TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @ThrillaRilla369

Saved - August 26, 2025 at 2:16 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

🧐🤔 https://t.co/q3USBWdHwk

Saved - May 25, 2025 at 8:50 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

This conspiracy theory is still tripping me out, y'all. 👀 What do you think, was it an inside job? https://t.co/M3R1G7obYR

Saved - May 1, 2025 at 10:20 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

What happened? https://t.co/pNc0gpkuYB

Saved - April 22, 2025 at 6:12 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Name a reason a child would ever need this https://t.co/yKFQpW0mp9

@Derekrants - Derek

@ThrillaRilla369 Track meet

Saved - March 26, 2025 at 8:24 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@CensoredMen @RealAlexJones https://t.co/QzcnYMqXTs Hillary Clinton won her first election because her opponent JFK Jr. died in a plane crash What are the odds?

Video Transcript AI Summary
John F. Kennedy Jr. was expected to run for the New York Senate seat in 1999, but died in a plane crash, after which Hillary Clinton was elected senator. Mary Mahoney, a former White House intern, was murdered in 1997. White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in 1993, with suspicions of foul play. James McDougall, a key witness, died of a heart attack in solitary confinement before testifying. In 2015, White House sheriff Walter Shibe was found dead in a river, with his death ruled an accidental drowning. DNC staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed, with speculation that he leaked DNC emails and was murdered in retaliation. Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found dead, and his death was reported as classified pending autopsy results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember John f Kennedy junior? He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself. And among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Shibe, a White House sheriff hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail, and he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shives' death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified pending the results of an autopsy.
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 8:18 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@CensoredMen @RealAlexJones https://t.co/H16rBpCB3M

Video Transcript AI Summary
A CNN correspondent reports from the Pentagon, near where a plane went down. Firefighters were still working to extinguish the blaze. The correspondent walked right up to the building and observed a huge gaping hole in the side. However, the correspondent saw no evidence of a plane crash anywhere near the Pentagon. The only pieces left were small enough to pick up by hand. There were no large tail sections, wing sections, or fuselage anywhere around.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Outside the Pentagon, CNN's Military Affairs Correspondent, Jamie McIntyre. Jamie, you got very close to where that plane went down. Speaker 1: That's right, Judy. A short a a while ago, I walked right up to next to the building was firefighters were still trying to put out the blaze. The the fire, by the way, is still burning in some parts of the Pentagon. And I took a look at the huge gaping hole that's in this sideway. But from my close-up inspection, there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site, is the actual, side of the building that's crashed in. And as I said, the only pieces left, that you can see are are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around.
Saved - February 1, 2025 at 1:55 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

So when does this stop being a coincidence? That’s the 3rd plane crash within a week 💥 https://t.co/zlwDhBJjUQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
A plane just crashed on Cotton Avenue, and I was right there. It's unbelievable! The crash happened right off the boulevard, and now it's on fire. The situation seems out of control, and it looks like it's affecting a side street.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, a fucking plane just crashed on Cotton Avenue, yo. I was right there, bro. What the fuck? Yo. Somebody oh my god. Yo. The world, yo. What the fuck? Crashed right off the boulevard at Cotton Avenue. It's on fire. It's not under control. It looks like a side street.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Diddy lawsuit sheds new light on Michael Jackson’s life and death. As I delve deeper into the music industry, I notice a troubling pattern: those who challenge the treatment of artists often face slander, smear campaigns, or worse. Just coincidences, right?

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

The Diddy lawsuit opens up a whole new angle on MICHAEL JACKSON’S death and life story. The more you look into the music industry, the more you see this weird pattern. Everyone who steps out of line and starts speaking out about how artists are treated- about how executives manipulate the industry and abuse their power- every one of them are slandered, smeared, and sometimes even suicided. Probably all coincidences though 🤷‍♂️ @IanCarrollShow

Video Transcript AI Summary
Michael Jackson's legacy is being reexamined in light of new allegations against P Diddy, who is accused of running a sexual blackmail operation in the music industry. Notably, Fahim Mohammed, who was Michael's security chief, later worked for Diddy. The lawsuit suggests that top record executives were aware of Diddy's activities. Jackson faced numerous accusations of misconduct, but investigations found no evidence against him. The media has often portrayed him negatively, overshadowing his charitable acts and personal struggles. Additionally, Jackson's controversial remarks about the music industry and his estate's management raise questions about his treatment and the power dynamics within the industry. His later security connections and the circumstances surrounding his death invite further scrutiny of the events leading up to it.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Michael Jackson conspiracy theories are back on the table. P Diddy's sexual blackmail ring puts Michael Jackson's whole life story in a whole new light. So this new lawsuit just came out that shows tons of evidence that p Diddy, Puff Daddy, has been running a sexual blackmail operation very much like Jeffrey Epstein, but in the rap and music industry for basically 30 years. And in that lawsuit, we learned that his head of security while he's running the sexual blackmail ring is this guy named Fahim Mohammed, who before working for Diddy was the head of security for Michael Jackson when he was only 21, and he was one of the first people on the scene when Michael Jackson died. And before we go to Michael Jackson, the most important part of the Diddy case to bring across is the fact that the record executives at the very top knew what p Diddy was doing. They were attending the parties with underage girls where they were spiking drinks. They were deeply involved in Diddy's personal life, and all evidence points to them supporting his operation, or at the very least turning a blind eye to it. So let's revisit Michael Jackson, the King of Pop, knowing what we know today. Starting in 1993, Michael Jackson was repeatedly accused of inappropriate things with children. And most of us eventually took that story and were like, okay, that's messed up. Michael Jackson's a bad dude. Without necessarily taking into account the way that the press had been smearing him in really messed up ways for years. And then a bunch of documentaries were made before and after his death, smearing him left, right, and center. But the Diddy lawsuit directly points out and reminds us that the people that own the record companies also own the media publishing businesses that can print the tabloids. They have close relationships with the people that own the newspapers and the magazines that print these stories that make these movies. That's how they offer record contracts to people and then get them to the top of the charts right away. That is if they play ball, if you know what I mean. But when you actually look into the evidence, the FBI were investigating Jackson for 10 full years, and they presented no evidence of criminal conduct on Jackson's part. The files have been declassified, and you can view them yourself. They include a raid of his home where they confiscated all electronics. This is their ID number that you'll see. We're talking computers, hard drives, cell phones, where they say the amount of gigabyte. And then following are pages like this where they have the ID of the different devices and they all say nothing. Literally, they all say this. They found nothing. But that didn't stop the press from running made up stories about how secret FBI files revealed that Jackson had paid 1,000,000 in hush money to dozens of boys he had abused despite the FBI files directly negating that statement. And to be clear, Jackson was a weird dude. He grew up in one of the most effed up environments imaginable. He had basically no father figure and was kept from his mother. And the press has repeatedly tried to make him seem even weirder to us. But sometimes they publish articles trying to make him seem like wacko Jacko, which is super racist. We'll get into that another time. But they actually wind up just showing his humanity, like, how he's shocked by the real world because he doesn't understand it. In this article, they explain how when he first saw a homeless person, he was like, what's that? And his driver had to explain to him what a homeless person was. And he was like, holy shit. And he made them stop the car, and he washed for a while then gave the woman $300. And then when they saw that a man that she was with was about to try to take it from her, Jack Jackson went and gave him $300, and she was crying and said that he'd saved her. And then he spent the rest of that day driving around giving out $100 bills to homeless people saying how it's just amazing that the world could be so messed up. He sang about this kind of stuff all the time. In that same article, they also confirmed that he likes women, not underage ones. And he had a secret girlfriend that he was seeing on the side, but keeping it away from his kids and would always be back before they woke up. So they branded him as wacko jack o early on and just, like, totally annihilated his public image. But what you might not have known is that that is a direct reference to a monkey, a fighting monkey from an old, like who was like a cartoon character, basically. His name was Jacko Macacko. And for the longest time, you could actually buy Jack O monkey dolls. And we could talk about how all the boys that accused him of things actually were in the middle of launching really successful entertainment industry careers when they made those allegations about what had allegedly happened to them when they were tiny children despite having previously gone on their stand and under oath saying that nothing had ever happened. But that would just be a waste of time. One of the far more interesting and relevant claims is that Michael Jackson said a lot of things about Jewish people, particularly later in his career. And then he was smeared to all hell and back as an anti semitic Nazi, except that when you search YouTube for the actual original phone call recording where he called Jews leeches, YouTube won't let you see it. You can't find it. Instead, they feed you a bunch of videos that are of this other phone call that seems to be his doctor that allegedly killed him, calling him when he was in the middle midst of heavy sedation and getting him to talk on the phone and slurred speech about how shitty his life was while he was completely fucked up on drugs that his doctor that was talking to him probably knew he was high on. Like, I don't know. Just feels like a a smear job to me. But when you search it on Twitter, you can find those videos no problem. Just saying. And that's not because X supports anti Semitic content. That's because X allows you to get to primary sources. Because if you want to know how history happened, you need to be able to access the primary sources. And, yes, Jackson did say that the Jews are were probably referring to the Jews in the music industry are like leeches and that they took everything from them and that they did it on purpose. But when you look into those allegations or those insults, you realize that because of his will that was probably fake and filed right before his death. So the will was signed on July 7th in Los Angeles by 3 witnesses. But Jackson's family pointed out that he was in New York that day, and there's video proving it. So they changed their story. But the witnesses definitely saw it, and it was just in New York. So anyways, because of this will, John Branca was put in charge of his estate, which included his net worth of 230,000,000, but far more importantly, his 50% share of Sony ATV worth 750,000,000. Dollars Yes, he was taking on Sony. He was going after the hand that feeds him. And when you look into John Branca, in 2003, Jackson fired Branca because he was siphoning money out of Jackson's accounts in collusion with Sony Music CEO Tommy Mottola and funneling it through a bunch of offshore accounts in the Caribbean. John Bronco is Jewish, and Tommy Mottola is also Jewish. Plus Tommy Mottola married Mariah Carey partway through his life when she was a young young woman. He was an old man. And there are other allegations about that whole situation you can look up on your own. In the first video I made about the Diddy case where I broke down the whole thing, I went through a whole bunch of music executives that are involved in that case or that come about when you start looking into it. And every single person that I showed in that video that was not black was Jewish. Because whether you like it or not, whether you wanna call people names about it or not, the vast majority of the power in the music industry is controlled by Jewish men. Another good example who we have not talked about yet is Lou Pearlman, who is famous for the boy bands NSYNC and Backstreet Boys. Not trying to say that all Jewish people are bad. People are just people. They make their own choices. But in the music industry, there are a fuckload of Jewish men that are doing shitty things to people and in a few other industries too when you think about it. We'll make another video about that. For most of Jackson's career, his head of security was Bill Bray, who was his mentor and basically his father. And the 2 were extremely close. Bill ran his security until he was 70 when he retired, and Jackson continued to pay his medical bills until he died at age 80. This is a letter that Michael Jackson wrote to Bill that is both really touching and really enlightens you as to the state of Michael Jackson's education and his perspective on the world and his life story. Pause if you wanna read that. But then once Bill retired, Jackson was then protected by other security people that came and went. And he wound up with this guy who has direct connections to Diddy's sexual blackmail operations, who was directly complicit in covering up crimes for Diddy and covering up murders, covering up drug use, prostitution, human trafficking. This is the guy that was protecting Michael Jackson the day that he died. The day that he was overdosed on drugs after he was probably already asleep and the only witnesses there there were no witnesses to the crime. I'm honestly kind of surprised that this guy never got checked into as a suspect. I'm not trying to make any allegations. I'm just saying anyone can inject a dude with lots of propofol. So knowing what you know now about the entertainment industry, about the world, about how this all works, about Israel, I suggest you reexamine the story of Michael Jackson and you relisten to some of his lyrics. I bet if I include the song, they'll take the video down for copyright as a way to silence this video, but you should probably relisten to the lyrics for they don't really care about us. And if you find the censored version, you should probably find out what the words that they censored are. And, you know, looking into this whole story of Michael Jackson, the one thing that I couldn't stop thinking about is, man, that sounds a lot like Kanye West. But that's probably just a coincidence. Right?
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 8:09 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I learned that JFK was on the verge of making AIPAC register as a foreign agent in 1963. Then, in November, he was assassinated just as it was about to happen. AIPAC now openly claims it influences politicians for Israel, framing it as beneficial for democracy.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Did you know JFK was about to force AIPAC to register as a foreign agent in 1963? And then, that November, right as it was about to happen he magically got pew pewd and to this day AIPAC openly brags about how it buys our politicians on behalf of Israel because that’s “good for democracy” @IanCarrollShow

Video Transcript AI Summary
Have you ever wondered how a major lobbying group in America can represent a foreign country without registering under the FARA Act? APAC boasts about its political spending and success rates but has avoided registration. Historically, they were nearly required to register as a foreign agent in 1963 when they were known as the American Zionist Council. President Kennedy was pushing for this, but after his assassination, the pressure eased, and they never registered. This allows APAC to operate without disclosing their funding sources. Consequently, they can influence elections while their policies remain unpopular with many Americans. It's crucial to recognize this influence and prevent foreign entities from undermining our democracy.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever wondered how we got to this point where one of the biggest lobbying groups in America can openly brag that they are representing a foreign country? This is from APAC's website, but somehow they don't have to register under the FARA Act as someone acting on behalf of a foreign actor. They literally brag about how many millions they spent and about how 98% of their buying of our politicians was successful this election cycle. Did you know that they were actually this close to having to register as a foreign agent before a certain thing happened? Here, I'll show you, and I'll show you where you can find all these primary sources too. So if you go to this URL right here, israelobby.org/azcdoj, it's a history of when APAC almost had to register as a foreign agent. And back then, they were known as the American Zionist Council. Right there? The American Zionist Council? Well, it turns out that president John f Kennedy was about to force them to register under FARC, and this is a history of all of the original documents that pertain to the legal case. And when you click on any of these links, it'll take you to original archive sources of the actual documents from the actual testimonies that you can read. Even cool little snippets like this that say federal lawyers are near decision on whether to require the AZC to register as an agent of the Israeli government. And back in June July of 1963, the federal government was nearing a decision requiring the American Zionist Council registering as an agent of the Israeli government. Americans of whatever faith believe firmly that America is their country and America alone. The Zionist lawyer, mister Lenvin, advised that public registration would be injurious to the American Zionist Council. You might notice that the honorable Donald Rumsfeld was involved. And as 1963 went on, it all heated up. And by October of 1963, they were saying things like forms are enclosed for the use of the American Zionist Council and registering under the foreign agents registration act. But then what happened in November of 1963? The president who was spearheading the whole thing just suddenly wasn't there anymore. And to be clear, I would never infer that Israel had anything to do with that whole thing. I'm just saying it was really convenient timing that it happened to turn out that way. And then in December of 1963, we get this document. As you know, our client is not prepared to register as an agent of foreign principle or to concede that it is subject to the registration requirement, December 11, 1963. And to this day, the single most influential big money group in democratic electoral politics is not registered as a foreign actor. Although the US justice department clearly states that FARA requires the registration of anyone that represents the interest of the foreign principal before any agency or official of the US government. All the rest of that also applies. That's just the most obvious statement. Because if they were registered under FARA, they would have to disclose where all the money is coming from, and, they don't want to. So they just don't. And that's how we wind up with screens like this. And with APAC openly braying on the Internet about how they pay to get candidates to win despite their policies being clearly unpopular with regular people in America. And that's why it's so important that we stop China from subverting our democracy by controlling what we see on our social media apps. You feel me?
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 7:50 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Here’s an explanation of the actual market wide criminal conspiracy that GameStop exposed and how and why short sellers could actually blow up the entire global economy. @IanCarrollShow https://t.co/7uCVpWP2Jd

Video Transcript AI Summary
GameStop's situation stems from short selling, where investors borrow shares to sell, hoping to buy them back at a lower price. This practice can lead to significant losses if the stock price rises instead. Some firms, like Bain Capital, have exploited this by mismanaging companies to profit from their decline. GameStop was targeted for years, but a savvy new leader began turning it around, causing the stock price to rise unexpectedly. Short sellers, who had heavily bet against GameStop, found themselves in trouble as they needed to buy back shares at higher prices. The more they bought, the higher the price went, creating a cycle that pressured them further. Retail investors recognized this and decided to hold their shares, realizing they had leverage over the short sellers who needed to close their positions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So this homey said, I can't believe this GameStop thing is still going on. Can someone explain this to me? I love Ian and everything he stands for, but I literally have no idea what this is about or how one stock could have any real effect on impacting ultra wealthy people. I'm down to help. I just need to understand what's going on. I got you, Matt. I'm gonna try to put it all into one video right now. I've made lots of videos about pieces of this, but I'm gonna try to, like, actually explain the real thesis of what's going on and why GameStop very well could affect the entire market, bring down corrupt financial institutions on a big scale. Yeah. I gotta put my hair up for this one. Okay. Don't get scared of charts. We're gonna keep it really simple. When you buy stocks normally, you're buying at a lower price and you're hoping it goes up so you can sell it and make some money. Right? Well, there's no rule in the stock market that says you're not allowed to, like, borrow something from someone. Right? So you're allowed to borrow shares from your homie. And if you borrow something, you're allowed to do what you want with it. Right? Like, I can borrow some shares and then sell them on the market right now. I just have to return them later to make sure that homie gets his shares back. Right? So you're allowed to do this thing called short selling where you borrow some shares from whoever right now, and you sell them at the market right now hoping actually the price will go down, and then later you'll buy some and return them to your homie, and you actually make money because you return them for less money than you actually made when you sold them in the 1st place. So short selling is this thing where you can bet the market will go down, and it's like taking out a loan. And when the market goes down, then you close out the loan and you make some money. You have to pay a little interest to keep that loan open but you can make a lot of money doing that, especially if you see a company that's like obviously gonna die because it's a failing business model and you wanna make some money while it dies. But you wanna be really careful because if you have all these loans open and you're paying interest to keep your loans open, you're hoping the price goes down, but then it starts to go up a lot, you could lose a lot of money because you'd have to buy them all back at a higher price to pay back your loan and you had to pay interest to keep your loan open and prices can go up infinitely theoretically. So short selling is pretty dangerous and everyone knows that. And back in the nineties all these risk people like at Bain Capital, like Mitt Romney, they realized that they can actually take companies down from the inside and basically loot a company from the inside, take all its money, give it to them and their buddies, the shareholders, and then bankrupt it and leave, and there's not really any consequences. You just buy into the company, buy a bunch of shares, get yourself on the board, take it over, start hiring people that'll do what you want, mismanage it, do a bunch of buybacks so the money gets paid back out to you and the shareholder buddies, and you can really just mismanage the company into the ground and basically loot it for all it's worth. And when it goes bankrupt, it's like, oh, well, whoopsies. It was destined to fail. We'll just move on to the next company. Whatever. My mistake. And they made 1,000,000,000 of dollars doing this to Toys R Us, and everyone else was looking around like, damn, that was a pretty solid strategy, Bain Capital. Maybe we could do that to some other companies. And this was just after the dotcom bubble happened. And so there's this whole Internet thing. Amazon was on the rise, and everyone kind of realized, like, you know, there's all these retail stores out there that are probably in big trouble, like Blockbuster and Sears and GameStop, you know, companies that are bound to fail. So why don't we make them fail faster and profit off of that? Plus, it turns out that these dudes that work at places like Bain Capital that can take these places down from the inside out, Turns out they have a lot of friends in the market that like to short sell. And the thing about supply and demand is when I'm borrowing like 1,000 and 1,000 and 1,000 of shares and selling them into the market right now, all that selling actually makes the price of the stock go down. Because, like, when everyone's selling something, it gets valued less. But when everyone wants to buy something, the value goes up. Right? So short selling actually makes a stock's price go down. And these guys realize that, like, you know, you like to make money when stocks go down, and I like to make money when companies get destroyed. And when we do those both at the same time, everybody wins, except the company, of course. And then it turned out they were like, hey. We both know a lot of people in the mainstream media that like to report on failing companies. You know, the kinds of reports that make investors scared and make them wanna sell a stock. And they realized they kinda had the dream team for bankrupting companies and they could all make money on the way down and no one would ever stop them because it's kind of legal. And it actually started to work so well that they started to get really greedy and they started to naked short sell which means like no one's checking if we're even borrowing these shares that we're borrowing in order to in order to short sell. So why even borrow them? We can just short sell shares and say we borrow them and the pan company is gonna go bankrupt anyways and when it does go bankrupt, we don't even need to pay that loan back because there's no shares to give back. They're gone. And fun fact, it's all tax free money too because there's no company to the shares are gone. Free money. So some of them got really greedy and started selling without even borrowing the shares in the first place, but we'll come back to that in just a second. Because the other thing that's important to realize about the stock market is it's like this big casino game now. So it's not like the big boys aren't just playing with, like, a share of a company. They're playing with these things that are called derivatives, which is like leveraging your assets to take out loans to, like, make big plays, big gambles. So they use all these special kinds of contracts where, like, they put up collateral in order for their bank or whoever to let them trade on a whole bunch of extra money they don't really have, but they've got collateral. So if it starts to go sideways, the bank can just take their collateral, and it's all safe. But like this way, I can trade with 100 times the money of what I actually have. It's called leverage. And all these different tricks, they're called derivatives, and they let these big players gamble with huge positions in the market. And so this now, when the stock moves by $1, they're leveraged 100 x. And so if the stock goes up by $1, they can make like 100 x $1 or if the stock goes down, vice versa. And this derivatives market has gotten really big, like 100 of 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars worth of these weird bets just all over the market. These are the top banks. It's like JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, their names are over there. And this is in 1,000,000 of dollars. So we're talking $49,000,000,000 That is $49,000,000,000,000 worth of these derivative bets open with just JPMorgan, the biggest bank. But the thing about these derivatives is they all have collateral backing them up. Right? And the thing they use for collateral, they're not like you and me. It's not like they're putting up their car for collateral. They're putting up their other assets. So in over here, they're gonna be trading these assets on that collateral, and over here, they're trading the collateral on these assets. And so the whole market is now tied together by all these big financial institutions trading 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars worth of stocks that they don't actually have on leverage that's based on collateral that they're trading for 1,000,000,000,000 of dollars worth of stock over there. You see what I mean? So, like, if they fuck this one up, then that one gets and there's all these dudes doing this, like, kind of criminal shorting businesses out of existence scheme in the market in kinda in secret. And they've been targeting GameStop for years now. Ever since 2014, the stock was on this endless ramp down. They were short selling it while they had infiltrated it and were mismanaging the company from the inside out. Amazon was licking its lips, ready to take over the video game online industry. And the people doing all this short selling also have all these other crazy bets open all over the market, and if any of them go wrong a whole lot of things go wrong. And then out of nowhere this random dude that would like live stream to 4 people about his investment thesis noticed that GameStop had a lot of short sellers and it wasn't necessarily a bad company. In fact, it had a future if it turned around. And then this really savvy businessman came and took over the company and started turning it around and he kicked out all the bad people that had been trying to mismanage it to death. And suddenly, all the people that had just spent years years short selling millions and millions of shares and all those loans were still open because they were expecting it to go to 0 and they wouldn't have to pay them back, suddenly the price is going up and they're all in trouble. Because the thing is, when the price goes up and one of the other people that's short selling the company gets scared and closes out their trades, they have to buy all those shares back to get out of that. Right? Because they borrowed and sold, so now I have to buy and give them back. But all that buying makes the price go up even higher. And there were a lot of people short selling this thing. And in fact, they had short sold it so much that they couldn't afford to buy it all back once the price started going up that high. I mean it was down to like 50¢ and they were opening short sales at 50¢. Today we're at what $60 times 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of shares that you have to buy back. Each one will make the price go up, and the whole stock market is tied together by all these crazy financial derivatives, and everyone's balance sheets are actually kind of sketchy in the first place. Yeah. And we all realize that all we have to do is buy the shares and just hold on to them because these guys need to buy them from us in order to close their trades out. Whoopsies. And you know, the more we thought about it, the more we realized, no. I don't really wanna sell. Fuck you. So then they tried to trick us into thinking that they had already closed their positions and it was all over. And we were like, I'm pretty sure you're lying dude. So we just held on for years. And it turns out we were right. Shorts never closed. And now we've all got the shares that they need in order to close. And you know, I still don't wanna sell. Fuck you.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 7:45 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

🧐 https://t.co/4p7bbYhFvw

Saved - January 20, 2025 at 11:28 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@IanCarrollShow https://t.co/hNRWzOdeKw Open AI is CIA?

Video Transcript AI Summary
OpenAI has appointed four new board members, raising concerns about their backgrounds. Sue Desmond-Hellmann, former CEO of the Gates Foundation and board member of Pfizer, has ties to the CIA-linked company Resilience, which manufactured mRNA vaccines. Nicole Seligman, former president of Sony Entertainment, has represented notable figures like Bill Clinton and Oliver North. Fiji Simo, CEO of Instacart, previously held high positions at Facebook, joining other Facebook executives on the board. Larry Summers, former US Treasury Secretary, is criticized for his role in financial crises and controversial statements about dumping waste in low-wage countries. Sam Altman remains on the board, bringing the total to seven members. Concerns are raised about the direction of AI development under this leadership, especially with Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI for its shift from an ethical nonprofit to a profit-driven entity.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: OpenAI just chose 4 new members for their board of directors. They could not have chosen a worse cast of characters, and there seems to be a pattern here. So yesterday, they released this statement with their 4 new board members. First, we have Sue, the former CEO of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also a board member of Pfizer. She's also a member of the president's council of advisors on science and technology. But for some reason when the White House wanted to write her bio, they thought that her two most prominent positions at Pfizer and the Bill and William the Gates Foundation shouldn't be on this page. I wonder why. Even spicier, this one's hard to find, she's on the board of directors of this company called Resilience, which strangely also has the CEO of In Q Tel on it. In Q Tel is the investment company for the CIA. There are actually a number of people on this board of directors that have links to the CIA other than this dude. And this company I'm talking about, Resilience, is the company that manufactured all of the mRNA for the thing that Moderna gave to everyone. Kinda weird. Next up is Nicole Seligman. Nicole is famous for being the president of Sony Entertainment. You know, the company that had some beef with Michael Jackson that we've recently talked about. She also previously worked at Paramount. She's a lawyer, and she's represented some interesting people like Bill Clinton. And if you know the Iran Contra scandal, she represented Oliver North in those trials. In this old article from the Washington post, they talked about how by all accounts, Seligman has won the trust and confidence of both president and Hillary Rodham Clinton. The first lady thinks the world of her says mrs. Clinton's press secretary. Man, that's some high praise from a really great person. What a good endorsement. For those of you keeping track of how many Zionists are on the board of OpenAI, she's also Jewish. I believe that brings the total to 3 out of 7. Not totally sure if there's more or not. Because, you know, I just I can't think of anything better for Israel's public image than to have the AI that's giving everyone answers to their questions about the world, answers that are pro Israel. And then we have Fiji, who is the CEO of Instacart, but she spent a decade working at high positions at Facebook. At the top, she was the head of the Facebook app. That's an addition to the Facebook executives already on the board, like Brett Taylor, who was the CTO. And he was the chairman of old Twitter when, you know, free speech was like totally good on Twitter. And we have Adam DeLand D'Angelo, who was, high school friends with Mark Zuckerberg and the CTO of Facebook. So that's 3 former Facebook executives. And last but not least, the crown jewel, Larry Summers, former US secretary of the treasury, former chief economist at the World Bank. He was heavily involved in repealing Glass De Gaulle, which is what allowed banks to gamble with all of our money in the stock market and caused the crazy bubbles and the crazy crashes that we've seen since. He was instrumental in both setting the stage for the o eight financial crisis, and then he was instrumental in the government allocation of our tax dollars to bail out his friends in the banks. I can't think of anyone that I would want farther away from the ethical development of AI than Larry Summers. As just one example of his, high ethical standards, in the nineties, what's called the Summers memo came out. A quote from it is quote, I think the economic logic behind dumping a load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable, and we should face up to that. Meaning, I mean, it's really good business to dump all of our corporate toxic waste in poor countries because they can't do anything about it. And that's just good business, and we should face up to that. Right? And then, obviously, Sam Altman is also back on the board, making a total of 7 people on the board of OpenAI, and I don't want any of them anywhere near the development of AI technology. Remember, Elon Musk is currently suing OpenAI for marketing themselves as an open source, ethical, nonprofit AI development company and then transforming themselves into a closed source, unethical, for profit AI development empire that is working to control the entire state of information on the Internet. I mean, working to develop technology that will benefit everyone all around the world. I mean, just imagine when you don't even need to do research and look for information anymore because AI will tell you everything you need to know about what's real and what's not. It's gonna be a brave new world soon. Just you wait.
Saved - January 18, 2025 at 11:45 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@WallStreetApes https://t.co/b7rS2752d4 $META CEO Mark Zuckerberg on the Joe Rogan podcasts says that the Biden admin pressured Meta to censor COVID-19 content.

Video Transcript AI Summary
At the start of COVID, there was some understanding of government and health authorities' actions due to the uncertainty surrounding the virus. However, as guidelines shifted from "two weeks to flatten the curve" to mandatory mask-wearing, it became confusing. This confusion peaked during the Biden administration's vaccine rollout. While generally supportive of vaccines, there was concern over attempts to censor discussions about potential side effects. The pressure to remove content that questioned vaccine safety was met with resistance, as it was deemed important to allow honest discussions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: There are times when if there's an emergency, your your ability to speak can temporarily be curtailed in order to get an emergency under control. So I was sympathetic to that at the beginning of COVID. It seemed like, okay. You have this virus. Seems like it's killing a lot of people. I don't know if we didn't know at the time how dangerous it was gonna be. So at the beginning, it kind of seemed like, okay. We should give a little bit of deference to the government and the health authorities on how we should play this. But when it went from, you know, 2 weeks to flatten the curve to, you know, in, like, in the beginning, it was like, okay. There aren't enough masks. Masks aren't that important. To them, it's like, oh, no. You have to wear a mask. And, you know, the like, everything was shifting around. I it's become very difficult to kinda follow, and and this really hit the most extreme, I'd say, during it was during the Biden administration when they Speaker 1: were trying to roll Speaker 0: out the vaccine program. And now I'm generally, like, pretty pro rolling out vaccines. I think on balance, the vaccines are more positive than negative, but I think that while they're trying to push that program, they also tried to censor anyone who is basically arguing against it. And they pushed us super hard, to take down the things that were honestly were true. Right? I mean, they they basically pushed us and and said, you know, anything that, says that vaccines might have side effects, you basically need to take down. And I was just like, we're not gonna do that. Like, we're we're clearly not gonna do that. I mean, that that that is kind of in our group lead group. Speaker 1: Who's telling you to take down things that are Yeah. It was it was talk about vaccine side effects. Speaker 0: It was Speaker 1: people in the, in the Biden administration. I think Speaker 0: it was, you know, I think it was, you know, I wasn't involved in those conversations directly, but I think it was Speaker 1: How difficult is that to not be involved in those conversations directly?
Saved - January 18, 2025 at 1:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On October 25, 1988, I spoke out about Hollywood's dark side on CNN’s “Larry King Live.” I recounted a troubling experience from my childhood when I was just 12 years old. While at MGM, I was separated from my mother and entered the office of Louis B. Mayer, and later Arthur Freed, where I encountered Freed in a compromising state. Looking back at my old footage now feels unsettling, highlighting the disturbing realities I faced in the industry.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

On October 25, 1988 Shirley Temple exposed Hollywood pedophilia on CNN’s “Larry King Live.” Temple shared her experience with a naked producer at MGM when she was 12-years-old. Temple said that she was separated from her mother at MGM and went into the office of Louis B. Mayer, and into the office of Arthur Freed about being given a role for a movie, Temple alleged that Freed was naked when she entered his office. If you review some of Shirley Temple’s old footage today, it is disturbing to say the least.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I went to MGM for a meeting about a movie when I was 12. My mother and I were separated; she met with Louis Bemaire while I met Arthur Freed. I thought Freed was a producer, but he was actually an exhibitor. When I saw something unexpected, I laughed uncontrollably, which made him furious, and he kicked me out. I quietly met my mother in the lobby, and we drove home in silence. I told her what happened, and she revealed that Bemaire had made advances toward her. We both agreed that we didn't like MGM and preferred Fox instead.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Left Fox. I went to MGM for one picture. Thank goodness, only one. And when I got there with my mother, we were separated. She went into the office of Louis Bemaire, and I went into the office of Arthur Freed. And he was gonna talk to me about a movie he wanted to put me in. I'm 12 years old, you know. And I thought he was a producer, but instead, he was an exhibitor. And I've never seen anyone naked before except myself. So I had no clue about what was happening. And, so it struck me so funny. I laughed at him, and I laughed uproariously. I had tears, you know, and he got infuriated. And he said, out, out, out. Go. So tell your mother? Well, I went down. I was very quiet. I went down and met her in the lobby of the administration building. She came up very quietly from Louis Bemaire's office, and we walked hand in hand silently to the car, which was unusual. We got in the car driving home. I said, mom, you won't believe what happened to me. And I told her what happened, and she got kind of quiet. She said, well, you don't know what happened to me. And Louie Louie Bemere wasn't as bad as as Fried was to me. Let me try that. He came on to my mother. And so we both decided that we didn't like him, GM, much of it. You know? It was better at Fox.
Saved - January 17, 2025 at 5:31 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Serious question Why is oPrnography free? https://t.co/gRFOHIbqNU

Video Transcript AI Summary
The corn industry is under scrutiny, especially with Twitter promoting reality shows featuring corn farmers. Most corn farms are owned by MindGeek, which was recently acquired by Ethical Capital Partners, co-founded by a former rabbi. This ownership raises questions, especially since the company is pushing corn content into everyday life, blurring boundaries. Corn is highly addictive, and its pervasive presence can influence culture and behaviors. It's essential to understand the implications of such influences and to be cautious about what you consume, as addictive substances can permanently alter brain chemistry. Young people should be particularly aware of these effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We've got to talk about the corn industry real quick because Twitter's out here serving ads for this website. But if you notice, they're starting to do reality TV shows with various corn farmers. We'll get back to this in just a second. If you didn't know, like, most of the corn farms in the world are owned by a single company called MindGeek. But this is actually nowhere near the whole list. This is closer to the whole list if you wanted to know. I know that none of you actually wanna know this, but sometimes ignorance really is bliss because the truth is kind of weird. This is not made up. The company that bought MindGeek is actually called Ethical Capital Partners, and it was cofounded by Solomon, who was called to law following his ordainment as a Jewish rabbi in Israel. And we all know that sexual content has been eking its way more and more into everyone's everyday lives and all sorts of complicated and controversial ways, doing all sorts of messed up things to young people's minds, regardless of your take on things. And this site has seriously changed the landscape. And this is clearly a marketing move designed to change the landscape in a big way. And who's it owned by? Leonid Ravinsky. I'll give you one guess where that name comes from. He's from Odessa, Ukraine. And it's just kinda weird that the entire corn industry is owned by people with ties to Israel. And they are explicitly pushing corn content into our everyday lives, merging the boundary between whatever the hell is going on. And corn is one of the most addictive substances ever invented. Like, it's not a simple conversation. Not trying to condemn people for their choices and habits and whatever you do. I'm just pointing out the big picture and facts are facts, And it's kinda weird. Probably don't think about the implications of that too much. Because I don't have to think very hard before those implications lead me directly to this. And how much easier it is to do these types of things to a culture that's filled with these types of influences. If you don't know the definition of the word subversion, you might wanna look up the word subversion and maybe Co intel Pro. And if you're a young person watching this reel, just be careful what you let into your brain because any addictive substance can rewire your brain chemistry forever. That's why
Saved - January 16, 2025 at 12:13 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@Cancelcloco @maddow Did you know the stock market is full of fake shares? https://t.co/Q8qGUlEXSW

Video Transcript AI Summary
The stock market has issues with fake shares, particularly through a practice called naked short selling, where shares that don't exist are sold. This was highlighted during the GameStop situation in 2021, where short interest reached 300%, indicating more shares were short sold than actually existed. Companies like Blockbuster and Sears faced similar fates, with short sellers driving their stock prices down until bankruptcy. When GameStop's price began to rise, short sellers faced potential infinite losses, leading to a short squeeze. Despite significant buying activity, the stock price did not reflect this due to ongoing short selling pressure. Many investors are still holding onto GameStop shares, aware that short sellers are trapped and unable to buy back without incurring massive losses. The interconnectedness of the market and the creation of counterfeit shares complicate the situation further.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the stock market is full of fake shares as in shares that don't actually exist and were created from nothing? You probably have some of them in your account. Today, we're gonna learn what really happened to Blockbuster and Toys R Us and a couple other businesses. You're gonna learn what really happened with GameStop in 2021, and you're gonna learn why the entire stock market is based on fraud, allegedly. Because before the whole GameStop thing happened, the words naked short selling almost never got mentioned. And when someone did mention it, it was considered a conspiracy theory. But just like a lot of conspiracy theories, things have changed a bit. I'm about to show you a clip of a senior banker at Morgan Stanley given the dirt at great personal risk, I might add. I would advise you to talk about it. Well, I So if you're not familiar with what short selling is, when I buy a share of a stock, someone else is selling the share of the stock. Right? And we agree on a price. Short selling is just a way to bet that the price will go down by borrowing a share from someone and you'll pay them back later. Then you sell it on the market, whatever price is going right now. So if you think this stock is gonna go down, you borrow the share from someone here. You sell it at this price, and you're right. And then later you buy it back and you close the trade out and you make money. The exact opposite as if you had bought the share here hoping to sell the share later when it was at a higher price. Exact opposite. Naked short selling is doing that, but you never even borrow a share. You just sell a share that did not exist before. Yes. That's as backwards as it sounds. But like you just heard the man say, a lot of the biggest institutions do this all the time. Like, you remember this guy that runs Citadel Securities? Well, this is them getting caught by FINRA for doing exactly that in 2020. Big legal jargon to say, selling something, failing to deliver it, and never having had any way to borrow it. These are the kind of market mechanics that make GameStop have a 300% short interest, meaning 3 times the number of shares that are supposed to exist have been short sold leading into whatever happened in 2021. We'll come back to this in a second. There's a pattern here that's repeated with a number of very high profile businesses that have failed over the last couple decades, such as Sears. Something bad happens or the sentiment turns, their stock price starts to decline, the short sellers pile on, and they get short sold and short sold and short sold until they go bankrupt. This was Circuit City. This was Pier 1 Imports, and this was Blockbuster, one of the first ones in this pattern. There's another side to this too. Because when a company is failing like this, they almost always hire a consultancy firm to try to help turn the business around. They charge exorbitant fees for, shall we say, questionable advice. And that's exactly what happened at GameStop while they were getting hammered and short sold and hammered and short sold. And eventually, they hired Boston Consulting Group to come and help turn the company around. But when Ryan Cohen took over shortly before the whole thing happened, the first thing he did was fire Boston Consulting Group and then sue them because he knew what was going on because the consultancy group gets paid either way. If the business fails, they still get paid. And all the short sellers, if the business goes into bankruptcy and ceases to exist, they never even have to buy back the stock at all, and they get 100% pure profit on all of those totally above board short sales tax free. And from the looks of things, GameStop was about to become another blockbuster or another Sears. This is Ken Griffin who runs Citadel, hanging out with his buddy, who it's worth mentioning before he ran a bookstore out of his garage and whatever whatever, he also worked in hedge funds before that. And you better believe these 2 guys know everyone in the industry, including at the consultancy firms. So GameStop was on its way down to 0, just like a lot of companies before them. And then something crazy happened because the thing about short selling is it's actually really dangerous because you're betting on the price going down, but the price can go up as much as there's no limit on how much a price can go up. So your potential loss is infinite. And when you short sale, the only way to get out of that trade is to buy back the stock that you short sold. And the problem is that buying the stock makes the price go up. This is why a short squeeze can happen because if there's a lot of short sellers that have been short selling a stock and then it starts to go up, all the short sellers need to close those positions. And right before the GameStop thing happened, 300% short interest is insane. Usually, short squeezes happen with, like, 20% short interest. This is only possible if there are at least 200% shares completely fabricated, made up out of nothing because they don't exist. The GameStop community had officially caught the short sellers in the act, and they had them buy the balls. And in the SEC's own report, the red bars that show short sellers buying back the stock clearly showed that short sellers did not close. If they had tried to buy back 300% of the shares, the price would have gone a lot higher than it did. But this is data from one of the biggest retail brokerages in the United States of a normal month of GameStop trading, showing that green is how many people are buying and red is how many people are selling. And it's been like this ever since 2021 every month. And the blue line is the price going down with all this buying happening. And these 2 guys that were probably pretty hyped on the biggest video game retailer in the world going out of business because who knows who benefits from that. They probably aren't quite feeling that way anymore about it, which is probably why we had paid ads saying that they closed. Probably why the Internet got filled with bots spamming identical messages about how everyone needs to get out because the stock is so bad. Probably why GameStop stock prices has been crazier than my ex girlfriend ever since. And it might help explain why in December of 2023, almost half of GameStop trades happened in dark pools. And still today, about half of the trades are short sales. Because when you have exerted enough short selling pressure over many years to drive the stock down to this degree, to the point where short sales are reported at 300% of the float, you might not have any way out. Buying back this much stock would bankrupt you, and there has been ample evidence ever since that they are still trapped. And that's why all the GameStop people are still holding because they can kick the can a lot, but they can't get out unless they buy the stock back. And there's a lot more rich people than just these 2 guys who are on the hook here. Think about what we've learned this year about how tied together the market is by leverage and swaps. Remember what that man said at the start? All the prime lenders do it every day. And by it, I mean create shares out of nothing and sell them counterfeit into the market. Now there is a lot more to the story than what I was able to fit into this short video. A lot more evidence of fuckery and a lot of very complex ways for them to hide their trades. But one thing's reserved, no one's selling.
Saved - January 12, 2025 at 9:40 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

🤔 🧐 Something ain’t right https://t.co/UKaxsmeDFC

Saved - January 11, 2025 at 5:42 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Describe this man in one word https://t.co/azOmnEz8Sf

Saved - January 10, 2025 at 1:54 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

How convenient https://t.co/CDTIOjUIW5

Saved - January 2, 2025 at 6:34 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Disney-owned ABC knew about Jeffrey Epstein and his clients for years. They buried the story from the public. ABC fired the producer who broke this https://t.co/mrIHA31dOY

Video Transcript AI Summary
I've had the story for three years, including an interview with Virginia Roberts, but we couldn't air it. Initially, I was told no one knew who Jeffrey Epstein was and that it was a stupid story. The palace learned about the allegations against Prince Andrew and threatened us, which made us hesitant. Despite having substantial evidence and other women backing her up, I couldn't get the story out. Now, with new revelations surfacing, I'm frustrated because we had everything. ABC News issued a statement claiming they have been investigating, but it feels like a cover-up. Amy Robach's private comments reveal more honesty than their official stance, suggesting there's more to the story than ABC is admitting. Stay tuned for more insider information.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I've had the story for 3 years. I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air. First of all, I was told who's Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a 1000000 different ways. We were so afraid we wouldn't be able to interview Kate. I should say all the things that they That also quashed the story. Yes. And then, and then Alan Dershowitz was also implicated in because of the planes. She told me everything. She had pictures. She had everything. She was in hiding for 12 years. We convinced her to come out. We convinced her to talk to us. It was unbelievable what we had. Clinton, we had everything. Mhmm. I I tried for 3 years to get it on to no avail, and now it's all coming out. And it's like these new relev revelations, and I freaking had all of it. I I I'm just so pissed right now. Like, every day I get more and more pissed because I'm just, like, oh my god. We it was on what what we had was unreal. Other women backing it up. Hey. Yep. Brad Edwards, the attorney, 3 years ago saying, like, like, we there will come a day when we will realize Jeffrey Epstein was the most prolific pedophile this country has ever known. I had it all 3 years ago. Speaker 1: Breaking story. ABC News has just given Project Veritas a statement about the leaked tape our ABC insider gave us and we released this morning. Here is the statement from ABC Corporate. It reads, quote, at the time, not all of our reporting met our standards to air, but we have never stopped investigating the story. Ever since, we've had a team on this investigation and substantial resources dedicated to it. That work has led to a 2 hour documentary and a 6 part podcast that will air in the new year. I mean, this sounds like a cover your ass lawyer speak response. No big surprise there. But more importantly, no real explanation of why this bombshell interview by Amy Robach with Virginia Roberts never aired. Now we also received a statement from Amy Robach herself. Here is that statement. I'm gonna read part of it to you. Quote, as a journalist, as the Epstein story continued to unfold last summer, I was caught in a private moment of frustration. This is exactly the opposite of what she actually said on the set. Speaker 0: I've had the story for 3 years. I've had this interview with Virginia Roberts. We would not put it on the air. I I tried for 3 years to get it on to no avail. I was told who's Jeffrey Epstein? No one knows who that is. This is a stupid story. Then the palace found out that we had her whole allegations about Prince Andrew and threatened us a 1000000 different ways. Well, then I got a little concerned about why I couldn't get on. Speaker 1: Now that right there sounds like the real story because sometimes in private, we are more honest. So we believe that there's a lot more to this story than what ABC News is telling us on the record. ABC News' statement and Amy Robach's statement are in conflict with her, quote, private moment of frustration, unquote. But here's the thing, our ABC News insider still works inside the network. So stay tuned, America, for more insider information and for more private videotape.
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 4:33 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MmisterNobody https://t.co/5BOtbBc9AO "They don't want well informed, well educated people" George Carlin

Video Transcript AI Summary
They don't want a population capable of critical thinking or well-informed citizens. Instead, they seek obedient workers—people just smart enough to operate machines and handle paperwork, but not smart enough to challenge the system. This system has been failing workers for decades, offering increasingly worse jobs with lower pay, longer hours, and disappearing benefits. Now, they're targeting Social Security, aiming to take retirement funds to benefit their wealthy allies on Wall Street. Ultimately, they control everything, and the rest of us are excluded from their elite circle.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But I'll tell you what they don't want. They don't want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don't want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They're not interested in that. That doesn't help them. That's against their interest. That's right. They don't want people who are smart enough to sit around the kitchen table to figure out how badly they're getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don't want that. You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers. People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shittier jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime, and the vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it. And now they're coming for your Social Security money. They want your fucking retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street. And you know something? They'll get it. They'll get it all from you sooner or later because they own this fucking place. It's a big club, and you ain't in it. You and I are not in the big club.
Saved - December 16, 2024 at 12:06 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

If you only knew what was really wrong with Ellen https://t.co/qauxMEtAYL

Saved - November 30, 2024 at 2:33 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@ryancohen https://t.co/12gnZRxaUl Who is the shadiest billionaire of them all?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ken Griffin is a notable billionaire, primarily known for running Citadel Securities, the largest market maker in the U.S., which processes a significant portion of stock trades. He has been acquiring extensive real estate, including the most expensive home ever sold in the U.S. for $238 million and multiple properties in Florida, Miami, and the Hamptons. Griffin's real estate ambitions include creating a billion-dollar residential property. Despite his wealth, he claims to work hard and not indulge in typical billionaire pastimes like golf, although he owns multiple luxurious homes. His background includes starting his investment career with funds from his grandmother, who had inherited wealth. Griffin's influence extends to political contributions, particularly supporting Republican candidates. His dual role in the market raises questions about fairness and transparency in trading.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who do you think is the shadiest billionaire that most people have never heard of? There's a lot of competition for that type. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and put my nomination out for Ken Griffin. Ken Griffin is famous for getting absolutely railed by this guy and for building the most expensive house in the world. We're gonna go over all of his real estate holdings in this video and it's extensive. But real quick, why this guy matters to everyone is he runs Citadel Securities, which is the largest market maker in the United States. Meaning if you trade stocks, 1 third of stock trades actually go through Citadel Securities, not the New York Stock Exchange. Oh, yeah. And he also runs one of the biggest hedge funds in the United States that trades against your trades that his firm executes. But don't worry, the 2 would never communicate and they're totally separate and they totally don't cheap by collaborate for real. They don't cheap. This data is according to Bloomberg. You can't quite see down here, but 20% of trades go to the New York Stock Exchange and 16% go to the NASDAQ. That's where, like, I wanna buy something and someone's selling it, and we meet at a price that's, like, you know, what we both agree to pay and sell. But if you trade on an app like Robinhood, for example, they just sell your trades to Citadel, and Citadel just decides what price the trade is worth within their little private pools. And it's totally fair, and it's all good. Don't don't worry about it. Citadel pays Robinhood for the opportunity to have your trades inside of their totally legitimate business operation. And since they pay to get your order flow from people like Robinhood, I'm sure they don't make any money off of that investment. They just do it for your own good. Anyways, enough of that. Let's get on to the fun stuff. Ken Griffin's been making waves in Florida because he's been buying up a bunch of the biggest properties around all right next to each other and turning them into a giant megalot, trying to make the 1st $1,000,000,000 property in the world, $1,000,000,000 residential property. A lot of these billionaires are into like really dark shit that we aren't allowed to talk about on most social media platforms that involve, you know, like children. And like I don't know what Ken Griffin's into, but one thing I do know that he's definitely into is his own ego. Like more so than almost any other billionaire, all of Ken Griffin's movements seem to be guided by him wanting to be the most important person in the world. Hence, this. Yes, if you zoom in on that photo, you'll notice the giant construction site. This is where he demolished multiple multi $1,000,000 mansions that were already on the property because he wanted bigger mansions on the property. But obviously he needs more than just those houses in Florida. He also bought Adrian Arce's 2 Mayfront houses in the Coconut Grove for a $106,900,000 Also bought this house in Casa Apava in Palm Beach for $54,600,000 Honestly, like he has so many houses that I might accidentally double some up or miss a few because, like, it's kinda hard to track down how many houses this guy has. If you can call this a house. Let's not ask questions about what's happening in all Speaker 1: of these houses all around the world that Speaker 0: he owns, that he's not occupying. Because sure, a bunch of houses in Palm Beach is cool, but like Star Island is far more prestigious. It's the most exclusive real estate in all of Miami. And so in true Griffin style, he went and snapped up multiple neighboring homes on the artificial island. He bought homes number 8 through 14 for a $170,000,000 over a few years because he needed all those houses on this island. But if that's not enough for a claim to fame, he also previously bought already the most expensive house or home ever purchased in the United States at the top of this tower, not compensating for anything. He bought fully 4 unfurnished floors for $238,000,000 breaking the record for the most expensive home ever sold in the United States. Clarify, the dude does not live in New York. He just wanted the tip, like, just the tip. If you think about it, it sounds like kind of a raw deal. Like, how long is that elevator ride? Like, what the fuck, man? But Kenny recently was living in Chicago before he moved to Florida. 2018, he splashed out 58,500,000 on a Gold Coast condo, once again, breaking the record to largest house sale in that city ever. He also paid 45,000,000 for the top four floors at 9 West Walton Street in Chicago. This dude's got something about owning the tips of tall towers. I don't know what's up with that, but obviously he also needs vacation homes. So he's got one in Aston, Colorado that cost him $9,400,000. Oh, and he also invest in Republican presidential candidate, Mitt Romney. We'll have another video about his friendly relationship with Mitt Romney and a few other, characters. You know what I'm talking about, you know what I'm talking about. But he obviously also needs a few houses in Hawaii. It's 10,000,000 for 1, 13,000,000 for the other. The 10,000,000,000 one has its own golf course. Like, cool. Think about how much water they're taking from the local communities to water his private golf course. But it gets worse. Because when this documentary was coming out this year, Ken Griffin raised a big stink about it, complaining that it was over representing his golf habits. Because he's, like, not even, like, that kind of rich guy. He's like, he he works hard and he doesn't even play golf. Quote, the idea that Ken always wants to be on the golf course when in actuality, that is one of the last places you would find him. He plays golf once a year, end quote. And in the end, the movie went with the scene of him playing tennis while they talked about how evil they were instead of playing golf. So to clarify, this is just to show off to his buddies. He doesn't actually play golf. Oh, yeah. I missed this one. In 2020, he paid $84,000,000 for Calvin Klein's old house in the Hamptons. Holy shit. I almost forgot. Buckingham Palace. In 2019, he dropped a 122,000,000 on this giant mansion right beside Buckingham Palace. But like to be fair, we should look up to people like Ken Griffin who like bootstrapped his way to the top with hard work in his dorm room in college, like starting this business that like he is really fond of telling the story about. He came from a family that like didn't even have that much where like his grandmother only inherited an oil business and 3 farms and a whole seed business. Then he got into Harvard because he was such a hard worker. So like to be fair, he is hard worker. And then his grandma would only give him a $100,000 at age 17 to start his first investment business. And then he called all of his rich friends and started it with $260,000. So like, we should all honestly be looking up to this guy that works so hard to get to where he is today. Because, like, that's really the American dream to have a grandma that inherits an oil business and a bunch of other things. They send you to Harvard with a whole bunch of money to make more money off of your money. Because once you make all that money off of your money, then you can do things like support really high quality politicians to do good things for the world that have nothing to do with your personal interests. And it's a good thing that this guy is so involved in, like, the regulatory process and, like, that his two self regulating organizations, his hedge fund and his market maker, are so integral to the markets functioning efficiently and effectively and fairly for everyone. Because without experts like him helping advise, the people that make the rules, how would they even know what kind of rules to make to benefit all the good guys in the market like Ken Griffin? And he's, like, best positioned to know because he's on both sides of the trade. He's making the market and trading the market, and that's the kind of guy we need. I just hope that one day I can live up to even a fraction of the man that Ken Griffin is. And maybe I too can one day have a tower as long and girthy and I mean, tall, not long, tall, as tall as Ken Griffin's tower. Speaker 1: And that markets are efficient because of active managers setting the prices of securities. Firms like Citadel setting the prices of securities. We're all running large teams of people that are engaged in fundamental research, trying to drive the value of companies towards where we think they should be valued.
Saved - November 20, 2024 at 8:58 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/wrlcZpsaLc 2024 Is The Year of Truth ‼️‼️‼️ All lies will be exposed ‼️ "All of these big dick deviants is all catching hell in 2024. It's up for all of them. It don't matter if you Diddy or whoever you is, T.D. Jakes, any of them. All lies will be exposed. That's all." ~Katt Williams

Video Transcript AI Summary
I was canceled for speaking out about figures like Michael Jackson and R. Kelly, but it's not about race; it's about truth. In 2024, many will face the consequences of their actions, and all lies will be exposed. Those who react negatively to this truth know why. I've spent 30 years gathering knowledge and secrets, and I know things I shouldn't. The industry tries to paint me as the villain, but I've raised my children well and have no dark stories. They claim I was blackballed for not showing up, but my IMDB proves otherwise.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Business saying I was gonna expose. When I talked about Michael Jackson, when I talked about r Kelly, they canceled me for these things because why would you talk about another black dude? Race is not where the line is drawn. It's god's side and the other side, and we don't care nothing about the other side. Period. Period. All of these, big deviants is all catching hell in 2024. It's up for all of them. It don't matter if you did here or whoever you is. T g j, it's any of them. The every all lies will be exposed. That's all. And and and and anyone who takes that the wrong way know why they take it the wrong way. The truth is the light. And you have been no one of these. Amen. Amen. Gee. I I kinda did you know what I'm doing here? Right. After that, I don't really kinda know where to go. Let me one more time. Right. We good now? Because the people wanna know, why did he get black balled? Yeah. Because He's gonna answer that. Because in 30 years, I've done nothing but collect information, knowledge, and your secrets. So if you and a man was in a corner doing something you wasn't supposed to be doing You will tell it. No. Somebody come to tell me. Okay. I gather that. I value that. I'll pay for that. Come. Tell me. I know so many things I shouldn't know, and they all know it. They all know it. Why? Because you don't make me the villain, Not the guy that raises black children and ain't never done a hard drug in his life and don't have no stories of doing nobody dirty. And and they'll just go out and they'll lie. The the industry doesn't mess with Kat because he didn't show up for the studio. No studios have ever said that. Look at my IMDB. It will show you.
Saved - November 20, 2024 at 8:58 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

What do all these people have in common? 1 Anne Heche 2 Chris Cornell 3 Avicii 4 Chester Bennington https://t.co/hxxb38L7nW

Saved - October 29, 2024 at 12:08 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

Here’s an explanation of the actual market wide criminal conspiracy that GameStop exposed and how and why short sellers could actually blow up the entire global economy. @Cancelcloco https://t.co/FSgLSnaLlw

Saved - October 27, 2024 at 12:29 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MichaelDeLauzon Her ex has familiar company https://t.co/GGspeBtiy8

Saved - October 21, 2024 at 5:05 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MattWallace888 https://t.co/yUm7ZbsMmB Wow!!! You Can't Make This Up 🤯 "So Congress has paid over $17 million in hush money for s@xual misconduct...and what's more is that it was taxpayer money." Can you believe it? 🎥 @RepThomasMassie

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congress has reportedly paid over $17 million in taxpayer money as hush money for sexual misconduct within its offices. The speaker contrasts this with allegations against President Trump, who allegedly used his own money for a $130,000 payment. The speaker suggests some members of Congress may have used taxpayer funds to cover up their misconduct. The speaker calls for the release of records related to these payments and questions whether the FEC will investigate the $17 million in settlements paid out by Congress. They emphasize that none of this money has been reported as a campaign finance expense.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who can't make this up? So, you know, congress has paid over $17,000,000 in hush money for sexual misconduct inside of the offices in these buildings. What? And what's more is that was taxpayer money. Right? The allegation is that president Trump paid a $130,000 of his own money. But here in congress, we have there may be some on this dais. I mean, I'm for turning loose all of these records. Who in here has had the taxpayer pay for their sexual misconduct charges the hush money? I bet there's some over there. There may be some over here. I don't know. But I do know it's taxpayer money, and I do know not a single penny of it has been turned in as a campaign finance expense. Is the FEC gonna investigate the $17,000,000 that the congress has paid to settle, you know, behind closed doors these these, sexual misconduct allegations?
Saved - October 20, 2024 at 3:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe it's crucial to understand PizzaGate, as it's a reality that demands attention. I recommend watching the documentary featuring Liz Crokin to grasp the severity of the situation. This is a disturbing truth that we all need to confront.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

If you do not understand what PizzaGate is, it’s time to educate yourself. PizzaGate is absolutely a fact, and this documentary with Liz Crokin is a must watch to get up to speed. It’s the type of evil that will give you nightmares, and we are on the verge of everyone having to face this fact. @LizCrokin

Saved - October 20, 2024 at 2:44 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@Stjade4 @RyanJC2009 Man I knew I forgot someone. How could I forget my man Avicii For your listening pleasure “FOR A BETTER DAY” - Avicii https://youtu.be/Xq-knHXSKYY?si=fuGJJiO2OPVQVRLj

Saved - October 11, 2024 at 11:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed the origins of Western medicine, highlighting John D. Rockefeller's pivotal role. In 1872, he monopolized the oil industry, leading to the 1911 Supreme Court ruling that broke up Standard Oil. Despite this setback, he aimed to dominate the pharmaceutical industry by funding medical schools and influencing curricula. He hired Flexner to promote allopathic medicine, which relied on synthetic treatments. This strategic control over medical education significantly shaped the foundation of Western medicine as we know it today.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/pJqyRKXNSf You can't talk about Western medicine, and how it all really started, without talking about ONE MAN AND ONE MAN ONLY: "So in 1872, Rockefeller bought up, shut down or bankrupt 90% of the oil companies. Our good old constitution came into place. And in 1911, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust act and split Standard Oil into 34 independent companies. So they said, you can't have the monopoly on this, you're done. You think that changed who he was? No. He promised to bankrupt America. At that very same time, they were learning how to turn petrochemicals, exactly what he had at his fingertips with the oil, into pharmaceuticals. Now, John D. Rockefeller's biggest threat was natural health. So what does he do? Being the businessman he is, he donates money to the medical schools because he wants to control. And what do you do when you want to control someone? You give him money. And then he hired a guy by the name of Flexner to study the school's curriculum, to figure out what they were teaching everybody, and to persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine, which used the unnatural substances to treat diseases. This is how western medicine was founded."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In 1872, Rockefeller allegedly acquired or bankrupted 90% of oil companies. In 1911, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act and split Standard Oil into 34 companies, but he allegedly promised to bankrupt America. Rockefeller saw natural health as a threat and donated money to medical schools to control them. He hired Flexner to study the curriculum and persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine, which uses unnatural substances to treat diseases. This is claimed to be how Western medicine was founded.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So in 18/72, Rockefeller bought up, shut down, or bankrupt 90% of the oil companies. Our good old constitution came into place, and in 1911, the Supreme Court found Rockefeller in violation of the Sherman Antitrust antitrust act and split Standard Oil into 34 independent companies. So they said, you can't have the monopoly on this. You're done. You think that changed who he was? No. He promised to bankrupt America. At that very same time, they were learning how to turn petrochemicals exactly what he had had at his fingertips with the oil into pharmaceuticals. Now John D. Rockefeller's biggest threat was natural health. So what does he do? Being the businessman he is, he donates money to the medical schools because he wants to control. And what do you do when you wanna control someone? You give them money. And then he hired a guy by the name of Flexner to study the school's curriculum, to figure out what they were teaching everybody, and to persuade the government to establish allopathic medicine, which use the unnatural substances to treat diseases. This is how western medicine was founded.
Saved - October 11, 2024 at 11:56 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@dom_lucre https://t.co/QzcnYMrvJ0 Hillary Clinton won her first election because her opponent JFK Jr. died in a plane crash What are the odds?

Video Transcript AI Summary
John F. Kennedy Jr. was expected to run for the New York Senate seat in 1999, but died in a plane crash, after which Hillary Clinton was elected senator. Mary Mahoney, a former White House intern, was murdered in 1997. White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in 1993, with suspicions of foul play. James McDougall, a key witness, died of a heart attack in solitary confinement before testifying. In 2015, White House sheriff Walter Shibe was found dead in a river, with his death ruled an accidental drowning. DNC staffer Seth Rich was shot and killed, with speculation that he was murdered for leaking DNC emails. Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found dead, and his death was reported as classified pending autopsy results.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Remember John f Kennedy junior? He was declared the front runner for the New York senate seat back in 1999. Days later, his plane crashed into the Atlantic Ocean, and his rival, Hillary Clinton, was elected senator. Mary Mahoney was a Clinton White House intern. She knew enough of the inner workings of Bill's sexual advancements to be a star witness during the Clinton impeachment trials. She was brutally executed at a Starbucks she was managing in 1997. In 1993, White House counsel Vince Foster was found dead in Fort Marcy Park near DC. He supposedly killed himself. And among a lengthy list of potential foul play, the bullet was never found. Then there's James McDougall, a key witness for White House prosecutors. He was serving his 3 year sentence for bank fraud at the Fort Worth Federal Medical Center in Texas. And just before he was to give a testimony before the grand jury, McDougal suffered a heart attack in solitary confinement. In 2015, Walter Shibe, a White House sheriff hired under Bill Clinton, joined the list. His body was found at the bottom of a river, nearly 2 miles from the base of the trail, and he was reportedly hiking. An autopsy determined that Shives' death was accidental drowning, but he might have known too much. 27 year old Democratic National Committee staffer, Seth Rich, was shot and killed in DC this year. There is speculation that he was the source of the controversial leaked emails allegedly sent by DNC staffers and that he may have been murdered in retaliation. Then Shawn Lucas, the lead attorney in a fraud case against the DNC, was found lying on the bathroom floor by his girlfriend when she returned home on August 2nd. His death was reported classified pending the results of an autopsy.
Saved - October 6, 2024 at 1:50 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@kimKBaltimore Here’s the proof https://t.co/fRqMAZmkKl

Video Transcript AI Summary
A person is heard making sexually suggestive comments, inviting someone to "bring that juicy ass over here and hop in daddy's new whip." They then ask if the person wants to "rip off that top and hop on in here." Another person responds that this behavior is "not okay" and that "you don't talk to people" like that. The first person states, "I've never been more ready."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, sweetie. Why don't you bring that juicy ass over here and hop in daddy's new whip? Excuse me? Who's talking to me? Oh. Well, you're just gonna stare at these daddies or you wanna rip off that top and hop on in here? That is not okay. You don't talk to people. I've never been more ready.
Saved - September 30, 2024 at 12:02 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@WallStreetApes https://t.co/sIeZtDhZxy Maui fire chief arrested for child abuse as 500 children are still missing

Video Transcript AI Summary
New court documents detail the indictment of Maui fire battalion chief Shawn Rogers, 52, for sex assault and continuous sexual assault of a minor. The alleged abuse began in 2019 when the victim was about 12 years old and continued for approximately two and a half years. Rogers, a 25-year veteran of the Department of Fire and Public Safety, turned himself in after a warrant was issued last week. He was the incident commander during the August wildfires. MFD chief Brad Ventura stated the department is deeply concerned about the allegations. Rogers is not scheduled to work this week, and the situation is under evaluation. The speaker then asserts that the person most responsible for the deaths in La Jena is, in fact, a mega pedophile.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And that breaking news, new details in the indictment of a Maui fire chief charged with sex assault and continual continuous sexual assault of a minor. The new court documents say battalion chief Shawn Rogers began abusing the victim in 2019 when she was about 12 years old, and the alleged assaults continued for about two and a half years. Rogers, who is 52 years old, turned himself in today after a warrant was issued for his arrest last week. Rogers is a 25 year veteran of the Department of Fire and Public Safety and was the incident commander during the August wildfires. Today, MFD chief Brad Ventura said in a statement, we are deeply concerned about the allegations. Mister Rogers is not scheduled to work this week, and we will continue to evaluate this situation as more information is available. So the person most responsible for the deaths in La Jena is, in fact, a mega pedophile. Why is this important? Because
Saved - September 16, 2024 at 4:41 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@dom_lucre https://t.co/Nxkk5Wugjv Haitian American Joseph Mathieu: "Bill Clinton was in charge of the $6 Billion donated to the Hope for Haiti Now charity. The Clintons kept the money for themselves."...👀

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker believes the Clintons have destroyed Haiti for decades, acting as enemies disguised as friends. While many know some people dislike Haiti, the Clintons are more dangerous because of their pretense. The speaker claims that the amount of money donated to Haiti after the earthquake was much larger than $6 billion, with Bill Clinton in charge. Despite the donations and Haiti's own resources, including oil reserves larger than Venezuela and one of the largest gold mines in the Caribbean, people still live under tents. Tony Rodham, Hillary Clinton's brother, allegedly has a 26-year contract related to Haitian gold. The speaker further alleges that Bill Clinton destroyed Haiti's rice production so rice from Arkansas could be sold there. The Clintons are said to control business in Haiti, requiring millionaires and billionaires to consult with them before undertaking any ventures.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, we have every reason to be mad because, the Clintons have destroyed Haiti for the decades. And, you know, they pretend to be our friends when in reality, they are our number one enemies. You know, there are some other people who clearly behave like they don't like us, so it's easy for us to protect ourselves against them because we know they are our enemies. But the Clintons are even more dangerous because they pretend to be our friends when in reality they're destroying Haiti. And I Yeah. Because I I Speaker 1: heard that the Clinton Foundation and all these other organizations gave over $6,000,000,000 to, Haiti for the relief effort, especially during the kind of natural disasters that you guys have gone through. Is that true? Speaker 0: No. It's more than true. The money is much more than $6,000,000,000. You see, after the earthquake, countries around the world, donate 1,000,000,000 of dollars. The amount was much larger than $6,000,000,000, and Bill Clinton was in charge of the money. And not only people around the world, but also American celebrities donate a lot of lots of money to rebuild Haiti, and 100 of home were destroyed after the earthquake. And if you can believe, the people are still living under tents. That's unacceptable. And not only they they held the money, they kept the money, but Haiti had enough resources for them to be, very comfortable. Haiti have oil, more oil than Venezuela. Nobody's talking about. Haiti have gold. We have one of the largest gold mine in the Caribbean. So and they let the world nobody is saying anything about our goals. And who do you think is in charge of our goal right now? The contract. Tony Rodham, Harry Conlon's brother. Speaker 1: Wow. Speaker 0: He's got a 26 years contract, and then also Haiti used to produce we used to produce our own rice. We didn't have to buy rice, overseas. Bill Clinton destroyed our rice, so his brother can sell the rice from Arkansas. Speaker 1: Yeah. Wow. Speaker 0: So they're doing a lot of things. Right now, if there's a millionaire or a billionaire who wants to do business in Haiti, they cannot do anything unless they check with the Clintons. The Clintons are the ones who is running Haiti. Speaker 1: Yeah. Speaker 0: And we are living in the 21st century.
Saved - May 10, 2024 at 1:05 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
A female University of Chicago student bravely fought off a robber by grabbing his gun and removing the magazine before he escaped with her phone. The thug was left dumbfounded as he searched for his magazine, which Madelyn had thrown into a bush. Prior to this incident, four suspects had robbed two other students at gunpoint. Madelyn's actions were truly badass.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/EwpYtiEZZ3 Female University of Chicago student fights off a robber by grabbing his gun as he tried stealing her phone. 21-year-old Madelyn fended off a thug by grabbing his gun and removing the magazine before he hopped into a getaway car with her phone. The thug looked dumbfounded as he looked for his magazine but Madelyn had thrown it in a bush. Shortly before the incident, four suspects robbed two other students and demanded their belongings at gunpoint. "I'm able to get my hands on the gun... and remove the magazine from the gun, and I toss it into the bush," Madelyn recalled. Bad*ss 🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
A woman in the 56100 block of South University was confronted by a suspect demanding her phone at gunpoint. She managed to grab the gun's magazine during a struggle. The loaded magazine is now with the police. Shortly after, another armed robbery occurred nearby. The victim hopes for increased safety on campus and in the city. She urges others to stay vigilant. Despite her instinctive reaction, she emphasizes the importance of safety over possessions.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: It was just before 3 in the 56100 block of South University. Maddie says the confrontation happened, and the suspect demanded her phone before flashing the gun. The pair got into a tussle. Speaker 1: I was grabbing for maybe my phone, maybe the gun. It's really like a blackout moment for me, and I realized that I was able to grab the magazine out of the gun. Speaker 0: The loaded magazine now in police custody, Maddie says, and she hopes it will help solve the crime. Just minutes after that, ordeal sent people in the area scrambling to safety, another armed robbery involving 2 suspects with handguns reported in the 1300 block of East 56th Street. That crime under investigation by the Chicago Police Department. Speaker 1: I I wanna feel safer on this campus. That's the bottom line. I think we can always ask for more from our campus and our city. Speaker 0: Maddie says she hopes fellow students and staff are vigilant and keep their guard up. When all said and done, she says her reaction was a knee jerk one, and she's thankful to be okay. Speaker 1: I couldn't necessarily really register the threat ahead of me. So definitely wouldn't advocate for fighting back in, you know, losing a life over a phone is definitely not worth it.
Saved - May 5, 2024 at 7:17 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The posts discuss how the Rockefeller family influenced the removal of natural remedies and the promotion of patented pharmaceuticals. It suggests that this manipulation of history has led to a lack of understanding about our roots and purpose.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/umODH5QVeh https://t.co/ahBD5lfAM6 How the Rockefeller influenced the world to remove all the natural remedies from practice and from the books, so that they may cash in on the patented pharmaceuticals. If they were able to remove and demonize natural cures as something "primitive" that was used since the dawn of time, you can't even begin to understand how immensely they crooked our history that they teach today. The less you know about your roots, the better for them, as the one that doesn't know his past, doesn't know why he's placed here, and certainly doesn't know where he's going.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The pharmaceutical industry, led by John D. Rockefeller, shifted focus from natural healing to petroleum-based drugs, controlling medical education and suppressing alternative treatments. Dissenters were silenced, leading to the dominance of pharmaceuticals in healthcare. Lobbying power ensures industry influence on laws and policies, contributing to medical errors and public health issues. Rockefeller's legacy as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry impacts American healthcare significantly. Translation: The pharmaceutical industry, under John D. Rockefeller's influence, prioritized petroleum-based drugs over natural remedies, controlling medical education and silencing dissent. Lobbying power influences laws and policies, contributing to medical errors and public health issues. Rockefeller's legacy as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry has a significant impact on American healthcare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When it was discovered that drugs could be produced from petroleum, America's top oil mogul ordered his army of propagandists to invert reality accordingly. Medicines used for 1000 of years were suddenly classified as alternative, while the new, petroleum based, highly addictive, and patentable drugs were declared the gold standard. After buying the German pharmaceutical company that manufactured chemicals of war for Adolf Hitler, Rockefeller leveraged his political influence by pressing Congress to declare natural healing modalities. Unscientific quackery. Rockefeller then took control of the American Medical Association and began offering massive grants to top medical schools under the mandate that only his approved curriculum be taught. Any mention of the healing powers of herbs, plants, and diet was erased from most medical textbooks. Doctors and professors who objected to Rockefeller's plan were crucified by the media, removed from the AMA, and stripped of their license to teach and practice medicine. Those who dared to speak out were arrested and jailed. When evidence began to emerge that petroleum based medicines were causing cancer, Mr. Rockefeller founded the American Cancer Society through which he suppressed that information. John D. Rockefeller is duly credited as the founder of the pharmaceutical industry, and the reason that medical error is currently the third leading cause of death in America. This is not an indictment against doctors. More than anyone, they are under the stranglehold of the single largest lobbying power in Washington. Every year, the pharmaceutical industry spends at least twice the amount as day go El to influence laws, policies, and public perception. Thanks to Mr. Rockefeller, the architect of American monopolies, no industry has more power over our lives than big pharma.
Saved - May 4, 2024 at 5:50 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MattWallace888 @ThisIsKyleR https://t.co/YOrMYFE8bu Many natural cures for cancer like this are suppressed. Surprised this was even allowed to air on TV

Video Transcript AI Summary
A berry from Australia's blushwood tree, EBC 46, is showing promise in curing various cancers. Animal trials have shown tumors disappearing within 48 hours, leading to human trials with positive results. The injection triggers an immune response, shrinking solid tumors like melanomas and head, neck, and breast cancers. If proven safe and effective, this treatment could be a new option for cancer patients, especially the elderly. The second phase of the trial begins next year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Good job. Thank you. The words cure and cancer don't often go together, but a single injection of a berry found only in Australia's far north is now thought to cure many types of cancer. It's been tested on animals at death's door and now on humans, making tumors disappear in just 48 hours. In the depths of the Queensland rainforest grows a small seed with huge potential. Speaker 1: This is an extraordinary drug. It's a unique drug, and it really is something quite different. Speaker 0: Derived only from Australia's blushwood tree, EBC 40 6 is a molecule that can fight cancer. Speaker 1: A full tumor destruction within 7 days. Speaker 0: Following astonishing results shrinking solid tumors in animals like Oscar, world first human trials have now begun. For melanoma sufferer Denise Powell, joining the trial was a chance to avoid amputation. Speaker 2: My cancer surgeon said, I can take that one out. If you get any more, then you might lose an arm. Speaker 0: Instead of more surgery, e b 46 was injected directly into the tumor in Denise's armpit. Speaker 2: Less than 20 minutes, the tumor had gone purple and black. Then within a couple of days, the tumor just kinda shriveled up and died. Speaker 0: This first stage trial is using safe low doses, but even early results look promising. Speaker 3: Surgery treats most tumors, about 60% of them worldwide, and to do that, you need an operating theater, but with EBC-forty six, you could go along anywhere. Speaker 0: When injected, EBC-forty six triggers an immune response, activating white blood cells to attack the tumor and shrinking it to nothing. So far, the treatment targets solid tumors such as melanomas and cancers of the head, neck, and breast cancer. If this rainforest remedy is found to be safe and effective in humans, it could offer a whole new treatment option for cancer patients, especially the elderly who can't face another round of chemo or go back under the knife. The second larger phase of the trial begins next year. Speaker 2: Here we have Speaker 0: Doctor Andrew Rochford, 7 News.
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 12:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The post highlights the allocation of funds to Ukraine and suggests alternative uses for the money. It mentions the possibility of building border walls, fixing Flint's water system, supporting homeless veterans, and aiding families affected by wildfires. The author expresses shock and calls for a reassessment of priorities.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/ntjSntP8wq This really puts things into perspective: "With the 165 Billion we gave to Ukraine, we could have built six border walls to stop illegal immigrants from pouring across our southern border. Could have fixed Flint's water system 215 times over easily. I like this one. Could have given every homeless vet $2 million. Holy shit. Could have given 50 million to every family impacted by the Maui wildfires. And they got $700. They got $700 each. We got to get our priorities straight, buddy."

Video Transcript AI Summary
We gave Ukraine $165 billion, enough to build 6 border walls, give every homeless vet $2 million, and help families affected by wildfires. Instead, they received only $700 each. HUD says $20 billion could end homelessness in America, but we spent $165 billion. This could have ended homelessness 8 times over. Our priorities need to change.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Check this out. With the 165,000,000,000 we gave to Ukraine Mhmm. We could have built 6 border walls to stop illegal 115 times over. Usually. I like this one. Could have given every homeless vet $2,000,000. Holy shit. Could've given 50,000,000 to every family impacted by the Maui wildfires. And they got $700. They got $700 each. We gotta get our priorities straight, buddy. According to HUD, they think it would take $20,000,000,000 to end homelessness in America. 20,000,000,000. And would you say we've sent a 100 and how much? We could have ended 65,000,000,000. So we could have ended homelessness 8 times over in America. Yeah, bro. It's outrageous. Priorities are. It's outrageous.
Saved - April 16, 2024 at 4:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a heartwarming encounter, an Uber driver named Lamiyah Jabbar went above and beyond for a passenger named Diane. After hearing about Diane's financial struggles, Lamiyah drove to a mall and bought her clothes and a gift card. The video highlights the importance of showcasing positive actions from both races, rather than focusing solely on negative incidents.

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

https://t.co/abWVWjJoiO This Uber driver, a Black woman Lamiyah Jabbar, age 30, picked up a White woman named Diane, who opened up to her about her financial struggles on the way to work at fast food chain Tim Hortons in Buffalo, New York. Lamiyah dropped Diane at her job, and instead of picking up a new passenger, Lamiyah drove to a shopping mall to visit several stores and asked women who looked to be about Diane's size what clothes they liked to wear and bought those clothes for Diane along with a gift card. I emphasized the race of the women in this video because that’s all I see on this platform now from both parties but only when the video makes either race look bad. We can also show the good in both sides.

Video Transcript AI Summary
I surprised Diane with a dress and a $50 Visa gift card because she mentioned needing clothes for church. She was grateful and thanked me. I also gave her a gift receipt in case she didn't like the dress. She appreciated the gesture, especially since she had been having a rough day.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, y'all. We're about to surprise somebody. I'll tell y'all why after. Hello? Hi, Diane. Hi. You remember me, Diane? Yes. You take so much. I right now, I don't know. I probably will. Diane, so this morning, I gave you a Uber ride to work. Oh, yeah. And we had a conversation earlier. Yes. We did. And you said that you was waiting for Christmas so that you can get house shoes and and some other stuff. Right? Alright. So you don't gotta wait till Christmas. Okay? So I bought you a dress. Oh my god. Here's the dress. Oh, thank you. Because you said you needed something to wear to church. Those are probably the people behind me. But that's your dress, so you could wear it to church. Oh, that's so sweet. If you don't like it, the gift receipt is in there. It's from Old Navy. And then here's a $50 Visa gift card. So you can take that and get your house shoes and your roll when it's time. Okay? Thank you so much. This has been such a horrible day. You're very
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 4:20 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MattWallace888 @dom_lucre https://t.co/GRSeBeImXJ Everything you have ever heard about America being a democracy, or even a constitutional republic, is a Flat-Out Lie! Ever since 1913, we've had a central banker owned plutocracy. 🔥

Video Transcript AI Summary
Before 1913, Americans could veto government spending by not buying bonds. The Federal Reserve Act in 1913 allowed the government to borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank without needing public approval. This created an unlimited credit line, bypassing the people's economic veto power. Now, the government can borrow without collateral, unlike individuals who need collateral to borrow money from a bank.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Prior to 1913, the American people had direct veto power against spending policies of the federal government because in order for the federal government to borrow any money, it had to go to the people. There was no central bank it could go to. It had to sell bonds. If you didn't wanna go to war, you didn't buy the bonds. If you didn't want this pork project that the government had in mind, you didn't buy the bonds. It was a very simple system, a republican system whereby you had veto power, economic veto power. And it worked very well until 1913. That's how come government managed to stay small because it didn't have an unlimited credit line to go on a shopping spree for 80 years and make you pay for it. So in 1913, there was this convenient new arrangement made. The Federal Reserve Act created an unlimited credit line for the Federal United States government to borrow directly from the Federal Reserve Bank and obligated the American people to pay it back, completely bypassing what was our veto power. And they no longer had to come to us directly to ask permission to fund something. They went directly to the bank. Now, if you go to the bank and want to borrow some money, what do you got to do? You got to put collateral up, right? They're not gonna give you a $5,000 loan if you have no collateral. If it's unsecured, you're gonna have to put up your house, your card, and land or something. Right?
Saved - April 9, 2024 at 4:14 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MattWallace888 @dom_lucre Cancer loves sugar Starve it https://t.co/ehYFyHYK1M

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cancer cells thrive on sugar and an acidic environment. The most acidic foods are meat, sugar, caffeine, and alcohol. Refined sugar is the worst. Sugar extracted from sugarcane is highly acidic. Cancer dislikes when sugar is cut off and oxygen is increased. To starve cancer, avoid sugar and sweet foods for 6 weeks.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Loves sugar. The fact is that a cancer cell consumes 15 times the glucose of any other cell. Cancer also loves an acid environment. The most acid forming foods are meat, sugar, caffeine, alcohol, and guess what is the most acid substance you can put into your body? Refined sugar. Nothing wrong with the sugarcane. All those minerals alkalize it up, but when they extract the sugar out of the sugarcane plant, it becomes a pure acid. Cancer hates it when you stop the sugar. Cancer hates oxygen. Cancer is not happy when you create an alkaline environment. We're gonna starve that cancer. How do you starve it? To starve it, you gotta know what it loves. It loves glucose, and so we suggested 6 weeks, no sugar, no honey, not no sweet at all.
Saved - April 8, 2024 at 12:56 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@DianaWallace888 @MattWallaceio https://t.co/9OfTm59JHm Medical schools are financed by drug companies?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Public health officials may not always prioritize our best interests. Parents should make their own decisions. Doctors should be open to learning about life-saving options. The pharmaceutical industry heavily influences medical education and the healthcare system. We need doctors to prioritize children's well-being over profits, even if it means taking a financial hit.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I don't think we can afford to assume that the people who are charged with our public health any longer have our best interest at heart all the time. Parents have to have to make their own decisions. Why would a doctor not want to know more about something that could save that could save a life or prevent a disease. I don't I don't I the AAP is financed by the drug companies. Medical schools are financed by the drug companies. This is a huge business. Vaccines are the largest growing division of the pharmaceutical industry. $13,000,000,000 They control medical schools. I mean, they're these doctors are not learning about prevention or vitamins or diets. What we are asking is for them to take a loss for the good of our children. That's a tough sell in a boardroom.
Saved - April 6, 2024 at 7:59 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@laralogan https://t.co/1B8392I137 ChemTrails are no longer a "conspiracy theory." CIA former director John Brennan is advocating for the use of Stratospheric Aersol Injections (aka chemtrails) "to combat climate change" & admitting that SAI can modify the weather.

Video Transcript AI Summary
SAI is a geoengineering technology that could help combat climate change by reflecting the sun's heat. It is cost-effective but comes with challenges. Greenhouse gas reductions are still needed, and geopolitical concerns exist due to potential weather pattern alterations. Lack of global norms complicates SAI deployment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Another example is the array of technologies often referred to collectively as geoengineering that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change. One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection or SAI. A method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do. An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels. This process is also relatively inexpensive. The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10,000,000,000 yearly. As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community. On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects such as ocean acidification because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. On the geopolitical side, the technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations. Others might seize on SAI's benefits and back away from their commitment to carbon dioxide reductions. And as with other breakthrough technologies, global norms and standards are lacking to guide the deployment and implementation of SAI and other geoengineering initiatives.
Saved - March 17, 2024 at 9:02 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@WallStreetApes https://t.co/6ay4tCqMzN "Doctors don't want you to learn this truth: For every problem in your body, there is a frequency that can heal you." 🤔

Video Transcript AI Summary
Doctors hide the truth: specific frequencies can heal various body issues. For sleep trouble, try 3 Hz; for anxiety, 432 Hz; for weight loss, 280 Hz; for illness, 528 Hz; for pain, 174 Hz; for low energy, 417 Hz. These frequencies can bring relief and rejuvenation. Subscribe for more natural medicine secrets.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Doctors don't want you to discover this truth. For every problem in your body, there is a frequency that can heal you. Nikola Tesla himself said, if you wanna find the secrets of the universe, think in terms of frequency. If you have trouble sleeping, listen to a 3 Hertz frequency. This soothing frequency will guide you towards deep and restorative sleep. If you're anxious, listen to a 432 Hertz frequency. Let this harmonious vibration envelop and calm your troubled mind. If you wanna lose weight, listen to a 280 Hertz frequency. This frequency is known to stimulate metabolism and promote fat burning. If you feel unwell, listen to a 528 hertz frequency. This healing frequency will provide relief and facilitate the regeneration of your body. If you have pain, listen to a 174 Hertz frequency. It has the power to alleviate your suffering and restore your overall well-being. And if you're experiencing a decrease in energy, listen to a 417 hertz frequency. You'll regain your lost vitality and experience an energy boost. Subscribe for more secrets about natural medicine.
Saved - March 13, 2024 at 9:38 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@MattWallace888 https://t.co/cstvxYxpGE 🚨❗Boeing Whistleblower found DEAD after this interview. Pay attention to what he exposed

Video Transcript AI Summary
Boeing's issues extend beyond the 737 model. An inspector found 300 defects at Spirit AeroSystems, but only 50 were reported on a subsequent visit due to time constraints. The rushed inspection process led to crucial issues being overlooked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: One, this is not a 737 problem. It's a Boeing problem. When I first started working at Charleston, I was in charge with pushing back defects to our suppliers. I take a group of inspectors and actually go to the supplier and inspect their product before they send it in. Well, I've taken a team of 4 inspectors to Spirit AeroSystems to inspect the 41 section before they send it to Charleston and we found 300 defects, Some of them were significant that needed engineering, intervention. When I returned to Charleston, my senior manager told me that we had found too many defects and he was gonna take the next trip. So the next trip he went on, he took 2 of my inspectors. And when they got back, they were given accolades for only finding 50 defects. So I pulled that inspector aside and I said, did Spirit really clean up their act that quick? That don't sound right. And she was mad. She said, no. Said the 2 inspectors were given 2 hours to inspect the whole 41 section and they were kicked off the airplane.
Saved - March 9, 2024 at 8:54 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@dom_lucre https://t.co/syG4zA5LXP Can cancer be killed by frequency and sound?

Video Transcript AI Summary
Cancer cells are vulnerable to frequencies between 100,000 and 300,000 hertz, with a 11th harmonic ratio. By adding the 11th harmonic, microorganisms are shattered within 3 minutes. The process destroys pancreatic, leukemia, and ovarian cancer cells, reducing their size and slowing growth rates by up to 65%. In laboratory experiments, 25% to 60% of leukemia cells were killed. Treatment rooms for children will feature healing plasma lights, silently destroying cancer cells.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We now know that cancer is vulnerable between the frequencies of 100,000 hertz and 300,000 hertz. 2 input frequencies, 1 low, 1 high. And the higher frequency must be 11 times the lower, what we musicians would call 11th harmonic. When we add the 11th harmonic, we begin to shatter microorganisms like a crystal blast. These organisms are being shattered by our electronic signals. They begin to slow down, then they stop, and then they begin to disintegrate within about 3 minutes. You'll see a large organism in the center of paramecium undergoing disintegration and swimming all around it, a tiny different organism, which is unharmed. We film the destruction of hundreds of microorganisms. We attack pancreatic cancer. They changed their shape and size. This is the beginning of a process of destruction for cancer cells. So now we attack leukemia cells. It's shattered into dozens of fragments. You can see by the end of the video, the great many ovarian cancer cells were destroyed. Now we attack pancreatic cancer once more. The tumor shrinks and is broken up in repeated controlled laboratory experiments, independently assayed by the 2 top experts. We killed an average of 25% to 42% of the leukemia cells as high as 60%. They also determined that we slowed the growth rate of the cancer by as much as 65%, so a double effect. Cancer treatment rooms for children will be a very different place. They'll draw pictures, coloring their books, play with their toys, all the while unaware that above them are beautiful blue pinkish plasma lights, emanating healing, pulsing electric fields, shattering their cancer painlessly and nontoxically, one cell at a time. Thank you.
Saved - February 3, 2024 at 8:45 PM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@JohnCena I don't see you but I see you... $GME but John, did you know? 👇👇👇 https://t.co/Wcbqo69RuY

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of fake shares in the stock market and how they are created through naked short selling. They mention high-profile businesses like Blockbuster and Toys R Us that have failed due to short selling. The speaker explains that short selling is betting on a stock's price going down, but it can be risky as the price can go up indefinitely. They discuss the GameStop situation in 2021, where short sellers were caught in a short squeeze by the GameStop community. The speaker suggests that short sellers may still be trapped and unable to buy back the stock. They also mention the interconnectedness of the market through leverage and swaps.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the stock market is full of fake shares, as in shares that don't actually exist and were created from nothing? You probably have some of them in your account. Today, we're gonna learn what really happened to Blockbuster and Toys R Us and a couple other businesses. You're gonna learn what really happened with GameStop in 2021, and you're gonna learn why the entire stock market is based on fraud, allegedly. Because before the whole GameStop thing happened the words naked short selling almost never got mentioned. And when someone did mention it, it was considered a conspiracy theory. But just like a lot of conspiracy theories, things have changed a bit. I'm about to show you a clip of a senior banker at Morgan Stanley given the dirt at great personal risk, I might add. Speaker 1: What inspired you to talk about it? Well, I I just they're living, you know, they're they're all living in kind of a fake world. You're all illegally and get your results done every day. Every day. And the fact that my fear don't ask questions, You appreciate the order. And if that involves, you're letting us not make it. You do it anyway. All the prime lenders, they all do it. Consistent like Speaker 0: So if you're not familiar with what short selling is, When I buy a share of a stock, someone else is selling the share of the stock. Right? And we agree on a price. Short selling is just a way to bet that the price will go down by borrowing a share from someone and you'll pay them back later. Then you sell it on the market, whatever price is going right now. So if you think this stock is gonna go down, you borrow the share from someone here, you sell it at this price, and you're right. And then later you buy it back and you close the trade out and you make money. The exact opposite as if you had bought the share here hoping to sell the share later when it was at a higher price. Exact opposite. Naked short selling is doing that, but you never even borrow a share. You just sell a share that did not exist before. Yes. That's as backwards as it announced. But like you just heard the man say, a lot of the biggest institutions do this all the time. Like, you remember this guy that runs Citadel Securities? Well, this is them getting caught by FINRA for doing exactly that in 2020. Big legal jargon to say, selling something, failing to deliver it and never having had any way to borrow it. These are the kind of market mechanics that make GameStop have a 300% short interest, as meaning 3 times the number of shares that are supposed to exist have been short sold leading into whatever happened in 2021. We'll come back to this in a second. There's a pattern here that's repeated with a number of very high profile businesses that have failed over the last couple of decades, such as Sears. Something bad happens or the sentiment turns, their stock price starts to decline, the short sellers pile on, they get short sold and short sold and short sold until they go bankrupt. This was Circuit City. This was Pier 1 Imports, and this was Blockbuster, one of the first ones in this pattern. There's another side to this too. Because when a company is failing like this, they almost always hire a consultancy firm to try to help turn the business around. They charge exorbitant fees for, shall we say, questionable advice. And that's exactly what happened at GameStop while they were getting hammered and short sold and hammered and short sold. And eventually, they hired Boston Consulting Group to come and help turn the company around. But when Ryan Cohen took over shortly before the whole thing happened, the first thing he did was fire Boston Consulting Group and then sue them because he knew what was going on. Because the consultancy group gets paid either way. If the business fails, they still get paid. And all the short sellers, if the business goes into bankruptcy and ceases to exist, they never even have to buy back the stock at all. And they get 100% pure profit on all of those totally above board short sales tax free. And from the looks of things, GameStop was about to become another blockbuster or another Sears. This is Ken Griffin who runs Citadel, hanging out with his buddy, who it's worth mentioning before he ran a bookstore out of his garage and whatever whatever, he also worked in hedge funds before that. And you better believe these 2 guys know everyone in the industry, including at the consultancy firms. So GameStop was on its way down to 0, just like a lot of companies before them. And then something crazy happened. Because the thing about short selling is it's actually really dangerous because You're betting on the price going down, but the price can go up as much as there's no limit on how much a price can go up. So your potential loss is infinite. And when you short sale, the only way to get out of that trade is to buy back the stock that you short sold. And the problem is that buying the stock makes the price go up. This is why a short squeeze can happen because if there's a lot of short sellers that have been short selling a stock and then it starts to go up, all the short sellers need to close those positions. And right before the GameStop thing happened, 300% short interest is insane. Usually, short squeezes happen with, like, 20% short interest. This is only possible if there are at least 200% shares completely fabricated, made up out of nothing because they don't exist. The GameStop community had officially caught the short sellers in the act, and they had them buy the balls. And in the SEC's own report, the red bars that show short sellers buying back the stock clearly showed that short sellers did not close. If they had tried to buy back 300% of the shares, the price would have gone a lot higher than it did. But this is data from one of the biggest retail brokerages in the United States of a normal month of GameStop trading, showing that green is how many people are buying and red is how many people are selling. And it's been like this ever since 2021 every month. And the blue line is the price going down with all this buying happening. And these 2 guys that were probably pretty hyped on the biggest video game retailer in the world going out of business because who knows who benefits from that. They probably aren't quite feeling that way anymore about it, which is probably why we had paid ads saying that they closed. Probably why the internet got filled with bots spamming identical messages about how everyone needs to get out because the stock is so bad. Probably why GameStop stock prices has been crazier than my ex girlfriend ever since. And it might help explain why in December of 2023, Almost half of GameStop trades happen in dark pools. And still today, about half of the trades are short sales. Because when you have exerted enough short selling pressure over many years to drive the stock down to this degree, to the point where short sales are reported at 300% of the float, you might not have any way out. Buying back this much stock would bankrupt you. And there has been ample evidence ever since that they are still trapped. And that's why all the GameStop people are still holding because they can kick the can a lot, but they can't get out unless they buy the stock back. And there's a lot more rich people than just these 2 guys who are on the hook here. Think about what we've learned this year about how tied together the market is by leverage and swaps. Remember what that man said at the start? All the prime lenders do it every day. And by it, I mean create shares out of nothing and sell them counterfeit into the market. Now there is a lot more to the story than what I was able to fit into this short video. A lot more evidence of fuckery and a lot of very complex ways for them to hide their trades. But one thing's reserved, no one's selling.
Saved - January 16, 2024 at 11:09 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@Cancelcloco https://t.co/IW6UJgXQqp

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@VivekGRamaswamy @elonmusk Wanna know what's rigged? The stock market as a whole. Remember when they pulled the buy button on $GME and others? They turned off the game to avoid losing. Shorts NEVER closed Power to the Players! https://t.co/Dh6IMVhJ48

Video Transcript AI Summary
Ryan Cohen, CEO and Chairman of GameStop, chooses not to receive any compensation for his role. He bought into the company with his own money and only seeks appreciation of his shares. GameStop's recent SEC filing reveals that 25% of the company is held by loyal shareholders who have directly registered their shares. This is a unique situation as individual investors collectively own more of the company than all institutions combined. After the short squeeze in 2021, people started uncovering corruption in the financial markets. The speaker plans to make more videos about what happened and the connections between GameStop and the larger financial system.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Who do you think is the lowest paid CEO in all of corporate America? As far as I'm aware, there's exactly 1 CEO that takes home no dollars, no stock compensations, no bonuses, nothing by choice. When you ask Google if there's any CEOs that don't get paid, It spits out this hilarious list, including Elon Musk and Larry Ellison and Steve Jobs. Or you can find articles from people like CNBC claiming that Mark Zuckerberg gets paid a dollar. I've made enough money, he said during a Facebook Q and A back in 2015. He just doesn't need any more money, which is why last year he took home $27,000,000 or you got Musk, the highest paid CEO in all of human history. Who's it's because his stock value went up so fast, but they made a pay package in 2018 that's now worth $50,000,000,000. Bunch of controversy there. Just to clarify, that's billion with a beat. Or Larry Ellison of Oracle, more than $5,000,000 in total compensation, more than 4,000,000 of that in cash bonuses. That's just a bonus. I have no idea how Meg Whitman snuck onto Google's list, like, $35,000,000. I mean, even selfless old Steve Jobs took home a 1,000,000 a year. Any of you real ones out there know who talking about talking about this. Oh, wait. Wrong photo. I'm talking about this. Oh, Speaker 1: shit. Wrong photo. Speaker 0: This guy. Oh, goddamn it. There he is, handsome bugger. This is Ryan Cohen. And if you didn't know, he's the CEO and chairman of GameStop. And when he was just the Chairman of the board, he was already choosing to take home no compensation in cash or stock awards, which is super rare. Plus, it's worth noting he became the chairman because he bought in with his own money to the tune of 1,000,000 and 1,000,000 of dollars and took over the company with his own money. Then he chose to receive no compensation from his work other than the appreciation of his own shares that he bought with his own money because if he does well at the company and the company does well, then his shares will go up in value and so will everyone else's. Then this year, he became the CEO as well and chose to receive no compensation of any sort for that role. That's just one of many things you probably don't know about GameStop because it never ended. Despite what bought accounts on Reddit that wanted you to get out of there and forget all about it, might have been paid to repost prolifically. And despite someone literally paying to advertised during the whole situation that the hedge funds close their positions. Cause you really needed to know that the hedge funds closed their positions. I mean, you were probably told that some sort of short squeeze happened, except that if you read the SEC report about the GameStop situation in 2020 anyone. You might have noticed that they explicitly said, a short squeeze did not appear to be the main driver of events. It continues on the next page, and a gamma squeeze even less likely. Or you would have seen this chart in the report where the SEC backed that claim up with their proprietary data that we don't have access to where they showed in red that short sellers buying back the stock while the stock was at its highest values in the dash line here was basically non existent. Remember, like, more than twice as many shares as existed were short sold leading into this before they suddenly changed how it was reported. And suddenly the short interest came down to only 22%, which is considered extremely high. That's today. This is like a screenshot from 3 days ago. It's still at 22% even once whatever happened with the reporting happened with the reporting. Like, to be clear, Most short squeezes happen with short interest between 10 30%. This is, like, really high. But I'm not telling you to buy any stock. Just filling you in on some shit that you might not have known. And this rabbit hole goes way deeper than this. I'm gonna make some long form videos about it because there's a lot more interesting things to know about this. Like, for example, GameStop, according to Yahoo Finance, held by insiders is 12% of the stock is held by insiders. That's basically all Ryan Cohen, the chairman and CEO with his own money. And only 28% of the stock is held by all institutions like BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, Morgan Stanley, all the big banks. So who holds all the shares? Well, according to GameStop's most recent SEC filing, The hardcore Game Stoppers that never sold their shit and have directly registered their shares in their own names meaning they took them out of the market so short sellers couldn't borrow those shares, they hold a whopping 25% of the company. This is me. I'm a part of this number. I am directly registered and I had no intention of selling them ever. Like, you might not realize how unique this number is. We own collectively way more of this company than all institutions combined. Like, that does not happen. Amazon, between the insiders and the institutions, that's, like, 70%. Microsoft, 73%. Google, 62%. Apple, 60%. Robinhood, 73%. And Best Buy, 83%. I mean, y'all already know that the big institutions own everything. At least, they own everything except for GameStop. Because despite what some of the documentaries you might have watched about it wanted to claim and make it seem like, most of us never sold. Actually, we bought and bought and bought and bought. Like, it's kinda hilarious how much people bought after the short squeeze. Like, this is Fidelity data on buying and selling from an average month in 2022, 2021, 2023. Green is how many people are buying, and red is how many people are selling the stock. Like, certainly. What happened in 2021 was fucking awesome and it was super cool. And if you don't know the story, you should go learn about it. But what happened with GameStop since 2021 is where the real story lies. Because it was after the short squeeze in 2021 when everyone started to dig into the corruption in the financial markets and they started to uncover a lot of things. Things that the financial markets do not want you to know. And the people with all the money that were on the other side of this trade do not want you to know. What they all found out is a huge part of why I am here doing what I do. It is long past time that I make a video about what really happened in 2021 and more importantly, what happened since 2021. So this is just a little teaser. There's infinite more or funny shit to talk about and a lot of dirt and one really cool chairman and an awesome company. And I'm gonna make a few more short form videos on this, assuming that I don't get my account banned for this for weird reasons. And I'm definitely gonna make a full length YouTube video or 2 or 3. Who knows because this shit goes deep. And before the entire financial markets collapse for whatever reason in 2024, it's important that you know what the GameStop people figured out because it's all connected. And I, by no means, speak for everybody in the GameStop community. It is a vast and complex story, and I'm just 1 dude. I'm not an expert at any of this, and I'm just an idiot that's Been following along as best I can, and it's been hilarious. You've been holding the stock along with us. You're a legend. I love you. And if you don't know what I'm talking about, stay tuned. More coming up. Speaker 1: Hold up. Speaker 0: This video is not quite the right length yet, so I got I got a spicy clip for you before we go. Speaker 1: It's a little bit too convenient that he got Kelvin Capital losing 1,000,000,000 of dollars, Citadel backing them, and then 2 days To 1,000,000,000 of dollars, Citadel backing them, and then 2 days later, Robin Hood stopping people from buying If that's what's happening, they all bark in bed with each other, which is scary. But there will never be any proof, right? Because, you know, what's gonna own up to the hedge funds colluding with Proof? Speaker 0: Yeah. Maybe not proof, but evidence? There's a lot of evidence of things, all sorts of things.
Saved - January 14, 2024 at 2:06 AM

@ThrillaRilla369 - Thrilla the Gorilla

@Cancelcloco https://t.co/ywu0omBEcl

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the concept of fake shares in the stock market and how they are created through naked short selling. They explain that short selling involves betting on a stock's price going down by borrowing and selling shares, while naked short selling involves selling shares that don't actually exist. The speaker highlights that major institutions engage in this practice and provides examples of high-profile businesses that have failed due to short selling. They also mention the role of consultancy firms and the potential for profit in short selling. The speaker then focuses on the GameStop situation, where the community caught short sellers in the act, causing a short squeeze. They suggest that short sellers are still trapped and unable to buy back the stock. The speaker concludes by mentioning the interconnectedness of the market and the existence of evidence of fraudulent practices.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did you know that the stock market is full of fake shares, as in shares that don't actually exist and were created from nothing? You probably have some of them in your account. Today, we're gonna learn what really happened to Blockbuster and Toys R Us and a couple other businesses. You're gonna learn what really happened with GameStop in 2021, and you're gonna learn why the entire stock market is based on fraud, allegedly. Because because before the whole GameStop thing happened, the words naked short selling almost never got mentioned. And when someone did mention it, it was considered a conspiracy theory. But just like a lot of conspiracy theories, things have changed a bit. I'm about to show you a clip of a senior banker at Morgan Stanley, given the dirt. At great personal risk, I might add. Speaker 1: What requires you to talk about whether they're they're You know, they're they're all living in kind of a fake You're out illegally and get your results You appreciate the order. And if that involves, you're letting us not make it. You do it anyway. All the prime lenders, they all do it consistently. Speaker 0: So if you're not familiar with what short selling is, When I buy a share of a stock, someone else is selling the share of the stock. Right? And we agree on a price. Short selling is just a way to bet that the price will go down by borrowing a share from someone and you'll pay them back later, then you sell it on the market, whatever price is going right now. So So if you think this stock is gonna go down, you borrow the share from someone here, you sell it at this price and you're right. And then later you buy it back and you close the trade out and you make money. The exact opposite is if you had bought the share here hoping to sell the share later when it was at a higher price. Exact opposite. Naked short selling is doing that, but you never even borrow a share. You just sell a share that did not exist before. Yes. That's as backwards as it accounts. But like you just heard the man say, a lot of the biggest institutions do this all the time. Like, you remember this guy that runs Citadel Securities? Well, this is them getting caught by FINRA for doing exactly that in 2020. Big legal jargon to say, selling something, failing to deliver it and never having had any way to borrow it. These are the kind of market mechanics that make GameStop have a 300% short interest, as meaning 3 times the number of shares that are supposed to exist have been short sold leading into whatever happened in 2021. We'll come back to this in a second. There's a pattern here that's repeated with a number of very high profile businesses that have failed over the last couple decades, such as Sears. When something bad happens or the sentiment turns, their stock price starts to decline, the short sellers pile on, they get short sold and short sold and short sold until they go bankrupt. This was Circuit City. This was Pier 1 Imports, and this was Blockbuster, one of the first ones in this pattern. There's another side to this too. Because when a company is failing like this, they almost always hire a consultancy firm to try to help turn the business around. They charge exorbitant fees for, shall we say, questionable advice. And that's exactly what happened at GameStop while they were getting hammered and short sold and hammered and short sold. And eventually, they hired Boston Consulting Group to come and help turn the company around. But when Ryan Cohen took over shortly before the whole thing happened, the first thing he did was fire Boston Consulting Group and then sue them because he knew what was going on. Because the consultancy group gets paid either way. If the business fails, they still get paid. And all the short sellers, if the business goes into bankruptcy and ceases to exist, they never even have to buy back the stock at all. And they get 100% pure profit on all of those totally above board short sales tax free. And from the looks of things, GameStop was about to become another blockbuster or another Sears. This is Ken Griffin who runs Citadel, hanging out with his buddy who it's worth mentioning, before he ran a bookstore out of his garage and whatever whatever, he also worked in hedge funds before that. And you better believe these 2 guys know everyone in the industry, including at the consultancy firms. So GameStop was on its way down to 0, just like a lot of companies before them. And then something crazy happened. Because the thing about short selling is it's actually really dangerous because you're betting on the price going down, but the price can go up as much as there's no limit on how much a price can go up. So your potential loss is infinite. And when you short sale, the only way to get out of that trade is to buy back the stock that you short sold. And the problem is that buying the stock makes the price go up. This is why a short squeeze can happen because if there's a lot of short sellers that have been short selling a stock and then it starts to go up, all the short sellers need to close those positions. And right before the GameStop thing happened, 300% short interest is insane. Usually, short squeezes happen with, like, 20% short interest. This is only possible if there are at least 200% shares completely fabricated, made up out of nothing because they don't exist. The GameStop community had officially caught the short sellers in the act, and they had them buy the balls. And in the SEC's own report, the red bars that show short sellers buying back the stock clearly showed that short sellers did not close. If they had tried to buy back 300% of the shares, the price would have gone a lot higher than it did. But this is data from one of the biggest retail brokerages in the United States of a normal month of GameStop trading, showing that green is how many people are buying, and red is how many people are selling. And it's been like this ever since 2021 every month. And the blue line is the price going down with all this buying happening. And these 2 guys that were probably pretty hyped on the biggest video game retailer in the world going out of business because who knows who benefits from that. They probably aren't quite feeling that way anymore about it, which is probably why we had paid ads saying that they closed, Probably why the Internet got filled with bots spamming identical messages about how everyone needs to get out because the stock is so bad. Probably why GameStop stock prices has been crazier than my ex girlfriend ever since. And it might help explain why in December of 2023, almost half of GameStop trades happen in dark pools. And still today, about half of the trades are short sales. Because when you have exerted enough short selling pressure over many years to drive the stock down to this degree, to the point where short sales are reported at 300% of the float, you might not have any way out. Buying back this much stock would bankrupt you. And there has been ample evidence ever since that they are still trapped. And that's why all the GameStop people are still holding because they can kick the can a lot, but they can't get out unless they buy the stock back. And there's a lot more rich people than just these 2 guys who are on the hook here. Think about what we've learned this year about how tied together the market is by leverage and swaps. Remember what that man said at the start? All the prime lenders do it every day. And by it, I mean, create shares out of nothing and sell them counterfeit into the market. Now there is a lot more to the story than what I was able to fit into this short video. A lot more evidence of fuckery and a lot of very complex ways for them to hide their trades. But one thing's reserved, no one's selling.
View Full Interactive Feed