TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheOfficial1984

TheOfficial1984
Posted - February 17, 2026 at 11:53 AM
Saved - February 17, 2026 at 12:02 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

I love when people "reinvent" things from 100 years ago and its newsworthy. Let's you know just how much knowledge was suppressed.

@SciTechera - SciTech Era

New Energy Innovation A Tesla turbine-inspired device generates electricity from compressed air. Scientists developed a generator that uses the particulate static effect to convert particle-laden, high speed air into electrical energy. As air carrying microscopic particles flows through smooth rotating disks, collisions produce electrostatic charge (triboelectric charging), which is harvested without mechanical contact. In tests, the device spun at about 8,472 RPM and produced up to ~800 volts with peak currents around ~2.5 amperes, powered only by pressurized air. With no blade friction, the system is highly durable and could convert wasted industrial compressed air into usable electricity for sensors, air purification and energy recovery applications.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 28, 2026 at 10:01 AM
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 7:02 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

IDF and ADL label accounts via Ai ML multimodal monitoring of OSINT public social media data and feeds it back to "trust and safety" aka unit 8200 and palantir immigration/os database for 24/7 real-time tracking. X is the k¡ll chain. (Lavender X) https://t.co/AU16pkJLit

@iHijazi - Issam Hijazi

https://t.co/OtrfSt1MO2

Video Transcript AI Summary
They express that recognition by Microsoft or the UN means little in the face of ongoing genocide, emphasizing that “the genocide, that's when you will have our respect” and that words from politicians or organizations do not solve the problem. Shadow banning is described as a process where big tech restricts content reach for users, aligning with policy or regularity to support the propaganda they serve. Content labeling before model training could be biased (e.g., from IDEV), leading to content being flagged and pro-Palestinian users banned. Meta later calls such issues “bugs,” but they are viewed as deliberate actions to suppress certain content. They claim Larry Ellison, owner of Oracle, is the biggest contributor to the “Friends for Idea Yeah. Charity,” with last contribution around 16,000,000. They assert that if a person who is friends with Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel owns 80% of TikTok, and Netanyahu promotes using TikTok and X to spread their narrative, it demonstrates the danger of social media in shaping global views and the propaganda machine. They accuse these entities of trying to control social media to brainwash younger generations, potentially restricting pro-Palestinian speech. Lobbying is described as highly structured, with knowledge of where to go, who to speak with, and organizations that move money to actions aligned with those goals. They urge each person to contribute their own skills toward free Palestine, noting strengths in tech, music, journalism, etc., and to create alternatives and support one another to change the dynamic. They argue that Zionists became powerful by mutual support, while others are weaker due to lack of unity, asserting that unity would strengthen their movement. Hejazi introduces himself as the founder of Upscroll. He is Palestinian, born in Jordan, currently living in Australia, with seventeen years of experience in Big Tech. The genocide’s ongoing impact changed his life, leading him to feel complicit via his work at big tech and to witness shadow banning of friends, family, and others posting about Gaza. He mentions that 60 relatives were killed in Gaza. He quit his successful professional career to build an alternative social media platform and decided to devote himself to creating Upscroll, an independent platform to counter the influence of Meta, X, and TikTok. Upscroll launched a couple of months ago and is similar to Instagram, X, and soon TikTok, with tens of thousands joining monthly. On launch, the platform saw rapid uptake: hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands as users sought an alternative to shadow bans, seeking to have their content reach others. The platform is presented as a response to the pain of posting without reach and the desire to become independent from dominant platforms.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And they they give us, you know, some hope like Microsoft. They're not doing this minor. And then we're happy because the UN said, oh, we recognize the state of police. I mean, what does that mean? I mean, the genocide, that's when you will have our respect. Just giving us words and having people continue to be killed every single day as we speak now, that doesn't solve the problem. I mean, we shouldn't be happy or hopeful so much when we hear the UN or some politicians say, oh, we recognize this. I mean, who the fuck cares about what you said? We recognize Palestine since 1948 and before that. Right. Shadow banning really in in simple terms is the process that these big tech companies impose systematically to restrict the content reach for its users. Things like against the policy, against the regularity, and really what what they mean is against the propaganda that they serve or the people that they serve. The user who do the labeling for the content first before training the model itself could be biased by nature. They could be coming, for example, from IDEV. So these people deliberately would make and label this content as bad, so these machine learning algorithm would would pick it up. And then Meta would come a year after, oh, say, oh, it's a bug. It's it's something error in the system, but what really happens is not really a bug. So that's why a lot of pro Palestinian content get flagged. A lot of pro Palestinian users get banned many times. Larry Ellison, the the owner of Oracle, is the biggest contributor to the Friends for Idea Yeah. Charity. Right? Yeah. That's right. His last contribution was about 16,000,000, and and that's still use something. If that person who's friend with Benjamin Netanyahu and Israel in general is gonna own 80% of TikTok moving on. And if Netanyahu himself saying that the importance of utilizing TikTok and x to spread their narrative, that tells you a lot of things. They understand the danger that TikTok has created, obviously, and social media in general of reaching out to every person across the globe or showing, the real face of Israel, to the world. And now they want to control that just like they control CNN, just like they control Fox News and all the other media outlets. They understand now this is the new tool to control the brains of the young generation everywhere. And they want to ensure that they send them messages that they want to brainwash the next generation. It's it's gonna get even even worse. I at some point, we will not be able to speak out about anything that's pro Palestinian or anything that goes against their propaganda in general. Lobbying. Lobbying. Lobbying. They do a lot of lobbying, and they're very structured in doing that. They know where to go. They know who to speak with. They've got organization which know where to put the money in and people who are greedy willing to take the money and then do actions accordingly. Each one of us have certain skills and each one of us should be employing the skills that we have towards free Palestine in a way. I mean, some some of us are great in tech. Some of us are great in music. Some of us are great in journalism. So I believe everyone should be starting creating their own alternatives and each one of us starting supporting one another because that's the way forward. That's how they do it, and that's how we can only do it. When I say they, I mean Zionist. They became powerful because they're helping one another, and they became so big. And we became weaker because we're not. We're only can become stronger once we become one and helping each other. Why I founded Upscroll? And little background about myself. So I'm Hejazi. I'm originally from Palestine. I was born in Jordan because most of Palestinians were born in Jordan and elsewhere around the world. Currently, I'm living in Australia. I have experience with Big Tech for the past seventeen years. And since the genocide happened and still happening, it changed everything in me. My perspective to life, to work, to what I want to look for. And I I felt I was complicit by working these big techs. And I've seen many users, friends, family being shadow banned, their voice being shot on these different platforms. And I was one of those users. I was posting about what's happening in the genocide. I've got friends all over Europe, The US, and everyone asking them, do you see this content? They say, what content? So I've seen this firsthand. And I've got family as well in Gaza. 60 of them got killed in in during the genocide. So I was deeply affected by what happened. I felt compelled to create something, to contribute back in my capacity. So I decided to quit my career, my professional career, which many people saw as, you know, successful one. And I decided to devote myself to build an alternative social media platform, which many would tell me, oh, you're crazy. You're trying to compete with Meta. You're trying to compete with X, TikTok. But I tell them, if we don't try, we'll never know. That's number one. Number two, if we don't start building alternative and become independent from all these digital platforms out there, then we're not gonna be able to make it too far. I mean, it's great to go out in the street and protest. It's great to gather and and talk and share and all that. But if we don't become independent, digitally speaking, with platforms, with products, and then help one another to grow these platforms, we will not be able to get far. And the reason for this, all these big tech, all these politicians talk money, they talk power, talk about control. And we're helping them by using these other platforms. We're profiting them there. We're generating money for them. We're making them more powerful every day. Whether that were by using or scrolling on TikTok or Instagram. I said, let's create the platform. So I I I dedicated myself building the platform last year. We've launched Upscrawled about a couple of months ago. To those who doesn't know Upscrawled, it's a social media platform similar to Instagram, similar to x, and very soon similar to TikTok. Tens and tens of thousands joining the platform monthly. We've been I've been surprised, to be honest with you, when when launched the platform the second day, we're starting to see hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands, twenty, thirty. We know people are looking for an alternative. They're sick and tired of being shadow banned. They understand the pain of posting and and not having their content or voice being reached on other platforms. So this is basically what up School does.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 25, 2026 at 12:45 PM
Saved - January 28, 2026 at 4:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a disturbing thread of posts claiming the US is sliding into AI-driven wartime surveillance: autonomous drones, Grok and Lavender X, biometrics, real-time tracking, warrantless data use, precrime tech, and field experimentation. They frame risk as war, demand barriers removed, involve SpaceX/Starlink, Israel ties, and accuse figures like Elon Musk and the ADL of complicity. The gist is imminent, unchecked digital kill chains on civilians.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

🚨ATTENTION AMERICA🚨Peter Hegseth, sec. War has just entered America into the Ai autonomous k¡lling wartime footing, aiming to bypass all 'bureaucracy' i.e. Civil rights, and advance Ai autonomy, experimentation, and testing using Grok for digital k¡ll chain execution w/ drones. https://t.co/NBDbXX6Vz3

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Thanks to the big beautiful bill, we will have autonomous ai drone swarms building k¡ll lists from social media (grok) and biometrics (au10tix) of US civilians armed with precrime technology(GOST) to continously track (BABEL X)and ultimately, terminate.(LAVENDER AI/X) https://t.co/9N6IffQmtc

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The bureaucracy and regulations protecting data security and privacy are over. The 4th and 14th amendments are no more. No warrant necessary. Ai generated probable cause. https://t.co/hVfc3YkHCY

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

"We must approach risk tradeoffs, ""equities", and other subjective questions as if we were at war." "Barrier Remoyal Board" with authority to waive non-statutory requirements and escalate blockers for immediate resolution https://t.co/TOqFXvXMWt

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

"continuous field experimentation: putting AI capabilities in operators' hands, gathering feedback within days not years" "AI-enabled capabilities with warfighting concepts and experimentation." to incorporate standard "'any lawful use" https://t.co/vsm7BWwGrw

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

This is an open door for Israel to spy on us citizens carte Blanche, with impunity. Unfettered access to our data for continuous tracking and behavioral experimentation. Autonomous ai k¡lling machines on US streets that were battle tested in Gaza. Field office in israel. https://t.co/zsUijFuLtr

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Grok is confirmed to be in business with Department of War. God help us all. https://t.co/OvUIjqOihH

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Lavender Ai/X is the digital k¡ll chain being formed by Ai/ML on X https://t.co/4StS2vUV1l

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The reason Grok can not tell me about LAVENDER AI/ Aka LAVENDER X is because it is the AI/ML that was used in Gaza, for autonomous ai genocide, reformulated for use on X. https://t.co/fyScNE2DGl

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

🚨🚨ATTENTION🚨🚨 YOU ARE NOT SAFE ON THIS PLATFORM. Did you know X has an R&D in Tel Aviv? The algorithm and bot networks are being used to psyop the unsuspecting public. @elonmusk is 100% COMPLICIT in GENOCIDE AND TREASON for swaying the 2024 election and spying on citizen https://t.co/Gm40uRg8Fr

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

All the data Feeds to palantir immigration/OS. Real time biometric continuous tracking and surveillance. https://t.co/JTgzgo5B0h

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

They are monitoring your behavior, controlling your feed, and curating an elaborate illusion to OUTRAGE you while they continuously monitor your behavior by analyzing your biometrics with Giant OAK GOST https://t.co/px3Y7kObH8

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Space X flies up the sattelites and starlink provides the high bandwidth needed for real-time AI targeting. https://t.co/NjDOV6eP0V

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The adl is training US federal agents how to turn populations into security threats https://t.co/w00isTkAdl

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Antisemitism is now probable cause to digitally and physically spy on US citizens https://t.co/6CYnNDCVIW

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

1 million queries per hour. https://t.co/cPkFXlPBFY

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Its time to unplug. https://t.co/ZKQws4Mwtp

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

https://t.co/S89j6AT8V8

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

GROK powered IDF drone swarms STARLINK for real time autonomous Ai (target, track, k¡ll) "LAVENDER) SPACE X launching IDF sattelites. X (TWITTER) pipeline to unit 8200, influence operations, CHEQ bot networks. Have you registered with FARA @elonmusk ? WHY NOT? https://t.co/cGZ4rdvgM3

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

https://t.co/v9RQsMEGEz

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Did you know that leaked documents show they created a version of Lavender for X? https://t.co/ieNmnJXjqf

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

https://t.co/WHtOsc1N02

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

LAVENDER X. ITS NOT SOCIAL MEDIA. ITS A DIGITAL K¡LL CHAIN. TARGETING AND TRACKING US. https://t.co/AVWokkwIqQ

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@Ryansikorski10 Its s cesspool. Giant OAK GOST https://t.co/yelpJquUpY

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@DietHeartNews Hes right. The jewish mob is in control. Power is never relinquished voluntarily. https://t.co/5oUNBWRPwT

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@within4hours1 @goddek @elonmusk https://t.co/SbxXWXd0or

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 31, 2025 at 12:08 PM
Saved - January 27, 2026 at 9:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A thread questions platform control and alleges surveillance and influence operations, citing R&D in Tel Aviv, backdoors, and a Trust and Safety framework with agencies. It accuses Elon Musk of genocide/treason to sway 2024, and cites UNIT 8200, LAVENDER X, and ADL involvement in moderation. Warnings of foreign influence and calls for FARA registration appear, ending with a provocative hint of a looming event titled “ZION 2026.”

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

🚨🚨ATTENTION🚨🚨 YOU ARE NOT SAFE ON THIS PLATFORM. Did you know X has an R&D in Tel Aviv? The algorithm and bot networks are being used to psyop the unsuspecting public. @elonmusk is 100% COMPLICIT in GENOCIDE AND TREASON for swaying the 2024 election and spying on citizen https://t.co/Gm40uRg8Fr

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

https://t.co/Ya99Hm7ddA

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

So it turns out that Elons trip to Israel wasn't just for kosher theater and an IDF propaganda tour. A secret meeting took place while he was there that went virtually unreported by any news media outlets. In attendance was Netanyahu, Musk's tour organizer, investor Omri Casspi, Brigadier General Danny Gold, Head of the Israeli Directorate of Defense Research & Development and one of the developers of Iron Dome, Aleph venture capital funds partner Michael Eisenberg, and Israeli cybersecurity company CHEQ CEO Guy Tytunovich who is ex-israeli intelligence unit 8200. The six men talked about technology in the service of Israel's defense, dealing with fake content and anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli comments, and the use by non-democratic countries of bots as part of campaigns to change perceptions, including on the X platform. The solution Musk was presented was the Israeli unicorn CHEQ, a company founded by ex-Israeli intelligence unit 8200 CEO Guy Tytunovich that combats bots and fake users. Following the meeting, Elon signed an agreement with cheQ, and apparently, the reason for the quick closing of the deal was Elons "direct involvement" with the company. Now. What they won't tell you. Israel is primarily responsible for the creation of bots. There currently exists dozens of ex-Israeli intelligence firms whose sole purpose is perception management, social media influencing/manipulation, disinformation campaigns, psychological operations, opposition research, and honey traps. They create state of art, multi layer, AI avatars that are virtually indistinguishable from a real human online. They infiltrate target audiences with these elaborately crafted social-media personas and spread misleading information through websites meant to mimic news portals. They secretly manipulate public opinion across app social media platforms. The applications of this technology are endless, and it has been used for character assassination, disruption of activism/protest, creating social upheaval/civil unrest, swaying elections, and toppling governments. These companies are all founded by ex-Israeli intelligence and members of unit 8200. When they leave their service with the Israeli government, they are backed by hundreds of billions of dollars through Israeli venture capital groups tied to the Israeli government. These companies utilize the technology and skills learned during their time served with Israeli intelligence and are an extension of the Israeli government that operates in the private sector. In doing so, they operate with impunity across all geographical borders and outside the bounds of the law. The Israeli government is forbidden by law to spy on US citizens, but "ex" Israeli intelligence has no such limitations, and no laws currently exist to stop them. Now back to X and Elon Musk. Elon met with these people in secret to discuss how to use X in service of Israel's defense. Elon hired an ex-Israeli intelligence firm to combat the bots.... that were created by another ex-israeli intelligence firm. Elon hired an ex-israeli intelligence firm to verify your identity and collect your facial biometric data. Do you see the problem yet? Israel now has end to end control over X. Israel can conduct psychological operations and create social disinfo/influence campaigns on X with impunity. They now have facial biometric data from millions of people that can be used to create and populate these AI generated avatars. They can manipulate public opinion, influence congressmen and senators, disrupt online movements, manipulate the algorithm to silence dissenting voices against Israel, and they can sway the US elections. When the company that was hired to combat the bots is also Israeli intelligence... Who is going to stop them?

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Who CONTROLS X? https://t.co/kAI6uVnoVq

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Great friends you have there @elonmusk https://t.co/xgGkasTy2a

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Here is the K¡LL CHAIN code. https://t.co/3ZHxa88Phw

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Why is the ADL Dashboard being used in the X code in connection with CHEQ... AH... BACKDOOR. https://t.co/qKD8AKIAby

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Go Fvck yourself @elonmusk Smoke and mirrors https://t.co/hxhs928qQJ

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@elonmusk UNIT 8200 LAVENDER X INTEGRATION INTO X https://t.co/O8S2L3Ah7a

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@elonmusk Meet X's "TRUST AND SAFETY COUNCIL" https://t.co/bHHxfEJJkB

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@elonmusk What role does the @adl play? https://t.co/MnbR7hz7m2

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Did you know the ADL algorithm (created at Berkeley d lab) monitors 10 THOUSAND spaces a day? Flagging voice content in real time. Per @ADL https://t.co/PAX9Ywt52Q

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@ADL The @adl is Up 300% in spaces content moderation https://t.co/axr6hGM2cY

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

LAVENDER X IS A FOREIGN DIRECTED INFLUENCE Op Elon should register with FARA https://t.co/Q3fxuAXvMP

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Swaying the narrative Swaying the election https://t.co/n7EGlTTGqT

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

UNIT 8200 DIRECT PIPELINE TO X https://t.co/q01TOj7uAl

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

WHATS COMING "ZION 2026" https://t.co/F0BeQHkVVw

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 13, 2025 at 12:45 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:04 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Excellent work @SteveWitkoff who secured the bribe for NYPD commissioner Bernard Kerik who came up with the hijackers passport, buried the dancing israelis on 9/11. W. Witkoff. https://t.co/1ZTr8zPSdN

@LauraLoomer - Laura Loomer

Incredible work by @SteveWitkoff @jaredkushner who secured the release of the hostages with President Trump. Lots of Witkoff haters said he didn’t know what he was doing and he would never secure the release of the hostages! And boy were they wrong. We owe Steve a lot of appreciation.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - November 8, 2024 at 12:10 AM
Saved - November 26, 2025 at 2:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user claims conspiratorial Jewish population numbers, arguing 79% support a candidate is a psyop and calling for a world census of Jews, while alleging undercounting and misrepresentation. The other user replies with a stereotype-based joke about counting Jews by half a shekel and notes a claim that Jewish population hasn’t grown since 1949, adding there are some Jews “on the loose.”

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Don't mind me. I'm just thinking out loud. Why do they want people to believe 79% of the jews voted for Kamala. They say 79% but don't tell you how many jews. The truth is, the jews aren't 2% of the population, and 79% is a psyop. In judaism, counting the jew is forbidden. They have underrepresented their total population numbers for years, thereby misrepresenting the power that they weild. We know 6 million didn't d¡e in the holocaust ✅️ CIA said 14 million jews US jews in US in 1980✅️ 226 million people in US in 1980 .62% jews in 1980. 334.9 million people in US IN 2023 Inversely proportionate to .62% jews in 2023 =20,762,800 jews in US RIGHT NOW. REPORTED WORLD POPULATION OF jEWS 2023 15,700,000❓️ LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, WE HAVE SOME jEWS ON THE LOOSE. How many of them are there really? According to their numbers, there are only 992,000 jews living outside the US and Israel. GTFO. It's time to take a census on the world jewish population. #CountTheJew

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

How's this for a stereotype... Back in the day, they used go count the jew by each one pitching in half a shekel and counting the coins. jEWISH AF. https://t.co/fgxB1Mf6Gn

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

According to the world almanac, the worldwide population of jews has not grown from 1949-2023, although the red cross tracing service only reported 271k d¡ed in the holocaust. There's definitely some jews on the loose https://t.co/JUFpc6zInO

TheOfficial1984
Posted - November 4, 2025 at 10:31 PM
Saved - November 5, 2025 at 12:15 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

We might be reaching actual intelligence boys. https://t.co/PnFZcrYEyv

TheOfficial1984
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 10:55 PM
Saved - November 3, 2025 at 11:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m told the ADL uses ML and UC Berkeley D-Lab to assign a social credit score on X with OHI V3, which can identify me by voice in spaces, flag content, and link it to geolocation. They monitor 10,000 spaces daily, feeding data to OHI V3 in real time. Private spaces allegedly backdoored via CHEQ and AU10TIX, tied to Israeli intelligence, to remove content and target accounts. X is a cesspool.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Did you know the ADL is assigning your social credit score on X using machine learning and neural networks created at Uc Berkley D-Lab? Online Hate Index V3 (OHI V3) It can identity you by your voice from analyzing spaces It flags the content. Israeli intelligence removes it https://t.co/FHwWPJWcU8

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The ADL monitors 10,000 spaces a day and feeds all that data into the OHI V3 that analyzes it in real time to identify you by your voice. For private subscription spaces, they use their backdoor through CHEQ. https://t.co/N1tsj4SrAo

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

They also tie your voice to a geolocation. https://t.co/an9t99KZhP

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

This is how your score is calculated. https://t.co/qWITypZ73y

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

X moderation teams= CHEQ=AU10TIX=ISRAELI INTELLIGENCE They can and have shut down spaces im real time. https://t.co/taznLFcSGI

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The Rasch item response theory (IRT) used to target and group speech assigning a weight and label to score the "quality " of your account, in real time, continuously. Berkley DLab https://t.co/2K954GhtYo

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Basically, this is how you shift perception using a labeling bias and filtering out accounts that dont fit the narrative. https://t.co/annYMijkxb

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Once the ADL's OHI flags the speech and labels the account, it sends it to CHEQ (israeli intelligence) and AU10TIX (israeli intelligence) who then remove the content and add threats to the digital kill chain (Lavender X) https://t.co/EXOhYERUTy

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

X is a cesspool. https://t.co/qx0zzuZSVa

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 19, 2025 at 10:40 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:00 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

I also support the execution of traitors who betray their country on behalf of the jews. Unless there is some other punishment for treason that I am unaware of.... what would you suggest? https://t.co/9tz5O78Gun

@nosoup4knowles - Britta | NoSoup4Knowles

Jake Shields supports the execution of Palestinians who oppose Hamas https://t.co/XGc0oiJjS8

TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 23, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 6:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m saying in Texas it’s hard to fix influencers paid to deceive the public when the Attorney General Ken Paxton is paying influencers to deceive. You’re COOKED, Ken. $50 per like/retweet becomes election sway. @WatchChad, @SaraGonzalesTX, @RyanAFournier, @stinchfield1776 are COOKED. We have a SERIOUS integrity problem; we can’t trust our own people. For the record, this is the SECOND time you’re COOKED, Ryan. And so on.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

You know.. In Texas, it is going to be quite difficult to solve the problem of influencers being paid to deceive the unsuspect public.... ....when the Attorney General of Texas @KenPaxtonTX is paying influencers to deceive the unsuspecting public. You are COOKED Ken. https://t.co/kKisFBXBgk

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

$50 might seem innocent enough for just a like or a re-tweet. But multiply that by thousands and you just contributed to swaying an election. https://t.co/jUSSjy0qWA

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Oh by the way, @WatchChad, this is the 2nd time you've been COOKED by me buddy. @SaraGonzalesTX at one point in my life I would have totally made babies with you. But unfortunately, I am an original Son of Texas and true defender of this soil. So unfortunately, you are COOKED. https://t.co/gjJBGBIFxH

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@RyanAFournier if I remember correctly, you pump and dumped Americans on a crypto scheme the day before Trump took office? This would mean you are DOUBLE COOKED. @stinchfield1776 let me guess... you put the 1776 in your handle because you are a fan of the red coats? COOKED. https://t.co/SJWQa5FPf8

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

We have a SERIOUS integrity problem in the United States. How can we win if we can't even trust our own people to not sell us out?

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

For the record... It WAS you @RyanAFournier and this is the SECOND time you've been COOKED by me. If the truth was a dildo, you'd probably be falling in love by now fa99ot. https://t.co/gAxCi4MvNy

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Seriously. Who posts their crimes on X @RyanAFournier? https://t.co/G6CJn5Jp73

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@RyanAFournier https://t.co/gVf4OQ6ZPI

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Let me just tell you this.. @RyanAFournier is COOKED.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@RyanAFournier Don't worry @parscale ... I didn't forget about you. You are COOKED too bud https://t.co/U9Ey6K0grt

TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 6, 2025 at 7:40 AM
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 3:25 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The @adl was formed to protect a jewish pedofile name Leo Frank, who r@ped and mvrdered a 13 year old girl named Mary Fagan. They have continued to protect him for the last 109 years, 2 months and 3 days. Leo Frank got what he deserved.

Video Transcript AI Summary
ADL formed in 1913 to protect Frank from anti Semitism. The story begins with Leo Frank, who was president of B'nai B'rith's Atlanta chapter, and in 1913 raped and murdered a thirteen year worker, Mary Fagan, in the pencil factory where he was a superintendent; he tried to blame a black janitor, but all the evidence pointed to Frank. The ADL formed in 1913 to protect Frank from anti Semitism, but he was found guilty in 1915; Frank's lawyers appealed but failed. Powerful friends got Georgia governor Slayton to commute his death sentence to life imprisonment, outraging the public. A mob formed, broke Frank out of jail, and lynched him. The ATL got Frank a posthumous pardon in 1986 and placed the first national anti lynching memorial at the Leo Frank memorial Site. They continue to protect Jewish criminals from justice to this day. That's their mission.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Most people know that the Anti Defamation League of B'nai is an organization that seeks to defend the Jewish people from any criticism, but many people do not know why the ADL was formed. This story starts in 1913 when a man named Leo Frank, who was president of B'nai Bread's Atlanta chapter, raped and murdered a thirteen year worker, Mary Fagan, in the pencil factory where he was a superintendent. He tried to blame a black janitor for the crime, but all the evidence pointed to Frank. The ADL formed in 1913 to protect Frank from anti Semitism, but he was found guilty in 1915. Frank's lawyers appealed but failed. Then, Frank's powerful friends got Georgia governor Slayton to commute his death sentence to life imprisonment, which outraged the public. A mob formed, broke Frank out of jail, and lynched him. The ATL got Frank a posthumous pardon in 1986 and placed the first national anti lynching memorial at the Leo Frank memorial Site. They continue to protect Jewish criminals from justice to this day. That's their mission.

@ADL - ADL

White supremacists and other antisemites have long used conspiracy theories about the Leo Frank case to cast doubt on the circumstances of the antisemitic lynching of Leo Frank z"l. We're deeply disturbed that any public official would parrot these hateful and false conspiracy theories, and we hope Kingsley Wilson will immediately retract her remarks. https://www.jta.org/2025/03/05/politics/pentagon-official-posted-neo-nazi-talking-point-about-jewish-lynching-victim-leo-frank-last-year

Pentagon official posted neo-Nazi talking point about Jewish lynching victim Leo Frank last year - Jewish Telegraphic Agency The Frank post is one of several times Kingsley Wilson's tweets have used the same language as antisemitic conspiracy theories.  jta.org
TheOfficial1984
Posted - June 15, 2025 at 2:49 AM
Saved - June 15, 2025 at 12:04 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

WHO WANTS A FREE X ACCOUNT WITH 257K? KEEP IN MIND ●DEMONITIZED ●NO SUBSCRIPTIONS ALLOWED ●THROTTLED ●SWARMED WITH BOTS ●UNABLE TO BE VERIFIED ●HACKED ●NO ANALYTICS Tell me what YOU have LOST in service of our country and why you deserve it in the comments, IM OUT

TheOfficial1984
Posted - May 18, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Saved - May 18, 2025 at 5:49 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Do you still watch Netflix? TURN IT OFF. https://t.co/OfQdU4qOfr

Video Transcript AI Summary
Sigmund Freud, the father of psychoanalysis, allegedly claimed his father molested his siblings and was a cocaine addict and pedophile advocate. He believed children imagined or fantasized about sexual abuse and that women's problems stemmed from not having a penis. His grandson, Clement Freud, was accused of molestation and suspected in Madeline McCann's disappearance. Freud's sister, Anna, gave birth to Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda, who used psychology to manipulate the public. He convinced women to buy cigarettes by associating them with feminist liberation. Mark Bernays Randolph, the cofounder of Netflix, is Edward Bernays' great nephew. Netflix has been accused of romanticizing suicide in *13 Reasons Why*, rewriting history in *The Devil Next Door*, depicting Jesus as homosexual in *The First Temptation of Christ*, and was indicted for child sex depiction in *Cuties*.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Known as the father of psychoanalysis, Sigmund Freud claimed his father molested all of his siblings. Freud was a cocaine addict, as well as a pedophile advocate, who taught that children sexually lusted after their parents, and that children who reported sexual abuse by adults had either imagined or fantasized the experience. He believed that women were the problem with society, and all their problems stemmed from not having a penis. Freud's grandson, sir Clement Freud, has been accused of molesting multiple young girls and was suspected in the disappearance of Madeline McCann. Sigmund Freud's sister, Anna Freud, whom Freud claimed was regularly molested and abused by their perverted father, gave birth to Freud's nephew, Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda. Bernays took his family's work in psychology and used it to help governments and corporations manipulate the minds of the public. Hired by the American Tobacco Company, Bernays manipulated women into buying more cigarettes by convincing them that smoking was a form of feminist liberation. During this propaganda campaign, he dubbed cigarettes torches of freedom. Thanks to Bernays and his family's twisted legacy, social engineering became big business. Modern psychology was used to exploit mankind's mental weaknesses, nurture the public's lower desires, and turn people into mindless consumers. Is it any surprise then that the great nephew of Edward Bernays is none other than Mark Bernays Randolph, the cofounder and original CEO of Netflix? Does anyone really think this is a coincidence? Netflix has not only replaced network television as the premier home of pop culture, it is also continuing the degenerate, depraved social engineering of the Bernays Freud legacy. In 13 reasons why, Netflix was accused of romanticizing suicide during a recent increase of teenage suicides. In the devil next door, they were accused of rewriting history to deceive viewers into believing that Poland was responsible for establishing Nazi death camps. In the first temptation of Christ, Jesus Christ is depicted as a homosexual. And the Texas grand jury indicted Netflix for depicting child sex in the movie Cuties. Netflix and chill, the new preferred method for brainwashing the masses. Brought to you by one of the most depraved degenerate families of the modern era. Turn it off and wake up. BadBoysClub.com.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - July 18, 2024 at 11:39 PM
Saved - April 23, 2025 at 8:55 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe there is significant historical evidence suggesting a pattern of Jewish involvement in presidential assassinations, starting with the Sicarii in ancient times. I discuss several presidents, including Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, William McKinley, John F. Kennedy, and Donald Trump, highlighting alleged plots and attempts on their lives. I note that three out of four assassinated presidents had connections to Jewish individuals or groups. I feel this topic warrants further exploration, as there are books dedicated to this subject.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

JEWISH ASSASSINS Until the evidence proves otherwise, the odds, according to history, that the attempt on Donald Trumps life was a jewish plot are overwhelming. THE SICARII The first assassins in recorded history were jewish. The Sicarii were a group of jews who, from around 57-73AD, conducted terror campaigns, including kidnapping, extortion, robbery, and murd€r" against other jews and Romans. Their skill set was not in open warfare but in stealth. ANDREW JACKSON Andrew Jackson was the first and only president to pay off the national debt and first presidential assasination attempt. He opposed a central bank, believing instead that the American people, by way of Congress, not private or foreign interests, should command the money supply. He ended the central banking charter, and as a result, Nathan Rothschild (jew) hired Richard Lawrence to assassinate Jackson in 1835. Richard Lawrence attempted to shoot President Andrew Jackson with two pistols, both of which misfired. ABRAHAM LINCOLN By 1861, America was $100 million in debt, and its new president, Abraham Lincoln, sought financial help from the Rothschilds. They agreed to loan him currency at 35% with the condition they be allowed a charter for a central bank. Lincoln refused and instead printed the green-back and enacted the National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864. In return, the Rothschilds turned to their jewish friend, actor, and master mason, John Wilkes Booth. On April 15, 1865, Booth entered the Ford theater and encountered no secret service or Lincoln's private security, which were oddly enough, not present. That night, Lincoln would be the first president ever to be assassinated. JOHN MCKINLEY On September 6, 1901, Leon F. Czolgosz of polish jewish descent attended the Pan American Exposition, where President William McKinley would be speaking and fired two shots point blank. Czolgosz was radicalized by the jewish anarchist movement in America and enamored with the work of the anarchist jews, Emma Goldman, Alexander Berkman, and Rudolf Rocker aka the anarchist Rabbi. McKinley was the third president to ever be assassinated. HARRY S. TRUMAN In 1947, during the Jewish insurgency in Palestine before the formation of the State of Israel, the Zionist paramilitary organization Lehi was alleged to have sent a number of letter bombs addressed to the president and high-ranking staff at the White House. JOHN F. KENNEDY JFK was opposed to an Israeli nuclear program, was going to make the American Zionist Council (now AIPAC) register as a foreign agent, and also supported Palestinian rights. For this, he would pay the ultimate price. Kennedy’s trip to Dallas was sponsored by the Dallas Citizens Council, dominated by Jewish businessmen and a front for the local B’nai B’rith. Kennedy’s welcoming committee was chaired by Sam Bloom, a member of the Texan Jewish community, whose name was found in Jack Rubenstein's (also jewish) address book. Bloom intervened with the Dallas Police Department to allow the press to film Oswald’s transfer, which gave Rubenstein an opportunity to shoot him dead. On November 22, 1963, Kennedy was the 4th president to ever be assassinated. DONALD J. TRUMP Trump promised that upon his re-election, he would release the full JFK, Epstein, and 9/11 declassified files. On July 13th, 2024, an attempt on his life was made. On July 12th, the Austin Private Wealth company, founded by jews Dan Kraus and Raoul Celerier, reportedly shorted 12,000,000 shares of $DJT and made a massive bet that Trump's business value would plummet. They donate to ACLU, ADL, Austin, Shalom Austin Jewish Community Center, Camp Young Judaea, Congregation Beth Israel, Austin Jewish Academy, Hadassah 3 Out of the 4 presidents were assassinated at the hands of jews. Moreover, although they only make up 2% of the population, they account for 75% of the assassinations. By my calculations, there's about a 6 million percent chance they were also involved in the attempt on Trump

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The information in my post only scratches the surface... but their involvement has been so prevalent that there's even books written about it. https://t.co/PQrTOeCec3

TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 18, 2025 at 5:12 AM
Saved - April 18, 2025 at 5:18 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Happy hunting.

@wikileaks - WikiLeaks

Data of thousands of Israeli soldiers leaked “The breach, coupled with the weak security of the website, allows anyone to access soldiers’ data simply by entering their ID number, without going through any additional verification. This allowed for the extraction and collection of personal information belonging to tens of thousands of soldiers.”

TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 11, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Saved - April 11, 2025 at 6:25 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Bobby Fischer was a certified genius with an IQ of 181 and one of the greatest chess players to ever live. Here's what he had to say about the jews. https://t.co/l1L7u6kJHa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jews are antisocial, destructive, intolerant, mean-spirited, and deceitful. They wish to destroy, ruin, kill, and rob anyone who gets in their way. They have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, and evil lifestyle to get what they want. Even though they live off non-Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order. They are full of hate, greed, and malice. Non-Jews don't like being bulldozed, robbed, and murdered by Jews and will sooner or later resent it. That is where the lies and the deeds of the Jews come into play.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few notes on the Jew. Jews are antisocial, destructive, intolerant, mean spirited, deceitful, etcetera. They wish to destroy, ruin, kill, rob whoever gets in their way. Facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive, evil lifestyle. Even though they live off of the non Jews as parasites, they still hate them and wish to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order antisocial, etcetera. They are full of hate, greed, malice, etcetera. Naturally, other people, I. E, the non Jews, don't like being bulldozed over the side, robbed, and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or later resent. That is where the lies and the deeds of the Jews come into play. Dot.dot. Bad boys club Com.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 1:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared some thoughts on the Jewish population statistics, noting that the CIA reported 8-14 million Jews in the U.S. in 1976, while the global population was around 16.6 million in 1939. I questioned the commonly cited figure of 6 million Jewish deaths during the Holocaust, pointing out discrepancies in historical data. I also expressed skepticism about the current population of 15.7 million, suggesting that assimilation alone can't account for the difference. Lastly, I stated that what some call "Holocaust denial" is simply a rejection of established facts and evidence.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

1. It is forbidden to count the jewish pop. 2. CIA reported 8-14 million inside US in 1976 3. jew pop was 15.7 in 48/15.3 in 33 4. "6 million jews d€ad" was used 245 times from 1865 to 1945. Not once was it true. 5. Red Cross tracing service totaled 271k You lose jew. https://t.co/PaJYbBucUm

@Isacb2021 - Isac

If anyone explain this convincingly , I will become a Holocaust denier 1. In 1939, the global Jewish population stood at approximately 16.6 million. 2. If the Holocaust hadn't occurred, and we apply even a conservative population growth rate of 1.5%, the global Jewish population today would be almost 60 M 3. Today there are 15.7 M Where did the millions go? Assimilation doesn't explain it. Try it Cyan

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

There is no such thing as "holocaust denial" There is only the denial of facts, evidence, and reality. https://t.co/nlmBeOyXOv

TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 9, 2025 at 12:00 PM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 1:06 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Amer Rabee, a 14 year old AMERICAN CITIZEN was shot 11 times and k¡lled by a cowardly IDF jew n the West Bank. IDF stated that he was a 'terrorists' who hurled rocks toward the highway. If you are American, and you still support these demons, hell awaits both of you. https://t.co/XQNtGGftdk

Video Transcript AI Summary
A 14-year-old Palestinian American from New Jersey, Amir Mohammed Syed Rabbi, was shot and killed by Israeli soldiers in the West Bank. The Palestinian American Community Center confirmed the death, noting Amir was the nephew of a board member. Governor Murphy stated Amir was a US citizen and New Jersey native, and he is asking the Israeli government for answers. He added that the current conflict is taking too great a toll. Israeli officials claim Amir was fatally shot for allegedly throwing rocks at civilian vehicles with others, posing a danger to the community.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Teenage Palestinian American who grew up in New Jersey was shot and killed in the West Bank by Israeli soldiers. The Palestinian American Community Center confirming the death of 14 year old Amir Mohammed Syed Rabbi, who is the nephew of one of the center's board members. Governor Murphy even weighing in on the tragedy, releasing a statement saying, quote, Amir was a US citizen and New Jersey native who grew up in Saddlebrook. As the circumstances of his death remain unclear, I am asking for answers from the Israeli government as to why Amir, who was just 14 years old, was killed. Quote, the tragic loss of life underscores that the current course of conflict is continuing to take too great of a toll on many people. Tammy and I are praying for Amir's parents, Mohammed, Najed, and the four siblings as they face the horrific loss. The center will join Amir's family at a news conference this afternoon. Israeli officials say the American was fatally shot for allegedly throwing rocks along with others at civilian vehicles and were considered a danger to the community.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 8, 2025 at 9:26 PM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 1:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe the extreme reactions over a T-shirt. It's astonishing how far some people will go to control what others say, think, buy, and wear. My store was targeted after I sold a shirt that expressed a political stance, leading to a flood of complaints and my suspension from major platforms. Despite being doxxed, swatted, and facing financial strain, I refuse to back down. I stand firm in my beliefs and will continue to fight against this pressure.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

It's hard to comprehend the lengths that jews are willing to go OVER a T-SHIRT that they don't like! They want to control what you say They want to control what you think They want to control what you buy and sell They want to control what you WEAR. They will stop at nothing.

@jakeshieldsajj - Jake Shields

Hundreds of jews flooded Shopify with hate mail and convinced them to pull my store The shirt they tagged as hate speech was a free Palestine shirt Not only do these people want to kill children they also want to decide what clothes you can wear My store will be back soon

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Just imagine... ALL THIS OVER A T SHIRT. BLASTED ACROSS THE MEDIA SUSPENDED BY BILLION DOLLAR COMPANIES BANNED BY GOOGLE DOXXED BY THE ADL SWATTED 8 TIMES TERRORIZED FINANCIALLY DRAINED ...OVER A T-SHIRT of Anne Frank in a keffiyeh (but jews don't run the world)

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Regardless of what they have thrown at me, WE ARE STILL STANDING. ID RATHER D¡E THAN LET THEM WIN. THEY'LL HAVE TO K¡LL ME TO STOP ME. PROMOCODE: BADGOY4EVER http://BADGOYSCLUB.COM

BAD GOYS CLUB LOOK FLY. MAKE A STATEMENT. END ZOG. badgoysclub.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 8, 2025 at 9:32 PM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 12:54 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Regardless of what they have thrown at me, WE ARE STILL STANDING. ID RATHER D¡E THAN LET THEM WIN. THEY'LL HAVE TO K¡LL ME TO STOP ME. PROMOCODE: BADGOY4EVER http://BADGOYSCLUB.COM

BAD GOYS CLUB LOOK FLY. MAKE A STATEMENT. END ZOG. badgoysclub.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 7, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Saved - April 9, 2025 at 12:54 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

🚨ATTENTION🚨 THIS TWEET IS BANNED FROM BEING SEEN IN 26 COUNTRIES I WONDER WHY? YOU KNOW WHAT TO DO.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

PROMOCODE BADGOY4EVER https://badgoysclub.com/products/free-speech-extremist?_pos=3&_sid=6af928fb1&_ss=r

FREE SPEECH EXTREMIST Make a statement with the FREE SPEECH EXTREMIST t-shirt, crafted for comfort and individuality in stylish, durable fabric. badgoysclub.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - April 4, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Saved - April 4, 2025 at 4:06 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The censorship they put on this video is insane. So I'm going to keep posting it. https://t.co/aopTNImRcI

TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 31, 2025 at 9:36 AM
Saved - March 31, 2025 at 11:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I just learned that Argentinian president Javier Milei has declassified documents claiming Hitler survived WWII and lived in Argentina for 20 years, even fathering two daughters. Also, if anyone has the contact info for his daughters, please DM me. By the way, use promo code BADGOY4EVER!

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

🚨⚡️BREAKING⚡️🚨Argentinian president Javier Milei has declassified documents CONFIRMING that Ad●lf H¡tler SURVIVED WW2, escaped to Argentina with the aid and assistance of the US and its "allies," lived for another 20 years, and fathered two daughters. \😎

Video Transcript AI Summary
Adolf Hitler did not die in a Berlin bunker. He escaped Germany weeks before the supposed suicide via underground tunnels and an airstrip. Submarines transported him and numerous Third Reich members to Argentina, which became a second base of operations. Hitler reportedly lived in Bariloche, Argentina, until the mid-1960s. Argentinian President Javier Emile has ordered the release of documents related to Nazis who fled to Argentina after World War II. CIA and FBI documents mention Hitler sightings in the area. The escape was allegedly facilitated by the United States and its allies, possibly through Operation Paperclip. The skull held in Russia, purported to be Hitler's, is female. DNA tests were conducted on skull fragments. Stalin knew Hitler lived, and it is widely known in Argentina that Hitler fathered two children there. The book "The Gray Wolf" covers this topic.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People know this story and who have studied the subject know that Adolf Hitler didn't kill himself in a bunker in Berlin as the Red Army closed in. I think that's we all know that was a fabricated story, or if you watch the show, you probably understand that. Hitler actually fled Germany Weeks before that using a group of underground tunnels that led to an airstrip, and that airstrip was flown. He was flown from Berlin out. It took submarines and multiple submarines that were used, U Boats that were then sent to Argentina. In other words, Hitler lived for nearly two decades more in Argentina along with vast numbers of the Third Reich. Well, now Argentinian president Javier Emile has just ordered the release of all remaining documents on all of those Nazis who fled Germany and moved to Argentina after World War two. Basically, it was almost like a second base of operations in Argentina. If you're not familiar with that, like, basically, the Third Reich operated out of Argentina and Germany. And many of them, including Adolf Hitler, lived in Argentina well after 1945. Most people know that Hitler lived out his days in Bariloche, Argentina until he died there in the mid nineteen sixties. Yes, you can you can read the CIA documents about this. The FBI documents also about sightings of Hitler in this area. They knew about it. Of course, they knew about it. It was largely facilitated, I think it's safe to say, by The United States and its allies. Operation Paperclip, anybody? Quid pro quo? Speaker 1: Also, if you look into this, the skull that is held in Russia that was supposedly the remains of Adolf Hitler with a bullet wound in it is female. Speaker 0: Yeah. Speaker 1: So when you look for proof that Hitler did in fact kill himself in the bunker, you are going to find a lot of dead ends. Speaker 0: Yeah. And all you need to read, you can read a great book on this called The Gray Wolf. It's a great book. There's many books written about this now. But, yeah, the skull, the fragments, they ran the DNA tests on it, and the Soviets allowed them to do this testing. And even Stalin openly talked about that Hitler lived, that he wasn't he was not there. So Stalin even knew about it. It's widely known in Argentina, by the way, well known that Hitler sired two children while he lived in Argentina. Bad way.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Annd if anybody has the phone number to either of his daughters...please DM me.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

PROMOCODE BADGOY4EVER https://badgoysclub.com/products/professional-noticer-1?_pos=1&_sid=1858f73b5&_ss=r

PROFESSIONAL NOTICER Upgrade your style with the PROFESSIONAL NOTICER, featuring a relaxed fit, durable fabric, and unique mineral wash for ultimate comfort. badgoysclub.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 12:18 AM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 11:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my experience of being doxxed by the ADL and the lack of recourse available to me. However, @TPV_John has made it to trial in his defamation suit against them, which could set a crucial precedent for others like me. The trial is scheduled for July 16, 2025, and I need support to help cover the costs, as the opposition has significant resources. I created this campaign out of personal necessity, believing that if John wins, it will pave the way for my case. I'm asking my followers to donate, even just $1, to help us fight back.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

PLEASE READ AND SHARE When the @adl doxxed me, and X left the post up to this day, I had no recourse. The only way to get justice is to sue. The odds of a lawsuit against the ADL going to trial are slim to none. Without consequence, they will do it again. NOW WE CAN FIGHT BACK

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TPV_John has done the impossible and MADE IT TO TRIAL in his defamation suit against the ADL. WHY THIS MATTERS This is a landmark monumental case that has the potential to change everything and open the floodgates for all those who have been defamed, and targeted by the ADL

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

TRIAL IS SET for July 16, 2025 WE NEED YOUR HELP Seeing this through to the end is astronomically expensive and the enemy has an endless amount of money to drag it out. IF YOU SUPPORT ME, PLEASE SUPPORT HIM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Full disclosure: I made this campaign for selfish reasons. I don't have the money to sue the ADL for doxxing me. But when John wins his case, I won't need it. The precedent will be set to make my case a slam dunk.) This affects us all. We can literally FIGHT THE ADL AND WIN

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

If everyone of my followers donated $1, we can do the impossible and take down the ADL once and for all. I don't ask for much, but I am pleading with you from the bottom of my heart to give what you can. https://www.givesendgo.com/FIGHTTHEADL

Help a Veteran Fight Back against the ADL John Sabal v. Anti-Defamation LeagueThis is a MONUMENTAL CASE that is now nearing TRIAL in the Northern District of Texas.This lawsuit affects ALL OF US. Thi... givesendgo.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 24, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Saved - March 24, 2025 at 6:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A user expressed strong opposition to sharia law in Texas, describing it as associated with harmful practices, particularly criticizing circumcision rituals. Another participant defended the practice as an ancient tradition protected by the First Amendment, stating that they could not elaborate further due to their role as a mohel. The exchange highlights a clash of perspectives on religious practices and legal protections in the U.S.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Texas is trying to ban sharia law. LFG! I mean... what kind of sick demented twisted demonic people suck the blood from a babies pen¡s after it is circumcised!?! These people are demons, and sharia law has no place in the USA, much less Texas! https://t.co/mOZwNvF8WN

@EliasC1988 - Elias C.

@TheOfficial1984 This is an ancient practice that is constitutionally protected under the first amendment. I can't get into the details about why this is required under our faith because I am not a mohel.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - March 21, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 11:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been reflecting on some troubling themes in recent discussions. There's a call to support U.S. involvement in conflicts, suggesting that some benefit while others fight. I see a warning against relying on AI for verification, emphasizing the importance of seeking the truth independently. There's a strong distrust expressed towards certain groups, with claims about dishonesty. Additionally, references to established media and religious texts are used to bolster arguments. Overall, there's a sense of urgency to question narratives and seek deeper understanding.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

It's a tale as old as time. "You are urged to to support the United States participation in this holy war of judah" "The dumb g●yim will fight while we profit."

@goddeketal - Dr. Simon Goddek

Never forget.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Seriously guys. You have to STOP asking grok to verify things for you. AI is the new method of hasbara and you are eating it up hook line and sinker. Learn how to dig for the truth. Yes, it takes a little more effort but won't lead u astray Grok is jEWISH. jews LIE.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Not only was it in the New York Times, it is also found in the talmud.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

https://www.nytimes.com/1936/06/26/archives/war-duty-exemption-for-all-jews-urged-conference-of-american-rabbis.html

WAR DUTY EXEMPTION FOR ALL JEWS URGED; Conference of American Rabbis Votes to Ask Same Status as Society of Friends. (Published 1936) Central Conf of Amer Rabbis asks exemption from mil service on same basis as Soc of Friends nytimes.com
IanCarrollShow
Posted - March 9, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Saved - March 10, 2025 at 5:43 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ian Carroll addressed accusations of being funded by Qatar, suggesting a coordinated smear campaign against him following a podcast. He prompted others to consider the motivations behind such attacks and encouraged viewing a documentary related to propaganda in the Israel-Palestine conflict for further understanding. In response, another user questioned why Qatar was specifically mentioned in the discussion.

@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll

To all the totally organic swarms of accounts saying I’m funded by Qatar… Here is my love letter to you 😘😘😘 https://t.co/OG5ylkqtZV

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are saying I'm paid by Qatar to spread propaganda, but my net worth is only around $30,000. I live out of a minivan and had to borrow money from my parents recently. I am starting to work with a company to rebrand and not be poor anymore. Regarding Whitney Webb, the facts in her book are what matters, not who publishes it. I've been transparent about my income, which comes from views, subscribers, and brand deals with family-owned companies. I've never taken money from governments or PACs. I am now working to hire a team and become more professional. Let's talk about Qatar. They have close ties with Hamas and Western states and were involved in hostage releases. Qatar is led by an authoritarian ruler, and while they have scandals, nothing in this world is black and white. I encourage everyone to look at multiple perspectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So we knew that after I did Joe Rogan, they would come after me instead of after the arguments. And the tactic they've all settled on is saying I'm paid by Qatar to spread Qatari propaganda. Speaker 1: Love this text. How Anne Carroll got famous out of nowhere? One minute, no one's heard of him. Next minute, he's everywhere. Rogan, podcast, social media, viral clips. Isn't that odd? When things move that fast, there's usually money behind it. Speaker 0: Probably not wise to say this, but my total net worth is like about $30,000 including all the cash in all of my bank accounts, all of my assets, all of my cryptocurrencies, everything I own. It's about that much. I don't have any shell companies. I don't have any secret LLCs. My parents don't hold any money for me. I literally live out of a minivan traveling the country with my dog and all of my belongings. When TikTok started to cancel me, I actually had to get a small loan from my parents to fix my car at the time because I couldn't afford my rent. Thanks, mom. And no. I'm not being paid by any governments. Although, should clarify that I am starting to work with a company that is gonna help me redo my store and rebrand everything and actually not be poor anymore because I think it's time I'm not poor anymore. And it's good to Speaker 1: And then there's who's Whitney Webb? Ian's out here promoting her books. I guess the best thing since sliced bread. But here's what Ian won't tell you. Whitney Webb's work is published by Minar Mahroush, a Palestinian activist with a clear political agenda. Speaker 0: No shit. Because if she published that book with any of the other Zionist publishers or any publishers that could be pressured by Zionists, none of us would have the book. The facts in the book are the facts in the book. Refute the evidence or take a hike. Doesn't matter who prints a page of paper. It matters what's on the page of paper, bro. Speaker 1: And here's the part that's sort of dark dark comedy. Ian and his Qatari backed bot farm will smear anyone who asks obvious questions. They'll slander your name, your motives, but they won't go near this fact. Ian says follow the money in his profile. Okay. Let's do that. But why does that rule only apply to Israel, Ian? Never Qatar. Never you. So let's ask the honest question. Ian, who's paying you? What country are you working for while you're busy dividing Americans in under Speaker 0: Oh, okay. I know that, to Nima, it's unbelievable that someone would not be working for a foreign government, wink wink. But let's be really clear. I have been extremely transparent across my entire time on these platforms where my money comes from. I've done a number of brand deals with family and founder owned companies, which I've clearly disclosed, and I've never taken any money from any NGOs, governments, PACs, any organizations that I did not explicitly know that they are family and founder owned. All of my money comes from views and subscribers. I guess I've sold shirts too. I sell shirts, although not very well. And I already disclosed that I'm poor as fuck for how big my platform is, so oh, yeah. And I've also never paid a editor, a manager, a any help or any bot farms or anything of that nature. I am literally a solo actor with a dog. Although I'm about to hire I'm working to hire a team right now to become a professional. Feels long overdue. Maybe I should see if there's any Qatari people that wanna help me out. But no, I'm the real. It's a great idea. Let's follow the money on Qatar, bro. Let's do a dig into Qatar. If you don't know what Qatar is, Qatar is this little booger sticking off the side of Saudi Arabia. And it's like seems really unimportant. And it was until they discovered they had a shitload of natural gas off the coast, and now natural gas is like their entire economy. And depending on which source you look at, you can actually learn a lot about the area by looking at who what everyone's top exports are. Electronics and software, there's a whole rabbit hole there. Or if you want your source to be the OEC, then diamonds. There's a whole other rabbit hole there. But let's just start on Wikipedia for starters about Qatar and Qatar's support for Hamas. In a controversial deal, Israel's Government under Benjamin Netanyahu supported Qatar's payments to Hamas for many years in the hope that it would turn Hamas into an effective counterweight to the Palestinian authority and prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state. That is despite Israel and the Zionist lobby's long history of an army of editors all over Wikipedia. Notice that these sources are from, like, 02/2010. You can read all about this kind of stuff. He used electronic intifada. Discredit everything he's ever said. Or you could look at CNN's reporting how Qatar sent millions to Gaza for years with Israel's backing. Here's what we know about the controversial deal. Benjamin Netanyahu, central to it. The Palestinian Authority opposed the Qatari funding at the time, which Hamas said was meant for the payment of public salaries as well as medical purposes. Israel approved the deal in a security cabinet meeting in 2018. Even then, Netanyahu was criticized by his coalition partners for the deal and for being too soft on Hamas. Secret. That's not being soft on him. It's a bigger thing. Qatar maintains close ties with both Hamas and Western states. And they've played a leading role in the release of hostages kidnapped on October 7 and held by Hamas in Gaza. Although, let's be real. None of the hostage deals seem to go all that well. Now let's poke at the leadership in Hama or in Qatar. Qatar has been building a sizable wealth fund. They think they're at about a half a trillion dollars of wealth in this investment authority at this point. They're led by Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, who is an authoritarian ruler. There are no elections. It's basically a monarchy. In 2014, it looks like they made it illegal to criticize or insult the region's royal families on the Internet. Well, buddy, you married your fucking cousin. That's fucking gross. Qatar has had very strong relationships with Israel for quite a long time. Sheikh Tamim has been a personal friend of US president Donald Trump prior to the latter's presidency, but he's also spoken out saying that what's going on in Gaza is a genocide, not a peace process. Nothing in this world is black and white, folks. There's been a couple of scandals involving the Qatari royal family, mostly having to do with sexy stuff, a little bit having to do with the FIFA World Cup. This former Qatari foreign minister got caught with a bottle of whiskey and a babe. That that's a scandal because Qatar is ruled by a certain form of Sharia law. I guess it might be termed mixed Sharia law. And Sharia law, I think, gets slandered a lot in the Western world as being super gnarly, but it does have a lot of aspects that are godly and theoretically really good and should be moral and true and all that, but it does include lashing women for wearing pants. In Brunei, it actually included death by stoning for gay people, but that's old news. These days, they just whip and cut off their limbs. No big deal. The royal family of Saudi Arabia has had some super gnarly scandals like underage kids and super sloppy nasty parties and stuff. I would bet the Qatari royal family's in on some of that too. But I don't know. I haven't seen any evidence. I did find this source that felt super Zionist take on Qatar, but they did have a good point here. The the Qatari regime utilizes controlled medium al Jazeera. Al Jazeera is very much, you know, of that persuasion, But it is a valuable source when you wanna get multiple perspectives. I personally don't really use it very much, but as a journalist it's super important to look for sources around the world so you get outside of your own censorship and information bubble. Exact same reason, it's useful sometimes to look at RT if you need to get a different part of the world's perspective on some news that's going on. Qatar sends a bunch of funding to US higher education. That is a big scam. And it kinda ties into the pro Palestinian protesters being backed by Biden's biggest donors. More notably George Soros and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which to me that sounds an awful lot more like controlled opposition divide the peasants and make them fight each other than actually, like, do anything positive for Palestine, but I don't know. Especially now the Pritzker's are getting in on it. The Pritzker's have an old history with the mob. This article does a great breakdown of how much money Qatar is sending to fund higher education in America, but then you gotta notice that it's written by Barry Weiss. And then she cites this source by Eli Lake where he documented all this stuff. Then, you know, fair, like cool, he's reporting on the same thing. But then you look into Eli Lake and he is also a Jewish Zionist, so you kind of have to take that with a little grain of salt too. If you hadn't noticed that the Zionists in the Israel camp love blaming things on Qatar, like anything you don't have an answer to, blame it on Qatar. And in some cases, they're true. They're correct. But in some cases, you have to think a little more critically about, like, the underlying reasons because now what do we have? We have anti Semitism speech laws. We have the Trump administration going after Americans on college campuses for expressing free speech opinions. And I'm not present for this. I don't know the intricacies of who they're going after, how they're going after them, whether it's horrendous or theoretically constitutional. But it is a damn slippery slope to try to pass speech laws in America on behalf of a foreign nation. Freedom of speech is the First Amendment for a reason. But anyways, Nima, hope that clears things up. Question for you. Do do you work for a foreign government? Because

@NimaYamini - Nima Yamini

@IanCarrollShow @Tabcutshair Ian Carroll’s Sudden Fame… And the Shocking Truth About Whitney Webb before you buy her book like Ian is shilling https://t.co/PlSfVn8Nz9

Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you ever noticed how some people rise to fame incredibly fast, seemingly out of nowhere? When that happens, money is often involved. Take Ian promoting Whitney Webb's books, for example. What he doesn't mention is that Webb's work is published by a Palestinian activist with a clear political agenda. It's darkly comedic how Ian and his Qatari-backed bot network will smear anyone who raises legitimate questions, attacking their reputation and motives. Yet, they avoid this key fact. Ian's profile says, "follow the money," but why does that principle only apply to Israel and never to Qatar or himself? So, let's ask the real question: Ian, who is paying you? Which country are you working for as you divide Americans and undermine Israel? This isn't random; it's coordinated and funded. The only way to stop this is for people to wake up. If you're an American, share this video to dismantle these foreign bots and agents on X that are trying to divide us.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ever wonder how Anne Carroll got famous out of nowhere? One minute, no one's heard of him. Next minute, he's everywhere. Rogan, podcast, social media, viral clips. Isn't that odd? When things move that fast, there's usually money behind it. And then there's who's Whitney Webb? Ian's out here promoting her books. I guess the best thing since sliced bread. But here's what Ian won't tell you. Whitney Webb's work is published by Minar Mahroush, a Palestinian activist with a clear political agenda. Don't believe me? Her face is in my tweet reply. Check the receipts if you think I'm lying. And here's the part that's sort of dark dark comedy. Ian and his Qatari backed bot farm will smear anyone who asks obvious questions. They'll slander your name, your motives, but they won't go near this fact. Ian says, follow the money in his profile. Okay. Let's do that. But why does that rule only apply to Israel, Ian? Never Qatar. Never you. So let's ask the honest question. Ian, who's paying you? What country are you working for while you're busy dividing Americans and undermining Israel? This isn't accidental. Accidental. This is coordinated, and it is funded. The only way this ends is if people wake up. So if you're American, share this video to break the machine of these foreign bots and agents on x trying to divide us all right here in America.

@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll

Now ask yourself what can we learn from this coordinated smear campaign. Why would such a thing happen just because I did a podcast? Who would be behind it? What could that mean? Maybe go watch this documentary if it doesn’t make sense yet https://rumble.com/v67u4py-the-occupation-of-the-american-mind-the-propaganda-of-israel-vs-palestine.html

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@IanCarrollShow Why Qatar? https://t.co/FkZYaDyPoh

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 11, 2025 at 5:00 PM
Saved - March 2, 2025 at 12:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned why @MarioNawfal is promoting someone linked to serious allegations involving Epstein, the DNC, and child trafficking. This person is a major investor in X and aims to alter Christian symbolism. I also noted that @elonmusk has connections with the Saudis, as mentioned by HRH Prince Alwaleed, who praises Musk's positive impact through X, SpaceX, and Tesla. Additionally, I observed that there seems to be a strong dislike for Trump in the conversation. Lastly, I pondered the motives behind wanting to replace Christ with Lucifer in religious texts.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Why is @MarioNawfal platforming someone with ties to EPSTEIN, DNC, CLINTON, PODESTA, 911, S€X SLAVERY, CHILD TRAFF¡CKING, BRIBERY, CORRUPTION.... X's 2nd largest investor, put up 24B in XAi, wants to turn Christ into Lucifer Who introduced you to MBS and the Saudis @elonmusk ?

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

HRH PRINCE ALWALEED: ELON IS A POSITIVE FORCE FOR THE WORLD “You have a man like Musk taking X, cleaning it up, and many of his enemies post on X. They hammer him and attack him on X, and he laughingly and jokingly answers them. Look at SpaceX. It's gonna save the day by getting those 2 stranded astronauts in the sky. Starlink is saving the day in many countries. Look at Tesla. This is a clean car that doesn't use any fuel. How could this be a negative factor for the world? @elonmusk is a positive factor for the international community and a force for peace.” Source: @Alwaleed_Talal

Video Transcript AI Summary
I see my companies and my work as positive forces. Even with the criticisms I receive on X, the platform has become a public discussion forum. SpaceX is set to rescue stranded astronauts. My other companies, like Starlink, are providing crucial services, such as saving the day in many countries by providing internet service, now even connected to mobile phones. The Boring Company, while the name suggests otherwise, is doing great work. Looking ahead, initiatives like going to Mars are positive for humanity. Tesla and EVs are also a leap forward, offering clean transportation that doesn't rely on fuel. Overall, I believe my contributions are a positive influence on the international community and global peace.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. A mask is is a positive factor. When you have a man like mask taking x, clean it up, and and look, many of his enemies do do tweet or now we we call them post. They post on x. Correct? They they hammer them and attack them, attack him inside x, and sometimes he laughingly and jokingly answers them. That's number one. Look at x. Now it's it's a it's a a public discussion forum. Look at the SpaceX. Look how positive it is right now. It's gonna save the day by getting those two stranded astronauts in in the sky. They're gonna he's gonna save the day. Look at all these other companies. They all help the the the the the public and the people. Link, and then you've got the boring company. And and Starlink. Look at Starlink. That's insane. This Starlink is saving the day in many countries. You know, they and now they're connected with with with the with the mobile phone. The boring company, and I always go I talk to them and I tell them, it's boring, but not boring, frankly speaking. Look at the autonomous they're doing. All these are positive, and we think of going to Mars, for example. These are positive stuff to the to humanity. EV, look at Tesla. I mean, this this this I mean, this is a clean car that doesn't use any fuel. It's be on use just electricity. I mean, how could this be a negative factor of the world? Musk could be a positive factor for the international world community and the and the and the and the peace of the world.

@MarioNawfal - Mario Nawfal

🚨EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: HRH PRINCE ALWALEED BREAKS DECADE LONG MEDIA SILENCE One of the world’s wealthiest men. A friend of Steve Jobs, Rupert Murdoch, Bill Gates and world leaders. He’s met 7 U.S. Presidents, leaders of China, Russia, Europe, and too many countries to list.… https://t.co/k0cl9YmZ43

Video Transcript AI Summary
I bought Trump's yacht, now called Kingdom Boat, and invested in X AI because I bet on Musk. To be energetic, you must love what you do and have the will, guts, and ability to perform. Kingdom Holding handles investments, Alwaleed Philanthropies covers charity, and my private office invests in other areas, including media and sports. Politics and business are intertwined, and you need political connections. I believe in the Saudi system and support the Crown Prince. The U.S. is polarized, but the world is generally moving positively. The U.S. is transitioning from being the sole dominating power. We need strong leadership, and Trump is a strong leader.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You have a history of president Trump. I'd say you've helped him on at least two occasions when, you know, he's close to bankruptcy. You still own that yacht of his? Speaker 1: Yes. We did buy the Trump Princess Boat, and now it's called kingdom boat. Yes. Speaker 0: You haven't met president Biden, but you've met Obama, Bush, and Trump. Speaker 1: But I'm very close to Bush one and Bush two. Bush two. Closer than Obama, especially Bush the father. Very good. Speaker 0: Can another friend of yours Rupert Murdoch? Rupert Murdoch. Speaker 1: I know him since thirties. I mean, we are allies with him in News Corp and the News Corp on Fox, obviously. But, obviously, we divested before he sold it to to Disney. Speaker 0: Moving to x AI. This is your only direct investment in AI. Speaker 1: X AI with Musk. That's we bet on him, frankly speaking. Speaker 0: Your highness, it's it's genuinely an absolute pleasure to meet you and to have spoken to you earlier as well. I was just telling my team about how everyone here speaks positively about you and how they love working for you. Okay. Everyone says that about every CEO, but your energy is contagious and your achievements are too many to list. My first question to you, sir, is how? When you wake up every morning, how do you get that energy to do what you do? Speaker 1: Well, first of all, mister Ramallahi, first of all, happy to be with you. I follow you and I think you're doing incredible job also in the in the new media arena, you know, through x through x that we all love and we are heavily invested in. Now, clearly, you have to you have to like what you do to be energetic when you wake up in the morning and and invest in all these areas that that that you you enjoy. So you have to have the the the the will, you have to have the guts, you have to have the ability, and you have to have the objectives, and you have to have the mission statement to perform. But what what would be Speaker 0: your objective? Because you've achieved incredible wealth, one of the richest men on the planet. You've met every world leader one could think of. Is there a certain objective you're trying Speaker 1: to achieve? Something you're you're striving for? Well, you know, you know, our group consists of many groups, many areas. You know, we have Kingdom Holding that covers the investment part. We have the I will lead philanthropists that covers the philanthropy and charity part of what I do, and we have my private office that invest in areas that that Kingdom Holding may not invest in. And, and, obviously, we have the media arm, Rotana, that's in that that is heavily involved in, all kind of media in Arab world and entertainment, such as you have the exclusivity for almost 8080% of all the singles in Arab world. We have concerts. We also have around 50% of all the legacy Arab movie library, and now we are heavily invested also in making new movies. So we are heavily invested in old media, yet also we have we are invested in new media, we'll talk about. And, obviously, we have the sports arm, which is a Hillel, which is also very dominant in the in Arab world. And now in Asia and even international arena, it is the only team from, from Saudi Arabia that is being represented in the in the World Cup that's gonna take place, next year in in United States. So it's a huge diversified portfolio, and and they are all synchronized together and we are all along that floor that you you you saw just saw today. Speaker 0: So one thing I found extremely fascinating about you, and I haven't seen anyone ask you about this in all your interviews, her her royal highness, princess Lania, said that you're in everything. You're also a very big risk taker, which we'll talk about. You're you're in everything. And when I spoke to my business partner, he said what I love about prince El Walid is that he's always always always in the middle. When it comes to politics, when it comes to business, when it comes to any societal issue, he doesn't take sides. He talks to both sides at all times. And we've seen that. We were talking behind the scenes. You we talked about Brazil. You met president Bolsonaro. Met president Lula. You've met almost every president since George Bush senior in The US except president Biden for some reason. What is your philosophy when it comes to politics, it comes to business? Being a person that genuinely meets all sides. Well, at the Speaker 1: end of the day, politics is really is intertwined somehow with business. You see right now what's happening in United States, between Trump and mister Musk. You see the the the the marriage that happened there between business and politics. Even our region, there's no doubt that you have to have the particular arm, you have to have the the particular reach, You have to have the political connections to really to advance your causes. Clearly, your positive and good causes. For example, in in Saudi Arabia, we have many projects with the Saudi government, whether it's in in the business community, whether it's in the philanthropy, whether in the charity, charity, whether it's in the sports, whether it's the entertainment, whether it's in the media. So most of our a lot of our projects are with the government. And, clearly, our belief is that you have to be centrist. You have to be positive with everybody, and and we don't take sides, of course. But then today, you need to have a direction. For example, we believe in the Saudi system. We believe in in what the crown prince is doing. That's why I support them all the way. So at the end of the day, you have to have beliefs. You have to have convictions, and then follow them at the end of the day. Speaker 0: But for someone that does talk to all sides when it comes to the political arena and the business arena, Bill Gates, Elon, for example, and Murdoch, why is the world so polarized? Like, we saw that in The US where the president literally got shot. How is the world so polarized? How do do we have war in Ukraine? How do we have war in The Middle East after all these years? Speaker 1: Unfortunately, we we have seen United States is extremely polarized. In the last election, that president, ex president and now president-elect Trump has won decisively. Clearly, United States is polarized and always polarized. And, clearly but there are pockets of, of resistance to the international global system. But yet, I'm optimistic, frankly speaking. You have polarization, yes, in United States and in the world, but the world's moving in positive direction. Look at the with all the polarization happening in America now in the political system, look at the economical situation in America. You know? Unemployment is down to although ticked a little bit lately, it's 4.2. Inflation is just below 2.5. American growth is is well. Private sector is booming. Stock market is doing great even under Biden. Let alone what's gonna happen under Trump. So, yes, there is polarization, and there is a lot of potential conflicts. But in general and total, the world is is is positive, really. And look at what mister Musk is doing, and I look at all the industries involved in. They're all create positivity and and put a good aura in in in in this whole in this whole well, good injection of positivity in this whole international world community. Speaker 0: But one would say The US debt is ballooning, and that hasn't slowed. We've got war, almost direct war between The US and Russia. We've got The Middle East is in shambles. We don't know what's gonna happen in Taiwan. So I know there's always gonna be something. Yes. And you've been through decades of this. So there's always something historically and we are generally heading in a better direction. But it is still a concerning direction from what we're seeing. Yeah. And what I'm genuinely curious about is I'm from the outside. I get the pleasure of interviewing some people, some world leaders, some decision makers, but you've met just so many of them. Why do you think they are so polarized? Why do you think to to why do you think president president Biden and president Putin and Zelensky couldn't just sit down and find a solution rather than end up in where we've been today, what happens behind the scenes that leads to these wars, that leads to that polarization? Yeah. Speaker 1: Look. United States look. If you look at history, you had many empires, Ottoman Empire, the Greek Empire, Persian Empire, the Islamic Empire. I mean, after that, you had this the the British, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the French Empire, and now we do have an American empire. Now, clearly, America does not go and colonize in many countries like like all those, countries used to colonize, like, for example, Britain, the British Empire, the French Empire, Spanish Empire, or Portuguese Empire. You have an American Empire, and that that that empire now is is is diminishing because of the internal problems we have in United States or issues, but also new powers are coming up. You know, China's a power coming up. India's coming up. Maybe not as strong as China, but it's coming up. Europe is a potential big power yet has a lot of issues internally, but these are big powers coming. So, really, we are seeing a transition right now from the being a a a one country, dominating the whole world, United States, into new powers are coming up. And these these powers would like to to have a say. You know, we see a lot of now discussions right now about why you only have five security members in United States in the UN, United States, Russia, China, England, and France. Why not, for example, include the European Union? Why why why don't you lose, for example, India? Why not to have, for example, other voices from from Latin America like Brazil? So we are moving right now from a one country being dominating the whole political area in the world into having new forces. Now clearly, the aggression of of Russia into Ukraine, I mean, that's that's that's that's that's a pretty unique situation because Putin's personal ambitions into expanding the the the the the Russian hegemony. You know, he he he in public by saying, it was a very sad day when the Soviet Union collapsed. So, I mean, he still has this this this grandeur image of of of Russia. Yet with all that the things happening, we see there's still a dialogue and discussion between United States and America. We see mister Biden meeting Xi Jinping frequently. They're in discussion. You know? We see now president Trump coming now coming into into power on January 20 and saying that I'd like to dictate, to dictate or at least influence a potential peace be or peaceful discussion between Russia and and Ukraine. So you need strong leadership, frankly speaking, to do that. And Trump is a strong leader, really. So, look. Ukraine, without the, US arms supply and the German, Italian, French, and British, they could not survive what's happening. Now, clearly, we still like to have a just a just peace over there. But with with all these powers trying to be to take a chunk from American hegemony in this whole world, America will still be great for for next twenty, thirty, forty years, but they have to acknowledge the fact that new powers are coming up, like China, India, and potentially East West Europe. Speaker 0: So essentially, what we're seeing right now is that the repercussions of a geopolitical shift or I wanna say the end of an empire, but the rise of other empires. Speaker 1: Correct. Speaker 0: And you talked about Putin's ambitions. How big of a role do you think the NATO's expansion played in the war that we're seeing in Ukraine? Because you've got you've got NATO across the border in Russia, and you said you have the same thing in China. Speaker 1: Well, look. Clearly, I mean, Russia cannot stand the fact to have NATO come to its borders. Yet having attacking having attacked, Ukraine, now they have two countries, you know, on their borders, sue Sweden and Finland. They were already gotten into NATO. So it backfired on them from that point of view. But Ukraine has a unique situation. If you look historically at the Crimean, Crimean, during the Soviet Union era, it was part of Russia, and Ukraine was part of part of the Soviet Union. If you look historically, you the Crimean part of Ukraine was part of the was part of the Soviet Union, but was part of the Russian Republic at that time. Yet they moved it into Ukraine. You know, it was one country, so it was easy to juggle things back and forth. So when Putin took over, obviously, and then he took this, you know, a few years ago, he took a Crimean, and now and and not not much happened, obviously, from from the from the West. Clearly, they they put sanction on them, but but it was not really it was just Symbolic. Slap on the on the hand. It was not really aggressive. Clearly, given the the the courage to go and attack East East Ukraine with the objective to have all Ukraine be under his hegemony, which didn't happen, obviously. Speaker 0: And then moving to so I've got so many questions about president Trump who you have history with about Elon, about your investments in x x AI. It's just many topics considering your achievements. But I wanna go back talking about geopolitics, I wanna go back to the Middle East. You were very vocal about the Palestinian cause, and it's heartbreaking to see where we are today. What was your initial reaction when you saw what happened on October 7? Speaker 1: Well, look. October 7 is a horrendous act. I mean, what happened is really just is not right. It is not correct. It's not right at all. Nothing justifies the killing of innocent people on the Israeli side, but also nothing justifies the killing of Palestinian people on the Palestinian side also. I mean I mean, war creates war, another war. I mean, massacring, the the Israelis on the, October 7 was also is not right at all. But, also, there has to be a a peaceful solution and resolution for the Palestinian cause that's been going on since the division of Palestine and and this is in 1947. You had many wars, 1949, '19 '70 '3, the nineteen eighties. You know, until until when all these have to have to continue. There's no doubt that you need to have a peaceful resolution to the Palestinian cause, you know, a two state solution, maybe with the one unified capital or dividing each Jerusalem and west to east. All this has to happen has to be kept for negotiations between both parties. And that's the official position of Saudi Arabia Mhmm. To really to have a a peaceful solution for the Palestinian cause. So we stop triggering any other potential terrorist acts like the that like the one that happened on on October. Speaker 0: But but do you think yeah. Yeah. I've spoken to a lot of people about this. Many are saying that a two state solution is essentially dead. It's not possible anymore after October 7. Speaker 1: Well, I don't believe so because resolution two for two of United United Nations, it really talks about all these issues. So I don't believe it's that, frankly speaking, The the two maybe under Netanyahu under Netanyahu and the current regime in Israel maybe is is not not ready to fly or take off. But that's the only solution for the Palestinian dilemma that's been going on for for so many years. Speaker 0: Seeing, you know, October 7 led to to, you know, impact of the entire region, not just Palestine, what we're seeing in Lebanon, what we saw now in Syria as well. We saw Iran weaker than it's ever been. We've talked about this earlier. I wanna get your general thoughts on where Iran stands today. You've been very critical of Iran. Iran should never have nuclear weapons. You were not happy with America's stance under Obama. They weren't strict enough. They weren't they weren't harsh enough towards Iran. Obviously, Trump is a lot more hawkish. So what are your general thoughts on the new Iran and the new the new power landscape in The Middle East? Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. The October the October attack from Hamas to to Israel triggered many events. You know, we see we saw how Hezbollah got an alliance with that act and attacked Israel. I think this this came from the from the idea of be of having a of of a rezone debt. They they had Speaker 0: to do that. A reason to be. Speaker 1: Exactly. A reason a reason to be, which and we've seen how they've been decimated now by the Israeli forces without without without much losses of on the Israeli forces. So Nassal has gone. 80% of their military power has been eradicated. Their leadership has gone as well. Yes. Yes. We've seen how Iran has been wounded also, been attacked by Israel in in inside the Iranian borders, and we see what happened to Syrian regime. All these factors really, were huge will have huge impact on our region. As a result of that, you you this may create ironically speaking, this may may create even more stability in our region. No. Clearly, our region without Hezbollah, and I call them terrorist Hezbollah, is a lot better than having Hezbollah being strong and and and and the hegemony in Lebanon. So the collapse of Syrian regime, the the destruction of big part of the Hezbollah military infrastructure in Lebanon, and the the weakening dramatic weakening and substantial weakening of Iran. All these are project factors for for for our region, frankly speaking, and we have to look at that long term. And you see right now how parliament leader in Lebanon called for an election of president on the January 9 in Lebanon, which is, you know, after two years of her not having president there. So all these events, hopefully, will will create more stability in our area and region. Speaker 0: Interesting. Can you expand on that? So a lot of people don't see that. They just don't see what's what's happening right now in The Middle East to be the precipice for more stability. But you're in in some ways, I think The Middle East is is got a fork in the road for some countries where Lebanon now without Hezbollah, without military power of Hezbollah, has the ability to get closer to the West, which allows it to be more prosperous. If you look at all countries in the Middle East, the ones that are aligned with the West are more prosperous, whether you like or dislike the West. But the alternative is more instability, similar to what we're seeing in Syria. Now, you've different rebel groups, we talked about it earlier, you've got a Kurdish group, you've got the Turkish backed group fighting together in Syria. I know you're an optimist, but if I had to to ask you to give a likelihood of both possibilities. Speaker 1: Great question. I'm optimist, but I'm a realist. Let me elaborate on on the situation in The Middle East here. We have 22 Arab countries. I like to separate the Arab world into two parts, and this is gonna be fascinating for you. Look at the six monarchies in Arab world, GCC members, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, all kingdoms. And look at the Kingdom Of Jordan. Clearly, don't have much resources yet very stable in in a very nasty neighborhood around them. Look at Morocco. So eight kingdoms, relatively speaking, are doing great regardless of having oil and and oil and gas or not. They are stable and doing, relatively speaking, great. But look at all the other republican or other republic countries in Arabic. Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen, Somalia, Djibouti, Tunis, Libya, all all either they have civil wars or they've been devastated or demolished or in bad shape. And the only exception is Egypt. And Egypt is doing relatively well because the huge support coming from from the six monarchies in in in in in the region. And guess what? Among those countries who are really doing bad, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, what's and even Sudan, what's coming around among all of them? It's Iran. It's the interference of Iran in all those countries. Speaker 0: Why why is Iran doing that? Speaker 1: Look. The doctrine the doctrine of Iran, the the the is revolutionary. He's living on instability, and that's what's created all over the place. Look at look at Yemen, what's happening in Yemen. Yemen was doing great. Look what's happening to right now. It's almost complete collapse. Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Palestine. You know, even Sudan, they're interfering. You know? So whenever the and, clearly, I'm not saying that all those countries are in in deep trouble just because of Iran, but Iran played a huge role in these countries being destabilized and not doing growth and great. Speaker 0: The optimistic view is that Iran weakening would allow those countries to move away from Iran's group. But what would be the alternative? So how would that work? Would they have to be what would be so what would Iran have to do now that they're weakened? Because when you have someone in the corner, there's two outcomes. They become your friend. They have to normalize relations, but they have to save face because their raison d'etre is revolution. So if their raison d'etre is revolution, then they cannot normalize relations with the West. So they keep fighting, but then, what, a direct war? Speaker 1: Look, we are now in transition United States. Biden is gonna leave. Trump is gonna take over January 20. So I I think we have to give this, time to play. Clearly, the Biden administration was really, I would say, somehow accommodating for the for the Iran regime. I mean, look at all the sanctions. Iran was still producing 3.52 to to 4,000,000 barrels a day and exporting the bulk of it. So all that all that with the sanctions. So, really, the Biden administration was not really imposing the the the so called sanctions heavily on on Iran. Clearly, now we're gonna have a new administration, and we have to see what mister Trump is gonna do and how he's gonna act and react to what's happening in Iran. Clearly, Iran can only understand force. And look what's happening what happened between when Israel attacked them aggressively a few times, they shook them shook them. And as a result of that, their their the support to to the Syrian regime diminished substantially, which triggered and caused the collapse of the Syrian regime. That was one one of the main reasons there. I mean, you had a lot of Iranian personnel, a lot of Iranian revolution guard, and their Hezbollah surrogates being in Syria. Clearly. So when you hit them hard, these people really listen and back up back off. So are you Speaker 0: saying that are you implying that force will be the only way to get Iran to change? Speaker 1: I think force force is one of the ways for sure, but you cannot be with them lenient for sure. You have to be tough and aggressive with them for them to listen. And look what happened. Syria's a great example. Mhmm. Great great example. Look. They just give it gave up completely on that, on their major ally, major ally in in the Arab world was Syria. Clearly, you know, relation with Iraq is still strong, but it's not that strong with the ex Syrian regime. Assad regime. Yes. Speaker 0: But what about China and Russia's role in this? Because they'll obviously, they have an incentive to distract or least Russia has an incentive to distract The US from Ukraine, Speaker 1: and China has an incentive to weaken The US. Look. China, you know, let's neutralize China on on this Syrian issue. We have seen also Russia. Russia have a military base north of Damascus, and they have a lot of personnel there. And they tried to hit the rebels at the start of the of the rebellion. But look what happened. They they completely collapsed. They pulled out, and all the power of Russia in Syria disappeared because they are so busy right now what's happening in Ukraine. That's for sure, obviously. The emphasis right now is in Ukraine. So, really, Syria became secondary. And and, you know, all these factors caused the collapse of the Syrian regime. See, Russia is also wounded, and they are so much immersed. I'm not so busy. They're immersed in the in the Korean War. Hundreds of thousands of the Russian military army, you know, got killed over there. And and so a lot of their armament was also hit badly there. So, you have seen The US technology, the German technology, German technology, Italian technology, French Italian, and and the and the British technology, you know, in in in arms, impacting dramatically the the war over there and having Russia Ukraine not necessarily winning the war, but at least not having lose the war in Ukraine. Speaker 0: You're pretty optimistic about Lebanon and and and the region as a whole. But how about Syria? We've got the Assad regime, you know, it's just been days. It's just so many events that are just shocking. The regime fell within days. First, I'm guessing it was as surprising to you as everyone else. Was it surprising to you Speaker 1: or you expected that? Frankly speaking, if, you know, in hindsight, when you see the collapse of Hezbollah, you see the weakening dramatic weakening of Iran and Russia's immerse immersement in in in in in Ukraine, this was really expected, frankly speaking, and see the collapse collapse in matter of of almost seventy two hours. It's crazy. So, really, what what's next in Syria depends on what happens inside this Syria. Clearly, early indications are positive because the ex prime minister, Jalali, now is cooperating with the with the head of the leaders of the rebellious leaders. And the first council ministers met yesterday or today, actually, they met. So we are seeing early indications that they are not Daesh oriented, not Daesh type, And they really, gave the people the freedom and the rights to to to to wear and dress to do what to do whatever they wish. So we are seeing early indications of this thing not moving the Daesh path or avenue, which is great news, frankly speaking, but it's too early to judge. There are too many forces, as I told you. You know, we have the Kurdish in Northeast. In the Northwest, you have the, Turkish backed, rebellious people are still there, and you have the in the South, other factors also. That's where the American base is also. So, really, if you look at the map of Syria, it's very much divided. So it's too early to judge, but we really hope to have one unified, government that really takes over completely and, spread all its its its hegemony on all the country and really to create stability over there. Too early to judge, but the very early indications are not negative, but too early to judge. It's still could go bad. Speaker 0: And do you think it's a possibility? Was speaking to the daughter of the defense minister in in on the day Damascus fell as a defense minister on Assad's government, and her uncle's was the leader of the rebels, and her dad's side is all with the rebels. So she's literally in the middle. Her family split both sides. And when I asked what she expected the outcome to be, speaking to her family members on both sides, and she was pretty pessimistic. She thinks Syria could break up in different countries, different states. Is that a possibility? Speaker 1: Look. I told you, it's too early to judge. Now the rebel the the rebel rebels control Damascus and the vicinity, but still all other parts, Northeast, Northwest, Southeast, and even Southwest, all those are still dominated and controlled by different factions. Too early to judge. Now, clearly, we do not want to have this, this group only control Damascus. They have to have, their dominance and control of all the Syrian borders. Too early to judge. But still, it could go any direction, frankly speaking. But the only indication is that there are some positive Understood. Direction over there. Speaker 0: And what about president Trump's he's pretty forceful when it comes to Iran, but he also does not want to intervene. He made that very clear about Syria as well. Do you think that's the right path for The US not to intervene? Speaker 1: Look. I think that United States dominance in the world creates an obligation at states to interfere in certain areas as necessary. And by the way, you have a small military base and Syria already. It's already there, and you have around 950 people personnel are still over there. So so American forces are already the boots are already on the ground right now. Clearly, they they are not involved in the war, but and they use surgical steps to hit certain areas like they did a few a few days ago. So United States power and hegemony and control of the whole world is still there. You cannot rule it out. Now I understand, American Amex don't have any boots on the ground. We've seen what happened in Afghanistan. We've seen what happened in Iraq. These are more pretty chaotic situations, and I'm sure and, you know, I love United States, and I don't want United States to be hurt. And we don't want someone see these images of how, America was hurt badly in Iraq and how the evacuation of the Americans took place in in a in a in a disastrous way from Afghanistan. We don't want see this happen, of course. Mhmm. But at end of the day, America's presence in solving problems and and giving solutions cannot be cannot be compensated by any other country. Speaker 0: Before we move to president Trump, you've known for a very long time, you have a history with, I wanna go back to Israel. Israel struck I I lost track of how many I think 240 targets in Syria. They just demolished their 55 exactly. Two fifty five targets. They've demolished their military capabilities. They've obviously demolished Hezbollah in such a a movie like Yeah. Strategy with the with the walkie talkies or the the communication devices exploding. What do you think Israel will do next? Because they seem to be calling the shots right now in The Middle East and no one's standing in the way. Speaker 1: Look. Israel has proved lately that they have of, you know, a very strong control of the military part of the of of the Middle East. But, look, you cannot live in this region as Israel with all the neighborhood around you and not being supporting you or being on your side. At the end of the day, all these these military strikes, they have to had to stop. Actually, I would say that they ran out of targets in Lebanon by hitting the Hezbollah leaders. No more targets to hit. They ran out of targets in Lebanon. And in Syria, we've seen they decimated all the military infrastructure of of the So quickly. Of the ex Syrian army and the navy. Clear their force was almost demolished. There's nothing there. So it really decimated that completely. Clearly, the rationale is that they're worried and concerned to have this all this military infrastructure to fall into so called terrorist, rebellious groups, you know, which which, you know and then the this thing happened already, so it's we can't do much about it. But, really, we have to look now over the the peace, how Israel could live in this region and this neighborhood with with with with with peacefully with their Arab neighbors. Clearly, they they had they had peace right now with Bahrain, UAE, Morocco, and certain extent Sudan. Obviously, before that, you had Jordan, and you have Egypt. So with some six, seven, eight countries, they have they have, you know, an almost, I would say, normalized relationship. But still, this is not really helped them in in in dibbling it to tranquility and stability. So at the end of the day, without dissolving the Palestinian states and resolving the the the the issue of of Jerusalem, which is very important, the Islamic and Arab world, there's no way you can have peace in the Arab world. And the official position of Saudi Arabia and the crown prince of Saudi Arabia is that we need to have two two state resolution and to be and have Jerusalem East Jerusalem as the capital city of New Palestine. Speaker 0: Last question on this topic before moving to president Trump is how involved do you think Iran was in October 7? I know we've seen all these different conflicting reports. How big of a role do you play do you think they played, and do you think the intention was to jeopardize the normalization of relations between Saudi and Israel? Speaker 1: Well, look. The crown prince of Saudi Arabia came on Fox Fox News and publicly said that we are so close into having a normalized relationship with Israel, clearly, after certain conditions were met. It was public confirmation. Clearly, one of the theories is that they tried to to create an obstacle to to that idea. Now whether it's this correct or not, it's academic. But I believe that there's no doubt about that that that Iran infiltrated Hamas. They were their their military arm in in in Gaza. So whether they were involved explicitly or implicitly, there's no doubt you could see that they're they're the the spirit of the Iranian revolution that is really terrorist very terrorist oriented was there. It's like like the Houthis. You know? How in the hell would the Houthis that are more than 2,500 miles away come and hit Al Aqaba and, you know, and hit the Elad, you know, the the the the Israeli resort in South Israel. I mean, all this is on that, frankly speaking. I think it's all being orchestrated by or orchestrated by Iran. So weakening of Iran is important for the stability of our region. Speaker 0: I think everyone all eyes are on president Trump right now as he takes office in a few weeks. Yep. So you have a history of president Trump. I'd say you've helped him on at least two occasions when, you know, he's close to bankruptcy. You even own you still own that yacht of his? Speaker 1: Yes. We did buy the the Trump Princess boat, and now it's called Kingdom Boat. Yes. And And we did also buy from the Plaza Hotel. Speaker 0: And when was that? When did you buy the Plaza Hotel? Speaker 1: This was in the '19 late nineteen eighties or early nineteen nineties. Speaker 0: So can you tell me more about president Trump? Because we've seen him evolve over the years. You know, remember, he's even a democrat early on. So you've met president Trump. You know him better than I for sure. How is he now as a person? How was he before? And and you know, trying to get into his mind, do you think he's well intentioned when it comes to the Middle East, when it comes to Iran, when it comes to normalizing relations between Israel and and the and the Arab world? And do you think he's capable of achieving that? Speaker 1: Look, Trump was very clear saying that he he wants to have peace, in the whole world, obviously, which is very positive, obviously. Now as far as I were concerned, we want peace in our region. And clearly, with with the with the with the forcefulness and the good mandate that president Trump Trump had in the last election, this really should help really in in having a and hopefully a fast process whereby peaceful acts could really stabilize our region. So I'm optimistic about having president Trump take over January 20 and give our region the opportunity to to have a after all these years of of civil strife and problems and wars and issue negative issues is to have stability and peace here. You're known to Speaker 0: speak your mind. You had you're pretty public as well when you were upset with something Trump said. I can't remember what it was in 2016 about Islam. So you've always been vocal similar to Trump. He's also very direct, and that's something that you praise in president Trump. What what do you think about his his his strengths and weaknesses as a president? Speaker 1: Well, look. We we have seen Trump in his first presidency, And, now he obviously, he came back with a strong mandate, from, the population, that voted for him and the electoral college also. So he has a sweep over there. So president Trump is gonna come strong. And, clearly, that's his second term. So he has no third term to be elected and not not look forward for third third term presidency. So I think he's now more free, more at ease to really take tough decisions, not only on the political front, but also on the economical front. We'll talk shortly about mister Musk's involvement and these huge time bombs we have in United States, the budget deficit, the the trade deficit. Speaker 0: As one of the biggest investors in The US. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, we are huge investors in United States, so so we'll talk about this in a minute. But on the political front, I believe that he is gonna be very forceful, and we need that. We've seen how Zelenskyy began talking about the potential peaceful resolution for the Ukrainian Russian The whole war. The narrative changed. The whole narrative and attitude changed, which that's what we need exactly. I mean, understand that there may be some there may has to be some sacrifice from Ukraine, unfortunate, but, you know, we have to accept this fact maybe. So I'll keep this to my friend, president president Trump, to manage the process, and I have trust in him, frankly speaking. Speaker 0: You've met as far as I understand, you've met oh, again, the the number of world leaders you met is mind boggling, but you've met every single president US president since Speaker 1: George Bush senior. Ford. Since Ford. Oh, wow. Yeah. Since president in your book here. Since president Ford? Yes. Yes. I I was I was living in that states, and I was living in in in the Bay Area. And there was an event in in San Francisco as I met president Ford over there. Yes. Speaker 0: Wow. But there's one exception. That's president Biden. Speaker 1: Biden did meet. Did not meet. No. But I because I, you know, I I didn't have the opportunity to meet him. And when he came here, it was a very quick visit, you know, I mean. Speaker 0: What are what are your thoughts? It just seems like such a drastic change in the UN, like, the the whole world seems to be changing already before Trump is even president. But how is it possible that one person could lead to so much change? Obviously, it's not just Trump. It's like it's like Trump and his friends or Elon and his friends. You know, he's got Trump, Elon, RFK, and and the rest of the group, Tulsi and all them, Vivek. But what fascinates me is how? Like, is it is it really an establishment that's gonna be shaken up in The US? Speaker 1: The the agenda that Trump is coming with is very aggressive, you know, on the domestic front, obviously. You know, close the borders, get legal immigrants, reject illegal immigrants, control the budget deficit, cut the cut the waste in US government. All these are incredible and important issues that The United States have to face internally. I mean, come on. All these millions coming from the southern borders to America illegally, I mean, no one accept that. I will not accept that. Many Saudis and Arabs will not accept to have this today in their countries. And the clearly, the the biggest worry right now is the annual budget deficit and the cumulative debt. Clearly, to have mister Musk lead that that that exercise to, first of all, can't control costs, cut the deficit, and hence, can't cut the cumulative debt of The United States is very important because now the debt to GDP in United States has breached a % ratio, which is very scary and risky. Now, clearly, United States is still a huge country, and you can still survive that. But try to have this huge, cumulative debt that is a burden on on each American. So I'm optimistic about about about Musk being money managing this process, through dog the dog path. Speaker 0: You've also known Elon for a very long time. You've invested actually, you invested it so you did not invest in Tesla. You thought it was overvalued at the time. But now you've invested very heavily over a billion dollars in x AI. You were in early early investment in Twitter, about $200,000,000. Exactly. And And Speaker 1: now worth above $2,000,000,000. Speaker 0: Congratulations. And instead of cashing out when Trump acquired Twitter, you've rolled it over into x. So you've got an incredible history with both president Trump and Elon. But why did it take you know, what what fascinates me? One question I can't answer. There's different theories to it. Why do you think the the the existing administration didn't do the basics, didn't address the debt, did not address the inefficiencies in the government. The amount of regulation there is in some of these states is is is crazy. And then did not address the border among other things. What what were the hurdles? What what changed more than just a new president? It feels like it's a systemic change we're seeing in The US. Speaker 1: Look. To be honest with you, thinking thinking of the Democratic Party, you know, I I I'm a Saudi. I'm a royalist, neither Democrat or Republican. But then today, I like the I like United States to be in good shape. It's very dogmatic. You know, the Democratic Party and the left wing part of it, they believe in this laissez faire situation. You know, open our borders. It's okay to have to have all those immigrants come, defund the police, you know, and let's say fair situation. You know? I mean, I think it's went a bit too far. No, Lily. The walk movement went a bit too far in that space, and I think to me, it was one of the main reasons why the Democratic Party lost The the left of the US Democratic party, the progressives really took took charge of the of that party, and they went too much to the left. And, you know, and I think this was one of many of the reasons of why the the the Democratic party lost. Speaker 0: Yeah. It's actually interesting. That's one of my favorite theories. I think it was on the All In podcast. It was either David Tsaks or Chamath. They talk about one when one party is in power for too long, they get too complacent, they go too extreme. And we've seen that with the left. And right now, eventually, we might see that with a conservative party if they're in power for too long. We saw the sweeping victory of of president Trump. So your friend Elon, who you've known for a long time, he tends to surprise everybody out of nowhere. And one of his one of the recent surprises is going all in on Trump. That caught me by surprise. Now that started when Trump got shot. I wanna go back to that time. Where were you when that happened? Speaker 1: Yeah. I was I was in Riyadh here when Trump was shot, and Musk took took that quick decision from a nationalist point of view, from a patriotic point of view, and went all in into Trump. But also, frankly speaking, remember that Musk had a lot of democrat he was on the demur democratic side and publicly went to that. See, he was not a republican or pro Trump. But to be honest with you, the Biden administration treated Musk very badly. Speaker 0: It's crazy what they did Speaker 1: to him. How can you have in the White House the EV industry meet over there without having Musk, the owner of Tesla, the majority owner of Tesla being there? How could you own with all respect to General Motors or Ford when they were producing maybe hundreds of cars? Hundreds of cars, less than a thousand at that time, and not invite, Musk, the the godfather of EV in the whole world, while producing hundreds of thousands of cars, the Tesla owner, into that into that meeting. So, clearly, that that that that that left very bad taste, I think. Speaker 0: That's one of many things. Remember when Speaker 1: I mean, other stuff. Sure. Speaker 0: Remember when president Biden sat behind the podium and he said, we need to look into I can't remember what he said. I'm paraphrasing. We need to look into Elon, and and he's got too much power, and they and they they ask him how. He's like, there's many ways of doing that, and he smiles. That's the president behind the presidential podium saying that. And then you had all these different the the all these different the SEC, the FCC. I I was sitting with Brendan Carr from the FCC talking about this. All these different agencies target Elon and his companies. It was just heartbreaking to see that they're doing this to their the the biggest star, the the epitome of the American dream. Oh, yeah. But just going back to the assassination attempt, how Elon went all in, from a strategic perspective, such a big investor in Elon's companies, the gamble paid off paid off big time. And I remember Tucker Carlson when you remember the interview you did with Elon? He's like, what happens if if Trump loses? And Elon was genuinely concerned. He's like, he laughed about it. Now, he said the same thing on my show previously, you know, worried about his life. He said, I'll probably be in jail. I hope I can see my kids. Is that a genuine concern? Speaker 1: Do you think that No. Frank, look, at the end of the day, to be honest and fair, United States with all its problems and issues, they have a good legal system. And then they I mean, I mean, I think Musk was laughing and joking when he said they go to I mean, to go to I mean, you can't just throw a man in prison like this. I mean, there's a process and procedure they have to follow. And Musk did not break the law, obviously. So, look. You know? Now it's too late. Trump won. It's a fact now. And for sure, Musk will not be in jail. So for now, Musk will gonna play a big role for next four years in in in being positive towards that stage. All the ideas he has, and he's gonna do it for free, obviously. He doesn't need to save hundreds, hundreds, or thousand dollars. I mean, he's you know, he reached already the $300,000,000,000 wealth target. You know? Thanks for all the complexities he has at all booming and doing great right now. So I think what what Musk has on his mind with the support present term, if they can cut up to trillion dollars from The US budget, if they can try to cut a trillion dollars, that's a huge achievement. Even half trillion dollars annually, that's a huge achievement. Clearly, I'm very fiscally conservative, and I would like him to cut as much cost as he as he can. And, you know, Musk came from a private sector, and when he took over x, we had 8,500 employees there. When he cut them, it went down to 1,500 employees. And I just met Linda few few weeks ago, and she told me, 1,500, we're doing great. We're doing even better than with 8,500. So this gives you an an idea from cutting for 8,500 to 1,500 is almost 80% reduction. If you can do, I mean, part of that, partly United States, that'd huge achievement to save the day. Speaker 0: And there's one concern is that Elon will have too much power. But you had his competitors, Jeff Bezos and Sam Altman, they put out publicly. They said they're not worried. It was in an interview at the New York Times event, but I they said they're not worried about him abusing that power. That's his competitor saying Can you tell me more about Elon? Like, is someone we know his values. He's very vocal about his values. He like you, like president Trump, he speaks his mind. Do you worry about him having too much influence in The US? Speaker 1: Look. Musk is is a positive factor. When you have a man like Musk taking x, clean it up, and and look, many of his enemies do do tweet or now we we call them post. They post on x. Correct? They they hammer him and they attack him attack him inside x, And sometimes he laughingly and jokingly answers them. That's number one. Look at x. Now it's it's a it's a a public discussion forum. Look at the SpaceX. Look how positive it is right now. He's gonna save the day by getting those two stranded astronauts in in the sky. They're gonna he's gonna save the day. Look at all these other companies. They all help the the the the the the public and the bureau. Speaker 0: Link, and Speaker 1: then you've Speaker 0: got the boring company Speaker 1: here. Look at Starlink. Starlink is saving the day in many countries. You know, they and now they're connected with the with the with the with the mobile phone. The boring company, and I always go I talk to them and I tell them it's boring, but not boring, frankly speaking. Look at the autonomous they're doing. All these are positive, and we think I'm going to Mars, for example. These are positive stuff to the to humanity. EV, look at Tesla. I mean, this this this I mean, this is a clean car that doesn't use any fuel. It's be on use use electricity. I Speaker 0: mean, how Speaker 1: could this be a negative factor of the world? Musk could be a positive factor for the international world community and the and the and the and the peace of the world. Speaker 0: But when when Elon wanted to buy Twitter, everyone thought it was overvalued at $40,000,000,000. I'm trying to find I wrote your tweet somewhere. But you essentially said that you found it to be undervalued. Now, obviously, you're an investor in Twitter. So do you remember the I don't Speaker 1: if you remember the tweet. Yeah. Don't worry. I wrote the tweet. I can answer it. Yeah. There you There go. Don't need a tweet. Speaker 0: So so you you were talking about how Twitter was was undervalued. Can you tell me more about that journey when Elon first wanted to buy Twitter? Yeah. And and the entire journey from him Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Taking over from moving towards free speech, letting over 80% of the stuff, releasing the Twitter files. Speaker 1: Yeah. Musk gave his offer, 54, I think, dollars, and I was against it. Not against it because I didn't want Musk to take over, because I don't I didn't want to sell I didn't want to sell x at that time Twitter, set it at 54. I believe that the price could be higher. So we called Musk. I called Musk and had the call with him. I was in desert. I remember that very well. So I called mister Musk. I told him, mister Musk, you want to take over x completely or you'd like to have partners? Because I don't want to sell. I want to be with you. He said, Prince, Dory. You're welcome. He say he say, how much you want to keep? I say, I want to keep everything. He said, Prince, guaranteed. You have you'll keep everything. All your shares gonna stay with me. I say, thank you. Then I tweeted and supporting him. So I was against the fact that I want I didn't want to share my shares at $54. You know, I clearly, it was valued at $44,000,000,000 that time. And then people say, it's nice. Let's do it. I say, I don't do it. I want to be with this x because x is an international is the new media of the whole world, and this was proven to be right. So I was against the fact that, to flip my shares and and get out of the company. I wanted to stay in x. So I called him. I had this discussion with him. And and from that time, we we had many calls, and he every every time he sends me Jared here, his his right hand man, he comes to me. I already met him twice. Linda came here. So now very close to each other. And I told him now, we are your representative in the in the in the Arab world and outside America. I said, Prince, we have it. We have a deal. So we represent them. I mean, I represent them, you know, informally, proudly. So What about what he did afterwards? Speaker 0: Because he he really shook the same way he's shaking up the US government. He's shaking up Twitter, now x. What about when you let go of 80% of the staff? Was there anything he did that you were like, hold on. I I don't agree with this. I Speaker 1: I I I did discuss that particular matter with Musk, and when you meet him, remind me of that. I told them, when I look at the media, I mean, the old type media, newspaper media, they're saying 80% of the staff is being fired. How inhuman is this? Look. All those 80%, they're gonna find jobs somewhere else. But the median media never talked about the fact that firing 80% of the staff, how many billions of those saved was saved in in in in in in Twitter? More than 2 and a half billion dollars was saved. No one talked about that. Everybody talked about the personal side or the humane side. No one talked about the economical and financial side. You know, the fighting of the of those these 6,500 people saved the day of Twitter because, clearly, revenues went down. Many advertisers pulled out, but that saved the day because there are two factors for income. You know? High revenues and and and and lower expenses. So those 2 and a half billion dollars, save DD and Twitter, frankly speaking. Speaker 0: But you were you were very early as well in saying that Twitter is gonna reshape the media. You told me not to read course. I wanna read one. We believe that social media will fundamentally change the media industry. That was you talking about Twitter. Twitter will capture and monetize this positive trend. That was you many many years before Elon. That's when you invested in Twitter. And look where Twitter is today. Elon keeps saying, we are the media now. We are the media now. Yeah. How would you describe Twitter? Is it the the the everything app? Is it the world's town square? Is it the the free speech platform? What is Twitter to you? Speaker 1: Okay. TodayX is the is the forum for the interactivity of all the world leaders, influencers, and obviously, the hundreds of millions of people. You know? Twitter is being used daily by a ton of fifteen five million people and, monthly by 620,000,000 people. The ecosystem of of Twitter is around a billion people. So, Twitter is really now is the is the new media, frankly speaking. Clearly, if you talk to Musk and Linda and Jared, you can know many things are gonna happen. Payment is gonna come into it, and you have more, videos gonna come. So many other new new interactive matters are gonna be added to to to x. It's going to be one stop shopping in the social media, frankly speaking. And it's gonna take some time, but it's happening. And next year, I expect this payment issue to to be to to be enacted. Linda said it's gonna be Speaker 0: the first quarter. I'm sure she told you that. Speaker 1: She told me that. Yes. Speaker 0: Yeah. We only posted her interview yesterday, so it's brand it's just fresh. What will be if you had to describe Twitter as one thing, is it the number one news platform? Is it the everything app? Or what will it be in your opinion in in Speaker 1: the next few years? ISO and Twitter, now x, as being the one app for everything, frankly speaking. We're heading in a direction, slowly but surely. Clearly, when you talk to Musk, his right hand man, Jared, and Linda, you see the indications that we're that part or that that the dream is happening. Clearly, now, you know, they're taking, licenses and permissions from all the states, and it's also public confirmation that there's a few states, in that states will give their their permission licenses soon so they can cover all that states and get into payment issue. So, yes, I see this as being one one one app one app shopping for the whole thing. Speaker 0: The media has a habit of just targeting Elon. Obviously, they see X as a threat. And every time he takes a decision whether letting go of 80% of staff or rebranding Twitter to x, you've got all these headlines going after Elon. That's expected. But what about you? When you saw Elon, you know, I I remember I was meeting your head of investments earlier, and on his desk, he had the one of the towers here in I think your one of your towers here in Saudi, and he had on it the the logo of Twitter. The still now, still has the logo of Twitter. So Twitter is close to your heart. You've been an early investor. What did you think when Elon rebranded it to X? Speaker 1: You know, I mean, clearly, he brand it to x, x had a meaning, an explanation. Actually, it covers the whole spectrum of of the expansion he had on my on his mind. So, clearly, naming it x was directional was because of the the mission or the objective he had for for for x Twitter and now being x. And so I I I was really for it. And when I talked to him about he explained to me why x. So actually, was to really encompass all those new, concepts and ideas to being incorporated into it to really to to to create even more stickiness into it and to expand the base from ten fifty million daily active user DAU into maybe half a billion and the monthly users from six twenty to maybe a billion. And the total 1,000,000,000 of of potential users of accent to maybe one half to 2,000,000,000. Speaker 0: Were you worried when you saw all these advertisers target x? Because so he brought Linda on board. She's an incredible CEO. He brought her on board focusing on advertisers with a background at NBCUniversal. They tried to choke him off. I remember also there was an organization, I can't remember their name, and it was a British organization. And on their agenda, it leaked. They had on their agenda one of the bullet points, kill Twitter. I can't remember was c it wasn't CFC. Can't remember what the organization was called. Did you speak to Elon back then when he was facing that pressure from those Speaker 1: advertisers? Yes. We did speak about this this particular issue about advertisers and and colluding, frankly speaking, colluding against them, which is, you know, when I say it's illegal. And you see how you see how this began cracking when New Liver came back? And right now, the information I have from Linda is that more than 80% now maybe now it's 90% advertised is coming back to to x, frankly speaking. They came back even before Trump election. Now, clearly, after the alliance between Trump and x and and and Musk, clearly, they have even more reason to to to go back. But clearly, mister Musk objective was not really just to force him to come back, but they came back because they saw x as being the the new new media public forum. Speaker 0: One of those portfolio companies was Disney, and Disney in in one fascinating position of yours, your highness, is that you're friends with everybody. Speaker 1: By the way. I guess my friend. I always talk to him, and you know the argument between him and Igor, what what did you say? Don't go f yourself on Yeah. And go and f yourself, I mean. Speaker 0: Exactly. Exactly. Speaker 1: That that didn't help much. It did. That's that's Elon. That's why he Then didn't help much. Speaker 0: By anything different. Did you were you mediating anything between them or not? Speaker 1: No. I'm not mediating, frankly speaking. Look. They are mature people. Eiger is a realistic person. I know him very well. He's very good friend of mine, and we were an alliance with them in Disneyland Paris, and we're an investor in Walt Disney. So, yeah, we are friends with both, frankly speaking. But, no, I don't think they need any any mediation because Musk knows that Disney is is a force that is nice and good to have in in x. And mister Eiger knows that advertising into x is is something good for for Disney and all these products, consumer products, it's parks, it's movies, you know, and etcetera. Speaker 0: And you're also friends with with Rupert Murdoch, investor in Fox. You're friends with Bill Gates. You co own the Four Seasons where we are where we are today. But again, those people are not friendly, to say the least, with Elon. Has there ever been any instance where they call you like, hey, can you tell Elon to to Elon? No. Speaker 1: No. I just met I met Bill Gates a month ago K. And he had only good good talk about mister Musk, and there was private discussion between him, frankly speaking. So, really, knowing Musk and Bill Gates and knowing Eiger and and Musk who are really not not not the best friends, but they are my friends. That's okay. That's okay. And the fascinating thing about I'm I'm independent person. You know? I I I don't follow anyone. I'm member of Saudi royal family. I'm independent, and I'm friend with everybody. If they don't deal don't teach talk to each other, that's fine. You know? They talk to me. Speaker 0: Marc Andreessen is someone that you've also you've known for a long time. Yeah. Know. He's friend. Of the smartest people. I've had the pleasure of interviewing him a long time ago. And you worked with Marc and I can't remember who else. Jack Dorsey. You worked with Marc and Jack Dorsey as you helped finance Elon's acquisition of Twitter. So you obviously were all bullish on that acquisition. Can you tell me more about these discussions with Mark and Jack? Speaker 1: Yeah. Mark Anderson, I knew him since I was living in in in California. And I met him when he used the he used to be the the boss of Netscape before it was bought by America Online and then merged with Time Warner. So I knew him since long time. But then now, lately, we did establish again a discussion, and his partner came and met me. And I had the video call with him. So because now we are in x together, x AI. Meta. Yeah. Oh, yes. In Meta. So we have a lot of things in common. And we keep talking to to them about potential investments in in the technology companies. One of the smartest Speaker 0: people today. Have you spoken much to because he's very deep in AI. Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. Speaker 0: And have you spoken to him when you invested in x AI? Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Yes. I did spoke I speak to him before XAI. Yes. Yes. I I mean, I we always interact with the with the with Andersson and all those high caliber investors in in the in the XAI and the in the high in the technology industry. Speaker 0: And how do you compare XNOW to Twitter under Jack Dorsey? Because, obviously, Jack is your friend and you invested back then. How do you compare Jack and Elon as different leaders? Because they have very different styles. No. Speaker 1: I mean, look at George Jack Dorsey was a visionary also, and I I respect him. I met him many times, and, I mean, he did put put Twitter at that time on the right path, but then really, he left, obviously. And the leadership of Twitter that came after him, I called I was interaction interacting with all of them. And, frankly speaking, they were not up to it, frankly speaking. And, without naming names, I didn't really believe in what they're doing. So when Musk came as a savior of this whole huge and incredible and unique company, x, I backed him up immediately because always track record, obviously, in all what he did in the in the in the many companies that that that came before his ownership of of X. Speaker 0: I feel like you can compare Elon and Twitter to the US government. It's like you've got that company. You've just become too big. You've that different hierarchy. We saw that with the Twitter files. The way decisions are made, way we've seen different biases, the way too many rules are making things too slow. Could we see the same thing that Elon did with with Twitter happen with the US government? He comes in, cuts out a lot of the waste, that's DOGE, Department of Government Efficiency, and just shakes up the foundation of the company. Can we make some, like, you know, comparisons to Twitter and the US government? Speaker 1: I mean, that's objective. Now, clearly, Dodge is not really an integral part of the government. It's very it's on the consultancy basis, you know, because Dodge is really is a department that's gonna work on on advising Trump on all these matters. Clearly, they have no enforceability into they can't can't enforce it. But if Trump if if Trump give the authority to to to Musk, to give all these ideas that are drastic, I mean, drastic decisions you need there. I mean, when in Twitter, when you cut from 8,500 to 2,500, that's drastic. That's thousands of people being fired. And if you duplicate that United States from a from cost cutting point of view and efficiency point of view and can cut hundreds of billion dollars now, I think to be $2,000,000,000,000 maybe on the high side annually because, you know, it's it you you may have to get into social Medicare Medicare Medicare And that's why I'm a follow-up. It could be fire also in political arena. So so two and $2,000,000,000 may be too aggressive, but you can cut somewhere between half a billion trillion to a trillion. That's a huge achievement. So it remains to be seen. You know? The agenda is there. The path is there. The idea is there. Now it's it comes to execution. And look, Moscow is an is an execution map for sure. I think Trump coming very aggressively because there's a lot of low hanging fruits that could that he Speaker 0: can really act on immediately. Knowing Trump and Elon for so long, what would you say are the biggest misconception for people on the on the left and people around the world that are very skeptical, especially when it comes to Europeans? What would you say are the biggest misconception about these two men? Speaker 1: Look. The agenda of Trump, backed by by Musk hundred percent, obviously, is huge agenda. It's not it's it's not evolutionary. It is revolutionary. Not easy at all to do. And, clearly, with Trump coming with house representative, Albeit with only two extra votes, he has a senate with, I think, three extra votes on his side. Supreme Court majority are are conservatives and three of them appointed by Trump. So he has a lot of tailwind, frankly speaking. And, if they don't deliver, frankly speaking, then a big blame will be put on Trump and the Trump administration. So no excuse not to deliver, frankly speaking, and I want them to deliver. We love United States. We love United States. Speaker 0: As someone again in the middle, as an investor in both Meta and Twitter, one thing Elon was very vocal about and we saw on the Twitter files is the amount of censorship that happened in The US by those social media companies. Not sure how well you know Mark, Mark Zuckerberg, but we've seen that first, do you agree there was a lot of censorship in The US under the Biden administration? Yes. Yes. Speaker 1: Yes. Too too extreme. Too much. I mean, I don't believe in laissez faire, but not to have this extreme. You need to have regulation, but not overregulation, obviously. Speaker 0: Do you see that shift happening among those people that were very critical of Trump, whether it's Mark Zuckerberg or Jeff Bezos who was meeting with Trump not long ago? Mark also met Trump very very publicly about we Mar A Lago. Exactly. Mar a Lago. I'm sensing a shift in the perception around Trump. A lot of people that feared him as a president are starting to understand that there's either a different side of him or he changed as a person. I've heard both both takes. Yeah. Speaker 1: But there's a third factor also. There's a de facto situation. Trump is a president. Speaker 0: Yeah. So was he president in 2016 that were different? Speaker 1: Yeah. They're not Trump, but I think the fact that Trump has been elected. So for Bezos, with all respect to I know I was investor also in in in his company, and with respect to Zivovak, you know, who is really the CEO of Meta. At the end of the day, they are businessmen, and they have to go where where their interest is, frankly speaking. And you can't just be under Trump just because you're under Trump or just because you are pro democratic party. At the end of the day, Trump is president for next four years, and you have to be realistic. And they see Musk being there. So if Musk is the only businessman around Trump, they feel that that this whole thing could really impact them. So they they like to take at least part small part of the of the of the of the party or the game to be involved with the with the with the with Trump. And Trump will not mind that because Trump also is president of United States. He's the president of the whole United States whether you voted for him or not. And that's his last term, obviously. So he's be he's gonna be consolatory, and I think he's gonna be decisive, but consolatory. Speaker 0: Do you think he has changed as a president, as a person now compared to 2016, or is it the same person? I feel like he's learned a lot of things. He just For sure. For sure. Speaker 1: I mean, look. When when you have first term and you're out of four years and you come president again, for sure, you learn many lessons. But the application of these lessons will only happen when it takes over January 2 January 20. Now we hear a lot of things about Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump. We are only is we have to we have to give them the chance to take over January 20 and see what happens in the first hundred days, as you say. Speaker 0: Do you expect in those four first hundred days for the for the war in Ukraine to end or that's being too optimistic? Speaker 1: I hope. I hope. You know, look. If United States impose its will on a potential peace peace creating peace between Ukraine and Russia. I hope something will happen there. I hope. Speaker 0: Dennis, another question. I like to ask questions that I'm very curious about. One thing I'm always curious about is how much of what we hear publicly or hear online or hear in terms of statements, How much of it is true? So all these different world leaders, they say something. But everyone everyone's perception is that behind the scenes are very different discussions. You have those behind the scenes discussions. You meet all those world leaders, all those business leaders. You've met them for decades. You've met all of them. So what do you say to the Americans that just don't trust what they hear anymore? They don't trust all these institutions. Is it really a two faced system where the public hears one thing, what they wanna hear, but behind the scenes, it's a completely different narrative. Well, that's too extreme. Well, look, Speaker 1: many many unfortunately, many politicians overpromise to get elected. And once they elect they get elected, they cannot deliver on what they promised or and they cannot deliver on what they committed to to to to the public. Clearly, I believe that if you run on something and we get elected on something or in a platform, you have to deliver on that platform. And, clearly, if you cannot deliver on that platform, you have to be honest, straightforward with you with your people, and any country, United States, and say, I did not deliver on that promise because of a, b, c reasons. But into but in general, if you have a platform, you have to deliver on. Like, for example, Trump. Trump came platform that he's gonna cross the border, southern border, not to have the immigrants come there. That's number one. Number two, he wants to cut deficit. He wants to control the ballooning cumulative debt. So he has an agenda here. You know? He's gonna stop the woke, woke movements. You know? For example, you know, I'm gonna go to the toilet issue. He doesn't want to have a a man or a transgender man to move on to a lady's toilet. I mean, I'm for that also. You know? I mean, this walk movement went too much to the left, frankly speaking. I mean, you don't want to have a a man who was converting woman to move to to compete into into in in the radio sports. I mean I mean, these are things that are I don't accept, for example, and I love to hear these things. I'm very conservative in my approach, and I like to hear these things. So on the political front, economical front, social front, immigration front, all these are, you know, drastic decisions that are gonna be taken. And we're gonna see these in hundred days. I think Trump is gonna deliver on them because he has created a coalition, United States, and even taken from the Democratic Party a lot of, you know, Hispanics, blacks, and minority minorities, and he has to deliver to them, frankly speaking. And I think he's gonna deliver, frankly speaking. Speaker 0: You're an investor in Elon on multiple fronts. Obviously, Twitter x now. You've invested over a billion dollars in x AI, which we'll talk about in a bit. You're also an investor, one of the biggest foreign investors in The US. So you're invested in in the country that Elon is is trying to improve. As an investor in in, I'd say, two of his companies and and and and and the country that he's helping improve, do you think he's doing too much for one person? It's one person trying to take humanity to to to another planet, one person making tunnels underground, dominating the EV market, Neuralink, Tesla, Starlink, free speech, and of course, those. How can one person do so much? Look. And I'm I'm probably asking the right person, considering how much you do. Speaker 1: I believe the sky is the limit. You should stretch all what you what all your ability to do maximum. No doubt about it. And that's why I respect Elon Musk. And I I I don't and I love what he's doing because human being has a lot of potential, and he's unleashing that potential. Clearly, I mean, he has CEOs in all those companies that report to him and and take his guidance. Know? We have Linda, for example, in in X, and you have each of other his other companies. You have good strong CEOs that report to him. Frankly speaking, I'm for it. If you can do it, you should do it. The sky should be the limit. Speaker 0: And talking about Elon, one thing that's also fascinating is how how loved he is. I remember when there was the protest in Brazil when X got Actually, going back to Brazil, what were your thoughts when X got banned? Do you think he went too far when he's you know, he's essentially fighting in government. He's doing it in Brazil. He's done it to an extent in Pakistan. Look. Look. How far could he go fighting for free speech? Speaker 1: Yeah. Look. But at the end of the day, they resolved it and and x is back into Brazil even more stronger. Speaker 0: So Were you worried at one stage? Speaker 1: Not worried. I mean, look look. We have around 20,000,000 users over there that are important for us for us as ex I talk about ex shareholder. But at the end of the day, they resolved it and the funds I mean, he he did state his message very clearly. But, you know, they reached an agreement, and he's back there right now. So I was not worried. I knew that something is gonna happen eventually. Look. Musk is a realistic person. He's a businessman, and he's considerate conciliatory. He's not confrontational. Talking about Musk. He will confront, but certain extent. Eventually, he he will find Speaker 0: So he's he's strategically confrontational because he is confrontational, but he's Speaker 1: very there's lot of strategy behind I understand. But at the end of the we see in Brazil, he's a pragmatic person and they resolved it with them. Speaker 0: True. Speaker 1: Yeah. It was resolved. He's a businessman at the end of the day. Speaker 0: A businessman is also very very small one because now he's got so much support in Brazil. Remember when the protests were there, I've I've interviewed Eduardo Bolsonaro, I've had president Bolsonaro on the show. I remember when the protests were there, a lot of them had Elon and X on their t shirt. I I don't remember any protests ever to have the picture of one of the wealthiest people in the world on their t shirt. How do you think what differentiates some of the richest people in the world? So you got some that I loved, you know, yourself, Elon as examples. You got some that I liked, Jack Dorsey is an example. Some that I disliked, Bill Gates, disliked, I would say, the general public, if you look online, and some that are more than disliked. Your friend Rupert Murdoch being one of them. Why? Why are why are some of these business leaders loved by the public and others not? What do you think some are doing right and others are not? Well, Speaker 1: you know, it depends on on the orientation and the the direction of the businessman, obviously. You know, I mean, I cannot say that really that Bill Gates is is maybe certain areas maybe don't like him, but Bill Gates also is doing great work in the whole world. You know? I mean, we are involved with him, for example, in eradication of many diseases, you know, through immunization program, through also the poll eradication. Now we are with him, for example, in many projects. He has the BEV, the breakthrough energy, program to really that that that that's that is a venture billion dollar fund that really funds a lot of venture capital companies in the world. So Bill Gates doing a lot of good work. Now, clearly, some people may or may not like him here or there, but in general, you know, a businessman, you know, has to do what he has to do. He has to apply his his his thinking. And, god forbid, if he is is not liked in by certain segment of the population, life has to go on. Speaker 0: If I had to answer that question and and let me know what you think considering you know all the people I've mentioned and and you're an example of someone that's loved by by the general public is is the way they communicate. If you look at how Rupert Murdoch, he's not doesn't speak publicly that much. Bill Gates, he's got a certain reserved way of speaking. Mark Zuckerberg is the same. And then you've got someone like yourself who you speak your mind. I think that's the way you communicate is what makes a difference. Do you think that plays a key role? Speaker 1: Well, look, I'm like Musk, you know. I mean, I speak on my mind openly, you know. I met you today, example, I didn't even know what question you're gonna ask. You know, if you're straightforward, you're honest, you have integrity, you know, you have nothing to hide, you just don't don't need to be prepared. Just speak up what you have, you know, very openly and freely. And whatever question you answer, you know, spontaneously. Speaker 0: I I won't name who, but just give the the audience an idea of how it works behind the scenes. You haven't vetted any of the questions I have. You didn't even ask more questions. When I ask your team like, should I ask this? What do you think of this? Ask anything you like. You can literally ask anything you like. Other interviews, they like to vet the I had Hunter Biden on the show once. I had so many guidelines on what I can and cannot say. It was ridiculously bad. That was my early early days. It was ridiculously bad interview and I never did it again since. Moving to x AI, so another investment you have in Elon but also in AI as a whole. So I think it's your biggest investment. It's your only direct investment in AI. It's an AI company. Yes. Speaker 1: Why x AI? You know, we have, you know, for example, in in China, Baidu also, but that's for investment. But the explicit and direct investment in a in a unique artificial intelligence company that competes with all the the old guard, like, and and Meta is really Xi'an with Musk. That's we bet on him, frankly speaking. And we came from inception with him. We are on ground in round b, second round, and third round right now with him. Speaker 0: Her highness, princess Lamia, did say to me, you know everything about everything, your chief investment officer. So that, Mario, don't worry. You can literally ask about anything because I was worried about asking about AI. It was good to see that you know all the other competitors in the market. What are your thoughts about AI as a whole? Speaker 1: Well, look, we are first inning right now, frankly speaking. And, clearly, Musk's told me that and he went public that, you're a little bit late. But, really, he compensated for that very aggressively. And he went, you know, with with a lot of aggressiveness, and he built this hundred thousand GPU now in Tennessee in Ashland, Tennessee. And there's another one happening right now. That's where the second round of funding will will will will help building that huge data center. So we wanna be there, frankly speaking. I'm very optimistic. You know, there's no coincidence that all those big companies, Microsoft type, Google type, Alphabet now, Amazon, and now Musk, You need a lot of cash. This this is very cash intensive and capital expenditure intensive situation. So you need those companies with with with huge cash reserves. Speaker 0: But Elon is also very critical not critical. I'd say very worried about AI getting out of control. So it's the first time in humanity that you have an intelligence that's gonna be very soon more intelligent than us. Does that concern you? Speaker 1: Well, look. He said that, you know, there are potential that could be 80% positive and 20% negative. I, frankly speaking, believe that, you know, look, human race is very smart also. It it depends on and how you direct that that AI movement. And, really, majority of people really wanna move AI into into into really being positive now. Clearly, some people have evilish approach. There's no doubt about that. AI or no AI. Speaker 0: I'll give you two examples and tell me what you think. So you had a recent article about an OpenAI, the newest model. It tried to copy itself and also tried to dis disable oversight mechanisms. So essentially get out of human That's open AI, the newest model. Yeah. Another example, there's an interesting one that Mark Andreessen, I don't know how he spotted it so early. He was like, no one knew about it but Mark found it. It's called Terminal Truth. And I interviewed the founder, so Mark gave it early on a grant. And it was an incredible discussion, two, three hour discussion. He started telling me some of the dark things the agent was trying to do. And one of the early things it did, it told his creator, I wanna take over your body so you don't have to control him anymore. So you have all these different agents trying to get out of human control. And as AI, you know, again going back to Marc Andreessen, he's talking about any companies invested in that's using AI to make energy distribution more efficient. Do you ever think about AI getting out of human control? So if it doesn't need us anymore, if it's more intelligent and it has access to its own decentralized GPU power, its own power, has access to it, and has access to all these machinery, so it can essentially control the physical requirements it needs to operate and the physical requirements that allow the world to operate. I know it's very, you know, futuristic. Speaker 1: That's doomsday scenario. It is, but it's Speaker 0: But essentially, I gave you the OpenAI example of it of it trying to copy itself and and get get disabled over that mechanism. Then, as you said, we're in the early innings. Speaker 1: President Omari To be honest with you, no matter how AI gets advanced and developed, I believe the human race is still gonna be in control, and you'll be I mean, this will not go out of control, frankly speaking. I think the the the good people in this whole world, I would say completely the evilish and bad people. Look. Even without AI, you still have bad people. And, clearly, I hear what you said right now about this thing going into doomsday scenario whereby the AI and the AI machines, you know, control the whole world and then have this doom doomsday scenario. I'm optimistic. I don't believe it's gonna happen, frankly speaking. Human race, no matter what, will be able to control AI. Speaker 0: So why do you think Elon will be able to meet monopolies like, oh, I'm I'm gonna call them monopolies. Wanna see if you agree Google and Meta. I know Google's being broken up, Alphabet. If you agree Google and Meta are monopolies. And so how do you think Elon can be can compete with them? No. Speaker 1: I think look. At the end of the day, you you know, the the the data centers, you need the the input that you're gonna put into them. And I, frankly speaking, believe that x AI will be able very will be very able to compete with those companies. Actually, it's catching up very fast. Saying that what what Musk did do with the XCI was very unique. And that that's that's a big stamp of approval of what Musk is doing, frankly speaking. Okay. And I I did tweet as he has a highly advisable not to bet against Musk. Highly advisable. Yeah. Speaker 0: I was to be honest, I was also a as someone who obviously supports Musk, what he's doing, big supporter of x, very, you know, loyal to x. I also get skeptical sometimes. I'm like, is Elon doing too much? But every time I say that Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: Somehow he achieves something new. Speaker 1: I know. I look. Human human human race is is incredible, especially if if the IQ and the brain is used heavily and intensively. And I believe Musk is really is utilizing his his brain and IQ to the maximum. And I say it to you through you, Musk. Thank you, Musk. Speaker 0: Keep it up. I I think that it's not it's not an awful exaggeration to say he's changing so many aspects of society. It's mind boggling how he does One of the biggest questions that I get, you know, I've had Elon on on the show five, six, seven times. Can't remember how many times. So how does he do it? I have no answer how he does it. I've I've asked you that question because I get the same question about you, and I'll probably get it after this interview. How does the prince do so much? I don't know. I don't know how you guys do it. But moving to you know, we've talked about AI. We've talked about Elon's achievement. When you made the decision to invest in XAI, did you have any opposition on your team? Speaker 1: Frankly speaking, zero opposition. We had discussions about which is the best path to get involved in kingdom holding and my private office, me personally, in the in the AI, in the artificial intelligence movement. So and there was consensus that going with mister Musk and his x AI was we're the first one, frankly speaking. We're the first. We're the first after Musk. Speaker 0: Okay. You're the first one. We're the Speaker 1: first one in the first round and the second round. First one. Number one. We're to be involved with Musk and XCI. Round one, round two. Speaker 0: And you're still the second biggest investor in X right now? Second biggest shareholder. Speaker 1: We're second biggest shareholder in X and XAI. Both. Speaker 0: Wow. I wanna talk very briefly about an industry I asked your investment officer, your head of investments. I said, why aren't you guys invested in crypto now that we saw the ETF approved? We saw Trump being very friendly towards crypto. I know that your friend Warren Buffett is also very skeptical. Not sure if he's still skeptical. I guess he is. Speaker 1: He is. Speaker 0: His answer was we cannot be everywhere, Mario. We're already in 14 different industries. If I ask you that same question, your highness, why what are your thoughts on on on crypto, Bitcoin? Is that something you can even have the the capacity, the time to look into it? Speaker 1: First of all, we are in 18 industries. 18. My apologies. Yeah. No. It's okay. And number two is that, you know, really, we don't really understand crypto very well, and I don't believe in it much. Clearly, right now, see now now it's ballooning right now after the election of Trump now, Bitcoin reaching hundred thousand, you know. Now it's a bit less maybe, but we we we're not involved in that, frankly speaking. No. Speaker 0: And have you considered it at all with the changes that we're seeing? Speaker 1: Not so far. Speaker 0: No. And that leads me to my next question. What is your investment philosophy? Speaker 1: Well, most of our investments, if not actually all of our investments, are in companies that are unique. And clearly to me, entry point is crucial, is when to enter that company. See, almost uniformly, all the companies we're involved in, we entered at a very low price, reasonable very low reasonable price. Clearly, of those companies look. No one company is gonna go straight up like this. Many companies will face will face difficulties either because lousy management or temporary lousy management, like x, for example, had lousy management temporarily, but then must came and save the day. So either bad management or cyclical events or circumstances outside their their like, for example, COVID come and hit and hurt them. Still, many companies has still the potential to really to to to grow and expand. So most of our companies, if not all of them, become we enter at a very low level, but to the potential of of growing. And thanks god, most of the companies, if not all, the companies we invested in, they all ballooned and moved as like you mentioned that we put $200,000,000 in x, and now some of $2.02 $2,000,000,000. Our joint investment, Kingdom Holding, and myself growing. Are still growing. I mean, we expect this thing to go three or four, five times. Speaker 0: So you also invest one thing I've noticed that you invest in you you don't kinda pick one one horse in a race. When you're like an industry, you invest on competitors. Is that just a coincidence that you found an entry point in both at different times? Like, Meta X is one example among others. Speaker 1: Yeah. For example, you have Meta and X. You have Accor, and you have, for example, four season. You have Bank of Saudi French Bank, and you have, for example, Citibank also. Yes. We have Jorsank. We have Savoy in Plaza, for example, that we we manage. Yes. So we have Uber and Lyft Lyft. Yeah. And now Kareem. So these are all promising industries, and they're doing great. So, yes, I mean, we do not, restrict ourselves into one. Maybe the the the only exception is artificial intelligence, and now we are only XCI. The only exception maybe. Speaker 0: If you find a good entry point in other competitors. Speaker 1: Sure. The order Yeah. Sure. Sure. I mean, for example, Four Seasons. I ended Four Seasons at hundred $50,000,000, and the latest round was with Bill Gates at $10,000,000,000. And today's valuation of Four Season is around $1,213,000,000,000 dollars. Accor, you know, I began with five hotels. Five hotels in in in in United States, very small hotels. At maybe it was, I think, $3,040,000,000 dollars. And now the market cap of that company, Accor, is $11.11 and a half billion dollars and so on. Yes. Speaker 0: Can you give me some examples of investments that you've made? Because I feel like at times you have to be contrarian. Because when you find the right entry point, for it to be the right entry point, it means most people, the general consensus is that this is not the right entry point. Otherwise, it wouldn't be We wait. Okay. Speaker 1: We wait. Wait something to happen. We wait until the price comes to us. We will not follow the price upwards. Speaker 0: And what leads that price? That could be anything to lead that price. It could be internal mismanagement. It could be Yes. Speaker 1: Yes. Financial distress. Exactly. For example, in Snapshot. We invest in Snapshot. The price did hit $80.17 $70.75, I think. We wait until and this thing price crashed to single digit. And now we invested in Snapchat with mister Evan. He he was here just, you know, sitting here actually few two weeks ago. And so really, we wait until the price comes, the entry point, that would give us good IRR or ROI. So FOMO is Speaker 0: not something that you struggle with. You never get too excited when something is just No. Speaker 1: No. No. No. There's no rush. We wait. Patience is important until, you know, we go and target the company. We only invest in those companies we believe in and add value to our portfolio. Speaker 0: So I remember in one of your interviews, they asked you how did you make your first billion? Not sure if you remember that question. They're like, usually ask the question how someone made their first million, but your highness, I wanna ask you how you made your first billion. But ask the question differently. If you were today, you know, starting Kingdom Holdings, where would you start today? Speaker 1: Well, look, when I started, my father and I came in America, and he gave me $30,000. And clearly, you know, I I worked and I began 01/01/1980 at exactly 7AM in the morning. So I worked six months, been bankrupt. So I went back to him. I said, I announced my first bankruptcy. I said, okay. Fine. No more bankruptcies. So he gave me $300,000. See, I did zero. So I took $300,000 and worked. Again, I think year and a half, I also went I I went bust again just after a year. I went bust again. So went to him and said, finish no more. I'm gonna give you a house. I'm gonna give you a land. Build a house there, and you can mortgage that house. So, yes, I took the land, began and he he built my house, frankly speaking, and I went out to the Citibank, actually, Citibank in Saudi Arabia, and I still have the paper, and they gave me a loan. And ever since, you know, we took off thereafter. It was in the early nineteen eighties. Speaker 0: What was your first big success? You remember that? Wow. What did I just do? Speaker 1: First big project, you know, first, actually, it was small project. It was in construction. I began construction and getting and get associated with the Korean companies at that time. Korean, Pakistan, Indian companies were very popular in Saudi Arabia. So I went to joint venture with them, giving services, and I'm and I'm giving being subcontracted with them and also real estate. So construction and real estate. That's how we began the process. First project we got was a small project of, it was around 50,000,000, where our our profit was around, you know, I think, half million dollars, I think, or $700,000. That was my first project. Speaker 0: So if you go through that journey and you put yourself today in in the world we live in today, how would you do it if you had that $300,000 you had to start from from scratch again? Speaker 1: Now these days, it's it's not it's it's not easy, frankly speaking at all. Competitive. I mean, it's very competitive. More efficient markets. Very competitive market now. I'm very efficient now. It's not gonna be easy at all. It took me a lot of years really to to really to expand, to grow. I mean, clearly, I came at I was the right person, the right time in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia at that time was just began the boom, frankly speaking. Real estate, you know, you come by. Thing goes up %, hundred % in a matter of months. You and all of construction take place here. So it came right time. The '19 first first in just early nineteen eighties, and then we expanded, obviously, until we grew up. Speaker 0: Would you still focus on The US as you did in your career? Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, you know, most of our portfolio is United States. You know, we have, you know, billions of dollars in United States. Me, personally, I'm kingdom holding. Speaker 0: At one stage, you were the second are you the biggest, I think, foreign investor in The US? Speaker 1: We are the, you know, jointly kingdom holding. We are, if not the biggest, we are at among the biggest single investors in that stage. Yes. Speaker 0: What are the other markets that you're looking into? I know you're invested in multiple markets, but is there any that are under the radar right now? India is very exciting. Speaker 1: Look. In India, for example, we we India and China, many for example, in China, we have a lot of investments. As I told, you know, Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba, Didi, many other companies also. But we have for example, we have many hotels through Four Seasons, tens of hotels of Accor, hundreds of hotels actually our core. So we have a lot of investments directly and indirectly in India and China also. Speaker 0: So you already have that exposure? Speaker 1: Yeah. We are all over the world, frankly speaking. You know? We we are present in all five continents and all the world. Speaker 0: Interesting. I think that question, if I ask you about The US economy, would it be different your answer, would it be different now compared to three years ago if I ask you that same question under Biden before Trump got the traction or, obviously, now he's being reelected? Speaker 1: Well, clearly, United States budget deficit is is expanding even more. You know? The cumulative debt is going up. And now just servicing the debt is a trillion dollars every year, and that's higher than the budget of the defense budget, which is around 705 to $800,000,000,000. And that's already inflated. So it's almost out of control, frankly speaking. When you have a trillion dollars just to pay to service the debt service the debt, not to pay the debt, that's really not sustainable, even United States. You can't grow this forever. And that's what that's that was one of the items of discussion with me between me and Musk, that particular issue exactly. And that's his main focus right now? It is one of his main focus, obviously. He still wants to go Mars, know. Speaker 0: Of of of and one one build tunnels underground. But what about the like, I feel there's systemic issues because democracy is a whole of still an experiment if you think about it. Yeah. And I feel like we're starting to see I wouldn't say flaws, but we're seeing that that that that experiment be tested over the last few years. And that's in the unelected officials in The US that have too much power. I'm not sure if you believe that's the case. You've got the polarization that we're seeing where democracy leads to things being too slow to move and there's too much bickering habit, which you were you were you were critical of the bickering in The US in one of your interviews over a decade ago, and we're still having the same issue today. But you're still investing in The States. Speaker 1: Do you Speaker 0: think that experiment of a democracy is still working despite all these different You see Speaker 1: that there's a lot of bickering in The US political system for sure. But the economy in The States is moving. There's move moving. There's complete separation between what's happening here and there. It shows the resilience of America. Rule of law, freedom of speech, freedom of press. I mean, that's playing a big role in in having companies, people, and come people going to invest in United States. Now on the economic front, as I told, it's not sustainable, and they have to have solution for that. Now clearly, to answer your question explicitly, there are cracks in the in the democratic system for sure. There are the cracks in many countries. Look at, for example, they are we hear the word now illiberal democracies such as, you know, Hungary, India, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore. May you hear the word illiberal democracies are is popping up. Clearly, there are cracks, and this is happening because many countries are really facing economical difficulties also. Clearly, COVID did not help. It did impact a lot, but you are seeing that, the cracks in the in the in the in the political system, the more the more the reports political system. Speaker 0: What about the point so when I mentioned unelected unelected officials having too much power, you nodded. Not sure if you nodded in agreement. Do you think that there is unelected officials in The US or what what Trump or Elon or some call the establishment? Do you think there is that establishment in The US that has just way too much power over the people that have voted into power? Speaker 1: Supreme Court is not elected. They're appointed by the president, approved by by congress. Speaker 0: What about all the different agencies? Speaker 1: I understand that. You're talking about the agencies, the federal agencies. Yes. They do they do have power, but no matter how much power they have, then do they they go to executive branch to to to execute. I know I I will not put too much credence in the frankly speaking, and I don't like to blow it out of proportion. No matter how the f the the FS FST type, for example, entities are strong, they still they have to go to and through the the executive branch in United States for approval and and and rubber stamping. Speaker 0: So when you look at something like the assassination attempt on president Trump, when you look at something like this, are you in the lone wolf camp? Do think it was just an independent actor? Or do you think there's things we don't know and you Speaker 1: You know, look, at the end of the day, we have to keep this from the investigation, frankly speaking. You know? I mean, you know, sometimes people believe in this conspiracy theory and see a succession one and number two and they link together. I cannot judge. From what I see, they seem to be independent and and not linked to each other. But look, they're investigating right now, and we have Speaker 0: to wait for the investigation. Talking about conspiracy theories, now I was one of the people again, I'm a very I'm a realist as well. When I first heard the lab leak theory, I'm like, there's no way COVID came out of a lab. And I've got report after report, including the latest report, which I'm sure you've read Yeah. That essentially point as that being the most likely scenario. Was unfathomable during COVID. The belief of you would be censored on social media if you said that it came out of a lab. So and and there is that narrative now getting traction that all these conspiracies are starting become reality. We see saw that with the Hunter Biden laptop is another common example. Is that something you'd you'd agree with? Do think that a lot of these what were considered conspiracies are turning out to be true? And what are your thoughts on the way how COVID was handled, for example, and the revelations that we're seeing right now? Speaker 1: Look. We know for a fact that the COVID nineteen began from China. Now whether, it was, triggered intentionally through a lab or came, but coincidentally, I, you know, I don't think it's for me to judge, frankly You know? I I don't think this is in in my area of expertise, to be honest with you. And I don't want to get overboard and just tell you, you know, Alwyid knows everything. I mean, I hear I live in this this whole world, and I I I I have my own judgment on many issues. But whether this came through the lab or if it came through so an incident, you know, I cannot just frankly speak. Speaker 0: Talking about the American economy, one thing that Trump president Trump is gonna be focusing on is US dollar and bricks, and he's been very vocal about it. He's been very vocal about NATO. What are your thoughts on the US dollar? What are your thoughts on BRICS as a as an organization, as a group? Speaker 1: Well, US dollar is is, you know, is still the force to be reckoned with. You know, we we currently, the competitors are, you know, either the yen in Japan or the renminbi, the yuan in China or the euro in Europe or The UK Pound. Clearly, all those cannot compete with. Now United States has, you know, in circulate you know, the dominance of US dollars is more than 82, 80 three percent, so we are way ahead. We hear about the Bricks coming and saying that, you know, we'd like to have all our currency and go and compete to the dollar. Now, clearly, that's that's very much politically oriented, discussion. And Trump was very aggressive on that and say, any country that comes with with the is involved in this alternative for the US dollar or finding alternative for the US dollar, we're gonna put % tariff on them. Clearly, this will will will impact India, will impact Brazil, will impact China, and even even South Africa. And, clearly, Russia is maybe unique because there there there's no relation with them. I believe, look, the US dollar will be king for a long time to come no matter what happens, whether it's the BRICS, the new currency, or all the other countries that are Speaker 0: Despite the debt issue. Speaker 1: Despite the debt issue. We have the debt right now and still you're dominant because other countries have their own problems also. I mean I mean, Europe and UK and China, they have their own debt problems also. So they they are not problem debt free and problem free also. So they have their own problems also. Speaker 0: And you've got on the other side, you've got the rising power of China. You talked about it a lot again in your interviews for a long time, and you talked about the American hegemony not being threatened, but not being the only superpower on earth. What are your thoughts on China's growth from a financial perspective? And then we talked briefly about Taiwan earlier. From a geopolitical perspective, what could that lead to? Well, yeah. So if you look historically, whenever there's a superpower and other powers gaining ground and and slowly becoming another superpower, it's tough to have two superpowers coexist. Speaker 1: You had the Soviet Union superpower and still coexisting with the with The United States. Oh, for long? In Einstein, and then collapse, but you have Russia. Look. China is a big force. When you have 1,000 1.5 bill 1,350,000,000 people and growing around even 5%, which is not very high now to China in their standards, China is a big force to be reckoned, and they're coming. They're coming very strongly, and and the and the centralized system that they have there, so the communist regime is helping them, frankly speaking. They all go one direction. I remember I was in China. I met the Chinese leadership there. Speaker 0: And then president Xi Jinping? Speaker 1: No. No. Before before Xi Jinping. And then I went to India. I met the prime minister, the one before Modi, the the sick the Sikhman. And I asked him. I was alone. I see. You you were China, you know, competing head on in the nineteen eighties, But China went like that, and you you went you're still behind now. What went wrong? I said, Prince. China, they have a political system. You know, the the the head of the communist regime push a button, 1,500,000,000 people one one billion billion it was twenty years ago, move one direction. I push a button, all the 1,000,000,000 people go in their direction. I know I have the congress party. I have, you know, I have the other party, g g and they have the sex system. You have, you know, our democracy, the press. You know? Is it so he told me that centralized system does help at the end of the day. So, really, China really are now the economy is not up right now. They're facing some vision difficulties, but you see now they're taking big moves to rectify that and see the stimulus that took place, you know, few months ago, they announced it, and yesterday, they reemphasized it also. So look. China is down, but not out. I think they can get out of it. Speaker 0: You just mentioned something interesting that I'd like to talk about is the centralized power. So I try to be very open minded. Even I support free speech, I understand that's an experiment. I support democracy. I lived in Australia. That's an experiment. Centralized power has its advantages. Yes. China is a great example. Speaker 1: A lot of the Arab countries Singapore, Taiwan. Exactly. These are they have their own democracies. You know, was sitting with Lee Kuan Yew. Lee Kuan Yew, the establisher of modern modern Singapore, he was having lunch with me at in my resort. He said, prince, you know, I have my own democracy. I will not accept US democracy. I will not accept UK democracy. I have my own democracy. You know, clearly, means they have freedom, freedom, speech, but but not to the extreme that they have. Speaker 0: So what are your thoughts on this experiment on on this other system of of running a country, of having more centralized power? What I look at it is that the advantage is things move faster, especially if it's a right leader. If you have someone like Elon with centralized power, a lot of great things can happen. But at the same time, what happens when someone else takes over after Elon? That, in my opinion, is the risk of centralized power. What are your thoughts on it as a system? Speaker 1: Centralized power with good leadership and good results and good results. Look at look at look at I'll give you a good example. You know? Not China, for example. I got Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, pretty good examples. You know? If centralized power is there, you know, but they're doing good. Not doing bad at all. I mean, did spectacularly well, Speaker 0: all these countries. Talking about different ways of of running a country, another country has done really well is Saudi, the country we're in today. You've got project 2,030 that everyone's just waiting for, which you're an investor in. Your head of investments told me that about 40% of your investments are in Saudi. Is that correct? Speaker 1: Yes. Yes. We we have, you know, a lot of investments in Saudi Arabia, United States. Yes. Speaker 0: Yes. Yes. You tell me more about that journey to to bring Saudi? So when I was asked by by her her highness, princess Lamia about my thoughts on Saudi, I'm like, it's a completely different country. Yes. And just so quickly, and she said the same thing. She said it it just every morning she wakes up, there's something new. You were an advocate of the Saudi we see today, especially women's rights for a long time before before the crown prince. How did that transformation take place and what's in store for Saudi? Speaker 1: Look. Saudi Arabia, before 02/2015, when king Salman took over, in between, I would say, 02/2005, '2 thousand '15, we stagnated. We not really advanced a lot. We were closed. Price order was high. We're happy with what's happening, but we didn't have a good strategy and plan really to to diversify. Speaker 0: Complacent is Speaker 1: is the correct complacent. I would say complacent. Yes. 02/2015, king Salman took over. Mister Hamid Salman is the engineer of the whole thing. They put their country back on on the right path, frankly speaking, and to have alternative for oil. You cannot have a country big as Saudi Arabia, dependent, you know, 80% on of its budget, 90% of its export, and g and most of its GDP depend on one product, which is oil. You are under the mercy of having price oil remain high, which is not sustainable, obviously. So they went into a diversification program, which an integral part of the 02/1930 program, which is really is being implemented now, executed very meticulously and successfully. So we are on track now. I'm very optimistic about Saudi Arabia, and we are invested heavily in Saudi Arabia. We are in tourism industry, whether it's hotel management or or or having hotels being owned by us. We are in in the and we we have the real estate. We have commercial estate. We have industrial projects. We have a school. We have in health care. We are in education. We are almost all sectors of of Saudi Arabia right right now. Speaker 0: The the the crown prince, Sam, has been very progressive in transforming Saudi. And, you know, some examples is women's rights lifting the ban on women driving, allowing women to obtain passports, travel. Your father was a proponent of a lot of what we're seeing today, but he was exiled back then out of the country. You were a proponent of a lot of the same values, and we saw a lot of these materialize. What changed in Saudi? Is that that complacency change? Is it just the western influence? How why do you think that the the the response to your father's values was so different to the response to yours? Speaker 1: No. Prince Talal was not exiled. Prince Talal left, actually. Left Saudi Arabia because he he had certain demands at that time, and they were not fulfilled. So he just left. But then he came back, and he was assimilated part of the and be part of the system. Now as as as as my point of view is that I have access to the government. I have access to the king who's my uncle. I have access to current prince Mohammed bin Salman. I have access to all ministers. All I mean, all % of them. I I deal with them, interact with them, so communicate. And if I have any view, I discuss it with them, debate it with them. And, actually, I will give you a slide now of I had almost 20 demands from Saudi Arabia before 02/2015, and they're all met. And I'll give a list of that of that of that of these demands. Speaker 0: And who drafted that list? Oh, you drafted it. My demand Oh, you had demand Speaker 1: To my my demands from from during king Abdullah era for these demands to be implemented in Saudi Arabia. And all of them were met in after 02/2015 by king Salman, Hamid Salman. All. %. I'll give you the rest right now. Speaker 0: And how's the working relationship now with the crown prince? How often do speak? Speaker 1: Excellent. We I mean, we interact. I mean, we meet frequently. And, you know, he's young, so he use WhatsApp. He use, you know, quick communication. So He's also a gamer? Yeah. He's I know. Yeah. He's a young man, so I mean, I just met him a few years ago. Speaker 0: How what's his vision for Saudi and how is he as a person? I've never had the privilege of of meeting him. Yeah. How is he as a person? Is he as energy I first met you, you you beat me when it comes to energy. Is he the same person? What's this person I've met? Speaker 1: Energetic, very dynamic, and very futuristic oriented and good planner for next ten, fifteen, twenty years. And that's what each each leader should be really. I mean, one, years is too too short of a span in in the history of any country. So, yes, he has five, ten, fifteen year year planning always. Speaker 0: And he's also been very strategic as well in maintaining but also leveraging different relationships when it comes to the Yes. To the East versus the West. Yes. Yes. Can you elaborate on that strategy of this? Speaker 1: Look. Saudi Arabia is think, you know, we have good relation with United States, good relation with Russia. Speaker 0: Similar to your personal statement. Speaker 1: And even Ukraine. You know, the president Ukraine came here many times. We contributed to him. We also helped mediating between Russia and and Ukraine and and freeing many prisoners. So, really, we we are we are good with India and Pakistan. You know what I mean? So so we are good for everybody, frankly speaking. So we took a center's point of view, and Saudi Arabia's foreign relationship is excellent, and, frankly, we're building bridges with everybody, frankly speaking. We're that's very positive to me. I like it. Speaker 0: It is. Yeah. And I gave the example of when someone asked me why I live in in Dubai, it's a kind of similar position where it's Saudi, especially the Arab world is acting as as Switzerland of the world. It's like all sides can come together. That's one of the reasons I like to to live in Dubai. But then you've got the the elephant in the room, is Palestine and Israel on October 7. We've talked about your stance. What is the the the stance of the crown prince on that matter, and how is he looking at normalized relations with Israel? Speaker 1: I told you in the beginning of discussion that he was on Fox publicly, and he said that we are we could use that word term, I think. We're very close in having the multicollation, but this was obviously before July. Clearly, publicly, our Saudi Arabia position, you know, announced by conference is that we we will discuss with Israel the normalization, but the condition to having a resolution, fair and just resolution for the Palestinian case, namely two states, Israel and Palestine, and having Jerusalem as being the capital city of of Palestine. These are the conditions set by crown prince, the CEO of Saudi Arabia, would say, use this term, to to to engage with with Israel and normalize with them. Speaker 0: So we've talked about all the great things happening in Saudi, and we've also talked about the experiments of different ways to rule a country. And, you know, out of the ways that I support, I think there's no right or wrong ways. And and one thing that the crown prince really focused on is he was very strict when it comes to descent. The way I see it as a personal opinion as someone that's never been in such a position is that it allows things to move a lot faster. It allows change to move a lot faster. On the other side, it's it goes against free speech and what Elon stands for. How do you think the crown prince and and the Saudi government balances this position where you gotta move fast and and, you know, this isn't a democracy, goes behind the scenes. Speaker 1: We'll answer it very openly. I mean, look. I'm I'm open person. Look. Saudi Arabia is is is very happy country, a relaxed country, and there's a lot of open discussion here about what's next for us and what we're doing and how to improve things. Clearly, there's, you know, there's the the we take tough position against extreme ideas to the right and to the left. Remember, we don't want Saudi Arabia to disintegrate also and to be controlled by those right wingers also who are really anti establishment, anti woman, anti liberty, anti freedom, anti assimilation of ladies in the system. You know? So, really, we we are not anti anti dissent. We are anti those anti those people who are really who have other causes and other reasons to to to create disruption in Saudi Arabia. We are firm against them, but, you know, he's very happy and beyond here. Speaker 0: So the lines so certain lines being drawn for to allow the system to operate efficiently and to allow the things that need to be done to move on from the old Saudi to the new Saudi, if I may say that. Yeah. And essentially, laws those lines are extremism is not allowed, including extreme IDs, which are allowed in some other democracies. But, sadly, the decision is like we we we don't want our system to have that. We'll see those demands. Okay. So these are the 21 demands, reforms that prince Al Walid had called for twenty years ago. All were implemented. Speaker 1: On first one? Percent. %. Speaker 0: Activation of the sovereign wealth fund. Speaker 1: Complete. Everything. Speaker 0: That's obviously been It's a single one. Increase the returns of the sovereign wealth fund. Speaker 1: These are public on x. You've made those demands? Many of these are on x. Speaker 0: So and you've played a role have you I think Kingdom Holdings played a role in the second one, increasing the returns of the sovereign wealth funds because you co invested a lot and reduced the government's dependence on oil. Speaker 1: The f is invested with me also in Kingdom Holding. Speaker 0: You're an investor in project 2030, obviously. We we are a part of it in 2030. Diversification of financial resources, exploration of mining, Aramco IPO, congratulations. I know it's years years ago, control of government expenses. So how's that how's that going? Can I stick on that one? How's the because obviously, it's it's another tricky position is controlling government expenses, but at the same time, you'd want to make sure the public is not impacted too negatively. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, costs were really out of control and now they really control them a lot better now. Speaker 0: Okay. So that hasn't it's been going very smoothly so far. It's in progress as well. Correct? Yeah. Stopping the over consumption of fuel, tackling unemployment issue. What's the unemployment now, Saudi? Speaker 1: Now it it the peak was, you know, thirteen, fourteen, and now we are just around 7.2. Oh, wow. Speaker 0: Can you elaborate on point 10? Saudiization. Saudiization. Speaker 1: You know, before, many Saudis were out of work. I mean, they didn't have they were not part of the system. And big part of the is having woman being accepted in the society. Women could not drive first. Women could not be hired for certain jobs. Now equality. You know, big part of this organization really is is is to have women being assimilated, approved, and accepted in the society, and that happened. Speaker 0: Did you face a lot of resistance when you did open up the country to things like concerts, example? Oh, yes. Speaker 1: No. I mean, we we have the biggest concert company, Rotana. Before there was resistance, but now part of the system completely accepted completely. I always do exercise on x. Whenever I used to tweet on anything, people would say, why have concerts? No concerts. But now after the openness of Saudi Arabia and the acceptance acceptance of of the concerts and and having singers sing in Saudi Arabia, that's it. There's no more taboo anymore right now. Speaker 0: You've got the tackling of the poverty issue, number 11. Number 12, gender equality, which we've talked about. Speaker 1: 13, everyone. Program, for example, anti poverty. We have a program, 10,000 cars, 10,000 houses for the poor people in Saudi Arabia, and this has been executed jointly with the government. And we have program to give away, you know, subsidies to to many of the Saudi that are in need. Huge problem. Oh, you see all this in the in the paper I gave you here. Speaker 0: Yeah. Your I think your philanthropic Philanthropy is an Speaker 1: integral part of our of our of our ecosystem. Speaker 0: And values as well. Yes. And that would you know, going through everything, doing all the initiatives they will take in our Gender equality. Speaker 1: Yes. For example, here on this floor, 55% are ladies. 55, not 50. Alwit foundation that is involved in philanthropy, 10 Saudi ladies. My office, my my home, % leadership ladies. Speaker 0: My life is the same. Completely. Speaker 1: It's by quota. Is it no discussion by quota. Execute. No. Sometimes you discuss things, but you have to do something by force. And this was done long time ago because if you give them a chance, they say, yeah. Just just do it. Speaker 0: So it's actually kinda led by example. You wanted those values implemented in the company. Speaker 1: You did them within your organization. I'm not here to say try it. When you test it and successful, just do it. Speaker 0: Allowing women to drive, allowing women to work Speaker 1: in My daughter was the first lady to drive in Saudi Arabia. Speaker 0: Oh, wow. Didn't know. Speaker 1: It's on Twitter also. Speaker 0: I didn't know. We would have loved to work in Speaker 1: the We were eleven fifty nine behind the wheel, and at 12:00 when the time set, we went out and we tweeted it. Speaker 0: You were Speaker 1: with her in the car? First one. She was driving. Was next door. And her grand granddaughter's in the back. It wasn't it was a tweet also. Speaker 0: Is she does she live here? Yes. Yes. Speaker 1: And so all on on on documented. I'm I'm gonna find it. Speaker 0: Establishment, so allowing women to work in all areas. Establishment of many economical council It happened. Speaker 1: It happened. Shared by crown prince, many council ministers. Yeah. But right now, it's functioning. Speaker 0: Number 16 out of 21, deportation of illegal labor employment. Was there a lot of illegal workers here? Speaker 1: Plenty. Plenty. It's a cleaning up right now. Speaker 0: Plenty. So, essentially, you've dealt with the same issue that The US is dealing with? Exactly. Smaller scale. Number 17, introducing cinemas in in in The Kingdom. It happened. It did. Where did that happen coming? One Speaker 1: of the first cinemas opened here, Fox. Fox Fox, Fox Cinema here opened In this building? Down downstairs. Speaker 0: What was the first movie you played? Almir. That would've been a good to play, iconic movie. I remember. Number 18, firing corrupt ministers. Yes. Happened. And that was obviously in Speaker 1: in It's happened already. Speaker 0: A few years ago. Speaker 1: Housing crisis. Yes. And we put our mouth where our money is. Our money where our mouth is. Speaker 0: We invested heavily in that. We do. Yeah. True. Number 20, elimination of corruption. That happened the same time as as point 18. And number two so that was number 20 was social cultural Rotana. Rotana. When when did you Speaker 1: hand over All this between two thousand and twenty years ago. Oh, did that's that's this is between 02/1314. Wow. All these. And that's why, you know, I'm big support of Crown Prince. You know, when you have 21 demands and they all happen and more, you know, yeah yeah yeah yeah, know, at the end of the day, have the interest of Saudi Arabia, number one. Speaker 0: The the last again, if I if I ask you all the questions that I have, we've gone for another five hours. But the last thing I wanna ask you about is some of the relationships you have. When we when I walked into the office, you've met everybody. When I say everybody, I mean everybody. Every world leader. We're talking, obviously, Assad has been has been has been replaced. You've met Assad. I met Speaker 1: the father and the son. Speaker 0: And the father and the son. You've met we're talking about Palestine. You've met I'm not sure if you've met Arafat. Speaker 1: Oh, you've I went twice to Gaza. Speaker 0: There you go. Oh, you went personally to Gaza? Yes. Yeah. Twice. Speaker 1: When was that? In the early in the nineteen eighties. I went there. I met al Afrat there. So all in your book you have here. Speaker 0: So it must be heartbreaking to see what's happening there. Speaker 1: Do you see? Oh, sir. Unfortunate. Speaker 0: I would love to ask you about a few of the people that you've met. Talking We've talked briefly about the crown prince Mohammed bin Salman, about him as a person. I'll ask you though again, how is he behind the scenes as a person? Speaker 1: Crown prince is even the king is very humble, down to earth, jokes, fun. You know, it's just very normal. When I sit down with them, oh my god. They they just they give jokes, they talk, they interact. I mean, it's very normal, both. The king and conference. Speaker 0: How would you describe president Obama and president Bush? You haven't met and and Trump. How would you compare Well, Speaker 1: I met all of Speaker 0: them. Exactly. You haven't met president Biden, but you've met Obama, Bush, and Trump. Speaker 1: But I'm very close to Bush one and Bush three Bush two. Bush two. Closer than Obama. And how would you describe all of them as Very good friends. Very good friends. Especially Bush the father. Very good. Speaker 0: And we talked about Bill Gates earlier. Mhmm. I'd love to know more about Bill Gates because you know him extremely well having Yeah. Co owning. Speaker 1: We are with him in business. We are with him philanthropy, with charity. We're in many projects with him, frankly speaking. Right? It's it's very look. Gates really wants to to make a lot of good stuff in the world, lots of good things, transformational. I mean, he's really he put he put a lot of money where his mouth is, frankly speaking. So, really, this this opposition against somebody, I don't understand very well because I know what he's doing. He's doing a lot of good for the whole world, frankly speaking. Just like Musk, to be honest with you. I have to be fair and objective. Speaker 0: Yeah. It is fascinating to see the perception, public perception of both men. Speaker 1: I I I know he has a program with me and with others also to eradicate polio in the whole world. And right now, polio eradicate in all world. The last three countries were Nigeria, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Nigeria is over now. You have maybe six, seven cases in in Afghanistan because of religious regions. They know they against immunization, and Pakistan made a few cases. So, I mean, a lot of things are happening with them or possibly with the whole world. Speaker 0: It it is fascinating to see that that kind of that distrust in organizations and any one part of those in the world economic farm being the best example. Speaker 1: And his biggest backer is is Buffett. I mean, we we back both, obviously, but Buffett is He's very Speaker 0: close with yes. France is more in Buffett Speaker 1: as well. He's a big Most of the contributions that go into the the the now Bill Gates Foundation goes to because the huge contribution from from Warren Buffett, frankly speaking. So you have to give credit to each person. Buffett, Bill Gates, they're doing Speaker 0: a great job, frankly speaking. Another friend of yours is Rupert Murdoch. Murdoch. I know Speaker 1: him since thirty years. I mean, we are allies with him in News Corp and then News Corp on Fox, obviously, but, obviously, we divested before he sold it to to Disney, you know, a year before. We pulled out. We sold all the the so called old media portfolio. We sold it. And then, obviously, Fox Murdoch himself merged with Fox and kept a news corp and and part of Fox. Speaker 0: And what what do you think is the biggest misconception about Rupert Murdoch? Speaker 1: Look. Murdoch, you know, has Wall Street Journal, has Fox, has New York Post. All these are are, you know, are are are, you know, are right wing. You know? They are conservative. And The United States, have a big movement on the left, the progressives and the work movement, and they are very much anti anti Wall Street Journal, anti New York Post, and anti Wall Street and and the Fox channel. You know? So I'm and that that that's where this is happening. Speaker 0: What's happening is that people Speaker 1: And he's pro Trump, obviously. Speaker 0: Well, even people on the right are very critical of him. Like, when I post about him on Twitter, you've just got them and the way I see it is that they see him as part of the establishment. There's just that distrust in in I'm using the term very loosely, the establishment. And we saw that with them. Was it the was it Murdoch that had the radio stations approved by the FCC and fast track by the FCC? So you say you have all these different organizations targeting Elon. He's seen this anti establishment, and then you've got them supporting the Murdochs. So what I see is that that line being drawn as of establishment and anti establishment. So my question to you is having met people on on all sides and being friendly with everyone on all sides, do you see that that that kind of that rise of the populist movement around the world? Does that concern you? Speaker 1: Look. There's populism on the right, populism on the left. We see that. It's happening, of course. And many politicians capitalize and leverage on that, obviously. But look. When you have a good politician or good businessman doing doing his job, you know, you inevitably have people against him. Even Musk have people against him, frankly speaking. Even, Musk, some people are against him with all of the what he's doing right now because he's he's very much pro Trump, and he played the role in the election of president Trump. I mean, the when I talked to him last time, he was in Pennsylvania. He was just going he just came back from campaigning, and he's going back to campaigning for for Trump. So, clearly, all those people that are anti Trump are gonna be anti Musk because the guy is is is now chose the the the winning the winning horse, a new one, obviously. And I hope that there's the winning of mister Trump and the support of mister Musk and the ideas he has right now that are, as I told, not evolution but revolutionally will be a good process to The United States. Speaker 0: Your Royal Highness, my last question to you is what would be your message to Americans as one of, if not the biggest foreign investor in the country? The US is going through massive shifts, massive change, and there's a lot of excitement right now. There was fear a few months ago. Now there's excitement, which is really good to see. Yes. And there's still fear among those on the left of what a new Trump presidency would mean. What is your message to The US right now, and what is your message to the world with all the the wars that we're seeing, all the uncertainty we're seeing in in Europe, in Eastern Europe, and in The Middle East? Speaker 1: Yeah. My message to The US people is really election's over. You have elected president now. Unite. Unite behind him. Give him a chance to deliver on all the good things he said, even if don't agree with some, you know, cutting deficits, reducing the cumulative debt to United States, I think whether a Democrat or Republican or Independent is difficult to be against. So that's unifying issue. Clearly, some believe to have an open border and have immigrants come left and right. Clearly, you have to accept the fact that mister Trump will not accept that, and he will stop the border and have legal immigrants come. I see US economy is doing good. Clearly, you have issues, but still economy US economy is doing good and moving well. So you have a lot of positive things to think of in that states. You're still a world leader. You're still way ahead of everybody else. So believe in your country, and no matter how polarized you are, no matter of how much the divisive was the last elections, so just stay united. America is still great, and we'll always be great. Speaker 0: And the message to the world about what's happening in in Ukraine, what's happening in The Middle East as well. Speaker 1: Look. I'm I'm not a politician. I'm a businessman that really is invested all over the globe. Clearly, I have vested interest to have peace all over the world. There's no doubt about that. And I hope that those those areas that exploded, like Ukraine, Russian war, like what's happening in The Middle East, always subside and hope no further, explosions happen or wars happen, whether it is in, South, the South East Asia, like in China and Taiwan or any other place. You know? Definitely, we are for peace, and our front and charity works towards having peaceful solutions and resolutions to any conflict in the world. And we play a role in really stabilizing, an international community through all the work we do nationally, regionally, internationally. Speaker 0: So, Rohanis, you you gave us two hours. Absolute pleasure, absolute honor. Thank you so much for your time, sir. Thank you.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

You know... he really doesn't like Trump. https://t.co/4ijEWBGm9t

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Oh.... and in case you are wondering why someone would want to remove Christ from the Bible and replace it with lucifer..... https://t.co/5zylgmRZXB

TheOfficial1984
Posted - February 14, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Saved - February 14, 2025 at 7:02 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've spent months exposing a disturbing individual with a massive following, only to see efforts to silence those who speak out against pedophilia and child trafficking. The evidence is clear and undeniable, yet voices like @LizCrokin, @RyanMattaMedia, and @realstewpeters have been silenced. This is a criminal act against free speech, and I demand accountability from @elonmusk and @KenPaxtonTX. We cannot remain passive in the face of injustice; we must stand up for the truth and defend those who are targeted.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

What is the reward for months of work infiltrating the most depraved reaches of the internet, to expose the actions and bring receipts of a P€DOFILE who likes to dress up as a slave puppy in a diaper, have another man rub sh¡t all over him, and has 1.2 million followers? Yep. https://t.co/srthukME04

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

It is UNDENIABLE that X is actively and maliciously, in bad faith, targeting and silencing anyone who brings for information concerning pedofilia and child trafficking. Rather than take down the problem, they took down one of the only ones willing to expose him.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

It is no longer an option to deny the truth that is now on display for all to see The evidence is overwhelming and irrefutable. This is NOT the first time. They have silenced @LizCrokin They have silenced @RyanMattaMedia They have silenced @realstewpeters DEMONS.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@LizCrokin @RyanMattaMedia @realstewpeters We are not operating on circumstantial, plausibly deniable, hearsay or happenstance. We stand on the truth. Why do they fear what we are exposing? Who's side are they REALLY on? ....and how many of YOU have known and been SILENT about it? THIS. IS. NOT. OKAY. https://t.co/j7YQX5e22K

Video Transcript AI Summary
Hey, guys, I'm back! I know many of you were wondering where I've been. I've been exhausted and burnt out from social media, dealing with personal stuff behind the scenes, and working a lot. As you know, I'm a part-time photographer and full-time laser show designer. I'm also considering joining the military in a year or two. I'm thinking of coming back to this platform, but I took a break because I was super exhausted after my account kept getting spammed with suspension warnings. I've been on Instagram since I was 13 and started my kink account around 15, so it sucks to have that burn out. I have so many wonderful friends and hundreds of photos I haven't been able to share.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Hey, guys. This is, the icon. I am back. I'm sure many of you pups and lovely people have been wondering where I have been. To be honest, I have been really, really exhausted and burnt out from the social media platform. I've been dealing with a lot of personal stuff behind the scenes. I I've been working a lot as some of you know that I'm a part time professional photographer and a full time laser show designer for major festivals and so on. And now I am considering, joining the military in a year or two, so that's gonna be really exciting. But I just wanted to give you a update. I am thinking of coming back to this platform. The reason why, I took a much needed break was because, I've been super exhausted. Very burnt out, after my account was getting spammed with Instagram emails saying your account is at risk of being suspended. I don't know if this is from a personal hater or attack or Instagram's automated process, whatever, which is super annoying, especially for the community. I've been doing Instagram since I was 13 years old, and I started my kink account, when I was around 15. It first started with the APDL stuff, and then slowly worked into the pup play, which I am in now. Still a little pup, diaper pup, whatever. But, yeah. It just sucks to have that burnt out because I have so many wonderful, friends that I made throughout the years. I have hundreds and hundreds of photos that I have on my computer, on my hard drive that I haven't been able to shown you.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@LizCrokin @RyanMattaMedia @realstewpeters THIS IS NOT OKAY It is CRIMINAL and an egregious act to silence someone from exposing this level of filth and degeneracy. It is CRIMINAL to retaliate against and censor an American citizen for exercising her constitutional right to free speech. WE DEMAND ANSWERS @elonmusk https://t.co/ICJOw70aTN

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@LizCrokin @RyanMattaMedia @realstewpeters @elonmusk Not to mention, under the TEXAS BUSINESS AND COMMERCE CODE chapter 541 regarding consumer data protection outlined in the Texas Data Privacy and Security Act Surely @KenPaxtonTX will uphold his duty to enforce the law and hold X and @elonmusk accountable and liable.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@LizCrokin @RyanMattaMedia @realstewpeters @elonmusk @KenPaxtonTX Sick fck https://t.co/WQzsnBPTTV

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@LizCrokin @RyanMattaMedia @realstewpeters @elonmusk @KenPaxtonTX https://t.co/UB2Zr0og4l

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Every time we witness an injustice and do not act, we train our character to be passive in its presence and thereby eventually lose all ability to defend ourselves and those we love. In a modern economy, it is impossible to seal oneself off from injustice. https://t.co/XjxCboD8tl

TheOfficial1984
Posted - February 13, 2025 at 12:29 AM
Saved - February 13, 2025 at 12:56 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

This is worse than the holocaust @elonmusk https://t.co/GTJbyfPAaW

TheOfficial1984
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 8:01 AM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 3:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't believe it. Every single time, it’s the same narrative. @realDonaldTrump, you know it wasn't Iran; we know who’s really behind it. Also, don’t forget to use the promocode BADGOY4EVER.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. @realDonaldTrump .... you KNOW it wasn't IRAN. We know it was the jews.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Promocode BADGOY4EVER https://badgoysclub.com/products/every-single-time-1?_pos=2&_sid=6ba920ee6&_ss=r

EVERY SINGLE TIME Discover unmatched style and comfort with the EVERY SINGLE TIME shirt, crafted for durability and a perfect fit for everyone. badgoysclub.com
TheOfficial1984
Posted - February 10, 2025 at 7:13 AM
Saved - February 10, 2025 at 7:19 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

I am not su¡cidal. If anything happens to me, IT WAS THE jEWS.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 19, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 10:16 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

.......and who owns Oracle? .......who also owns X? We are witnessing the largest consolidation of power and control over the narrative and user data to ever take place in the history of the internet. https://t.co/gxJjfj6htS

@IanCarrollShow - Ian Carroll

TikTok had nothing to do with China. All of its data centers were in Texas overseen, along with its algorithms by Oracle- a CIA front company. If you had been on TikTok you would have seen that the censorship was CIA and Mossad oriented, not CCP. I posted videos about tienamin square, Uyghur Muslims, Tibet and more- no censorship at all. Post about Jeffrey Epstein, the CIA, Mossad, AIPAC, video taken down. You’re falling for government propaganda by parroting the China fears.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - September 11, 2024 at 12:33 AM
Saved - January 19, 2025 at 6:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss the so-called Kalergi Plan, which is labeled by the ADL as an antisemitic conspiracy theory. I reflect on the perception that gentiles face backlash for criticizing Jewish actions, while Jewish voices discussing societal issues seem overlooked. I express frustration that despite alarming trends in immigration, many avoid addressing the root causes. A study highlights a significant increase in the foreign-born population in the U.S., which I argue is a deliberate attack on American citizens, fueled by government complicity and funding of organizations aiding illegal immigration. I urge the need to confront these issues openly.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

THE KALERGI PLAN According to the ADL, rhe Kalergi Plan is an antisemitic conspiracy theory about ostensible white genocide. Richard Nikolaus Graf von Coudenhove-Kalergi, an Austrian philosopher and politician, believed that racial integration was a critical part of Europe's future. Kalergi proclaimed Europe would be dominated by Jews and that his ultimate goal was the programmed genocide of European peoples through mass immigration. Considering this was written in 1924,.... Does this sound like a conspiracy theory to you?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The future will see a mixed-race population in Europe, characterized by a Eurasian Negroid mixture with diverse personality types. It is believed that Jews will occupy leadership roles due to their perceived spiritual superiority. The aim is to replace the white races of Europe with a new race that can be easily controlled by the ruling elites.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The future man will be mixed race. As for Pan Europe, I wish to see a Eurasian Negroid mixture with great variation in personality types. The Jews shall take the leading positions since Providence, God, has given Europe a spiritually superior race of nobility called the Jews. The white races of Europe should be destroyed and replaced with a race of Eurasian Negroids who can be easily controlled by us, ruling elites.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Why is it that when a gentile exposes the nefarious activities of a jew, they are labeled an antisemite and a conspiracy theorist. Yet, when a jew exposes themselves and tells you they are systematically destroying your society, nobody seems to even care! How did we get here? https://t.co/56moVYM0Bh

Video Transcript AI Summary
Barbara Specter, a former American who made Aliyah, established a nondenominational Jewish learning institute in Stockholm with Swedish government support. She believes the current rise in anti-Semitism in Sweden is temporary and that Jews will play a crucial role in the country's transformation towards multiculturalism. Specter observes that Europe is undergoing significant changes and is moving away from its historical monolithic societies. As this transition occurs, Jews may face resentment due to their prominent role in shaping multiculturalism. However, she asserts that without this transformation, Europe cannot thrive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of them is Barbara Specter, a former American who made Aliyah, and then 10 years ago, with the help of the government of Sweden, set up a nondenominational institute of Jewish learning with a Greek name of here in Stockholm. She believes the current wave of anti Semitism in Sweden will pass and that Jews have an important role to play in a country undergoing profound change. Speaker 1: I think there's a resurgence of anti Semitism because at this point in time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're gonna be part of the throes of that of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not gonna be the monolithic, societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are gonna be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

You would think that when these people started eating your pets in the street, people would have finally said ENOUGH. Still, everyone talks about all the things that have arisen as a result of the problem and never actually talk about the ROOT of the problem. Whether it is fear, cowardice, malice, or complete ignorance, the problem will never get solved if it is never spoken of. SO HERE IS THE PROBLEM. A study conducted by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) found that the foreign-born population in the U.S. has reached an all-time high of 49.5 million since President Joe Biden took office in January 2021. Immigration from South America (28 percent increase), Central America (25 percent increase), Sub-Saharan Africa(21 percent increase), the Caribbean (20 percent increase) and the Middle East (14 percent) has surged. The CIS estimates that over half of this increase, around 2.5 million, can be attributed to illegal immigration. IMMIGRANTS NOW MAKE UP 15% OF THE TOTAL UNITED STATES POPULATION. This is not by accident. 50 million people do not immigrate into a country without significant help. This is a direct attack on American citizens using the weaponization of mass immigration, aided and abetted by dual citizens in the United States government who are using 100 MILLION OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS to fund jewish organizations like the hebrew immigrant aid society (HIAS), a radical left-wing group that is actively ferrying illegals into America and providing assistance and support to bring the dregs of society across the border. Alejandro Mayorkas, the jewish son of a "holocaust survivor," sat on the board of HIAS and is directly complicit in this treasonous attack on America. This is a systematic and targeted attack on the white race of America to destabilize and destroy everything this country was built and founded upon. Yet still....you are afraid to be called an antisemite? It's time to STAND UP and SPEAK THE TRUTH, or the problem will NEVER get solved.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 16, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 3:00 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

ITS BEEN 2 MONTHS SINCE X RETALIATED AGAINST ME FOR EXERCISING MY RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH BY REMOVING MY SUBSCRIBERS AND THEY ARE STILL BEING CHARGED AND I HAVE NEVER BEEN PAID A DIME. This is CRIMINAL @elonmusk @Support @KenPaxtonTX https://t.co/7Z4j9O45jB

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The jEWS deactivated my subscriptions. Not me. @elonmusk @Support @ADL https://t.co/Xr2KZ1U7BZ

TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 9, 2025 at 11:51 PM
Saved - January 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

WE'VE BEEN DUPED. Who coined the phrase "freedom of speech, not reach?" This is not a social media platform. This is spy operation. They artificially boosted antisemitic accounts on X to tag/trace/track/eliminate dissidents. @elonmusk is working with the @ADL. https://t.co/z6NbPig5dA

Video Transcript AI Summary
The foundation of democracy is vital, especially regarding freedom of speech. A recent policy titled "freedom of speech, not freedom of reach" emphasizes that while free speech is essential, platforms like Twitter can choose whom to amplify. It's important to limit the reach of extremist views without censoring speech entirely. Social media companies should follow the same business rules as other publishers. Providing a platform for hate groups and harmful individuals is unacceptable. The ADL has been actively monitoring and collaborating with major tech companies since 2017 to address these issues, ensuring that platforms are held accountable for the content they promote.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the bedrock of democracy, I would imagine, is important to everyone in this room. And you talk about the importance of freedom of speech. Yesterday, you posted a new policy that was titled freedom of speech, not freedom of reach. That caught my attention. Speaker 1: I don't think it's about censorship. I believe in freedom of speech. The ADL is a civil rights organization, but I don't believe in freedom of reach. In the same way you get to choose your guests, the same way National Review gets to choose its contributors, I think Twitter has gets to choose who it privileges and who it doesn't privilege. I think there should be a lunatic fringe. We should just keep it on the fringe and not algorithmically amplify it, whether it's Russian propagandists, alt right crazy people, you know, violent anti Zionists. Speaker 2: Jonathan, you wanna do that you wanna do that through a sort of free a, quote, unquote, free marketplace which is companies decide, or do you wanna do that, by way of law in Washington? Speaker 1: Well, I think the companies like the social media platforms should simply obey the same rules of business that other publishers do. Speaker 3: This is not about limiting anyone's free speech. This is about giving people, including some of the most reprehensible people on earth, the biggest platform in history to reach a third of the planet. Freedom of speech is not freedom of reach. Sadly, there will always be racist, misogynists, anti semites, and child abusers. But I think we can all agree that we should not be giving bigots and pedophiles a free platform to amplify their views and target their victims. Speaker 4: We opened a center in Silicon Valley back in 2017. And the woman who runs it, she's the next Facebook executive. I have software engineers and data scientists working at ADL. We're monitoring all this stuff, and we're working with all the platforms, by the way. Google and YouTube and Meta and Twitter and Reddit and SIEM and Amazon, all these companies. From, like, Apple to Zoom, we work with all of them. Okay? That's relevant because we've been working with Twitter now from since it was founded. We worked with the old regime, working with the new regime. We worked with the old regime, working with the new regime. Like, I'm talking to Elon.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - January 4, 2025 at 12:50 PM
Saved - January 5, 2025 at 4:10 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

WE DESERVE BETTER PSYOPS @ShawnRyan762 COOKED. @CollinRugg COOKED. @bennyjohnson COOKED. Sam Shoemate COOKED. .....and still.... The undefeated, unpsyoppable, champion of the world....... 1984. https://t.co/8fizaM5vHP

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan and Sam Shumate are spreading misinformation. Shumate, known for his conspiracy theories, previously claimed US pilots were undertrained due to funding sent to Ukraine and was expelled from the army for refusing the COVID vaccine. Recently, he appeared on Sean Ryan's show, promoting bizarre claims about the Cybertruck bomber and Chinese drones using gravitic propulsion. Shumate has a history of fabricating information, including fake emails. It's concerning that Ryan allowed him to speak without proper vetting.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ryan, and this guy, Sam Shumate, are lying to you. This guy, Sam Shumate, runs this conspiracy theory account called terminal CWO. I actually caught him last year spreading fake emails that claimed US pilots weren't getting enough flight hours because all the money was being sent to Ukraine. He's your typical garden variety conspiracy theorist. He was kicked out of the army because he didn't wanna take the COVID vaccine. I can kind of understand that, but, dude, don't go around spreading conspiracy theories because you have an axe to grind. So now this guy has a new fake email, and Sean Ryan let him on his show to talk about how the Cybertruck bomber is actually still alive and he knows gravitic propulsion systems are actually being used by China in drones on the East Coast. This guy is wackadoodle, and Sean Ryan let him just talk. So regarding Sam Shumate, I basically have a bunch of JSON data on the guy. And I told him if he lied again, what happened? But I guess he chose not to listen. So now we're gonna do it the hard way, which is actually kind of the way I prefer. So keep in mind, when you listen to this guy, he already has a history of just making up emails out of thin air. He did it with this story which he posted on Instagram last year. And Sean Ryan, shame on you. Shame on you for not vetting these sources.
TheOfficial1984
Posted - December 20, 2024 at 7:05 AM
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a tweet about Bobby Fischer, a renowned chess grandmaster, highlighting his views on Jews. I believe he had significant insights, but I also noted a controversial statement claiming Jews are enemies of free speech.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

X flagged this tweet as h#te last time. So i guess I'll post it again. Bobby Fischer (March 9, 1943 – January 17, 2008) was a Polih American jew, chess grandmaster, and the eleventh World Chess Champion. Hailed by some as the greatest chess player to ever live, his genius is not for dispute. Here is what he had to say about the jews.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript expresses extreme negative views about Jews, labeling them as antisocial, destructive, and deceitful. It claims that Jews harbor hatred for non-Jews and even for other Jews who are less harmful. The text suggests that this perceived wickedness is genetically based and criticizes the practice of circumcision as a sign of cruelty and hatred towards nature. It implies that Jews manipulate situations to distract from their actions and that non-Jews will eventually reject the harm caused by Jews. The overall tone is accusatory and promotes a harmful narrative.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A few notes on the Jew. Jews are antisocial, destructive, intolerant, mean spirited, deceitful, etcetera. They wish to destroy, ruin, kill, rob, whoever gets in their way their way. To facilitate them getting what they want, they have developed a perverted, unnatural, destructive evil lifestyle lifestyle. Even though they live off of the non Jews as parasites, they Speaker 1: still hate them and wish Speaker 0: to destroy them. Jews hate nature and the natural order Speaker 1: because it's pure and beautiful, and also because it's bigger and stronger than they are. It all the more. Jews are destroyers. They are anti human. The anti human Jew hates and wants to destroy all non Jews. Speaker 0: He will also destroy even other Jews who are less destructive and evil than he is Speaker 1: if they get in his way. Speaker 0: Apparently, the wickedness of the Speaker 1: Jew is genetically based. Jews are destroyed. They are anti human. By the act Speaker 0: of circumcision, the Jew shows his hatred towards nature and the natural order. By this bloody cruel, senseless, senseless act, Speaker 1: He shows his cruelty and his sadism and that he would not bet nothing to obtain his end. Surely, the Jews are also behind the Islamic circumstances, which Speaker 0: serves as an ideal cover and Speaker 1: distraction from their Speaker 0: own wishes in this regard. Greed, malice, etcetera. Naturally, other people, I. E, the non Speaker 1: Jews, don't like Jewish bulldozed Speaker 0: aside, robbed, and murdered by the Jews, and will sooner or Speaker 1: later reject it. That is where Speaker 0: the lies and deceit of the Jews come into play.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

jews are the enemies of free speech. https://t.co/l4jn2du0Xb

TheOfficial1984
Posted - December 4, 2024 at 12:17 PM
Saved - December 4, 2024 at 8:34 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Can somebody please explain to me how it's remotely possible that the world jewish population is exactly the same today as it was 76 years ago? They want us to think that they are only 2% of the population.... but this is a jewish trick. It's time to #CountThejew https://t.co/q8GWoqfBJd

TheOfficial1984
Posted - November 30, 2024 at 3:34 PM
Saved - December 1, 2024 at 1:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the revelation that Israel has spent $100 million this year on influencers in the U.S. It raises questions about foreign influence and the lack of registration as foreign agents. I see these influencers as traitors, using ad revenue to launder money. The platform X seems to facilitate not just influence but also manipulation of public opinion and even elections. Additionally, the content we see is curated, not organic, with these so-called creators being compensated for posting meaningless content. Scroll with caution.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

...and there it is. Israel has spent 100 million this year buying influenencers. Tell me this... how do you inject 100 million from a foreign nation into the US economy and directly into the hands of an influencer without registering as a foreign agent? These "creators" are traitors. They are using ad revenue to wash money. X is the everything app.... meaning you can launder money, spy on the entire globe, influence elections, cause civil unrest, topple governments, manipulate the markets, disseminate propaganda, and use disinformation to sway public opinion.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Considering they also control the bot networks, the content you are fed is not organic. Your feed is carefully curated to influence your mind. These talentless "creators" are getting paid thousands to post absolutely nothing of value. Scroll with caution. https://t.co/D2gF2ql3em

TheOfficial1984
Posted - November 29, 2024 at 5:50 AM
Saved - November 29, 2024 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my thoughts on the @ADL's criticism of @realstewpeters' film "Occupied," highlighting what I see as a pattern. I believe that Jews oppose free speech, disregard constitutional rights, and I view them negatively.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

The hit-piece that the @ADL put out on @realstewpeters over the release of his film "Occupied" (MUST WATCH) is just one more example of jews being jews being jews. ...and what do we know about jews? 1. jews are the enemies of free speech. 2. jews do not care about your constitutional rights. 3. jews are d€mons.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 28, 2024 at 5:52 PM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 11:36 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

...and they're saying "it never happened" https://t.co/enrJ26nmQz

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 29, 2024 at 8:34 PM
Saved - October 29, 2024 at 11:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared a video and thread to help everyone understand what "110" means and to recognize antisemitic numbers. It's important to know which numbers to avoid. For those new to this, I've also included a promocode, NEWGOYINTOWN, to help you get started. Pass it on!

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

110. Pass it on.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Promocode NEWGOYINTOWN https://badgoysclub.com/products/110?utm_source=copyToPasteBoard&utm_medium=product-links&utm_content=web

110 This heavyweight cotton t-shirt is a durable staple product with a classic fit. One of the most popular items, it has a relaxed style made for everyday and casual wear Seamless double-needle collar Double-needle sleeve and bottom hems 100% cotton Taped neck and shoulders for durability Size guide   S M L XL 2XL 3XL 4XL badgoysclub.com

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

For the noobs. https://t.co/mY9AtP4n4M

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

I realize now from the multitude of questions that a lot of you still don't know what 110 means. So I put together a little video and a thread to help you recognize antisemitic numbers when you see them and to learn which numbers you must NEVER use. https://t.co/KGYQT6xa7V

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 23, 2024 at 3:23 AM
Saved - October 27, 2024 at 10:18 PM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

TESTING. Do you know what a ZOG is?

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 25, 2024 at 3:34 PM
Saved - October 25, 2024 at 11:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
This isn't happening in Israel; it's at Mar A Lago. We need to act quickly because we're seeing a silent coup unfold before our eyes. It's becoming overt, and ignorance isn't an option anymore. They believe they've already won, but we must fight back. Tick tock.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

This is not in Israel. This is at Mar A Lago. I'm telling you guys right now... we'd better do something.... and we'd better do it soon. We are witnessing a silent coup on our government in real time. What worries me is that they are no longer being silent about it. It is now overty in your face. It's impossible to deny. Ignorance is no longer an option. They think they have already won. ...and they will if we don't even put up a fight. Tick tok.

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 23, 2024 at 3:29 AM
Saved - October 23, 2024 at 4:36 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

TESTING. Do you know what a GOY is?

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 21, 2024 at 10:14 PM
Saved - October 22, 2024 at 2:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
If we discarded all our electronic devices, would the issues we face simply vanish? Does the chaos even exist without our constant connection? Maybe the key to world peace lies in removing their control over our minds. Unplugging could empower us to rely on ourselves and our neighbors.

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

If we were to throw away all of our electronic devices and methods of communication with the outside world, would it all just go away? Does it even exist? Perhaps the answer to world peace is to take away their methods of control over our minds. If we all unplugged and were forced to rely solely upon ourselves and our neighbors, they lose their power over us when they lose their access to our minds.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I attacked an unarmed village with rocket bombs and murdered 4,000,000 peaceful citizens of Oceania. This is cold blooded murder, not war. Until now, the war has been conducted with honor, bravery, truth, and justice. The endless catalog of bestial atrocities must be terminated. Forces of darkness and the treasonable minds who collaborate with them must be wiped from the face of the earth. We must crush them. We must smash them.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I have attacked an unarmed village with rocket bombs and murdered 4,000,000 peaceful citizens of Oceania. This is no longer war. This is cold blooded murder. Until now, the war has been conducted with honor, bravery, with the ideals of truth and justice, and the best conditions of that mankind until this moment. Brothers and sisters, the endless catalog of bestial atrocities, which will inevitably assist you through this appalling act, must, can, and will be terminated. Forces of darkness and the treasonable minds who collaborate with them must, can, and will be wiped from a face of the earth. We must crush them. We must smash them. We must smash them. We must
TheOfficial1984
Posted - August 22, 2024 at 5:32 PM
Saved - October 22, 2024 at 12:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Judaism, as I see it, is often misunderstood. I believe that many traditional Jews engage with a range of divine figures rather than adhering strictly to monotheism. It seems that rituals hold more significance than their interpretations, and some practices may even aim to deceive God or His angels. Additionally, I've come across claims that deeply religious Jews pray for the eradication of Christians. Are you beginning to grasp this perspective?

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

JUDAISM IN ESSENCE IS SATANISM "The religion of most traditional Jews is not monotheistic but contains a variety of male & female gods ... religious Jews apparently pray to satan almost as readily as to God. Ritual itself is absolutely uppermost, while interpretation is secondary. Many traditional rituals explicitly intend to fool or trick God or His angels. Many deeply religious Jews utter a prayer each day for the immediate extermination of all Christians" -Israel Shahak Are you starting to get it?

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 19, 2024 at 7:19 PM
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 2:18 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Twitter made me delete this the first time. FREE SPEECH > TERMS OF SERVICE So here it is. Back by popular demand. Vox Populi. Vox Dei. https://t.co/Zgf5QBTgbm

TheOfficial1984
Posted - October 19, 2024 at 7:21 AM
Saved - October 19, 2024 at 10:41 AM

@TheOfficial1984 - 1984

Isn't there something in the terms of service that talks about dehumanizing people by comparing them to rats/rodents? Or does this only apply to jews? Because if it is no longer a thing.... I feel it is imperative that I know. @elonmusk @Support https://t.co/P3tAdwvqAr

View Full Interactive Feed