TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TheThe1776
reSee.it AI Summary
I see Obama forcing me to buy health insurance; Biden then subsidized premiums with $24B a year to insurers. These subsidies expire in 2025, hiking costs 200–300%—a deliberate bribe. Trump didn’t create this; Obama did. Biden expanded subsidies in 2021 not to help me, but to buy votes in 2022–24. Now the election’s over, my bill goes up while donors still get paid. A cash pipeline to UnitedHealthcare, Pfizer, Blue Cross: gridlock elsewhere, but not here. I’m the hostage.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Obama made you buy health insurance; Biden temporarily subsidized premiums, with $24B yearly to insurers. Subsidies expire in 2025, hiking costs 200-300%, a deliberate bribe. Trump didn’t create this, Obama did. And Biden temporarily expand the subsidies in 2021, not to help you, it’s to buy votes in 2022 and 2024, now the election is over, your bill goes up, but their donors still getting paid. It's a cash pipeline to donors like UnitedHealthcare, Pfizer and Blue Cross; politicians gridlock elsewhere but not here. You're the hostage, they win, you lose.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker argues that the Obama and Biden administrations created and extended health-insurance subsidies, not to help individuals, but to fuel a cash pipeline to insurance companies. They claim that the policy began as a temporary expansion of subsidies in 2021, intended to help voters in 2022 and 2024, but now that the election is over, the subsidies will expire in 2025 and premiums will surge.
Key points emphasized:
- Premiums are currently subsidized: if a typical premium is $600 a month, the speaker says people pay $400 and the government sends $200 to insurance companies, effectively providing $24 billion a year in free money to big insurers.
- In 2025, the discounts are said to disappear, causing the bill to revert to $600 or higher. The claim is that Democrats allowed this to happen and knowingly prepared for the premium spike.
- The subsidies were expanded temporarily in 2021, but the speaker asserts they were not meant to help voters indefinitely; after the election, the impact is that premiums will rise.
- The core assertion is that this is not primarily about health care, but about a cash flow to insurance companies. The speaker contends insurers lobby for subsidies and donate to keep them coming, and when subsidies expire, blame shifts to the other side while insurers profit.
- The speaker claims Trump did not create this; Obama did, and Biden extended it only until after the election. The current gridlock is described as political theater because the real election has ended and the dispute is between insurance companies and the general public.
- Democrats are portrayed as fighting for their next campaign donation checks from major insurers (UnitedHealthcare, Pfizer, Blue Cross) and for donor interests rather than for individuals.
- The speaker asserts that people will experience rising premiums in 2025 and will beg for relief, while they blame the opposing party. A contrast is drawn between government spending that is criticized (e.g., $6 billion for Ukraine) and the claim of $24 billion per year for insurance companies.
- The concluding message is that the money is not for you; you are the hostage and the insurers are the kidnappers. The claim remains that each party will let this happen again, and thus, neither Democrats nor Republicans work for the people.
- The speaker urges viewers to stop voting for either side and to share the message if they are sick of it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obama made you buy health insurance, and Biden made you pay less, but only temporarily. And now both parties are letting your premium skyrocket in 2025, and it's not by accident. It's a bribe. Biden's discounts expire in 2025, and your bill goes up by two to 300%. Right now, if your premium is $600 a month, you pay $400 a month, and the government sends $200 straight to the insurance companies.
That's $24,000,000,000 a year in free money to big insurance. But in 2025, those discounts disappear, and your bill goes back to $600 or higher. Why? Because democrat let it happen. They know, and they don't care.
They expanded these subsidies in 2021 temporarily, not to help you to buy votes in 2022 and 2024. Now the election is over, and your bill goes up. But their donors, they're still getting paid. Here's the real thing that should piss you off. This isn't about health care.
It's a cash pipeline to insurance companies. They lobby for subsidies. They donate to keep them coming. And when the subsidies expire, they blame the other side while raking in billions. Trump didn't create this.
Obama did, and Biden extended it, but only until after the election. And now they're gridlocked because the real election is over. The real campaign, insurance companies versus you. They win and you lose. They're not fighting for you.
The Democrats are fighting for their next campaign donation check from UnitedHealthcare, Pfizer, and Blue Cross. They know what's coming. They know your premiums are about to explode if they haven't already, and they know that you'll be beg begging for relief this year. And they know that you'll blame the other party while they cash their checks. They shut the government down over $6,000,000,000 for Ukraine, but 24,000,000,000 a year for insurance companies?
Not a p. Because that money isn't for you, it's for them. You're the hostage, and they're the kidnappers. When your bill doubles in 2025, remember, they knew they let it happen, and they'll do it again because you keep falling for it. Democrats or Republicans, neither side work for you.
So stop voting for either side and arguing amongst yourselves like they do. Share this if you're sick of it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched President Lukashenko confront a British reporter with undeniable facts. It's refreshing to hear leaders speak the truth without fear of the West. The West often pretends ignorance while funding chaos in various countries like China, Ukraine, and Iran, with media complicity.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
President of Belarus, Alexander Lukashenko, destroys this British reporter with facts. Great to hear the OBVIOUS truth being spoken by leaders who do not fear the WEST regime. The WEST likes to play dumb, but they did this in China, they did this in Ukraine, they did this in Iran, they did this in so many other countries. They fund insurrection and disorder and social chaos. The media is also complicity and funded.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Original-language summary:
У конфлікті йдеться про вторгнення в білоруський будинок: «Навіщо ви в прошлом році прийшли в наш будинок та пыталися його кради». Спікер 0 каже: «Ви лізете» й «ми не ліземо в ваш будинок», попереджає, що «якщо ви розвяжемо тут війну... буде ядерна війна». Він згадує, що «ще 80 років, ще 100 років не прошло з початку війни», та що «відкуди їх прислали» після протестів. Обговорюють роль Заходу: «Лідери фінансувалися з Западом», «вони всі сидять у вас» після протестів. Спікер 0 стверджує, що «Ви фінансували» тих, хто виходив на мітинги, і додає: «Я винен був захищати страну та свої народ».
English translation:
In the exchange, the issue is an intrusion into Belarus, with the line: "Why did you come to our house last year and try to rob it." Speaker 0 says: "You are intruding" and "we are not coming into your house," warning that "if you start a war here... there will be a nuclear war." He notes that "it's been 80 years, and 100 years haven't passed since the start of the war," and questions "from where they were sent" after protests. They discuss the West's role: "Leaders were financed by the West," "they are all sitting with you" after the protests. Speaker 0 asserts that "You financed" those who demonstrated, and adds: "I had to defend the country and my people."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Навіщо ви в прошлом року прийшли в наш будинок та пыталися його розрушити? Навіщо? Яке ваше справи до наших виборів? Ми ж не ліземо в Віліка Британію або в Амеріку. Ми ж не ліземо в ваш будинок.
Ви чого прийшли в наш будинок і початкувати його кради. Ви прийшли в Білорусь, де живеть мирні 10 миліонів чоловік, пострадавших в останній війні, як ніхто. Євреї тільки можуть зравнитися з тим, як пострадали ми та вони в той війні. Ви чому прийшли в мій будинок?
Speaker 1: Олександро Бергувович, ну при чем тут ІІ мірова.
Speaker 0: Як при чем? Ви мілитися на нас маюли досі ж мір. От при чем. Молитися тому, що ми воєвали проти фашизму зкіліції з вами. Ви не пам'єте?
Ви з англичанами в коаліції. Пам'єте дядьку, який сігари все час ходив та курил і у нас з трубкою? Ви цього не пам'єте?
Speaker 1: А причому тут Вторая мирова война та сьогоднішня политической ситуація в Голочі?
Speaker 0: Я вам обясню. Ви за Другу мирову войну з білоруським народом ще не розобралися, не розрахувалися за ті потири, які ми понесли. Ще тільки 80 років, ще 100 років не прошло з початку війни, а ви вже вирвалися знову в цей будинок вірвалися знову війну. Ви ж розумієте, що якщо ви розвяжемо тут війну, в Білорусьі буде тянута Ната і буде тянута Росія. Це ядерна війна.
Speaker 1: Ніхто не хоче нову війну.
Speaker 0: Чого тогда лізете сюди?
Speaker 1: Ми не лізете сюди.
Speaker 0: Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете.
Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете. Ви лізете.
А
Speaker 1: Люди, які вийшли на улиці та кричали: Лукашенко викрали наші голоси, вони були фінансуванні Западом? Ні, вони дівно вірять та зрадувати. Щес.
Speaker 0: Лідери фінансувалися з Западом. В противному випадкі вони там прибіження сьогодні не знайшли. Вони всі сидять у вас. Чому? Вони збіжали туди, відкуди їх прислали.
І відкуди їх фінансували. Слухай, Стіво, що ти мені розповіш? Ці всі тихушки, хлопушки, цепкали. Вони у вас сидять. Чому?
Тому що це ваші люди і ви їх фінансували. Вони ж не побіжали в Кітай. Не побіжали, їх би там не прийняли, тому що вони к ним не мають нікого відташення. Що ти темиш? Ти ж це прекрасно розумієш.
А ти мене впрягаєш репресії, репресії. А що ти від мене зручив? Я винен був захищати страну та свої народ.
reSee.it AI Summary
I questioned whether Hillary Clinton approved the 2010 sale of Uranium One to Russia's Rosatom, which controlled 20% of U.S. uranium, in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The deal required approval from the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment, including the State Department under Clinton's leadership. The Hill noted an FBI investigation into Rosatom's subsidiary for potential racketeering and bribery during the approval process. Congress is curious why they weren't informed, and there are allegations of significant Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, raising Republican concerns about Clinton's involvement. I wonder why she hasn't faced legal consequences.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Did Hillary Clinton approve the 2010 sale of Uranium One, controlling 20% of U.S. uranium, to Russia’s Rosatom for Clinton Foundation donations? The deal, involving a Canadian firm, required approval from the U.S. Committee on Foreign Investment, including the State Department, led by Clinton. The Hill reported the FBI was investigating Rosatom’s subsidiary for racketeering and bribes to influence the U.S. nuclear industry during the deal’s approval. Congress questions why they weren’t informed. Reports also allege millions in Russian donations to the Clinton Foundation, prompting Republican suspicions about Clinton’s role in facilitating the deal. So why isn’t Hillary Clinton in prison!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Congressional investigators are being asked if Hillary Clinton gave 20% of the US uranium supply to Russia in exchange for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The question stems from the 2010 sale of Uranium One, a company controlling a fifth of US uranium, to Rosatom, a Russian firm.
The US part of the deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, comprised of nine agencies, including the State Department, where Hillary Clinton was the boss at the time.
The Hill newspaper reported that the FBI was investigating a Rosatom subsidiary for racketeering, money laundering, and bribes aimed at giving Russia more influence over the US nuclear industry while the deal was being approved. Some members of Congress want to know why they weren't told about this. The Hill also reports that the Russians were channeling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation at the same time. Republicans are questioning if Hillary Clinton helped this deal along.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Question for congressional investigators. Did Hillary Clinton give 20% of The United States supply of uranium to Russia for donations to the Clinton Foundation? And it flows out of the sale in 2010 of this company, Uranium One, which controlled about a fifth of America's uranium to a Russian firm called Rosatom. By law, even though Uranium One was a Canadian firm, The US part of this deal had to be approved by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, which is comprised of nine agencies, including the State Department, and at that time, Hillary Clinton was the boss there. Anderson?
So, I mean, a lot of this was looked at during the campaign. Why is it coming up back now again? I mean, there were also the all the donations to the Clinton Foundation. Yeah. Absolutely.
It was all talked about before. But the Hill newspaper, which reports on a lot of things with the government here, came out with a report showing the FBI was investigating a subsidiary of Rosatom for possible racketeering, money laundering, bribes, all aimed at giving the Russian government more influence over The US nuclear industry while this deal was being approved. So some members of congress want to know why they weren't told about all of this. And furthermore, the Hill says the Russians were channeling millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation at the same time, raising the question, for some Republicans, did Hillary Clinton help this deal along in any fashion?
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the U.S. is too powerful to face an external attack due to its oceans and military bases. However, the real threat lies within. Cities like Los Angeles and New York, once thriving, now resemble wastelands. I see harmful policies—like drug distribution, allowing shoplifting, defunding police, and incentivizing unemployment—as wrecking our urban environments. It's like planting corn and expecting beans; it simply doesn't work. I suspect that these decisions are being made intentionally to undermine society, rather than being mere accidents.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
President Nayib Bukele says the U.S. is too powerful to be attacked from outside. Oceans and military bases make invasion impossible. But he warns the real danger is from within. American cities like Los Angeles and New York, once beautiful, now look like wastelands. He says bad policies, like giving out drugs, letting people shoplift, defunding police, or paying people not to work, are wrecking cities. Bukele compares it to planting corn and expecting beans, it just doesn’t work. He believes smart people are making these choices on purpose to destroy society from the inside, not by accident.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The US is too powerful to be destroyed from the outside due to its geography and military strength. The demise of the US must come from within, as previous presidents have stated. Cities that were once beautiful are now wastelands, and it's unthinkable that someone from El Salvador wouldn't want to live in a US city.
This erosion of cities is by design, with policies like giving money for drugs, paying people not to work, and defunding the police. These decisions are made openly, and the consequences are predictable. Planting policies that defund the police, allow shoplifting, and give drugs to addicts will destroy society, the city, and the economy.
When these policies cause more problems, the response is to enact more of the same solutions. These people are not dumb; they are smart, so these actions must be by design.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The USA is too powerful to be destroyed from the outside. Actually, geographically, you nobody can invade The US, The United States. You nobody. I mean, even if, you know, huge armies will collude and want to attack The US, it's impossible. I mean, have to cross all the ocean, all the Pacific Ocean and all the Atlantic Ocean just to get to the shore.
I mean, it's impossible, right? And The US has military bases, it's impossible. So the only way The US can fail and this is not my analysis. This was made by presidents before, by US presidents before. The demise of The US has to come from within.
Right? The enemies have to be inside, not not really outside. No no no external enemy can can cause so much damage as internal, as an internal operation. When you're watching internal operations here, can see them in cities. Cities that were pristinely beautiful thirty years ago are wastelands right now.
You would see people I mean, I'm from El Salvador, a third world country in Central America. And myself, I can see cities here and say, I want to I want to live here. So that that would be unthinkable three decades ago. Totally unthinkable that a Salvadoran wouldn't wanna live in The US city, in The US main city. I mean, Los Angeles, and New York, Chicago.
Yeah. Well, Philadelphia, Baltimore. When you look how the cities are eroding so fast, this has to be by design. I mean, who who I mean, who would make so many stupid decisions? Like, okay.
We're gonna we're gonna give you money for drugs. Really, they're doing that. In some cities, they're giving people drugs. I mean, they're literally giving people drugs in some US cities. Or they say, okay, we're gonna give you money if you don't work.
Or we're gonna you know, they make all of these laws that make no sense. Or if they have a high crime, okay, I have a solution. Let's defund the police. Right? They make this analysis here.
And you see all these campaigns, defund the police. You will see these campaigns of, you know, let's allow shoplifting up to this amount. They make these decisions openly. I mean, it's not even a secret. They make it they made them.
They make them openly. And you we we all know what would be the consequence of it. It's like I I I always use this example. We we you know, I know The US grows a lot of corn, but in El Salvador, do grow some corn, and we also grow beans. I always make the example that you can either plant corn or you can plant beans.
It's fine. But you cannot plant corn and expect beans to show up. Or you cannot plant beans and expect corn to show up. So if you plant a defunding of the police, allow for shoplifting, give drugs to drug addicts, you know, give money for people to stop at work, What would be the consequence of it? You will destroy the society, you will destroy the city, will destroy the economy.
And it's not only a logical thing to think, it's already happening. And when they see more problems, say, Oh, so we need more of the same solutions that caused these problems in the first place. And they enact more of them, so they have more problems. And they enact more of the same solutions that cause those problems. They have more problems.
So you would you would think these people, they they can be so dumb. Of course, they're not. They're smart. They're very smart people. So why are they doing these things?
Because it's by design. It has to be by design.
reSee.it AI Summary
Operation Soteria Shield, led by the FBI in Texas, successfully rescued 109 children and arrested 244 traffickers, involving over 70 agencies and seizing 213 terabytes of illicit data. Despite numerous similar arrests nationwide since the current administration took office, mainstream media largely ignores these critical stories. With hundreds of thousands of children reported missing each year in the U.S., this crisis deserves top coverage. Unlike the previous administration, which seemed complicit, we must prioritize children's safety above all else.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Operation Soteria Shield, a 2025 FBI-led effort in Texas, rescued 109 children and arrested 244 child traffickers. Involving 70+ agencies, it targeted online exploitation, seizing 213 terabytes of illicit data. Despite hundreds of similar arrests nationwide since the current administration took office, mainstream media barely covers these stories. With approximately 350,000-460,000 children reported missing annually in the U.S., the global epicenter of child trafficking, this should be the top news. Yet, liberal media prioritizes race wars and other agendas, sidelining this crisis. We didn't see these kinds of arrest with the last administration because they were complicit. Why the silence? Children’s safety should be the #1 priority.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the FBI in Texas arrested 244 child traffickers and rescued 109 missing children. They allege the "liberal media" won't focus on this as much as on race issues or the "LGBT community agenda." The speaker asserts that hundreds of child traffickers have been arrested in various states since the current administration took office, a phenomenon they didn't observe during the last administration. They state that over 300,000 children are reported missing each year in the U.S., which they call the "largest child trafficking" nation. The speaker questions the media's silence on child trafficking and suggests a focus on race is prioritized instead. They ask why these arrests weren't as prevalent in the previous administration.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: FBI in Texas just arrested 244 child trafficker predators and rescued a 109 missing children. Let's see if the mainstream media, the liberal media will blow this up and focus on this the way they are, the things in California. There's been hundreds of others in other states that I've saw over the past few months since this administration took office of hundreds of traffickers, of child traffickers being arrested. Yet this is something you didn't see at all in the last administration, and this is something that should be focused on greatly in this nation. Our media should be focusing on, yet they'll pass by.
They'll do a short story, and they don't blow it up the way they do it when they try to push race wars or the LGBT community agenda, any of these things. They don't blow this up. It'll be a passing story, and that's it when really this is what this nation should be focusing on. Last statistic I saw, over 300,000 children, these are the ones who reported or reported each year missing in The United States. We are the largest child trafficking, creditor trafficking of children, let's call it, in the world, in The United States.
This should be the main story. This should well, this is what we should be focused on, but I guarantee the liberal media will not blow this up and focus on it the way that they are trying to push a race agenda and race war the way that they are. And you have to ask yourself, why? Why are they silent? Why do they blow up all these other things and are greatly silent on these things that we should be focusing on with the most terrible things you can think of being done to children in a world, in a nation now where our children can't go out to play the way that they used to.
And we have to watch them walking through stores, gas pumps, or wherever it may be. Why are they silent about these things? And why didn't we see these kinds of arrest with the last administration? Don't share this. Leave a comment.
Let me know what you think. Jesus is king.
reSee.it AI Summary
I support the LA protest and encourage people to express their frustrations, even if it means causing chaos in their own neighborhoods. It's ironic to see individuals who enjoy the freedoms of this country act against it while waving foreign flags. Their actions only serve to strengthen the opposition. On another note, I want to highlight @takeitupwithhr, a true patriot with great content. Please consider following him.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This man support the LA protest; keep going, burn your own backyard if you must. Why? You’re the right’s best unpaid campaign ad. Throwing tantrums, screaming “death to America” in a country that gave you freedom to do it. Flying foreign flags while trashing the nation that grants your rights isn’t pride, it’s stupidity. Every time y'all riot, loot, tear things up, you're just birthing another red voter.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker supports the LA protests because they believe the protesters are counterproductive. They accuse protesters of ingratitude, noting they were born in America and enjoy its freedoms and conveniences.
The speaker claims the protesters are mostly American-born with Mexican heritage, not truly Mexican, and only visit Mexico for vacation. They argue that protesters wouldn't dare disrespect Mexico in the same way due to fear of cartels.
They criticize the protesters for blocking freeways, destroying businesses, and complaining about injustice while benefiting from social programs. The speaker believes the protests are helping the political opposition more than anything else. They encourage the protesters to continue, as their actions are creating more conservative voters.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Someone asked me if I support the protests that are going on in LA. I 100% do. Please keep going. Burn down your own backyard if you must. Know why?
Because this this right here is the greatest campaign ad that this side never had to pay for. Motherfuckers out there in Los Angeles throwing a full blown fucking tantrum. Like y'all just crawled out the Rio Grande, screaming death to America in a country that gave you the fucking freedom to do that shit. You were born at Kaiser Permanente in Burbank. Stop it.
You ain't El Chapel. You're Chris from Pasadena. You ain't cartel born. You were Target born with a Costco membership by age five. Half you motherfuckers protesting ain't even Mexican Mexican.
You're American with Mexican heritage and a tattoo of the Virgin Mary you got on a Vegas bender. Don't get it twisted. I respect the heritage. But flying a foreign flag while shitting on the country that gave you the fucking freedom to do it, that's not pride. You don't even go to fucking Mexico unless it's for spring break in Cancun with a passport you got from the US government.
And you won't go live there. Why? Because you like your DoorDash. Your seven Elevens, your air conditioning, and your freedom to scream dumb shit without a cartel rolling up on your motherfucking ass. And let's be honest, ain't nobody screaming death to Mexico while flying an American flag through Guadalajara.
You know why? Because that's how you end up in a back alley, starring in Cartel TikTok season three. Meanwhile, the rest of America is sitting back watching you block freeways during rush hour, destroying businesses, wearing $300 fucking Jordans, screaming about injustice in the city with the most social programs and diversity hires in the fucking country. Y'all are the political version of throwing a Molotov cocktail at a fucking Prius because you're mad about gas prices. So listen, I'm not mad you're passionate.
I'm mad you're dumb. And your dumbass behavior is helping the other side more than a Trump rally in Texas with free brisket. Every time y'all riot, loop, tearing up your own shit, you're just birthing another red voter. So, yeah, I support the protest. Keep fucking going.
Keep flying flags of countries you ain't got the fucking balls to move to and shitting on the system that literally gives you the right to shit on it.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
@takeitupwithhr is the gentleman in this video. Please give him a follow, he is an amazing patriot and has awesome content🇺🇸❤️
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared Judge Joe Brown's insights on Joe Biden's racism and his views on the Central Park 5, which he believes deserved severe punishment. His perspective challenges John Legend's comments on Trump, making them seem misguided. I included a clip of Judge Brown speaking, as I find his points compelling. I also expressed my frustration with celebrities like Legend, who, in my view, are disconnected from the struggles everyday people face under this administration, particularly regarding inflation and other pressing issues.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Listen to Judge Joe Brown giving firsthand accounts on how Racist Joe Biden is, the reason they are going after Trump and how he believed that the Central Park 5 should have been crucified considering what they confess to, etc. What he says makes John Legend comment on Trump look very foolish! I added a clip at the end, please watch. The guy is spot on! John Legend is a puppet and a sellout for the DNC. People need to stop looking up to celebrities because they don’t live in the same world we live in and are not affected by Biden’s inflation, etc. They do NOT have a clue the real problem that real people face today under this installed administration!
Video Transcript AI Summary
According to Speaker 1, Joe Biden is responsible for problems in the American criminal law system that negatively impact black people, stemming from legislation in the 1970s, 80s, and 90s. The speaker claims Biden said, "Negroes are animals" and recounts Biden's past plagiarism scandal. The speaker alleges that incriminating information on Biden was found on his son's laptops, which is why the documents are being sought from Trump. The speaker cites the Supreme Court case Department of the Navy versus Eagan, stating there are no limits on a president's power to classify or declassify information. The speaker criticizes John Legend for pontificating about racism without relevant expertise, while Biden has a history of racist remarks and policies. The speaker also defends Trump's record on race relations. Speaker 0 accuses John Legend of being a sellout and puppet who only addresses racism during election years and urges him to invest in Black communities instead of crying racism on TV.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thoughts on that real quick.
Speaker 1: Who is this boy? Who is this boy?
Speaker 0: He's a singer John Legend. Always he
Speaker 1: was white. Anyway, he hadn't paid any damn dues. Let me put it this way. Most of what is wrong with the criminal justice system in The United States Of America that's trickled down from the federal level to the state level that negatively impacts blacks and other minorities, which started off in 1979, '19 '80 '1, '19 '80 '3, '19 '80 '7, '19 '90 '1, and 1994, thanks to Joe Biden, Stennis, Eastland, and Byrd. And you can thank them for some of the problems with American criminal law as they negatively impact black folk.
This mess about all of these people in jail, first offenders for one rock, you can thank Joe Biden for with his mess about crack even though it seems to have settled into his household, quite heavily. I heard the lowdown scummy bastard say in front of me, it was in Dover, Delaware. He was on the podium. He said, quote, Negroes are animals, and they turn the streets into jungles, and they need to be put in zoos where they are safe and can be observed. He said, Negro children are animals, and they turn schools into zoos.
And I don't want my children going to a school with Negroes and it turned into a zoo. I heard him say that. I saw him when he said it. He's a liar. He had to withdraw from the presidential campaign in 1988 because he lied about his academic career.
He got found early to have plagiarized some things that caused his expulsion from an academic institution. He's a piece of urban trailer park trash who's had nothing but government jobs his entire life and has turned out a very rich man because of the bribes, the extortion, and the downright payoffs he has gotten under the table illegally. And there's some things that I saw that I read from the three downloaded laptops of his son. There were three, not one. I interviewed the technician.
They are very incriminating, and there is a high probability that what they're after Trump in Florida for relative to refusal to turn over so called classified documents that were placed under an act that under the theory of Marbury versus Madison eighteen o three, two hundred and twenty one years ago were unconstitutional. And what the point was is to get them back from Trump so they could be destroyed and not incriminate Biden and Obama from what was on those laptops. So we have a witch hunt. We have a problem that is engendered by the DAs in question, Fannie Willis, we just got through talking to having meetings in the White House going after somebody's very strong political opposition. We've got a situation down in Florida where somebody is trying to go against what the Supreme Court has already said in 1988 in the case Department of the Navy versus Eagan, e g a n, which has multiple concurring opinions and quite a few of them say there are no limits on what a president can classify or declassify or any limitations on how he chooses to do so, either openly by written order or by action.
Individual like like Fannie who has jumped in here trying to do something, and we have another clown like this person right here who has no political science background, no law background, no political background, no economic background who is coming in to pontificate about somebody's wrong and who's racist. So every damn thing I've seen about Biden, and I've been I'm not that far under him just a few years. What's going on is he has no qualifications to sit there and render anything other than an opinion generated by looking at the propaganda of the left of the Democratic Party plantation of which he is an enthusiastic member. So what he's saying about Trump being a racist versus somebody that for the last fifty years, I have been hearing making one racist remark after another. I have had to deal with in the practice of defense law as somebody that was passing one bill after another, making another element of criminal law against minorities based on nothing but racist premises.
I've watched that for forty five years. So I see this clown sitting up there doing nothing else but that and then culminating it by having the audacity to say, if you don't vote for me, you're not black. So we have a handkerchief head house boy sitting up there trying to call somebody who has done more in a few years for black folk than this clown is done in his entire 50 and nowhere near as much damage. Hell, I thought the people that were in that Central Park 5 should have been damn near crucified considering what they confessed to and it wasn't like it got beat out of them. One of them got brought down by his father and the police got confronted by the father and this person and the dad said this son of mine needs to make a confession to you.
That's how it started. It was a pretty horrible crime. Mhmm. So I'm looking at what this clown has been sitting out there being tagged out there to be the monkey on a little chain and start talking smack that he has no expertise in. Right.
Speaker 0: John Legend, you are a sellout. You are a puppet. You come out every election year and cry racism to try to convince black people to vote a certain way. You don't live in the hood. You don't live in the city.
You are not really impoverished. You are not really a victim. You're not even married to a black woman. If you got all this money, take your ass to Baltimore, Detroit, Memphis, and fix the cities up on your dime, and that'll convince me. Not you getting on TV and crying like racism is so bad for you and has messed up your life.
Because to me, it seems like you're doing pretty well, bro. And to me, it don't really seem like you come around and do stuff for black people until it's time for election year. So we're not doing that, bro. We're not fucking with it. Fuck
reSee.it AI Summary
The U.S. has over 1.5 million nonprofits generating $2.6 trillion annually, more than many countries' GDPs. Despite this, issues like homelessness and food insecurity persist. Wealthy donors often use nonprofits for tax breaks, highlighting a broken system that leaves many in need.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
The U.S. has over 1.5 million nonprofit organizations, with a staggering $2.6 trillion annual revenue, surpassing the GDP of most nations. Yet, homelessness, mass incarceration, and food insecurity plague the country. Nonprofits often serve as tax write-offs, allowing wealthy donors to pocket money meant for the vulnerable. This shows a broken system leaving millions to suffer while the nonprofit sector gets filthy rich.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The United States has over 1.5 million nonprofit organizations that gross $2.6 trillion a year. This is more than the GDP of most countries. Despite this, the U.S. has a large percentage of homelessness, mass incarceration, and food insecurity. This raises the question of how this is possible.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The United States has over 1,500,000 nonprofit organizations. Wow. And they gross 2,600,000,000,000.0 a year. With a t? 2,600,000,000,000.0 a year.
That's sorry. That's not even the GDP of most countries on earth. Absolutely. But when you look at the, quote, unquote, efforts or those that's entrusted with this affair and rectifying this affair, and you see the fallacy and the gross negligence that comes with United States, they have one of the largest percentages of homelessness, mass incarceration, food insecurity, you know, and the list goes on. So now when you dive into the statistics behind it, it's like, wow.
How's that possible? This is a real problem.
reSee.it AI Summary
My father confronted Karmelo Anthony's self-defense claim in a powerful way. While Anthony's mother expressed her fear for her son, my father attended Anthony's press conference uninvited, standing silently with an arm in a sling. Despite being asked to leave, he remained until security escorted him out peacefully. This starkly contrasted Anthony's violent response when I asked him to leave; he stabbed me after threatening me. My father's nonviolent stance highlighted Anthony's lethal decision, revealing the true victim in this tragic situation.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Austin Metcalf's father dismantled Karmelo Anthony's self-defense claim with a single act. While Anthony's mother wept publicly, claiming fear for her son, who killed 17-year-old Metcalf after refusing to leave a restricted area, Metcalf's father mirrored the scenario. He appeared uninvited at Anthony's press conference, stood silently with one arm in a sling, and refused to leave when asked twice. Security escorted him out without violence. In contrast, when Metcalf asked Anthony to leave and attempted to escort him, Anthony stabbed him in the heart after threatening, "Touch me and see what happens." Metcalf's father's nonviolent defiance exposed Anthony's lethal choice, undermining his self-defense narrative as his family plays victim while another buries their child. 💯🎯🎯🎯
Video Transcript AI Summary
Austin Metcalf's father attended Carmelo Anthony's press conference uninvited, mirroring the circumstances of his son's death. He stood silently to the side with one arm in a sling. Asked to leave, he refused, similar to how Anthony refused to leave the area where he encountered Metcalf. Security escorted him out without violence.
This action undermined Anthony's self-defense claim. Anthony allegedly threatened Metcalf when asked to leave, escalating the situation. When Metcalf tried to escort him out, Anthony stabbed him. Metcalf's father's peaceful removal from the press conference highlighted how Anthony could have avoided the fatal confrontation by simply leaving when asked. The speaker contrasts the two scenarios, emphasizing that Anthony chose violence, resulting in Metcalf's death.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Austin Metcalf's father literally just single handedly destroyed Carmelo Anthony's entire self defense case in one move. So while Carmelo Anthony's mom's over there crying in front of the media talking about how much her daughter can't sleep in their room because of how scared they are, knowing that their son just took the life of Austin Metcalf simply because he tried to tell him to leave from an area where he was not supposed to be in the first place. See, Metcalf's dad did exactly just that. While he showed up uninvited to an event where he was not supposed to be, in an area where he was not supposed to be, he showed up to Carmelo Anthony's press conference. He walked in, one hand in a strap or a sling and his other hand just free.
So when I said single handedly, now you get it. Well, showed up. He just stood to the side in a corner, said nothing. He was asked to leave. He refused to leave, kinda like Carmelo Anthony was asked to leave and refused to leave.
They told him again to leave, kinda like Carmelo Anthony was told again to leave, but refused to leave. And then the security approached him and escorted him out. No weapons were drawn. Nobody died. Nobody was stabbed.
But in their case, when Carmelo Anthony was asked by Austin Netcalf to leave, he immediately got defensive and pretty much put up a threat when he said touch me and see what happens. When Austin Metcalf again told him, bruh, just leave. He told him, punch me and see what happens. And when Austin Metcalf held him and decided to escort him out, right, that's when he pulled out the knife and stabbed Austin Metcalf in the heart. So look.
Now the roles were reversed. This one white guy showed up to a press conference where he wasn't invited filled with black people. When he was asked to leave, he refused. When they asked him again and he refused again, then security came and escorted him out. No blood drawn, no lives lost.
And there goes their entire self defense case because that was exactly what, Carmelo Anthony should have done when he realized since he was so lost, when he realized he was under the wrong tent and was asked to leave, he should have simply just grabbed his shit and fucking left. But he chose to take someone's life, And now they're out here crying victim when another family just had to bury their 17 year old child.
reSee.it AI Summary
I find it appalling that someone like Karmelo Anthony receives special treatment after committing murder. The reaction from both sides of the political spectrum, celebrating his release after a judge reduced his bail, is disturbing. He claims he can't afford bail but lives in a $900,000 gated mansion. This situation highlights a troubling reality of perceived privilege and a failure to hold individuals accountable for their actions. Instead of celebrating those who uplift society, we see a glorification of criminals, which reflects a deeper issue in America.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
America’s broken when a killer like Karmelo Anthony gets special treatment instead of punished for cold-blooded murder. The woke mob, black and white, cheered his release after a judge slashed his bail. He cried poor and can’t afford bail, but now goes home to his rented $900,000 gated mansion. They celebrated a man who stabbed a white boy to death, crying “victim” to dodge accountability. Don’t ever say there’s no black privilege because this proves there is. This isn’t justice, it’s sickening. Instead of uplifting black excellence who contributed positively to society, these hypocrites glorify criminals, shunning those who rise above. This is what’s wrong with America.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Carmelo Anthony was released from jail after claiming he couldn't afford bail. The speaker believes the judge caved to the "woke mob." Upon Anthony's release, he was greeted by a parade of cheering black and white people.
The speaker asserts Anthony is a killer who murdered a white boy in cold blood and that his release demonstrates "black privilege." The speaker does not want to hear about white privilege or black people suffering.
The speaker finds the celebration of Anthony's temporary release disgusting and accuses black people of riding hard for criminals instead of demanding better or celebrating black excellence. The speaker suggests that to be accepted by black people, one must be despicable.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You saw that. Right? Now you saw that. Right? So Carmelo Anthony.
Alright. So the woke crowd, black lives matter, all of you color folk, all the skin folk, so I guess you got what you wanted, temporarily anyways. You got Carmelo Anthony, all of the crying, all of the whining, all the we shall overcome, and I guess you got him out of jail because he cried poor. And he cried poor saying that he could not afford whatever the bail was to get on up out of there. So then the judge decided to cave to the woke mob and decided to let him out so he could go home to his $900,000 gated community in his big ass house to, and the moment that he gets there, he get he arrives to a parade of black people.
A parade of black people, woke people, black and white, who are cheering on a killer who murdered a white boy in cold blood because that is exactly what happened. Don't talk to me again about white privilege. I don't wanna hear that shit. Don't talk to me again about black people suffering and black people don't have it good in this country and black people disproportionately. Don't talk none of that big shit to me because I'm not hearing it.
This literally was black privilege. The boy screamed victim victim victim. Oh my god. I'm so black. Feel bad for me.
Regardless of the fact that he literally stabbed a guy in cold blood. Celebrating Carmelo Anthony's temporarily temporary release is beyond disgusting. Honestly, it's sickening. You are what's you are what's wrong with black America because instead of demanding better, you literally ride hard for these criminals and you don't sit there wanna hold them accountable. You don't celebrate black excellence.
Right? You don't celebrate black people who are doing good, who stay out of trouble, who don't go around stabbing people, who don't carry knives to schools, right, who don't hold loaded guns to pregnant women's stomach, who don't have dead bodies in their trunk. You don't celebrate black people who don't do those things. No. Those are the black people that you ride hard for and they're the ones who are out there getting degrees, having good careers, and being doctors, and being lawyers, and judges, and things like that.
You call them sellouts because they're not being criminals cause they're not out there acting a fool. So I guess if I want black people to love me, I gotta be the most despicable person on the planet and then maybe you will finally accept me.
reSee.it AI Summary
I don't understand why people are upset with DOGE for revealing billions while trusting politicians who lie. Spending $1 billion would take $1,000 daily for 2,740 years or $35,580 every day over an average lifespan. When politicians dismiss DOGE's billions, it's time to wake up, America!
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
What's wrong with you people mad at DOGE for uncovering billions, believing politicians who lies to you? This woman broke it down: In order to spend $1 billion, you would need to spend $1,000 daily for 2,740 years which is back to the Roman Empire’s fall or in an average 77 year life, you’d need to burn $35,580 every day. So, when politicians downplay DOGE’s billions as “no big deal,” wake up, America, it’s insane money!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Are you really buying that billions of dollars isn't that much money? Let me break it down. If I gave you $1 billion and told you to spend $1,000 every day until it was gone, it would take you 2,740 years to spend it all.
To spend $1 billion in the average human lifespan of 77 years, you'd have to spend $35,580 every single day. So, when politicians say billions of dollars is fine, remember how long it would take you to spend that kind of money. Wake up!
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What the hell is really wrong with some of you people? All you people that are really mad at Doge for finding all this money and you actually believe the politicians that say, oh, the billions are fine, then it's not that much money. I broke it down so maybe you could understand it a little bit better. If I gave you $1,000,000,000 and I told you I wanted you to spend a thousand dollars every single day until that billion dollars was completely gone, how long do you think you'd have to live in order to spend that $1,000,000,000? 2 thousand 7 hundred and 40 years before you spent all of the money.
You could have started when the Roman Empire was ready to fall and you'd still be spending that money today. And I broke it down in case you didn't understand that, I broke it down a little more so maybe you can understand it a little better. The average human being lives approximately seventy seven years. Approximately. If I wanted you to spend $1,000,000,000, all of it, in that seventy seven years that you're on this earth, how much money do you think you'd have to spend every single day to make sure it's all gone before you're gone?
$35,580 every single day. Wouldn't that be horrible? Oh, man. I gotta spend $35,000 today to reach my goal by the time I'm 77 years old. So the next time a politician says, the billions of dollars at Doge's is fine and it's not really that much money, wake up, America.
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched Gavin Newsom on Charlie Kirk, and his charm hides his deceit. I believe he's the most dangerous politician out there. To Tucker Carlson, I called him a sociopath who could beat a lie detector test. He's a polished fraud, and I say never trust this psychopath.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
If you watched Gavin Newsom on Charlie Kirk and you didn’t know he was a snake, he would definitely fool you. His charm and charisma is his secret weapon to mask his LIES, making him whom I believe is the MOST dangerous politician around. 👂 to Tucker Carlson basically saying that Gavin Newsom is a sociopath who can beat a lie detector test and he’s 💯🎯‼️ Gavin Newsom is a polished fraud, and that’s what makes him lethal. NEVER trust this psychopath.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Gavin Newsom has a rare ability to lie without any physical tells. He can implement policies like locking down the state and then dine at the French Laundry without a flicker of guilt. I'm not diagnosing him, but in my experience, that's unusual.
California isn't a true democracy; it's a machine state with a corrupt political culture. Kamala Harris was disliked by many Californians, yet she thrived. Dianne Feinstein could have remained a senator indefinitely, regardless of her condition.
It worries me that someone from California's political environment could enter a presidential race. As a native Californian, I've seen the state decline since 1985 due to its political leadership. What would Newsom even run on? His potential candidacy suggests they believe they can win without voter consent, and that's frightening.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Many different things about Gavin Newsom. But one thing I know for a fact about Gavin Newsom is he has the capacity to beat the light the lie detector test. Gavin Newsom will say anything he needs to say, not like Biden's. Not like this, actually. Whatever Biden's fault, he's not like this.
Like, Biden would you know, he has, like, guilt. If he's lying to you, he gets twitchy. Gavin Newsom's palms don't sweat. His respiration doesn't increase. His body temperature doesn't change.
Nothing changes in Gavin Newsom when he lies to your face. And there are not that many people like that actually. That's a rare quality. Like to lock down the state, to keep people's kids from getting an education, and to arrest people for surfing, and then go have dinner at the French Laundry. Like most people couldn't do that.
They'd just be like You're saying he's a sociopath. Just he can lie and not care. I'm not a psychiatrist, but I so I don't know that I don't really know the category and I'm not gonna diagnose him, but I'll just say in fifty years of being around a lot of people, I've met very few who can behave that way. Very, very few. It's a very unusual quality, and of course, it's probably useful in politics.
Is he electable? Is he electable? Yeah. Exactly. Are the American people gonna see that the way that you see it?
Or Well, as you know, the system in California does not include elections. I mean, it has nothing to do with what the people think. It's a it's a machine state. It's the most corrupt out of 50. Kamala Harris was, like, despised by most Californians, and she, you know, was a sitting US senator.
Diane poor Dianne Feinstein, my neighbor in Washington, I I don't I don't think she was a horrible person, just for the record, but she was non compass menace, and like she could have lived well beyond her death as a US Senator. So it's like, it's not a democratic state, small d democratic state. It's not run on the basis of what the population wants. It's a fixed game in California. And so it does make me very uncomfortable that someone from that political culture, which is an utterly corrupt political culture, an authoritarian political culture, could like enter a presidential race, because clearly, what are you running on if you're Gavin Newsom?
As a native Californian, I know what the state was like in 1985 because I lived there, and it's completely degraded from that time. And like, how did that happen? Well, part of the big reason the big reason is the political leadership of the state. You've got nothing to run on. What are you running?
Have you driven through LA recently? Like, seriously. So the fact that he would get in the race suggests, you know, they think that they can win without the consent of voters, and that freaks me out.
reSee.it AI Summary
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs is under investigation for bribery, fraud, conspiracy, and racketeering, with allegations that she and state Democrats received $400,000 from Sunshine Residential Home in exchange for taxpayer funds. The Joint Legislative Committee Chairman is bringing in the Auditor General to assist with the investigation. Additionally, $339 million went missing during her tenure as budget director, leading to the resignation of her aide, Sarah Brown. Lawmakers are demanding accountability as state agencies seek a $350 million bailout, raising serious concerns about governance in Arizona.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Arizona Governor Katie Hobbs faces an investigation into bribery, fraud, conspiracy, and racketeering. Allegations claim she and Arizona Democrats pocketed $400,000 from Sunshine Residential Home, a state contractor, in exchange for millions in taxpayer funds. The Joint Legislative Committee Chairman has unleashed the Auditor General to join Maricopa County investigators, vowing to expose this "major breach of trust." Compounding the scandal, $339 million vanished under Hobbs’ watch as budget director, triggering the resignation of her six-year aide, Sarah Brown. Lawmakers are reeling as insolvent state agencies now demand a $350 million bailout, details conveniently withheld from the legislature. Arizona lawmakers are demanding answers: How did this happen? This isn’t governance, it’s a criminal empire crumbling under its own greed. Arizona’s been betrayed and it’s time for Hobbs and all involved are held accountable.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm currently under investigation for bribery, fraud, conspiracy, and racketeering. The chairman of the joint legislative committee has informed Maricopa County Investigators that the auditor general will assist in the investigation, prompted by reports detailing how a state contractor, Sunshine Residential Home, allegedly bribed me and Arizona Democrats with $400,000 in exchange for millions more in state funds.
Additionally, state lawmakers are investigating the disappearance of $339,000,000. My budget director, Sarah Brown, also resigned after six years. A state legislator has voiced concerns over insolvent state agencies requiring a $339,000,000 bailout and is demanding answers regarding misleading information about spending. The request has now increased to $350,000,000.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Katie Hobbs is under investigation. You heard me correctly. Katie Hobbs, the governor of Arizona is now under investigation. Here are the details. Katie Hobbs is now being investigated for bribery, fraud conspiracy and racketeering.
The chairman of the joint legislative committee has informed Maricopa County Investigators that the auditor general will assist in the investigation. This comes after the Arizona Republic detail how state contractor Sunshine Residential Home bribed Katie Hobbs and Arizona Democratic with $400,000 and in return got millions more in state money. He writes, In my capacity as a chairman of the joint legislative audit committee, I want you to know that the Auditor General Office stands ready to partner with you in getting the facts about the troubling matter. Make no mistakes, we will allocate the resources the auditor general needs to help restore what appears to be a major breach in trust in our government. Additionally, Arizona state lawmakers are now investigating Katie Hobbs after $339,000,000 disappeared.
As Hobbs budget director Sarah Brown also mysteriously resigned after working with Hobbs for six years. State legislator Alan Koldenan, I think I'm saying his name right. Think it's wrong too. Imagine my shock when the legislative was informed that the state has several insolvent agencies and requires a $339,000,000 bailout to close out the current fiscal year. Since liaison dedicated to briefing members of the legislature failed to provide details on how we got here.
I am putting in a request in writing. Arizona deserves to know details. Why did you mislead legislator about the spending you intend to approve? In just two weeks time, I've learned that the problem has worsened and that your office is now requesting $350,000,000 Now let me tell you guys, there is no question a criminal enterprise is being run-in the state of Arizona. Katie Hobbs, in my opinion, honestly, sheets.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe President Trump’s recent decision to end federal taxpayer benefits for illegal immigrants is a necessary step to prioritize American citizens. I question why we should provide more support to non-citizens when our own people are struggling. It’s frustrating to see the financial burden of supporting millions of illegal immigrants, which costs us billions each year. Trump's actions aim to put Americans first and address what I see as an imbalance in our system. If you don’t support this country, you shouldn’t expect benefits.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
President Trump just ended ALL federal taxpayer benefits for illegal immigrants, redirecting billions back to Americans. Forget the Democrat cries of "racist", why should illegals get more than our own citizens? We can’t go into another country and demand better treatment than their people. If you’re not waving the red, white, and blue, go home, we don’t care what happens to anyone that does not love and support this country, that’s including you Democrats. So why must America cater to 20 million illegals costing us around $182 Billion yearly and 365,000+ non-citizens are receiving SSI and on top of that 54% are also receiving additional Social Security benefit. Trump’s move is to put Americans FIRST and end the insanity!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Last night, President Trump ended all federal taxpayer benefits for undocumented immigrants, returning that money to American citizens. Democrats will likely label this as racist, offensive, and hateful, but I disagree. Why should America be more accommodating to these individuals than their own countries?
I can't expect Paris to do more for me than for Parisians, so why should America have to bend over backward for these people? If you're not waving the American flag, I don't care about you. Go back to where you came from, where you are wanted. If you love those countries so much, go back. I'm an American patriot and I don't care about anyone who doesn't love and support this country, and that includes you Democrats.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So last night, president Trump ended all federal taxpayer benefits for undocumented immigrants in America, thus giving the money back to Americans. Now I know and you know that the Democrats are gonna call this racist, offensive, hateful. No. Why should our country be more accommodating to these people than their own country? I can't go to Paris.
Paris do more for me than they do for the people of Paris. So why is it that America must bend at the knee for these types of people? No. Go right the fuck back where you came from. That's not hateful.
You're wanted there because you're from there. You fly the flags of countries that you love so much. Go back. If you're not flying the red, white, blue, I don't wanna talk to you. I don't give a fuck what happens to you.
I am a patriot of America. I do not care what happens to anyone that does not love and support this country. That includes you, democrats.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm tired of Trump being blamed for everything, from grocery prices to train explosions. It's ridiculous to attribute personal issues, like a partner not coming home or no Valentine's gift, to him. Let's give him some credit for his efforts and stop this blame game!
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This woman is sick of Trump getting blame for everything under the sun—from grocery prices to plane crashes, even train explosions and drone mishaps. If you could, you'd blame him for your partner not coming home last night or for being the side piece this Valentine's Day. It's always Trump's fault: your partner working out of town, overtime tonight, or no gift on your special day. Give the man some credit! He's doing an amazing job. Stop this blame game!
Video Transcript AI Summary
I am so sick of you people always blaming President Trump for everything! Groceries, plane crashes, trains blowing up, drones, you name it. You'd blame him if your partner didn't come home, or if you found out you were the side piece on Valentine's Day. You'd say it's his fault they're working out of town, working late, or why you didn't get a gift!
He gets no credit for the amazing job he's doing. You people blame him for absolutely everything. If you could blame him for your partner having another partner, you would.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm so sick of y'all. Y'all blame president Donald Trump for everything. Any and everything. Y'all blame them for the groceries. Y'all blame them for the plane crashes.
Y'all blame them because of the train blowed up. Y'all blaming him on the drones. I bet if you could, you'll blame Donald Trump because your boo didn't come home last night. I guarantee you, if you could find a way, you would blame Donald Trump because you found out that you was the number one this Valentine's Day. You found out you was the side piece and you can't handle it, and I guarantee you, if you guys could, some type of way, you would blame Donald Trump for it.
It's it's President Donald Trump fault that they had to work out of town this weekend. It it it's Donald Trump fault that tonight they gotta work over. It's it's Trump fault. It's President Donald Trump fault. It's President Donald Trump fault that you didn't get no gift.
I'm sick of y'all. Y'all blame he don't get no credit for nothing. This man is doing an amazing job, and y'all don't give him no credit. For real though, y'all. Y'all don't think that they blame president Donald Trump for everything.
If they could blame him because they bae got another bae for Valentine's Day, don't you think they would? Y'all
reSee.it AI Summary
Leticia James once accused President Trump of inflating property values to defraud banks, despite banks confirming no fraud occurred. Now, reports suggest she may have inflated her own property values for larger loans, mirroring the crime she accused Trump of. It's time for accountability; she should face the same legal scrutiny she imposed on him, but not in a New York court. We should pursue everything she has, as she lacks Trump's legal resources. Let's see if she can withstand the pressure she created. We demand justice!
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
The Hunter has become the hunted. Remember when Leticia James dragged President Trump through court, accusing him of inflating property values to defraud banks? Banks confirmed no fraud occurred, yet she sought to seize his assets. Now, the tables have turned. It’s being reported that James herself inflated property values for bigger loans, the very crime she accused Trump of. It's time for accountability. Drag her through the same legal wringer, but don't let it be in a New York court. We should take EVERYTHING she got because she doesn't have Trump's lawyers. Let's see if she can handle the heat she dished out. We demand Justice!
Video Transcript AI Summary
Remember when I said that whatever Trump is accused of, the accusers are guilty of the same? Letitia James, who dragged Trump through court, is now being investigated for the same thing. She tried to hit Trump with a half-billion dollar lawsuit, claiming he inflated property values to defraud banks. But the banks said they weren't defrauded and that everything checked out. Now, James is being accused of inflating her property value to get bigger loans. Isn't that the same thing she went after Trump for? I hope they take her to court and take everything she owns because she doesn't have Trump's lawyers.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright. How many times have I told you, whatever they accuse Trump of is what they are guilty of? Because tell me why the same thing that Leticia James dragged Donald Trump through court for, she's being investigated for right now. Yeah. Yeah.
I remember that half a billion dollar lawsuit that she tried to pull on Donald Trump and went to attempt to seize Donald Trump's properties. You know, where she said he inflated his properties so he can defraud the bank, and then the bank came out and said, we weren't defraud of anything. We sent out our investigators. They did their math. Everything added up.
We gave Donald Trump the money he paid back in time and in some cases before time. We love doing business with Donald Trump, but tell me why now it's being reported that Leticia James inflated her property value so she can get bigger loans. Ain't that the same shit she tried to take everything from Trump for? See, I'm just hoping they don't bring this to a New York court. They need to drag her ass in red water and take every fucking thing she got because she ain't got Trump's lawyers.
reSee.it AI Summary
I testified at a field hearing about the alarming rise in crime linked to the border crisis, something I never expected to address when I became sheriff a decade ago. In my 24 years in law enforcement, I've never encountered such a significant criminal element from outside our borders in Wisconsin. I reached out to fellow sheriffs across the state, and their reports confirmed a variety of serious incidents. One sheriff expressed a dire concern, stating that if Trump doesn't win the upcoming election, we are in serious trouble.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Sheriff of Dodge County WI Testifies at a Field Hearing on what some of the Sheriffs shared with him. People don't understand how bad it is if you would ask me 10 years ago when I became sheriff. If I’d be sitting here in front of you talking about a border crisis, I would have said no way. No way we weren't in a position where it's going to be this bad. I'm here to tell you that is not the case. In my 24 years of law enforcement, I have never seen the type of criminal element from outside of our borders in our state. Home state here of Wisconsin, our border state of Wisconsin, like we are seeing now. It didn't take me long to reach out to our fellow sheriffs and say hey what have you got around the state and for them to come back to me with some incidents and there's crimes of all kinds from around the country around the state I’m gonna start with a couple of them in my own county that happened here recently. One sheriff said If Trump doesn't win this election we are screwed! 👂 👇 as he shares the rest of what he’s been told by other sheriffs.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm here representing the opinions of many sheriffs and want to share some serious incidents. Sheriffs are saying that if Trump doesn't win the election, we are screwed and people don't understand how bad the border crisis is. In my 24 years in law enforcement, I have never seen this level of criminal activity from outside our borders in Wisconsin.
We've had cases involving Sinaloa cartel members with large amounts of meth and fentanyl, but no prosecution. Another incident involved a scammer from India attempting to steal $81,000. We also had a stabbing by an illegal alien and a sexual assault where the victim was trafficked from her mother. Additionally, a homicide occurred due to a drug debt. We need the federal government to secure our southern border because Fentanyl is killing 1,500 people a year in Wisconsin.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It might eliminate some feedback. We'll see what happens. Certainly. Gary Schmidt, continue. Thank you.
I represent many opinions of the, sheriffs of the Sheriffs Association, not all. So I'm not speaking as the president here today, but, I I do have a number of, incidents that I would like to share with everybody. As you know, being a sheriff is a a very tasking job. There's a lot of work that I have to do. This morning I was out looking for a, young lady who was missing.
Found her thankfully. Right now I am supposed to be back where we I have 17 individuals doing a a search warrant and a homicide investigation. There's a lot of things that we have to do. I thank you for taking your time to be here in your home state or come from across the country to be here. I I do note, along with Mr.
Van Orden, what what he indicated earlier, I'm disappointed that we don't have individuals here to hear what we have to say here today. We are your constituents and we have concerns and I thank you for hearing them. I hope you can take them back to the other side and share them. But it's very important stuff for you to hear. And I really thank, Senator, Johnson for being here, but where's senator Baldwin, and and other members of of the other side?
That that's very concerning to me as a constituent. I I, elect you to be here just as congressman Fitzgerald elects me to be his sheriff. I have a responsibility to him. You have a responsibility to me. I appreciate you hearing what we have to say.
With that being said, some of the sheriffs that have shared some very serious things with me. If Trump doesn't win this, this election, we are screwed. That's a quote from one of our sheriffs. Another sheriff, people don't understand how bad it is. If you would've asked me ten years ago when I became sheriff if I'd be sitting here in front of you talking about a border crisis, I would've said no way.
No way. We weren't aren't in a position where it's going to be this bad. I'm here to tell you that is not the case. You obviously know that is not the case. In my twenty four years of law enforcement, I have never seen the the type of criminal element from, outside of our borders in our state home state here of Wisconsin, our border state of Wisconsin, like we are seeing now.
It didn't take me long to, reach out to our fellow sheriffs and say, hey, what have you got around the state for for them to, come back to me with some incidents? And there's crimes of all kinds from around the country around the state. I'm gonna start with a couple of them in my own county that happened here recently. The first one, really, the the first arrest took place under president Trump at the very end of his of his, last, of his first term. We the DEA, in collaboration with with our agency, made an arrest of an individual from the Sinaloa drug cartel, in which they seized 81 pounds of methamphetamine.
Eighty one pounds. That's a small human. Five and a half ounces of fentanyl. Five and a half ounces of fentanyl will kill a hundred and fifty six thousand people. From one person, from a cartel member that lives in the city of Juneau, Three Thousand people, my county seat.
Here to tell you we have cartel members in every single one of the counties in Dodge County. Alright. I'm sorry. In in in the state of Wisconsin. It is happening.
And and we thought, okay. The DEA is here. The federal government is here to save us on this one. No prosecution. He was arrested.
No prosecution. They're gonna work him. To this day, I don't know that this individual has ever been prosecuted for any of those offenses. In February, our drug task force came to me and said, hey. We've got this guy again.
I said, what do you mean we got this guy again? I thought, isn't this guy in prison? No. We've got this guy again. And, we they had some controlled buys into him, made an additional rest, and ended up with £4 of methamphetamine, another four pounds, 2.1 pounds of marijuana, and $51,000 in suspected drug money, which was all seized.
My people did the right thing. I don't know what happened after at at at transition of power to the, Biden administration because under Trump's administration, they were doing good thing. And all of a sudden, it just fell off the table and nothing happened. Two years later into the Biden Harris administration, we have to come back and arrest this guy, and we have possession with intent to deliver more than 50 grams of meth, possession with intent to deliver marijuana, two hundred grams to a thousand grams, maintaining a drug trafficking place, possession of drug paraphernalia, three counts of manufacturing and deliver of methamphetamine blows me away. We have him in prison now.
The state is now paying for him to be in prison. He shouldn't have been here in the first place, and the state is going to pay for him to be in prison for eighteen and a half years and then have him unsupervised or at least for ten years when he shouldn't be here in the first place or should be in federal prison. That is a problem. That is a a problem that's now on the Wisconsin taxpayers to take care of him. Another comment that was made earlier about law enforcement in other countries, we don't have them taking a hold on our our our state here in Wisconsin yet.
It's coming. We will have more cartel members coming into the state of Wisconsin. We will have more instances of individuals threatening our families. It's going to happen just like it happens in Mexico if this continues, if we don't stop this. I'm fearful for my family.
I'm fearful for the family of those that serve with me that when we have cartel members and if we're going to arrest individuals, that they're gonna turn around and say they're gonna hand us that DVD and say, what are you going to do if we don't do something soon? Other incidents. Oh, we had a scammer from India. Tried to scam somebody out of $81,000 in Dodge County just last month. We were able to get in, intercept, and and take this person into cuts into custody in the midst of the deal.
We don't always get to do that. This was really cool. We got him in custody. He is now in our court system, and we are hopefully working on some kind of deportation process, but we got a 5 to hundred thousand dollar cash bond. We'll take care of it here at the state because the federal government isn't doing it, but I sure wish the federal government would.
Fond Du Lac County incident. Individual on March twenty second of twenty twenty four, the individual, was stabbed. An illegal alien, left left the, the victim for dead. Just left her for dead. Fond Du Lac County, in collaboration with two other counties, was able to take this individual into custody on on multiple charges, first degree attentional homicide, mayhem, first degree reckless injury, aggravated battery.
Those are all pending. Another Fond Du Lac County just over the county border, 12 year old female had just grown shown up, at somebody's door. She broke away from somebody who was sexually assaulting her, had her bound, had her gagged, had her blindfolded. He broke she broke away. She had enough power to get away and and and get to somebody's home and seek help.
Here, just and he paid for her. And he paid for her from her mother. Unbelievable stories that we're hearing right here in Wisconsin. Oconto County, an individual who was who was found dead laying in a park in in Green Bay Shores State Wildlife Area. The Oconto County Sheriff tells me that that, his staff worked really hard on this find only to find out that this individual, the victim, was dealing.
And this individual owed this, the suspect money. The suspect is, it goes, finds him, picks him up at his home, takes him out of the park, couple rounds, puts him down. And, here we have a a homicide in Ocono quiet Ocono County in in Northeast Wisconsin. I could go on time after time. There's there's there's all kinds of incidents.
We we have illegal driving, peep people not having licenses. We can't identify them. Incidents where we're stopping people on the side of the road, and and we can't identify them. One incident on I on Highway 41, right in our county. Four individuals, none of them would identify themselves to us.
One of them we figured out who it was. Three of them we took to the jail. One we find out has a US Marshals Service warrant. And you know the US Marshals Service warrants aren't aren't cheap warrants. They're felony warrants.
We didn't know who that was. Forty minute ride to jail before we figured out who it was. More and more of these individuals are coming into our county. Fentanyl is is killing people. We have 1,500 people a year dying in in Wisconsin because of fentanyl overdoses.
And and I would love to put up a border around Dodge County or around the state of Wisconsin, but we need the federal government to do that at our at our southern border.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe @SenWarren has lost touch with her role as a public servant, prioritizing her own interests over those of the people she was elected to represent. Her claims about her heritage and her dismissive attitude towards constituents highlight this disconnect. As we scrutinize her spending of public funds, her refusal to acknowledge any wrongdoing is particularly troubling. It feels like Congress members often act in self-interest rather than serving the American people, which seems fundamentally unconstitutional.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Hey @SenWarren you don't deserve your position. It's gone to your head. You've lied about your heritage and called us "ordinary," revealing your disconnect from the role you were elected to serve. As a public servant, your job is to represent the people, not to act superior or misuse our money. When the servant places themselves above the master, we have a problem. Now, as we uncover how you're spending our funds, you wave your hands like a narcissist, refusing to apologize. This is the most upsetting aspect of the average Congress member—you don't represent America; you represent your own interests and line your pockets. This should be unconstitutional when you fail to fulfill your elected duty.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Elizabeth Warren, you claimed ordinary Americans aren't entitled to know how their taxes are spent. That's unacceptable. Your position is one of service to the people, not the other way around. Acting as if you're superior to those you represent shows a lack of understanding and disregard for your duty.
Your refusal to apologize for misusing taxpayer money, instead deflecting with narcissistic behavior, is deeply troubling. Congresspeople shouldn't prioritize self-enrichment over representing their constituents. This behavior violates the purpose of your elected office and demands serious self-reflection. You need to remember who you serve.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This message is for dear Elizabeth Warren. Young lady, you sat there and you said in front of the world that us ordinary Americans do not have the right to know what you're spending our hard earned taxes on. I just wanna take a moment to tell you, miss Elizabeth Warren, that you do not deserve to be in the position that you're in. And the reason why is because it has gone literally to your head. Not only have you lied about being an Indian and all these other things, but the simple fact that you call us ordinary or you call us average in any simple shape or form tells me that you do not understand the position that you've been elected into.
And let me explain something. You see the position that you've been elected to because you need to understand this, you don't. The position that you have been elected into is a position of that of a servant. Meaning your job is to serve the people. The moment that the servant becomes higher than the master, we have a huge issue because you feel it's okay to do whatever you want with our money.
And now you're getting upset because we're finding out exactly what you're doing with our money. And the sad part is instead of coming out and saying, you know what? I am so sorry that we got caught. You guys are just sitting there and waving your hands about like narcissists. And that my friend, that is the most upsetting thing about the average congress man or woman that is elected is that you guys you guys don't represent America.
You represent yourself and lining your pockets. And that, my friend, should be against the constitution when you no longer fulfill your purpose to duty at which you've been elected for. So, yeah, I don't know, Elizabeth Warren. You you got some self reflecting to do there, young lady. Have a great day.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m sorry, but it looks like the Democrats are in trouble. If you support them, prepare for a shock. During the Super Bowl, Elon Musk will release ads revealing the truth about their actions and how they've mismanaged your money. Tomorrow is going to be eye-opening.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This woman says she is sorry, but the Democrats are going down in flames. If you're on their side, brace yourself. Tomorrow, during the Super Bowl, Elon Musk is dropping ads that'll expose what you've been voting for. And for those who backed Kamala Harris, get ready to see how the Democrats have been playing with your money for years. They hid their crazy moves to keep you in the dark. Now you'll see the truth and feel foolish for defending them. Tomorrow's gonna be wild.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I apologize to Democrats. Tomorrow, during the Super Bowl, Elon Musk will run three commercials exposing what you've been voting for. For those who defended Kamala Harris, I look forward to your reaction when you see twenty years of Democrats' actions with your money. Their support of questionable policies was to keep you in the dark, but now the truth is out. How will you feel defending a party that has been stealing from and lying to you? I can't wait to see the fallout tomorrow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm sorry. The Democratic Party is going down in flames. So if you are on that side of the aisle, my biggest apologies. Because when Elon Musk runs these three commercials tomorrow when everybody's watching the Super Bowl, you all are going to really see what you all have been consistently voting for. And for those of you who were arguing with me about Kamala Harris and whether or not she would be a viable pick, I can't wait to see your faces when I show you for the last twenty years what the Democrats have been doing with your money.
And the only reason that they're behind a lot of the crazy shit that they were supporting was to make sure you didn't find out, and now you are. So how silly are you going to feel 100% defending that party knowing that them crooks was stealing from you and then lying to you at the same time? I can't wait to see this shit tomorrow.
reSee.it AI Summary
Democrats recently stormed the Education Department, acting entitled and disrespecting a security guard. They claimed they pay his salary, forgetting that taxpayers do. Their behavior was out of line, especially with Maxine Waters involved. They attempted to block doors and demand meetings without following proper procedures. Test scores have been declining since the '70s, particularly in blue areas, and our kids struggle with reading. If this is the extent of their efforts, we’ll be just fine moving forward.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This Man 💯 Nailed It! Democrats stormed the Education Department with cameras, acting like they own the place. They disrespected a security guard just doing his job, questioning his employment and claiming they pay his salary. Newsflash: American taxpayers pay your salaries, not his. You're part of the legislative branch, not the executive branch, which oversees the Education Department. That guard showed more patience than any of us ever could, especially with Maxine Waters talking trash. You tried to block doors and demand meetings with the executive branch, led by Trump, without following proper channels. And for what? Test scores have been dropping since the Education Department was created in the '70s, especially in blue areas. Our kids can’t even read, and you brought the teachers' union leader? Trump should shut this mess down. If this low-budget insurrection is all you’ve got for the next few years, we’ll be just fine.💥🔥🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
Democrats created a scene at the Department of Education. Their behavior was disrespectful, especially towards the security guard who was simply doing his job. They acted entitled, ignoring proper channels for meetings with the executive branch. This incident highlights the Democrats' flawed priorities. Declining test scores, especially in Democrat-controlled areas, demonstrate a failure of the Department of Education since its inception. The involvement of the teacher's union chairman further underscores this failure. This low-budget attempt at insurrection is pathetic; if this is their best effort for the next four years, we're in good shape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Democrats gonna pull up with cameras to the education department and show y'all a whole black asses today? That shit was hood as hell. And the sad part my congresswoman pulled up too. So y'all gonna show y'all ass and disrespect that security guard who was just doing his job. You're gonna question his employment status and tell him you pay his salaries.
No. You don't pay his salaries. The American people pay your damn salary. Acting like y'all high and mighty and better than anybody? Let's get this shit straight.
Let's get this shit straight. Let's get this shit straight. You guys are part of the legislative branch. The Department of Education falls underneath the executive branch. That man did his job.
He didn't have to let y'all asses in, and he did not. Shout out to the security guard or the security individual professional. That man got more patience than I could ever have because that raggedy raves in face Maxine Waters talk more shit than a little bit. I mean, y'all have truly reached rock bottom. Y'all walk up to the education department trying to block the doors and demanding a meeting with the executive branch.
You know the proper channels. If you want a meeting with the executive branch, you schedule that with the executive branch, and that's Donald j Trump. Y'all are out of line. Now let's talk about the education department. Have you seen the test scores?
Ever since the Department of Education was created in the late seventies, every year our test scores have gone down. And some of the bluest areas have the lowest test scores in the nation. Our kids can't read. And you pulled over with the chairman of the teacher's union? Honestly, Trump, shut this shit down.
I can't believe these Negroes pulled up and wanted to have a low budget insurrection. If this is all y'all got for the next four years, we doing just fine.
reSee.it AI Summary
I didn't appreciate President Trump during his first term, but after some research, I've come to see things differently. It's time for people to wake up; Trump has been playing a strategic game while we've been misled. His negotiation skills are top-notch, and his actions speak louder than words. His tariffs and deals with countries like Colombia and Mexico have turned potential threats into opportunities for America. Trump understands people and negotiates from strength. He truly puts America first and fights for our prosperity every day.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
👇 woman didn’t appreciate President Trump in his first term because he rubbed her the wrong way. Well, this is what it looks like when you do a little research and wake up from the lies you’ve been fed about President Trump. People needs to Wake up because President Trump has been playing chess while we've been fed checkers. If you've been skeptical, I challenge you to dive into the truth. The man loves America like no other. He's not just talk; he's action. Trump's negotiation tactics? They're straight out of a masterclass before the media turned on him. He plays the long game, never making a deal without the leverage to walk away, ensuring America's prosperity and security. Think tariffs are a scare? Look beyond the headlines. Trump's moves with Colombia, Mexico, Canada, and Panama? Genius. He turned potential economic threats into opportunities, securing our borders, supporting our economy, and strengthening our global position without firing a single shot. Forget what you've heard about him being anyone's puppet. Trump reads people, understands motives, and negotiates from a place of strength. His North Korea strategy? Brilliant. His approach keeps our enemies guessing and our allies in check. He's not only our President; he's the one who's finally putting America first, making decisions that might ruffle feathers but guarantee we're not just surviving; we're thriving. If you've doubted him, just know he doesn't just love America; he's fighting for it EVERY DAY.🙏🏼🇺🇸❤️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trump's strategic approach to negotiations is impressive. He plays the long game, never making a deal he isn't willing to walk away from. Many misunderstand his tactics, focusing on sensational news rather than the underlying economics. For instance, his dealings with North Korea and tariffs on Colombia and Mexico were calculated moves to leverage better agreements. Countries quickly adjusted their stances when faced with potential consequences, like tariffs or border control issues. Trump’s methods reveal a deep understanding of negotiation dynamics, aiming for mutual benefits without compromising national security. The key is to look beyond the headlines and understand the real implications of his strategies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Can we talk about and I'm sorry. I don't know how else to say this. How Trump has everybody by the balls? It is something else to watch. I never I did not appreciate him his first term.
Rubbed me the wrong way. I believed everything I heard, but, oh my gosh. I'm gonna post a link in the comments of an article that was written by negotiation journal. I encourage everybody, especially if you don't like him, to go read it. The way he does business has been taught.
It's been written about before they turned on him. You need to realize he plays the long game, and he never makes a deal he's not willing to walk away from. It's brilliant. If people would, like, calm down for five seconds and not believe the news because they are lying to you, all you have to wait is five minutes after they say something untrue to find out it was a lie. They've got you panicked over tariffs.
You need to, like, look at economics, really. Honestly, you've got to look at economics. You need to look at the way the country was before the income tax was implemented. Do you not believe it? Read some of Thomas Sowell's stuff.
Like, he is a top economic specialist. He even talks about it. He's using it again as leverage. He says and you read this article. I was shot shot by the tactics he used his first term that we never heard about.
We heard about, oh, he's this person's puppet and that person's puppet. Not realizing a tactic is to read people, to find out what makes them tick, to listen. What do they really want? What can we do together to give us both what we want without compromising the safety and the security and the prosperity of the country I have been elected to run. If you read this thing that he did with North Korea, I was like, brilliant.
Brilliant. I mean, it was it was brilliant. So you hear things like did you hear how, like, Columbia doesn't like him? Like, they won't even work with him. Oh, he's putting tariffs on them?
What about our coffee? Yeah. People really said that. Seven seconds later, the Colombian president calls Trump and says, basically, nope. Mister president Trump, I'm gonna actually, I I don't I don't want those tariffs you were talking about.
I'm gonna go ahead and bring my plane to you. I will pick up my people. Uh-huh. He called them daddy. Then it's all, god.
Can you believe he's putting tariffs on Mexico? What about our corona? Yeah. Chuck Schumer talked about that in Canada. I said to my husband, by tomorrow, they're gonna be begging.
Why? Because their currency value dropped. All he was asking was, here's the deal. This is good for you. This is good for us.
If you don't do this, we're going to do that. It is an either or. Close your border. Help us stop the flow of fentanyl that is coming through the North and the South border. Rather than doing anything about it, they wanted to play chicken with the wrong guy.
What do you know? Mexico, all of a sudden, is like, hey. Don't you know, we're just don't let's let's not worry about the tariffs. I'm gonna give you soldiers to work our side of the border. Don't you worry about it.
Oh, and Canada did the same thing. Had a great conversation with president Trump today. We've decided to pause to pause the tariffs for thirty days, and I'm actually going to assign a fentanyl czar to help with it and manpower. Panama? How could he threaten to take Panama?
Even though China's gonna control it if we don't stop and then it's gonna totally mess with our trade. Oh, and also we spent so much money building that canal and lost many lives. What is he thinking? He never wanted it. What he wanted was for them to drop the relationship and the contract they had with them.
That's that's what he wanted. And then also so Panama froze in. Oh, don't worry about you guys. Your ships can pass through. We're not gonna charge you.
This is how it works. I'm so horny to like with this, but we have been bent over and screwed nine ways to Sunday for years, for years. No more. You just gotta calm down. You just gotta calm down.
Stop reading the news. Stop. Read the article.
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m furious with Democrats for treating Americans like fools while prioritizing illegal immigrants. Their platform feels like a betrayal, wasting billions on useless projects while neglecting citizens. Now they dare criticize President Trump, who is trying to stop their theft and corruption. I see through their lies and am done listening. America has had enough of this betrayal; the game is over, and they can no longer fool us.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This woman is furious with Democrats. She’s accusing them of treating Americans like fools while prioritizing illegal immigrants. She claims their entire platform is built on this betrayal, squandering billions on useless projects while neglecting citizens. Now y’all dare criticize President Trump? He's the one trying to stop your theft and corruption! Stop lying from your podiums—we see through you. The game's over; we're done listening. You've been bought, and we're not buying your nonsense anymore. America's had enough of your betrayal. The gig is up, and y’all can never fool us anymore.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Democratic Party seems to think we're unaware of their actions. They've misused our money on projects that don't benefit the American people, focusing instead on supporting immigrants. It's clear they aren't representing us. Their attempts to connect with the public are transparent; we know they've been dishonest. The majority of Americans see through their lies and recognize that they have been bought and paid for. We are not interested in what they have to say anymore. It's time for them to stop pretending to care about us and go back to where they came from. We won't be fooled any longer.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm over. I'm just trying to find out. Do the Democrat party think that we are stupid? You know what I'm saying? We dumb.
We don't know what the fuck is going on. I don't even know why they brought they fraud ass out. Okay? Because they some frauds. Okay?
Y'all been stealing our money, spending on dumbass projects, billions of fucking dollars. And now y'all wanna come out and open up y'all mouth and talk about y'all don't talk about it.
Speaker 1: Y'all don't talk about it. Y'all don't talk about it. Y'all don't talk about it. Y'all don't talk about it. Y'all don't talk about it.
Y'all don't talk about it. Y'all don't
Speaker 0: talk about it. Y'all don't talk about at y'all from stealing the fucking money because that's what y'all was doing. Y'all was stealing our money and and and and and putting it into these bogus ass projects. Okay? Didn't have nothing to do with the fucking American people.
Okay? And then on top of that, to make matters worse, y'all wasn't even for the people. Y'all was all for fucking immigrants. Because that's what the fuck y'all got talking for y'all. Immigrants.
Okay? So I don't know. You know what I'm saying? Like, I don't know why you're trying to why the Democrat party try to come out and play this role if it's like they for the people. And everybody know y'all are not for the people.
Okay? Y'all are for immigrants. That's what y'all party been built up on, building up immigrants. Okay? So y'all could dismiss us with these lies that y'all trying to come out with on these podiums and, you know what I'm saying, trying to talk to the American people because the majority of us already know the game.
We already know what y'all been doing with our money. Okay? The gig is up. Okay? Ain't nobody listening to you Democrats anymore.
Okay? Y'all been bought and paid for. Ain't nobody listening to y'all. Y'all need to go on back where the fuck y'all came from. Okay?
Because I guarantee you the majority of the American people ain't trying to hear shit y'all y'all saying. We ain't trying to hear shit y'all saying. Okay? Because y'all done played us. Y'all not for us.
Y'all for the
reSee.it AI Summary
I criticized CNN's Jim Acosta for his concerns about a potential criminal investigation into Liz Cheney. If she coached witnesses, that's witness tampering, which is illegal. Cheney shouldn't be exempt from the law. This isn't revenge; it's about justice.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Rep. Tim Burchett (R-TN) torched CNN's Jim Acosta over possible Criminal Investigation into Liz Cheney. If Liz Cheney met with people and coach them and told them what to say, that’s witness tampering. Witness tampering is breaking the law and she shouldn’t be exempt. Jim Acosta seems to be overly worried for Liz Cheney. No one is above the law, this is NOT revenge, it’s justice!
Video Transcript AI Summary
A House Republican report recommends a criminal investigation into Liz Cheney. If she broke the law, she shouldn't be exempt, just like anyone else. Questions arise about whether she manipulated evidence or coached witnesses. The investigation should reveal the truth; if she’s innocent, she has nothing to fear. There’s a concern about a double standard in justice, with calls for accountability regardless of political affiliation. The January 6th committee's investigation is criticized as a political witch hunt, with claims that it lacked impartiality and fairness. The conversation touches on the need for a consistent justice system and the belief that the investigation should focus on facts rather than politics.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Obviously, you know that, there was a house republican report on January 6th that recommends that there be a criminal investigation into Liz Cheney. Do you think there should be a criminal investigation into Liz Cheney, one of your former colleagues?
Speaker 1: If she broke the law, why should she be exempt? If if I I guarantee you, if Manu Raju or or or or you broke the law, you all be they drag y'all into court in in chains. And why should she be exempt?
Speaker 0: You don't think Liz Cheney broke the law, do you?
Speaker 1: If she manipulated this thing, if she met with people, if she coached them as they're saying, if she talked to them on a secret website which they're saying she did, if she coached them, if she altered evidence, if she withheld evidence, What's
Speaker 0: the evidence? What's the evidence of that? I mean, the report came out just days after Donald Trump said that Liz Cheney and other members of the committee should go to jail. Aren't they just doing his bidding?
Speaker 1: What's the evidence that Matt Gaetz has other than a report? You've got a a report. It's the same thing. That's why people do not trust the media. You have a double standard for 1 and not for the other.
If she if she didn't break the law, then she's fine. But if she didn't break the law, she should be held accountable. What is wrong with them asking questions? The
Speaker 0: house ethics committee is is voting to release this report presumably with some Republican help. This is a house Republican report on January 6 recommending that Liz Cheney be criminally investigated. Isn't this Banana Republic stuff?
Speaker 1: Why is she being exempted from the law? Everybody who broke the law should be exempted. No. It's not Banana Republic. If she broke the law, I don't see why that's such a hard thing.
If she didn't
Speaker 0: break the law, she's not. There's no evidence she broke the law. She they just looked at what happened on January 6th and Donald Trump said that they overturned a free and fair election.
Speaker 1: Other than Barry Loudermack, who's a very respected member of congress doing his very long investigation and very tiring investigation into this. And if they found it, I think it ought to be brought to light. If not, then she's fine. I don't see I have a problem with them investigating that.
Speaker 0: Do you want the government to go after Trump's, political enemies?
Speaker 1: If they broke the law, I don't care if they're my political enemies or they're my friends. If they broke the law bad, they ought to be brought in and they ought to be brought to justice. There there shouldn't be. That's what we talk about all the time. That's why Trump's in the White House because there is 2 systems of justice in this country and you can't have it both ways.
You have got to it's gotta be straight and right down the middle. You can go back and watch all the tapes that the conservatives put out of the Democrats saying there's not there's not 2 forms of justice or just one. Well, there is 2 forms of justice. The Biden White House, obviously, they're releasing criminals, they're releasing pedophiles, they're releasing Chinese communist spies, and at a record number, and nobody's paying attention. There is 2 systems of the justice in this country, and I'm tired of him and he should be either.
Speaker 0: Congressman, I mean, you don't think that the January 6th committee should have investigated what took place at the capitol on January 6th?
Speaker 1: Well, I know
Speaker 0: you don't believe that.
Speaker 1: I know you don't think If they investigate it, why didn't they call me in? I volunteered. I was the last person to leave the house for the last house member, myself, Mark Wayne Mullen. Neither one of us was called in to see what we saw, to saw Doesn't
Speaker 0: it but doesn't it show leadership?
Speaker 1: All they did was investigate the political wherewithal. It was a witch hunt from the start. That's why the final episode of that crazy thing, there was more people watching reruns of Spongebob on the on the cartoon network.
Speaker 0: Is this about clowns? So is this about getting revenge? Is this about Trump getting revenge? How Republicans going along with it?
Speaker 1: It's about justice. When we point the finger at somebody who's not kind to us, you all automatically assume it's political. If it's political, then why not play it out into the court of public opinion? You sure had it played out on January 6th and you never called anybody in. It was all a political witch hunt.
They they stacked the committee. They didn't allow then speaker McCarthy to to appoint his 2 people that You and
Speaker 0: I talked about this before. Congressman, you and I talked about it. It would never have happened in the first place if Trump had just honored the results of that election. But that's all the time we have. Congressman Tim Bridget of Tennessee.
Thanks very much for
Speaker 1: your time. Jim, I hope you have a very politically incorrect merry Christmas, brother. And remember, you're going to be invited back into the White House under the Burchard administration.
Speaker 0: I look forward to that invitation. Thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was initially denied crucial evidence for my defense while locked up pre-trial. After gaining access, I discovered information that outside lawyers weren't aware of. Now released on bond, I have proof that President Trump was right: Nancy Pelosi was directly responsible for January 6th.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
J6 political prisoner Brian Mock was locked up pre trial. He was initially denied the very evidence pivotal to his defense until he was granted exclusive access, revealing more than outside lawyers knew. Released on bond, he now holds proof from his storage that President Trump was RIGHT, that Nancy Pelosi was directly responsible for January 6th and it’s NOT a conspiracy, but fact.
Video Transcript AI Summary
While I was pretrial in DC after January 6, I was denied access to evidence initially. Eventually, I gained access to evidence.com, which provided me with more information than most, including lawyers. After securing my bond, I retrieved evidence that supports the claim that President Trump is correct: Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for the events of January 6. This is not just a conspiracy theory; it’s a fact. I can prove Pelosi's involvement. More details will follow.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. Quick message number 2. This one's important. So when I was locked up in DC again, Jan 6 are here. When I was locked up pretrial, they basically denied us any access to evidence.
For some reason, when they finally did give us access to evidence, I got access to evidence.com. Nobody else was, except for us that were in DC at the time back in 2021, 22. When we got access to that, I was getting more information than most, anybody else on the outside. Lawyers didn't see what we saw. When I came out, I managed to get myself bond where almost nobody else did once they were held pretrial in DC.
When I did, I had evidence that I have it in my possession right now. Just got out of my storage unit that shows that president Trump is right. Nancy Pelosi is directly responsible for what happened on January 6th. It is a conspiracy. It's not a conspiracy theory.
It's fact. More to come. I can prove Nancy Pelosi was responsible for this.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Sunny Hostin calling Trump a convicted felon for the last 4 years when her husband is about to be a convicted felon for insurance fraud. If that happens, she will be married to a convicted felon. Now that’s KARMA 🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/uLukaZPgLh
Video Transcript AI Summary
Additional fraud charges are being considered, including insurance fraud, which could lead to a 20-year prison sentence. This poses a serious threat to him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Really? Well, how about we add some additional fraud charges on to you? And they're talking about threatening him with, insurance fraud, which I would say you could get about 20 years in prison. So that's a death sentence for him.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across a thought-provoking question about the Biden family. It highlights that five members own 22 U.S. companies and 175 LLCs, with 233 bank accounts that reportedly generate no visible goods or services, yet they receive millions annually. What’s going on here?
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This guy has a very valid question on the Biden Crime family get rich program.: “Five members of that family own 22 U.S. companies along with 175 registered LLCs and have 233 bank accounts and ALL of those companies and ALL of those LLCs produce NO visible good or service, yet those 233 bank accounts taken millions upon millions of dollars EVERY year for what?…“
Video Transcript AI Summary
If the Trump family had 22 businesses producing nothing of value, registered to five family members with 233 bank accounts and 175 LLCs, receiving millions annually without offering a product or service, would you suspect corruption? This describes the Biden family, which has the same structure. What are these 175 LLCs doing to generate such income? If they aren't producing anything, what are they selling? I'm open to understanding what the Biden family is involved in. Can anyone explain the purpose of their 233 bank accounts and 175 LLCs? If they do sell something, who are their customers? I doubt they have any U.S. customers. Prove me wrong.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just a quick question for you liberals out there. If the Trump family had 22 businesses that produce no visible good or service, and each of those 22 businesses that produce no visible good or service was registered to 5 members of the family, And between those 5 people that own those 22 companies, they had 233 bank accounts as well as a 175 registered LLCs, all that produced no visible good or service. But through those 175 LLCs and into the 233 bank accounts, they receive tens, if not 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars every single year for producing no visible good or service. Would you think there was some corruption going on? Would you think there was some, I don't know, crime happening?
Because that's the Biden family. Five members of that family own 22 US companies along with a 175 registered LLCs and have 233 bank accounts. And all of those companies and all of those LLCs produce no visible good or service. Yet. Those 233 bank accounts take in 1,000,000 upon 1,000,000 of dollars every year for what, what are those 175 LLCs doing?
What are they making? What are they producing? And more importantly, what are they selling? Because if you're not making anything, you're not producing anything. What the fuck could you possibly be selling through a 175 LLCs?
What are those 175 LLCs in 22 US companies doing? What are they doing that is getting 1,000,000 of dollars deposited in those 233 bank accounts? You know exactly what they're doing. They're selling Biden. They're selling control of an American president.
And here's the thing, I'm open to having my mind changed. Just tell me what they're selling. Tell me why the Biden family needs 233 bank accounts. Tell me what their 175 LLCs do. Tell me the product they sell.
233 bank accounts and a 175 LLCs. Just tell me one thing they fucking sell. And if you can find me one thing they sell, go ahead and show me who their customers are. I'm willing to bet that even if they do have customers for fucking something, those customers don't have US passports. Go ahead and prove me wrong.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
George Stephanopoulos tried to shame Nancy Mace who was a rape victim because she endorsed Trump. Well watch Megyn Kelly call out George who was Bill Clinton’s enabler and it doesn’t get better than this 🔥💥‼️ https://t.co/SncYtkMoLZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
George, your concern for victims of sexual assault seems disingenuous given your past actions. You were part of a team that aimed to discredit Bill Clinton's accusers, creating a so-called war room to destroy their credibility. You admitted to enabling Clinton despite multiple allegations against him. When Paula Jones accused him of exposing himself, you and your colleagues attacked her character instead of defending her right to speak out. Your comparison of Jones to a woman seeking money for a tabloid story shows a lack of empathy. Now, you question how others can support a man found liable for sexual assault in a civil trial, yet you seem to ignore your own history of shaming victims. How is this line of questioning appropriate for you at ABC?
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What a kind, sensitive man who clearly cares deeply about women and their sexual assault allegations. Thanks for being an ally, George. I see how concerned you are that victims might not come forward if they are publicly attacked by their rapist or his defenders. To be sure, that is a very real concern. It happens all the time, which you know because you invented it.
Remember? When you created a whole command center designed to smear Bill Clinton's sexual assault and rape accusers so you could elevate him right into the presidency. The attorney representing many of Bill's accusers, and there were many, George, Juanita Broderick, Kathleen Willey, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, to name just a few, said you and James Carville at Hillary Clinton's direction formed a so called war room whose purpose was, quote, to destroy any woman that would challenge Bill Clinton. You know The War Room? They made a whole movie about it.
George Stephanopoulos, director of communications. Bush was on the defensive. Another good night for Bill Clinton. Three debates, 3 wins. I guarantee you that if you do this, you'll never work in democratic politics.
Okay? Such a tough guy. This attorney points out that you don't like to talk about this particular behavior, George. Maybe that's why you skipped it in your discussion with Nancy Mace. But as you know, private detectives were hired, The women say they were threatened, and they were publicly shamed by you and your well funded team.
Did you worry then that this behavior might shame victims from coming forward? You admitted in your own memoir that Hillary Clinton told you about one accuser, quote, we have to destroy her story. Did you object? Did you say, that's shaming? No.
In fact, you later described yourself as Bill Clinton's, quote, enabler. But, sir, how could you have enabled and defended a man like this, accused by multiple women of sexual assault, rape, and harassment, which brings us to Paula Jones. You were Clinton's attack dog when Jones came forward claiming Bill Clinton had exposed himself to her, that when he was governor of Arkansas, he summoned her through state troopers to a Little Rock, Arkansas hotel room and took out his penis, a charge Clinton denies just as Trump denies E. Jean Carroll's allegations against him. What do you think he wanted done with that thing, George?
Just a little show and tell? Jones was poor, a graduate of secretarial school, and worked for the state. She had no power, no connections, and he was the sitting governor. She didn't go to Columbia and Oxford and become a Rhodes Scholar like you, George. She was a nothing to you.
Your buddy Carville immediately went after miss Jones, infamously saying, if you drag a $100 bill through a trailer park, you never know what you'll find. And you? Did you defend Paula Jones saying, we don't shame accusers. That's wrong. No.
You compare Jones to Tonya Harding as, quoting here from The New York Times, just another woman seeking cash for telling a tabloid tale. Fire up that war room, George, and destroy her. Bill Clinton would ultimately pay Paula Jones almost $1,000,000 to settle her civil suit against him, and you remained team Clinton all the way, to say nothing of Juanita Broderick's rape allegation or Kathleen Willey's allegations and more. But now you, quote, don't understand how Nancy Mace can support a man found liable for sexual assault of 1 woman 30 years ago in a civil trial in which the burden of proof is just 51% likely. My god.
How did anyone at ABC think this was a good line of inquiry for George Stephanopoulos of all people to
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
I’m excited for 25 year old Valentina Gomez who has moved from Missouri to Texas to primary one of the biggest RINO in Texas Dan Crenshaw. She has something that is much needed in the Republican Party and that is BALLS! https://t.co/tX6U7xXTw4
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm running for Congress in Texas to challenge the establishment and fight against corruption. Congress is filled with individuals like Speaker Johnson, who I believe betray the American people. At 25, I have an MBA, speak multiple languages, and was a former NCAA Division 1 swimmer. My campaign is about being honest and standing up against the bureaucrats in Washington. I aim to expose corruption and protect our children. I believe in strong measures against illegal immigrants who harm Americans; they should face severe consequences rather than mere deportation. Buckle up, Texas—I'm ready to make a difference.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm running for congress in Texas, and I'm taking down a rhino and a dinosaur once and for all because congress is full of crooks like speaker Johnson, who is just a little man with no balls that funds Ukraine and betrays the American people every chance he gets, and then who is only good at betraying his fellow Navy Seals. I'm 25 with an NBA, fluent in multiple languages, former NCAA division 1 swimmer, and with many more accolades to my name. But here's the only reason why you should vote for me because I don't give a what all those bureaucrats in Washington DC think about me. I'm coming to Texas to speak the truth, cook the crooks, and save the children. Buckle up Texas because this is my first rodeo.
It's that simple. Public executions for any illegal that rots or kills an American. They don't deserve deportation. They deserve to be ended.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Representative Lisa McClain GOES OFF on the Biden/Harris Administration who spent $66 Billion on illegal immigrants & only 3 Billion on Homeless Vets 💥🎯🔥🔥🔥 https://t.co/wQdMWOXrXr
Video Transcript AI Summary
In 2023, the federal government spent over $66 billion on illegal immigrants, while only $3 billion was allocated for homeless veterans. This disparity raises questions about priorities. The breakdown of spending on illegal immigrants includes $5.8 billion for SNAP, $10 billion for Medicare, and $3 billion for education. There is a call to redirect some of this funding to support veterans, including a request for $13 million for a national call center for homeless veterans and $17.2 billion for mental health services. The suggestion is to prioritize American veterans over illegal immigrants and to increase funding for caregiver support programs instead of education for undocumented individuals. The frustration with the current administration's choices is evident, emphasizing the need for a shift in focus toward veterans' needs.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I know we've talked about the numbers, but I think it bears repeating. The federal government spent over $66,000,000,000 on illegal immigrants in 2023 according to the Federation For American Immigration. Does anyone here wanna guess how much we've spent on homeless veterans in 23? Yes? High well, let's just start.
Higher, lower, the same? Anybody wanna guess?
Speaker 1: Fractional.
Speaker 0: Fractional. Thank you. 33,000,000,000. 66 on illegals, 3,000,000,000 on people who have laid down their lives for this country. Can anyone explain up there why that makes sense?
Speaker 1: Well, one is including all sorts of benefits, and one is just looking at a very, very narrow
Speaker 0: No. No. I'm using the same numbers. I'm sir sir, you are I am using apples to apples.
Speaker 1: Very different.
Speaker 0: I'm using apples to apples. So since you know, why don't you share with me?
Speaker 1: We don't track US vet we don't track You don't track US veterans in the census. So that that would be very helpful. If we did, then I would be able
Speaker 0: to give you a very Do you know the answer? Because I do. I do. So I appreciate your opinion of which you have no facts on, but let me continue, and let me educate you some more. The federal government, breaking that 66,000,000,000 down, let's look at what we fund.
So you might wanna get a pencil and paper and take some notes because I'll help you do your job. 5,800,000,000 in SNAP, 10,000,000,000 in Medicare, 8,200,000,000 in uncompensated hospital expenditures, 3,000,000,000 for primary and secondary education for illegal immigrants, illegal immigrants. Excuse me. And how many illegal immigrants are given taxpayer funded housing compared to the number of homeless veterans that are sleeping on the street? You don't know because you don't want to know.
You don't want to see the numbers. Well, different. I do, and I can share with you the American people do because I'll share with you the people in my district in Michigan of the 9th district. We care about our homeless veterans. We care about our veterans.
And, yes, we care about them a little bit more than we care about people who have broken the law to get here illegally. So I actually have some suggestions and maybe some answers on how to fix it. Instead of 66,000,000,000, here are a couple things we could spend. The White House has requested 13,000,000 for the national call center for homeless veterans. I'm gonna say it again.
13,000,000 with an m. Right? Maybe we could find that out of that 66,000,000,000, right, different between 1,000,000,000,000, big difference. We could funnel some more of that 66,000,000,000 to our homeless veterans. Anyone opposed to that?
Why aren't we doing it? Why aren't we doing it? Anybody got an idea? Anybody got an idea why we're not god bless you. Why we're not doing it?
I'll tell you why we're not doing it because the Biden administration does not want to do it. Am I correct? Am I incorrect on that? I didn't think so. This year's budget request from the White House asks for 17,200,000,000 in mental health spending for veterans.
That 10,000,000,000 we lose to Medicare spending would surely benefit to struggle with the mental health issues. So why don't we do this? America is a very charitable country. Why don't we take care of our own first? Anyone see a problem with that?
Why don't we? I'll tell you why we don't. Because the Biden administration doesn't want to do that. It's it's it's maddening to me. The White House budget requested for caregiver support programs not 2,900,000,000.
Maybe instead of 3,000,000,000 for educating illegal immigrants, we can give more funding to caregiver support programs. Right? We're all talking about both sides of the aisle, which ironically doesn't even wanna participate in this hearing, sadly, but not unexpected. We all talk about caregiving is a problem. Right?
I hear that on both sides of the aisle. What will happen if we took that 3,000,000,000 and gave it to caregivers that live in the United States? Anyone have a problem with that? Why don't we do it? Anybody?
The Biden administration doesn't want to do it. And you play games with your facts, and you you play this shell game. Well, I'm gonna share with you. The American people are not fooled, and they are frustrated and fed up with it. Let's just be honest about where this money is going so we possibly can redirect it to the correct place.
Let's start with our veterans. Thank you. And with that, mister chairman, I yield
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Governor JB Pritzker (IL-D) threatens President Trump on illegal immigrants: “I want to remind you that a happy Warrior is a Warrior. You come for my people, you come through me." https://t.co/fzJfe0xcej
Video Transcript AI Summary
I stand firm against anyone who seeks to take away the freedom, opportunity, and dignity of the people of Illinois. A happy warrior remains a warrior. If you come for my people, you will have to go through me.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And who intends to come take away the freedom and opportunity and dignity of Illinoisans. I would remind you that a happy warrior is still a warrior. You come for my people, you come through me.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Trump family business employee Lynne Patton talks about how the Trump family saved her life. This is truly a very moving story, it shows just how kind hearted and compassionate the Trump family is and they’re all about giving second chances❤️❤️❤️. https://t.co/crJKDLFrbh
Video Transcript AI Summary
I relapsed with cocaine in 2012 while working a high-pressure job at a major real estate company. Eric Trump confronted me about my drug use, and seeing his tears made me break down. He encouraged me to get help, and Laura Trump supported me over the phone. Their family later backed my recovery, and I was amazed when their father wanted me to continue working in Washington. This experience showed me a different side of the Trump family; despite their lifestyle, they genuinely care and are willing to support others for the sake of the country.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Always say it's not hyperbole. They truly saved my life. I relapsed with cocaine in 2012, I believe. I had already been working for them for about 4 or 5 years. You know, very high pressure job working for the largest real estate, you know, company in the world at the time.
When I relapsed, Eric Trump called me into his office, confronted me about my drug use. As I'm basically lying to his face, I'm fidgeting and I look up and he's got tears in his eyes. And that's when I just lost it. I started crying like a baby and I was like, did it right? And he's like, Lianne, you're better than this.
You're we want you to get the help that you need. Laura Trump was on the phone, speaker phone. His brother and sister later, you know, supported me in my endeavor and I got some outpatient assistance. And then when, their father still wanted me to work in Washington, I was just floored because they gave me another chance. And I don't think people see that side of this family enough.
They were born and bred in this lifestyle, and they live, breathe, and eat it. You know? But they're willing to walk away from all of that for this great country.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Californians go out to Vote in droves and maybe this is the year that we beat the cheating machines and the mail in cheating! Vote in person and request for a paper ballot. Let’s make it TOO BIG TO RIG and give President Trump 54 Electoral Votes and send him to the White House🙏🏼🇺🇸❤️
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Christians PLEASE do NOT sit out this election. This is a spiritual battle between good vs evil and together we can make a difference to defeat this Evil. 👇is a very powerful message, please take the time to listen🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼 #Trump2024IsTheOnlyChoice https://t.co/uBWCq0HRT7
Video Transcript AI Summary
Why are people so comfortable disrespecting faith? For many, faith is more important than family or friends. Mocking Jesus, who died for our sins, is serious. In the last days, scoffers will come, forgetting God's promises and the impending judgment. We must live holy lives, looking forward to a new heaven and earth. Disrespecting God is unacceptable, and we need to pray for those who do. The pursuit of likes and fame is fleeting compared to eternity. We must seek repentance and forgiveness. God has warned us about these times, and we should be vigilant. Let's pray for mercy and guidance for this generation, asking God to open hearts and lead people to salvation. We need to stop playing with God and recognize the seriousness of our actions. Repent and seek forgiveness; time is short.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This what we doing? This what we doing? Why why are y'all so comfortable disrespecting people's faith like this? Do y'all know that people hold their faith closer than family, closer than friends? Do you know that do you know that, like, for us that are seriously living for Jesus out here, he is closer to us than anything.
He's more important to us than ourselves. Why do y'all keep playing with the name of Jesus like this? Bro, y'all better wake up. Yeah. Y'all better wake up to what's going on, people.
Who who the audacity.
Speaker 1: The the audacity, man. Who I don't even notice, dude. Who do you think you are? Why why have we gotten so comfortable playing with God? That is the son of God you are mocking, who died for your sins.
You are firsthand mocking your one ticket to salvation. And God warned us about this, man. 2nd Peter 33. Above all, you must understand that in the last day, scoffers will come. Scoffing and following their own evil desires.
They will say, where is this coming, he promised? Ever since our ancestors died, everything goes on as it has since the beginning of creation. But they deliberately forget that long ago by god's words, the heavens came into being and the earth was formed out of water and by water. By these waters also, the world of that time was deluged and destroyed. By the same word, the present heavens and earth are reserved for fire being kept for the day of judgement and destruction of the ungodly.
But do not forget this one thing, dear friends, with the lord, a day is like a 1000 years and a 1000 years are like a day. The lord is not slow in keeping his promise as some understand slowness. Instead, he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish but everyone to come to repentance but the day of the lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar. The elements will be destroyed by fire and the earth and everything done in will in it will be laid bare.
Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of god and the speed is coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire and the elements will melt in heat. But in keeping with this promise, we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth where righteousness dwells. So then dear so then dear friends, since you are looking forward to this, make every effort to be found spotless, blameless, and at peace with him.
Bear in mind that our lord's patience means salvation just as our dear brother Paul also wrote you with the wisdom that god gave him. He writes the same way in all his letters speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand which ignorant and unstable people distort as they do other scriptures to their own destruction. Therefore, dear friends, since you have been forewarned, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the air of the lawless and fall from your secure position, but grow in the grace and knowledge of our lord and savior, Jesus Christ. To him be the glory both now and forever.
Amen. This is ridiculous, man. We done got way too comfortable playing with the name of God. What are you doing? And and we got people clapping and cheering this on.
Man, you're gonna face judgment. God not playing? Do you think all of this just came to be? Do you think life just happened? Are you that ridiculous?
You playing with the one man that saved you. You putting that crown of thorns on me. You can't wear that crown. You ain't suited for that, bro. Whoever you are, you ain't suited for that.
You put no makeup to fake lacerations on your back. You're not built like that, bro. Come on. Why are we playing with god? And why is this okay?
Why are people cheering this song? Why is this getting likes? Why is this what are we doing? Did you not hear what God said? How did he how did he predict this 1000 and 1000 of years ago?
How? Because god warned us this stuff was gonna happen. He's outside of space and time. He saw this. All of this scoffing is going to be dealt with on judgement day.
Repent. Repent. Repent. Repent. Repent.
Ask for forgiveness. Give your life to God. God said in the last days, this type of stuff is gonna be happening. When was the last time you see people getting this comfortable with disrespecting God? Disrespecting Jesus like this?
And why is Jesus the only one they play with? Why every other religion they not playing with it like that? Why we playing with Jesus? I tell you why. Because Satan is at work.
You better wake up. You better wake up and you better get right with God. And we gotta pray for people. We gotta pray for people. Whoever this dude is, I don't even know who he is.
I guess he's some famous actor or some man, I hope you see this video. Man, give your life to God, bro. I tell you what, you you made a real bad mistake in what you did, but but you can you can get forgiveness if you go to God with an open heart. But but but what you what you did, man, that that's unacceptable. Playing with God like that, bro.
Are we serious? And I don't care. I I don't care. I'm gonna speak up on it, man. I don't care who got a problem with it.
We gonna stop playing with God, bro. We gonna stop playing with God. This is ridiculous. But it's okay. God warned us about this, but God warned us about this.
Wow. Wow. I'm I'm I'm disgusted, man. I'm disappointed. I'm disappointed.
You you you that you that thirsty for likes and views and clicks? You you knew that I was gonna get likes and views and clicks, bro. That that all of that all of that status, all of that popularity, all of that money, what you gonna have it for? 60, 70 years? And then boom.
In eternity, all of your status, all your popularity, all your riches, all them clicks, all that attention is leading to a 6 foot deep grave. Then what? Then what? In eternity. Oh.
People don't even know. They don't know what y'all playing with. Come on, bro. We gotta be better. Matter of fact, bow your heads.
Let's pray. Holy Spirit, lead us. Holy Spirit, teach us to pray. Dear Lord, please have mercy on this generation, Lord. And in the wisest words of your son, he said, father, forgive them for they know not what they do.
Oh, Lord. Right now, I pray that you lead these people to repentance, oh, god. However, you have to bring these people to repentance, oh, god. Please bring it. Whatever measures you have to take to open people's eyes, oh, lord.
Take it. If not that much of measure, then fine. If that much of measure, then make it be done, oh, god. God, please show mercy on us, oh god. Please show mercy on us, oh god.
Please bring many more people to salvation, oh lord. Father, forgive us for where we have turned as a nation, as a generation, as a society, oh god. Lord, give the real believers. Give the seekers of you the strength, the endurance to continue to act in love, to continue to spread the gospel, to continue to be patient while all of this goes on in the world. And god, for the for the lost, please bring them home, oh lord.
Whatever holes that the devil has on this generation, father, I bind them out in the name of Jesus. God, forgive us, oh lord. Jesus, I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry that people are playing with your name, playing with you like this. They are making a joke of your sacrifice that saved us, oh God, and they don't even care.
Jesus, I'm so sorry. I'm so sorry. Jesus, you are king. Your sacrifice meant something to some of us. We love you, God.
Forgive us and forgive them, oh, Lord. Show us mercy again, God. God, we love you and we pray for your deliverance, and we know that your will be will be done. And father, we're eagerly waiting for you to return. Whenever you're ready, Lord.
Thank you, Jesus. We love you, father. We pray all this in the mighty name of Jesus. Amen. Playing with God, man.
Playing with God. Repent. Repent. Repent. Repent.
Repent. Repent and ask for forgiveness. We ain't got long. I can't tell you today. I can't tell you the hour.
I don't know that information, but I tell you what. When I read this book and I see God forewarned us about all this stuff, I get it. We ain't got long. Jesus be with this nation, please. Please in the mighty name of Jesus.
reSee.it AI Summary
At a Trump rally, I noticed Diddy throwing shade, while Danica Patrick took a jab at Kamala Harris. She emphasized that choosing Trump means getting a lineup of notable figures and declared her support for Trump as genuine, stating she’s not a paid speaker and has never attended a Diddy party.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Diddy catching shade at a Trump Rally🤣🤣🤣. Danica Patrick trolls Kamala Paid Guest Speakers: “You literally get six Presidents when you pick him. You get Donald Trump… JD Vance… Bobby Kennedy… Tulsi Gabbard… Vivek Ramaswamy… Elon Musk… I’m not paid to be here. I don’t have a teleprompter… I don’t need a telephone. I NEVER went to a Diddy Party. I’m doing this because I love this country and there’s nobody that’s been tested more than Donald Trump showing his love of this country…”💥💯🎯❤️🤍💙🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
You get six influential figures when you support him: Donald Trump, JD Vance, Bobby Kennedy, Tulsi Gabbard, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Elon Musk. I'm here to express my support for this country without any preparation or compensation. Donald Trump has faced numerous challenges, including indictments and personal attacks, yet he remains committed to making America not just great again, but even better. This moment feels surreal, with security measures in place, highlighting the unusual times we live in. No one has demonstrated their dedication to this country more than Trump.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You literally get 6 presidents when you pick him. You get Donald Trump. You get JD Vance. You get Bobby Kennedy. You get Tulsi Gabbard.
You get Vivek Ramaswamy, and you get Elon Musk. Because when I decided that I'm gonna vote, now I'm speaking, and I'm not paid to be here. I don't have a teleprompter. I'm winging this right now, everybody. I don't need a telephone.
I never went to a ditty party. I'm doing this because I love this country, and there's nobody that's been tested more than Donald Trump on showing his love for this country through indictments, house raids, mugshots, and getting literally shot. I mean, I'm standing here. This is, like, a very surreal situation. There's there's there's glass around me to make sure that nothing happens.
Like, this is the time that we're living in. Nobody has been tested more than him on how much he wants you to have this amazing country, not only great again, but better than it's ever been.
reSee.it AI Summary
I feel so hopeful and happy hearing about the Amish coming to help rebuild homes for Hurricane Helene victims. They're sending a team to Swannanoa, North Carolina, to build cabins for those who lost everything. They plan to work from Monday to Friday and then return with a fresh crew. They prefer to work without interference. I’m also sharing the wishlist since many have asked for it in the comments. It’s heartwarming to know that the children affected will still have a Christmas.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
My heart is full of hope and happiness hearing this lady talk about the Amish coming to help rebuild homes for the victims of Hurricane Helene and that the children who lost everything due to hurricane will have Christmas: “The Amish from Lancaster Pennsylvania is sending a 56 passenger to Swannanoa North Carolina to build little cabins for people who lost their homes. They’re gonna be here from Monday through Friday. Friday they’re gonna go home and come back Monday with a fresh crew… They say they don’t want any help… stay out of their way and let them do what they got to do… Operation Santa Claus. The kids here in the mountains who lost everything… These youngens here in the mountains are gonna have Christmas one way or another…”🙏🏼❤️🇺🇸💪
Video Transcript AI Summary
My heart is overflowing today! The Amish from Lancaster, Pennsylvania, are sending a 56-passenger bus to Swannanoa, North Carolina, to build cabins for those who lost their homes. They'll be here from Monday to Friday, returning with a new crew the following week, and they prefer to work independently.
Recently, I mentioned starting an Operation Santa Claus for local kids affected by the disaster, and look at the amazing packages Amazon delivered! My neighbors saw the packages and are also donating from the Amazon wish list. Thanks to everyone’s generosity, the children in the mountains will have a Christmas, and the Amish will help rebuild Swannanoa quickly.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna keep squalling about all this, but my heart is absolutely overflowing today. First of all, the Amish from Lancaster, Pennsylvania is sending a 56 passenger bus to Swannanoa, North Carolina to build little cabins for people who lost their homes. They're gonna be here from Monday through Friday. Friday, they're gonna go home and then come back Monday with a fresh crew to start all over again. And they say they don't want any help.
They just basically want people to stay out of their way and let them do what they gotta do. They said they're gonna be a 100% self sufficient. And they're gonna get that done and people are gonna have a home, at least in Swannanoa. A couple of days ago, I did a video saying I was gonna do a little Operation Santa Claus for the kids here in the mountains who lost everything. And look what Amazon just brought.
This is y'all's goodness. I wonder what that Amazon driver thought. My cat doesn't even know what to think. Look at her. My heart's just beating so fast, and I probably sound like a crazy rodeo goat.
But I don't even know what to say. This is just amazing. I love y'all. I just had to stop filming because the neighbors came by and saw all these packages and wanted to know what was up. And so I proudly told them, and they're gonna also donate from the Amazon wish list.
So this has been amazing. And these young uns here in the mountains are gonna have Christmas one way or another. Y'all did that. And the Amish are come to build little houses. Y'all, they'll have that whole city of Swannanoa built within a week.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
I’m adding the wishlist here since there’s been a few requests in the comments 🙏🏼 https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/TSUHGVFNLIT8?ref_=wl_share_btn_assoc_p-tiktok_o-1_srctok-b152f01fe28c924f_ht-t_te-00010006&ascsubtag=srctok-b152f01fe28c924f&btn_ref=srctok-b152f01fe28c924f
Amazon.com
amazon.com
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
Looks like they hired Admiral John Kirby as Joe Biden’s Coordinator for Strategic Communications because he has the same communication skills as Joe Biden🤷🏻♀️🤦🏻♀️😂. Good job to journalist Matt Lee for questioning about NATO expansion towards Russia. https://t.co/NmzKzpTP9L
Video Transcript AI Summary
What does "revisionist Russia" mean? It suggests a desire to return to the Soviet Union's former glory. Secretary Hagel mentioned Russia's army being on NATO's doorstep. Some argue this is due to NATO's eastward expansion, but that perspective isn't universally accepted. NATO's expansion is seen as beneficial, not a threat. While NATO is a defensive alliance, Russia's military movements, including actions in Ukraine, are viewed as aggressive. The expansion of NATO doesn't imply hostility; it's about security. The focus should be on Russia's actions that destabilize neighboring countries, rather than blaming NATO for its proximity to Russia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What he meant by calling revisionist Russia?
Speaker 1: Revisionist Russia?
Speaker 0: Yeah. What what what does that mean?
Speaker 1: What? The secretary?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Secretary Hagel.
Speaker 1: I think what he's referring to there is that, that there appears to be in their intentions and their motives, a call a calling back to the glory days of the Soviet Union.
Speaker 0: He also used the that phrase that its army, meaning Russia's army on NATO's doorstep. Why is that? Is is it not logical to look at this and say the reason that the Russian army is on NATO, the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is because NATO has expanded rather than the Russians expanding? That in other words, NATO has moved closer to Russia rather than Russia moving closer to NATO? Is that not an accurate way to look at this?
Speaker 1: I think that's the way President Putin probably looks at it. It's certainly not the way that we look at it.
Speaker 0: You don't you don't think that NATO has expanded eastward toward Russia?
Speaker 1: NATO has expanded. Okay. And and the expansion has been a good thing for
Speaker 0: So the reason that the Russian army is at NATO's doorstep is not the fault of the Russian army, not the it's not the Russian army that's done it. It's NATO has moved closer to moving I'm pretty
Speaker 1: sure it wasn't NATO who was ordering, you know, upwards of 15 battalion tactical groups to within 10 kilometers of the border with Ukraine. And I'm pretty sure it wasn't NATO who put little green men inside Ukraine to destabilize eastern states. I'm pretty
Speaker 0: sure that Ukraine is not a member of NATO. So unless that's changed It's not it's not changed.
Speaker 1: But I'm pretty sure the movement by Russia
Speaker 0: is Russia's decision. If NATO has moved east, the reason that the Russian army is closer or on NATO's doorstep is because NATO moved, not east. MS NAUERT:
Speaker 1: NATO is not an anti Russia alliance. NATO is a security alliance.
Speaker 0: For 50 years, it was an anti Soviet alliance. So do you not understand it Togo, do you not understand how or can you not even see how the Russians would perceive it as a threat? And the fact that it keeps getting closer to their border while their troops I mean, the places where their troops are you say their troops are and may may have been in Ukraine and Georgia are not made up of.
Speaker 1: I don't have I'm not gonna pretend to know what goes in president Putin's mind or Russian military commanders. I mean, I barely got a history degree at the University of South Florida. What I can tell you what I can tell you is that is that, NATO is a defensive alliance. It remains a defensive alliance.
Speaker 0: Fair enough, but it has moved east. Correct? I mean, that's just
Speaker 1: the fact. It expanded.
Speaker 0: Absolutely. Right. Exactly.
Speaker 1: But there's no reason for anybody to think the expansion is a hostile or threatening move, and we've been saying that throughout the last 15 years,
Speaker 0: man. Like getting you're you're moving closer to Russia. You're blaming the Russians for being close to NATO. No.
Speaker 1: No. No.
Speaker 0: No. That's that's exactly what Haig
Speaker 1: was born. Blaming the Russians for violating the territorial integrity of Ukraine and destabilizing the security of Ukraine
Speaker 0: Which is not a NATO. Which is not a NATO. I
Speaker 1: I
reSee.it AI Summary
I was shocked when my 8-year-old daughter told me a boy walked into the restroom while she was there, and the school said there was nothing they could do. I took a stand at the Cabarrus School Board meeting, calling out their hypocrisy. I challenged the board members to invite their husbands to witness the same situation and see if they would be okay with it. I praised the one board member who truly advocates for children, highlighting the need for parents to stand up for their kids' rights. This is how we should act as parents.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This daddy was told by his 8 year old daughter that she went to the restroom at school and a boy walked in there to watch her pee and that she went to the front office and told them what happened and they told her that there’s NOTHING they can do about it. Well, the Daddy went in front of the Cabarrus School board to protect his daughter’s right.: “ Cowards… I’ll tell you what, I wanna prove that y’all are hypocrites. So each of you ladies, I want you to invite your husbands and let’s go to the bathroom and I want them to watch me watch you use the bathroom and let’s see if they get mad… Now stand up and do something, you’re so scared to lose federal funding, it’s ridiculous… There’s one woman on this board that stands up for the people and the kids. That’s a role model. Listen and pay attention, that’s why she gets the votes…” This is how it’s done Parents🙏🏼🔥🔥🔥
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve been tirelessly helping hurricane victims, and when asked to summarize the situation, I said, “The only support we've had from North Carolina is Mark Robinson. Everywhere we turn, organizations are shutting us down, putting chains on our supplies, and stopping our pilots. FEMA hasn’t shown up, and we have no funds. Yesterday, we flew over 400 flights, with pilots covering their own gas. Mark is the only one standing by us. Everyone in NC needs to vote for @markrobinsonNC as our next Governor. Thank you for your support, Mark.”
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This lady has been working nonstop helping the victims since the hurricane hit and this was her response when asked what is her best summary to tell America about what’s happening here.: “America the ONLY person that’s been here from the State of North Carolina has been Mark Robinson, everywhere else we’ve turn… every organizations shutting us down… They’re putting chains on our supplies. They’re stopping our pilots. This is ALL citizens done… FEMA has NEVER shown their faces to us. We got NO funds… We flew over 400 flights yesterday and the pilots paid for the gas themselves… Mark is the ONLY one that has stood by the State of North Carolina.” Everyone in NC must Vote @markrobinsonNC for NC next Governor🙏🏼🇺🇸. Thank you Sir for all you’re doing for the victims of Hurricane Helene🙏🏼❤️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Since the hurricane hit, North Carolina has received no help from any organization except Mark Robinson. Every organization is shutting them down, putting chains on their supplies, and stopping their pilots. FEMA has not appeared. All assistance has been citizen-led, with pilots paying for their own gas for over 400 flights. Mark Robinson is the only one who has stood beside the state.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Working nonstop for how many days? Since the hurricane hit. What is your best summary to tell America about what's happening here? America, the only person that has been here for the state of North Carolina has been Mark Robinson. Everywhere else we turn, every organization, every from every organization is shutting us down.
Everywhere we turn, they're putting chains on our on our supplies. They're stopping our pilots. This is all citizen done. None of this has come from any organization. FEMA has never shown their head faces to us.
We've got no funds. All of these pilots have been out here. We flew over 400 flights yesterday, and the pilots paid for the gas themselves. This is ridiculous. Mark is the only one that has stood beside the state of North Carolina.
reSee.it AI Summary
I heard a story about a helicopter pilot who flew into a dangerous area to rescue people in need. He instructed his son, who was his co-pilot, to let the stranded individuals in and flew them to safety. Upon landing, the fire chief told him he couldn't return for more rescues, warning that he would be arrested if he did, despite his son still being up there. It’s shocking to see officials turning away help when people are trapped and desperate for rescue. This situation feels incredibly unjust and raises serious concerns about what’s happening.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This man said helicopter pilot flew into an area to rescue people who were needing help. Told his co-Pilot, who was his son, to get out to let the people in and flew the people to safety. When he landed, the fire chief or assistant fire chief told him he couldn’t go back up up to rescue people and he said his son was up there and he was told if he went back up there he would get arrested🤬. Officials are turning HELP away from the people that desperately need it. These people are trapped and could be rescued, but our government is stopping this from happening! What the H€LL is really going on? This is beyond shameful!
Video Transcript AI Summary
A helicopter pilot flew into a disaster area to help people. He instructed his copilot, who was also his son, to help people board the helicopter, and then flew them to safety. Upon landing, a fire chief or assistant fire chief told him not to return to rescue more people, threatening him with arrest if he did.
The speaker questions why authorities are turning away water, provisions, helicopters, and people with chainsaws while simultaneously directing people to donate to agencies that supposedly will provide aid. The speaker accuses them of turning away help while people are dying and asks viewers for their thoughts.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I just watched a video of a helicopter pilot that flew into an area where people were needing help. He landed his helicopter. He told his copilot to get out and let the people come in, of which was his son, by the way. And he flew those people to safety. And when he landed, the either fire chief or the assistant fire chief told him not to go back up to help people, not to go back up to the mountain area and rescue people not to.
He said, well, I need to go back and get my copilot, my son. And they said if you go up there, we'll arrest you. What is going on? They're turning away water. They're turning away provisions, helicopters, people with chainsaws.
But yet, they'll tell you, oh, go donate to this agency over here, and then the money will get to the people. Donate your supplies to this agency, and then then they'll take the supplies in. That's ruthless. You got people out here dying, and they're turning help away. Turning help away.
What is going on? What do you guys think? Put your thoughts down below. Thanks for watching. I'll see you
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim to have four databases revealing 38 individuals behind a "shadow government," including Bill Gates. I assert that the Biden Administration is controlled by this shadow entity, and I can confirm this confidently based on the information I've gathered.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
French billionaire Philippe Argillier claims he has four databases that will expose 38 individuals who run the "shadow government" Bill Gates is one of those 38 individuals.: “The Biden Administration is under the control of the Shadow Government. I can confirm this without any hesitation based upon the information that I have.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Shariah government is described as the actual government that gives official orders to the elected government. This entity is extremely powerful, behind the scenes, and involves influential individuals at the highest rank in finance and politics, including some heads of state.
It is claimed that 38 individuals run the daily lives of 8,000,000,000 people on Earth. This shadow government is allegedly behind most, if not all, elected governments, dictating their actions based on geopolitical agreements, many of which are anchored in military interventions abroad. The Biden administration is specifically claimed to be under the control of this shadow government.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Is the question. What is the Shariah government? I will, I'm gonna I'm gonna give a short answer as to the Shariah government is the actual government that gives official, orders to the elected government. I understand this could be hard to believe, for some individuals, But the way it works, at least, what I was able to witness witness for the past 20 years is an extremely powerful entity behind the scene and quite an entity. It is, it does involve very influential individuals, at the highest rank possible in finance as well as in politics.
There are some heads of state behind the scene indeed. And altogether, 38 individuals run the daily lives of 8,000,000,000 people on earth. Maria, the shadow government is the entity that is behind most, if not all, elected government that tell them what to do and what not to do based upon geopolitical agreements, most of most of them anchored in military abroad interventions. That's what the shadow government is. And I can tell you today that the Biden administration is under the control of the shadow government.
I can confirm this without any hesitation based upon the information that I have.
reSee.it AI Summary
I'm feeling frustrated and want to reach out to Kamala Harris. I've worked hard as a self-employed veteran and saved to buy my first food truck, but now I'm selling it to an illegal immigrant who has no credit or funds, yet has paperwork showing he can receive financial support. Meanwhile, I can't secure a business loan despite having good credit. It seems unfair that those who haven't contributed can get funding while I struggle. I believe the current administration prioritizes illegal immigrants over hardworking Americans, and I want answers.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
This Veteran is very upset and wants to send a message to Kamala Harris. She heard that Illegals were getting loans and money all over social media, but had a hard time believing it. She has been self employed for so long and worked hard to purchased her first food truck in 2019 and paid cash for it, but now is selling it and the person who wants to buy her food truck is an Illegal: “…He’s an Illegal immigrant. He has NO credit. He has NO money in the bank, but he showed me his paperwork, that he would receive funds to purchase my food truck... I have good credit, can’t even get a business loan…. Somebody please tell me how do I work so hard to have somebody who comes to this country, not long, no credit and he shows me paperwork where they’ll be funding him money…. They’re getting money, money for doing nothing, but just being here. It’s not right and I want answer …” The ANSWER is simple. STOP voting Democrat! They have proven to put Illegals before Americans! Biden/Harris Administration set a record for MOST illegal immigrant crossings in a year. There were 3.2 Million illegal immigrants encountered in Fiscal Year 2023. KAMALA HARRIS' PLAN FOR AMERICA'S BORDERS •Let in over 10 million illegal immigrants without any vetting •Make sure illegal immigrants get free healthcare paid for by you •Decriminalize illegal border crossings •Free tens of thousands of criminal illegal immigrants from ICE detention •Reject funding for additional Border Patrol agents •Give citizenship to over 20 million illegal immigrants and make them eligible for Social Security
Video Transcript AI Summary
A business owner is selling their food truck, which they bought in 2019 for over $25,000 cash. The potential buyer, an illegal immigrant with no credit or money, showed paperwork indicating they will receive funds to purchase the truck. The seller, a veteran who has been self-employed for decades, claims they have good credit but cannot get a business loan due to their skin color. They want to know why someone who recently came to the country with no credit is receiving money to buy their food truck when they had to work hard to establish their business. The bank told them that normally they have to go to a dealership, but in special circumstances, they allow it. They are demanding answers from the vice president, who is running for president, about why immigrants are getting money while they struggled to get a business loan.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I need this message to go out to our vice president, who's running for president. I have heard all over social media about, excuse me if I say anything wrong, immigrants getting, loans, money. It was hard for me to believe. It was just extremely hard
Speaker 1: for me to believe.
Speaker 0: I've been in business such a long time. Back in 2019, I purchased my first food truck. It cost me over $25,000 I paid it cash money. I worked hard to pay for this truck. I'm now selling it, because I'm just gonna I'm doing other things, but I'm selling it.
I had a guy come to look at purchasing my vehicle, my food truck. And he explained to me he's an illegal immigrant. He has no credit. He has no money in the bank,
Speaker 1: but he showed me his paperwork
Speaker 0: that he will receive funds to purchase my food truck. I'm thankful that he's buying it,
Speaker 1: but I'm hurt that I worked so hard
Speaker 0: to pay cash for my food truck. I have good credit. Can't even get a business loan because of color of my skin. I have veterans in
Speaker 1: my family. I'm a veteran. I've been self employed for so long. But somebody, please tell me. How do I work so hard to have somebody who comes to this country not long, no credit?
And he shows me paperwork where they'll be funding him money to buy my food truck. And when I talked to the bank, they told me, usually, they have to go straight to a dealership because, no, I'm a I'm a private cell.
Speaker 0: But for special circumstances, they're gonna you know, they allow it.
Speaker 1: But I need my president to tell me why I worked so hard all these years, all these decades. Couldn't get a business loan, but I bust my ass to get the money to create my business. And we got immigrants coming here, and they're getting money. Money. We're doing nothing but just being here.
It's not right, and I want answers.
reSee.it AI Summary
If I inherited my parents' company, choosing between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump would be straightforward. Kamala Harris, despite her law degree, failed the Bar Exam, has never owned a business, and has a record of zero legislative accomplishments during her time in the California Senate. In contrast, Donald Trump graduated from a top business school, has decades of experience running successful businesses, and employs thousands. I would never risk my company with someone who has such a poor track record when I could choose someone proven to succeed.
@TheThe1776 - ꪻꫝể ꪻꫝể
You inherited your parents company and couldn’t run it, who would you choose to run your company given 👇facts. Kamala Harris or Donald Trump? Now say that company was the United States. Kamala Harris: ◦Graduated from Hastings College of Law. This Law school is ranked 82nd out of 196 Law Schools. Took the Bar Exam and FAILED. ◦NEVER owned her own business. NEVER own Employees EVER. ◦2017-2021 she served in the California Senate, during those 4 years, she worked on 164 pieces of Legislation NOT one EVER became Law, but what is worse is she’s a Liberal governing in a Liberal State and she was still 0 for 164. During 4 years w/ZERO Accomplishments. ◦Has a record of the lowest approval ratings in the history of this country at 28% as Vice President. Donald Trump: ◦Graduated from Penn’s Wharton School of Business. It’s rank 1 out of 124 Business schools in the country. ◦He has run many businesses over 53 years. Employed Hundreds of thousands of Employees. Currently he has 22,450 employees, that equates to hundreds of millions of dollars that flowed into the Economy. For me, this is an easy choice. Plain and simple, I would NEVER hire someone who will run my business to the ground. Why take a chance on someone who failed the Bar Exam, has NEVER run anything, have NOT accomplished anything and has the lowest approval rating at her job, when I can hire someone who I know that will make my business a success.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Kamala Harris has a law degree but failed the bar exam. She served in the California senate without passing any legislation. As vice president, she has a low approval rating. Donald Trump, a successful businessman, has created jobs and has a higher approval rating. The speaker suggests choosing Trump to run a company over Kamala based on their track records.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just hear me out. Kamala Harris versus Donald Trump. Just the facts. You can fact check me. It's all true.
Kamala, she graduated from Hastings College of Law. The law school is ranked 82nd out of a 196 law schools. She graduated. She took her bar exam. She failed.
She failed the exam. She has never had her own business, never had any of her own employees ever. 2017 to 2021, she served in the California senate. During those 4 years, she worked in a 164 pieces of legislation, not one of them ever became law. What makes it worse is that she's a liberal governing in a liberal state, and she was still 0 for 164.
So during the 4 years, she accomplished nothing. As vice president, she has a record, the lowest approval rating ever in the history of this country, 28%. Donald j Trump, who graduated from Penn s Wharton School of Business, It's ranked number 1 out of a 124 business schools in the country. He has run many businesses over 53 years, employed 100 of thousands of employees over that time. Currently, he has 22,450 employees split between men and women.
That equates to 100 of 1,000,000 of dollars over time that have flowed into the economy. Personally, I don't just vote blindly along party lines. I just vote common sense. Let me keep it simple. If your parents had a company and you inherited this company and you didn't want to or couldn't run it yourself, who would you pick to run it, Kamala or Trump?
Someone that has never run anything or someone that has run companies worth 1,000,000,000? Now let me extrapolate for a second. Forget about this company I was saying your parents own. What I'm really talking about is a company called the United States of America. Again, please common sense.
Thanks.