TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Theo_TJ_Jordan
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the concept of "code switching" and how it relates to figures like Tim Walz, who presents a facade that doesn't align with his true identity. I express frustration with how the political landscape has abandoned traditional masculinity, leading to a disconnect with normal men. I critique the Eurocentric framing of political preferences and highlight the growing divide between young men and women, particularly in their political views. I also point out the failure of the party to represent normal women and the absurdity of blaming external factors for these shifts.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
"Code switch" means to front something you're not. The Tim Walz as regular guy ruse just told on itself. Walz is an embodiment of Progress and Queer+. He's been involved in gay orgs since he was a young teacher. The DNC abandoned normal men. 🧙♀️✊️🦄
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes they were on the ticket because of progressive actions in Minnesota, but also because they could "code talk" to white men, putting them at ease. The speaker suggests they provided a "permission structure" for this demographic to vote for the ticket. They claim that, with the exception of Minnesota, the ticket did not get enough of this demographic in swing states.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I knew I was on the ticket. I would argue because we did a lot of amazing progressive things in Minnesota to improve people's lives, but I also was on the ticket quite honestly, know, because I I could code talk to white guys watching football fixing their truck doing that, that I could put them at ease. I was the permission structure to say, look, can do this and vote for this. And and you look across those swing states with the exception of Minnesota, we didn't get enough of
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I am normal man. 🎬😵💫 They are mysogynoir. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 Progress and save democracy. 🌊🧟♂️🧟🧟♀️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Vance gained media attention after writing a book. The book's premise involved criticizing his hometown instead of promoting it. Vance is described as a venture capitalist who is pretending to be a cowboy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And senator Vance, he became a media darling. He wrote a book about the place he grew up, but the premise was was trashing that place where he grew up rather than lifting it up. This guy's a venture capitalist cosplaying like he's a cowboy or something. I don't even know what a venture capitalist does most of the time.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
@HoggArkie That's how ideologically consumed the party of equity is now. They ran a masculinity TV ad because polls showed normal dudes had all bailed from this FrankenFemme shit show. This was their best job at staging American men.👇 they can't even fake it. 😵💫🧙♀️🌊
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is perhaps the worst brand I could come up with for the DNC right now. They promote a siloed soft activist boy as their new lead lion. Lol goodness gracious.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is perhaps the worst brand I could come up with for the DNC right now. They promote a siloed soft activist boy as their new lead lion. Lol goodness gracious.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
It's a very Eurocentric framing. 😏
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The bulk of Americans (VAST majority of men) prefer Vance over Starmer. Just like preferring Trump over Walz. Those pairings are much the same. The latter are the trophy of FrankenFemme. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 So whittled down and off the male norm they present uncomfortable in their own skin.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I'm almost disappointed to report that it isn't nearly the sludge one would think. It's still wild this is presented not as the Opinion of Collinson, but as the lead story of "Analysis on our Most Trusted Name In News". 👁 Our journos don't like Americans. Who is this for? 👇
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Even Stephen A doesn't buy this shit anymore.
Video Transcript AI Summary
President Obama suggested some men may not want a woman president. In response, the speaker argues that Black people’s potential reluctance to vote for a woman or even willingness to vote for Trump could stem from policy concerns, not misogyny.
The speaker cites inflation, cost of living, gas and grocery prices, immigration, and border issues as key factors. They suggest some believe there's more sensitivity towards immigrants than struggling Black communities. The speaker highlights the allocation of $53 million in prepaid credit cards for immigrants, questioning why similar support isn't provided to Black people who have been struggling for years. They ask if people don't think Black people notice these disparities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want you to hear exactly what this man had to say.
Speaker 1: I'm speaking to men directly. Part of it makes me think that, well, you just feeling the idea of having a woman as president. That's not acceptable.
Speaker 0: Respectfully, president Obama, what you said is not acceptable. Is it possible that the only reason some black folks may not be inclined to vote or they may be a dis bit disenchanted or dare I say may even be willing to go as far as voting for Trump? Is it possible that it's policy as opposed to misogyny, inflation, the cost of living, the price of gas, the price of groceries, that don't matter? Immigration and our borders. And this belief that there's an elevated level of sensitivity towards them as opposed to black folks struggling, if not starving in this country.
Yes. That plays a role too. When the mayor in New York was talking about $53,000,000 in prepaid credit cards for immigrants who came across our borders illegally and having prepaid credit cards for them. And I said, wait a minute. Black folks been starving for years.
We ain't get that. You don't think they notice?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Kamala and Roland said normal men have only bailed on Team Progress because of "Russian Disinformation". 👁 Because every inconvenient thing in Progressland just gets shoved in the Russia! Russia! Russia! bucket.😵💫 🎬🌊🧟🧟♂️🧟♀️👏🦭👏
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker asserts that misinformation and lies are already being spread, and warns of foreign interference. Drawing on experience from the Senate Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 election, the speaker claims Black people were specifically targeted with misinformation. The speaker urges listeners not to let them take their voice.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: They've already started with the misinformation and the lies. We know that there is foreign interference, and I have to say to everybody listening to this, don't let them take your voice. Because I I was part of the Senate Intelligence Committee when we investigated Russia's interference in the twenty sixteen election. Black folks were targeted with misinformation.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Look at him tweak like a boxer right before he lays the wood. Lol I love this clip. 🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 questions the strength of the new president's mandate, noting he won the popular vote by only 1.5% and the general election with less than 50% of the vote.
Speaker 1 argues that the president does have a mandate, stating they are not a supporter of Trump, but of truth and facts. The president won every swing state, increased voter turnout among Black, Latino, and young voters, and 89% of counties shifted to the right. Republicans hadn't won the popular vote since 2004, but they did this year, also winning the electoral college. Speaker 1 doesn't understand how people can look at that and say there's no mandate.
Speaker 0 suggests they have different definitions of a mandate. Speaker 1 believes Democrats may use the close margin as an excuse to avoid changing their strategy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It's only been in office for six weeks. Seems like six years, doesn't
Speaker 1: it? Mhmm.
Speaker 0: And he's been going around with his cronies touting his so called landslide landslide and blowout win. But he won the popular vote by 1.5% Mhmm. One of the smallest ever Mhmm. And he won the general election by less than 50%. So what kind of mandate is this really?
Speaker 1: Well, it it is a mandate, and I'm gonna explain why. And I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and the facts. And here's the facts.
The man won every swing state. Mhmm. He increased in terms of his vote voter turnout in his favor from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos, and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard 2020. '80 '9 percent of the counties shifted to the right.
That's a mandate. We can sit up there and play around all we want to. In 2020, they didn't. Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote.
A matter of fact, the republicans hadn't won the the popular vote. If I remember '26, '2 thousand and '4, but they did this year. So twenty years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state and or top it all 89 of the counties shifted gifts.
I don't understand how people can look at that and say, there's no mandate. There's a mandate.
Speaker 0: What's a different definition of a mandate,
Speaker 1: I guess? But but the problem is that if you're the Democratic party and you lost 49.8 to 48.3% and you're looking at that 1.5% dip. That's an excuse for you to say, what we did really wasn't that bad. Some people didn't show We should continue to do that. See, said those Don't continue to that.
Find a new strategy.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The Party doesn't represent normal women either. By design. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 "War for women's rights" just means this. 👇👁 https://theojordan.substack.com/p/defending-manhood
Defending Manhood
How Toxic Masculinity Narratives Undermine Fatherhood and American Society
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
🧙♀️✊️🦄 https://t.co/e4zqhDqDhI https://t.co/IDo2o4lfO5
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker pledges to use their voice to uplift and educate their community about racism, anti-blackness, and violence. They commit to loving their Black neighbors the same as their White neighbors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About racism, anti blackness, or violence. About racism, anti blackness, or violence. I will use my voice in the most uplifting way possible. I will use my voice in the most uplifting way possible. And do everything in my power to educate my community.
I will love my black neighbors the same as my white ones.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Progress(ion)... We social-engineer and use Equity-based policy to send massive amount of women to college. Universities become dominated by feminist figures and ideology. Masculinity is deemed "toxic" and expelled. Regular men are expelled too (see: conservatives). Within
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Progress(ion)... We social-engineer and use Equity-based policy to send massive amount of women to college. Universities become dominated by feminist figures and ideology. Masculinity is deemed "toxic" and expelled. Regular men are expelled too (see: conservatives). Within
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is a UVA professor. This is the ideological poison our students are being hit with nationwide. These are the same maniacal zealots who are launching campaigns to strip everything Thomas Jefferson out of UVA to be replaced by the Queer Equity. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 https://t.co/75Bin3yFx9
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm a lover and the baddest, and you haven't experienced pleasure like I have. I'd like to teach you, and we can start training tonight.
I had an opportunity to do transdisciplinary scholarship with bankroll Thomas Jefferson on some salvation for Sally Hemings moment. As a sapphisexual, I'm intellectually inclined, but also looking at your titties. That's why black feminism is perfect for me. Misogyny sounds good as fuck. I like moving this radical enterprise about getting off and being free, and getting the highest vestiges of power to invest in that project.
I thought Felicia Rashad's husband was whack and corny. If all you gotta do is be a doctor to get a Claire Huxtable, I'll do that because I can turn it out in the way that she deserves. I work with whoever got the most dollars to make the most sense, which is currently being a professor at the University of Virginia. I just want to know why we're making terrible choices and who is coming for us. Until then, I will save them, and you can lay in my bosom while you soothe your pains and mastermind how we're gonna save ourselves again.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think I'm a lover, like in all the ways. I'm literally the baddest. Like you couldn't even understand it because you're not ready and you haven't ever come as many times as I've come. So you don't even know what it is like to sort of live in that place. But I would like to teach you, if you are available tonight, we can start our training sessions.
I thought I was gonna come home, but then I got this remarkable opportunity to do transdisciplinary scholarship with bankroll Thomas Jefferson on some salvation for Sally Hemings moment. But I am a sapphisexual, so I'm very intellectually inclined, but also I'm sitting at, I'm looking at your titties while it's happening. Like, the two of those things is why black feminism is perfect for me. I find in my own personal life, misogyny sounds good as fuck. I like moving this radical enterprise that's literally about getting off and all the way and being free, and being able to get some of the highest vestiges of power to invest in that project.
That feels thug to me, from early. Like I remember watching Felicia Rashad and I was like, Your husband's whack. Like you're a bad you're the baddest of them. He's corny as fuck. Like, if all you gotta do is be a doctor to get you a Claire Huxtable, I'll be that.
Like, I'll do that because I bet you I can turn it out in the way that she deserves because he's not cutting it. I know he isn't. I work with whoever got the most dollars to make the most sense. And that currently looks like being a professor at the University of Virginia, but I don't feel that I ever was like, I wanna be a professor. I just wanna like, pontificate.
I just wanna know why are we making these terrible fucking choices and who is coming for us. And until then, I will save them And you can lay in my bosom while you soothe your pains from what the world is doing to us and mastermind how we're gonna once again save ourselves.
reSee.it AI Summary
If you asked me to depict a modern Red Guard, I’d show you the chaos unfolding on campuses, where protests and walkouts are rampant, often fueled by radical ideologies. I see a disturbing trend of anger and division, with groups targeting individuals like Riley Gaines. The narrative has shifted from Black Lives Matter to issues of gender and climate, yet it all feels like a continuation of the same radicalism. The irony is palpable; those who once resisted state control now seem to embrace it. This isn’t just a phase; it’s a troubling reality we face.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
If you asked me to create a video of a modern Red Guard, it would be this. Not one father involved anywhere here.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Here it attacked DNC HQ. Yes, the Democratic Party. While the party of median Democrats cultivated, fed, harnessed, and perversely utilized this destructive mania, it hates them too. It's goal is to destroy America/capitalism. ✊️
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
"Harris also faces protesters on her reproductive freedoms tour ... ACCESS Reproductive Justice decided not to attend. “We feel that the plight of the Palestinian people is very much a reproductive justice issue." What?!? 😵💫🧟♂️🧟♀️🧟 https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-1-13-24
Unscripted 1-13-24
The Same Thing (Decolonizing)
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Peel this toxic shit apart, expose it for what it really is and has always been, end the Hatecraft spells used across every front, and let's end this madness meant to end America as we know it. 👇🎙️ https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-1-13-24
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trans activism is described as the decolonizing of masculinity, similar to how radical feminism became an attack on masculinity. Feminism, once a movement for women's equality, allegedly became a force that inverts its original goals, exemplified by men dressed as women receiving female awards and endorsements.
Queer plus activism is framed as the decolonizing of heterosexuality, disrupting the "human blueprint" of male-female procreation. This involves radicalizing the fringes against the middle of bell curves, where the state empowers these edges to disrupt societal norms.
Anti-racism is presented as the decolonization of capitalism, with concepts like "whiteness as property" and abolishing whiteness being discussed in academic journals. Equity, as part of DEI, is identified as the driving force behind this decolonization effort, aiming to dismantle existing power structures and invert them to accommodate the fringes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thinking about this today. And if you think about it, trans activism is literally the decolonizing of masculinity. Now let that marinate for a second because I pound all the time how it all rode in on the back of. Right? I pound feminism a lot, and not the historical, like the whole scope of everything.
You know, people come back to me with bizarre shit, like, you don't want women to have suffrage? I mean, it's absolutely crazy. Obviously not that's like anti racist who tell me I'm a white supremacist if I disagree with any aspect of the dogma they wanna push. Right? So when I pound feminism, no.
I'm talking about what it ultimately became at the end of this once it became this rabid activist vehicle, and it perverted on itself, and it actually became a snake eating its own tail. And that crazy, out of control, what was in essence a decolonizing movement, and I'll tie it back there in a second, really became inverted to what the goals of feminism were, and that's how we have Leah Thomas standing on a female NCAA championship podium. That's how we have Dylan whatever the hell that person's name is doing tampon commercials. That's how we have that bizarre montage where all these awards, first female this, shatter the glass ceiling this, first female this, highest Jeopardy score this, top college student this, they're all men. They're men dressed as women.
I mean, think about that. Right? The same movement that started with smash the patriarchy got so out of control and ate itself that this just like, you know, zombie like, comatose walk forward and whatever the activism direction they just told you to walk became men and woman face. It's really weird, but tying it back to this idea of decolonizing, the radical feminism movement, and I understand like radfem means something to those who study this I almost used scripture. It'd piss some people off, wouldn't it?
This doctrine has a meaning that it doesn't to me, and I recognize that that's sort of my own ignorance, if you will. I'm never gonna sit down and study the waves of feminism. It's not something that interests me. I'd rather chew glass. But radfem to me means what was once a good cause, like all of our justice based movements, what was once a good cause, women's suffrage.
The fact that women don't all have to stay home and be stay at home moms, the ability for women to have careers if that's what they choose to do. You know, these basic sort of objective, reasonable things that our people support, and then it becomes this out of control Frankenstein monster that's ultimately a decolonizing monster, and that's why that's how I use the term radfem is to describe the difference between something that all Americans would agree with for the most part, all reasonable ones, versus this activist movement that you gotta be in this really bizarre sect in order to agree with it all. The problem is that sect got so empowered in such a gross scope, they, like, took over the whole managerial class. And I don't wanna drift off in this too much, but that was all through academic capture. Look at the people who testified in congress, that horrible testimony about Palestine, another decolonizing movement.
They were all women. Right? And they weren't just women, they were all a very specific kind of woman. They were a type of woman I wouldn't get along with at all, a type of woman that my wife wouldn't get along with very well, a type of woman that a lot of my favorite women on Twitter wouldn't get along with very well because they don't speak for women. They don't recognize women or represent women.
They represent this specific ideology, which unfortunately has captured academia in full and was able to drive this from the top down at an inorganic level, and it's caused a lot of problems. But if we look at this from a what do how do I wanna say this? If we look at this from a like, the vein of how this attacks, the mechanism, the method of attack. Right? If you think about what transactivism ultimately was, if feminism and I've said this story many times, and it makes a lot of people who were in the feminist movement for good reasons for a long time bristle, and I don't really know why because I think it's a very objectively true progression, whether it offends you or ruffles your feathers or not.
But if you think about this engine, so we start with the like, back when this was a good cause. Right? The society is set up so that women are not treated equally. It's like a men dominated society. That's where the idea of the patriarchy came from.
So women are equal to men. Women can do anything that a man can do. Any positive trait associated with a man is not to be associated with a man, because by associating it with a man, you are therefore saying it's not associated with a woman. It's not a female trait. Maybe we talk about aggression in a good way or assertiveness or confidence.
Right? You attach those to a male and as a male trait, as something masculinity maybe, as something that we might think of as masculine traits, and it's like, you can hear it already. Right? Can't you hear the counter already? What are you saying?
Are you saying that women can't be assertive? They can't be confident? Right? This goes right into that pocket, and like, no. That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying it tends to be associated as, like, a more masculine trait. But by attacking all positive traits in that manner, you strip all positive traits from being able to be associated or attached to males. And if you do that, just think this out logically, what are you left with? You're only left with the negative traits that can be associated with males, and of course, you're not gonna spend the same effort to whittle those away. And if you put all those together attached to men, what do you what do you have?
What did you just create? Toxic masculinity. It was a ideological attack on masculinity itself driven by feminists who were grossly overempowered at both the level that they climbed as well as the scope of institutional capture and control. I mean, it's absolutely staggering how much this one assembly line angry, rabid feminist mindset has captured like academia and medical and science institutions and shit in full because those all go together as part of that expert class capture. And I wrote a post about that, about how when I was in college, I saw a lot of very overt political dogma or not dogma.
I'm sorry. Rhetoric. Right? It was very this was back in the general betrayal, it's like Bush era. Everyone was very liberal, and I remember thinking, wow.
If you're conservative, it's very hostile on these campuses. I really wasn't in politics, so other than observing, it didn't really fire me up. In hindsight, it should have. But anyways, that post, I talked about how everything's changed now. It's very ideological now, and that's driven by those rabid once feminists.
That's why it all rode in on the back of because the feminist movement had wide side support. The anti racist movement, the queer plus, the gender spirits, that never did. But the feminist movement did because, of course, because we did have a society that was more geared towards males, that was created by males for the most part, particularly at the power structures. And so, of course, that once we got to this point of, like, civil rights as we've made this movement in this country, it became obvious that we had these issues and we needed to correct to allow women to live the liberty that America is about as well. So it, like, came from Good Place, but it got very perverted.
And what's interesting about it, and I got very long winded here, and I didn't mean to, I'll be shorter on these next prongs, is that it truly was an attack on masculinity. Because if you agree with the energy that I'm describing, and I don't know how you couldn't, then you would understand how it would ultimately want to attack masculinity. What does smash the patriarch mean? Right? That is a decolonizing form of energy.
Let's switch over to queer plus real quick, because you'll see the same mindset driven by the same people with the same method of attack. Now, what is being decolonized on the queer plus side? Heterosexuality. Duh. Just look at it.
Right? There was a Vice article that said men who don't experiment with their sexuality are homophobic. Boys, actually. It was targeting young boys. That the majority of young boys who don't experiment with their sexuality, they're homophobic.
Think about that for a second as a headline of an article. Right? It was that's not an Onion article. It was a real one. Now granted, that outlet is trash, but still, a lot of people read that stuff.
If you think about what that means, it's the same decolonizing engine. We have the fringe, and it's a little bit different here because we have, like, a true fringe that fits outside of the bell curve, and here it's an unquestionable bell curve. Unquestionable. You have a man and a woman who procreate to make child. That's a very human blueprint.
Nobody can argue against that. It's bizarre. People try to. We're pointed in the correct direction of artificial wombs for Christ's sake, but the reality is a man and woman make child. And so everything that flows from that blueprint, there are certain mandates and set things that are static, that are not changing.
Right? And they are set by this very blueprint, and in the queer plus world, what once started as the gay rights movement, which again, very similar in Trail here or in Track, there were certain aspects of our society that were set up that people who were in same sex relationships were in essence being persecuted by laws, and we, as like an advanced people, realize, well, that's not fair. Let's make some changes that are common sense and reasonable here. But it got completely pulled away as all of these layers I'm going to describe here did in the same direction because it's the same thing to we used to get criticized for saying it's a slippery slope. Right?
These things are slippery slopes. Oh, no. You're a bigot. For you saying there's any slippery slope, you're bigot. Well, look where queer plus activism is now.
Right? Let's tie this back to decolonizing. It's decolonizing heterosexuality. Heterosexuality is obviously the norm. If you think of it as a bell curve, the reason I brought up the human blueprint, the design that mandates certain responsibilities and certain obligations, aka the woman will birth the child.
Right? These things are not up for debate. They are just part of being a human being, so that sets our bell curve. And if you're somebody who falls out of that bell curve, then you feel like it is oppressive. It is wrong.
It makes you feel bad. That's what all of these engines are about. Go back to transactivism for a second. We're gonna go into an elementary school classroom and disrupt the gender binary for every child in the classroom, in the whole school, in the whole district, in the whole state, in the whole country, so that if we have certain children who are so confused, so off the norm, so out on a fringe that they're a boy and they think they're a girl because they're so effeminate, or they're a girl and they think they're a boy because they're so masculine, We're going to disrupt the bell curve for everybody to accommodate and make those people on the very far fringes feel a little bit better about themselves, make their emotions not be so hurt that they are so abnormal as opposed to the rest of society. Think how destructive that engine is, but that is the engine of decolonization.
I just described sort of blended together because they are blended together. They're the same thing. The decolonization of of masculinity, that sex, gender, and the decolonization of heterosexuality. That's queer plus activism. They're both the same thing.
It's taking radicalizing the fringes against the middle of bell curves. More importantly here, it's the state radicalizing and empowering the fringes against the middle of the bell curve, which means all of our society. Think about those scenes we've seen everywhere of this rainbow guard, these fucking maniacs who are out there screaming they wanna queer other people's kids, fighting people at schools and shit. It's crazy. Those are the radical edges who are very abnormal as opposed to our bell curve of America.
Why we would be allowing this attack where we are artificially empowering those edges and allowing them to disrupt that middle is crazy, but that's not a bad definition for what? Decolonizing. Decolonization. It is an attack mechanism that is designed to invert. What's the word you hear used to hear all the time?
They don't use it as much anymore because it gives away the hand. Dismantle. Dismantle the current power structure. It's oppressive. Right?
The oppressor. Oppression. We hear that all the time. Settler, colonial. It's the same framework, but the oppressor, the oppressed.
So it's the idea that our cultural norms are, in essence, power structures. These power structures are unfair, oppressive to those fringes, so we need to dismantle and disrupt them, invert them so that we can accommodate those edges. But because it inverts, that's not what it ends up being at all. It is a power play. We are going to empower the edges against the middle.
That's why it's decolonization. Now let's switch over to hardcore settler ideology, decolonization ideology. Let's talk race in America. Let's talk anti racism. Let's talk the idea of whiteness.
Let's talk the idea of whiteness as property. There are Harvard Law Review journals, Harvard academic journals talking about whiteness as property. Lots of them. There's a few that talk about abolishing the white race. It's not very good, is it?
Abolishing the white race. Abolishing whiteness. I mean, it's crazy. I'm sorry. They may not say white race.
Abolishing whiteness. I mean, that's absolutely nuts. And I think on one, they talk about, like, the one that I quoted on my thread the other day, it uses white race. So don't tell me whiteness isn't about that. But it largely isn't.
I know there's this big brouhaha about this all, but it is about capitalism. It's about decolonizing capitalism. That is sort of the overriding glue that ties us all together. That's what summed up in one word we hear all the time, equity. It's the e in the middle of DEI, which became the state religion of America somehow.
Don't know how that happened, although we're starting to figure it out, aren't we? We need to figure out where those roots truly come from, but it's complete capture. It's the decolonization of capitalism is what all these things feed. But let's talk about anti racism and this idea of whiteness and whiteness as property again for a second. One thing that's really important to understand is why these antiracist radicals worked so hard to try to change the definition of racism to the commonly understood definition of institutional racism.
Unscripted 1-13-24
The Same Thing (Decolonizing)
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Peel this toxic shit apart, expose it for what it really is and has always been, end the Hatecraft spells used across every front, and let's end this madness meant to end America as we know it. 👇🎙️ https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-1-13-24
Video Transcript AI Summary
Trans activism is described as the decolonizing of masculinity, similar to how radical feminism became an attack on masculinity. Feminism, once a movement for women's equality, allegedly became a force that inverts its original goals, exemplified by men dressed as women receiving female awards and endorsements.
Queer plus activism is framed as decolonizing heterosexuality, disrupting the traditional human blueprint of male-female procreation. This involves radicalizing the fringes against the middle of bell curves, empowering abnormal edges to disrupt societal norms.
Similarly, anti-racism and the concept of whiteness are presented as decolonizing capitalism. The speaker mentions academic journals discussing whiteness as property and even abolishing whiteness. Equity, as part of DEI, is identified as the driving force behind this decolonization of capitalism. The speaker claims anti-racist radicals are trying to change the definition of racism to institutional racism.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thinking about this today. And if you think about it, trans activism is literally the decolonizing of masculinity. Now let that marinate for a second because I pound all the time how it all rode in on the back of. Right? I pound feminism a lot, and not the historical, like the whole scope of everything.
You know, people come back to me with bizarre shit, like, you don't want women to have suffrage? I mean, it's absolutely crazy. Obviously not that's like anti racist who tell me I'm a white supremacist if I disagree with any aspect of the dogma they wanna push. Right? So when I pound feminism, no.
I'm talking about what it ultimately became at the end of this once it became this rabid activist vehicle, and it perverted on itself, and it actually became a snake eating its own tail. And that crazy, out of control, what was in essence a decolonizing movement, and I'll tie it back there in a second, really became inverted to what the goals of feminism were, and that's how we have Leah Thomas standing on a female NCAA championship podium. That's how we have Dylan whatever the hell that person's name is doing tampon commercials. That's how we have that bizarre montage where all these awards, first female this, shatter the glass ceiling this, first female this, highest Jeopardy score this, top college student this, they're all men. They're men dressed as women.
I mean, think about that. Right? The same movement that started with smash the patriarchy got so out of control and ate itself that this just like, you know, zombie like, comatose walk forward and whatever the activism direction they just told you to walk became men and woman face. It's really weird, but tying it back to this idea of decolonizing, the radical feminism movement, and I understand like radfem means something to those who study this I almost used scripture. It'd piss some people off, wouldn't it?
This doctrine has a meaning that it doesn't to me, and I recognize that that's sort of my own ignorance, if you will. I'm never gonna sit down and study the waves of feminism. It's not something that interests me. I'd rather chew glass. But radfem to me means what was once a good cause, like all of our justice based movements, what was once a good cause, women's suffrage.
The fact that women don't all have to stay home and be stay at home moms, the ability for women to have careers if that's what they choose to do. You know, these basic sort of objective, reasonable things that our people support, and then it becomes this out of control Frankenstein monster that's ultimately a decolonizing monster, and that's why that's how I use the term radfem is to describe the difference between something that all Americans would agree with for the most part, all reasonable ones, versus this activist movement that you gotta be in this really bizarre sect in order to agree with it all. The problem is that sect got so empowered in such a gross scope, they, like, took over the whole managerial class. And I don't wanna drift off in this too much, but that was all through academic capture. Look at the people who testified in congress, that horrible testimony about Palestine, another decolonizing movement.
They were all women. Right? And they weren't just women, they were all a very specific kind of woman. They were a type of woman I wouldn't get along with at all, a type of woman that my wife wouldn't get along with very well, a type of woman that a lot of my favorite women on Twitter wouldn't get along with very well because they don't speak for women. They don't recognize women or represent women.
They represent this specific ideology, which unfortunately has captured academia in full and was able to drive this from the top down at an inorganic level, and it's caused a lot of problems. But if we look at this from a what do how do I wanna say this? If we look at this from a like, the vein of how this attacks, the mechanism, the method of attack. Right? If you think about what transactivism ultimately was, if feminism and I've said this story many times, and it makes a lot of people who were in the feminist movement for good reasons for a long time bristle, and I don't really know why because I think it's a very objectively true progression, whether it offends you or ruffles your feathers or not.
But if you think about this engine, so we start with the like, back when this was a good cause. Right? The society is set up so that women are not treated equally. It's like a men dominated society. That's where the idea of the patriarchy came from.
So women are equal to men. Women can do anything that a man can do. Any positive trait associated with a man is not to be associated with a man, because by associating it with a man, you are therefore saying it's not associated with a woman. It's not a female trait. Maybe we talk about aggression in a good way or assertiveness or confidence.
Right? You attach those to a male and as a male trait, as something masculinity maybe, as something that we might think of as masculine traits, and it's like, you can hear it already. Right? Can't you hear the counter already? What are you saying?
Are you saying that women can't be assertive? They can't be confident? Right? This goes right into that pocket, and like, no. That's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying it tends to be associated as, like, a more masculine trait. But by attacking all positive traits in that manner, you strip all positive traits from being able to be associated or attached to males. And if you do that, just think this out logically, what are you left with? You're only left with the negative traits that can be associated with males, and of course, you're not gonna spend the same effort to whittle those away. And if you put all those together attached to men, what do you what do you have?
What did you just create? Toxic masculinity. It was a ideological attack on masculinity itself driven by feminists who were grossly overempowered at both the level that they climbed as well as the scope of institutional capture and control. I mean, it's absolutely staggering how much this one assembly line angry, rabid feminist mindset has captured like academia and medical and science institutions and shit in full because those all go together as part of that expert class capture. And I wrote a post about that, about how when I was in college, I saw a lot of very overt political dogma or not dogma.
I'm sorry. Rhetoric. Right? It was very this was back in the general betrayal, it's like Bush era. Everyone was very liberal, and I remember thinking, wow.
If you're conservative, it's very hostile on these campuses. I really wasn't in politics, so other than observing, it didn't really fire me up. In hindsight, it should have. But anyways, that post, I talked about how everything's changed now. It's very ideological now, and that's driven by those rabid once feminists.
That's why it all rode in on the back of because the feminist movement had wide side support. The anti racist movement, the queer plus, the gender spirits, that never did. But the feminist movement did because, of course, because we did have a society that was more geared towards males, that was created by males for the most part, particularly at the power structures. And so, of course, that once we got to this point of, like, civil rights as we've made this movement in this country, it became obvious that we had these issues and we needed to correct to allow women to live the liberty that America is about as well. So it, like, came from Good Place, but it got very perverted.
And what's interesting about it, and I got very long winded here, and I didn't mean to, I'll be shorter on these next prongs, is that it truly was an attack on masculinity. Because if you agree with the energy that I'm describing, and I don't know how you couldn't, then you would understand how it would ultimately want to attack masculinity. What does smash the patriarch mean? Right? That is a decolonizing form of energy.
Let's switch over to queer plus real quick, because you'll see the same mindset driven by the same people with the same method of attack. Now, what is being decolonized on the queer plus side? Heterosexuality. Duh. Just look at it.
Right? There was a Vice article that said men who don't experiment with their sexuality are homophobic. Boys, actually. It was targeting young boys. That the majority of young boys who don't experiment with their sexuality, they're homophobic.
Think about that for a second as a headline of an article. Right? It was that's not an Onion article. It was a real one. Now granted, that outlet is trash, but still, a lot of people read that stuff.
If you think about what that means, it's the same decolonizing engine. We have the fringe, and it's a little bit different here because we have, like, a true fringe that fits outside of the bell curve, and here it's an unquestionable bell curve. Unquestionable. You have a man and a woman who procreate to make child. That's a very human blueprint.
Nobody can argue against that. It's bizarre. People try to. We're pointed in the correct direction of artificial wombs for Christ's sake, but the reality is a man and woman make child. And so everything that flows from that blueprint, there are certain mandates and set things that are static, that are not changing.
Right? And they are set by this very blueprint, and in the queer plus world, what once started as the gay rights movement, which again, very similar in Trail here or in Track, there were certain aspects of our society that were set up that people who were in same sex relationships were in essence being persecuted by laws, and we, as like an advanced people, realize, well, that's not fair. Let's make some changes that are common sense and reasonable here. But it got completely pulled away as all of these layers I'm going to describe here did in the same direction because it's the same thing to we used to get criticized for saying it's a slippery slope. Right?
These things are slippery slopes. Oh, no. You're a bigot. For you saying there's any slippery slope, you're bigot. Well, look where queer plus activism is now.
Right? Let's tie this back to decolonizing. It's decolonizing heterosexuality. Heterosexuality is obviously the norm. If you think of it as a bell curve, the reason I brought up the human blueprint, the design that mandates certain responsibilities and certain obligations, aka the woman will birth the child.
Right? These things are not up for debate. They are just part of being a human being, so that sets our bell curve. And if you're somebody who falls out of that bell curve, then you feel like it is oppressive. It is wrong.
It makes you feel bad. That's what all of these engines are about. Go back to transactivism for a second. We're gonna go into an elementary school classroom and disrupt the gender binary for every child in the classroom, in the whole school, in the whole district, in the whole state, in the whole country, so that if we have certain children who are so confused, so off the norm, so out on a fringe that they're a boy and they think they're a girl because they're so effeminate, or they're a girl and they think they're a boy because they're so masculine, We're going to disrupt the bell curve for everybody to accommodate and make those people on the very far fringes feel a little bit better about themselves, make their emotions not be so hurt that they are so abnormal as opposed to the rest of society. Think how destructive that engine is, but that is the engine of decolonization.
I just described sort of blended together because they are blended together. They're the same thing. The decolonization of of masculinity, that sex, gender, and the decolonization of heterosexuality. That's queer plus activism. They're both the same thing.
It's taking radicalizing the fringes against the middle of bell curves. More importantly here, it's the state radicalizing and empowering the fringes against the middle of the bell curve, which means all of our society. Think about those scenes we've seen everywhere of this rainbow guard, these fucking maniacs who are out there screaming they wanna queer other people's kids, fighting people at schools and shit. It's crazy. Those are the radical edges who are very abnormal as opposed to our bell curve of America.
Why we would be allowing this attack where we are artificially empowering those edges and allowing them to disrupt that middle is crazy, but that's not a bad definition for what? Decolonizing. Decolonization. It is an attack mechanism that is designed to invert. What's the word you hear used to hear all the time?
They don't use it as much anymore because it gives away the hand. Dismantle. Dismantle the current power structure. It's oppressive. Right?
The oppressor. Oppression. We hear that all the time. Settler, colonial. It's the same framework, but the oppressor, the oppressed.
So it's the idea that our cultural norms are, in essence, power structures. These power structures are unfair, oppressive to those fringes, so we need to dismantle and disrupt them, invert them so that we can accommodate those edges. But because it inverts, that's not what it ends up being at all. It is a power play. We are going to empower the edges against the middle.
That's why it's decolonization. Now let's switch over to hardcore settler ideology, decolonization ideology. Let's talk race in America. Let's talk anti racism. Let's talk the idea of whiteness.
Let's talk the idea of whiteness as property. There are Harvard Law Review journals, Harvard academic journals talking about whiteness as property. Lots of them. There's a few that talk about abolishing the white race. It's not very good, is it?
Abolishing the white race. Abolishing whiteness. I mean, it's crazy. I'm sorry. They may not say white race.
Abolishing whiteness. I mean, that's absolutely nuts. And I think on one, they talk about, like, the one that I quoted on my thread the other day, it uses white race. So don't tell me whiteness isn't about that. But it largely isn't.
I know there's this big brouhaha about this all, but it is about capitalism. It's about decolonizing capitalism. That is sort of the overriding glue that ties us all together. That's what summed up in one word we hear all the time, equity. It's the e in the middle of DEI, which became the state religion of America somehow.
Don't know how that happened, although we're starting to figure it out, aren't we? We need to figure out where those roots truly come from, but it's complete capture. It's the decolonization of capitalism is what all these things feed. But let's talk about anti racism and this idea of whiteness and whiteness as property again for a second. One thing that's really important to understand is why these antiracist radicals worked so hard to try to change the definition of racism to the commonly understood definition of institutional racism.
Unscripted 1-13-24
The Same Thing (Decolonizing)
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Here is the Red Guard chasing Riley Gaines like a rabid mob until she ended up barricaded inside a room with police called in. This was on a college campus in San Fran. Our media barely touched the story and DNC voters kept painting Riley as The Hate. 👁
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is legitimately one of the craziest scenes I've ever watched. And I've seen some shit! Look closely at the details in the hallway. The signs, the narrow demographic this is, the completely dead eyes, the laser-targeted rage. None of this is by chance.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Now watch this crowd. This shit is scary when you understand the scope of the intentionally built powder keg and how the entire left of America (who controls our cultural channels) is openly using this as a political weapon. It can point anywhere. ✊️🔥
Video Transcript AI Summary
Protect trans kids. Protect kids.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Protect trans kids. Protect trans kids. Protect trans kids. Protect kids. Protect trans kids.
Protect trans Protect Protect trans trans kids. Protect
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Is this kid even alive?!? 😵💫 I'd laugh if it weren't so heinous and cruel.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Man, I can really lay some wood with my chest of receipts, huh? 💥 Let's do this... *pours another cup* ☕️
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is what I do every morning. Before the sun rises, I sip coffee and turn over rocks. ☕️🪨 I'd rather just read the news. But we don't really have news anymore. I'd prefer not to grapple with Critical Christ Theory (Equity) every day, but alas... 🧙♀️✊️🦄 Check this out. 🧵🥳
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Back in 2020, everything was sold as being about Black Lives Mattering. ✊️⬛️ Now it's all trans and gender. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 But is this really about trans or skin-color?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Now analyze these scenes. Who is marching? That is a year or two ago in Argentina. It's The Same Thing, of course. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 Read the thread and see how US Hatecraft fuels it. I believe we were funding it.🤬
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Wow, this is some of the most wicked Hatecraft I have seen. And you know that's a high bar. This isn't some activist org, but our Most Trusted Name In News. 👁 🧵 Pull up a stool and let me show you how these bastards craft this evil political tool. ✊️ https://www.yahoo.com/news/argentina-once-led-lgbtq-rights-220354216.html
Argentina once led on LGBTQ rights. After 4 lesbians are set on fire, critics blame rising intolerance on Milei’s government
Critics blame rising levels of intolerance on the government of the right-wing president.
yahoo.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Wow, this is some of the most wicked Hatecraft I have seen. And you know that's a high bar. This isn't some activist org, but our Most Trusted Name In News. 👁 🧵 Pull up a stool and let me show you how these bastards craft this evil political tool. ✊️ https://www.yahoo.com/news/argentina-once-led-lgbtq-rights-220354216.html
Argentina once led on LGBTQ rights. After 4 lesbians are set on fire, critics blame rising intolerance on Milei’s government
Critics blame rising levels of intolerance on the government of the right-wing president.
yahoo.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Considering I don't believe in "gender" or "trans" as anything but a new academic scripture for those who abandoned our oldest roots, almost uniformly the fringe and failed, and most black Americans don't do Queer spells... no. 👎https://t.co/Qr4Zp5LtYh https://t.co/tRY06MCQ2g
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Black Lives Matter is rich white people devoid of masculinity who all despise Christianity. 🌊😵💫✊️🧟♂️🧟♀️🧟 https://t.co/e4zqhDqDhI
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker pledges to use their voice to uplift and educate their community about racism, anti-blackness, and violence. They commit to loving their Black neighbors the same as their White neighbors.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: About racism, anti blackness, or violence. About racism, anti blackness, or violence. I will use my voice in the most uplifting way possible. I will use my voice in the most uplifting way possible. And do everything in my power to educate my community.
I will love my black neighbors the same as my white ones.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Watch these two together... So this is about white supremacy? https://t.co/lOA30n9hJz https://t.co/EvcSoOXRSx
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ashra Nimani asked if photos would be shared to identify people. She stated the issue is whether she is on "this side or that side."
A speaker questioned why parents can't have a choice, claiming there is indoctrination and removal of parental rights.
Ashra Nimani stated she doesn't agree with the conservative interpretation of many people within Islam, but she does agree on the value and dignity of parents as the essential predictor of a child's success and stability. She believes Montgomery County Public Schools should be on the side of all parents and not make parents choose a side.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Are you gonna share those photos so people can be identified here? My name is Ashra Nimani. My name is Ashra Nimani. So I
Speaker 1: didn't know
Speaker 2: if you're
Speaker 0: on this side or that side. Oh, do you wanna shake hands? No. Yes. I know if my hand's holding something.
Speaker 2: Why is it that everybody can't go and say, why is it that parents can't
Speaker 1: have a choice? Because, ultimately, what is happening is an indoctrination and a removal of parental rights.
Speaker 0: So the lady asked me which side I'm on. I don't agree with the conservative interpretation of many of the people here within Islam, but what I do agree on is the value and dignity of parents, and that is the essential predictor of a child's success and stability. We should all agree on that, and we should all support that. And here, Montgomery County Public Schools should be on the side of all parents and not make parents have to choose a side. Alright, you guys.
More reporting from here in Montgomery County soon.
Video Transcript AI Summary
A person claims the other has never met an atheist. The other person acknowledges this and says, "Nice to meet you." The first person declines to shake hands. When asked why, the first person says, "That's okay," and then states, "I'm fine without your gun."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You haven't met an atheist before. Hi. How are you? You said I haven't met an atheist before? Yeah.
You you look at me like I haven't met an atheist before. Oh, okay. Well, nice to meet you. Nice to meet you too. Do you wanna shake hands?
No. I really don't. Really? Why not? That's okay.
Yeah. You're fine. I'm fine without your gun.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Or it's about trans and gender? 👁 https://t.co/BLFVshldvL https://t.co/lmfV01OWCF
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The point is that they don't have a fucking clue. 🎬😵💫✊️ This is our Red Guard. The Rainbow Guard 🧙♀️✊️🦄 https://t.co/DisCLY5buZ
Video Transcript AI Summary
As a transgender and queer woman, the speaker denounces what she calls the occupation regime's propaganda that she should support the occupation, settlers, and apartheid regime, and oppose Palestinian resistance, due to the Zionist government's LGBTQ-friendly policies and supposed enmity of Muslims and Palestinians. She states this is a lie, regardless of how often politicians and talking heads repeat it. She claims to have no friends in the Zionist regime, among the settlers, in the White House, Congress, the Supreme Court, or corporate boardrooms. She asserts that she has no enemies among the Palestinian people fighting for their freedom, and that the enemies of LGBTQ people are in the United States. She says the claim that Palestinians are her enemy is a lie.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I come to you today as a transgender woman, as a queer woman, as a member of the LGBTQ community. And I come to you today to denounce the duplicitous and divisive propaganda spread by the occupation regime. Then tell it, I should support the occupation. I should support the settlers. I should support the apartheid regime, and I should oppose the resistance of Palestinians.
And why? Because of the allegedly LGBTQ friendly policies of the Zionist government and the supposed enmity of Muslims and the Palestinian people. Yeah. But I am here to tell you that is a bald faced lie. Yeah.
It doesn't matter how many times the politicians and the talking heads repeat it or how cleverly they tell it. It is a lie. I have no friends in the Zionist regime. I have no friends among the settlers. I have no friends in the White House, the halls of congress, the chambers of the supreme court, or the corporate boardrooms where exploitation is turned into profit through the malign sorcery of capitalism.
And there is not one enemy of mine among the Palestinian people fighting for their freedom. My enemies, the enemies of the LGBTQ people are right here in The in This United States. They say that Palestinians are my enemy, but that's a lie.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
2020 was not any different. This is all just a continuation.✊️ We've had the receipts for years. The Hatecraft has lost its grip. It cannot advance this anymore. Let's go and shove it back in a hallway locker where it belongs.🦁🇺🇸 https://t.co/1EWVYXWB95 https://t.co/dP1ISzTwK3
Video Transcript AI Summary
People of Yoggins don't want to be treated like idiots. The speaker questions the education and qualifications of individuals making demands, suggesting they lack knowledge of history. They accuse someone of being a "traitor" to their people. The speaker compares someone to a "black judice" and mentions a selling price suffering a 33¢ loss.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People of Yoggins hate to sit there like fucking idiots. Molly, this is beautiful. You guys go to clown college for, like, twenty six weeks to wear those clothes. No hairdresser has to go to school for longer than you do. Oh.
Yep. Half of you don't even have a college education to be out here getting demands about the people when you can't even read a fucking history book. Yeah. I know where you woke up. But you wanna sit here and tell me that you're educated enough to make demands about shit you know nothing about.
Yep. You should fucking know better. You should know better. Traitor. Traitor to your fucking people.
What the fuck? You're like the fucking black judice. Selling price to suffer fucking 33¢ today.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
It's all bullshit. Harry Potter Faketivism manufactured by colleges. These are the most pathetic stripes of society geared up in plastic battle suits convinced they're fighting fascism Again, if this wasn't so dangerous, it would be the funniest shit ever https://t.co/Ex3yNESLKe
Video Transcript AI Summary
People were accusing police officers, particularly black police officers, of being the KKK because they didn't want to be taken away. People were trying to get beyond the police tape.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Of what she said. Seriously, they were looking at police officers, particularly black police officers and accusing them of being the KKK because they didn't wanna be taken away, and I guess they were trying to flip the switch. But the idiocy that you see on your on your screen right now did you see the guy run underneath? Look, they're trying to get beyond the police tape here. I mean kind of destruction are they Craziness right now.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
But it's not funny at all. 🤬 https://t.co/pfWETJuplm https://t.co/O3QIGhhiIO
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
There is a painful irony in this convo, btw. What did this same troop become during COVID? The state's bitch! And I mean on command. Hell, we still see these events fully masked deep into 2024. Who is licking boots? Who spent the last half decade standing up to state overreach?👁 https://t.co/v8BwdBx5Ro
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
It's very dangerous and I'm not laughing. https://t.co/iXA91AoKYD https://t.co/EYfSlWnfwJ
Video Transcript AI Summary
Woke is allegedly Maoism with American characteristics, a species of the genus Marxism. Marx believed that to bring socialism, the means of production must be seized, referring to how humans construct themselves. Economic production shapes society, which in turn shapes individuals.
Critical race theory is Marxism with race replacing class; whiteness is framed as a cultural private property to be abolished. Queer theory views "normal" as a cultural property, with queer identity in opposition. Postcolonial theory sees the West as oppressor, with decolonization as the removal of Western cultural influence.
Western Marxism emerged from the failure of European revolutions, evolving into critical theory, which argues that capitalism doesn't immiserate workers. The culture industry was seized to sell identity-based agitprop. Woke is identity-based Marxism, with groups like LGBTQ+ and black communities seen as nations seeking liberation.
Mao's identity politics and "unity, criticism, unity" are mirrored in woke's inclusion initiatives. The goal is a sustainable and inclusive future under socialist discipline, coordinated by entities like the World Economic Forum and the UN. Europe faces the risk of either giving in to Marxist provocation or overreacting, both of which are strategic traps. The aim is to create global citizens who prioritize global responsibilities over rights, mirroring China's social credit system and oppression.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Thank you. I'm glad to be here. I want to, address something Tom just said, which is in fact that woke is supposed to advance equity in Europe. So here's the definition of equity and see if it sounds like a definition of anything else you've ever heard of.
The definition of equity comes from the public administration literature. It was written by a man named George Fredriksen And the definition is an administered political economy in which shares are adjusted so that citizens are made equal. Does that sound like anything you've heard of before? Like socialism. They're going to administer an economy to make shares equal.
The only difference between equity and socialism is the type of property that they redistribute, the type of shares. They're going to redistribute social and cultural capital in addition to economic and material capital. And so this is my thesis when we say what is woke. Woke is Maoism with American characteristics, if I might borrow from Mao himself, who said that his philosophy was Marxism Leninism with Chinese characteristics, which means woke is Marxism, and it's a very provocative statement. It's something you will certainly hear it is not, that it is different and the the the professors and the philosophers will spend a large amount of time explaining to you why.
No. No. It's about economics when it's Marx ism. This is social. This is cultural.
This is different. It's not different. I need you to think biologically for one moment, and I don't mean about your bodies. We could do that. That's a different topic.
I want you to think how we organize plants and animals when we study them. There's species, but above species, there are the genus of the animals. So you think like the cats, all the cats, but you have tigers, you have lions, you have house cats, you have whatever, leopards, many different kinds of cats. If we think of Marxism as a genus of ideological thought, then classical economic Marxism is a species. Radical feminism is a species in this same genus.
Critical race theory is a genus or sorry, a species in this genus. Queer theory is a species in this genus. Postcolonial theory that's plaguing Europe is a species in this genus, and they have something that binds them together called intersectionality that makes them treated as if they are all one thing. But the logic is Marxist, and I wanna convince you of that because Marx had a very simple proposition, but we get lost. We think that Marx was talking about economics because he often talked about economics.
He wrote a book called Capital. It's a very famous book. And we think, well, this is about economic theory, but this isn't true. It it's only true on the surface. If we go below the surface, what Marx was talking about was something different.
We know what Marx's hypothesis was was that we must seize the means of production if we're going to bring socialism to the nations, to the world. We have to seize the means of production. So we have to ask what does he mean? And if we think that it's about capital, then we miss what he means. If you think it's about the means of production in the factory with a hammer and the means of production in the field with a sickle, then you miss what it means.
Because Marx explained what makes human beings special in his earlier writings. And what makes human beings special is that man is a being that is incomplete and knows that he is incomplete. He is a man whose true nature has been forgotten to him, which is social being. He is a socialist at heart who doesn't realize it. And the reason he doesn't realize it is because of the economic conditions operating as a means of construction or production, not just of the economy, but of him, but of man, of society, and particularly of history.
Marx said that he had the first scientific study of history. How was history produced? By man, doing man's activity, and man's key activity was economic activity as he saw it. And so economic production doesn't just produce the goods and services of the economy, it produces society itself. And society, in turn, produces man.
He called this the inversion of praxis. And so when he says we must seize the means of production and he's talking about factories and fields, he's actually talking about how we construct who we are as human beings so that we might complete ourselves, so that we might complete history. And at the end of history, mankind will remember that he is a social being and we will have a socialist society, a perfect communism that transcends private property is how he put it. He said, in fact, that communism is the transcendence of private property as human self estrangement. That's a quote from the Economic Philosophic Manuscripts of 1944 1844.
So Marx was interested in controlling or understanding and controlling how man produces himself. And he writes about this ex exclusively in the eighteen forties. Very deeply. How do we do this? And he looks at the economic conditions and he says, this is where it is.
And that's why we get economic Marxism and that's why we think Marx was an economist. But Marx was never an economist. He was a theologian. He wanted to produce a religion for mankind that would supersede all of the religions of mankind and bring him back to his true social nature. And this is the true fact of Marx.
And what the goal was, like I said, was to complete man. So what he said is, well, how are we building man currently? All of his economic analysis is about how are we building man at present through what he called material determinism. And he said, well, what we have is a a special form of private property in our society. Our society is organized around private property.
And so all of our thoughts organize around private property. In other words, there's a special kind of property that the bourgeois elite class has access to and then they organize society to exclude everybody else from access to that property through exploitation, through alienation, through estrangement, through oppression. And so what Karl Marx was proposing is that economics becomes a vehicle to separate society into a bourgeois class that has access to a special form of property. The people who have access wish to retain that, so they oppress people and keep other people out of that special form of property. They erect a system of classism to do that.
It's enforced by an ideology called capitalism that believes that this is the right way to, engage in the world. And what we have to do is awaken the under class, the proletariat, to the real conditions and the fact that they are historical agents of change and bring them to do a revolution and transform society so that we would have equity or socialism, whichever word you want. They have the same definition. Now let's say that we step out. We this is we we step back from this species, this economic species, homo economicus, and we step back to the genus and we look at this idea, a special form of property that segregates society into people who have the bourgeois and the people who do not have, who are in class conflict with an ideology that keeps this in place.
And the underclass must awaken with consciousness to fight back and to seize the means of production of that form of deterministic property. And now we say, change out class, put in race, And watch, we get critical race theory falls out of the hat. Just like that. Very simple. In 1993, Cheryl Harris wrote a long article for the Harvard Law Review called Whiteness as Property.
She explained that whiteness or white privilege constitutes a kind of cultural private property. She says it must be abolished in order to have racial justice. Just like Karl Marx said that in the Communist Manifesto, he wrote, communism can be summarized in a single sentence, the abolition of private property. Well, this is why critical race theory calls to abolish whiteness, because whiteness is a form of private property. People who have access to this property are whites or white adjacent or they act white.
These are words out of the American lexicon that they've used to describe how how people gain access to the private property. People without that are people of color and they are oppressed by systemic racism. Systemic racism is enforced by an ideology of white supremacy instead of capitalism. If you think of whiteness as a form of cultural capital, white supremacy, as they define it, is identical to capitalism. It's the belief it's not believing that white people are superior.
It's believing that white people have access to the control of society and should maintain that even if you don't actually believe that. If you merely support that, you have adopted the the ideology of white supremacy into your mind. And so you have the exact same system. And the goal is to awaken a racial consciousness in people so that they will band together as a class and seize the means of cultural production so that white cultural production is no longer the dominant mode. It's a big mystery in Europe.
I know. And in The UK, throughout Europe, I hear this question again and again. Why on earth is this very American phenomenon about slavery and so on that doesn't apply to our country? Why is it popular here? It's because it's not about history at all.
It's not about slavery at all. Those are excuses that they use. It's about creating a class consciousness that's against this form of property called whiteness, that's against the dominant culture that may just be, of matter of fact, say, you're in Europe. That's why. Because it becomes a site by which people can come together and they can channel resentment and try to claim power.
I wrote a book called Race Marxism and I defined critical race theory as it really is in that book on the first page. I said that critical race theory is calling everything you want to control racist until you control it. But couldn't we say the same about Marxism? It's calling everything you want to control bourgeois until you control it. But those mean the same thing.
They mean exactly the same thing. But what about, say, queer theory? How is that Marxist? It's very strange. All this gender and sex and sexuality.
Well, Tom said, What is woke attack? The idea of being normal. Well, the queer theory thinks that there are certain people who get to set the norms of society. They are privileged. They call themselves normal.
They say, This is normal. It's normal to consider yourself a man and look like a man and act like a man and dress like a man and eat meat like a man. And then there are women that should be feminine and pretty and all these things. And so they get to define what's normal. They're heterosexuals, so they get to define the heterosexuality as normal and other sexualities are abnormal.
And so you have a conflict across this cultural property of who gets to be considered normal and who is a pervert or a freak or some other term that gets used in their literature. But technically, who is a queer? Which Which sounds like a slur, but they adopted it and it's a technical academic term now. It means an identity without an essence, by the way. An identity that is strictly oppositional to the concept of the normal as defined by queer theorist David Halperin in his 1995 book, Saint Foucault, Toward a Gay Hagiography.
I didn't make that up. I'm not extrapolating. So you see, queer theory is just another species of the genus of Marxism. What about postcolonial theory, which is plaguing Europe, thanks to Franz Fanon and his biggest European fan, Jean Paul Sartre? What about this?
Well, it's the same. You have the West as the oppressor. They have access to the material and cultural wealth of the world because they've decided their culture is the default and have gone and colonized the world to bring culture to the world, as they say. And so the oppressed, the the the natives around the world, the people have to band together and their activity is going to be called decolonization. They have to remove every aspect of Western culture.
So when they come to Belgium or they come to France or they come to The United States and they say, We're going to decolonize the curriculum or they go to The UK and say, We're going to decolonize Shakespeare. This is what they mean. We're going to remove the cultural significance of your cultural artifacts because those cultural artifacts themselves are oppressive to us. This is the same system. It's another species and the exact same genus.
And that genus is Marxism, which is a way of thinking about the world. And the goal is always to seize the means of control of the production of man and history and society. Marx merely believed it was through economic means. Now it's through sociocultural means. The evolution into this sometimes called Western Marxism began in the nineteen twenties.
We had a Russian revolution in 1917, and this did not happen in Europe. And the Marxists in Europe were confused. And so Antonio Gramsci sat down and wrote out some things, and George Lukocz sat down and wrote history and class consciousness after the failure of the revolution in Hungary. And they wrote what became cultural Marxism, The idea that we have to enter the cultural institutions in order to change them from within because Western culture has something about it that's repelling socialism. So we have to go inside and change the culture to make it socialist.
Now, you aren't allowed to talk about cultural Marxism now. They've categorized this as a conspiracy theory. They say that it is anti Semitic. This is not true. Antonio Gramsci wrote books.
George Lukotch wrote books. You can read those books. They have a philosophy. If they don't like the name cultural Marxism, we can use the name that other people at the time used, Western Marxism. So much like, I don't know, a virus adapting to the conditions, it chain it changed to try to infect a new host.
It worked in feudal societies. Marxism took over in Russia. It took over later in China. It took over in all of these kind of agriculturally driven feudal societies, but it wouldn't work in actual capitalist nations because Marx was wrong. Then several Germans from the Frankfurt School started to study this phenomenon in more depth, and they evolved the idea further.
They evolved the idea into what's called critical Marxism. They developed what's called the critical theory. And Max Horkheimer, who designed the critical theory, explained the critical theory. And what did he say? He said, Well, what we came to realize was that Marx was wrong about one thing.
Capitalism does not immiserate the worker. It allows him to build a better life. So I developed the critical theory because it is not possible to articulate the vision of a good society on the terms of the existing society. So critical Marxism criticizes the entirety of the existing society. Everything is somehow needing to be subjected to Marxist conflict analysis.
But how is that to be done? They sought an answer through the middle part of the twentieth century and World War two breaks out. The Frankfurt School comes to America, which in this metaphor is the Wuhan Institute of Virology because gain of function began to happen on the Marxist virus very quickly in America. And American universities adopted these professors from Germany. And Herbert Marcuse, writing in the nineteen sixties, said extremely clearly, this writing in 1969, not only did he say capitalism delivers the goods, gives people a good life, makes them wealthy and comfortable and happy, he also said that the working class is no longer going to the be the base of the revolution because of these things.
In other words, we don't have to be responsible to the working class anymore, which opens up the ability for Marxists who are seeking power to make friends with the corporations. The bosses are no longer the enemy. They're an opportunity because the working class is irrelevant. He said the energy is somewhere else. He said it's in the racial minorities, the sexual minorities, the feminists, the outsiders.
That's who he said have the energy for a Marxist revolution in the West, not the working class. And so Marxism was able to evolve to abandon the working class. And so, did they do? Well, all they had studied for thirty years was what they called the culture industry. An industry that commodifies and packages culture and sells it back to people.
So, supposedly stripped of what it actually is. Empty. Abstract? No. And so what, of course, did they do?
They seized the means of production of the culture industry because that's what they do. And so they started to transform the culture industry to sell racial, sexual, gender, sexuality based agitprop as though that were genuine culture. And so we get concepts like cultural appropriation. We get concepts like cultural relevance, cultural this, cultural that, cultural everything. And it's all provided in pastiche.
It's all provided, as a as a as a mockery of what's really going on. And this evolved in America's highly racialized context, and we ended up with woke, a form of identity based Marxism, a a constellation of Marxist species that all work with the same operating premise but locate themselves in different, and I'll use the German term here for this, folk. LGBTQ is a folk, and they get folkish identity there and become activists. The black community is a folk. How do I know?
That's what W. E. B. Du Bois said it would be when he laid down the foundations that became critical race theory later. They think of themselves as nations.
Don't they all have flags? Don't they put them on your buildings like colonizers? Don't they hang them in your streets? They think of themselves as occupying nations, but they see themselves as bound together just like the various colonized nations around the world and seeking liberation from Western civilization. And so we end up with Western Marxism taking many forms but with one overarching approach.
And the approach that they use, I started off by saying, is Maoist, not merely Marxist. Now you know the theory is Marx. It's just evolved into different species to attack the West at its weakest points through our tolerance, through our acceptance, through our openness, through our generosity, through our best traits, actually. The things that we should be proud of being. The things that we are proud of being.
But Mao Zedong knew how to use identity politics. I don't know how you study in Europe, but in America, we have very red washed education as we might say. The communists have stripped out all education about communism entirely. You don't learn about it in America at all. So we don't learn anything about Mao.
And maybe you don't know this, but I tell this to American audiences and they're shocked. Mao used identity politics. He created 10 identities in China. Five, he labeled red for communist. Five he labeled black for fascist.
And he categorized people into these identity categories. What they are doesn't really matter. Of course, were communist. They were things like landlord and rich farmer and things like this. Right winger is a bad category in and of itself, by the way.
Conservative, all of them, bad. Bad influences, that's another one. You could be a bad influence for just thinking the wrong thing or saying the wrong thing at any time or because the government decides it doesn't like you. These are the bad categories. And if you have a bad category, very importantly, your children have a bad category by default.
So they create a social pressure for your children to identify as revolutionaries, at which point they get a red identity, a communist identity, a good identity, and they get rewarded for it. And the youth red led the revolution in China because Mao did this, identity politics through the children in the schools. This should feel very uncomfortable to you because here we have, at least in The United States, we tell our children, being white is bad. Being white is oppressive. You automatically hurt people of other races by your very existence.
But by the way, if you become queer, we'll celebrate you. And you can create a radical army of people who identify as gender minorities and sexual minorities at seven years old. You can lead them into paths of puberty blockers and transition, medical transition, which, of course, big pharma profits off of at seven years old, behind their parents' back. There's a reason for this. It's the same program that Mao Zedong used to radicalize the youth in China.
The only thing different is the identity categories have have shifted. It's Maoist cultural revolution with American characteristics and it's being exported to Europe. And just like how critical race theory has come to Europe even though it doesn't make sense, it will come to Europe whether it makes sense or not, and you will have a cultural revolution here too. You guys even had a kind of offshoot one in 2020. George Floyd dies in Minnesota, which has nothing to do with you, you guys have statues coming down in Europe.
Total nonsense. It doesn't matter though. The point is to destroy Western civilization from within using Maoist techniques. One last point about Mao to kind of drive that point home. Mao said in 1942 that his formula to transform China was called unity, criticism, unity.
First, you try to create the desire for unity. Then you criticize people for not living up to that. Then you bring them into unity under a new standard. Does that feel like what you're being put through? But the words are different.
We use words like inclusion and belonging. We'll have a place where everybody feels like they belong. We just want to have an inclusive space. But unfortunately, you have racist ideas and you have to criticize for you we have to criticize you for those. You need to criticize yourself for those.
You need to go study in Mandarin. Exactly like Mao said. And then we can bring you into unity under a new standard, which Mao called socialist discipline, which we in the West would not buy. We call it in the West inclusion. And so we have this new program, and within inclusion, we have or above inclusion, actually, we have sustainability.
We have a sustainable and inclusive future. I see the agenda 2030 here with an x over it. The sustainable and inclusive future is the new socialist standard that we will have freedom under socialist discipline. And Mao said the way that that will work is through what he called democratic centralism. We call that stakeholder capitalism.
And my shot at the World Economic Forum is taken because it's one of the things coordinating this. My shot at the United Nations is taken because it's one of the things that's coordinating this. So woke is Marxism. It's advancing through Maoist cultural revolution. It's using Americanized identity categories.
And while some of those will not work in Europe, I guarantee you the colonial aspect will. They will find your weakness. They will adapt the theory to fit because it's like a virus that will evolve to its host. And Europe is at great risk. Now the last thing I'll mention is this risk is twofold.
When you endure Marxist provocation, Marxist strategy is always of the same type. It's called middle level violence. They don't come at you with full blown Bolshevik assault very often. It's middle level violence. They provoke, which means if you give in and you do like Jean Paul Sartre said in his forward to The Wretched of the Earth by Franz Fanon, the the postcolonial book, he said, the violence is coming, so Europe's best bet is to give it away so that they don't kill you.
They'll murder you and take it, or maybe you can give it away. Give your culture away. Give your countries away, and they'll let you live. They're coming for you, and this is what Europe needs to learn. That's what he says in the forward of Wretched of the Earth.
You can read it for yourself, probably in the original French that I can't read. And I think that's the path Europe has followed. So you can give away. That's one side because they provoke at the middle. Or you can react and overreact, which sadly Europe has had a a rough history in the last century with overreactions.
And if they if you overreact, what will they do? They will weaponize your overreaction for a century, forever, and gain moral authority so that you end up having to give it away later anyway. So you have to stand firm in your principles, but you have to do so cleverly. You have to do so understanding that you're being provoked, which means you don't react as the prov the provocateur wants you to react. You have to outsmart them, which is not possible unless you know the diagnosis of your problem.
It's a Polish proverb, never attempt to cure what you don't understand. Woke is Marxism, evolved to attack the West. If you don't understand that, you will not act correctly. You will not cure it, and it will conquer your countries. It will conquer all of Europe, and we will have a very, very long, sustainable, and inclusive future with absolutely no freedom because the goal is to make us into what they call global citizens.
Have you heard this term? This term is nonsense. There's no global sovereign, so there is no global citizenship. There's no relationship because there's no ruler, and we don't want a ruler of the globe. It's a nonsense term.
But they tell you, if you actually read their literature, what is a global citizen? It's somebody I kid you not. I make no joke. They say this themselves. It's somebody who supports the 17 sustainable development goals of the United Nations Agenda 2,030.
That's a global citizen. And they say, what are the rights of a global citizen? This is in a book about global citizenship education published two years ago. What are the rights of a global citizen? And the answer, one paragraph later is, we're not that interested in rights with global citizenship.
It's more about global responsibilities. In other words, slavery. This is a pivotal moment in the history of the Western world. The model that they are pushing us toward using the means and mechanisms of that place is the model we see in China. If you want to know what your future looks like if we don't stop the woke, look at China.
Look at the social credit system. Look at the oppression. Look at people disappearing for having the wrong opinions. One of their greatest billionaires, Jack Ma, said the wrong thing about the government and disappeared. A billionaire.
If you want to know what the future of Europe and America and the five eyes or whatever the country is, it's China. That's the model. So we have to fight back against woke. But to fight back against woke, we have to understand it, and I will close by restating my thesis. Woke as Marxism evolved to take on the West, and it's been very successful so far because we haven't known our enemy.
We cannot name our enemy, and I've come here to name our enemy. So thank you for your time and attention in letting me do that.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
"Decolonizing"? Lol what?!? These are The New Colonizers. ✊ https://t.co/YgB7G9rWj2 https://t.co/fOJ0sz2vhf
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Under every Progress rock is Queer shit. The Same dogma over and over and over.🧙♀️✊️🦄 Why? I've answered it 100x now, in writing and in audio. Can you? Are you able to craft in your mind an explanation for why everything funnels down to that same landing place? If not, do it.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Under every Progress rock is Queer shit. The Same dogma over and over and over.🧙♀️✊️🦄 Why? I've answered it 100x now, in writing and in audio. Can you? Are you able to craft in your mind an explanation for why everything funnels down to that same landing place? If not, do it.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
We didn't land here by chance. 🧙♀️✊️🦄 The Same Thing 👇 just older. https://t.co/84j4o57AeO https://t.co/UaPEtOCMnr https://t.co/oOJABTQACb
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're not going back, just like a tree.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're not going. We're not going back. We're not going. We're not going back. Just like a tree
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I despise this shit. It's all so pretextual. https://t.co/uWphO6XnrM https://t.co/J0dlCfP8uv
reSee.it AI Summary
I urge everyone to share these thoughts widely. There’s a troubling connection between historical practices of castration for artistic purposes and modern gender-affirming treatments for youth. I question why our government continues to endorse these practices as legitimate science and medicine, while our society seems oblivious to the implications. The media fails to inform the public about critical issues like the Cass Review. We are witnessing a moral decline, and if we don't confront this, our future looks bleak.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Share this with as many people as you can. Force their minds to make the connection that's always been right in front of them. This is why they need control of X back. This would have been removed as "hate". The capture is the only way this destruction took so many of our kids.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
You mean they cut off the balls of young boys in order to render them artificially feminine in order to placate the desires and fetishes of adult narcissists? Yes, exactly. That's what this has always been. All it has ever been.
Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm worried about her mental well-being and dilation. When she's not under my supervision, she tends to revert to old habits. I've even had to wake Jazz from sleep to ensure she uses the dilator properly, emphasizing the importance of maintaining her health. I would be furious if she goes to college and her condition worsens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But with her, I'm worried about, like, her mental well-being and her dilation. The minute she leaves my house, we have a dilation problem.
Speaker 1: That is a concern. When you don't have that watchful eye, they tend to go back to old patterns.
Speaker 0: I have woken Jazz out of a dead sleep and taken the dilator and put the lubrication on it and said, here. You take this and you put it in your vagina. If not, I will. Vagina is bad. Even when I'm home, once a day.
I will be so mad if she goes away to college and that thing seals up. I wring her neck. Can you imagine?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
So why is our federal govt still pushing this wickedness as science and medicine and education? Our kids are ideological cannonfodder! 🤬 Why does the Harris campaign not have to address this?!? It is central to D-Equity-I. ✊️🌊
Video Transcript AI Summary
I want children to see themselves in everyday stories, like going to the park with family. This representation provides them with insights they may not receive in school. Being visible in an educational environment allows others to feel it's acceptable to be visible too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I want kids to be able to see themselves in books that are just about, you know, going to the park with your family. They're getting that sort of information that they might not be getting in the classroom. To be visible in a school setting is to give that mirror for somebody else to say it's okay for me to be visible as well.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This man Richard leads our federal Health and Human Services dressed as a woman named Rachel. Review his past, he presents with clear mental-health issues throughout his life. Obviously. And now he casts spells as the AAP keynote.🧙♀️
Video Transcript AI Summary
Admiral Rachel Levine, a pediatrician and the assistant secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services, addresses concerns about children transitioning before 18. She emphasizes the challenges of adolescence, particularly for those experiencing gender dysphoria. If a child feels female but is undergoing male puberty, it can be distressing. Critics argue that children are too young to make such decisions. Levine clarifies that for prepubertal children, no medical procedures are performed; instead, they are supported through therapy to explore their feelings.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Admiral Rachel Levine is a pediatrician and the assistant secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services. She's the highest ranking openly transgender federal official in the country. What would you say to folks who think that they're being reasonable by saying, why can't children just wait till they're 18?
Speaker 1: Adolescence is hard and puberty is hard. What if you're going through the wrong puberty? What if you inside feel that you are female, but now you're going through a male puberty?
Speaker 0: The argument is, well, they're too young to know.
Speaker 1: I wanna make it clear that for prepubertal children, there are no medical procedures done. The standard of care allows them to explore that, with therapy.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Read this. 👇 that's not just real, but was in court yesterday. 🚨 If the American people (and I'm glaring at the center-left here, those "median Democrats") cannot denounce this boldly and demand it be ceased even at political loss, our country is lost.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is an ideological house of horrors.
@FionaJaneMurray - Fiona M
This is just incredible. Read even just the Argument in this brief from Alabama in the Supreme Court, which breaks down what they found in discovery about WPATH and the US department of Health & Human Services regarding standards of care etc. It is absolutely mind-blowing.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
But the DNC machine hasn't backed down on this society upending insanity as law one bit, have they? Nope. Our own news outlets (American Pravda which serves the same Equity agenda) hasn't even informed our nation of The Cass Review or WPATH leak. Why? 🤬
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
You know why. ✊️🌊 we all do by now.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Start high-level with GLSEN. 👇 The multi-billion supported conglomerate that has pervaded all of our schools with the specific mission of "queering" kids, and it's tentacles that stretch from the Fortune 500, to the Obama White House, to George Soros. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/what-is-glsen
What is GLSEN?
The curious case of Kevin Jennings
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is child abuse on video celebrated as Progress and Pride. Why are we allowing this horror to become institutionalized? There is no means of defending this logically. Those doing it simply never have to. We are in deep shit. https://t.co/7v8E50ooUG https://t.co/Zkuf4lABwQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
If someone desires female anatomy but does not have it, there is a surgical option available. This procedure involves inverting the penis to create a vagina.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: If you want girl parts and you don't have them, you can do special surgery where they turn your penis inside out and then the vagina inside.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The Era of Moral Decay ✊️🌊 https://t.co/eNKWAHqyZw https://t.co/tYo9kzGp6k https://t.co/MjZReuse28
Video Transcript AI Summary
Happy Pride Month! I'm pansexual and non-binary, and I'm 10 and a half. Anyone can do drag, and drag should be for all ages. Some people think it's inappropriate, but it’s a fun experience.
In my class, 36% identify as LGBTQ. Education is key, and I do storytelling with drag queens. Everyone has the right to express their gender identity, and we should support our kids.
It’s important to understand that fear often comes from a lack of knowledge. When people learn more, they change their minds. You are beautiful, heard, and loved.
Desmond’s Instagram has over 40,000 followers, showing the power of visibility and acceptance.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Happy Pride Month. Happy Pride Year. Happy Pride Life.
Speaker 1: I'm pansexual and non binary.
Speaker 2: How old are you?
Speaker 1: 10a half.
Speaker 2: You're 10a half? Yeah. You'll and you're pan sex
Speaker 0: 10a half.
Speaker 2: You'll go to bed with anyone. Yes. Welcome to the White House.
Speaker 3: Thank you. Good.
Speaker 0: The bravest, the most inspiring people I ever know.
Speaker 3: Are we top this at the White House?
Speaker 1: I'm wearing the trans tape that I drew on.
Speaker 3: This is my 200 and 20 1st day of publicly transitioning.
Speaker 0: God, love you.
Speaker 3: Anyone can do drag? Everyone can do drag.
Speaker 2: It's your deal. What letters are you?
Speaker 3: I'm gay.
Speaker 2: You're a gay 11 year
Speaker 3: I always do my pronouns so right.
Speaker 2: What's the wonderful word
Speaker 3: for a wonderful experience?
Speaker 1: You know about child This term hasn't trended yet, and people aren't talking about this.
Speaker 3: If a student were
Speaker 1: to come up to me and say, hey, Desi. I'm non binary. Can you call me bae? And I told that student, oh, honey. You're way too young to know your gender identity.
This would not only be transphobic, this would also be considered childism. I'm a teacher. This helps.
Speaker 0: There's no such thing as someone else's child.
Speaker 3: Does anybody in this room know how to twerk?
Speaker 0: Our nation's children are all our children.
Speaker 3: And then you just move your bum up and down like that. That's twerking.
Speaker 2: Who wants to be a drag queen when they grow up?
Speaker 3: You've heard of drag queens, but doesn't mean it is a self described drag kid.
Speaker 1: They, she I identify as being gender fluid. Sometimes I feel more like a babe. Sometimes I
Speaker 3: feel like a g. Sometimes I feel
Speaker 1: like a g. Sometimes I feel like a e.
Speaker 3: When Desmond was a toddler, Wendy says he'd sit in her lap as she watched the show RuPaul's Drag Race about adult drag queens, and he was mesmerized.
Speaker 1: Drag should be an all ages thing, and some people consider it provocative. It's not inappropriate.
Speaker 3: Those people seem to walk away having a good time.
Speaker 2: Yeah. Start them young. Right?
Speaker 3: There are people who would say to that, he's only 10. Wait a while.
Speaker 2: Wait for what?
Speaker 3: I'm biased. Oh, you're both. Yeah.
Speaker 2: What about you? We don't know her
Speaker 0: letters yet.
Speaker 3: Desmond, are you transgender? No. Do you identify as gay though?
Speaker 2: Mhmm. Percentage of your class would you say is LGBTQ?
Speaker 1: 36%. What
Speaker 2: the hell is going on in that school?
Speaker 3: I'm all about education. I actually do storytelling drag queens in Chicago. Right? Got it. Family program.
Speaker 0: You should have every single solitary right, including including the use of your gender identity bathroom.
Speaker 3: Can you provide a definition for the word woman?
Speaker 1: Can I provide a definition?
Speaker 3: Mhmm. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I can't.
Speaker 3: You can't?
Speaker 1: Not this untaxed. I'm not a biologist. Have the
Speaker 2: How much did LADWP spend on on participation in this?
Speaker 1: Whatever it is, it's well worth it.
Speaker 0: These are our kids. These are our neighbors. That's somebody else's kids. They're all our kids. I want you to watch life.
Speaker 3: I want you to
Speaker 0: watch life. Saint Jude and children.
Speaker 3: You are beautiful. You are heard. You belong. Understood. You are loved.
Speaker 0: And you belong.
Speaker 3: His Instagram, Desmond, is amazing, has more than 40,000 followers. People fear what they
Speaker 2: don't know.
Speaker 0: And when people realize individuals realize, oh, this is what you're telling me to be frightened of. This is the problem. This is I mean, people change their minds. People are just don't know enough to know. Well, and it's not because of intellectual integrity.
It's just lack of exposure.
Speaker 3: I'm seeing some amazing, and jackets are gonna tip-off with the world.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Where are we, folks? https://t.co/NO7vMvHAdD
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
There is a fascinating dichotomy between America's academic obsession with gender and the Taliban's barbaric fixation on the same. https://t.co/rYh0ordodZ
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Wow. This man is so representative of the fraud we are under. Excellent work, @vossaustin! https://t.co/MoDTK9haKm
Video Transcript AI Summary
To transition to better solutions, clinical trials are necessary, which can take a decade. There's a need for disruptive entities outside the bureaucratic system. The origin of the virus is debated, with some suggesting a lab leak. Dr. Fauci denies funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan. The debate continues on the virus's origins and the responsibility of funding. There are concerns about trusting the Chinese government with dangerous viruses. The need for a new system is suggested, as well as the possibility of future outbreaks. History will ultimately determine the truth.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried and true, which we know gives us results that can be beneficial, I mean, we've done well with that, to something that has to be much better. You have to prove that this works, and then you've got to go through all of the clinical trials, Phase Is, Phase IIs, Phase III, and then show that this particular product is going to be good over a period of years. That alone, if it works perfectly, is gonna take a decade.
Speaker 1: Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine. We haven't given to anyone yet, but there must be some way
Speaker 2: There might be a need or even an urgent call for, an entity Right. Of excitement out there that's completely disruptive, that's not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.
Speaker 0: It's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem.
Speaker 2: But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an, novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere.
Speaker 3: There's no question that there will be a challenge to the coming the But also there will be a surprise outbreak.
Speaker 4: You're trying to obscure responsibility for 4, 000, 000 people dying around the world from a pandemic.
Speaker 5: And let's let's send doctor Fauci
Speaker 3: I have to well, now you're getting into something. If the point that you are making is that the the the grant that was funded as a subaward from EcoHealth to Wuhan created SARS CoV 2. That's where you are getting. Let me finish.
Speaker 4: We don't know.
Speaker 3: We don't know. It did come
Speaker 4: to the lab, but all the evidence is pointing that it came from the lab. You And there will be responsibility for those who funded the lab, including yourself.
Speaker 3: I You said the overwhelming amount of evidence indicates that's a lab leak. I believe most card carrying viral file phylogenists and molecular virologists would disagree with you.
Speaker 6: Now you're thinking, well, maybe it might be a lab leak.
Speaker 3: You know, Jim, I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process.
Speaker 6: And on this theory of a lab leak, I I you know, I've been wondering this. Do we have any idea how that would even work?
Speaker 3: A lab leak could be that someone was out in the wild, maybe looking for different types of viruses in bats, got infected, went into a lab, and was being studied in the lab, and then it came out of the lab. But if that's the definition of a lab leak, Jim, then that still is a natural occurrence.
Speaker 5: Fauci ever explained to you why he didn't believe the virus came from the Wuhan lab and why he actively worked to silence that theory?
Speaker 7: I think it's important to look at prior to 2012, we didn't really have another mechanism other than nature. We weren't doing gain of function research. But this virus was immediately the most infectious virus, not the most, I think probably right behind measles virus that we've ever seen infect man. So I immediately said, wait a second, this is a natural. And then you go back and look at the literature and you find in 2014, this lab actually published a paper that they put the H2 receptor into humanized mice so it can infect human tissue.
And then you learn that the new COVID, which came from bats, now can hardly replicate in bats. Yeah. So how does that happen?
Speaker 4: Doctor Fauci, knowing that it is a crime to lie to congress, do you wish to retract your statement of May 11th where you claimed that the NIH never funded gain of function research in Wuhan?
Speaker 3: Senator Paul, I have never lied before the congress. Microphone. Your microphone.
Speaker 7: Senator Paul,
Speaker 3: I have never lied before the congress, and I do not retract that statement. This paper that you're referring to was judged by qualified staff up and down the chain as not being gain of function. What was let me finish.
Speaker 4: You take an animal virus and you increase its responsibility to humans Right. You're saying that's not gain a function?
Speaker 3: Yeah. That is correct. And and, senator Paul, you do not know what you are talking about, quite frankly. And I wanna say that officially. You do not know what you are talking about.
I I don't know how many times I can say it, madam chair. We did not fund gain of function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. We do not send money now to the Wuhan
Speaker 4: virology. Sending money. We did. Under your tutelage, we were sending it through EkoHealth. It was a subagency and a sub grant.
Do you support that the money from NIH that was going to the Wuhan Institute?
Speaker 3: Let me explain to you why that was done. The SARS CoV 1 originated in bats in China. It would have been irresponsible of us if we did not investigate the bat viruses and the serology to see who might have been infected. Perhaps it would be
Speaker 4: possible to send it to the Chinese government that we may not be able to trust with this, knowledge and with this, incredibly dangerous viruses.
Speaker 1: Why don't we blow the system up? I mean, obviously, we can't just turn off the spigot on the system we have and then say, hey. Everyone in the world should get this new vaccine. We haven't given to anyone yet, but there must be some way.
Speaker 2: But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of an, novel avian virus could occur in in China somewhere.
Speaker 3: It makes me very uncomfortable to have to say something, but he is egregiously incorrect in what he says. Thank you.
Speaker 4: Thank you. History will figure that out on its own.
Speaker 5: We will
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The people they paint as the bad guys are actually the good guys. That's because if you listen to the good guys, you'll realize who the bad guys are. 💡 https://t.co/FypD2FIn8v
reSee.it AI Summary
I know someone who can effortlessly deliver a 30-minute speech without any notes, even on the floor of the European Parliament. His name is James Lindsay, and his extensive knowledge comes from reading academic journals and books. This post has gained a lot of attention, and I've shared it multiple times.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I don't know many people who can spit receipts for 30mins straight... with no notes. I don't know any who could do it on the floor of the European Parliament.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of "woke" and its connection to Marxism. They argue that "woke" is essentially Marxism with American characteristics, as it seeks to redistribute social and cultural capital in addition to economic and material capital. The speaker explains that various ideologies such as critical race theory, queer theory, and postcolonial theory are all species within the genus of Marxism, sharing the goal of seizing control of the means of cultural production. They warn that Europe is at risk of succumbing to this ideology and urges understanding and resistance against it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Thank you. I'm glad to be here. I want to, address something Tom just said, which is in fact that woke is supposed to advance equity in Europe. So here's the definition of equity and see if it sounds like a definition of anything else you've ever heard of.
The definition of equity comes from the public administration literature. It was written by a man named George Frederiksen. And the definition is an administered political economy in which shares are adjusted so that citizens are made equal. Does that sound like anything you've heard of before, like socialism? They're going to administer an economy to make shares equal.
The only difference between equity and socialism is the type of property that they redistribute, the type of shares. They're going to redistribute social and cultural capital in addition to economic and material capital. And so this is my thesis when we say what is woke. Woke is Maoism with American characteristics, if I might borrow from Mao himself who said that his philosophy was Marxism Leninism with Chinese characteristics, which means woke is marxism, and it's a very provocative statement. It's something you will certainly hear it is not, that it is different.
And the the the professors and the philosophers will spend a large amount of time explaining to you why. No. No. It's about economics when it's Marxism. This is social.
This is cultural. This is different. It's not different. I need you to think biologically for one moment, and I don't mean about your bodies. We could do that.
That's a different topic. I want you to think how we organize plants and animals when we study them. They're species, but above species, there are the genus of the animals. So you think like the cats, all the cats, but you have tigers, you have lions, you have house cats, you have whatever, leopards, many different kinds of cats. If we think of Marxism as a genus of ideological thought, then classical economic Marxism is a species.
Radical feminism is a species in this same genus. Critical race theory is a genus or sorry, a species in this genus. Queer theory is a species in this genus. Postcolonial theory that's plaguing Europe is a species in this genus, and they have something that binds them together called intersectionality that makes them treated as if they are all one thing. But the logic is Marxist, and I wanna convince you of that.
Because Marx had a very simple proposition, but we get lost. We think that Marx was talking about economics because he often talked about economics. He wrote a book called Capital. It's a very famous book. We think, well, this is about economic theory, but this isn't true.
It it's only true on the surface. If we go below the surface, what Marx was talking about was something different. We know what Marx's hypothesis was was that we must seize the means of production if we're going to bring socialism to the nations, to the world. We have to seize the means of production. So we have to ask what does he mean.
And if we think that it's about capital, then we miss what he means. If you think it's about the means of production in the factory with a hammer and the means of production in the field with a sickle, then you miss what it means. Because Marx explained what makes human beings special in his earlier writings. And what makes human beings special is that man is a being that is incomplete and knows that he is incomplete. He is a man whose true nature has been forgotten to him, which is social being.
He is a socialist at heart who doesn't realize it. And the reason he doesn't but of man, of society, and particularly of history. Marx said that he had the first scientific study of history. How was history produced? By man doing man's activity, and man's key activity was economic activity as he saw it.
And so economic production doesn't just produce the goods and services of the economy. It produces society itself, and society, in turn, produces man. He called this the inversion of praxis. And so when he says we must seize the means of production, and he's talking about factories and fields, he's actually talking about how we construct who we are as human beings so that we might complete ourselves, so that we might complete history. And at the end of history, mankind will remember that he is a social being, and we will have a socialist society.
A perfect communism that transcends private property is how he put it. He said, in fact, that communism is the transcendence of private property as human self estrangement. That's a quote from the economic philosophic manuscripts 1944 1844. So Marx was interested in controlling or understanding and controlling how man produces himself, and he writes about this exclusively in the 18 forties very deeply. How do we do this?
And he looks at the economic conditions, and he says this is where it is. And that's why we get economic Marxism, and that's why we think Marx was an economist. But Marx was never an economist. He was a theologian. He wanted to produce a religion for mankind that would supersede all of the religions of mankind and bring him back to his true social nature.
And this is the true fact of Marx. And what the goal was, like I said, is to complete man. So what he said is, well, how are we building man currently? All of his economic analysis is about how are we building man at present through what he called material determinism. And he said, well, what we have is a special form of private property in our society.
Our society is organized around private property, So all of our thoughts organize around private property. In other words, there's a special kind of property that the bourgeois elite class has access to, and then they organize society to exclude everybody else from access to that property through exploitation, through alienation, through estrangement, through oppression. And so what Karl Marx was proposing is that economics becomes a vehicle to separate society into a bourgeois class that has access to a special form of property. The people who have access wish to retain that, so they oppress people and keep other people out of that special form of property. They erect a system of classism to do that.
It's enforced by an ideology called capitalism that believes that this is the right way to, engage in the world. And what we have to do is awaken the underclass, the proletariat, to the real conditions and the fact that they are historical agents of change and bring them to do a revolution and transform society so that we would have equity or socialism, whichever word you want. They have the same definition. Now let's say that we step out. We this is we we step back from this species, this economic species, homoeconomicus, and we step back to the genus, and we look at this idea, a special form of property that segregates society into people who have the bourgeois and the people who do not have, who are in class conflict with an ideology that keeps this in place.
And the lender class must awaken with consciousness to fight back and to seize the means of production of that form of deterministic property. And now we say change out class, put in race, and watch. We get critical race theory falls out of the hat. Just like that. Very simple.
In 1993, Cheryl Harris wrote a long article for the Harvard Law Review called whiteness as property. She explained that whiteness or white privilege constitutes a kind of cultural private property. She says it must be abolished in order to have racial justice. Just like Karl Marx said that in the communist manifesto, he wrote, communism can be summarized in a single sentence, the abolition of private property. Well, this is why critical race theory calls to abolish whiteness because whiteness is a form of private property.
People who have access to this property are whites or white adjacent or they act white. These are words out of the American lexicon that they've used to describe how how people gain access to the private property. People without that are people of color, and they are oppressed by systemic racism. Systemic racism is enforced by an ideology of white supremacy instead of capitalism. If you think of whiteness as a form of cultural capital, white supremacy as they define it is identical to capitalism.
It's the belief it's not believing that white people are superior. It's believing that white people have access to the control of society and should maintain that. Even if you don't actually believe that, if you merely support that, you have adopted the the ideology of white supremacy into your mind. And so you have the exact same system, and the goal is to awaken a racial consciousness in people so that they will band together as a class and seize the means of cultural production so that white cultural production is no longer the dominant mode. It's a big mystery in Europe.
I know. And in the UK, throughout Europe, I hear this question again and again. Why on earth is this very American phenomenon about slavery and so on that doesn't apply to our country? Why is it popular here? It's because it's not about history at all.
It's not about slavery at all. Those are excuses that they use. It's about creating a class consciousness that's against this form of property called whiteness, that's against the dominant culture that may just be a matter of fact, say, if you're in Europe. That's why. Because it becomes a site by which people can come together and they can channel resentment and try to claim power.
I wrote a book called race Marxism, and I defined critical race theory as it really is in that book on the first page. I said that critical race theory is calling everything you want to control racist until you control it. But couldn't we say the same about Marxism? It's calling everything you want to control bourgeois until you control it, but those mean the same thing. They mean exactly the same thing.
But what about, say, queer theory? How is that Marxist? It's very strange, all this gender and sex and sexuality. Well, Tom said, what is woke attack? The idea of being normal.
Well, the queer theory thinks that there are certain people who get to set the norms of society. They are privileged. They call themselves normal. They say this is normal. It's normal to consider yourself a man and look like a man and act like a man and dress like a man and eat meat like a man.
And then there are women that should be feminine and pretty and all these things. And so they get to define what's normal. They're heterosexuals, so they get to define the heterosexuality as normal and other sexualities are abnormal. And so you have a conflict across this cultural property of who gets to be considered normal and who is a pervert or a freak or some other term that gets used in their literature. But, technically, who is a queer, which sounds like a slur, but they adopted it, and it's a technical academic term now.
It means an identity without an essence, by the way, an identity that is strictly oppositional to the concept of the normal as defined by queer theorist David Halperin in his 1995 book, Saint Foucault, Toward a Gay Hegeography. I didn't make that up. I'm not extrapolating. So you see queer theory is just another species of the genus of Marxism. What about post colonial theory, which is plaguing Europe thanks to Franz Fanon and his biggest European fan, Jean Paul Sartre?
What about this? Well, it's the same. You have the west as the oppressor. They have access to the material and cultural natives around the world, the And so the oppressed, the the the the natives around the world, the people have to band together, and their activity is going to be called decolonization. They have to remove every aspect of western culture.
So when they come to Belgium or they come to France or they come to the United States and they say we're going to decolonize the curriculum or they go to the UK and say we're going to decolonize Shakespeare. This is what they mean. We're going to remove the cultural significance of your cultural artifacts because those cultural artifacts themselves are oppressive to us. This is the same system. It's another species in the exact same genus, and that genus is marxism, which is a way of thinking about the world.
And the goal is always to seize the means of control of the production of man and history and society. Marx merely believed it was through economic means. Now it's through sociocultural means. The evolution into this sometimes called western Marxism began in the 19 twenties. We had a Russian revolution in 1917, and this did not happen in Europe.
And the Marxists in Europe were confused. And so Antonio Gramsci sat down and wrote out some things, and George Lukacs sat down and wrote history and class consciousness after the failure of the revolution in Hungary. And they wrote what became cultural Marxism. The idea that we have to enter the cultural institutions in order to change them from within because western culture has something about it that's repelling socialism. So we have to go inside and change the culture to make it socialist.
Now you aren't allowed to talk about cultural Marxism now. They've categorized this as a conspiracy theory. They say that it is anti Semitic. This is not true. Antonio Gramsci wrote books.
George Lukacs wrote books. You can read those books. They have a philosophy. If they don't like the name cultural Marxism, we can use the name that other people at the time used, western Marxism. So much like, I don't know, a virus adapting to the conditions, it it changed to try to infect a new host.
It worked in feudal societies. Marxism took over in Russia. It took over later in China. It took over in all of these kind of agriculturally driven feudal societies, but it wouldn't work in actual capitalist nations because Marx was wrong. Then several Germans from the Frankfurt School started to study this phenomenon in more depth, and they evolved the idea further.
They evolved the idea into what's called critical Marxism. They developed what's called the critical theory. And Max Horkheimer, who designed the critical theory, explained the critical theory. And what did he say? He said, well, what we came to realize was that Marx was wrong about one thing.
Capitalism does not immiserate the worker. It allows him to build a better life. So I developed the critical theory because it is not possible to articulate the vision of a good society on the terms of the existing society. So critical Marxism criticizes the entirety of the existing society. Everything is somehow needing to be subjected to Marxist conflict analysis.
But how is that to be done? They sought an answer through the middle part of the 20th century and World War 2 breaks out. The Frankfurt School comes to America, which in this metaphor is the Wuhan Institute of Virology because gain of function began to happen on the Marxist virus very quickly in America. And American universities adopted these professors from Germany, and Herbert Marcuse, writing in the 1960s, said extremely clearly, this writing in 1969, not only did he say capitalism delivers the goods, gives people a good life, makes them wealthy and comfortable and happy. He also said that the working class is no longer going to be the base of the revolution because of these things.
In other words, we don't have to be responsible to the working class anymore, which opens up the ability for Marxists who are seeking power to make friends with the corporations. The bosses are no longer the enemy. They're an opportunity because the working class is irrelevant. He said the energy is somewhere else. He said it's in the racial minorities, the sexual minorities, the feminists, the outsiders.
That's who he said have the energy for a Marxist revolution in the west, not the working class. And so Marxism was able to evolve to abandon the working class. And so what did they do? Well, all they had studied for 30 years was what they called the culture industry, an industry that commodifies and packages culture and sells it back to people, supposedly stripped of what it actually is, empty, abstract now. And so what, of course, did they do?
They seize the means of production of the culture industry because that's what they do. And so they started to transform the culture industry to sell racial, sexual, gender, sexuality based agitprop as though that were genuine culture. And so we get concepts like cultural appropriation. We get concepts like cultural relevance, cultural this, cultural that, cultural everything. And it's all provided in pastiche.
It's all provided, as a as a as a mockery of what's really going on. And this evolved in America's highly racialized context, and we ended up with woke, a form of identity based Marxism, a a constellation of Marxist species that all work with the same operating premise but locate themselves in different, and I'll use the German term here for this, folk. LGBTQ is a folk, and they get folkish identity there and become activists. The black community is a folk. How do I know?
That's what W. E. B. Du Bois said it would be when he laid down the foundations that became critical race theory later. They think of themselves as nations.
Don't they all have flags? Don't they put them on your buildings like colonizers? Don't they hang them in your streets? They think of themselves as occupying nations, but they see themselves as bound together just like the various colonized nations around the world and seeking liberation from western civilization. And so we end up with western Marxism taking many forms, but with one overarching approach.
And the approach that they use, I started off by saying, is Maoist, not merely Marxist. Now you know the theory is Marx. It's just evolved into different species to attack the west at its weakest points through our tolerance, through our acceptance, through our openness, through our generosity, through our best traits, actually. The things that we should be proud of being, the things that we are proud of being. But Mao Zedong knew how to use identity politics.
I don't know how you study in Europe, but in America, we have very red washed education as we might say. The communists have stripped out all education about communism entirely. You don't learn about it in America at all. So we don't learn anything about Mao. And maybe you don't know this, but I tell this to American audiences, and they're shocked.
Mao used identity politics. He created 10 identities in China. 5, he labeled red for communist. 5, he labeled black for fascist. And he categorized people into these identity categories.
What they are doesn't matter. Of course, they were communist. They were things like landlord and rich farmer and things like this. Right winger is a bad category in and of itself, by the way. Conservative, all of them, bad.
Bad influences. That's another one. You could be a bad influence for just thinking the wrong thing or saying the wrong thing at any time or because the government decides it doesn't like you. These are the bad categories. And if you have a bad category, very importantly, your children have a bad category by default.
So they create a social pressure for your children to identify as revolutionaries, at which point they get a red identity, a communist identity, a good identity, and they get rewarded for it. And the youth read led the revolution in China because Mao did this identity politics through the children in the schools. This should feel very uncomfortable to you because here we have at least in the United States, we tell our children being white is bad. Being white is oppressive. You automatically hurt people of other races by your very existence.
But by the way, if you become queer, we'll celebrate you. And you can create a radical army of people who identify as gender minorities and sexual minorities at 7 years old. You can lead them into paths of puberty blockers and transition, medical transition, which, of course, big pharma profits off of. At 7 years old behind their parents' back. There's a reason for this.
It's the same program that Mao Zedong used to radicalize the youth in China. The only thing different is the identity categories have have shifted. It's Maoist cultural revolution with American characteristics, and it's being exported to Europe. And just like how critical race theory has come to Europe even though it doesn't make sense, it will come to Europe whether it makes sense or not, and you will have a cultural revolution here too. You guys even had a kind of offshoot one in 2020.
George Floyd dies in Minnesota, which has nothing to do with you, and you guys have statues coming down in Europe. Total nonsense. It doesn't matter though. The point is to destroy western civilization from within using Maoist techniques. One last point about Mao to kind of drive that point home.
Mao said in 1942 that his formula to transform China was called unity criticism unity. First, you try to create the desire for unity, then you criticize people for not living up to that, Then you bring them into unity under a new standard. Does that feel like what you're being put through? But the words are different. We use words like inclusion and belonging.
We'll have a place where everybody feels like they belong. We just want to have an inclusive space. But, unfortunately, you have racist ideas, and you have to criticize for you we have to criticize you for those. You need to criticize yourself for those. You need to go study shui in Mandarin, exactly like Mao said.
And then we can bring you into unity under a new standard, which Mao called socialist discipline, which we in the west would not buy. We call it in the west, inclusion. And so we have this new program, and within inclusion, we have or above inclusion, actually, we have sustainability. We have a sustainable and inclusive future. I see the agenda 2030 here with an x over it.
The sustainable and inclusive future is the new socialist standard that we will have freedom under socialist discipline. And Mauss said the way that that will work is through what he called democratic centralism. We call that stakeholder capitalism. And my shot at the World Economic Forum is taken because it's one of the things coordinating this. My shot at the United Nations is taken because it's one of the things that's coordinating this.
So woke is marxism. It's advancing through Maoist Cultural Revolution. It's using Americanized identity categories. And while some of those will not work in Europe, I guarantee you the colonial aspect will. They will find your weakness.
They will adapt the theory to fit because it's like a virus that will evolve to its host, and Europe is at great risk. Now the last thing I'll mention is this risk is twofold. When you endure Marxist provocation, Marxist strategy is always of the same type. It's called middle level violence. They don't come at you with full blown Bolshevik assault very often.
It's middle level violence. They provoke, which means if you give in and you do like Jean Paul Sartre said in his forward to the Wretched of the Earth by Franz Fanon, the the post colonial book, He said, the violence is coming. So Europe's best bet is to give it away so that they don't kill you. They'll murder you and take it, or maybe you can give it away. Give your culture away.
Give your countries away, and they'll let you live. They're coming for you, and this is what Europe needs to learn. That's what he says in the foreword of Wretched of the Earth. You can read it for yourself, probably in the original French that I can't read. And I think that's the path Europe has followed.
So you can give away. That's one side because they provoke at the middle. Or you can react and overreact, which, sadly, Europe has had a a rough history in the last century with overreactions. And if they if you overreact, what will they do? They will weaponize your overreaction for a century, forever, and gain moral authority so that you end up having to give it away later anyway.
So you have to stand firm in your principles, but you have to do so cleverly. You have to do so understanding that you're being provoked, which means you don't react as the the provocateur wants you to react. You have to outsmart them, which is not possible unless you know the diagnosis of your problem. It's a Polish proverb. Never attempt to cure what you don't understand.
Woke is Marxism evolved to attack the west. If you don't understand that, you will not act correctly. You will not cure it, and it will conquer your countries. It will conquer all of Europe, and we will have a very, very long, sustainable, and inclusive future with absolutely no freedom. Because the goal is to make us into what they call global citizens.
Have you heard this term? This term is nonsense. There's no global sovereign, so there is no global citizenship. There's no relationship because there's no ruler, and we don't want a ruler of the globe. It's a nonsense term.
But they tell you if you actually read their literature, what is a global citizen? It's somebody I kid you not. I make no joke. They say this themselves. It's somebody who supports the 17 sustainable development goals of United Nations agenda 2030.
That's a global citizen. And they say, what are the rights of a global citizen? This isn't a book about global citizenship education published 2 years ago. What are the rights of a global citizen? And the answer, one paragraph later is, we're not that interested in rights with global citizenship.
It's more about global responsibilities. In other words, slavery. This is a pivotal moment in the history of the western world. The model that they are pushing us toward using the means and mechanisms of that place is the model we see in China. If you want to know what your future looks like if we don't stop the woke, look at China.
Look at the social credit system. Look at the oppression. Look at people disappearing for having the wrong opinions. 1 of their greatest billionaires, Jack Ma, said the wrong thing about the government and disappeared. A billionaire.
If you want to know what the future of Europe and America and the five eyes or whatever the countries, it's China. That's the model. So we have to fight back against woke. But to fight back against woke, we have to understand it, and I will close by restating my thesis. Woke is Marxism evolved to take on the west, and it's been very successful so far because we haven't known our enemy.
We cannot name our enemy, and I've come here to name our enemy. So thank you for your time and attention in letting me do that.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Didn't realize this post would spread so far again. I've boosted this speech like 10x now. People called me out for not identifying the speaker. Fair enough. That is James Lindsay @ConceptualJames. Most of his work can be found here... https://newdiscourses.com/
New Discourses
New Discourses. Pursuing the light of objective truth in subjective darkness.
newdiscourses.com
reSee.it AI Summary
Measles, a serious disease, is being discussed as a way to escape the past. The anti-vax movement is responsible for its resurgence. The author expresses strong negative feelings towards those spreading COVID lies in 2024, as they are causing harm and the shots are now necessary due to these lies.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Seth is talking about measles as a means of getting away from his past.
@SethMacFarlane - Seth MacFarlane
Measles, a no-joke disease that can lead to severe complications and death—and that none of us ever had to worry about thanks to vaccines—is back, brought to you by the anti-vax movement. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/03/florida-measles-outbreak-preventable
Florida is swamped by disease outbreaks as quackery replaces science
The state is in the grip of a measles outbreak, yet Joseph Ladapo, the surgeon general, continues to ignore medical science to stop it
theguardian.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Which past? This one. 👇 @SethMacFarlane is a broken bitch.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors can be wrong, but natural immunity should be considered. Vaccines have side effects, and not everyone needs them. Misinformation fuels skepticism, weakening public health systems. Science evolves, and vaccines can have ill effects on some. Judicious vaccination could reduce vaccine damages. COVID vaccines are important, despite risks. The COVID vaccine is the most tested in history. Personal experiences shape opinions on vaccination. It's crucial to have open discussions on this topic.
Translation: Doctors can make mistakes, but natural immunity should be taken into account. Vaccines have side effects, and not everyone requires them. Misinformation leads to skepticism, weakening public health systems. Science evolves, and vaccines can have negative effects on some individuals. Careful vaccination could decrease vaccine-related harm. COVID vaccines are vital, despite potential risks. The COVID vaccine is the most tested in history. Personal experiences influence views on vaccination. It is important to have open conversations about this subject.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But then why are doctors wrong about so much? Well, they're right about a lot too. And yes. And but very often people who aren't doctors have been righter about things. Like what would be
Speaker 1: an example of that?
Speaker 0: I would think this country did not allow for natural immunity to be considered? And I know this is a subject dear to your heart. Like even if you had the disease, you still had to get a vaccine. That's powerful, stupid. They don't do that in Europe.
Speaker 1: I think they do that here. There's mandatory vaccination in grades in school.
Speaker 0: Right. But if you already but if you already had the
Speaker 1: disease, you have natural immunity. We didn't see That was that was that was that was
Speaker 0: believe in that. That was immunity. We didn't see That was that was that was that was that was that
Speaker 1: was debunked, though. I mean, that was that's that's debunked.
Speaker 0: Don't you know people who've had COVID 4
Speaker 1: or 5 times? I do. That's not natural immunity. There's no immunity there. You've had COVID 5 times.
Speaker 0: Probably because you had too many vaccines. I didn't have COVID. Did you
Speaker 1: did the vaccine gave you COVID?
Speaker 0: Well, that's certainly nothing unscientific about the fact that the vaccine, which does weaken you in order to strengthen you As do all vaccines. Exactly. Yeah. But while you're in a weakened state, yes. That's why so many people like me got it, did not have it while the thing was raging and I was taking zero precautions because I was never that afraid of it.
Speaker 1: But that's anecdotal.
Speaker 0: Like, I've had every booster that I have. Anecdotal that yeah. And I have never had COVID.
Speaker 1: I get a flu shot once a year. I haven't had the flu in 20 years.
Speaker 0: Right. Well, I haven't eaten. I don't get a flu shot.
Speaker 1: K. So this is all anecdotal. But but Right. You know the difference between anecdotal and and statistical. I do.
And, And statistically, you still have a 90% better chance of not being hospitalized, not dying if you're vaccinated.
Speaker 0: Oh, well, that but that's assuming all people are alike, and that is one of the giant fallacies in your way of thinking. We are not all alike. Yes. I would recommend and have recommended the COVID vaccine for the high risk people. Like, if you're 90 or fat, get it.
Absolutely. You need it. Some people don't. But you had Jokovic didn't need it. But you had Aaron Rodgers didn't need it.
Speaker 1: But you had something like 1900 kids who died of COVID during the pandemic.
Speaker 0: I don't think that's right. The New York How many how many
Speaker 1: of them died from the vaccine?
Speaker 0: None. The New York And
Speaker 1: then and the the thinking there is that, well, probably most kids are not gonna die from COVID, so why bother with the vaccine? Because it's only gonna be a few 100 kids.
Speaker 0: Right? I don't know how many kids died. That seems very high to me. I I know at one point the New York Times grossly talking about misinformation, they had to apologize. They got it completely wrong.
She reported something like 900,000 children have been hospitalized and it was like 63,000. So maybe those facts should be better.
Speaker 1: Papers can get it wrong, and they print retractions
Speaker 0: and you know this. But also the with COVID or from COVID, did 1900 children die with COVID? Yes. It's a whole different story.
Speaker 1: It takes 7,000,000 people worldwide. 7,000,000 people worldwide who died from COVID. Like, if if even just a fraction of that is and and it's probably a larger fraction who died of COVID than who died with COVID. Even if even just a fraction of that is that's still a lot of fucking people. That's a lot of fucking people.
Speaker 0: Yes. And but okay. But that's that's that's about 1,000,000 people. Things are and you cannot prevent that.
Speaker 1: You can, though. I mean, you you you can prevent that.
Speaker 0: At what cost? What's the cost of getting a vaccine?
Speaker 1: What what's why is why what's
Speaker 0: the The fact that you don't even have a clue, what's the cost of getting a vaccine, that you don't know the answer to that? No. You completely want to shut your eyes to the fact that there are repercussions to all medical interventions, including a vaccine. All vaccines, they come they say side effects just like every medication does. You can see it in the literature.
They can't write it on the vaccine, so you have to dig them. And of course, there is a vaccine court because so many people have been injured. This is not a screed to say don't do vaccines. I'm not against doing vaccines. I'm against doing vaccines that I don't think I need.
I should be able to decide that for myself inside my body. But, yes, there are there are pathogens that would come along that I would fight you for. But don't you think that the vaccine That's a good point. To get the vaccine.
Speaker 1: And and you bring me to
Speaker 0: my next point. Don't don't you
Speaker 1: think that the the vitriol and the the the just the the aggression towards the the the the, that the anti vaccination movement, the way it souped itself up during all this, that the next time there is a pandemic, our public health system is so weakened.
Speaker 0: Yes. Exactly. Because of the because of them and their fucking misinformation that made people skeptical. The fact that everybody came out and said, if you get the vaccine, you you you cannot get the disease, and then, of course, that was wrong. And you and if you get the vaccine, you can transmit it.
And that's what's going on inside.
Speaker 1: I understand. They're not they're not you just said yourself, doctors are often wrong. They are. Especially when they're researching a drug or
Speaker 0: a new disease.
Speaker 1: And I
Speaker 0: am not blaming them for it. I'm just saying that's why there shouldn't be the science. There's no the in science. That's what you want. You want just to be the the the one true opinion
Speaker 1: That's not
Speaker 0: true. Whatever
Speaker 1: it is. No. The strength of science
Speaker 0: And you don't want it? You don't know what The strength
Speaker 1: of science is that it has the capacity to evolve
Speaker 0: and produce a whole lot of that some that vaccines affect have ill effects on some people. I I They do. Again, anecdotally.
Speaker 1: But statistically, it's here and it's here. It's like it's it's people how many 7,000,000 people died of COVID. How many people died from the vaccine?
Speaker 0: Probably a few.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the number is, but I know it's not 7,000,000.
Speaker 0: If we were more judicious about who needed it versus who it might hurt, which would not be the blanket policy of just everybody, one size fits all, then perhaps we could take down the damages from the vaccine that happened.
Speaker 1: But then why vaccinate for anything? Why? Take down the why vaccinate for for measles? Why not why why vaccinate for mumps or rubella, pertussis? Why why vaccinate for any of those things?
Because somebody might get hurt by the vaccine. I mean, what why why do those vaccines because COVID is newer?
Speaker 0: I well, COVID is newer.
Speaker 1: It is it yes. It's but is that the only reason? I mean, this this was by the time you got the vaccine I don't know if you had it. But by the time I got the vaccine, this was the most tested vaccine in the history of vaccination.
Speaker 0: Yes. I had it.
Speaker 1: Because I had
Speaker 0: to get it.
Speaker 1: So many people by that point had had it. It's like, by the time it got into my arm, it's like, alright. I think I'm gonna be okay.
Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I just so you know, I took one for the team. Okay? So so, you know, that should go into it. I did something I did not wanna do.
And we have to talk about this all
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I don't usually cast away over positions, but this is an exception. Those who push the classic COVID lies in 2024 are dead to me. Because they know the harm it's causing. These shots are now on the schedule because of those lies. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-10-28-23#details
Unscripted 10-28-23
Listen now | Free preview
theojordan.substack.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The Queer+ revolutionaries have openly stated their objectives, but the media has hidden this from the public. Queer Theory's architects and their relationship with influential figures should be questioned. The funding behind the movement, such as the Pritzker fortune, is not widely discussed. The mainstreaming of these ideas raises concerns about prioritizing the well-being of children. It is important to connect the dots and take action against these ideologies. Gender theory and Queer Theory are interconnected, and their architects should be examined.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Ever read this? If not, you should right now. The Queer+ revolutionaries have never hidden their objectives; in fact, they state them quite plainly.👇 It was the D-Equity-I Troop and their captured media who hid this all from our people H/t @the_apollonic https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03626784.2020.1864621
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Who founded it? Who weaved it into federal law?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Why don't you ask The Messiah about his relationship with Kevin Jennings. 💡 @BarackObama https://theojordan.substack.com/p/what-is-glsen https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1713161056434929715?s=20
What is GLSEN?
The curious case of Kevin Jennings
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Why is there not discussion about the Pritzker fortune pushing deranged Queer+ revolution across America? Why is this only something talked about within "right-wing" channels that the entire DNC base has been trained like puppies to ignore? I answered my own questions, didn't I?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Why was this ever mainstreamed? This is the kind of shit a civilized society does NOT normalize and push on its young. Why would we make the derangement and sexual fetishes of men like this a higher priority than the minds and future of our children? What and who does this serve?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
You know these answers, don't you? So then what are we going to do about it?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
It's mind-blowing the base can't connect these dots and see where they've been herded. But it's not a surprise anymore. They couldn't see the ruse of... Critical Race Theory Gender Theory Queer Theory This is just Critical Christ Theory. The Same Thing. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1752336447351259210?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
https://theojordan.substack.com/p/what-is-glsen
What is GLSEN?
The curious case of Kevin Jennings
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Do you think things look any better in the arena of gender theory? Understand, these don't live alone. Think of them as a hydra; multiple dragon heads of the same singular beast. Here are those architects. 👇 You may want to finish your breakfast first. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1533848596008902658?s=20 https://t.co/x5Eoe3K0Al
reSee.it AI Summary
These posts express frustration and skepticism towards certain organizations and individuals. The author questions their integrity and accuses them of deception. They also criticize the absence of these organizations in addressing certain issues and express doubt about their ability to regain trust. The author highlights the need for accountability and honesty. The posts also mention concerns about censorship and the abandonment of free speech. The author references specific articles and institutions to support their arguments.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
These orgs are a scam to me. Just another agenda dressed up in our new Secular Cloth And no, I'm not tainting all the people there. I have high respect for a handful. But they're either being deceptful with us or have compromised their own integrity. Either way, I'm done caring.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The elephant in the room the left will not address. 👇 Not even our Illustrious "Free speech"/"Save the schools!"-orgs like @TheFIREorg @fairforall_org. We all agree the teachings of Jesus cannot adorn classrooms. Well, then why can the teachings of secular DEI gods like "Xir"?
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And if they want the intellectually honest to care about them again, they'll need to own up to their role (absence) in how we got here. But considering this same sect's track record with vaccine Hatecraft and COVID propaganda, I won't hold my breath. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1749813461687885998?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
One of the times Cathy made the mistake of engaging w/o honesty, I asked about her articles. She linked them... all but this one. Reminded me of a Christakis-play The original host link I used in 2022 is gone. How bout that. Yes, there were principal baddies. Look in the mirror
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
The Moral, defending free speech and protecting Our Democracy. 👁 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1749663373631934694?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This is the article @CathyYoung63 thought was so dangerous it shouldn't be platformed. Read it in full with all of this in mind and tell me which press warrants censorship. I've tried to have her just own up and correct course. She won't. She's trapped. https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/science/articles/pandemic-science
How the Pandemic Is Changing Scientific Norms
Imperatives like skepticism and disinterestedness are being junked for political warfare that has little in common with scientific methodology
tabletmag.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This brand is rotten. GFY! https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1749794563319849377?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Well, I'll just make it pop in one tweet... https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1749664805437284596?s=20
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker recounts an interaction with someone named Nick Christakis on Twitter. They question whether Nick was aware of a specific study when he made a conclusion about vaccination. The speaker wanted Nick to admit he didn't know about the study, but he didn't. The speaker believes Nick is compromised and possibly dishonest. They also criticize people who wear masks and claim to be objective but push their own agendas. They mention Kathy Young and Nicholas Christakis as examples of such people.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dude shows up in my replies, and he says, as I'm ripping his ass I think I was in the middle of writing this thread when Christakis comes riding through on his white horse. And he says he says to me, he goes, you mean this study? And he drops a link. And I look, and it's the holy grail from 124. And it appears to be in a long thread.
And at first, my heart sunk a little. I'm like, shit, man. Did I miss it? Like, did he talk about the 124? But he couldn't have because his conclusion was, Based on the studies above, vaccination is clearly superior.
So I click on the link to go what's finding out. Dude dropped it the next day. He writes his safe face thread on, like, 21st, writes a final conclusion of vaccination is superior to everything, quote, at least for now. And he knows that that's what's gonna hit 100 of 1,000, if not millions of eyeballs. Right.
And then the next day, he puts this little thing in and he goes, just now, a new study out of Israel appears to show strong strength and blah blah blah. It is a good study, knowing damn well that nobody's going back to his thread the next day to read that other thing. Right? So I said, Nick, I'm aware of your thread. But what I wanna know is, Were you aware of the 124 study when you pushed tweet on this 12/21 study that concluded vaccination was superior?
He says, this is exhausting. You can look at all the data you want, but in general, vaccination is a blah blah. And I'm like, fuck you, pal. I was like, that's the answer I wanted. I wanted to know if he would own up because, side note, I knew he knew about the 124 study because he posted somewhere about it on Twitter.
And I'm holding that receipt in my hand as I'm asking him, Nick, Did you know about this study when you wrote your safe face thread? I really wanted him to tell me no because then I was gonna pull his pants down further, but he didn't. He turned around and he fled. And I've brought that up dozens of times. I know it's caught Nick's attention multiple times because he finally blocked me once when I was talking about it.
That's my story about Nick Christakis. And when you add all of that together and you say, what does that story tell us? It tells us some deeply disturbing things. It tells us Nick Christakis is a compromised person. He's either dishonest for his own selfish agenda, or I think there's possibly tentacles in Yale.
Yale. Willing to say that out loud. Yeah. That's an old thing too. Possible.
Yeah. Yeah. Absolutely. It shows you that some of the most dangerous people in our country, in my opinion, are the mask Wearers in the center left who claim to be these objective people above the fray. Hello, scam Harris.
And what they're really doing is pushing agenda, pushing bullshit and trying to herd things in the direction of their agenda while wearing the costume of the good guy. Yeah. And in my opinion, that describes people like Kathy Young and Nicholas Christakis to a t.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This journal article below which openly calls to "Abolish the White Race" came out of Harvard over 20 years ago. Where were you, Our Great Defenders of Academic Integrity and Free Thought? 👁 "But we weren't formed back then." I know. That's my point! 🤬 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1743993027733889441?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
But NOW our nation is facing "An Existential Threat to Higher Education". Says who? One of our oldest newspapers, @TheAtlantic. The same outlet that helped turn lab-leak into disinformation; those who helped orchestrate Russiagate to remove a president. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1743993664555106638?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
You don't possibly think this is limited to Harvard, do you? Check this thread out. 👇🧵 Not Harvard. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1733471573015695427?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
@TheAtlantic NOW Time Magazine wants to detail the "Right's Effort Take Over American Universities". 👁 The same Time Magazine that so proudly trumpeted of subverting our democratic process in the name of "Saving Our Democracy". 🤬 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1748378501776921077?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This was back when they were openly pushing to be able to censor truth (conservatives and populist pushback) as a national security threat under the "Disinformation Governance Board". Once in DHS, it's untouchable. Our very own Ministry of Truth. 👁 This Time article was priming for that. Just one tiny piece of an avalanche of that identical material pouring out of every MSM and DNC crack at the time, which was all part of conditioning (brainwashing) our populace into accepting the abandonment of the First Amendment under the basis of "safety". Constant existential threat; the tactic of every regime. Yes, it's that horrifying. It's what Hitchens called the "Will to Obey". There is a second and perhaps even scarier aspect though. This is a textbook propaganda move where you get out ahead of a story you know will one day land by sharing a rose-colored version of the same. It allows you to confront and be the one who leads the topic, then those trying to get the truth out begin in an adversarial posture. "Limited hangout". It's a classic propaganda technique. The Truman Show deploys it across every front. Think Ukraine. 💡 https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
The extraordinary effort was dedicated to ensuring the election would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. Here's how it was done
time.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
"It's not about race. It's about who do you connect with. Who do you vibrate with? Who's on the same wavelength? Who wants to be the same kind of person? ... It ain't where you from, it's where you at." https://theojordan.substack.com/p/im-not-who-you-keep-saying-i-am
Video Transcript AI Summary
Race should not be the determining factor in our relationships. It's about connecting with people who share our values and goals. The media and others profit from fueling racial division, making us feel trapped in a never-ending battle. We need to focus on the present, not where we come from. It's about finding common ground and moving forward.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. I think race, it takes up too much space. There's people that we all have in our lives who are same race that we can't stand, And there's people in our lives from other races that we get along with way better. So it's not about race. It's not about color in gender and this and that.
It's about who do you connect with. You know? Who do you vibrate with? You know what I mean? Who's on the same wavelength?
Who wants to be the same kind of person. Who wants to do the right thing when you wanna do the right thing? That's who you connect with. So I think a lot of people get make a lot of money off of the race is fighting against each other and bickering, and they the ones who push it in our face all the time that we're separate. And, Does feel like there's more of that, doesn't there?
Yeah. It seems like it's, it's like you're stuck in a bad movie and you can't get out. Like, you can't find the exit, and it continues to play on the screen. And you're just running around looking for the exit, and this That movie continues to just haunt you day by day by day by day. You know?
That's what we're caught in. A a never ending, winless battle of, you know, of race and color and worried about, you know, where you from and you know? Hip hop what's great about hip hop, like, it was a it was a saying in hip hop, early hip hop, I think. Rakim coined this phrase. You know?
It ain't where you're from. It's where you at. You know? And It's so true. It's not about where you come from.
It's about where you at right now.
I'm not who you keep saying I am
Nothing is more essentially racist than race essentialism
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
It's quite revealing that the New England Patriots organization elected to lead with this quote. That wasn't just intentional, it was a statement in the current climate. This fits in so well with much I have written about. The Truman Show loves this dialogue in pro sports!
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts highlight concerns about vaccine hesitancy being suppressed and the potential side effects of mRNA vaccines. The author questions the actions of health agencies, media, and the government in suppressing inquiry and scrutiny. They also mention experiencing long COVID and express frustration at being labeled as "antivaxxers" for asking questions. The posts reference the spread of mRNA nanoparticles throughout the body and reported issues with menstruation in women.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This contamination is a different issue from transcribing. Yet another real-world identified concern of the mRNA delivery vehicle. These critical inquiries were all suppressed as "vaccine hesitancy". Just think about that. 👁 We weren't allowed to know. 🤬 https://t.co/75JFqAZBeL
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the contamination of vaccines with plasmid DNA and questions the validity of the specified limit of 10 nanograms per dose. They criticize the lack of thorough testing and communication by authorities regarding this issue. The speaker suggests that further investigations and prospective studies should be conducted to determine the potential risks and side effects of the vaccines. They also mention that the vaccine can spread beyond the injection site and reach various organs, including the liver, heart, and even the brain. The speaker emphasizes the importance of transparent communication and informed decision-making regarding vaccination.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Ganz sicher nicht. Und bevor man überhaupt ausspricht, dass man wieder die Menschen aufruft, impfen zu gehen, sollte man mal gründlich hinsehen, was man jetzt auch in den letzten Jahren gelernt hat. Und man hat zum Beispiel gelernt, und zwar schon im Februar heuer wurde das das erste Mal publiziert, dass die der Impfstoff verunreinigt ist, nämlich mit Plasmit DNA. Und das ist kein kein keine falsche Information, wenn ich Sie jetzt ansehe, wie Sie die Stirn runzeln, sondern das sind Fakten. Es haben unabhängige Labors haben Plasmitrückstände gefunden, und zwar in einem viel höheren in einer viel höheren Konzentration, als dass die Spezifikation vorsieht.
Und man muss noch dazusagen, man muss auch hinterfragen, stimmt überhaupt diese Spezifikation, diese berühmten zehn Nanogramm pro Dosis? Das ist
Speaker 1: aber richtig gut.
Speaker 0: Weil es ja auf nackte die DNA geht, hier ist die DNA genauso wie die Messenger RNA, sie ist verpackt in dem Lipid an Nanopartikel. Damit geht sie auch in die Zelle Und das ist gar nicht gesagt und ich ich möchte das auch aus aufgrund meiner biotechnischen Erfahrung als auch Analytikerin und ich war sehr, sehr eng gearbeitet auch mit der Entwicklung, mit der Produktion hinterfragen, ob das tatsächlich der richtige Grenzwert ist. Und die Behörden schweigen dazu, es wurde auch nicht getestet, ja? Das ist ja das Nächste, was man den Menschen sagen muss. Getestet hat der Hersteller, man hat das Prüfzertifikat dann weitergeschickt.
Es wurde Papier bestenfalls kontrolliert und die Kontrolllabers haben kaum Analysen durchgeführt. Ja, die haben vier Parameter gemacht, unter anderem Klarheit, Farbe Content, also Gehalt. Und all die wichtigen Dinge auf Verunreinigung zu testen, das hat man nicht gemacht und man ist das seit Februar? Es gibt jetzt erneut wieder Berichte auch aus Deutschland von von Dienstag und das kommt überhaupt nicht in den Mainstream Medien an. Und dort muss es ankommen, bevor bitte doch irgendjemand nachdenkt über weitere Impfempfehlungen.
Also das berühmte Plasmit Gate, wie's auch heißt, ja, wenn Sie's schon gehört haben. Und das ist kein keine irgendeine Idee, die irgendwer hat, sondern das sind reale Daten von Labors wiederholt gezeigt, dass wir da ein Riesenproblem haben
Speaker 2: Und es war jetzt die Bewerbungstellung. Schweigen.
Speaker 0: Und das ist ein Skandal, meiner Meinung nach Also das muss man dringend hinsehen.
Speaker 1: Dass die Behörden nicht, was Sie sagen, ist ja alles richtig. Was die Behörden jetzt nicht gut reagieren, ist komplett inakzeptabel. Was man halt Auch
Speaker 0: die Medien. Die Medien haben ein bisschen das
Speaker 1: eine Relativierung hier sagen möchte. Also diese zehn Pickogramm, Da das sind ist die Empfehlung der WHO. Ja. Aber die Spezifikation im Impfstoff gibt es nicht, dass dort eben nur diese zehn
Speaker 0: sollte gern. Das waren immer das Klein erzählen.
Speaker 1: Genau. Das ist das, was die WHO empfiehlt und das, was so in der europäischen Pharmokopäer drinsteht für auch andere Impfstoffe, zum Beispiel Hepatitis a, Chicken Pooks, für Tollwut Impfstoffe, auch für Influenza, das sind diese zehn diese zehn Einheiten. Ob das bei dem Coronaimpfstoff auch so drinsteht, weiß ich nicht.
Speaker 0: Da steht drinnen. Ich hab da die Chargen angesehen. Das steht drinnen sowohl bei den Es gibt ja Prozess eins, Prozess zwei Genau. Diese Spezifikation, das wird dir gezeigt in der Abreicherung. Das ist dir dann kein Routinetestparameter mehr zwingen, sondern ich muss das validieren, ich muss das zeigen.
Speaker 1: Und wir müssen kurz
Speaker 2: im Namen des Buches einschreiten. Wir kommen da alle nicht mehr mit, wenn Sie dieses Fachgespräch
Speaker 0: ist eine Verunreinigung und der Prozess definiert mir das Produkt. Das ist ganz, ganz wichtig bei biotechnischen Verfahren. Das heißt, wie ich probtiere Das heißt, was
Speaker 2: Sie sagen, ist nicht nur in in in meine und in die Sprache des Publikums übersetzt. Was Sie sagen, ist, Dass in diesen Impfstoffen Verunreinuhren gefunden wurden, von denen noch nicht klar ist, welche negativen Folgen sie haben. Genau. Ob sie auch Kardiogen sind oder Oh, ja.
Speaker 0: Und ob man's überhaupt vom von der Konzentration her richtig erfasst, denn es handelt sich nicht nackte DNA, sondern die ist, wie gesagt, eben in dieses Vehikel verpackt, wie auch die Messenger RNA.
Speaker 1: Ja.
Speaker 0: Und damit kann ich sie gar nicht so mit diesen Testmethoden, die man
Speaker 2: bei so einem Zweifel müsste so ein Medikament vom Markt genommen werden. Das sagen Sie ja damit, oder? Ja, also im Endeffekt wird man
Speaker 0: das Zweifel und untersucht werden wir uns nicht
Speaker 2: beworben werden.
Speaker 0: Und zwar sofort. Und das wissen wir seit Februar. Im Februar kamen bereits die ersten Daten.
Speaker 1: Das müssten drei
Speaker 0: Dinge Niemand. Was macht
Speaker 1: aus meinem Blick wegen. Das Erste ist, man müsste da sauber kommunizieren. Die Zulassungsbehörden müssten jetzt sagen, wir haben die und die Grenzwerte, die wurden überschritten oder nicht überschritten. Das müsst die jetzt mal machen. Das Zweite, was notwendig wäre, ist, man müsste testen, ob diese Mengen tatsächlich in sequenziellen Tierversuchen eine unkogene Wirkung haben auf die Stammzellen, das würde jetzt das zweite Schritt sein.
Und das Dritte würde sein, Ja. Dass man jetzt, es würden ja in Deutschland jetzt fünfundsechzig Millionen Menschen geimpft, weltweit waren das viele Milliarden. Man müsste jetzt prospektive Studien ansetzen, zu unterscheiden zwischen Geimpften und Nicht Geimpften und dann zu sehen, gibt es irgendwelche Krebs Krebsrisiken, die dann tatsächlich bei den Menschen ankommen? Denn so ehrlich muss man sein, Diese zehn Einheiten, die man da empfiehlt von der WHO, die kommen ja aus anderen Impfstoffen und auch anderen Medikamenten. Da geht man davon aus zum Beispiel, dass bei der Influenzaimpfschrift zwischen vier Komma sieben mal zehn hoch minus sieben bis zehn hoch minus fünfzehn, die wahrscheinlich zehn noch minus fünfzehn, wissen Sie, wie null da sind.
Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist, dass ein Krebsfall auftritt oder eine Infektion. Also die die Die Wahrscheinlichkeit ist unheimlich gering und diese Basenpaare, das sollen ja immer zweihundert sein, die sind frakturiert. Es gibt 'n enthematischen Abbau. Also die Sicherheitsgrenze, die die WHO hier setzt, ist extrem hoch. Also es gibt 'n theoretisches Risiko, die das kann man nicht ausschließen.
Das muss sauber kommuniziert werden. Es muss untersucht werden und es muss in 'ner prospektive Studie auch
Speaker 2: bei Ihnen. Was Sie, der Vorwurf, den Sie haben, ist, dass das nicht gemacht wird, sondern dass es verschwiegen wird, korrekt?
Speaker 0: Es wird verschwiegen und dass man, ich möchte noch einen weiteren Punkt nennen, ja? Also mein Punkt ist, und ich halte niemanden vom Impfen ab, ja? Menschen mögen das für sich. Sie kennen Ihren Körper, Sie sollen das tun, was Sie für richtig halten. Aber man muss den Menschen sagen, Achtung, das sind Verunreinigungen.
Und das Zweite ist ja, es sei auch eine aufgeklärt gehört, dass der Impfstoff nicht an der Einstiegsstelle bleibt, sondern und ich hab noch einmal jetzt da jetzt dieser Tage nachgesehen, was denn die EMA, die Europäische Arzneimittelbehörde auf ihrer Homepage schreibt. Und sie sagt ganz konkret, also Sie verweist nur auf Tierstudien und sagt, der Impfstoff verbleibt, also bleibt an der Einstichstelle und geht auch in die Lymphknoten. Und zusätzlich bestätigen Sie auch, dass in diversen Organen auch kleine Mengen ankommen, ja? Das hat man den Menschen nie gesagt, und zwar in der Leber, im Herzen, im sogar im Gehirn, ja, in der Milz findet man kleine Mengen von von den Spike Proteinen. Und das hat man den Menschen doch nie gesagt und das finde sollten wir wissen.
Bis hin zu den Nebenwirkungen. Auch darüber sollte gesprochen werden und die gibt es, diese Nebenwirkungen. Ich kann das selbst aus meiner eigenen Familie berichten.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I did my first long COVID in quite a while last night. 👇🧵 Sadly, I think I'll be doing many more. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1735877540923797842?s=20 https://t.co/ZeJUTwX32E
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
I meant to write "first long COVID thread", but leaving out the last word by mistake made it even better. Lol
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
These are the types of words that got us attacked as evil monster "antivaxxers" by our own govt, the media it controls, and own neighbors. Nothing I state below is false. "Vaccine hesitancy" meant "You shall not ask questions!"... while they mandated! 🤬 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1501930434455748617?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Wow. The party is over. https://t.co/HhVjJtR75r
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are nothing more than representatives of the people. In financial terms, a derivative asset is never worth more than the underlying asset. The derivative exists because the underlying asset exists. It is delusional to think that a representative of the people is more important than the people themselves. In our government, politicians will have to live the same life as ordinary citizens. They will have to face the consequences of their actions, and if they make mistakes, they will suffer more than the good-hearted Argentinians. The era of privileges and political games is over. This can only be achieved by an outsider, someone who comes from outside the system. We are outsiders, and we built our own structure to kick them out. The old ways must end for a different Argentina to emerge. The attacks against me are because they fear the awakening of the people. They thought this would never happen, but now a third of the population is shouting for freedom. They have realized they don't want to be sheep, they want to be lions. They will devour corrupt politicians, greedy businessmen, and deceitful media. They will also expose the fake economists and pollsters who profit from the state. Argentina is waking up, and there is light because people have discovered that slavery is not profitable. This awakening is unstoppable, just like an exponential function that reaches a turning point.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Nosotros no somos más que nuestros representados. En términos financieros, en términos financieros es el derivado, el activo derivado, nunca vale más que el subyacente. El derivado existe porque existe el subyacente. Nosotros, digamos, existimos como representantes del pueblo porque existe el pueblo, es una locura, es un delirio arrogarse que un representante del pueblo es más que el propio pueblo. Es un delirio, es el delirio en el que vive la casta política.
Entonces, en nuestro gobierno, los políticos van a tener que vivir la misma vida que vive el ciudadano común, van a tener que internalizar el resultado, van a tener que internalizar el resultado, y si se mandan bacanas, no solo van a sufrir los argentinos de bien, van a sufrir más los políticos. Van a tener que vivir como viven los argentinos de bien, se les acabó los privilegios, se acabó la joda. Y esto solamente lo puede hacer un outsider, lo puede hacer un tipo que viene de afuera, y no cualquier tipo de outsider, porque está llena la historia de outsider que se meten en estructuras preexistentes. Nosotros somos outsider, outsider, porque somos outsider sin estructura precedente que la construimos para esto, ¿para qué? Para sacarlos a patadas en el culo.
Se acabó la joda, se acabaron los privilegios de la política, se acabó, se acabó. Una Argentina distinta es imposible con los mismos de siempre. Basta de la joda, se les terminó la joda y por eso me quieren exterminar, por eso me mandan a los doscientos fracasados, ¿sí? Por eso me mandan a los pseudos intelectuales, por eso me mandan a los curavilleros, por eso me mandan, digamos, a atacar por los medios, por por eso me atacan los empresarios prebendarios, porque se acabó la joda. ¿Por qué recrudece el ataque?
Porque creían que esto no iba a pasar y se encontraron con un tercio de la población gritando libertad, gritan libertad, descubrieron que no quieren ser corderos, descubrieron que se sienten mejor siendo leones, porque como dije la mi primer discurso, yo no vine acá a guiar corderos, vine a despertar leones y estás despertando, están despertando y se van a comer crudo a los políticos chorros, se van a comer crudo a los empresarios prebendarios, se van a comer crudo a los sindicalistas que entregan a la gente, se van a comer crudo a los medios de comunicación que fueron funcionales a todos estos chorros para mantener este curro, y se van a llevar puesto a los econochantas, a los encuestores y a toda esa basura, ¿sí? Que abogan por la religión del Estado por que curran de ahí. Eso, es decir, Argentina está despertando. Hay luz, sí, hay luz, porque la gente está despertando, descubrió que la esclavitud no es negocio, y hay una vida mejor que en la vida en libertad. Por eso estás viendo lo que estás viendo.
Esto lleva a la misma dinámica que una función exponencial, y en algún momento hubo un punto de giro y ahora no lo pueden parar, no lo pueden parar cuando la función exponencial empezó a crecer, no la podés parar.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Important comment below. Why do these Yuri Robots attach "white" to "Christians"? Millions of Christians are not white. So why such the clear connection in their programmed minds? Because it's not actually about white or Christian at all. It's revolution. https://t.co/iXA91AoKYD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Woke is described as Marxism with American characteristics, aiming to advance equity by redistributing social, cultural, and economic capital. It is part of a genus of ideological thought that includes classical economic Marxism, radical feminism, critical race theory, queer theory, and post-colonial theory. These species share the logic of Marxism and are bound together by intersectionality. Woke ideology seeks to awaken a class consciousness against the dominant culture and property, such as whiteness, heterosexuality, and Western civilization. It employs Maoist tactics, using identity politics and cultural revolution to destroy Western civilization from within. The ultimate goal is a sustainable and inclusive future under socialist discipline, resembling China's social credit system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hello. Thank you. I'm glad to be here. I want to address something Tom just said, which is in fact that woke is supposed to advance equity in Europe. So here's the definition of equity and see if it sounds like a definition of anything else you've ever heard of.
The definition of equity comes from the public administration literature. It was written by a man named George Frederiksen. The definition is an administered political economy in which shares are adjusted so that citizens are made equal. That's a very good question. I think shares equal.
The only difference between equity and socialism is the type of property that they redistribute, the type of shares. They're going to redistribute social and cultural capital in addition to economic and material capital. And so this is my thesis when we say what is woke. Woke is maoism with American characteristics. If I might borrow from Mao himself who said that his philosophy was marxism Leninism with Chinese characteristics, which means woke is Marxism.
That's a very provocative statement. It's something you will certainly hear it is not, that it is different. And the the the professors and the philosophers will spend a large amount of time explaining to you why. No. No.
It's about economics that's a different topic. I want you to think how we organize plants and animals when we study them. They're species, you have house cats, you have whatever, leopards, many different kinds of cats. If we think of Marxism as a genus of ideological thought, the classical economic Marxism is a species. Radical feminism is a species in the same genus, critical race theory is a species in this genus.
Queer theory is a species in this genus. Post colonial theory that's plaguing Europe is a species in this genus and they have something that binds them together called intersectionality that makes them treated as if they are all one thing. But the logic is Marxist and I wanna convince you of that because Marx had a very simple proposition but we get lost. It's a very important thing to do. And so we're going to have a very important thing to do.
And what makes human beings special is that man is a being that is incomplete and knows that he is incomplete. He is a man whose true nature has been forgotten to him, which is social being. He is a socialist at heart who doesn't realize it. And the reason he doesn't realize it is because of the economic conditions operating as a means of construction or production, not just of the economy, but of him, but of man, of society, and particularly of history. Marx said that he had the 1st scientific study of history.
How was history produced? By man doing man's activity, and man's key activity was economic activity as he saw it. And so economic production doesn't just produce the goods and services of the economy. It produces society itself. In society in terms produces man.
He called this the inversion of praxis. And so when he says we must seize the means of production and he's talking about factories and fields, he's actually talking about how we construct who we are as human beings so that we might complete ourselves, so that we might complete history. And at the end of history, mankind will remember that he is a social being and we will have a socialist society, a perfect communism that transcends private property. That's how he put it. He said, in fact, that communism is the transcendence of private property as human self estrangement.
That's a quote from the Economic Philosophic Manuscripts 1944 18/44. So Marx was interested in controlling or understanding and controlling how man produces himself. He writes about this ex exclusively in the 1840s very deeply. How do we do this? And he looks at the economic conditions and he says this is where it is and that's why we get economic Marxism and that's why we think Marx was an economist.
Marx was never an economist. He was a theologian. He wanted to produce a religion for mankind that would supersede all of the religions of mankind and bring him back to his true social nature. This is the true fact of Marx. And what the goal was, like I said, is to complete man.
So what he said is, well, how are we building man currently? All of his economic analysis is about how are we building man at present through what he called material determinism. And he said, well, what we have is a special form of private property in our society. Our society is organized around private property. So all of our thoughts organize around private property.
In other words, there's a special kind of property that the bourgeois elite class has access too. And then they organize society to exclude everybody else from access to that property through exploitation, through alienation, through estrangement, through oppression. And so what Karl Marx was proposing is that economics becomes a vehicle to separate society into a bourgeois class that has access to a special form of property. The people who have access wish to retain that, so they oppress people and keep other people out of that special form of property. They erect a system of classism to do that.
It's enforced by an ideology called capitalism that believes that this is the right way to, engage in the world. And what we have to do is awaken the underclass, the proletariat, to the real conditions and the fact that step out. We this is we we step back from this species, this economic species, homo economicus, and we step back to the genus. When we look at this idea, a special form of property that segregates society into people who have the bourgeois and the people who do not have, who are in class conflict with an ideology that keeps this in place, and the lunder class must awaken with consciousness to fight back and to seize the means of production of that form of deterministic property. And now we say change out class, put in race and watch.
We get critical race theory falls out of the hat just like that. Very simple. In 1993, Cheryl Harris wrote a long article for the Harvard Law Review called Whiteness as Property. She explained that whiteness or white privilege constitutes a kind of cultural private property. She says it must be abolished in order to have racial justice.
Just like Karl Marx said that in the Communist Manifesto, he wrote, communism can be summarized in a single sentence, the abolition of private property. Well, this is why critical race theory calls to abolish white. These are words out of the American lexicon that they've used to describe how how people gain access to the private property. Instead of capitalism, if you think of whiteness as a form of cultural capital, white supremacy as they define it is identical the capitalism it's the belief it's not believing that white people are superior. It's believing that white people have access to the control of society and should maintain that even if you don't actually believe that, if you merely support that, you have adopted the the ideology of white supremacy into your mind.
And so you have the exact same system, and the goal is to awaken a racial consciousness in people so that they will band together as a class and seize the means of cultural production so that white cultural production is no longer the dominant mode. It's a big mystery in Europe. I know. And the UK, throughout Europe, I hear this question again and again. Why on earth is this very American phenomenon about slavery and so on that doesn't apply to our country.
Why is it popular here? It's because it's not about history at all. It's not about slavery at all, those are excuses that they use. It's about creating a class consciousness that's against this form of property called whiteness, that's against the dominant culture that may just be a matter of fact, say, if you're in Europe. That's why.
Because it becomes a site by which people can come together and they can channel resentment and try to claim power. I wrote a book called Race Marxism and I defined critical race theory as it really is in that book on the 1st page. I said that critical race theory is calling everything you want to control all racist until you control it. But couldn't we say the same about Marxism? It's calling everything you want to control bourgeois until you control it.
But those mean the same thing. They mean exactly the same thing. But what about, say, queer theory? What is woke attack? It's the idea of being normal.
Well, the queer theory thinks that there are certain people who get to set the norms of society. They are privileged. They called themselves normal. They say this is normal. It's normal to consider yourself a man and look like a man and act like a man and dress like a man and eat meat like a man.
And then there are women that should be feminine and pretty and all these things. And so they get to define what's normal. They're heterosexuals, so they get to define the heterosexuality as normal and other sexualities are abnormal. And so you have a conflict across this cultural property of who gets to be considered normal and who is a pervert or a freak or some other term that gets used in their literature. But technically, who is a queer, which sounds like a slur, but they adopted it and it's a technical academic term now.
It means an identity without an essence, by the way. An identity that is strictly oppositional to the concept of the normal as defined by queer theorist David Halperin in his 1995 book, Saint Foucault toward a gay hegeography. I didn't make that up. I'm not extrapolating. So you see queer theory is just another species of the genus of Marxism.
What about post colonial theory, which is plaguing Europe thanks to Franz Fanon and his biggest European fan, Jean Paul Sartre? What about this? Well, it's the same. You have the west as the oppressor. They have access to the material and cultural true wealth of the world because they've decided their culture is the default and have gone and colonized the world to bring culture to the world as they say.
They have to remove every aspect of western culture. So when they come to Belgium or they come to France or they come to the United States and they say we're going to decolonize the curriculum or they go to the UK and say we're going to decolonize Shakespeare. This is what they mean. This is the same system. It's another species in the exact same genus.
And that genus is Marxism, which is a way of thinking about the world. And the goal is always to seize the means of control of the production of man and history and society. Marx merely believed it was through economic means. Now it's through sociocultural means. The evolution into this sometimes called Western Marxism began in the 1920s.
We had a Russian revolution in 1917, and this did not happen in Europe. And the Marxists in Europe were confused. And so Antonio Gramsci sat down and wrote out some things, and George Lukacs sat down and wrote history and class consciousness after the failure of the revolution in Hungary. And they wrote what became cultural marxism. The idea that we have to enter the cultural institutions in order to change them from within because Western culture has something about it that's repelling socialism.
So we have to go inside and change the culture to make a socialist. Now you aren't allowed to talk about cultural Marxism now. They've categorized this as a conspiracy theory. They say that it is anti Semitic. This is not true.
Antonio Gramsci wrote books. George Lukacs wrote books. You can read those books. They have a philosophy. If they don't like the name cultural marxism, we can use the name that other people at the time used, Western marxism.
So much like, I don't know, a virus adapting to the conditions, it changed it changed to try to infect a new host. It worked in feudal societies. Marxism took over in Russia. It took over later in China. It took over in all of these kind of agriculturally driven feudal societies but it wouldn't work in actual capitalist nations because Marx was wrong.
Then several Germans from the Frankfurt School started to study this phenomenon in more depth, and they evolved the idea further. They evolved the idea into what's called critical Marxism. They developed what's called the critical theory. And Max Horkheimer, who designed the critical theory, explained the critical theory. And what did he say?
He said, well, so I developed the critical theory because it is not possible to articulate the vision of a good society on the terms of the existing society. So critical Marxism criticizes the entirety of the existing society. Everything is somehow needing to be subjected to Marxist conflict analysis. But how is that to be done? They sought an answer through the middle part of 20th century and World War 2 breaks out, the Frankfurt School comes to America, which in this metaphor is the Wuhan Institute of Virology because gain of function began to happen on the Marxist virus very quickly in America.
And American universities adopted these professors from Germany and Herbert Marcuse writing in the 1960s said extremely clearly this writing in 1969, not only did he say capitalism delivers the goods, gives people a good life, makes them wealthy and comfortable and happy. The to the working class anymore, which opens up the ability for Marxists who are seeking power to make friends with the corporations. He said it's in the racial minorities, the sexual minorities, the feminists, the outsiders. That's Tszyu said have the energy for a Marxist revolution in the west, not the working class. And so Marxism was able to evolve to abandon the working class.
And so what did they do? Well, all they had studied for 30 years was what they called the culture industry, an industry that commodifies and packages culture and and so we get concepts like cultural appropriation. We get concepts like cultural relevance, cultural this, cultural that, cultural everything and this evolved in America's highly racialized context, and we ended up with woke, a form of identity based Marxism, a a constellation of Marxist species that folk, LGBTQ is a folk. And they get folkish identity there and become activists. The black community is a folk.
How do I know? That's what W. E. B. Du Bois said it would be when he laid down the foundations that became critical race theory later.
They think of themselves as nations. Don't they all have flags? Don't they put them on your buildings like colonizers? Don't they hang them in your streets? Turned civilization.
And so we end up with western Marxism taking many forms, but with one overarching approach. In the approach that they use, I started off by saying is Maoist, not merely Marxist. Now you know the theory is Marx. It's just evolved into different species to attack the west at its weakest points through our tolerance, through our acceptance, through our openness, through our generosity, through our best traits actually, the things that we should be proud of being, the things that we are proud of being. But Mao Zedong knew how to use identity politics.
I don't know how you study in Europe, but in America, we have very red washed education as we might say. The communists have stripped out all education about communism entirely. You don't learn about it in America at all, so we don't learn anything about Mao. And maybe you don't know this, but I tell this to American audiences and they're shocked. Mao used identity politics.
He created 10 identities in China. Five, he labeled red for communist. Five, he labeled black for fascist. And he categorized people into these identity categories. What they are doesn't matter.
Of course, they were communist. They were things like landlord and rich farmer and things like this. Right winger is a bad category in and of itself, by the way. Conservative, all of them, bad, bad influences. That's another one.
You could be a bad influence for just thinking the wrong thing or saying the wrong thing at any time or because the government decides it doesn't like you. These are the bad categories. And if you have a bad category, very importantly, your children have a bad category by default. So they create a social pressure for your children to identify as revolutionaries, at which point they get a red identity, a communist identity, a good identity, and they get rewarded for it. And the youth led the revolution in China because Mao did this identity politics through the children in the schools.
This should feel very uncomfortable to you because here we have, at least in the United States, we tell our children being white is bad. Being white is oppressive. You automatically hurt people of other races by your very existence. But by the way, if you become queer, we'll celebrate you. And you can create a radical army of people who identify as gender minorities and sexual minorities the only thing different is the identity categories have have shifted.
It's Maoist Cultural Revolution with American characteristics, and it's being exported to Europe. And just like how critical race theory has come to Europe even though it doesn't make sense, it will come to Europe whether it makes sense or not, and you will have a cultural revolution here too. Total nonsense. It doesn't matter though. The point is to destroy western civilization from within using Maoist techniques.
Then you bring them into unity under a new standard. Does that feel like what you're being put through? But the words are different. We use words like inclusion and belonging. We'll have a place where everybody feels like they belong.
We just want to have an inclusive space. But, unfortunately, you have racist ideas, and you have to criticize for you we have to criticize you for those. You need to criticize yourself for those. You need to go study in Mandarin, exactly like Mao said. And then we can bring you into unity under a new standard, which Mao called socialist discipline, which we in the west would not buy.
We call it in the west inclusion. And so we have this new program and within inclusion, we have or above inclusion, actually, we have sustainability. We have a sustainable and inclusive future. I see the agenda 2030 here with an x over it. The sustainable and inclusive future is the new socialist standard, that we will have freedom under socialist discipline.
And Mao said the way that that will work is through what he called democratic centralism. We call that stakeholder capitalism. And my shot at the World Economic Forum is taken because it's one of the things coordinating this. My shot at the United Nations is taken because it's one of the things that's coordinating this. So woke is Marxism.
It's advancing through Maoist Cultural Revolution. It's using Americanized identity categories. And while some of those will not work in Europe, I guarantee you the colonial aspect will. They will find your weakness. They will adapt the theory to fit because it's like a virus that will evolve to its host is always of the same type.
It's called middle level violence. They don't come at you with full blown Bolshevik assault very often. It's middle level violence. They provoke, which means if you give in and you do like Jean Paul Sartre said in his forward to The Wretched of the Earth by Franz Fanon, the the post colonial book, he said, the violence is coming. So Europe's best bet is to give it away so that they don't kill you.
They'll murder you and take it or maybe you can give it away. Give your culture away. Give your countries away, you can read it for yourself, probably in the original French that I can't read. And I think that's the path Europe has followed. So you can give away.
That's one side because they provoke at the middle. Or you can react and overreact, which sadly Europe has had a a rough history in the last century with overreactions. And if they if you overreact, what will they do? They will weaponize your overreaction for a century, forever, and gain moral authority you have to outsmart them, which is not possible unless you know the diagnosis of your problem. It's a Polish proverb.
Never attempt to cure what you don't understand. It will conquer all of Europe and we will have a very, very long sustainable and inclusive future with absolutely no freedom because the goal is to make us into what they call global citizens. Have you heard this term? This term is nonsense. There's no global sovereign, but they tell you if you actually read their literature, what is a global citizen?
It's somebody I kid you not. I make no joke. They say this themselves. It's somebody who supports the 17 sustainable development goals of United Nations agenda 2030. That's a global citizen.
And they say, what are the rights of a global citizen? This isn't a book about global citizenship education published 2 years ago. What are the rights of a global citizen? And the answer 1 paragraph later is we're not that interested in rights with global citizenship. It's more about global responsibilities.
In other words, slavery. This is a pivotal moment in the history of the Western world. The model that they are pushing us toward the look at China. Look at the social credit system. Look at the oppression.
Look at people disappearing for having the wrong opinions. One of their greatest billionaires, Jack Ma, said the wrong thing about the government and disappeared. A billionaire. If you want to know what the future of Europe and America and the Five Eyes or whatever the countries, it's China. That's the model.
So we have to fight back against woke. But to fight back against woke, we have to understand it. And I will close by restating my thesis. Woke is Marxism evolved
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
For all the incessant rhetoric about "institutional racism", here is what it actually looks like in application. 👇 https://t.co/EIJFz57pMT
reSee.it AI Summary
The left is waking up to the reality of BLM and soon will realize the truth about Queer+ activism. GLSEN, backed by billions, has infiltrated schools. Queer Theory's architects and gender theory are equally concerning. This isn't by chance; it's a calculated revolution. Dissent is labeled as bigotry, but it's forced upon us. Society must acknowledge the greater story and the evil within this Trojan Horse. Our culture and children are being manipulated against our will. Everything about this is wrong.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
A whole lot of people on the left have been smacked out of their little moralizing coma and back to reality re what BLM is and was always about. Now I look forward to when they do the same with Queer+ activism. Wait til you see what you find under those rocks!
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Start high-level with GLSEN. 👇 The multi-billion supported conglomerate that has pervaded all of our schools with the specific mission of "queering" kids, and it's tentacles that stretch from the Fortune 500, to the Obama White House, to George Soros. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/what-is-glsen
What is GLSEN?
The curious case of Kevin Jennings
theojordan.substack.com
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And then take a close look at Queer Theory's architects. 👇 Oh, it gets so much worse. Everything he states here is factual. It's their own words! Receipts. Hard to hold back such wicked lust. Why does our Intellegensia worship and champion these figures?
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the connection between anarchism and pedophilia, but is interrupted and asked to talk about something relevant. They then play a game called Queer Theory Pedophilia Jeopardy, where they mention influential figures in queer theory who have supported the eradication of age of consent laws. They also mention an article that defends pedophilia and compare it to a preference for spicy food. The speaker talks about the author Pat Califia and quotes from their book, highlighting their views on children's sexual activity. They mention Judith Butler's controversial views on incest and conclude that no queer theorist has spoken out against pedophilia.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There is a long correlation between anarchism and pedophilia and support for pedophilia. The Oh, wait wait wait wait wait wait wait, that's a beautiful line. Thank you so much for asking how about something relevant. I've been talking about rape culture all day and pedophilia and the support of pedophilia is not rape culture. Actually actually, it seems if you're acting like this is a spurious connection, so we're gonna play Jeopardy.
This is we're gonna play Queer theory we're gonna play Queer Theory, Pedophilia, Jeopardy! Okay, answer. Commonly called the godfather of queer theory. Okay. 100 points.
Foucault, another way to ask this is, who argued? No, I guess the answer would be argued for the eradication patient of age of consent laws as in down to infants.
Speaker 1: Who is to a co? Thank
Speaker 0: Next one. The author of the the author of the, founding documents of queer theory.
Speaker 1: Who is Gail Rubin?
Speaker 0: Who is Gail Rubin? What percentage? Don't know the answer is 50%. Question is?
Speaker 1: Amount in that article that was a defensive pedophilia specifically, quote, boy lovers. So they just talk boys. Oh.
Speaker 0: And since you're not believing me, quote quote, this is in the founding document of Queer Theory. White communists and homosexuals in 19 fifties, boy lovers are so stigmatized that it is difficult to find defenders of their civil liberties, let alone for their erotic orientation. In the founding document of career theory. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm using facts.
Speaker 1: A thousand, a thousand apologies.
Speaker 0: One must never let facts in a way. Oh, she also compared by the way, she compared pedophilia she compared pedophilia 2, a preference for spicy food. The thing is I have never heard of anyone who has to have years therapy because they ate
Speaker 1: hot and sour soup.
Speaker 0: Okay, short for 200. Now it is, now it is now it is pedophilia and queer theory for 300, that would be author of, Macho Sluts. Author of Macho Sluts and Public Sex. Pat Phillipia. Wait, wait, wait.
What was it somebody said? Stay relevant.
Speaker 1: Okay, let's talk
Speaker 0: let's talk about, Pat Califia Okay. Here's something from 1 of, Pat Philippius books You know, it's really interesting. It's really interesting that when I actually start talking about the relationship relationship between queer theory and anarchism and pedophilia that, it becomes they they really want to shut me up now. So here's Pat Califia. They want to
Speaker 1: get coffee. You're a host host.
Speaker 0: Pat Califia.
Speaker 1: Oh, wait. Wait. Wait. Wait. Just a second.
Just a second.
Speaker 0: I was accused of homophobia because I am against pedophilia.
Speaker 1: Yes. Right. Who is it who actually makes the connections? Could you not?
Speaker 0: Okay. Here's something by Pat Califia. Pat Califia has written, any child old enough to decide whether or not she or he wants to eat spinach, play with trucks, or wear shoes is old enough to decide whether or not she wants to run around naked in the sun, masturbate, sit in someone's lap, engagement in sexual activity by which she does not mean play doctors. She means with adults. She's very clear about that because she also says that, pedophile should be more and not less, invested in children's lives.
Okay. So we're at 300. 400 is, the most famous, queer theorist of today. Answer Judith. No.
It is not Judith Butler. It's who is judge Judith Butler? Okay, Judith Butler is the most famous queer theorist of the day
Speaker 1: incest is
Speaker 0: a violation suggesting I think there may be occasions, which it's not. Why would I talk that way? Well, I do think that there are probably forms of incest that are not necessarily traumatic and which or which gain their traumatic character by virtue of the conscious of social saying produce. Yeah. That's true.
That's one of that's one of the queer heroes. Okay. Now now we have we have, for 500, we have, the last 1 in the Queer Theory and Pedophilia. The answer is queer theorist who has spoken out strongly against pedophilia
Speaker 1: 0. 0. Who is no one?
Speaker 0: Who is no one? Not a single one. Because the entire thing is based on transgressing. Yeah. I know, dear fucking god.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Do you think things look any better in the arena of gender theory? Understand, these don't live alone. Think of them as a hydra; multiple dragon heads of the same singular beast. Here are those architects. 👇 You may want to finish your breakfast first. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1533848596008902658?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
This isn't happening by chance (been underway for decades) and is of a specific design and for a specific objective. A revolutionary objective. Aha! 💡 This talk contains a treasure trove of information for understanding this all. https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1657015219133071360?s=20
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And of course all dissent to this (even logical scrutiny) gets painted as bigotry. But those good people above working so hard against it? ☝️ That's the LGB United. Are they bigots too? No, our people have been subjected to systematic propaganda (Hatecraft) to force this on us.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Now, there is a greater societal story here too. I'm not submitting that everything in this pot is pedophilia. I describe that greater story below. But just like radical death-cult activism rode in under BLM, yes, true evil rides within this Trojan Horse.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Nathan skipped some important pages here. All gender theory ever was, is the need of some to legitimatize their own variance off gender norms. "I'm not an effeminate man, I'm actually a woman." No, you're actually not. You're just a guy who is feminine. And because that is off…
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
And instead of us addressing it, we're painted as Monsters for even mentioning it. Yet, this activism is consuming our culture and being forced down the throats of our children against our wishes! Everything about this is wrong. 👇 https://x.com/Theo_TJ_Jordan/status/1712531196264006069?s=20
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0, known as the "beautiful vegan Messiah," talks about their name and their dad. They mention liberating pigs from small cages and criticize their mom. They also claim to have a high score on Hot or Not. Speaker 1 interrupts and tries to calm Speaker 0 down, but Speaker 0 continues with offensive language. Speaker 1 calls for security to remove Speaker 0 and apologizes to the audience for the behavior.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I am the beautiful vegan, Messiah. It's a song. I didn't say I was and she knows it. I was just like my dad. Okay.
10 luxury cars. My dad told me I had the same your name is him until I legally changed it. My mom did not bail me out, gentlemen, she knew I was innocent. I'm liberating over 70,000,000,000 Pigs in cages so small they cannot move for years. Okay.
I work, my mom's a sociopathic piece of. I have the highest score in Hot or Not history. I got 9.9 out of 10 after 327 women raided me. Let's see your talent. Let's see your talent, you ugly piece of.
Speaker 1: Okay. Stop. Hey. Hey. Look at me.
Speaker 0: Let's get this out.
Speaker 1: No. Hey. Hey. Hey. No.
You need to look at me.
Speaker 0: I don't have to do
Speaker 1: Okay. Take him out. Security, get him out of here.
Speaker 0: Thank god. Thank god.
Speaker 1: You're not gonna come out here and use that kind of language in front of my audience. And audience, I apologize. That is childish and immature behavior.
@Theo_TJ_Jordan - Theo Jordan
Every element is there ☝️ in 1min 11secs. This is a loser of our society's natural order. One riddled from his own daddy issues. And all gender ideology and Queer+ activism have done is artificially elevate and empower him and praise him for being broken. https://theojordan.substack.com/p/unscripted-4-11-23#details
Unscripted 4-11-23
Listen now | A rant about the madness of elevating gender dysphoria, and the damaging impact of mainstreaming gender theory on both the individual and society as a whole
theojordan.substack.com
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/pmn/B3GYZRXESZA2BJCFFNIZBUHSY4.jpg)
