reSee.it - Tweets Saved By @UAPReportingCnt

Saved - November 23, 2025 at 11:14 AM

@UAPReportingCnt - UAP Reporting Center

🚨 David Grusch just dropped a bombshell: he says he’s had first-hand exposure to non-human sentient beings — and their motives aren’t all peaceful. He also claims President Trump is fully briefed on UAPs and may eventually speak out. This story isn’t slowing down. #UFOx https://t.co/KhZUj2M2ao

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 (anonymous whistleblower): Government seems to be involved. They’re definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. We’ve recovered the vehicles and have physical proof. I was partially cleared into those activities and had access to the data, reading intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes you’ve seen it. So when people say this is kooky, there’s nothing to back it up… Speaker 2 (NASA): NASA is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what Mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where’s the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Members of this administration are very aware of this reality; the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership. I think he’s assembled a cabinet, and I believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access and have spoken to people about it. I’ve had meetings with very smart, solid people who believe there is something out there. It makes sense there could be, but I’ve never been convinced, despite that. It’s not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, and two, he’s open to transparency on UAPs? He’s very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don’t want to get ahead of what the president might want to reveal. There’s been a role to cover this up through administrations. Speaker 0: I was physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I had to seek legal protection because I was fearful professionally and personally. Speaker 1: And when you mention recovering pilots or remains nonhuman, that’s something you saw in the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. There were pictures. It’s uncomfortable to discuss because it’s outside a normal worldview to understand there is a biological sentience that piloted these crafts and does not necessarily look 100% like us. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Speaker 0: There were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or outer space, you said you don’t know where they’re from. Is it interdimensional? What are we talking about? Speaker 0: I’ve talked to a lot of graybeards about the origin. I leave an open mind. There is an extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth, but I didn’t see that data. I’m not conversant in the high-confidence theories the US government had. I’m not aware of any remains the department has of extraterrestrial beings or technology. Speaker 1: Do other governments know? Do they have programs? Speaker 0: They have their own programs. Two and a half years ago we’ve been in an arms race with peer competitors—Russia and China—and they have their own programs. I viewed a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs. Speaker 1: We’ve recovered things—bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense of their motive or whether it’s peaceful or not? We’ve seen a mixed bag of motives. Speaker 0: Activity and motive vary; the reasons for visiting are not fully understood. Could it be because we have interesting genetic material on Earth and we’re a Jurassic Park tourist attraction? There could be a myriad of reasons. Speaker 1: For other people coming forward, what do you say about intimidation? There are reports of harassment. There’s hope. Congress values whistleblower information now, and there’s appetite to do the right thing. There are things happening behind the scenes that the administration may discuss when ready. Speaker 1: We’ll follow every element. It’s fascinating. Speaker 0: Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Sean Hannity here. Subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Government. Seems to be the case. I don't like to characterize necessarily where they came from. They're definitely some kind of nonhuman sentience. But it is true, believe it or not, we've recovered the vehicles, and we actually have physical proof. And I was actually partially cleared into some of those activities. It was beyond oral testimony provided to me. I actually had partial access to the data and actually read the intelligence reports resulting from those programs. Speaker 1: And with your own eyes, you Yes. Saw And so when people say this is kooky, this is out there, there's nothing to back it up Speaker 2: I don't speak for other parts of the government, but I can tell you NASA, which I speak for, is open and transparent with our data. Do you believe what mister David Crush said, or is he lying? Whatever he said, where's the evidence? Speaker 1: What do you say? Speaker 0: Certainly, members of this current administration are very, very well aware of this reality. Certainly, the the current president is very knowledgeable on this subject, and I trust his leadership on it. And I think he's assembled an an a team cabinet, and I really believe if Trump wants to be the greatest president and the most consequential leader likely in world history, he certainly has the knowledge, the capabilities, and understanding of some of these sensitive government transparency issues. Speaker 3: I have access, but and I I speak to people about it. I've had actually meetings on it. People that are very smart and very solid have said they believe there is something out there. And, you know, it makes sense that there could be. I've never been convinced even despite that. You know, I just for some reason, it's not my thing. Speaker 1: So you think, one, he knows, Speaker 0: and two, he's open to transparency on UAPs? He certainly is very well informed on this issue. Leave it at that. I don't wanna get ahead of what the president might want to reveal personally. There's been a role to cover this up Mhmm. You're saying, through administrations? Speaker 1: Mhmm. And there have been people who have been threatened and told Yeah. Not to testify? Speaker 0: I was, physically threatened even before I sent in my intelligence community inspector general report under the previous administration. I actually had to go and and seek legal protection that way because I was, you know, literally in fear both professionally and in my personal life. Speaker 1: And when you mentioned in that testimony of recovering the pilots or or remains nonhuman. Mhmm. That's something that you saw as far as the intelligence with your eyes? Speaker 0: Yes. And it is a very uncomfortable even for me now, as as somebody who's seen it, experienced it, even talking about it, because it's so outside a normal person's world view to understand that there is this biological sentience that have piloted these crafts that don't necessarily look 100 like you and I. Speaker 1: Were there pictures? Were there? Speaker 0: There were. Yes, there were. Speaker 1: When I said from another planet or from outer space, you said not, we don't know where they're from. Is it interdimensional? What what are we talking about? Speaker 0: I've talked to a lot of, I'll call graybeards on the program. That is a subject of hot debate on origin. I've as a guy trained in physics formally as well in my background, I leave an open mind on what the origin is. Certainly, there is the extraterrestrial hypothesis, and they could be coming from elsewhere off Earth. But I don't usually go there because I did not see that data. I and I'm not conversant in the high confidence theories that the US government had. I'm not aware of any remains that the department has, of, you know, any signs of extraterrestrial beings or activity or technology. Speaker 1: You say we, the US government knows, but there are many other governments around the world. Do Speaker 0: they know? They have their own programs. And like I said, two and a half years ago, we have been in arms race with our peer competitors, you know, namely Russia and China, and they have their own programs in that in this regard. And I was actually able to view a body of intelligence that discussed adversarial programs, and I'll leave it at that. Speaker 1: We've recovered things you say. Yeah. Bodies and physical remains. Was there a sense that the motive of whether how they got here, what they were doing, was it peaceful, not peaceful? We've seen a mixed bag of Speaker 0: activity and motive and intent, why they're visiting. That's once again that gets into our assessments, not necessarily we can't quite understand the intent of some of the sentience and why they're visiting. Could it be because, we have interesting genetic material on earth? We're a Jurassic Park tourist attraction for them? Could be a myriad of reasons. For the other people who are coming out, you say to them what? You've obviously faced intimidation. You talked about harassment. There are reports that others have too. I say that there's hope. Certainly, Congress values whistleblower information right now. And certainly, I believe there's an appetite with the administration to do the right thing on this as well. And there's some other things that are happening behind the scenes that I'll let the administration discuss when they're ready. Speaker 1: Okay. Well, we appreciate your time, and, we'll follow every element. It's fascinating. Speaker 0: Yep. Thanks for having me. Speaker 4: Hey. Sean Hannity here. Hey. Click here to subscribe to Fox News YouTube pay
Saved - December 29, 2024 at 3:39 AM

@UAPReportingCnt - UAP Reporting Center

This is huge.... Nancy Mace stated that she was briefed on two specific shapes of the unidentified objects seen in New Jersey. However, she can’t disclose the details because the information was shared with her in a secure SCIF (Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility). https://t.co/Q9Vf4lzSjx

Video Transcript AI Summary
Everything is on the table regarding unidentified aerial phenomena. Recently, in a classified briefing, two specific shapes were discussed that the U.S. government cannot identify, supported by footage and photographs. It seems clear that the government is not being transparent with the American people and Congress about these incidents. Congress deserves to be informed to address safety concerns, especially along the eastern seaboard.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Oh, well, I think everything is on the table. I mean, I've been in some briefings where specifically about 2 or 3 weeks ago, we were in a skip in a classified setting and I can't share what shapes these are. But there are actually two specific shapes that have been, there's footage and photographs of them in the skies that the federal government, the US federal government cannot identify and don't know what they are. So I think that all options are on the table. With regards to the drones, I think it's very clear it's the US government. I think it's very clear the US government is lying to the American people and the congress because we don't really know what's going on. I do believe that at least congress has the right to know so we can pacify some of the safety concerns and fears of that people have all along the eastern seaboard.
Saved - December 10, 2024 at 6:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I provided an update on the situation regarding the sophisticated drones over New Jersey. I had discussions with top officials from the White House and Homeland Security, and we're actively seeking answers. I urge everyone to report any sightings to the FBI or local law enforcement. These drones are concerning because they can go dark as soon as they're spotted, particularly in relation to sensitive targets and critical infrastructure, including military and utility assets, as well as the President-elect's residence. We're treating this matter with utmost seriousness.

@UAPReportingCnt - UAP Reporting Center

UPDATE: NJ Governor Phil Murphy on the "very sophisticated" "drones" over New Jersey: "This is something we're taking deadly seriously." Partial transcript: "I was on with the White House and Homeland Security leadership literally at the very top yesterday, pretty much all day. I'm hoping we'll get answers sooner than later. I would just ask folks to continue to let FBI or local law enforcement know if they see something.. These are apparently very sophisticated. The minute you get eyes on them, they go dark. We're obviously mostly concerned about sensitive targets and sensitive/critical infrastructure. So you've got military assets, utility assets, you've got the President-elect, one of his homes here. This is something we're taking deadly seriously."

Video Transcript AI Summary
Drones have been spotted in Morris County, New Jersey, causing public concern. Authorities, including Homeland Security and the FBI, have found no evidence of a public safety threat. There were 49 reported sightings, but many may be misidentified aircraft. The drones appear sophisticated and go dark when detected, complicating investigations. Officials are focused on protecting sensitive infrastructure and are working closely with federal partners for answers. Residents are urged to report any sightings to local law enforcement. There are no confirmed reports of malicious drone activity, and any crashed drones should be reported for investigation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The drones in New Jersey, in Morris County. 20 I said, I don't know how many mayors sent a letter to you this morning. Ask it for a clarification. What can you tell us? What is going on and why is it taking so long to come up with an explanation? Speaker 1: Yeah. It's a good I I don't blame people for being frustrated. Let me say most importantly right upfront, we see no evidence. And I say we, this includes Homeland Security, FBI, Secret Service, our state police, authorities at all levels of government. The most important point to say is we don't see any concern for public safety. That's number 1. Number 2, having said that, it's really frustrating, that we we don't have more answers as to where they're coming from and why they're doing what they're doing. We had last night 49 sightings. I think 20 of them were over a 100. Now those include I think I saw 1 mistaken of fixed wing, craft, a plane, a small Piper Cub for instance for a drone, or you saw 1 and that counts, and then I saw the same one and that counts. So we think these are overstated, but they're it's it's a non zero number. I was on with the White House and Homeland Security leadership literally at the very top yesterday, pretty much all day. I'm hoping we'll get answers sooner than later. I would just ask folks to continue to let the FBI or their local law enforcement know when they see something, and we'll continue to do everything we we can with our federal partners to get clearer answers. Speaker 0: Why is it so hard to get answers? Speaker 1: These are apparently very as I understand it, very sophisticated. The minute you get eyes on them, they they go dark. And, you know, we're obviously most concerned about, sensitive targets and sensitive critical infrastructure. So we've got military assets, we've got utility assets, we've got the president who elects one of his homes here. This is something we're taking deadly seriously. We've gotten good cooperation out of the feds, but we need more. And that's that was my plate. Speaker 0: Finally, how long how much longer Speaker 1: do you think you're taking care of? Don't know, but, if we have news, I'll come I'll I'll let you know. The the minute we know something, I'm not gonna hide it under a bushel. Speaker 0: Okay. Governor, you have you know, people saying, you know, I saw a drone in a was spraying something, or I saw a drone crashing my yard and set it off an alarm when I tried to go near it. There's a lot of fear amongst New Jersey residents. I mean, what is your message? Speaker 1: Well, the the message I just gave. But by the way, we're we're not aware of any nefarious drone that has crashed. Or if or if there is one that's crashed, could someone please call me and let me know where that is? There are a couple of rumored, downings for one reason or another. One of them was a toy. The other one was never found. But having something having our hands on equipment that's on the ground would be helpful. No question about
View Full Interactive Feed