TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheRISEofROD

Saved - December 11, 2025 at 8:34 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Are you fucking livid yet? https://t.co/OIombzm5BD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the United States has, for about a century, supported Israel not only for strategic reasons but through a broad, coordinated influence network. The question is raised: why have we fought regime-change wars on Israel’s behalf, why do we back Israel in Gaza, and why do we provide foreign aid? The speaker states the answer is not solely because of APAC. The central claim is that there exists a vast network inside the United States—a “fifth column.” This network stretches from Silicon Valley and Stanford on the West Coast to Harvard and Columbia on the East Coast, including major businesses like BlackRock and large hedge funds, mainstream media, banking and finance, and Hollywood, all the way to Washington, D.C. through lobbying groups such as APAC and J Street and mega donors like Sheldon Adelson. The speaker describes this as a Jewish oligarchy that operates across industries and elite sectors, working either directly under Israeli intelligence or on behalf of Israel, to push America to support Israel’s well-being. The justification offered is that because they are Jewish, they care about the Jewish state; because they are Jewish, they have a special allegiance to Israel. The speaker asserts that after October 7, there was particular sympathy, and influence was used in various spheres—CBS, Harvard, Columbia, Silicon Valley, government, and Congress. The reference is made to a representative who served in the IDF and appeared in his IDF uniform, illustrating the claimed special affinity. The argument continues that when called upon, this network uses its influence across media, finance, academia, Hollywood, technology, and government. The stated purpose of this influence is to benefit their Jewish community at large and to benefit Israel.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States has been supporting Israel realistically for about a hundred years. Why have we fought regime change wars on their behalf? Why are we now backing them in Gaza? Why have we given them foreign aid? The reason that we have done all of this is not just because of APAC. It's because there is a vast network inside The United States, a fifth column. Everywhere you look from Silicon Valley and Stanford University on the West Coast to Harvard and Columbia and all the big businesses like BlackRock and the major hedge funds on the East Coast. Mainstream media, banking and finance, Hollywood to Washington DC with the lobbying groups like APAC and J Street and the mega donors like Sheldon Adelson. From one industry to the other, from one elite sector of society to the next, we have a Jewish oligarchy. And they have been working either directly under Israeli intelligence or on behalf of Israel indirectly to push America to support Israel's well-being. Because they are Jewish, they care about the Jewish state. Because they are Jewish, they have a special allegiance to the Jewish state of Israel. Because they are Jewish, we're particularly sympathetic after October 7 and used influence, whether it was at CBS, whether it was at Harvard, Columbia, whether it was in Silicon Valley, in government, in Congress, the representative who was in the IDF, who came in in his IDF uniform, because they are Jewish, they have a special affinity with Israel. And when called upon, they use that influence in media, finance, in academia, in Hollywood, tech, government. They use that influence to benefit their Jewish community at large to benefit Israel.
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 7:19 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

I have never hated people so much in my fucking life. Fuck the jews. https://t.co/s5xkoQrjrE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript claims that the entire opioid epidemic in America was caused by the Sackler family, describing them as a Zionist Jewish family responsible for the deaths of half a million Americans and the severe addiction of three to six million Americans, who were ruined, separated from families, ended up on the streets, jailed, or otherwise harmed. It states that in the mid-nineties the Sackler family produced OxyContin, which was so strong and addictive that it could not get FDA approval because it was "actually considered stronger than street level heroin," and asserts they bribed the FDA to push it through. For twenty-four years, while receiving data indicating the pill’s addictiveness and lethality, the Sackler family allegedly pushed pharmacists to prescribe it to patients and disseminate it to everyday Americans to generate enormous profits, described as billions of dollars. The money earned from destroying society and causing addiction is said to have been used to place their names in museums, colleges, and hospitals, and to fund anti-Muslim groups and politicians, including Bush, Obama, and Zionist Jewish politicians like Chuck Schumer, to keep them in office. The transcript claims they used the profits from their pharmaceutical business to promote themselves and maintain power. Regarding the ending, it asserts that the profits are at least over $10,000,000,000, though the exact amount is unknown, and notes they received no jail time, while the victims’ addicts allegedly spent more time incarcerated. It mentions a $7,000,000,000 fine, which it says was insufficient given the profits. The narrative concludes by alleging they got away with this because they are a “bunch of Zios,” with the entire court system and media described as controlled by them, and asserts that they are all part of the same system that exploits and harms the public for profit, showing no concern for the people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The entire opioid epidemic in America was all due to one Zionist Jewish family, the Sackler family. They're responsible for the deaths of half a million Americans and the severe addiction of between three to six million Americans, which had their lives ruined, pushed away from their families, living on the streets, and many even ending up in jail. Unlike the Sackler family, which in the end would not serve any jail time at all. In the mid nineties, the Sackler family produced a pill called OxyContin, which could not get FDA approved because it was so strong and addictive that it was actually considered stronger than street level h. The Sackler family had to bribe the FDA into pushing it through, which there's blame on the FDA for that because they're supposed to protect us from this sort of stuff. And for the twenty four years, while receiving data that this pill was addictive in killing people, the Sackler family was still pushing pharmacists to prescribe it to their patients and pushing it out there to all everyday Americans to get addicted so that they can make insane amounts of money, billions of dollars. And the money that they gained destroying society and causing all this addiction, they used that money to put their names all inside museums, colleges, even hospitals. They even used that money to fund anti Muslim groups and even funded big politicians, Republican and Democrat like Bush and Obama, and helped to fund fellow Zionist Jewish politicians like Chuck Schumer and keep them into office. They used money off our destruction to promote themselves and keep their people in power. And how does the story end? We don't know how much money they profited off of this, but we know it's at least over $10,000,000,000 from how much they siphoned off their own pharma business. They received no jail time whatsoever. Their addict victims end up doing more time than them, and they had to pay a $7,000,000,000 fine, which they still made a huge profit. They got away with this because they're a bunch of Zios. Our court system's run by a bunch of Zios, and our media protects them, and they're a bunch of Zios too. They're all together, and they're all part of the same system that uses us and destroys us and profits in the process. And they don't care about us. They only care about themselves.
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 2:30 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

CIA 🇮🇱✡️ Mossad did Vietnam https://t.co/h1WQex2Nog

Video Transcript AI Summary
Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and order the main claims and their sequence. - Preserve key facts, dates, and figures mentioned. - Highlight unique or unexpected details (e.g., CIA memo and term origin). - Exclude filler, repetition, and off-topic material. - Translate only if needed (transcript is in English); present in English. - Avoid adding personal judgments or external context; present claims as stated. - Aim for a concise, cohesive 377–472 word summary capturing essential points and conclusions. In 1964, president Lyndon B. Johnson claimed that a US ship called the USS Maddox had been attacked by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf of Tonkin, but the second attack never happened; it was a complete fabrication. Yet Congress passed the Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution, effectively giving Johnson a blank check to escalate the war in Vietnam. By 1968, over half a million US troops were in Vietnam, with carpet bombing of villages and the spraying of chemical weapons like Agent Orange, and millions of Vietnamese citizens affected, all described as based on a lie. After France lost its colonial war in Vietnam, the US stepped in, ignored international agreements, and installed a dictator in the South. He was so corrupt and brutal that even the Vietnamese people hated him. When nationwide elections were planned to unify the country, Ho Chi Minh was guaranteed to win, but the US backed out and canceled democracy. So, the US didn’t just join the Vietnam War; it escalated, provoked, and manipulated its way into it. As thousands of soldiers died and anti-war protests surged in the US, people asked questions about the rationale for Vietnam, why the poor were drafted while the rich received deferments, and why the government lied about the Gulf of Tonkin. The CIA was not about to lose that narrative. In 1967, they wrote a classified memo, CIA dispatch number 1035-960, a propaganda guide sent to journalists and foreign operatives on how to quietly discredit critics, especially when questions arose around JFK. This memo labeled those questions as conspiracy theorists because that term didn’t exist before then. The memo was weaponized to shame critical thinkers, equating questioning the government with being unhinged or batshit crazy. It worked: the Vietnam War escalated with a provable lie sustained by media propaganda and shielded by a weaponized insult that’s still used today. Conspiracy theorists at the time didn’t mean crazy; they were people who weren’t buying the government’s story, and many of those critics were right. So when someone says the government would never do that, remember that it did, and they created a stigma to silence dissent. And if you think this is crazy, consider what happened in Panama. Follow for more deep dives. They don’t want you to know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So what if I told you that the Vietnam War was started with a lie and that the phrase conspiracy theorist was actually invented by the CIA to shut people up who figured out about it? Let's talk about how the government gaslit an entire generation into war and then smeared anybody who questioned it. In 1964, president Lyndon v Johnson told the American public that a US ship called the USS Maddox had been attacked by North Vietnamese forces in the Gulf Of Tonkin, except for that second attack. Yeah. It never happened. No. Not like maybe didn't happen. Like, definitely didn't happen. It was a complete fabrication. But that didn't stop congress from passing the Gulf Of Tonkin Resolution, which essentially gave Johnson a blank check to escalate the war in Vietnam. So, yeah, by 1968, we had over half a million troops in Vietnam. We were carpet bombing villages, spraying chemical weapons like Agent Orange, and millions of Vietnamese citizens based on a lie. So here's the part that they don't teach you about in school. After France lost its colonial war in Vietnam, The US stepped in, ignored international agreements, and installed this dictator in the South. He was so corrupt and brutal that even the Vietnamese people fucking hated this guy. And when nationwide elections were planned to unify the country, elections Ho Chi Minh was guaranteed to win, we backed out. We canceled. No democracy for you, baby. So, yeah, we didn't just join the Vietnam War. We escalated, provoked, and manipulated our way into it. Now here's where it gets even a little bit darker. As thousands of soldiers died and anti war protests exploded across The US, people started asking questions, you know, like, why were we even in Vietnam? Why were the poor drafted while the rich got deferments? And why did the government lie about the Gulf Of Tonkin? And the CIA, they were not about to lose that narrative. Let me tell you. So in 1967, they wrote classified memo. CIA dispatch number 1035Dash960. It was a propaganda guide that was sent to journalists and foreign operatives on how to low key discredit anybody speaking out against this shit, especially when people were asking too many questions around the JFK. This memo wanted to call these people conspiracy theorists because that term didn't really exist before then. And then it was weaponized to shame critical thinkers, equating questioning the government with being absolutely unhinged batshit crazy out of your mind. Oh, and it worked. Think about that for a second. The Vietnam War was escalated with a provable lie sustained by media propaganda and shielded by a weaponized insult that's still used today. Conspiracy theorists back then didn't mean crazy. It just meant somebody who wasn't buying the government's bullshit. And honestly, the people that they were calling crazy were fucking right. So next time somebody says, well, the government would never do that. Just remind them that they already did, and they made sure that you would be too embarrassed to say anything about it. And if you think this is fucking crazy, just wait till you hear what we did in Panama. Follow for more deep dives. They don't want you to know.
Saved - October 6, 2025 at 10:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm frustrated with the pro-Israel ads targeting Christians, which I see as manipulative. I believe the concept of "judeo-Christian" is misleading and that the Scofield Bible is a fraud. I feel Jesus warned us about deceitful influences, and I reject what I see as harmful narratives.

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Netanyajew is blasting loads of jizreal all over our country, geofencing churches to pump pro-Israel kosher propaganda ads to Christian's phones. There is no such thing as "judeo-Christian". It's a fucking scam. "Scofield bible" is a total farce. Jesus warned us about the Synagogue of Satan. Don't fall for their satanic kazarian mafia ashkenazi jew bullshit.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript outlines "Largest geofencing and targeted Christian digital campaign ever." "Geofence boundaries of every major church in California, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado, and Christian colleges during worship times" to "track attendees and target with ads." "Israel, the state of Israel, on this FARA registration is disclosing that a foreign state pays for an influence campaign that will locate your cell phone if you go to church in any of CA, AZ, NV, CO." "They will target and track your phone at church and, after you leave, continue to track you and send you customized Israel ads using Israeli money to back that campaign." "That's why we have FARA." "List of targeted churches includes Scottsdale Bible Church, North Phoenix back Baptist Church, Northwest Community Church, Palm Valley Community Church, Palmcroft Baptist Church." "Analyses of attendees, budget conversions, cost per message, slides exposing what they're trying to do."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So here on whatever page this is, 23 out of 86. Item, targeted geofencing. Right there. Description. Largest geofencing and targeted Christian digital campaign ever. Geofence the actual boundaries of every major church in California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado, and all Christian colleges during worship times. Track attendees and continue to target with ads. So what that means is that Israel, the state of Israel, on this FARA registration is disclosing that a foreign state is paying for an influence campaign that will actively locate your cell phone if you go to church in any of California, Arizona, Nevada, and Colorado. They will target and track your phone at church. And then when you leave church, they will continue to track you and send you customized Israel ads using Israeli money to back that campaign. That's why we have FARA, is so that they have to disclose shit like this. Imagine how many other FARA forms were not filed registered, because most of the Israel lobby is not registered. Why is this one registered? I assume because the Americans involved didn't wanna go to prison. And so they said, we need to do this by the books and register it. That's what I assume. I haven't looked into that yet. But that is just a handful of the spice that is in this document. Because then they also have as I mean, they have a list of all of the churches that they are targeting with this digital geofencing. Meaning, they put down a digital fence in their application around the church building, and any device, any cell phone that goes inside that geofence, they track that phone, and they track your data, and they track your movement and your activity. If you go to any of these churches, Scottsdale Bible Church, North Phoenix back Baptist Church, Northwest Community Church, Palm Valley Community Church, Palmcroft Baptist Church, it goes on and on and on and on and on and on. And they have this comprehensive list of all of the churches that they're gonna target, all across all these states, California, Texas, you name it. Then they have all the independent ones. They have analysis of how many people are at each church, how much like conversion of payments from this this budget into, you know, targeted messaging, how much will it cost per message. And then they have all of these slides just exposing what they're trying to do.
Saved - August 30, 2025 at 6:16 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Synagogue of Satan https://t.co/KuExZvu9lV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 frames Kenneth Copeland with provocative claims: "I'm a rich Jew backed by a richer Jew. He made that airplane so cheap for me. I couldn't help but buy it." They add, "That is Kenneth Copeland" and ask, "Now do you know what him and the most evil people on the planet have in common? Everything." They cite new information: "a rich tiny hat club member and backed by a richer one" and "Israel is the only nation, the only country created by God." They ask, "Is this man a Christian? No. Is he pretending one and stealing Christian's money?" A Tommy g video allegedly shows Copeland "brags about giving millions of dollars to Israel and even gave tactical supplies to over half a million people in the IDF." The speaker warns, "It is individuals just like this that are destroying the Christian reputation" and notes, "The problem is they're not Christians. Obviously, he said it himself and he brags about what he actually is and where he gives his money to." "He steals your money, your resources from you and gives it to your enemy."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm a rich Jew backed by a richer Jew. He made that airplane so cheap for me. I couldn't help but buy it. Do you really believe that human beings are demons? No. I do not. And don't you ever say I did. That is Kenneth Copeland. Now do you know what him and the most evil people on the planet have in common? Everything. Some new information just came out about this dude. Now if you watch the first video I posted, I went into how, like, this guy is probably the devil, but it gets even deeper than this. So the first clip that popped up, he said he's a rich tiny hat club member and backed by a richer one. Well, turns out he wasn't lying. He was telling us the truth. And not only that, he claims that Israel is the only nation, the only country created by God, which is really fascinating because I know for a fact that Christians don't believe this. Christians believe that God created everything. So is this man a Christian? No. Is he pretending one and stealing Christian's money? Yes. Now, he's just been exposed tremendously by Tommy g. There's a new video that he just put out that is very fascinating. Really think you guys should go watch this. Where he discovered and breaks down the fact that Kenneth Copeland brags about giving millions of dollars to Israel and even gave tactical supplies to over half a million people in the IDF. So the reason why I'm saying this is I'm calling upon all the Christians to stand up and say something about this. It is individuals just like this that are destroying the Christian reputation that make Christianity look so bad in the public eye. It is guys just like this. The problem is they're not Christians. Obviously, he said it himself and he brags about what he actually is and where he gives his money to. He steals your money, your resources from you and gives it to your enemy.
Saved - August 27, 2025 at 1:34 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

@grok @Froyd369 Fuck the ADL https://t.co/hwfklrVtHG

Video Transcript AI Summary
The Anti Defamation League presents itself as a moral authority. An organization devoted to fighting hatred and discrimination. But the organization's very foundation tells a far darker story. One rooted not in the pursuit of universal justice but in the defense of one man's crimes and the protection of a specific group from accountability. In 1913, Atlanta was home to B'nai B'rith chapter of a Jewish fraternal organization led by a man named Leo Frank. That year, a 13 year old employee named Mary Fagan was found brutally murdered. The investigation revealed that she had been raped and strangled in the factory. The crime itself was reframed as an example of antisemitism rather than an individual act of violence. It was this lynching, not the murder of Mary Fagan, that became the rallying point for the creation of the Anti Defamation League. Words that hurt feelings are treated as greater offenses than acts that destroy lives.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Anti Defamation League presents itself as a moral authority. An organization devoted to fighting hatred and discrimination. But the organization's very foundation tells a far darker story. One rooted not in the pursuit of universal justice but in the defense of one man's crimes and the protection of a specific group from accountability. In 1913, Atlanta was home to B'nai B'rith chapter of a Jewish fraternal organization led by a man named Leo Frank. Frank was a superintendent of the National Pencil Company factory. That year, a 13 year old employee named Mary Fagan was found brutally murdered. The investigation revealed that she had been raped and strangled in the factory. When the crime was traced back to Frank, the evidence was damning. Witness testimony, forensic findings, and circumstantial details all pointed toward him. In a desperate attempt to save himself, Frank tried to shift blame to a black janitor named Jim Connolly, exploiting the racial prejudices of the era. The courts however saw through the deflection. Frank was convicted in 1915 of both rape and murder. Frank's powerful allies, many of whom were in Northern business and political circles, mounted an aggressive campaign to overturn his sentence. When the appeal process failed, they pressured Georgia's governor, John Slaton, into commuting Frank's death sentence to life in prison. This act sparked public outrage across Georgia. Many saw it as the rich and well connected interfering in justice for a poor working class girl. The outrage erupted into vigilant action. A group of men broke into the prison, kidnapped Frank, and lynched him. It was this lynching, not the murder of Mary Fagan, that became the rallying point for the creation of the Anti Defamation League. The ADL's founding mission was not about protecting all people from defamation or ensuring equal justice. It was about shielding Frank, and by extension, members of the Jewish community from public condemnation. The crime itself was reframed as an example of antisemitism rather than an individual act of violence. The victim was pushed into the background of history and the perpetrator was made into a symbol of injustice. In 1986, the ADL secured a posthumous pardon for Frank. They also erected the first national anti lynching memorial to memorialize a man convicted of raping and murdering a child. This origin story set a precedent that echoes in the ADL's actions to this day. Protect their own no matter the nature of the crime. The contradiction is clear. Words that hurt feelings are treated as greater offenses than acts that destroy lives. This double standard stems from an entrenched worldview in which Jewish identity is placed above all others. A belief that they are chosen and therefore entitled to exceptional treatment. In this framework, crimes committed against non Jews are minimized, excused, or ignored. While perceived offenses against Jews, no matter how minor, are elevated into moral crisis.
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 3:16 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

What in the kosher hell is going on here? https://t.co/1h32cTbCx8

Video Transcript AI Summary
People are gathering at the command center, which is equipped with computers, telephones, and internet. The purpose is to call friends and family, asking and begging for donations to give money to the holy organization operating here. Viewers are urged to go to the link and donate. The speaker is looking for someone to explain the purpose of the command center in thirty seconds.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wow. Wow. Wow. Look what's going on. Look what's going on here. It's empty. Slowly by chilly, a lot of people coming here in the big command center. Now computers, telephones, Internet, so you can call everyone, everybody, your friends, your family. You call and you're asking and you're begging for donations to give money for the holy organization here in the command center. We're starting live. And guys, go into the link and donate. And I'm looking for a guy here what can explain in thirty seconds what this what is this? What is about? I told you what it's about, but I wanna you know, with all the things. Bye. Have a nice and beautiful day.
Saved - August 6, 2025 at 2:58 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great Noticing Continues https://t.co/P8oXc9MbVP

Video Transcript AI Summary
JFK issued an executive order to change the treasury currency to silver certificates, which would have impacted the Federal Reserve's authority over interest rates. In the same year, JFK sent a letter to Israel requesting the ability to investigate their nuclear facilities. The speaker finds the timing of these two events to be peculiar, though not necessarily causally related. The speaker expresses feeling a personal connection to JFK.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that JFK set an executive order to change the currency of the treasury to be silver certificates, which would have drastically changed the Federal Reserve's authority over certain interest rates? In that same year, he sent a letter to Israel saying, I wanna be able to investigate your nuclear facilities. The the world government should be able to do that. I just think that's really weird timing. I'm not saying that it's cause and effect. I just think that that's really weird timing, and I didn't know those facts. So that's weird. But this is my driver, and I feel like JFK and I would have been good friends if I'm allowed to say that. Am I allowed to say anything anymore?
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 10:16 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great Noticing Continues https://t.co/HT93ryagn8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ruth hides in plain sight. The key question is whether one can spot the lies and feel the evil. It's about noticing patterns.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ruth hides in plain sight. The important thing is it can you spot the lies? It's can you feel their evil? Can you notice the patterns, Robert? Yes. I can.
Saved - May 25, 2025 at 7:05 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

We don’t hate 🇮🇱✡️ enough. https://t.co/CSnkcJMN47

Video Transcript AI Summary
Harmful stereotypes about Jews, such as the claim that Jews run the world or other major institutions, are banned. Content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media is also banned. However, some believe that Jews are the "masters of the universe," citing figures like Zuckerberg, Sergey Brin, and Jan Koum as proof. They believe "we" have to figure out a way to win the digital battle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We banned content with harmful stereotypes about Jews, such as the claim that Jews run the world or other major institutions. We banned content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media. Speaker 1: Few moments later. When you think about it, the masters of the universe are Jews. You know, we we've got old men at AI. We got Zuckerberg. We got Sergey Brin. We got the whole the proof across the board. Jan Combs, you know, head of what founded WhatsApp. It's us, And we have to figure out a way to win the digital battle.
Saved - May 13, 2025 at 6:06 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Based Trump ⚡️⚡️ https://t.co/K3Y5te7gPF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Reportedly, Trump has cut contact with Netanyahu, feeling disrespected and manipulated. A Gulf diplomatic source claims Trump will announce US recognition of a Palestinian state. A general from Mar-a-Lago said APAC is being shut out, Walls tried to undermine Trump with Netanyahu, and the US may decouple from Assad and MI6. Trump dropped the requirement for Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel for its nuclear agreement. State Department sources say a coalition is forming to recognize Palestine, prompting calls from APAC and Zionists to prevent it, which Trump has largely disregarded. The Trump administration sidelined Israel and held secret talks with Hamas, focusing on hostages and humanitarian aid. Israel responded that recognizing Palestine would force unilateral actions, warning of consequences for those who turn their backs on Israel, including Trump. The speaker speculates Trump may have read the Epstein files and realized Epstein worked for Mossad and politicians are blackmailed by Israel, which sealed his feelings of manipulation by Netanyahu.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't know what the hell is going on, but I like it. President Trump has cut contact with Netanyahu, slamming the Israeli prime minister and his allies for acting arrogant and trying to push him around. Trump reportedly feels disrespected and manipulated by Netanyahu. Trump to announce US recognizes Palestinian state Gulf diplomatic source claims. Just spoke with a general who is in the Mar A Lago crowd. He said that APAC is getting shut out of the Trump administration, confirmed that Walls was trying to undermine Trump by working with Netanyahu and said that he is hopeful that The US will decouple from Assad and MI six. President Trump has dropped the requirement for Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel as part of its nuclear agreement with The United States. State Department sources have informed AF Post that a coalition is forming to recognize Palestine. Following the revelation of the plan, APAC and Zionists have been calling to prevent Trump from recognizing Palestine. White House sources informed AF Post that president Trump has largely disregarded calls from Stevie Flicker, Mark Levin, Miriam Adelson, and Mike Huckabee. Trump administration sidelined Israel and held secret talks with Hamas calling them positive. The negotiations have focused on securing American hostages and delivering humanitarian relief to Gaza. And this is the Israeli response to all of this. Israel says recognition of Palestinian state will force unilateral actions in response. Take this message back to Washington. If The US recognizes Palestine, there will be hell to pay in the White House of those who turn their backs on America's most important ally, and that includes Trump. Also, Trump is Hamas. Am I skeptical of all this? Yes. And this is the main reason why. Thomas Friedman from the New York Times wrote, this Israeli government is not our ally. So are they just pushing for a new government? Who knows? But it seems like Trump is seriously pissed. This would be the first time that a president has cut ties with Israel since JFK. Theory that I'm going with at this point is that Trump possibly read through the Epstein files because we know that he hated Epstein. It's been very obvious to me that he hates Netanyahu but felt obligated to work with him and support Israel. But if he read through those documents and realized that Epstein was working for Mossad and that all of our politicians and elites have been blackmailed by Israel this entire time, If he was already feeling manipulated by Netanyahu, this probably sealed the deal.
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 2:07 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

I’m going to post this every fucking day. https://t.co/CjHme9p8Wh

Saved - March 31, 2025 at 6:30 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Based Bishop Richard Williamson ⚡️⚡️ https://t.co/ktawx2F59V

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that the new religion is one where everyone is nice and sweet, and the only sin is Nazi sin. According to the speaker, the 6,000,000 are the redeemer, meaning the Jewish people are God. The speaker equates this to Auschwitz instead of Golgotha, and the gas chamber instead of the cross. The speaker asks if they can blaspheme against Jesus Christ without issue, but questions what would happen if they blasphemed against the Holocaust by saying there were no gas chambers, suggesting this would result in outrage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where everybody is nice, everybody is sweet, that nobody has original sin. The only sin that's still left is Nazi sin. That's the new religion. The 6,000,000 are the redeemer, which means that the Jewish people are God. That's the religion today, and that's deadly because you get Auschwitz instead of Golgotha, the gas chamber instead of the cross. Can I blaspheme our lord Jesus Christ? Does anybody worry? No problem. Blaspheme as much as you like. Can I blaspheme against the holocaust by saying that there were no gas chambers? Horror, horror, horror. Burn him at the stake. He's a heritage.
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 11:36 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

What else do you Notice? https://t.co/pvm36Gyijn

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions why Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Ian Carroll are being targeted, suggesting a common thread: their lack of unwavering support for Israel. Olivia Nuzzi, who allegedly orchestrated attacks against these figures, previously faced scrutiny for an affair with RFK Jr. The speaker highlights the coincidence of Nuzzi's car having license plates referencing RFK Jr. and questions RFK Jr.'s silence on Israel, noting Dave Smith's criticism of his "blind spot" and support for Israel "whatever it takes" despite the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. RFK Jr.'s association with Rabbi Shmuley, who has been accused of extortion, is also criticized. The speaker questions RFK Jr.'s focus on antisemitism as a health crisis, arguing it deviates from his intended platform of addressing vaccines and the CDC. The speaker speculates about potential blackmail involving RFK Jr., suggesting Olivia Nuzzi is aware of it and is working to protect him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just a weird set of attacks because I'm going, what does Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and Ian Carroll have in common? Especially to then say something as petty as I'm copying I'm copying her and trying to rebrand. That in and of itself to me registered as a conspiracy because something you should know about neocons, the forever war sent American sons and daughters to die perpetually overseas, in lands and territories that they don't recognize is that one thing that they have in common is that you must worship Israel, the foreign state. And here you have three independent voices who are being smeared and libel, who don't do that, and who truly are not being controlled by anybody else despite the implications of these pieces. And when the she was revealed of who was overseeing this piece and who was going to personally edit it, we found out that this person was Olivia Nazzi. Clean shot, Olivia Nuzzy said. It needs to be a clean shot. They are speaking like they are an assassination hit squad. Who is this human being? Who is Olivia Nuzzy? Why is she calling shots clean shots on people like Candace Owens and directing and being some ghost hand behind the scenes? And it's not, once you understand who Olivia Nuzzy is, shocking that she would go after Tucker Carlson. What's rather shocking is that Jessica Reed Krause is bragging about how close she is to Donald Trump while having a person who is taking shots at real conservatives in this country. So I'm gonna tell you about Olivia Nazzi. She was a correspondent for New York Magazine. Yes. The one that we just uncovered, that whole weird pedophile senior writer, sympathizer. She was a correspondent for New York Magazine 02/2017 to 02/2024, so she had quite a long tenure there. And so, yeah, she had quite a long tenure at New York Magazine until in February, New York Magazine had placed her on leave after it was disclosed that she was having an affair with RFK junior. Now they both maintained at the time that this was clearly a sexting affair. But the other element of this is super interesting. Olivia, currently living in Malibu, which means now she's living in a city, which means now she's gotta drive a car, is driving a car. She's driving a foreign car in Malibu, and her license plates and I'm not giving you the end of a license plates, but her real true license plates are, and I can show you here, RFK66Blank blank. That is some coincidence. I gotta tell you. I gotta tell you. Okay? Like, I gotta tell you, it's a weird thing. Like, it's not every day that your license plates reflect the sexting scandal that you just had. Okay? It's not every day. Who purchased this foreign car? Who got this car to Malibu? Okay? It's a British car. And your license plates are RFK and some numbers. So we discussed yesterday how we all kinda know who killed JFK, but we keep doing this weird song and dance in America. Like, we're like, dude, it's awkward. We don't wanna, like, say, well, like, things are adding up. And we've all we've always known that we weren't really waiting for the release of these files to vindicate us. It's very clear why else would you lock something down for this long. It's very clear who was involved. And the weirdest song and dance and all that we're all doing at the moment is pretending that r k junior's unflinching loyalty, and quite frankly, his fear of saying anything negative about Israel is not bizarre. Okay? I'm gonna pull up Dave Smith here. Dave Smith has been just an incredible powerhouse. He was majorly supportive of RFK junior as a candidate, saying essentially, because he's moderate. Like, I like him because he doesn't like war. Like, he is a libertarian, and he has been a leader in the liver in in in the libertarian movement for quite some time, Dave Smith. And he got behind RFK until he didn't. He he felt like it was very weird that RFK had just this blind spot for Israel. It was weird to him. And he calls him out. He called him out right to his face. Skyler, let's pull that up. Dave Smith just calling out RFK junior for this, like, remarkable hypocrisy while pretending to be anti war, but also simultaneously, like, unwilling to say anything about the state of Israel. Speaker 1: It it is the the worst humanitarian catastrophe in the world right now. And the idea that you, who are supposed to be the anti neocon, anti war presidential candidate are immediately on October 7 before we even had an investigation, before we even knew what happened there, you immediately say what basically, you said everything they say about Ukraine. You said it was an unprovoked attack, which, like, come on. Give me a break. An attack from Gaza against Israel is unprovoked. And then you said, we have to support them in whatever it takes. Well, look, sir. We're watching it right now. This is whatever it takes. Just women and children dying under rubble. Every day you can't go on social media without seeing another video of some baby dying. This is what we are after the last twenty years of disastrous wars, we gotta support the next one. And and sir, this is this is like a biblical level of evil. And and why? Why should we as Americans bitch have to fund this? Why should we have to give them a blank check? I'm sorry. It's been long enough. Speaker 0: And RFK didn't have an acceptable answer, and that was something that was one of the reasons why he was just not gonna be vocal in his support. Dave Smith was not gonna be vocal in his support of RFK junior, but he said the biggest thing was just the fact that he was hanging around rabbi Shmueli. I mean, like, this is, a thing that everybody just agrees on. He is just a filthy, disgusting human man, and he made him a part of his campaign. This is a person who openly blackmails people. He's being sued right now from a wealthy Jewish family down in Miami before trying to extort them. He he deals in extortion and blackmail in broad daylight and try to extort the owners of Fontainebleau by calling them Nazi sympathizers, everything that he did to me and everyone. He was just like a smear merchant. And r f k junior's just buddy buddy with him. How weird? And when I got into my most viral debate last year with him, and he I just let rabbi Shmuelu be rabbi Shmuelu. I kinda just sat back and watched him be a demon. RFK junior randomly tweeted right after this debate, which everyone was just like, yeah. He got what he deserved. He's disgusting. Like, nobody was defending rabbi Shuli. Nobody. RFK Junior comes to his defense and spoke about the troubling rise of antisemitism. You you gotta watch this debate because he did not in RFK junior's tweet, it was almost like someone just took his phone and said, this is what you gotta do. You know? I control you, man. So he goes on to this and talks about antisemitism, but here's where it gets interesting because this is before he got into office. Now RFK is in office, and I'm thinking, okay. He had to defend his rabbi Shmueli buddy who just got destroyed in a debate, but he's kinda made antisemitism his focus. This is a tweet from him that he recently sent out. Antisemitism, like racism, is a spiritual and moral malady, that sicken societies and kills people with lethal lethalities comparable to history's most deadly plagues. In recent years, the censorship and false narratives of woke cancel culture have transformed our great universities into greenhouses for this deadly and virulent pestilence. Making America healthy means building communities of trust and mutual respect based on speech, freedom, and open debate. And then he includes a link to the HHS.gov. So that's weird. And then he's decided that antisemitism is a health crisis. This is not what we put you this is just not what we put you in office for. I don't care. We need to debate any of this other than this is not what people put you in office for. We wanted you to go after vaccines. We wanted you go after the CDC. We did not want you to establish antisemitism as a health crisis. And The Atlantic was right when they wrote this headline. Make public health officials stay in their lane again. Fighting antisemitism isn't RFK's junior's job. Yes. That is correct. What are we even speaking about here? Why is RFK junior feel like he's just being moved by rabbi Shmooli in the background and not focused on what we put him in office for? Why is RFK junior not the first person that's all over the JFK files? If he's gonna do some outside work outside of focusing on health and he's he's really worried and and wants to dedicate his time, I I would think maybe looking into the JFK files and giving us some sort of a conclusion on what he thinks could be interesting, but that's not what he's doing. And so what's interesting is I I have begun to wonder who's got something on RFK junior. And indeed, as I said, because Olivia Nazzi's got a big mouth when she's not busy hunting big buck, there is some interesting stories that are circulating in the background, and it does, again, at least according to what is circulating all throughout the PR world, thanks to Olivia Nazzi, and she wants to make sure she protects RFK. She made that clear. She wants to protect RFK. She doesn't want this stuff made public. Is that there's some sexual blackmail in the background that's going on. Some sexual interests in the background that's going on. And let me tell you, Olivia Nazzi knows it, we could guess that some other people know it. I'm willing to guess a guy like rabbi Shmooley would make sure that he knows it. And so I'm just finding this whole thing and the stuff that I've heard about r f k junior and the stuff that I know Olivia Nuzzi has on him to be interesting in the context of the fact that she's operating hit pieces against conservatives. She hates Donald Trump, and yet she's chummy chummy with someone who is within striking distance from Donald Trump. I find all this to be very interesting. It's just be should be publicized that there's weird sexual blackmail.
Saved - March 27, 2025 at 8:36 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great Noticing Continues https://t.co/XY0OUO13gz

Saved - March 18, 2025 at 1:53 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

This is peak jewish supremacy going on here in USA. https://t.co/mK8QBMB877

Video Transcript AI Summary
While travel nursing, the speaker worked on an organ transplant floor where they learned that many patients were Israeli citizens. These citizens come to the U.S. for procedures not offered or perfected in Israel, or when a matching organ isn't available in Israel. The speaker suspects Israelis are being fast-tracked on organ waitlists, citing a patient who received a double heart and lung transplant within a week of arriving in the U.S. Additionally, the speaker claims that the flight and hospital stay of Israeli citizens are covered when they come to the U.S. for such procedures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: During my time spent travel nursing, I worked at a hospital and I was floated onto a floor that I didn't normally go to, and they specialized in organ transplants. And within five minutes of me being on the floor that day and getting a report, I heard someone make a comment about, oh, it's okay. Half the floor is Israeli anyway. And I didn't really know what that meant. So I asked the girl that was about to give me a report, she was like, oh, yeah. Like, half our floor at any given moment are Israeli citizens that have come here for health care, which I didn't really think much of. Was like, oh, okay. They're flying in. Okay. It wasn't until I, like, sat down with one of my Israeli patients and she talks me through the whole thing, that I realized what was going on. Israeli citizens are given the option if there's a US hospital that has a procedure that is not offered in Israel, or if there's a US hospital that is better at a procedure than a hospital in Israel, or if the Israeli organ donation centers don't have a good match for them, They come to The US and receive our organs from our citizens. I don't know how it's happening, but I have suspicion that some of these Israeli citizens are being fast tracked on the wait list for U. S. Organs, in specific because one of the patients I was taking care of had received a double heart and lung transplant, and they had only been in the country for less than a week. How do you get matched and then become a recipient of such an important set of organs after waiting only a week. More than that, for any Israeli citizen that is brought here, their flight to The US is covered. Their stay while in The United States, their stay in the hospital, which mind you, for the average person receiving a organ transplant or a high level procedure where they will need to be hospitalized for up to two weeks afterwards, that's like
Saved - March 18, 2025 at 12:36 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

They ✡️🇮🇱 always infiltrate, deceive, corrupt and play victim card. https://t.co/BQhlvGy5O4

Video Transcript AI Summary
Jewish businesses are flourishing, exemplified by the Rothschild and Warburg families, who use financial influence to control the working man. By the 20th century, Jews dominate global money markets, wielding international power despite comprising only 1% of the global population. Their capital allows them to terrorize world exchanges, opinion, and politics. New York is the center of Jewish power, with the New York Stock Exchange controlled by Jewish banking houses like Kuhn, Loeb, Warburg, and others. These Jewish figures prefer to operate discreetly, blending in with their host countries. Examples include Bernard Baruch, Otto Khan, Felix Warburg, Watermish Schiff, Untermeyer, Felix Frankfurter, Herbert Lehman, LaGuardia, Henry Morgenthau, and June Leon Blom. Even when in power, the Jew remains a parasite, dependent on misled hosts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Jewish business blooms as never before. The house of Rothschild is just one example of the use of this tactic by the Jews and spread their net of financial influence over the working man. The house of Warburg follows the same tactic as do other Jewish banking families. By the beginning of the twentieth century, the Jews are sitting at all junctions of the world's money market. They're an international power. Although they make up only 1% of the population of the earth, their capital enables them to terrorize world exchanges, world opinion, and world politics. New York New York is today's chief center of Jewish power. New York The New York Stock Exchange, financial center of the world, is ruled by such Jewish banking houses as Kuhn, Loeb, Verburg, Hanauer, Lertheim, Lebeson, Seligman, Guggenheim, Wolf, Schiff, Strauss, Stern, and so forth. These Jewish kings of France love to play out their power behind the scenes and stay out of the limelight. Outwardly, they fit right in with their hosts. They look almost like genuine Americans. Bernard Baruch, Jewish financial adviser and friend of the American president in the guise of a smart citizen of The United States. Otto Khan, Jewish Banker of Wall Street enjoying his role as Anglo Saxon lord. Jewish banker Felix Warburg. Jewish banker, Watermish Schiff. Jewish lawyer and German hater, Untermeyer. Professor Felix Frankfurter, Jewish legal adviser to the American president. Herbert Lehman, Jewish governor of the state of New York. LaGuardia, half Jewish mayor of New York City. Henry Morgenthau, Jewish Secretary Of The Treasury Of The United States. June Leon Blom, Former Prime Minister of France, who knows how to act just like a genuine Frenchman. Millions of French workers once greeted him as their party leader. The Jew whore, militia, former minister of war for England. English Soldiers salute their commander. But the Jew is still a ruthless parasite even when in power, for his power doesn't come from his own strength. It lasts only as long as his misled hosts are willing to carry him on their backs.
Saved - March 13, 2025 at 6:06 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Barbara Spectre 🇮🇱✡️ telling the world that jews are pushing multiculturalism open borders throughout Europe / western civilization and they will be resented for it all. The Kalergi Plan aka Great White Replacement must be stopped and reversed. You don’t 🤬 hate them enough. https://t.co/L5KQOg4rL2

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm Barbara Spector, and I established Paideia in Stockholm with Swedish government support to promote Jewish learning. I'm optimistic that the current antisemitism in Sweden is temporary, and Jews are vital as Sweden changes significantly. Antisemitism is rising because Europe is struggling with multiculturalism. We're in a transitional period. Europe must transform from its past monolithic structure to survive, and Jews are central to this shift. Our leading role in pushing for multiculturalism will cause resentment, but Europe needs this transformation to survive.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One of them is Barbara Spector, a former American who made Aliyah, and then ten years ago, with the help of the government of Sweden, set up a nondenominational institute of Jewish learning with the Greek name of Paideia here in Stockholm. She believes the current wave of antisemitism in Sweden will pass and that Jews have an important role to play in a country undergoing profound change. Speaker 1: I think there's a resurgence of antisemitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're going to be part of the throes of that of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are gonna be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode, and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 11:14 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

David Icke has been dropping massive ✡️🇮🇱 truth bombs for decades while getting called every slanderous name in existence, but they never called him LIAR. https://t.co/mltzXyfgtn

Video Transcript AI Summary
Israel is the largest recipient of American aid and military support because the House of Rothschild takes money from the United States and gives it to Israel, which is also of the House of Rothschild. The House of Rothschild controls the countries of the European Union, which is why Israel is not questioned about its nuclear capabilities and gets away with mass murder repeatedly. When the same force controls all these different agencies, they will be coordinated. That's why Israel gets away with what it gets away with. If people think that's antisemitic, they're wrong; antisemitic means anti-Arab.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The reason, therefore, that, Israel is the biggest recipient of, American, aid and military support is because this hand called the House of Rothschild takes the money from The United States and hands it to this hand, called Israel of the House of Rothschild and says thank you very much. The reason that, there's no questioning of Israeli nuclear capability, that they get away literally with mass murder time and time again is because the House of Rothschild also controls the countries of the European Union and controls the European Union. When you've got the same force controlling all these different agencies, then, of course, they're gonna be coordinated. That's why Israel gets away with what it gets away with. And if people think that's antisemitic well, actually, antisemitic means anti Arab, by the way, then they'll have to take it and shove it somewhere where the sun don't shine.
Saved - March 8, 2025 at 3:32 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

All the cuckservatives who are attacking Qatar as the boogeyman to deflect from Israel’s genocide, pedophile blackmail, degeneracy, satanic ritual baby sacrifice and blood thirsty desire for USA war with Iran really need to stop sucking massive amounts of kosher dick for shekels.

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

There’s enormous pressure on the United States to participate in a brand new war against Iran. The government of Qatar thinks that’s unwise, so of course they’re being slandered relentlessly in American media. Qatar’s prime minister, Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani, explains. (0:00) How the Left Used the World Cup to Attack Qatar (3:03) Cultural Imperialism (4:35) Attacks on the Nuclear Family Worldwide (9:23) Why Does Corporate Media Hate Qatar? (12:41) Qatar’s Hamas Office (17:29) Is Qatar an Enemy of the United States? (19:47) Steve Witkoff (26:23) Qatar’s Relationship with Iran (32:15) How Close Is Iran to Getting a Nuclear Weapon? (42:31) Have the Sanctions on Iran Worked? (49:33) Trump’s Efforts to End the Ukraine War (52:40) Advice to Trump on How to Negotiate Peace Between Israel and Gaza (56:51) Qatar’s Energy Resources Includes Paid Partnerships.

Video Transcript AI Summary
It's unfortunate that some countries and NGOs used the World Cup to attack our values and impose their own. We respect everyone who respects our laws, just as we respect the laws of other countries when we visit. We won't change our country for a one-month event. This cultural imperialism is driven by an agenda to normalize unacceptable things and a disbelief that a small Arab country could host such a tournament. We've even built things we don't need, like nursing homes, to meet international standards, even though it goes against our values. The attacks on our family values aim to make societies vulnerable. We value family bonds, as they create a strong, unified nation. We're doing what we believe is right for our people, our region, and our friends, aiming for peace despite those who undermine it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thanks for joining us, mister prime minister. Speaker 1: Thank you very much. Speaker 0: So you had the World Cup a few years ago here. It was very widely covered around the world, and part of the coverage, maybe the majority of the coverage was not about soccer football. It was about your country and how it was, you know, needed to come into line with the social mores of the West, etcetera. There was a lot of lecturing about, to your country about the way that you live. Did you feel that? Speaker 1: Well, it's unfortunate, you know, there are the whole purpose of hosting the World Cup is to bring the world together in that country to put the country in the spotlight about the football, about the tournament, and about people coming together. Unfortunately, countries and some NGOs try to use this as an opportunity to attack on values of the society itself, on the values of the country, of the community by using it as an opportunity to change these values and to impose their own values on our country and our people. That's something wasn't, was expected from our side that we will be attacked, we will be hearing a lot of lectures about values and things that are not belongs to us. And basically our decision from the beginning that we don't need to change the country for one month's settlement. And, I cannot change the value of a whole society and impose on them values that I don't believe in. And, it's against every principle in our society, against the principles of Islam, against the principles of Christianity as well. And that's basically, we said very clear. We respect everybody who's coming here as long as they are respecting the laws in that country. As you are expecting from the Qataris when they visit any of your countries in Europe, to respect your laws. And basically, that's what we want from the people. Anything happen in their personal life, it's their personal life. But nothing should happen in public against the laws of the state of Qatar, and we will never change. The problem that those countries and NGOs put a lot of efforts in demonizing this World Cup in order to impose their values. Yet, there were many things happening around the world and they are just turning blind eye. If they put some efforts and energy on those real issues that affecting the human lives around the world, it would be much better than the waste investment that was in campaigns against the country to change its values, to impose new values which are not even, you know, related to us. Speaker 0: So why do you think that is? This used to be called cultural imperialism. Yeah. You know, taking your values and using force to impose them on another society. But this is probably the richest country per capita in the world. It's free. Qataris can come and go. They don't have to live here. They choose to live here. And your values are thousands of years old. Why would it be important for an NGO? I thought they were supposed to be feeding people but instead they're yelling at you for not having enough transgender Qataris, like what is the point of that? What do you think that actually is? What are Speaker 1: they trying to do? Well, think it's mainly driven by an agenda that these are the things that we would like to see in countries that they are not accepting it, you know, and societies that they are not accepting it. We need to make it normal for them. We need to normalize it. Second, a lot didn't accept the fact that Qatar is a small Arab country, can host a world class tournament. Basically, they were like, you know, how a lot of attacks that why Qatar won the World Cup, like they don't have even the culture of the World Cup. I don't know what's, you know, what does it mean if if I am a country like a marginal country, I don't have the right to host a world tournament. And this is more about, honestly, I see it like more racism and superiority and that's basically, I think, the main driver for this. Speaker 0: Susan, an official here told me a funny story and I want to check to see if it's true. This person told me that some bureau or commission in the United Nations was raiding the human rights here in Qatar and said in order to score higher, you have to build nursing homes Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: For your old people to live. And this person tried to explain, you know, we don't have nursing homes because old people, parents live with their children. But you built them anyway in order to get a higher score on this and they remained empty. Is that true? Speaker 1: Well, it is true actually. They are like, you know, sometimes when you have international organizations trying to impose certain conditions in order to give you like the better status that will make you look good, it requires from you some steps that you will do that. It's not even required, needed here in this kind of society. Look, Qatar is a very small country. The people here, family matters for us. Parents matters for us. We are in debt to our parents until the last day in their life or in our lives, whatever comes first. If someone will leave his parents alone without taking care of it, he will be publicly shamed by the society. It's not really an acceptable custom or habit in this country to have your elder, to have your parents staying in a senior home. He's the one, the parents are the ones who took care of us when we were children, until we grew up to become independent, and we should, we have the duty to take care of them. And that's really the genuine nature of the Qatari society, so that's why you end up with something that you don't need. It's not according to your value, it's not according to your religion, But we build it anyway to get the fancy It Speaker 0: does, if you take three steps back, it's like they're mad at you because you don't have enough transgenders, they're mad at you because you don't put your parents in some institution. Maybe they're trying to break up your families. Speaker 1: Well, can be a reason. Honestly, I don't know what is really the purpose behind this, but we see that, you know, a lot of things that are happening are attacks on humanity in general. It's when you lose the family value, when you lose the connection between the family themselves, you will lose the connection between the people as well on a broader level, on the people in the same neighborhood, on the people in the same region, in the same countries. And that basically will just make us, you know, as individuals who are quote unquote independent from anyone. That's what we will feel. Yet, it will just make our societies vulnerable and easy to be penetrated. That's right. That's I think the main issue that we are facing and the main threat that we are facing. You have seen, Tucker, you you spent now a few days in Qatar and you have seen you came to my home and you have seen that my home is surrounded by my family homes. And it's not I'm not really living in isolation from them. I'm not. The nuclear family, the bigger family, and it's like it's all one community, family and basically you can apply this and magnify it to the entire country. This is not the case for Mohammed, this is the case for everyone here. People even when they move temporarily to another neighborhood or to another place ten minutes away from their family, they feel homesick. So it's it's we believe that this supposed to be the case for all the countries where families, families bonds matters. Families bonds really create from you, from your society a strong society. That's not easily penetrated. And that's what creates the national unity as well in face of external threats and everything. Speaker 0: So that's kind of the key is that when you are cut off, when you're alone, you are powerless and you can be controlled. Yeah. You can be penetrated. Speaker 1: You can be penetrated. Yes. Very true. Speaker 0: Your country has been in the American media sporadically recently and it's under attack for reasons I don't fully understand. One the reasons I wanted to come here was to understand why people are mad at you. And I think you've got the biggest overseas US air base right near here. So you're clearly a US ally. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: But I keep reading reference to Qatar as anti American or pro Islamist or a threat to The United States somehow. Where do those attacks come from, do you think? Speaker 1: Look, we, as a country, we always want to do the right things. And basically, the right things not for only for our people, but for our people, for our region, and for our friends. And when you are trying to do the right things, sometimes you change your mind, you know, when you hear this kind of criticism. But it wasn't really in our culture because we believe that it serves the real cause behind all these efforts is to bring peace. Peace for the people, peace for the region, and peace for our friends. And basically, the peace is like is the main foundation for us, for our people to prosper. Peace has a lot of enemies. A lot of enemies who wants to undermine it for political reason, who wants to undermine it for economical reason, who wants to demonize your effort in order to make sure that every step you will take will be suspicious in order to control also the parties that you are helping in that. And basically, they don't know by doing such a thing they are not harming us, but they are harming the region, and they are harming our friends including The United States. And having an ally like and partner and friend like Qatar with the airbase as one example and working together very closely on a lot of issues, a lot of files helping bringing Americans homes from different countries, whether it was in the evacuation in Afghanistan, whether it's in American hostages all around the world, mediating in different conflicts. They basically, if they, you know, keep criticizing Qatar and attacking Qatar, they think that this is just harming Qatar and Qatar reputation. It's not. It's actually because we always like, you know, we go back to the results. We focus on the outcome and we think about that that should be our objective and we should focus there and we shouldn't really disturb ourself with any noise. But they don't know that this is harming The US and The US interests at the end of the day. Speaker 0: So my sense is that part of the criticism and the confusion from Americans, well, I think two causes. One, you have a Hamas office here. And Hamas has been designated, I think, repeatedly by the US government, certainly by the Congress, as a terror organization, and people say, well, could you have a Hamas office here? What is that? Speaker 1: We have to go back to the root of this office. Like, why it's here in the first place? And Hamas office, when it was opened here in the first place, it was opened with full transparency and full consultation and actually even request from The US. Speaker 0: The US asked you to put a Hamas office here? Speaker 1: They are actually. They have asked us to open the channels with them and to have an established communication channel with the same case what was applied to the Taliban as well. And look, at the end of the day, if you have a presence of someone in your country and you are engaging and talking, it doesn't mean that you are endorsing his ideas. It doesn't mean that you are supporting him. We are, the purpose of this office was to facilitate peace, to stabilize the region, and to make sure that always it's serving the purpose. And you can go through even everything that, all the events that happened in the recent ten years since the office was officially opened here in Doha. How many peace deals have been brokered from that office through that channel? Many of them. 02/2014 was the discussion and the negotiations was initiated here and ended in Egypt. In 02/2018, '2 thousand '20 and '20 '1 with all those escalations and many of escalations that we avoided to prevent a war. There are many, plenty of them. You will lose count. Then after October 7, the first hostage deal released the hostages, the women and children, was 109 and the foreigners. It was 109 hostages. November 23 happened through that office. The second hostage deal which we are going through right now, it was produced out of this office. So the office is a communication channel and it doesn't make me, you know, feeling shy that I speak with someone whom I have a disagreement with. President Trump spoke with North Korea. He didn't shy out. He met with him. He engaged with him. He wants to put an end for the conflict. He wants to make a deal with him. He's a dealmaker and this country basically is brokering deals. Speaker 0: Initially at the request of the US government? Speaker 1: Yes. And it continued like everything that we did looked at her. What I'm confident that throughout the years that I've been working under the leadership of the Emir, we are sure that every step we are taking we are very transparent, coordinating with The US and making sure that we are doing the right thing. So I have nothing wrong that I did that I am shying away from. I know that we have a lot of attacks and unfortunately we have attacks from The US legislation like from the Congress many times that although we did it at the request of the government, yet the Emir always tell me that if we are able to save a single life it's worth everything. And I'll tell you something, we've been under a significant attack in the last fifteen months during this war in Gaza. Unbelievable. No one would handle such an attack. And we worked tirelessly on achieving this deal. And the moment we went out to announce that deal being achieved and we see the celebration in the streets whether it's in Gaza or in Israel. That moment makes us forget everything. Speaker 0: You've been attacked with the US Congress. The core question for me is if Qatarsi is an enemy of The United States, why is our air base here? Have there been calls to remove the air base? Speaker 1: Well, there are like some voices who unfortunately very much misinformed that this is very critical for The US security to be here in this region. And, you know, actually the base itself when it's moved in the first place was moved after September 11. Yes. To Doha. And it was a very risky decision for any country to take it, and we took it. We took it because of the friendship that we have with The US, because of the partnership that we are committing ourselves together with The US. And it turned out to be like the most important US base outside The United States. And basically it served the security of The United States, but also it served the stability of this region. Speaker 0: If you're like us, you're probably a little tired of companies that claim to care about your privacy and then whip around without your knowledge and sell your data to the highest bidder. They do it all the time. They make a fortune off your private information. Everything about you, everything you do online can be sold and it is. But there's one way to stop it. It's called ExpressVPN. ExpressVPN is an app that sends a % of your online traffic through secure encrypted servers. Privacy is the point of the product. If you don't have it, everything you do online can be tracked and recorded by data brokers and then sold to pretty much anyone, including foreign governments. That seems like a total violation of your rights, but unfortunately, it's legal. ExpressVPN prevents it. It prevents data hawks from compiling your personal information. It blocks them from invasively profiting off what you do online. So if you're new to using a VPN, rest easy. It's super easy. You just plug it in and it works. With ExpressVPN, their identity defender scours the sites of data brokers and requests that your information be removed. Right now, you can get an extra four months of ExpressVPN for free. Just scan the QR code on the screen or go to expressvpn.com/tucker. So the president's envoy in this region and to Ukraine and globally at this point is Steve Whitkoff, his friend. And Whitkoff, who I think has done a good for the record, think has done a good job, but was attacked in some US media for his connect he had done business in your country, and he was attacked as a tool of your government. Speaker 1: Well, you know, sometimes when you read the reports about Qatar, Qatar like you feel that this is a superpower that controls, you know, everyone and everyone is a tool in the hand of Qatar. Like, this is all a joke. Steve is respected businessman. He has done business. We didn't do anything wrong with him. We have done business. I I've known him for a long time. I attended his son wedding. I have a personal relationship, and all this happened before even the election, know, before the election taking place. This was, I think, last February, just months before the election. And this friendship and relationship, it means that there is a trust between two people. And this trust will of course matters for, you know, the working relationship that we have and partnership that The US and Qatar has. And it benefited the deal at the end of the day. The man traveled all the way. He stayed here. He spent a few days in Doha. He participated with us in the negotiation. He pushed when it was required. He did a great job. We, as partners, we achieved the deal at the end of the day. The deal wouldn't be achieved without with Qatar single handedly or with The United States single handedly. It means all of us, all of us are one team and work together now. People are attacking him for his relation with Qatar and being a tool in Qatar. If you go back and trace back, those people who are not interested in having a deal, not interested in having they put their political interests ahead of the interests of even the hostages themselves. How many family in Israel celebrated the return of their loved ones? I'm not going to talk about Chazza. There's hundreds of thousands of people. They've been fed after a very long war. But just, you know, if you look at this and look at the ones who attacked someone like Steve Whitco, who achieved and succeeded in reaching this deal because of his relation with Qatar, is to make sure that the next time he calculates his steps. But Steve is a great man, straight shooter. It doesn't matter for him as it doesn't matter for us. We are friends, yes. This is something I feel proud of. I have many friends in The United States and those friends might become, you know, in certain positions whether in this administration or in the future administration. Doesn't mean that, you know, those friends will be like a tool in our hand or in other hand. And basically, the people who are using this, they just, you know, the problem that they cannot take it that a small country can get the results. They always have to think about an external factor that bringing them these results. And when they look at it as a small country and with this amount of resources, the first thing that will come to their mind, oh, they are bribing everyone. I'm a country like any other country. I'm operating like any other country. I protect my people's interests. I protect my region's interests. I protect my friends. And that's what will always continue the same way. Speaker 0: So Trump gets elected in November, inaugurated in January, and immediately there's a cease fire. Almost immediately with Steve Whitcomb leading the negotiations with your help. But that's coming after years of bloodshed utterly destabilizing this part of the world, the world itself. Where was the Biden administration during all of that? Speaker 1: Look, Takar, what's really making me feel sad that the agreement that we have achieved on January 15 is almost 95% the one the framework that's been agreed in December and the agreement that's been agreed in March 24. And it took all these months in order to, put it in motion. With the previous administration, we were working very closely. The director of CIA is someone that I worked with, I respect a lot. And we did, you know, a lot of work together. The partnership was honestly, you know, an exemplary. But at the end of the day, I think it's the calculations of of one party over the other That why would I do it now? Let me wait. And then president Trump, of course, they know there is no, like, there is no deal happening before the inauguration as he announced. It might have a consequence, and I believe that was that played a big role in this. Speaker 0: But the fact is they couldn't get a deal done and he did. Speaker 1: I think this is look, also the way that Steve has managed to represent President Trump was also a very effective way. Speaker 0: One of the criticisms of your country is that you're too close to Iran. I should say you're very physically close to Iran. Speaker 1: Yeah, are physically close How close? It's around 120 miles away. Speaker 0: Right across the water? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's just, you know, you can have a boat ride and ninety minutes you are there. Speaker 0: So what is how would you describe your relationship with Iran and why do you think you're being Speaker 1: criticized for Look, it's you know, Iran has has a lot of problems in the West. We understand that. We acknowledge that. They have problems with the region, with countries in the region. Yes. At the end of the day, Iran is, you know, our next door neighbor. And we have to have to maintain a good relation with all our neighbors. We have a lot of things in common when it comes to the gas field, the largest gas field in the world. It's partnership between us and Iran. It's half two third of it in the Qatari territory and one third is in the Iranian territory. Speaker 0: This is in the Gulf, this is undersea? Speaker 1: Yeah. This is the one in the Gulf Sea. You have I have to coordinate on environmental issues, like, for example, the water contaminations. I have to coordinate on security issues, like smuggling. I have to have this relationship, this working relationship with Iran. But also when you think about it from a bigger perspective, it's for the interest of the region to have a better relation for everyone in the region with Iran. And you have seen that there is a huge progress in the relationship Iran and the GCC between Iran and the GCC in the last few years. And basically, even the disagreement that we had in certain policies, for example, we worked against each other in Syria for fourteen years. Speaker 0: Against Iran? Against Iran, yeah. Speaker 1: Right, which was Speaker 0: backing Hezbollah Speaker 1: in the And the same thing in Lebanon, and those differences are put aside when it comes to the bilateral. We made the bilateral as a relationship of necessity that we need to have this engagement together all the time. Those disagreements, we talk about them, we try to understand each other concern, and we try to find a common ground. And basically that's what we expect from other countries to do when they have, when they are, you know, around neighbors that some others has disagreements with. You need to engage. Now, this is criticized in The US that we are close to Iran. In terms of what? In terms of policies that has controversies with the The US, it's not true. Our policies has been very clear. Our policy is based on principles. Our policy has zero enemies. We have to have friends with everyone. We would like to see peace in our region, we would like to see peace around the world. If there are, if we see innocent people under attack, whatever their backgrounds, we will always help them and we'll support them. These are the things that our power policy stands standing for. So if they see me that you know this is like putting me on a club on the other. They are watching me from thousands miles away. They don't know what's happening in this region. They have no knowledge about it. This relationship, it's an important relationship, not for me, for the entire GCC and for the entire GCC stability. Look Tucker, I think that there is a misunderstanding. Or let's say maybe it's more about a legacy issue. That The US needs to take care of the whole world problem. This shouldn't be the case. Each region needs to address their own problems. Needs to make sure that this region is stable. The US is the friend and the ally of and partner of all the GCC countries. So The US expects from us to come to them with vision that this is the way we would like to see the region and that's the way we are going to work on the region. And we would like to have also your support in that direction. That's I believe how the relationship should work between us and The US. Not I'm waiting for The US, what's the problem between them and Iran and then I base my dealing with Iran based on what The US want. The US is waiting to listen to me what I need from Iran because I am the friend of The US and Iran is my next door neighbor. And basically I think this misunderstanding or let's say the legacy issue, that's what's driving this whole narrative floating here and there. I think that you know, one day everything will be resolved diplomatically. If I take a stand against my neighbor because of an external issue, very strong stand, what I'm going to do if those two adversities come together. Speaker 0: So I think it's the policy of your government that you oppose Iran getting nuclear weapons. Certainly your neighbors Speaker 1: Yeah. Course. Speaker 0: Are on the record against it. How close do you think Iran is to getting a nuclear weapon? To building one? Speaker 1: Well, look, actually, a nuclear weapon is bad for the region, for any country, whether it's Iran or any other country. But also, like, when it comes to, you know, developing a nuclear program, there are concerns, of course, whenever any nuclear program is developed around your region. And those concerns can be not only military concerns, but also security and safety concerns. As I mentioned to you, if the water is contaminated, the nuclear facilities of Iran are on the other side of the coast. It's closer to Doha than Tehran itself. So the risks and the threats is affecting me, my country, affecting other countries in the GCC more even. Speaker 0: So, there's a nuclear site directly across from you? Speaker 1: Yeah. And that's basically, you know, that's why it's putting the entire region in a lot of risk if there is no clear standards for managing those nuclear facilities. And those clear standards ensuring that this is a nuclear power plant that will be used for peaceful use. Now, who's right and who's wrong? This is not for me to judge. Yet, what we would like to see, we would like to see a nuclear program that have complying with the international standard. We are speaking with the Iranians all the time that we need to work together, need to work with the IAEA in order to ensure that those standards are followed. There are a lot of news and headlines we see that Iran is close to a nuclear weapon. This is nothing we have ever heard, we have ever seen, I mean, or experienced. Even our engagement with the leaders there, or even with the supreme leader, he said very clearly that he has issued a fatwa or a declaration that Iran will never go for nuclear bomb. And basically, this has also its moral status within the country. So, I hope that we can reach to a solution, a diplomatic solution where, you know, there is prosperity for the region, sanctions are lifted, nuclear program is peaceful and assurances for the entire region. And this is will be, I think, a booster for the region development and prosperity. Speaker 0: So there's a great deal of pressure in Washington on the White House and on the Congress to participate in or sign off on an attack, an aerial bombardment of the Iran nuclear sites. However many there actually are, one of which, as you said, is directly across from you, so you think about this a lot. What would be the consequences if that happens? And that's not theoretical, as you know, that could happen soon. What would happen next? Speaker 1: Well, think it will just will be a start of a war that will spread all over the region. And basically do we expect from any country to get attacked and to stay silent? There will be a reaction. Those reactions and retaliations, where it's going to be? Are they going to reach thousands of miles away? They are going to be in the region. And basically every country in the region are concerned from such a step because it will affect our security, number one. But also for a country like The US, it will affect their security as well. They have a big stake in that region. Whether it's on military bases, whether it's on energy facilities in that region, economic interest, forget about everything, educational facilities. Mhmm. So all those, you know, interests will be affected if something, God forbid, drops in that region. Look, we there is no way that Qatar would, you know, support any kind of military step in that region. And we will not give up until we see a diplomatic solution between The US and Iran. This needs to reach to an agreement. Speaker 0: May may I ask, just going back a second, you've said that there's the Iranian nuclear facility directly across the water from you. If that were blown up and nuclear material wound up in the water since it's right on the water, what would happen to the water? Speaker 1: This will be basically entirely contaminated. We have run this exercise of risk in the country. A few years ago before we bought, before we built our reservoirs, we had the water that we use for our people is from desalination. And we don't have rivers, we don't have water reserves, and basically the country would run out of water in three days. The whole country? The whole country. Now, after the reservoirs we increase that capacity and we are keep increasing it. But, this is not only applied for Qatar. This is applied for Qatar, this is applied for Kuwait, this is applied for UAE. It's all of us in that part. Speaker 0: So if that nuclear site gets blown up and nuclear material winds up in the water, none of those countries have water? Speaker 1: No water, no fish, no nothing. Like, it has no life. Speaker 0: Oh, so that would be a history changing environmental catastrophe. Speaker 1: It an environmental catastrophe. That's why I'm, you know, that's why I'm telling you that's the position of Qatar in the map and the region with Iran. A lot of people they don't even understand it. I remember one, once I went to know visit the US Congress and I was meeting with one US Senator and we were talking and discussing about Tijuana and He said basically, you don't have don't have to deal with them. And I drew for him a map on his desk. For the first time he realized that this is these two countries are that close to each other. So there are a lot who doesn't see this region as close, you know, to Iran and like it's too intertwined. Speaker 0: So they don't have maps in the senate? Speaker 1: No, they do have maps, but probably they don't know what's what other. We are very small. Speaker 0: Do you think, I mean, to extent you can say I should say you're the prime minister, but you're also the foreign minister so you this is what you do all day every day. But to the extent you can say, do you think that the Iranian government is willing to de escalate through negotiation, open up its nuclear sites to international inspection of some kind, reassure the world they're not two weeks away from getting a bomb as we read practically every day on the internet, whether it's true or not. I mean, do you think that's achievable? Speaker 1: Well, think it is achievable and actually all the engagement that we had with Iranian officials, as as I mentioned to you, we were just there a few days ago actually and engaging with the president, engaging with the supreme leader, the foreign minister over there in order to find a diplomatic solution. And basically, are willing to engage, they are willing to get to a level that creates comforts for everybody. And most importantly, are focused on mending their relationship with the region and that's something in itself. It can create a lot of progress in every front with their own. So, believe there is an opportunity. Now, come back to the question the chicken and the egg which come first. I believe we should forget about these questions and you know get the parties together. Start to understand each other's concerns. And basically if everything is complying with the international standards, I don't see any reason why we don't have a deal. Speaker 0: Sleep is essential. All mammals do it, but only people have trouble doing it. At night, wanna get into bed, feel great, and pass out. But how do you do that without drugs? Well, Cozy Earth is one way. Cozy Earth makes an amazing bamboo sheet set that sounds weird, but is awesome. Next level soft. They're temperature regulating. Now let you stay cool and comfortable all night long, it really helps your sleep. Cozy Earth makes them. They also make bath sheets, the perfect addition to your shower routine. Huge, super absorbent, stunningly soft. You'll never wanna go back once you go the full, enormous, soft bath towel route. Cozy Earth is all about turning your house into a sanctuary where you can unwind, recharge, sleep. They make it risk free with a hundred night sleep trial and a ten year warranty. Really? Yep. A hundred nights, ten years. Go to CozyEarth.com/Tucker. Use the code Tucker for up to 40% off. That would include sheets, towels, pajamas, and more. CozyEarth.com/Tucker, and you get a post purchase survey. I'll probably send it to you. Tell them you heard about it here. That's good for everybody. We hope you enjoy it. There's talk in The United States of increasing sanctions on Iran. I didn't know it was possible, but Iran has been under some form of sanctions for almost fifty years. Forty six years, I think. Have they achieved their intended goal? And bigger picture, have you ever seen sanctions against anybody achieve their intended goal? Speaker 1: Look, this issue is very controversial. First, as a principle for for my country, for state of Qatar, we see unilateral sanctions are unaffected. And it's punishment of punishing the people, not punishing a country or a regime. That's number Speaker 0: one. They still have the revolutionary government from 1979 in Speaker 1: power, Yeah. I mean, if this is if it has if it would lead to a result, we wouldn't be in in that situation until now. Speaker 0: But El Castro died in Havana Speaker 1: Yeah. After fifty Speaker 0: years of US sanctions. Speaker 1: So so just, you know, going back sanctions, what does it create? Pressures the people, starves them, creates black markets, it creates a whole illegal system. It's if the sanctions are coming out of The US, it actually prevents all The US interest or companies to have business and lose the opportunities for other countries. So I don't see a world where the sanctions work. Honestly, for us, as I told you, it's a core principle in our foreign policy. We refuse we don't don't support sanctions at all. Sanctioning countries, I'm talking about. And sanctioning countries is just making the situation much worse. Speaker 0: Well, can I just ask you, so three of the biggest oil producing countries in the world Venezuela, Russia, Iran Yes? Have been under, I mean, the most extensive sanctions in history. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: They're still selling oil though. Speaker 1: Oh, yeah. Speaker 0: Like a lot of oil. Speaker 1: Yeah. Much yeah. I think I think it's mainly it's sold in different means, in different currencies. And look, Tucker, I I recall when the Russian sanction came out at the beginning beginning of the war on between Russia and Ukraine. I had an interview in one of The US meditations and I said very clearly that sanctions will only create a parallel marketplace for other currencies. So the dollar dominated international currency, you will start to see people moving, countries moving away from that. Yes. By the time. So it won't benefit. It won't benefit, it won't get you what you want. It's the contrary. That's basically what's been, you know, at the end like any country like Venezuela for example or Iran, they need to survive. They need to feed their people. They need to get, you know, at least the basic requirements that they want. They will find ways to sell their oils. They will find ways to use other currencies. They will find markets who will accept them. And, you know, selling them and buying from them. And that's basically you created like a parallel market. And that's that's what I've been saying. That's Speaker 0: So you cut out US countries, you weaken the US dollar, you make the country more repressive inevitably, but you don't dislodge the leadership whether it's Putin, Chavez Maduro, the ayatollahs in Iran, Fidel Castro, and you don't prevent them from selling their oil in international markets. So why exactly would you levy sanctions? Speaker 1: Honestly, from at least, you know, my my humble experience looking at all those sanctioned countries, in the last, let's say, you know, I always like to talk about my tenure in diplomacy which is ten years. In the last ten years I've seen a lot of sanctions floating around on a lot of countries. None of these sanctions has achieved the results that's intended for. Speaker 0: Well, mean I think that's true. It's not an ideological point I think. Yeah. That's like factually true, right? Speaker 1: It is factually true, yeah. Speaker 0: So why does the Why do we keep doing it? Speaker 1: Just, you know, if you go and name a single country that has a regime change. Yes. Or an entire, like, behavior change to the good because of sanction, you will not find any. Speaker 0: Okay. So again, I I don't think what you're saying should be controversial because it's provable. Yeah. Go to Wikipedia. Yeah. So why I mean, just I think this morning I was reading, we're gonna sanction this person more. There's got to be some reason that the US Congress and various administrations have continued to want to do this even though there's absolute proof that it doesn't work. What would be the reason to do it? Speaker 1: Well look, as I told you, you know, when you know some, I don't know honestly, we can ask this question more for US, you know, legislator and policy makers, but I think from my perspective this is when you have like, if you don't talk to the other party, if you don't want to use military, which is something that we never advise for, the only tool will be will remain in your hand is sanction to show power and to show leverage, which some people they think that this is leverage and power, which is not. Speaker 0: Well, it doesn't seem to be. Speaker 1: No. Speaker 0: I Power's measurable. Right? Speaker 1: Actually, as you know just you know, if you go through every, like, every sanctioned countries, it never achieved the objective. That's what I want to see. Speaker 0: Yeah. I I think that's Uh-huh. It's true. How does the Ukraine war end, do you think? Speaker 1: Well, look, you know, there is lesson that history taught us. That there is no war started with one of the parties wants the war. Always two parties they don't want the war and they end up in a war. And there is no war ended without a negotiation around the negotiation table to find a peaceful solution. How despite how long it took. So this war will end at the end of the day around the negotiations. Now, if you look at the recent efforts that President Trump is is doing and together with the Kingdom Of Saudi, I believe this is the right direction, the right path forward. Because you know, we were like when the war started as a state of Qatar, we always like you know express our willingness to help to support if there is any chance for mediation. Looked at it, it's something far away, it's in Europe. Yet we have some experience in mediation which is a track record that we have built throughout the year. And we saw that this conflict is too complicated, we tried to break it down to smaller mediation efforts and we were working on the children file, for example, Russian and Ukrainian children bringing them back to their families. We were working on the energy file but unfortunately didn't work out. In order to build a foundation for you know someone like President Trump to come and to broker a peace deal. I believe it is the moment. I believe that the steps that's being taken are the right steps. And basically, the way it ends, it should be the way that it addresses both countries' concerns. I think that the Ukrainians has legitimate concerns that they need to address, and the Russians has legitimate concerns that the Ukrainians needs to address. And I believe this will never reach a solution unless there is some, you know, direct talks between them. And also some demonstration of support from the partners of both Ukraine and Russia that they need to put an end for this and they need to understand each other concern and they need to take them in consideration. And the partners role is to give them the assurances and the comfort that those considerations will be taken seriously. Speaker 0: I hate to say it, but I think Russia's partners are probably willing to express support for a settlement. I don't know if Ukraine's are, and that would be Europe, Great Britain, and Western Europe. And I mean, you just saw the prime minister of Britain say the other day, we're gonna send British troops to Ukraine. Speaker 1: Well, it's, you know, at the end of the day, as I told you, it's it's an issue between Russia and Ukraine, and they need to they need to address it themselves. They need to get the assurances that, you know, both countries need. I think that within, even within the EU, everyone is sharing the same opinion, I believe, but at the end of the day they will come will come down to a conclusion that this issue needs to be settled peacefully and this issue needs to take into consideration everyone's concern. Speaker 0: You participated in a successful ceasefire between Israel and Gaza, and who knows if that lasts. I mean, I don't Speaker 1: know when this Speaker 0: is gonna air, I don't even want to speculate. But clearly, it's been awful for everybody. Certainly been awful for Gaza, it's been awful for its neighbors. I think it's been really bad for Israel. I mean, it's just kinda hard to see an upside. So how would you, if you were in charge, fix this, you know, eighty year old conflict for good? Speaker 1: It's going back to the basics, you know. If you look at the history since Madrid declaration in the nineties, where Israel needed to be integrated in the region, economic normalisation should happen between the countries in the region, and a political horizon for the Palestinians to establish their own state on the borders of 1967, which is according to the Security Council resolutions. Since that time, until today, we didn't see anything but the situation is going backward. More settlements, more violence, more, you know, policies which are destructive for the Palestinians, unfortunately. And basically, are expecting from the Palestinians, you know, just to obey, to stay quiet, and not, you know, there will not never be any anything instigated. This is normal, you know, when you have, you know, a situation that's lasting that long. To have this kind of turbulence all the time. And I'm not talking here about seventh of October, I'm talking about the entire period. How many wars we had. We had a lot of them. A lot of people, we hear them saying that we need to try something new. We need to try things that we are not even, you know, thinking about. Yes, we agree. The two state solution. We've been talking about we never tried this. Have we ever tried this and didn't work? Does this country that's established next to Israel will be a threat for Israel? It's a threat as long as it's not a country. And we said that we are willing to provide security guarantees for Israel. We all of us, we will be integrated together as one region and demilitarize Palestinian state even. So, it's not even like, you know, a fully independent Speaker 0: Not even a real country. Yeah. It's demilitarized. Speaker 1: So, it's basically like everything you are offering and in exchange we all we were always like, you know, either because of their political situation in Israel, like, we were always faced by rejections. There were just few leaders in Israel who had the courage to come out and to say that this is this is the only solution. This is the only way forward. But in the last few years, we we didn't see any of them. Speaker 0: Do you think Donald Trump can force the Palestinian state? Speaker 1: I think, you know, look, President Trump, he's he's a great dealmaker. He's a great businessman. He's very successful. He made brokered many deals around the world during the first administration, and I believe if we will have peace one day, this is the best opportunity for us with someone like President Trump. Speaker 0: Are you is Qatar at net zero? I know there was some enthusiasm about making sure you got to net zero. Speaker 1: Well, if you see, you know, the largest exporter of LNG and net zero, I think there is something happening wrong. Speaker 0: Does that mean you're dead if you're dead to zero? Speaker 1: We are committed, first of all, that, you know Speaker 0: Wait, aren't you supposed to pretend you're getting to net zero? Speaker 1: Look, I'm not, you know, going to pretend anything that I'm not going to do, but the gas has proven that it is the most important reliable baseload source of energy for the next century maybe. So, and the gas is much cleaner than a lot of other energy resources. Benefiting the environment, benefiting a lot of countries switching from coal to gas, and that's what we are producing, that's what we are focusing on. Now, countries who were just, you know, rushing to get to net zero and trying to impose some, you know, green policies that are not realistic, they are attracting from those policies now. Yeah. You see them like, you know, some of them they are going back to court. Speaker 0: Well, they're also on the verge of revolution in some cases because they destroyed the lives of their people. Speaker 1: Yeah. So, it's basically also, it's not fair when you try to impose, you know, these kind of regulations in countries that they have their resources not being developed, not being exploited, and they have no electricity even. Like Africa, for example. And you want to make sure that now everything there is green, is to reach net zero, and you are not allowed to come and to exploit your energy. But they don't have electricity. So the whole concept I think it's right now there is a lot of debate, there is a lot of, you know, argument about it and I'm not sure if the world will be able to achieve it. Look, we understand the danger of the climate, We understand the danger of the climate change, but it doesn't mean that we shoot ourselves in the foot. We need to think about it wisely. We need to think about it gradually. And look, Tucker, once the maybe I told you in a separate meeting that, you know, the pyramid of of the needs of the people, First, security, then food and water, then health, energy, education, education, strong economy, and then climate change and the environment. So we are living in a region that barely handling the three layers of foundation. And people like coming and you know trying to impose on us the tip of that. We need to make sure that our neighbors, our surrounding are secured. We need to ensure that they are fed. We need to ensure that they have enough health care. We need to ensure that they have a good education. We need to make sure that they have energy, access to energy in the first place. Speaker 0: Time for their true life Alp story. I got a call from a friend of mine yesterday, honestly, true story, who said his girlfriend had just broken up with him over Alp. He wouldn't stop. And I thought to myself, that's kinda sad. He said, no. It's not sad. Imagine if I'd married her. Now I know I was saved. Then the next day, this same friend is driving at twice the speed limit through a major American city pulled over by a cop in a speed trap. Cop takes his license registration, goes back to patrol car, runs him, comes back, looks in the window, and sees a tin of Alp on the dashboard, pauses, stunned, says to my friend, you use Alp? Yeah. I do, says my friend. So do I, says the cop. We all do. He looks at my friend thoughtfully and goes, drive safely, sir, and hands back his license registration. No ticket. So in two days, he's saved from a tragic marriage to a girl who doesn't like Alp and a speeding ticket. All true. It's more than a nicotine marriage. In a nation of 350,000,000 people, we're guessing there are about 350,000,000 Alp stories. Email us yours. We wanna know and read it on the air. Email tellall@AlpPouch.com. Tell all @AlpPouch.com. Give us your Alp story. It does seem like things have changed just in the past six months, partly because of the electricity needs of AI, of EVs, all the stuff baked in the cake. The clear limits of renewables, like they can't actually run a modern society, that's all obvious now, and so a lot of investment funds and politicians have sort of pulled back from the net zero theology. But what's amazing to me is that it seems like some of them really believed it. I mean, the case of Qatar, you're opening up a new gas field and I think some, like even energy people laughed at you and said that there's kind of no future for gas. Yeah. Speaker 1: Well, look Speaker 0: Why did they say that? Speaker 1: This actually happened to us twice. Once when we started the gas exploitation, it wasn't yet the future of the energy. At that time, this was back in the early nineties. And we took the risk. Qatar was in totally different economic situation at that time. We took a great risk. We put a lot of pressure on the country and the needs of the country. And apparently, the LNG picked up and became one of the main sources. Then, at the peak of the net zero and the green agenda we announced the expansion of our production which was back in 2018 and we decided to go on to invest. And at that time, you can read reports from the IMF for example that a lot of countries will end up with a lot of oil and gas but with no money because they will have no countries to sell their gas to or they will have no markets to sell their oil to. And this was just in 2018 and like everyone was panicked. In the same year, we have announced that we are going to expand our gas field production and we are hoping to double it by 02/1930. So, from 77,000,000 cubic ton, which was peaked in 2011 and continued being sustained until today, by 02/1930 we will reach 144. And that's basically will be the biggest. Speaker 0: So, was a projection in 2018 that no one would want to buy your natural After Speaker 1: 02/1950. Speaker 0: Who made that? I mean, that's like Speaker 1: That's IMF report actually. It's not projection for Qatar, it was for the entire GCC. Speaker 0: Basically That's so far out of whack with observable reality. Like, that's insane, Speaker 1: It's not, it wasn't, I mean, like, we had the debate about this within our government at that time and we didn't believe it. We have seen that the requirement for the energy will just increase. We were watching the revolution in a lot of technologies and we have seen that whether it's the green hydrogen, the blue hydrogen, the renewables, all of them they can never be cost effective in the next ten, fifteen years and maybe more. And they will not be enough. The base load you will always need an energy mix and the base load of this mix will be the energy which will remain always the gas. Speaker 0: So that was obvious to just interested non experts like me or just people who read about it like on the side. But the IMF researchers and energy analysts who came up with this projection, do you think they really believed it? Speaker 1: Well, don't know honestly. Mean, we were like at the beginning when we have seen these reports we were just questioning why they are doing that. But it was like part of the global sustainability agenda and probably this is an idea that all international organizations agreed to promote. Basically, it's the same thing like, you know, when it comes to those organizations you always see a common agenda item that everyone is advocating to, told the same direction. Speaker 0: Look. They're lying to you in order to keep you from Speaker 1: We have nothing against, you know, the green and the climate change. It's something that all of us we need for our survival, for our planet, yes. But also we need to be realistic in our approach. We need to make sure that this progress is not harming us, it's benefiting us. It's not because we want to make sure that the planet lasts forever, that our people doesn't last forever. I mean, it's it's basically, it's really a miscalculation. Now, another example I will I want to give you, like for example in our partnership with The US in the gas area. We have during you know the time before like the fracking and shell gas in The US, we were supplying The US with LNG at certain point of time and we built this what's so called the Golden Pass in Texas in order to be a receiving terminal for the gas. During President Trump time in the first administration we signed with him, we signed during his administration to make it as a sending terminal. All the gas, The US gas will be exported through that terminal, which is a partnership between Qatar Energy and ExxonMobil. Speaker 0: So to explain, you take natural gas out of the ground, it's often found with oil, but then you have to basically freeze it and make it convert it to a liquid state in order to ship it across the ocean. Yes. So LNG is liquefied Speaker 1: natural gas, that's what you're talking Liquefied natural gas, yes. And then you have also beside that during the same meeting when during the previous administration with President Trump, the first one, we have signed the largest single largest petrochemical plant in the world. It's called the Golden Triangle, which hopefully will be online very soon. And that's what will provide the basic feedstock for all the industries in The United States, which is the polymers. And this is also a partnership between Qatar Energy and Speaker 0: US I mean looking back, think we can be a little bit more critical in trying to understand what the green agenda was or net zero was. But no one ever explained without natural gas, how are you gonna get fertilizer and plastic? Did anyone ever explain that to you? Speaker 1: No. They have no answers. Even I mean, look, even people with the like who are adopting the green agenda, when they are talking about electricity, for example, generating electricity from green energy, green resources, those electricity will need batteries. Batteries will need lithiums or the EVs. Yeah. This lithium, when you mine those lithium, what is the effect on the environment? Oh, I know. And, if you calculate it, it's much worse for the planet and for the land than the oil and the gas combined. And maybe from the coal as well. So it wasn't really well thought of. It was something that I believe was you know taken to a direction doesn't serve the interest of the entire world. Speaker 0: Does it make you nervous that the smartest most powerful people in the world could jump to conclusions they didn't think through without evidence? That they could just say something was true without knowing it was true and thinking through the consequences? I mean, it seems like a kind of mass insanity that took over the world. It Speaker 1: keeps us up all night. Speaker 0: Me too. Mister Premonster, thank you very much. Speaker 1: Thank you very much, I appreciate it. Thank you.
Saved - March 3, 2025 at 7:14 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

How many millions of White Europeans died in Ukraine for the Greater Israel? https://t.co/UyGdnIjWtD

@SaltyGirl09 - 𝕊𝔸𝕃𝕋𝕐 𝔾𝕀ℝ𝕃

Welcome to the Balfour Declaration 2.0 Ukraine is turning into the new Israel. Jews flooded the streets of Amsterdam, chanting, "We will rape white women and drink your blood". Thread 🧵 https://t.co/YpguqJNlqH

Saved - March 3, 2025 at 2:32 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

🇮🇱 Netanyajew has been manipulating America to do his Middle East war bidding for decades through MOSSAD ✡️ Epstein pedophile blackmail. Slick Willy Clinton went to Epstein island at least 26 documented times to rape children. https://t.co/BvH3kbA3ip

Saved - March 2, 2025 at 11:50 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Israel ✡️🇮🇱 is NOT “our greatest ally” https://t.co/8m6Qk2qJHF

Video Transcript AI Summary
Under Operation Timber Sycamore, the CIA collaborated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and others to overthrow the Syrian government, costing billions and countless lives. This covert action, linked to Libya, remains largely unacknowledged. Israel has significantly influenced US wars, costing trillions and impacting geopolitics. Netanyahu, in 2002, falsely promised a wonderful war in Iraq, with toppled dictators and a rising Iranian youth. For 25 years, he and US political consultants have dragged the US into Middle Eastern wars, creating chaos. The US has destabilized Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, and Libya, often due to their relationship to Israel, spending trillions. The US is isolated, often standing alone with Israel in UN votes, backing policies that foster endless Middle Eastern wars. The US has been involved in the overthrow of Assad for thirteen years.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But Obama signed an order called Operation Timber Sycamore. People should look it up. You can find it online, but you can't find it in the mainstream media because it's not discussed. But it was a so called presidential finding that the CIA should work with Turkey, with Saudi Arabia, with others to overthrow the government of Syria. So that was the plan. So a war that cost billions of dollars, hundreds of thousands of lives, CIA operation, covert action, links with Libya, never explained, never discussed. And even when the government falls last week, no background given. You know, we're supposed to have amnesia. We're not supposed to understand that what happens is the result of long term plans that have been pretty disastrous. And by the way, as I've said, Israel has driven so many American wars, and we say, absolutely yes. That's our greatest ally. These have been at huge cost to The United States, cost of trillions of dollars, cost geopolitically, but somehow we gave away our foreign policy to Israel years and years ago, and it's been absolutely devastating. And it's interesting to go back and watch Netanyahu speak to the American people. Go look at a video clip of 02/2001, '2 thousand '2. In 02/2002 in October, he comes and testifies in the senate, and there's a nice clip of him promising how wonderful the war in Iraq is gonna be, because, Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction. He says a % certain. Complete lies, by the way, and they knew that they were lies at the time. And it's gonna be wonderful. We're gonna topple that dictator, and then dictators are gonna be toppled everywhere, and the young people of Iran are gonna rise up. This is his idea together with his US Political Consultants, together with neocons in the US government for the last twenty five years. They have never apologized for dragging The United States into countless wars in The Middle East, spending trillions of dollars running up US debt, and doing what? Creating chaos. So just to go back to the seven countries, because it's worth remembering. Lebanon, it barely exists as a functioning country right now. Syria, it's going to be picked to pieces. Don't believe Well, it's obvious in what we're seeing every day. Territorial integrity? Yeah. Israel's just invaded from the Southwest into deeper Syria, Turkey from the North. Russia has its area, The United States and the Kurds have their area. This place is just gonna be a battlefield for years to come. Iraq. We know what happened with Iraq. Trillions Of Dollars, a complete destabilization of the country. Look at the other three wars. The United States broke apart Sudan. Why? Well, Sudan was an enemy of Israel, so we have to break apart Sudan. So we supported the South Sudanese. Now we have the the real trifecta, massive civil war in Sudan and massive civil war in South Sudan. In other words, we broke apart the country, and now there's civil war in both halves of the country. Somalia basically doesn't exist as a country. Libya, it doesn't exist. It's a battlefield. It's a war zone. So that's six out of six. And Netanyahu's crowing. Now we go on to Iran. Come from? We've paid probably $7,000,000,000,000 if you add it up according to Brown University studies, for example. Something like $7,000,000,000,000 has gone into this. Israel couldn't do this for one day. Israel, you know, Netanyahu, we are lions. Yeah. Right. You are liars, but, we are the ones funding you, arming you, paying for all of this. That's The United States. And this is weird to me because we say yes to defend our ally. No. No. No. We're doing their foreign policy, which makes no sense, which doesn't lead to any peace, which leads to basically a war zone across the Middle East, and we say this is good for us. Why is this good for us? What what do what's The United States getting out of any of this? We haven't gotten anything out of any of this except massive geopolitical isolation. The most recent votes in the UN, for example, put The United States alone, alone with Israel. And I shouldn't exaggerate. We have Micronesia on our side. We have Nauru on our side with its 12,000 people. Maybe a couple of other countries. The whole rest of the world is saying, what is going on? Endless war in The Middle East. Well, this is because we're defending someone with some seventh century BC vision of what they want their country to be. Were Americans involved in the overthrow of Assad last week? Of course, they were, because this has been an ongoing operation. Whether they were involved in the final days, I don't know. They were involved in the in the thirteen years nonstop. I don't understand how. Actually, let me tell you an interesting story, by the way. The war started in 2011. Was portrayed as always as the CIA does as a local uprising and the freedom fighters, and it was said this was Syrians protesting against Syria. That's always how any CIA regime change operation works. There may also be local opposition, but the CIA is the it provides the armaments. It provides the flow of heavy weapons. It provides the financing. It provides the training. It provides the camps. It provides the political organization. So this started in 02/2011.
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 8:01 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

🇮🇱 Israel ✡️ did 9/11 https://t.co/GW5itSJXJS

Video Transcript AI Summary
How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the plane crash that supposedly cremated him, fly out of the plane, and end up readable in the hands of investigators? Why did the alleged hijackers even need passports on domestic flights, and why were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? If the 19 accused Muslims were easy to identify, why were they not under surveillance? Adding to the suspicious evidence, the anthrax letters, clearly worded to blame Muslims, killed five people. These letters said, "Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great." But the anthrax was proven to have come from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. Also, there are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: How could Mohammed Ada's passport survive the fireball explosion that supposedly cremated him, fly out of his pocket, fly out of the incinerated plane, flutter to the ground in the two feet of debris, and end up in readable condition in the hands of investigators, all within forty eight hours. Why did 19 Muslim men even need passports on domestic flights? How were passports found but not the plane's voice recorders? Why did the hijackers need passports they would never use again after their suicide flights? And why were the 19 accused Muslims not under surveillance on 09/11 if they were so easy to identify? The conspicuous trail of planted evidence continued three weeks after the nine one one attacks when anthrax letters killed five people and were clearly worded to throw the blame on Muslims. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great. It has since been proven that the anthrax came from a US army lab and was never mailed by Muslims. There are no airport security videos of any of the 19 accused Muslims boarding any of the hijacked planes.

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

What happened to Flight 93 on 9/11? It sure as hell didn’t crash in PA, just like no plane crashed into the Pentagon. https://t.co/dPMJJezDhH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The crash site of Flight 93 left people puzzled. When I arrived, all I saw was small debris and singed trees, not what you'd expect from a Boeing 757 crash. TV reporters couldn't identify anything, the pieces were so small. A photographer said it looked like just a hole in the ground. It was just a large crater with tiny bits of debris. The coroner described a 10-foot wide, 10-foot deep trough covered with dirt, nothing that screamed airplane. Even the editor in chief couldn't identify any airplane debris. The mayor of Shanksville was shocked, exclaiming, "There's no airplane. Is this it? Is this all?"
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole issue of flight 93 basically boils down to one question. If you just happen to drive by and someone told you that a Boeing seven fifty seven has just crashed into this hole and most of the 100 ton airliner is now buried under the ground, would you believe it or not? This is the kind of puzzlement the people from Shanksville experienced when they arrived on the crash site of flight 93. Speaker 1: We drove back that road and where the road ended, that's where the plane was. And, I mean, you know, I the only thing I could tell you know, I get out, you know, like I said, I heard this thing, you know, I felt the explosion, saw the fireball, and I'm and I get up there and I'm thinking, where is it, you know? Just debris pieces, small pieces of debris, you know, the trees were singed and burning, used to smoldering. Speaker 2: Nothing. It was just little pieces. There was nothing to actually like a door or window or anything. You couldn't really it was just little pieces of shrapnel everywhere. Speaker 3: What's that right there? Over in here. Speaker 0: TV reporters were also at a loss when faced with the idea that an actual plane had just crashed on that site. Speaker 4: You know, at first, wasn't even sure that this was that these were pieces of the plane. They're so small, and Speaker 5: and it's and it's indistinguishable. You can't tell whether it's a piece of Speaker 4: the fuselage or piece of Speaker 5: the seats. You don't know what it is. Speaker 6: Chris Kinnicki, he's a photographer. He was back there just a couple of minutes ago. And, Chris, I've seen the pictures. It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground. Speaker 7: Basically, that's right. From where we could see, there wasn't much left. Speaker 6: Any large pieces of debris at all? Speaker 7: No. There was nothing nothing that you Speaker 8: could distinguish that a plane had crashed there. Speaker 2: It's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and and just tiny tiny bits of debris. Speaker 9: Blurt also went out to Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller. Hurried to the scene and abandoned strip mine. When he arrived, he couldn't believe his eyes. Speaker 10: It looked like someone gouged about a 10 foot wide, 10 foot deep trough through the strip mine area. But when you looked in, it was covered with dirt. There was nothing there that you could really say. Was an airplane. Speaker 0: Dennis Roddy was the editor in chief of the Pittsburgh Gazette. Speaker 6: Airplane debris? Nothing I could identify. Speaker 0: Possibly the most disconcerted of all was the mayor of Shanksville, Ernie Stuhl. Speaker 4: And there's no airplane. This is it. What this all? Speaker 0: I always
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 8:01 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

What happened to Flight 93 on 9/11? It sure as hell didn’t crash in PA, just like no plane crashed into the Pentagon. https://t.co/dPMJJezDhH

Video Transcript AI Summary
The crash site of Flight 93 left first responders and reporters in disbelief. When we arrived, we were expecting to see a plane, but instead, we found only small pieces of debris scattered around. It was hard to believe a Boeing 757 had crashed there; the area looked like a gouged-out trough covered in dirt. There was nothing recognizable as airplane parts. Even experienced photographers and officials were stunned by the lack of identifiable wreckage. All that remained was a large crater and tiny bits of debris, leaving us wondering where the plane had gone.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The whole issue of flight 93 basically boils down to one question. If you just happen to drive by and someone told you that a Boeing seven fifty seven has just crashed into this hole and most of the 100 ton airliner is now buried under the ground, would you believe it or not? This is the kind of puzzlement the people from Shanksville experienced when they arrived on the crash site of flight 93. Speaker 1: We drove back that road and where the road ended, that's where the plane was. And, I mean, you know, I the only thing I could tell you know, I get out, you know, like I said, I heard this thing, you know, I felt the explosion, saw the fireball, and I'm and I get up there and I'm thinking, where is it, you know? Just debris pieces, small pieces of debris, you know, the trees were singed and burning, used to smoldering. Speaker 2: Nothing. It was just little pieces. There was nothing to actually like a door or window or anything. You couldn't really it was just little pieces of shrapnel everywhere. Speaker 3: What's that right there? Over in here. Speaker 0: TV reporters were also at a loss when faced with the idea that an actual plane had just crashed on that site. Speaker 4: You know, at first, wasn't even sure that this was that these were pieces of the plane. They're so small, and Speaker 5: and it's and it's indistinguishable. You can't tell whether it's a piece of Speaker 4: the fuselage or piece of Speaker 5: the seats. You don't know what it is. Speaker 6: Chris Kinnicki, he's a photographer. He was back there just a couple of minutes ago. And, Chris, I've seen the pictures. It looks like there's nothing there except for a hole in the ground. Speaker 7: Basically, that's right. From where we could see, there wasn't much left. Speaker 6: Any large pieces of debris at all? Speaker 7: No. There was nothing nothing that you Speaker 8: could distinguish that a plane had crashed there. Speaker 2: It's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and and just tiny tiny bits of debris. Speaker 9: Blurt also went out to Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller. Hurried to the scene and abandoned strip mine. When he arrived, he couldn't believe his eyes. Speaker 10: It looked like someone gouged about a 10 foot wide, 10 foot deep trough through the strip mine area. But when you looked in, it was covered with dirt. There was nothing there that you could really say. Was an airplane. Speaker 0: Dennis Roddy was the editor in chief of the Pittsburgh Gazette. Speaker 6: Airplane debris? Nothing I could identify. Speaker 0: Possibly the most disconcerted of all was the mayor of Shanksville, Ernie Stuhl. Speaker 4: And there's no airplane. This is it. What this all? Speaker 0: I always
Saved - March 1, 2025 at 2:26 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

AH tried to warn us about these lunatics. https://t.co/SUawnSfIU0

Video Transcript AI Summary
Amalek, a descendant of Asaph, must be totally uprooted and eradicated from the earth. Amalek comes from Asav, the brother of Jacob. Asav, in modern terms, is America. Asav became Edoine, then Rome, and eventually Christianity, which transformed into Western civilization. Therefore, Asav today is Western civilization, including Europe and the United States. The throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek. Any nation with that religion can be considered Esau, and we have the audacity to destroy Amalek and cut off their offspring.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About for among all the descendants of Asaph, descendants of Amalek, male and female, young and old. And that is why Amalek is so terrible and it has to be totally uprooted. Therefore, God tells us we should erase their memory, and we should eradicate them from the face of the earth. Who is Amalek? Amalek comes from Asav. Asav was a brother to Jacob. Asav, Speaker 1: who in modern day terms is really basically, you know, certainly one of them is is is America. Esav became Edoine, which is a nation. Edoine became Rome. Instead of it being Rome, it became Christianity. Christianity, of course, ultimately became Western civilization. So Ace of today is really Western civilization. Ace of is Europe, The United States. Speaker 0: The throne of God is incomplete until we destroy Amalek. Speaker 1: Any nation that has that religion can be considered Esau. Speaker 0: The audacity, the to destroy Amalek and to cut off the offsprings of the nation of Amalek.
Saved - February 25, 2025 at 3:02 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

🇮🇱 HASIDM ✡️ BUT I DONT BELIEVE EM' Never Forget/Never Forgive 2024 NYC synagogue tunnel jews at World Headquarters of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement with blood stained mattresses and baby high chairs down there. https://t.co/xWTojWwND0

Video Transcript AI Summary
They're called Hasidim, a Jew with the black clothes and the curls and everything, but I don't believe them.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A Jew with the black clothes and the curls and everything. They're called Hasidim. Hasidim, but I don't believe them.
Saved - February 21, 2025 at 2:38 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

This has to be one of the greatest film scores. https://t.co/3sc6jbLqBK

Saved - February 15, 2025 at 4:08 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Are you angry yet for being lied to forever? https://t.co/8muxrX2uHp

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've discovered a way to use water to fuel your car! It doesn't matter if it's rainwater, well water, city water, or even ocean water.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A local little better has discovered a way, hear this, to use water to let your car. I don't care if you use rainwater, well water, city water, ocean water.
Saved - February 2, 2025 at 12:26 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Synagogue of Satan ✡️ Your time is up 🇮🇱 https://t.co/JeAt4L6iNc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Some individuals believe they are descendants of gods, viewing themselves as the chosen ones while considering others delusional. They interpret wisdom, which they associate with Lucifer, as a source of ancient teachings, while seeing the Christian God, referred to as Adonai, as an adversary. They justify their financial corruption by claiming that they are the just ones, and the rest of humanity is wicked, believing that they must control and dominate others to save the planet from destruction. They argue that humans are harmful to the environment, leading to a belief in reducing the population. This ideology is reflected in media, such as in "The Matrix," where humans are compared to a virus.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: These people honestly believe that they are the descendants of gods, that they are the chosen, that they are god's special people, that we are delusional, and that the true creator is this wisdom principle that they think of as Lucifer, that wisdom principle gave us ancient mystery school teachings, and that the enemy which they call Adonai the adversary, which we would call the Christian God, came to try to defeat them. Then they even take it a step further and they look at texts like the Bible and they say that where it says in the end times that God will take the money from the wicked and restore it to the just, that we as a planet are the wicked and they are the just so this is how they justify their financial corruption. They don't believe that we deserve the money in fact they believe that if they did not dominate us and if they did not control us and play all these games that we left to our own devices would destroy our planet. So in some twisted rationale, they believe they are saving the earth. They believe humans are bad for the environment. We cause pollution, so they have to reduce population. Then they seed that into movies like The Matrix where agent Smith says that we are like that humans are like a virus on the planet. This is one of a variety of ways in which they will usually embed their teachings into the villain.
Saved - January 29, 2025 at 6:34 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Where are reparations for 60 million White European Christians murdered by Bolshevik jews in the twentieth century? https://t.co/q3WYyAZzvZ

Video Transcript AI Summary
I sympathize with all innocent victims of war, but the Jewish experience isn't unique. As someone of Ukrainian descent, I acknowledge that 7 million Ukrainians were murdered, with many perpetrators being Jewish, such as Trotsky, Beria, and Durschinsky. I want to know when I will receive reparations for my people's suffering. We'll take a break and return to address this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have a comment and a question. Very quickly because we gotta go. First of all, I have the greatest sympathy for all innocent people who die in war, but the Jewish experience is not unique. I happen to be of Ukrainian descent and 7,000,000 of my people were murdered. And disproportionate number of the perpetrators of these crimes in the Ukraine, the Ukrainian famine happened to be Jews. Trotsky, Beria, Durschinsky. And, I'd like to know when I'm gonna get my reparations for my murder roses. Okay. That's that's also another issue. We'll we'll take a break and we'll answer and we'll come back.
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 5:06 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

BlackRock 15 minute cities incoming. https://t.co/HdozvbwaHH

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've noticed some oddities regarding the LA fires. First, insurance companies stopped offering fire coverage three months before the fires began. Many reports suggest that electrical wires from the power grid may have caused these fires, and the water supply has been cut off. It's strange that the trees remain standing while the houses are destroyed. Additionally, when searching for "2028 smart LA city," it seems there's a plan to build a smart city in LA, which would be easier if there are no existing buildings. This is just for educational purposes, and I hope everyone stays safe. Thank you.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've noticed something a bit strange about these LA fires everyone's been tagging me in. The first weird thing that I noticed is that insurance companies dropped fire coverage 3 months before the fire started. And many people have reported electrical wires from the power grid causing these fires. And, of course, the electrical wires from the power grid causing these fires. And of course, the water supply has been cut off. And don't you think it's a bit weird in this picture that all of the trees stay standing but the houses aren't? Of course, this is for educational purposes only and I'm not claiming anything. And then we go to Google and type in 2028 smart LA city. What a coincidence they want to build a smart city in LA. And of course, it's a lot easier to build a whole city if there's no buildings there. Of course, this is just for educational purposes only, and I hope everyone is safe over there. Thank you.
Saved - January 11, 2025 at 2:58 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

All roads lead back to PizzaGate. https://t.co/ygzYjMImEa

Video Transcript AI Summary
Edgar Madison Welch, known for the 2016 Pizzagate incident at Comet Ping Pong, has died after being shot by police in North Carolina during a traffic stop. Welch entered the pizza shop armed, searching for a nonexistent child sex ring he learned about from a conspiracy website. He was sentenced to prison but released in 2021. The discussion touches on the resurgence of the Pizzagate conspiracy amid recent events in Hollywood, including ongoing investigations into high-profile figures. The speaker reflects on the timing of these incidents and expresses skepticism about the narrative surrounding them, suggesting a connection to the Pizzagate theory.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bet you didn't see this. Speaker 1: 9th, the man who terrorized people at a crowded DC pizza shop back in 2016 has died. Edgar Madison Welch was shot and killed Monday by police in Kannapolis, North Carolina after he pulled out a gun during a traffic stop. 8 years ago, the so called Pizzagate gunman entered comet ping pong in Northwest with a revolver and rifle. He was searching for a non existent child sex ring, which he learned about from a right wing conspiracy website. Welch was sentenced to prison and released back in 2021. Speaker 0: This happened 2 hours ago, or it was reported 2 hours ago. Let's break this video down a little bit. Speaker 1: 8 years ago, the so called Pizzagate gunman entered comet ping pong in northwest with a rev revolver and rifle. He was searching for a nonexistent child sex ring. Speaker 0: Interesting that they just had to include those words. A non existent child sex ring. Why? Why not just say he was searching for a child sex ring? Speaker 1: He learned about from a right wing conspiracy website. Speaker 0: And of course, he just had to add that too. Right? Of course, he learned about it from a right wing conspiracy website. So let me get this straight. Just as all of Hollywood, basically all of Hollywood burns to the ground, the conspiracy theory that is most associated with Hollywood and elites and celebrities pops up again out of nowhere because the person who allegedly went in looking for it and, by the way, didn't shoot anybody, he shot at the ground and then walked out and turned himself in, that person is shot and killed. Now for sake of this video and the time that I have, if you don't know what we're talking about when we say Pizzagate, go watch this highlight that I made. It will explain everything. There's a couple highlights, actually, and then you will have an idea of what we're talking about. And then if you don't know who this guy is, let me show you this really quick. Why is it that this keeps coming up? Why is it that this non issue and this conspiracy theory just seems to keep coming up? Listen, there have been so many things that have been said about this fire, about what could have started it, about the reason that it's happening, just all kinds of things. And one of those things has been, you know, it is pretty coincidental that, this is right around the time where the Diddy file the Diddy stuff started coming out, Jay z. We still don't have any clue who's on the Epstein client list. All this stuff that seems to be happening that seems to be exposing a lot of what we've been talking about for the last, you know, who knows freaking 8 years now. Just kinda weird that all of Hollywood burns to the ground right as all this stuff is starting to be exposed. And then this happens. Man, I'll tell you what, I pushed against this whole idea. I pushed against the idea that this is what was happening that all of Hollywood was being leveled because they were burying and burning all the evidence from this. But I gotta tell you, when I saw this come across, it kinda turned my head kinda made me start thinking that maybe that's what's actually happening. And I have said this from the beginning. All roads lead back to that pizza parlor. And I still believe that. But hey, I am just a conspiracy theorist.
Saved - January 6, 2025 at 4:13 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

https://t.co/pwxqGfRiQS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The official narrative of 9/11 suggests that a group of individuals executed a highly sophisticated terror attack, yet many find it hard to believe. Just weeks before the attacks, Larry Silverstein acquired the Twin Towers and secured an unprecedented insurance policy covering terrorism. Shortly after, the towers were destroyed, resulting in a massive insurance payout. Additionally, the Pentagon reported missing funds the day before, only to be struck the next day. Building 7 collapsed hours later due to a small fire, a claim disputed by engineers who argue it resembled a controlled demolition. Questions remain about the design of the towers, reports of explosions, and the background of the hijackers. Furthermore, the involvement of Israeli individuals and the formation of a group of engineers challenging the official narrative raises further doubts about the events of that day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The official 911 narrative is that brown people are geniuses now, who coordinated the most sophisticated terror campaign ever before seen that bypassed the world's biggest defense budget and then was never able to even remotely replicate anything like it again. Honestly, I'm just impressed that people from the hidden sand village could fly airplanes at all, let alone Steph Curry half court no scope them into 3 really important buildings with perfect aim. That is a 911 miracle, and it turns out there's a lot of miracle work going on with 911. So let's first start with god's chosen miracle, Bishwan. A month and a half before 911, this guy becomes the new owner of the Twin Towers after signing a 99 year lease for 3.2 $1,000,000,000. You might be thinking to yourself, wow. This guy looks very honest and trustworthy. His name is Larry Silverstein. You you can't make this up. Larry did what any response would would do after buying anything. He finailed a never before seen insurance policy that covered the towers for double their value. His policy request was so fucking retarded that the broker had to bring together 25 different insurance lenders to give him what he asked for, making him one of the first people in American history to get terrorism insurance on a commercial building. And as we know, days later, Kumar and Pajit, Oahu Alayoop, slam dunk 2 planes into the towers, reducing Larry's multibillion dollar investment into a pile of rubble and the biggest insurance payout in the history of the world. Sadly, Larry couldn't make it to work on 911, and unfortunately, it's still alive to this day. Roaming the earth, waiting for Satan to reclaim his soul back to the underworld. But trust me, it's not just rich that God blesses miracles with. The government gets its fair share as well. September 10th, the day before 9 11, retards at the Pentagon announced $2,700,000,000,000 in missing funds, only to have a Tuscan Raider park a Boeing 757 directly in their accounting department the next day, thirty 2 minutes after the second tower was hit, 225 miles away. Three buildings hit in less than an hour? Now that's a 911 miracle, baby. Building 7, the Twin Towers' cute little lolly sister located 1600 feet away from the impact site quietly fell straight into the ground 7 hours after the Twin Towers. The news and the people that run it blamed a small office fire, but every single structural engineer ever calls that impossible. That's what the physics shows. Saying it was a controlled demolition. A perfect controlled demolition of an intact building. It is too bad engineers don't believe in miracles. Total miracle death. Now I still have some questions, and they're questions that miracles can't quite answer. Why did Leslie Robertson, lead engineer for the Twin Towers, say that she literally designed them to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 airplane? Until 911, no steel structure in history has ever collapsed due to a fire. So how the did it happen 3 times in a row in one day? Why did hundreds of survivors report explosions There was an, heavy duty explosion here. Inside the lobby. Speaker 1: This is a big explosion. Continuous explosion. Speaker 0: Floor by floor. Yeah. And they needed it. Planes take our our bill. Why did 3 of the plane hijackers have a US Naval Air Station military base as their primary address of residence on their driver's license? Why did NIST admit they deliberately avoided searching for explosive residues in their official investigation? Why did a dozen independent researchers find thermite and explosive materials at ground 0? Why is it okay for this to do whiteface? But when I do blackface, it becomes this huge problem all of a sudden. Who is e team, and why were they a group of Israeli artists living in the towers with unrestricted access leading up to 911? Speaking of which, who are the dancing Israelis, and why were they jailed and deported for filming and celebrating the towers collapsing? Speaker 1: Here, we're revealed as Mossad assets who were arrested after cheering and high fiving and videotaping, the crash of the airplanes into the world trade towers. Speaker 0: Why did thousands of the world's top engineers and architects form an entire organization to challenge the official 911 lies and narrative?
Saved - January 4, 2025 at 9:45 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Based Rep Massie https://t.co/b0v98pvKUJ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many members of Congress have an APAC representative, akin to a babysitter, who communicates on behalf of APAC. This person is often a constituent but is closely tied to APAC. On the Republican side, it's common for members to have lunch with their APAC contacts, who have their personal cell numbers for direct communication. Some Congress members have mentioned consulting their "APAC guy" to influence ad campaigns. This relationship is not publicly acknowledged, as it doesn't benefit Congress members to reveal they have a connection with a foreign entity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everybody but me has an APAC person. What does that mean an APAC person? It's like your babysitter. Your APAC babysitter who is always talking to you for APAC. They're probably a constituent in your district, but they are firmly embedded in APAC. And Every member has something like this? That's how it works on the Republican side. And when they come to DC, you go have lunch with them. And they've got your cell number, and you have conversations with them. That's absolutely crazy. I've had four members of congress say, I'll talk to my APAC person. And it's clearly what we call them, my APAC guy. I'll talk to my APAC guy and see if I can get him to dial those ads back. Why if I never heard this before? Why would they wanna tell their constituents that they've basically got a buddy system with somebody who's representing a foreign country? It doesn't benefit the congressman for people to know that, so they're not gonna tell you that.
Saved - January 3, 2025 at 1:51 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

WEF is ✡️ Synagogue of Satan https://t.co/Kn74WbfgO8

Video Transcript AI Summary
As you browse the Internet, algorithms monitor your eye movements, blood pressure, and brain activity to understand your identity. Imagine in 10 or 20 years, an algorithm could determine a teenager's position on the gay-straight spectrum. This raises concerns about privacy and the implications of such technology. What does it mean for personal identity if algorithms can define it so precisely?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: As you surf the Internet, as you watch videos or check your social feed, the algorithms will be monitoring. The algorithm tracks your eye movements, your blood pressure, your brain activity, and tells you who you are. Now imagine the situation in 10 or 20 years, when an algorithm can tell any teenager exactly where he or she is on the gay straight spectrum. Violence. I think that, you know, it's more or less because what did he just say? Can tell any teenager exactly where he or she is on the gay straight spectrum. What the fuck just happened?
Saved - January 2, 2025 at 3:25 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Do you understand why ✡️ did 9/11 to push America into Middle East war? There were never “weapons of mass destruction” but Cheney’s Halliburton actually made $Billions while millions of innocent people died. Netanyajew got what he wanted too. No More Fucking Wars For Israel 🤬 https://t.co/CfH8XwrxnL

Saved - January 2, 2025 at 12:18 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Musk is the savior though, right? https://t.co/bgYmzesYy3

Video Transcript AI Summary
He's a self-made billionaire who started his first company with help from his wealthy family and friends. He sold it for $22 million but faced issues with a later online banking startup that had a major security flaw, leading to his firing despite a $180 million payout. While he’s credited with founding Tesla, he actually joined later and misled investors to secure loans. Tesla profits largely from selling carbon credits, and his claims about taking the company private were misleading. Now, he's facing a $248 billion lawsuit for allegedly manipulating Dogecoin's price for profit. He promotes a vision of saving humanity while exploiting the system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He's just amazing. He's gonna bring humanity to Mars. You're not being serious, are you? This is all this is a bit. Right? What? He's a genius and a self made billionaire. Oh, you might wanna sit down for this. He started his first company with money from his dad and his rich friends. Well, he ran it well enough to make it huge. Not really. He sold it for $22,000,000 to a larger company that was just trying to squash all competition, and then he got even more money. Speaker 1: Raising $50,000,000 is a matter of making a series of phone calls. Speaker 0: He's still a genius. You'll never be able to take that away. His online banking startup had a security flaw that was so bad, you could transfer funds from anyone else with just an account number. The board fired him because he was ruining the company financially, but he still made a 180,000,000 when it sold. He is the reason we can have a green future. Speaker 1: I'd like to be on the cover of Rolling Stone. That'd be cool. Speaker 0: What he really wanted was fame. But he still founded Tesla. Tesla was founded by Martin Eberhard and Marc Tarpenen. Who? Not Elon. He bought in. He became CEO in 08, then started a media campaign to get loans and investments. Daimler said they would invest if he got a Department of Energy loan, so he lied and said he did. Then he applied for the Department of Energy loan and put Daimler's involvement on that application. He lied to get the loans? Yep. $451,000,000 of government money. And now Tesla makes money in an interesting way, selling carbon credits. Companies' carbon emissions are capped, and Tesla reduces emissions, so they earn a lot of credits. And they sell them to the companies that go over. The few quarters that Tesla was profitable were mostly thanks to this. That just erases the progress. When Elon tweeted, funding secured, Tesla going private at $420, that was a lie, and it inflated the stock price of Tesla. Speaker 1: My cash balances are are very, very low. I I simply had loans against my my stock, so I I I if if Tesla's SpaceX went bankrupt, I would go bankrupt too. Speaker 0: Now he's being sued for $248,000,000,000 for buying Dogecoin, then using his public presence to inflate the price and profit off of it. He says he's gonna save the planet and save humanity while he exploits people and the system.
Saved - January 1, 2025 at 8:31 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great Noticing Will Continue https://t.co/eNB3rKq6oj

Saved - December 31, 2024 at 9:03 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great White Replacement aka ✡️ Kalergi Plan must be stopped and reversed through mass deportations, secured borders and extended families. No More Immigration ⚡️⚡️ https://t.co/DVOG4sqY9S

Video Transcript AI Summary
Forced mass non-white immigration is occurring exclusively in white countries, accompanied by government-mandated integration into predominantly white areas. There is a continuous promotion of interracial relationships while traditional white values are criticized. This situation can be seen as a deliberate attempt to create conditions that threaten the existence of this group, which amounts to genocide.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So let's break this down again. You have forced mass non white immigration into white countries and only white countries. Upon this, we have the government forcing integration to all white living spaces within the country. And then they promote miscegenation all day and all night while demonizing everything that is traditional or white. Speaker 1: And deliberately inflicting on that group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. Speaker 0: It's genocide.
Saved - December 20, 2024 at 12:01 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Great Noticing https://t.co/qaMDYyR4sq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mussolini allied with Hitler, who signed two agreements with Pope Pius XII, promising Catholic support in Europe if Hitler established the Roman Catholic Church as the sole legitimate religion after winning World War II. The Bush and Kennedy families were also involved in financing Hitler. This discussion connects the Vatican, fascism, and the conflict with America and England. The term "Empire Strikes Back" relates to New York as the Empire State, with references to Spielberg and Lucas films featuring Hitler seeking the lost ark. The Taliban's actions are viewed as propaganda rather than for profit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you remember that the Mussolini was an ally of Adolf Hitler, and that Adolf Hitler signed 2 concordant contracts with the Vatican. The pope Pius the 12th signed 2 contracts with Adolf Hitler that he would throw full Catholic support in Europe behind the new regime of Adolf Hitler if Hitler, upon winning upon winning the World War would establish the Roman Catholic church as the only legitimate religion of the world under the new order of the world. Speaker 1: We find that, the Bush family was heavily involved Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: In financing Hitler and, the Kennedy family as well. Speaker 0: Right. Now the point is I wanna continue with this. When when you understand we're talking about the Vatican, we're talking about Hitler and Mussolini. We're talking about the fascist of Europe and war with America and England. Now we're talking about the Empire Strikes Back. And as we said in the last program, New York is the Empire State. That's why you have, Steven Spielberg and George Lucas movies talking about, the the lost ark, the Raiders of the Lost Ark. Who is that, going for the lost ark with Indiana Jones, but Adolf Hitler? And in the last crusade, it's Adolf Hitler again. So Well, what the Taliban is making here Speaker 1: is not for the profit, but for the propagandans. And so propaganda.
Saved - December 19, 2024 at 7:07 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

The Kalergi Plan through European Union https://t.co/IlOcXINkOE

Video Transcript AI Summary
The European Union funds member countries for accepting immigrants, with Ireland benefiting significantly. This funding often ends up in the hands of developers and the wealthy elite, who then donate back to the government, creating a cycle of influence. As more money is printed, the wealthy grow richer while ordinary citizens face declining euro value, increasing the wealth gap. As awareness of this corruption spreads, anger grows among the public, prompting the government to label dissenters as racist to deter others from joining. This strategy helps maintain the elite's power and complicates collective resistance against new laws. It's crucial for everyone to unite and challenge this system for a better future.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Watch this. The European Union provides funding to member countries for accepting immigrants. Ireland receives this money, which then flows to developers, hotels, and the wealthy elite. These elites funnel some of that same money back to the government through donations and gifts, creating a cycle of wealth and influence. Meanwhile, immigrants are used to secure votes for the government reinforcing their power. As more money is printed to keep the system going, the wealthy become richer while ordinary citizens like you and I suffer as the value of the euro drops, widening the wealth divide. As people outside the circle figure out what's happening, they become angry. This group grows scaring the government. To stop this, the government used propaganda to label those people as racist and far right, scaring others from joining. This corruption allows the government to maintain its circle of wealth and power. The European Union, in turn, benefits by promoting immigration and diversity, which makes it harder for people to join together and resist new laws that give them more power. If we all don't come together and oppose this, we can't stop it. It's up to all of us to break the change they have around us and their thoughts. This needs to change. We all deserve better.
Saved - December 15, 2024 at 12:18 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

“Muh fellow Whites” https://t.co/OO3JDQkShA

@DelusionPosting - Delusional Takes

https://t.co/9leHiQoThy

Saved - December 4, 2024 at 8:48 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Houston, we’ve got a problem 😂😭 https://t.co/wPPoCOj9an

Video Transcript AI Summary
There were 12 flight attendants on a flight, 11 of whom were flamboyant and one was an older woman. The experience was overwhelming, and after six months, I only went to the bar three times. One outing was with the older woman, and it was a disappointment. Another time, I ended up listening to two women complain about their lives for three hours. I questioned why I even tipped after that. Now back in Houston, the scene is just as unappealing, filled with older people and very few younger ones. The reputation of airline pilots is often questioned, and it’s easy to see why.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: 11 out of 12. There's 12 flight attendants, individual, never the same flight attendant, Troy. 11 fucking over the top fucking fucking homosexuals and a granny. 11. I mean, think of the odds of that. I thought I was in Chicago, which was party land. After that, it was just a continuous dream of Dave and granny and grandes. Well, I don't give a fuck. I hate I hate a 100% of their ass. So 6 months, I went to the bar three times. In 6 months, three times. 1 with the granny in the bag, and I wish I hadn't gone. At the very end with 2 girls, one of them, it was probably doable, but we ended up Hope you have it. Going to the bar and then to the crew at Saint Louis. And all these 2 women wanted to do was one wanted to berate her sister and the other one to bitch about her husband, literally, for 3 hours being the FO. When that was done, 2:30 got back to my room. I'm like, why the fuck did I tip? Speaker 1: K. Webb is, transmitting, but watch what you're saying. Speaker 0: Apparently, but there was still a little bit. You know what I mean? I still would want anyone to know if I had So, I mean, it was a completely disaster specific, but now I'm back in Houston, which is easily one of the ugliest things. I mean, it's all these fucking old dudes and grannies. And there's, like, maybe a handful of 2 chips. Speaker 1: K. Someone's got it stuck, Mike, and, tell us all about their endeavors. We don't need to hear that. Speaker 0: Houston. SkyWest 635. We're 195 for 230, and that was not us. Speaker 1: SkyWest 6285 Houston Center. Roger climb and maintain flight level 360. Speaker 0: 360, Skyler, 685. And they they wonder why airline pilots have a bad reputation.
Saved - June 28, 2024 at 9:42 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Here is the beautiful White Christian Russian Imperial Romanov family. Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra Feodorovna, and their five children: Olga, Tatiana, Maria, Anastasia, and Alexei, were shot and bayoneted to death by Bolshevik jews under Yakov Yurovsky in July 1918. https://t.co/VycFws3Zz3

Saved - April 4, 2024 at 9:29 AM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Can someone tell me when exactly this commie cuck clown show ends? https://t.co/S34IkPtUkh

Video Transcript AI Summary
The republic managed to reduce the deficit by $160 billion, but they couldn't overcome the issue of seniors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But the republic was able to cut back on the fact that only they only were not able the only thing they couldn't defeat was the seniors. It's it cuts the deficit by $160,000,000,000. $160,000,000,000. I'm serious. Think about it.
Saved - March 21, 2024 at 8:38 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

@elonmusk These Americans who were murdered by Illegals under Obiden Regime’s open borders invitation invasion are collateral damage for The Great Replacement. https://t.co/qQap0WRme9

Saved - December 23, 2023 at 11:03 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

"To determine the true rulers of any society, all you must do is ask yourself this question: Who is it that I am not permitted to criticize?" https://t.co/rYY25resAU

Video Transcript AI Summary
This chart shows the Jewish executives in various companies including Universal Studios, 20th Century Fox, ABC News, CBS, Columbia Pictures, Warner Brothers, ESPN Sports, Fox News, Washington Post, MTV Music Television, Nickelodeon, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Comedy Central, NBC Entertainment, Google, Disney, ABC Kids and Family, YouTube, Los Angeles Times, Discovery Network, and Paramount.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The red are the executives that are Jewish at these companies. This right here is a chart of, Universal Studios 20th 20th Century Fox, ABC News, CBS, CBS News, Columbia Pictures, Warner Brothers, ESPN Sports, Fox News, Washington Let you go and admire MTV Music Television, Nickelodeon, USA Today, Wall Street Journal, Comedy Central, NBC Entertainment, Google. What else do we have? Disney, ABC Kids and Family, YouTube, Los Angeles Times, Discovery Network, Paramount
Saved - December 22, 2023 at 3:26 PM

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

This is fucking insane!!🤬 https://t.co/t95DeWC7NX

@RealMacReport - Real Mac Report

MSNBC: "This is the most people I have ever seen in Eagle Pass". https://t.co/S3PV4wZQit

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker mentions that the crowds in Eagle Pass have never been this large before. They also mention that other reporters in different parts of the border are experiencing the same situation. The number of migrants arriving is unprecedented, as confirmed by government reports on apprehensions and encounters. The speaker acknowledges that the implications of these numbers are uncertain, but it is clear that resources are being stretched thin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another thing is these crowds here in Eagle Pass have never been this large during my reporting. This is the most people I've ever seen in Eagle Pass, and other reporters, colleagues working other parts of the border in Arizona, in Hakumba, near San Diego tell me the same thing. We have these conversations, and the conversation is always, well, I've never seen this number of migrants arriving. And we know from the reports coming from the government with these numbers. We have the number of apprehensions, the numbers of encounters, everything spiking. So we we don't know What this will mean moving forward, we just know that the numbers are much larger as the resources are spread thing
Saved - December 15, 2023 at 5:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The responsibility for the harm caused to American citizens on our soil lies with those who supported open borders and ignored the issue. Additionally, we should not overlook the impact of the "got aways" in increasing the number of incidents.

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Every Uniparty Traitor who either pushed open borders or looked the other way is responsible for mass murder of American citizens on our own soil when these military age male Illegals are activated to fight us. Treason! https://t.co/7jds93oA5w

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker repeatedly asks about the country someone is from, specifically mentioning Syria. They express confusion and frustration about not knowing the person's nationality and why it is being kept a secret. The speaker ends by asking if the person is from Syria.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. What country? No. No. No. No. No. No. No. What country? No. No. Why? What country? No. No. No. You're from Syria. Oh. Syria. What country guys from? Hey. Why is it a big secret? I don't even know. What's the problem? No. Why not? No. Woah. What's the problem? You got some Syria?

@TheRISEofROD - Machiavelli

Don't forget about "got aways", so double that number. https://t.co/U6deE1G3qB

View Full Interactive Feed