TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ThePatriotOasis
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting that the post claims in 2025 Congress approved millions for studies defying President Trump’s mandates: $250,000,000 for transgender animal experiments; $150,000 to study Covid & climate impacts on Alaska; $124,000 on beagle experiments.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🔥🚨 BREAKING: It's now been revealed that in 2025, Congress approved MILLIONS for wild and ridiculous "studies" defying President Trump's mandates - $250,000,000 for Transgender Animal Experiments. - $150,000 to study Covid & Climate Impacts on Alaska - $124,000 on Beagle Experiments
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 highlights that the report indicates the federal government wasted millions in the past year on transgender animal experiments and lab testing beagles in China, noting a contrast with funds used for voting identification. He frames the issue as a question of priorities: we don’t want to pay for people to have an ID to vote, but we’ll pay for lab testing beagles in China.
Speaker 1 responds by acknowledging the presence of extensive federal spending and the need for greater oversight. He says this is the ninth year they have worked through this, and that there is always a need for more eyes on it and greater transparency. He emphasizes that the problem is not confined to a single administration or Congress, but rather that there is broad complexity requiring scrutiny and sunshine.
Speaker 1 identifies the shutdown as the largest area of waste in the prior year, stating that $85,000,000,000 was lost during that period. He argues that shutdowns do have real fiscal impacts, countering a common belief that they do not affect outcomes. He then points to a specific critique: a quarter of a billion dollars was spent on transitioning mice and monkeys by NIH. He claims that American taxpayers do not want their dollars spent on such activities, and reiterates that taxpayers are more supportive of spending on national defense, education, and infrastructure, but not on what he describes as wasteful or inappropriate expenditures.
Across the exchange, the speakers stress the overarching theme of government spending that does not align with the public’s perceived priorities. They emphasize the need for oversight and accountability, highlighting large-scale waste associated with shutdowns and specific research expenditures. The dialogue centers on contrasting perceived essential investments with expenditures they describe as wasteful or misaligned with taxpayer priorities, especially in the context of animal research and international laboratory activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Federal spending broadly speaking. The report says that the federal government wasted millions in the past year on transgender animal experiments and lab testing beagles in China. So in other words, we don't wanna pay for people to have an ID to go vote, but we're gonna pay for lab testing beagles in China?
Speaker 1: Oh, yes. That that is there. It was a very, very large federal government. There is always need for more oversight in this. This is the ninth year that we work through this.
Doesn't matter who's in the administration or who's in congress. There's a lot of complexity. There should be a lot of eyes on it and provide some sunshine. The biggest waste area we had was actually last year in the in the shutdown. We lost $85,000,000,000 during that time period.
A lot of people say shutdowns don't affect anything. Yes. They do. We lose a significant amount of federal tax dollars during that kind of, experience. You identified one of the things that I actually brought out, and that is we talk a lot about Minnesota and the fraud, but we also need to be able to talk about a quarter billion dollars that was spent on transitioning mice and transitioning, monkeys by NIH.
Those are things the American taxpayer dollar doesn't wanna spend their money on. They don't mind spending money on national defense, on education, on roads. They don't mind spending money on core things, but they don't want their money wasted.
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Australia, France, and Germany have cancelled New Year celebrations. They claim the French government cannot keep citizens safe from radical Islamic terrorism. They fear a beautiful country and culture is committing suicide.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Australia, France, and Germany have now all CANCELLED their New Year's Celebrations. "It has ALL been cancelled beacuse the French government can NO LONGER keep its citizens safe from Radical Islamic Terrorism." "We are watching one of the most beautiful countries and cultures commit suicide."
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss what they describe as a global rise in Islamist-linked threats and the impact of migration on security in Western countries. They begin by asserting that France’s government can no longer keep its own people safe from “potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country,” and claim that France has allowed so many Middle East and North African migrants that crowds can no longer be assembled. They extend the concern to other Western nations, stating that the threat is now widespread, including in Germany, where they say many people are afraid to attend famous Christmas markets because they have become highly dangerous targets for radical Islamists.
Speaker 1 provides details: since 2014, seven European Christmas markets have been attacked—three in France and four in Germany. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week; among them is described as a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who allegedly urged his followers to kill as many people as possible. The report notes that an attack in Poland on a Christmas market was foiled as well. The German case is characterized as a migrant who came from Egypt, moved to Germany, and, according to the speakers, worked at a mosque in a country they describe as tolerantly allowing him to operate there. They claim this individual began indoctrinating other Muslims to murder Christians. They describe attending a German Christmas market at this point as akin to playing Russian roulette, expressing fear that an asylum seeker living on tax dollars could drive a car into a market and kill many people.
The speakers reference Australia, stating that 16 people were murdered on a beach “this past Sunday,” and claim that there is a heightened threat as their government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim-majority countries, with the Muslim population purportedly doubling in a decade. They criticize Australia’s Labour Party as “left-wing,” asserting it has “the strictest gun laws in the world” yet intends to add more, while instructing viewers to light a candle as a symbolic response. They describe the current government as being led by people who are detached from reality and who prioritize political orthodoxies over people’s lives, claiming that the media feeds the same narratives and spin.
Speaker 2 endorses a symbolic action: “Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness.” They state that a national cabinet meeting will consider a proposal to empower agencies to examine what can be done in this area.
Overall, the dialogue emphasizes a narrative of increasing Islamist terrorism linked to migrant populations in Europe and Australia, argues for stronger security measures and altered political responses, and frames mainstream reporting as insufficient.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A beautiful and spectacular event, and it has all been canceled because the French government can no longer keep its own people safe from potential radical Islamic terrorists that they have welcomed into their country. Think about that. France has let in so many Middle East and North African migrants that they can no longer assemble in crowds. We're watching one of the most beautiful countries and cultures in the world commit suicide, and this threat has now spread all over the West. This is not singular to Australia or France.
It is everywhere now, including in Germany where many are too scared to go to the country's many famous Christmas markets because they are now so dangerous, they're such a target for radical Islamists. Take a listen to the details from this report.
Speaker 1: Terrorists have struck seven European Christmas markets since 2014, three in France and four in Germany, all carried out by men of Muslim or Middle Eastern backgrounds. Authorities arrested five men suspected of planning attack number eight in Germany last week. One of them, a Muslim cleric from a German mosque who urged his followers to kill as many people as possible.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Attack number eight foiled. There was another attack in Poland on a Christmas market foiled as well. The one in Germany, a Muslim cleric that left Egypt to move to Germany, moving to a country which tolerantly allows him to work at a mosque, to have a mosque. And what does he do when he gets to Germany and he's saved by the West?
He begins indoctrinating other Muslims to murder as many Christians as they possibly can. Going to a German Christmas market at this point is a bit like playing Russian roulette. Is today the day that one of our asylum seekers living off our tax dollars is going to plow his car through this market and kill 20 of us? We don't know. In Australia, where 16 were murdered on a beach this past Sunday, many say that they have felt the threat skyrocket as their own government imported tens of thousands of migrants from Muslim countries.
The Muslim population doubling in a decade in Australia. The left wing prime minister of Australia, the Labour Party, a country that has the strictest gun laws in the world already, just wants to add more gun laws, light a candle, and move on.
Speaker 2: Light a candle. Put it in their front window tonight at 06:47PM to show that light will indeed defeat darkness. We will task. I'll take to national cabinet this afternoon a proposal to empower agencies to examine, what can be done in this area.
Speaker 0: Being led by people that couldn't care less if you live or die, completely detached from reality. Politically correct nonsense. Stronger gun laws so the Islamists have a harder time murdering us is the answer. Right? Don't wanna actually fix the problem.
They'll let thousands of us die before they'll be accused of being racially intolerant. They care far more about their political orthodoxies than your life. You should always remember that. You know, everybody's reporting the same stories, the same spin. You turn the channel, it's always the same.
But not us. We're different. We report the real news. No spin. Just the facts.
Turn to us, and you won't turn back.
Speaker 1: Tune in to Rob Schmidt tonight on Newsmax.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING - Video as resurfaced and is going viral of Biden Press Secretary Jen Psaki saying: “No one is coming into the United States of America who has not been through a THOROUGH screening.” Can we get an update, @jrpsaki? https://t.co/1kmtUEs0QU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 raises a concern about a security risk and asks what reassurances can be given about screening and efforts to prevent such individuals from entering. The speaker then asserts that no one is coming into the United States who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process. They note that there are many individuals who have not been through that process and have gone to lily pad countries as that process has been completed. The statement adds that this does not mean there is a flag attached to those cases; it means they have not completed their...
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Security risk of some kind. What reassurances can you make about the screening process and the attempts to make sure that somebody like that doesn't make his or her way here? I can absolutely assure you that no one is coming into The United States Of America who has not been through a thorough screening and background check process. And, there are many individuals, as you noted, who have not been through that process, and they have gone to lily pad countries as that process has been completed. It doesn't mean that that's because there's a flag.
It means they have not completed their
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨 FULL INTERVIEW! @NickSortor JOINED Tucker Carlson for an interview on the events in Portland. CARLSON: "You just came from Portland, how did you assess it?" SORTOR: "It feels like a THIRD WORLD COUNTRY, you have a police department INFILTRATED by a Leftist Militant group!" https://t.co/hW9CR7edMI
Video Transcript AI Summary
Nick says Portland doesn’t feel like America, "it doesn't feel like America... it feels like a third world country." He cites infiltrated police and a downtown that’s "post apocalyptic." He was assaulted by Antifa, but "the Portland police arrested me instead when I got assaulted." The charge was "disorderly conduct" while violent acts occurred; "the DA refused to go through with the case" and video shows him "telling the person to back away" as Antifa blocked cameras with an umbrella. He describes police failing to explain charges for 45 minutes and a sergeant ordering the arrest. They claim police allow Antifa to control traffic; a restaurant owner's access was blocked. DOJ plans investigations into Portland PD; "a can of worms has been opened here" and talks of a "forensic look" and possible federal power or overhaul. He also mentions a fired Secret Service agent and broader national concerns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you there?
Speaker 1: I'm here, Tucker. Thank you for having me, sir.
Speaker 0: Alright. Thanks so much for doing this. So you just came from Portland. How would you assess it? What's it like?
Speaker 1: It it doesn't feel like America, Tucker, at this point. It feels like and I know it's a cliche, but it feels like a third world country. I mean, you have police that have been totally infiltrated by a leftist militant group. And, you know, right now, you can see police cars behind me. These police cars would protect me if somebody were to come up and assault me.
That's not how it works in Portland. The the the the Portland police arrested me instead when I got assaulted. It's a different world out there, and not even just around the ice facility. Like, your your monologue was spot on here, Tucker. If you go downtown, and it looks like it's it's post apocalyptic almost.
The graffiti everywhere, the vandalism, the boarded up windows. There are no people in Downtown Portland. It is it's quiet as hell. There's nobody walking around. People don't go there for leisure anymore or for vacation.
It's because they're afraid, and they should be afraid. You you the the chance of you getting beat up or stuck with a needle or robbed in the street is through the roof because police there aren't actually allowed to be police. So
Speaker 0: So what happened to you, if you don't mind explaining? You were arrested for being assaulted? Is that a cry is it a crime in Portland to be assaulted?
Speaker 1: It's a crime in Portland to be a a a conservative, Tucker. I mean, as as weird as that sounds, the the video evidence and even the DA has come out and said because the DA refused to, to to go through with the case. So they ended dismissing all of the, the the charges. The video very clears, clearly shows me telling the person to back away as I'm walking down the sidewalk, and then the Antifa thugs you know, this stuff is coordinated. Right?
They come up with an umbrella to try to block other cameras. And as soon as when they do that, they're gonna they're gonna commit some sort of act of violence, and that's exactly what they did this time. One of their thugs decided to swing on me and hit me in the face, before breaking my camera and then throwing me in a hole. Was that person arrested? Absolutely not.
Was I? We know the story now.
Speaker 0: What did they charge you
Speaker 1: with? Well, they charged me with disorderly conduct too, which is really weird considering the amount of screaming and vandalism and assaults on officers and explosions of fireworks and such that happened in the middle of the night in the streets out there. You know, they they butt break in the cars. If you try to if you're not a member of Antifa and you try to drive down that street, they're going to hit your car. They're gonna break your windows.
There's plenty of videos of that happening, and none of that is apparently disorderly. They call what I did disorderly because it's a what I'm doing is a threat to the order in their city, which is a, basically, leftist authoritarianism.
Speaker 0: So you got your face in the way of an Antifa fist, and so you're the criminal. What did the did the cop apologize as he was arresting you? Like, what I mean, it's it's hard even to imagine the scene you're describing. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And and so I actually went to this group of police. There are about 12 of them. They're way down the road. They don't they don't do anything ever. Obviously, that situation changed a little bit as time went on, but I went over there to seek refuge with them to, hopefully like, I wasn't even reporting anybody.
I was just standing back hope like, hoping that the situation would, you know, get like, ease up a little bit. And I I'm standing there joking with a bunch of them for seven to eight minutes or so, and then a sergeant rolls up on a bike and says, cuff him. And that's exactly and they're like, that guy? This guy right here, cuff him? And he said, yeah.
Cuff him. He's under arrest. And they had no idea why. They couldn't explain to me for over forty five minutes, Tucker, what my charges actually were. They they they started driving to the jail very slowly, hoping that somebody would fill them in on why I was actually being arrested.
And so they had to pull over on the side of the road near the jail and just sort of twiddle their thumbs, waiting on a call from a lieutenant. And as soon as they got that call from the lieutenant, the that lieutenant instructed the officer to get out of the vehicle, presumably so I couldn't hear what they were talking about on the phone. Something stinks over there. I mean, I there were three people all night long in Portland that came through that jail. It's the only jail in Portland, and three people, including myself, ended up coming through there that night.
It's wild.
Speaker 0: And there were riots underway. Oh,
Speaker 1: yeah. Yeah. That same night, my car was vandalized. There were fires in the street. They do that every single night, and that no nobody is ever arrested for that.
Speaker 0: It's it's so far from the America that you imagine when you think of America. I mean, this is kind of my point. So for example, like, a place Palm Beach or Miami or Jacksonville, even Tampa, sit you know, big cities in Florida. That's the opposite of what would happen. And so you wonder, like, how can Yep.
Portland, Oregon share a flag with Miami, Florida?
Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a it's a it's a great question. And as you as you very well said, this stuff doesn't happen in Florida. It never people aren't going to block the roads in Florida.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: Because what happens? You're gonna get run over. Because, you know, the these these people will take residents that live right near the ICE facility and box their cars in with people. They'll surround them and terrorize them. But there's nothing that the driver can do about it.
If they defend themselves, they go to jail. If they try to drive through the crowd to save their family from these thugs, these violent, mentally ill thugs, they are the ones that get arrested, not the thugs that held them hostage.
Speaker 0: So what does that tell you? It tells you that if the rioters don't get arrested, but anyone who resists the rioters get arrested, that tells you that the rioters are in effect working for the state. They're the militia then. Right? I mean, what else would that tell you?
They're on they're
Speaker 1: on the same side as the state. Yeah. Of course. And then people ask me all the time. It's like, okay.
Well, are are these what are the what are these Antifa folks' thoughts on the Portland police? And it's there's no ill will between the two groups at all because they're practically working together at this point. Yeah. Just the other day, there was a a business owner or a manager of a restaurant that's at the end of the street where the ICE facility is on. There's only one street to get to that to that business.
And he walks up and begging and pleading with the officers there to open the road, not because the police had closed the road, but because, the Portland police had relegated traffic control duties to these Antifa militants that were not letting through, employees of the restaurant or patrons of the restaurant, only letting through their own people, and Portland police were letting it happen. Portland police ended up I have it all on video. I posted it all on my ex. Portland police walk up to these, militants that are controlling traffic and say, hey. We need you to we need you to open up the road.
Would you mind opening the road so that people can get to the spaghetti factory? And they said no. And so the road just never opened, and police just walked away. I mean, I I that that that's how deep this rot runs. Like, who is giving these officers orders to stand down and defer to Antifa?
Speaker 0: So you've just changed my mind in this completely. I mean, so I went into this thinking, well, the problem is these groups, Antifa and others, whatever Antifa is, no one's even really ever defined it that I can tell. But these, you know, these groups of radicals angry about something committing violence against people, but it sounds like the DOJ needs to come in and take control of the Portland Police Department on on civil rights grounds. I know they're very busy policing antisemitism on Ivy League campuses. It's kind of critical problem in America.
But if a police department is indistinguishable from Antifa, that might even be a bigger problem, and maybe they should take it over tomorrow. Why wouldn't they?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's something that I should probably, I I'd like to talk to to attorney general Pam Bondi about. She's been very, responsive to this entire situation. She put Harmeet Dillon on it. They've launched an investigation, into the, into the practices of the Portland Police Department.
And and and Tucker, we, we actually put in this demand for discovery after my arrest, and we were demanding all communications between, Rose City Antifa, which is an organized group that isn't an entity that exists, and the Portland Police Department. And literally within an hour of us doing that, my attorney got a call, an angry call from the, the DA's office, and then eventually said, okay. Well, you know what? We're we're just we're not gonna move forward with this case. They were clearly bothered by the fact that we were demanding discovery relating to the discussions between Rose City Antifa and the Portland Police Department.
So there's something there. There's something there. If we didn't make that demand, I don't think they would have dropped this case.
Speaker 0: That's an incredible story. It's not the story I expected to hear from you at all. That's an amazing story, and it's a horrifying story because where does it leave the citizens of Portland? I mean, if the police department is in
Speaker 1: here, then
Speaker 0: where do you go?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I spoke with a resident. There's an apartment building that is directly it's adjacent to the ICE facility. And they are these residents are terrified to speak publicly. I finally got one to speak to me on camera.
I haven't released it yet, but he wanted his face blurred because they're terrified of what happens when they walk out of their apartment building when they're complaining about what's going on in the street and the lack of action on the on the part of police officers and the city of Portland. The city of Port there is a noise ordinance in the city of Portland. You know, people have the right to, the the quiet enjoyment of their home. Right? And, and the Portland police and the city have selectively decided they're not going to enforce it there to the detriment of the multiple veterans that live there with PTSD that are hearing them the, the Antifa folks in the street shooting off fireworks in the middle of the night, scaring the crap out of them.
They're talking about children in elevators that are crying because it's like a war zone out in front of their house every single day, and the police are just letting it happen. For for what reason? I don't know. Is it political? Is it because they're totally infiltrated by these leftists?
I mean, there's there's a lot of reasons that it could be, but it's something that we need to find out because there are this is not a a victimless situation here. The victims are the people of Portland that are just trying to live their lives and go about their daily business without fear of of being, you know, beaten in the street for complaining that people wanna scream in front of their house at 03:00 in the morning. That's how bad it is.
Speaker 0: I think a lot of Americans are under the impression that nothing has changed in the last forty years, and the law enforcement and intelligence agencies are fundamentally pro American and committed to the rule of law. That would include the US military, CIA, NSA, and and police departments and National Guard units. You know, you you think they're sort of on your side. And I think you're hitting at something that most people don't understand, which is a lot of these organizations, these institutions have been completely taken over by people who sympathize with Antifa. And I would include the US military in that.
Many many members of the US military cheered the assassination of Charlie Kirk, many online. And that seems like a problem that needs that seems like the problem. Because if things go south, the people with the guns have to be loyal to the constitution. They can't be loyal to Antifa. Right?
Speaker 1: Right. And, I mean, you're you're absolutely spot on there. It's, it's chilling the amount those are just the people that we have that are have the weirdly enough, have the balls to say that stuff publicly, like condoning the assassination of Charlie Kirk and stuff. Mean, it's terrifying to think how many of these people are in the background working for these, police agencies. Actually, we, we were able to get a secret service agent fired, one that works on protective details fired for saying that Charlie Kirk had it coming.
He said that publicly on Facebook. That's somebody that works on a protective detail. That should terrify everybody because then it it leads back to think, okay. Well, did they did people within the secret service just let what happened to Trump and Butler? Did they just let that slide?
You know? The we know these people exist. We know they're on these protective details. We know that they've infiltrated the military. That that that that's that's terrifying, and we really need systematic reviews of all of this stuff.
And I know down there in in Portland, I'm actually so well, here in DC anyway. Here in DC, I will be meeting tomorrow with Harmit Dillon and the Department of Justice, and they'll be doing a a a full interview from start to finish on, from what happened and what their next steps are going to be. They're I I spoke with president Trump about it today, personally. They are not going to let this go. They want to expose all of the rot within this police department out there because, ideally, that will, that model will be able to spread to other police agencies across the country.
Like, what they find in in Portland may help them in Chicago, for example. So a can of worms has been opened here. The police chief out there in Oregon or in, in Portland has been on TV every day slandering me saying that it is provocative to film in public with a light on your camera even though it's dark and so you need a light. I mean, any reasonable human being can figure that part out, but they're terrified. They know that that we're not letting this go, that we're that and now they got the DOJ on their backs.
I I I'm just hoping that that the political pressure keeps up, and people don't just forget about the story.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I I hope not. I know that Hartmeet Dillon, who I know very well, my former lawyer, is a really serious and smart person and a very tough person. So I have full confidence in her, but I I hope that we don't devolve into, like, an endless conversation with Antifa and, like, you know, some angry 19 year old. Yeah.
I'm against all that. But cops with guns and handcuffs and the power to arrest citizens, If they're corrupt, boy, there's nothing scarier than that. US military officers. Yep. Many of whom are, like, lunatics, like, left wing lunatics.
And, of course, the foreign policy establishment doesn't care because all they want is another profitable war or they wanna extend their wars in, you know, Ukraine, etcetera. They want a war with Iran. So they don't really care about whether the people who run the US military are loyal to the constitution of The United States. They don't care at all because they're not loyal to The United States. So but we should care.
And I I just really hope when you're up there, when you're up there, you'll encourage a forensic look at law enforcement, number one.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Absolutely. And I think you brought up a a really good point that needs to be, talked about more where, if there is a way and and I'll definitely ask about this. If there is a way to put more federal power within the Portland Police Department, I don't think it's able to be saved as is. I think it would need to be totally just turned on its head or maybe scrapped and started over.
You know? I I I I that that would be you know, I feel like that might be the only way to save it unless you can take federal control over that stuff. I think that was a really good point that you made. Now definitely definitely ask about that. Look.
I mean, this is just what we've seen in one city so far. How many more Yeah. Of these cities are having the same issues that we're not talking about? I know Chicago's a hot topic and stuff right now, but, you know, I'm sure like, is this stuff happening in Seattle? Like, how how many other cities are you having the same issue, with corrupt political hacks that are that have arrest powers.
I mean, that's that's very concerning. It should concern everybody.
Speaker 0: Well, that you you really changed my mind, Nick, and I appreciate your reporting. Thank you for doing this, and I hope you'll come back.
Speaker 1: Thank you for shining the light on this, Tucker.
Speaker 0: Thank you.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING - Security Guard Shakeem Ali in Houston, Texas posts video saying he doesn’t care if he loses his job but “FCK CHARLIE KIRK” You know what todo. Make him Famous! https://t.co/4KnEXtuwq5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker dismisses job insecurity, saying, "If I lose my job, I'm not fucking worried about it. I don't who gives a fuck?" He then targets Charlie Kirk: "But fuck Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk running his goddamn mouth, and he got dealt with." He claims, "Just like any other wood in this country, he got dealt with." He adds, "Just because his skin color is white doesn't make him any different." The speaker asserts that "one thing I know won't ever happen again, he won't run his goddamn mouth no more." The closing line is, "That's what I said."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: On a lie. Say, look here, man. Let me tell you something, and I'm a say this from my mouth. If I lose my job, I'm not fucking worried about it. I don't who gives a fuck?
But fuck Charlie Kirk. Charlie Kirk running his goddamn mouth, and he got dealt with Just like any other wood in this country, he got dealt with. Just because his skin color is white doesn't make him any different. He got dealt with. So one thing I know won't ever happen again, he won't run his goddamn mouth no more.
That's what I said.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING: Meet US Navy Petty Officer Hyland, he has 1.5M followers on TikTok. He’s openly celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk. He needs to be investigated immediately. This is a clear violation of the UCMJ @SecWar, and should not be allowed in our military. https://t.co/OTmRiXZB99
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 says, "If you're celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, you're a bad person. You're going to hell." Speaker 1 adds, "May. Fuck Charlie Kirk," and declares, "The off ramp to the high road is closed," insisting they won't feel guilty about a "bullshit hero" who spread harm. They stress, "This has nothing to do with conservative versus liberal" or with Democrats versus Republicans, and point out the alleged suspect is "an old white guy." They predict media will misframe the event as "an isolated incident by a lone shooter" and that "it's gonna end up being a white guy." They acknowledge sadness with "Abso fucking lutely," but conclude, "However, fuck that guy. God’s timing is always right." "Good day, goofies."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you're celebrating the death of Charlie Kirk, you're a bad person. You're going to hell. May. May. May.
May.
Speaker 1: May. Fuck Charlie Kirk. The off ramp to the high road is closed. We are not gonna be made to feel bad about y'all bullshit hero that consistently spewed harmful rhetoric, that consistently put people's lives in danger with the bullshit platform that he was given by all of you racist goofies. This has nothing to do with conservative versus liberal.
This has nothing to do with democrat versus republican. This has nothing to do with the left versus the right because that's what y'all gonna prop it up as. And the alleged suspect is an old white guy. But I bet the mainstream media won't be talking about white on white violence. They won't be talking about gun control.
They gonna say there was an isolated incident by a lone shooter. And they gonna hold off the identity for as long as they can, and it's gonna end up being a white guy. But we're not talking about these dangerous white men that just decide to get a gun and just start killing people. We're not gonna be gaslit to feel bad about a terrible person. Is what happened to him sad?
Abso fucking lutely. However, fuck that guy. I don't condone what happened to him, but guess what? God's timing is always right. Good day, goofies.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING: Medical worker praises Charlie Kirk’s assassination, expresses how much she hates conservatives then says, “I’m glad he got shot, I hope he dies, I don’t care.” Do your thing X. We need a name/employer https://t.co/ymLoHl8uTx
Video Transcript AI Summary
My coworker was all in a tizzy because she gonna tell me that Charlie Kirk got shot, and I said, good. So we get into this whole conversation about it, and she goes, well, you can't hate people for their political views. And I'm like, yes. I can. Like, that's specifically why I hate people sometimes.
You can't hate me for my views because my views don't infringe upon your rights. You don't hate me for what I believe in because it doesn't interfere with your life. Some of these views are dangerous, and I'm glad he got shot. Hopefully, he dies. I don't care.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My coworker was all in a tizzy because she gonna tell me that Charlie Kirk got shot, and I said, good. So we get into this whole conversation about it, and she goes, well, you can't hate people for their political views. And I'm like, yes. I can. Like, that's specifically why I hate people sometimes.
You can't hate me for my views because my views don't infringe upon your rights. You don't hate me for what I believe in because it doesn't interfere with your life. Some of these views are dangerous, and I'm glad he got shot. Hopefully, he dies. I don't care.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING: NYC comedian Rahul Pandya makes fun of Charlie Kirk’s death during his show last night. “Isn’t it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully this time.” https://t.co/9PRFSBV8be
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: Isn't it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully for once? I mean, talk about professionalism at the right time.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Isn't it just so refreshing to finally see an assassination pulled off successfully for once? I mean, talk about professionalism at the right time.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Minnesota transgender killers' Father has worked for 29 Years as a top-level CIA /DOD Contractor, per reports. Thoughts? https://t.co/k2f3SgkDGX
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
Tim Walz: "I've become friends with school shooters." https://t.co/njJQc1kJxR
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 describes shift on gun policy after Sandy Hook: "I sat in that office with those Sandy Hook parents. I've become friends with school shooters. I've seen it." He notes: "The NRA, I was NRA guy for a long time. They used to teach gun safety," and recalls: "I'm of an age where my shotgun was in my car so I could pheasant hunt after football practice. That's not where we live today." He cites Minnesota data: "The number one where the most firearm deaths happen in Minnesota are rural suicides," and argues "we have an epidemic of children getting guns and shooting themselves." He cautions against stigmatizing mental health: "just because you have a mental health issue doesn't mean you're violent." He states: "Sometimes it just is the guns. It's just the guns, and there are things that you can do about it." He calls for a "healthy conversation" that finds "solutions... that work, protect second amendment, protect our children."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Honor, you previously opposed an assault weapons ban, but it only later in your political career did you change your position. Why?
Speaker 1: Yeah. I sat in that office with those Sandy Hook parents. I've become friends with school shooters. I've seen it. Look.
The NRA, I was NRA guy for a long time. They used to teach gun safety. I'm of an age where my shotgun was in my car so I could pheasant hunt after football practice. That's not where we live today. And several things I wanna mention on this is talking about cities and where it's at, the number one where the most firearm deaths happen in Minnesota are rural suicides.
And we have an epidemic of children getting guns and shooting themselves. And so we have and we should look at all of the issues. Making sure folks have health care and all that, but I wanna be very careful. This idea of stigmatizing mental health, just because you have a mental health issue doesn't mean you're violent. And I think what we end up doing is we start looking for a scapegoat.
Sometimes it just is the guns. It's just the guns, and and there are things that you can do about it. But I do think that this is one, and I think this is a healthy conversation. I think there's a capacity to find solutions on this that work, protect second amendment, protect our children. That's our priority.
Speaker 0: Gentlemen
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: It's been revealed that Cracker Barrel spent $700,000,000 MILLION DOLLARS on their re-branding. To date, they've lost -$143,000,000 million in stock value since the launch. Will they ever recover? https://t.co/vqLdqpR17M
Video Transcript AI Summary
Cracker Barrel spending $700,000,000 on a rebranding plan that they say will turn the product from old rustic to perhaps more modern streamlined. After a week's backlash, the company issued an apology: "we know we won't always get everything right the first time, but we'll keep testing, learning, and listening to our guests and employees." Critics called it lame: "you kicked uncle Herschel to the curb. Now you are paying the price. Own it and stop making excuses," and, "eating Sunday supper in a place that looks like a car dealership does not say vintage Americana." The stock price has dropped 10 percent since this controversy began, about a $143,000,000 in value wiped off the books. Cracker Barrel wants to move ahead, but it's not happening anytime soon.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But even the apology is getting backlash. Cracker Barrel spending $700,000,000 on a rebranding plan that they say will turn the product from old rustic to perhaps more modern streamlined. Customers say that's just a giant helping of biscuits and baloney. They don't like it. So after a week's worth of backlash, the Tennessee based company did put out an apology statement of sorts, which said, in part, quote, we know we won't always get everything right the first time, but we'll keep testing, learning, and listening to our guests and employees.
But the mayor Culpa, well, it didn't go down that well. Critics called it lame, and social media lit up with comments like these. Quote, you kicked uncle Herschel to the curb. Now you are paying the price. Own it and stop making excuses.
Another wrote, eating Sunday supper in a place that looks like a car dealership does not say vintage Americana. But the company's new logo, let's begin there, a simple gold shield with the restaurant's name, but gone is the image of a man affectionately called uncle Herschel dressed in overalls sitting by a barrel. The company also says stores will be decluttered with fewer knickknacks on the wall with brighter paint and and booths. Critics call that soulless, sterile, and woke, a raising heritage, they say. Another part of the apology statement though went on to say, look, the things people love most about our stores aren't going anywhere.
Rocking chairs on the porch, a warm fire in the hearth, peg games on the table, unique treasures in our gift shop, and vintage Americana. But you know what, guys? It's not just the criticism that won't go away. The the stock price for Cracker Barrel has dropped 10 percent since this, since this controversy began. That translates to about a $143,000,000 in value being wiped off the books.
So, yes, Cracker Barrel wants to move ahead and wants this country, controversy to go away, but it's not happening anytime soon. Back to you.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Cracker Barrel REPLACED the phrases on the back of their famous PEG game citing "Offensive language." Cracker Barrel is now officially the new Bud Light. https://t.co/PTQAi6hHy8
Video Transcript AI Summary
Two speakers compare versions of a joke about leaving numbers and objects to signal intelligence or ignorance. They reference "the original" and "the offensive version," then discuss a "cleaned up" version. The dialogue includes lines such as "If you leave only one, you're a genius. If you leave two and the rocking chair, but not the game," and "You're rocking the chair, but you're not rocking the game. Leave three or more. No reason to be embarrassed. Try again." They note misspellings like "embarrassed." They attribute changes to "it's woke" and "They don't like the first word, and what it means The first word in their name, Cracker What." They add that "there's a man, and they're saying that could represent the man, and then he's leaning on the barrel."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're a genius. If you leave two, you're pretty smart. If you leave three, you're just plain dumb. And if you leave four, you're more than just plain ignoramus.
Speaker 1: Now that was that was the original.
Speaker 0: That's the offensive version. Now what's about the cleaned it up yet. So you'll feel you won't be as
Speaker 1: says, if you leave only one, you're a genius. If you leave two and the rocking chair, but not the game. Wait. If you if leave two and rocking the chair, but not the game. Okay.
You're rocking the chair, but you're not rocking the game. Leave three or more. No reason to be embarrassed. Try again.
Speaker 0: They misspelled embarrassed.
Speaker 1: Which is embarrassing. Okay. So the original Okay. The reason they're doing this is it's woke. They don't like the first word, and what it means The
Speaker 0: first word?
Speaker 1: The first word in their name, Cracker What
Speaker 0: does that mean?
Speaker 1: Because there's there's a man, and they're saying that could represent the man, and then he's leaning on the barrel. But this is
Speaker 0: what
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: MSNBC just compared President Trump cleaning-up Washington D.C. to 1933 NAZI Germany. "This is what the Nazi's did in 1933, one of the first things they did in the spring of 1933 was take of over the state governments and their Police." https://t.co/ia9xoTnmqQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Donald Trump is trying to establish police control Over major cities. He started with LA, but then he started on Washington. This is what the Nazis did in 1933. They one of the first things they did in the 1933 was to take over the state governments and the policing functions of the state governments like Bavaria, Prussia, and so on and forth. And it's he if on 01/06/2021, Donald Trump had the kind of control Yeah. It would not have what folks called in the national Right. To help folks at home Storm the cow. It was the Metropolitan Police Department. It was DC's MPD that if they were not there That's right. The capital would have been overrun. That's right. They would have found Nancy. It was the MPD officers who did their duty and held the line until the National Guard could arrive after the president relented.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Because think about what Donald Trump is trying to do here. He is trying to establish police control
Speaker 1: Mhmm. Mhmm.
Speaker 0: Over major cities. And he started actually I mean, he started with LA, but then he started on Washington. This is what the Nazis did in 1933. They one of the first things they did in the 1933 was to take over the state governments and the policing functions of the state governments like Bavaria, Prussia, and so on and so forth. And it's he if if on 01/06/2021, Donald Trump had the kind of control Yeah.
Of policing in the District Of Columbia that he seeks to have in this city and others, how do you think that would have went?
Speaker 1: It would not have what folks called in the national Right. To help folks at home Storm the cow. People it's easy for us to forget because between six, so many things have happened since then. But on January 6, history will record, and if you talk to anybody who knows, it was the Metropolitan Police Department. It was DC's MPD that if they were not there That's right.
The capital would have been overrun. That's right. They would have found Nancy It was the MPD officers who did their duty and held the line until the National Guard could arrive after the president relented. Can't believe he had to be relented. Uh-huh.
And called them in.
Speaker 0: Hours later.
Speaker 1: Hours later. So I I do think that that's a really important point. And
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨#BREAKING: Chief Magistrate Ann Marie Emmons of Decatur County allows Yvette Thurston, 54, who BEAT a baby in the face repeatedly at Little Blessings Child Care in Bainbridge, GA, released on just 10% of a $44,000 bond, despite video evidence showing the assault. https://t.co/All3vrAPs1
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨 BREAKING: Hollywood Actor Michael Shannon on Donald Trump: “He’s an idiot. He’s a total idiot. He’s not my president. I will never call him the President of the United States.” https://t.co/sjNM46Vps2
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong disapproval, stating someone is an idiot and not their president. They declare they will never refer to that person as the President of the United States.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A positive surprise on all this, but maybe he will probably go more. No. He's an idiot. He's a total idiot. He's not my president.
I will never call him the president of The United States. I won't I will I will never say that.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨 Liberal calls for the DEA*TH of President Trump today before he signs the Big Beautiful Bill "You don't think they'll do it outside will they? If someone wants todo it we will support you." https://t.co/JUoEmLap3B
Video Transcript AI Summary
A ceremony is planned for the signing of a bill. The speaker speculates about the possibility of it being held outdoors, suggesting July 4th as a potentially "cool" date. The speaker expresses support for anyone who may be undecided.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I hear they're holding a ceremony so that he can sign this big beautiful bill into law. Do you think it's gonna be outside? No. They wouldn't. But, like, on the July 4, be a cool time to do it.
If anyone's, like, on the fence, we would support you. 100%. That'd be real nice.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Mahmoud Khalil, Columbia college riot organizer, is back leading protestors at Columbia University https://t.co/iNkyHFsuii
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Authorities NOW arriving at Vance Boelter’s home https://t.co/sYNDCltTIL
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: Governor Tim Walz gives an update on the TWO state representative's that were shot. "This was a politically motivated assassination." https://t.co/IphZu1rsjY
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were killed in a politically motivated assassination. State Senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were also shot multiple times and are in recovery. Hortman is remembered as a compassionate public servant dedicated to improving Minnesota. The speaker emphasized that peaceful discourse is the foundation of democracy and differences should not be settled with violence. Despite political divides, compromise is possible. This act of political violence should serve as a reminder to settle differences peacefully. Local, state, and federal agencies are collaborating on a full investigation, and those responsible will be held accountable to prevent future tragedies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here today because an unspeakable tragedy has unfolded in Minnesota. My good friend and colleague, speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark, were shot and killed early this morning in what appears to be a politically motivated assassination. Our state lost a great leader, and I lost the dearest of friends. Speaker Hortman was someone who served the people of Minnesota with grace, compassion, humor, and a sense of service. She was a formidable public servant, a fixture and a giant in Minnesota.
She woke up every day determined to make this state a better place. She is irreplaceable, and we've been missed by so many. Minnesota's thoughts and prayers are with her family, her loved ones, her children, and her parents. My prayers also go out to state senator John Hoffman and his wife Yvette, who were each shot multiple times. The Hoffmans are out of surgery at this time and receiving care, and we are cautiously optimistic they will survive this assassination attempt.
This was an act of targeted political violence. Peaceful discourse is the foundation of our democracy. We don't settle our differences with violence or at gunpoint. In the state of Minnesota and as recently as last week, in the most closely divided state legislature in the country, we sat down, we worked things out, we debated, we shook hands and compromised, and we served the state of Minnesota together. We proved that it's possible even in these politically charged times to find compromise and adhere to the principles of democracy and civil discourse.
We must all, Minnesota and across the country, stand against all forms of political violence. At this precipice moment we're on, this tragic act here in Minnesota should serve as a reminder to all of us. The democracy and the debates in the halls of congress, in state houses, in school boards is a way to settle our differences peacefully and move society to a better place. We're collaborating with all local, state, and federal agencies on a full investigation. We're committed to keeping Minnesotans informed as the situation continues.
I assure you that those held those responsible for this will be held accountable, and each and every one of us are committed to making sure that a tragedy like this never repeats itself in Minnesota or across this country. I'd now like to turn it over to my public safety team to fill you in on, the specifics of this ongoing investigate.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
Will Smith wants to "Cleanse" America of Trump supporters https://t.co/p8M3IIC6q8
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes it is beneficial to hear Donald Trump speak, despite finding it painful and embarrassing as an American. The speaker suggests that hearing Trump allows people to know who he is, which then allows the country to cleanse itself of him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And as painful as it is to hear, Donald Trump talk and as embarrassing it is as an American to hear him talk, I think it's good. We get to hear it. We get to know who people are, and now we get to cleanse it out of our country.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
BREAKING 🚨 New leaks indicate that Hakeem Jeffries was caught paying protesters to rally against DOGE, Elon Musk and President Trump. https://t.co/B7K0ZYN2R8
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
Tucker Carlson calls out Liz Cheney, Anderson Cooper, KJP & Garland’s Blatant Lies about J6 https://t.co/5L2xg898r5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The death of Officer Brian Sicknick remains unclear, but video evidence shows he was not beaten to death by Trump supporters at the Capitol. Despite claims from media and politicians, including Liz Cheney and Anderson Cooper, that he was murdered during the January 6 events, these assertions are false. Attorney General Merrick Garland stated that five officers died that day, but this includes officers who later died by suicide, not directly related to the events of January 6. The actual number of officers assaulted is reported as over 100, which is unacceptable, but labeling January 6 as the worst assault on the U.S. government since the Civil War is exaggerated.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Consider the death of police officer Brian Sicknick. Now we still don't know exactly how officer Sicknick died. We're not certain that anyone does know. No one has explained it. But after reviewing the previously withheld video evidence, we can tell you with certainty that officer Sicknick was not beaten to death by Trump voters at the capitol.
The tape shows very clearly Brian Sicknick walking through the building in apparent health after the media told us for 2 years that he had been murdered. So they were wrong about that. Okay. They got caught. Here's the interesting thing.
They won't admit it. Liz Cheney's tweet is still on Twitter tonight. Officer Sicknick was killed defending our capital from the violent mob on January 6th. No correction. Anderson Cooper of CNN still has not apologized.
Quote, officer Brian Sicknick died after being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher during the fight. He told us, those are lies. So why not just admit it and move on? But they won't. In fact, this week, the White House trotted out both the press secretary and Joe Biden's attorney general, the attorney general of the United States, to claim not just that Brian Sicknick was actually murdered by Republicans at the capitol, but that other officers were murdered too.
It's it's almost beyond belief. Watch this.
Speaker 1: The right rage of bipartisan lawmakers. You heard them all yesterday. You guys reported on it who have condemned, this false depiction of the unprecedented violent attack on con on our constitution and the rule of law, which cost police police, officers their lives.
Speaker 2: It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy, That power is peacefully transferred from one administration to another. Over a 100 officers were assaulted on that day. 5 officers died.
Speaker 0: 5 officers died on that day. Now that's just not some guy in Twitter. That's the attorney general of the United States. That's a man whose honesty is central to his job. If you had a choice between IQ and integrity in an attorney general, of course, you go with integrity because it's essential.
But Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, is a liar. He just lied about something that is provably false. Who are these 5 officers who were quote killed that day? Notice he didn't tell you. No one ever tells you.
No one ever shows you their autopsies. They don't want any detail. They just want the slogan. Now they're counting Brian Sicknick. That's a lie.
But who are the other 4? Well, those are 4 officers who killed themselves after January 6th. In some cases, long after January 6th. But their suicides we know for a fact were the result of the republican mob at the capitol. It's just it's just false.
And it's not some esoteric fact. That fact is available to anyone who has internet access. No police officers died that day on January 6th. None. Not one.
Some were assaulted. That is true. And their assaults are indefensible. So how many were assaulted? Well, Garland said over a 100.
The government accountability office says the number is 114. We're just gonna roll with that. We We don't know if it's true, but we'll take it at face value. And that is bad. We are opposed to assaulting police officers in any context.
We said that on January 6, 2020. Almost say it again. We're against that. But is January 6th the worst assault on the US government since the civil war? That's insane.
It's not even close.
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that Marn'i Washington, a FEMA supervisor, has been relieved of her duties after instructing disaster relief officials to avoid homes displaying Trump signs. She communicated this directive both verbally and via a Microsoft Teams chat to relief workers.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨BREAKING: The FEMA supervisor who instructed disaster relief officials to “Avoid homes advertising Trump,” has been relieved of duties, according to an official statement. Her name is Marn'i Washington. Marn'i reportedly conveyed the message both verbally and through a Microsoft Teams chat to relief workers.
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis™
🚨#BREAKING: New leaks indicate that Dirk Nowitzki's brother allegedly filed a lawsuit against Mark Cuban for making "inappropriate sexual advances" toward him. Mark Cuban is GAY?????? https://t.co/OS811FGZ6p
@ThePatriotOasis - The Patriot Oasis
PUTIN - "Biden can take a seat and eat pancakes and visit us for some tea." The entire world knows Biden is unfit to be president. Americans look weak and are laughed at around the world. https://t.co/RmyqJF6PaF
Video Transcript AI Summary
Russia's attack on us is unnecessary. They should take back their attack and all other weapons. Instead, they should come here and have pancakes with us. If you're asking about war, it's funny. Firstly, it causes harm and poses an additional threat. Secondly, we can defend against these attacks. War is your choice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: На россию зачем атака Пусть заберут назад атака все другое вооружение садится за блины приезжает к нам на на ч пить. Если про война о чем зачем так задайте этот вопрос смешно во-первых это конечно наносит вред это создает дополнительную угрозу во вторых мы конечно сможем отражать эти атаки. Война есть твой