Disco Witches of Fire Island.
What's the tea? The guide to all things trans and or non binary. This is a book about a girl who pretends to be a boy because of, I don't know, some some laws of the land, and then she ends up falling in love with the princess, but the princess doesn't know that she is a he. Gender queer under gaming. Jay's gay agenda.
In deeper waters, love at second sight. The rules of royalty, act like a prince, but don't fall for one. Rick has gotten into middle school, and his doors are opening. One of them looks like the school's rainbow spectrum club. Icebreaker about a gay hockey player.
Why couldn't you do why could you just make it about hockey? Darius the great deserves better. An internship? Check. A spot on the varsity soccer team?
Check. Video calls anytime with his long distance best friend? Check. His first boyfriend? Check.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Watch this man challenging Code Pink for accepting funding from Neville Roy Singham and expose ties to the CCP. 🍿 https://t.co/9yDlXIu8O2
Video Transcript AI Summary
David confronts Speaker 1 about Code Pink's funding, alleging it comes from Roy Sigham, who he claims is close to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). David says Sigham speaks at CCP propaganda forums and that Speaker 1's cofounder was married to him. Speaker 1 denies receiving much money from Sigham or any foreign entities. David asks about the People's Forum, which he says receives $20 million from Sigham, and where Speaker 1 hosts events. David questions why Speaker 1 is not worried about Chinese influence, especially with organizations like Code Pink allegedly destabilizing America by taking money from the Chinese government. Speaker 1 claims they are the best thing for the country. David mentions a House GOP investigation into Sigham and asks if Speaker 1 is against foreign influence, given Sigham's Marxist ideology and ties to the CCP. Speaker 1 defends Sigham's right to his beliefs and denies Code Pink endorses Marxism. David also inquires about Code Pink's connection to the Party for Socialism and Liberation, which he says also receives money from Sigham.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember me from last time?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Tell me your name again.
Speaker 0: My name is David. I was a big fan of yours until I realized you received so much funding from Roy Sigham that I can't really support you.
Speaker 1: Oh, well, actually, we don't receive that much money from Roy Sigham. Most of our
Speaker 0: money
Speaker 1: comes
Speaker 0: from you told me you didn't get any money from him. Now it's that you're receiving not that much.
Speaker 1: We don't get a penny from any foreign entity.
Speaker 0: Like, somebody like an oligarch that goes to CCP propaganda forms and speaks to them?
Speaker 1: Actually, he's not an oligarch. He's an individual who made some money doing hype.
Speaker 0: Your cofounder was married to him, Jody Evans. What's the deal there now?
Speaker 1: You know, somebody can marry whoever they want. It doesn't mean anything. If you look at Code Pink
Speaker 0: So the cofounder of Code Pink was married to the guy that speaks a CCP propaganda forms, and you guys are saying that has nothing to do with you?
Speaker 1: Absolutely nothing to do with you.
Speaker 0: What about the People's Forum? Don't you go and host a lot of events at the People's Forum, which receives 20,000,000 from Roy Singham?
Speaker 1: Israel might have about 200 nuclear weapons.
Speaker 0: Why are we so worried about Israel and not worried about Chinese influence, especially when we have organizations in The United States that destabilize America like your organization, taking money from Chinese government.
Speaker 1: I think we are the best thing for this country because we want our money, our resources to be used to help people here in
Speaker 0: So why do you take money from an oligarch that cozies up to the Chinese government?
Speaker 1: I don't. You do? First of all.
Speaker 0: It's clear transactions. The house GOP has actually launched an investigation into Roy Stingham. What do you think about that?
Speaker 1: I'm insane. I think they can do whatever they want.
Speaker 0: Isn't he influenced by foreign government and you're against that?
Speaker 1: No. He's influenced by his own, whatever I
Speaker 0: His Marxist ideology that cozies him up close to the CCP government.
Speaker 1: He can be.
Speaker 0: He's a self proclaimed Marxist.
Speaker 1: He wants have you ever
Speaker 0: heard He's a self proclaimed Marxist. Right? So is that something that Code Pink endorses?
Speaker 1: Of the constitution. Have you ever heard
Speaker 0: of Absolutely. Freedom of speech. I mean, everything is great. I'm just wondering why is cofounder so close to a Marxist advocate who is close to the CCP foundation?
Speaker 1: Enough of my free speech for the moment.
Speaker 0: How close are you to the party for socialism and liberation? Another faction that receives a lot of money for Roy Singh This is usually what happens when you confront Adia Benjamin. We've done this previously in the cafeteria of the Senate Building. Yeah. But you don't want to answer why you take so much money from the Chinese government or from somebody that is so prominent amongst the CCP.
You're against foreign interest, yet you take money from an individual that is propped up by the CCP government. He's a self proclaimed Marxist as well. In there. Get in there. Okay.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Oh, look! A bunch of future Starbucks baristas walked out of a graduation ceremony. 👀🤓 https://t.co/CHiVzGjQzF
Video Transcript AI Summary
It is a distinct privilege to join family, friends, Grand Nation, and graduates this morning to honor and congratulate the class of 2024.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Family and friends, Grand Nation, graduates, what a distinct privilege it is to join you this morning to honor and congratulate the class of 2024.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
How long till this guy turns Republican? Any guesses? https://t.co/EHItv48JsI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Do you see the idiocy I'm talking about? Why would 22 Democratic senators echo the same thing, thinking it would resonate with Americans? It just shows how unchanging our democracy's fabric is in the eyes of some officials and their constituents, which is why Trump is in office.
Do I have to go to Capitol Hill and give lessons? You don't get it? Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer—you all get together, put something in a prompter, and say the same thing into a microphone in separate rooms. You think that's going to resonate? Then you wonder why you're no longer in power and why Trump is in the White House.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now you see why Stephen a Smith was in the polls as a presidential candidate? See what I'm talking
Speaker 1: about? You see that idiocy right there? You talk about something, people being tone deaf. Why the hell would 22 democratic senators be literally echoing the same thing and think that would resonate with the American people? All it shows is that the same fabric of our democracy is unchanging in the eyes of some of these officials and as a result, the constituency they represent, which is why Donald Trump is in office.
What do I have to come up to Capitol Hill and give you lessons? Seriously. You don't get it? All you did Elizabeth Warren, Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer, Let's all get together. Let's put this in a prompter and all together, albeit in separate rules, we'll grab a microphone and say the same damn thing.
And that's what's going to resonate with the American people. And then you wonder why you're no longer in power. You wonder why Trump is in the White House.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
I remember this… good times. 🤣🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/kUWgaxpKAO
Video Transcript AI Summary
Alyssa Milano, a liberal actress and activist, claimed she traded her Tesla for a Volkswagen Electric, criticizing Elon Musk's Twitter for aligning with hate and white supremacy. However, users reminded her of Volkswagen's controversial history as a state-owned company in Nazi Germany. Musk responded with a laughing emoji, indicating he wasn't bothered by Milano's comments.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Liberal actress and activist, Alyssa Milano, getting a bit of a history lesson after she thought she pulled one over on new Twitter CEO, Elon Musk. Milano tweeted that she traded in her Tesla for a Volkswagen Electric adding, I'm not sure how advertisers can buy space on Twitter. Publicly traded companies' products being pushed in alignment with white with hate and white supremacy doesn't seem to be a winning business model. But users were quick to point out Volkswagen's dicey past, more than one sharing that the company started out as a state owned enterprise in Nazi Germany. Musk's response, well, he responded with the crying laughing emoji.
So he does not seem to mind, what Alyssa Milano did. Emily, one person tweeted a match.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Biden's latest move at airports? Migrants can skip the ID check with just a phone app. Meanwhile, the rest of us are still fumbling for our passports. That doesn’t sound dangerous at all 😐 . 👀 https://t.co/3NF6oJLTzD
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Biden administration is allowing migrants to bypass ID checks at airports, raising security concerns. A recent DHS report reveals that illegal migrants can use the CBP One app instead of traditional identification, even choosing whether to allow officers to take their photo. This practice may inadvertently increase national security risks, according to the inspector general. A DHS spokesperson disputed the report, claiming it lacks context. However, the national security director for air marshals emphasized that unvetted individuals on flights pose a threat, as they can repeatedly fly without proper identification, often on taxpayer-funded flights.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Biden administration is allowing migrants to skip ID checks at the airport. That's according to a new DHS report. It's obviously raising airport security concerns.
Speaker 1: Jonathan, you could imagine how frustrated they are hearing this, especially right now. It's the holiday season. People are just rushing to get to the airport early. You know, they have to show that ID. They have to wait on the security line.
Well, migrants, illegal migrants do not have to show their IDs, and most of the time, they're able to wait in these special lines to get through security. A recent report from the DHS inspector general reveals that illegal migrants don't need to show any ID, passport. Instead, they can simply use the CBP one app as their document. They could even choose whether to allow officers to take their picture. The CBP one app report their personal information.
The inspector general report states that, quote, if CBP and ICE continue to allow noncitizens whose identities immigration officers cannot confirm to enter the country, they may inadvertently increase national security risks. Well, a spokesperson for DHS fired back at this report telling Fox that it contains inaccurate statements and lacks important context. But we spoke to the air marshal national security director who tells us this has been a concern for years. She's
Speaker 2: We've been fighting this for over three and a half years now because unvetted unidentified people on our aircraft are a threat to our communities, not only in the aircraft, but when they land and take another flight. I don't know if Americans are aware. This isn't just a one time thing. These illegals can fly on flights over and over and over.
Speaker 1: And most of these flights are free flights that you, the taxpayer, are responsible for paying for.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
“We would have won if we could regulate social media” And THEN they call US a threat to Democracy! It’s truly hard to wrap the mind around how these people can be so anti freedom. https://t.co/FRYXxJu9B4
Video Transcript AI Summary
Regulating social media is crucial, as Congress has failed to address the influence of rogue corporations. After losing an election, some argue that they need to control the narrative and censor opposing views to protect their agenda. They believe silencing dissenting information is necessary because they lack confidence in their ideas and ability to win fair elections. The focus is on maintaining control over the narrative to secure electoral victories. It's ironic that those advocating for censorship may not fully understand its implications, especially if they were subjected to the same treatment as their opponents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, it would help if we could regulate social media because one of the biggest defenders is DC and Congress have not been able to do one thing in regard to the rogue corporations. I gotta get any better
Speaker 1: Stop. Again, they lose an election, and then they complain. You didn't censor our opponents enough. We weren't able to control the narrative enough. We need to be able to control what people are saying and make sure the information that we don't like doesn't get out there.
If it's harmful to our party or what we're trying to accomplish, we need to censor it. All those pesky facts and that misinformation that gets in the way of our narrative, we need to be able to silence that. Because we're not confident enough in our ability to go out there in the market of free ideas and communicate our ideas better and win fair elections. No. We need to have it rigged in our favor.
We must control the narrative. That is how we continue to win these elections. I mean, if you think about it, they lost control of the narrative this election, and Democrats got swept. I mean, it's just a fact. It's so crazy that I hear these people consistently and irregularly talking about censorship.
And, you know, maybe they say it like this because it actually hasn't been used against them. But if it was actively used against them in the way it's been used against the right, I wonder if they'd be saying the same things.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
This influencer was approached by private investigators because of her coverage on P Diddy. They offered her $ 🤦♀️ https://t.co/FzL6ir1YtL
Video Transcript AI Summary
I had a strange encounter with two private investigators who visited an old residence of mine. They claimed to be there to discuss my YouTube channel and whether I had received funding for my stories. My friend, who lives there, called me, and I spoke with them directly. They admitted they were investigating influencers on behalf of an undisclosed client, trying to find out if anyone had been paid to discuss Diddy's lawsuits and connections with other celebrities. They mentioned that if I had been paid, they would have offered to pay me to reveal the details and promote a different narrative. It was quite an unexpected and unsettling experience.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Had a very interesting experience with Diddy. Tell me about that. Yeah. So, just yesterday, we had, 2 private investigators, sorry, the day before yesterday, go ahead and visit an old residence of mine. They showed up at the door.
Now a friend of mine remains in at that residence. She answered the door. These 2 men were claiming to be there to talk to me about my YouTube channel, whether or not I received funding for any of the stories or topics that I cover on my show. She ended up giving me a call. I was able to speak to these 2 men as they were at her door, and through lots of probing and asking them several questions about who they work for and why they were at my door, they end up admitting that they are private investigators who are working on behalf of a client that they would not disclose, traveling around to the houses of influencers, knocking their doors, and trying to figure out whether or not they've been paid by a certain institution, company, entity to discuss p Diddy's, lawsuits and his connection to other celebrities.
Now upon finding out that I was not paid, they also let me know that had they found out I was paid by a certain company, entity, client, they would offer to pay me to disclose exactly who that was, and they'd like to know the business deal that I made with them in order to pay me more to promote the opposite narrative. So, obviously, I was taken aback by this visit. Very, very strange.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Im grateful Ive never experienced friends and family disowning me over my political views as Im blessed to not have any that are unhinged liberals. Its truly sad that in today’s world being “normal” is to be outcast and mistreated by those that are truly mentally ill. https://t.co/JGaLfUSzYJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
After coming out as a conservative on November 5th, I resolved never to be silenced again. Although I had identified as a conservative since 2015, fear kept me quiet for years. Following my public declaration, I faced threats and backlash, losing over 1,500 followers in three days. Instead of feeling defeated, I found liberation in speaking my truth. We’ve allowed the extreme left agenda to flourish because of our silence and fear of consequences. But we have nothing left to lose. When we confront our fears, we realize they often aren't as daunting as we imagined. Just like in "The Sandlot," stepping past our fears reveals that what we dread may not be as threatening as we thought. If you're hesitant to speak out, remember that the weight of silence far exceeds the potential consequences of speaking up.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: After I came out the closet as a conservative, November 5th in a very public way, I made a decision that I will never again allow myself to be bullied into silence. Now I had been a conservative technically since 2015, 2016. Right? I had my great awakening, my my true red pilling during that time. But for almost 8 years, I was silent.
I was afraid to speak up. I knew that speaking up would mean some sort of, societal consequence. I knew that if I bought myself one of them red hats with those four words on it, that it was gonna mean hell for me, especially in a place like the Bay Area. But after November 5th, going through one of my greatest fears which was like this, you know, what I thought was gonna be this public retaliation. And it was.
Right? I got a multitude of death threats, a multitude of people telling me all kinds of things that I should do with myself, deletion of self and things of that nature. But I realized after that point, you know what? This ain't so this ain't so bad. As a matter of fact, the benefits of speaking truth greatly outweigh any sort of external, attacks or any sort of retribution, any sort of retaliation that anybody could impose.
And I'm talking about thousands of people. Right? Those of you who know my story, I lost at least 1500 followers within the span of 3 days. And I thought that would mean something. I thought that I would feel that.
I thought if people continuously attack me, you know, I would back down and cower down. It would be a terrifying experience. But in truth, it was a liberating experience. And so from that moment on, I said, never again will I silence myself or anybody. Never again will I be bullied into submission.
This is how we got to this place in the first place. This is how we got here. We got to this extreme far left wokeist agenda being spewed all over us within the entirety of our society because we said nothing. We're afraid to get canceled. We're afraid to lose family members.
Well, guess what? It already happened. We have nothing to lose at this point. So continue to speak truth to power. They feed off of our fear.
They need us to be fearful. They need us to to be in a state of of angst, to always be looking forward to what may happen if we ever do damn near step out into our truth. And when we let go of that fear or when we step through that fear at the very least, we realize that it's kinda like the kids on Sandlot, if you guys ever seen that movie before, an American classic. Right? It's only when you step past that fence to go get that baseball do you realize that, oh, there isn't a huge man eating dog on the other side and this mean old man who basically sicks the dog on people.
But instead, it is, you know, a big old bear of a dog with nothing but love in his heart and, and James Earl Jones. That's it. So if you're out there right now and you are afraid to speak out, I'm telling you right now that whatever you feel the consequences may be will never be in in proportion to the weight that you will carry if you remain silent.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
This lady was asked to leave Target and told to go back to her country despite being here legally for wearing a MAGA hat. https://t.co/Qlg7vVL6i3
Video Transcript AI Summary
I just got kicked out of Target for wearing a hat, and I was told to go back to my country. This made me question where freedom of speech and the right to wear what I want are. People can dye their hair or get tattoos without issue, but my hat seems to provoke a reaction. Everyone should want their country to thrive, regardless of political views. If people are so concerned about freedom, why aren't they practicing it? It feels contradictory to advocate for freedom while restricting it based on differing opinions. Can anyone explain this?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I literally got kicked out of Target today, actually, just now. And I'm sitting here and I'm like, what? And they were telling me that I should go back to my country and mind my own business. And I was like, what? And I totally forgot that I have this.
I put it on, went to the gym, then I went to Target. But one thing I don't understand is where is the freedom of speech? Where is my freedoms of wearing whatever I wanna wear? If I dye my hair blue, make a huge tattoo on my forehead, everybody is totally fine with it. But when I'm wearing hats, that doesn't really say anything wrong.
I think everyone in this country should want their country to be great regardless of what they think about politics or who they are voting for, especially living in this country. And And if they are the opposite views, where is my freedom? They're pursuing freedom so much and thinking that the opposite candidate will take away their freedom. Why they're not practicing this freedom. Can anybody explain?
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
This Liberal Karen has an argument with an immigrant Trump supporter for having Trump flags on his own property then cries about it and calls the police and the mayor. https://t.co/vPaSUUMyJF
Video Transcript AI Summary
A business owner states she is being harassed for supporting Trump, including having her car scratched. She accuses a woman of wanting her to remove Trump flags and suspects the woman is sleeping with Mayor Ernie. She believes half the country hates her for her political views.
The business owner requests a trespass form for the woman. She claims she is in a peaceful space and doesn't understand why people are acting like girls. She feels the harassment is due to election season and her Trump displays. She expresses disbelief at Kamala being on the ballot. She believes police time is being wasted on "Karens" crying over a sign. She wants to go viral with a video of the harassment and is concerned about what the woman has in her bag.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hi. Okay.
Speaker 1: Sorry. Can you get a
Speaker 0: I don't know. There is a liberal right there that's harassing me. She wants me to take all my Trump's left. Now you are. I don't care.
You're probably sleeping with mayor Ernie, anyways.
Speaker 1: Okay. And I'm I'm gonna do my best to do. Okay. Thank you, sir. Very well.
Thank you, sir. Please. Bye. He he just he just needs to speak with her. Your phone?
He asked. He did not accuse you sleep He walked away. Just the longest day. I was walking away. You weren't walking away.
You're staying on the on the on the corner right there. Talking to Ernie. But that's not work that's not walking away now, is it?
Speaker 0: No. That's standing there.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry about that.
Speaker 0: Okay. I'm, like, in my peaceful space. I'm a business owner, and I don't care. That's my my my second amendment, whatever I wanna do in my life, you know. And I just don't like this.
You know, I had a car before, and they hate me because I like Trump. Half of this country does. And then they scratch my car. Exactly. Now I have this harassment that's happening.
I don't understand.
Speaker 1: Well, if if you want her trespass, I can fill out this form.
Speaker 0: Okay. Let's give it to her. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And that way, she she won't be able to come back. And if she does come back, we can come and Okay.
Speaker 0: I mean, I really you know, I'm a peaceful person. I don't like doing these things. And I just don't like, you know I don't know why you're acting like girls.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm I'm gonna advise you the same way I advised her, which is just avoid one another. Okay?
Speaker 0: I I'm totally happy here. I'm working. I have a business to run. Alright. I don't have time for this tettiness, wokeism.
You know, this this has to stop. It's election season. I know that she's not hurt, that she sees my, you know, my my Trump dress and my Trump flags. This is man of the free. That's why we live in this country.
Speaker 1: Okay. But what I'm gonna ask you for is your name and date of birth for my records. Of course.
Speaker 0: And then, like You know, and I know it's election season and we love president Trump. I don't know why they are so brainwashed having Kamala in the ballot and it's just a crazy, you know. Are they, like, anyway? Okay.
Speaker 1: Officer Peter, thank you so much. I mean, yeah, thank you.
Speaker 0: Know, I I would rather you guys utilize your time with the real criminals. But this book is a miswill. The Karens are real. They're crying for nothing because of a sign
Speaker 1: of honor, man. Okay. Well, the
Speaker 0: solution here is And they're harassing me and trying to have a take my Trump flags and everything. I'm like, it is none of the police.
Speaker 1: Well, the solution is mutual avoidance. Okay. Wonderful. Gonna tell her, don't come back here. I'm gonna urge you not to interact with her.
Speaker 0: Well, I'm I'm in a nice safe space. She walked in there. I'm trying to see the video so I can I can go viral now? She have rasp. She I I don't even know what's in her bag.
Speaker 1: Okay. Well, thank you
Speaker 0: for the information. I'll go out
Speaker 1: and pay for it and see that check her and
Speaker 0: once the next Okay. Wonderful. Okay? Yeah. I love my airport.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
This ain’t Texas. Do you think Texans would dance like this? https://t.co/rfdsQM3QKu
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Rob Schneider schooling a heckler on free speech. https://t.co/W5olrZUSCV
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses someone who appears to be angry, stating that it's okay to be mad. The speaker then pivots to the topic of free speech in America. They claim that the essence of free speech is protecting the speech that people hate, not the speech they like. This protection is necessary to prevent the government or individuals from censoring what others can hear. The speaker concludes by saying that disagreement is welcome and encourages the other person to express their views, even through actions like writing an act or performing on stage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everything okay? No. Are you mad? You okay? No.
No. He's not mad. He is. You're mad? Yeah.
Good. That's okay. There's you know what the cool thing about in America is? Free speech isn't the speech you like. Nice stuff is not what needs to be protected.
It's the stuff that you hate that needs protection so that somebody, like the government or you, doesn't get to decide what everybody else gets to here. And you're more than welcome to disagree and write an act and get on stage and sell out like I just did.
@TheLizVariant - TheLizVariant
Good morning! While Mondays can be tough for some people, I hope this new ad brings a bit of laughter and positivity to your day.Happy Monday! https://t.co/J94XvrMZOZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
The second Trump ad questions if the Joe Biden from the debate can handle another four years in the White House, referencing his mishaps with stairs, a bike, and a jacket. The ad urges viewers to vote for Joe Biden today and Kamala Harris tomorrow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's the second Trump ad Okay. That's about to come out. Watch. When you think about the Joe Biden you saw in the debate, ask yourself a question. Do you think the guy who was defeated by the stairs got taken down by his bike, lost a fight with his jacket, and regularly gets all lost, makes it 4 more years in the White House?
Oh my god. Know who's waiting behind it. Right? Vote Joe Biden today. And Kamala Harris tomorrow.