TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @USMortality

Saved - March 27, 2025 at 7:54 PM

@USMortality - Ben

Canada's excess mortality increased by 400% after vaccination - that can't be normal!

@USMortality - Ben

Source: https://www.mortality.watch/explorer/?c=CAN&ct=weekly&e=1&df=2017%2520W01&ss=2017&ce=1&p=0

Mortality.Watch We aggregate mortality data from muliple sources to generate daily updated mortality charts. Select from 120 countries and many different chart types. mortality.watch
Saved - August 15, 2024 at 9:39 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve raised concerns about a study by Puhach et al. in Nature Medicine, claiming it misrepresents data to show lower viral loads in vaccinated individuals. My reanalysis of the raw data, using mean and confidence intervals, indicates no significant difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. I’ve provided individual charts and highlighted issues with the LOESS method, which narrows confidence intervals inappropriately. Additionally, I noted that vaccinated individuals were excluded from key analyses, leaving gaps in the data.

@USMortality - Ben

🔥🔥🔥 NEW SCIENTIFIC FRAUD IN NATURE? A study published by Puhach et al., 2022 including @EckerleIsabella & @BenjaminMeyer85 in @NatureMedicine is fraudulently misrepresenting the data to suggest that viral loads are significantly lower in vaccinated people by using inappropriate LOESS smoothing. That is not the case, as I can clearly show by my open source reanalysis of the raw data, when using mean and 95% confidence intervals. There's clearly no significant difference in "viral load" between vaccinated and unvaccinated at all! Screenshot: - Top: screenshot of study - Center: screenshot for Figure 3b/c of the study - bottom: re-analyzed chart with mean and 95% CI Code: https://gist.github.com/USMortality/9e6b16fa25e9785dfd659c402c170bd2 Study: https://nature.com/articles/s41591-022-01816-0#Sec18…

Reanalysis Puhach et al, 2022 Reanalysis Puhach et al, 2022. GitHub Gist: instantly share code, notes, and snippets. gist.github.com
Infectious viral load in unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals infected with ancestral, Delta or Omicron SARS-CoV-2 - Nature Medicine Infectious viral load (VL) expelled as droplets and aerosols by infected individuals partly determines transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). RNA VL measured by qRT–PCR is only a weak proxy for infectiousness. Studies on the kinetics of infectious VL are important to understand the mechanisms behind the different transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the effect of vaccination on transmission, which allows guidance of public health measures. In this study, we quantified infectious VL in individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 during the first five symptomatic days by in vitro culturability assay in unvaccinated or vaccinated individuals infected with pre-variant of concern (pre-VOC) SARS-CoV-2, Delta or Omicron BA.1. Unvaccinated individuals infected with pre-VOC SARS-CoV-2 had lower infectious VL than Delta-infected unvaccinated individuals. Full vaccination (defined as >2 weeks after receipt of the second dose during the primary vaccination series) significantly reduced infectious VL for Delta breakthrough cases compared to unvaccinated individuals. For Omicron BA.1 breakthrough cases, reduced infectious VL was observed only in boosted but not in fully vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals. In addition, infectious VL was lower in fully vaccinated Omicron BA.1-infected individuals compared to fully vaccinated Delta-infected individuals, suggesting that mechanisms other than increased infectious VL contribute to the high infectiousness of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1. Our findings indicate that vaccines may lower transmission risk and, therefore, have a public health benefit beyond the individual protection from severe disease. The infectious viral load of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 is lower than that of Delta in symptomatic breakthrough infections of recipients of two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, suggesting that the higher transmission of Omicron BA.1 is not linked to higher infectious viral load. nature.com

@USMortality - Ben

Here are the individual reconstructed charts: https://t.co/SjOlFC2wA8

@USMortality - Ben

https://t.co/x1D39nl9j6

@USMortality - Ben

My letter to @Nature and the authors: https://t.co/SnzJca1jgD

@USMortality - Ben

Well... https://t.co/tNL4w3E8oI

@USMortality - Ben

Here with the individual measurements: https://t.co/bEeTOReJti

@USMortality - Ben

https://t.co/ba8wro6IaB

@USMortality - Ben

Here are all three methods: LOESS, MEAN, MEDIAN! LOESS is simply inappropriate, because it results in a too narrow confidence interval. There's clearly no significant difference when using a simple mean or median per day. https://t.co/8kEfM5kcOV

@USMortality - Ben

A reader notified me of a mistake in the CI calculation, here's the update chart. The conclusion still stands! https://t.co/MhThNTxCCN

@USMortality - Ben

For delta; the patients are listed in figure1 of the study. - unvaxx: 117 samples / 62 patients= 1.9 samples per patient - vaxx: 166 samples / 104 patient = 1.6 samples per patient So the datapoints are pretty much independent!

@USMortality - Ben

When using 6 days, they should have measured each patient every day, then plotted it to!

@USMortality - Ben

There’s no significant difference in FFU/mL based on the t-test results. Moreover, vaccinated individuals were entirely excluded from the analysis from day 0 to two weeks after their second dose. This creates a black box, leaving us with no information about what might have occurred during that period.

Saved - June 30, 2024 at 10:20 AM

@USMortality - Ben

New peer reviewed study shows that neither vaccines nor previous infection protects from infection of later variants! - It's all a lie!

@USMortality - Ben

https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.26.2300659#html_fulltext

Eurosurveillance | Page Not Found eurosurveillance.org is the online home of Eurosurveillance, Europe's journal on infectious disease surveillance, epidemiology, prevention and control. eurosurveillance.org
Saved - June 24, 2024 at 9:12 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Official German Government Documents Post 3: The delay in COVID-19 vaccine approval raises questions about potential collusion and political motivations. The FDA and European authorities may have intentionally postponed approval until after the 2020 US election. This suggests a possible desire to avoid giving credit to President Trump. Source: Official German Government Documents.

@USMortality - Ben

BREAKING: Official German Government Documents confirms, that the COVID-19 vaccines were possibly delayed on purpose until after the 2020 US election, thus possibly showing evidence of collusion! "Approval by the FDA before the US elections is not desired, nor by the European authorities, which means that there will not be initial results before November." @SenRonJohnson @SenTedCruz @SenRandPaul @michaelpsenger @elonmusk

@USMortality - Ben

This may suggest that the authorities did not want to get approval under president Trump, but wanted to wait - for supposedly political reasons - until after the election. Source: https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/InfAZ/C/COVID-19-Pandemie/COVID-19-Krisenstabsprotokolle_Download.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

RKI - Homepage - rki.de
Saved - May 17, 2024 at 4:45 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Epidemiological charts show mixed results for diseases and their vaccines. Spike in deaths after diphteria vaccination, drop in polio cases, no clear change for measles, spike and drop for tetanus. Increase in cervical cancer incidence after HPV vaccination. Influenza deaths increased with vaccine coverage. COVID-19 deaths initially increased, then sharply declined. All-cause mortality doubled or tripled in most countries since vaccination. Other diseases like multiple sclerosis and diabetes seem to appear inversely to disappearing infectious diseases. Hepatitis deaths increased after HepA and HepB vaccines, while other forms of hepatitis rose despite vaccination.

@USMortality - Ben

🔥 Some epidemiological charts for historic diseases and their vaccines. A thread 🧵1/n 1. Diphteria - Start of vaccination 1938 against diphteria in France is followed by an immediate spike in deaths, then return to pre-vaccination trend. (“Tote” & “Todesfälle” => “Deaths”)

@USMortality - Ben

2. Acute Poliomelitis (Polio) - Small spike after vaccination start in 1958, then sudden drop.

@USMortality - Ben

3. Measles - Vaccine introduced in 1983, long after deaths have been very low already. No clear change of pre-vaccination trend.

@USMortality - Ben

4. Tetanus - Huge spike after the vaccine was introduced in 1940. Then drop to almost 0 around 2000.

@USMortality - Ben

5. Human papilloma virus (HPV) - increase in cervical cancer incidence after vaccination start in 2006, not seen in unvaccinated age groups and countries with low vaccination rates.

@USMortality - Ben

6. Influenza - Population vaccine coverage of the yearly influenza vaccine in the USA increased from 51% in season 2010/’11 to 63% in 2018/’19. Influenza deaths also increased from under 10 deaths per 100,000 to almost 15/100k according to CDC’s calculations.

@USMortality - Ben

7. COVID-19 - After vaccination started on 12/8/2020 in the UK, and days later in the the rest oft the world, COVID-19 attributed deaths first increased, then remained high for over a year, to then sharply decline with the Omicron variant.

@USMortality - Ben

In all these charts, it remains unclear how the curves would have looked like without vaccination, but except maybe in the case of polio the effectiveness of the vaccines should clearly be up for debate.

@USMortality - Ben

Especially when we are looking at other statistics, which show interesting correlations, such as all-cause mortality.

@USMortality - Ben

8. All-Cause Mortality - Since the start of vaccination, deaths from all-causes in most countries have doubled or trippled further.

@USMortality - Ben

9. There are also other forms of diseases which seem to appear with an inverse relationship to the disappearing infectious diseases, such as multiple sklerosis, type 1 diabetis, asthma and allergies.

@USMortality - Ben

For sources and also to comment and subscribe, please visit my substack: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/10-epidemiological-charts-for-historic

10 Epidemiological Charts for Historic Diseases and their Vaccines Diphtheria - Start of vaccination 1938 against diphtheria in France is followed by an immediate spike in deaths, then return to pre-vaccination trend. (“Tote” & “Todesfälle” => “Deaths”) Acute Poliomyelitis (Polio) - Small spike after vaccination start in 1958, then sudden drop. usmortality.com

@USMortality - Ben

For those of you who can understand German, great documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA_-rkCF0zM

@USMortality - Ben

10. Hepatitis - Diseases of the liver which are caused by a virus according to CDC. Since the introduction of the HepA and HepB vaccines in 1981, and 1995 respectively, deaths by hepatitis have increased 5x! https://t.co/ExrqfKzroD

@USMortality - Ben

After introduction of the Hepatitis A vaccine, deaths from that virus decreased, but deaths from this type are relatively low compared to the other variants. https://t.co/cUQ3XWeeYh

@USMortality - Ben

After the introduction of the Hepatitis B vaccine in 1981, deaths increased to almost 3x rate for this type. https://t.co/zGfqkd8JTj

@USMortality - Ben

We can also observe that other forms of hepatitis (not A/B) were steeply on the rise since the 1990’s, despite vaccination against the A/B variants. https://t.co/qZUEGEMmi7

Saved - March 18, 2024 at 12:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
There's a pharma-funded measles scare campaign, but the data doesn't support it. Measles cases are low in the US despite dropping vaccine rates. There's no evidence that the MMR vaccine prevents measles cases. The studies linked in the MMR package insert didn't test for measles case prevention. The reported cases may not represent the true measles prevalence, and lower cases for vaccinated individuals could be due to misclassification or other factors. All-cause illness and deaths are important to consider.

@USMortality - Ben

There's a large pharma funded Measles Scare Campaign ongoing. The actual data doesn't support this.

@USMortality - Ben

World:

@USMortality - Ben

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IB1xB2ccbbJA0rf_H0ln1jJwuCq3wMfwn-HT95V_qGE/edit#gid=1189781993

Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com

@USMortality - Ben

US:

@USMortality - Ben

Measles cases are still very low, even as vaccine rates are dropping. That's what the vaccissts fear.

@USMortality - Ben

There's no evidence, that MMR prevents measles cases:

@USMortality - Ben

Two German states are significantly below the Measles/MMR vaccination target, however their incidence rate is not different to the other states.

@USMortality - Ben

Not even the studies that are linked in the MMR package insert, actually tested for measles case prevention:

@USMortality - Ben

Has the Measles (MMR) vaccine scientifically been shown to reduce measles cases or deaths? A deep dive into the scientific literature! ⬇️⬇️⬇️ A Vaccine For Measles Prevention CDC currently states (1), that they recommend the MMR vaccine to protect against measles. Two products are available: M-M-R II and PRIORIX. What is Measles? According to Mayo Clinic (2) a 'red, blotchy rash' usually appears on the face. Also, the following clinical symptoms are listed: Now that we know what clinical measles looks like, let's take a look at the package inserts of the two products! M-M-R II (rHA) Merck's package insert (3) lists the clinical trials on page 20. Here it says, that only the antibody response was compared against the previous M-M-R II HSA vaccine. --> No clinical indications as endpoints, no real placebo used! PRIORIX The second current vaccine, was also simply compared to the antibody response of M-M-R II. --> Also, here: No clinical indications as endpoints, no real placebo used! 1/2 (See next Tweet for continuation) Sources: (1) https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/mmr/public/index.html (2) https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/measles/symptoms-causes/syc-20374857 (3) https://www.merck.ca/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2021/04/MMR_II-PM_E.pdf (4) https://www.fda.gov/media/158941/download

Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) Vaccination | CDCCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC twenty four seven. Saving Lives, Protecting PeopleMinusSASstats What Everyone should know about the MMR vaccine. What is the MMRV vaccines? Who should and should not get these vaccines? How well do these vaccines work, and what are the possible side effects? cdc.gov
A preventable disease that's on the rise-Measles - Symptoms & causes - Mayo Clinic Learn about this vaccine-preventable disease that used to be common in childhood and is well known for a characteristic red, splotchy rash and high fever. mayoclinic.org

@USMortality - Ben

Always remember, these are cases, that are not based on a statistical representative population sample, thus do not actually represent the true measles prevalence in the population.

@USMortality - Ben

Lastly, these are cases, not deaths. Even if cases for vaccinated were lower, this could also mean that it's based on misclassification (diagnosis bias), or other effects, that may lead to different forms of sickness. That's why all-cause illness and deaths are so important.

Saved - January 1, 2024 at 12:50 AM

@USMortality - Ben

The correlation between vaccination and excess disability in the US is pretty stunning! https://t.co/XjanpE00CF

Saved - December 10, 2023 at 1:44 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
The increase in disabilities in the US since the Covid-19 vaccine rollout is statistically significant. The civilian labor force with a disability has risen by 40%. This is not due to any y-axis manipulation or population growth. Claims suggesting otherwise are unfounded. The evidence remains clear and undeniable. The charts can be viewed and updated weekly through the provided open-source code.

@USMortality - Ben

There's just no denying with this. The increase of disabilities in the US since Covid-19 vaccine rollout is statistical significant.

@USMortality - Ben

🔥 Civilian Labor Force with a disability increased by 40% since COVID-19 vaccination started. Coincidence?

@USMortality - Ben

This is not based on any y-axis trickery either.

@USMortality - Ben

It has also nothing to-do with the general population growth, as "truthers" (actual pharma shills & dishonest fake news spreaders) like this guy "Daniel" like to claim. The signal remains clear and statistical significant.

@Truth_in_Number - Truth In Numbers (Daniel)

@DowdEdward The disability rate of this group has increased, VERY slightly, over a long time-horizon. Disabled percent of population, 16+ is 10.6% higher in June of 2023 than it was in January of 2010. This doesn’t show the dramatic rise, implied by the graph that @dowdedward posted.

@USMortality - Ben

Same chart with complete y-axis. It's clear. It's undeniable. There was nothing before vaxx rollout. It's not from Covid.

@USMortality - Ben

Automatically update charts (weekly) can be found here: https://s3.mortality.watch/charts/index.html?prefix=covid19/usa/ Open source code can be found here: https://github.com/USMortality/charts/blob/master/covid19/usa/disability.r

charts/covid19/usa/disability.r at master · USMortality/charts Data calculations for Mortality.Watch. MOVED TO: . Contribute to USMortality/charts development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com
Saved - December 6, 2023 at 3:57 PM

@USMortality - Ben

🔥 Switzerland's birth rates are now at a record low! https://t.co/GgvgVwu4T8

Saved - December 6, 2023 at 3:54 PM

@USMortality - Ben

🔥Swiss insurance data shows a +100% increase of cancer medication recipients since start of vaccination! https://t.co/NFHakrhsEh

@kati_schepis - Kati Sch.

Die Gesundheitsdaten der Helsana (=grösster Krankenversicherer der CH) zeigen seit Einführung der COVID-Impfung einen Anstieg der „Krebsmedikamentenbezüger“ (Versicherte, die Krebsmedikamente benötigen) um > 100%. Kurzpräsentation Prof. Beck: youtu.be/3Z6rviCbCNg https://t.co/Rfd0PSQRYG

Saved - November 6, 2023 at 10:40 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The mass vaccination rollout in highly developed countries led to a significant increase in median excess mortality by +149%. Only three out of the 20 countries saw an improvement, while the rest experienced an increase. None of the countries achieved normal excess mortality levels. Despite expectations of reduced mortality with vaccines, excess mortality almost tripled. Various factors, such as pre-existing immunity, declining mortality trends, and the limited effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions, contribute to this unexpected outcome. The analysis used a conservative baseline method and considered the Human Development Index to control for confounding factors. The individual country charts provide a detailed overview.

@USMortality - Ben

🔥 Median all-cause excess mortality in the 20 most vaccinated highly developed countries increased by +149% after vaccination rollout! #COVID #COVID19 #Vaccine #MRNA #Excess #ExcessDeaths Results In 2020 median excess mortality in the top 20 highly developed countries was +4.5%, with the mass vaccine rollout in 2021, it increases to +9.9% and even further deteriorated in 2022 to +11.2%. ❓ How many countries saw an improvement of relative excess mortality with mass vaccination? 📉 3 📈 17 ➡️ Only three countries saw an improvement in excess mortality, 17 had their excess mortality increase. ❓ How many countries achieved normal excess mortality levels (<1%) with vaccination? 📉 0 📈 20 ➡️ None of the countries saw a return to negative or close to zero excess mortality levels. Here are the individual excess mortality charts for all 20 countries: Methodology The 20 most vaccinated countries of the @OurWorldInData COVID-19 dataset were selected (min. 1 dose) and filtered by a very high Human Development Index (HDI) >=0.8 value. (1) Excess Mortality was assessed by age-standardized mortality rates, where available, otherwise crude mortality rate (CMR) was used. A conservative pre-pandemic three-year average 2017-2019 (as used by Levitt et al. (9)) of the mortality rate was used as baseline, except for the United Arab Emirates, where the average of 2018-2019 was used, due to limited data availability. Relative excess mortality was calculated by the @MortalityWatch tool, all links to charts can be found in the provided spreadsheet. (2) Discussion In contrast to general expectations, excess mortality continued and almost tripled with global mass vaccine rollouts. Considering, that: 1) The COVID-19 vaccines are said to offer a protection against death of up to 94%, according to the CDC, this should have led to a massive reduction in overall excess mortality, not an increase. (3) 2) 2020 IFR estimates by Ioannidis et al., already demonstrated a moderate IFR for all age-groups of 0.23%, and 0.05% for <70-year-olds. (6) 3) Subsequent virus variants decreased in CFR/IFR, a drop of 79% in IFR from previous variants was reported for the Omicron variant in 2022. (8) 4) Early variants of 2020 lead to many deaths in the most vulnerable, hence a temporary mortality deficit should be expected going forward. (“Pull forward effect”) 5) The early diamond princess outbreak of 2020, demonstrated that only about 20% of people tested positive. Since measures and awareness were non-existent at that point in time on the ship, it is clear, that a significant amount of the population must have pre-existing immunity. (7) 6) Use of a conservative three-year average baseline method. In many countries, a declining mortality trend can be observed pre-pandemic. In this case, the average method, could even lead to underestimation of excess mortality. Given these reasons, it appears mathematically impossible, for excess mortality to rise in subsequent years after a novel virus outbreak, and with a “highly effective vaccine” available. HDI was used as an indicator, to quickly control for several confounders, that typically impact mortality levels in lower developed nations. E.g. general health status, income levels, poverty levels, that typically impact health outcomes. A common example is when mistakenly comparing lower HDI countries such as eastern European nations, e.g. Bulgaria, with higher HDI countries. Often, restrictions & NPI's are brought forward as the reason why 2020 saw relatively fewer excess deaths. However, it is already established by now again - as it was pre-2020 for seasonal influenza - that none of the NPI's have significantly reduced the spread of COVID-19. (Meta studies by Cochrane and Johns Hopkins (4) (5)). Germany's R value already decreased below 0, before the first lockdown in March 2020, indicating the natural limitation of outbreaks. Sources & Data 1) https://github.com/USMortality/charts/blob/master/covid19/most_vaccinated.r 2) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1yDFsp6hLD7Z9BhkVntJwd3G8vTADTwmtPx4TQ25MrBk/edit#gid=0… 3) https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#vaccine-effectiveness… 4) https://cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006207.pub6/full 5) https://sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022/01/A-Literature-Review-and-Meta-Analysis-of-the-Effects-of-Lockdowns-on-COVID-19-Mortality.pdf 6) http://web.archive.org/web/20201101000542/https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/BLT.20.265892.pdf 7) https://x.com/USMortality/status/1620665889757749249?s=20… 8) https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9022446/ 9) https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122010817

charts/covid19/most_vaccinated.r at master · USMortality/charts Data calculations for Mortality.Watch. MOVED TO: . Contribute to USMortality/charts development by creating an account on GitHub. github.com
Page Not Found Web word processing, presentations and spreadsheets docs.google.com
COVID Data Tracker CDC’s home for COVID-19 data. Visualizations, graphs, and data in one easy-to-use website. covid.cdc.gov
Reduction in the infection fatality rate of Omicron variant compared with previous variants in South Africa The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron (B.1.1.529) variant has caused global concern. Previous studies have shown that the variant has enhanced immune evasion ability and transmissibility and reduced severity.In this study, we developed a mathematical model with time-varying ... ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Comparison of pandemic excess mortality in 2020–2021 across different empirical calculations Different modeling approaches can be used to calculate excess deaths for the COVID-19 pandemic period. We compared 6 calculations of excess deaths (4 … sciencedirect.com

@USMortality - Ben

Diamond Princess 2020 - only 17% of passengers were PCR positive, less than 9% symptomatic. 83% were not infected and already immune, hence PFR = IFR = 7/3700 = 0.19%!

@USMortality - Ben

Again noteworthy, due to the average baseline method, the increase is not due to a modeling artifact!

@USMortality - Ben

15) Australia https://t.co/TTJh2L1mQC

Saved - October 11, 2023 at 7:01 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
COVID-19 vaccines lack scientific evidence of saving lives and have caused numerous deaths and injuries. Serious adverse events occur in 1 in 800 to 1 in 5000 cases. Germany alone reported 254 vaccine-related deaths. All-cause mortality remained high or increased in 2021/2022, challenging vaccine safety claims. VAERS data shows a significant increase in deaths post-vaccination. Efficacy studies failed to show statistical significance in reducing COVID-19 deaths or all-cause mortality. Correlation between high vaccination rates and low mortality existed pre-vaccine rollout. Excess mortality increased even after high vaccination rates. Not all countries experience mass deaths among the unvaccinated. The UK's all-cause data reveals no significant advantage for the vaccinated. Excess deaths correlate with poverty levels and lockdowns. COVID-19 deaths may be inflated due to coding practices and death certificate modeling. Wastewater surveillance and PCR tests lack validation.

@USMortality - Ben

There is no scientific high quality evidence that the COVID-19 vaccines have saved any lives. On the contrary, they have demonstrably caused many deaths, much more than any other Pharma product in history, and also caused many - often permanent - injuries. Here’s the evidence: VACCINE Safety: - Serious Adverse Events (SAE) are estimated to be in a range of 1 in 800 to 1 in 5000: - https://bmj.com/content/378/bmj.o1731/rr-0 - https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X22010283 - https://twitter.com/hugh_mankind/status/1590733326553600003 - https://twitter.com/JulikaBrand/status/1550013097917747201 - COVID-19 vaccines have caused at least 254 confirmed deaths in Germany, as confirmed by the official death statistics of the federal statistics office: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/german-government-confirms-254-vaccine - No one knows how all-cause mortality would’ve looked like without vaccine, but the fact that mortality stayed high or increased in 2021/2022 is evidence that at least one of the words of ‘safe & effective’ cannot be true: - https://twitter.com/profnfenton/status/1596948154339196930 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1701930193101721613 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1592549814344241152 - VAERS shows a never-seen-before hockey stick increase with the introduction of the vaccines, that has not been explained by the health authorities. European data shows the same. - https://twitter.com/P_McCulloughMD/status/1712156115587223750 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1407009199020658689 - https://twitter.com/JesslovesMJK/status/1707703130547540320 - VAERS shows that most death reports occur in the first 14 days. This is why people who died within two weeks of vaccination were likely considered unvaccinated. - https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1682008709067681792 - Young & Healthy: US data shows, that mortality rates increased after the vaccine rollout in all age groups 0-9, 10-19, 20-29: - https://mortality.watch/explorer/?c=USA&t=cmr&ct=yearly&ag=0-9&ag=10-19&ag=20-29&v=2… Efficacy: - None of the RCT Studies, except the Johnson & Johnson, showed a statistical significant effect on all-cause mortality. The mRNA vaccines has each +1 death in the vaccinated group. Novavax yielded +4 in the vaccinated group. Why J&J produced much fewer deaths, is a mystery as AstraZeneca, that used the same approach, had equal deaths in both groups. Also, the non-covid deaths are not balanced in the JJ trial results, pointing towards evidence of incorrect randomization of participants. - https://twitter.com/TracyBethHoeg/status/1512105790441607168 - Summary of the six authorized COVID-19 vaccines in US and EU. None of them were able to show statistical significance in regard to COVID-19 deaths or all-cause mortality (except JJ, as explained above) - not even in combination with 175 thousand test subjects. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1577776630818283542 - Correlation DOES NOT EQUAL Causation: The Correlation between High Vaccinated and Low Mortality Countries, that the ‘Real Truther’ is describing, existed already before the vaccine rollout. If we look at before/after, no stat. Significant effect can be observed. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664118356725874690 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1664043455801327616 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1532100552535965697 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1551149126364106754 - Higher unvaxed charts, are typically either confounded by general health status or manipulated via 14 day unvaccinated trick, lumping unknown vaccine status into the categories. My request to make the raw data public was denied, guess why? https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1579474197503700999 - There are many examples of jurisdictions, where excess mortality exploded, after the vast majority of the population was vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1689356018105688064 - Not remotely possible that the vaccines have saved many lives! Excess mortality in seniors has increased by another +112% after more than 80% had already been vaccinated: - https://x.com/USMortality/status/1709011271071527057?s=20… - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1464985828904554496 - There are many countries that do not have any stat. Significant excess deaths, namely Luxembourg in southern Italy, so how do you explain that no unvaccinated are dying en-masse there either? - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1703492850137075764 - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709039967555707013 - There’s no stat. signifificant advantage visible when comparing the UK all-cause data by vaccination status. Often, the unvaccinated have even lower mortality rates: - https://twitter.com/TheRustler83/status/1708969809583501695 - Dr. Rancourt discovered, that excess deaths are mostly correlated with poverty levels, and the poorest suffer the most from the lockdowns, but likely also from vaccinations: - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1667403684798668800 COVID-19 correlation - There's a simple explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths typically track with excess deaths - but only in western/wealthy countries! Most western countries have incentivized coding seasonal respiratory illnesses as COVID-19 & also apply their own death certificate modeling on top of that, such as what CDC does with the NVSS/MMDS! - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709325123910869088 - Wastewater surveillance cannot be used to establish the claim, that Covid-19 was novel or to assess levels of virus, because genetic material from multiple strains and persons are mixed or pooled together, and no data from before 2020 (as control of the method) is available. - https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1709645502659330151 - The COVID-19 PCR test has never been clinically validated! In contrast, most people that tested positive in hospitals were incidentals, i.e. test positive, but actually are not sick with a respiratory illness, such as COVID-19: - https://twitter.com/FLSurgeonGen/status/1707115008927166706

Saved - October 6, 2023 at 9:10 PM

@USMortality - Ben

For 2022, unfortunately the data does not line up, but there are clearly some weeks where only a fraction of deaths have a vaxx status. I'll keep investigating...

Saved - September 23, 2023 at 10:32 PM

@USMortality - Ben

Pfizer mRNA vaccines contain up to 354x more DNA than allowed! #mrna #covid #covid19 #pfizer #vaccine

Saved - August 18, 2023 at 8:30 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
Elon Musk mentioned his arrival in Japan. @USMortality asked about the high excess mortality rate in Japan. @Popssmith1 disagreed, but @USMortality insisted it was not normal.

@elonmusk - Elon Musk

Just arrived in amazing 🇯🇵 Japan 🇯🇵

@USMortality - Ben M.

@elonmusk Can you inquire, why excess mortality in Japan is through the roof?

@Popssmith1 - Pops smith

@USMortality @elonmusk Death rate looks reasonably normal..

@USMortality - Ben M.

@Popssmith1 @elonmusk No

Saved - August 9, 2023 at 11:51 PM

@USMortality - Ben M.

BREAKING: German Government confirms, there's no data that can back up the claims that COVID-19 vaccinated people have better health outcomes!!

Saved - August 9, 2023 at 6:00 AM

@USMortality - Ben M.

🔥 The final age-adjusted excess mortality tally is here! For the entire pandemic time 'March 2020 - April 2023' out of the four biggest states, Florida performed best, California worst! @GovRonDeSantis @GavinNewsom

@USMortality - Ben M.

Source: https://www.mortality.watch/explorer/?c=USA-FL&c=USA-NY&c=USA-TX&c=USA-CA&t=asmr_excess&ct=monthly&cs=bar&df=2020+Mar&dt=2023+Apr&sp=who&ce=1&st=1&m=1&pi=0&p=1&v=2

Mortality.Watch We aggregate mortality data from muliple sources to generate daily updated mortality charts. Select from 120 countries and many different chart types. mortality.watch
Saved - July 19, 2023 at 10:54 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Out of the 10 most populous areas, only one has returned to normal, while two are nearing that point. The remaining seven are still facing challenges. These stats reveal that one area is okay, three are close, and six are not okay.

@USMortality - Ben M.

Out of the 10 most populous counties for which we have mortality data, only one is back to normal, and two are close! 🧵 1/11 USA - Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Close

@USMortality - Ben M.

Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Close

@USMortality - Ben M.

Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Not OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

OK

@USMortality - Ben M.

Close!

@USMortality - Ben M.

The first tweet should obviously mention countries not counties, and here are the stats: - ok 1 - close 3 - not ok 6

Saved - June 26, 2023 at 2:29 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Rancourt argues that poverty, not a virus, is the cause of excess mortality. Antibiotic prescriptions were cut during COVID, leading to changes in mortality by age. Peaks in mortality occur synchronously worldwide, which is impossible. Borders did not stop the virus, and vaccines caused excess mortality. The elderly are at high risk from vaccines, while young adults have a plateau of risk. Governments caused excess mortality, and Dr. Rancourt's full findings can be found on his website.

@USMortality - Ben M.

Dr. Rancourt PhD: "There's a strong correlation to poverty, which is one of the pieces of evidence that allows you to say that this is not a virus. [..] No matter how you slice it, there's absolutely no correlation with age, which is a definitive proof that this cannot be COVID"

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the correlation between all-cause mortality during the COVID period in the United States and the fraction of the population living in poverty. They explain that this correlation is very strong, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.86. They argue that this correlation suggests that COVID is not the main cause of deaths, as clinical studies indicate that the virus primarily affects elderly individuals. The speaker also mentions that there is no correlation between age and COVID-related deaths, further supporting their claim.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Now in the United States when you integrate that all cause mortality, in the COVID period, and then you look at you look for social factors that correlate to that on a by state basis. This is the strongest correlation that we found for a single social factor. We looked at many many. It is it shows a correlation of all cause mortality integrated over the COVID period on the y axis as a function of the fraction of the population that is living in poverty. And this is a what we call in science, this is technically a very strong correlation. So the Pearson correlation coefficient is plus 0.86, which is unheard of in the social sciences and it's not just a correlation, it goes through the origin, which means it's proportionality, which means that, if in a state that would have had no poverty, there would have been no excess deaths during the COVID period. Okay. So there's a strong correlation to poverty, which is one of the pieces of evidence that allows you to say that this is not a virus because a virus and COVID in particular is said from clinical studies to, kill mainly elderly people and it's even exponential with age. So we find instead that we correlate the things like poverty but if you did this kind of a map which I didn't bring as a function of age, median age or number of people living in the state, fraction of the population that is over 80 or over 65 and so on, no matter how you slice it, there is absolutely no correlation with age, which is a definitive proof that this cannot be COVID as studied in clinical studies.

@USMortality - Ben M.

"During the covid period, all western countries cut antibiotics prescriptions by 50%, so they were not treating bacterial pneumonia." "The age structure of the excess mortality has changed as you move into the vaccination period."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the impact of reduced antibiotic prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. They explain that poor states in the southern United States, where it is hot, experienced a higher death rate due to bacterial pneumonia. The speaker believes that bacterial pneumonia was a co-cause of death in many COVID-19 cases. They also mention that excess mortality rates varied across age groups before and after vaccination. Before vaccination, the rates ranged from 5% to 40% in the ten most populous states. However, during the vaccination period, the pattern changed, with 25 to 44-year-olds experiencing up to 60% excess mortality.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What we found was that this death was occurring mainly in the poor states in the south of the United States, where it's also very hot. And those are populations that normally get many, many prescriptions of antibiotics in the winter. So they are, they have a high susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia infection and they normally get treated. But during the COVID period, all Western countries cut antibiotic prescriptions by 50% or more, including the United States. So they were not treating bacterial pneumonia, and these people always get them, always have this problem, and were not being treated. And so we believe, and the CDC has agreed based on death certificates, that a co cause of death in the great majority of the so called COVID nineteen deaths is bacterial pneumonia. So we know that there was a massive epidemic of bacterial pneumonia. We know that it was not being treated, up to standards whatsoever, and we believe that mechanistically this is what killed the poor, obese and so on. Okay? And there are other factors as well, and we discussed them in detail in our papers. Now this is we're still in the United States here and this is the percent increase in mortality. So it's the excess mortality expressed as a percentage of what the mortality would normally be, now get this, by age group. This is now by age group and this is before vaccination was implemented in the COVID period. So we're in, we're starting at 11th March, 2020 and going up to the end of 2020 before we start vaccinating. And we can see that excess mortality expressed as a percent for the 10 most populous states in the United States here, the different colors, goes from something like 5% or 10% for the 0 to 24 year olds and goes up to something like 20% all the way up to 40% for the other age groups. So it's very, very high and it's high across the board in relative amounts expressed this way for all the age groups of young adults all the way to the elderly, okay? And then if we keep those 10 populous states and look at what happens in in the period where you were vaccinating because the rollout was very rapid, you get a very different pattern like this, where the 25 to 44 year olds are affected up to 60% excess mortality on a relative basis. So the structure of the the age structure of the mortality has changed now as you move into the vaccination period.

@USMortality - Ben M.

"These peaks occur in very specific hotspots, but synchronously around the world [..] that from an epidemiological standpoint is strictly impossible, because the time from seeding of an infection to the sudden rise of mortality is completely uncertain."

Video Transcript AI Summary
There were simultaneous peaks of mortality in different parts of the world during the pandemic, which is highly unlikely from an epidemiological perspective. The time it takes for an infection to lead to a rise in mortality varies greatly depending on various factors. Even if infections were spread simultaneously, mortality peaks would not occur synchronously. These peaks were likely caused by specific actions taken in hotspots, such as Lombardy, Italy, where people were encouraged to go to the hospital and multiple patients were put on a single ventilator. This resulted in a significant loss of life during that peak.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That same kind of peak happens at the same time in different parts of the world. So there are hot spots when just after you announce the pandemic, you get these massive peaks and they're shown here for Lombardy, Italy and the region of Madrid and an area in France and so on, these peaks occur in very specific hot spots, but synchronously around the world. Now I want to insist on this that from an epidemiological standpoint is strictly impossible because the time from seeding of an infection to the sudden rise and measurable rise of mortality is completely uncertain. There are it is a factor that is extremely sensitive to the details of the population, the institutional structure, and so on. It cannot be the same everywhere. Even if you fly seeds out by airplanes at the same time to everyone on the same day. You will not get peaks of mortality that occur synchronously. It is impossible. They vary that time between seeding, depending on the size of the seed and so on and the maximum in mortality varies by many, many months, it can even be years. So that's impossible. This was the first thing I said when I saw these peaks as I said, this is not a viral respiratory pandemic. This has to be peaks that were caused in those jurisdictions that were hotspots. And in fact, in Lombardy, Italy, They, in that region in particular, they said don't stay home, come straight into the hospital, we'll treat you, and they were putting 2 people per mechanical ventilator when they were sick enough. And so they were doing horrible things and there was a massive, killing of people, I believe, in that in that peak.

@USMortality - Ben M.

"The virus absolutely refused to cross these borders, of course this is absurd, a viral respiratory disease is believed to spread, and it does not need a passport, and it does not respect borders, so that's yet another proof, that this is not a viral respiratory pandemic."

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses the borders in Europe during the pandemic. They point out that the virus did not cross these borders, which they find absurd since a viral respiratory disease is believed to spread without regard for borders. The speaker presents maps showing the intensity of excess mortality in Europe before and during the pandemic. They highlight hotspots in Northern Italy and Spain, but note that the borders between Portugal and Spain, Spain and Southern France, and Germany remained unaffected. As the pandemic progressed, the peak gradually subsided by May and June.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So I put in blue here some borders. Now those borders are interesting because you'll notice in the maps that I will show you of the magnitude of that mortality peak mapped on Europe that the virus, if it was a virus, absolutely refused to cross these borders, absolutely refused. There's no crossing of these borders. Now that's, of course, that's absurd. A viral respiratory disease is believed to spread and it does not need a passport and it does not respect borders. So that's yet another proof that this was not a viral respiratory disease pandemic. So let's look at these maps. We're going to start in January 2020 before the pandemic was announced. And what I'm representing here with the different colors is the intensity of the excess mortality in January, integrated for January. So basically January was an ordinary month and you're around 0 for all of Europe. February, same scenario, nothing special is happening. Now we hit March, which was when the pandemic was announced and when this peak arose. And there you go, those are the hotspots. So you can see Northern Italy, large regions around Spain, around Madrid and Spain and so on. And what you'll notice is that you do not cross the border between Portugal and Spain, you do not cross the border between Spain and the Southern France, you do not cross the border whatsoever into Germany. Germany was completely protected from this excess mortality at that time in the pandemic and, so Germany did not have these excess deaths whatsoever and then as we go down off this peak March into April, it's still we're still on the tail of that large peak. Those regions are the same basically and those borders are not crossed whatsoever. And then we get into May June and the peak is over.

@USMortality - Ben M.

"You see, as a consequence of the vaccine rollout, there's a higher regime of mortality." "Same thing for each of the states in Australia." "The large peak [in the southern US] coincides with [the] vaccine equity [program]"

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the increase in mortality rates after the vaccine rollout in Australia. They point out a peak in mortality during the country's summer, which coincides with the sudden rollout of the third dose of the vaccine. The same pattern is observed in different states of Australia. The speaker then mentions a vaccine equity program in Mississippi, where the most vulnerable people were vaccinated. This program resulted in a significant increase in cumulative doses given and a corresponding peak in mortality rates for individuals aged 25 to 64 in poor states across the United States, such as Alabama.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And a huge increase in mortality, a new regime of mortality when they rolled out the vaccine. So we said, let's target Australia and see what's happened there. And you can see that integral value in the vaccination period jump up for Australia there on this graph. And this is a blow up of it. So you see mortality by week in Australia, and you see the vaccine rollout and you see that as a consequence of the vaccine rollout, there is a higher regime of mortality rate there. And we also see a peak in their summer, our winter. Remember, mortality is higher in the experienced winter. So in the Southern Hemisphere, mortality is higher in what is our summer, during the period that is our summer, but it's their winter. And so there's seasonality like we normally have, but here in the middle of their summer, they have a sharp peak right there, you can see it and that coincides exactly with the very sudden rollout of the 3rd dose of the vaccine. And I'll show that in detail now. Here's the rollout of the 3rd dose superposed on that peak of mortality for all of Australia and it is the same thing for each of the states in Australia. So this is Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and so on, you get this rollout of the 3rd dose and a peak in mortality that accompanies it. So on that basis, we can calculate things, which I'll show you in a minute. But first, I want to do a little bit of around the world of these kinds of correlations. So this is, Mississippi, which is something happened that was very unusual and very sad in the United States. They decided that they needed to have vaccine equity. So large financiers and companies and pharma tied interests decided that people were not being vaccinated enough in certain states in the United States, so they will have a vaccine equity program, which was highly funded. They hired thousands of people and they went and vaccinated the most vulnerable people living in various homes and so on. And so in the poor states, you can see that vaccine rollout, you can see that increase in the cumulative doses being given there and that is the equity program, the vaccine equity program. And then you can see that huge peak that is coincident with that in mortality for the 25 to 64 year olds. Now we see that large peak, which is bigger than anything else that coincides with vaccine equity in basically all of the poor states in the United States, so Alabama and so on, okay?

@USMortality - Ben M.

"You are injecting people, that are at high risk of dying when you inject the elderly" "Young adults, are above the exponential [risk]. There's a plateau of risk of dying for young adults."

Video Transcript AI Summary
This video discusses the risk of death from the injection for different age groups. It shows that when injecting the elderly, there is a higher risk of dying compared to young adults. The graph demonstrates a plateau in the mortality risk for young adults, while the exponential part represents the risk for older adults. This data helps explain the sudden deaths of athletes and young people that have been mentioned.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Injecting people that are at high risk of dying from the injection when you inject the elderly. And this is the 1st quantitative demonstration of that for Australia and Israel where we're able to do it. And you can blow up The bottom of that exponential and you can see that the young adults are above the exponential that is that holds for the more elderly adults starting at around age 40. So there is a plateau of risk of dying from the injection for young adults that is maintained. And you see it if you do a semi log, for those of you used looking at these graphs on a semi log basis, you can see that plateau in the mortality risk from the injection for the young adults there. Relative to the linear part is the exponential part on this kind of graph. So you can see what people are talking about in terms of sudden deaths of athletes and young people and so on in this kind of data.

@USMortality - Ben M.

And finally, Dr. Rancourt's conclusions: 1) If govt's had done nothing - no excess mortality. There was no pandemic, that caused excess mortality. 2) The measures that governments applied, caused excess mortality. 3) The vaccination campaign definitely caused excess mortality.

Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker discusses their conclusions on all-cause mortality and the pandemic. They claim that if governments had not taken any extraordinary measures, there would have been no excess mortality beyond the usual trend. They argue that the measures implemented by governments caused varying levels of excess mortality in different jurisdictions. Additionally, they assert that the COVID-19 vaccination campaign itself resulted in excess mortality, with different doses and age groups being associated with peaks in deaths. The speaker promises to provide specific numbers in their presentation.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you god? Speaker 1: I do. I want to start by giving you my conclusions. I've been working on all cause mortality and its analysis for more than 3 years, And I've written more than 30 reports about it, detailed scientific reports. Some of them are more than a 100 pages long With many figures and graphs and detailed interpretations, and I've come to the following conclusions that I will try to demonstrate, You know, how you must come to these conclusions by my material here that I brought today. And the conclusions are as follows. First of all, if governments had done nothing out of the ordinary, if they had not announced the pandemic, Had not responded to a presumed, pathogen, have done nothing other than what we normally do when we have a high I see some mortality in the winter, then there would have been no excess mortality. Nothing special would have happened. That is a conclusion that I, hold firmly from analyzing the data. So in that sense, there was no pandemic that caused excess mortality. None at all. There was the usual ecology of, pathogens, viral, Bacterial, whatever you want to imagine. There's there's a huge ecology of pathogens that we live with. They're always there. We get sick. We recover. Sometimes we die. That's all true, but there would have been no excess mortality beyond the historic trend If we just left things alone. So there was no pandemic in that sense. The second point I'm going to be making is that the measures The government's applied, which I would think of as a as an assault. There were many different kinds of assaults against people, and those assaults definitely quantitatively caused excess mortality in many jurisdictions and at various times during the pandemic period. Very significant deaths. In some jurisdictions, relatively little and so on. And the final point is that the vaccination campaign, the COVID nineteen vaccination campaign itself, Definitely caused excess mortality in indefinite peaks that are seen that are Directly associated with various vaccine rollouts of different doses to different age groups and in different jurisdictions, and you can See those excess mortalities immediately. There is no way to escape the conclusion that the vaccines definitely cause death In a significant number, and I'll give you what those numbers are in my presentation.

@USMortality - Ben M.

And finally, please follow Dr. Rancourt himself: @denisrancourt Watch the full video: https://rumble.com/v2ohtte-physicist-dr-denis-rancourt-presents-his-findings-on-all-cause-mortality-ot.html?s=09 Find all my latest work: http://mortality.watch

Dr. Denis Rancourt Unveiling All-Cause Mortality: A Critical Analysis of the Pandemic Declaration and Vaccination Rollout | Ottawa Day One | NCI Dr. Denis Rancourt, an esteemed physicist and researcher, presents a stunning analysis of worldwide "all-cause mortality." Delve into his thought-provoking examination of the pandemic declaration and rumble.com
Mortality.Watch We aggregate mortality data from muliple sources to generate daily updated mortality charts. Select from 120 countries and many different chart types. mortality.watch
View Full Interactive Feed