reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @TheStormRedux
reSee.it AI Summary
I joined Maria Bartiromo to discuss the Comey indictment and the possibility of Grand Conspiracy charges against numerous individuals in the U.S. I believe Comey should consider himself fortunate compared to others like Roger Stone and General Flynn. However, he may not feel so lucky if superseding indictments and conspiracy charges arise soon. Ultimately, I think there are about two dozen people who could face these serious charges for their actions over the past several years. Interestingly, Pam Bondi was supposed to join us but didn't end up being interviewed.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Devin Nunes, Chairman of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, just joined Maria Bartiromo to discuss the Comey indictment and potential Grand Conspiracy charges against “two dozen characters in the United States.” Nunes thinks James Comey should consider himself lucky that he wasn’t treated like @RogerJStoneJr and @GenFlynn. However, Comey might not be feeling so lucky here shortly if there are superseding indictments & Grand Conspiracy charges coming soon. “I would just lastly say this about this indictment, he’s also going to be very lucky if there’s not a superseding indictment. But I’d say most importantly, he will be lucky if there is not a grand conspiracy charge brought - which is really what should be brought against probably about two dozen characters in the United States over the last seven or eight years.” Interesting side note: Pam Bondi was scheduled to be on with Maria as well, but ended up not being interviewed 🤔
Video Transcript AI Summary
Devin: Comey should consider himself lucky, Maria. Not treated like Roger Stone... not ambushed Flynn... Comey has long been a liar, a leaker. He's dishonest. He ruined the FBI. He's going to be lucky if there's not a superseded indictment, but most importantly, he will be lucky if there is not a grand conspiracy charge brought, which is really what should be brought against probably about two dozen characters, in The United States, over the last seven, eight years. On the conspiracy charge, the statute of limitations does not apply if it's a conspiracy that's still going on. There were 30,000 emails that Clinton had that Clinton was worried would come out before the two thousand sixteen election. And then Clinton plan was to say that the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians. It's all true. That's all happened. That's, like, the quintessential definition of conspiracy. Dozens more should be indicted. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a kind of grand conspiracy case. They lied to Congress, lied to the FBI, misled the American people. The victim is President Trump and his family. Raided Mar A Lago. We need answers to that.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Devin, thanks very much for being here this morning. Give us your reaction to the indictment of Jim Comey.
Speaker 1: I think Comey should consider himself lucky, Maria. Number one, that he wasn't treated like Roger Stone was treated, who had a very similar charge where they actually raided his home at 6AM, drug him out. And that was before they had actually called the CNN cameras so that they couldn't go and get it all on camera. So that didn't happen to him. Secondly, what also didn't happen to him is what happened to General Flynn where where Comey himself admitted that they ambushed Flynn in the White House, charged him on very similar charges even though the FBI agents themselves said that they didn't believe that Flynn had lied.
And, oh, by the way, that information had leaked out on General Flynn that they then misled the American public about what was what actually General Flynn said. So, look, Comey has long been a liar, a leaker. He's dishonest. He ruined the FBI. And I would just lastly say this about this indictment is he's gonna also going to be very lucky if there's not a superseded indictment.
But I'd say most importantly, he will be lucky if there is not a grand conspiracy charge brought, which is really what should be brought against probably about two dozen characters, in The United States, over the last seven, eight years.
Speaker 0: So that's what I wanna talk about, the conspiracy charge. Will that come and what does that mean, conspiracy charge? Because John Ratcliffe also brought that up to me saying the statute of limitations does not apply if it's a conspiracy that's still going on.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that's right. And so when you go back and look at this at 50,000 feet, what are we really talking about here? What what actually happened that they were all involved in? It all it all goes back to really one thing, and that was that there were 30,000 emails that Clinton had that Clinton was worried would come out before the two thousand sixteen election. And then if those came out, it would make her unelectable.
That's what this is all about. Everything goes back to that. And then what happened is is that Comey and company and all of them got involved in the so called Clinton plan, which if you remember the Clinton plan was to do what? To say that the Trump campaign was colluding with the Russians and that's how the emails got out. It's all true.
That's all happened. That's that's, like, the quintessential definition of conspiracy.
Speaker 0: Unbelievable. So I wanna know from you is who else do you believe should be indicted? You just said there should be dozens more who should be, affected here. And also, the, chance of further charges against Jim Comey. Is it just lying and obstruction or something more?
Stay right there. We wanna talk about that when we come back. I'm with Devin Nunes this morning, and we'll be right back. Is number one, should there be more charges against Jim Comey? And number two, should there be more indictments?
What do you think?
Speaker 1: So on Comey, I think the answer is for this, it's very specific and it's over whether or not he lied on this one part. The larger part is whether or not you can bring a a kind of grand conspiracy case. And you know, people talk about, you know, there's the law which is lying to Congress, lying to the FBI, but there's also a term in there called misleading. And what a lot of these guys did is they made up things using intelligence that didn't exist, but acted like they knew something that actually wasn't there, and they lied and misled the American people. By doing that, all the times they testified before Congress, the Senate, they lied over and over and again with this, oh, we've seen something.
We can't tell you about it because it's classified. But what do we now know by everything that's been declassified is, is that they didn't have any intelligence on Russia colluding with Trump. In fact, the only intelligence that they had is that the Russians were very well aware of Clinton's plan, and they actually not only thought Clinton was gonna win, but likely preferred that she would win. So going back to the cover up of her missing emails that by the way are still missing, they all got involved in this plan. They all got the FBI exercise.
They were able to go spy on the Trump campaign. They were able to then get the molar witch hunt going that then led to the Ukraine. Remember that dies off, then you have the fake whistleblower and the Ukraine impeachment. I mean, needs a whole investigation in and of itself. We now know the latest information that happened on January 6 now with agents that were out there, the pipe bombs, all this other stuff that is who broke the windows that I asked when I was in Congress, I really wanted to know that.
But most importantly, Maria, who's the victim in this? The victim is President Trump and his family. Yeah. Raided Mar A Lago. That's a problem, and we need answers to that.
reSee.it AI Summary
When Team Trump needs to make a strong point, they showcase Stephen Miller, who articulates the idea of a vast conspiracy against the government. He emphasizes that this was a coup orchestrated by the intelligence community and the Democratic Party, particularly targeting President Trump. Miller asserts that recent revelations from the DNI and FBI confirm the premeditated nature of this conspiracy, which he believes meets the criteria for seditious conspiracy and insurrection. He calls for accountability for all involved to reclaim democracy.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
When Team Trump needs to hammer a point home to the American public, they put Stephen Miller front & center - and damn he does a great job 🔥 Listen to him explain how massive this Grand Conspiracy is and how he has full faith in the DOJ to bring accountability to the criminals who perpetrated it. “It was a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government. A coup carried out by the intelligence apparatus of this country, by the deep state, by Hillary Clinton and the Democrat party. The new information that has been revealed by the DNI and by the FBI eliminates any scintilla of doubt about the intention, the premeditation, the planning and the orchestration of this conspiracy. It meets all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy against the United States. It meets the criminal elements of an insurrection. It meets the criminal elements of a conspiracy against the government and the criminal elements of the conspiracy to deprive citizens of their civil rights under color of law… Because it is a conspiracy, every single individual actor is now part of that conspiracy. So that includes Brennan and Clapper and Comey and Hillary and Schiff and everybody else who knowingly and willfully perpetrated this plot, this coup, this conspiracy, this scheme against President Trump & the government of the U.S., and now is the time and the hour and the moment for accountability so that we can reclaim this democracy.” Good Sunday Morning! 🙂
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Russia collusion hoax against president Trump remains the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country. It was a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government, a coup carried out by the intelligence apparatus of this country, by the deep state, by Hillary Clinton, the Democrat party. The new information revealed eliminates any scintilla of doubt about the intention, the premeditation, the planning and orchestration of this conspiracy. It meets all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy against The United States, it meets the criminal elements of an insurrection, a conspiracy against the government and a conspiracy to deprive citizens of their civil rights under color of law. One egregious felony after another. Every single actor is now part of that conspiracy, including Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Hillary, Schiff, and others. There must be accountability to reclaim this democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Your reaction to what was released this week.
Speaker 1: The Russia collusion hoax against president Trump remains the single greatest hoax and the greatest assault on our democracy in the history of this country. There's no comparison. There's no parallel to anything else. It was a coup, and I'm using that term literally. It was a coup to overthrow a democratically elected government, a coup carried out by the intelligence apparatus of this country, by the deep state, by Hillary Clinton, the Democrat party.
The new information that has been revealed by the director of national intelligence and by the FBI eliminates any scintilla of doubt about the intention, the premeditation, the planning and orchestration of this conspiracy. It meets all of the criminal elements of a seditious conspiracy against The United States. It meets the criminal elements of an insurrection. It meets the criminal elements of a conspiracy against the government and the criminal elements of a conspiracy to deprive citizens of their civil rights under color of law. One egregious felony after another.
And because it is a conspiracy, as demonstrated by the forethought of realizing and documenting that they understood that this was fake from the beginning, meeting the mens rea standard in law, Because of that, because it is a conspiracy, every single individual actor is now part of that conspiracy. So that includes Brennan and Clapper and Comey and Hillary and Schiff and everybody else who knowingly and willfully perpetrated this plot, this coup, this conspiracy, this scheme against president Trump and the government of the United States. And now is the time and the hour and the moment for accountability so that we can reclaim this democracy, Maria.
Speaker 0: Well, do you believe we will actually get accountability? We've been demanding accountability now for a decade. Our audience is well aware that this is the biggest political scandal we have ever seen and an effort to undermine and take down a duly elected president. But now we want to see the tricksters face the consequences. Will they?
Speaker 1: -I have complete confidence in the Department of Justice to follow these facts, to follow this new, further avalanche of evidence, and to take all the necessary legal steps to ensure that the wrongdoers, the coup plotters, the schemers, and the insurrectionists are held fully accountable under the laws and constitution of These United States. Yes, Maria. I believe that.
Speaker 0: Now, last weekend, John Ratcliffe, CIA director who is a former prosecutor, former DNI, told us that consp that the statute of limitations, the five year statute, does not apply when it comes to conspiracy. And he conspiracy is ongoing because they still won't admit it. The conspiracy is still happening. So what is your take on what Ratcliffe told us last week?
Speaker 1: -Oh, he's completely right. So several of the statutes I mentioned, we have not even come close to eclipsing the statute of limitations. But more than that, it is an ongoing and continuing conspiracy. It continued through the entirety of president Trump's first term. It continued through the entirety of president Biden's term in office, and it continues to this day.
There are still deep state coup plotters who are trying to conceal and hide this information on behalf of the people they are protecting. There are still staffers in Democrat offices who know the full truth, are concealing that truth. So all of this behavior, all of this conduct collectively means the conspiracy hasn't ended, is ongoing. Comey, in particular, has throughout the years engaged in conduct and lies, public statements, and testimony in front of congress, false testimony, whose sole purpose was to perpetuate and continue the conspiracy. So I have every hope and expectation that the Department of Justice, under the leadership of our courageous attorney general, will follow these facts and follow the evidence and deliver justice.
Because if we have a country where we can continue to have FBI careerists and CIA careerists, deep staters who will fabricate and doctor evidence, who will create and produce fake material, fabricated material, phony information to try to go after their political enemies up to and including the president. If we continue to create the impression and the reality that there is not a criminal, a severe criminal penalty for such conduct, it will never stop. It will never desist. It will keep on going forever. And we will continue to have a country that is sabotaged endlessly by the production of fake documents, fake material, fake plots against democratically elected officials.
We can't have that. There must be consequences.
Speaker 0: Well, I mean, it's just extraordinary to me that the mainstream media has completely ignored this story. And they obviously were complicit from day one, being the quote unquote useful idiots of the cabal to spread this nonsense across the world. But the Russia collusion lie had such an incredible impact. People went to jail. They should not have, people were raided.
They they raided Mar A Lago, president Trump's home looking for these documents according to Devin Nunes. Correct. By the that's
Speaker 1: a great point. The Mar A Lago raid was a perpetuation and continuation of this same conspiracy. They went in search and in hopes of trying to recover the documents that would implicate their own criminal conduct.
Speaker 0: That's right.
Speaker 1: The entire raid was a perpetuation of the same criminal scheme as you mentioned. And so many innocent people suffered irreparable harm. Paul Manafort was left to rot in a prison cell because of this ridiculous investigation, this witch hunt that is carried out. How many homes were raided, how many documents were taken, emails were taken against the innocent, against people whose only crime was working for president Trump. Right.
And everything that has happened, including, I would argue, I would argue all of the interference in 2024 that took place and in 2020 that took place, all the dirty tricks that kept taking place against president Trump were all part of a desire to keep him from getting back into the Oval Office to uncover and expose and share with the world the full truth of what happened as we are seeing now, Maria.
Speaker 0: They also set up General Mike Flynn. Let's not forget about that. There were so many implications of this lie. But even more so, let's talk about the impact to the American people. Because while Adam Schiff was going on the Sunday political shows and he was the chairman of the Intelligence Committee for a time, saying, there's collusion in plain sight.
When you have that kind of title, you're the chairman of the Intelligence Committee, and you say, There's collusion in plain sight, We believe you. You've got the job. You must have seen more than we've seen. So to outwardly lie like that because you have that title. Same thing with former director of CIA, John Brennan.
He's got that title. We believe him because he says it. So all of this, when they were running around, Russia, Russia, Russia, how much did they miss? How much did they leave on the cutting room floor? For example, right now, we are dependent on China for 90% of the underlying components for our prescription drugs.
We saw Russia invade Ukraine. More territory. We saw Iran continue to build up nuclear weaponry. All of the things that actually matter to the American people were not the focus.
Speaker 1: But the cost
Speaker 0: is ten years.
Speaker 1: Incalculable. The the the cost is incalculable of having the entire security apparatus of this country focusing on the hoax instead of the real national security threats facing America Right. Lie after lie after lie that was told to the American people preventing us from actually solving our relationship with Russia, preventing us from actually developing security and independence from all of our adversaries around the world, dealing with these big geopolitical questions. Instead, we were consumed endlessly by the same hoax, the same lie. And there the the charlatans that engage in this conduct are beneath contempt.
They are without dignity, and they are beyond redemption. What they have done, you can't even measure the harm that it inflicted.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just watched Kash Patel's segment with Larry Kudlow about the Grand Conspiracy, and it’s definitely worth the time. There’s a lot of buzz lately with Kash, Tulsi Gabbard, and Ed Martin all discussing this topic. Kash confirmed that the FBI is aware that Obama and Hillary are at the center of it all. He emphasized the commitment to rooting out corruption, especially public corruption, in line with President Trump's promise. It feels like we are witnessing the takedown of a major criminal enterprise in American history.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
FBI Director Kash Patel’s full segment discussing the Grand Conspiracy with Larry Kudlow - and it’s worth 10 minutes of your time 🔥 There is a reason that Kash, Tulsi Gabbard, Ed Martin and others are all giving media interviews about this topic over the past few days. Guess we will just have to wait and see why… Kash confirmed that without a doubt, the FBI knows Obama and Hillary were the head of the snake. He ended the interview by stating: “We are going to rout out any sort of corruption, especially public corruption, because that’s what President Trump promised the American people - and that’s what this FBI is going to deliver. Whether it’s mortgage fraud or public corruption… and we’ve got a lot more public corruption cases that we’re building here as we speak.” What a time to be alive. We are witnessing the takedown of the largest criminal enterprise in American history! 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions the Mar-a-Lago raid, asking, “how is the FBI just gonna go and raid Mar A Lago at president's home,” and “would it happen again?” Speaker 1 replies that it was “a total weaponization and politicization by the FBI and DOJ and the Biden administration dating back to the Obama administration that led not only to Russiagate as you opened up with, but to the invasion of Donald Trump's private home in Mar A Lago.” He says “there was no constitutional basis to do so. There was no lawful predicate to open that investigation.” He says the FBI is “ridding this place of its former leadership structure” and that documents are being declassified for public viewing. He notes, “Every single person that has been found to have weaponized or participated in that process has been removed from leadership positions.” He states, “There was no crime. There was no predicate to go and invade Donald Trump's home.” On mortgage fraud: “it's a multi agency effort” and “we're going to route out any sort of corruption.”
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now I gotta say though, director Kash Patel, my judgment at least is one Indian's judgment. The FBI is not here to invade the home of a former president and first lady. That is not what the FBI is supposed to do. Now that's not under your aegis. That came in the, prior administration.
I get that. But I have a lot of questions about that. First of all, how is that possible? And how is the FBI just gonna go and raid Mar A Lago at president's home, for heaven's sakes? How could that have happened, and would it happen again?
That's another question I wanna ask.
Speaker 1: The answer to both of those questions is the same of terms of origination. It was a total weaponization and politicization by the FBI and DOJ and the Biden administration dating back to the Obama administration that led not only to Russiagate as you opened up with, but to the invasion of Donald Trump's private home in Mar A Lago. There was as we now know, thanks to the federal courts, there was no constitutional basis to do so. There was no lawful predicate to open that investigation. But once you let the politicians run the FBI and DOJ and weaponize it against their political opponents like they have done for years against Donald Trump, back to Russiagate and to his home, we are now showing and exposing again the weaponization.
And to your second point, once we rid, and that's what we're doing here at the FBI, ridding this this place of its former leadership structure that did that weaponization, and we're giving accountability to the American people as we find it. As you highlighted, myself, director Ratcliffe, others in the intelligence community are declassifying documents at a great rate to publicize what we're finding so the American public can read it for themselves.
Speaker 0: Has there been a full investigation of the Mar a Lago invasion? Why, where, when, who did it? You talk about the leaders. I guess we can blame the leaders of the FBI, but there are a lot of people on the ground. I don't know how that all works.
Question, has there been a major league investigation? I don't think the public is aware of one, or if there is, what the conclusions were.
Speaker 1: Look, Larry, on this one, as you know, I gotta be careful in terms of what investigations we formally have open. But you know this for me. I've been on the Russia gate beat for about a decade, getting back to my time with congressman chairman Devin Nunes, exposing the corruption at the FISA court, the illegalities, and the weaponization there, and the involvement of Hillary Clinton's campaign to directly fund and weaponize the department of justice and the FBI. And what I'm committed to here as the director of FBI is to root it all out. And here's the thing, Larry.
We are answering questions publicly so the public knows what we're doing in terms of whether or not we have an investigation. Putting that aside, these documents show that people in leadership positions may have lied. Brennan, Clapper, Comey. We are not going to leave one document unturned. That is why we are going out throughout this building and throughout the country and finding these materials that they wrote down in burn bags and tried to destroy.
And all of it, in my opinion, we are going to show the public at least through the declassification process and the documents we're producing that it is public. And whether or not this investigation is going as far reaching as it should, I will just answer you with this. While I can't comment on the investigation itself, we, me specifically, have shown the American public time and time again of the weaponization, and now I'm the director of the FBI, thanks to Donald Trump. And we have a great attorney general and Pam Bondi. And where we can find accountability, we are joining forces literally on a daily basis to do so, especially on the matters involving Russiagate.
No one knows it better than the team we've built here.
Speaker 0: Listen. I know I mean, you've been on this show many times. We've talked about it on this show many times. We've talked about it on the radio show. But, Cash, can you say there is an investigation of the FBI's role in that invasion?
Speaker 1: I am, of course, overseeing the current, matters that the FBI involved themselves with during from Russiagate on. And whether or not there's an open investigation, Larry, you I think you know that I can't answer that, but I think you know that our partners across the IC would not be divulging this type of if it did not serve some sort of use for me specifically here at the FBI. I can't speak for them. And, of course, I won't speak to any charging decisions on any matters. That will come with the collaboration of our great
Speaker 0: partners at
Speaker 1: DOJ who work hand in hand with us every day.
Speaker 0: I know. Alright. Let me ask follow-up though. Have the leaders it's under a different regime. You came in.
You're you're there now, the leader. But have the old leaders who assigned this and directed this operation, have they been dismissed from the FBI?
Speaker 1: Every single person that has been found to have weaponized or participated in that process has been removed from leadership positions. And we if we if and when we find any others that are involved in this, as you know, this is a 37,000 person agency, we are going to take swift action just like we have and just look at the record of the people that have been dismissed for their actions and what they're saying when they get out there about how they personally opined about the weaponization of this place just like one of Peter Strach's friends did recently this past week.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: That's how we know we're finding the right folks. Right. And we're gonna keep doing it. It's not done yet, but we're gonna stay on it.
Speaker 0: Alright. I get it. Thank you for that answer. I I know you're going as far as you can go. Another question.
Why was Mar A Lago invaded? What were they looking for? This is speculation. No one knows to this day. I mean, it happened to y several years ago.
We'll probably be talking about this for years ahead. The subject of Russiagate came up at the Alaska meeting of the two leaders, Russia and The United States, Putin and what were they doing there, Kash? Does anybody have any idea? Why was the FBI what was the FBI looking for?
Speaker 1: The answer has been definitive. There was no crime. There was no predicate to go and invade Donald Trump's home. We have answered that definitively. Now you know me.
Working backwards from that point, we are going to hold people accountable who weaponize that system of justice for the following reason. With we, the FBI, must restore accountability and credibility to the American public so we can arrest more top 10 predators, so we can go after more terrorists, so we can find the other people involved in Abbey Gate. These are the cases that matter to the FBI, and the distractions, to put it mildly, the prior leadership regime are what thwarted the American public's belief and and and credibility in the FBI. And so when they do raids like Mar A Lago, now the American public knows. It was made up.
It was completely false. It was completely unconstitutional pursuant to our judicial courts, and we are working into those matters to say, why did you do it? We know there was no reason. Now it's time for accountability, and that's who we're talking to. And by the way, Larry, I'd like to announce on your show, If you got nothing to hide and you were DOJ and FBI before, you're welcome to come talk to the FBI at any time.
And if you don't wanna come talk to us, we're gonna come find you, and we're gonna put you in an investigative position and posture that will make you feel very uncomfortable, kinda like you did when you weaponized the the government. The only difference is we're gonna be doing it on a factual, legal, and constitutional basis to do so.
Speaker 0: Is there any doubt in your mind that the progenitors of this whole Russiagate nonsense was a, about about Barack Obama and b, Hillary Clinton and the Clinton campaign. Is there any doubt about that? They were the I mean, the intel and the FBI ran with the ball and the media ran with the ball. But Hillary Clinton's campaign invented this whole steel dossier, and Barack Obama, you know, gave it new legs by getting a changed intelligence assessment after the election was over. Is that in your mind that that's basically correct?
Speaker 1: No. And look at the ICA that was just declassified by director Ratcliffe, the intelligence community assessment. It literally shows in the declassification that people did not follow appropriate procedures, and Brennan and Clapper and Comey put their thumb on the scale and said, oh, this has this document has to be written in such a way that it shows such a baseline so that president Obama at the time and Hillary Clinton could use it to weaponize justice. And, look, that's not me saying it. That's in the documents, and that's why these investigations of these matters are going on in the public as much as we can so we can bring them along.
I know you reported on Russia Gate from Trump, but there weren't many that did so credibly.
Speaker 0: You bet we
Speaker 1: did so.
Speaker 0: You bet we did. To the It infuriated me. It infuriated me. Okay. And listen.
It's quite true. I worked for Trump. Okay? And I'm a supporter of Trump. But I did it because this is an American thing.
We have to restore the integrity of our law enforcement system here to make America, you know, great again, to coin a phrase. Kesh Patel, last minute. Just gotta ask you this. It's a lot smaller beer than what we've been talking about. But this business about mortgage fraud is cropping up everywhere.
Now we have this Federal Reserve governor, Lisa Cook. We had senator Adam Smith. We got in New York, the attorney general, Leticia James. It does the FBI do the investigating for mortgage fraud?
Speaker 1: It's a generally speaking, it's a multi agency effort, and when we receive referrals, we reach out the experts at FHHA and all the other institutions like the Federal Reserve and you're talking about. And we say, hey. If this is a matter that you want us to look at, you gotta provide us with all the documentation, and we will take a thorough look at it and work with our partner at DOJ I mean,
Speaker 0: if you have a contract, we've all done it or most of us have done it. If you have a contract and it says, is this your primary residence? What's so hard about that? It's like binary. Yes.
No. Yes. No. There's no fudging. Yes or no.
I don't understand what's so hard about this. There's like this disease breaking out.
Speaker 1: Yeah. And listen. We are gonna route out any sort of corruption, especially public corruption because that's what president Trump promised the American people, and that's what this FBI is going to deliver, whether it's mortgage fraud or public corruption. I think you just saw a couple of takedowns by the FBI in the last month of two sitting mayors and police officers who are publicly involved in corruption, I believe, in New Orleans and elsewhere. So that effort's not coming, and we've got a lot more public corruption cases that we're building here as we speak.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm excited about John Solomon's upcoming document release regarding the Clinton Foundation, along with new information on the redactions in the James Comey documents. Thanks to Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, I believe we'll uncover shocking details about what Comey's team was instructed to do. I anticipate that the evidence will reveal how much the government had but chose not to act on. I love being shocked these days.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
In addition to his new document release about the Clinton Foundation, John Solomon is releasing more documents tomorrow that will show the redactions in the previously released documents about James Comey 💥 “I believe because of the good work of Kash Patel and Pam Bondi, we’re gonna get to see what’s behind those redactions. I think it’s gonna shock people. I think we’re gonna see some pretty clear evidence of what the lieutenants working for James Comey were told to do. I think when people see it tomorrow, they’ll get a real shock of just how much evidence the government had and didn’t pursue.” I love being shocked these days.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last week, 'the three FBI probes shut down in 2016 at the direction of the Obama Justice Department'—'the famous quote, shut it down'—preventing agents from pursuing predicated criminal information about the Clinton Foundation and a pay-to-play scheme. In 2019, two whistleblowers filed a complaint, leading to a criminal IRS investigation. 'We might wanna sign you special witnesses up as confidential witnesses.' a 'full stop'—'we can no longer talk about the Clinton Foundation. We can't talk about it.' 'We're shutting it down.' IRS emails claim the IRS 'doesn't have any resources to investigate a nonprofit that might have been violating the law,' despite prior targets of conservative nonprofits in 14-15. 'There is a protection racket that was around Democrats.' Grand juries are formed; we're to learn about prominent name. 'There was a section of those James Comey FBI leak investigation memos that was redacted.' We're gonna see what's behind those redactions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Big story here and a bigger one coming tomorrow.
Speaker 1: Yeah. That's right. Yeah. We'll talk about tomorrow in a second. So this is another example.
Last week, we talked about the three FBI probes that were shut down in 2016 at the direction of the Obama Justice Department. The famous quote, shut it down. Those agents were not allowed to pursue predicated criminal investigatory information about the Clinton Foundation and a pay to play scheme. We now learn three years later, 2019, in the first Trump administration, two whistleblowers, one of them, a decorated federal investigator who used to do terrorism financing and uncover all of the Al Qaeda financing for the US government, very respected, they file a whistleblower complaint. It leads to a criminal investigation by IRS.
They're moving down the path very quickly. Hey. We might wanna sign you special witnesses up as confidential witnesses. We might wanna have you work with us. Let's get this case done.
And then a full stop out of the blue, we can no longer talk about the Clinton Foundation. We can't talk about it. We're shutting it down. We got the internal emails from the IRS. What was going on behind the scenes at the IRS?
They were making up excuses like this. The IRS doesn't have any resources to investigate a nonprofit that might have been violating the law. Now the same IRS that went after lots of conservative nonprofits in the fourteen, fifteen time frame in the famous Lois Lerner scandal suddenly had no resources when it came to Hillary Clinton and her foundation and pay to play and tax allegations. All the documents are up on the website. Some people can read them.
There is a protection racket that was around Democrats, whether it was Hillary and Bill Clinton or Joe Biden or Hunter Biden. We keep seeing federal agents being denied the right to pursue normal criminal investigations when it came to Democrats.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Alright. This is getting bigger by the day.
Speaker 1: It is.
Speaker 0: We know grand juries are formed. We know there's a grand conspiracy investigation. We're gonna learn something about a very prominent name tomorrow. What can you tell us?
Speaker 1: Yeah. So I I mentioned that last week that there was a section of those James Comey FBI leak investigation memos that was redacted. I believe because of the good work of Kash Patel, the FBI director, and the attorney general Pam Bondi. We're gonna get to see what's behind those redactions. I think it's gonna shock people.
I think we're gonna see some pretty clear evidence of what the lieutenants working for James Comey were told to do. I think when people see it tomorrow, they'll get a a real shock of, just how much evidence the government had and didn't pursue. Again, the same pattern, Sean. You get pretty strong evidence of criminality. You don't pursue it when it comes to democrats or their friends in the deep state.
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared that CIA Director John Ratcliffe and Kash Patel plan to declassify documents revealing the FBI's efforts to amplify the Steele Dossier and how they suppressed the counterintelligence referral memo. I believe this will bring more transparency to what I see as a major political scandal.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
CIA Director John Ratcliffe says that he and Kash Patel will be declassifying more documents that show: A). The lengths that the FBI went to amplify the Steele Dossier. B). How they buried the counterintelligence referral memo. He added, “People should expect that the Trump administration will continue to shed transparency, light and truth… There is no question this was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime.” Hope the criminals sleep tight tonight!
Video Transcript AI Summary
There are more documents to be declassified that will show how sinister the FBI was in amplifying Hillary Clinton's steel dossier as real and credible, and how they buried the counterintelligence referral memo. According to Speaker 1, he and FBI director Patel will be declassifying these additional documents. Speaker 1 stated that there is no Russia collusion hoax file cabinet at the FBI or CIA, and that they have to look for well-hidden documents by tracing through emails and looking for signs and clues. The Trump administration will continue to shed transparency, light, and truth because this was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime. It derailed the country and President Trump's first four years in office, and Donald Trump is committed to making sure it doesn't happen again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there more to come from either you or FBI director Patel? Is there more are there more shoes to drop that we should be looking for?
Speaker 1: Yeah. There are, Trey. So, you know, people need to understand that, you know, there is no Russia collusion hoax file cabinet at the FBI or at the CIA. We have to look for these documents. Sometimes that are well hidden.
You have to go trace through emails and look for signs and clues that would point you to. That's how I found John Brennan's notes and that's how we found additional documents. I've talked with FBI director Patel. He and I will be declassifying additional documents that show just how sinister the FBI was in, you know, amplifying Hillary Clinton's, steel dossier as real and credible to be included in the intelligence community assessment, but also in how they buried, the counter intelligence referral memo that I that I mentioned before. How they went to great lengths, to try and keep that out of the intelligence community assessment.
So there will be more to come. And I think that, you know, people should expect, that the Trump administration will continue to shed transparency and light and truth again because, Trey, there is no question. This was the greatest political scandal of our lifetime. No one wants to see this happen again. It derailed our country.
It derailed president Trump's presidency, his first four years in office. And it really is a stain on our country that should never happen again and and Donald Trump is committed to making sure that it doesn't.
reSee.it AI Summary
CIA Director John Ratcliffe announced that he will be declassifying the classified annex of the Durham Report soon. He confirmed that the statute of limitations does not apply to John Brennan, James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, and others, as conspiracy cases extend five years from the last act. Ratcliffe noted that those involved are still perpetuating the conspiracy. When asked about treason, he stated that he would leave that determination to Pam Bondi and Kash Patel. Exciting times ahead!
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
CIA Director John Ratcliffe will be declassifying the classified annex of the Durham Report in the next few weeks. He also verified that the statute of limitations will not apply to John Brennan, James Clapper, Hillary Clinton and others because in a conspiracy case, it’s 5 years from the last act of the conspiracy. He added, “the people behind this are STILL furthering the conspiracy.” He was asked whether or not treason was committed and he said he is going to leave that up to Pam Bondi and Kash Patel. Exciting times 🍿
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims John Brennan, Clapper, and Comey pushed the fake Steele dossier into intelligence assessments, forming the basis for Crossfire Hurricane. According to the speaker, underlying intelligence, soon to be declassified in the Durham Report annex, will show Hillary Clinton and the FBI amplified the fake Russia collusion claims. Brennan, Clinton, and Comey testified within the last five years, and their testimonies are allegedly inconsistent with the soon-to-be-declassified intelligence.
The speaker suggests there's an opportunity for indictments and prosecutions of those who may have lied under oath, and that referrals have been made. The speaker believes the individuals discussed conspired against President Trump and the American people. The statute of limitations may not apply because the conspiracy is ongoing, as those involved haven't admitted wrongdoing in 2016 and 2020.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Look. We've all our audience knows this. Thanks to you and thanks to Devin Nunez. Our audience is well aware of what took place here, but we want to see accountability. Many of the statute of limitations have expired.
It's been almost ten years for many of these folks who did this. But John Brennan testified to Congress, and so did Hillary Clinton within five years. I think it was in 2020 and then again in 2021. Are those statute of limitations still alive? Tell me if, in fact, we could see a criminal prosecution here as you just the other day, three weeks ago, have, in fact, referred criminal referrals to the DOJ.
Speaker 1: Well, Maria, so so part of what came out last week was about how John Brennan, Clapper, Comey, they all pushed the the known fake steel dossier into intelligence community assessments and as the basis for crossfire hurricane and all that. But what hasn't come out yet and what's going to come out is, the underlying intelligence, that I have spent the last few months making recommendations about final declassification and sent that to the Department of Justice that will come out in the John Durham Report classified annex. And what that intelligence shows, Maria, is that part of this was a Hillary Clinton plan, but part of it was an FBI plan to be an accelerant to that fake Steele dossier, to those fake Russia collusion claims by pouring oil on the fire, by amplifying the lie and bearing the truth of what was what Hillary Clinton, was up to. And you're right, Maria. John Brennan testified to John Durham in August.
He also testified to the House Oversight Committee in 2022. Hillary Clinton testified before John Durham under oath in 2022. James Comey testified, before the Senate Committee in September 2020. All of that's within the last five years. And much of that testimony is frankly completely inconsistent with what our underlying intelligence that is about to be declassified in the Durham Annex, what what that reflects.
And so, you know, Pam Bondi does have a a strike force. It is a different department of justice, a different FBI, and an opportunity to look at how these people really did conspire, to run a hoax, a fraud, on the American people and against Donald Trump's presidency. And so coming forward, we understand that they did this, but now we need to understand how they did this. And I think that's why you see the left losing their minds over this, Maria, saying, why are you spending time? This is vindictive.
You're going back. This is Donald Trump, you know, seeking retribution. It's not. Donald Trump's election by the American people was a statement, Maria. They said to the to to to everyone, we know what you did to Donald Trump, and we reelected reelected him because we know this was all fake.
We know it was a hoax. Now we wanna understand how you did it so that it can't happen again. And that's what, this declassification process that we're undergoing right now, what's going on, why it's so important, and why there can be accountability and preventability to prevent these same people that did it in 2016 with the with the Steele dossier, with the Hunter Biden laptop in 2020 from doing it again in the future.
Speaker 0: What I think I hear you saying is there is still an opportunity for indictments, potential prosecutions, accountability from those people who may have lied under oath, like John Brennan, James Comey, and perhaps Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Well, that's why I've made the referrals that I have. DNI Gabbard has made referrals. Yeah. And why we're gonna continue to share the intelligence that that would support the ability of our Department of Justice to make fair and just bring fair and just claims against those who have perpetrated this hoax against the American people and this stain on our country.
Speaker 0: Director, one other question on this. Tulsi as well as president Trump used the word treason. Is there a statute of limitations on treason?
Speaker 1: Well, Maria, what I would say is this, is is there is no doubt in my mind that the people that we just talked about conspired. They conspired against president Trump. They conspired against the American people. And so I'll leave it to Pam Bondi and our department of justice, Kash Patel, and our FBI to investigate K. The conspiracy to do what and what charges, that they're capable of bringing.
But, again, I don't think statute of limitations are going to to impact because in the conspiracy, Maria, the statute of limitation, doesn't start to run until the last act in furtherance of that conspiracy. And, Maria, part of why this is so important is the people behind this are still furthering the conspiracy. They're refusing to to admit or acknowledge what they did in 2016
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And what they did in 2020 Yeah. Was wrong. And so so I think that's why this is so important, and why I'm excited about what the American people will see very shortly and what's to continue to come.
Speaker 0: We'll we'll we'll wait for that John Durham report and the annexed classified declassification and a release of that in this week or in the upcoming
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
I was going to clip this, but the whole segment is 💯 worth watching. @StephenM is brilliant. https://t.co/NpPkp8Z5zZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Speaker 1, President Trump spent four years planning his return and knew exactly what he wanted to do upon entering office. Trump blew up the establishment, offering Americans hope and a choice beyond the status quo. The speaker claims Trump outmaneuvers the left and is determined to do what's right for the American people.
The Democratic party allegedly resorts to lawfare due to an unsellable ideology with unpopular stances on issues like open borders, taxes, and policing. The speaker believes Democrats are doomed if a free and fair society is achieved.
The administration is focused on reforming education, fighting crime, and ensuring fair trade. The speaker asserts that Trump built a movement with a generation of leaders to carry on his work. Restoring the republic means prioritizing law-abiding citizens and ensuring the government serves them first.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Steven, we're almost halfway through 2025. You've been around for a long time. You've been around president Trump for a long time. Give me your take on the state of things within the Trump administration two point o, as I call it, and what are the top priorities heading into the summer?
Speaker 1: Well, first of all, it's wonderful to be here with you. I've been I've been around for ten years now. Sometimes it feels like it's only been a year. I mean, just in terms of how quickly time has moved as we've gone through as a nation, this incredible revolution of common sense as the president calls it, and the birth of the MAGA movement all the way to the height of not just American politics, but world politics. Right?
The the MAGA movement, the Trump movement sits on top of geopolitics for the entire world as the most successful influential political movement, changing the entire planet in terms of in terms of peace, security, prosperity. What I think about the most as I look back on this short period of time is how the president spent the last four years planning and preparing and getting ready for this moment. That when he took that oath of office on January 20, he knew exactly what he wanted to do from the moment he stepped into that Oval Office. He knew what bill he wanted to pass through Congress. He knew what he wanted to do on the border.
He knew what he wanted to do on trade. He knew what he wanted to do on foreign policy, on military policy, on reforming the bureaucracy, and on fighting and draining the swamp. So we've seen more action and more activity in the last four months than any new administration has ever put into effect.
Speaker 0: Let me ask you about president Trump. Because as you say, you've been around for ten years. You've seen him through a lot. What has changed about president Trump and what hasn't changed about president Trump and the way he operates in the White House?
Speaker 1: So president Trump, I've had again, I've been so blessed, so fortunate to be able to watch him as a leader upfront, close, and personal for ten years as yet he built the MAGA movement from nothing, from scratch. You know, in in 2016, when he first ran, I think I don't wanna insult anybody, but I think pretty much every other Republican in that race was some version of an establishment Republican. That's all the Republican Party had to offer was establishment republicanism, status quo. President Trump blew up that whole entire failed system, and for the first time in our lifetimes, gave the American people a different choice, something other than the status quo, something other than and I know it's a harsh word to use, but we were on a glide path to national suicide between open borders, between uncontrolled bureaucracy, between our total surrender on trade and economic policy, the throttling of American energy, the destruction of our culture, our education system, and the destruction of the rule of law, we were going to become a failed nation. And he changed all of that, and he offered people not just a choice, but hope for the first time in their lives.
They had hoped that somebody in the system would fight for them. Nobody would ever choose to endure the the ten years of communist persecution that he, his family, his business associates, and his friends were subjected to. Watching him now be able to outmaneuver the left every single day, be 10 steps ahead of them at all times, just demonstrates how much they miscalculated by coming after him because they've now made him far stronger than they could have ever possibly imagined. I've never seen any leader more determined and resolved to do the right thing. Whenever anyone brings him a problem set, he always just says, we need to do what's right for the American people.
I don't care what they say about me. I don't care what they do to me. I don't care what I have to endure. We're gonna do what's right for the American people, and that's what you're seeing every single day. The first term of president Trump was the most successful presidency that we have ever seen.
But the second term is to find even the highest expectation of the American people ever had.
Speaker 0: What do you think happens to the democrats as a whole? They took things way too far on a lot of fronts. Where do you think their party goes from here?
Speaker 1: Part of the reason why they have resorted to lawfare as effectively their entire political strategy is because they have an unsellable ideology. In other words, they're they're committed in a in a popular democracy. They're committed to a series of beliefs that are, like, 20% in support. So they have to be corrupt to get anything done. Men and women's sports, as president says, completely open borders to the worst criminals on the face of the earth.
People guilty of child predation, murder, even people who are are guilty of violent torture and beating and killing and and and just senseless slaughtering. And they're let in without limitation for four years. Right? A political party that's committed to raising taxes on everybody. Right?
A political party that is against the police, that wants to defund the police in your community, that wants to let rioters run free. And the punching bag for all of this are the hardworking American citizens. The people who do it right, they're the ones are getting the brunt of it every day, economically, socially, culturally. So it's it's an unwinnable political message. If we can accomplish these reforms to just have a free and fair society, the democrats are doomed.
They cannot compete or operate in a fair system, which is why they have to rig it.
Speaker 0: What are you guys doing to ensure that a future administration doesn't come in and just dismantle everything that you've worked so hard to do?
Speaker 1: Well, it's hard for it's hard for me to think that far into the future because every day is a is a is a lifetime right now. You know, we wake up in the morning under president Trump's direction, and he wants to know what are you doing to reform higher education? What are you doing to fight violent crime? What are you doing to make our trading system fair and deal with the theft of American jobs? What are you doing to make sure that our government is responsive and accountable to the people and isn't a swampy, horrible, terrible bureaucracy?
So we're so much focused on solving these crises and challenges of today. But I think the best answer to your question is that because president Trump built a movement, an entire movement, there are now a whole generation of leaders to carry on what he started and what he created.
Speaker 0: What does restoring the republic look like? I know that's basically the overall goal over this four year term for president Trump. You're a big player in that. So what does that mean? How do you restore the republic?
Speaker 1: When president Trump talks about restoring the republic, he means restoring a country in which the fundamental loyalty and allegiance we have is to the American citizen who does everything right. That's why the system has been such a travesty for so long is that the people who they work hard in a job that perhaps is thankless, nobody's appreciating them. They earn enough money barely to support their family, to take care of their kids, to take care of their loved ones. They follow every rule. They pay every tax no matter how outrageous.
And they look around them, and everybody else that isn't doing it right is getting rewarded. So the scammers and grifters in Washington DC are getting rich. The illegal aliens are getting rich. The criminals are getting away with everything. So this person thinks I've done everything right in my life, and the entire system serves everyone at my expense.
Restoring the republic means that the citizen, the law abiding, god fearing, honest citizen, is at the center of the government's priorities and allegiance. And that's what president Trump is doing with his leadership each and every day.
reSee.it AI Summary
There's a palpable panic in DC right now, as explained by President Trump's Counselor, Alina Habba. She highlights that the upset stems from cutting off funding to politicians, which threatens their financial interests. Habba emphasizes that scrutiny will be applied to the wealth of politicians, questioning how they amassed their fortunes. She suggests that this situation is causing anxiety among them, particularly with figures like Elon Musk potentially exposing their financial dealings. The message is clear: accountability is on the horizon, and it's unsettling for many.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
PANIC IN DC ⚡️ This is the best rundown I’ve heard yet, and it comes from President Trump’s Counselor, @AlinaHabba. “Why are they getting upset? Because we’re taking money out of their pockets… If you make x amount of money and you’re worth $68 million dollars, we’re gonna look at why that is… There is a panic in DC at this moment, where I now live, and it is very simple. We are cutting them off from their funding. And that means politicians… and that’s where the panic is coming from. It’s pretty basic… Nancy made how much money? And we’re gonna go down the line of looking at ALL these people…. So they are panicking. And Elon may be triggering just a little bit of insecurity, which is that they are worried about us looking at exactly what they’ve done and exactly how much they’ve made. And that is now stopping. And it’s a panic.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The panic in DC stems from the fact that we're cutting off the funding to politicians who prioritize personal financial gain over the American people. Elon Musk is being targeted because he's cutting off their lifeline. There is no reason why federal employees should get rich off their service. They're not screaming about other billionaires, they're screaming about Elon because he's hitting them where it hurts.
Their reaction shows we've hit their Achilles' heel, and we will continue to hit them. We will address why our children are not educated, why they have an increase in ADHD, why our borders aren't safe, and why we have a fentanyl crisis. Elon is triggering insecurity because they're worried about us looking at exactly what they've done and how much they've made. And that is now stopping.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If we wanna if we wanna save money, people are gonna get upset. Why are they getting upset? Because we're taking money out of their pockets. The the best thing that Elon Musk is gonna do is gonna look at people's salaries and say, okay. If you make x amount of money and you're worth $68,000,000, we're gonna look at why that is.
And that's really the bottom line because we could talk about everything, every executive order, but there is a panic in DC at this moment where I now live, and it is very simple. We are cutting them off from their funding, and that means politicians, not just saving taxpayer dollars, and that's where the panic is coming from. It's pretty basic. In our administration, we have a tremendous amount of billionaires who are successful businessmen, and I could name them all, but we know who they are, who have taken a leave, sold their companies, walked away from their lives to sacrifice to help America be great again. There are many, many.
Now, Elon's become a target for one very simple reason, because he is cutting the funding to these politicians who have put their bureaucratic personal financial gain and interest above the American people. That is the difference. That may not be felt by some of the other people that are in the administration that have done the same thing that Elon does that has that are incredibly successful billionaires. But they are targeting him because he is cutting their lifeline. Their financial listen, Nancy made how much money.
And we're gonna go down the down the line of looking at all these people. There is no reason as a federal employee, me included, I shouldn't walk out richer from the federal government. That should not be the case. No. I don't know why I'm gonna be there.
Happen. You don't You do it. The only reason they're screaming about Elon, it's very simple. Nobody has said it yet, and I'm gonna say it. It's because they're hitting their pockets.
Only reason they're screaming about Elon. They're not screaming about Howard Lutnick. They're not screaming, about Burdnam. They're not screaming about those billionaires. They're screaming about him, and that's because he's going in and hitting where it hurts.
So you know what happens when you scream and when you sing songs outside at a rally, which, by the way, what are you doing on the American taxpayer dollars creating songs against the Republican party? It's bizarre. But when you're doing things like that, that says to me one very simple thing. We have hit your Achilles' heel, and we will continue to hit you. We will look at why our children are not educated.
We will look at why our children have an increase in ADHD. We will look at why our borders are not safe, why our security is crazy, and why there is fentanyl crisis right now in our country like we have never seen. Because illegal immigrants were supposed to come in and vote for Kamala Harris, but it didn't work out for them. So they are panicking. And Elon may be triggering just a little bit of insecurity, which is that they are worried about us looking at exactly what they've done and exactly how much they've made.
And that is now stopping. And it's a panic. It's very simple.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just had a great discussion with Kash Patel about dismantling the deep state and holding them accountable for their crimes. I've been investigating the Biden Crime Family for four years, and I’m ready to work closely with Kash and the FBI to share my findings. There's panic in DC!
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Rep. James Comer, with a huge grin on his face, says that he just sat down with Kash Patel and had “a long discussion” about dismantling the deep state and how to hold them accountable for the crimes they committed. Comer has relentlessly been investigating the Biden Crime Family for the past 4 years, so I’m sure he will be working closely with Kash & the FBI to provide him with everything he has uncovered. Panic in DC! @JustTheNews @jsolomonReports @JamesComer
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is still work to determine if the Biden family caused any national security damage, especially after receiving $8 million from China and allegedly laundering it through shell companies. Despite the intelligence community's awareness, no action was taken, and a letter from 51 former officials falsely claimed the initial findings were untrue. Accountability for those involved in the cover-up is essential. A discussion with Kash Patel highlighted the challenges ahead as he prepares to lead the FBI. There is a need to dismantle deep state elements within the agency that have censored conservatives and misled the public. Rebuilding trust in the FBI and the intelligence community is crucial, along with holding accountable those responsible for the misinformation and cover-ups.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is there still more work to be done to make sure we understand if there was any national security damage done by the Biden family as a result of this drift?
Speaker 1: Yes. I mean, you just watch Christopher Wray's closing interview on 60 Minutes this week when he said our biggest threat is China. Well, why wasn't he concerned about the fact that Joe Biden's family took $8,000,000 from China? They lied about it, and and then they laundered it through a series of shell companies. The banks caught them.
The intelligence community caught them. And yet nothing was ever said or done about it. In fact, the intelligence community went so far as to write a letter, with 51 of their former intelligence officials signing it, saying that that that initial discovery wasn't true. So, I think that we've got a lot of work to do to, hold people accountable that were involved in the cover up. Prior to to doing this interview, John, I sat down and had a long discussion with Kash Patel.
Yeah. I'm really excited about, his his, new, reign as as the director of the FBI. I think that that he will be able to work closely with my house oversight committee. We pledged, co to cooperate with them. And I said, Cash, you're gonna have a tough job in in getting ready, getting rid of, and and dismantling, these deep state bureaucrats in the FBI that have censored conservatives.
They coordinated and colluded with the left wing media to disinform and indoctrinate, their their, viewers. And and, you know, they've they've lost the confidence of the American people. So, you know, there's gonna be a lot of rebuilding that's gonna have to take place at the FBI and in our intelligence community. But more than anything, I hope that we can go back and hold people accountable for all the cover ups and all the lies that they told to the American people.
reSee.it AI Summary
I just had a great interview with Larry Kudlow where we discussed John Ratcliffe's new role as CIA Director and Trump's call for major reforms. We touched on the Military Industrial Complex and the Department of Defense's failure to pass a budget audit for 16 years. I emphasized the need for changes at the DOJ and questioned the lack of outrage from officials regarding past surveillance abuses, including the illegal monitoring of the President and American citizens. It's time for Trump to act on the mandate given by the public for a return to Constitutional justice.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Kash Patel just joined Larry Kudlow for a great interview where he discussed John Ratcliffe stepping in as CIA Director, Trump’s mandate for sweeping changes, the Military Industrial Complex, the fact that the Dept. of Defense has not passed a budget audit in 16 years, and the changes that need to happen at the DOJ. [Full interview below] “The question again that we should be asking those folks that are outraged (at the FBI) is, where was your career official outrage when Russiagate occurred and you illegally surveilled the President? Where was your career outrage when hundreds of thousands of Americans were unlawfully surveilled in one year alone, just two years ago? Where was your outrage when houses of worship were raided or where our children go to school?… I think it’s time that Donald Trump came in there with the sweeping mandate that the American public gave him to return a singular system of Constitutional justice.” 🇺🇸 Go get em, Kash!
Video Transcript AI Summary
John Ratcliffe is heading to the CIA, and his experience as a former federal prosecutor and congressman makes him a strong choice. He has previously exposed issues within the FBI and DOJ, advocating for accountability in Washington. There's a need for leadership changes in the Department of Defense, which has faced criticism for its handling of recent conflicts and has not passed a budget audit in 16 years. The FBI's political biases have been highlighted, especially regarding their actions during Russiagate and the treatment of Trump associates. There's a call for a return to a fair justice system, emphasizing that if Trump is successful, he can reform these institutions to fulfill their intended roles.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We know, that, John Ratcliffe is going to the CIA. I think he's a pretty tough guy, and he knows where at least some of the bodies are buried. What do you think? What what's he look for?
Speaker 1: You know, Johnny's a personal friend. We you know, he was in congress when we did Russiagate when I was a chief investigator and then later when he was DNI, and I was the deputy director. He's a fantastic choice. He understands the intelligence community. But, also, you gotta remember, he was one of the stalwarts in congress who's a former federal prosecutor that stood up and said, look.
My FBI and my DOJ that I used to run and work in lied to the American people, lied to a federal court, and illegally surveilled the president and thousands of Americans. And he took a lot of heat for it, but he was right.
Speaker 0: He was right. Absolutely. Now we haven't heard, FBI. Now Matt Gaetz, justice department, that does oversee the FBI, but we need a strong FBI director.
Speaker 1: Look. Whether it's FBI, DOJ, DOD, I think the narrative in the mandate that president Trump received is simple. They want accountability inside of Washington DC. I'm not saying everyone in these institutions, far be it from everyone, has corrupted them, but the leadership structure, for example, at the Department of Defense where our chief of staff, these 4 star and 3 star generals, a lot of them are fantastic, Larry. But some of them, I don't understand what they're doing.
They're there for their next promotion, and they're there to propagate, DEI and white rage and climate change. But these are the same folks. When we get when president Trump gets criticized for these appointments, why don't we ask the American public to say, hey. These are the folks that gave us the the disastrous Afghanistan withdrawal. These are the folks that drone struck 7 Afghani children in response to that and didn't take responsibility for that.
These are the folks that failed the no fail mission in the United States. They're now leading us into multiple world wars. Of course, it's time for a change, and that's what America voted for. I mean,
Speaker 0: let's go back to that, this, woke Pentagon, DEI Pentagon, etcetera. And Pete Hegseth wrote a brilliant book about that. He's a much decorated military veteran himself and a very smart fellow, as we all know. He's being criticized for this. I think he should be praised for this.
I mean, this is a kind of sweep of the Pentagon that you have to have every few, I don't know, 30 years, 4 I mean, nothing I correct me if I'm wrong. George Marshall, George c Marshall, great wartime leader, had a similar sweep with generals and top, officers, redid the headquarters, redid the joint chiefs of the jet. I don't know. Have we done anything like this since then? I mean, that was a long time ago, like 75 years ago somewhat.
Speaker 1: Well, Ike Eisenhower warned us about it 60 years ago, he said. The Defense Industrial Complex, if you let it, will overtake not just the DOD, but all of Washington DC, and it has. And they do a lot of good work. But all of these folks that are in these leadership positions that have corrupted it are running a circular revolving door. Hire me into the DOD, then hire me into your 7 figure payday at this defense industrial contract.
By the way, while I was serving as secretary of defense, and let me make sure you get a $1,000,000,000 contract. This has to stop. This has to be broken apart. I mean, you're talking about a defense department. Just one one clear example.
In the Ukraine conflict, they didn't lose a $1,000,000,000 by wasting it. They lost a $1,000,000,000. They can't they can't find it.
Speaker 0: Right.
Speaker 1: And this department of defense, and you're the economic guy, has not passed a budget audit in 16 years. Of course, it's trying for sweeping leadership.
Speaker 0: Who what you mean hasn't passed a budget audit? This is, interesting new info.
Speaker 1: Yeah. So as chief of staff, I I oversee, you know, the entire Department of Defense. And every year, there's an annual financial audit that checks the balances and the books. And the Department of Defense has not passed an audit of its budget in over a decade.
Speaker 0: Isn't that something? Now what about the FBI? There was a great story couple days ago. I think it was The Washington Times. FBI leaders shocked and stunned at Trump's victory.
And then it goes on. You know, it takes the next 20 or so paragraphs that they they couldn't believe it happened, and they may have to hand in their resumes. Shocked and said, why would the FBI be so political? That's not their mission. Well, the answer is maybe they're all liberal democrats over there, and maybe that's part of it, or that they are the ones who were in charge of weaponization.
I mean, you know, here. Melania Trump really refused to talk to Jill Biden afterwards because Melania was still furious at the FBI invasion Sure.
Speaker 1: In Mar
Speaker 0: a Lago, okay, down the road from here. What business did they have? What business did the FBI have inviting CNN at 5 AM in the morning to bust up Roger Stone's house down in Fort Lauderdale or wherever Roger was living when all they had to do was contact the lawyer? The answer is left wing politics.
Speaker 1: Now look. As a former national security prosecutor at the Department of Justice, where I worked with FBI agents all across the country and around the world, the question, again, we should be asking those folks that are, quote, unquote, outraged, where was your career official outrage when Russiagate occurred and you illegally surveilled the president? Where was your career outrage when thousands of hundreds of thousands of Americans were unlawfully surveilled in 1 year alone, just 2 years ago? Where was your outrage when houses of worship were raided or where our children go to school? The FBI was posting up outside.
So I didn't see or hear any of that outrage then, but it goes to your point. It shows their political proclivities, and the worst weapon we have in government is a 2 tier system of justice that's been weaponized. So I think some of these folks are finally showing us their hypocrisy, and, I think it's time that Donald Trump came in there with a sweeping mandate that the American public gave him to return a singular system of constitutional justice. Here's the thing. There is no revenge list.
If Donald Trump is successful, he will make these institutions, the FBI, DOJ, DOD, etcetera, successful forever.
Speaker 0: Do what they are supposed to do, which is to say, I would say, meet out the law fairly in a neutral fashion with the constitution. Name what's the name of the book? Government Gangsters. I wanted to get that in. Kash Patel, thank you very much for coming.
See you.
Speaker 1: You tonight.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe that November will bring a significant upheaval in Washington, DC, resulting in unprecedented accountability for those in government. Kash Patel suggests that the deep state is quietly strategizing, but ultimately, there will be no escape from the consequences of their actions. I'm optimistic about this new era where accountability prevails. Let's go!
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
A NEW DAY IS COMING 🇺🇸 “I think in November… there is going to be a cataclysmic implosion in Washington, DC, the likes of which we have not seen. And the deep state, once it’s sunk, cannot be raised… and we are going to see a new day in Washington, where people are held accountable internally in government for their criminal conduct.” - Kash Patel, March 2024 The DS has been eerily silent and cooperative and I suspect they are game planning behind the scenes, but there is no escape. A new day is coming in Washington, DC where people will be held accountable. LFG 💥
Video Transcript AI Summary
If the January 6th committee is legitimate, then members of Congress cannot evade accountability for crimes like destroying evidence. If Donald Trump wins the presidency, there should be a thorough investigation into those in Congress who may have participated in corrupt activities. We need to identify who suppressed evidence and whether there was malicious intent, as these actions are crimes regardless of congressional status. True accountability requires defeating the deep state, and electing Trump is the first step. We must inform Americans about issues like the 51 intel letter, Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's classified documents. These matters will converge, leading to significant upheaval in Washington, where the deep state will face consequences for its actions, ushering in a new era of accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if the January 6th committee is in fact this legitimate committee, then you know what members of congress can't hide behind the speech and debate clause for committing felonies when it comes to destroying and suppressing evidence to law enforcement agencies. And since we just found out about it, here's what I'm proposing. If and when Donald Trump wins the presidency, there may be a full fledged investigation into those in congress who aided and abetted this corrupt criminal activity, and we should look at who was responsible for what and whether there was any ill will and intention to suppress evidence from federal investigators. And if there was, that's a crime whether you're in congress or not. So we should start there because they said the January 6th committee is legit.
Okay. If you're legit, then you're subjected to the federal statutes, and let's see who broke the law. The deep state has always gotten away with it because the deep state has been in charge. So if you want real accountability, whether it's Democrat or Republican, remember it's that whole uni party thing, you have to defeat the deep state. And electing Donald Trump president is step 1.
Getting out there and telling Americans the truth about the 51 intel letter, Hunter Biden's laptop, Joe Biden's classified documents case, and Robert Hearst's creation of a new legal standard to case, and Robert Hurst's creation of a new legal standard to exonerate falsely a pre a president who should have been charged criminally, and unlike what they're doing to Donald Trump. And so we have to go out there and just pound that mission on behalf of president Trump about the truth. And when I think in November, all of those things intersect, there's going to be a cataclysmic implosion in Washington DC, the likes that we have not seen. And the deep state, once it's sunk, cannot be raised just like the Titanic, and we are going to see a new day in Washington where people are held accountable internally in government for their criminal conduct.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Maricopa County Elections Board has indicated that election results may take time to finalize, suggesting that leads on election night could change as more ballots are counted. I interpret this as a warning that if Trump is leading, they might "find" ballots to shift the outcome in favor of Kamala. I’m not buying it this time.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Maricopa County Elections Board basically just announced that they are going to cheat: “It’s important to remember that here in Arizona, the races are extremely close and it still might take a few days for you (the media) to call these races. It is possible that some of the candidates who are ahead on election night… might not be ahead and might not maintain those leads after Election Day, as additional ballots are counted and reported.” Let me translate: If President Trump is winning, they will “find” the ballots they need to put Kamala ahead of him. Not gonna work this time, motherf’rs!
reSee.it AI Summary
Right after the deep state launched their next Russia collusion hoax, Putin made a statement saying his favorite candidate used to be Joe Biden, but now he's backing Kamala Harris as Biden recommended. It feels like an epic troll moment.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Right after the deep state kicked off their next big Russia collusion hoax, Putin came out and said this: “If we can name a favorite candidate, it used to be Joe Biden. Now he’s not participating in the election campaign and he recommended to all his allies to support (Kamala) Harris, so that is what we are going to do.” Epic troll 😂
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they haven't called European or US leaders recently, but are open to contact and exchange information through channels like the foreign ministry. They claim it's not for them to determine US elections, but if they had a favorite candidate, it used to be Joe Biden. The speaker says Biden recommended supporting Harris, and that is what they are going to do.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's been long since I've called, any, leaders of, the u of Europe or the US, but we're not against any type of context of we're not limiting them. Yes. Sometimes we exchange some kind of information using different channels. First of all, through through the foreign ministry, it's not for us to determine these elections of the US people. I said that if we can name a favorite candidate, it was it used to be Joe Biden, but now he's not participating in the election campaign.
And he recommended to all his allies to, support, miss Harris. So that is what we are going to do.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kash Patel predicts a significant event in Washington, DC in November, leading to accountability for government officials involved in criminal conduct. He suggests a thorough investigation into Congress members who supported the J6 Committee to uncover any law-breaking. Exciting times ahead.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Kash Patel: “I think in November… there is going to be a cataclysmic implosion in Washington, DC, the likes of which we have not seen. And the deep state, once it’s sunk, cannot be raised… and we are going to see a new day in Washington, where people are held accountable internally in government for their criminal conduct.” 💥 Kash also proposed a full fledged investigation into everyone in Congress who aided & abetted the J6 Committee 👀 “Let’s see who broke the law.” The next few years should be fun! 🇺🇸
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the January 6th committee's legitimacy and the need to hold members of Congress accountable for any criminal activity related to it. They suggest investigating those who aided in suppressing evidence. The speaker emphasizes defeating the deep state for accountability, mentioning issues like the 51 intel letter and Hunter Biden's laptop. They predict a significant change in Washington after the truth is revealed, leading to internal accountability for criminal behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And if the January 6th committee is in fact this legitimate committee, then you know what members of Congress can't hide behind the speech and debate clause for committing felonies when it comes to destroying and suppressing evidence to law enforcement agencies. And since we just found out about it, here's what I'm proposing. If and when Donald Trump wins the presidency, there may be a full fledged investigation into those in congress who aided and abetted this corrupt criminal activity, and we should look at who was responsible for what and whether there was any ill will and intention to suppress evidence from federal investigators. And if there was, that's a crime whether you're in Congress or not. So we should start there because they said the January 6th committee's legit.
Okay. If you're legit, then you're subjected to the federal statutes, and let's see who broke the law. The deep state has always gotten away with it because the deep state has been in charge. So if you want real accountability, whether it's Democrat or Republican, remember it's that whole uni party thing, you have to defeat the deep state. And electing Donald Trump president is step 1.
Getting out there and telling Americans the truth about the 51 intel letter, Hunter Biden's laptop, Joe Biden's classified documents case, and Robert Hurst creation of a new legal standard to exonerate falsely a pres a president who should have been charged criminally, and unlike what they're doing to Donald Trump. And so we have to go out there and just pound that mission on behalf of president Trump about the truth. And when I think in November, all of those things intersect, there's going to be a cataclysmic implosion in Washington DC, the likes that we have not seen. And the deep state, once it's sunk, cannot be raised just like the Titanic, and we are going to see a new day in Washington where people are held accountable internally in government for their criminal conduct.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Showed this classic video to my pops last night and he was blown away, which made me realize how effective this compilation is for waking folks up to just how fake the Fake News Media really is. Please download it and text it to your friends & family who are still asleep 🙏🏼🇺🇸 https://t.co/CQ7xhPwUvW
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fox San Antonio's Jessica Headley and Ryan Wolfe discuss the issue of one-sided and false news stories on social media. They express concern about the sharing of biased and fake news without fact-checking, particularly by some youth who use their platforms to push personal agendas. They emphasize that this is extremely dangerous to democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm Fox San Antonio's Jessica Headley. And I'm Ryan Wolfe. Our greatest responsibility is to serve our Treasure Valley communities. The El Paso, Las Cruces communities. Eastside of the responsible.
One-sided news stories plaguing our country plaguing our country. The sharing of biased and false News has become all too common on social media. More alarming, some media outlets publish these same fake stories without checking facts first. The sharing of biased and False news has become all too common on social media. More alarming East 46 states basically are true without checking facts first.
Unfortunately, some members of the youth have their platforms to push their own personal bias An agenda to control to control exactly what people think, and this is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is Extremely dangerous to our democracy. This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
This is extremely dangerous to our democracy.
reSee.it AI Summary
President Trump accuses Nancy Pelosi of being responsible for January 6th and claims that Jack Smith is preventing him from presenting evidence at the trial. It seems like Trump intends to introduce the evidence that the Unselect Committee allegedly tried to destroy, causing panic among them.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
President Trump says that Nancy Pelosi is responsible for January 6th and that Jack Smith won’t allow him to introduce evidence at the trial because the Unselect Committee tried to destroy all of it. If you ask me, it sounds like Trump is going to introduce the evidence they tried to get rid of and they are panicking.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker criticizes the prosecutor's request to exclude evidence suggesting that the January 6th attack could have been prevented. They argue that Nancy Pelosi, the mayor of DC, failed to take the security measures offered, such as providing 10,000 troops. The speaker claims that if these measures were accepted, the attack would not have occurred. They also express frustration that the peaceful and patriotic nature of the event is not acknowledged. The speaker accuses the prosecutor of being dishonest and unattractive, claiming that they don't want the evidence brought up because it was destroyed illegally. They further criticize the prosecutor's track record and label them as a sick puppy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna get to another big development today. Jack Smith says he doesn't want you to be able to introduce evidence in your defense that maybe the the January 6th attack was preventable, that police and others had, engaged in some security failures, intelligence failures beforehand. Your reaction real quickly to the prosecutor's request today.
Speaker 1: No. Can you believe this? He's tried to defend Nancy Pelosi and the mayor of DC, but he tried to defend Nancy Pelosi Who did not do the job. We offered them, as you know, 10,000 troops or National Guard, whatever they wanted, before the event, because I know it's gonna be a very big event. And I it wasn't my event.
I went and showed up and made a speech. Right. We offered 10,000 people and more if necessary. Marion. If they use 500 people, if they use 200 people, January 6th wouldn't have been January 6th.
So, they can you imagine? This guy says, We don't want to introduce that. Well, that's a very big part of it. She was responsible for January 6th because she didn't take the security that we offered her. We opened 10,000 troops, and you know, you had far fewer people than that.
It was a very small a group of people relatively compared to the people listening to the speech was which was, by the way, the largest number of people that I've ever before. Nobody ever talks about that, John. They talk about the group that went down and peacefully and patriotically, as I said. As you know, they don't mention that either. You know, that was even brought up in the unselect committee.
They didn't even use those words. They didn't say that I said the words peacefully and patriotically. This is a very dishonest group of people. And the deranged prosecutor, Jack Smith, he's a deranged human being, unattractive both inside and out. And you look at this guy, he doesn't want me to say that they turned down and they turned it down in writing, by the way.
And And what happened is, as you know, the unselect committee deleted and threw out everything. They threw everything out, Which would be illegal. If you ever did that in a court, a regular court as a civilian, could you imagine somebody on the right, a Republican or something somebody doing? As you know, they deleted and threw out all everything having to do with the hearings because a lot of bad things were said about NC Pelosi, a lot of bad things were said about a lot of people that they didn't wanna get out to the public. So they threw out everything.
They deleted everything. There is no information. There's nothing left. It's like crazy. And the reason he doesn't wanna do that is because they illegally, destroyed everything.
They destroyed all evidence. So he wants to do this because of the fact that they destroyed all evidence. They don't have the evidence anymore. And a lot of that evidence was pinpointing that Nancy Pelosi didn't take the troops. Days in advance, I said it.
And I said it loud and clear, and they know I said it because I believe it was the mayor wrote a letter back that she doesn't want the troops. Yeah. No. It's exciting. It's Yeah.
But can you imagine a man saying, we're not allowed to bring the fact up that I offered 10,000 troops for January 6th. Yeah. Is you know, look. He's got a bad record. He's lost a lot of cases, and he loses them because he goes too far.
He's a sick puppy.
reSee.it AI Summary
Actor Michael Rapaport, known for his criticism of President Trump, recently revealed that he has had conversations with Trump and is now considering voting for him. Rapaport expressed his frustration with the state of the world, including the economy and the chaos both in the US and globally. This unexpected shift in Rapaport's stance has surprised many, highlighting a potential awakening among liberals.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Michael Rapaport says that he had conversations with President Trump and now he might vote for him. “If things don’t get straightened up in this fucking world asap… When I’m seeing motherfuckers in New York City… rip down American flags on Veterans Day. When the economy is the way the economy is… The interest rates?… Go check what it’s like to buy a car, buy a house. The money. The fucking chaos in this country. The chaos around the world… If it comes down to (Trump) and Smokin’ Joe Biden… voting for (Trump) is on the table.” I can’t emphasize how much this warms my heart to see liberals waking up. Especially someone like Rapaport who has spewed the most vile hatred toward President Trump for the past 7 years. #TheGreatAwakening
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses frustration with the current state of the world and mentions having conversations with both Donald Trump and Joe Biden. They mention the economy, mortgage rates, and the chaos in the country and around the world. Despite their reservations, they admit that voting for Donald Trump is a possibility if things don't improve. They emphasize the need to get the situation under control.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's been other things too. There's been other things too. There's other times where I'm sure, like, I don't for Dick's Day and Donald Trump, who I had conversations with, I might vote for that motherfucker. Oh, yeah. I'll break the fucking oh, yeah.
I'll break your hearts. Let me tell you something. Things don't get straightened up in this fucking world ASAP, and I know smoking Joe has said the right thing about Israel, But when I'm seeing mother in New York City climb in public in front of crowds of people, ripped down UN flags, ripped down Israeli flags, ripped down American flags on Veterans Day, when the economy is the way the economy is, when I'm paying fucking mortgage rates up the I mean, I'm getting forget a forget a colonoscopy. You don't need to get a colonoscopy. Go, go buy a house.
The interest rates, go buy a car, and I know smoking Joe has done some things for the I know, but I'm telling you right now, go go buy yourself go go check go check what it's like to buy a car, Buy a house, the money, the fucking chaos in this country, the chaos around the world, but I'm too far down the cringle man dingle. I'm too far down the disruptive warrior rabbit hole to pull back. Now the comments have been made, I said. I've had conversations with some of my if it comes down to pig dick Donald Trump and smoking Joe Biden, I'm sorry. I am sorry.
Voting for pig dick Donald Trump is on the table. I'm sorry. I'm fucking I'll still call him slob dick Donald Trump, pig dick Donald Trump, and all that, But we need to get this whole fucking situation under control.
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump avoids answering questions about how the 2024 election will prevent cheating. However, he recently hinted at releasing proof of winning by a significant margin in 2020. Revealing this evidence before the next election could make it harder for them to repeat such actions. Timing is crucial.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Everytime Trump is asked about how the 2024 election will be different in terms of stopping the cheating, he deflects and doesn’t answer the question. However, earlier today he was asked the question again. In the midst of deflecting (lol) he said something I think is important: “We did great against him (Biden) and I believe we won by a tremendous amount. And we have proof of it and we’re releasing the proof. It’ll come up a lot over the next period of a few months.” Think about that. If hard evidence showing what they did in 2020 is revealed to the masses shortly before the next election, it’s gonna be a lot harder for them to do it again. Timing is everything.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President, people are concerned about whether the Trump team has taken the necessary steps to prevent cheating in future elections. They also wonder if the cheating that occurred during the last election will happen again. I received these questions frequently. I campaigned vigorously, holding seven large rallies in one day, traveling from Florida to Iowa. Despite this effort, things changed late in the evening when numerous ballots appeared, and at 3:02 in the morning, something bad happened. I believe we won by a significant margin and have evidence to support it, which we will release in the coming months.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: President, we use a lot of
Speaker 1: calls, emails from people voted for you, and and one of their anxieties is, well, why is it gonna be different this time? Is the Trump team on it? Have they done the things necessary to ensure things the next time around? What do you say to them?
Speaker 0: So I the 2 biggest questions I get is how do you take it, And the second is, will it happen again? Meaning, the cheating, and the cheating is massive. We got caught with COVID. And, again, you know, I was somebody that ran very, very hard. I did 7 rallies on the final day, 7, and they were all big rallies.
They weren't small ones. They were big ones. Started at 9 in the morning, and we finish finish up at 4 in the morning, 4 o'clock in the morning, and all over the place. I went from Florida to Iowa. I went from 81 degrees to 2 degrees below 0.
That's pretty tough. It's not a not
Speaker 1: a trade people wanna make very often?
Speaker 0: No. No. And and, you know, honestly, that's, if you could look at it, that's called pneumonia time. When you go from 81 or 82 to 2 degrees below 0 at, late in the evening. That's a that's a you're covering a lot of territory.
And I did A great job, and we got votes like nobody's ever no no sitting president has ever gotten anywhere near that number of votes, truth? And I felt I could go home, and I would watch a fair election. And I went home, and it looked really good. And then around 10 o'clock in the evening, all of a sudden, they started the lots of ballots and things started changing, and then at 302, in the morning, things happened that were really, really bad. So, you know, we did great against him, and, I believe we won by a tremendous amount.
And we have proof of it, and we're releasing the proof, and you'll see the proof. It'll come up a lot over the next period of a few months.
reSee.it AI Summary
Trump visits Iowa, hangs out in a fraternity house, dances and pumps fists to energize the crowd. In an interview, he mentions his popularity among the youth. He flips a burger and later attends the Cyclones/Hawkeyes game. A legendary day for Trump in Iowa!
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Trump goes to Iowa state today, hangs out in a fraternity house, exits the place by stirring up the crowd with dancing & consecutive fist pumps, gives a quick interview with @brianglenntv, says “the youth likes Trump,” walks over & flips a burger, then heads off to the Cyclones/Hawkeyes game. Legend
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Trump expresses his gratitude for the turnout and mentions the support he received from the governor of South Dakota. He acknowledges the concerns of the students regarding the cost of living, gas prices, and Joe Biden's actions regarding oil. President Trump assures that he will address these issues and mentions the possibility of drilling. He emphasizes that gas prices will increase but doesn't provide further details. The conversation ends with President Trump being praised by the interviewer and him walking away, seemingly preparing to cook a burger.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you, everybody. Oh, look. My man is My man. I got it.
Speaker 1: Hi. How you doing, president Trump?
Speaker 0: I'm doing good. I'm What do
Speaker 1: you think about this? What is this, sir?
Speaker 0: This is some, turnout. Yeah. I guess the youth likes Trump, but
Speaker 1: we love Iowa. We just left South Dakota last night. It was an amazing evening. We got a wonderful endorsement, as you know, from the governor, and, we're here, and this reception's been incredible. All these students are talking about the cost of living, gas, and, of course, what Biden did with oil.
Speaker 0: Going up. Gasoline's going up. Your heating's going up. Everything. We're gonna bring it all the way We're at it.
We're gonna we're gonna do a little bit of drilling. I can tell you that right away. But no gasoline's going way up, way, way up. Thank you, everybody. We'll let you
Speaker 1: walk around here. I know you're a busy man.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: You take care of yourself. Okay. Sir, thank you very much. Yeah. They love it.
They love you, mister Eason.
Speaker 0: They love you. I love him.
Speaker 1: President Trump taking a few minutes. Alright. Alright. He's gonna walk. Where we going?
Speaker 0: It's
Speaker 1: like president Trump is throwing a a burger on the grill right now.
reSee.it AI Summary
Kash Patel accuses Fani Willis of illegal actions, claiming she allowed leaked indictment charges and falsely blamed clerks. He argues the entire case should be dismissed. Trump's team must challenge the unlawful grand jury indictment. Interview with realx22report is enlightening.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Kash Patel says that Fani Willis broke the law when she allowed the leaked indictment charges and was 100% lying at her press conference when she blamed the leak on the clerks. He says that the entire case should be thrown out! “Donald Trump’s team needs to challenge the grand jury’s indictment in this case. It is unlawful. Therefore, the case in it’s entirety must be thrown out because the district attorney herself broke the law.” Awesome interview with @realx22report
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the importance of the rule of law and the secrecy of grand jury proceedings. They accuse the state prosecutor of leaking the indictment against Donald Trump before it was presented to the public. The prosecutor denies any knowledge of the leak and claims it was a clerical error. However, the speaker argues that the prosecutor must have been involved since the clerk only receives the indictment after the prosecutor's approval. They suggest that the leak was intentional to create a negative narrative against Trump. The speaker concludes by stating that Trump's team should challenge the indictment as unlawful and seek to have the entire case dismissed.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Rule of law that's inviolable, the grand jury. Georgia has the same rule of law. Grand jury proceedings can never be released to the public without consent of the chief judge after they have signed and executed an order, unsealing the motions and pleadings and allowing them to be presented to the public. This is supposed to be sacrosanct universal law. This is why you don't see grand jury testimony out there often because it is never permitted.
Now we have a state
Speaker 1: prosecutor, And it's not like the grand jury issued an indictment and then the state prosecutor leaked it, like, 3 minutes before she went to the podium.
Speaker 0: This was 6 hours before she presented the indictment to the public and the court. And then she was asked point blank about that process. And she had the audacity to lie to the world. She says, oh, it was the clerk's handling of paperwork, I don't know how they do their business.
Speaker 1: I am not an expert on clerks' duties, or even administrative duties. I wouldn't know how to work that system, and so I'm not gonna speculate.
Speaker 0: That is a complete lie. The only way the clerk of the court gets a grand jury is after the district attorney goes for presentment, gets a vote on the indictment, yay or nay, and then walks it to the clerk's office and says, here is the paperwork. Fannie Willis is outright lying, she's the head prosecutor, which means she has to sign off on every single indictment. And the fact that an identical indictment leaked 6 hours beforehand means her and her office were using leverage points in the media to gin up a narrative against Donald Trump. Now just like a search warrant that's exposed to be fraudulent in violation of the 4th Amendment Mhmm.
Because the government overreached, in this instance, Donald Trump's team needs to challenge the grand jury's indictment in this case. It is unlawful and therefore, the case in its entirety must be thrown out because the district attorney herself
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Based Ron Johnson! On Covid: “This was all pre-planned by an elite group of people… Event 201… This is very concerning in terms of… what continues to be planned for our loss of freedom… We’re up against a very powerful group of people.” TRUTH Bombs from a US Senator
Video Transcript AI Summary
The government's collaboration with social media to spread falsehoods and suppress the truth is deeply troubling. The existence of alternative COVID treatments and vaccine side effects should have been made known to the American people. This manipulation was preplanned by a select group of individuals, as seen in Event 201 before the pandemic was widely known. Unfortunately, few in Congress are willing to acknowledge this, instead pushing for vaccines without considering potential harm. We must rely on courageous reporters like Maria and John Solomon to expose the truth against the mainstream media's narrative. It is crucial for more Americans to open their eyes to the dangerous path we are on, as an elite group seeks to gain total control over our lives through increased government spending, WHO takeovers, and potential loss of sovereignty.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's just extraordinary to me that, you know, the government was working with social media to amplify lies and suppress truth and has been doing so repeatedly. Why couldn't the American people know that, you know, there were other alternatives to treat COVID. Why can't the American people know that there were side effects with the vaccine?
Speaker 1: This was all preplanned By an elite group of people. That's what I'm talking about. Event 201 that occurred in late 2019 prior to the rest of us knowing about this pandemic. Again, yeah. This is very concerning in terms of what has happened, what is happening, what continues to be planned for our Loss of freedom.
Again, it needs to be exposed. But unfortunately, there are very few people even in congress that really take a look at this. They they all push the vaccine. They don't wanna, you know, be be made aware of the fact that the vaccines might have caused injuries, might have caused death. But, So so many people just simply don't want to admit they were wrong, and they're gonna do everything they can to make sure that they're not proven wrong.
We're up against a very powerful group of people here, Maria. But, you know, fortunately, you say, what can we do? Well, you know, we do have reporters like yourself, Like John Solomon, other people who have the the courage to report the truth against the mainstream media and against the narrative. But that's the only way this is gonna be solved, is we need the Truth to be exposed. We need more Americans to listen to the truth, to be exposed to the truth, to pull their heads out in the sand, quite honestly, open up their eyes and understand has happened to this country?
We are going down a very dangerous path, but as a path is being laid out and planned by an elite group of people that want to take total control over our lives, and that's what they're doing bit by bit. They do it by increasing mass massive government spending, Increase the size of government, takeover of the WHO, these amendments that are coming up, that are gonna be voted on in 2024, and the WHO are frightening. And they they really risked taking away all of our sovereignty, but people have to wake up awaken to the dangers of the moment.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
President Trump was just asked how we are going to stop them from stealing the election in 2024: “Well, we’re prepared for it… They had people in there that were bad people - and we’re gonna do it and I’m gonna be involved this time…“
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the alleged shenanigans that took place in Pennsylvania during the 2020 election. They mention incidents such as blocking Corey Lewandowski from entering, covering windows with cardboard, and ballots arriving in the middle of the night. The speaker then talks about the preparations made by the Trump campaign and the RNC to prevent such incidents in the future. They express their intention to be more involved this time. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of the election process, suggesting that there should be one-day voting, paper ballots, and voter ID to ensure honesty. They criticize the extended voting period and the presence of ballots scattered around for 42 days.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There's shenanigans that went on at Pennsylvania in 2020 where they blocked Corey Lewandowski from going in, put cardboard up on windows, ballots coming in, in the middle of the night, all the shenanigans. What does the Trump campaign what does the RNC have in place right now to stop that from happening again in November 5, 2024?
Speaker 1: Well, we're prepared for it. Now until this Stuff happened. I campaigned. I was a happy warrior. I campaigned.
And then at 4 o'clock in the morning, I left Iowa. And I left a cup I think I did 7 rallies that day, if you can believe it. These were big rallies. But I left, I went home, and I watched. And the people that were running these places, now they were being led by they were being Literally hurt by thugs.
You had thugs in there telling them to get out. You had bow watchers and voter watchers. We're thugs, absolute thugs, We're telling them to get out, get the hell out of here. And the stuff that went on was unbelievable. Now I I, as a candidate, I'm supposed to go home after and watch and see, but nobody's ever seen, like, what happened.
Now they use COVID to cheat and various other things, but They had people in there that were bad people. And we're going to do it And I'm gonna be involved this time. The most important time isn't, in my opinion, leading up to the elections, what they're doing with the election, the vote. And some of these votes now last for 2 months instead of the old days we had one day voting. And what happens in 2 months?
A lot of things happen But it's too much. And we should have one day voting. We should have paper ballots, and we should have voter ID. And you have honest And that's what we should have. When you see these votes where they take 42 days and they have ballots sitting all over the place, it's a disgrace.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
After Obama’s chef was found dead today, Jesse Waters tries with all his might to keep a straight face as he tells his audience that the Clinton’s chef also died. A tragically strange coincidence, indeed.
Video Transcript AI Summary
State and local police are investigating Tafari's death, and our thoughts are with his family and the Obamas. In a strange coincidence, another presidential chef, who worked for Clinton, also drowned. We will provide updates on the investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: State and local police are still conducting an investigation into Tafari's death, and our hearts go out to Tafari's family and to the Obamas. And Primetime will keep you updated. Now in a tragically strange coincidence, Tafari is not the only presidential chef to drown. Clinton chef also
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Probably the best video I’ve seen that encapsulates what it was like to be a part of the patriotic protest on January 6th. Incredible
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
“Since it’s inception in 1947, the CIA has a LEGAL mandate to never interfere domestically, especially with partisan politics…” … which is exactly what they did with the letter. As Kash says, this is the exact definition of election rigging. Return the diamonds.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses a letter that shows Gina Haspel, the head of the CIA, broke the legal mandate of not interfering domestically with partisan politics. The letter contained false information about Hunter Biden's laptop and was used to counter the narrative surrounding it. The timeline is important, as it shows the contact between Tony Blinken and Mike Morell in October, resulting in 51 signatories being added to the letter. The CIA's involvement in partisan politics is seen as election rigging, and the speaker calls for subpoenas to be issued to Gina Haspel, her leadership team, and those involved in adding signatures to the letter.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Jan, you're probably gonna ask me, so what? What's the big deal? Well remember, since its inception in 1947, the CIA has a legal mandate to never interfere domestically especially with partisan politics. And this letter shows that Gina Haskill, CIA, broke that mandate, that legal mandate, and did just that, and her employees went out and had signatories added to a letter that they knew contained false information that Mike Morell wanted out for political reasons at the behest of Tony Blinken at the time then Biden's senior campaign aide so that they could counter the narrative about Hunter Biden's laptop. Remember that's what it all came down to.
And the timeline is critically on. The blinking contact to morale is in October and in a for those span they have 51 signatories, they have the letter approved from the CIA saying you can publish this information even though it's sensitive. The CIA participated in partisan politics and then candidate Biden used it in a presidential debate and said our intelligence community even says my son's laptop is Russian disinformation. That is the definition of election rigging and there better be a whole host of subpoenas going out to Gina Haspel, her leadership team and every one of those people that have now been identified on that email chain adding signatures to that letter.
@TheStormRedux - TheStormHasArrived
Comer & Grassley will be holding a press conference on Wednesday Comer just sent a message to the DOJ: “Do not indict Hunter Biden before Wednesday… We know exactly what this family was doing… Wednesday will be a very big day for the American people…” LFG!
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker sends a clear message to the Department of Justice, urging them not to indict Hunter Biden until they have seen the evidence presented by the House Oversight Committee. They claim that the Biden family, including the president, has been involved in influence peddling with various adversarial countries through LLCs. The speaker believes that the IRS and DOJ are unaware of many undisclosed accounts and have not thoroughly investigated the matter. They have spent the past 100 days examining bank documents and meeting with former associates and whistleblowers to uncover the truth. The speaker suggests that the charges against Hunter Biden, such as potential money laundering and being an unregistered foreign agent, are minor compared to the crimes committed. They believe that these countries received policy decisions in return for their investments in the Biden family. Wednesday is anticipated as a significant day for the American people to learn the facts and for the Department of Justice to take appropriate action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My message to the Department of Justice is very loud and clear. Do not indict Hunter Biden before Wednesday when you had the opportunity to see the evidence that the house oversight committee will produce with respect to the web of LLCs, with respect to the number of adversarial countries that this family influence peddled in. This is not just about the president's son. This is about the entire Biden family, including the president of the United States. So we believe there are a whole lot of accounts that the IRS and the DOJ don't know about because we don't believe they've done a whole out of digging in this, and we have.
We've spent the past 100 days pouring over bank documents. I've used subpoena power to get these bank documents. But we've been meeting with the former associates of the Bidens in their different influence peddling schemes. We've been meeting with whistleblowers. We know exactly, what this family was doing, and by all accounts from the the media reports that we're getting, what they're looking at charging Hunter Biden on is a is a slap on the wrist.
It's a drop in the bucket. So Wednesday will be a very big day, for the American people in getting the facts presented to them so that they can know the truth, and then the Department of Justice can finally do what they should have done years ago. What? Well, obviously, the president's son committed many crime many crimes. I mean, you're you're looking at Potential money laundering.
Jonathan Turley comes on Fox all the time and talks about, he was essentially a foreign agent for countries like China. He's an unregistered foreign agent. You know, there's those are serious crimes. You've got the possible racketeering. I mean, the list goes on and on and on.
And, again, Maria, it's not just the president's son. And we don't believe these countries were paying the Biden family for nothing. We believe they were getting a return on their investment, and the return on investment would have been policy decisions for then vice president Joe Biden and current president Joe Biden.