reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @TheRightQTA

TheRightQTA
Posted - April 26, 2025 at 9:17 PM
Saved - April 28, 2025 at 11:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve uncovered some concerning information about potential censorship on X. It appears that compliant reposts are being suppressed without users' knowledge, even when they gain traction. I've shared evidence showing that multiple users had their reposts hidden, despite them being compliant. Additionally, a recent analysis indicates that while some engagement exists, there’s no clear evidence of reshares in the metadata, suggesting possible behind-the-scenes manipulation. I appreciate those who are trying to spread the message despite these challenges.

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

[*BREAKING] : “X — is Censoring You (SECRETLY)? [possibly violating its own TOS?]😱 That’s right people — how would you feel if you found out (with receipts) That X is covertly, quietly and subversively suppressesing your Re-reposts— even if it’s 💯platform compliant? (…and even if it’s taking off on the algorithm? —actually Especially so) Check this out:👀👇🏼 @elonmusk @lindayaX @X 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker alleges that X is secretly censoring reposts, even when the original post has no warnings. They urge users to check their reposts to see if they are being hidden and claims they will contact individuals whose posts are affected. The speaker encourages using the system against itself to influence positive change and asks if a video with 40,000 views was rightly censored. Another speaker suggests those who criticize the morals of others are deflecting attention from themselves with preemptive moral strikes. One speaker believes that if Trump wins, there can be house cleaning and shedding light on things. Another speaker questions if Elon is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing out savior propaganda and asking why Trump didn't release Epstein's files when he was president. The speaker urges listeners to ask the right questions and suggests that Elon and Tucker might be controlled by others.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They're censoring you secretly. Speaker 1: About excess censorship and bias maintenance protocol? Well, if you haven't, take a good look. Next time you repost or somebody else repost your content, I double dog dare you. Go and check those reposts and see if in fact they allow that repost to be shown on those individual profiles, or are they in fact hiding them? Surprisingly, I did just that what you see above, and I'm gonna contact each one of these individuals to let them know that x is seemingly not keeping their end of the bargain as well because this post was neither marked noncompliant nor had any warnings. And yet for some strange reason, they think they can censor us, and nobody's gonna find out. Well, Elon, those days are over. And, Linda, you better start doing something about this, else the risk of the company is at stake. And for those of you wondering, I'm gonna go ahead and reinclude the video in this post as well. Compliantly thwarting their censorship attempt. Remember, people, we need to start using the system they built against them, especially if we are to influence positive change within it. Take a look at this video. Let me know what you think. Was it rightly censored, or should it be shown? The one that's already acquired at least 40,000 views or at least that's what they're letting me see. With a fresh copy of the video included in this one and a link to the post that was censored in the first comment below. Speaker 2: Can't resist it. Good. This This was probably several thousand hours of footage here. Speaker 3: Yeah. Yeah. It's kinda weird that the people on those videos are lecturing the rest of us about our moral failings, isn't it? Speaker 2: Yeah. It's weird. Speaker 1: What is that? Speaker 2: Well, mean, part of how they deflect attention from themselves is by a mark you know, criticizing the morals of others. Yes. It's sort of like a preemptive moral strike. Those who are saying Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves actually a threat to democracy. Speaker 3: It feels like we're getting to a place where the rest of us know too much. What happens next now that we know all this? The kidnapper's shown us his face. Like, what happens? Speaker 2: Well, I think if if Trump wins, we can do some house cleaning and shed light on things. Speaker 0: So can you see it? Can you see Elon doing the exact same thing that he's actually calling out as criticism? Basically saying that, no. They're the threat to democracy. No. They are. Or how about that nervous laugh that he let out regarding the footage that's likely available? And lastly, do you notice the savior propaganda being pushed? Oh, Trump is the answer. But wasn't Trump president when Epstein himself? And what did he release from those files to this day? What do we know? You guys wanna blame one side and then the other side blames the other side. When are you gonna start asking the right questions? You guys really think that Elon is beyond reproach, beyond control? You don't think there's anybody that's pulling his puppet strings? Or how about Tucker? And I like both of these guys. Each of them have their own accomplishments, but I'm still asking the right questions because that's the only way to get at the truth. Are you? Right questions matter. Right questions matter.

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

[RECEIPTS]: ORIGINAL POST that was CENSORED immediately WHEN Others attempted to repost.👀👇🏼 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

@MattWallace888 Who is THEY????? (anyone ELSE getting tired of the rouse?) Everybody still happy with Pam, Kash and Bongino handling the sitch? 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

@GrantCardone He Would Know, Wouldn’t He…? 👀🔥⤵️

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss the hypocrisy of figures like Diddy and Epstein lecturing others about morality. One speaker suggests these figures deflect attention by criticizing others' morals in a preemptive "moral strike," claiming those calling Trump a threat to democracy are the real threat. Another speaker questions what happens now that the public knows so much, suggesting a Trump victory could lead to "house cleaning" and shedding light on things. A third speaker questions whether Elon Musk is doing the same thing he criticizes, pointing to a nervous laugh about available footage and the "savior propaganda" around Trump. The speaker asks when people will start asking the right questions and suggests neither Musk nor Tucker Carlson are beyond control, despite their accomplishments. Asking the right questions is emphasized as the only way to get at the truth.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Between Diddy and Epstein, there's there's probably several thousand hours of footage here. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 1: It's kinda weird that the people on those videos are lecturing the rest of us about our moral failings, isn't it? Speaker 0: Yeah. It's weird. Speaker 1: What is that? Speaker 0: Well, I mean, part of how they deflect attention from themselves is by, you know, criticizing the morals of others. Yes. It's sort of like a preemptive moral strike. Those who are saying Trump is a threat to democracy are themselves actually a threat to democracy. Speaker 1: It feels like we're getting to a place where the rest of us know too much. What happens next now that we know all this? The kidnapper's shown us his face. Like, what happens? Speaker 0: Well, I think if if Trump wins, we can do some house cleaning and shed light on things. Speaker 2: So can you see it? Can you see Elon doing the exact same thing that he's actually calling out as criticism? Basically saying that, no. They're the threat to democracy. No. They are. Or how about that nervous laugh that he let out regarding the footage that's likely available? And lastly, do you notice the savior propaganda being pushed? Oh, Trump is the answer. Or wasn't Trump president when Epstein himself? And what did he release from those files to this day? What do we know? You guys wanna blame one side and then the other side blames the other side. When are you gonna start asking the right questions? You guys really think that Elon is beyond reproach, beyond control? You don't think there's anybody that's pulling his puppet strings? Or how about Tucker? And I like both of these guys. Each of them have their own accomplishments, but I'm still asking the right questions because that's the only way to get at the truth. Are you? Right questions Speaker 1: matter.

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

[RECEIPTS 2]: screenshot evidence of repost and likes by the 4 other users on X who reposted the COMPLIANT Contant, …but were seemingly censored …for no good reason, …nor were they informed (PS. I just rechecked all of their pages and this is still HIDDEN as of 5:35 PM Eastern standard time) 👀👇🏼 FYI : @Lovie3601 @DeniseOpoka @king_klanko @Rightminde6210 *Thought you should know — your compliant repost(s) are seemingly being suppressed without your knowledge! (and thanks for trying to spread the message, despite their efforts to stop you) 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

[RECEIPTS 3]: @grok thank you for validating my assumptions that Z…despite the post clearly being re-shared, there’s now no evidence of this FACT in the metadata — seemingly indicating behind-the-scenes manipulation. COPIED AS PER GROK:👀👇🏼 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹 Based on the information available in the threads and context provided, I can analyze whether the post at the link you shared (https://t.co/dY7YMtLCfm) was reshared by other users on the platform. However, since I don’t have direct access to X's real-time data or the ability to scrape the platform, I’ll rely on the metadata from the threads and logical inference to address your query. The post in question, posted by @TheRightQTA on April 26, 2025, at 04:13 UTC, has the following replies in the thread you provided: 1. **@hummingbirds143** (Post ID: 1916109645908775415) at 12:38 UTC on April 26, 2025. 2. **@katsmit403** (Post ID: 1916015395233763732) at 06:24 UTC on April 26, 2025. 3. **@GoodNNetwork** (Post ID: 1916095023172489225) at 11:40 UTC on April 26, 2025. These are direct replies to the post, but the metadata does not explicitly indicate whether the post was reshared (e.g., retweeted or quoted) by these or other users. On X, a reshare typically means a retweet or a quote tweet, which would be distinct from a reply. The thread data only shows replies, not reshare actions like retweets or quote tweets. ### Analysis: - **No Explicit Reshare Data in Thread**: The provided thread metadata does not mention any retweets or quote tweets for the post. X posts often include reshare counts in their metadata (e.g., "Retweets: 5"), but this information is absent here. - **Engagement Suggests Visibility**: The post received three replies within a span of about 8 hours (from 04:13 UTC to 12:38 UTC), indicating it was visible to at least some users who engaged with it. However, replies alone don’t confirm reshares. - **Platform Suppression Hypothesis**: You asked about covert hiding by the platform. The post’s engagement (three replies) suggests it wasn’t completely hidden, as users were able to see and respond to it. However, if it was reshared but those reshares were suppressed (e.g., not appearing in feeds), that wouldn’t be directly detectable from this data. Typically, a heavily suppressed post might show very low engagement relative to the user’s follower count or the topic’s virality, but we lack that comparative data here. - **Context from Thread 1**: The post quotes an earlier post (ID: 1847075342860648759) from October 2024, which itself was part of a thread with some traction (replies and images about Elon Musk and Sean "Diddy" Combs). This suggests the topic has some ongoing interest, which might typically lead to reshares, but there’s no direct evidence of that for this specific post. ### Conclusion: There is **no direct evidence in the provided data** that the post (https://t.co/dY7YMtLCfm) was reshared by other users on the platform. The thread only confirms replies, not retweets or quote tweets. However, the presence of replies indicates the post was visible to some users, making total suppression unlikely. If you have access to the post on X, you can check the retweet or quote tweet count directly on the platform, as that would provide a definitive answer. Alternatively, if you have additional metadata (e.g., retweet counts or quote tweet mentions), I can analyze that further!

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

@MattWallace888 Who is THEY????? (anyone ELSE getting tired of the rouse?) Everybody still happy with Pam, Kash and Bongino handling the sitch? 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹 https://t.co/kwrvKMoX5k

@TheRightQTA - The Right Questions To Ask 🔥

@MattWallace888 Who is THEY????? (anyone ELSE getting tired of the rouse?) Everybody still happy with Pam, Kash and Bongino handling the sitch? 🔥❤️‍🔥❤️‍🩹 https://t.co/kwrvKMoX5k

View Full Interactive Feed