TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TomFitton
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Leftist terrorist insurrection shutting down travel and commerce in Minnesota.
@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin
NEW: I’m told multiple ICE agents with rooms booked at the St. Paul Downtown Doubletree by Hilton received this notice today that their rooms are being cancelled & the hotel will temporarily close “due to heightened public safety concerns in St. Paul.” I called the hotel & checked online & they are indeed not taking any bookings right now. They referred me to other hotels. I'm told this also happened today at the Intercontinental St. Paul, with ICE agents with bookings there notified the hotel will be temporarily closing today due to the ongoing unrest in Minnesota. An agent who talked to the front desk manager there says he was told it was done to protect staff because they have been getting threats from unknown individuals for lodging DHS agents.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Leftist terrorist insurrection shutting down travel and commerce in Minnesota.
@BillMelugin_ - Bill Melugin
NEW: I’m told multiple ICE agents with rooms booked at the St. Paul Downtown Doubletree by Hilton received this notice today that their rooms are being cancelled & the hotel will temporarily close “due to heightened public safety concerns in St. Paul.” I called the hotel & checked online & they are indeed not taking any bookings right now. They referred me to other hotels. I'm told this also happened today at the Intercontinental St. Paul, with ICE agents with bookings there notified the hotel will be temporarily closing today due to the ongoing unrest in Minnesota. An agent who talked to the front desk manager there says he was told it was done to protect staff because they have been getting threats from unknown individuals for lodging DHS agents.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
NYC election integrity update: 1 million names cleaned from voting rolls thanks to @JudicialWatch! https://t.co/JLUduAZFnq
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judicial Watch’s legal action led to the removal of 5,000,000 names from voter rolls nationwide. Specifically, 1,000,000 names were cleaned from New York City’s rolls, 1,200,000 from Los Angeles’s rolls, and hundreds of thousands to millions of names were cleaned from Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Kentucky. The list goes on, all thanks to Judicial Watch’s heavy lifting in court. They say millions more names need to be cleaned up, and Judicial Watch is in federal court now. In the meantime, there are 5,000,000 fewer opportunities for voter fraud.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Everyone, great news. Judicial watch legal action just led to the removal of 5,000,000 names I can report from voter rolls nationwide. A million dirty names cleaned from New York City's rolls. 1,200,000 names cleaned from LA's rolls, hundreds of thousands, millions of names cleaned from Colorado, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky. The list goes on and on, all thanks to judicial watches, heavy lifting in court.
Now, of course, millions more names need to be cleaned up, and judicial watch is in federal court now. But in the meantime, right now, there are 5,000,000 fewer opportunities for voter fraud.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
In order to help address 9/11 conspiracy theories, @JudicialWatch sued for and obtained the Pentagon parking camera footage of AA#77 hitting the Pentagon. http://pentagonmemorial.org
Home - 9/11 Pentagon Memorial
pentagonmemorial.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
BREAKING: @JudicialWatch Lawsuit Uncovers 2016 Biden Alias Email: Hunter Biden Copied On Ukrainian President Call Info. This is another smoking gun. It blows out of the water the notion that there was any distance between Joe and Hunter Biden on the Burisma influence-peddling scandal. https://www.judicialwatch.org/joe-biden-email/
Judicial Watch: Lawsuit Uncovers 2016 Joe Biden Email Showing Hunter Biden Copied on Ukraine President Information - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today it received five pages of records from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) that show then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter received a May 26, 2016, email detailing a scheduled “8:45 am prep for a 9 am phone call with Pres Poroshenko,” who was the president of Ukraine. Joe Biden’s email address is the alias robert.l.peters@pci.gov, Hunter Biden’s email account is disclosed as hbiden@rosemontseneca.com. (Hunter Biden was on the board of the controversial Ukrainian firm Burisma at the time.)The email, with the subject line “Friday Schedule Cards” was sent by John S. Flynn, who was Joe Biden’s assistant:Boss--8:45am prep for 9am phone call with Pres Poroshenko. Then we're off to Rhode Island for infrastructure event and then Wilmington for UDel commencement. Nate will have your draft remarks delivered later tonight or with your press clips in the morning.Respectfully,
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
BREAKING: @JudicialWatch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate https://www.judicialwatch.org/wrongful-death-lawsuit-babbitt/
Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the U.S. Government on behalf of the family of Ashli Babbitt, the U.S. Air Force veteran who was shot and killed inside the U.S. Capitol by then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd on January 6, 2021 (Estate of Ashli Babbitt and Aaron Babbitt, et al. v. United States of America).
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
These recordings and photos provide dramatic, first-hand evidence that the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt was unjustified. It is disturbing that neither the Pelosi Congress nor the Biden/Garland DOJ took no action over this needless death. https://www.judicialwatch.org/jw-dc-police-babbitt/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judicial Watch presents a cell phone video showing police officers placed at harm by lieutenant Byrd's reckless decision to shoot Ashley Babich, illustrating that civilians and other law enforcement personnel were in the line of fire. They claim Byrd's shooting was treated differently than other police officer shootings, and argue that if it weren't a Trump supporter, if it weren't January 6, if Capitol Hill Police, then I'm convinced lieutenant Byrd, in the least, would have faced a more serious criminal investigation. The release includes photos of Byrd's headshot, hands, and the gun, and notes it is unclear whether a criminal prosecution was recommended and rejected. An audio interview with Byrd includes Garrity warnings; Byrd says, "I would prefer to have a lawyer." Judicial Watch also notes it sued the DoJ for prosecutorial decision information and Congress for 14,000 hours of video; Pelosi is the enemy of transparency.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So right here for you now is the new cell phone video showing those police officers who were placed at harm's way as a result of lieutenant Byrd's reckless decision to shoot Ashley Babich. So here's the video. Watch it through through its entirety, and you'll and you'll see why it's important. So there you have it. You see in that video why lieutenant Byrd's decision to shoot Ashley Babbitt was so reckless and dangerous because not only were there civilians there, but there were other law enforcement personnel who were, practically speaking, right in the line of fire.
Now my view is lieutenant Byrd's shooting was treated quite differently than other police officer involved shootings. And, of course, I don't need to tell you that. You already know that. And if if it weren't a Trump supporter, if it weren't January 6, if this weren't the Capitol Hill Police, which is the police agency right now run by Nancy Pelosi and her call and her Democratic colleagues on the hill, I'm convinced lieutenant Byrd, in the least, would have faced a more serious criminal investigation. And also, again, in the least, an administrative sanction for recklessly shooting this unarmed individual.
It was a bad shooting. And this that video we have, which it took us forever and a day to get, further demonstrated. Also, we received and it wasn't it looked like it was a criminal investigation. One of the curious things, and I say this not knowing how it was resolved because the justice department, which which were also suing for records about their decision related to the prosecution of lieutenant Byrd or non prosecution in his case, hasn't given us the documents. But it's unclear from the documents we received whether there was a criminal prosecution recommended and rejected.
So we don't know for sure whether someone wanted to prosecute him or not within the police department or within the justice department or how that worked. But the pictures we have demonstrate that it looks, you know, it looked to me that he was being seriously investigated, at least in part. Here, there's a picture of him. You can see, you know, they they got a head straight on headshot of Lieutenant Byrd. It's not quite a mugshot, but it's pretty darn close.
And then they have, which I thought was very even more interesting, pictures of his hands. So I I defer to the forensic experts among you, to tell us why in your comments why that's important. And then, of course, there are pictures of the gun. Many pictures of the gun were produced to us as well. And you'll see those pictures, they're running through now.
So, you know, this is stuff exclusively obtained by Judicial Watch. And some of the other photos we have include, photos of the crime scene generally, and, they're gonna run a few photos as I'm talking here. You can kinda see the doorway, where Babbitt, went through. Well, she didn't get through because they shot her. Remember, behind that you had that crowd behind that door, and I'm sure it was scary for everyone involved.
If you're on the wrong side of that door, you see a crowd and you don't know what's gonna happen. But we pay these police officers to keep their heads about them and not panic and not shoot. And included in these audio witness statements is the audio statement of lieutenant Byrd, who, as best we can tell, refused to cooperate, which is his right. But here is the two minute or so audio interview of Lieutenant Byrd. The voices sound weird because, and they sound weird in all of the witness statements, audio at least, is because the government somehow wanted to disguise the voices of people even though in the case of Lieutenant Byrd, he's identified.
So here is the audio interview. Here's the audio of the interview of Lieutenant Byrd.
Speaker 1: Today is 01/06/2020. It is approximately nineteen thirty eight hours. I'm internal affairs division. We were located at 119 D Street, US Capitol Police Headquarters. Present is the target of the criminal investigation for the officer involved shooting.
Sir, would you please introduce yourself?
Speaker 2: Lieutenant Michael Byrd, United States Capitol Police, House Chambers Section, Capitol Division. PIN number
Speaker 1: Thank you very much for that, sir. And if you please introduce also, if you please introduce yourself? Agent MPD IED. And also, president. Special United States Capitol Police Criminal Investigation section.
Thank you. Before we get into the interview itself, I wanna advise you to just call it the Garrity Warnings. What Garrity says is that, you know, you're not required to statement to us today, that if you choose to do so or not choose to do so, have no bearing on your employment, that any statement you give is voluntary, but also please be aware that any statement that you give will be shared with the United States Attorney's Office. Any Any statement you give will be shared with the United States Attorney's Office. Okay?
Do do you understand the guardian law?
Speaker 2: I do. Okay.
Speaker 1: Are you willing to give us a statement today?
Speaker 2: I would prefer to have a lawyer
Speaker 1: present. Okay.
Speaker 2: I don't I don't know the in the information that you just provided. That
Speaker 1: is perfectly understandable. And I will not ask you to provide a statement today. I will ask you though that when you do secure counsel, you have my business card and my contact information on them. If you have them reach out to me to arrange for you to provide a statement when appropriate.
Speaker 2: Yes, sir.
Speaker 1: Okay. Alright then. Well then, with that said, we're going to end the recording at this time unless there's anything else, you know, like that. Okay. We're going to end the recording at this time.
It is approximately nineteen forty one hours.
Speaker 0: So you see lieutenant Byrd didn't wanna talk. He wanted to have his lawyer, and as best we can tell, no one ever interviewed him, at least in the police department of the Metropolitan Police Department, about his decision to shoot Ashley Babbitt. Of course, he talked to the media about it, but he didn't talk to law enforcement. Isn't that interesting? So this is it shows you how important Judicial Watch's work is that we're able to get this information in the face of a congress that's focused on trying to destroy its political enemies using the pretext of January 6.
And, of course, this is not our only lawsuit. As I said, if we sued the justice department for its information on the shooting death of Ashley Babbitt, the only person killed a via homicide that day. And we sued the congress for the videos. They're telling the court, in our case against them for the videos, fourteen thousand hours of videos from that day. Not one second of the January 6 videos that congress has can be released to judicial watch under the open records law.
In fact, they're saying they're not even public records. And if they were, they're not important enough to release. The public interest doesn't outweigh their interest in confidentiality. Well, which is it? The worst day in American history that the public has an interest in figuring out how it happened, or some just regular congressional day that doesn't require them to start releasing videos of what went on?
You know where we stand on it, but Pelosi is the enemy, as I said before, of transparency on this.
Judicial Watch: DC Police Release New Audio, Video, and Photos from Investigation of U.S. Capitol Police Killing of Ashli Babbitt - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received multiple audio, visual and photo records from the DC Metropolitan Police Department about the shooting death of Ashli Babbitt on January 6, 2021, in the U.S. Capitol Building. The records include a cell phone video of the shooting and an audio of a brief police […]
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
I have no doubt there is an "Epstein Client List"--the only question is whether it is made public or not. @JudicialWatch FOIA lawsuit could be key to the truth. @IngrahamAngle @FoxNews. https://t.co/ki7aHtitrG
Video Transcript AI Summary
The discussion centers on the lack of transparency surrounding the Epstein case, focusing on the alleged client list and the circumstances of his death. Kash Patel questioned why the FBI was supposedly protecting a "pederist" by withholding the list. Tom Fenton suggests a reluctance to release names for political reasons, even non-incriminating ones. He highlights the FBI's denial of documents related to Pam Bondi's investigation.
Molly Hemingway criticizes the FBI for prioritizing narrative management over transparency. A former inmate doubts Epstein's suicide, citing the cell's layout and constant surveillance. Fenton points out conflicting forensic investigations into Epstein's death and questions the release of inconclusive video footage. He notes the government's reluctance to release further documents, citing conspiracy theories. The speakers question whether Epstein acted alone, the extent of information shared, and the need for a clearer explanation of his associations and activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And it's Tom Fenton, judicial watch president, Molly Hemingway, the federalist editor in chief and Fox News contributor. Tom, here's what Cash Patel said about that Epstein client list shortly after he was nominated as f a I FBI director Watch.
Speaker 1: You say that the FBI has Epstein's list. They're sitting on it. That doesn't seem like something you should do. You're protecting the world's foremost predator. Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the the largest scale peterist in human history?
Speaker 2: Simple. Because of who's on that list. What the hell are the house republicans doing? They have the majority. You can't get the list?
Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.
Speaker 0: Tom, you sounded pretty definitive there. So what changed?
Speaker 3: I think they decided for political purposes, they didn't want to include the individuals who are on these lists and put them in the public domain. And they were concerned that some of them may be may not have done something, warranting the disclosure. I mean, that's that's the most charitable interpretation. You know, but there is a list. There's no doubt.
I mean, they talk about in the memo they wrote. Well, there there's no, incriminating client list. Well, what does that mean? I want the non incriminating client list. And of course, a client list is a term of art.
Right? Where where are his associates? Where is the list of contacts? You know, we asked under our foil lawsuit, Pam Bondi, give us the documents that you say you were looking at. Give us documents about the release of these documents.
You said the FBI was obstructing the release. They came back to us and we have nothing.
Speaker 0: Molly.
Speaker 4: Well, this is a proxy for what we've seen with so many big stories throughout the years where the American people just wanna know what's going on with Whatever the attempts, you know, whether it's the one in Butler on Trump or the one that was successful against JFK, the Russia collusion hoax, the situation with Epstein, everyone understands that there might not be a, you know Smoking gun. Right. But there no one feels very satisfied with the level of investigation that was taking place or the transparency. And it seems that the FBI and other government agencies care more about managing the narrative than actually just revealing the information that needs to be revealed.
Speaker 0: Then we have interviews with former mobsters who actually was in the same jail as Epstein and had kind of a shocking claim. Watch.
Speaker 5: Jeffrey Epstein would had to be a magician to try to hang himself in that cell. I was in that cell. You just there's no way to there's nothing on the ceiling. Yeah. The bed post is this high.
I couldn't even go to a restroom without them walking back and forth and having me on camera. You know? There's no way he committed suicide.
Speaker 3: Tom. You know, when Pam Bondi yesterday said that video they released isn't conclusive.
Speaker 0: But it's a reset. That minute is a regular reset
Speaker 3: of the And they're still looking for that minute. And to release video that doesn't show what happened in the cell isn't terribly persuasive. I'm not sure what they were expecting there. The fact is there are two competing forensics investigations, one by Epstein's family, which suggests that it was a homicide and one by the examiner up in New York. He says it was a suicide.
So given those issues, to say because the video doesn't show one way or the other whether someone went in there to conclude, oh, well, there's nothing to investigate seems odd. And they also said, we're not gonna give you any more documents. And kind of with this, well, there are too many conspiracy theories out there. And I I I don't like to be this like that. And Americans, I think, by and large, have questions about Epstein.
And to be told that Yeah. You know,
Speaker 0: we said that I think Kas Patel made that point, like, a year before being nominated. But still, I mean, I think this all adds to the swirl of a bit of confusion about this and doubt. And, again, the government only, I I think, engenders trust among the American people with full transparency. So when Pam Bondi and everyone knows how much I like Pam Bondi. Mhmm.
I like her a lot. But when she says, well, those are basically never gonna see the light of day. But who was it downloaded child porn, or was it were there individuals engaged in acts with children? That's the question, I think. And unless any either of you know what the definitive answer is, I don't know.
Speaker 3: I mean, they talk about a thousand victims. I mean, so was Epstein the only victimizer for that number of victims? I don't think
Speaker 4: Well, just again in general, there haven't been there has not been the appropriate level of information shared. We know that the guy you mean, maybe he maybe he didn't kill himself or maybe he did. Why? Why was he in prison? Why is Ghislain Maxwell still in prison?
Why are all these people talking this way? There's no way that we've gotten a clear enough explanation of what's going on. How did he make his money? How did he get associations with so many high level people? People are willing to accept any number of answers, but they need to be treated like adults in the communications.
Speaker 0: Well, this is a sticky wicket they have in front of them. Tom and Molly, both of you, thank you very much.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
So @AGPamBondi DOJ attorneys were in federal court yesterday arguing why the American people should not be able to see what the Biden FBI was planning with Twitter (@X). https://www.judicialwatch.org/twitter-censorship-hearing-set/
Judicial Watch: FBI Hiding Biden Twitter Censorship Records - Federal Court Hearing Set - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a hearing is ordered by U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan for June 18 at 11 a.m. ET in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for “Twitter Files” records concerning Hunter Biden’s laptop and other censorship. The only issue remaining in the lawsuit is the FBI’s continued hiding […]
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
FRUSTRATING: So @JudicialWatch has to go to Federal court this morning to fight with @AGPamBondi DOJ and @FBIDirectorKash FBI for basic info about the Biden's FBI schemes to use Twitter (@X) to spy on and censor Americans. Judicial Watch senior attorney Michael Bekesha will be standing up for us today!
reSee.it AI Summary
Tom Fitton highlighted a recent court hearing where DOJ attorneys argued against public access to information regarding the Biden FBI's plans with Twitter. In response, another user expressed support for Fitton's efforts and emphasized the desire for comprehensive disclosures from Elon Musk, referring to it as the "MOTHER OF ALL TWITTER FILES." The user encouraged Musk to assist Fitton in obtaining this information.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
So @AGPamBondi DOJ attorneys were in federal court yesterday arguing why the American people should not be able to see what the Biden FBI was planning with Twitter (@X). https://www.judicialwatch.org/twitter-censorship-hearing-set/
Judicial Watch: FBI Hiding Biden Twitter Censorship Records - Federal Court Hearing Set - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that a hearing is ordered by U.S. District Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan for June 18 at 11 a.m. ET in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice for “Twitter Files” records concerning Hunter Biden’s laptop and other censorship. The only issue remaining in the lawsuit is the FBI’s continued hiding […]
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
FRUSTRATING: So @JudicialWatch has to go to Federal court this morning to fight with @AGPamBondi DOJ and @FBIDirectorKash FBI for basic info about the Biden's FBI schemes to use Twitter (@X) to spy on and censor Americans. Judicial Watch senior attorney Michael Bekesha will be standing up for us today!
@RealKeyWestJess - Key West Jess
@TomFitton @AGPamBondi @X @IvanRaiklin and many others have been urging @elonmusk to release these things. We want the MOTHER OF ALL TWITTER FILES so maybe @elonmusk can help you @TomFitton https://t.co/zgd9NUOBRV
@RealKeyWestJess - Key West Jess
@SenRonJohnson @SenRonJohnson this is the clip that got me. You HAVE GOT TO SUBPOENA @elonmusk & @X for their DM’s for this exact reason. The list @IvanRaiklin has is a perfect start. https://t.co/gx2ob9t6Iq
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the hearing is titled "What Are They Hiding?" and cites over 60 oversight letters to federal health agencies as evidence. These letters cover issues like hot lots and VAERS analysis procedures.
The speaker says their oversight letters were prompted by Anthony Fauci's emails released under FOIA in February, requiring someone to go to court to obtain them. After requesting unredacted versions of the initial 4,000 pages in June 2021, they received the same redacted pages by July.
In September 2021, a request was narrowed to 400 pages. From October 2021 to January 2022, they were allowed to review 50 pages at a time in a reading room, without the ability to make copies. The last 50 pages have not been released after nearly two years. The speaker suggests the unreleased documents may contain incriminating information and should be accessible to Congress and the public.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The title of this hearing is what are they hiding? My own evidence of that is, for example, over 60 oversight letters that I've written to the federal health agencies. This is just a small number covering two issues, hot lots and the standard operating procedures of their analysis on VAERS. But some of my first oversight letters, were prompted by the emails that were released under FOIA in February. These are Anthony Fauci's emails.
Again, they were released under FOIA. In other words, somebody had to go to court. Even though members of congress, we we have the right to see these things. Somebody had to take them to court. Once they released about 4,000 pages, we requested unredacted versions of these things on 06/11/2021.
By July, we received basically the same 4,000 redacted pages. In September 2021, we requested only 400 of the 4,000. We narrowed our our request. In October 2021 through January 2022, they allowed us to look at 50 pages at a time in a reading room. We couldn't take copies.
We could just take notes. We are down to the last 50 pages. They will not release these. It's been now going close to two years. This is what has been provided to us.
Do you think there might be some incriminating information in this? Now again, these are government documents. This is government, federal, federal records. This should be made available to congress. This should be mailed made available to the American public, but it is not.
So that's the Fauci emails.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
So under the theory of equal justice under law, the Jan 6 precedents suggest @SenAlexPadilla should be charged and convicted for resisting and impeding law enforcement and face 1-3 years in federal prison.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
President @RealDonaldTrump should consider invoking the Insurrection Act to protect lives, ensure deportations, and to arrest those causing anarchy in California. Local state and elected officials in that state have placed themselves on the other side of the rule of law.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
And why is Comey still walking around a free man given his death threat to @RealDonaldTrump?
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Comey threatened @realDonaldTrump's life! Will he be prosecuted? https://t.co/qbs6A6CKel
Video Transcript AI Summary
James Comey is accused of making a death threat against Donald Trump by posting a photo of seashells arranged to read "86 47," which allegedly means "kill Trump." Trump stated Comey knew what it meant and called him a "dirty cop." Tulsi Gabbard believes Comey should be jailed for issuing a call to assassinate the president.
The speaker claims Democrats want Trump killed, citing Comey's post, Benny Thompson's legislation to deny Trump Secret Service protection, and the Biden administration restricting Trump's protection. The speaker believes Comey spied on Trump during the Obama administration and that Bill Barr should have prosecuted him.
The speaker suggests the FBI should be defunded and its powers curtailed, and a separate entity reporting to the President should investigate the FBI and DOJ. The speaker also suggests investigating the Biden crime family and censorship of Americans. The speaker believes deep state agencies like the FBI and IRS target Americans based on political beliefs and should be shut down.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The left and Democrats wanna get Trump killed. I've told you this before, and I'll tell you again. It's further evidenced in Comey's death threat to president Trump. First up, James Comey, the worst FBI director in American history, and that's saying something. Corrupt, criminal, treacherous, has just, been caught effectively threatening the life of the president of The United States, Donald J Trump.
And what happened is he posted online the following picture, eighty six forty seven. Let's go to and he says he just happened to run across that on the beach. So we're all about we're all supposed to believe that he just magically ran into this phrase, eighty six forty seven. And if you don't know what it means, it means kill president Trump. I yeah.
Now I know there are other re other definitions of 86 that defenders of Comey have suggested, but in that context, it doesn't matter. It's it's the word literally is eighty six forty seven means kill the president. When you 86 someone in this context, you mean to kill them. And do I think he just ran across this on the beach and posted a photo? No.
I don't. I think he knew what he was doing, and here's what his reaction was suggesting that he knew he had done something wrong. I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn't realize some folks associate those numbers with with violence. Some folks, it is associated with violence.
It never occurred to me that I oppose that I oppose violence of any kind, so I took the post down. And since then, he's deleted his entire Instagram account. I don't believe his account. He sounds he he makes it seem like he just ran across this number while walking down the beach. Do you believe it?
I don't. It's like some episode of Lost. You walk down the beach, and there's some message written with seashells. Who is he fooling? Not me.
And nor, it looks like, is he fooling president Trump or key members of the Trump administration. Let's go to that video of president Trump responding to Comey's death threat.
Speaker 1: He knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant. If you're the FBI director and you don't know what that meant, that meant assassination. And it says it loud and clear. Now he wasn't very competent, but he was competent enough to know what that meant.
And he did it for a reason, and he was hit so hard because people like me, and they like what's happening with our country. Our country has become respected again and all this. And he's calling for the assassination of the president. Obviously, he apologized and said he does Well, he apologized for his violence. But Look.
He's a very bad What do you wanna see happen? Is a What do you wanna see happen? I don't wanna take a position on it because that's gonna be up to Pam and all of the great people. But I will say this, I think it's a terrible thing. And when you add his history to that, if he had a clean history he doesn't.
He's a dirty cop. He's a dirty cop. And if he had a clean history, I could I could understand if there was a leniency. But I'm gonna let them make that decision.
Speaker 0: Well, president Trump per usual was right on target there. Of course, Comey knew. He knew better. He ain't fooling anyone. And in my view, it should just it should be just a matter of when he's prosecuted, not if he's prosecuted.
Tulsi Gabbard seems to share my same concerns. Let's go to the video of Tulsi number 20.
Speaker 2: Like him who issued direct threats against the president of The United States essentially issuing a call to assassinate him must be held accountable under the law.
Speaker 0: Do you believe Comey should be in jail?
Speaker 2: I do. Any other person with the position of influence that he has, people who take very seriously what a guy of his stature, his experience, and what the propaganda media has built him up to be, I'm very concerned for the president's life. We've already seen assassination attempts. I'm very concerned for his life, and James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this.
Speaker 0: The left and Democrats wanna get Trump killed. I've told you this before, and I'll tell you again. It's further evidenced in Comey's death threat to president Trump. Quite obviously a death threat. Remember, Benny Thompson, the senior official senior Democrat leader in the House, offered a piece of legislation to deny president Trump secret service protection if he was, quote, convicted by one of their lawless judges in their kangaroo court proceedings with the thinking that he would go to Rikers without secret service protection, which would be a death sentence.
The Biden administration deprived him of secret service protection, adequate secret service protection, restricting his activities and leading to not one, but tier two near death experiences of by the president. And we're six supposed to supposed to believe that this leading anti Trump activist, James Comey, who had it in for Trump from the get go, just innocently posted this, I don't buy it. And maybe he has a defense, but my view is he should tell it to the jury. And we've been investigating Comey for years. And one of the outrages of what happened to Trump is that Comey was never prosecuted for the abuses of him of his targeting Trump, where he literally personally spied on him as he's coming into office, authorized interference and operations against the president, and and previous to that, his campaign in ways never seen before in American history.
He stole and leaked president Trump's FBI files. And Bill Barr, the attorney general for president Trump, didn't bother to prosecute him. Outrageous. And I had a little video on this. I think it was two was it two what's the what video was it?
Or the 02/2019 video. Let's go to that. Comey was spying on Trump. The reason he was writing the memos was to create a record so that he could destroy him. I'm paraphrasing admittedly, but that's pretty clear what was going on.
This report confirms they went in to confront him with the with the, with that ambush interview because they were trying to make a case against him. You had the FBI director under Obama playing spy. We're talking about spying on the Trump campaign, spying on president-elect Trump, spying on president Trump. Comey was the chief spy, and he was designated as such by bar Barack Obama because they met about this very issue a a day or two before in the Oval Office with Barack Obama, Biden, Susan Rice, all the king's horses, all the king's men in there, and Comey was the go to That's right. I'm getting mad watching me from several years ago.
I I may not play videos from that long ago. It's disturbing how much older I've gotten since then. But we don't forget here at Judicial Watch about this corruption. And so when you're considering whether Comey's, quote, innocent, as president Trump says, he's not an innocent guy. He's a dirty cop, and him threatening Trump's life is not only perfectly consistent for his behavior, but of of Democratic left generally in recent years, where they've embraced violence and the threat of violence in order to achieve their results.
And as I noted in that previous video, it's not just Comey, it was the whole gang that targeted Trump. And they all knew, and particularly Comey knew, that there was never any basis as I highlighted in this major speech to CPAC a few a few years ago. Judicial watch protected Trump and our republic from the worst corruption scandal in American history by exposing the FISA abuse abuse, the Comey corruption, and the seditious conspiracy against Trump by the FBI and DOJ. Obama knew, Clinton knew, Comey knew, Biden knew, Brennan knew, McCabe knew, Strzok knew, Clapper knew, Schiff knew, the FBI knew, DOJ knew, the CIA knew, the State Department knew. They all knew Trump was innocent, but they smeared and spied on him anyway.
Worse than Watergate. Trump is a crime victim. Let's remember that. And he's a crime victim again as a result of this gang, specifically Comey's death threat against him, a threat issued while he was overseas, increasing the risk, and, again, elevating through his Instagram account. You know, Comey's a he's on TV.
He's a public figure. So it wasn't like some guy in the far off never never reaches of the Internet posted a threat. He's a serious public figure. Now I don't take him seriously, but this corrupt city does too often. And he abused and seems seemingly violated the law to put the president's life at risk.
Now our friend Susan Crabtree reported online, Twitter the other day, or ArmEx, that for threats such as this, the Secret Service normally just goes immediately to the person who made the threat. They don't wait days to pursue online threats made against the president of The United States. So my guess is that Comey's already been interviewed, or he's or he's about to be interviewed, like, three days from now, but, you know, if not this evening, but over the weekend. And so the question is, is there gonna be a prosecution as a result of that interview and the evidence gathered by the Secret Service or the FBI, understanding FBI is providing some backup support? And as president Trump noted that he didn't wanna say anything because it's Pam Bondi's decision.
And, you know, in the way things have worked in Washington DC before, too often, it is Pam Bondi's decision. The United States Attorney General, as appropriate, makes prosecutorial decisions of this nature. But that's purely at the discretion of the President of The United States, who is chief prosecutor. And I've said it once, and I'll say it again. If I were President Trump, I would direct the prosecution of these gangsters in government that abused him.
And in the case of James Comey, the FBI director, he had to fire because of his corruption and abuse. He's president. He's prosecutor in chief. He can direct the prosecution of James Comey right now. Now he may not choose to exercise it for fear of causing a political fight over that or or for some practical reasons, but he does have that power.
And and my thinking is he should exercise it forcefully, especially in matters like this. His life is on the line. His Secret Service agents around him, death threats, they could get killed as well. Citizens around him could get killed as well. We saw that with Butler, the assassination attempt.
An innocent American was murdered that day as well. People injured. So this isn't just about president Trump. It's about other innocents in the vicinity of a president during an assassination attempt. And so I would just get on the horn and tell attorney general Bondi if I were president Trump, prosecute him.
I'm directing you as president. If you don't wanna do it, I'll find someone else. Now, my guess is in these circumstances, Pam Bondi's gonna do it. Pam Bondi's gonna do it. But you never know.
Right? And so president Trump, the best way to ensure that something is done, in some many cases, is to do it yourself. Right? And he can do it literally himself by ordering the prosecution. And this kind of raises the bigger question of the justice department and the FBI.
Who runs the show there? And I highlighted last week, and it it bears repeating, that we need to really put those agencies under the microscope. You know, James Comey is a perfect example. He was director of the FBI and ran the agency like some sort of Stasi against the political enemies of the deep state. Working hand in glove with the Obama gang, and essentially partnering with the Hillary Clinton campaign to target Trump.
Now, I haven't seen any move by the new leadership of the FBI, Kash Patel, who I consider to be a friend, Dan Bongino, to curtail the FBI's powers in the sense of defanging the FBI, laying people off in mass numbers like is happening at USAID in the Department of Education. If I were director of the FBI or I were president, I would direct the FBI director to essentially make the FBI in terms of there's a if indeed there is a statutory minimum for the FBI to operate, I would say to Kash Patel, let's get down to that. Because there's nothing the FBI is doing that can't be handled by another federal agency in terms of law enforcement or, frankly, even counterintelligence if necessary. And the same goes with the justice department to a lesser extent, because there may be some more statutory basises for allowing some more people to work at the justice department. And the other issue is who investigates the FBI over these abuses I've talked about?
The targeting of Trump under the Biden administration, Justice Department, the FBI. Who investigates the investigators? I don't think they can do it themselves. And so the president should stand up a separate entity funded with justice department dollars, but reporting to him in the White House, appoint a prosecutor that reports to him directly, partners with, attorney general Bondi as the prosecutor deems fit, and just prosecute, investigate, call grand juries, And the president, as the chief prosecutor, or the prosecutor in chief as I call him, he can decide in the end what to prosecute and what not to prosecute. He can even suggest areas of investigation.
And actually more than suggest direct areas to be investigated as it relates to the criminality of the weaponization by the Obama, Biden, Clinton gang against him. Think of all the other things that need to be investigated. The issue of the invasion. Who's responsible for that? The issue of censorship of Americans.
Who's responsible for that? The Biden criminality, the Biden crime family. What's the Justice Department doing on that? I would just charge as if those pardons didn't exist because I think they're null and void. Let them raise them as defenses and argue that they're null and void.
You can't issue a pardon to someone for no crimes going back ten years. That's not a pardon. It doesn't mean anything. And this is the sort of thing that a president can get done, and it would very be very difficult that for Pam Bondi to get done or, frankly, Cash Patel to get done. I don't trust the FBI to investigate the FBI.
I just don't. And I don't trust the Justice Department to investigate the Justice Department. I could have a half a dozen friends in both agencies. It doesn't matter. It's the institutions that are corrupted.
And I don't think the American people trust them either. I mean, they're stonewalling on document after document in response to our FOIA request still. There's no significant criminal investigation, as best I can tell, of the lawfare against Trump and other innocent Americans. Time's a wasting. Time's a wasting.
Of course, Congress is completely AWOL on this. So the FBI should be effectively shut down, at least my personal view is that. Others may have different views. I recognize that. But I don't trust them as far as I could throw them.
Same goes for the IRS. IRS has been abused time and time again to target Americans. That's reason alone to shut it down. And and these are the this is the kind of thought process and thinking and leadership, you know, if I do say so myself, leadership necessary to protect the republic. We've developed these deep state agencies, these administrative agencies in the at the federal level whose goal, among other things, is to be ready, willing, and often able to target Americans on the basis of their political beliefs.
Third world tyrannical activity. And if someone's using a gun repeatedly against you, and the gun being the IRS or the FBI or other agencies, you take the gun away. Now, does it mean they're gonna stop their criminality? I'm not naive. But let's take the weapons out of the hands of the toddlers who are running the deep state.
And that's a charitable interpretation of their behavior. This is the communist approach to governance. Jail and kill your enemies. And Comey is a malicious example of it. Really is.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Tyranny.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Supreme coup?
@kyledcheney - Kyle Cheney
BREAKING: The Supreme Court has blocked the Trump administration from deporting foreign nationals under the Alien Enemies Act. Thomas, Alito dissent. https://t.co/SsigpMnPf9
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
HUGE: We just hit 5 million plus dirty names removed from voter rolls! 1 million in NYC alone! @JudicialWatch with the heavy lifting just made sure there are 5 million fewer opportunities for voter fraud!
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
HUGE: @JudicialWatch sues DOJ and FBI for Epstein records. https://t.co/XsedVnXkaL
Video Transcript AI Summary
Judicial Watch is suing for the release of the Epstein files, including the client list and related documents held by the Justice Department and the FBI. They claim they have been stonewalled and that their FOIA request has not been answered. Judicial Watch states that going to federal court is the best way to determine what records exist, which are being withheld, and the scope of the search for these records. They assert their aim is to uncover government secrets related to the Epstein scandal that the government does not want the public to know.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So Judicial Watch just sued for the Epstein files. We want the client list. We want the documents the justice department and the FBI have about this scandal. We've been getting stonewalling, so despite the release of some records, it looks like other records haven't been released yet. Indeed, they haven't responded to our basic FOIA request for this information.
That's why we're in federal court now. The best way to understand what records are available, which records are being held secret, and where did they look for the records is to be in court. That's where judicial watch is. That's what we specialize in doing, getting secrets from the government they don't want you to know about. And people wanna know about the Epstein scandal, and we aim to get to the bottom of it.
reSee.it AI Summary
I was surprised to learn that Steven J. Jensen, the new assistant director for the Washington field office, previously led the domestic terrorism operations section during the Capitol attack. He also set up a system to track violence at school board meetings as potential domestic terrorism.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
WHUT? "The new assistant director @FBIDirectorKash named to run the Washington field office, Steven J. Jensen, was in charge of the bureau’s domestic terrorism operations section on that day, and he played a key role in responding to the attack on the Capitol. Mr. Jensen was also responsible for establishing a system to monitor incidents of violence at school board meetings across the country as potential acts of domestic terrorism..."--NYTIMES
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
TERRORISM: The Left's murderous targeting of @ElonMusk, a federal official, and @Tesla is terrorism and must be treated as such by federal and state law enforcement. https://t.co/Y4jnTvWdwX
Video Transcript AI Summary
Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch discusses allegations against ActBlue, including Elon Musk's claim that it funds groups behind demonstrations against Tesla. Fitton notes ActBlue's leadership changes and questions whether they knowingly accepted illegal foreign donations. He characterizes actions against Tesla as potential terrorist activity targeting a federal official.
Fitton dismisses Reid Hoffman's claim of not being able to control where all his money goes, alleging shared values among those involved. He recalls "billions of dollars" that appeared after Harris took over the nomination and suggests a criminal investigation into ActBlue's fundraising practices. He links supporting terrorists abroad with domestic terrorism.
Fitton also addresses concerns about Joe Biden's executive orders potentially being signed via auto pen, raising questions about the legality and who was truly running the White House given Biden's "cognitive decline." He criticizes the lack of media scrutiny on Biden's staff and suggests Republicans should have investigated the possibility of invoking the 25th Amendment.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let's continue this conversation with the president of judicial watch, Tom Fitton. Tom, it's great to see you. These aren't these aren't the only allegations against ActBlue out there. I mean, Elon Musk is accusing the Democrat platform of funding groups responsible for the so called demonstrations against Tesla. ActBlue denies any wrongdoing, by the way.
Musk does point out that ActBlue is currently under investigation for allowing foreign and illegal donations into criminal in criminal violation of campaign finance laws. Tom, what are your thoughts on all this?
Speaker 1: Well, what's really interesting about ACLU is recently, just in the last week, it's been announced essentially their core leadership has has fled. So a lot of their key people are gone, which suggests there was something going on that caused them to flee. And you have to wonder whether these questions about taking money knowingly from sources that they knew or had reason to know were not valid, like, from abroad for political campaigns, whether that's the issue that we're concerned about or as Elon Musk is highlighting that, you know, it's one thing to be funding public policy debates through charitable donations and and political operations. It's another thing to be funding terrorism and political violence against your opponents. And what I think is going on against Tesla and Elon Musk is a terrorist act is terrorist activity.
And it's dangerous. It's violent, and it's also directed at a federal official. You know, the left well, as the left reminds us, he works for Trump. He works in the White House. And when you engage in violence targeting a federal official to stop him from doing his work, you know, there are other serious crimes, both criminal and civil that arise from that.
And so anyone involved in that seems to be should be subject to investigations. What's going on against Tesla? The FBI needs to be all over it, assuming they're capable of doing anything other than investigating, parents and people going to church.
Speaker 0: Yeah. Indeed. Reid Hoffman, who also has denied any wrongdoing here, was asked about this fundraising during an interview on on the, what is it, All In podcast. Here's what he had to say.
Speaker 2: Have you spent any money to try to impact RFK one way or the other?
Speaker 3: I wouldn't be surprised if we look at all the money that goes to all the different organizations, if organization x kinda had some kind of ballot thing. Minds my voice instruction was always like, no. No. No. Don't do that.
That's antidemocratic. But, you know, you can't control everything just like you invest in a company and CEO sometimes the dumbass that you Right. Can't do anything about.
Speaker 0: Yeah. I can't can't control all that all that money. Are you buying you buying that, Tom?
Speaker 1: No. They know exactly what's going on here. It's it's, you know, it's not like they have to have someone coordinating it. They all share the same values. You know, and thinking back to the coup against Biden by Harris and Obama and Pelosi, remember those billions of dollars that all of a sudden magically appear shortly after she took over the nomination?
I think that's curious and interesting. And in light of ACLU's prominent role in fundraising for the left and not only organizationally, but politically in terms of campaigns, you know, the amount of money that they raised and the serious questions about whether the proper controls were in place needs to be the subject, as I said, of a serious criminal investigation. And I tell you, if you're involved in supporting terrorists abroad by also engaging in terrorism here as we're seeing up in Colombia with that student student being arrested by the Trump administration for supporting terrorism. They they wanted to deport him. Who who was helping him can run those those so called protests?
You know, there's gotta be a line. Yeah. It's one thing to have first amendment speech.
Speaker 0: Question.
Speaker 1: But if you're working in league with terrorist organizations through transnational left wing groups, that's a much more significant legal issue.
Speaker 0: Sure it is. And last thing I wanted to get into with you is this. Wanna ask you about this scandal that's coming to light. Joe Biden may have not been signing any of these executive orders, the pardons, his entire occupation of the Oval Office. Apparently, it was all being done through this this auto pen device.
Legal experts are saying if Biden's apparatchiks were signing things in his name and without his knowledge and permission, it could invalidate his entire occupation of the Oval Office. How do you see this?
Speaker 1: I think it's an interesting issue. And if I were president Trump, I'd start looking at the documents underlying what Biden did in the White House, figure out who was running the show. The legality of the executive order, being signed auto pan versus in person aside. The big issue is given president Biden's obvious cognitive decline that was covered up by people around him in the media, we need to know who was making decisions because, you know, if you don't know who's making the decisions, you don't know if they're being made for proper reasons. Right?
You know, Biden you know, everyone knows what Biden's about. I I dare you to go and ask someone who was the chief of staff for Joe Biden? Who was his domestic policy adviser? Who no one no one in DC knows who was working in the Biden White House. They were this anonymous cabal, relatively speaking, who the media was very uninterested in reporting on.
Compare and contrast that with reporting on of on Elon Musk with who was running the Biden administration. And, you know, and I think the challenge for Republicans is why weren't they asking these questions two years ago? They should have been having hearings on the twenty fifth amendment and could have been exploring this. They may not have been able to remove them under the twenty fifth amendment, but they could have been asking tough questions to people around him, and they still can, frankly.
Speaker 0: Bingo. And the only reason why Democrats get away with what they get away with is because of the timidity of Republicans. Tom Fitton, thank goodness for judicial watch. Thank you, man. Appreciate the time.
reSee.it AI Summary
I discussed how the Clinton administration audited its opponents and how the Obama DOJ and FBI used IRS data to target enemies, particularly during the 2012 election against the Tea Party. I mentioned the leak of tax files belonging to @RealDonaldTrump and others, which the Biden administration handled lightly. I also noted that efforts by @RealDonaldTrump's officials to modernize the IRS and combat fraud were met with alarm, contrasting the previous administrations' actions.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
The Clinton gang audited their enemies. Obama DOJ/FBI used IRS data to target his enemies and Obama used the Lois Lerner IRS to shut down his Tea Party political opposition in order to win reelection in 2012. The tax files of @RealDonaldTrump and thousands of others were leaked to Left media and Biden regime gave perp a slap on the wrist. But @DOGE government officials under @RealDonaldTrump taking steps to modernize the tottering IRS systems and root out fraud is a "raises alarm!". @ElonMusk @JudicialWatch
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Dear @DOGE, FDA Records Show Purchases of Fetal Organs, Heads and Tissue for ‘Humanized Mice’ Project https://judicialwatch.org/new-fda-records-humanized-mice/
Judicial Watch: New FDA Records Show Purchases of Fetal Organs, Heads and Tissue for ‘Humanized Mice’ Project - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it received 198 pages of records and communications from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) involving “humanized mice” research with human fetal heads, organs and tissue, including communications and contracts with human fetal tissue provider Advanced Bioscience Resources (ABR). Most of the records are communications and […]
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
HORROR: FDA Paid for ‘Fresh and Never Frozen’ Human Fetal Parts for Use In ‘Humanized Mice’ Creation! @WMALDC @JudicialWatch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtBkEACPHoA https://t.co/hV9kJErytf
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
The Biden gang sent the FBI to my home -- and retaliated against me and @JudicialWatch. I want justice. https://t.co/8uUohE6Y9q
Video Transcript AI Summary
The FBI's actions against President Trump and other American citizens demand accountability. Where are the Republican senators demanding justice? I experienced this firsthand when FBI agents served a subpoena at my home. This is retaliatory abuse and intimidation by the Biden administration, using the FBI. The raid on President Trump's home was based on trumped-up document retention issues. This is unacceptable. We must stand for freedom, against the extremist left, and for the Constitution and the liberty it represents.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Speaking of the FBI, there's gotta be accountability for what they did to Trump and to many other American citizens. Where are the Republicans in the Senate demanding justice for what the FBI did? They sent FBI agents to my home to serve a subpoena, knock, knock, knock on my door. Other Americans also face that type of retaliatory abuse and intimidation by the Biden administration, happily from the FBI. They raided the home of president Trump on trumped up issues related to document retention by a former president.
To describe it is to condemn it. Stand up for freedom. Stand up against the extremist left. Stand up for the constitution and the American revolution for liberty it represents.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
USAID funded Soros operations and allies. @JudicialWatch exposed it years ago....six years ago with @TuckerCarlson https://t.co/JsbYlWKFtR
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Tom Fitton is the president of judicial watch and he joins us tonight.
Speaker 1: One of the
Speaker 0: reasons I'm so glad that you're here, Tom, is because you kind of tie a bow on stories. The Obama administration's over, but there's a lot that they did that we don't know anything about because the press refused to cover those stories. Tell us this small piece of it. What did they do in Albania and why?
Speaker 1: Well, they're supporting the socialist communist government there, the source operations, and they're doing it with taxpayer dollars. They were doing it in 02/2016, and they were even doing it in the first part of the Trump administration in 2017, cosponsoring surveys of the population that generated 91% of the support in favor of the pro government, pro Soros operation that would have restricted the independence of the judiciary. Now like all strong man governments, they don't like independent judiciary. So they were trying to reform the judiciary in a way that would have brought it under the control of the socialist government there. And what's troubling is that obviously Soros needs no taxpayer money to do any of this advocacy work, but the State Department and USAID is partnering with Soros, and basically allowing Soros to set our foreign policy agenda.
And then secondly, Soros' operations, according to these documents, were allowed to come into the state department and provide technical reviews of other applications for other government money in Albania.
Speaker 0: But I mean George Soros hates The United States and I'm judging that by the projects that he funds all of which are designed to change the country as it is now or to thwart US interests. So why in the world would any state department give money to a Soros funded operation?
Speaker 1: Well, it's not only in Albania. We have four had four lawsuits at one point. Albania, Romania, he's active in Hungary, Guatemala, Colombia. They're very, very active, and it doesn't take a lot of money, to have a big impact in these countries. And the governments are under assault from the slora state department unity effort, to bring socialism and stop anything in the area of reform, constitutionalism, the sort of things that Americans would be comfortable with, the Soros groups aren't.
And, you know, look, he's billionaire. He doesn't need the money and when you fund him in one place it means he has more money to spend elsewhere so if you don't like what Soros is doing here at home you should know it's being indirectly subsidized thanks to the state department US IID at least as early as at least as soon as long ago as 02/2006.
Speaker 0: So Soros is getting state department money, Planned Parenthood which is arm of the Democratic Party gets a half a billion a year in taxpayer funds. Is there any right of center or pro America group that gets any taxpayer funding of any kind?
Speaker 1: Well, I think most of them don't think to ask for it, but certainly the state department is not terribly interested in funding groups that are antagonistic to their agenda abroad. And this is kind of another way for the state department to stick it to the Trump administration Yeah. Because some of this activity was taking place in early two thousand seventeen, again, attacking the idea of an independent judiciary in Albania. This is your tax dollars at work and we had to sue to get the records.
Speaker 0: The more you know the more appalling it is and thank you for bringing this slide. I appreciate it.
Speaker 1: You're welcome.
Speaker 0: Jump it.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Defund the Left by shutting down USAID.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
VOTER FRAUD: Connecticut State Employee Arrested for Changing Republican Voter Registrations to Democrats https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/02/connecticut-state-employee-arrested-changing-republican-voter-registrations/ #gatewaypundit via @gatewaypundit
VOTER FRAUD: Connecticut State Employee Arrested for Changing Republican Voter Registrations to Democrats | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
A Connecticut state employee faces multiple charges for altering voter registrations from Republican to Democrat during a state-led event, raising serious concerns about election integrity and prompting calls for stricter oversight.
thegatewaypundit.com
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Third soldier inside Black Hawk helicopter involved in DC midair collision identified https://www.foxnews.com/us/third-soldier-black-hawk-helicopter-involved-dc-mid-air-collision-identified #FoxNews
Third soldier inside Black Hawk helicopter involved in DC midair collision identified
The third soldier aboard a Black Hawk helicopter on a training mission when it collided with an American Airlines jet over Washington, D.C., Wednesday has been identified.
foxnews.com
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
BREAKING HUGE: @RealDonaldTrump announces "that Venezuela has agreed to receive, back into their Country, all Venezuela illegal aliens who were encamped in the U.S., including gang members of Tren de Aragua. Venezuela has further agreed to supply the transportation back." https://t.co/z7CzH0eIgp
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
I am at @Kash_Patel hearing. Only one member of the Judiciary Committee received a "pardon" for crimes:Adam Schiff.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
.@Kash_Patel also knew Trump was innocent. But Kash actually tried to protect him and expose the abuse. Kash Patel can't be confirmed as FBI director soon enough. Call your senators to share your views at 202-224-3121.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Fani Willis slammed by court over hiding records on her secret collusion with Pelosi Jan 6 committee against @realDonaldTrump -- ordered to pay @JudicialWatch $22k! And she is late on that! https://www.judicialwatch.org/court-awards-judicial-watch-21578/
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fannie Willis has acknowledged her communication with the Pelosi January 6th committee, revealing a potential collaboration in the efforts against Trump. This admission came after a court found her in default for not responding to Judicial Watch's lawsuit. Initially, she denied having the documents but now seeks to withhold them, citing privileges and exemptions. Judicial Watch plans to challenge this secrecy in court. This situation raises concerns about the integrity of Willis's prosecution, suggesting it is tainted by dishonesty and disregard for the law.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Hey, everyone. Thanks to Judicial Watch and a court order. Fannie Willis finally fessed up to being in communication with the Pelosi January 6th committee. Frankly, it looks like as part of her get Trump conspiracy in league with Pelosi and other Democrats here in Washington DC. Now, she only fessed up to having this information after a court found her in default in response to Judicial Watch's lawsuit, which she hadn't answered.
Just incredible series of events. But rather than turn over the documents, she finally admitted to having after first denying not having, she wants to hide them all, citing privileges and exemptions. Now I tell you, judicial watch is gonna push back on this secrecy in court. But in the meantime, it's further indication, that the Fannie Willis prosecution is marked by lies, corruption, and contempt for basic laws. For instance,
Court Awards Judicial Watch $21,578 ‘Fees and Costs’ in Open Records Lawsuit against Fani Willis - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that the Superior Court in Fulton County, GA, issued an order granting $21,578 “attorney’s fees and costs” in the open records lawsuit for communications Willis had with Special Counsel Jack Smith and the House January 6 Committee. The order followed a previous order finding that Willis was in default in the lawsuit.
judicialwatch.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Milley MUST be court-martialed. No fake pardon by Biden should stop @RealDonaldTrump from seeking justice.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe @realDonaldTrump should disregard the blanket pardons from the Biden administration. Instead, he should court-martial Milley and investigate Fauci and others on Biden's list. I see these pardons as invalid and lacking any legal authority.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
PARDONGATE: @realDonaldTrump should ignore the preemptive, blanket pardons just issued by whoever is running the Biden WH. Specifically, President Trump should immediately court-martial Milley and proceed as appropriate in criminally investigating Fauci and any one else on the Biden's list. The blanket pardons issued by Biden are invalid and constitutional nullities and should be considered to have no legal force or effect.
Video Transcript AI Summary
If Biden pardons Milley unlawfully, it should be challenged with a court martial. There are valid reasons for this action. Judicial Watch has initiated a lawsuit to investigate Milley's involvement in a collusive attack on our freedoms, which included a meeting with Merrick Garland.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I tell you, if Biden preemptively pardons Milley in a way that I think is unlawful, they really should challenge it with a court martial, and there's more reason to court martial him. And Judicial Watch has filed a lawsuit to investigate it. He was involved in a collusive attack on our freedoms with Merrick Garland in a meeting.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe the recent Biden speech reveals a sinister agenda from the Left aimed at dismantling our constitutional republic. It highlights their efforts to undermine the Supreme Court, promote lawfare, confiscate property, impose censorship, and erode First Amendment protections.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
INCITEMENT: Whoever wrote that villainous Biden speech reaffirmed that the Left wants to destroy our constitutional republic -- by targeting the Supreme Court, encouraging lawfare and worse, confiscating wealth and property, imposing censorship on Americans, and eliminating First Amendment protections for free speech.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
CLASSY: Harris declines to invite @JDVance for courtesy visit to vice president's residence before inauguration https://www.cbsnews.com/news/harris-jd-vance-vice-presidents-residence/
Harris declines to invite Vance for courtesy visit to vice president's residence before inauguration
Vice President Kamala Harris has not extended an invitation for a formal sit-down or tour, multiple Democratic and Republican sources told CBS News.
cbsnews.com
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Jack Smith's resigning in shame isn't enough. I want JUSTICE! https://t.co/KTHJHpz1TU
Video Transcript AI Summary
Recently, I underwent significant skin cancer surgery and was recovering at home when the FBI arrived with a grand jury subpoena from the Biden DOJ. I was interrogated for four hours about Trump documents, my First Amendment rights, and even my lunch with President Trump. It felt like a partisan fishing expedition, akin to being on an MSNBC panel. I understood their motive: it was payback and intimidation for defending Trump against their abuses of power.
By the way, where's Tom? Oh, there he is! He always looks good—must be all that weightlifting he does.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Not too long ago, I had a significant skin cancer surgery and a few hours after I got home, I'm on the couch recovering when the FBI comes knocking, came knocking on my door with a grand jury subpoena from the Biden DOJ. I ended up being hassled and abused by the special counsel team for 4 hours over Trump documents, my first amendment rights, and what I had for lunch with president Trump. It was a partisan fishing expedition. Frankly, it was like having to spend a day on an MSNBC panel. But I knew why they brought me before that grand jury.
It was payback and intimidation for daring to defend Trump against their abuse of power. I'm fit. Where's Tom fit? You stand up, Tom fit. Oh, he still looks good?
Tom always looks good. I don't know. I think he does that weightlifting stuff, Tom. Right?
reSee.it AI Summary
The Supreme Court's 5-4 decision feels like a failure for the Republic. I'm frustrated that they’re allowing @RealDonaldTrump to be targeted by Democratic operatives like Judge Merchan and Alvin Bragg. It’s hard to understand how Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Barrett supported this ruling.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
The Supreme Court, by a vote of 5-4, failed the Republic tonight and will allow @RealDonaldTrump and the presidency to be abused tomorrow by Democratic operatives Judge Merchan and Alvin Bragg. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Amy Comey Barrett joined with their leftist colleagues to allow this unprecedented abuse. The ruling makes no sense...
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
FANI WILLIS CONFESSES! Heavy lifting @JudicialWatch and a state court forced Fani Willis to confirm documents exist about her collusion with the partisan Pelosi January 6 Committee to "get @realDonaldTrump." https://t.co/oeVPRLnIj3
Video Transcript AI Summary
Fannie Willis recently revealed she has records of her communications related to the January 6 operation against Trump, following a Judicial Watch lawsuit. Initially, she claimed no such records existed, but a court found her in default for not responding to the lawsuit. Instead of complying with the court's suggestion to release the records, she is attempting to use legal exemptions to withhold them. This situation suggests she was involved in collusion with the Pelosi operation, shows a disregard for the rule of law, and undermines the public's right to know. Legal actions will continue to challenge this.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, Fannie Willis just confessed to having records of her communications with the January 6 Pelosi operation, the Get Trump operation. She only confessed to this yesterday, thanks to a judicial watch lawsuit. Of course, when we first sued and began asking for these records, they told us they had no records. Well, it turns out that wasn't true. In fact, the only reason we got the confession yesterday was because a court last week found her in default.
She didn't bother to answer the lawsuit under law as you as she was supposed to. But rather than turn the records over as the court, I think, strongly suggested, she's using a loophole of exemptions and privileges to hide the records from the American people. Now we're gonna push back hard in court. Our head lifting will continue. But in the meantime, this really does confirm a, she was in collusion with the Pelosi operation to get Trump.
B, she has no respect for the rule of law. C, she has no respect for your right to know.
reSee.it AI Summary
I believe Judge Merchan's upcoming sentencing of Donald Trump on January 10 is a blatant misuse of power in a politically motivated case initiated by Alvin Bragg. This situation represents a direct assault on our democracy, supported by Democratic operatives within the Biden DOJ. The fact that this case has persisted is a significant failure of our justice system. I feel that responsible judicial authorities should dismiss what I view as a kangaroo court proceeding.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
In another wild abuse of power, corrupt and unethical Judge Merchan will "sentence" @RealDonaldTrump on Jan 10 in the sham case brought against him by Democratic politician Alvin Bragg. This is a direct attack on our "democracy" by partisan abusers in NY, which has been cheered on and enabled by Democratic Party operatives in the Biden DOJ. That this case has been able to survive this long is a historic failure of our justice system. The "sentencing" in the kangaroo court should be put aside by responsible judicial authorities.
reSee.it AI Summary
The Wall Street Journal reported that President Biden has been mentally absent since taking office, suggesting that White House aides and advisors are running the government. I believe Judicial Watch should investigate, and Congress should also look into this situation.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
WORST CORRUPTION SCANDAL IN MODERN ERA? The Wall Street Journal put out a story about how President Biden has been completely out of it mentally since the moment he got into office and how our government has been run by White House aides and advisors. Certainly, Judicial Watch will investigate, but Congress should investigate what went on here, too. https://t.co/8a4ARTYXHk
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Fani Willis attorney told court yesterday she wants a "global" settlement of @JudicialWatch's lawsuit.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Pray for the safety of @realDonaldTrump and his team.
reSee.it AI Summary
Judge Chutkan has officially dismissed the January 6th case against me, @RealDonaldTrump. In her opinion, she attempts to defend Jack Smith and the Biden administration by stating there’s no evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. However, she acknowledges that the dismissal aligns with the understanding that a sitting President's immunity is temporary and ends once they leave office.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Judge Chutkan just officially dismissed the sham January 6th case against @RealDonaldTrump. In an opinion, Judge Chutkan tries to provide cover for Jack Smith and the Biden regime by finding "there is no indication of prosecutorial harassment or other impropriety underlying the Motion." But Judge Chutkan also notes: "Dismissal without prejudice is also consistent with the Government’s understanding that the immunity afforded to a sitting President is temporary, expiring when they leave office." https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/67656604/282/united-states-v-trump/
.Order – #282 in United States v. TRUMP (D.D.C., 1:23-cr-00257) – CourtListener.com
OPINION as to DONALD J. TRUMP re: the Government's unopposed 281 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 11/25/2024. (zcll) (Entered: 11/25/2024)
courtlistener.com
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
HUGE: @JudicialWatch just won! As Fifth Circuit hours ago ruled AGAINST counting ballots that arrive AFTER Election Day!
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Republican-controlled House just voted to fully fund everything they "oppose" in the Biden-Harris administration. And now they've fled DC until after the Election.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
New Trump assassination-related videos obtained by @JudicialWatch under Right to Know law from Beaver County sniper team. Sensitive content warning. https://t.co/uCSTqpj93h
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 asks Michelle if she wants to move to the lower roof for comfort. Speaker 1 is looking for gas meters, suspecting someone has a device. Speaker 0 says the CR units were under the water tower. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 is aware of any gas meters seen while coming through. Speaker 0 mentions a bike with a book bag on the west side of the building that will be checked.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Michelle, do you wanna talk down on that lower roof? We'll just you feel more comfortable there. Whatever you're comfortable with. I know we got you covered, but if you feel comfortable in the lower group. What's that?
No problem. Oh, okay. Just wanna make sure you're good. We got a ladder. Yeah.
I just set up for this ladder. I was like, I'm gonna die.
Speaker 1: Trying to see if I see gas meters anywhere because if he has this device,
Speaker 0: Correct. The CR units were under the water tower until we can get A couple of guys up
Speaker 1: here asking if you're aware of any gas meters you
Speaker 0: may have seen on your way through. Oh, and then they're gonna check there's a bike with a book bag that he was with. They're going to check that now. It's supposed to be on the west side of the building.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
In order to help address 9/11 conspiracy theories, @JudicialWatch sued for and obtained the Pentagon parking camera footage of AA#77 hitting the Pentagon. http://pentagonmemorial.org
Home - 9/11 Pentagon Memorial
pentagonmemorial.org
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
DC was under siege by terrorist Left! https://t.co/6HnGNJg2wa
Video Transcript AI Summary
We are on Capitol Hill with helicopters flying around, a rare sight due to left-wing violence. The streets are closed off near the US Capitol, not for peaceful protests but to incite violence and target police. The Biden administration treats these violent left-wing groups differently than those involved in January 6. Charges like conspiracy, sedition, or insurrection are unlikely due to the administration's alliance with them. Unfortunately, we may see more violence from the left leading up to the election, supporting terrorists who harm Americans abroad.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Well, here you see we're on Capitol Hill overlooking the US Capitol there. Very unusual sight. Helicopters flying around the capitol. I don't remember seeing it before, and I've been in Washington. The left has been rampaging.
The pro terrorist left, invaded our nation's capital. Down here, you'll see this is just a few blocks from the US Capitol. The streets are completely closed off because these are not, quote, first amendment demonstrations. These are designed to, encourage violence and, if necessary, abuse the police. There's no doubt about it.
These people have been across the country rampaging as I've been noting. The Biden administration obviously has been treating them very differently than the January sixers. Are there gonna be charges for conspiracy, sedition, and insurrection? I doubt it, because, unfortunately, the Biden administration is allied with a lie a lot of these violent demonstrators. So let's hope the police are safe, and, I suspect we're gonna just see more of this as we get closer to the election, unfortunately, from the left that is inherently violent, supporting these terrorists who've been killing Americans abroad.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
Leftist terror supporters arrested in Texas after threatening police...
reSee.it AI Summary
At 2:45 p.m., Lt. Byrd made a radio call about shots fired in the House chamber lobby. He later reported an injured person, believing they were shot. However, no shots were fired at Byrd or his fellow officers, except for the one he fired at Ashli. Witnesses claimed Byrd ambushed and murdered her. Byrd faced no charges or disciplinary action for the incident.
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
"At 2:45 p.m., or within one minute after shooting Ashli, Lt. Byrd made the following radio call: 405B. We got shots fired in the lobby. We got shots shots fired in the lobby of the House chamber. Shots are being fired at us and we’re sh, uhh, prepared to fire back at them. We have guns drawn. Please don’t leave that end. Don’t leave that end. Approximately 35 seconds later, Lt. Byrd made another radio call, stating, “405B. We got an injured person. I believe that person was shot.” In fact, no shots were fired at Lt. Byrd or his fellow officers. The only shot fired was the single shot Lt. Byrd fired at Ashli. He heard the loud noise of the gunshot. He saw her fall backwards from the window frame. The facts speak truth. Ashli was ambushed when she was shot by Lt. Byrd. Multiple witnesses at the scene yelled, 'you just murdered her.' Lt. Byrd was never charged or otherwise punished or disciplined for Ashli’s homicide."
@TomFitton - Tom Fitton
BREAKING: @JudicialWatch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on Behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate https://www.judicialwatch.org/wrongful-death-lawsuit-babbitt/
Judicial Watch Files $30 Million Wrongful Death Lawsuit against U.S. Government on behalf of Ashli Babbitt’s Husband and Estate - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the U.S. Government on behalf of the family of Ashli Babbitt, the U.S. Air Force veteran who was shot and killed inside the U.S. Capitol by then-Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd on January 6, 2021 (Estate of Ashli Babbitt and Aaron Babbitt, et al. v. United States of America).
judicialwatch.org