TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ThomasSowell
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Megyn Kelly talks about Tulsi Gabbard's "Russian asset hoax." "This was started by Hillary Clinton. She started it because Tulsi was a rising star within democratic politics." https://t.co/vyzqRLtk2b
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hillary Clinton started the Tulsi narrative because Tulsi was a rising star. She was a woman, a minority, and combat vet. Tulsi began 'to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying' and spoke up, making enemies in the party. She was outraged when she learned the DNC 'cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie.' Hillary Clinton allegedly called her a 'Russian asset,' part of the 'Russia, Russia, Russia hoax.' 'Her campaign made up the all the stuff about there being a server in Trump Tower Right.' Don Junior was using it to commute. Tulsi left the party. She argued the Russia-Ukraine war 'didn't have to happen' if Putin's views on NATO expansion had been listened to. She met with Bashar al Assad; Trump opened negotiations with Kim Jong Un; 'Diplomacy means you talk to your enemies.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: This was started by Hillary Clinton. Why? She started the Tulsi because Tulsi was a rising star within Democratic politics. She had all the boxes checked. She was a woman.
She was a minority. She was the first this and the first that, and she was a combat vet. Beautiful, well spoken, like amazing. And then she started to be kind of open minded to what Bernie Sanders was saying and maybe had some problems with the Hillary Clinton messaging and having Hillary shoved down our throat as the Democratic nominee back in '16 Yes. And spoke up about it and started to make enemies in the party because of that.
And then was outraged when she found out the DNC cheated on behalf of Hillary to try to make sure she got the nomination and screwed Bernie, and she was angry, and a and a rift was formed. Then Hillary Clinton called her a Russian asset just like Hillary Clinton's campaign was the one that made up that Donald Trump was a Russian asset. The Russia, Russia, Russia hoax. Her campaign made up the all the stuff about there being a server in Trump Tower Right. And Don Junior was using it to commute.
Those were lies made up by the Clinton campaign. Hillary Clinton absolutely loved making up lies in her campaign about the Russians interfering in against anybody who she didn't like or wanted to undermine. Tulsi was just one of them. Then Tulsi, an independent thinker, quite obviously Yeah. Winds up leaving the party.
And then she says, you know, this war that is going on between Russia and Ukraine didn't have to happen. If we had just listened for a minute to what Putin was saying about how it was genuinely important to him that Ukraine not be, ex that NATO not be expanded by allowing Ukraine potentially to join it, This whole thing could potentially have been avoided. And was it really so important to us that we not say that? Couldn't we have said that? Couldn't we have listened to him?
The other major nuclear power in the world, maybe that was worth more than a day's worth of thought. That is really what is used against her. If you go back and you look at why. Why is she a Russian asset? Okay.
That's it. The made up Hillary Clinton stuff, this, and then she met with Bashar al Assad, an enemy by far. Sure. It's no question. And And so they say, you know, she's got, like I guess she's getting her marching orders from Assad.
Okay. Trump himself decided to open up negotiations with Kim Jong un. I feel like course. No more spend with Bashar
Speaker 1: al Assad. Perfect sense to me because what are you gonna do? Diplomacy means you talk to your enemies. Isn't that more important than talking to your allies? Like, I
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Canadian MP Lauren Collins: "We need to think about the intersection of gender and the climate crisis... We are facing a climate emergency." https://t.co/iactHZe6KQ
Video Transcript AI Summary
"Hysterics, it, hysteria, it refers to something that is wildly emotional." "Climate emergencies are not gender neutral." "The degradation of ecosystems disproportionately impacts women and girls, and I am wildly emotional." "This is the existential crisis of our time." "And to hear that asking for high ambition is climate hysteria, that makes me wildly emotional." "We are facing a climate emergency." "I hope that the people around this table and the people listening will refrain from using language like climate hysteria." "It comes from the Greek word womb, of the womb." "And it's not surprising to hear this from someone who has written articles that are pro life."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Wanna start off by, addressing one of the comments that was made by the witnesses around climate hysterics. Hysterics, it, hysteria, it refers to something that is wildly emotional. It comes from the Greek word womb, of the womb. It is used in ancient Greek to refer to things associated with women. And I think I hope you'll forgive me if I get emotional.
Climate emergencies are not gender neutral. The degradation of ecosystems disproportionately impacts women and girls, and I am wildly emotional. This is the existential crisis of our time. And to hear that asking for high ambition is climate hysteria, that makes me wildly emotional. Absolutely.
You know, when think about my womb, you know, the two children that I bore from that womb and what future we are leaving them, I am wildly emotional. And it's not surprising to hear this from someone who has written articles that are pro life. I think that we need to think about the intersection of gender and the climate crisis. And I hope that the people around this table and the people listening will refrain from using language like climate hysteria. We are facing a climate emergency.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
AG Pam Bondi to Rep. Madeleine Dean: "You want to talk about incompetence, you're the one that said Joe Biden on PBS was competent. You had to retract those words. Don't talk, don't insult me publicly." https://t.co/0gtYG3Ky2P
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker accuses someone of incompetence, referencing a prior statement made on PBS where they called Joe Biden competent, which they then had to retract. The speaker objects to being insulted publicly by the chairman and claims this behavior is discourteous and outside the committee's guidelines, characterizing it as a personal shot while also criticizing Biden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You wanna talk about incompetence? You're the one that said Joe Biden on PBS was competent. You had to retract those words. Mister chairman me. Don't don't insult me publicly.
This is so discourteous. This is so outside the committee's guidelines. Taking a personal shot at me while swiping at Biden
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Thomas Sowell's take on immigration. Do you share the same opinion? https://t.co/DPPxXWBoEx
Video Transcript AI Summary
There is no single pattern that applies to all immigrants. The US has roughly 11 million illegal immigrants, overwhelmingly from Mexico, and Obama issued an executive order protecting about 5 million of them. There are no immigrants "in the abstract." Immigration policy is ineffective without border control. It is unknown whether these 11 million people are doing net good or harm to the economy. The US has a chronic surplus of subsidized agricultural output.
Congress should investigate the current immigrants, including their kids' performance in school, crime rate, and disease rate. Migration is not always a once-and-for-all process. Most Polish immigrants to the US lived outside of Poland before settling on American soil. Between the mid-1830s and the late 1930s, approximately 30 million people left the Indian Subcontinent, and nearly 24 million returned. Refugees seldom return, while sojourners are often predominantly male and young adults.
Refugees tend to be a relatively representative sample, while sex ratios shift towards balance as migration changes from sojourning to permanent settlement. Distinguishing refugees from sojourners is difficult, especially as people abuse refugee status to circumvent immigration laws. Legitimate immigrants and refugees may find their access restricted as a result.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When only 2% of immigrants from Japan to The United States go on welfare, while 46% of the immigrants from Laos do, there is no single pattern that applies to all immigrants. Everything depends on which immigrants you're talking about, and which periods of history. Okay. Here's the assignment. The period is today, and the immigrants we're talking about are the roughly 11,000,000, that seems to be the best estimate.
Roughly the 11,000,000 who are in this country illegally, overwhelmingly from Mexico. President Obama has issued an executive order protecting about 5,000,000 of them from deportation and other legal penalties. A humane act.
Speaker 1: Well see one one of things about the immigration debate is they talk about immigrants in the abstract, and there are no immigrants in the abstract as that passage indicates. And we don't know who those people are that that are here. They may all be PhD's from the University of Chicago, and we see they should all stay. Or they may and may in fact be people who major in sociology at Berkeley, which cases get them all out of here as soon as possible. But we don't know.
That that's one of the problems of so called immigration policy. We don't have an immigration policy unless we control the border. It doesn't matter what our policy is. If anybody who wants to cross the border can cross, then our policy is just a bunch of words on paper.
Speaker 0: Okay. So I think I hear you. I I think I can deduce from that set of comments two policies. One is for sure you get control of the border. Yes.
That's just obvious. We get control of the border. But from that point forward, you're as dubious about the editorial position of the Wall Street Journal Mhmm. Which is consistently pro immigrant as you are dubious of the president of The United States because your point is neither one of them really knows in enough detail Yes. Who these 11,000,000 people are, whether they're doing net good or harm to the economy.
So you you that's in you don't buy the Wall Street Journal argument. No. Then on net surely they're doing more good than harm. More economic good than harm. You don't buy that?
Speaker 1: No. And especially when they're trying to talk about having people in agriculture. I mean this is a country that has had a chronic surplus of agricultural output for decades on end costing the taxpayers billions upon billions of dollars.
Speaker 0: But because the federal government subsidizes the Yes. Of the surplus. Right?
Speaker 2: Yes. Alright.
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yes. In fact I I I think the federal government subsidizes the water that creates the surplus that it then subsidizes again. And I think I think that that any discussion of of people in the abstract drives me crazy because there are no abstract people. A hundred years ago people understood that, and so when there was a debate about immigration there was a multi volume set of tomes about the characteristics of the immigrants from various countries.
Where where where do they how do their kids do in school.
Speaker 0: They had the guts to be picky.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: They said we'll take some. Yes. But they better do us good.
Speaker 1: Yes.
Speaker 0: Okay. Okay. So what kind of debate would you like to Congress as I mentioned a moment ago, it just has just fallen to the control of Republicans both houses. Republicans aren't gonna be able to move much legislation because the president can still veto it. What kind of debate should they have?
What kind of hearing should they hold on immigration?
Speaker 1: They should find out what kind of people how how are the people that we know about now? How are their kids doing in school? What is their crime rate? What is their disease rate? All those things that matters.
You know, I they brought on all these kids and I said these just kids. Well you know kids do grow up and they have other kids. We don't know. May may maybe that's a good thing. Maybe it's a bad thing.
We don't have a clue.
Speaker 2: Migration is not always a once and for all process, even for those who leave their homelands never to return. They may migrate from one foreign country to another before finally settling down. Most Polish immigrants to The United States, for example, lived outside of Poland before settling on American soil, and many southern Europeans lived outside their native lands before settling in Australia. Some entrepreneurial refugees from communist North Korea settled first in South Korea, then in Latin America, and finally in The United States. The story of migration is often also a story of remigration.
These repeated relocations also test the persistence of a group's culture in very different settings. The many large scale relocations of Jews over many centuries, for example, has not destroyed either their cultural heritage or their cohesiveness, though both have been modified in the process. The migrations of conquerors, refugees, slaves, and sojourners have been outstripped by the migrations of those going to settle permanently in a new land. However, even during the era of mass migrations across oceans during the past century and a half, vast numbers of people have continued to return home. It has been estimated that between the mid eighteen thirties and the late nineteen thirties, approximately 30,000,000 people left the Indian Subcontinent, and nearly 24,000,000 returned, even though these Indians were scattered across thousands of miles of ocean from the South Pacific to the Caribbean to East Africa.
At the other end of the spectrum, refugees seldom return, whether they have fled from famine, as among the Irish in the eighteen forties, or from persecution and mob violence, as among the Jews from Eastern Europe beginning in the eighteen eighties. Thus, during the early twentieth century, fewer than 10% of the Irish and Jewish immigrants to The United States returned, compared to about 60% of the Southern Italian, Croatian, and Slovenian immigrants to The United States who returned home during the same era. In the last decade of the twentieth century, the return flow of immigrants to Hong Kong was only 6% of those leaving, again, a refugee movement in anticipation of China's takeover of the colony in 1997. The widely varying reasons for migration have been reflected in very different patterns among the migrants. Refugees tend to be a relatively representative sample of the population from which they come, as far as age, sex, and other demographic characteristics are concerned, while sojourners are often predominantly male and predominantly young adults.
During the era of mass emigration from China, Japan, and Italy, male emigrants outnumbered female emigrants several times over, whether their destinations were The United States, Latin America, Asia, or Australia. Where a migration begins to change in character from one of sojourning to one of permanent settlement, the sex ratio typically begins to shift, sometimes dramatically, toward one of male female balance. The earlier male predominance among the immigrant group may be followed by female majorities among later immigrants, and, of course, sex balanced offspring among descendants of the immigrants who are born in the new land. Sometimes, the movement toward a balancing of the sexes is aided by a higher rate of return home among males still following the sojourning pattern, while females tend to stay. Often, the females are the wives of those men who have decided to remain, whether or not that was their original intention, and who therefore send for their families to join them.
Among groups where arranged marriages have been common, the women who migrate may be joining fiances whom they marry upon arrival. This was once common among Japanese immigrants to Canada and The United States and was not unknown among Italian immigrants to Australia, especially for those men who could not afford a long trip back to Italy to find a bride. While refugees are, in principle, distinguishable from sojourners or other kinds of migrants, in practice, this distinction has often been difficult to make. This has been especially so in the late twentieth century, when national and international policies designed to provide humane access to other countries for refugees have been taken advantage of by people declaring themselves to be refugees from persecution in order to circumvent immigration laws. Professional smugglers of illegal immigrants have included among their services briefing these immigrants on the fabrication of stories to tell in order to gain asylum.
Moreover, even freelance illegal immigrants often know that representing themselves as refugees increases their chances of being allowed to stay. The losers in this process include the legitimate immigrants and refugees who may find their access restricted as a result of the political backlash against other immigrants who abuse the trust and generosity of the receiving country.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Katie Hopkins: "White South African farmers are being hunted on their land by black gangs. Fact." https://t.co/N2zyRGsniz
Video Transcript AI Summary
White South African farmers are being hunted from their land by black gangs. These gangs attack white farmers at night. The attacks involve torture, not just burglary. The number of white farmers being killed is incredible. South Africans have expropriation without compensation, meaning the government is taking land. The speaker went and slept on the farms to feel the fear. White people are denied treatment in hospitals in South Africa. It's an extreme situation that no one will talk about.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: White South African farmers are being hunted from their land by black gangs. Fact. And I had a young son at the time and and he would sometimes have nightmares about when the monsters would come, you know, at nighttime. But in South Africa, that is when the gangs come and they work together and they attack white farmers. And some of the things that happen to white farmers, we don't need to talk about here.
But the barbarity, it it isn't just about burglary, which it gets filed away as. This is torture. And the numbers of white farmers being killed is incredible. And because South Africans have expropriation without compensation, basically means we're taking your land. So I went and slept on the farms to feel the fear.
White people are are denied treatment in hospitals in South Africa. It's an extreme situation that no one will talk about.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
An American surgeon filmed herself on a "peer to peer" call with UnitedHealthcare, trying to get a patient’s surgery approved. https://t.co/d0d3rAFzfm
Video Transcript AI Summary
Dr. Potter is speaking with an unnamed doctor at United Healthcare to discuss a patient's breast reconstruction. Dr. Potter wants to understand why the procedure is not covered, particularly the nerve graft to preserve sensation, stating it's the patient's only chance.
Dr. Potter requests the evaluation and reasoning behind United's decision, including the literature reviewed. The unnamed doctor cannot provide their name or email the information, citing security and internal resource policies.
Dr. Potter expresses concern that United is making a medical determination, not just a coverage decision. Dr. Potter cites data from 2023 and 2024 supporting the procedure's effectiveness and wants to see the data United is using to deny coverage. Dr. Potter will file an internal appeal.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, it's Doctor. Potter. Can you just tell me your name one more time? I'm sorry, you won't give me your name? I don't understand the relationship.
I'm just asking for your name so that I know what doctor I'm speaking with before doing a peer to peer. Just want know who you are. So United won't let you give your name out for security reasons. Can you tell me what specialty you are? Did you do breast reconstruction?
You did not do breast reconstruction. Okay. Is it her plan that's not allowing her to have this or United? Does she have a plan Can you send me that evaluation? Like, can I see their reasoning and thought process when they reviewed the literature to see what they reviewed?
I mean, you understand this is this patient's one chance to have sensation preserved. And I do think that it's very reasonable to do this as a fellowship trained microsurgeon. I think it's very reasonable to dissect out the fourth intercostal nerve and to graph that to the dermatosensory elements on the nipple to try to give her this chance. Yeah, would just love to see where United has gone through that data. I mean, I'm a physician, I'm a doctor, and I feel like I'm making a medical decision for my patient.
It seems like United is making a medical determination about this, and I don't exactly know how that works. Right? Seems like they're practicing medicine. I I just wanna read it like a paper, right, and see what the references are so I can understand. Can you email it to me?
You're not allowed to email it to me? It's an internal resource. I mean, there's data from 2023 and 2024 showing that this is effective. Yeah. I really would love to read that and see what United is using as the the data to support that, and, this is her only chance.
Right? Okay. Yeah. I'll do an internal appeal. Yeah.
And I appreciate your time, and I'm so sorry that y'all aren't allowed to give out your names as a fellow physician. Like, I would love to be able to talk to you like you were a peer vet. It's crazy. Yeah. Well, best of luck to you, and I appreciate we will appeal.
Thanks. Bye.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Really shows how long this has been dragging out. https://t.co/OikV6LyD5q
Video Transcript AI Summary
A federal report predicted possible catastrophic warming of the Earth by the 1990s due to strong climate change. Scientists claim that if action isn't taken within the next eight or nine years, major cities worldwide could go underwater.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The federal report today predicted possible catastrophic warming of the Earth by the nineteen nineties with the strong climate change. What the scientists are telling us, we don't get our act together within the next eight or nine years. We're talking about cities all over the world, major cities going underwater.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
"We've got a gigantic government bureaucracy. We've got overregulation. We've got agencies that have overlapping responsibilities." https://t.co/Ju4GtBzhM3
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there is a gigantic government bureaucracy with overregulation and overlapping agency responsibilities. There are approximately 450 federal government agencies, with new agencies constantly being created.
The speaker suggests that this overregulation makes it difficult to get anything done and everything is basically illegal. These regulations create hidden but substantial costs for people.
The speaker states that excessive requirements drive up housing costs and slow down new housing starts. The speaker concludes by saying that the builders of America need to be allowed to build.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got a gigantic government bureaucracy. We've got overregulation. You've got agencies that have overlapping responsibilities. There's something like 450 government federal government agencies. Almost two per year that company since America was founded.
So, mean, we're just creating new agencies all the time. It's getting to the point where basically everything's illegal. You just can't get anything done. I've noticed. These become real costs to to people.
They're they're hidden costs but they're very substantial. You know, it's very hard to build, new housing if if if, you're burdened with massive requirements that don't make any sense. It drives up the housing cost, it slows down new housing starts. We need to let the builders of America build. Amen.
Yeah.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
Throwback to when Anthony Fauci and Mayor Bowser went door to door to promote COVID vaccines and got confronted by this resident. https://t.co/Wb4l4UcJDf
Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual states they will not get vaccinated due to a lack of clear information and the speed of vaccine development, which they believe is insufficient. They claim nine months is not enough time for vaccine development.
Another individual says they are only speaking in close proximity because they are vaccinated, and that not getting vaccinated will allow the virus to continue spreading.
The first individual compares COVID-19 to the flu. Someone states COVID-19 is more serious than the flu, and that while 20-30,000 people died of the flu the previous year, 600,000 Americans have died from COVID-19. The first individual disputes the COVID-19 death toll, claiming it is "you all's number."
The first individual believes there is something else going on when people are paid or incentivized to get vaccinated, and that the vaccination campaign incites fear in people, and that the pandemic is fear.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: People in America are not settled with the information that's been given to us right now. So I'm not gonna be lining up taking a shot on a vaccination for something that wasn't clear in the first place, and then you all create a shot and miraculous time. It takes years to But you talked to the next
Speaker 1: the factory
Speaker 2: Well, it it used to take years.
Speaker 0: Okay. It used to it used
Speaker 2: be You how many years were invested in this in this approach? About twenty years of science to get us to be able to do
Speaker 0: not enough. And nine months is definitely not enough for nobody to be taking no vaccination that you all came up with.
Speaker 1: The only reason I'm talking to you right now as close as we are is that I've been vaccinated. Right. But if it allow thousands of people like you don't get vaccinated, you're gonna let this virus continue to percolate in this country and in this world.
Speaker 0: Something like the common flu then. Right?
Speaker 1: And that's like not
Speaker 2: like serious than the flu.
Speaker 0: Well, the flu kills a lot of people and the two
Speaker 2: You know how many people died of the flu the last year? I mean, not this year, virtually none, but the previous year, about twenty to thirty thousand. You know how many people have died from COVID nineteen in The United States? Six Hundred Thousand Americans.
Speaker 0: Well, you well, that well, the the number that you are giving that died, that's that's once again, that's you all's number.
Speaker 1: You gonna pass.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Definitely. Because when you because when you start talking about paying people to get vaccinated, when you start talking about incentivizing things to get people vaccinated, there's something else going on with that. Something else is something else going
Speaker 1: on with It is something going on with There's something else going on But I'm glad millions of people like me and almost everybody here didn't get in this do you know what their incentive was? Protecting their health and protecting the city. But that why why I'm gonna keep you an ego.
Speaker 0: It's okay because my my my my incentive Y'all campaign is about fear. It's about inciting fear in people. You all attack people with fear. That's what this pandemic is. It's a fear.
It's fear, this pandemic. That's all it is.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
In honor of Joy Reid's show getting scrapped, here is the exact moment when she and Rachel Maddow realized that Trump was winning the election. https://t.co/wPlzeTVPSp
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're seeing Trump take the lead in key areas. In the battleground state of Georgia, Trump has prevailed. Despite votes still being counted, we're committed to ensuring every vote is tallied. The atmosphere is somber as the map's implications sink in.
The outcome isn't what many hoped for, particularly regarding a potential historic election. The campaign, despite being flawlessly run and endorsed by numerous prominent figures, faces uncertainty.
People worldwide are waking up to this, with many expressing alarm. Of the seven swing states, only Georgia and North Carolina have been called. Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin remain uncalled. Trump has won Pennsylvania, presenting a significant challenge for the Democratic ticket. We've achieved something incredible, overcoming seemingly impossible obstacles. It's going to be a tough speech.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Trump has now taken the lead in Bucks County.
Speaker 1: NBC News now projects that in the battleground state of Georgia in the presidential race, Donald Trump has prevailed. The Republican Party will control the United States Senate. This is live from Howard University in Washington DC.
Speaker 0: We still have votes to count. We still have states that have not been called yet. We will continue overnight to fight to make sure that every vote is counted. Thank you all.
Speaker 1: A short and to the point statement from Cedric Richmond, the Harris campaign co chair. You now see them turn as one to start to leave the grounds. The evening
Speaker 2: was getting increasingly somber as people realized what this map is looking like. They turned off the TV set and just piped up the music because the room was starting to get increasingly somber.
Speaker 1: You know, we always knew it was gonna be down to the blue wall, and the blue wall is still uncalled at this point. But it sounds like the Harris campaign is is sort of keeping things tight in terms
Speaker 3: of whether or not they're gonna string people along into thinking this is gonna happen. What they went to that venue tonight hoping to see and witness was a historic election of Kamala Harris to the presidency Yeah. Was the end of the Trump era as they knew it. And so we don't know the outcome yet, but that is not what they are receiving, and they are being told to go home, and wait till tomorrow. I I that is that's just I
Speaker 4: And nothing that was true yesterday about how flawlessly this campaign was run is not true now. I mean, this really was an historic flawlessly run campaign. She had Queen Latifa never endorses anyone. She came out and endorsed. You know, I mean, you she had every prominent celebrity voice.
She had the Swifties. She had the Beehive. Like, you could not have run a
Speaker 3: better campaign. In Western Europe and in The UK and in The Middle East, people are waking up
Speaker 1: to this.
Speaker 0: Oh, and they are.
Speaker 3: I've gotten people from Western Europe who are extraordinarily alarmed and terrified. May I reiterate, there are two of the
Speaker 1: seven swing states that have been called by NBC News right now, which is Georgia and North Carolina. None of the other five states have been have been called at this point. You can see this is the battleground states, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, the so called Blue Wall. None of those states called by NBC News. In the swing state of Pennsylvania, NBC News now projects that that presidential contest has been won by Donald Trump.
It presents an insurmountable future here for for Kamala Harris and for the Democratic ticket. Let's watch as Trump takes the stage in Palm Beach, Florida.
Speaker 5: We overcame obstacles that nobody thought possible, and it is now clear that we've achieved the most incredible political thing. Look what happened. Is this crazy?
Speaker 0: Boy, it's gonna be a real tough speech for her.
@ThomasSowell - Thomas Sowell Quotes
“Activism is a way for useless people to feel important, even if the consequences of their activism are counterproductive for those they claim to be helping and damaging to the fabric of society as a whole.” — Thomas Sowell