TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheRustler83

TheRustler83
Posted - February 3, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Saved - March 17, 2025 at 9:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
During lockdown, a significant number of care home residents were prescribed end-of-life medications, leading to thousands of deaths in Scotland and England. This practice, framed as "anticipatory care," raises serious ethical concerns, with claims of blanket DNR orders issued without family consent and falsified signatures. The NHS/NICE guidelines reportedly encouraged the use of drugs like Midazolam and Morphine, which can cause severe respiratory issues. Testimonies from the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry highlight these troubling actions, suggesting state-sanctioned harm.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 9 times out of 10 Care Home residents were prescribed ‘End of Life’ medication during Lockdown What followed was 5,000 deaths in just 10 weeks at Scottish Care Homes and 50,000 in England…..

Video Transcript AI Summary
Antibiotics were often prescribed, but if a resident didn't improve, "just in case" medication was given. Consulting with GPs was done over the phone, and regardless of symptoms, "just in case" medication was typically prescribed. It could take months to get a GP to visit a resident's home.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mentioned that often all that would happen was that just in case medication would be prescribed. If it was something more mild, were you able to get things like antibiotics and Speaker 1: milder Yeah, we prescribed antibiotics but nine times out of 10 if a resident didn't get better from that, it was just in case it was prescribed. Speaker 0: Thank you. Ms Curry, in your experience Speaker 1: No, we didn't get any GP's and we consulted with GP's over the phone and nine times out of 10, regardless of what the resident's symptoms were, they were prescribed just in case medication. We really, really, really struggled. I think it was months and months before we got a GP into her home.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Just-In-Case medication = Anticipatory Care medicine= End-of-Life drugs It’s just a nicer way of saying “We are going to kill you now”

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Link to the full transcript + witness statements from the day⬇️ https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearing/impact-hearing-health-social-care-day-30

Impact Hearing | Health and Social Care | Day 30 | Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry Day 30 of the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings.Date: 26 March 2024Time: 9.45am Please note the timetable below is provisional and subject to change. covid19inquiry.scot

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

From the same day at the Inquiry 26/3/2024 This should have brought the entire house of cards crashing down 0 (zero) media coverage of those testimonies

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

They killed your elderly relatives in Care Homes… Then blamed it on ‘COVID’… https://t.co/Ldw7TXYcYv

Video Transcript AI Summary
The numbers of people who died of COVID are skewed because many unwell individuals were classified as suspected COVID cases without testing. Other health conditions seemed nonexistent during COVID, and care home residents who became unwell were automatically considered COVID positive. The numbers don't accurately reflect COVID deaths. According to Lisa DiGiacomo, a director with Open Ministry Healthcare, deaths were classified as suspected or COVID-related, even with underlying health conditions. Scott Finnegan, Group General Manager for First, agrees with this assessment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Death, and actually, the the numbers of people who died in the COVID are very screwed because there's lots of people who just took unwell were were were classed as suspected COVID without any tests being carried out. There was lots of workloads that actually because, it seemed that other kind of health conditions didn't exist during COVID, and if you took unwell when you were living in a care home, you were just automatically considered as as being COVID positive. And think there was a lot of frustration about that as well because the numbers don't actually reflect the amount of people that sadly passed away from COVID. Speaker 1: As Scott clearly said, it wasn't all about Covid positive deaths, it was suspected Covid or Covid related, where it may have been another underlying health condition. I'm Lisa DiGiacomo, I'm a director with Open Ministry Healthcare. Speaker 0: Scott Finnegan, Group General Manager for First and

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Midazolam Matt Hancock April 2020

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

In the week that Matt Hancock promoted the ‘Assisted Dying Bill’ Let us remember his role in promoting End of Life medicines during lockdown⬇️ ‘A Good Death’ by Matt Hancock & Dr Luke Evans https://youtube.com/shorts/4WozgdHS8WI?feature=shared https://t.co/0IdUNAST0i

Video Transcript AI Summary
Good death requires equipment, medication, and staff. The NHS has enough syringe drivers to deliver medications for comfort during passing. Precautions are in place to ensure sufficient medications like midazolam and morphine. Morphine is prescribed per patient to prevent abuse. Relaxing morphine prescribing laws for doctors and healthcare professionals could reduce waste in healthcare homes. The government is keeping the reduction of key medicine wastage under review.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good death needs three things. It needs equipment, it needs medication and it needs the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away? Yes, we do. The second one is with that, that's the syringe drivers deliver medication, particularly things like midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Yes. And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused. So I have to prescribe it for Mr. Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a healthcare home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered relaxing the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and healthcare professionals so that there isn't waste. That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Scottish Covid Inquiry | Full Documentary | https://youtu.be/bojR7A5MKPA?si=faXtUa_OCIRumdFk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Care Home Excess Deaths in 2020 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 No excess before lockdown 100% excess during lockdown No excess after lockdown https://t.co/VVNTUWYZ0h

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

DO NOT RESUSCITATE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨DO NOT RESUSCITATE🚨 💥 Blanket DNR orders across entire Care Homes 💥 DNR orders without families consent 💥 Falsified signatures 💥 No GP call outs to Care Homes 💥 Ambulances & Hospital access denied for Care Home residents https://t.co/jo8mnJn3P2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The inquiry anticipates hearing that people were pressured into DNR notices, were not resuscitated without a notice, and may have been neglected and left to starve. Families may not have been told the truth about the cause of death, and the usual death certification process was altered. A solicitor produced a DNR order with a name printed in block letters, not a normal signature. A witness stated they told the care home categorically that they did not want a DNR order in place for their grandmother. A care home manager said there was a push from the NHS to implement more DNRs. One home received DNR/ACPR forms for all residents who didn't have one. Challenges arose when families wanted their loved ones to receive hospital treatment for non-COVID ailments, but facilities wouldn't accept them. It was stated that GPs were said to have discussed DNR forms with families, but this didn't seem to be the case. The process was rushed, with a focus on who needed a DNR because they wouldn't be able to go to the hospital. There was no individual consideration, and care homes weren't asked about a resident's health when considering DNRs. Access to ambulances and hospitals was limited, leading to DNR decisions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices. That people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place. That residents may have been neglected and left to starve. That families are not sure they were told the truth about their relatives' cause of death that the usual process for certification of deaths was departed from. Speaker 1: The solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order and it had my name on it and it was dated on the November 2. Kind of block capital letters with my name. Speaker 2: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 3: And could the care home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words to them were categorically I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 2: My name is Peter McCormick. I'm the manager. I guess there was an impression that there was, I'm not sure that's the right phrase, but a push on by the NHS to get more of these things in place. In one of our homes, we received DNA ACPRs for all of our residents that hadn't already got one in place. Speaker 4: The difficulty you then had was if the family member had said, well, if my loved one becomes unwell, not specifically COVID related, just with anything, and hospital treatments required, then, yeah, I would still like them to go. That was then the challenge because you weren't able to put them anywhere because nobody would take them. Speaker 2: But I think there was a restriction in terms of access to care for people in care homes. I think that was a decision that must have been made by the NHS. But that doesn't appear that wasn't a discussion that was held in the full public light. And I think had it been, well, there have been people with all sorts of opinions, but it seemed to be a decision that was made very low key, not very well publicized, but was a reality of the first couple of years of the pandemic anyway. Speaker 5: On page five of the statement, I think it's a section that you've commented on, Ms Ling. You state that you were advised GPs had discussions with families about DNA CPR forms Then subsequently all residents who didn't previously have such forms were issued with them. But despite being told by the GPs that these discussions had taken place, your impression was that that wasn't actually the case? I think Why did you what created that impression for I Speaker 4: think it was because it was very much something that was just rushed. So it was updated ACPs, your anticipated career plans, which was fine. And then it was you need to look at who doesn't have DNRs because they will now then need to have one. And so when that was the discussion that was had with myself, I had said at the time, well, I can't make that decision. You'll you'll need to speak to the families about that, but I can let you know who doesn't have one. Because standard practice would be for the GP to have that discussion with the family member if the resident wasn't able to have that discussion themselves. And then within a couple of days, you then did then get these outstanding DNRs that we didn't have previously. So you would question whether that was something that was done in conjunction with families because the initial conversation was it's just they need to have them now because they won't be able to go to hospital because they just didn't want to take them. Speaker 5: Yeah. So essentially there was no nuance. There was, the conversation you had was based on there being no nuance, no individual consideration, just that everybody Yeah. In your care home who's resident there must have one of Yes, because Speaker 4: they wouldn't be going to hospital if they were unwell. Speaker 5: And I take it on that basis then you weren't asked about your impression of a particular resident's health and frailty as part of the consideration of whether was clinically appropriate to put the DNA CPR measures? Speaker 4: No, we weren't. And even when residents who did have COVID or maybe didn't have COVID just became unwell, you know, as people still continue to do throughout the pandemic, it was very much a cut and dry. You know, you got advice over the telephone, but you still you would have to fight very, very hard and challenge a lot to get someone admitted to hospital when you could clearly see that if they went to hospital, they had a really good chance of improving, of getting over, but, you know, it was making them unwell in the first place. But it was almost like you were not playing God, but it was just, no, you can't go. You just have to stay there. You could have gotten better if you'd been given the chance. Speaker 5: And your understanding is the lack of ability to access an ambulance, paramedics or hospital was the reason for these DNA CPR decisions being put in place? Yeah. Had you ever previously experienced a time where every resident your care had to have this? No.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

People asking where the directive came from: Straight from the NHS/NICE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“Sedation and opioid use should NOT be withheld because of an inappropriate fear of causing RESPIRATORY DEPRESSION” COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing symptoms (including at the end of life) in the community NICE guideline NG163 Published: 3 April 2020 https://files.elfsightcdn.com/5266f37f-1e60-4e3b-9202-0f9e41473266/2a4df24d-b4c4-4056-aec6-c4bbd5c11090.pdf https://t.co/pRel3HLhaq

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#Midazolam

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 MIDAZOLAM NICE Guidance NG163 instructed the use of End-of-Life drugs Midazolam + Morphine to ‘treat’ elderly patients with ‘COVID’ Giving Midazolam with Morphine causes Respiratory Depression - like they are being WATERBOARDED!! https://t.co/vVF3NfpUXC

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker received a call from a care home stating her father had fallen and was agitated, and would be given morphine. She was shocked he was on an end-of-life path of injecting to stop his issues. She later learned midazolam, one of the medications being used, is considered by some practitioners to be like being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. The speaker was not advised about a specific end-of-life care plan for her father. She expressed concerns to the care home manager about what she had seen and the way end-of-life care was being administered. Despite a DNR in place from the first care home, she learned her father had been mobile and trying to get to the toilet. She felt it was a random decision to keep him quiet, in isolation, in a comatose state.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I was then told they were going to introduce end of life medication, which would be midazolam and if needed, and morphine, and I was shocked. Tuesday, April 21, I got a phone call again from the care home to tell me my dad had fallen out of bed again. He was very restless and agitated, and he was to be given morphine. I was shocked to find out he was not on a a related path of injecting to stop his issues, and this is where the confusion comes in because when you hear that somebody's on end of life care, you imagine, as I said earlier, that somebody is, you know, at peace. They're in pain. They can be in peace. And that that's the medication he was given, midazolam and morphine, would be helping him. Subsequently from that, I found out that midazolam isn't a particularly nice drug, and some practitioners refer it to being being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. And I I don't know if it's been removed, but I believe those motions are foot to look in at the the use of midazolam and morphine in end of life care. Speaker 1: Were you ever advised about a specific care plan in terms of end of life care for your father at the point Speaker 0: At that point? Speaker 1: Yeah. No. Did you know what the care plan was to be? Speaker 0: I didn't. No. I didn't know exactly what was going on, and, subsequently, there was a conversation with a doctor. Speaker 1: And tell me about what was said in that conversation. Speaker 0: I'd expressed my concerns to the returning new care home manager that I was distressed and upset about what I was what I'd seen, what was happening, and the way the end of life care was being administered. I was confused because I mean, there was a DNR put in place from the first care home. However, you know, I think anybody here would think to themselves that when they start introducing end of life care that there's no way back and that the person is beyond hope. And yet I found out that my father had been mobile. He'd been walking about. He had poor man had been trying to get to the toilet. He'd been shouting for help. And they had started, in my opinion, it was it was almost like a random decision to keep him quiet, keep him in isolation, in a room, in a comatose state.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Human Rights Act

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨The most powerful moment of the entire Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry remains the testimony given by Shelagh McCall on behalf of Bereaved Relatives Group SKYE…. State sanctioned murder Please watch and share🙏 https://t.co/6RvAd6II0a

Video Transcript AI Summary
The inquiry will investigate if the right to life was protected in care homes, including potential pressure for "do not resuscitate" notices, lack of resuscitation, and neglect. Evidence may point to systemic failures in care delivery, regulation, and inspection in Scotland. The bereaved want to know how the virus entered locked-down care homes and spread. The inquiry will hear that people were transferred from hospitals to care homes without testing, potentially ignoring local capacity and patient interests. Blanket bans on visits exacerbated the situation, denying families contact with loved ones. Some staff risked their jobs to inform families, while some management prioritized reputation over resident care. Families faced unanswered calls, were treated with disdain, and witnessed deterioration in health, suspecting neglect. Records were sometimes missing or incomplete. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of the prohibition on torture and inhuman and degrading treatment. The inquiry should consider whether inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose and the impact of restrictions on family life. The group wants to ensure that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The inquiry must investigate whether the right to life under Article two was respected and protected. We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices. That people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place. That residents may have been neglected and left to starve. This group is made up of people whose relatives died in care homes, as well as care workers who bore witness to the conditions in those homes. As well as revealing the suffering of individuals and their families, we anticipate that the evidence in these hearings will point to a systemic failure of the model for the delivery of care in Scotland, for its regulation and inspection. In due course, this group will be asking you to make recommendations that will ensure that the elderly and vulnerable are properly cared for, and that what happened during COVID-nineteen cannot happen again. The bereaved want to know how it was and why it was that the virus was able to enter care homes when they were in lockdown ahead of the rest of society, and how the virus was then able to spread like wildfire within the homes. The inquiry will hear evidence that people were transferred into care homes from hospitals without testing. This happened at a national level, with no obvious consideration given to local capacity or the best interests of patients and residents. It was at a time when it appears no Scottish hospital had reached a level of capacity that might have signalled an imminent critical incident necessitating such a step. The situation was only exacerbated by the decision of government that there should be a blanket ban on face to face visits with those in care homes. It's a natural human response to be as close as possible to a loved one in the final phase of their life. This was denied to care home residents and their relatives. The enquiry we hear that when relatives tried to contact their loved ones by video conference or telephone, their efforts were thwarted. Excuses were given about malfunctioning iPads, problems with the Wi Fi network. The excuses kept changing. In some instances, management told staff not to share with the outside world what was going on in a home. Some staff formed the view that management cared more about their reputation in the community and the protection of their business than they did about the residents, their families and the care workers who do the job not for the money but because their heart is in it. Some staff went behind management's back, risking their jobs to keep families informed. Families' calls went unanswered over days and sometimes weeks. On some occasions when contact was made, families were treated with disdain as if they were an inconvenience. Families were told their loved one was fine, only to get a sudden hurried phone call that they were dying. Many families witnessed remotely a significant deterioration of their loved one's physical and mental health in lockdown that was nothing to do with Covid-nineteen. Some suspected their loved one was suffering from neglect, dehydration and starvation. Questions were asked and relatives were fobbed off. The blanket ban on visits meant that care plans could not be checked. The inquiry will hear that when records were requested after a loved one's death relatives found that the records were missing or incomplete. When relatives did manage to make contact over video with their loved one and witness for themselves the deterioration in their condition, there is evidence that at times their wishes about medical treatment were ignored or overridden. The reality for bereaved relatives is that some did not see their loved ones face to face again after the lockdown began. The right to visit during the last moments of life was not always granted and if it was it was restricted to one family member. Some residents died alone. Care home staff witnessed many excess deaths. They held people's hands as they died. That trauma will never leave some of them. After death some relatives were not given all their loved ones belongings back. They suspect they were burned in spite of having been quarantined. After death some relatives were so concerned about what had occurred that they reported the death to the police. They want to know how it got to that stage. The inquiries promise to take a human rights based approach and hearing first from those impacted by the pandemic is a recognition of that approach in action and that is welcomed. But a meaningful human rights based approach goes far beyond that. The inquiry must investigate whether the right to life under Article two was respected and protected. We anticipate the inquiry will hear that people were pressured to agree to do not resuscitate notices, that people were not resuscitated even though no such notice was in place, that residents may have been neglected and left to starve, that families are not sure they were told the truth about their relatives cause of death, that the usual process for certification of death was departed from. The inquiry must investigate potential violations of Article three, the prohibition on torture in human and degrading treatment. Relatives will speak of their loved ones lacking food, water and hygiene that there was inadequate, inappropriate, absent or delayed medical attention that welfare attorneys' views were not listened to when it came to medical treatment that there was inadequate staffing to provide proper care resulting in residents suffering unnecessarily. We urge the inquiry to consider whether in light of people's lived experience the inspection and regulatory regimes were fit for purpose to prevent or remedy these harms. An inquiry must also consider the impact of the restrictions that were put in place in care homes on the rights of residents and their loved ones to a family life under Article eight. We expect the evidence will demonstrate that no proper efforts were made towards maintaining relationships and that people's health declined as a result. When you come to hear from the decision makers and those who implemented the decisions and the restrictions, we want you to ask did those people take a human rights based approach? Did they consider that the result of their decisions and the restrictions that followed would be the situations that the inquiry is going to hear about in this first tranche of hearings. Fundamental to a human rights based approach are accountability and a guarantee of non repetition. Most of all, what this group wants the inquiry to ensure is that no family member, no care home resident and no care worker in the future has to go through what they and their loved ones suffered during Covid-nineteen.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

COVID MISATTRIBUTION

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🎙The Doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis….. COVID MISATTRIBUTION Pamela provides an explosive testimony on behalf of her brother, James, at the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry…. https://t.co/w316XA7M0R

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker's brother, James, died in Ninewells Hospital in May 2021 at age 41. She describes him as a healthy, kind chef. After being taken to the hospital, she believed he was in the best place. However, she later learned from his medical records that doctors tried to put him on a ventilator, which angered her because this wasn't communicated to her. She communicated with her brother via text for the first few days, but then he was given lorazepam and ventilated. The family didn't want him on a ventilator due to low chances of recovery. He developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, which she discovered later in his records. The death certificate cited SARS COVID-2 as the cause of death. She noted a discrepancy in the time of death, raising questions about resuscitation. She requested investigations into his death, focusing on his participation in a trial where the signature on the consent form didn't appear to be his. She questioned whether trial drugs caused an allergic reaction. She also discovered he was prescribed toxomolobab, an immune suppression drug, making him more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. She claims doctors and nurses lied to her daily.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis. Everything that was in my brother's notes was different from what I was being told on a daily basis. Speaker 1: It's about your brother James. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: We know that James sadly died in Ninewells Hospital in Dundee on the 10/05/2021. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: And he was 41. Yeah. And you tell us a little bit about him. In your statement he was a chef and he worked all over Scotland. Speaker 0: Yeah, that's correct. Speaker 1: Did James have any children himself? Two. You also say that he was kind, was helpful. Speaker 0: Very, and good. Speaker 1: And you describe him as generally as a healthy individual. Speaker 0: Yep. Speaker 1: I think after trying to get in touch with NHS twenty four, your brother was taken to A and E at Ninewells. Speaker 0: Well I thought he was in the best place. I thought he was just gonna get a drip and, you know, he was in there for, like, dehydration and everything would be okay. Speaker 1: At paragraph 15 you say that you now know or you know now that they were trying to put him on a ventilator. How did you come by that knowledge? Speaker 0: Because I obtained my brother's medical records and I read them every page. Speaker 1: And what was your reaction to finding that out? Speaker 0: That my brother must have been scared and I was angry. Speaker 1: Why were you angry? Speaker 0: Because the messages that I was getting from my brother and obviously he didn't tell me how scared he was and you know, I don't know, was angry. I angry. I was angry because the things that I read in his notes wasn't what the doctors were saying to me on a daily basis. The doctors were lying to me on a daily basis. Nurses were lying to me on a daily basis. Everything that was in my brother's notes was different from what I was being told on a daily basis. Speaker 1: I think you mentioned to me a few moments ago that you were able to keep in touch with your brother. Speaker 0: It was only for the first couple of days. My brother went into hospital on a Friday night. By half past ten on Friday night, were told my brother was going to die. We were communicating via messages and stuff like that, brother, you okay? And you know, he was texting back and I got a thumbs up in one of the pictured messages that sent me. I was telling him that he had to eat and he was going to be okay and got some fluids and that in him. That was happening for the first couple of days. That happened over the course of the weekend. Speaker 1: You note that things went a little bit quiet and you discovered from his records that your brother had been given lorazepam. Speaker 0: Yes, so I think that was the night that he was ventilated. So he got ventilated early hours of the Monday morning, which was the twenty first. Went out of the hospital on the September 17. He started to become, you know, he wasn't responding. I'm saying, Brother, are you there? Are you there? Answer me. Just give me a wee thumbs up, just give me someone. But I think it was by tea time on the Monday night, you know, I just wasn't getting any responses from him. So I had phoned the hospital and I asked them, have you given my brother anything? They told me that he was on a CPAP but he may start to get tired. So then I asked them and he told me that he was eating and he was drinking and he was good. And then I asked them, have you given my brother infant? Have you made my brother tired because he's not responding to me? So there was quite a discussion with one of the nurses, it got a bit heated. Speaker 1: What was your attitude towards your brother possibly being put on a ventilator, or indeed his attitude to that happening? Speaker 0: We didn't want that to happen. Why not? Because the chances of coming off one were no good. That was quite evident you were saying that people were going on them and no coming off them. Speaker 1: You say at paragraph 25 that he developed a ventilator associated pneumonia or VAP. Speaker 0: Yes. So I had Speaker 1: Is that something you found out afterwards? Speaker 0: Yeah, so I had a friend whose husband had also been in hospital with COVID and he was on maximum oxygen for three weeks. So what I can understand is why the ventilator was being pushed on my brother and I'm not a doctor but I thought why can you not just give my brother maximum oxygen for three weeks if that's what it takes, why is there such a hurry to put him on a ventilator? Sorry, with regards to the ventilator associated pneumonia, nobody told me about that. I found that out later. Speaker 1: It was something you found out from his record. Speaker 2: Yeah. In the early stages of the pandemic, COVID-nineteen patients with severe respiratory distress were often treated aggressively with intravenous fluids and mechanical ventilation. It became apparent however that intravenous fluids could exacerbate fluid in the lungs and further reduce oxygenation. Speaker 1: What he did tell you was that James had had a cardiac arrest. Speaker 0: That's correct. Speaker 1: And I think one of the infections that your brother had had was MRSA which had caused damage to his face. A death certificate in relation to your brother was released which certified that cause of death was SARS COVID. Speaker 0: SARS COVID two was the only thing on my brother's death certificate. Speaker 1: I think you made the point there was a very small discrepancy about the actual time of death as well. Speaker 0: Yeah, and that also brought in a question whether or not my brother was resuscitated. Speaker 1: You've asked for a considerable number of investigations into how your brother died. Speaker 0: Yeah, that's correct. And can you Speaker 1: just tell us about those investigations? What investigations have you asked for? What are you looking for? Speaker 0: Well, what had happened was my brother was put on a trial and I found through his notes that the signature wasn't his. It was a study investigator, I believe, signature that had signed him up for this trial. Now we've got a man that didn't go to doctors, didn't have any medications, you know he was allergic to penicillin, that's about all we knew. So these trial drugs and stuff, I had a query about why my brother was given these drugs, could anything have happened to him by being given these drugs, was it an allergic reaction that he had? That was about all I knew at the time of his passing until I obviously obtained his medical records and then found out lots of other things. By reading through the records and discrepancies at the time of death and then all the infections that he had and being lied to on a daily basis from the doctors I tried to then get a private postmortem and I was supported by my funeral directors to contact Health Improvement Scotland Speaker 1: Presumably from having read your brother's medical records the various hospital acquired infections that were disclosed. Speaker 0: That's a One thing, Speaker 1: I'm sorry, give me a moment. The one thing that you do make a note there is that you also found out that he'd been prescribed an immune suppression drug which may have made him more susceptible to those infections. Speaker 0: So that's a toxomolobab. He was given that and what that does is suppresses your immune system. Now he was already vulnerable and in a hospital. He didn't have these infections when he went in. And then he ended up with all of these.
TheRustler83
Posted - January 19, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 7:45 AM

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“Essentially the vaccine roll out put everyone in the UK in a Phase IV post-authorisation trial” Anna Morris KC UK COVID-19 Inquiry 14th January 2025 https://t.co/W9K5RN6Mzq

Video Transcript AI Summary
The vaccine rollout in the UK effectively placed everyone in a Phase IV post-authorization trial, serving as real-world data. The government pre-paid AstraZeneca for vaccine supplies and indemnified pharmaceutical companies like Moderna and Pfizer against certain claims. Public messaging emphasized the necessity of vaccination, linking it to personal freedoms, travel, work, and family visits. Financial incentives were provided to healthcare providers to boost vaccination rates, potentially fostering a mindset that prioritized delivery at all costs. Urgent reform is needed, as the current system has failed to adequately support those injured or bereaved. Despite promises from past and present governments to review the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, no action has been taken four years after the initial vaccinations.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Essentially, the vaccine rollout put everyone in the U. K. In a Phase IV post authorization trial. We were the real world data that Mr. Keith Casey referred to this morning. The inquiry will hear evidence that the UK government agreed to pay AstraZeneca in advance for the supply of a potential vaccine and that the government also agreed to indemnify them and the other pharmaceutical companies such as Moderna and Pfizer in respect of any losses from certain third party claims. Vaccines were consistently reported as safe with members of the public being told in messaging, you must have them. Everyone's personal freedoms, ability to travel, go to work or to visit loved ones often depended on being vaccinated. The government also provided health care providers with financial incentives to maximize vaccinations within their communities. This must have contributed, even unconsciously, to a mindset that the vaccine must be delivered at all costs. It must now be clear that reform is urgently required and the current system has not met the need for fair, and we say it needs urgent reform. It must now be clear that reform is urgently required and the current system has not met the needs of the injured and bereaved. There have been promises made by the previous and current government to look at the VDPS. But here we are, 4 years after the first vaccination, and there has still been no action taken.
TheRustler83
Posted - March 27, 2021 at 5:48 PM
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 5:47 PM

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#ScottishNurse Video 3 of 3 Please share & RT 🙏 https://t.co/pEW8UsupCV

Video Transcript AI Summary
A healthcare worker is fed up with mask-wearing and inconsistencies in pandemic treatment across hospitals. They urge fellow healthcare professionals to speak out against government influence and lies in the media. It's time to tell the truth for the sake of their children.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The other colleague I spoke to is terrified to speak out. They've had enough. They've had enough of the mask wearing. My head is splitting every shift from wearing a mask in a ward with 6 6 patients. I'm looking after 6 patients sometimes. I've been doing bank work. So I've been going around all the wards, and I can see in every ward they're treating this pandemic different. They've got beds shot in some wards and not in others. And then Nicholas Sturgeon's on on the television saying, the hospital saved the NHS, but the beds are empty. Guys, this is not what it seems. So please please please listen. Nurses and doctors, pharmacists, paramedics, NHS, 111, 24 workers, call workers, the doctors, GPs, physios, OTs, alternative therapy medicines, these people are coming forward, and we are all going to speak out. We are all going to speak out. We're gonna speak the truth. And I'm sorry that the government have influenced you by control of social media, control of mainstream media, and you haven't listened. And this is it now. It stops now. The lies stop now. I have to speak out. My kids.
TheRustler83
Posted - March 27, 2021 at 5:44 PM
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 5:44 PM

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#ScottishNurse Video 2 of 3 https://t.co/TcGU8pLhIV

Video Transcript AI Summary
Every year, people die from diseases and viruses. Lockdowns are affecting people more than the virus. Many colleagues are scared of losing their jobs. I am now unemployed and looking for work. Colleagues feel alone and scared. Some have seen traumatic injuries from vaccines not reported. Symptoms are treated, not the cause. Speaking out gets you dismissed as crazy. Colleagues are terrified to speak out.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Every year, and it's so sad because people die. People die and lose their lives. We are born to die. We're born with disease. There's viruses. Lockdown isn't is affecting people more than this virus ever has, ever. There's so many of us trying to speak out. There's so many of the colleagues I've worked with. They're scared. They're scared of losing their job. That's what's going on. I'm now unemployed. I will start looking for a job. I've been I've been trying so hard so hard to reach out. I was on my loan for a long period of time, and everyone now that I speak to states that they felt so alone, so scared. I'm not I'm not doing it anymore. I'm not being part of it. My colleagues, they don't want to be part of it either. They don't want to be part of it either. I honestly don't know what else is gonna stop this because the vaccine rollout is going to be happening to our children. I have seen traumatic injuries from the vaccine. They're not getting reported to the yellow card scheme. They're treating the symptoms, not asking why why it's happening. It's just treating the symptoms. And when you speak about it, you're you're dismissed like you're crazy. I'm not crazy. I'm not crazy because every other colleague I spoke to is terrified to speak out. They've had
TheRustler83
Posted - March 27, 2021 at 5:40 PM
Saved - April 21, 2024 at 5:41 PM

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#ScottishNurse resigns from her #NHS post in protest at Governments handling of #Covid19 & #Lockdown 💥 Silence is compliance 💥 Hospitals empty 💥 Wards closed 💥 Very few deaths from Covid 💥 V@cc!ne injury Thank you for making a stand & speaking out Kirsty. #Respect 👊👊 https://t.co/s5BN69ITQc

Video Transcript AI Summary
I am a nurse who recently resigned from the NHS due to government corruption and lies. Hospitals are not full, beds are empty, and wards are closed. I have lost family members to COVID, but question the narrative. I have spoken out about the vaccine rollout, vaccine injuries, and the need for lockdowns to push vaccinations. The hospitals are not busy, and the situation is not as dire as portrayed.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Kirsty, I'm a staff nurse. I'm a band 5 RGN. I worked in the NHS. Tonight, I done my last shift on the bank. I resigned from my post, my permanent post about 5 weeks ago. I can no longer be part of the lies and the corruption by the government, not by the NHS. I mean, I've absolutely loved working there and working with amazing teams, amazing nurses, amazing amazing people, but silence is consent as far as I am concerned. The hospitals aren't full. The beds aren't full. Beds have been shut. Wards have been shut. Very little people have passed, and I am so sorry to every person that's passed due to illness, the coronavirus. My family have lost 2 people. One deemed questionable about COVID on their death certificate. I've been trying to speak out. I've been writing letters to, the government. I've spoke out to Unison. I have I have, questioned everything that's been going on for a long period of time. Vaccine rollout, vaccine injury, realizing that it's an experimental agent that is gonna keep going because they need to actually use the lockdowns. As an emergency medicine. So they have to keep the lockdowns going to make sure that people are getting vaccinated. There's no emergencies. The hospitals are not busy. They never have been.
TheRustler83
Posted - April 7, 2024 at 9:25 AM
Saved - April 7, 2024 at 11:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
There was a shocking discovery of a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for the author's grandmother, with the author's name on it without their authorization. Blanket DNR orders were placed on care home residents, preventing hospital admissions and ambulance callouts. End-of-Life drugs were prescribed over the phone. The author questions the lack of a police investigation into the unlawful deaths of care home residents during the pandemic.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

‘There was a still more shocking sight to come. It was a piece of paper known as a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) form for her grandmother – and Ms Grant's name was on it as the next of kin authorising it She had never authorise such a thing’ https://dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13277723/Were-Covid-patients-left-die-against-wishes.html

Were Covid patients left to die against their wishes? Gillan Grant (pictured right) put her name on a document that effectively denied her grandmother (left) potentially lifesaving treatment. dailymail.co.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Credit to @BrokerJonathan for writing this very important piece Jonathan, if you are needing any more information on this please feel free to extract anything from my posts Or the threads by @biologyphenom

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🎙Scottish COVID-inquiry, Care Home managers confirm; 🚨Blanket ‘Do not attempt CPR’ notices were placed on their residents by GPs/NHS 🚨 No hospital admissions and no ambulances would attend Care Home residents with a DNR order Impact Hearing Day 31 26/3/2024 Part 1

Video Transcript AI Summary
Summary: Updating anticipatory care plans during the pandemic was challenging due to families wanting hospital treatment for their loved ones, but facing restrictions. There was a push by the NHS to implement DNA CPR in care homes, causing access to care to be limited without much public discussion. Translation: During the pandemic, updating care plans and implementing DNA CPR in care homes faced challenges and restrictions, impacting access to care without widespread public awareness.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'd like to move on to anticipatory care plans and DNA CPR. With regard to putting in place anticipatory care plans, I understand you had to contact patients contact families and also have discussions with residents. What is the reaction of families on being contacted about that matter? Speaker 1: I think we've always had anticipated a care plan, so getting in touch to update those, you know, on the back of the GPs asking to kind of just as lockdown came into play wasn't something that was out of the ordinary. The difficulty you then had was if the family member had said, well, if my loved one becomes unwell, not specifically COVID related, just with anything and hospital treatments required, then, yeah, I would still like them to go. That was then the challenge because you weren't able to put them anywhere because nobody would take them. So trying to have that conversation was really difficult, and it wasn't one that I personally would then put the families back to the JPs because that's not on me. That was my call, not to escalate that. But people were still wanting their care escalated, but were being told by medical professionals that they couldn't get it. Speaker 2: D and ACPR is a normal part of care home life, I guess. There's always a discussion with people about whether which route they would like to go. But I guess there was an impression that there was I'm not sure that's the right phrase, but a push on by the NHS to get more of these things in place. In one of our homes, we received D and A ACPRs for all of our residents that hadn't already got one in place, and we had a bit of a discussion back and forward, and we actually sent them back to the NHS. There was a restriction in terms of access to care for people in care homes. I think that was a decision that must have been made by the NHS, but that doesn't appear that wasn't a discussion that was held in the sort of full public light. It seemed to be a decision that was made very low key, not very well publicized, but was a reality of the first couple of years of the pandemic anyway.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@AamerAnwar Revelation of method: 🚨 5,000 elderly patients discharged from hospital into care homes 🚨 blanket DNR orders placed on residents 🚨 no ambulance or GP call outs where resident had a DNR order 🚨 GPs prescribed End-of-Life drugs over the phone to care home residents

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom

@covidinquirysco - Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry

Day 15 of the Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings begins today at 10 am. A Restriction Order has been placed relating to one of today's witnesses. More information and broadcast streams are available on the Inquiry's website: https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/hearing/impact-hearing-health-social-care-day-15

Impact Hearing | Health and Social Care | Day 15 | Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry Day 15 of the Scottish COVID-19 Inquiry's Health and Social Care Impact Hearings.Date: 23 November 2023Time: 10am covid19inquiry.scot

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@BrokerJonathan @biologyphenom Clip of Gillian Grant extracted from the Scottish Covid Inquiry;

@biologyphenom - Dave-independent researcher

🆕Scottish COVID inquiry|23 Nov 2023 🚨🚨Gillian discovered AFTER her grans death there was a DNR in place. A concerned Lord Brailsford-'was it signed?' 'it was in block capitals..with my name...it is NOT my signature at all' Full statement-https://www.covid19inquiry.scot/sites/default/files/ev-documents/sci-wt0142-000002.pdf https://t.co/AWf6qfg0pl

Video Transcript AI Summary
I found out there was a do not resuscitate order for my grandmother after she passed away. The order had my name on it, but it wasn't my signature. The care home had discussed the possibility of a DNR with me, but I had clearly stated I did not want one. The DNR form was incomplete because the section asking if the patient was aware of the order was left blank.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And, you subsequently ascertain that there was a do not resuscitate notice in relation to your grant. Speaker 1: That's great. Speaker 0: Can you just explain how you you came by that information? Speaker 1: We had heard that there was a possibility that there was a donor resuscitate order. After my grandmother had died, we'd heard from the solicitors that there was talk that there was a do not resuscitate order in my grant's file, but nobody had ever seen it, and so we didn't know the full facts of it. But when I actually sat with the inquiry team to give this statement, my solicitor produced the do not resuscitate order, and it had my name on it, and it was dated on the 2nd November. And it sorry? I've got a copy of it, but, it's kind of block capital letters with my name. Speaker 0: So in other words, not your normal signature? Speaker 1: Not my signature at all. Speaker 0: Was the possibility of a DNR notice ever discussed with you by the care home? Speaker 1: Yes, it was. Speaker 0: And could the care home have understood from the discussion that they had with you that you might be authorizing a DNR notice for your grandmother? Speaker 1: Absolutely not. My exact words then were categorically, I do not want to put a do not resuscitate order in place. Speaker 0: You tell us in the in paragraph 65, which is a lengthy paragraph about this, that the DNR is incomplete. Yes. How is it incomplete beyond the point that you've just clarified with the lordship about about your signature? Speaker 1: There's a section in it that, asks if the if the patient is aware of the do not resuscitate order being in place, and there's a box to tick yes or no, and neither box is ticked.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The evidence is all there In plan sight Where is the Police investigation into the unlawful deaths of thousands of Care Home residents during the ‘pandemic’ ? https://t.co/VgvyiBoa6e

TheRustler83
Posted - February 11, 2024 at 10:24 PM
Saved - February 27, 2024 at 8:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In England, there were significant excess deaths among the elderly in April 2020, with a correlation to increased doses of Midazolam. These deaths were not solely due to COVID-19. Age-standardized mortality rates doubled in April 2020 and there was another spike over Christmas/New Year 2020/21. The use of Midazolam was widespread, particularly in care homes, suggesting a systemic policy of euthanasia. The anomaly of excess deaths in April 2020 indicates the harms of lockdown measures. There is evidence of discussions about "A Good Death" involving equipment, medication, and staff administration. Similar patterns were observed in Scotland. The elderly were put on end-of-life care with Midazolam and morphine, raising questions about the existence of a deadly disease. The actual IFR of deaths attributed to COVID is 0.1%, suggesting that something other than COVID-19 protocols was causing the deaths.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Midazolam doses V Monthly Deaths (Age 75+) England 2019-2021 🚨 32,000 #ExcessDeaths in April 2020 +112% above 5-year average 🚨 Midazolam doses up +131% in April 2020 Our elderly weren’t dying from COVID- they were systemically assaulted with End-Of-Life protocols 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Midazolam doses V Excess Deaths (Age 75+) England 2019-2021 🚨 55,000 #ExcessDeaths in 2020 +20% above 5-year average (Age 75+) 🚨 60,000 Excess doses of Midazolam given in 2020 These were not ‘COVID’ deaths NICE NG163 End-of-life protocol 2/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly Modazolam doses V Age-standardised mortality rates (Age 75+) 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England 2019-2021 There is no hiding place here - age standardised rates are the gold standard - and they DOUBLED in April 2020 We also see a second correlation spike over Christmas/New Year 2020/21 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Excess Midazolam % Vs Excess Death % (Age 75+) England 2020-2021 April 2020 🟧 Midazolam +131.5% 🟦 Excess Deaths +112.8% January 2021 🟧 Midazolam +57.5% 🟦 Excess Deaths +27.7% How to create the illusion of a pandemic …. 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Source no.1 NHS OpenPrescribing #Midazolam usage, past 5 years 5/ https://openprescribing.net/chemical/1501041T0/

Page not found | OpenPrescribing openprescribing.net

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Source no.2 ONS Monthly mortality analysis 6/ https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/monthlymortalityanalysisenglandandwales

Monthly mortality analysis, England and Wales - Office for National Statistics Provisional data on death registrations and death occurrences in England and Wales, broken down by sex and age. Includes deaths due to coronavirus (COVID-19) and leading causes of death. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Credit to Dr Wilson Sy for posting his paper: ‘Excess Deaths in the United Kingdom: Midazolam and Euthanasia in the COVID-19 Pandemic’ I wanted to focus on the most vulnerable age group- the elderly- to take a deeper look at the correlation with excess 7 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377266988_Excess_Deaths_in_the_United_Kingdom_Midazolam_and_Euthanasia_in_the_COVID-19_Pandemic

ResearchGate - Temporarily Unavailable researchgate.net

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“The UK COVID-19 pandemic was iatrogenic, created with widespread and persistent use of Midazolam injections in all regions of England, particularly in care homes, under a systemic policy of euthanasia” 🟩 Monthly Midazolam use 🟥 COVID Deaths 8/ https://t.co/RD3gI7cQNK

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The anomaly of excess deaths in April 2020 is clear evidence of Lockdown harms ‘COVID’ cases were low at this time yet this was our highest month of death during the pandemic These were deaths caused by the COVID-treatment & response protocols Why else did deaths just stop? 9 https://t.co/1eDOemv2TY

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

17 April 2020 Health Secretary Matt Hancock & Dr Luke Evans MP, openly discuss what is needed for: A Good Death Telling us in plain sight You are still on the list, Matty 10/ #Midazolam

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

A Good Death needs three things: 🚨 Equipment 🚨 Medication & 🚨 The staff to administer it Dr Luke Evans MP Matt Hancock MP & Health Secretary 17th April 2020 https://t.co/vIA5zgLIvb

Video Transcript AI Summary
We have enough equipment and medication in the NHS to ensure a comfortable death. The supply chains for medications like midazolam and morphine are closely monitored to prevent shortages. Prescribing morphine per patient is being reviewed to reduce wastage. The clinical team is constantly discussing ways to optimize the supply of key medicines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, I mean, a a a good death needs 3 things. It needs equipment, it needs medication, and it needs, the staff to administer it. So in terms of equipment, a few quick questions. Do you have enough syringe drivers in the NHS to deliver medications to keep people comfortable when they're passing away? Speaker 1: Yes. We do. There was a challenge raised about this, about 8 days ago, and we resolved actually, it wasn't so as bigger challenges as was made public, and we've we've resolved that. So, yes, right now, we do. Speaker 0: And the second one is with that, but that's the the syringe drug drugs deliver medication, particularly things like midazolam and morphine. Do you have any precautions put in place to make sure we have enough of those medications to be delivered? Speaker 1: Yes. And we've got a big project to make sure that, those sorts of medications as well as the ITU medications that I spoke about earlier, the the supply chains global supply chains for those medicines are are clear. They are in fact, though those medicines are made in a relatively small number of factories around the world. So it is a delicate supply chain, and we are in, contact with the whole supply chain. Speaker 0: And in line with that, morphine is currently prescribed per patient. The reason to do that is to stop it being abused, so I have to prescribe it for mister Hancock. However, in this situation, if you're going into a health care home, you may not want to waste precious things like morphine. Have you considered the laws around morphine prescribing for doctors and health care professionals so that there isn't waste? Speaker 1: That's something that we keep under review. I've looked at that particular point to reduce wastage of key medicines, and it's something that the supply chain the supply team, sorry, in, in the department and, the clinical team, talk about all the time. I don't know if that's JV T's part of the clinical team, and he may want to say more. Speaker 0: Thank you. I've I've nothing really nothing really to add on that. Okay. Okay.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Scotland 2020/2021 🟪 Excess deaths in care homes 📊 Midazolam usage 3,000 excess deaths during lockdown - blamed on ‘COVID’ After lockdown ‘COVID’ disappeared for the summer - returning after the FLU vaccine roll out in September 2020 https://t.co/OU1yK3Xi4U

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Altogether now …. https://t.co/Cw1eIS8koi

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

https://t.co/JkGwRBsXY9

@biologyphenom - Dave

🆕Neil Oliver|15 Feb 2024 💣💣Truth bombs -'We know now the elderly were put on end of life care in hospitals and in care homes... -'They were dosed up with midazolam and morphine and hustled to the exit' -'What if there was no deadly disease at all?' 👍Thanks @thecoastguy https://t.co/x3tF8ze7RS

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the true cause of the high death toll during the pandemic, suggesting it may not have been due to a deadly disease but rather the measures put in place. They ponder if COVID-19 was just a rebranding of existing illnesses to instill fear and control. The speaker raises concerns about loss of freedom, censorship, and demonization of non-compliant individuals.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think about how we know now that the elderly were put on end of life care. In hospitals and in care homes, they were dosed up with midazolam and morphine and hustled to the exit of life and how those fatalities, those large numbers of the elderly all dead at once made the death tolls for SARS CoV 2 so apparently frightening. And I think about the experimental gene therapies that were all but mandated for billions of people around the world. I think about all of it and I wonder, what if, what if there was no deadly disease at all? What if there was no disease to fear? No danger? And people died. Before anybody, you know, reminds me in the comments or whatever, people died. I know that. But people die in their tens of thousands every year from outbreaks of seasonal viral illness, Flu. What have you. What if COVID was actually nothing new? Just more of the usual rebranded as something new? Given a scary new name? What if? What if all we got were not the consequences of a deadly disease but the effects of the measures that were put in place because of the so called pandemic. What if? What if there was no pandemic at all? Just a fiction that enabled people with an agenda to take control of the world, to erase freedom, to censor inconvenient truth, to demonize an awkward minority of people that wouldn't comply, People who had questions they wanted answered.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For those 32,000 excess deaths in April to have been ‘COVID’ deaths the IFR needed to be 25% The actual IFR of deaths attributed to COVID is now known to be 0.1% Something else was killing those old folks Was it the COVID-protocols rather than ‘COVID’ Read NG163 https://t.co/Vt22UlwT6l

TheRustler83
Posted - February 21, 2024 at 12:49 AM
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 8:47 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Guys, why aren't you doing CPR? We've been told not to. He arrested en route 20 minutes ago. We're just in aprons... we can't do CPR. We just had to let him go. I'm so sorry... we tried everything we could en route. How to do CPR on an adult. COVID-19 update. Dr. Hilary Jones demonstrates CPR on National TV with Lorraine Kelly. "Because of COVID... cover their nose and mouth." England 2020. 70,000 excess deaths. Majority of excess deaths were at home and in care homes. Hospitals and GP surgeries shut their doors to patients. Death by Denied Medical Care.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

👩‍⚕️ Guys, why aren’t you doing CPR? 🚑 We’ve been told not to… 🚑 He arrested en route 20 minutes ago. We’re just in aprons… we can’t do CPR 🚑 We just had to let him go … 👩‍⚕️I’m so sorry …we tried everything we could en route… #Breathtaking let’s a bit of truth slip out

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

How to do CPR on an adult COVID-19 update https://www.lbc.co.uk/hot-topics/Covid/cpr-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-safe-mouth-to/

How do I do CPR during the Covid-19 pandemic, and is it safe? With the threat of Covid-19 in the UK many are asking is it still safe to do CPR on people? And should you change the way you do CPR? lbc.co.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Dr Hilary Jones …

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Dr. Hilary Jones demonstrating CPR on National TV with Lorraine Kelly …. 👨‍⚕️“Because of COVID … cover their nose and mouth….” https://t.co/sRA6ZwK60U

Video Transcript AI Summary
We recommend doing continuous cardiac compressions during CPR, especially during COVID times. If unsure about COVID exposure, cover the mouth and nose while performing compressions. Keep shouting for help and wait for the ambulance to arrive. Covering the mouth and nose will not suffocate the person, but rather help force air in and out of the lungs.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that's CPR. Right. Currently, we're encouraging people to do 30 compressions to 2 breaths. But because of COVID, if you don't know if someone could have been exposed to COVID Of course. Cover the mouth and nose. Just carry on with the cardiac compressions. Yeah. You shouted for help. You're waiting for an ambulance. You just carry on until the ambulance is there. To cover the mouth and nose like that, though? Yes. Yeah. It it Alright. It is. I mean, the the the you're not going to be suffocating them. Okay. You're going to be forcing air in and out of the lungs by doing

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

England 2020 70,000 #ExcessDeaths 32,000 AT HOME +35% 25,000 Care Homes +30% 17,000 Hospitals +10% The majority of excess deaths were at home & in care homes Hospitals & GP surgeries shut their doors to patients Death by Denied Medical Care https://t.co/ngbTtTWxKV

TheRustler83
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 12:13 PM
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
National Records of Scotland have removed 5,000 excess deaths since the COVID-vaccine rollout, raising questions about what caused the excess and if it was related to the vaccines. The baseline mortality rate has also been artificially increased, which removes excess deaths and raises concerns about government accountability. Despite elevated mortality rates, politicians are denying the existence of excess deaths. The ONS has also changed the way excess deaths are calculated, removing 27,000 deaths since 2020. This raises suspicions about the harms of lockdown and the vaccine. The same trick is being played UK-wide. History is being rewritten, and those involved in COVID crimes are being rewarded. The truth is evident in age-standardized mortality rates, which show excess mortality across all age groups. Northern Ireland has also eliminated excess deaths by adjusting the baseline.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿National Records of Scotland have today removed all of the #ExcessDeaths from 2023 Removing 5,000 excess deaths since the roll-out of the COVID-vaccine .. Why? What are they hiding? What caused the excess? Was it the vaccines? 1 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Records of Scotland have revised excess death numbers for 2023, reducing them from 3,329 to 360. A total of 5,142 excess deaths have been removed over the pandemic, lowering the total from 19,500 to 14,400. They have changed their methodology, using a statistical model instead of a 5-year average, potentially hiding post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. The new method shows abnormal spikes in deaths in 2019 and 2022-2023. Questions arise about the cause of these extra deaths, with speculation about the vaccine's role. Translation: The National Records of Scotland have adjusted excess death figures for 2023, reducing them significantly. They have changed their calculation method, potentially concealing post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. Anomalies in the data raise questions about the cause of these additional deaths, including speculation about the vaccine's impact.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, guys. The National Records of Scotland have today deleted all the excess deaths for 2023. This is in line with the new methodology set out this week by the ONS for calculating excess deaths. So for 2023, using the old method, we had 3,329 deaths excess deaths in Scotland last year. Using the new methodology, they've now reduced that to just 360 excess deaths, removing almost 3,000 excess deaths from the death count. Over the course of the pandemic, they've removed a total of 5,142 excess deaths, reducing the total excess from 19,500 down to 14,400. What they are doing now, guys, is they are hiding the excess deaths that have occurred after the vaccine rollout. So how have they done this? Well, traditionally, NRS and ONS used a 5 year rolling average for calculating their baselines. Now that wasn't without its flaws, but it's a standard process used all over the world. But what I've done now is they've banned the 5 year average and have replaced that with a statistical model, which brings in all kinds of variables that could be manipulated to increase the level of the baseline and in doing so, reduce the level of the excess. Now if you look at the the black dash line here as the old traditional 5 year average method. Now you can see it's rising steady as the death columns in blue here rise and fall. So it's tracking what was going on. But the new method is red line. You can see that it's abnormally high for some reason in 2019 before the pandemic and also spikes from 2022 to 2023 for no apparent reason. This is after the pandemic. Now remember, the World Health Organization declared the pandemic over in May 2023. So why in Scotland are deaths continuing to be high? Higher than pre pandemic levels by around 5000 to 6000 a year. What's causing these extra deaths? Is it the vaccine?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

NRS just deleted 5,000 excess deaths in Scotland 2 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The modelers adjust for population increase in Scotland due to low birth rates compared to death rates, resulting in a declining population. Net migration is the only factor maintaining population levels, with migrants generally under 40 years old. Despite this, deaths are rising while the population is falling, leading to speculation about the role of vaccines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now one thing the modelers will talk talk about is they're having to do this model to adjust for population increase. In green, you see the population level in Scotland over the last 5 years. That is almost static around 5,400,000 to 5,500,000. Now the population in Scotland is static because birth rates are currently lower than death rates. So there's less births than there is death, meaning the population is naturally in decline. And the only way population is increasing is through net migration. And that's the only way Scotland is maintaining its population at the moment. All of this is our fix. None of the migrants are coming in here are aging the population. Migrants will generally be under 40 years of age, so they're not putting strain on the deaths or the death figures. So why are our deaths continuing to rise when our natural population is falling? It's not the population. It's not aging. It's something else. Is it the vaccines?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The pre-pandemic 5-year average mortality was 57,000 deaths per year The NRS have now raised that baseline to 63,000 deaths per year +6,000 +10.5% This artificially increases expected deaths and removes excess deaths ..and with it questions to Government on #ExcessDeaths 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The population of Scotland has increased by just 0.2% from 2019 to 2023 That being the case, there is no justification to increase mortality rates by 10.5% We have also suffered 20,000 extra deaths of our elderly during the ‘pandemic’ meaning death rates should now be lower 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘FIX’ is in …. Our politicians will now deny that there is any #ExcessDeath even though mortality rates remain elevated above pre-pandemic average by ~10% We need to raise awareness of this scam …5,000 deaths removed by the stroke of a pen…. END https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/about-us/contact-us

Contact Us | National Records of Scotland National Records of Scotland nrscotland.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Review of the ONS change in methodology for the whole of the UK🇬🇧

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨The ONS announced they are changing the way #ExcessDeaths are calculated The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿since 2020 7,000 from 2020 20,000 from 2021-2023 Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine? 1/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes - Office for National Statistics Overview of a new method for estimating excess deaths across UK countries, and a comparison of estimates from the new and current methods. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Same trick being played UK wide by the ONS🇬🇧⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

"Every record has been destroyed or falsified, every book rewritten, every picture has been repainted, every statue and street building has been renamed, every date has been altered & the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped" George Orwell

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Rewarding those for services to COVID crimes …. Previous Experience: “Producing the slides and graphics for the UK Covid-19 daily briefing”

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The excess-death-.deniers will often claim that the 5YA is a poor baseline and that Age-standardised-mortality-rates (ASMR) are a better measure Here is the ASMR & excess-ASMR for 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 A clear signal that mortality is in excess, across all age groups The truth is like a lion

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Northern Ireland showing the same ‘kick’ in baseline into 2023 - with ALL of their #ExcessDeaths eliminated by one keystroke …💻

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For 2023, NISRA have now added an extra 1,000 deaths to the baseline, following the new ONS guidance This eliminates the 768 #ExcessDeaths for the year - diluting the high mortality levels still being experienced after the pandemic 2/ https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deaths/death-statistics

Death Statistics NISRA provisional death statistics are based on death registration information collected by the General Register Office. Information on the quality nisra.gov.uk
TheRustler83
Posted - February 22, 2024 at 9:36 PM
Saved - February 23, 2024 at 7:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency (NISRA) has adjusted their records, removing 2,000 excess deaths. The new baseline shows a negative excess of -286 deaths. NISRA added 1,000 deaths to the baseline based on new guidance, eliminating the previously reported excess deaths. The methodology used by NISRA and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) is being criticized for attributing the increase in death rates to changes in population rather than acknowledging excess deaths. Similar adjustments have been made in Scotland and England & Wales, raising questions about what is being hidden and the impact of lockdowns and vaccines.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency #NISRA have just deleted 2,000 #ExcessDeaths from their records In 2023, NI suffered 17,254 deaths 768 more than the 5YA +4.7% above average After raising the new baseline to 17,540, a negative excess of -286 is now reported 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For 2023, NISRA have now added an extra 1,000 deaths to the baseline, following the new ONS guidance This eliminates the 768 #ExcessDeaths for the year - diluting the high mortality levels still being experienced after the pandemic 2/ https://www.nisra.gov.uk/statistics/deaths/death-statistics

Death Statistics NISRA provisional death statistics are based on death registration information collected by the General Register Office. Information on the quality nisra.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The new ONS/NISRA methodology claims the increase in death rates is due to changes in population From 2020 to 2023 the NI population has increased by just 0.8% The NEW baseline mortality rate has increased by 9% in the same period This model is FLAWED to hide excess deaths 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Same truck being played in Scotland🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿National Records of Scotland have today removed all of the #ExcessDeaths from 2023 Removing 5,000 excess deaths since the roll-out of the COVID-vaccine .. Why? What are they hiding? What caused the excess? Was it the vaccines? 1 of 2

Video Transcript AI Summary
The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them from 3,329 to 360. They've removed 5,142 excess deaths since the pandemic began, lowering the total from 19,500 to 14,400. The new methodology uses a statistical model instead of a 5-year average, potentially hiding post-vaccine rollout excess deaths. The new method shows abnormal spikes in deaths in 2019 and after the pandemic. This raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role. Translation: The National Records of Scotland revised excess deaths for 2023, reducing them significantly. They've removed over 5,000 excess deaths since the pandemic began. The new method raises questions about the cause of these extra deaths, with some speculating about the vaccine's role.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, guys. The National Records of Scotland have today deleted all the excess deaths for 2023. This is in line with the new methodology set out this week by the ONS for calculating excess deaths. So for 2023, using the old method, we had 3,329 deaths excess deaths in Scotland last year. Using the new methodology, they've now reduced that to just 360 excess deaths, removing almost 3,000 excess deaths from the death count. Over the course of the pandemic, they've removed a total of 5,142 excess deaths, reducing the total excess from 19,500 down to 14,400. What they are doing now, guys, is they are hiding the excess deaths that have occurred after the vaccine rollout. So how have they done this? Well, traditionally, NRS and ONS used a 5 year rolling average for calculating their baselines. Now that wasn't without its flaws, but it's a standard process used all over the world. But what I've done now is they've banned the 5 year average and have replaced that with a statistical model, which brings in all kinds of variables that could be manipulated to increase the level of the baseline and in doing so, reduce the level of the excess. Now if you look at the the black dash line here as the old traditional 5 year average method. Now you can see it's rising steady as the death columns in blue here rise and fall. So it's tracking what was going on. But the new method is red line. You can see that it's abnormally high for some reason in 2019 before the pandemic and also spikes from 2022 to 2023 for no apparent reason. This is after the pandemic. Now remember, the World Health Organization declared the pandemic over in May 2023. So why in Scotland are deaths continuing to be high? Higher than pre pandemic levels by around 5000 to 6000 a year. What's causing these extra deaths? Is it the vaccine?

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

England & Wales 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🚛⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨The ONS announced they are changing the way #ExcessDeaths are calculated The new ‘Statistical Model’ method has removed 27,000 excess deaths in🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿&🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿since 2020 7,000 from 2020 20,000 from 2021-2023 Are they hiding the harms of lockdown & the vaccine? 1/https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/causesofdeath/articles/estimatingexcessdeathsintheukmethodologychanges/february2024

Estimating excess deaths in the UK, methodology changes - Office for National Statistics Overview of a new method for estimating excess deaths across UK countries, and a comparison of estimates from the new and current methods. ons.gov.uk
TheRustler83
Posted - November 1, 2023 at 7:57 PM
Saved - November 2, 2023 at 2:27 PM

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

@AllisonPearson Alison, if you haven’t already done so, I would suggest you read NG163 - and that will explain a lot of the horror treatment protocols we saw during Lockdown NICE/NHS have buried this document & replaced it with NG191 Still available in archives; https://wales.pallcare.info/files/docs/COVID-19%20documents/NICE%20covid19-rapid-guideline-managing-symptoms-including-at-the-end-of-life-in-the-community-pdf-66141899069893.pdf

Oops, something lost Oops, looks like the page is lost. Start your website on the cheap. wales.pallcare.info
TheRustler83
Posted - September 7, 2023 at 1:05 PM
Saved - September 10, 2023 at 7:44 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scotland has reported a significant increase in deaths, surpassing the pandemic's peak. A total of 4,282 excess deaths have occurred in 2023, with various causes. Cancer, circulatory issues, dementia, respiratory problems, and other unidentified factors have contributed to this rise. These excess deaths have been consistent for the past 18 months, particularly during the Autumn-Winter inoculation period. Analysis using a 10-year baseline reveals a staggering 16,000 excess deaths since August 12, 2020. The reasons behind this alarming trend remain a mystery.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨BREAKING: Scotland confirms 4,282 more deaths than expected in 2023!! 11% more deaths than the pre-pandemic 5-year average Deaths are HIGHER now than at any point in the pandemic What is causing these #ExcessDeaths Humza Yousaf? https://nrscotland.gov.uk/statistics-and-data/statistics/statistics-by-theme/vital-events/general-publications/weekly-deaths-registered-in-scotland

Deaths registered weekly in Scotland | National Records of Scotland National Records of Scotland nrscotland.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨 4,282 Excess Deaths in Scotland so far in 2023 #Cancer 445 excess deaths +4% #Circulatory deaths 535 excess +5.3% #Dementia 158 excess +4% #Respiratory 572 excess +13.8% #OTHER 🤷🏻‍♂️ 1651 excess +17.5% What is this mysterious ‘OTHER’ that is killing thousands of Scots? 2/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

CONSTANT #ExcessDeath for the past 18 months In the last 3 years we have seen a SPIKE in deaths around week 35-40 as we head into the Autumn/Winter inoculation period … 3/ https://t.co/KvyuKgi3B8

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

CONSTANT excess deaths EVERY week in Scotland …🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿⬇️ https://t.co/ByTP8fQyQa

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

More analysis, using the 10 year pre-pandemic average as a baseline ….⬇️

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

16,000 excess deaths since 8/12/2020 ⬇️

TheRustler83
Posted - August 25, 2023 at 8:53 AM
Saved - August 30, 2023 at 7:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The latest data from the ONS reveals COVID-19 deaths in England by vaccination status. Out of 8,330 deaths, 95% were vaccinated, while 436 deaths were among the unvaccinated. Surprisingly, the unvaccinated had a lower death rate than those who received four doses. Vaccination rates across the adult population were confirmed at 81.6% for dose 1, 78.7% for dose 2, and 64.3% for dose 3. The Spring Booster campaign saw a 155x higher mortality rate for the 4-dose vaccinated. The ONS admitted errors in the data, and now they've stopped reporting it altogether. The truth behind excess deaths remains unclear.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

🚨🚨 The ONS has finally released the COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ for 2023 in England🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 8,330 deaths were #Vaccinated (95%) 436 deaths were #Unvaccinated (5%) And STILL our Government pretends the jag prevents death with COVID…💉 https://ons.gov.uk/releases/deathsinvolvingcovid19byvaccinationstatusenglanddeathsoccurringbetween1april2021and31may2023 1/

Deaths involving COVID-19 by vaccination status, England: deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19) by vaccination status, broken down by age group. Deaths occurring between 1 April 2021 and 31 May 2023 in England. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

COVID-19 ‘Deaths by Vaccination Status Data’ England, 2023 #Unvaccinated 436 deaths 5% 1 dose 💉 62 deaths 0.7% 2 dose💉💉 334 deaths 3.8% 3 dose💉💉💉 1,032 deaths 11.8% 4 dose 💉💉💉💉 6,902 deaths 78.7% They say the vaccine protects against death from COVID? 2/ https://t.co/GyHqifJf9Z

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘Base Rate Fallacy’ crew will no doubt claim +95% of the population are vaccinated-they are not Actual vaccination rates across the adult population 18+ was confirmed from NHS vaccination records: 81.6% dose 1 78.7% dose 2 64.3% dose 3 9M #Unvaccinated Source: 🇬🇧UK HSA 3/ https://t.co/EIGKvFBg9j

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 18-39 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 4/ https://t.co/uXrlkynZpA

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Monthly age-standardised mortality rates (ASMR) By vaccination status for all cause deaths, per 100,000 person-years, England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Age 40-49 The #Unvaccinated had a lower rate of death than 4 dose vaccinated 💉💉💉💉 5/ https://t.co/vVORa2ikYx

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS confirms 201,564 deaths to 31st May 2023 194,506 were vaccinated (96.5%) 7,058 were unvaccinated (3.5%) The unvaccinated make up 18% of the adult population, yet only 3.5% of all-cause deaths & just 5% of ‘COVID’ deaths.. So, what is causing all of the #ExcessDeaths? 6/ https://t.co/zBwxGt5HfE

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Can the Prime Minister or Health Secretary answer this simple question ??

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The Spring BOOSTER campaign ran from March - September 2022 During that period, the Age-standardised mortality rate for the 4-dose vaccinated, was 1.55 x Higher than the #unvaccinated This should have made no difference to all-cause mortality rates, so why the increase? 7/ https://t.co/LtsSpwtO3y

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Vaccination records from the NHS⬇️ 45M took Dose 1 43M took Dose 2 34M took Dose 3 (Booster) 22.5M took Dose 4+ The population of England is 57M Anyone saying 95% of the country took the vaccine is lying 9/ https://t.co/TvJbSj96G5

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS admit their first error within the data Expect more This is what happens when data-sets are manipulated by hand, with unforeseen consequences popping up downstream ….. 10/ https://t.co/qPLj1kXt1O

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

ONS now confirming they will no longer be reporting ‘Death by Vaccination Status’ data … This is what happens when the data does not support their narrative They bury it If this data was positive for the vaccine, bet your life they’d be shouting it from the rooftops…📢 https://t.co/cU5hMreLlr

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Those 8,330 deaths are amongst 52,000 COVID deaths in the #Vaccinated since 1st April 2021 …. who’s fooling WHO here ….⬇️💥💥💥

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

💥 END GAME💥

TheRustler83
Posted - August 26, 2023 at 11:49 PM
Saved - August 28, 2023 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
COVID deaths among the vaccinated: 52,000. Deaths among the unvaccinated: 8,850. Vaccines don't prevent infection or transmission, but they do prevent death. Pfizer and AstraZeneca claimed 100% protection, which was proven false. Vaccination rates don't affect death rates. Vaccine efficacy against death is disputed. Vaccines didn't provide immunity as promised, with millions testing positive. The truth behind vaccine claims exposed.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

♦️52,000 COVID-19 deaths amongst the #Vaccinated 🔷 8,850 COVID-19 deaths amongst the #Unvaccinated 1st April 2021 - 31st May 2023 England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 I thought they said the vaccine stopped death from COVID 🤷🏻‍♂️? Source: ONS (Table 5) https://ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/deathsbyvaccinationstatusengland

Deaths by vaccination status, England - Office for National Statistics Age-standardised mortality rates for deaths involving coronavirus (COVID-19), non-COVID-19 deaths and all deaths by vaccination status, broken down by age group. ons.gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla telling us all that the Pfizer jag gave us 100% protection ….. 😬 He has deleted that tweet now 2/ https://t.co/uTp9J8IQzF

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

AstraZeneca press statement telling us their vaccine gave 100% protection against; Severe disease, hospitalisation and death …. Absolute lies 3/ https://t.co/fwUFHIQaHv

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Dr Sara Kayat telling 2 Million #ThisMorning viewers that the COVID vaccine was 100% effective against hospitalisation and death Philip Schofield couldn’t believe it either …. Dr Raj & Dr Hilary would spill the same pish over morning TV that day … we keep receipts 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Here is then Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, confirming that - NO the vaccines don’t work to prevent infection or transmission …. But they DO prevent death with COVID Turns out he lied to 52,000 dead English men and women… 5/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

For the mutts claiming that COVID deaths are only higher, because so many more are vaccinated Here are the death rates per 100,000 population …. Enjoy yer swim 🏊🏻🌊

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The ‘base rate fallacy’ fallacy … Let’s imagine that 95% of the population are vaccinated* And 95% of COVID deaths are amongst the #Vaccinated What that gives you is: ZERO MEASURABLE BENEFIT Your ‘efficacy’ is ZERO…. *70% are vaccinated, not 95% https://t.co/sER8PMmOpp

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The vaccine-lovers will still claim that the ‘vaccine’ provides ~90% efficacy against death with COVID That means, if we didn’t have the vaccine, those 52,000 deaths would have been 520,000 deaths …😬😬 WHO is doing their math, Neil Ferguson ?? Absolute nonsense https://t.co/HMDBgURhwa

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Pharma & Government originally told us that the COVID vaccines gave us immunity from catching COVID Within 4 months of the vaccine roll out, Millions of Brits started testing positive for ‘COVID’ after their COVID vaccine Testing positive at 4X Higher the rate of unvaccinated

TheRustler83
Posted - April 12, 2023 at 9:18 PM
Saved - April 12, 2023 at 11:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The UK MHRA stopped reporting Yellow Card figures for COVID-19 vaccine side effects in December 2022. The last set of fatal events published by age showed 2,362 reports with a fatal outcome received for COVID-19 vaccines by patients up to and including 23 November 2022. PfizerBioNTech monovalent had 870 fatal events, AstraZeneca had 1,368, and Moderna monovalent had 89. The MHRA received 125,000 serious adverse events from PfizerBioNTech monovalent and 192,000 from AstraZeneca. The Moderna monovalent SpikeVax had 31,000 serious adverse events.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The MHRA has stopped reporting the Yellow Card figures for the COVID19 vaccine side effects Fatal event summary: Pfizer/BioNTech monovalent 870 Pfizer/BioNTech bivalent 33 AstraZeneca 1,368 Moderna monovalent 89 Moderna bivalent 41 Brand unspecified 72 Total deaths: 2,473

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The MHRA stopped publishing the weekly summary in December 2022 Last set of fatal events published, by age: 2,362 reports with a fatal outcome received for COVID-19 Vaccines by patient up to and including 23 November 2022 Source: UK Government #MHRA

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Pfizer monovalent (U.K. MHRA) 85.3 M doses 125,000 serious adverse events 870 fatal events reported 10 deaths reported in children aged 10-19. Five of the reports submitted by their Doctor - these are not submitted by ‘cranks’ 3/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

AstraZeneca (UK MHRA) 49.2 M doses 192,000 serious adverse events 1,368 fatal events Fatal event reported in: 1 in 36,000 doses or 1 in 18,000 person vaccinated This vaccine was unofficially pulled in July 2021 - and it wasn’t used as a booster 4/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Moderna monovalent #SpikeVax 16.6 M doses 31,000 serious adverse events 89 fatal events Only used for 1.7M doses of Dose 1, but 13.3M doses of booster - replacing AZ, and introducing pick n mix vaccine doses for the sleep walkers … 5/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Pfizer Bivalent (two strain booster for over 50s) 11.5 M doses 3.242 serious ADRs 33 fatal events (had to be 3-3) This was used for Dose 4 / Dose 5 boosters in 2022/23 For millions, it would have been their 3rd different type of jag. Fannies 6/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Moderna Bivalent (two strain booster for over 70s) 9.3 M doses 3,735 serious ADRs 41 fatal events This was used for Dose 4 / Dose 5 boosters in 2022/23 7/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Brand unspecified 1,716 serious ADRs 72 fatal events reported The fact the vaccine brand was unknown in 72 deaths is evidence that informed consent was not recorded 8/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

“It is estimated that only 10% of serious reactions and between 2 and 4% of non-serious reactions are reported” From the UK Governments own #YellowCard reporting site 9/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

A reminder that Public Health Scotland counted anyone that died within 21 days of a vaccine as being #Unvaccinated We had huge ‘Covid’ deaths in Jan/Feb 2021 amongst our care home population - just jagged For PHE it was 14 days Vax deaths hidden as ‘Covid’ deaths ? 10/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Source: U.K. Government MHRA I’m boring myself now Good night END https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions

Coronavirus (COVID-19) vaccines adverse reactions A report covering adverse reactions to approved COVID-19 vaccines gov.uk

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Department of Health ‘Green Book’ - the bible on vaccination guidance Chapter 14a ‘Covid’ Infection Fatality Ratio for someone aged 15-44 = 0.0% Why the FCUK was the vaccine given to kids FFS!!! https://allcatsrgrey.org.uk/wp/download/public_health/vaccination/Green_book_chapter_16April2021.pdf - THE END - https://allcatsrgrey.org.uk/wp/download/public_health/vaccination/Green_book_chapter_16April2021.pdf -

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The U.K. Column used to track the Yellow Card data - it is now only upto date to September 2022 However, it is still useful for summarising individual reactions by type 12/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Miscarriage / loss of pregnancy before 20 weeks ……

TheRustler83
Posted - March 30, 2023 at 11:17 AM
Saved - April 1, 2023 at 3:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Scotland has seen a 56th consecutive week of excess deaths, with 1739 already in 2023. COVID is only attributed to 28 of the excess deaths. The total number of deaths registered in Scotland in week 12 of 2023 was 1370, 19 above the 5-year average. The cause of the hundreds of excess deaths each week is unknown.

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

The total number of deaths registered in #Scotland in week 12 of 2023 (20th to 26th March) was 1,370 (219 or 19% above the 5-year average) Excess deaths soaring again as we hit a 56th consecutive week of excess It’s not Covid driving it- so what is it Humza? #IrnBruGraph 1/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

#Scotland 28/2/2022 - 20/3/2023 70,004 all-cause deaths 🟧 6,441 excess deaths +10.1% 🟦 2,131 deaths involving ‘COVID’ 🟧1,739 excess deaths already in 2023 🟦 only 494 attributed to ‘Covid’ (28%) What is driving the rest of the excess, Humza ? 2/

@TheRustler83 - Rustler

Scotland has now reported a 56th consecutive week of excess death An extra 6,441 deaths in just over a year An extra 1,739 deaths in 2023 ‘COVID’ only attributed to 28% of the excess What is causing hundreds of excess deaths each week in ? And it’s rising again 3/

View Full Interactive Feed