TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @The_Real_Fly
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
CHRIS CHRISTIE MEETS ZELENSKY, EAGER TO SPEND AMERICAN LIVES IN REGIONAL CONFLICT https://t.co/wxIOuWYA09
Video Transcript AI Summary
- «Щиро дякую, щиро дякую за те, що приїхали.»
- «щиро подякувати вам та вашим колегам, зокрема Конгресу. Ми неймовірно вдячні за таку двопартійну підтримку.»
- «вся країна, всі американці на правильному боці, на боці правди, на боці демократії, вони переконані у перемозі України.»
- «Посилює нас, посилює нашу позицію в цій війні. І тому дуже важливо, що ми розуміємо, що Сполучені Штати є лідером, надають нам найбільшу підтримку на полі бою, для наших збройних сил і, звісно, в фінансовому секторі з питань бюджету, що теж дуже важливо.»
- «Тому що ми можемо виплачувати зарплатні людям, вчителям, лікарям.»
- «Мільйони американців, які ніколи не виїзджали за територію Америки, але вони вішають українські прапори біля своїх домівок.»
- «Я хотів би, щоб ті американці, які підтримують Україну, перемагали в суперечках, тому що це дозволить надавати підтримку рішучіше і швидше.»
- "Thank you very much for coming."
- "Thank you to you and your colleagues, in particular Congress. We are incredibly grateful for such bipartisan support."
- "The whole country, all Americans on the right side, on the side of truth, on the side of democracy, they are convinced of Ukraine's victory."
- "It strengthens us, strengthens our position in this war. And therefore it is very important that we understand that the United States is a leader, provides us the greatest support on the battlefield for our armed forces and, of course, in the financial sector regarding budget issues, which is also very important."
- "Because we can pay salaries to people, teachers, doctors."
- "Millions of Americans who have never left the territory of America, but they hang Ukrainian flags at their homes."
- "I would like those Americans who support Ukraine to win arguments, because this will allow us to provide support more decisively and faster."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Щиро дякую, щиро дякую за те, що приїхали. І насправді це чудовий сигнал, що ви розпочали свій візит в Україну з відвідування Бучі, тому щиро дякую за це. І також хотів би щиро подякувати вам та вашим колегам, зокрема Конгресу. Ми неймовірно вдячні за таку двопартійну підтримку. Для нас вона є дуже важлива.
Ми дуже вдячні адміністрації, пане президента та президенту Байдену, тому що дуже важливо, що вся країна, всі американці на правильному боці, на боці правди, на боці демократії, вони переконані у перемозі України. Я радий, що бачу таку спільність єднання в підтримці України. Дякую за те, що ви приїхали сюди. І я вважаю, що ми можемо обмінятися певними запитаннями, певними важливими деталями щодо контрнаступу. Ми дуже вдячні, тому що увесь світ нам допомагає в цьому.
Посилює нас, посилює нашу позицію в цій війні. І тому дуже важливо, що ми розуміємо, що Сполучені Штати є лідером, надають нам найбільшу підтримку на полі бою, для наших збройних сил і, звісно, в фінансовому секторі з питань бюджету, що теж дуже важливо. Тому що ми можемо виплачувати зарплатні людям, вчителям, лікарям. Це дає потужну підтримку. Але, крім того, підтримку на полі бою.
Я говорив багатьом своїм колегам про те, що є мільйони американців, які ніколи не виїжджали за територію Америки, але вони вішають українські прапори біля своїх домівок. Як ви знаєте, в Америці часто бувають непорозуміння, як і всюди. Але я значна частина американського народу дуже добре розуміє, що нам потрібно підтримувати Україну в цій боротьбі. І є реальні аргументи. Тому я хотів би, щоб ті американці, які підтримують Україну, перемагали в суперечках, тому що це дозволить надавати підтримку рішучіше і швидше.
І тепер я можу сказати, що я був тут, я бачив речі на власні очі, і можу ділитися з американцями інформацією, яка зачепить ці серця. Я переконаний. І найгірше чи не краще всі стали достатньо візуальними людьми, ми візуалами, ми сприймаємо все на власні очі. Багато людей не сприймають речі, просто їх читаючи, їм треба їх побачити, щоб їх відчути. І тому я хочу їхніми очима на території України, я хочу поділитися з ними.
Ви та ваша адміністрація організували цей візит чудово. До нас всі ставилися з гостинністю і показали нам важливі речі. Тому я вдячна вам за ваше схвалення цього і за вашу готовність нас приймати. І тому з нетерпінням чекаю нашої розмови, тому що я є поборником того, щоб було більше підтримки для України, більш ширша підтримка для України. І я хочу ділитися цими аргументами таким чином, щоб це відповідало вашому баченню і щоб це сприяло перемозі.
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
TRUMP SHOOTING “COULD HAVE BEEN” SET UP * https://t.co/IXXMefw0sh
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker questions the lack of immediate action by law enforcement in response to threats. They suggest negligence or intentional failure in security measures, prompting the need for a thorough investigation. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring the safety of public officials. They advocate for a comprehensive inquiry before making any accusations.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I look at all of these things and I look at different videos where, an assailant will pull a firearm on a law enforcement officer and the first thing that they do is they immediately pull and draw and mitigate the threat and the risk. You know, I ask why local law enforcement officer did not do so. The other thing is that when you set up an advance team, I keep hearing this about the perimeter elements. Yes. You know, the perimeter is actually established by your threats that are in the area.
So if I don't have any threats outside of a 100 yards, okay, fine. I can court on off a certain area. But if I have a building a 160 yards perfectly adjacent to the stage, That's an obvious threat, especially with an elevated position that has overwatch. Mhmm. That's a sniper's paradise.
And, you know, we talk about Eagles Nest. You also have what Jon talks about, but the water tower.
Speaker 1: So what I'm hearing from you is it's not a failure on the ground for sure, but ultimately a failure in advance? I
Speaker 0: think it's a failure in advance. I think it's a failure to have this the counter snipers to be able to establish their range fit and their sketch maps.
Speaker 1: I also heard there also we've also learned that local snipers were stationed inside that building.
Speaker 0: I I haven't heard that piece of it yet, but that doesn't necessarily make sense unless they were actually in a window which was backed off. Because a lot of times you get yourself in there. Sometimes you expose your rifle in a way to try and do a force protection or a show of force that actually stops things. Others are actually more tactical where they'll sit back a little bit, but a sniper for the law enforcement is only trained to shoot about 75 yards unlike your counter sniper teams that are on But but here's my problem. In having done this for so long, they always say the adage of ignorance is bliss, and I think that's true.
I've done 1,000 of advances. I've done 1,000 of of counter sniper operations with our teams in, you know, Iraq and Afghanistan, etcetera. The amount of negligence, the amount of mistakes that was made here, I have a very difficult time not leaning myself towards this was intentional as opposed to fecklessness.
Speaker 1: Wait. Talk to me about that. I actually heard you say this right, the day after, which I wanted to ask you about. What do you mean intentional?
Speaker 0: You know, I
Speaker 1: You mean an intentional failure on the part of No.
Speaker 0: I wouldn't say an intentional failure on the part of, but I kinda just, you know, I sit here and I scratch my head. You don't wanna be the conspiracist. You don't wanna be the
Speaker 1: I'm telling you because that's what it's that's what it's leaning towards.
Speaker 0: No. I I I know. And and and that's the issue is that you walk this fine balance of you're not trying to be a conspiracist, but you look at it and you go, how could this have gone so
Speaker 1: But it's one thing if someone on the street says it. It's not that I mean, you, Cor Mills, member of former sniper, you saying it, I mean, it makes my eyebrows go up. What when you say you're walking the line on this, intentional what?
Speaker 0: You know, it almost seems to me, I think, that an investigation is necessary at this point within congress, not just the FBI, not just others. You know, I look back at it and I'm thinking, alright. You know, for an individual, if you looked at the escalations and how they're trying to approach him, let's just say that it was like, okay. 1st, we wanna censor and silence you, then we wanna indict and imprison you. Now we're attempting to kill you and take Woah.
Speaker 1: Woah. Woah. Woah. Woah. Woah.
Woah. Woah. Woah. Woah. You let's let's slow down.
Speaker 0: Please.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm hearing 2 things from you. I don't wanna jump ahead of things, but I'm also hearing you jumping ahead of things.
Speaker 0: Well, actually, I'm just looking at all the different possible capabilities. You know, one of the things as a military member, one of things well, wait. But one of the things as a person who's running the special operations committees before, one of the people who's actually done this is that you look at all potential analysis. Right? That
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and his team have said do not
Speaker 0: No. I agree.
Speaker 1: Dial it back. Do not blame this on Joe Biden.
Speaker 0: Oh, well, actually, I didn't say Joe Biden. And to be completely Who's
Speaker 1: the they then? Let's be very specific.
Speaker 0: Well, that's that's what the investigations do. Was it local law enforcement that had made the mistakes? Or was there something to it? Was there, other types of things that we need to do analysis or looking at and providing analysis? My point is that when something so significant, you're talking about something that hasn't happened in decades.
Right?
Speaker 1: I totally I I I
Speaker 0: My point is is this, from a perspective of someone who's actually conducted these, these are not difficult advances. This is not like I'm putting together a stage placement and a tight shot. This is about looking at your surroundings. What is my green, yellow, and red route, which is your routes out in case. What is my actual elements of that I need to be looking at as far as mitigating threats or risks or increased levels.
Where's my range fan for the sniper that says, okay, here's my 100, my 200, my sketch. Here's an area where someone could shoot. Here's some because here's my thing.
Speaker 1: So you're saying Let's just say for
Speaker 0: the voice element.
Speaker 1: You're saying this is so basic that how big the screw up was, that's what's leading your brain
Speaker 0: down the road. Exactly right. In in a way. But but because you're saying the thing,
Speaker 1: let's just say it's true. Tom Emmer was just on with me, and he said very specifically to me. I wrote it down. Mhmm. He said very good.
It is too early to be talking about who is at fault and who is
Speaker 0: investigation is necessary.
Speaker 1: But, is it is it not dangerous? Is it not reckless to use to even be throwing around the word intentionally?
Speaker 0: So to to to question things as we do an investigation is recklessness. Because at that point, then should we never question anything? My point is this.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not trying I'm not trying to be a PC. My point is in the political environment that we are in.
Speaker 0: What would it have taken? Right? Let's just say that resources was limited. Let's go with that as as a reasoning. So how many times have you seen where they just put up a police car inside of a parking lot with not an officer in it and just leave the lights on as a deterrent?
Why couldn't that have been a simple thing that was placed in? Why couldn't we have said to the owner of the actual AGR company, hey, look, we don't want to disrupt your business, but we also want to make sure your parking lot is clear, people trying to park in there for the rally, why don't we place an officer there? My point is that this was too easy of a solution. And when I think about a 160
Speaker 1: I'm just so uncomfortable with even having I'm
Speaker 0: uncomfortable with having to say it. Trust me, my whole point is is that I would like to look at this and say, where was the mistake made? How can we correct it in the future? Why was this actually done? But I think that this does warrant a j 13 type commission where we can actually look at it and say, let's investigate and find out why this happened so it doesn't happen to anyone.
This is not about a political thing. This is about we had an attempt to assassinate a president. Millimeter difference between this being an attempt and this being an assassination. And I can tell you at a 160 yards, Kate, just to give you an idea, your off the shelf rifle shoots what they call 1 minute of angle at every 100 yard line. So at a 100, it's 1 inch, 202 inches, etcetera.
So now you're talking about 1.6 inch grouping capability of a rifle off a manufacturing line. Your average human being, because we used to do this in nursing manufacturing, you're 20 inches inches shoulder to shoulder, 40 inches head to waist, and you have 6 by 8 in your average head size. These are kind of the dimensions that you look at as an average. You're talking about a 1.6 inch grouping for multiple shots on a basic rifle. We're blessed, and I do believe in divine intervention, so I am a person of faith.
I can't explain one. I hope that it was a corrugated roof and maybe he slipped off on one of the edges of the corrugated roof where he was rushed. But this the whole thing I think just needs to have explanation so the American people and everyone can feel comfortable.
Speaker 1: And I think that's why people are saying pump the brakes because we have seen conspiracy theories, honestly, on the right and the left. I just said, Donnie O'Sullivan on that that it's already going like wildfire. This is the kind of political environment that they're saying it's too hot and people are jumping to too many conclusions. Well, as a military That's I am so As a
Speaker 0: military member, one of the things that we
Speaker 1: do is
Speaker 0: we what if scenario everything in the world. Right? That's how I know. But it but it I don't know. I'm just saying it is look at.
The what
Speaker 1: if the what if the you you talk about maybe in an investigation and the what if that that you you are presenting on live television. I don't know. It's just
Speaker 0: Well, so listen. I'm I'm a public official. Yes. Anything that I do, anything that I say, I say in the public. I don't try and hide it in private.
I think that the American people need transparency, accountability, and accessibility to the elected officials, not to try and hide behind what we want to look at. And I also think that if we if if the American people know that we're questioning these things as well, well, it puts them at rest to at least know why aren't they at least looking into this? Why we should look at every single situation which is of this significance. We should look at it from multiple angles to ensure that nothing is left out, nothing could be potentially claimed as being covered up. We need to have more transparency to the American people, and I think that's what everyone deserves.
Speaker 1: But a full investigation Full investigation. Before anyone That's
Speaker 0: right.
Speaker 1: Points it.
Speaker 0: That's exactly right.
Speaker 1: And that's
Speaker 0: why I say Eileen. I have not made an accusation or something. I just wanna make sure we're covering our bases to ensure that we get a proper investigation at all levels to ensure this doesn't happen again and that our president can be safe.
Speaker 1: Congressman, thank you for coming, and thank you very much. John, back to you. Alright.
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
AMERICAN CHARGED WITH FELONY HATE CRIME FOR BURNING ISRAELI FLAG * https://t.co/067o1wy2me
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
Member of the S African parliament - homo erectus https://t.co/aw3bM0Mq08
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
White people just watch
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
BLM: LOOTING GUCCI OR FROM MACY’S IS REPARATIONS: “TAKE WHATEVER YOU WANT THEY HAVE INSURANCE “
Video Transcript AI Summary
Looting Gucci, Macy's, or Nike stores is seen as a form of reparation, ensuring that individuals have basic necessities like food and clothing. The speaker argues that taking items from these businesses is justified because they have insurance and will be compensated. In contrast, the speaker's own community does not receive any form of reparation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If somebody decides to loot a Gucci or a Macy's or a Nike because that makes sure that that person eats. That makes sure that that person has clothes. That's reparation. That is reparation. Anything they wanna take, take because these businesses have insurance.
They're gonna get their money back. My people aren't getting anything.
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
BUILDING #7 FLASHES AT THE TIME OF COLLAPSE — CONTROLLED DEMOLITION ?
@The_Real_Fly - The_Real_Fly
CITIZEN RESPONSE TO JOE BIDEN’S SPEECH IN MAUI *
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker expresses strong anger and frustration towards Joe Biden and his wife, criticizing their actions and calling them traitors. They accuse Biden of being out of touch with the common man and lying about personal experiences to establish commonality. The speaker also condemns Biden's inability to address the tragedy and loss experienced by others, particularly children. They insult Biden and suggest he should step down from office. The speaker further criticizes the governor and expresses outrage at the behavior of individuals in government. The transcript ends with a vulgar insult directed at Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It is almost impossible to believe that this guy, that this old man, this Walmart greeter, this fake install president, 1, why the fuck is his wife with them wherever he goes? We didn't hire this person. I didn't hire you, Joe. You're a traitor. I know what you are.
I know what Kamala is. I know what the Democratic Party is. And I know that we have a constitutional crisis of epic proportion. But hearing you talk about your house that had a little fire, you almost lost your cat in your Corvette. There are children that were incinerated to ash, you fucking old man.
You vile human beings. The only way you feel you're able to communicate and then you have some kind of, you know, you're still out of touch with the common man. You don't even understand how to speak to them. The only way you think you can establish commonality with them is to lie that the same thing happened to you. No matter what the tragedy is, your son wasn't killed in action, by the way.
You all sit and burned down. Your children weren't burned to death. How dare you get up there and speak this way? Your job is to go there and assuage them in a way that you talk to them about their loss, then you can't imagine what it's like. Then you can't imagine what it's like never to find the bodies of the poor children that were sent home from schools that died alone, alone, in fear, without their parents or a guardian, that the most abhorrent thing happened.
You're a disgusting, despicable bastard. You're too old. You need to step down from office. Maybe the tackling hyena behind you, maybe still rise to the occasion. She can't even form a coherent sentence.
This is an outrage an outrage. It should be we should just rebuild the goddamn thing the way it was. When you hear the psychopath that the first thing out of the governor's mouth was, oh, we we're gonna reclaim the land for this or for that. Who the fuck are the people we hire in government? And if there's any truth to the matter that this idiot held back the water, he should be sent down to Guantanamo Bay, never to be seen again.
It's just outrageous how we behave in this country. There's no adults. An an event no matter how tragic there be men that are able to rise to the occasion, in 5 seconds, you should know what to do. You should understand the right thing. You almost lost your cat.
Go fuck yourself.