TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @UAPWatchers

UAPWatchers
Posted - February 21, 2026 at 7:17 PM
Saved - February 21, 2026 at 10:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting Luna’s claim that interdimensional beings can operate through time spaces, with photo evidence from classified briefings now to be public. Others chime in: it could be time, or beings in GEO, oceans, or via quantum mirroring. Some push for tougher questions; others doubt. A few point to a black square as the craft; a comment asks how many more briefings I’ve attended than Luna.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Rep Luna Confirming Interdimensional Beings Here On Earth "Luna has said that there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces that we currently have" "Yea, I think that a good example of that would be some of the photo visual evidence that we have seen directly in some of these classified briefings that will now be made public"

Video Transcript AI Summary
Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna, chair of the Oversight Committee task force on the declassification of federal secrets, discusses what she describes as evidence of interdimensional beings operating through existing time spaces. She references photo and video material from classified briefings that are now being made public, including a video “dead dropped” to Representative Eric Burleson from within the Department of War showing a UAP/ unidentified aerial phenomena deflecting a Hellfire missile, captured from ISR footage off the coast of Yemen. Luna says there is evidence of an advanced technology not created by mankind, and while some cases previously labeled as UAPs were later identified as drones, there remains a portion of evidence that cannot be explained. She notes that multiple governments have examined these phenomena, and emphasizes a national security perspective: as AI and drone technology evolve, it is important to determine whether these are potential adversarial weapons. She argues that the federal government’s denial of access to some members of Congress is alarming and incompatible with a free, transparent society, and she expects the American people to draw their own conclusions after reviewing the evidence. Luna adds that Representative Gates joined the initial codal discussion with her and Representative Tim Burchett, and stated that if viewers have seen the material they have seen, they too would become believers. She then questions whether the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings, asking whether the technology could be something the U.S. possesses that others should not know about, or if it indicates capabilities possessed by a foreign actor that operate in ways that are hard to understand. Based on interviews and testimony she has reviewed, she says there is reason to believe the tech is not created by mankind, though she concedes it is also possible that certain advanced U.S. weapons could be involved. The conversation centers on the accessibility of evidence, the secrecy surrounding it, and the potential implications for national security and public transparency.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: With that, we bring in Republican congresswoman from Florida, Anna Paulina Luna. She is chair of the Oversight Committee task force on the declassification of federal secrets. She has said that there is evidence of interdimensional beings that can operate through the time spaces that we currently have, which is obviously, gonna catch a lot of people's attention. Anna, Paulina Luna, thank you very much, congressman. It's good good to have you with us today. So you I wanna go back to that. You told Joe Rogan in a podcast in August when you were discussing all of this that you have viewed evidence of interdimensional beings here on Earth and that they operate through the time spaces that we currently have. Can you explain what you mean by that? Speaker 1: Yeah. I think that a good example would be some of the photo visual evidence that we've seen directly in some of these classified briefings that will now be made public. One of the famously now, I guess, infamous videos that we showed in one of our hearings was actually a video that was dead dropped to Eric Burleson, who's a member of congress, from within the Department of War, and it shows a UAP and unidentified area phenomena deflecting a Hellfire missile. This was taken off of ISR footage off the coast of, I believe it was Yemen. So long story short, there have been briefings that we've received as congress that leads us to believe that, yes, there is definitely an advanced technology out there that's not created by mankind. And, yes, of course, we've seen other evidence where it could potentially be UAPs, and then we later find out that there's drones. But there is a certain amount of evidence that we simply can't explain. Some of the physics that are defied in how these vehicles operate are very interesting to note, and we are not the only government that's, you know, looked into this extensively. But I really do look at this from a lens of national security. And as you know, as we continue to evolve specifically on the front of AI and drone technology, we have to ensure that, a, are these things, whatever they may be, are they potential adversarial weapons, advanced weapons, or not? And I think the whole aspect that the federal government can deny access to members of congress, of which has happened not just to myself, but to other members of congress as well, is not just alarming, but it's also something that cannot truly exist in a free and fair society. Government should not operate in secrecy. And so I look forward to the American people being able to determine their own conclusion after they've seen some of the evidence that we have seen. But most recently, representative Gates actually came forward. He was on that initial codal with me and representative Tim Birchitt where we we were denied access. And he will tell you that if you've seen some of the stuff that we've seen, you will too become a believer. Speaker 0: So, I mean, it's it's fascinating. And, you know, so you're saying that the Air Force has covered up UAP sightings. So, you know, if there is potentially is it because it's technology that we have that they don't want anyone to know that we have militarily? Or is it that it's a foreign actor who has some abilities in technology and things that spin in ways that we can't understand? Speaker 1: Based on our interviews that we've conducted, just in person, but also to, given some of the testimony that we've received, we do have reason to believe that this tech is not created by mankind. However, it is also possible that there are certain advanced weapons that the US government may

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

"Yea, I think that a good example of that would be some of the photo visual evidence that we have seen directly in some of these classified briefings that will now be made public"

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@RSkybyrd If its not just viewed as time then yea maybe.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@criticallyme92 Maybe they are in GEO, under the oceans or using quantum mirroring.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@gu28228262 Yep watch this space.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@LilyBuzios Well we will see.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@ayush0477 Nothing yet.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@BinxieB Do we even fully understand time space...

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@michaelmeyer05 I covered this in your other comment.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@CraigHarris456 Nobody is saying that it is limited to just this... It was a loaded question and she replied. These hosts need to do better, ask better questions.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@michaelmeyer05 We shouldn't even presume that time travel is involved, it could be. It could also be that they are in the oceans or in GEO. If we take it a step further they could be using quantum mirroring, in which case we would never see them unless they wanted to be seen.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@jimmy_yuma84150 You know that black square is the actual craft right? 😉😂

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Surtur Times the teller.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@carlhancock Tell me, how many more classified briefings you have been in than Luna?

UAPWatchers
Posted - February 5, 2026 at 7:39 PM
Saved - February 6, 2026 at 10:50 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I challenge mainstream archaeology’s gatekeeping when faced with strong, cross-continental evidence about ancient megastructures. From Baalbek’s massive stones to Tenochtitlan’s legends and Lake Titicaca, I argue the data piling up—over 200 scans under pyramids—shows reuse of foundations and feats big enough to disrupt official timelines. Instead of openness, academics often resort to dismissal and personal attacks, clinging to authority. I call for honest reassessment.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨When Gatekeepers Panic: Why Mainstream Archaeology Is Losing Control of the Narrative Listening to Joe Rogan talk with Raul Bilecky really just puts a spotlight on something that's been blatantly obvious for a long time, but people still pretend not to see it. The weirdness around ancient structures isn't just about stones and dates. It's about who gets to speak, who gets shut down, and how aggressively the mainstream reacts when its story starts to crack. Take places like Tenochtitlan, even the Aztecs themselves didn't claim to have built it from scratch. They said it was a place where the gods were born, but that gets brushed aside because it doesn't fit the approved narrative. Same thing all over the world. You stand at places like Lake Titicaca, surrounded by massive stonework, and the obvious question is where were the people living? Where are the cities, the debris, the daily life? The answer is simple later cultures reused the stone. They dismantled what was there and built on top of it. That’'s how humans have always operated. Sacred places get reused, foundations get recycled. Baalbek is the perfect example. The Romans were obsessive record keepers, they literally documented everything they built, everything they moved, everything they engineered, and yet they somehow forgot to mention the thousand ton stones already sitting seven meters in the air beneath their temples? Stones weighing over a thousand tons that modern machinery still struggles to move today. Stones that were cut, shaped, sometimes even partially quarried, then left in place because whatever system existed to move them wasn't available anymore. This is exactly where the mainstream completely loses credibility. Instead of saying "we don’t know," they default to lazy dismissal as Raul rightly said. Joe stated that its worse than lazy, it's willfully ignorant. They've been confronted with evidence for decades. Alternative archaeology didn't just pop up yesterday. People have measured, scanned, documented, and cross checked this stuff again and again, and the response is always the same in that there was no society capable of this, so it must be younger. Except that excuse keeps failing as the evidence piles up. There is real power in admitting you were wrong. That's how science is supposed to work. You get new data, it disrupts your model, and you update the model. Instead, what we get is academics digging their heels in, protecting their status, protecting their publications, protecting their careers. At that point, it stops being about truth and starts being about control. They're not investigators anymore. They're gatekeepers. I have noticed it myself when posting about the pyramids, academics dig and and resort to trying to belittle you, undermine you (Pun intended.) That behavior gives it all away. Spend any amount of time watching how these people act online and it's embarrassing. The cattiness as Raul put it, the sneering, the personal attacks. It exposes them completely. These aren't curious minds. These are insecure people clinging to authority. There's just way too much evidence spread across too many continents to keep being in denial. None of it makes sense under the current story, and that terrifies them. That's why people like Filippo Biondi scare the crap out of them because the data keeps lining up. Over 200 independent scans under the pyramids, all pointing to the same structures. At some point, denial stops being skepticism and starts being self destruction. If that data holds, the mainstream need to admit they were wrong on a foundational level. And here’s the irony. They still have a choice. They could step back, acknowledge the evidence, and say, “We may have misunderstood this.” That moment is slipping away fast. Every time they lash out, every time they smear, every time they refuse to engage honestly, they discredit themselves further. Watching it happen in real time is fascinating. Not because it’s funny, but because it’s revealing. The mainstream isn't being threatened by conspiracy theorists. It's being threatened by evidence, and instead of meeting that evidence head on, they're acting like assholes. That tells you everything you need to know. #AncientHistory #Archaeology #Gatekeepers #ForbiddenHistory #LostCivilizations #AlternativeArchaeology #MainstreamScience #HistoryUnfiltered #PyramidScans #QuestionEverything Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvhFuEp55X0&t=25s

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the discussion, the speakers note that in places like Lake Titicaca and Lebanon (Baalbek), massive ancient structures exist, yet there are few remnants of cities because later generations repurposed blocks for farms and homes. They argue that these sites are revered, and later cultures may have built atop them. They point to Baalbek as an example where enormous stones—thousand-ton stones and others up to 1,600 tons—were used in structures that were later covered by Roman buildings. The Roman documentation is described as precise, yet it does not mention these enormous stones or their placement under the structures; the stones were cut and quarried but some were never moved and seem to have been integrated into the foundations. The speakers emphasize that such stones are difficult or impossible to replicate with modern technology, even with advanced machinery. The conversation shifts to personal journeys and sources, mentioning Fingerprints of the Gods as an influence and a sense of frustration with mainstream explanations. They criticize mainstream archaeology as lazy or purposefully ignorant for not engaging with alternative evidence, arguing that conventional wisdom claimed ancient societies could not have achieved certain feats. They cite the necessity of acknowledging evidence that disrupts established narratives. The dialogue touches on the gatekeeping nature of academia and the hostility encountered online (on platforms like X), describing academics as resistant to reality and clinging to their preferred narratives. They compare this gatekeeping to other rigid systems, suggesting that older individuals claiming to be gatekeepers should not control ancient history. They argue that global archaeological findings do not fit a single, simple story. A key point is the discussion of Felipe Albiondi (Felipe Albiondi) and the subterranean scans beneath pyramids, which reportedly show consistent results across more than 200 independent studies. If these findings are correct, it would force a reconsideration of established histories. The speakers note that mainstream researchers are reluctant to admit potential errors, instead choosing to discredit new evidence. They describe this as a pattern where the debate is stuck, with proponents of alternative archaeology pressing forward while the mainstream dug in. Ultimately, they observe that a critical moment is approaching where the evidence presented—verified by numerous studies—could demand a reevaluation of long-held beliefs, but mainstream institutions continue to resist acknowledging it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Lake Titicaca and I mean, there's structures all over the place, but you're like, where were these people living? And you because there's no remnants of cities or towns. And the reason is is because in modern times, people have recommissioned the blocks and started and use them for their farms and their homes and things like that. You have a good location, a place of reverence, a play you're gonna build the next the next culture is going to build on it, you know, and I think that's happened a lot in a lot of places. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, everywhere. Right? I mean, that's Lebanon too. That's Baalbek. It's it seems to be the case that those Yeah. Those immense stones where the Romans built on top of them. But there's the Roman documentation is pretty precise. They documented everything. They never talked about these enormous thousand ton stones that are seven meters up in the air. Speaker 0: Now we're just gonna put them in the base of Speaker 1: our structure here. Right? What? They didn't even talk about them. They talked about the the these beautiful structures that are on top of that are clearly Roman, but the stuff underneath it just just defies logic. And some of the stones that were never moved and put into place that were cut and quarried Yeah. Yeah. But just never moved. 1,600 tons? Like How? Speaker 0: And things you can't replicate, you know, nowadays. It's Speaker 1: That's what's crazy. Like, with modern machinery, we can't do it. Speaker 0: I mean, it's I've always when I started this path, you know, I was you know, Fingerprints of the Gods was one of the first books I picked up. Me too. My dad had it in his library, and and and and that just that set me off on a on a course. And the the inability to be able to to I I don't know. I don't I don't buy the mainstream. It it it's it feels a little bit lazy, the the responses that that the mainstream kinda gives to some of this stuff as opposed to just saying I don't know? Speaker 1: It's purposely ignorant. It's more than lazy. Because if it was just lazy, the the I mean, they've been confronted by all this other alternative archaeology evidence and all these other people that have, like, explored these things and shown. And that there was always the conventional wisdom that there was no society back then that was capable of doing this, so they had to attribute it to more recent societies. Speaker 0: Until go back, Lee Tebbe. Yeah. Then Speaker 1: Then you're like, okay. You guys need to shut the fuck up. Speaker 0: It's I mean, the the there's a power in admitting, like, you're if we're looking for the truth here, then it's like, okay. We got this evidence that disrupts this that we thought before. Alright. Just say that. Right. You know what I mean? They can't. It it it Speaker 1: It's fascinating that they can't, you know, because they are like every other form of academia. They're they are just like I mean, you might as well be talking to a gender studies teacher. Just like they don't wanna look at reality. They just did just want their narrative, and they wanna be the gatekeepers of information, and then they just wanna push that narrative forward. And they're so mean. Speaker 0: Dude, it I only started recently being on x within the past year, and I'm just like the cattiness of it all, man. It's Well, just Speaker 1: exposes them. It exposes their personality, And they're just not the type of people that I wanna talk to about anything. Especially not you're not the gate if you're a 41 year old person, you're not the gatekeeper of ancient history. You can't be. There's too much. There's too much all over the world. It doesn't make sense. None of it makes sense. And that's, I think, why they're so terrified of people like Felipe Albiondi and the the And the scans. Scans underneath the pyramids. Because if he's right, and it appears he is, over 200 different independent scans. Yeah. And they all say the exact same thing. If he's right, you guys are fucked because you have to you're gonna eventually have to say, we're wrong. Speaker 0: It's it's you you you have a a moment here where you can choose which direction to go. Pretty soon, that moment's gonna be lost. Yeah. But it's like, this is what the evidence is presented, and like you said, verified over 200 different studies. It's like, alright. We might be wrong. Let's Right. He went Well, let's say, what they don't wanna do they don't wanna do that. Speaker 1: They're still digging their heels in, and they're just discrediting themselves, which is fascinating.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

I'm waiting... https://t.co/JZhe9Y5ybY

Video Transcript AI Summary
They discuss why there is resistance in academia to challenging ideas. The reason, they say, involves multiple factors: pride, ego, the pressure to sell books, and the entrenchment of textbook material that universities rely on. Speaker 1 adds that while it’s all of the above, a lot of it shows up online as ego and bad personalities. People who are accustomed to never being questioned and who move within a rigid academic hierarchy—tenured professors and those coming up under them—tend to enforce the same structure. Any heterodox thinker or outsider gets dismissed or criticized harshly. They frame the culture as lacking open-mindedness. Speaker 0 uses a parable-like image: a truck stuck in a tunnel blocking traffic, and a farmer who walks up and suggests letting air out of the tires to solve the problem. The point is that the reluctance to let other people bring in thoughts and opinions creates a real barrier to progress in the study of these topics. This dynamic, they argue, hinders advancement, even though the places they’ve encountered do have research and a certain level of understanding of what happened. They emphasize that bringing in a fresh set of eyes can be valuable for the field. In their view, while existing research and understanding exist, openness to new perspectives is essential, and the current resistance—rooted in ego, tradition, and hierarchical safeguards—can be a real detriment.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What's the reason behind it? Is it pride? Is it ego? It's is it because you wrote some books on it that you need to keep selling? Is it because it's in textbooks that universities use? I mean, it there's there's a lot of layers to it. Speaker 1: It's all the above, but you can tell just by the way they communicate online, a lot of it is ego. Yeah. Yeah. A lot of it is ego and just really bad personalities. You know, these people that are accustomed to never being questioned, accustomed to being in the hierarchy of academia where, you know, you have these tenured professors, and then they have the people that are coming up under them, and they all follow the same sort Speaker 0: of Yeah. Speaker 1: Rigid structure. And so any heterodox thinkers, anybody who comes in from outside the box, they just get shit all over. Speaker 0: Yeah. There's no open mindedness. I know I I don't know if this is like a parable or something, but, you know, I don't know. Some story where there's there's a truck going into a tunnel and it gets stuck. And it's backing up traffic and nobody can get through. Everybody's trying to figure out what the hell how to get this truck through. And just, you know, some some farmer walks up and he's just like, take the air out the tires. And and problem solved. And so the inability to let other people come in with with thoughts and opinions, it just it really I think it's it's a real detriment to to to the study of these things because in my approach to some of the places I've gone, I think it is that, yes, we have research. Yes. There is a level of understanding at a lot of these places what happened, but it's also that going into with a with a fresh set of eyes. You know?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@BeLikeWahter Appreciate it, thank you.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

That's odd because my last post about the Giza pyramids, I got told plenty by a bunch of people that believe everything they read in books. Take a look at how much power and how long it takes to taxi a rocket section to the launch pad and then explain to me how stones of equivalent weight and more where transported over mountains etc.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Chis138 I agree with you, there are so many similarities across so many sites.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@HopefulIdiot I think you kind of miss the point.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@KitTortuga Time to open up science and accept facts.

UAPWatchers
Posted - November 25, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Saved - November 26, 2025 at 12:48 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Chris Mellon, with 20 years in intelligence and in top Pentagon roles, says bluntly that the U.S. Air Force has hidden UAP data from Congress for decades. It’s one of the most direct statements from someone at his level, and it deserves attention.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Chris Mellon just dropped one of the most direct statements I’ve ever heard from someone at his level and it deserves attention. This is a guy who spent 20 years in the intelligence community and worked at the top of the Pentagon, and he’s saying, flat out, that the U.S. Air Force has been hiding UAP data from Congress for decades. #UAP #UFO #ChrisMellon #AgeOfDisclosure #AirForce #Congress #NationalSecurity #Transparency #SkywatchSignal #ufotwitter #uapX Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kBFgexrONyA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Mellon, a former U.S. intelligence official with about twenty years of experience in the Defense Department and on the Senate Intelligence Committee, shared remarks in response to the UAP documentary Age of Disclosure. He references the documentary’s claim that the Air Force maintained a secret program in the 1990s to track UAP near Area 51 and other sensitive military facilities, a claim attributed to General James Clapper, former Director of U.S. Air Force Intelligence and former Director of National Intelligence. Mellon asks several pointed questions about whether that secret Air Force UAP program still exists today, where the data resides, and what the Air Force has learned. He critiques the Air Force for its handling of information requests from Congress. Specifically, he notes that when Congress sought UAP information in the 2020 intelligence authorization bill, the Air Force denied possessing relevant information beyond a handful of recently submitted, non-sensitive reports issued after DoD guidance in 2020 required all military components to report UAP sightings. Mellon contends that the Air Force brass appear to treat Congress with contempt, even if not legally unlawful, and he expresses belief that the secret Air Force UAP program described by Clapper, or a similar program, remains quietly active behind the scenes. He argues this could explain several anomalies in UAP reporting. Mellon highlights incidents to illustrate his concerns: - Air Force F-22s, despite superior sensors, did not report UAP operating in DoD training areas off the East Coast, while Navy F-18s routinely detected and reported UAP on the same ranges. - The USS Princeton radar data from the Nimitz/UAP case allegedly disappeared after U.S. Air Force officers visited the ship. - There are multiple instances where Navy data was reportedly removed by Air Force personnel. - Nimitz deck logs from the period of Princeton UAP tracking in 2004 are missing. - The Air Force has reportedly never reported UAP detected by its strategic radar systems, including solid-state phased array radars with vast range and coverage, even when UAP were detected for days directly in front of these emitters. - No NORAD UAP intercept cases from recent decades were submitted with the 2021 UAP report to Congress, including the well-known UAP incident over the Bush Ranch in Texas, where F-16 pilots reportedly were compelled to sign NDAs by the Air Force. - As recently as the previous year, the Air Force refused to provide NORAD UAP intercept data to DOD’s All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office in Congress. - There are no reports of UAP in space despite a substantial U.S. Air Force space surveillance capability. - The Air Force reportedly seized Navy sonar data obtained after an encounter by a U.S. nuclear submarine with an underwater UAP. Mellon concludes that the Air Force may be withholding UAP data by placing it in an obscure, highly secret “waived special access program” inaccessible to even the chair and ranking members of the intelligence committees, or by invoking authorities such as the Atomic Energy Act to justify concealing data. He suggests the Air Force could claim to be merely the executive agent for the CIA or the National Nuclear Security Agency, creating a potential reporting gap where one agency’s claim of responsibility shifts the burden, allowing the other to deny accountability. Mellon characterizes this dynamic as a possible exploitation of a fissure in the current congressional military and intelligence reporting framework, describing it as a “deep state” mechanism that avoids full congressional visibility into UAP information.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: My name is Chris Mellon. I spent approximately twenty years in The US intelligence community, both in the Defense Department and on Capitol Hill with the Senate Intelligence Committee. The other day, I had the opportunity to see the new UAP documentary Age of Disclosure, and after reflecting on it, I prepared a few remarks that I hope will be of assistance to Congress. In the new UAP documentary Age of Disclosure, we learned that the Air Force had a secret program to track UAP in the vicinity of Area 51 and other sensitive military facilities in the 1990s. This report comes from none other than General James Clapper, former Director of U. S. Air Force Intelligence and former Director of National Intelligence. Does that secret Air Force UAPP program continue to this day? Where is the data? What did the Air Force learn? Moreover, why is it that when Congress asked the services for UAP information in their possession in the 2020 intelligence authorization bill, the Air Force denied having any pertinent information other than a handful of very recent innocuous reports submitted after DoD guidance was finally issued in 2020, requiring all military components to report UAP sightings. In my view, the Air Force brass treat Congress with contempt, even if not in a strictly illegal manner. I also believe that the secret Air Force UAP program described by General Clapper, or another like it, remains quietly active behind the scenes. I say this because it would explain a number of things. For example, why is it that Air Force F-22s, despite having greatly superior sensors, did not report UAP operating in DoD training areas off the East Coast, when Navy F-18s were routinely detecting and reporting UAP on the same ranges? Why is it the USS Princeton radar data from the Nimitz case disappeared after US Air Force officers visited the ship? In fact, there are many similar cases where Navy data was removed by US Air Force personnel. Similarly, why are the Nimitz deck logs missing for precisely the period of Princeton UAP tracking back in 2004? Why is it the Air Force never reports UAP detected by its strategic radar systems? These solid state phased array radars are believed to be the most powerful emitters on the planet. Yet despite their massive range and constant coverage, even when UAP are detected operating for days directly in front of these powerful emitters, the Air Force fails to issue any UAP reports. Why is it that none of the innumerable NORAD UAP intercept cases from recent decades were submitted with the 2021 UAP report to Congress, including the famous UAP case over the Bush Ranch in Texas, where F-sixteen pilots were made to sign NDAs by the Air Force. As recently as last year, the Air Force was still refusing to provide NORAD UAP intercept data to DOD's All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office in Congress. Why are there no reports of UAP in space, despite a massive U. S. Air Force space surveillance capability? Why is it that the Air Force seized Navy sonar data obtained after an encounter by a U. S. Nuclear submarine with an underwater UAP? In sum, I believe the Air Force is treating Congress contemptuously when it comes to dodging formal congressional requests for Air Force UAP data. It seems likely the Air Force has either carefully marshaled all of its UAP data into an obscure, highly secret, quote, waived special access program that even the chair and ranking members of the intelligence committees are not cleared for, or that the Air Force is using Atomic Energy Act or other authorities to justify concealing this UAP information. For example, the Air Force might claim they are merely the executive agent for CIA, or the National Nuclear Security Agency, and that reporting of this data is therefore not their responsibility. Their counterpart agency might claim the reverse, leaving Congress uninformed as the quote deep state exploits a fissure in the current congressional military and intelligence reporting framework.
UAPWatchers
Posted - November 22, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Saved - November 23, 2025 at 10:59 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I watched David Grusch on Fox News; he laid out statements that could stop the country in its tracks, addressing crash retrievals and bodies with no holds barred.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨David Grusch Went on Fox News and Removed Every Excuse Anyone Had Left Davi Grusch dropped the kind of statements that should make the entire country stop in its tracks. He discusses everything from crash retrievals to bodies, no holds barred. #UAP #UFOs #Grusch #Disclosure #FoxNews #Transparency #NonHuman #Congress #UAPTaskForce #TruthMatters Source Fox News: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HFIOoS7XFN4&t=161s

UAPWatchers
Posted - November 19, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Saved - November 20, 2025 at 12:15 AM

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨NASA finally showed a HiRISE image… and it’s worse than what amateurs have been posting for weeks. They spent a month talking about processing, calibration, and public transparency was promised. What we got today was a single, washed out frame that wouldn’t look out of place on a 2007 astronomy forum. Meanwhile backyard telescopes, 8 inch SCTs, and mid range CCD rigs have been pulling sharper ATLAS images since early November. If the word comet was a drinking game, nobody would’ve made it past three minutes. They hammered the safest narrative they have, comet, comet, comet, comet, please don’t look at the anomalies. This was the most generic copy paste talking points imaginable, paired with an image that somehow looks worse than amateur stacks from New Mexico and Spain. They promised clarity, they delivered a placeholder. And they clearly hope the public won’t notice the difference. #3IATLAS #NASA #HiRISE #SpaceNews #AviLoeb #Interstellar #ATLASComet

UAPWatchers
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Saved - November 16, 2025 at 4:21 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that a longtime New York businessman funded UAP research at UAlbany, backing Knuth, Szydagis, Levy, and their team who published in Progress in Aerospace Sciences this year. Eric Davis joined as visiting adjunct faculty. The donation launches UAlbany Project X (UAPx), a full academic program using radar, radiation sensors, AI, and fieldwork. UAlbany joins Harvard, Sweden, and Germany in advancing UAP science, and I’m curious to see what UAPx yields.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Big news out of Albany and it’s actually the kind that moves the needle. A longtime New York businessman just put real money behind UAP science at UAlbany. Funding for the people doing the hard work, Knuth, Szydagis, Levy, the crew that already pushed peer reviewed UAP research into Progress in Aerospace Sciences this year. They’ve now brought Eric Davis on board as visiting adjunct faculty. That alone should tell you that UAlbany isn’t messing around. The donation launches something new. UAlbany Project X (UAPx) is a full academic program dedicated to gathering real data with radar, radiation sensors, AI, and fieldwork. Harvard has a team, Sweden has one, Germany has one and now UAlbany steps in and honestly, they’re coming in hotter than anyone could of ever expected. This is exciting news for the UAP topic, let’s wait and see what comes from UAPx in the near future. Source: https://www.albany.edu/news-center/news/2025-ualbany-receives-major-gift-advance-scientific-research-unidentified-aerial #UAP #UFO #Albany #Knuth #EricDavis #UAPx #Physics #Science

UAlbany Receives Major Gift to Advance Scientific Research on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena The University at Albany has received a transformational endowment gift from longtime businessman Tony Gorman to support cutting-edge physics research on unidentified aerial phenomena. albany.edu
UAPWatchers
Posted - November 15, 2025 at 7:13 PM
Saved - November 15, 2025 at 8:21 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that The Age of Disclosure drops soon. Dan Farah says he spent three years interviewing 34 officials from military to intelligence, and they’re all saying the same thing: they’re real, they’re here, and they’re not ours. They describe craft over nuclear sites, weapons being switched on and off, recovered materials, and recovered bodies that they say were not human. It lands Nov 21 in theaters and worldwide on Prime Video. I’m skeptical but curious about Jay Stratton.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨FOX NEWS: The Age Of Disclosure The Age of Disclosure is about to drop, and the producer/director Dan Farah says he spent three years interviewing 34 high level officials, military, intelligence, people who actually had access and they’re all saying the same thing... They’re real, they’re here, and they’re not ours. These officials describe craft over nuclear sites, weapons being switched on and off, and recovered materials, even recovered bodies that they say were not human. It lands November 21 in theaters (NYC, DC, LA) and worldwide on Prime Video. Personally, I’m not expecting much from this documentary for various reasons, but I am interested in what Jay Stratton has to say. #UAP #UFO #Disclosure #AgeOfDisclosure #NationalSecurity #Whistleblowers #Congress #ReverseEngineering #NHI #UAPDisclosure Source Fox News: Watch The Full Interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdJLVRToeEU

Video Transcript AI Summary
Dan Farrah, director and producer of The Age of Disclosure, discusses his new documentary, which he says reveals an eighty-year cover-up of nonhuman intelligent life and a secret race among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of nonhuman origin. The film opens in select theaters in New York, Washington, and Los Angeles on November 21 and is available worldwide to purchase or rent on Prime Video. Farrah notes that he interviewed 34 extremely high-level military, government, and intelligence officials who have direct knowledge of the issue. Much of what they know is classified, but in the film they break their silence on what they can lawfully disclose. He states that every interviewee makes it clear that it is no longer a question of whether this is real; it is a very real situation and humanity is not the only intelligence in the universe. Nonhuman intelligence exists, UAPs are real, and they are not human. The film explores questions about who is controlling these UAPs, where they come from, and what their intention might be. Farrah explains that a long time ago the topic was moved away from congressional oversight and even away from presidential oversight, with certain elements within the government and defense contractors gatekeeping knowledge about the topic. Some officials in the film claim to have seen craft and recovered nonhuman bodies, and there are claims of crashed craft and nonhuman bodies within them. He emphasizes that having 34 credible people willing to put their name and reputation on the line constitutes strong evidence in a time when videos and photos can be created or manipulated. A major reveal in the film is that elements of the US government are in a high-stakes secret cold war with adversarial nations like China and Russia to reverse engineer technology of nonhuman origin. The discussion highlights that the first country to crack this technology could lead for years to come. China is said to have established its own UAV task force, signaling a strategic race akin to the Manhattan Project, but on “the atomic weapon on steroids.” The fear is that if another nation wins this race, it could significantly alter global power dynamics. Regarding public reception, Farrah acknowledges skepticism and stigma around the topic. For a long period, the public, Congress, and even the president were kept out of the loop, but in recent years senior Congress members and administration officials, aided by whistleblowers, have begun pursuing the truth for the American people. He suggests that it is only a matter of time before a sitting president steps forward to tell humanity that we are not alone and that the United States intends to lead the way.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The director and producer of The Age of Disclosure. Speaker 1: We've had repeated instances of something operating in the airspace over restricted nuclear facilities, and it's not ours. Speaker 2: They have both deactivated and activated nuclear weapons with both The United States and Russia. These are otherworldly things that are performing maneuvers that have haven't been seen. The UAP activity surrounding nuclear weapons is not a historic issue. It's an on going issue. Speaker 3: Well, joining us now to talk about his new film, The Age of Disclosure, is director and producer Dan Farrah. He says the documentary reveals an eighty year cover up of nonhuman intelligent life and a secret war among major nations to reverse engineer advanced technology of nonhuman origin. The film will be released in select theaters in New York, Washington, and Los Angeles on November 21. Also available worldwide to purchase and rent on Prime Video. Dan, thanks for being here. Thank you. You've been working on this for more than three years and you say this is going to be a groundbreaking documentary. Speaker 0: Yeah. Yeah. I interviewed 34 extremely high level military government intelligence officials who all have direct knowledge of this issue. Much of what they know is classified, but in this film, they break their silence on what they can lawfully disclose. Speaker 3: I mean, there's a lot of skepticism as you know. There's a lot of stigmatism about this issue. But as you're talking to all of these people and you're building these blocks for this movie, you get to the point where it's not a matter of if it's happening or if it's real? Speaker 0: Yeah. So every single person I interviewed made it very clear that it was no longer a question of whether this was a real situation. It's a very real situation. Humanity is not the only intelligence in the universe. Speaker 3: Humanity is not the only intelligent species. We are absolutely not alone. Speaker 0: Nonhuman intelligence exists. Speaker 3: UAPs are real. They're here, and they're not human. Speaker 0: The questions now are who's controlling these UAP? Where do they come from? And what is their intention? Speaker 3: This sounds I mean, it's hard for everybody to digest. And an eighty year cover up with a country that keeps it deep and dark, and it hasn't gotten out. That's the tough part for people to buy into. Speaker 0: Yeah. So a number of the officials in my film make it clear that a long time ago, this topic was moved away from congressional oversight and even away from the oversight of the president of The United States. And there are certain elements within our government and within defense contractors that have really been gatekeeping the knowledge about this topic. Speaker 3: And there are people in this film who are respected in their fields, who say they have seen these craft and have seen the recovered nonhuman bodies. Speaker 2: I have seen with my own eyes nonhuman craft and nonhuman beings. Speaker 0: They go on the record about the fact that there have been crashed craft that have been recovered. In some cases, there's been nonhuman bodies in these craft, they claim. And these are people who are putting their reputation and their names on the line. You know, often you hear people say, show me the evidence. In my opinion, 34 extremely credible people putting their name and reputation on the line is the best evidence because we live at a time where you can put a video or a photo out and everyone will half the people out there will say it's fake or AI. Speaker 3: AI and everything The title is age of disclosure. And do you think that this is going to start something bigger? The premise of this is that there is a race to reverse engineer what has been recovered by different countries essentially competing against one another. Speaker 0: Yeah. So one of the big reveals in the film that a number of the interview subjects share is that elements of the US government are in a high stakes secret cold war race with adversarial nations like China and Russia to reverse engineer technology of nonhuman origin. Speaker 2: The first country that cracks the code on this technology will be the leader for years to come. China has established its own version of a UAV task force. Speaker 3: You think for a second that they wouldn't consider using it to achieve their ends of domination? Speaker 2: This is similar to the Manhattan Project. This is the atomic weapon on steroids. Speaker 0: We won the atomic race, and we used the bomb to end World War two, and we became the definitive superpower for the next hundred years as a result. The fear here is that if another nation wins this race, it could really change the lay of the land in terms of power. Speaker 3: But for the people who are still skeptical, still can't get their head around it, they're gonna watch this. Maybe they'll have their eyes opened. But many might ask why now? Why is it happening now? Speaker 0: So for a very long time, the public, congress, and even the president have been kept out of the loop on this subject. In the last few years, senior members of congress, senior members of the administration, thanks to whistleblowers, have found out what's been going on. And they are now in pursuit of the truth for themselves and for the American people. Speaker 1: Even presidents have been operating on a need to know basis, but that begins to ramp out of control. Speaker 0: It's not acceptable to have secret parts of government that no one ever sees. I think it's only a matter of time at this point before we have a sitting president step to the microphone and have the biggest moment a leader can possibly have, which is telling all of humanity that we're not alone in the universe and that, you know, The United States intends to lead the way.
UAPWatchers
Posted - November 11, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Saved - November 11, 2025 at 7:12 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that 3I/ATLAS isn’t “obviously a comet,” but a historic anomaly: persistent non-gravitational acceleration, unusual Ni abundance, anti-tail jets, and low water—unseen in standard comets. I condemn appeals to authority, urge open data (HiRISE images, spectral data, non-gravities) and transparent math, and promote testing the null hypothesis of artificiality. Science advances by interrogating outliers, not silencing them. Science thrives on curiosity, not dogma.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 Counterpoint: “Debunking the Debunkers The Real 3I/ATLAS Anomalies” Let’s be clear from the outset, calling 3I/ATLAS just another comet isn’t science, it’s theology. And the priesthood is planetary science’s self appointed gatekeepers who think ridicule equals rigor. The “It’s Obviously a Comet” Fallacy When skeptics declare something “obvious,” it’s a signal they’ve stopped thinking. 3I/ATLAS isn’t “obviously” anything, it’s a once in history interstellar object showing persistent non-gravitational acceleration, anomalous nickel abundance, anti-tail jets, and negative polarization outside any known distribution. Declaring “all comets are weird” is not an explanation, it’s a blanket that smothers inquiry. That same logic would have dismissed Oumuamua’s lack of coma, Borisov’s hyperactivity, or even the first exoplanet as just noise. Science doesn’t advance by normalizing outliers. It advances by interrogating them. The Ad-Hominem Pivot: “Loeb Isn’t a Planetary Scientist” That is totally Irrelevant, the truth doesn’t care about your academic passport. The laws of physics apply equally to astrophysicists, planetary scientists, and the dishwasher repairman Loeb mentioned in his recent essay. If anything, the “stay in your lane” mindset is why discovery stagnates. Perhaps this is the reason SETI doesn’t yield results. The first person to model extrasolar planets wasn’t an “exoplanet scientist.” The first to map DNA wasn’t a “geneticist.” Science thrives on outsiders unafraid to question consensus. Something which the scientific community seems to be lacking in. Loeb’s critics complain he “misrepresents” comet data, yet they publish zero peer-reviewed rebuttals. Not one formal paper refuting his acceleration math or spectral findings exists in the literature. Instead, we get blogs and hit pieces, not datasets and derivations. If he’s wrong, prove it in print, with equations, not adjectives. Put your money where your mouth is and your name to your conviction. Probability Abuse and the “Comet Coincidence” Problem Critics hand wave away 3I/ATLAS’s improbable orbital alignment by calling Loeb’s statistics “atrocious.” Yet none of them run their own Monte Carlo models. It’s lazy to say “retrograde, near-ecliptic, near-planetary encounters are normal” when your sample size of interstellar comets is two prior examples. You can’t generalize from a dataset smaller than the number of fingers on your hand. If a third interstellar object happens to mirror our planetary plane within 5°, grazes Mars, and stays geometrically hidden from Earth during perihelion, you don’t shrug, you calculate the odds. That’s what Loeb did. Rejecting the math because it “feels contrived” isn’t statistics, it’s superstition. 3I/ATLAS’s Spectral Anomalies Are Measured, Not Imagined Critics claim nickel-rich plumes and water deficits are “just chemistry.” Fine, show the chemistry. Where’s the thermal model that predicts a Ni/Fe inversion by orders of magnitude? Where’s the kinetic pathway that suppresses H₂O production while maintaining CO and CN jets? Those models don’t exist because they don’t fit canonical comet physics. Invoking “comets are like cats” is not a mechanism, it’s a metaphor. A metaphor doesn’t explain 4% water content, or nickel emission lines detectable at 3 AU. The Peer-Review Shield The blog author hides behind “I consulted planetary scientists.” That’s not peer review, that’s appeal to authority wrapped in hearsay. Science isn’t a popularity contest. (Well actually maybe it is) If “zero planetary scientists give Avi’s claims any credence,” perhaps that says more about group think, than about data. The same could have been said of Wegener’s continental drift, Galileo’s heliocentrism, or Zwicky’s “missing mass.” Every paradigm shift starts as a minority report. “Anomalies Are Expected” doesn't equal “Anomalies Explained” Yes, interstellar comets will differ, but that doesn’t mean every difference is natural. Claiming “we expect it to be anomalous” is the new “God works in mysterious ways.” If every outcome is pre-excused, your hypothesis is unfalsifiable and therefore unscientific. The Character Assassination Clause The author openly admits this isn’t a scientific rebuttal but a behavioral critique: “It’s his behavior that’s the problem, not his arguments.” In other words he embarrasses you on TV. That’s not science. That’s professional jealousy dressed as epistemic virtue. Loeb’s crime is speaking directly to the public, something his critics envy but won’t admit. They call it “misleading” when he writes accessible analogies; they call it “self-promotion” when he answers mainstream media questions; and they call it “bad faith” when he refuses to bow to the Comet Club. Meanwhile, those same critics leak snide posts to blogs, cite each other in circular rebuttals, and then complain he’s “controlling the narrative.” No, he’s just the only one doing the work in public. The Real Issue: Data Suppression While they argue semantics, NASA still hasn’t released the HiRISE images taken October 2-3, 40 days ago. That’s data, not theory. And the silence isn’t scientific skepticism, it’s bureaucratic fear of confirming the unexpected. If 3I/ATLAS is so “obviously a comet,” then let’s see the raw images, the spectral breakdowns, and the exact non-gravitational coefficients from Horizons. Stop hiding behind press releases and politics. Because if you need secrecy to protect certainty, you’re not doing science. You’re guarding dogma. The Big Picture Loeb never said 3I/ATLAS is an alien spacecraft. He said the probability that it might be artificial given the data is non-zero and worth testing. That’s not conspiracy theory he is simply applying scientific method. The refusal to even entertain the null hypothesis of artificiality is what’s unscientific. It’s not about being “right.” It’s about having the courage to follow the evidence wherever it leads, even if it risks being wrong in public. Final Word So, to those who keep shouting “It’s just a comet” before the investigation’s complete: If you’re so sure, publish the models, release the data. Put your equations where your certainty is. Until then, your skepticism is theater. Loeb’s curiosity is science. #aviloeb @RepLuna @GalileoProject1 @DobsonianPower @RedCollie1 @NASA “Science dies when arrogance replaces curiosity.” Skywatch Signal

UAPWatchers
Posted - November 8, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Saved - November 8, 2025 at 9:33 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that MeerKAT detected the first confirmed radio absorption lines from interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, signaling active chemistry around a visitor from beyond our Solar System. Hydroxyl lines at 1.665 and 1.667 GHz match thermal broadening of about 230 K. NASA’s Juno will attempt follow-up in March 2026 as 3I/ATLAS swings near Jupiter. The thread shows mixed reactions, but the official line remains: not alien contact.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 BREAKING: First Radio Signal Detected from 3I/ATLAS At 04:10 UT, Oct 24 2025, South Africa’s MeerKAT Radio Telescope captured the first confirmed radio absorption lines from the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS marking the object’s official radio detection milestone. According to a report by D.J. Pisano et al., MeerKAT identified hydroxyl (OH) radicals at 1.665 GHz and 1.667 GHz, showing narrow absorption at Doppler shifts around -15.6 km/s. In other words molecules tied to water breakdown, the fingerprints of active chemistry are now confirmed around an object that originated beyond our Solar System. These OH lines align with thermal broadening consistent with 230 K surface temps. The detection came just days after solar conjunction, when 3I/ATLAS was nearly aligned with the Sun. Avi Loeb notes the object’s trajectory sits within 9° of the 1977 Wow! Signal direction. This isn’t alien contact. But it’s the first radio whisper from an interstellar visitor and it came from one of the most sensitive arrays on Earth. NASA’s Juno spacecraft will attempt a follow up scan in March 2026 as 3I/ATLAS swings near Jupiter. History just added a new data point. #3IATLAS #MeerKAT #InterstellarObject #Astronomy #RadioSignal #WowSignal #SpaceScience Sources: https://medium.com/@avi-loeb/first-radio-signal-from-3i-atlas-absorption-by-hydroxyl-radicals-oh-molecules-0e0fc6e54732 https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17473

First Radio Signal from 3I/ATLAS: Absorption by Hydroxyl Radicals (OH Molecules) First Radio Signal from 3I/ATLAS: Absorption by Hydroxyl Radicals (OH Molecules) MeerKAT, a radio telescope with a diameter of 13.5 meters operated by the South African Radio Astronomy Observatory … avi-loeb.medium.com
The Astronomer's Telegram astronomerstelegram.org

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@GWHope53 Seems I owe you an apology sir. 🫡

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@oldmangrub Yep the Hydrogen line.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Mavmetax Thank you sir 🫡

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@yanikmtandere Show me once where I stated its aliens in this click bait BS post? Quote: This isn’t alien contact.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Ellysmurfin It sure is. Also the same range I set my dogwhistle to, as it is supposed to attract the craft.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@BurrafatoKim The hydrogen line. Yep indeed it does.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@anukiranghosh There is two links there if a Harvard professor isn't valid enough try the second link. https://www.astronomerstelegram.org/?read=17473

The Astronomer's Telegram astronomerstelegram.org

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Nathansmit94376 I thought we were there already 🤔

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

A special telescope in South Africa called MeerKAT just heard something from the space visitor 3I/ATLAS a rock that came from another solar system! 🤣 It didn’t talk, but scientists picked up tiny radio waves from water molecules around it kinda like hearing a gentle whisper from far, far away. That means 3I/ATLAS isn’t just a boring rock, it’s got active stuff on it, maybe ice turning into gas or something else. Next year, NASA’s Juno spacecraft will listen again when it flies closer to see if it can catch more signals. So yeah, we just heard from another world.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@PCosmologist Consider me mind blown right now. Here I was thinking it was just water molecules.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@VinAndSori Not quite the debunk you were hoping for right?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@ProctorHopkins I got more news incoming lol

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@AnthonyM31326 It is supposed to be the frequency that gets picked up when near UFOs as well. That is what I set my dogwhistle up at lol

UAPWatchers
Posted - November 3, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Saved - November 3, 2025 at 11:15 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report a fresh agroglyph in a wheat field near Ipuaçu, Santa Catarina, early Monday. Locals woke to the familiar pattern. This town has become Brazil’s epicenter for recurring crop formations since 2008, appearing overnight, geometric and symmetrical. Researchers and ufologists are on site, measuring the layout and comparing it with previous designs.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨They’re Back New Agroglyph Appears in Ipuaçu, Brazil It’s happening again. A fresh agroglyph or crop circle, has appeared in a wheat field near the highway entrance to Ipuaçu, Santa Catarina, early Monday morning. Locals woke to see the familiar pattern pressed into the crops. This small Brazilian town has become the country’s epicenter for recurring crop formations, first documented in 2008 and returning almost every year since. Each time, they emerge overnight, geometric, symmetrical, and beyond the capabilities of local pranksters. Researchers and ufologists are already on site, measuring the layout and comparing it to previous designs. @zzzyzzyva @RedCollie1 Source: https://ndmais.com.br/ciencia-e-espaco/eles-voltaram-marca-misteriosa-reaparece-em-plantacao-e-intriga-moradores-em-sc/

Eles voltaram? Marca misteriosa reaparece em plantação em SC Agroglifo em Ipuaçu volta a surgir em uma plantação e reacende o mistério que há anos intriga moradores e ufólogos no Oeste de Santa Catarina ndmais.com.br
UAPWatchers
Posted - October 31, 2025 at 11:34 AM
Saved - October 31, 2025 at 4:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that the FBI’s Office of Private Sector is asking private companies, defense contractors, and local law enforcement to report unmanned system incursions, including UAPs, through FBI channels. The memo places UAPs alongside drones and UUVs, urging notices of anomalous craft in restricted zones with photos, videos, movement data, and operator details. It signals a civilian UAP detection network, noting recent spikes at DoD and critical infrastructure sites.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 FBI Enlists the Private Sector to Watch the Skies For UAP A newly released FBI “Office of Private Sector” memo confirms that the Bureau is now asking private companies, defense contractors, and even local law enforcement to report unmanned system incursions including UAPs through FBI channels. The document lists Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) right beside drones, UAVs, and UUVs. That means the FBI officially acknowledges UAPs as a category of unmanned system threats to U.S. installations and defense infrastructure. The guidance urges reports from any site that spots anomalous craft, hovering objects, or “unknowns” breaching restricted zones with instructions to include photos, videos, movement data, and operator information if possible. In short the FBI is building a civilian UAP detection network using the private sector as its eyes and ears. The memo notes a spike in incursions at DoD and Defense Critical Infrastructure sites in recent months echoing reports of drone swarms and metallic spheres around nuclear and research facilities. The line between drones and UAPs just got blurred in an official federal briefing. #ufotwitter #uapX Source: https://www.newsnationnow.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/108/2025/10/OPS.pdf

UAPWatchers
Posted - October 25, 2025 at 11:46 PM
Saved - October 26, 2025 at 5:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that 3I/ATLAS is visible near the Sun in Virgo, not hidden as claimed. Independent logs show it in the same frame as the Sun, mag 15, RA 13h38m44.9s, Dec –07°40′32.5″, tracked and verifiable. Observers say official briefings misled about a November 3 window; measurements indicate non-gravitational behavior and faster-than-expected motion. The data are available for all to see.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3I/ATLAS: IS NOT BEHIND THE SUN. They told us it would be hidden. Guess what? They lied. For weeks, the story was that 3I/ATLAS would slip behind the Sun on October 29, invisible, untouchable, gone. The perfect excuse to keep you from watching, bullshit🧵👇 https://t.co/btd0BxOmmJ

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

1/ At 13:25 today a team captured 3I/ATLAS right next to the Sun in Virgo, and guess what, it was visible, bright. and Trackable. It wasn't behind anything, it was in the same frame as the Sun itself. The thing they said would vanish is still here. Well who knew right?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ Every official outlet repeated it that the Solar conjunction would make observation impossible, it was too close to the Sun, so wait until November 3. That was never true. They needed the moment of silence. The window where the world would look away.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3/ An amateur astronomer logged it while NASA give us nothing. RA 13h 38m 44.9s | Dec –07° 40′ 32.5″ | Distance 2.34 AU | Mag 15.00 Spica in frame, Venus on the edge. No error and defo no fluke. 3I/ATLAS is side by side with the Sun and moving fast.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

4/ Between Oct 21–25, the team measured a 15 arc-minute offset from JPL predictions. Lateral velocity ≈ 3.95 km/s. Angular acceleration is increasing. Brightness rising faster than physics allows. Whatever this is, it isn’t coasting on gravity alone. So...

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

5/ NASA also bullshitted when they said perihelion would hide it. It won’t. On Oct 29 it will still be visible, the exact moment any craft would burn or maneuver. The most efficient deceleration window in orbital mechanics and everyone was told not to look. 😲

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

6/ Look at these timelines bro lol Oct 1-NASA shutdown, public comms go dark. Oct 16-SETI rewrites post-detection protocols. Oct 21-IAWN adds 3I/ATLAS to the planetary-defense list thefirst interstellar object ever flagged. Oct 25-Independent telescopes confirm it’s not behind the Sun. Too many coincidences for one month.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

7/ If this is just a comet, we’ll see the normal things like a predictable arc, symmetrical coma, steady and brightening. If it’s not, we’ll see controlled motion, directional light, non-gravitational thrust. Either way, it will happen in full view.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

8/ Those mofos wanted darkness, they wanted control over who speaks and what gets published. Well you know what 3I/ATLAS broke their narrative because it’s visible and it’s measurable. And this time, anyone with a scope can verify it.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

9/ Observers point your telescopes toward Virgo. Current RA 13h 38m 44.9s, Dec –07° 40′ 32.5″, Mag 15.00. Use Spica as your anchor. Record RA/Dec, brightness, and timestamp. Compare to JPL Horizons. Post what you find. Fuck the official narrative!

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

10/ They told us to wait until November 3. They told us perihelion would be in darkness. They built a communication monopoly before anyone could ask questions. Now the lie’s in the light and its our time to shine! NASA blanket can do one right?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

11/ If 3I/ATLAS behaves like a rock, fine, but if it doesn’t, you’ll see it for yourself. The data belongs to everyone now. They can’t hide what happens in the light. #defundnasa #3IATLAS #Disclosure #SkywatchSignal #Astronomy

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@ianfmusgrave It literally says in that article, it is not behind the Sun.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Harkins8Harkins It's not impossible to see. You just need the right equipment.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@loki13373 Savage is right lol

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@thePM_001 I don't believe we are living in a snow globe.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@AmiciThree Pffft NASA...

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@UmeshRadia The trouble is tigers and sneaky.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@HeliJoc Dobsonian Power will be on the case tomorrow. @DobsonianPower

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@BrianEpstein1 https://t.co/dzlGGm9P1Q

UAPWatchers
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 7:57 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note the IAA overhauled SETI post-detection protocols after 15 years, with a final vote by year’s end. The document widens from radio beacons to technosignatures and artefacts, led by Garrett, Denning, Tennen, and Oliver, updating the 1989 rules for AI, deepfakes, and social media. It requires independent verification, multi‑global archives, researcher safety, and transparency; no reply before international consultation. It signals ethics, information warfare prep, and a 2026 framework.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 SETI Just Updated the Post Detection Alien Protocols The International Academy of Astronautics just overhauled the official SETI post detection protocols for the first time in 15 years. Published October 16 2025. Final vote: before year’s end.🧵👇 #SETI #Disclosure #UAP https://t.co/3s4bZvBcYY

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ This is the document that tells scientists what to do if we detect alien intelligence. The new version expands everything from radio beacons to technosignatures of any kind, like lasers, heat signatures, megastructures, even physical artefacts.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3/ The update didn’t come from politicians or the Pentagon. It came from scientists. Jodrell Bank’s Michael Garrett, York anthropologist Kathryn Denning, space lawyer Leslie Tennen, and astrobiologist Carol Oliver led a full rewrite. Their goal is to drag the 1989 framework into the AI, deepfake, and social media era.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

4/ It’s no longer just about what happens if we find a signal. It’s about how to confirm, communicate, and survive it. The new rules: Data must be verified independently and archived in multiple global repositories. Researchers’ safety is now a formal concern. Transparency is mandatory.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

5/ It also says this, verbatim: “Pending international consultation, no reply should be sent to a confirmed detection.” Any response must go through the United Nations or other global bodies. No single government or lab can speak for Earth. That’s a major shift in tone.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

6/ Principle #7 locks the door on knee jerk “reply to ET” plans. Principle #8 adds ethics and law. And the new preamble openly admits that AI, social media, and political chaos now define how discovery will unfold. SETI is preparing for information warfare as much as contact.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

7/ The document even mentions ChatGPT, literally used during feedback analysis for community consultation. The 2025 draft was crowdsourced through surveys, early career SETI networks, and the Post Detection Hub at St Andrews. Hundreds of scientists helped write this thing.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

8/ If ratified before year’s end, the 2026 Update becomes the first globally recognized contact era framework built for our century. Presentation: IAC 2026, Antalya (Türkiye). The subtext is that they’re planning for the possibility that discovery isn’t hypothetical anymore.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

9/ The scientific language is calm, but between the lines, the message is clear. SETI is getting ready for something real. #SETI #Disclosure #SpaceNews #Extraterrestrial #Technosignatures #UAP

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

Source: https://www.arxiv.org/pdf/2510.14506

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@ChrisWalte2024 🤣😂

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@GWHope53 LMAO Its true!

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@DarKentucky Long overdue. The timing feels a bit strange though.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@NOTFallingFor1t I would assume that they just use it for bulk analysis. I don't know, but NASA already use it.

UAPWatchers
Posted - October 22, 2025 at 2:34 PM
Saved - October 22, 2025 at 4:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve followed 3I/ATLAS as it flipped from an anti-tail toward the Sun to a classic tail streaming away. Nordic Optical Telescope data (July–Sept 2025) confirm a full inversion of mass flow. Loeb and Keto model the change: CO2-driven sublimation near the Sun, with H2O-dominated scattering farther out; closer in, dust and larger grains take over. About 2 million tons lost (0.00005 of its ~33 billion-ton mass). Perihelion exposes ~33 GW of solar energy; post-perihelion glow could redefine the object’s nature.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 3I/ATLAS Just Flipped Its Jet From Anti-Tail to Tail Something just changed with 3I/ATLAS. The interstellar object that’s been ejecting a sunward jet, an anti-tail pointing toward the Sun has flipped. Now it’s producing a classic tail, streaming away from the Sun. 🧵👇

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ New images from the Nordic Optical Telescope in the Canary Islands confirm the shift. Between July and September 2025, 3I/ATLAS transitioned from ejecting material toward the Sun to ejecting it away. A complete inversion of its mass-flow geometry.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3/ Avi Loeb and Eric Keto modeled the change. Their data shows sublimation, mostly CO₂ driving massive ice ejection as the object nears the Sun. At 3-4 AU, sublimation of H₂O ice dominates the scattering signal. Closer in, the short-lived ice gives way to refractory dust and larger grains. The tail turns, the object heats up and the physics shifts.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

4/ Loeb’s colleague Adam Hibberd raised a question that nobody inside NASA will touch. If 3I/ATLAS were an engineered probe slowing down, the anti-tail would be braking thrust. The new tail, forward propulsion. Exactly what you’d expect near perihelion.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

5/ The total mass loss so far is about 2 million tons. That’s 0.00005 of the object’s total mass, barely a skin layer peeled off a 5km body weighing 33 billion tons. The glow we see could be nothing more than exhaust residue from a small surface layer of ablation. Whatever’s beneath remains hidden.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

6/ Loeb estimates the surface will face 33 gigawatts of solar radiation at perihelion, that’s industrial scale energy. If 3I/ATLAS stays stable under that heat, or shows any sign of course control as it rounds the Sun… then we’re no longer looking at a comet. We’re looking at a maneuver.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

7/ Loeb’s next test comes after perihelion on Oct 29 and closest Earth approach Dec 19. If the post-solar side of 3I/ATLAS glows naturally, he’ll downgrade it on the Loeb Scale to Rank 2. If not and the jet reversals, brightness dips, and geometric emissions persist, then the scale won’t be enough. #3IAtlas #AviLoeb #UAP #Interstellar #Disclosure Source: https://medium.com/@avi-loeb/the-anti-tail-of-3i-atlas-turned-to-a-tail-9ad2479b6633

The Anti-tail of 3I/ATLAS Turned to a Tail! The Anti-tail of 3I/ATLAS Turned to a Tail! New images of the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS, taken by the 2.5 meter diameter Nordic Optical Telescope, in the Canary Islands, Spain (accessible here) … avi-loeb.medium.com

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@EricPedersen81 Hahah yup, onto the next thing by then.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@DocDtheWriter I love the speculation. A Sun scoop top-off would explain the anti tail as braking/plasma intake, then a classic tail after the burn.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@craziicraka Shaking the money maker.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@redchessqueen99 "A big ball of interdimensional fuckery." I am using that from now on.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@znmead I sure do hope so.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Kerriolivier I got to admit, I'm not seeing it either.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@The_Griffin__ Data from older images.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@OZARGPT Yeah that's correct.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@SteveHaverty https://t.co/X9MOs4EHmw

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ New images from the Nordic Optical Telescope in the Canary Islands confirm the shift. Between July and September 2025, 3I/ATLAS transitioned from ejecting material toward the Sun to ejecting it away. A complete inversion of its mass-flow geometry.

UAPWatchers
Posted - October 15, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Saved - October 17, 2025 at 2:04 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m noting Sabine Hossenfelder’s take: with 3I/ATLAS, data has become more unusual the more we collect. Nickel and iron shedding, CO2 and water oddities, a tail pointing at the Sun, unprecedented polarization. She emphasizes the real issue: not considering alien tech just to doubt Avi Loeb could be humanity’s biggest mistake. Data doesn’t add up; something’s off, and calling it “just a comet” misses it.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Sabine Hossenfelder: Just said what a lot of scientists won’t about 3I/ATLAS “The more data we have, the more unusual it’s become.” “It’s shedding nickel and iron at an exceptional rate.” “Its tail points toward the Sun, possibly seen for the first time.” “It changes the polarization of light in an unprecedented way.” She’s talking about 3I/ATLAS, the interstellar object drifting through our system right now. It’s not behaving like any comet we’ve seen. With nickel, iron, CO₂, and water in weird ratios. A tail facing the wrong way. Polarization that makes no physical sense. Then she highlights what really matters: “Not looking at a piece of alien tech because we don’t want Avi Loeb to be right could be the single biggest mistake our civilization ever makes.” That’s a warning from a physicist who usually debunks this stuff. Even she’s saying the data doesn’t add up. Something’s off with 3I/ATLAS, and everyone pretending it’s “just a comet” knows it. Source: https://www.youtube.com/clip/UgkxcCOojusX8o8bKqALgRjCBov1ZpS4oEHa #3IATLAS #SabineHossenfelder #AviLoeb #UAP #InterstellarObject #Disclosure #Astrophysics

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses 3I/Atlas, an interstellar object detected entering our solar system. Most astrophysicists consider it a comet, a body of ice that sublimates near the Sun to produce a tail, but 3I/Atlas shows several unusual features. Key observations from recent studies: - It is shedding nickel and iron at an exceptional rate, and it emits carbon dioxide and water in an unusual ratio, which some researchers say could resemble exhaust from a propulsion system. - The object’s light polarization changes in a way that researchers call unprecedented among asteroids and comets. - Its tail is pointing toward the Sun, even though it is still far from the Sun, an uncommon characteristic observed for the first time by some. - It followed an unusual trajectory, skimming close to Mars, Jupiter, and Venus, and it will reach its closest approach to the Sun on October 29, near the Sun’s far side relative to Earth. It is moving unusually fast and, unlike typical comets, does not appear to tumble as much and may exhibit some self-illumination, though such claims are speculative and described as far-out. The speaker notes this is only the third interstellar object observed, so comparisons are limited. While 3I/Atlas is the fastest of the three, the significance of its proximity to the planetary plane is unclear—some say it’s near the plane because of detection biases, while others question why it would approach those planets so closely if not on a deliberately chosen orbit. The possibility that it could be space junk or a piece of alien technology is raised as a speculative hypothesis, with some voting for it as a scenario worth serious consideration, though there is no evidence supporting alien technology. Most plausible explanation offered is that 3I/Atlas is a comet distinct from those previously observed. However, the speaker cautions against dismissing the alien-tech possibility too quickly, arguing that scientists tend to emphasize Type II errors (failing to reject a false hypothesis) and sometimes ignore Type I errors (rejecting a true hypothesis). They illustrate this with examples, noting that a hypothesis can persist in science if it is rejected, and warn that not acknowledging a potential truth about extraterrestrial tech could be a major civilization-level mistake. In short, 3I/Atlas exhibits several extraordinary and puzzling features that prompt continued scrutiny, with competing interpretations ranging from a highly unusual comet to the provocative, albeit unproven, possibility of alien technology.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The three eye atlas. This is why astrophysicists are confident it really came from far away. But just what is it? Most astrophysicists think it's a comet, that's a body mostly made of ice, which starts evaporating as it gets closer to the Sun, which then creates the characteristic comet tail. But if it's a comet, it's an odd comet. In a study that just appeared on the archive, astrophysicists report that 3A atlas is shedding nickel and iron at a rate they call exceptional. It also emits carbon dioxide and water in a ratio that researchers have called unusual and that some say would fit to being exhaust from a propulsion system. Yet another recent paper found that the object changes the polarization of light in a way that they call unprecedented among asteroids and comets. Yet another oddity is that despite still being far away from the Sun, Three Eye Atlas has developed a tail that's pointing towards the Sun rather than away from it. Astrophysicists have described this as not common and possibly observed for the first time. All this comes after 3i Atlas was found to be on an unusual trajectory almost in the plane of our solar system coming close to three planets, Mars, Jupiter, and Venus. It'll reach its closest approach to the sun on October 29, pretty much on the opposite side of the sun as we are, and it's moving unusually fast. Some have argued that it doesn't seem to be tumbling around as much as one would expect or that it seems to have some self illumination, but these claims are really far out there, maybe somewhere in the Oort Cloud. Still, even if we take only what we read in the astrophysics papers, this sounds suspicious, does it? Unusual, unprecedented, exceptional, observed for the first time. How many oddities does it take for an object to warrant extra scrutiny? So what are we to make of this? Let's start with a question of how unusual the object actually is. For this, we have to ask unusual compared to what? This is only the third interstellar object we've ever seen. We don't have much to compare it to. Yes, it's the fastest of those three, but so what? Why is it so close to the plane in which the planets lie? Quite possibly because if it wasn't, we wouldn't have seen it. Why does it get so close to these three planets? Let me ask you in return: if this was a deliberately chosen and designed orbit, why does it stay away from Earth, the one planet in the habitable zone? That doesn't make any sense. Maybe they're afraid of us and trying to hide. Well, they're not doing a good job at it, do they? That leaves the possibility that it's a piece of space junk. Personally, I think it's highly likely that there are other intelligent civilizations in our galaxy. They almost certainly have explorer missions, and more importantly, there must be lots of tech debris flying around in interstellar space. But a broken alien spaceship might just drift through our solar system is unlikely, but not impossible. I think it's a hypothesis we should seriously consider. Let me be clear, we have no evidence that 3i Atlas is alien technology. The most plausible explanation is that it's a comet different from those we've seen before. But I worry that astrophysicists may be too eager to dismiss the alien tech possibility. I worry about this because scientists tend to overstress Type two errors and typically ignore the risk of Type one errors. A Type two error is when you have a hypothesis that's false but you don't reject it. Vaccines cause autism is a typical example. Scientists are all over these errors all the time. Whenever they say no science has not shown this or that, they're coming after type two errors. Basically they have a big hammer labeled insufficient evidence and they enjoy using it. A type one error on the other hand is when you have a hypothesis that's true and you erroneously reject Bacteria can cause stomach ulcers was an example of a Type I error. These errors can persist in science for a long time because a hypothesis that's been rejected is one that doesn't attract attention among scientists anymore. They tend to not think about the consequences of failing to acknowledge a truth. So this is what I worry about when it comes to alien technology: Not looking at a piece of alien tech because we don't want AviLib to be right could be the single biggest mistake that our civilization can ever make.
UAPWatchers
Posted - October 12, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Saved - October 14, 2025 at 6:03 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m reporting on Maussan’s live reveal about the Buga Sphere: a 12,560-year-old object with proto-Sanskrit glyphs claiming a historic catastrophe and a future warning. Tests describe an ultra-pure aluminum alloy with rare earths, a possible solid-state resonator, and embedded microfibers. A replica is planned at the landing site; eye-witness Don José felt dizzy. Lab data, skies filled with spheres, and a decoded message speak of great oceans, end and renewal, possibly linked to Younger Dryas.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨The Buga Sphere: 12,560 Years of Silence Breaks on Live TV Jaime Maussan just went live from Mexico City, and what he revealed about the Buga Sphere might change how we look at human history. This one had everything from metallurgy that shouldn’t exist, writing older than language itself, and a message that sounds like a warning from the past. 🧵👇

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ Live from Garden Santa Fe, Maussan opened No Humano saying they finally identified the symbols carved into the top of the Buga Sphere. They’re not random marks, they’re proto-Sanskrit, the root of the oldest written language known to man.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3/ He says the glyphs tell a story that dates back 12,560 years. Not mythology, but an account of something catastrophic that happened on Earth and possibly a message left behind for whoever came next.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

4/ The tests that followed were just as wild. According to documents shared with Maussan by Dr Steven Greer, U.S. labs found that the sphere is built from high-grade refined aluminum blended with rare-earth elements like cerium, yttrium, and neodymium. Alloy work that, by our timeline, shouldn’t exist.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

5/ Aluminum smelting wasn’t invented until 1886. Yet the carbon dating on the resin fused to the object comes back at 12,560 years old. That means whoever made it had tech far beyond anything we can account for.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

6/ Engineer Rodolfo Garrido went on air showing micrographs of the metal, he said the refinement level is non-natural. His words: “To refine aluminum this pure, you need an industry of high sophistication.” But the sphere predates every known civilization.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

7/ He added something that stunned even Maussan. The sphere’s rare earth mix mirrors materials used today for electromagnetic resonance devices. He called it a solid-state resonator. In other words, it wasn’t just decorative, it was functional.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

8/ Local officials in Alto Bonito have approved construction of a replica monument at the exact site where the sphere allegedly landed. The ground there is still dead, no vegetation even with six months of rain, still nothing grows there.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

9/ The man who found it was Don José, a street vendor who sells peanuts. He described picking it up, feeling dizzy, with a metallic taste in his mouth, and nausea. He still works the same job. He never asked for fame or money. Just said, “I knew it wasn’t from here.”

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

10/ Back in the lab, 111 pages of metallurgical and fiber-optic analysis are now complete. Fiber optics thinner than a human hair, are embedded in an object supposedly made when humanity still hunted mammoths.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

11/ Meanwhile, in the skies, new footage of spheres over Los Angeles, Sydney, Poland, Italy, and Uruguay. Maussan calls them sensors. He says they’re cataloguing Earth and not visiting for the first time, but checking back in.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

12/ The decoded proto-Sanskrit that is still being finalized by archaeologist Agnese Sartori and Dr Jaime Vizcaya, reportedly speaks of “Great oceans moving,” “The end of one world and the birth of another,” and “a great gift delivered to humanity.”

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

13/ Vizcaya told Maussan privately that the message may describe the same global event that ended the Pleistocene, the Younger Dryas cataclysm. The symbols show a broken circle with a dot inside meaning destruction followed by renewal.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

14/ Maussan’s team insists they’ll keep the investigation open. No secrecy, no gatekeeping, they’ll publish every test and translation. He invites skeptics, scientists, and anyone with credentials to test the data themselves.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

15/ At the end of the broadcast he looked straight at camera and said: “This is one of the greatest discoveries of all time. We are only beginning to understand who made it.” Whatever the Buga Sphere is, artifact, device, or message, it’s rewriting the timeline piece by piece.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

16/ They have the receipts, they are following up with lab testing. What do you think, is the Buga sphere a real object or an elaborate hoax? Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW9vGQR4ALc #BugaSphere #JaimeMaussan #UAP #Colombia #ProtoSanskrit #StevenGreer #UFOs #NoHumano #Disclosure #AncientTechnology

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@RedCollie1 You say that, it reminds me of one of the crop circles that looked like dimensions overlapping. I am sure you will know the one I am talking about?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@real_TI_28 I get you, Greer and Jaime. Lab testing should over rule and personal judgement though. If they can prove everything via lab testing, then we have to accept it.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@UAPWixy If all timelines converged it would be sucked into a super massive black hole! Think Lizzo...

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@huwhitememes I counter your bill and ted with a .... https://t.co/3dhbKELZ3L

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@SStknstx Yeah the timeline fits.

UAPWatchers
Posted - October 10, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Saved - October 11, 2025 at 6:12 PM

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Rep. Tim Burchett Speaks Openly About The Pitfalls Of Disclosure Tim Burchett speaks openly about the disinformation campaigns. The red herrings, the possible traps and shares his thoughts about disclosure and why he feels like it won't happen. #ufotwitter #uapX Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O3eiFAl2JtQ

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 says he spoke to eight or nine, ten maybe, military personnel about personal experiences with these things. He notes a disinformation campaign run by whomever to discredit researchers, saying they tried to destroy their careers, and cites a weekly newspaper reporter finding out that one of the guys suffered from PTSD, a cover of his military career, calling it a total violation of the law. He argues Washington DC destroys heroes and urges real whistleblower protection. He mentions two whistleblowers living outside the country and that people have come to him at the Longworth Building or at his East Tennessee home; scientists showed footage of aircraft flying at crazy speeds that would turn you into a ketchup package due to g-forces. He believes nothing will happen until someone in the White House discloses it, and he says he hopes President Trump has private discussions; they want some answers.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So how many military personnel have you spoken to about their personal experiences with these things? Speaker 1: I'd say, well, I don't know, eight or nine, ten maybe. You know? But I have to be real careful because I'm I'm clearly somebody out there, and I'm not backing down on it. I'm not ashamed of it or anything, but I don't Speaker 0: You have no reason to be ashamed of it. No. Why would you be ashamed Speaker 1: of Well, that's what they try to do is they try to shame people. Speaker 0: Oh, are are you are you hiding relevant secrets from the American public? I don't think you are. No. But why are they ashamed? Speaker 1: Well, I have to be careful about the white flags, the stuff they bring stuff bring people bring me that's not real. Speaker 0: Well, that that's that's why we're talking to you. Speaker 1: Yeah. Well, that's it. Speaker 0: A lot of people come to me with stuff like that. Speaker 1: Yeah. And I got these pictures, and I wanna show you this. I've got this you know, I'm always afraid I'm gonna end up on a in a refrigerator up in North Carolina or freezer in North Carolina somewhere, you know, because I I don't I'm not going up there and checking out some guy's finds he's got. And I'm you know? And but So wait. But do Speaker 0: you so I think what you're saying is the disinformation campaign run by whomever Speaker 1: It's real. Speaker 0: Well, it's definitely real. And I assume it's run by the US government or its satellites and the defense contractors. But part of the way that they discredit people who are interested in finding out what this is is by telling them false things. And then Speaker 1: They tried to destroy their careers. They did that to one of our guys, one of the the very first person the first hearing we had, if you remember, some weekly newspaper reporter found out that one of the guys suffered from PTSD a cover of his military career. You know what? In Tennessee, we embraced that. My daddy fought on Pella in Okinawa. Until the day he died, I never woke him up over the top of him. I always woke him up by his big toe because he might have woke up on one of those dadgum islands and pinned me up against the wall. Speaker 0: I believe that. Speaker 1: And so and we celebrate our our our heroes. And but Washington DC just destroys them. And to think that a weekly newspaper found out this guy's medical history, which is a total violation of the law, somebody should go to jail for it, but nobody did. They tried to destroy this guy. And that's and, you know, that's what happens to people in Washington DC. That's what happens to our military heroes when they step out of line because of the the sewer or deep state or whatever you wanna call it. But that that that's what they and that's why we need we need real whistleblower protection for them. Speaker 0: Well, I agree with that completely, which we don't have. No. And by the way, I know two whistleblowers who are living outside the country because they can't come to The United States. Sure. They'll be Speaker 1: And I'll have people actually I've had people call me. One last thing. I'm in the Longworth Building. It's no secret. It's public record. But I've had people that'll call me or send a message to me and wanna come by, and they won't come in there. They'll ask me if I can come outside. I've had people call me and wanna come to the house in East Tennessee because they don't wanna come to Washington, DC, and talk to me. There's a well publicized television show that was on for a while that I didn't know they were coming. I mean, they said some people wanted to talk to me, it was a trusted friend, And I said, sure, send them, bring them up, come on up to DC. And I said, well, they don't want come to DC. And they drove from wherever to my house in East Tennessee on a Saturday afternoon, and then they put some stuff on a screen that was pretty compelling. What was it? It was aircraft flying at just crazy stuff that we can't do that would turn you or me into basically a ketchup package. It was not. Speaker 0: No human being could handle the g No. Speaker 1: Not at our well, with the technology we have, the g force would just have just torn apart. And, you know, was it was it unmanned or whatever? I don't know. But these guys and one of them was a well, they were scientists. Several of them were scientists. There's They Speaker 0: came to see you. Speaker 1: They came to see me. Yep. And our because it's kind of Speaker 0: Wait. So what do do with that information? Speaker 1: I try to grasp it within my very small brain of, and what am I supposed to do with that? Ask God all the time, what do you want me to do with this stuff, Lord? And right now, I'm just gotta get enough disclosure. I've come to the realization that nothing is ever gonna happen, Tucker, until we have somebody in the White House that says enough is enough and just discloses it. And I hope president Trump you know, I've had discussions with him privately and other times, and I'm not I've talked to his people, but at some point, there's several of us, Luna, myself, and several others that are concerned about this issue, and we want some answers.
UAPWatchers
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 8:38 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss recent unidentified incursions over Denmark and New Jersey, emphasizing that I won't label them as drones. In Copenhagen, the airport was shut down for four hours due to 2-3 massive unidentified objects that witnesses compared to the size of an A380. Meanwhile, residents in New Jersey are reporting various strange crafts near JFK, including orbs and aircraft-shaped objects. The government attributes these sightings to Russia or China without any evidence, and radar systems are unable to track these objects entering or leaving secure airspace.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Ross Coulthart: Unidentified Giants in Our Skies Denmark & New Jersey Under Siege Ross Coulthart discusses the recent incursions over Denmark, and he refuses to call them drones. Copenhagen’s airport was shut down for 4 hrs last week after 2-3 huge unidentified objects entered restricted airspace. Witnesses said they were the size of an A380. The same week, New Jersey residents still report strange craft near JFK, some orbs, some aircraft shaped. The govs blame Russia/China with zero proof. Radar can’t track these objects coming in or going out. Something’s flying over secure airspace & no one knows what it is. #UAP #Denmark #NewJersey #Area51 #Drones #UFO

Video Transcript AI Summary
Viewer Andrew reached out to us on X, asking, "Ross, do you believe the New Jersey drone incursions and the recent Denmark incursions all related or connected? Asking because the drones are still flying over my house in New Jersey." The response centers on uncertainty: "We don't know yet, and that's the whole point." The speaker questions why governments link these unidentified objects to foreign state actors like Russia or China and asks, "Where is the evidence?" and notes, "As the president has said, they don't know what it is." In Copenhagen (Sept 22–23), there were "sightings of two to three large unidentified objects near the Copenhagen Airport" that "shut down that airport for four hours and about a 100 flights were disrupted." Danish authorities "immediately referred to it as an attack" and are "pointing the finger at Russia," with a nearby "bulk Russian carrier crewed by Russian crewmen" claimed to be involved, and "this strains credibility." The discussion cites ongoing U.S. incursions, including "anomalous objects" near JFK and reports of "orb like objects" near Eglin AFB, emphasizing "flight safety" and "national security concerns" and stating, "we have no idea what was responsible."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Viewer Andrew reached out to us on X. He said, Ross, do you believe the New Jersey drone incursions and the recent Denmark incursions all related or connected? Asking because the drones are still flying over my house in New Jersey. Speaker 1: Good question. We don't know yet, and that's the whole point. Why are governments repeatedly, as happened in CONUS in The United States, asserting that these objects, I'm not going to call them drones, are in fact linked to foreign state actors like Russia or China. Where is the evidence? As the president has said, they don't know what it is. Okay, so what are we talking about? We're talking about how in Copenhagen, Denmark, on September 22 through to twenty third this year, there were sightings of two to three large unidentified objects near the Copenhagen Airport in Denmark. It shut down that airport for four hours and about a 100 flights were disrupted. And there were similar disruptions. There were follow on disruptions at other airports around Scandinavia. Now, the Danish authorities immediately referred to it as an attack and they're pointing the finger at Russia. And the suggestions that because there was a bulk Russian carrier crewed by Russian crewmen about 80 kilometers away, that somehow these dastardly Ruskies have been able to insert a drone into some of the most secure airspace in Denmark, a country which has some of the world's best radar, and somehow get those drones in without detection and out without detection. This strains credibility. Now, obviously there's the beginning of the disinformation. They're now trying to claim it might have been civilian aircraft, and there's the usual suspects, the squawking seagull crowd, who basically suggest that we're all hysterical and that it's all a big confusion about nothing. I was talking to my friend who helped us with the Greenland story, lawyer and investigator Martin Kleist earlier this week, and Martin was at Copenhagen Airport right at the very moment that all of this was going down. And he said that the police and military response was hysterical. There was absolute out of control concern. This wasn't just a drone flap. There's a lot more behind all of this. He said that at one stage, he was accosted by a special forces policeman who demanded to know, what did you see? What did you see? I'm going to be hopefully talking to Martin later in the week. But what's really interesting is the correlation between the Copenhagen incident and dare I say it, the slightly less frequent, but still ongoing incursions in Continental United States. Contrary to the disinformation that's being put out by certain agencies, this has not gone away. I am still in touch with people, including police and local government in New Jersey. They're telling me they're still seeing these My friends, John and Jerry Tadesco are still seeing these anomalous objects, including in the flight paths on the approach to Kennedy Airport at New York. This is serious. And this is why this matters. The whole issue of UAPs, of unidentified objects making incursions over secure airspace, especially crowded passenger airports like Copenhagen or JFK New York. This raises really grave flight safety national security concerns. And it's a huge concern when governments start defaulting to the explanation that it's the dastardly Ruskies, or as happened in New Jersey, the dastardly Chinese. Where is your bloody evidence? Why make these allegations without any proof? The simple fact is I am being told by multiple sources, we have no idea what was responsible for the New Jersey incursions and the incursions that are still ongoing across different parts of The United States, including over military bases. I've spoken to somebody two days ago who's been sending me videos from Florida near Eglen Air Force Base. These incursions, whatever they are, may not necessarily be drones. There are people that have described to me seeing orb like objects coming into airspace, and then in some way morphing into shapes of aircraft.
UAPWatchers
Posted - September 28, 2025 at 3:30 PM
Saved - September 28, 2025 at 8:03 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Ross Coulthart reports on recent unidentified aerial incursions over Denmark and New Jersey, describing them as large objects, comparable in size to an A380, that prompted the temporary shutdown of Copenhagen's airport. Witnesses have observed various strange crafts, including orbs and aircraft-shaped objects, near JFK Airport. Authorities attribute these incidents to Russia or China without providing evidence, while radar systems fail to track the unidentified objects entering or leaving secure airspace.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨Ross Coulthart: Unidentified Giants in Our Skies Denmark & New Jersey Under Siege Ross Coulthart discusses the recent incursions over Denmark, and he refuses to call them drones. Copenhagen’s airport was shut down for 4 hrs last week after 2-3 huge unidentified objects entered restricted airspace. Witnesses said they were the size of an A380. The same week, New Jersey residents still report strange craft near JFK, some orbs, some aircraft shaped. The govs blame Russia/China with zero proof. Radar can’t track these objects coming in or going out. Something’s flying over secure airspace & no one knows what it is. #UAP #Denmark #NewJersey #Area51 #Drones #UFO

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Viewer Andrew asked, 'do you believe the New Jersey drone incursions and the recent Denmark incursions all related or connected?' ... 'because the drones are still flying over my house in New Jersey.' 'Where is the evidence? As the president has said, they don't know what it is.' In Copenhagen, 'September 22 through to twenty third this year, there were sightings of two to three large unidentified objects near the Copenhagen Airport in Denmark.' It 'shut down that airport for four hours and about a 100 flights were disrupted.' The Danish authorities 'immediately referred to it as an attack and they're pointing the finger at Russia.' 'There was a bulk Russian carrier crewed by Russian crewmen about 80 kilometers away.' 'This strains credibility.' 'There’s the beginning of the disinformation.' The scene near Copenhagen was 'hysterical' — 'The police and military response was hysterical.' 'There are people that have described to me seeing orb like objects coming into airspace, and then in some way morphing into shapes of aircraft.' 'Where is your bloody evidence?' 'These incursions, whatever they are, may not necessarily be drones.' 'My friends, John and Jerry Tadesco are still seeing these anomalous objects, including in the flight paths on the approach to Kennedy Airport at New York.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Viewer Andrew reached out to us on X. He said, Ross, do you believe the New Jersey drone incursions and the recent Denmark incursions all related or connected? Asking because the drones are still flying over my house in New Jersey. Speaker 1: Good question. We don't know yet, and that's the whole point. Why are governments repeatedly, as happened in CONUS in The United States, asserting that these objects, I'm not going to call them drones, are in fact linked to foreign state actors like Russia or China. Where is the evidence? As the president has said, they don't know what it is. Okay, so what are we talking about? We're talking about how in Copenhagen, Denmark, on September 22 through to twenty third this year, there were sightings of two to three large unidentified objects near the Copenhagen Airport in Denmark. It shut down that airport for four hours and about a 100 flights were disrupted. And there were similar disruptions. There were follow on disruptions at other airports around Scandinavia. Now, the Danish authorities immediately referred to it as an attack and they're pointing the finger at Russia. And the suggestions that because there was a bulk Russian carrier crewed by Russian crewmen about 80 kilometers away, that somehow these dastardly Ruskies have been able to insert a drone into some of the most secure airspace in Denmark, a country which has some of the world's best radar, and somehow get those drones in without detection and out without detection. This strains credibility. Now, obviously there's the beginning of the disinformation. They're now trying to claim it might have been civilian aircraft, and there's the usual suspects, the squawking seagull crowd, who basically suggest that we're all hysterical and that it's all a big confusion about nothing. I was talking to my friend who helped us with the Greenland story, lawyer and investigator Martin Kleist earlier this week, and Martin was at Copenhagen Airport right at the very moment that all of this was going down. And he said that the police and military response was hysterical. There was absolute out of control concern. This wasn't just a drone flap. There's a lot more behind all of this. He said that at one stage, he was accosted by a special forces policeman who demanded to know, what did you see? What did you see? I'm going to be hopefully talking to Martin later in the week. But what's really interesting is the correlation between the Copenhagen incident and dare I say it, the slightly less frequent, but still ongoing incursions in Continental United States. Contrary to the disinformation that's being put out by certain agencies, this has not gone away. I am still in touch with people, including police and local government in New Jersey. They're telling me they're still seeing these My friends, John and Jerry Tadesco are still seeing these anomalous objects, including in the flight paths on the approach to Kennedy Airport at New York. This is serious, and this is why this matters. The whole issue of UAPs, of unidentified objects making incursions over secure airspace, especially crowded passenger airports like Copenhagen or JFK New York. This raises really grave flight safety national security concerns. And it's a huge concern when governments start defaulting to the explanation that it's the dastardly Ruskies, or as happened in New Jersey, the dastardly Chinese. Where is your bloody evidence? Why make these allegations without any proof? The simple fact is I am being told by multiple sources, we have no idea what was responsible for the New Jersey incursions and the incursions that are still ongoing across different parts of The United States, including over military bases. I've spoken to somebody two days ago who's been sending me videos from Florida near Eglen Air Force Base. These incursions, whatever they are, may not necessarily be drones. There are people that have described to me seeing orb like objects coming into airspace, and then in some way morphing into shapes of aircraft.

@PalamarJoey - Palamar Joey

@UAPWatchers https://t.co/mlYdot9DrC

UAPWatchers
Posted - September 21, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Saved - September 24, 2025 at 4:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The Buga Sphere's resin sample has been dated to 12,560 years old, based on a recent radiocarbon lab report. This finding predates significant historical milestones, including the Great Pyramid and Gobekli Tepe. The dating falls within the Younger Dryas, a time of climate upheaval when early human societies were forming. The rigorous testing process confirms the sample's authenticity, suggesting it carries ancient organic material. This raises questions about its creators and aligns with myths of lost civilizations and advanced cultures. The Buga Sphere challenges our understanding of history and technology.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

🚨 The Buga Sphere Resin Sample Just Got Dated: 12,560 Years Old This isn’t a rumor, it’s straight from a radiocarbon lab report dated Sept 19, 2025. What they found changes everything we thought we knew.🧵👇

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

1/ A resin sample pulled directly from the Buga Sphere was tested by Sirius Technology Advanced Research, LLC. The result shows it dated to 12,560 years Before Present. That’s roughly 10,600 BC give or take a few.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

2/ For perspective here is a comparison: The Great Pyramid: 4,500 years old. Gobekli Tepe: 11,500 years old. The Buga Sphere’s resin, 12,560 years old. This thing predates written history, dynasties, and even agriculture.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

3/ The dating falls squarely into the Younger Dryas, a period of massive climate upheaval. Glaciers melting, megafauna dying, and humans just beginning to form the first sacred sites. The Buga Sphere was already here.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

4/ The test isn’t sloppy guesswork. The sample was treated with HCl, cleaned, and burned at 900°C. Graphite conversion, measured by accelerator mass spectrometer. Compared against official Oxalic Acid standards. ±30 years uncertainty. That’s razor sharp.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

5/ The lab notes the resin carried a pMC of 20.94. For non scientists, that’s a measure of modern carbon left in it. 100% is living material, 20% means this is dead ancient. No chance of modern contamination.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

6/ It means the Buga Sphere isn’t some modern hoax. It carries organic material that pushes it back into a world before civilization a time when mainstream science says humans weren’t capable of such work. Now the engraving makes sense right?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

7/ Picture mammoths roaming around, comets striking the Earth, ice sheets still smothered the north… Someone, or something, left behind a sphere with internal mechanics we still don’t understand. If this doesn't give you goosebumps, nothing will!

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

8/ The official report was signed by Dr. Alexander Cherkinsky, a senior research scientist in radiocarbon studies. This is as legitimate as it gets. This is the same process used to date fossils, ancient cities, and sacred sites across the world.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

9/ If the Buga Sphere is real and the science now says it is ancient, then we’re forced to confront a brutal question. Who built it, and why?

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

10/ The date aligns with myths of floods, cataclysms, and lost civilizations. It aligns with Hancock’s warnings about an advanced culture erased at the end of the Ice Age. It aligns with rumors that non human intelligence has been here far longer than us.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

11/ The Buga Sphere isn’t just an anomaly, it’s evidence. Evidence that pushes the timeline of human, or non-human technology back more than 12,500 years.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

12/ Call it what you want, an artifact, relic, or alien tech. But the science is clear. The Buga Sphere carries a fingerprint from an age when we weren’t supposed to exist in this way. Something doesn’t add up. Receipts in next post.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

13/ Dr Alexander Cherinksy: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alexander-Cherkinsky Source: https://myemail.constantcontact.com/Astounding-report-on-Buga-Sphere.html?soid=1109615552303&aid=ClbIh3ChNkI #ufotwitter #uapX #Bugasphere

Constant Contact : File Not Found myemail.constantcontact.com

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@HuguesPrevost I have covered it from the start: https://uapwatchers.com/?s=Buga+sphere

Buga Sphere / UAP Watchers uapwatchers.com

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@rasmurtech That date fits the pyramids a lot better than what the mainstream would have you believe.

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@US_Tax_Slave No it is not, clue is in the name. "Skywatch Signal" "Skywatcher"

@UAPWatchers - Skywatch Signal

@Username_Hicks Until they fit a narrative, yeah I get it.

View Full Interactive Feed