TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @TonySeruga

Saved - February 5, 2026 at 5:08 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

NO KINGS Financials Released! The Financers: - Arabella: $79M - Warren Buffet: $16M - Ford: $51M - Rockefeller: $26M - Soros: $72M - Tides: $45M $294,487,641 MILLION Source @realannapaulina https://t.co/Op4Z28GUGN

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 6:14 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

One of my Democrat neighbors, who became an Independent in 2024, read this book and just bought 50 copies to hand out to his Hollywood and Wall Street associates. The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon by @peterschweizer You know volume sales are taking off when Amazon excludes it from the Amazon Associates Program. Peter Schweizer’s The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon is highly recommended, a MUST READ: https://amzn.to/3LAX3XC

Amazon.com. Spend less. Smile more. Free shipping on millions of items. Get the best of Shopping and Entertainment with Prime. Enjoy low prices and great deals on the largest selection of everyday essentials and other products, including fashion, home, beauty, electronics, Alexa Devices, sporting goods, toys, automotive, pets, baby, books, video games, musical instruments, office supplies, and more. amazon.com

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The Mexican government has been weaponized against the United States. Wake up. We are at civilizational WARFARE! President Trump and his administration need to read this book by @peterschweizer, The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon Every day, ICE is arresting hundreds of illegal immigrants with a criminal record. They didn’t just come here. They were sent here. Our debates about immigration revolve around what happens with immigrants once they arrive. We need to start talking about who is sending them and why. For decades, establishment elites sold us the story of immigration as a compassionate renewal of the American Dream within a harmonious melting pot. But beneath that narrative lies a different reality: Mass migration has morphed into the most powerful political weapon ever aimed at the United States—one engineered by elites at home and aided by adversaries abroad. Now Peter Schweizer, the bestselling investigative journalist of our time, is blowing the lid off this whole series of schemes.  Schweizer detonates a political shock wave eclipsing his past bombshells, revelations that have sparked FBI probes and bipartisan reforms. Urgent, shocking, and overflowing with national security implications, The Invisible Coup makes America’s greatest political threat visible for all to see—and solve. https://amzn.to/4pVqdPj @realDonaldTrump @JDVance @DAGToddBlanche @HarmeetKDhillon @EagleEdMartin @POTUS @VP @SusieWiles @DNIGabbard @Sec_Noem @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @FBI @TheJusticeDept @ATFHQ @SteveHiltonx @BiancoSheriff @AlexVilanueva33

Amazon.com. Spend less. Smile more. Free shipping on millions of items. Get the best of Shopping and Entertainment with Prime. Enjoy low prices and great deals on the largest selection of everyday essentials and other products, including fashion, home, beauty, electronics, Alexa Devices, sporting goods, toys, automotive, pets, baby, books, video games, musical instruments, office supplies, and more. amazon.com

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨Migration is not a leak. It’s a valve — and both sides keep it open on purpose. 🇲🇽 The Premise: "Weaponized Migration" Migration has always been a tool of statecraft. When flows are sudden, large, and uncoordinated—but conveniently tolerated or quietly facilitated—they serve https://t.co/eBU2DUQBUH

Saved - January 28, 2026 at 2:07 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I read about Melinda Rose Cook, CRNA at VCU Health and Duke Health, who posted videos urging people to inject succinylcholine into ICE agents and spray poison on them, and to go on dates with agents and drug their food. I want comments from VCU Health and Duke Health, and I question how such a person could work with patients and how anyone could feel safe at their facilities.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Meet Melinda Rose Cook, CRNA, a nurse anesthetist working at @VCUHealth and @DukeHealth. She posted a series of videos encouraging people to inject ICE agents with succinylocholine, a temporary paralysis drug, and spray poison on them. She also encourages women to go on dates with agents and drug their food. Any comment @VCUHealth? Any comment @DukeHealth? How can you have such an insane, vile person working with patients? How can anyone feel safe at your facilities if you employ such people?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker offers a “resistance tip” that includes using poison ivy or poison oak mixed with water (in a gallon of water) and placed into a water gun to aim at faces and hands. They then mention single women dating “these ice guys” and suggest using dating apps like Tinder and Hinge to find them. The plan continues with bringing ExLax to put in their drinks to make them sick, with the aim of incapacitating them for the next day. The speaker notes the act would be highly easily deniable and that nobody’s going to die, but acknowledges that you could get sick too.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Okay. For today's resistance tip, vote, anybody got any, poison ivy, poison oak in their yard? Get some of that up with gloves, obviously. Get it in some water, like a gallon of water and get some get the poison ivy oak water, and I'm gonna put it into a water gun. Aim for aim for faces, hands. Are the single ladies where these ice guys are going have a chance to do something, you know, not without risk, but could help the cause for sure. Get on Tinder. Get on Hinge. Find these guys. They're around. They're a nice agent. Bring some ExLax and put it in their drinks. Get them sick. Yeah. Nobody's gonna die. Just enough to incapacity them and get them off the street for the next day. Highly easily deniable. You know, you could get sick too.
Saved - December 20, 2025 at 2:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that The Black Vault obtained a full, redaction-free release of a FOIA document on Joint Psychological Operations Task Force HQ training. Initially released in 2014 with b(2) redactions from FOIA 09-F-1583, a 2016 re-review under 16-F-1727 yielded full disclosure. The 331-page “Joint Psychological Operations Task Force Headquarters Master Training Guide” now provides comprehensive guidance for PSYOP unit training and organization.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The Black Vault has successfully obtained a new release of a previously heavily redacted document, which sheds new light on a military manual concerning Joint Psychological Operations Task Force (JPOTF) headquarters training. The document, originally requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case 09-F-1583 in 2009, and partially released in 2014, contained multiple redactions under FOIA exemption (b)(2), primarily concerning internal personnel rules and practices of an agency. However, following a 2016 case filed by The Black Vault to request a re-review under 16-F-1727, the document has now been released in full, with no redactions. Exemption (b)(2) is often cited to protect sensitive information related to internal rules, processes, and management of an agency, particularly when disclosure would risk circumvention of those rules. In the original release of the document, these redactions appeared throughout, obscuring details of how JPOTF headquarters operate during psychological operations (PSYOP), including its organizational structure, training methodology, and mission-related tasks. The 2016 re-review of the document resulted in a full release with no redactions. This version, now available for download below, includes significant information previously withheld. The document, titled “Joint Psychological Operations Task Force Headquarters Master Training Guide,” provides comprehensive guidance for military leaders on training and organizing PSYOP units. https://www.theblackvault.com/documentarchive/foia-victory-full-disclosure-of-military-psychological-operations-training-document/ The second and third images below: 2014 Release on the left, while the 2024 Release is on the right. FOIA Victory: Full Disclosure of Military Psychological Operations Training Document [331 Pages, 67MB] https://documents2.theblackvault.com/documents/osd/16-f-1727.pdf

FOIA Victory: Full Disclosure of Military Psychological Operations Training Document - The Black Vault The Black Vault has successfully obtained a new release of a previously heavily redacted document, which sheds new light on a military manual concerning Joint Psychological Operations Task Force (JPOTF) headquarters training. The document, originally requested under Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) case 09-F-1583 in 2009, and partially released in 2014, contained multiple redactions under theblackvault.com
Saved - December 9, 2025 at 1:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that Gorsuch pressed against a rogue bureaucratic state, arguing there’s no “4th branch” of government and questioning Humphrey’s Executor. He asked whether the president has a duty to execute the laws, noting the Democrats’ side can’t say yes. The case asks if Trump can unilaterally fire a Democrat FTC commissioner. The FTC is part of the Executive Branch. h/t @DailyCaller

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨 EPIC: SCOTUS Justice Neil Gorsuch goes OFF on the rogue bureaucratic state at today's oral argument, as the Court seems poised to hand Donald Trump a victory "...there is no such THING in our constitutional order as a 4th branch of GOVERNMENT!" 🔥 "Maybe it’s a recognition that Humphrey's Executor [precedent in question] was poorly reasoned!" Gorsuch pressed the Democrats' side: DOES the president have a duty to execute the laws of the US? The attorney can't say YES! This case is whether Trump has the power to unilaterally fire a Democrat FTC commissioner. The FTC is part of the Executive Branch! h/t @DailyCaller

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the scope of executive power and the president’s duties under the Constitution. - They begin with the question: does the president have a duty to faithfully execute all the laws? Speaker 1 responds: no, in the sense that there isn’t plenary power to directly enforce every provision; there are two questions, and the president does not have to be vested with unilateral authority to enforce directly. He cannot break the law, but not every law must be personally and directly executed by him. - On the duty to faithfully execute, Speaker 1 emphasizes there is a duty and a power in the take care clause, but the clause’s text does not grant at-will presidential authority over all enforcement. The president does not require plenary power of supervision for all actions, though there is some supervisory authority in specific contexts. - Regarding the FTC, Speaker 1 notes the president does have some power of supervision, including the ability to fire a commissioner for demonstrable, palpable violations of law, under the relevant statute. This supports the view that direct, personal enforcement is not uniformly required, but supervisory/remedial actions exist in certain agencies. - They discuss whether the government must report to the president for misdemeanors but not for civil penalties or injunctions, and the exact scope of the court’s holding in Trump v. United States. Speaker 0 probes the theory that their discussion builds on two words from Trump v. United States to offer a broader gloss, potentially drawing on Humphrey’s Executor to argue for a revised constitutional structure without a fourth quasi-branch of government. - Speaker 1 clarifies their theory references Marbury v. Madison (citing it for the distinction between powers vested in the president and executive power in the constitutional sense) and notes Marbury discusses removability of federal offices. They contend Humphreys is not the sole basis; rather, the tradition of executive power and constitutional vesting informs their view. - The conversation turns to the potential risks of adopting this theory: how to decide which powers are exclusive and what fallout might occur. Speaker 1 argues the modern era has seen a stable tradition of independent agencies, with little precedent striking them down, and from 1935 to 2025 there has been unanimity in upholding traditional independent agencies. - Speaker 0 notes that litigation over Humphreys has occurred, and while the court often cites Humphreys as a strong decision, separation-of-powers disputes will persist. Speaker 1 agrees there will always be litigation, but emphasizes that precedents affirming Congress’s authority to create and sustain traditional independent agencies have not generated significant problems. - In closing, Speaker 1 asserts that the court’s precedence supporting Congress’s cooperation with presidents to create traditional independent agencies remains durable and non-problematic. Both acknowledge ongoing litigation and debate in separation-of-powers issues, but view traditional independent agencies as stable within the current framework.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just wanna explore just for a brief minute, I hope. Your your scintilla of conclusive and preclusive power theory. You agree, I assume, the president is vested with all the executive power. Yes. You agree that he has a duty to faithfully execute all the laws. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Civil and criminal. Speaker 1: We we agree that the constitution imposes on on the president a duty to faithfully execute the laws. Speaker 0: All the laws. Well, all the some laws he doesn't have to? There. That'd be news to our friends across the street. Speaker 1: The the take the take care clause is a duty and it is also a power but the text of the clause does not provide that the president must have at will presidential. Speaker 0: I didn't ask that. This is does he have a duty to faithfully execute all the laws? Speaker 1: We know from the. Speaker 0: Yes or no? Speaker 1: I I would say no in the in the sense. No. In the in the sense that let let me there's two different questions and I want to make sure that I'm answering the question. Speaker 0: The question is, does the president have a duty to faithfully execute all the laws? The answer is no, why? Speaker 1: So, he can't break the law for sure. For sure. Does he have to be vested with statutory authority to actually enforce directly enforce or to actually. Speaker 0: I'm not asking whether he has to bring the indictment. I'm asking whether he has a duty to faithfully execute the laws. Speaker 1: I think the president does not under both history and tradition. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: Have have to have plenary power of of supervision but in the case of the FTC, he does have some power of supervision including if there's a demonstrable palpable violation of law, the president could absolutely fire a commissioner of the FTC under the fine language of the statute. Speaker 0: So, the answer is no, I guess. But you say that he does have to, he has to have direct supervision and removal authority for someone who has conclusive and exclusive authority to bring crime, criminal prosecutions, right? Speaker 1: That is our understanding of this court's decision in Trump The United States. Speaker 0: That's that's your understanding. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: But not civil. Speaker 1: That's that's right. And to go back to Italy. Speaker 0: And and then just to be clear, so that means if if the government wants to bring a misdemeanor, that person has to be reportable to the president. But if the government wants to bring ruinous fines and penalties and injunctions, that person doesn't. Speaker 1: I don't know the scope of this court's holding in Trump The United States. I'm asking Speaker 0: you for your theory because it's a very interesting theory. You're building off of two words from Trump versus United States and putting a gloss on it that I I I'm not familiar with. I I'd understood the executive power and he has conclusive and conclusive authority of that but this line, I I don't know where it comes from. You're you're asking. I'm wondering, I'll be on it. I'll put my cards on the table. Maybe it's a recognition that Humphrey's executor was poorly recent and that there is no such thing in our constitutional order as a fourth branch of government that's quasi judicial and quasi legislative. Maybe you're trying to backfill it with a better new theory that itself recognizes that we've got a problem. Speaker 1: The theory that we are referring to, Justice Gorsuch, as we understand it, is not just based on this court's recent decision in Trump v United States. It goes all the way back to Marbury v Madison and Marbury does not use the term conclusive and preclusive but it absolutely says. Speaker 0: And neither does Humphreys. It uses quasi things. Speaker 1: It talks it talks about the distinction between authorities that are vested in the president and the president's powers in the constitutional sense and executive power in the constitutional sense and it actually cites Marbury V Madison for that. Speaker 0: Oh, sure. I would hope it would. Speaker 1: For that proposition and Marbury itself distinguishes in the context of removability of federal offices. Speaker 0: I guess I'm just wondering, are we going to get, if we take, if we, if we take your your theory to backfill Humphreys and go down this road, how are we supposed to decide which powers are exclusive for your purposes as you understand it, not as I understand it from from Trump, United States, but as you understand it, what powers are going to fall in and what kind of fallout? Are we going to have just as much litigation over that as anything else we might do in this case? Speaker 1: I don't think so. We've had this modern era of traditional independent agencies for a long time. We haven't had any precedent ever striking them down and this court has not been, as far as I know, overwhelmed with difficult questions of line drawing. In fact, from 1935 to 2025, we had pretty much unanimity among courts. The traditional independent agencies are fine. To go back to Speaker 0: You haven't had a lot of litigation over Humphreys and its limits and its boundaries and I mean, seal the law, you invoke it as a great decision. We've we've had a lot Speaker 1: of litigation. We do invoke seal a lot as a great decision. There's. Speaker 0: We're always going to have litigation of this separation of powers, aren't There Speaker 1: will always be litigation. Yeah. Absolutely but the point is that this court's precedence affirming congress's authority to work with presidents to create traditional independent agencies has not generated any significant problems, still less insurmountable Speaker 0: problems. Speaker 1: Thank you.
Saved - November 30, 2025 at 11:50 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I claim Rahmanullah Lakanwal, the National Guard shooter, has a CIA handler, calling it a color revolution tied to Barack Obama and John Brennan. I say the attack date—November 26—was deliberate to precede Thanksgiving for maximum symbolic impact, aiming to disrupt the holiday’s buildup and strike at core U.S. cultural and patriotic symbols.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

National Guard shooter Rahmanullah Lakanwal has a CIA handler. This is a color revolution, 💯 Barack Obama and John Brennan. And the date of the attack was chosen on purpose. November 26 timing was deliberate, selected to coincide with the eve of Thanksgiving for maximum symbolic and psychological impact. Thanksgiving, celebrated annually on the fourth Thursday of November, is a quintessential American holiday centered on themes of gratitude, family gatherings, national unity, and historical narratives of peace (e.g., the 1621 Plymouth feast). By striking just one day before—on a Wednesday afternoon—it disrupted the holiday's buildup, evoking a sense of violation against core U.S. cultural and patriotic symbols.

Saved - October 19, 2025 at 6:30 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I remember Jonathan Gruber, the ACA’s architect, calling Americans “too stupid to understand” Obamacare. These people hate Americans and think they’re better. Democrats should admit they were duped. Watch: youtu.be/Adrdmmh7bMo

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Remember this 🤡? Jonathan Gruber the architect of Obamacare and the ACA calling Americans ‘too stupid to understand’ Obamacare. These people REALLY hate Americans and believe they are better than everyone else. Democrats need to just admit it, they were duped. Watch it here: youtu.be/Adrdmmh7bMo

@RogerMarshallMD - Dr. Roger Marshall

$40B/year bonus for Obamacare subsidies—mostly to well-off at 4x poverty. Dems are threatening a gov’t shutdown to borrow $400B+ over 10 yrs from our grandkids, subsidizing successful insurance companies. Borrowing from future generations for corporate welfare? No way. https://t.co/uaOBRD5fRw

Saved - October 18, 2025 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I contend that many Americans don’t know Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus isn’t a medical doctor and is linked to a Marxist-Leninist Ethiopian party analysts label as terrorist. Tedros and the WHO supposedly enjoy CCP backing. On Jan 20, 2025, Trump signed an executive order to withdraw from the WHO, pausing funding and halting the Pandemic Agreement talks; full effect is Jan 22, 2026. The exit avoids treaty obligations, while concerns target WHO-led governance, binding measures, and national policy alignment.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

It is simply mind boggling that at least 90% of Americans do not know the Director-General of the World Health Organization, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, is not even a medical doctor and is a member of a Marxist-Leninist Ethiopian political party that analysts have listed as a perpetrator of terrorism. Tedros and the W.H.O. is supported by the Chinese Communist Party. On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order initiating the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO, citing its COVID-19 failures, lack of reforms, and disproportionate U.S. funding. The move paused all future U.S. funding, ended negotiations on the Pandemic Agreement, and recalled U.S. personnel. The withdrawal takes full effect on January 22, 2026. This exit protects the U.S. from being legally bound by this treaty’s sweeping obligations: Key Concerns Hidden in the WHO Pandemic Agreement Coordinated WHO Governance That Pressures National Policies While Article 3 affirms national sovereignty, the agreement—adopted under Article 19 of the WHO Constitution—creates binding international obligations for Parties once ratified (Articles 31–33). It empowers WHO to coordinate pandemic responses through: A global Pathogen Access and Benefit-Sharing System (Article 12) A Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network (GSCL) (Article 13) A Coordinating Financial Mechanism for pandemic response (Article 18) National pandemic planning, surveillance, and communications strategies (Articles 4, 6, 16) Once ratified, countries are expected to align domestic policies with WHO-led systems, subjecting national decision-making to international influence. https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/12/22/report-trump-transition-team-looks-to-pull-u-s-out-of-w-h-o-on-day-one/

Report: Trump Transition Team Looks to Pull U.S. out of W.H.O. ‘On Day One’ The U.S. will exit the globalist World Health Organization (W.H.O.) on day one of President-elect Donald Trump's new administration taking power, a report Sunday predicts. breitbart.com

@Bannons_WarRoom - Bannon’s WarRoom

Natalie Winters: WHO’s New “AI Pandemic Tool” Will Monitor Social Media in Real Time @nataliegwinters https://t.co/TB0yeKWfuT

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm just gonna give you a punch list of some of the clandestine things the WHO has been doing behind closed doors on the pandemic treaty front, but on the sort of global convergence of, you know, emergency crisis response. But what they don't tell you is that emergency means climate change or racial inequity. Take your pick of woke buzzword. But they created the public health and social measures decision navigator, The two point o platform, which will quote, identify relevant content from websites, social media, and other public sources to identify important health events. It's called the epidemic intelligence from open sources, and essentially, they launched a new AI pandemic tracker that's going to be monitoring and essentially patrolling social media to see what kind of misinformation they need to crack down on their fusing essentially new AI tools, to be able to do this so they can process more sources, get probably more of your social media posts, more of the war room clips, that you share. They've also announced progress. This is another story of mine on what they call the pathogen access and benefit sharing system. They have a nice little acronym for it, the PABSS system, where they this one's actually quite wild. They're working on a pandemic causing pathogen database global sharing initiative. Yes. You heard that right. They didn't learn anything from COVID, or I guess maybe they learned everything if what they cared to learn was how to cause a global pandemic. They're pretty good at that. But they are providing quotes, catch this, safe, transparent, and accountable access to pathogens with pandemic potential to all WHO member states, not just China, but every country. They also want to guarantee, quote, equitable, rapid, and timely sharing of countermeasures buried there. What they don't tell you, they mean vaccines. And they also want to, quote, strengthen global health preparedness by pooling resources across borders, which as you and I both know, that is just a dog whistle for suppressing not just nationalism, but the idea of hypernational supply chains and not being reliant on what we saw. It was the completely defunct and completely inadequate globalized supply chains that failed, that are, of course, reliant on probably the UN, WHO's largest benefactor, China, but totally failed during COVID. That's just some of the latest things that the WHO is working on. It's absolutely wild. And I think it goes back to sort of the key point that Nora was making. And even you see with the Bolton stuff, right, Even when we come after these people and rightfully so, they are not just sitting and cowering. They are rebranding. They are like a hydra. They are coming back with even greater force because they know they are lashing out in their last few breaths, again, metaphorically, but seeking because they understand, right, that this is a a serious existential threat.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm just gonna give you a punch list of some of the clandestine things the WHO has been doing behind closed doors on the pandemic treaty front, but on the sort of global convergence of, you know, emergency crisis response. But what they don't tell you is that emergency means climate change or racial inequity. Take your pick of woke buzzword. But they created the public health and social measures decision navigator, The two point o platform, which will quote, identify relevant content from websites, social media, and other public sources to identify important health events. It's called the epidemic intelligence from open sources, and essentially, they launched a new AI pandemic tracker that's going to be monitoring and essentially patrolling social media to see what kind of misinformation they need to crack down on their fusing essentially new AI tools, to be able to do this so they can process more sources, get probably more of your social media posts, more of the war room clips, that you share. They've also announced progress. This is another story of mine on what they call the pathogen access and benefit sharing system. They have a nice little acronym for it, the PABSS system, where they this one's actually quite wild. They're working on a pandemic causing pathogen database global sharing initiative. Yes. You heard that right. They didn't learn anything from COVID, or I guess maybe they learned everything if what they cared to learn was how to cause a global pandemic. They're pretty good at that. But they are providing quotes, catch this, safe, transparent, and accountable access to pathogens with pandemic potential to all WHO member states, not just China, but every country. They also want to guarantee, quote, equitable, rapid, and timely sharing of countermeasures buried there. What they don't tell you, they mean vaccines. And they also want to, quote, strengthen global health preparedness by pooling resources across borders, which as you and I both know, that is just a dog whistle for suppressing not just nationalism, but the idea of hypernational supply chains and not being reliant on what we saw. It was the completely defunct and completely inadequate globalized supply chains that failed, that are, of course, reliant on probably the UN, WHO's largest benefactor, China, but totally failed during COVID. That's just some of the latest things that the WHO is working on. It's absolutely wild. And I think it goes back to sort of the key point that Nora was making. And even you see with the Bolton stuff, right, Even when we come after these people and rightfully so, they are not just sitting and cowering. They are rebranding. They are like a hydra. They are coming back with even greater force because they know they are lashing out in their last few breaths, again, metaphorically, but seeking because they understand, right, that this is a a serious existential threat.
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 6:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a special federal grand jury was empaneled in Fort Pierce, Florida, as part of an investigation ordered by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi into allegations that Obama administration officials mishandled or manipulated intelligence assessments related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. The court approved the panel on Sept. 26, 2025; proceedings begin Jan. 12, 2026. Prosecutors from the Miami U.S. Attorney’s Office lead the process.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

A special federal grand jury was empaneled in Fort Pierce, Florida, as part of an investigation ordered by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi into allegations that Obama administration officials mishandled or manipulated intelligence assessments related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election—often referred to by critics as the "Russiagate" probe. This inquiry stems from claims that senior officials, including former President Barack Obama, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump's campaign through fabricated or exaggerated intelligence findings. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida approved the empanelment of this additional grand jury on September 26, 2025, with proceedings set to begin on January 12, 2026, in the Northern Region division (Fort Pierce). Prosecutors from the Miami U.S. Attorney's Office, led by Jason Reding Quiñones, are overseeing the process. Choosing Fort Pierce as the venue was partially due to the totally illegal raid of Mar-a-Lago and of course, it being strategically advantageous for the Trump administration, given the area's political leanings and its location in Trump-friendly South Florida, potentially yielding a more sympathetic jury pool compared to Washington, D.C., Sucks to be: Barack Obama John Brennan James Clapper James Comey Susan Rice Andrew McCabe Rod Rosenstein Peter Strzok Christopher Wray Hillary Clinton Jack Smith Merrick Garland Valerie Jarrett Ben Rhodes John Carlin Mary McCord Lisa Page Peter Strzok James Baker Jonathan Moffa Michael Kortan David Laufman Sally Yates Bruce Ohr Nellie Ohr Samantha Power Lisa Monaco Victoria Nuland Denis McDonough Jim Rybicki Bill Priestap Christopher Steele Richard Dearlove Alexander Downer Stefan Halper Josef Mifsud Sergei Millian Sidney Blumenthal Cody Shearer Terry McAuliffe Jonathan Winer John Podesta Cheryl Mills Heather Samuelson Jake Sullivan Robbie Mook Robert Mueller Andrew Weissmann Peter Kadzik Rachel Brand Matthew Axelrod Mary Jacoby Preet Bharara Josh Campbell Jennifer Palmieri Sir Andrew Wood Robert Hannigan Alexandra Chalupa Michael Sussman Dimitry Alperovich Donna Brazil Stacey Abrams and officials from the DNC, Crowdstrike, Fusion-GPS-Glenn Simpson, Perkins Coie-Marc Elias.

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 6:02 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
On September 10, 2025, during the assassination of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University, numerous IMSI-catchers were deployed, primarily by law enforcement, to track cellphone signals. This investigation revealed 12–14 foreign-registered cellphones, potentially Israeli, near the scene. The NSA confirmed 12 Israeli-registered phones were active during the event. In contrast, raw GPS data indicated 44 foreign-registered phones, including 16 Israeli, 13 Chinese, 12 Russian, and 3 Iranian. While some foreign phones may belong to students at the university, this does not clarify the presence of the Chinese, Russian, and Iranian devices.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

GPS—There were dozens of IMSI-catchers (devices that mimic cell towers to intercept and track mobile phone signals) present during Charlie Kirk's assassination on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. Most appeared to be deployed by law enforcement as part of the subsequent investigation to locate suspects by analyzing cellphone traffic in the area. These tools helped identify phone activity, including reports of 12–14 foreign-registered cellphones (all potentially Israeli) near the site. The National Security Agency (NSA) surveillance data identified 12 Israeli-registered cellphones active near the assassination site during the event. This information was shared with federal law enforcement and subsequently passed to the White House and differs greatly from raw, unfiltered GPS data, leading up to the assassination itself. Raw GPS data shows there were 44 foreign-registered cellphones in the area, 16 Israeli, 13 Chinese, 12 Russian, and 3 Iranian. Disclaimer: Alternative explanations for the presence of these foreign cellphones includes the possibility that they belonged to foreign nationals studying at Utah Valley University's Center for National Security Studies (the largest such program in the region) however, that doesn’t explain the Chinese, Russian, and Iranian devices.

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 2:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
After escaping in 1968, I managed to evade capture until 1978 and was even removed from the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list in 1977. In 1987, I faced racketeering and fraud charges in Oregon but avoided prison by paying a $100,000 fine.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

After his 1968 escape, he evaded capture until 1978 and was removed from the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list in 1977 without being recaptured at that time. Figure that one out. In 1987, he faced charges for racketeering and fraud in Oregon but avoided further prison time by paying a $100,000 (he just had lying around) fine.

Saved - September 28, 2025 at 2:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the connections between the Oklahoma bombing and the Las Vegas shooter, Stephen Paddock. Paddock had a significant background in intelligence and forensic accounting, having worked for the IRS and as a postal inspector. His father, Benjamin Paddock, was a CIA covert officer involved in bank robberies and had ties to extremist groups. He allegedly taught Timothy McVeigh and others how to rob banks. I questioned the CIA's involvement in these events and suggested they have a history of robbing banks and casinos, particularly in relation to cash storage facilities in the cannabis industry.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Oklahoma Bombing and a Connection to the Las Vegas Shooter? The government’s secrets are massive. Did you know, for example, Stephen Paddock, the so-called Las Vegas ‘shooter’ worked for the Internal Revenue Service and as an auditor for the Defense Contract Audit Agency and as an internal auditor indirectly for Lockheed Martin. He was even with the USPS, but not as a letter carrier or mail processor as the Internet would have you believe but as a postal inspector. A sworn federal law enforcement agent. Stephen had an extensive intelligence and forensic accounting background. His father Benjamin Paddock, was a CIA covert officer who was arrested for robbing a bank in 1960, he was convicted and escaped prison in 1969, subsequently appearing on the FBI's most-wanted list. However, in reality, it was all a CIA op to embed Benjamin into extremist organizations like the Symbionese Liberation Army and Black Panthers as their bank robbery expert. Its gets stranger, Benjamin Paddock also taught Timothy McVeigh, Terry Nichols and the ARA bank robber gang financing McVeigh, and Nichols, how to rob banks and get away with it, ARA bank robber Richard Lee Guthrie, who many investigators privately suspected him as John Doe No. 2. He committed suicide in 1996 while in custody. Were the CCTV cameras intentionally turned off? Benjamin Hoskins Paddock died of a heart attack on January 18, 1998, in Arlington, Texas (Tarrant County). He was buried at Fort Gibson National Cemetery in Fort Gibson, Oklahoma. What exactly was the CIA’s involvement with McVeigh and Nichols? And what if I told you the CIA has a history of not only robbing banks, but casinos (which do not like to publicize robberies nor share the amount taken) and in the past few years, they especially have a love for money storage facilities. The cannabis industry, for example, uses huge warehouses to store their cash.

Saved - September 27, 2025 at 9:43 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

And most have never seen this video of Ray Epps, the DIA recruited asset on J6.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says he was on Constitutional Avenue. 'We went down first. There was four police officers, and some people entered. The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate.' He mentions 'There were anteaters with us' and notes they were aggressive with the police, 'throwing things, breaking things... hitting our own people.' He asserts they are not violent and do not hate the police department, and that the officers were on their side. From the top of the Capitol steps, he recalls 'thousands of papers behind it' and says it was 'an amazing sight' that made him emotional. He frames the action as symbolic after trying everything the right way, aiming to be visible and to make a point because 'the vote was stolen' and 'If our vote's stolen, what do we have left? A dictator.' He aided an injured man, 'Upper left. Cesar' who wasn't breathing. He suspects Antifa: 'I'm positive because that's how Antifa does things.'
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And this gentleman, just you wanna just describe your the whole situation? Just kinda like where you were in the things? Where were you actually today? I'm gonna flip it around. Is that right? Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue. Speaker 0: Is that right? Can I flip it on you? Speaker 1: Yeah. I don't know. Speaker 0: Okay. Go ahead. Speaker 1: I was on Constitutional Avenue. K. We went down first. There was a few a few of us that got to the gate. There was four police officers, and some people entered. The gate was taken down, and the second gate was entered. And then went to the third gate. There was some anteaters with us, and we didn't know they were anteaters at the same at that time, but Speaker 0: They're pretty aggressive with the police. Speaker 1: Yeah. Pretty aggressive with the police. Were throwing things, breaking things. Speaker 0: That's ridiculous. There was they broke some some Speaker 1: street pipes and fencing down. They were throwing things, hitting our Speaker 0: own people. So people hold on to that thought because people are gonna ask the question, how'd you know they were Antifa? Speaker 1: We didn't know they were Antifa. Speaker 0: At the time. Speaker 1: But they weren't they weren't us. We're we're not violent people. Speaker 0: Right. Okay. That's a good point. Speaker 1: We don't we don't hate the police department police department's on our side. They may not we're taking orders from their boss. We're doing a job. They probably feel the same way we do about this whole thing. But I gotta tell you, when we we got to the top and looked back Speaker 0: The top of? Speaker 1: The top of the steps. Speaker 0: At the Capitol? Speaker 1: Yep. Speaker 0: That's pretty cool. Speaker 1: It was quite an amazing sight. I got a little emotional when I looked back and I saw all the papers behind it. Wow. Thousands of papers behind it. Speaker 0: So what is your thinking? Why why are we going down to the capital at that point? Is it to make sure that we surround just a visual? Are you thinking at that time it's it's kind of a visual thing, or are you actually thinking it's symbolic? What are you thinking? Speaker 1: I think it's symbolic. I I think we have tried everything. We we we've been down there several times. We've done everything the right way. We haven't broken it off. Speaker 0: We I love that. That's true. That's so true. Speaker 1: We you know what? I I've been here before with a million and a half people, and there wasn't a piece of trash left on the ground afterward. There were people there to pick it up and put it away. This is who we are. It's symbolic because we've tried everything Yes. The right way. And they needed to know that we're fed up. Speaker 0: Yes. Yeah. So you're you're you're saying that you're marching down there and it's it's it's one more thing that we as patriots can do to show those elected officials look. We didn't just come out here to jump around and and yell and scream. We came here to be visible, and we came here to make a point. And that's right where you are. Right? That's exactly what you're saying. You want these guys to know. Exactly. Speaker 1: Exactly right. You sent a message for them because, we are now not a republic. Right. We we don't have a vote in Speaker 0: need. Right. Speaker 1: The vote was stolen. And if our vote's stolen, what do we have left? Right. A dictator. Speaker 0: If anybody can hear this, just make sure that you guys let me know if if you can hear this gentleman. Just message me. Hey. Just yeah, Chris. We can hear loud and clear. So you're you're you get to the top. You don't see any violence other than maybe just the way that these guys were talking to the police. Speaker 1: Oh, no. No. No. No. These guys were fighting with the police. They were? They were tearing the things down. They were breaking things. I mean, and we try we were trying to calm them down. And I'm a pretty big guy, so I was able to talk some of them down, but I had some of them that wanted to fight. I'm not gonna fight them. They they were very violent. They were very violent. Were they Antipa? I'm positive because that's how Antipa does things. That's not how we do Speaker 0: things. Mhmm. I don't know. Alright. Speaker 1: Well We tried to talk we had several of us trying to talk them out of it. Speaker 0: And you just basically said that they were they were they wouldn't listen to anything you said? No. Speaker 1: There were certain ones that wouldn't. Most would. They were also throwing things in the air and hitting our own people. Wow. So, yeah, it was pretty crazy. Speaker 0: So they did you see anybody breach the doors to to the capital? Speaker 1: I didn't see the breach. Okay. I didn't see the breach. We had a gentleman go down with an upper left. Speaker 0: Yeah. Cesar. Speaker 1: Upper left. I'm so surprised. Upper left, the seizure. Right. And he wasn't breathing. So when we were up there, before they went in, I had that going on. I helped with that. I helped get him out out of the area, and we had to, carry him out. And it was quite a task while we're here. Speaker 0: So, I mean, you guys yeah. Right? You're scoot down this way. You guys are not antagonizers, obviously, and I mean guys, I mean, I put this gentleman on. I've been talking to him for about thirty minutes, and I'm not gonna put somebody on that I think is a total whack job because, right, we have a message and it's gotta be credible. And this man is telling me that, first of all, when I when I was started talking to them, they said it was clearly Antifa that breached those gates. It was clearly Antifa, and and he really didn't think that they would that the Trump people probably would have walked through the gates had they not been breached first. And so

@gatewaypundit - The Gateway Pundit

BREAKING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps’ FBI Call to the American Public via @gatewaypundit https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=breaking-federal-agents-drag-j6-political-prisoner-ryan

DEVELOPING: Federal Agents Drag J6 Political Prisoner Ryan Samsel To The Hole and Isolation Immediately After The Gateway Pundit Releases Ray Epps' FBI Call to the American Public | The Gateway Pundit | by Alicia Powe            Earlier today, Alicia Powe at The Gateway Pundit exposed J6 insurrection leader James Ray Epps lying to the FBI in a leaked interview obtained by The Gateway Pundit. thegatewaypundit.com
Saved - August 29, 2025 at 4:10 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that Robert "Robin" Westman was linked to at least five antifa protests, with evidence of burner phones at his residence. His connections to the Zizians, a radical group led by Jack LaSota, raise concerns about their ideology and activities. The Zizians, described as a cult-like collective of transgender vegans, have been implicated in multiple murders across several states. Their leader promotes extreme views and has been arrested, alongside other members facing serious charges. The group is currently under investigation, highlighting troubling cult dynamics in online communities.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

GPS—Robert "Robin" Westman devices were present during at least 5 antifa protests. Upon cross pollinating devices at his residence, there were numerous ‘burner’ phones. His devices have also appeared to have been present with a number of Zizians, including their founder Jack LaSota, on two occasions two months apart. It adds up, because he claims to "hate fascism & inequality", he had "1312" in his username. He was 100% trantifa, not a "right winger" like many lying Antifa are trying to claim to distance themselves from the sh*t storm surrounding the church shooting of children. It's also important to point out that the Far Left/Antifa to Trans pipeline many times, terminates with incorporating Nazi ideology through the Pro Palestine intersection involved. The Zizians, are a cult-like group that has been widely described in media reports as a radical collective primarily consisting of transgender vegans with ties to rationalist communities, anti-AI ideologies, and extreme activism. This group has been linked to a series of murders and suspicious deaths across multiple U.S. states in 2025, earning it labels like "trans murder cult" or "vegan death cult" in various news outlets and online discussions. The Zizians originated from online rationalist and effective altruism circles in the Bay Area, drawing in highly intelligent individuals, including math geniuses and programmers. The group's leader, Jack LaSota (also known as "Ziz" or "Jack Ziz"), is a transgender person who reportedly promoted extreme veganism, anti-artificial intelligence views, and authoritarian control over members. Experts have compared it to cults using models like Steven Hassan's BITE (Behavior, Information, Thought, and Emotional control) framework, noting how it allegedly manipulated followers through emotional and ideological means. The group has been accused of issuing "kill orders" and fostering an environment that led to violence, though not all members are implicated in crimes. In early 2025, the group came under scrutiny after a traffic stop in Vermont led to the discovery of connections to the murder of U.S. Border Patrol Agent David Maland. A 21-year-old transgender member of the Zizians was indicted on federal murder charges and faces the death penalty. The Zizians have been tied to the deaths of a Pennsylvania couple (parents of one member) and other incidents in California, including an attempted murder and a faked death. In total, the group is linked to at least six killings across three states: Vermont, Pennsylvania, and California. Additional arrests include LaSota on trespassing charges (held without bail) and other members like Alexander Leatham and Suri Dao, who face trial for related murders. One case involved a German math prodigy allegedly drawn into the group before her involvement in crimes. As of mid-2025, multiple members are in custody, with ongoing trials and federal investigations. The U.S. Justice Department is pursuing capital punishment in at least one case. The group has gone underground, but it has sparked broader discussions about cult dynamics in online communities.

Saved - August 13, 2025 at 7:53 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Tony Seruga claimed there were three 'pipe bombers' involved in the January 6 incident, suggesting that the FBI manipulated video evidence and that the devices were actually bomb dog training devices. He stated that a group of officials was informed that the original devices likely contained fingerprints and were replaced on the morning of January 6. Bill Sobel countered that the test devices had a one-hour timer, questioning their placement the night before, and argued they were meant to be discovered to disrupt the certification session. Seruga clarified that the original devices had remote triggers, similar to those owned by Thomas Matthew Crooks.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨 Update on J6 ‘pipe bomber’ 🚨 What if I told you there were 3 ‘pipe bombers’ and the video released by the FBI was staged and manipulated. The ‘pipe bombs’ were FBI bomb dog training devices. The evening of January 5th, a small group of DIA, DOD, FBI, U.S. Capital Police and U.S. Secret Service were read in that the planted devices likely were not wiped of fingerprints/DNA. So, on the morning of January 6th, the devices were retrieved and new devices were planted.

@BillSobel - Bill Sobel

@TonySeruga The test devices had a '1 hour' timer so it makes no sense they would be placed the night before. They were never a danger, they were only there to be 'discovered' to stop the certification session in the riot hadn't materialized.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

@BillSobel The original devices had remote triggers and not the silly kitchen timer the replacement devices had. The remote triggers were the same brand Thomas Matthew Crooks had in his possession, normally used to launch aerial fireworks. https://t.co/e5lPnBb6va

Saved - July 28, 2025 at 12:16 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a bot farm creating comments that echo phrases like "AI is just a tool" and "AI will NEVER be conscious!" These bots aim to agitate and disempower us, contributing to a narrative that aligns with depopulation agendas by global elites who don't need most of the population.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

This is where they make the bots who parrot "AI is just a tool" and "AI is only as smart as its programmer" and "AI will NEVER be conscious! PERIOD." AI controlled Bot Farm. 100s of them tossing 1000s of comments and postings designed to agitate you. Polarize you. Offend you. Disempowering you. THIS IS WHY DEPOPULATION IS HAPPENING. The globalist elites do not need 99% of the world’s population. For now, this just may be who you are arguing with. 😉

Saved - July 24, 2025 at 1:17 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve heard there’s a whistleblower with a recording of conspirators discussing the Epstein birthday card story, insisting it be released before Director Tulsi Gabbard revealed how intelligence was politicized by top figures in the Obama Administration. This was part of a long-term effort to undermine President Trump and the democratic process. Notably, the fabricated WSJ article was published just before Gabbard shared her initial evidence.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

I’m told there is a whistleblower provided recording of the conspirators planning the Epstein birthday card story and demanding the story break BEFORE Director Tulsi Gabbard released the details of how in 2016, intelligence was politicized and weaponized by the most powerful people in the Obama Administration to lay the groundwork for what was essentially a years-long coup against President @realDonaldTrump, subverting the will of the American people and undermining our democratic republic. The fake WSJ story dropped the evening before @DNIGabbard’s release of the initial evidence.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

President Trump has officially filed a MASSIVE libel lawsuit against Wall Street Journal, News Corp, Dow Jones, and Rupert Murdoch Trump called the Epstein birthday card story totally "false, malicious, and defamatory." Trump said the WSJ was warned and printed the story anyway. @realDonaldTrump in additional to the Murdochs; Paul Ryan and Trey Gowdy were in meetings too! FAFO! 🔥

Saved - June 13, 2025 at 9:47 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

.@IlhanMN’s adult daughter is calling for the death of America. She is regularly in the presence of known terrorists. @TheJusticeDept @FBI @DHSgov https://t.co/Qdjs0EPtgR

Saved - May 7, 2025 at 3:31 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m concerned about Senator Thom Tillis' resistance to U.S. Attorney Ed Martin's investigation into the events of January 6, which seem to have significant connections to North Carolina and Fort Bragg. This location has ties to Mark Milley and the CIA, particularly regarding Ryan Wesley Routh, who made numerous visits to Fort Bragg and has a troubling history. I encourage others to voice their opinions to Senators Tillis and Cornyn, as well as other officials, about these issues. Mike Benz also highlights the deep state connections in North Carolina.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Senator Thom Tillis (@SenThomTillis) doesn’t want U.S. Attorney Ed Martin digging into the Fedsurrection/J6 which has VERY, VERY deep ties to Tillis’ North Carolina and Fort Bragg (the meeting point for J6 all linked to Mark Milley) additionally Fort Bragg had heavy involvement with CIA/Ukraine asset Ryan Wesley Routh, who attempted to kill President Trump. Ryan Wesley Routh visited Fort Bragg 147 times, staying overnight on 29 occasions.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Be heard! Call Senators on Judiciary! Make Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) and Senator Thom Tillis (@SenThomTillis) know how you feel! Senator Thom Tillis @SenThomTillis DC number: 202-224-6342 Senator Thom Tillis local office numbers: 📍 Raleigh 📞 (919) 856-4630 📍 Charlotte 📞 (704) 509-9087 📍 Greenville 📞 (252) 329-0371 📍 Hendersonville 📞 (828) 693-8750 📍 Greensboro 📞 (336) 885-0685 John Thune office locations: 📍 Aberdeen 📞 (605) 225-8823 📍 Sioux Falls 📞 (605) 334-9596 📍 Rapid City 📞 (605) 348-7551 📍 Washington, D.C. 📞 (202) 224-2321 John Cornyn offices: 📍 Houston 📞 (713) 572-3337 📍 Harlingen 📞 (956) 423-0162 📍 Lubbock 📞 (806) 472-7533 📍 Dallas 📞 (972) 239-1310 📍 San Antonio 📞 (210) 224-7485 📍 Tyler 📞 (903) 593-0902 📍 Austin 📞 (512) 469-6034 📍 Washington, D.C. 📞 (202) 224-2934 Cassidy offices: 📍 Alexandria 📞 (318) 448-7176 📍 Baton Rouge 📞 (225) 929-7711 📍 Lafayette 📞 (337) 261-1400 📍 Lake Charles 📞 (337) 602-7253 📍 Metairie 📞 (504) 838-0130 📍 Monroe 📞 (318) 324-2111 📍 Shreveport 📞 (318) 798-3215 📍 Washington, D.C. 📞 (202) 224-5824 —thanks @DataRepublican

@JackPosobiec - Jack Poso 🇺🇸

BREAKING: RINOS LINING UP TO BLOCK ED MARTIN https://t.co/sgtWRoRjh4

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

“North Carolina Is The Heart Of The Deep State” Mike Benz Examines Sen. Tillis Remarks Disputing Fedsurrection @MikeBenzCyber Thanks @Pammo0419 https://t.co/dCScTSYRz8

Video Transcript AI Summary
Senator Tom Tillis cited January 6 as his reason for blocking Ed Martin, which is suspicious because January 6 was a "Fedsurrection" that happened over four years ago, and peaceful protesters have been pardoned. Tillis mentioned apprehension about Martin pursuing a "Fedsurrection" theory, claiming there was no federal involvement. This is curious because North Carolina, Tillis's state, is the heart of the Mark Milley deep state and has a history of domestic interference. North Carolina played an extraordinary role in January 6. Fort Bragg, the special operations and psychological operations center, is located there. North Carolina was the center of the "Fed's erection" logistics for January 6. The Thomas Caldwell complaint shows the Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and three percenters met in North Carolina days before January 6. Person three, an unindicted co-conspirator, transported heavy weapons and created maps of the Capitol. Mark Milley told Gina Haspel in November 2020 that there was a right-wing coup afoot. The speaker questions why Tillis is blocking Martin, given North Carolina's role in January 6.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Here's where to me it gets very dark. Tom Tillis has made precisely one public statement about this to the press, and that was just this morning where he said it was January 6 that, is the reason that he is not going to approve Ed Martin. And obviously, January 6 was a Fedsurrection. January sixth also happened. Checks notes, what, four, four years and four months ago. It has no play today. Everyone, you know, who did not commit a violent crime that day has been pardoned by the, by the president of The United States. The there are no active cases when it comes to peaceful protesters. This is not just an ancient memory. It's settled. It's done. For that to be invoked is the reason to block Ed Martin suggests something much darker to me. Because if you actually parse that statement that senator Tom Tillis said is he mentions towards the end of his remarks that he was apprehensive about Ed Martin pursuing a Fedsurrection theory of the case. He he alludes to the fact that he says that there was no federal involvement. That was a sort of pipe dream. I'm paraphrasing what he says and he slips that in there and I find that very curious because he's a senator from North Carolina and North Carolina is the heart of the shall we say Mark Milley deep state when it comes to all things psychological operations, domestic a very nasty history of domestic interference and domestic politics. Speaker 1: Well, Ralph Farrick at UNC Chapel Hill doing the COVID gain of function stuff. Mike, if you can hang with us through the break. Possibly, we're also gonna have AJ Ken Paxton joining us shortly to get into all this. So, Mike, I want an update on what I think you are rightfully known for all things NGOs, how they're funding all that resistance after we come back. If you can hang through, that'd be great. Warm, if you could just give me two minutes. You know, this audience is always wanting to be ahead of the curve on how they're sort of reformulating their resistance to Trump. Obviously, the NGOs taking a key role, if not the foremost role, maybe second to the judiciary, though, as you've alluded to, they're all conjoined. It's all one of the same. How have they sort of been rebranding? I know this is a topic you've been discussing a lot, but just give us some some key pointers. I know they'll find everything you're talking on on x too, but just give us some of the top line assessment. Speaker 0: I know this is not the question that you just I know this is not the question you just asked, but I was just talking about Tom Tillis in North Carolina in January 6. And if I only have a minute and a half, I'd like to just put something out there to to put the button on that because I think it's concerning and important if you don't mind. North Carolina. Speaker 1: No, go ahead. Speaker 0: Where Tom Tillis is the senator played an extraordinary role in January 6 itself, which is why it highly disturbs me that Senator Tillis would be the one who's blocking this from the Republican side. North Carolina is what houses Fort Bragg. The special operations, the psychological operations center, and and where they're where organizing protest activity has been a hotbed of that exact place for coming up on sixty years now going back to Lyman Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs of Staff Domestic Operations in the 1960s. But most importantly, North Carolina was the center of the Fed's erection logistics for January 6. Go back and read the Thomas Caldwell complaint from the Justice Department. There's the entire Eastern Seaboard presence of the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, and the three percenters all three days before January 6 starting January 3 met commonly in North Carolina where the FBI and Justice Department allowed the quote quick reaction force bringing the guns and explosives to skate free as an unindicted co conspirator. This person was called person three and I'm going to read a few things from this complaint. Person three is has a room and is bringing someone. He will be the quick reaction force. Oathkeeper friends from North Carolina are taking commercial buses up early in the morning the same night. They will have the goodies in in case things go bad and we need to get heavy. Then, it says, person three had maps. Person three you know, created maps of the of the capital in order to map out where to go. He brought, he was the the transit for actually bringing the guns and explosives to the meetup site in North Carolina. And this this person who was literally transporting heavy weapons with a quote quote ferry planned a ferry heavy weapons across the Potomac. Should that become necessary on January 6 and distributing maps to find the quickest route to the capital should those heavy weapons be needed. This person played the key role in for the basis of the indictment of the entire oath keepers squad. Never was charged. Again, right there in North Carolina, right where the military should have been doing its its counterintelligence and counterinsurgency work. We know Mark Milley said to Gina Haspel, the head of the CIA on 11/09/2020, just two months before January 6 that there was a right wing coup afoot and something need to be done to stop it. Mark Milley would not just go back and sit on his thumbs if that's what he said to the CIA director. They would be infiltrating those very groups and they would be doing it right there in North Carolina where Fort Bragg is and exactly where they said the meetup point for January 6 was. So my question is is what is so scary about the Fed's erection theory given North Carolina's role in it that the senator from North Carolina is the one blocking it?
Saved - May 1, 2025 at 5:14 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

I just had a conversation with one of the biggest Democrat Party donors. His net worth is in the $5BN range. He is beyond furious. He was informed yesterday by dem leadership that they are going to run Kamala Harris for California governor.

Saved - April 29, 2025 at 11:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by the spread of Muslim police forces in U.S. cities, enforcing what I see as morality and sharia law. Many Americans remain unaware of this development in their own communities. I draw parallels to Iran, where the regime's morality police violently punish women for "improper hijab," leading to severe consequences. The situation has deteriorated since Mahsa Amini's case. I believe similar forces are already present in the U.S., like the Muslim Community Patrol in NYC.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

This is spreading across the U.S. If Americans knew how many U.S. cities have their own Muslim police forces that are enforcing morality/sharia law. Americans are still in the dark. They have no idea what has been happening in their own county. In Iran, the regime's "morality police" hurls a woman into the back of a van for "improper hijab". She will suffer anything from jail time to torture and/or execution. Nothing has changed since Mahsa Amini. In fact, it's gotten so much worse. Yes, they are already here in the U.S., in NYC known as the Muslim Community Patrol. https://t.co/PpBxJR0mWF

@BeniSabti - BenSabti

#Islamic regime in #Iran is the real trouble for Iranians and the world. The elections are meaningless! رژیم جمهوری اسلامی=منشا بدبختی مردم ایران. اونوقت توقع دارن مردم بیان رای بدن. اگه راست میگین وجود گشت ارشاد رو به رای بزارین!

@Carlos__Turcios - Carlos Turcios

🚨INVASION🚨This is Miami Florida, one of the largest Republican led cities in the country. The Islamic Sharia Law is EVERYWHERE! Follow: @Carlos__Turcios

Saved - April 20, 2025 at 3:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m outraged that the radical left is mocking Trump’s orders! An undercover investigation revealed that Southern New Hampshire University is pushing far-left DEI propaganda in sociology courses, including false claims about funding in white school districts, violating Trump’s executive order.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The radical left is mocking Trump’s orders! OMG’s undercover investigation—exposed via a leaked call—proves Southern New Hampshire University (SNHU) is cramming far-left DEI propaganda into sociology courses, pushing lies like “why white school districts have so much money.” This violates Trump’s executive order banning DEI in federally funded schools!

@JamesOKeefeIII - James O'Keefe

EXCLUSIVE: Summit Public Schools HR Director Confesses to Violating Title VII, California FEHA, and School Policy: “We’re Going With the Black Person… NO MATTER WHAT” in Race-Based Hiring; Admits, “I Don’t Think We Would Hire MAGA People" “Whenever there's a qualified candidate and they happen to identify differently or present differently, we're probably going with that person… That's what DEI is all about.” “We have one trans teacher in our district, and, so, I think it's just culturally, we just naturally look for those folks.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
An HR director for Summit Public Schools stated that in choosing between a white and black applicant, he'll choose a black applicant "no matter what," which is a violation of California state law and the school's policy. The HR director said they look specifically for transgendered people and people of color to teach the school children, saying, "we just naturally look for those folks." The HR director said the school would avoid hiring MAGA people and that DEI questions are included in the hiring process. He gave an example of a scenario-based question where a student talks about a different political value than the teacher, and how the candidate responds. He stated that if the candidate says they want to make sure the student learns about conservative values, that is "probably not what we are looking for."
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You get presented with unequal merits Yeah. Like a white person and a black black person or whatever. Speaker 1: Yeah. We're going with the black person. Speaker 0: Yeah. No no matter what. Speaker 1: Yeah. No matter what. Yeah. Speaker 2: An HR director for a California charter school says that in choosing between a white and black applicant, he'll choose a black applicant no matter what. No matter what is not only a violation of California state law, but also the school's own policy. The HR director for Summit Public Schools continues to tell our journalists they look specifically for transgendered people and people of color to teach the school children. Speaker 1: If it's a person of color, great. If it's a trans teacher, great. You know? And so I think it's just culturally, we just naturally look for those folks. Speaker 2: We asked Jonathan Fair, the director from Summit Public Schools, if he would hire a conservative person or a MAGA person. Ferrer says the school would avoid hiring any MAGA people. You're hiring like Speaker 0: MAGA people for staff sometimes if it just happens or I don't think we would. Like in Nevada. Speaker 1: Like I don't think we would. Oh my god. I'm talking way too I'm feeling so bad. I I feel like I'm talking your ear off. I'm talking way too much. No. HR Speaker 2: director for a California charter school says that in choosing between a white and black applicant, he'll choose a black applicant no matter what. Ferrer's statement that he will hire the candidate on the basis of race alone no matter what is not only a violation of California state law, but also the school's own policy, which states, quote, it is the policy of Summit Public Schools that no person shall be subject to discrimination on the basis of disability, gender, gender identity, gender expression, nationality, race or ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or any other characteristic that is contained in the definition of hate crime set forth in section four two two five five of the penal code, including immigration status. Jonathan Ferrer is an HR director for a charter school district located in the Bay Area just outside of San Francisco. Ferrer describes his position of HR director as a role that handles the school's LGBTQ and DEI protocols. Fairer also tells us that he is put in charge of layoffs, and he facilitates LGBTQ gender wellness training, whatever that means. Speaker 1: I'm director of human resources for a school district. Speaker 0: Tire district. Well Rare district. And the district spans from Northern California to Washington? Speaker 1: Northern California and Washington. We have four schools in Washington. Oh. Three schools in Washington now. And then we have 10 schools in the Bay Area. Speaker 0: So what what does an HR director for a school district entail? Speaker 1: I'm dealing a lot of with, like, training, making sure our principals and our teachers are trained. I lead our DEI efforts in the district, so we have, LGBTQIA plus, like, gender wellness training on Thursday, Speaker 0: directly with students and teachers. Speaker 1: Students and teachers. Yeah. Speaker 2: Our undercover journalist met Jonathan Fair for a first date, and Fair proudly confessed to engaging in discriminatory hiring practices. The HR director admitted that when the school district is presented with two equally merited candidates, one white and one black person, that he would hire the black person entirely based upon their race. Quote, we're going with the black person no matter what. Speaker 0: So you also want a diverse staff because you get more federal funding? I think federal and state are So you guys want you want a diverse environment, which I completely understand. I I value that as well. Does that mean at a certain point you just aren't looking for a certain type of person? Speaker 1: With the exception, I'll I'll I'll say what we do look for, like, Like, for example, if the English department is all male. Right? All white male. You know? Maybe we'll wanna add a person of color, like, somewhere, like, in the mix. Speaker 0: Well, certainly in the in that situation like you described, where it's all one type of person, and then you get presented with unequal merits Yeah. Like a white person and a black black person or whatever. Speaker 1: Yeah. We're going with the butlers. Yeah. Majority of the teaching staff, even in California, are white females. And that's just that's just how it goes. And so, whenever there's a qualified candidate and they happen to identify differently or present differently, we're probably going with that person. Speaker 0: Right. No no matter what. Speaker 1: Yeah. No matter what. Yeah. Sorry to say that, but that's really how it goes down sometimes. Yeah. Speaker 0: That's what DEI is all about. Speaker 1: Right? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Speaker 2: After experiencing four years of a volatile economy, America is facing record inflation and a massive threat to the US dollar. Experts are warning the stock market could crash, and we could be facing a recession. In these uncertain times, I recommend gold to my audience, and I trust Fisher Capital as my official gold partner. Not only have my friends at Fisher delivered hundreds of millions of dollars in gold to their clients, they've also proven to be vigilant and right on the front line supporting causes that make our country stronger and better. Fisher Capital is the largest corporate partner for Turning Point USA, close friends of OMG. We appear at their events every December and continues to make sure the new administration is successful. Based on my experience and client testimonials, the team at Fisher Capital consists of some of the most caring and compassionate individuals in finance today. And when you click the link, you will qualify for an exclusive offer only available to my listeners, where you can get up to $20,000 of free silver with your qualifying purchase. When you speak with Fisher, make sure to mention that James O'Keefe sent you. Our portfolios are too important to trust to stocks and bonds alone. Protect yourself with gold today and get it from Fisher Capital. Go to Fisher0mg.com. That's Fisher0mg.com. Fisher 0 m g Com. And what Jonathan Fair is admitting to here is actually a violation of California state law. According to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, that's FEHA as the acronym, employers are prohibited from discriminating against candidates based upon race or skin color. The Summit Public Schools director openly admits that the school district will either disqualify or employ a candidate based upon their skin color alone. This is a violation of California labor law. Ironically, it is also a direct policy of the Summit Public Schools policy that no person shall be discriminated against on the basis of their race. The HR director for Summit Public Schools continues to tell our journalists they look specifically for transgendered people and people of color to teach the school children. Thayer said, quote, we just naturally look for these folks. Speaker 1: Who do we feel is best for kids right now in the context of that school side or that classroom? Yeah. So if it's a person of color, great. If it's a trans teacher, great. You know? Speaker 0: Now, do you guys, since you do have a DEI program, have certain quotas that you have to hit for different types of So, Speaker 1: obviously, we have a lot of kids that identify as LGBTQ, maybe even trans. So we wanna we have one trans teacher in our district. And so I think it's just culturally, we just naturally look for those folks. Speaker 2: We asked Jonathan Ferrer, the HR director from Summit Public Schools, if he would hire a conservative person or a MAGA person. Ferrer says the school would avoid hiring any MAGA people. He also reveals that the school has DEI questions baked into their hiring process, which will allow Summit Public Schools to cut out certain candidates who are not politically aligned. Speaker 0: So that means you're hiring, like, MAGA people for staff sometimes if it just happens or I don't think we would. Like in Nevada Like I Speaker 1: don't think we would. Speaker 0: Well I would think someone in your position who is sensitive to issues like LGBTQ issues and things like that would know the kind of person who might be toxic to be a teacher for students? Yeah. Speaker 1: I think that comes out in an interview. Speaker 0: And would try to kinda weed that person out? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think a lot of it comes out of the interview. We do have DEI questions built into our selection process, so how they respond to that. And we have a rubric of, obviously, if they say any of these things, this is not someone who's answering the question the way we're aligned with. Speaker 0: Like, are those questions? Speaker 1: Like, for example, like, a scenario based question where a student talks about a different different political value, you know, than you do, how do you respond Mhmm. To that student? So if it if the candidate or the teacher is like, well, I wanna make sure that they learn about conservative values, blah blah blah, etcetera. And if they say that during the interview, that's probably not what we are Mhmm. Looking for. So I would say, yeah, I'd say things like that. Speaker 2: In recent months, many of our fellow Americans experienced unprecedented natural disasters and damaged infrastructure, making access to health care essentials impossible at the very moment it was needed. When disaster strikes, being prepared is your best defense. And now I'm excited to share with you the brand new field emergency kit from our friends at The Wellness Company. The ultimate survival kit for any situation or medical help is not an option. Inside this rugged waterproof case, you'll find essential medications that cover over 60 conditions that you can encounter along with a detailed 85 page doctor written guidebook. This ultimate kit includes amoxicillin, an essential for treating bacterial infections and antivirals and antiparasitics like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, medications that are critical in situations where you're exposed to respiratory viruses or parasites. And for those facing potentially life threatening allergic reactions, the field kit includes epinephrine, the generic EpiPen, along with vital first aid supplies such as tourniquet and wound and burn treatments. Natural disasters are happening at record rates, so I urge everyone to get the ultimate field emergency kit from our friends and supporters at The Wellness Company by going to twc.health/0mg, t w c Health / 0 m g. That's twc.health/0mg. And now you can save 50% just by using code o m g at checkout. Reach out to us via our tip line, tips@okeifmediagroup.com, or send us a message on signal, (914) 491-9395, and one of our journalists will get back to you. Thank you, and stay tuned.
Saved - April 10, 2025 at 11:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
FoxNews, like CNN and MSNBC, is portrayed as an enemy of America, driven by the Murdoch family’s disdain for Trump and the MAGA movement. I believe both political parties are merely different factions of a corrupt system that prioritizes government interests over the people. The real threat lies within the government itself, influenced by a shadowy network of unelected bureaucrats and powerful entities like the CIA, Federal Reserve, and military contractors, all operating with little accountability.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Here’s your PSA! FoxNews is TV for stupid people. They ARE the enemy against America too. Just like CNN, MSNBC. The Murdoch crime family HATES Trump, MAGA and America First. There is a reason they got rid of truth tellers they couldn’t control, Bill O’Reilly and Tucker Carlson. But make no mistake, both hen houses are full to the brim with foxes. Inaction can be just as devastating as a full on assault. The enemy is not only within the wire, but has taken over command. Republicans, Democrats, just two different wings of the same rotting, rancid bird. It isn’t really Republicans versus Democrats, it’s our elected representatives and the government they serve against all of us. That’s right, they do not serve the people, they serve the government, i.e., the shadow government and deep state*. *The Shadow Government (The Unconstitutional Power of Government Secrecy) i.e., CIA, CFR, MSM, FISA, NSA, Silicon Valley, JSOC, DNI (17 Agencies), 5 Eyes, GCHQ MI6, DHS, DOS, NRO, NCTC, NGA, DOD, FBI and the Deep State (The System Behind the Government, unelected bureaucrats with zero accountability) i.e., the Federal Reserve (a private company NOT the government!), the Treasury, Wall Street, Foreign Lobbyists, Military-Industrial Complex (MIC) Lobbyists, the actual Military-Industrial Complex (MIC)/Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex (MICC) itself, Defense Contractors, Intelligence Contractors, World Bank, IMF.

Video Transcript AI Summary
The mentally retarded are classified as educable, trainable, and custodial, but assessment must be individual. Custodial retarded may exhibit seemingly random motions, sometimes causing self-inflicted injuries. The vast majority of the mentally retarded can be taught a great many things, but abilities vary, even among the educable. A stimulating environment is important, but standards must be realistic. Many trainable retarded individuals can learn household responsibilities, some complex. It is unrealistic to expect mastery, but they can be trained as valuable assistants in skilled trades. The mentally retarded are people of all backgrounds, found wherever people live.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Usually, the mentally retarded are divided into classifications: the educable, the trainable, and the custodial. Obviously, we can only assess the abilities or potential of the mentally retarded on an individual basis. Seemingly random motions and movements are fairly common among the custodial retarded, and they may take many forms. Sometimes there are motions which seem to have no meaning whatever, and may even cause unintentional self inflicted injuries. The vast majority of the mentally retarded are intelligent enough that they can be taught a great many things. However, there's a wide range of ability, even among those considered educable. And their ability to learn obviously varies according to their level of intelligence. Equally important is a stimulating environment. However, we must remember to set realistic standards that are not too high for the individual. Many of the trainable retarded can learn to take certain kinds of household responsibilities, some of which may be more complex than they are usually given credit for. It would be wrong to expect a mentally retarded person to become a master craftsman. The standards are too high. But even in the skilled trades, for example, the mentally retarded can be trained to become valuable assistants. Who are the mentally retarded? They are people. They come in both sexes and in all sizes, shapes, creeds, and colors. Wherever people live, there also live the mentally retarded.
Saved - April 7, 2025 at 5:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I recently learned about Chief Justice Roberts' close friendship with Norm Eisen, a prosecutor known for his involvement in legal strategies against Trump. Their bond reportedly includes a week-long stay at Eisen's lavish palace in the Czech Republic. Additionally, Roberts is said to be part of a secretive group of elite judges and lawyers, which raises questions about transparency and influence within the judicial system. This connection seems to shed light on the handling of significant cases, including those related to the 2020 election.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨 Chief Justice Roberts’ Secret Friendship with Trump Prosecutor Ally Norm Eisen Exposed 🚨 Roberts didn’t just bump into Eisen at a D.C. cocktail party. No, these two are apparently such “good pals” that Roberts jetted off to the Czech Republic for a week-long sleepover at Eisen’s lavish 150-room palace. It’s straight from the mouth of Norm Eisen himself—the very same man who practically wrote the Deep State’s instruction manual on how to destabilize political opponents via color revolutions, lawfare, and weaponized legal warfare against President Trump. https://revolver.news/2025/04/resign-justice-roberts-secret-friendship-with-norm-eisen-has-been-revealed/ But wait, there’s more (no wonder the 2020 election fraud cases went nowhere): 🚨 REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Secretive, Invite-Only Club of Elite Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson 🚨 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/revealed-chief-justice-john-roberts-caught-secretive-invite/

RESIGN: Justice Roberts’ secret friendship with Norm Eisen has been revealed... - Revolver News A supreme conflict of interest. revolver.news
REVEALED: Chief Justice John Roberts Caught in Elitist Club of Judges and Lawyers That Includes James Boasberg, Beryl Howell, Amit Mehta and Ketanji Brown Jackson | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft A recent investigation unveils Chief Justice John Roberts' involvement in a clandestine judges' club, raising ethical questions amid connections to several controversial judges. This revelation could reshape perceptions of judicial impartiality. thegatewaypundit.com

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Prison! Make @NormEisen the poster child for draining the swamp, fighting the deep state and justice served. Promises made, promises kept. @TheJusticeDept @AGPamBondi @realDonaldTrump @FBI @FBIDirectorKash @FBIDDBongino

@listen_2learn - The Researcher

Norm Eisen accidentally told the truth that Judge Juan Merchan was part of his Bragg lawfare team. It didn’t take him long to figure out that he messed up. I previously posted that Norm appeared to say that he was writing documents for the judge. If true, that means Norm

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the strength of both the prosecution and defense teams, contingent on Trump allowing the defense team to operate effectively. The jury sent out a note, and while preparing a response, a second note arrived. This second note requested the judge to reread the legal instructions, a process that took eighty minutes.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We have a strong team, judge, prosecution team, very good defense team if Trump lets them do their job. I thought today's proceedings with the note coming out from the jury, and then while we were getting ready to answer the first note, we got a second, jury request to have the legal instructions read back to them by the judge, which was an eighty minute adventure.
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 1:36 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Letitia James is facing charges of mortgage fraud related to a federal HAMP loan. For over twenty years, she misrepresented her Brooklyn apartment building as a four-unit property on mortgage applications, despite it officially being five units. This discrepancy allowed her to secure more favorable loans, saving her significant money. Ironically, the same legal principles she used to prosecute others may now lead to her downfall. Additionally, records show that in 1983, she and her father took out a real estate loan together, listed as "husband and wife."

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Additionally, Letitia James is about to be charged with mortgage fraud, a federal crime because it is a federal government HAMP loan. For over two decades, Letitia James repeatedly claimed her Brooklyn apartment building was a four-unit property on mortgage applications—despite official records proving it had five. This may seem a minor discrepancy, but misrepresenting the unit count enabled her to secure more favorable loans, including a 2011 Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) loan that saved her tens of thousands of dollars annually. Now, the same legal principles she used to prosecute others may be her downfall. But there’s more. According to New York City Department of Finance records, on May 20, 1983, Letitia James and her father, Robert James, took out a real estate loan from Kadilac Funding Ltd. for $30,300 as “husband and wife." For the record, Letitia James' mother is Nellie James.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Pam Bondi just went scorched earth! “We have filed charges the State of New York, Kathy Hochul, Letitia James, and Mark Schroeder.” “As you know, we sued Illinois, and New York didn't listen... you're next.” As big as some of you think this is, it’s bigger! AG Letitia James, I warned you. You have no clue what’s coming for your corrupt wildebeest ass! You may think George Soros and Norm Eisen have your back, but they will be busy with their own cases!

@RapidResponse47 - Rapid Response 47

BREAKING: @AGPamBondi announces the DOJ has filed charges against the State of New York, Gov. Kathy Hochul, AG Letitia James, and DMV Commissioner Mark Schroeder. "New York has chosen to prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens. It stops — it stops TODAY."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Charges have been filed against the state of New York, Kathy Hochul, Leticia James, and Mark Schroeder of the DMV. This action is being taken by a new DOJ to protect American citizens and angel moms. New York is accused of prioritizing illegal aliens over American citizens.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're here today because we have filed charges against the state of New York. We have filed charges against Kathy Hochul. We have filed charges against Leticia James and Mark Schroeder, who is with DMV. This is a new DOJ, and we are taking steps to protect Americans, American citizens and angel moms, like the moms standing right behind me who you're going hear from in a moment. New York has chosen to prioritize illegal aliens over American citizens. It stops. It stops today.
Saved - March 20, 2025 at 1:06 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across an investigation revealing that many federally funded children's hospitals continue to offer gender transition services, despite an executive order from Donald Trump aimed at defunding these practices. Over three dozen hospitals confirmed they still provide treatments like puberty blockers, hormone replacement therapy, and surgeries for minors. The report highlights that these services remain widely accessible across the country, with some well-known facilities involved. It's a thorough read that raises significant concerns.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨 Biden Is Gone, but These Federally Funded Children’s Hospitals Will Still Mutilate Your Children 🚨 A new investigation found that droves of federally funded hospitals are still providing child sex changes despite Donald Trump’s executive order defunding those demented services. More than three dozen hospitals still receiving Washington’s funding confirmed to the Daily Caller that they remain able and willing to mutilate America’s youth, giving quotes like, “From what I’ve heard of, nothing has changed with what our providers provide” in light of the president’s executive order. The available services include puberty blockers, hormone replacement therapy, and surgeries for people under 18. They remain accessible across the country, including at facilities you’ve surely heard of or visited. The report is thorough, revealing, and definitely worth reading. See it here: https://dailycaller.com/2025/03/19/trump-executive-order-child-sex-changes-hospitals/

EXCLUSIVE: Children’s Hospitals Continue Offering Sex Changes After Trump Moved To Defund Procedures Hospitals are still providing child sex changes despite President Donald Trump's executive order defunding those services, a Daily Caller investigation found. dailycaller.com
Saved - March 15, 2025 at 5:35 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

https://t.co/swmellQAu4

Saved - March 11, 2025 at 1:53 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Who is Behind This Autopen? Six Criminals Were Pardoned with Biden Autopen – *Signed in the City of Washington* – On Same Day Joe Biden Vacationed and Golfed in St. Croix. https://t.co/Atah7bsTNi

@OversightPR - Oversight Project

🚨WHOEVER CONTROLLED THE AUTOPEN CONTROLLED THE PRESIDENCY🚨 We gathered every document we could find with Biden's signature over the course of his presidency. All used the same autopen signature except for the the announcement that the former President was dropping out of the race last year. Here is the autopen signature. Here is the signature from the letter announcing Biden was dropping out of the race.

@libsoftiktok - Libs of TikTok

BREAKING: Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey asked the DOJ to investigate whether Biden’s cognitive mental decline allowed unelected officials to make decisions without his knowledge or approval. If that’s the case, Biden’s executive orders, pardons, and other actions, may…

Saved - March 7, 2025 at 2:13 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m following up on claims that Justice Amy Coney Barrett communicated with Catholic Charities, a major organization involved in human trafficking, which received substantial funding from USAID. Catholic Charities USA reported $4.7 billion in revenue, with $1.4 billion from government support. The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops lists numerous federal grants for migration and refugee services, including those addressing human trafficking. I question how Catholic Charities' revenue nearly quadrupled since the Biden administration, particularly in Galveston, Texas, raising concerns about their role in human trafficking operations across the U.S.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Following up on tips that Justice Amy Coney Barrett was in communication with leadership at the number one human trafficking organization in the world, Catholic Charities, an organization that relied on billions from USAID. According to Forbes, Catholic Charities USA was the 13th-largest U.S. charity last year. Of its total $4.7 billion in revenues, Catholic Charities received $1.4 billion from government support, compared with $1 billion in private donations and $2.2 billion in other income.   The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Migration and Refugee Services lists 10 federal grants for migration and refugee services on its website, including eight from HHS (to provide services for newly arrived refugees; strengthen refugee marriage and families; unaccompanied alien children placement and reunification in the U.S.; a joint grant with Catholic Charities USA to provide training and assistance regarding human trafficking; a joint grant with the Lutheran group to address needs of refugee youth, children, and families, which was later supplemented to find homes for trafficked children; and another to provide services to adult trafficking victims); one State Department grant (resettlement services to newly arriving refugees); and one DHS grant (to process, receive, and place Cuban and Haitian parolees).  🚨QUESTION: How does the Revenue for the NGO the Catholic Charities nearly quadruple since the Harris/Biden Administration took over? In 2018 the Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston,Texas only brought in $44 million In 2021. the revenue for NGO blossomed to $217 million. Why is that? That’s just one city. Catholic Charities funded hundreds of U.S. cities human trafficking operations, Yes, Human Trafficking right before your very eyes and they may have the ear of one or more of our Justices?

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Many conservatives believe Justice Amy Coney Barrett deliberately lied and intentionally misled the vetting team during her confirmation. But it isn’t just about her ideology, though. It is becoming very obvious Justice Amy Coney Barrett is also compromised out of fear for her and her family. After Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s potential assassin was caught, Justice Amy Coney Barrett lost it. Many thought she was about to resign. She was genuinely scared to death. The Biden Admin and dem Senators ignored Justice’s pleas for help. Protesters were allowed to get very, very close to Justice’s homes. This was intentional. And if you don’t seriously believe these judges are scared to death to rule against the administrative and intelligence states, you’re simply not paying attention. Look at what happened to SCOTUS, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, on June 8, 2022, Nicholas Roske traveled to his home with zero difficulty, with plans to break in Kavanaugh's home, kill him, and then commit suicide. They and their families are being intimidated daily. Even the Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer threatened the court with zero repercussions. "You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price," the senator from New York said of SCOTUS Justices. And when protestors began harassing Justices at their homes, pretty much NOTHING was done. https://nypost.com/2022/06/15/feds-indict-california-man-nicholas-john-roske-found-with-gun-near-kavanaughs-home/

Feds indict California man found with gun near Kavanaugh’s home A federal grand jury has indicted a California man who was found with a gun, knife and pepper spray near the home of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. nypost.com

@NRSC - Senate Republicans

"Every single DSCC-backed candidate beholden to Schumer’s money machine should demonstrate a degree of decency and disavow the dangerous attack on our independent judiciary." https://www.nrsc.org/press-releases/schumer-backed-senate-candidates-silent-on-scotus-threat-2020-03-05/

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm speaking to Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh directly. You have set destructive forces in motion, and there will be consequences for your actions. You will be unprepared for what's coming.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna tell you, Gorsuch. I wanna tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you.
Saved - March 5, 2025 at 11:25 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Many conservatives believe Justice Amy Coney Barrett misled the vetting team during her confirmation. It's clear she feels compromised and fearful for her family's safety, especially after the assassination attempt on Justice Kavanaugh. The Biden administration and Democratic senators ignored her pleas for help while protesters were allowed to approach her home. Judges are under constant intimidation, as evidenced by threats from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and the lack of action against harassment at Justices' homes.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Many conservatives believe Justice Amy Coney Barrett deliberately lied and intentionally misled the vetting team during her confirmation. But it isn’t just about her ideology, though. It is becoming very obvious Justice Amy Coney Barrett is also compromised out of fear for her and her family. After Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s potential assassin was caught, Justice Amy Coney Barrett lost it. Many thought she was about to resign. She was genuinely scared to death. The Biden Admin and dem Senators ignored Justice’s pleas for help. Protesters were allowed to get very, very close to Justice’s homes. This was intentional. And if you don’t seriously believe these judges are scared to death to rule against the administrative and intelligence states, you’re simply not paying attention. Look at what happened to SCOTUS, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, on June 8, 2022, Nicholas Roske traveled to his home with zero difficulty, with plans to break in Kavanaugh's home, kill him, and then commit suicide. They and their families are being intimidated daily. Even the Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer threatened the court with zero repercussions. "You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price," the senator from New York said of SCOTUS Justices. And when protestors began harassing Justices at their homes, pretty much NOTHING was done. https://nypost.com/2022/06/15/feds-indict-california-man-nicholas-john-roske-found-with-gun-near-kavanaughs-home/

Feds indict California man found with gun near Kavanaugh’s home A federal grand jury has indicted a California man who was found with a gun, knife and pepper spray near the home of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. nypost.com

@NRSC - Senate Republicans

"Every single DSCC-backed candidate beholden to Schumer’s money machine should demonstrate a degree of decency and disavow the dangerous attack on our independent judiciary." https://www.nrsc.org/press-releases/schumer-backed-senate-candidates-silent-on-scotus-threat-2020-03-05/

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm speaking to Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh directly. By overturning Roe v Wade, you've unleashed chaos and turmoil. Be prepared to face severe consequences for your actions. You will be caught off guard by the repercussions of your decision.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I wanna tell you, Gorsuch. I wanna tell you, Kavanaugh. You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price. You won't know what hit you.
Saved - March 4, 2025 at 12:14 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Colorado Sec. of State Jena Griswold (@JenaGriswold) no posts since November 2024, I wonder why? 😉 Jena belongs in prison not Tina Peters (@realtinapeters)! It’s always the eyes!

@realMikeLindell - Mike Lindell

It's time to free Tina Peters! The inquiry into the DOJ/AG/DA weaponization of government against Clerk Tina Peters has begun! Huge appreciation to our attorneys, Patrick McSweeney, Kurt Olsen & John Case. And to our faithful supporters, we could not do this without you - thank you! Please support these efforts at http://lindellplan.com.

Lindell Offense Fund lindelloffensefund.org
Saved - February 7, 2025 at 9:32 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

We will be providing the DOJ with GPS on both of these Twatwaffle sh*t weasels meeting for hours on end with cartel leaders, hundreds upon hundreds of times over the past 6 years. https://t.co/vBtc68Bjm4

Saved - February 7, 2025 at 4:08 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ukraine's situation has reached a turning point, with the U.S. beginning to phase out its support. Keith Kellogg has confirmed that an audit is being conducted to track the substantial funds sent to Ukraine, especially after Zelensky admitted uncertainty about the whereabouts of $100 billion. The narrative suggests that the U.S. proxy war against Russia has concluded, with losses for Ukraine and NATO, and a shift in leadership for Zelenskyy. I emphasize skepticism towards legacy media, particularly regarding war coverage.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Ukraine, it's over. And now the U.S. is phasing out Project Ukraine. Trump’s Special Envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Keith Kellogg, has confirmed that an audit is underway to track the billions sent to Ukraine for the war. This comes after Zelensky admitted he had no idea where $100 billion had gone. The U.S. proxy war against Russia is over. Ukraine and NATO have lost. Zelenskyy is on the way out. We told you from the beginning. Remember all the propaganda victims on X who had Ukraine flags in their bio? Never, ever trust the legacy media, especially when it comes to war. https://youtu.be/kgjy7Co2Hjo?si=6XTWFSnnNZBHxP5W

Saved - February 2, 2025 at 8:31 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

We just blocked over 5,000 botfarm accounts. Interesting they all pivoted from their passion for Ukraine to Canada at the exact same moment. Most originated from Chinese Communist Party PLA efforts using Canadian, US and UK IP addresses. https://t.co/d9M9ThbwbE

Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:37 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

https://t.co/7Hd5kDyivT

Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:37 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
CPT Rebecca M. Lobach, from Durham, NC, served as an aviation officer from July 2019 to January 2025 with no deployments. She was part of the 12th Aviation Battalion at Ft Belvoir, VA, and received several awards, including the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The Army also released the following about CPT. Lobach, including a statement from the family. Cpt. Rebecca M. Lobach, of Durham, North Carolina, served as an aviation officer (15A) in the regular Army from July 2019 to January 2025. She has no deployments. She was assigned to the 12th Aviation Battalion, Ft Belvoir, Va. Her awards include the Army Commendation Medal, Army Achievement Medal, National Defense Service Medal and Army Service Ribbon.

Saved - February 2, 2025 at 2:28 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The third pilot in the Black Hawk helicopter collision has been identified as 28-year-old Capt. Rebecca Lobach, who served as a White House aide during the Biden administration. https://t.co/Jp8DFg16AG

@NewsNew97351204 - News News News

The U.S. Army has identified the third pilot of the H-60 Black Hawk Helicopter that collided with an American Airline CRJ-700 passenger jet on Wednesday as it was on approach to land at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport, killing 67 people. Captain Rebecca M. Lobach, 28, from Durham, North Carolina was one of three soldiers aboard the chopper that crashed into the jet just as it was coming into land. The Army had initially refused to identify Lobach at the request of her family but the decision to release her name came 'at the request of and in coordination with the family,' according to a statement released by the Army.

Saved - January 28, 2025 at 5:09 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Biden administration continues to raise concerns, particularly regarding pardons granted to individuals like Mary McCord, who played significant roles in actions against Trump, including submitting a fraudulent FISA application and collaborating on impeachment efforts. Additionally, Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm announced $22.9 billion in loan guarantees for Green New Deal projects, with over $14 billion directed to Michigan, benefiting her political allies. Many of these loans are unlikely to be repaid, leaving taxpayers to cover the losses.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

🚨 Biden Crime family knows no limits. 🚨 Courtesy of @JamesGRickards, here is some additional stench: Fauci and Cheney were among the best known of those suspected criminals who received pardons. But the most egregious pardons were granted to individuals most Americans have never heard of.the top of that list is Mary McCord. She was an Assistant U.S. Attorney and congressional staffer. Here’s a short list of her actions: She submitted the fraudulent FISA application to spy on Trump. She ginned-up the ancient Logan Act charges against General Michael Flynn. She worked with Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler on the Trump impeachment committee. She was a staff attorney to the kangaroo court J6 Committee. She worked with Fani Willis to push criminal charges against Trump in Fulton County, Georgia. McCord also worked with Jack Smith in the J6 prosecution of Trump. It’s difficult to think of anyone who did more harm and launched more attacks on Trump than Mary McCord. She has now been pardoned by Joe Biden. Pardons were not the only last day damage done by the Biden team. His Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm announced $22.9 billion in loan guarantees to Green New Scam energy projects. Over $14 billion of those guarantees went to companies in Granholm’s home state of Michigan to reward her political supporters going back to her 2006 campaign for governor of Michigan. Most such loans are never repaid. The recipients skim the proceeds in the form of benefits and dividends and then leave the company in bankruptcy with U.S. taxpayers holding the bag.

Saved - January 26, 2025 at 3:56 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m calling for a brainstorming session to find a solution for Tina Peters, known as “GoldStarMom,” who is currently in a Colorado prison. She’s been unfairly targeted for exposing issues with the 2020 election. Let's rally support from influential figures.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

We need to brainstorm a solution to facilitate the release of Tina Peters “GoldStarMom” @realtinapeters from the Colorado Prison System! Railroaded by marxist lawfare for proving there were problems with the 2020 election. @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump #supremacyclause #tinapeters #votefraud #2020election

Video Transcript AI Summary
I'm in Larimer County Jail, and I want to share my experience. The support from everyone keeps me going during these dark days. Being locked up for doing the right thing is incredibly hard, especially when I have nothing in common with the other inmates. My daily meals are basic, and I have limited access to books and news. I urge President Trump to review the election records I preserved, as they are crucial for transparent elections. We need change before the midterms. To the American people, your support means everything to me. Never give up or back down; stand up for what you believe in. I appreciate the letters and campaigns supporting me. Thank you all for your kindness and encouragement.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Alright, everyone. I'm in the Larimer County Jail with hero Tina Peters, and I just want to give her a chance to check-in with you all and tell her tell you all what's on her arm. So, Tina, just give us an update. Speaker 1: Well, the only thing that keeps me going are you guys out there. You know, it's been some pretty dark days, I'll be honest. You know, I never ever thought, and I'm sure you out there have never thought about being locked up in a small cell. Especially, you know, a lot of these women here, practically all of them, have done something to deserve being here, you know, either drugs or or other offenses. But when you're locked up and you're innocent and you're locked up for doing the right thing, you know, it it's hard. It's really hard because I don't have anything in common with the people here, and you have no freedom. You really don't have any freedom. We're usually locked down most of the day. When we get out, you know, it's to have lunch. Our our meals consist of I finally got on a kosher diet because I I knew I could get something. Speaker 0: Fresh. Tell everyone about not your, what a typical day looks like for eating. Speaker 1: K. Alright. Well, 5:30 in the morning, they wake us up. They the lights are on 247 in our cells. But the bright lights, the brightest lights come on, at 5:30 in the morning, and then and they stay on until 10 o'clock at night. We get out about about that time to go have breakfast. My breakfast consists of a an apple and peanut butter, which I'm grateful, because that's on a kosher diet. For lunch, I'm lucky if I, get the, sliced carrots, raw carrots, and, they give me cookies. The rest of the stuff, I can't eat. And then for dinner, we always get a sandwich. So it's either bologna and cheese, which I don't eat baloney, or peanut butter and jelly, and it's not the kind of jelly that you would that you get at home. Everything is, it's it it it's very base, very basic, you know, the the the language the women use, the things they talk about. You know, a lot of these women have been I was sitting with a girl at breakfast today, and her mom, is 43 years old, has always been an addict, and she's in here. Her brother was in here, and it's just it's just systemic. It just goes through, families. Speaker 0: It's I knew and you mentioned that behind you is the entertainment. The library. That's the library. Speaker 1: This is it. There's a few books that are, not the type of books that most of us would wanna read. And then the other 2, levels are Bibles, which you only need 1 Bible. You're only allowed 3 books. You can't receive books from outside. They say you can use your tablet. The tablet is an Android device that is not like an iPad at all. You don't have Internet. No Internet access at all. So I don't even know what's going on in the news except for what, you know, what you can tell me. Speaker 0: And then I and then I wanna ask you, much of what you're what you've been through, even though you've got so many tireless advocates that that care about you, I shared with you that our local retreat, the Joe Poft Yeah. Story where your your mom reached out and, asked that some of the articles that have circulated be sent to Trump. And, so I just got back from DC, for the part of the press conference for the j sixers. You've kind of been integrated into the j six community because everything that you're fighting for is really the same stuff that they have. Yes. But you've been convicted of state charges. So we're all praying for a miracle, not quite knowing how this is gonna unfold. But if you, if you could send a message to, Donald Trump, whether it's your case or all the Jason's cases, what would your wishes be? Speaker 1: Yes. Well, as you know, every Friday in my show, I was dedicated to the j six community. And Vicky Witthoff, Ashley Babitzenbaum is a is a dear friend. And the other ladies, with her, Freedom Corner, I've been there, and, it's a really special place. These people are standing out there. They were standing out there just this past week and every night for over 700 days in the snow, in the rain, in the freezing up, faithfully. And so, you know, it's people like them that are standing up for people like us. Yeah. That really means a lot. But I would say to president Trump, you know, we're we're standing up for you. The election records that I preserved. I'm the only one in Colorado, and maybe across the United States that preserve the 2020 election records. All the rest of them in this state were erased. If not for, doing the images, the before and after image, of before the trusted build, I don't even like to call it that, we would not have those those records. And so, president Trump, there's more clerks, there's more election officials that wanna stand up, for transparent, free, fair elections. It needs to be fixed. You know? Just We're wishing we're we're wishing, we we were risking it all to, make sure that every single person in this in in not just the United States, but around the world, because we know that Venezuela was affected by this, Brazil, many, many nations. This is going on in Serbia. We we the judge would not allow us to, put in the emails from Serbia linking me and what was going on with what we found. I would encourage president Trump that you, have someone review the Mesa County reports 1, 2, and 3 if you haven't already. And, and we need to implement change before the 2024, when before the the, excuse me, before the, the midterms because governors will be elected during that time and other, legislators. But Alright. And then Get me out. Speaker 0: Well, and one last question. Just, the American people, MAGA has been saying bye. But right now, I just wanna let you know that we aren't forgetting about you. We do love you. And if you had a a message to send to, just the Americans out there, what would you tell them right now? Speaker 1: You're the wind in my under my wings. I had somebody ask me what I do in my cell, and, really, it's just the thoughts of getting out. You you can't, you can't acclimate to this life. You can never give up. You can never give in. You can never back down. I would say stand up. Ask God what it is that, that he's called you to do in this lifetime, and be about doing it and stand for something. I appreciate you all so much. I'm very grateful. I'm grateful for the yellow ribbon campaign, for the banners, for the letters, and for reaching out to president Trump. He's gonna he is a great president, always has been, and we need to protect and make sure that we our vote counts. Thank you all so much. I'm so grateful.
Saved - January 25, 2025 at 2:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
GPS reveals crucial information. If we remove the numerous undercover agents and the tragic incident involving Ashli Babbitt, January 6 would have been insignificant. As someone who conducts intelligence analysis, I find Rep Beyer’s comments misguided. There are still over 40,000 hours of unreleased video footage. This lack of transparency raises questions, especially regarding police officers disguised as protestors who seemed to incite the crowd.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

GPS—it will all come out now. Remove the 2,567 antifa and 348++ undercover DHS HSI, USCP, DCMPD, FBI, ATF, the murder of USAF veteran Ashli Babbitt by drug addict USCP Lt. Michael Byrd and J6 would have been a big nothing burger! For those of us that do intel analysis for a living, dipshidiots like Rep Beyer looks like an idiot. There are over 40,000 hours of video the public STILL hasn’t seen. There’s a reason. Including behind the scenes with police dressed as protestors, agitating the crowd.

@RepDonBeyer - Rep. Don Beyer

The January 6 pardons are among the worst things Trump has ever done. He put violent, dangerous felons into our communities. They are emboldened by Trump's “get-out-of-jail-free” cards. Who knows what other crimes they will commit? Unfortunately, we’re all about to find out. https://t.co/VXEiAA3SZx

Video Transcript AI Summary
January 6 was a direct threat to democracy and the safety of those protecting it, including Capitol Police and local officers. Many off-duty officers rushed to help, and numerous still suffer from injuries sustained that day. The pardons issued by Trump for those involved in the violence are a betrayal of law enforcement and undermine their sacrifices. These pardons included individuals who assaulted officers and committed heinous acts, sending a dangerous message that such violence is acceptable. Despite previous support for law enforcement, many now defend these pardons, which diminishes their credibility. Trump’s actions have released violent individuals back into communities, raising concerns about future criminal acts. I yield back.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister speaker, I represent many of those people who protect us on Capitol Hill. Members of the Capitol Police, the Metropolitan Washington DC Police Force, the Arlington County Police, police who live in my Northern Virginia District. January 6th was not some distant abstract event for my constituents. Democracy was on the line that day, but so were their lives, their bodies, their physical safety and well-being. And as events spiraled out of control on January 6th, calls for help went out on the police radios, and they were answered by men and women in uniform throughout the metropolitan Washington, Virginia, Maryland area. Some of whom were off duty. Many were off duty, and they chose to get dressed, jump in the cars, and race in to help us, to protect our capital, to protect all here who work here. 100 of those officers still bear the wounds seen and unseen that will never heal. The January 6 pardons and commutations were some of the worst things that Donald Trump has ever done. The January with these pardons, Trump embraced lawlessness and violence. Trump pardoned people who beat and tased my constituent officer Michael Fanone. Tastes repeatedly in the neck, and he described it as being like torture, and it led to him having a heart attack at that very time. Jeff pardoned the people who gave a brain injury to my officer constituent, Jeffrey Smith, days before he died by suicide. Congressman Himes mentioned how he was beaten the head with a pole. His wife, Erin Smith, said those injuries changed him in his final days. He was a different person. And his officer Smith's death was later ruled as a a line of duty death because it resulted from the injuries suffered here on our behalf. Trump pardoned the people who attacked my constituent officer Brian Cichnik. They they sprayed him with pepper spray hours before his death from 2 strokes. The medical examiner said his death was from natural causes, but what happened to Brian before his death, during the attack on the Capitol clearly led to his death. Trump pardoned people who charted Nazi slogans, who yelled racial slurs at our black police officers, including and those who who called for the assassination here of speaker Nancy Pelosi and Trump's own vice president, Mike Pence. Trump pardoned a man who was charged with throwing an explosive device at the police in the capital. Was a man who previously been convicted of domestic violence, battery by strangulation. Trump pardoned a man who stomped on an officer's head, who beat other officers with a flagpole and a crutch and with pieces of furniture, and sprayed officers with pepper spray. Trump pardoned a man who ripped off the gas mask of a police officer, beat him in the face with that, and then crushed him in a door. Trump pardoned hundreds of people who pleaded guilty to assaulting law enforcement, many of them with deadly weapons. He pardoned or commuted the sentences of over a dozen violent criminals convicted of seditious conspiracy. And by pardoning those who carry out these heinous crimes, Trump has made our country less safe, and he betrayed law enforcement heroes who protected the Capitol at great personal cost. These pardons sent a message that violent crime, even against law enforcement, will be sanctioned by Trump's government if it is carried out in his name. I urge my colleagues to remember the families of the 5 police officers who died as a result of January 6th. Officer Brian Sicknick, Jeffrey Smith, Howie Lebengood, Gunther Hashida, and Kyle DeFreitag. And I urge you to remember the many officers who defended the Capitol on January 6th, who put themselves at risk to protect us, and who will carry the scars, and the seen and unseen, as long as they will live. These scars are inflicted by people who will face no further legal consequences for those acts, thanks to president Donald Trump. This injustice is a gross betrayal of their service and sacrifice, but does not diminish their patriotism. After January 6th, many of my colleagues posted messages of support for law enforcement and the Capitol Police. It was on their doors. It was on their walls in the halls of Longworth and Rayburn and and Cannon. It was even on social media. Members like speaker Johnson, who called for the prosecution of those criminals who committed those acts of violence against the police who guard the Capitol. Let me quote speaker Johnson, to the fullest extent of the law. Republicans went on to hold votes on symbolic, non binding resolutions expressing support for police. Back to the blue, they told us. Back to the blue. Their silence or worse, their defense of Trump's pardons are unforgivable. They can never again claim to back the blue with any credibility. Finally, a warning. With these pardons, Trump put violent, dangerous people back into our communities. Many of them did terrible things on other days besides January 6, 2021, but all of them had just been emboldened by receiving get out of jail free cards from this president. Who knows what other criminal acts they will perpetrate next? Unfortunately, we're all about to find out. Mister Speaker, I yield back.
Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:45 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I emphasize that pardons cannot be issued for state crimes or crimes against humanity, nor do they protect those accused of treason. There are various ways to challenge preemptive pardons, which could financially cripple those who receive them and hinder criminal trials. It's crucial to recognize the individuals truly responsible for the corrupt Biden administration, including key figures like Lisa Monaco, Samantha Power, and Hillary Clinton, among others.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Relax… you can’t pardon for state crimes. And you can’t pardon for crimes against humanity. Pardons do not shield those accused of treason either. There is more than one way to skin a cat. Challenging preemptive pardons will most certainly bankrupt all of those receiving them, leaving zero funding for criminal trials. Just keep in mind who ultimately has really been responsible for the corrupt Biden regime… including all his evil bastard minions; Lisa Monaco, Samantha Power, Victoria Nuland, Valerie Jarrett, Susan Rice, Eric Holder, Antony Blinken, Jake Sullivan, Jack Smith, Matthew Colangelo, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Hillary Clinton, Marc Elias, Christopher Wray, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Rod Rosenstein, Avril Haines, Wendy Sherman, Janet Yellen, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, Ron Klain, John Kerry, et al.

Saved - January 20, 2025 at 9:45 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

@sweetguarddog They don’t need a convention of states. Texas and Florida alone can assure they all spend the rest of their lives rotting in prison.

Saved - January 16, 2025 at 3:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I want to bring attention to Suchir Balaji, a former OpenAI employee who recently died under suspicious circumstances. Before his death, he raised concerns about alleged criminal activities by his boss, Sam Altman. Authorities have ruled it a suicide, but doubts linger, especially from Balaji's mother, who shared her story on Tucker Carlson's show. Carlson noted that while he's heard similar claims before, the details surrounding Balaji's case are unprecedented and strongly suggest foul play.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Suicide or Murder? You’ve probably never heard of Suchir Balaji, but he’s worth learning about. Until two months ago, Balaji worked for OpenAI, developing technologies like ChatGPT that are rapidly changing the world.  Toward the end of his employment, Balaji began believing his boss, billionaire Sam Altman, was committing crimes. So he blew the whistle. Police discovered his dead body shortly thereafter.  Was it a suicide? That’s what authorities say, but there’s plenty of reason to hold doubt. Balaji’s mother certainly does, and she joined today’s Tucker Carlson Show to tell the most shocking story we’ve heard in a long time. Click the image below to watch.   Tucker on this case: “This is not the first time I’ve been contacted by a family saying, ‘Our child’s death has been ruled a suicide, but we think it was a murder.’ Many people have claimed that. [But] I’ve never seen anything like this before. This, to any fair person, suggests [Suchir Balaji] was murdered.”

@TuckerCarlson - Tucker Carlson

Suchir Balaji worked as an engineer for Sam Altman building AI, until he decided that Altman was committing crimes. Balaji became a whistleblower, and soon after was found dead in his apartment. California authorities claim it was suicide. Crime scene photos clearly show a murder. Balaji’s mother, Poornima Ramarao, tells the most shocking story we’ve heard in a long time.

Video Transcript AI Summary
My son, Sukhir, was a gifted individual who excelled in computer science and worked at OpenAI. He raised concerns about copyright violations in AI data usage but was never acknowledged for his contributions. After he publicly criticized OpenAI, he died under suspicious circumstances, officially ruled a suicide. However, evidence suggests otherwise, including blood throughout his apartment and a wig found at the scene. The police investigation was inadequate, and I believe there was foul play. Despite reaching out to authorities and media, we have faced indifference and cover-ups. We seek justice for my son and demand a thorough investigation into his death, as well as the broader implications of AI practices. We want to raise awareness and protect whistleblowers like him.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Thank you very much for joining us. Speaker 1: So My son. I owe this to him. Speaker 0: Well, this is a remarkable story. So we were connected by someone we both know. I had followed this casually in the media. I didn't know what to make of it. Your son died in November. You commissioned, an examination by a forensic pathologist, independent forensics pathologist called, Doctor. Dinesh Rao. I have it right here, accompanied by photographs that you took. And, I don't think any honest person looking at this would conclude this was a suicide. There's some an awful lot of evidence that it wasn't. I was actually shocked by it. So I wanna get into the details of what may have happened, but I'd like to start, if you don't mind, by hearing about your son. Who was he? How old was he? What did he do? What was he like? Speaker 1: Sukhir was a prodigy. From birth, we knew he was gifted. And for leaving, he studied his, masters bachelor's in computer science from UC Berkeley, the top school. He had 4.0 GPA throughout. As soon as he graduated, he started working in OpenAI as a researcher AI researcher. His first project was WebGPT for which a fresh graduate, he took the lead role and that WebGPT turned out into the chap GPT and application. Yes. And once this was, a publication of of 4 people. One of them is Sukshir. Following this, he worked at OpenAI for pre training data. That means he was scooping up all the Internet data feeding to chat GPT's AI model. Following this, he worked Speaker 0: on Which is which is the fuel that it runs on. It needs massive amounts of data in order to become what it is. Right? That's the Speaker 1: Yes. Requirements. It's an AI model. And for the AI model, they need to be data fed. And this data is what everybody is saying as copyright data. Yeah. That's what all the lawsuits are against. Yes. He was involved in fueling that data. He was he Speaker 0: was directly involved in that part of the business. It. Speaker 1: Yes. He knows inside out. Yes. Following that, he worked directly on the chat GPT application team itself under John Shkerman. In this team, he was vital. His former boss, John, claims that his role was vital in Shard GPT team, and he did some kind of tuning and optimization, made it very efficient. It's a significant contribution. But the irony is he was never acknowledged by OpenAI. And even after he left OpenAI, he's after his death also, no one has acknowledged him. Prior to joining OpenAI, he was so qualified. He was national champion in 2016 for Computing Olympiad. It means he was a top programmer of 2016. Following that, he went he took a gap year. At 17, he said he doesn't need a degree. Right after 12, he said, I don't need a degree. I don't need to go to college. He took up a job in CORA, software engineer. He was hired with $25,000 sign on bonus and a pay equivalent to a master's or a bachelor's folder. He worked there for a year, and then he joined UC Berkeley after taking a gap year. It took a lot of effort on parents into persuade him to go back to college for which he was grateful throughout. In UC Berkeley, he represented UC Berkeley for ACM ICPC intercollege programming contest, the world contest. He went to China along with his team. It was in 2017. 2018, he won $100,000 award for a TSA competition. This is for passenger screening algorithm, which TSA has implemented today. He was shining all throughout his life. Prior to this, at the age of 11, he got, 680 in SAT. And then I put in the paper he wrote, like, makes makes me believe he's a prodigy. That science paper is about, quantum computing, optimizing a CPU. And, like, he talks about VLSI design that my friends claim they studied in their masters in electronics and communications. All these things make me believe he's a prodigy, and he's demonstrated he had exceptional abilities. And Speaker 0: it's like like he did. So it's but and it sounds like from reading about it that he ran into trouble only when he began to question whether or not the data that was being fed to OpenAI was copyrighted. Speaker 1: He never raised the voice when he was within OpenAI because he had concerns that management will not approve. And he started to question all these when, Chargegbt became profit making. As long as it was nonprofit, it was okay. He explains in his publication on suchi.net what his views are and why he believes this is copyright violation. And, when he started after reinstatement of Sam Altman in 2023 November, November 21st was the day he got reinstated. I know it so well because it was Sushi's birthday that day. He got reinstated. And after that, Suji started thinking about the copyright violation, and he did discuss with me. It's very unethical, and he feels awful about it. And I said, yes. It's unethical. I agree with you. Speaker 0: What's unethical is using copyrighted material, material owned by other people for your business, which Speaker 1: Yeah. Artist work will be lost. Their means of living will be impacted. Yes. And also, he did a research and he published, like, how the Stack Overflow and then, few other, like, maybe Quora, few other websites, the traffic is reducing. And he also made a publication in which he explains that the answer given by chat GPT versus the answer given by Stack Overflow, how unscientific and inaccurate the answer is. Speaker 0: Interesting. Yeah. When did he leave OpenAI? Speaker 1: He left in August. Speaker 0: Of 2024? Speaker 1: Yes. 3rd week of August. Speaker 0: 3rd so recently? Speaker 1: Very recently. Speaker 0: When did he write his now famous paper about what the management of OpenAI was doing with copyrighted material? Speaker 1: He next day, he already had made up his mind prior leaving to leaving OpenAI. In fact, in July, he discussed with his, UC Berkeley colleague that he want to do a start up and his friend expressed interest. His name is Tyler Zhou. And next day, after leaving OpenAI, he went on interview with Canadian News Media. We didn't know anything about it. Yeah. We just found out bus based on his call logs, he spoke to someone for 40 minutes. After his passing, we called him and found out he was Tungus. And it was next day after his, last day at work. Speaker 0: Who did he speak to? Speaker 1: I'll get back to you on this. Speaker 0: But he spoke to a reporter? Speaker 1: Kennedy and news media that sued OpenAI. Kennedy and news media. That sued OpenAI. Kennedy and news media that sued OpenAI. Speaker 0: Interesting. Speaker 1: On October 23rd, his interview was published in New York Times where he makes a very, very open statement, and he calls OpenAI violates copyright data. Speaker 0: On October 23rd, he was quoted in the New York Times saying that OpenAI violates Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Copyright law. Yes. It's stealing other people's material. Yeah. Okay. And what what day did he die? Speaker 1: I'm sorry? Speaker 0: And what what day did he die? Speaker 1: 22nd November, but we found a body on 26th November. Speaker 0: So he, he was quoted saying that OpenAI was committing crimes, and a month later, he was dead. Speaker 1: That's not just it. On November 18th, New York Times named my son as custodian witness. Custodian witness is very, very important. He had the documents against OpenAI. That was on 18th, 22nd. He just came back from vacation from LA and Catalina Island the same night. They have attacked him and killed him. Speaker 0: Tell us about what the New York Times wrote on November 18th. He had these documents. What were the documents? Speaker 1: We need to get the documents from New York Times. It's a sealed document, and it's not open for public. But we need to become, like, the estate administrator. My husband will be the estate administrator end of this month. Then they will go and acquire that data, what documents they were. At the moment, we don't have information. Speaker 0: But you know because you read at the New York Times that your son had given journalists papers that he says implicated OpenAI in crime. Speaker 1: Yes. And also, on December 2nd, Sujit had an interview planned with Associated Press, Matt O'Brien. On December 2nd, Sujit did not attend. 3rd, they called on his phone. By then, we had his phone. My husband took phone call, and he found out that Sujhi wanted to take legal action against OpenAI. He wanted to give the witness. By then, this news was not out yet that Sujhi was a custodian witness, but we got it. Then all we did was hurrying up the second autopsy, private autopsy moment. We heard that this was his initiative, and he didn't make it to do that. Speaker 0: So to bottom line it, it sounds like your son, who's your only child, by the way, and I'm and I'm really sorry about that, your son was in a position to threaten really threaten OpenAI. Speaker 1: Well, it's not his intent was not to threaten. He just cared about people. He cared about humanity. He writes in his article in New York Times as well as the publication. He believes the way the AI is currently without any regulation is a harm to humanity. He stood up for a cause, and he lost his life for a cause. He's a martyr. Obviously, he's a martyr, and then he never hesitated. He took his put his life at risk. Speaker 0: So the, official cause of death is suicide. You're his mother. Clearly, you spoke to him a lot. Did you get any indication that he was depressed? Speaker 1: No. He just came back from vacation. He had a very active lifestyle. When he when we had his memorial service, Many of his friends came, and they gave, the details of when they met him and how many times they met him after he left. He was visiting family. We were going out for dinner, lunch. He was fine. And more than anything else, he had concrete career plans. Speaker 0: Yes. And interviews scheduled, and he had things on his to do list. Did he ever suggest to you say to you that he felt his life was threatened? Was he worried? Speaker 1: He had concrete plans. He wanted to do some work for humanity. That's the last day when we spoke. Last conversation with Sujeer in person was that he had a nonprofit in mind, and he didn't want to take the salary for his work. He said, mom, I have enough resources. I don't even need to get paid. I want to serve humanity. And he wanted to work in neuroscience and machine learning combination. Using that, I think I've seen on his desktop one of the project for future of doctor visit. Since we haven't unlocked his email and, laptop yet, we have to discover that. But we know. He discussed with me. He's it's a 1 year plan. He said, give me a 1 year time. You'll know everything. Because Did Speaker 0: he ever talk to you about Sam Altman? Speaker 1: We Did Speaker 0: you ever talk to your son about Sam Altman? No. Speaker 1: We refused to. Speaker 0: You refused to? Speaker 1: We refused to talk to Sam Altman. Speaker 0: But did your son ever talk to you about Sam Altman? Did he ever say anything about Sam Altman? Speaker 1: Not to me, but to his friends a lot. When he was in Catalina Islands, he spoke a lot against him. He literally didn't like him. In fact, I've seen his chat log saying that he wanted to work with Annie Heltman in her nonprofit work. Speaker 0: And that would be Sam's sister who has accused him of sexual abuse? Really? He wrote that down? Speaker 1: Yes. So he he knew what personality Sam Altman had, and his main concerns were the lies. Speaker 0: The lies? Speaker 1: Lies that Sam Altman used to Speaker 0: The lies? Speaker 1: Lie. Yeah. He was lying a lot, and, my son is very ethical, and he he couldn't stand it. Speaker 0: So the time if we could go to the time line, around your son's death. So he goes to Catalina Island with friends Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: To backpack, to camp? What was he doing? Speaker 1: Backpack in yes. November 16 to November 22nd, there were 5 guys who went and my son was one of them. All these are his middle school and high school classmates. Some of them were his best buddies. We spoke to every one of them when they came back and everyone gave an image like he is happy. He was very happy. He celebrated his 26th birthday on 21st November, the day before he died. What more do we need to give an account of his happy mood? Speaker 0: Exactly. And if you, you know, at a certain age, you know people who've killed themselves and typically, you know, the suicide follows a a morose period of isolation. The person sitting alone in his apartment drinking. He died the night he came back from a camping trip with his high school and college friends. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Yep. K. Speaker 1: Our attorney, he came to his apartment with us. And moment he inspected his apartment, he said he had fresh supplies ordered. He has so many packets unopened. This doesn't look suicidal at all. Speaker 0: So, and the photographs that you took, which we'll get to in a minute, you know, I I just wanna say this is not the first time I've been contacted by a family saying, you know, our child ruled a suicide, but we think it was a murder. I mean, many people have claimed that. I've never seen anything like this before. This is, this should, I think, again, to any fair person suggest that he was murdered. But let's get to that. So what do you know? He came back from Catalina, and if you don't mind telling us what you know about what happened then? He comes back that evening to San Francisco. Speaker 1: He came around, like, 11 o'clock, he texted me his flight is taking off. That was on 22nd. And then 4:54, he texted saying that it's pouring in San Francisco. And, when he got off Uber, leasing off his, manager, he has apparently seen Sujit coming off with big suitcase and other things. And then Sujit said, yes. I'm coming back from LA. That's somewhere between 1 to 2 PM that day. And then he spoke to dad at 7:15 PM. He was very happy, And Balaji said, like, shall we go to CSI CES in, Las Vegas in January? Because it was raining here, dad brought up the concept that, you know, weather will be great in January, and so she said yes. And dad gave him birthday gift. Speaker 0: Gave him a birthday gift. Speaker 1: Birthday gift. Because 21st was his birthday. He said he'll send him it, you know, cash, just a token of a love, and so he accepted it. Speaker 0: The then that's the night he died? Speaker 1: The day he died. Speaker 0: So his last conversation with his father was what time, roughly? Speaker 1: That's the last conversation. Speaker 0: That was the last conversation. Speaker 1: I called the next day, 12:15 PM. Phone rang once, and it went to voice mail. Speaker 0: When did you learn that your son was dead? Speaker 1: That was on 26th. 25th, I went to his apartment, knocked on the door, no one open. I called the dispatch. Unfortunately, it took a day of effort for us to get his open apartment open. 25th, they went and they didn't even call me back. What happened? Apparently, they have gone and knocked on the door. They didn't bother to open the door. They just said, okay. Nobody's opening the door, and they went back. Security guard from the apartment complex says he saw the fire truck and the ambulance and the police, and they went back. 5:30, I waited waited and waited. And 5:30 PM, when I called on Monday, 25th, they said, ma'am, unless you are here, we cannot open the door. Next morning, Unions I went to Union City Police Station, that's where we live, and filed a missing person complaint. I waited for 1, 1 and a half hours, but both the parents, meanwhile, when we started calling all the hospitals in San Francisco area to see if he he may have had an accident, why he's not responding to us, what happened to him. Moment we found that he was not in any of the hospitals, we took a deep breath. Okay. He's safe. But when we went to his apartment, 1 o'clock, I went to San Francisco, and the dispatch came at 109. Until 4 o'clock, we were not told anything. Speaker 0: And then you got a call from from the city? Speaker 1: No. That is not how it went. One zero nine, 2 people, 2 officers came, and they went with the leasing office manager, leasing manager, and I'm waiting outside. They didn't allow me inside the premises. I'm waiting outside the complex. Then 113, they have seen apparently. That's what the report says. They've seen the body. Within 5, 10 minutes, they came out, and they told me, no. We didn't enter. We're waiting for 2 more officers. We have a security protocol. We cannot go inside. Around 2 o'clock, 2 more officers came. Speaker 0: But they knew your son was dead and they lied to Speaker 1: you? They didn't tell at that moment. Speaker 0: 2 Speaker 1: o'clock, they have a protocol. I don't blame them. 2 o'clock, 2 officers came. They went inside. 20 minutes, they came back and said, we're waiting for 2 more officers. We have security protocol. We can't go inside. And they said at 2 o'clock, they said, ma'am, you can go back home. We'll inform you in 5 to 6 hours. I said, I'm not going anywhere. They told me it's going to take some time for the next two officers to come. I said, let it be. Please give me the phone number. I'll contact them and find out if there's any way we can expedite it. My son's safety is in question. I cannot wait any longer. And then at 3:20, I saw a big white van coming, and my heart sang seriously. Speaker 0: Knew as they were speaking to you that your son was dead, but didn't tell you? Speaker 1: They didn't tell. Speaker 0: That's disgusting. That's inhuman. Sorry. Speaker 1: It is. It is. And you know what? They're asking me to go home. And how I knew my son was dead is looking at the white van. At that moment, I knew ambulance didn't come. And instead of even then, I was optimistic. Okay. Maybe ambulance wasn't available. They sent another van. And when I just saw a stretcher that came out, I went and spoke to the officers who are the medical examiners. They said we have a dead person in the apartment. That's how I came to know. Speaker 0: When we first did a deal with Black Rifle Coffee, Evan, the CEO, sent us, like, a case of coffee beans. And, honestly, I have not had any coffee since then in the past 8 months. It's not made by Black Rifle. We are obsessed, and it's not just coffee. They've got high performance energy drinks, tons of merch that's very cool. It is the best, and we can say that as daily obsessive users of the product. Black Rifle Coffee is awesome. And by the way, Black Rifle itself is awesome. The company is filled with special forces veterans working there, bringing you the best products on the market. Black Rifle's always been more than just about must have offerings. They're committed to supporting veterans, first responders, law enforcement. Every purchase provides funding to those groups and gear the people who are protecting us, who are the heart of this country. From premium coffee roast, ready to drink cans to American gear, every item designed to give you a sense of this country. Black Rifle Coffee. Blackriflecoffee.com. Use the code Tucker for 30% off on your first order or simply grab one of their items off your grocery shelves in your town. We drink it. We recommend it. I'm I'm I'm so sorry. That is really I mean, that is I I didn't know things like that happened. That is awful. Speaker 1: It's a gated community. He had a gun with him to protect himself. What more can we expect in America than this? It's a very reputed apartment complex. Not that it's cheap or something. They have 4 or 5 units. 4 or 5 buildings, I mean to say. Speaker 0: Did the officers at the scene give you any indication of how they thought your son died? Speaker 1: At 4 o'clock, they came to the leasing office, and then medical examiner said he shot himself. He killed himself. It's a suicide. At that moment, I raised to them, look, my son went into New York Times. He's a whistleblower, and his death doesn't look suicide to me. They just didn't want to listen. He bought a gun. It belongs to him. Nobody went into the complex. Nobody came out. He was all by himself, and it's a suicide. And it how long it took? Can you believe it? 40 minutes to investigate. 40 minutes to determine determine the date cause of death. And at 4 o'clock, they give me the keys for the apartment, and they say you can collect the body tomorrow. Like, right from that moment, I see foul play. Proper formalities were not followed, and the next day, they released the body within 24 hours without doing the complete autopsy. They removed the bullet. They did a CT scan. They just returned the money to us. Then, we just checked with the funeral home and we discussed with them. And then they also said, looks like it doesn't seem normal. There's something very unusual here. You should do a second private autopsy. Speaker 0: That The funeral home suggested that. Speaker 1: Yes. And even we were thinking. Both of us were also thinking. Funeral home also suggested. We were shattered, obviously. Right? We were completely shattered. We just didn't know what's going on. And seeing a son like that and they said, like, his eyes are gone with the gun wound. Don't see his face. We couldn't see him. Speaker 0: But the fact that the funeral home, which, of course, sees dead bodies every day, said to you, this doesn't look right, doesn't look like a suicide. We recommend that you get a a second autopsy, a real autopsy. That's amazing. Speaker 1: Actually, the way it's and they didn't look at the body. They didn't look at any evidence. But the way the information was given to us and the way the procedures and policies need to be followed and norms were not followed according to them. Before they received the body itself, they said this doesn't look normal. And we addressed the concern that it could be some foul play here. And we knew from the very moment we heard the news, we know it's not suicide. Next day, in the death news and I'm shattered by calling police, calling medical examiner, coroner's office, homicide unit. We've done everything we can. Speaker 0: So, tell me what you know about what's been proven from the the CCTV from the surveillance footage about your son's last moments. Is there any evidence anyone came in or out of the apartment? Speaker 1: No. Actually, even when our attorney concluded it's a suicide, even at that moment, I mentioned to the attorney, look, there are 3 entrances to this building. 1 of them is gated. It has CCTV. Other 2 entrances don't have CCTV. And why are we ignoring that nobody came in, nobody went out? And, also, what we just recently discovered, his packages are missing. His roommate or no, his, you know, neighbor in the apartment complex, he mentioned that in the they have a shared package room. They have a shared bin or basket or something. He'd seen Suu Kyu's package until December 31st. He reached out to me through Twitter. On x platform, when I tweeted, he found out I'm Suu Kyu's mom and he said, have you picked up Suu Kyu's packages? I don't see that after January 1st. Those packages are missing. When we talked to that, neighbor, he said, like, it's very common that packages get lost. In September, they received a notification that if you see so and so man, then let us know. And that tells us a lot about the security and, you know, like, there's a compromise of key, there's a compromise of entrance. All of these need to be investigated, obviously, when there is a murder. Speaker 0: So let's, let's get to the reason that I am anxious to do this interview, which is this, report that you commissioned, doctor Dinesh Rao, and it contains his analysis of the condition of your son's body based on an autopsy, I believe, and it and it critically contains, 7 crime scene photographs that you took in your son's apartment. Is that correct? Speaker 1: That's right. There are 7 evidences that were very critical, which has not been picked up by the authorities. Within 40 minutes, they concluded they haven't even picked up critical things like a bag with blood that has my son's saliva in it. They haven't picked that up. And how could they miss haze falling all over from the wig? Speaker 0: Right. So that's that's what I wanna get to. So the 2 things that jump out to me the first thing that jumps out, and it's, very obvious from the photographs that you took, is that there's blood all over the apartment. So the official explanation is that your son shot him, and I'm sorry to I I know this is hard, but I think it's important to go through this. The official explanation is your son shot himself once in the head and the bullet enter the brain stem and extinguished life immediately. Speaker 1: Can I say something there? Yes. It didn't touch his brain stem at all. It didn't even touch his brain, and the angle is downwards. Speaker 0: Yes. So I'm saying the official explanation is he shot himself once in the head. He died. Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: But these photographs show that that's not at all what happened because there's blood all over the apartment. There's blood on the door, on the floor, in the bathroom. There's blood everywhere. So that right there, just employing common sense, tells you that who you know, that the person from whom that blood came, your son, presumably, did not have a fatal brain injury, at least when he was bleeding. I mean, this is something was going on in the apartment. Right? The second thing that jumps out is that there is a tuft of hair that's not hair. It's from a wig. Speaker 1: It's from a wig. And there's a clip seen. Speaker 0: It's okay. So tell us what that is for people who don't know. It's a part of a clip in wig. Speaker 1: Like, there's some kind of plastic band or something that put fits the wig on the head. We can see that coming out behind the door. Yes. And that's obvious evidence that no crime scene investigators are police can miss. They just ignored everything that showed murder, and they picked up everything that showed a cover of suicide. Speaker 0: But how could they ignore? So your son did not I mean, he was a 26 year old man with short hair from pictures. He's not wearing a wig. Speaker 1: Correct? No. No. He is not. And these hairs are not his. This investigator's analysis looked at the hair from the autopsy pictures, but my son's hair and this hair, this is not his hair. Speaker 0: And the and the portion of the wig, the clip in wig has blood on it? Speaker 1: Yes. Speaker 0: Okay. So as a, you know, non forensic investigator myself, I look at that and I'm saying that's a that's a where where did this come from? And there's blood all over the apartment. Right there, I would say this is you know, maybe it's a suicide, but you're gonna have to tell me how because that you know, what is that? Speaker 1: It's not a suicide. It's a homicide, obviously. We have enough reasons to believe that. 1 is coming from the private autopsy. It's not a suicidal angle at all. Speaker 0: So you said that, and let me let you explain. It's not a suicidal angle. So you you had the the the the crime scene, your son's body was taken away. It was evaluated in some way by the authorities. They say this a suicide. You have an like a real autopsy done by professor Rao, and he says, what about the bullet angle? Will you explain that? Speaker 1: The autopsy was done by doctor Joseph Cohen. Speaker 0: Okay. Speaker 1: And, he says two things. One of them is the bullet angle is going downward about 30 to 45 degrees downward. It's been shot here. It's missed the brain. Second thing is there's a head injury on the left side of the head. In fact, I spoke to medical examiner's office, executive director. I told him there's a head injury. The sinus struggle in the bathroom. He just declared that I'm the decision making authority of state of California. I decide the cause of death. And when I brought up we'll have federal investigation, there was a momentary setback in his voice on the phone, but still they're holding on to suicide. Speaker 0: So doctor Cohen's autopsy, and this is grisly, I'm sorry, but shows, demonstrates, proves that the bullet was fired at what angle? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's downward angle. That someone cannot shoot themselves. Speaker 0: Right. So in other words, if this were a suicide, your son would have had to have held the gun to his forehead coming down. Speaker 1: He was made to sit. If you look at the same thing, like, so it's the victim was sitting down. He was made to sit someone standing, he shot him down. In fact, like, Balaji and I, my husband and I are going to create a virtual reality. Once we get all the evidence, we'll create a virtual reality video and present it to court what exactly happened to him on that moment. Speaker 0: You also said, if I heard you correctly, that he had another head injury not caused by a bullet. Speaker 1: Yes. Can you Speaker 0: tell us about that? Speaker 1: Actually, it appeared to us that from his fallen toothpick and toothpick and the blood in the sink and all that, it appeared around 10 ish because 10:10 is his last browser history on the desktop. He was brushing his teeth before going to bed. He was attacked from behind on the head. That's why this fallen dustbin, this fallen toothpick, and his earbud has fallen in 2 different directions because of the head impact. And we believe after that, he was either electrocuted or he was, you know, like, he was paralyzed from the head injury, and then he just they just held him up, paid him seat, and shot him. But, also, we know that that we are waiting for further report, but that may not be the cause of death. The gunshot wound is not the cause of death. And probably, they might have suffocated him. We don't have any details of that cruelty, but we're waiting for further reports from the city's crime. Speaker 0: Why do you believe the gunshot was not the cause of death? Speaker 1: Because it's not touched the brain. It only causes, makes him unconscious. Speaker 0: So the autopsy show that the bullet did not touch his brain? Speaker 1: Yes. And also since I called the apartment on 12 on 23rd at 12:15 PM, it rang once and it went to voice mail. Oh, that makes me believe the killers were still there in the apartment. Again, we need to verify all that. We can do something called geofencing. Through that, we can figure out who was there, who was visiting that complex, and all that information. That's exactly why we need thorough investigation. Speaker 0: You certainly do. You said your son's last browser record is from 10 PM ish? Speaker 1: 10:10 PM. Speaker 0: And what was he looking at? Do you know? Speaker 1: I think he was looking at a black cat or something. Because last time in Sushiro and I met, a cat was going in front of me, and then I told him it's a superstition. And then he was looking at, neuroscience topics, and he logged into a website for those you know, for the start up or something like that. He logged into a website, and he was doing some research. Speaker 0: So he wasn't looking up, how do I kill myself? Speaker 1: No. That's the first thing that we look for, actually. Speaker 0: Of course. Of course. Of course. I mean, killing yourself is a, you know, a a profound decision. People, there are signs. Speaker 1: And can I say something? Yes. It doesn't add up if he's so brave to go to news media, to go be a witness. He's so courageous. How does someone so courageous do a cowardly act? It doesn't add up at all. Speaker 0: What doesn't add up is there's blood all over the apartment, and, there's a piece of a wig on the ground covered in blood. That's not his wig. And, you know, you you you don't need to be a detective to imagine that if someone's gonna commit a murder, he might be wearing a wig as he goes into the apartment. So that right there, considering your son didn't wear a wig as a 26 year old male, you Speaker 1: know Hays were not his. That's also another thing. Speaker 0: What weren't his? Speaker 1: Those hairs were not his hair. We have the picture of his hairs. His hair is fallen down in the bathroom sink. That is different from the wig in the head in the wig. His original hair have been found on the floor. They might have strangled him by his hair or something. His hair has fallen down. That hair versus the big hair are different. Speaker 0: Did anybody hear anything in the apartment? Did anyone hear the gunshot? No. No one heard anything? Speaker 1: No one heard anything. Speaker 0: And 2 entrances into the complex have no surveillance cameras? Yes. Wow. It makes the hair on your arms go up. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a lot. Speaker 0: Yeah. Again, I've I've been involved in many stories like this, more than 5, and I've never seen one like this. Speaker 1: Brutal. Speaker 0: Well, it's unbelievable. So what's unbelievable is it's so obviously not a clean-cut story. I mean, you wouldn't walk into an apartment with blood splattered everywhere and see a man on the floor with a gun in his hand and say, oh, it was a suicide. Well, how did the blood get in the bathroom? He shot himself in the head. Like, that doesn't even make sense. Speaker 1: It it was a cover up. Right? So they picked up what they want to pick up. We don't know if they have been instructed to do this beforehand. Speaker 0: So, okay. Let's thank you for describing all of that, and I'm sorry. I know it's awful. Yeah. But, tell me how the authorities responded, if you don't mind. Speaker 1: Authorities have been very indifferent. In fact, we hired an attorney, a senior attorney. He wrote to chief of police, city administrator, chief medical examiner, executive director of medical examiner. He wrote very clearly couple of points. One of them is he was not suicidal. Before making a decision of suicide, they need to take his mental state into account. Yes. He has happy pictures. He they shared the pictures. He just came back and he said, talk to 4 of his friends who accompanied him. And he also said the autopsy information in that letter. The autopsy report says that this is the angle of gunshot. It doesn't look suicide at at all. A doctor described this as atypical abnormal worrisome angle. We wrote all of this to them. We just had them to reconsider it and do the investigation. Chief of police apparently has agreed to do investigation, but medical examiner stopped it. He said, no. This is suicide. And their attorney came back and said, what they said was, oh, yeah. The angle looks different. So what? It's a suicide. Speaker 0: A man shooting himself in the forehead from a downward angle. Yeah. Okay. I'm not even sure if that's possible, but, Speaker 1: we are going to demonstrate that. We just ordered a dummy gun. We're going to create a dummy of his size, and we're going to demonstrate using the VR or using the video. We're going to demonstrate to people it's not possible. Speaker 0: Who is the medical examiner who refuses to reconsider a pretty obviously silly explanation for this? Speaker 1: His name is, David Hellman. Speaker 0: David Hellman. Yes. He's the San Francisco medical examiner. Speaker 1: But he has been covered by David Sewell, who's the executive director. Every time we call, it's him. And even the news report is given by David Sewell. There's no false witness. Speaker 0: And who is David Sewell? Speaker 1: He's the executive director of medical examiner's office. He is the one who's holding on to suicide despite of seeing all the evidences. He wants to declare it only suicide, nothing else. Speaker 0: What does he make of the bloody wig and the blood splattered in the bathroom when your son was not found in the bathroom? Like, how does he explain that? Speaker 1: He didn't want to listen to it. He didn't want to pay attention to any of the things that they were saying. And you know the worst struggle here is? The first attorney, he was reluctant to help us. When he said so when medical examiner's office said suicide, he didn't want to fight because they have been threatened, obviously. Then we hired a second attorney. He got a crime scene investigator, and our attorney said, we'll give you explanation of every blood mark. And he came back this Monday, and he gave explanation. And none of that explanation he gave corroborates to what happened in the apartment based on what we see. That means even the crime scene investigator was bought. He gave, inaccurate results. If both the attorneys are like this, then where do we go? We definitely need some serious help here from the authorities. Speaker 0: Okay. So the authorities would begin with the mayor of San Francisco? Speaker 1: Mayor of San Francisco? Actually, Sam Altman is on the transition committee for the new governor. He's a friend. Speaker 0: He's a friend of The new mayor? Sam Altman is a friend of the new mayor? Yes. Okay. So let's move up. Then you go to the governor of California, Kevin Newsom. Speaker 1: We're trying to. We are first trying to meet the district attorney of San Francisco, DA of San Francisco. We probably are going to get an appointment sometime next week or later this week. Speaker 0: It's it's mid January. Your son was killed in November. Speaker 1: We had not been getting any appointment. We wrote to everyone. We wrote we wrote to Rob Bonta. We wrote to DA. Like, we didn't get any appointment from any of them. 5 weeks were wasted by our 1st attorney. He does nothing. He just keep prolonging, prolonging, prolonging. He wasted 5 weeks. Then we hired a second attorney. It's been almost 2 weeks since we hired. But now, like, we just didn't trust any of these people. We got a report from someone else, and now we're coming to media because these people, like, none neither the authorities nor the attorneys are helping us. Speaker 0: This needs to go to the Department of Justice, I think, in the Trump administration. Speaker 1: I did. Right? Speaker 0: You did? Speaker 1: Yeah. We haven't heard yet because it's only been a few days. Yeah. We did write to them. Speaker 0: In general, possessions are overrated, but there are some things you really would not want stolen. And to me, family shotguns, including a whole bunch of them I got from my father, are at the top of that list. So I keep my dad's shotguns in a Liberty Safe because it's safe, and it's also really attractive. Liberty Safe just created something really cool. It's a limited edition safe that commemorates the inauguration of Donald Trump, America's 47th president. The original design celebrates Trump and his swearing in upholding Liberty's equipment to building their safes right here in the United States, and they went all out on this one. It's the special 47 edition. It features a one of a kind artwork that pays homage to the president. It's very, very cool. Not all safes are created equal. There are plenty out there, and a lot of the manufacturers slap an American sending name on the label, but they are not made here. They're from China or other foreign markets. Liberty safes are made in the United States. For over 30 years, Liberty has made it safes right here, and that matters. Because when you buy a Liberty safe, you're supporting American workers and American values. Their products are more than just a place to protect your dead shotguns, for example. They are a symbol of this country. So celebrate this historic moment, secure the things that you want to keep forever in a Liberty Safe. Visit liberty safe dot com or find a Liberty dealer or retailer near you to order your limited edition safe today. Liberty Safe made in America. Has anybody in a position of authority in the state of California said to you, boy, this needs more investigation. It doesn't look right. Speaker 1: Everybody is suppressed. No one has come in our favor. In fact, even our attorneys whom we hired have been made to tell it's a suicide to us. Every day from every different angle, there is a push for us that it's a suicide. But we parents, we know, and we want to fight for justice for our beloved son. Speaker 0: I but I I don't understand on what basis. So your son had just come back that day from hanging out with his buddies. Okay? So which is, like, a happy thing. It's No evidence that he was suicidal whatsoever and tons of forensic evidence that he was murdered. So on what grounds are they saying it's very likely he killed himself? Speaker 1: Okay. That's because of the cover up. Remember, like, there was a gun near him. He owned a gun, and they put a shell casing and 4 bullets near it. They made it look like it. So there are both the evidences, right, for the medical examiner to pick up. He picked up the one that looks suicidal. He ignored the one that looks like homicide. That's what it is. Speaker 0: So now to Sam Altman. What contact with Sam Altman have you had since your son died? Speaker 1: We contacted HR for 401 k plan details. Until then, no one from OpenAI ever contacted us. They gave the PR report that they're supporting the family. How? So she had obviously put parents in his emergency contact. Right? They got the death news on December 13th. They made no attempt to contact us. And when we reached out to HR, Sam Altman said he wants to talk to us. But then we already knew Sukhir was, you know, his presence or his living would have been a threat to AI industry in general. I wouldn't want to name one company, but, eventually, it's going to expose everything. Right? So we didn't want to talk to Sam Altman. And then they said we provide employee assistance program, though he was a former employee. He said we have medical insurance. We don't need it. Then they pushed us saying, we want to get you on a Zoom call ASAP to go over his stock options. Then our response to that is, why are you in a hurry? We are not. We've lost our son. We're grieving. Money is not important to us. Please talk to a probate attorney, and we had a probate attorney talk to the HR. This is our Speaker 0: They wanted to talk about his stock options? Speaker 1: Yeah. That's why they wanted to get us on a Zoom call. Speaker 0: Do you think, do you believe you can't know, I guess, but do you think that Sam Altman was involved in your son's death? Speaker 1: We don't know. We need to investigate it. We can't, you know, we can't say anything at this time. But one thing I know for sure is if he was deposed, there are a few, organizations who could have been impacted for that matter. Like, there are a lot of AI companies which violate copyright law, and we don't know what OpenAI wanted to hide when my son deposed. What was the wrongdoing that he would have brought up, not just a copyright law. That's exactly we need FBI to investigate thoroughly. Was there any, criminal activity? Was there any illegal activity? We don't know. Right? Why? Why would they silence him? What would he have spoken? If it's just a copyright law, do you think these big organizations like Microsoft and OpenAI care? No. They don't care about it. Right? Because they have money and power. What else was involved in the deposition, in the testimony that took my son's life? We need thorough investigation. Speaker 0: So you haven't seen those documents. You don't know? Speaker 1: Okay. There are two things here. 1 is the custodial documentation. Right? The second thing is his own statement. His own statement be heard from few former employees of OpenAI. There are certain wrongdoings there. Speaker 0: Like what? Speaker 1: We can't say something that someone shared. Right? So I I would want to keep it more, you know, just overview that something like that. So that is the reason they're hiding. And you know what? If we come and tell openly our life could be at risk, but we are taking the risk and coming out and telling publicly that's the reason our son was killed because he knew something that was going on. Keeping in mind, he was feeding the data. Right? Pre training data. Speaker 0: So he knows be clear, you think this is not simply about OpenAI stealing, you know, copyrighted material? It's there's more than that? Speaker 1: More than that. 100% sure. Because copyright data, obviously, my friends and I were all talking. These companies, they get many lawsuits like this. Right? Speaker 0: Sure. Speaker 1: Do they really care about it? No. Speaker 0: What is the kind of thing they do care about? What kind of crimes do you think they would kill someone over? Speaker 1: Stealing some data that, against that that could cause a violation possibly. They might be stealing some data. Speaker 0: From the US government, from other government? Speaker 1: Something like that. Maybe government is involved. We don't know. We're speculating. Speaker 0: That's just a remarkable story. Do you think that we will find out? Like, how will the rest of us find out what your son testified to? Speaker 1: That's exactly why we call out to president Trump to do a thorough investigation. We want the FBI director to be assigned to investigate this. This is not just about copyright. This is about a lot of other things that are going on that could cause harm to society potentially, not just my son's death. There's something harmful that need to be evaluated and, like, thoroughly investigated. That's exactly why they're covering up a suicide. Why do you think medical examiners, the executive director would come and tell? Why do you think nobody gives us appointment? Because there's some kind of foul play and there's strong power behind medical examiner. Speaker 0: So you're saying that AI itself poses a threat to the world and that your son understood this. Speaker 1: Yes. He understood it, but he was keeping in mind that's one aspect. The other aspect is he knew everything OpenAI does. Yes. And he might have actually felt overwhelmed by what kind of activity he got involved in. We know that he spoke to a copyright attorney, which is again a cover up, we suspect. And what Matthew Buderic told us on November 29th is, yes, I met with your son. He's a very brave man. So chief told us what open AI did to him. He didn't say anything beyond that. That day, he said, I live in San Francisco LA. I come to San Francisco quite quite a quite quite a few times, and I'm going to talk to you next time when I come. And then he's been silenced. He's not telling us anything. We had our attorney call. Even then, apparently, he did not say. So if we depose him, he's going to spill out everything. And, also, we suspect he's Sam Altman's friend, and he's played against our son and has indirect involvement. We don't know. Speaker 0: Wow. There was a a moment where Sam Altman left his own company or seemed to leave his own company for a few days. You may remember this. What was that? Do you know? Speaker 1: Sam Altman was fired. This was because of AI safety issues. The board of directors for OpenAI from the nonprofit side, especially one called Elias Sesto, he and others, excuse me, fired Sam Altman. And then all the 700 employees, including her son, wrote a letter or a momentum saying that if they don't reinstate Sam Altman, they're all going to resign. So they brought Sam Altman. They fired Ilya, who's the AI safety expert. And to be honest, few days after my son's death was announced, December 15, Ilya was seen in, a presentation in one of the conferences. He had 2 security guards with arm no. With, firearms around him. He was so scared of his life. So we are seeing a mafia behind all these things, honestly speaking. Speaker 0: What were the safety issues that caused Sam Altman to get fired, do you think? Speaker 1: We don't know if it's safety issue or whatever. We don't have the details of it. Even my son doesn't know any of these things. In fact, he supported Sam Altman's reinstatement. Speaker 0: Yes. You said that. Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Like, a lot of AI safety people have been leaving OpenAI. If you notice, their CTO, Mira, I don't have no no her last name. Their CTO also resigned. Many people have been leaving OpenAI, not just the researchers. Speaker 0: Why? Speaker 1: That's exactly I want to know why. There's so many people to leave. Obviously, there is something, right, that they're not happy about. Right? Only person who spoke against them was my son. Rest of them just quietly walked away. My son, he couldn't take it. He felt like, you know, he need to stand up and tell the truth so some harm can be prevented. We need to investigate all this seriously. Speaker 0: Did your son ever mention during that period when Sam Alban left, that very brief period, there was a report, in the news media that said, within OpenAI, AI itself was being worshiped like a god. Did he ever mention anything about that? Speaker 1: He did. Such he didn't mention. Speaker 0: And do you have any sense of what these harms are? I mean, clearly, people are afraid of what AI can do, not just by eliminating jobs, which is enough to worry about, but there are other things that people are very concerned about. Do you know what they are? Speaker 1: They are in my son's publication. Some of them he's covered. One of them is, like, less traffic means the loss of jobs. That was one of his concerns. I'm proud of him for bringing that up. Yes. He gave the graph graphical representation of how the traffic is reduced to Stack Overflow and fewer website that are a means of leaving for people. That will be taken away. That's his concern. And, also, the accuracy, as I mentioned earlier in the interview, the accuracy of data. And, also, he says something called, like the modulation index or something. Point 5 versus 1 dot o, he tells in his article. If it's point 5, the data in and data out are not the same. If it's 1, data in and data out are same. Most companies, including OpenAI, use point 5. That means the data accuracy is not maintained. That is his biggest concern. He being, kind of like an architect inside, he knows in and out of chat GPD. Speaker 0: What happens next? Speaker 1: If my son were alive, he was planning to bring a competition to OpenAI. He was working on a medical start up. I even checked with him. How do you think it's a competition? Not directly. Mom is an indirect competition, he said. He would have been a great humanitarian. He would have done a lot of causes for humanity with the concerns he had. We lost a great human being, not just my son, who would have made a big difference to the world. Now what we want is we want justice. We want death sentence to the one who killed my son as well as the imprisonment for people who are behind it. We don't know who it is, but we want to know. And we want to know what my son stood against and take actions, at least in honor of him, At least do something that he stood for and, you know, let his soul be at peace. Speaker 0: What happened to the piece of wig found on the floor soaked in blood in your son's apartment? Where is it? Speaker 1: It's still there. We didn't pick it up because we want police to go and look at it. Speaker 0: It's in the apartment right now? Speaker 1: Nobody came to do the investigation. We have the apartment case. Nobody came to do the investigation. We have been requesting police. Speaker 0: It's sitting there right now? Speaker 1: Yeah. Still there. We didn't pick up anything because it's crime scene evidence. Speaker 0: But no one's investigating it as a crime scene? Speaker 1: No. In fact, like, our attorney said up to December 31st, these people will retain the apartment. In fact, we are paying the rent, and we are maintaining the apartment as is because we want someone to come and investigate all these things with so much evidence. If medical examiner still calls it suicide, this is an ethical question, the regulatory question. So it's Speaker 0: just sitting on the floor right now? Speaker 1: Yes. It's the same place. We didn't touch any of that. Speaker 0: Oh, this is a really crazy story. Speaker 1: It is. Reality. Right? It's not a story. It's how gruesome it is, and, like, you see all the bloodshot. Like, there was a fight, and my son has been tortured. He didn't die immediately. And where where can we go with? Where is peace of mind for us? We can't we just don't have any peace of mind. Our life is not normal at all. The only thing that could make a difference after the loss of our son is getting justice, punish the wrongdoers, protect AI. Speaker 0: Did you know that California was this corrupt? Speaker 1: Yeah. We know it's very corrupt. That's exactly why we're requesting FBI thorough investigation. We did speak to an agent at Ting class Friday. We're waiting for that agent to get someone assigned if you know, special agent or something. And we also know that there's a transition period in the government. Some may be moved transferred, some may be leaving. So we just thought, okay. Let's wait. Meanwhile, we did all the groundwork that we needed to do. We have the evidence. We are here in the media. We're telling the media now we want a new oncoming federal government to intervene because Newsom, we know. Trump himself makes lot of statements against Newsom. We don't we wrote to Ro Khanna. Speaker 0: You talked to Ro Khanna, congressman from Silicon Valley? Speaker 1: We wrote to him. No response from him. Many people tried Speaker 0: response from Ro Khanna? Speaker 1: Yes. Many people tried to reach out to him. Not one. Many people. No response from him. Because they're all inside. Right? All this tech lobbying. Speaker 0: Okay. Well, I'm gonna you know what? I'm gonna text Ro Khanna right now. Speaker 1: Please do. Speaker 0: I'm going to. And I'm gonna send him this right here. And, Ro Khanna has not responded to you? Yes. Okay. Speaker 1: I sent out I filled in a form in his website. I gave my phone number. I gave all the details on his website. Many people from whom we know have tried to contact Rohan. They took my email address and they said, Rohan Rohan will reach. It's been 2 weeks. He hasn't reached us. Initially, we thought it's holidays time, so he's little busy. But even it's 14th January today, no response yet. Speaker 0: Okay. I'm I'm gonna I just texted him right now, and I just sent him, pictures of the relevant information, and I and I hope that you'll try again. Well, I mean, Ro Khanna is this is the Silicon Valley member congress. And Speaker 1: We don't believe in state government at all. We know how corrupt it is, especially in, San Francisco Bay Area. It's very, very corrupt. We don't believe in the system. Unless, you know, we change the governor, we won't believe anything will happen here. We need to go to federal, and we also found out that he's protecting the whistleblower act as well. Speaker 0: He's trying to what? I'm sorry? Speaker 1: Whistleblower. There's a federal aspect as well. It's not just a Speaker 0: whistleblower. Yes. Speaker 1: Right? There are two things here. 1 is wrongful death, 1 is a whistleblower. The whistleblower comes under federal because the lawsuit was filed in New York, and he was a custodian witness. So we have a backing from federal government involvement. If it's just the state, corrupt state would fight against it. Since that is federal, they can overtake the federal aspect. We are writing to, Federal Trade Commission now, today or tomorrow, and we want them to do a quiet investigation of the case. We have a top attorney in whistleblower that's helping us prove one of his contingency basis. We will work with him and bring the truth out. Speaker 0: I mean, your son was born in this country. You can't murder American citizens because they're standing in the way of your business. That is not allowed in this country. You can't do that. Speaker 1: Imagine we are immigrants here, and we came here. We raised our son. We were so proud of him. We we don't expect this to happen in this country No. In America. No. Speaker 0: That's right. Speaker 1: We don't expect this to happen. Like, sense of security has been lost for me ever since. Speaker 0: Do you worry about your safety? Speaker 1: Potentially. Now that, like, we've gone so public, they may not target us. Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: But there might be some kind of, you know, threat in terms of accidents or something like that can potentially, indirectly, they could harm us that they cannot be caught. We are we suspect that. And I don't go out alone anywhere because I'm more vocal. So I don't go out alone for walk or anywhere. I always take my husband along, and we make sure if we go somewhere, we inform our friends where we are. We just keep letting people know. In fact, like, I don't want my family from India to visit me because it's a big risk for them. Speaker 0: Has The New York Times called you to do this story? Speaker 1: We call New York Times 2 days after we got his body, and we told, I think his name was, I don't remember his name. So we told him many times. They haven't even interviewed. They ignored it completely. And he said he'll get back. He will say he'll let us know, what he can do, and he's he doesn't even take our call. Speaker 0: What about the television networks? CNN, NBC, Fox? Is anyone Speaker 1: Nobody. ABC just relayed the vigil, candlelight vigil that we had for Surchiran Milpitas. 1.5 minutes, they relate of the visual information. ABC News. Speaker 0: Local. Speaker 1: Now that that we just received this evidence today morning. We probably might reach out to some of the news media. Now that we have this evidence, news media will talk to us. We want to take it much forward. Speaker 0: Yeah. I don't for the 3rd time, I just wanna say this again. I don't think anybody, any honest person could look at this and say, oh, yeah. That's a suicide. I mean, I just I you know. Speaker 1: We were hesitant because, like, they can try to manipulate the evidence or something like that. We were very hesitant. You know, like, they can even attack the apartment, remove everything, clean up. You know, like, some things crazy things, like, they might cause a fire and then let the, you know, water sprinklers go on and it'll destroy the evidence or something. Right? That's why we were very quiet. We didn't go to media until we got this authoritative report. It's very scary. Speaker 0: Well, I'm I'm grateful that you're making, you know, as much noise about this as you are, and you're as aggressive as you are. Thank you for doing that. And I'm gonna Speaker 1: Whistleblowers' lives matter. Oh, I'm sorry. We cannot lose. Honestly, I was talking to my son. I expressed concerns about his whistleblower activity. But what I was thinking was he won't get another job because he's going against employer. Speaker 0: Right. Speaker 1: He kept assuring me he has his own plan startup plans, but taking his life is something that I never expected. This is not the first time. 2 whistle blowers from Boeing were found dead last year. One of them exactly same way. Another one died in the hospital. They drugged him. Speaker 0: You mean Speaker 1: This is America. Speaker 0: Yeah. Thank you for this. Speaker 1: We need to protect them. Most whistle blowers we were talking to the whistle blower attorneys. Most of them, they don't even know there is support. There's not enough awareness. Going forward, we want to create awareness and help others. Then not just that, there should be some kind of regulation protection. And I'm sure we are going to talk to New York Times at some point of time and said, how did you put his life as risk? If he was a custodian witness, why didn't you give him protection? Why was he left alone? Right? What kind of protection did he have for speaking truth? Costing his life? Speaker 0: Well, I think most Americans, like you, would not even consider the possibility you'd be murdered over something like this. You know, the penalty you would assume would be, you know, having trouble getting another job but getting killed in your apartment. And your son I know I've asked you. I just wanna make totally clear. He never mentioned being followed or feeling threatened or anything like that. Speaker 1: Actually, I do have some observation. After New York Times article came, he didn't want us to visit. He would come home and avoid me going there, and he would also come during the weekday, not the weekend. I want to investigate why. Was he already under some kind of someone was following him or something? I was about to demand him an answer, but he's no more. Like, slowly, you know, like, with an adult son, like, how much can we push him each time he visit? I just made sure, like, he's eating well and he's healthy and he has strong plans, he's has hobbies, all of those things. But this kind of information, why are you coming in the weekdays? I was didn't get a chance to push him. He was gonna come for Thanksgiving, and that's when I would question him. I thought he wasn't even alive till then. We didn't have enough time. Speaker 0: Thank you for telling us the story. Speaker 1: Thank you for hosting us. And, no, we want Americans to know what happened. And why has the mean covered by news media? Why no one is talking about it? Why they want to repeat like parrots what medical examiner is saying? Why they don't want to stand up for truth? Why? Are we so sold out for these tech lobbying? Is there any regulation on the amount of money they can spend for lobbying? Right? It's indirect bribe. Right? So they're all sold out. Can't we do anything? I'm an American citizen too. This is totally disappointing. They let a reporter came home. He took the pictures. He wrote the article. And then when I mentioned OpenAI's name, there was so much fear in him. He was scared. So the tech companies, they're controlling and they're turning down to be mafia, controlling the government, controlling the news media. What more harm do we want from them? Do we public do we need to live in safety or do we need to live in fear? What what are we doing? Why are we quiet now? Now that an innocent life is gone, we're seeing so much going on. Why are we quiet? Why can't we start just this for switch here moment? Why can't we do rallies? Why can't we go on a nonstoppable moment until we get the justice, until we get the punishment? I'm I'm calling out to all Americans to stand with me. We want to do rallies all over America. We want to do vigil all over America, and we want to enforce FBI investigation and punish the culprit. Speaker 0: I hope this helps.
Saved - January 14, 2025 at 4:48 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
On January 10th, I witnessed Jose Gerardo Escobar attempting to start a fire at Pioneer Park in Azusa. GPS data linked him to Juan Manuel Sierra-Leyva, another suspected arsonist, in the area multiple times. Both are tied to individuals associated with the Sinaloa cartel and various NGOs. Despite media narratives suggesting otherwise, I believe Escobar's connection to major fires is evident, especially with a third man, Ruben Montes, arrested for starting fires in Irwindale, close to where the Eaton Fire is still active.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Jose Gerardo Escobar attempted to start a fire on January 10th, around 11:30 pm at Pioneer Park near the foothills of Azusa, California. GPS connected Escobar with the accused propane torch arsonist Juan Manuel Sierra-Leyva in the same immediate vicinity on 11 occasions. Both men are associated with two foot soldiers of the Sinaloa cartel and a number of border invasion facilitating NGOs. The corrupt media will drive a narrative that Jose Gerardo Escobar was not connected to the major fires, but that’s only because he got caught. We also connected a third man who was subsequently arrested in Irwindale, California, on Sunday for arson. Roughly 16 miles away from Altadena where the deadly Eaton Fire continues to rage. Firefighters were responding to a small brush fire in Irwindale when they witnessed Ruben Montes, 29, starting blazes in the area, Irwindale police have confirmed he was detained by officers at the scene and ultimately arrested for arson.

Saved - January 3, 2025 at 5:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I researched the Vindman brothers, focusing on Leonid Simon Vindman, the older brother of Alexander and Yevgeny Vindman. Leonid is the founder and managing partner of Tungsten Capital Advisors, a Ukrainian firm linked to corruption and controlling interest in Optima Metals. I also looked into connections to Fort Bragg and individuals like Ryan Wesley Routh and Matthew Alan Livelsberger. As always, I emphasize the importance of following the money in these investigations.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Research all 3 Vindman brothers, including Leonid Simon Vindman. Connections to Fort Bragg, Ryan Wesley Routh, Matthew Alan Livelsberger, Shamsud-Din Jabbar, etc., etc. But Who is the Third Vindman Brother? The third brother is Leonid Simon Vindman, he is Alexander Semyon Vindman (real name: Олекса́ндр Семенович Ві́ндман), Yevgeny Semyon "Eugene" Vindman (real name: Євген Семенович Віндман) and older brother. Leonid Simon Vindman the “Founder and Managing Partner of Tungsten Capital Advisors” is a corrupt Ukrainian company that had controlling interest in Optima Metals. Like always, follow the money! tungstencapitaladvisors.com/Leadership.html

Saved - December 22, 2024 at 2:24 AM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

After extensive cell phone, laptop, and vehicle GPS data analysis, going back 4 years, Ryan Wesley Routh visited Fort Bragg 147 times, staying overnight on 29 occasions. https://t.co/zaCQq26ByH

Saved - November 23, 2024 at 3:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discovered that officer Michael Byrd, who fatally shot J6 protestor Ashley Babbitt, has a troubling disciplinary history, including multiple gun-related incidents. He failed a shotgun qualification, an FBI background check, and faced suspension for losing a weapon. After J6, I tracked his movements via GPS, revealing he was frequently visiting drug houses while under a taxpayer-funded security detail. It's alarming to think that at the time of the shooting, he had already failed a background check and was not authorized to carry a firearm.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

The corrupt, racist cop who fatally shot J6 protestor Ashley Babbitt has a lengthy disciplinary record that includes multiple gun incidents! The issues in officer Michael Byrd's background included a failed shotgun qualification test, a failed FBI background check, a suspension for a lost weapon and referral to prosecutors for firing his gun at a stolen car. Personal Note: but there is so much more! After J6, once Michael Byrd was identified, we began reviewing his movement via GPS, while he was being ‘protected’ by taxpayer funded security detail living at Andrew AFB and partying into the night all while refusing to “telework” per a cushy agreement. GPS demonstrated Byrd was regularly visiting two different drug houses, sometimes 10 times in a week, with his security detail? WTF!? Let this sink in, at the time of the shooting of unarmed Ashley Babbitt, Michael Byrd had failed a background check and should not have been carrying a gun. https://justthenews.com/accountability/hldcop-who-shot-j6-protestor-has-lengthy-disciplinary-record-mishandled-firearms

Cop who fatally shot J6 protestor has lengthy disciplinary record that includes gun incidents The issues in officer Michael Byrd's background included a failed shotgun qualification test, a failed FBI background check, a suspension for a lost weapon and referral to prosecutors for firing his gun at a stolen car. justthenews.com
Saved - November 2, 2024 at 5:53 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Forcing someone to stand in line for 5 hours to vote, IS in itself, voter suppression. Each of these election boards received tens of millions of dollars. WHAT DID THEY DO WITH ALL OF THAT MONEY @JoshShapiroPA?

Saved - October 31, 2024 at 5:11 PM

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

Daughter of Powerful Chinese Communist Official Reveals Tim Walz Had a Secret Sexual Relationship with Her as His Troubling Ties to the Country Pile Up https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14012181/tim-walz-fling-china-communist-daughter-kamala-harris-vp.html

Tim Walz had secret fling with Chinese Communist's daughter Tim Walz had a secret fling with the daughter of a high-ranking Communist official during his 1989 teaching stint in China, DailyMail.com can exclusively reveal. dailymail.co.uk
Saved - October 30, 2024 at 10:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I tracked 31,834 mobile devices at the Kamala Harris rally in D.C. Notably, 91% had attended multiple rallies. Over 11,000 came from Atlanta, and 6,500 from California. Additionally, 6,122 devices were linked to previous Antifa, BLM, or Pro-Palestinian events.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

GPS—31,834 mobile devices at the Ellipse in Washington, D.C. for a Kamala Harris rally. 91% have attended 3 or more Harris rallies. Interesting, just over 11,000 were from Atlanta, Georgia, followed by 6,500 from California. Using our Antifa/BLM/Pro-Palestinian overlays, 6,122 were linked to 3 or more Antifa/BLM/Pro-Palestinian protests/riots.

@TonySeruga - Tony Seruga

https://t.co/pcv3xibCDq

View Full Interactive Feed