TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @Uncommonsince76

Uncommonsince76
Posted - February 9, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Saved - February 10, 2026 at 12:38 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why is Redfin running an anti White Male ad???? Oh. It’s run by a Jew. https://t.co/sD0kPXOOZW

@_johnnymaga - johnny maga

Redfin’s Super Bowl ad: White parents get divorced, minorities move into neighborhood where evil White man refuses to acknowledge them, minorities save White family’s dog, clean up evil White man’s property after storm. Could it be more obvious? https://t.co/Mzq00BHuRq

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a distorted version of the familiar greeting, saying, “A beautiful day for one neighborhood. Beautiful day for a neighbor. Would you be mine? I know it's hard, sweetie. Could you?” and adds, “But you'll still see dad.” The speaker then declares, “It's a neighborly day in this beauty wood, a neighborly day for a beauty. Would you be fun? Thank you.” The line ends with, “Star, could you be Big storm coming in. I Thank you so much.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A beautiful day for one neighborhood. Beautiful day for a neighbor. Would you be mine? I know it's hard, sweetie. Could you? But you'll still see dad. It's a neighborly day in this beauty wood, a neighborly day for a beauty. Would you be fun? Thank you. Star, could you be Big storm coming in. I Thank you so much.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - April 2, 2024 at 4:59 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 9:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
Before we send more money to Ukraine, @SpeakerJohnson, can we get answers on why Gonzalo Lira was killed? He was the American journalist who said dirty American politicians work with dirty Ukrainian politicians to use Ukraine as their unsavory piggy bank!!!

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Before we go off sending more money to Ukraine @SpeakerJohnson, can we get some answers on why Gonzalo Lira was killed?? He was the American journalist who said dirty American politicians work with Dirty Ukrainian politicians to use Ukraine as their unsavory piggy bank!!!??? https://t.co/GE93j3zxXx

Uncommonsince76
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 7:27 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. Even worse now seeing Epstein and Rothschild discuss “opportunities.” RIP Gonzalo https://t.co/uERmZmtA2A

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, is described as a “cokehead” and a manufactured political figure. He is said to have been manufactured by Igor Kolomoyski, described as a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch who owns OnePlusOne Media in Ukraine. OnePlusOne Media is claimed to have financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People, which hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even political interest, to play the role of President in the show. The show ran from 2015 to 2018 and achieved huge ratings, with claims that there was disproportionate propaganda and PR for the show, some saying it was completely astroturf. Viewers who know Ukrainian and watched the show described it as mildly enjoyable but not a big deal. It is asserted that Kolomoisky created a political party called Servant of the People, mirroring the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky. The claim is that Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. The speaker notes that not many actors are billionaires, implying Zelensky’s wealth is unusually high for an actor, and contends that Zelensky is the “finger puppet” of Kolomoisky. The narrative continues that Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden, to the tune of $50,000 a month plus additional benefits, in 2014, when Burisma, the Ukrainian oil and gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors at $50,000 a month. It questions who controls Burisma, asserting Kolomovsky is the same person who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. The speaker asserts that Zelensky and Hunter Biden are “spiritual cousins,” both bankrolled by the same man, Kolomovsky. It is claimed that both have serious drug addictions and both are intimately involved in Ukraine, with a contrast that Zelensky does not have a father who is President of the United States. There is a claim that the White House is freaking out over Ukraine, and that in Ukraine there are many secrets. The assertion is that “the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment” have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, financially exploiting it and stripping it of monies and assets needed by the Ukrainian people. This is linked to Ukraine being one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption and Western exploitation. Hunter Biden’s $50,000 a month is highlighted, with a remark that $50,000 a year would solve the problems of four or five families in Ukraine, illustrating the disparity given Ukraine’s poverty. The laptop is invoked to mention a possible 10% kickback to the old man, Joe Biden. The speaker asserts that Kolomovsky financed Zelensky and Joe Biden, and suggests there are many others who financed Ukraine’s leaders to carry out “evil deeds,” asserting that the West is terrified the truth will come out in Ukraine.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Now, Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, And OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelensky, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show. It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly, Kolomewski, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I mean, I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch. And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes, in 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins, they are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who's President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. And this is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe: because of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? $50,000 a month. And you say to yourself, well, 50,000 isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, dollars 50,000 a year would easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year, and Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh, yeah. Look it up. You don't have to take my word for it. Don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden. God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - February 3, 2026 at 11:14 PM
Saved - February 4, 2026 at 3:25 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. Even worse now seeing Epstein and Rothschild discuss “opportunities.” RIP Gonzalo https://t.co/uERmZmtA2A

Uncommonsince76
Posted - December 20, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Saved - December 21, 2025 at 10:06 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

POV: Your husband was just brutally murdered on live television. https://t.co/lV8PTgH0dm

Uncommonsince76
Posted - December 21, 2025 at 12:01 AM
Saved - December 21, 2025 at 3:05 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I note that in 1995, Erika Kirk’s Jewish uncle Jack Solomon joined Utah Valley State College’s new Center for Jewish Studies board, hoping to bridge Jews and Mormons and guide Israel relations. They claim Charlie Kirk was murdered there; receipts and more info follow (1/3).

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 1995, Erika Kirk’s Jewish uncle Jack Solomon was a board member for the new “Center of Jewish Studies” at Utah Valley State College. The goal of the center was to “bridge the gap between Jews and Mormons and guide the relationship with “Israel.” Charlie Kirk was murdered at that specific university… Receipts and more info below 👇 🧵 1/3

@ProjectConstitu - Project Constitution

🚨SHOCKING: Erika Kirk’s “Devout Catholic Widow” Act COLLAPSES—Half Her Family Is Jewish & Her Cousin Just Exposed the Wild Party Girl Lies!😱 Erika Kirk's "pure conservative Catholic widow" persona is FALLING APART—and the family secrets are insane. She claims no real dating/partying/drinking for years before Charlie, shades wild lifestyles, and presents as fully Catholic traditionalist. But look closer: Her aunt Karla Frantzve (her dad's sister) married casino tycoon Jack D. Solomon in Vegas (2002 marriage cert—30+ year age gap). Meet Karla Frantzve Solomon—lives in Salt Lake City, Utah, studied at University of Arizona, profile still up showing her with Jack. Jack built the famous Colorado Belle casino in Laughlin, restored Jerusalem's Zion Gate, co-founded Israel's armored corps museum at Latrun, trustee for Hebrew University, major donor to Jerusalem Foundation—deep pro-Israel power player with Utah roots. That marriage plugs Erika's family directly into prominent Jewish networks (Rothstein/Solomon names everywhere in records). Then there's Nicole Rothstein—Erika's actual COUSIN (through Karla) but always called "best friend/twin soul/sister/roommate." Nicole's old posts: them at Madonna concerts, Rockefeller Christmas tree, 2AM NYC nights with drinks flowing. Nicole dropped partying videos from their roommate days. Cabot Phillips (TPUSA insider) spamming "I can't stop watching this." Nicole: "that's our girl ❤️" (tagging Erika). Yet Erika goes on national TV: "I didn't drink," barely dated, criticized roommates for heavy partying/multiple men. She lived the full Miss Arizona/model/NYC nightlife before Charlie—fine if true, but why LIE about it while preaching "trad values" and running TPUSA? Erika scrubbed old posts, completely hides the Jewish family side, and downplays Nicole as just a pal. Charlie built everything on authenticity. His widow now leads it. Why hide the cousin? The heritage? The partying past? The facade is cracking hard. I've got ALL the receipts: Karla's FB profile, marriage certs, IG partying proof, donor pages, family ties, Cabot comments, and more. Who's shocked? Drop your thoughts. Big THANK YOU🙏to @Mia_Stretch who's expert investigative skills we're really put to the test here. She and I worked together to compile all of this information. Please Go FOLLOW Her!! RT and Tag @RealCandaceO and let's make sure she knows this...

Uncommonsince76
Posted - December 11, 2025 at 9:39 PM
Saved - December 11, 2025 at 11:36 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“When you think of Monsanto you think of Chemicals right? Would you believe me if I told you they were a Jewish pirate family that got started in the big slave trade in New Orleans?” -Dr. Longo https://t.co/KLL147iHAS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 presents a line of inquiry and a set of provocative claims about Monsanto. The conversation begins with a question about whether the listener has heard of the Monsanto family and what they associate with the name. The reply prompts the common stereotype that the name is linked to chemicals—specifically “the chemical, the nasty, like, shitty chemicals.” Building on that stereotype, Speaker 0 then introduces a controversial and broader assertion: that Monsanto is not only connected to chemicals but originated as a powerful, Caribbean Jewish pirate-style family. The claim continues with a provocative framing: they “got started in the big slave trade in New Orleans.” The speaker states that the Monsanto family were slave traders first, positioning them as “one of the most prominent” in that historical trade, and argues that their involvement in slavery preceded their later involvement in chemical ventures. The speaker emphasizes a causal thread or progression: the family’s early prominence in slave trading laid the groundwork for their later notoriety in chemical industries, leading to the claim that they “poisoned us with chemicals.” This phrase is presented as a historical fact in the speaker’s view, highlighted by the assertion that it is “a fact” that is not discussed openly. The speaker contrasts this alleged history with contemporary public discourse, noting that many people are talking about Monsanto on platforms like TikTok, but “no one talk[ing]” about the alleged slave-trading origins and the supposed early acts of poisoning associated with the family. In sum, Speaker 0 frames Monsanto as a name associated with chemicals in public perception, but counters with a narrative that the Monsanto family began as slave traders in New Orleans, describing them as a prominent lineage tied to the slave trade before transitioning into chemical enterprises, and asserting that they “poisoned us with chemicals” as a matter of historical fact that remains under-discussed in popular discourse. The speaker points to online chatter about Monsanto on TikTok as evidence that the topic is discussed superficially, without addressing these claimed origins.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Have you ever heard of a family by the name of Monsanto? Yes. You what do you think of Monsanto? You think of chemicals. Right? Yeah. The chemical, the nasty, like, shitty chemicals. Would you believe me if I told you they were they were one of those Caribbean Jewish pirates of the Caribbean family? And that they got started in the big slave trade in New Orleans? Wow. They were slave traders first, The Monsanto family, way before they got into chemicals, was a slave trading family, one of the most prominent poisoned us with chemicals there. This is a fact, and they don't talk about it. And you have all these people screaming about Monsanto on TikTok and stuff, and no one talk
Uncommonsince76
Posted - November 28, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Saved - November 28, 2025 at 2:41 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see, from a map of Germany and Poland before and after World War I, that Poland didn’t exist and large swaths were German territory. This framed the Poland–Germany dispute. I note Hitler wanted the Danzig corridor and reports of mistreatment of Germans in Poland; he was greeted by applause in the corridor when he invaded. I reject the idea he aimed to conquer the world for land, and I question Britain’s empire-destroying choice to “save” a country it didn’t save.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the most red pilling things you can do to inform yourself about the second world war is simply look at a map of Germany and Poland before World War I and after World War I. You’ll notice before World War I Poland does not exist, and large Swaths of it are German territory. This was the crux of the argument between Poland and Germany . Hitler was looking to get the Danzig corridor back, which was mostly a German enclave. He was also receiving reports that they (German people in Poland) were being treated terribly. When Hitler ultimately decided to invade the Nazis were greeted with thunderous applause from the Germans in the Danzig corridor. The idea that Hitler was trying to take over the world because of a territorial dispute over German land is insane. But what is even more insane is the idea that Britain had to destroy its empire in order to save a country it didn’t even save.

Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 21, 2025 at 2:07 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 10:01 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“The author understood Mossad infiltrated NIAID/NIH and was scheming a large bioweapons attack…” That’s not some whack job writing that, but respected immunologist J Bart Classen in a scientific journal…. You just don’t know about it. https://t.co/ugXj6I20pU

Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 20, 2025 at 1:49 PM
Saved - October 21, 2025 at 6:29 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is Hitler describing the Stock Market as a tool for Jewish control over an economic system, that ultimately grinds down the interest of the nation through speculation and swindle… He nailed it. https://t.co/KXed16XgkV

Video Transcript AI Summary
The transcript argues that there was a gradual monetization of the entire labor force and the creation of a share system, with the stock exchange becoming the conductor of the national economy. It claims that the owners of this institution were, without exception, Jews, and that the few non-Jews involved were only token Christians meant to maintain a public illusion that these institutions are natural to all peoples, while in reality they originate from the Jewish essence. Europe is described as being at a crossroads, dividing into Western Europe on one side and Central and Eastern Europe on the other. Western Europe, especially England, advanced in industrialization, drawing numerous agricultural laborers into cities to form a new fourth estate. A key point asserted is that England, like France, had relatively few Jews, so the urban masses did not come into direct contact with this “foreign nation,” and any aversion did not have strong sustenance. The text contends that Jews in England, numbering about 50,000 to 60,000 at the time, Europeanized themselves to such an extent that they remained hidden from the ordinary eye of the common people. They were not noticed as pillars of the economy or as bearers of great capital, and they no longer appeared as foreigners but as Englishmen themselves. This concealment, it is claimed, prevented antisemitism from gaining fundamental power in these countries, and the same situation is asserted for France. It is then claimed that democracy could be introduced in these countries, permitting a form of government that allegedly allowed the outweighing of intelligence and true energy by the sheer dead weight of the masses. In this context, a small class of Jewish intelligence allegedly operated within the British population to manipulate the broad masses, who, unaware of whom they were obeying, served the purposes of this small class.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In parallel with this, however, there was a gradual monetization of the entire labor force. The share system came into being. And as a result, the stock exchange gradually became the conductor of the entire national economy, but the owners of this institution were and are without exception, Jews. I say without exception because the few more than who participate in it as non Jews are in the end nothing more than token Christians who are needed to keep up the pretense to the broad masses that these institutions are natural to all peoples and their economies, while in reality, they are institutions which correspond exclusively to the essence of the Jewish people and thus also spring from it. At that time, Europe stood at a crossroads. It began to divide into two halves, Western Europe on the one hand and Central And Eastern Europe on the other. Western Europe first advanced in industrialization, especially in England, crowds of agricultural laborers, sons of farmers, or ruined farmers themselves poured into the cities and formed a new fourth estate. But there is one important fact here which many failed to take into account. England, like France, had relatively few Jews. The consequence of this, however, was that the great masses concentrated in the cities did not come into direct contact with this foreign nation, and the aversion which would necessarily arise did not find sufficient nourishment. Finally, the Jews of England, who at that time numbered scarcely 50 to 60,000, were able to Europeanize themselves with playful ease to such an extent that they remained hidden from the primitive eye of the common man. And he could not notice them as pillars of the economy, but especially as the bearers of great capital. They no longer appeared as foreigners, but as Englishmen themselves. This prevented antisemitism from gaining fundamental power in these countries. The same was true of France precisely because of this, however. It was possible to introduce in these countries the system known as democracy. Precisely in these countries, it was possible to establish a form of government that could mean nothing but the outweighing of intelligence and true energy by the sheer dead weight of the masses. In other words, it was possible there for the small class of Jewish intelligence here hidden in the British people to manipulate the broad masses with playful ease in such a way that the latter, unaware of whom they were obeying, served the purposes of this small class. There

@cimmerian_v - Cimmerian Pervert

Yes, they are https://t.co/r4Q7e8yg4T

Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 15, 2025 at 4:53 AM
Saved - October 15, 2025 at 10:49 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I spot Gavin Wax, the Jewish “republican” who helped leak those edgy group chat messages, seen with democrat Chuck Schumer handing a flag to a “Holocaust survivor” who lived in Italy. There’s no such thing as “democrat” or “republican”—it’s Jews vs you.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Oh look! There’s Gavin Wax. The Jewish “republican” that worked to get these “edgy group chat” messages leaked… Notice him with democrat Chuck Schumer? These supposed opposing jews are handing out an American flag to a “Holocaust survivor”… only one problem. She lived in Italy during the war. 😂 There is no such thing as “democrat” or “republican”. It’s jews vs you.

@hayasaka_aryan - Kaguya’s Top Gal

The jewish guy that leaked the Republican groupchats https://t.co/Kj9C9jNkpA

Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Saved - October 2, 2025 at 1:49 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“(Israel) is going to try and ethnically cleanse Gaza.” -Charlie Kirk https://t.co/ptDUe6xMNA

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker says 'Fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate' I gotta be careful the way I say this. 'To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza.' They say 'They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from that.' 'And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge.' They add: 'the idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's more after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets.' But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. 'COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein.' 'When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Fact is now Bibi and the Israeli hard right government has a mandate I gotta be careful the way I say this. To they're gonna try to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Yep. I mean, that that's and I'm I don't use that term lightly. Okay? They're talking about basically removing 2,500,000 people from that. Okay? And honestly, they have a mandate to go seek justice and revenge. They do. The the there is they this idea that they need to have a true truce or a peace treaty, that's more after you see women and children be burned alive and dragged to the streets. But there are some serious questions here, Patrick. And let me tell you, my pattern recognition over the last five years has become pretty sharp. COVID, Maui fires, you know, Epstein. When I see a story and it doesn't click, we're our guts are usually right.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - October 1, 2025 at 12:56 PM
Saved - October 1, 2025 at 5:20 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews will conspire together to get powerful politicians to lobby for the sale of a social media platform to another billionaire Jew, then immediately start censoring criticism of Jews. But if I say Jews run the west, I am the crazy one.

@RedPillMediaX - Red Pill Media

⚡️🇮🇱🇺🇸 BREAKING Since Jewish billionaires took control of TikTok, the Juice emoji has officially been BANNED. https://t.co/Mgi4sbE3y1

Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 23, 2025 at 5:27 AM
Saved - September 23, 2025 at 8:00 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Damn I had to look this up. This unaired SNL skit was supposed to air in 2013 but was cut. It’s accurately making fun of all the congressmen that trip over themselves to support Israel. It would be pretty funny if it wasn’t so sadly accurate. https://t.co/YEEU9Rf9YK

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 1: Why don't you like Israel? Speaker 2: Senator, I support the state of Israel. The junior senator from South Carolina, mister Scott, says, "As an African American Republican from South Carolina, love of Israel is in my blood. I'm sorry. I just love that little country so much." He proclaims Israel "the warmest, the the most generous, kindest, gentlest, the most self effacing" and adds, "Israel has the best food. What? They they got the best beaches, most beautiful women in the world." "That's very subjective." He also asserts, "the tallest mountain in the world is in Israel." "That's definitely not true." "Yeah. And Ben Gurion Airport, that's that's the best airport ever." The Vermont senator says, "I am a Jew" and "I love the state of Israel," calling GOP actions "pure grandstanding." McCain notes, "no one in this room cares more deeply about the safety and security of Israel than I do." The hypothetical: Netanyahu asks you to go on national television and perform oral sex on a donkey. "Would you do that for Israel?" "I don't think so." "Hey. I'll do it for Israel. Bring me the donkey." "For Israel, I'd do it in a second, but then I grew up on a farm."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Swear. The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 1: Why don't you like Israel? Speaker 2: Senator, I support the state of Israel. Speaker 0: The chair recognizes the junior senator from South Carolina, mister Scott. Speaker 3: Thank you, mister chairman. I asked my colleagues to forgive me because the subject of Israel is a very emotional one for me. As an African American Republican from South Carolina, love of Israel is in my blood. I'm sorry. I just love that little country so much. The people of Israel are the warmest, the the most generous, kindest, gentlest, the most self effacing Speaker 2: Really? Speaker 3: Easygoing people on God's green earth. Israel has the best food. What? They they got the best beaches, most beautiful women in the world. Speaker 2: That's very subjective. Speaker 3: What else they got? They got they make the best movies, and they have the best rock and roll hip hop. Speaker 2: Well, that's doubtful. Speaker 3: You know the tallest mountain in the world is in Israel. Speaker 2: That's definitely not true. Speaker 3: Yeah. And Ben Gurion Airport, that's that's the best airport ever. Speaker 2: I guess. Speaker 0: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 3: So when you criticize Israel, you're walking on the fighting side of me. Speaker 1: I'm sorry, but I've I've got to say something. Speaker 0: The chair recognizes the senator from Vermont. Speaker 1: As everyone in this room knows, I am a Jew. Speaker 3: No. No. Agree. Really? Speaker 4: An old Jew, and like all old Jews, I Speaker 1: love the state of Israel. But what my Republican colleagues are doing here is pure grandstanding. Speaker 0: The chair recognizes the senator from Arizona, mister McCain. Speaker 5: Thank you, mister chairman. Senator Hagel, I I think you know that no one in this room cares more deeply about the safety and security of Israel than I do. Speaker 2: What? That is a lie. I I love Israel. Order. Speaker 5: So let me pose to you a hypothetical. You get an urgent call from the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who truly is one of the greatest men of this or any age. Speaker 2: Bingo. Damn straight. Damn straight. Speaker 5: And he says to you, it is vital to Israel's security that you go on national television that night and perform oral sex on a donkey. Speaker 2: Oral sex on a donkey? Speaker 5: That's right. That's right. Would you do that for Israel? Speaker 2: Senator, with all due respect, why would the security of Israel Speaker 5: Excuse me, senator. If it's alright with you, I'll ask the questions here. Now remember, the survival of Israel is at stake. Would you fillet that donkey? Speaker 2: I don't think so. Speaker 5: Then I regret to say, senator, I cannot support your confirmation. Speaker 2: Hey. I'll do Speaker 3: it for Israel. Bring me the donkey. Speaker 2: For Israel, I'd do it in a second, but then I grew up on a farm. So

@VoxExVeritas - VoxΩVeritas

SNL banned episode. It was too real for TV. This shit aged like wine.. https://t.co/pVTA5I1d97

Video Transcript AI Summary
Next week, the full Senate will vote on whether to confirm Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense. On Friday, Hagel testified again before the committee handling his nomination, and it did not go very well. The hearing featured tense questions over Hagel's past remarks about the U.S.–Israel relationship, including: "The United States will always have an extremely close relationship with the state of Israel, but that's not to say that in every single instance, our interest and those of Israel will be identical." The exchange also included partisan bravado, with remarks like "As everyone in this room knows, I am a Jew." A fellow senator pressed Israel's importance, and a McCain hypothetical asking Hagel to perform on "donkey" triggered a heated debate about what he would or would not do for Israel: "Would you do that for Israel?" and "Would you fillet that donkey? I don't." The discussion turns to ridiculous assertions and corrections about donkeys versus mules, and Hagel slips away as the hearing veers off track, cut to Saturday Night Live.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Coming up on C SPAN. Next week, the full Senate will vote on whether to confirm Chuck Hagel to be the next Secretary of Defense. On Friday, the former senator appeared once more before the committee handling his nomination. It did not go very well. Speaker 1: If the room could come to order, please. The chair recognizes the distinguished senator from South Carolina, Mr. Graham. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Speaker 2: And thank you, senator Hagel, for appearing before us once again. Speaker 3: -Not at all, senator. Speaker 2: -As you know, senator, I like you. Speaker 3: -I like you too. Speaker 2: That's why I have to tell you that I'm frankly troubled by some comments you have made in the press regarding our relationship with our closest ally, Israel. These comments trouble me. They trouble me. I find them troubling and am troubled by them. Specifically, a quote that appeared in the 04/11/1998 edition of The Washington Post, you said, and I quote, The United States will always have an extremely close relationship with the state of Israel, but that's not to say that in every single instance, our interest and those of Israel will be identical. Now, I like you, senator. I do. You're a good man. But when I read that statement, I thought to myself, is this a typo? Are my are my eyes deceiving me? I mean, does he really think that our interests and those of Israel could ever be different? Or have I slipped into some parallel dimension where white is black and black is white, where the sun rises in the West instead of the East like it's supposed to, where cats go wolf wolf and dogs go meow. Is this some kind of crazy dream world where the sky is green and the grass is blue, where horses ride people, or instead of going nine and seven, the San Diego Chargers went seven and nine, where the school bus doesn't take kids to school, it takes parents away from school. Like, some mad, bizarro universe where Speaker 1: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 2: Why don't you like Israel? Speaker 3: Senator, I support the state of Israel. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the junior senator from South Carolina, mister Scott. Speaker 4: Thank you, mister chairman. I asked my colleagues to forgive me because the subject of Israel is a very emotional one for me. As an African American Republican from South Carolina, love of Israel is in my blood. I'm sorry. I just love that little country so much. The people of Israel are the warmest, the the most generous, kindest, gentlest, the the most self effacing Speaker 2: Really? Speaker 4: Easygoing people on God's green earth. Israel has the best food. What? They they got the best beaches, most beautiful women in the world. Speaker 3: That's very subjective. Speaker 4: What else they got? They got they make the best movies, and they have the best rock and roll hip hop. Speaker 3: Well, that's doubtful. Speaker 4: You know the tallest mountain in the world is in Israel. Speaker 3: That's definitely not true. Speaker 4: Yeah. And Ben Gurion Airport, that's that's the best airport ever. Speaker 3: I guess. Speaker 1: The time of the senator has expired. Speaker 4: So when you criticize Israel, you're walking on the fighting side of me. Speaker 3: I'm sorry, but I've I've got to say something. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the senator from Vermont. Speaker 5: As everyone in this room knows, I am a Jew. Speaker 4: No. Really? Really? Really? Speaker 5: An old Jew, and like all old Jews, I Speaker 3: love the state of Israel. But what my Republican colleagues are doing here is pure grand grandstanding. Speaker 1: The chair recognizes the senator from Arizona, mister McCain. Speaker 6: Thank you, mister chairman. Senator Hagel, I think you know that no one in this room cares more deeply about the safety and security of Israel than I do. Speaker 4: What? That is a lie. Speaker 2: I I love Israel. Order. Speaker 6: So let me pose to you a hypothetical. You get an urgent call from the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who truly is one of the greatest men of this or any age. Speaker 2: Bingo. Damn straight. Damn straight. Speaker 6: And he says to you, it is vital to Israel's security that you go on national television that night and perform oral sex on a donkey. Speaker 3: Oral sex on a donkey? Speaker 6: That's right. That's right. Would you do that for Israel? Speaker 3: Senator, with all due respect, why would the security of Israel Speaker 6: Excuse me, senator. If it's alright with you, I'll ask the questions here. Now remember, the survival of Israel is at stake. Would you fillet that donkey? I don't Speaker 3: think so. Speaker 6: Then I regret to say, senator, I cannot support your confirmation. Speaker 4: Hey. I'll do it for Israel. Bring me the donkey. Speaker 3: For Israel, I'd do it in a second, but then I grew up on a farm. So Speaker 5: Excuse me. Excuse me, mister chairman. Once again, this is pure grandstanding by by Republican colleagues. In any case, filleting a donkey is not even possible. Donkeys are castrated. Speaker 1: I believe my distinguished colleague from Vermont is thinking of mules. Donkeys are not castrated. And even if they were, you couldn't tea bag them maybe, but you could you could still, you know, fillet them. Does the witness have a question? Speaker 3: Do I need to be here or I Speaker 5: Fine. Yeah. Will stipulate that the donkey or the mule or whatever, you know, has all its private parts. Speaker 0: It worked At this point, the hearing began to veer off track, and senator Hagel was able to slip away without anyone noticing. We now rejoin Saturday Night Live already in progress.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 21, 2025 at 4:20 PM
Saved - September 21, 2025 at 4:50 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Video footage of TPUSA illegally removing the SD card from a 2Nd camera right in front of Charlie Kirk 5 minutes after he was shot. I bet those cameras had great angles of the shooting and or alleged shooter. We’ll never know now…. https://t.co/38AS5VV3ko

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 instructs others to 'stay stay back and back to the grass as much as possible.' He states, 'I the guy who was arrested, got a photo of him.' The exchange ends with 'Yeah.'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. Okay. Just stay stay back and back to the grass as much as possible. I the guy who was arrested, got a photo of him. Yeah.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 9, 2025 at 8:25 PM
Saved - September 21, 2025 at 2:54 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Out of all the books, political commentary, and cartoons made by Scott Adams, this will be remembered as his most important advice. “The best advice I can give to White people, is to get the Hell away from Black people.” -Scott Adams https://t.co/vqs1gzhkTK

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker cites a poll claiming that 'nearly half of all blacks, are not okay with white people' and calls that a hate group: 'that's a hate group. That's a hate group.' He urges white people to 'get the hell away from black people. Just get the fuck away.' He describes moving to a neighborhood with a 'very low black population' because 'there's a high correlation between the density,' and cites Don Lemon to say 'even Don Lemon sees a big difference in your own quality of living based on where you live and who's there.' He argues, 'it makes no sense whatsoever as a white citizen of America to try to help black citizens anymore' and that helping Black America is 'no longer a rational impulse.' He adds, 'It's over. Don't don't even think it's worth trying. Totally not trying.' 'And there we go. You didn't expect that today, did you? But those who don't wanna focus on education, you just need to get away from them. Just get as much distance as you can. That's my'
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So if if, you know, nearly half of all blacks, are not okay with white people, according to this poll, not according to me, according to this poll, that's a hate group. That's a hate group. And I don't wanna have anything to do with them. And I would say, you know, based on the current way things are going, the best advice I would give to white people is to get the hell away from black people. Just get the fuck away. Where wherever you have to go, just get away because there's no fixing this. This can't be fixed. Alright. This can't be fixed. You just have to escape. So that's what I did. I went to a neighborhood where, you know, I have a very low black population because unfortunately, there you know, there's a high correlation between the density. And this is according to Don Lemon, by the way. So here, I'm just quoting Don Lemon when he notes that the when he lived in a mostly black neighborhood, there were a bunch of problems that he didn't see in white neighborhoods. So even Don Lemon sees a big difference in your own quality of living based on where you live and who's there. So I I think it makes no sense whatsoever as a white citizen of America to try to help black citizens anymore. It doesn't make sense. It's it's no longer a rational impulse. And so I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna back off from being helpful to black America because it doesn't seem like it pays off. Like, I've been doing it all my life and I've been the only outcome is I'd be I get called a racist. That's the only outcome. It makes no sense to help black Americans if you're white. The the it's over. Don't don't even think it's worth trying. Totally not trying. And there we go. You didn't expect that today, did you? But those who don't wanna focus on education, you just need to get away from them. Just get as much distance as you can. That's my
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 19, 2025 at 5:17 AM
Saved - September 19, 2025 at 7:11 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I witnessed a man in grey using Charlie Kirk's chair right after the shooting to remove what seemed like an SD card from the overhead camera, indicating evidence tampering. He then discreetly handed it off to another man, who tucked it into his hat and walked away, suggesting a clear cover-up.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Minutes after Charlie Kirk’s shooting a man in grey uses Kirk’s chair (evidence tampering) to jump up and remove presumably an SD card from the above head camera (more evidence tampering). But here is the kicker. He slyly passes it off to another man behind the tent, who then stuffs it in his hat and walks away like nothing happens…. 🤯 😳. Looks like a textbook cover up.

Video Transcript AI Summary
Something out fireworks. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk Athletes, you need to leave. In the scene, the speaker conveys that a safety team is present and references an active shooter situation involving Charlie Kirk. They report that Charlie Kirk has been shot, and that Charlie Kirk got hit is cited as what the security detail said. A family member's message adds urgency, noting that Charlie Kirk Athletes, you need to leave.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Something out fireworks. Safety team is here. I just heard them say the active shooter, Charlie Kirk has been shot. Charlie Kirk got hit is what the what the security detail just said. My son just messaged me and says that Charlie Kirk Athletes, you need to leave.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 11, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Saved - September 11, 2025 at 4:56 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“I have less ability online to criticize the Israeli government without backlash, than actual Israelis do. And that’s really really weird, isn’t it Megyn?” -Charlie Kirk https://t.co/x1Vm2JVoVV

Video Transcript AI Summary
"We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan?" "That's not right. Wrong headed." "I So got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand." "I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer." "He says, I think he would have told me." "He didn't say he had any of those connections." "I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true." "It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein." "But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: We're just gonna try to we're we're gonna just stamp out everything type type of practice, but it goes to the point where if, for example, if I I have less ability sometimes online to criticize the Israeli government about backlash than actual Israelis do. And that's really, really weird, isn't it, Megan? Speaker 1: That's not right. Wrong headed. I I'll tell you this for me. I So got some blowback after saying Mossad possibilities with Epstein, a comment behind which I stand. I mean, I really and I've, of course, reported what Alan Dershowitz has said as his lawyer. He says, I think he would have told me. He didn't say he had any of those connections. I hear all that. That doesn't mean it's not true. I think all these things should be explored. It's one of the many things that should be explored around Epstein. But saying that and also saying he might be a US asset, etcetera, doesn't make you antisemitic.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 2, 2025 at 3:36 PM
Saved - September 3, 2025 at 12:10 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Ominous clip from CSPAN in 1998. Here you see the Jewish controlled media already planting into the minds the Osama Bin Laden was our main enemy… When in reality Al Qaeda was a response to overwhelming support for Israel… https://t.co/rXdtCj3wbE

Video Transcript AI Summary
Caller Dale discusses the Swiss banking settlement and urges politicians to pressure Swiss banks to quit being bankers for the international terrorist and drug dealers. He says, "this guy that blew up the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania is some billionaire from Saudi Arabia" and wonders where his money is kept, suggesting "the Cayman Islands or Swiss or the whole host of these other banks," to push a cleanup so terrorists and drug dealers won't have any place to put their money. He cites a front-page LA Times profile of "the Saudi dissident ... Hosami Bin Laden," noting "his father had 52 children from a number of different wives" and that he is "worth several $100,000,000 according to Robin Wright," with the piece explaining how "he turned against the Americans essentially as a result of Operation Desert Storm in 1990." Speaker 2 references Jonathan Quitney's Endless Enemies, arguing that "The United States foreign policy simply creates enemies wherever we go" and that "we shoot at people and people get shot at with American bullets and American weapons"; if "this man turned against the United States government as a result of desert storm, we've created another enemy there we might not have had before."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Dale, good morning. Speaker 1: Yes. Good morning, and thank you for taking my call. I just wanted to talk about the Swiss banking settlement, and I think that's great that they finally owed up to their mistakes. What I like to see are politicians put pressure on the Swiss banks to quit being the bankers for the international terrorist and drug dealers. Supposedly, this guy that blew up the embassies in Kenya and Tanzania is some billionaire from Saudi Arabia. I wonder where that guy keeps his money probably in the Cayman Islands or Swiss or the whole host of these other banks. And I wish there was some pressure in the cleanup of the banking system and all these terrorists and drug dealers won't have any place to put their money. Speaker 0: There's a story on the front page below the fold in the Washington edition of the LA Times that profiles the Saudi dissident who you referred to, Hosami Bin Laden. He is his father had 52 children from a number of different wives. He is, worth several $100,000,000 according to Robin Wright who wrote the piece for the LA Times. And he profiles she profiles how he turned against the Americans essentially as a result of Operation Desert Storm in 1990. Speaker 2: Well, you know, there was a there was a very interesting book written a couple of years ago by a journalist named Jonathan Quitney. It was called Endless Enemies. And his theory was that The United States foreign policy simply creates enemies wherever we go, and and I think this is another example. When when we intervene in the in the affairs of other countries and we shoot at people and people get shot at with American bullets and American weapons, we create enemies. And if this if this is true, that this man turned against the United States government as a result of desert storm, we've created another enemy there we might not have had before. Speaker 0: Two things related to this, an editorial cartoon in
Uncommonsince76
Posted - September 1, 2025 at 1:01 AM
Saved - September 1, 2025 at 4:34 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is Fred Leucther, the American execution expert who proved the gas chambers in Auschwitz we’re frauds describing how his career was later destroyed and how he was followed by Israeli agents… https://t.co/BhVRp0Q3rf

Video Transcript AI Summary
After I testified in court, life turned upside down. I faced a spurious charge of practicing as an engineer without a license; 'One doesn't need a license. I don't believe in any single state to be an engineer.' I was persecuted; friends threatened; I lost my job; my execution equipment was put out of business because the Department of Corrections were afraid to deal with me. A Missouri convention warden faced pressure; his secretary apologized. My house was firebombed; friends threatened. I was followed by two Mossad agents from Israel during the trial. My cousin, told by the head of the Massachusetts State Police, said two Mossad agents were in Malden and watched by the State Department, CIA, and FBI. I blocked a road, confronted them, pulled out a 45 caliber pistol and touched his nose with it; they fled. This was around 1993-1994, before I went to California.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Anyway, after after I testified in court, my life essentially was turned upside down. I was put through hell. I was prosecuted in court on a spurious charge of practicing as an engineer without a license. And one doesn't need a license. I I don't believe in any single state to be an engineer. You only have to have a license if you certify blueprints and I didn't do that. I I was persecuted. I had my friends threatened. I had I lost job office. I was effectively put out of business in my execution equipment business because the Department of Corrections were afraid to deal with me. People that work for the state and particularly Department of Corrections are political animals and they were afraid. I had one warden on was at a convention in in in the Midwest. It was actually Missouri and I walked into the coffee shop at the hotel and there was a big curved coffee bar in the center and I sat down opposite him and I looked at him and I waved. He looked at me, he got up and he walked out of the room. And when I got back to my room I had a phone call and his secretary had called me so I called him back and she said, Well, then so and so wanted me to apologize. She says, but there's been so much political pressure that she said he was afraid to be in the same room with you. Oh, well. So I mean it was terrible. I had my house fire bombed. I had my friends threatened. I I was even followed by two Mossad agents who came over from Israel specifically to follow me around during the time of my trial. I was informed by by my cousin who had been informed by a gentleman who was ahead of the Massachusetts State Police. And when we were younger, we grew up and we played with that gentleman who was the head of the State Police. At any rate, he called my cousin. He says because of the fact that Freddy is facing the court now, I can't communicate with him. He says, but I'd like you to get a message to him. We've been advised by the by the State Department and by the CIA and by the FBI that there were two Mossad agents in Malden. We don't know what they're doing, but they're being watched. Well, I was unaware of this until she told me and for about three or four days I was being followed and I didn't know why I was being followed. Well, at any rate, after I found out the day following that, I was being followed again by a vehicle with tinted windows. It was I think it was a Cadillac or some such thing. And I got into a semi rural part of Malden and they followed me up the hill and I spun my car out and blocked the road. At that point I got out of the car and I down to the window and I pounded on the window of the driver's side. The gentleman rolled the window down. There were two very dark complected. I guess they were were were Jews from Israel. They could have been Arabs. Right. You know, they were Middle Eastern types. At that point I reached inside my jacket and I pulled out a 45 caliber pistol and I touched his nose with it and I asked him what he wanted. Well, the two gentlemen in the car, as dark complected as they were turned white. And the next thing I know, they put the car in the reverse, floored it, went up over the curb, hit somebody's fence, spun around, and took off down the street from whence they came. And I guess they didn't want some kind of an incident Right. Because I was legally carrying a firearm. I was legally protecting myself. They wouldn't have looked too good if in the news media. Oh, absolutely. And with the police, if they're foreign agents of a foreign government Sure. Following somebody around. Yeah. Yeah. So that was the last I saw them. I think they finally figured that I was a little too crazy to deal with. Now wait. What year was that about? That must have been about '60 that must have been about '93. Okay. '94. Right. It was before I went to California. Okay.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 29, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Saved - August 30, 2025 at 6:06 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve noticed that there are no books detailing German plans to exterminate all Jews, while there are many about a supposed Jewish plan to destroy Germans during the war. Additionally, there was an American plan, the Morganthau Plan, aimed at disarming and starving millions of Germans. Hitler and the Germans fought fiercely because they believed their survival was at stake.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Books about German plans to kill all the jews… doesn’t exist. Books about the Jewish plan to destroy the Germans. Widely available during the war. Official German plans to kill all jews… doesn’t exist. Official American plan, led by a Jew (Henry Morganthau) to disarm and starve millions of Germans- Morganthau Plan Why did Hitler and the Germans fight to the bitter end? Because opposite of what you have been told, they believed their survival depended on it..

Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 23, 2025 at 2:14 PM
Saved - August 23, 2025 at 9:40 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Earlier this week Marlon Brando apologized to Jewish leaders for claiming “Hollywood is run by jews.” The jews accepted his apology, and said he is free to work again.” - Norm Macdonald https://t.co/aXIcPGACkc

Video Transcript AI Summary
Earlier this week, actor Marlon Brando met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on Larry King Live, including the remark 'Hollywood is run by Jews.' The meeting focused on Brando's apology and the context of those statements, with Brando expressing remorse for the remarks he made. The Jewish leaders accepted the apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again, effectively clearing him to resume professional activities in the entertainment industry. This development followed Brando's outreach regarding controversial remarks from the Larry King Live appearance, and the leaders' decision to move forward by granting permission for Brando to return to work in the profession.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Earlier this week, actor Marlon Brando met with Jewish leaders to apologize for comments he made on Larry King Live, among them that, quote, Hollywood is run by Jews. The Jewish leaders accepted the actor's apology and announced that Brando is now free to work again.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 20, 2025 at 3:38 PM
Saved - August 21, 2025 at 12:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the complex relationship between Putin and Jewish influence in global politics. I trace Putin's rise from the collapse of the Soviet Union and the perceived exploitation by Jewish oligarchs under Yeltsin, leading to Putin's crackdown on them. I argue that Western media and politicians, often linked to Jewish interests, have portrayed Putin as a dictator while ignoring his efforts to protect Russian sovereignty. I suggest that the ongoing conflict in Ukraine and the portrayal of Putin are influenced by these dynamics, advocating for a leader like him to counter perceived external control.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why do the jews hate Putin? Why does the mass media spend so Much time trying to rile up the masses to go to war with him? Why does Mark Levin, Brian Krassentein, and Ben Shapiro do everything they can to tell us opposing Putin is in “our interest.” I’ll tell you why. 🧵 1/18 https://t.co/DWNNXAhn73

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

First we must go back and see the roots of what led to Putins rise to power. Remember that the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991. The process of “liberalization” and turning Russias communist economy into a capitalist economy was left up to the planted Jewish puppet, Boris Yeltsin. As you can see he was president from 1991-1999. 🧵 2/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Here is one Jewish puppet besides another… (Yeltsin/ Clinton) and you can see how they were working together for the “new world order of the west. -discussions of economic prosperity for Russia -American investment -Nuclear arms deals -Expansion of NATO.. Many may not remember, but when Bill Clinton was not sleeping with Mossad spy Monica Lewinsky, he was very much serving Jewish foreign policy with his overrepresented Jewish leadership in that area… (Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, William Cohen, Victoria Nuland, etc) 🧵 3/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
"Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works." "We want Russia to be involved in it." "We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it." "We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that." "So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working." "That is all I can tell you." "The more we say about it, the worse it'll be." "We are moving toward peace." "The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia." "That has not been done yet." "There is no relationship between two"
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Our position is that we're going to have an operation that works. We want Russia to be involved in it. We made some progress today consistent with both of our objectives with neither side giving up the things that were most important to it. We made some progress today on that, and we recognized that some of the things that needed to be decided, neither of us could in good conscience decide without giving our military leaders the chance to work through that. So we agreed that this week this week, our military leaders would be keep working. That is all I can tell you. The more we say about it, the worse it'll be. We are moving toward peace. The first and most important thing is make peace in Bosnia. That has not been done yet. There is no relationship between two
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0 outlines three outcomes: (1) there will be a NATO-Russia agreement that all the leaders will support; although they disagree on expansion, they agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. (2) the notion that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions, and that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. (3) they resolved a number of roadblocks relating to START II and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of START II and we would together support guidelines for START III, which we would hope could be negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results. Speaker 1: Just a moment. you've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Different. One, the idea that there will be a NATO Russia agreement that all the leaders will support. That's a significant thing. We agree to disagree about the question of expansion, but we agree that there must be a partnership between NATO and Russia going forward into the future. Two, the the notion that that Russia should play a larger role in international economic institutions. And that if certain internal changes are made, which president Yeltsin has already announced his support for, then The United States will make a more vigorous effort to facilitate investment in Russia. And third, and I think almost unexpected even among us, we were working along here hoping this would happen. We resolved a number of roadblocks relating to start two and other related issues which permitted us to say that president Yeltsin would seek a prompt ratification of start two and we would together support guidelines for START three, which we would hope could be, negotiated quickly after that, which would reduce the Cold War arsenals by, over 80% from their Cold War height to more or less 80%. These are dramatic and very substantial results, and I'm very pleased with them. Wolf? Speaker 1: Just a moment. I'd like to continue for a second longer. You've touched on a very current issue which has to be clarified all the way. Well, you understand, of course, why is it that the state DOMA has not yet ratified START two?
Video Transcript AI Summary
“I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform.” He notes that in 1993 versus 1992 “the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income,” “inflation was brought down,” and “the stabilization of the currency was improved.” He supports further integrating the Russian economy into a global market system, acknowledges dislocations, and urges assistance so the Russian people know there is effort to address these problems. He predicts benefits will flow in the coming year as trade and investment expand and stresses the need for a social safety net and retraining. He says the people of Russia have to define their own future and rejects the idea that the US directs policy, declaring that as long as we share “the same values and the same vision” he wants to be “an equal partner” because “the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed.”
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I I commend president Yeltsin for his commitment to continuing the path of economic reform. If you look at 1993 as compared with 1992, If you look at how much the deficit was reduced as a percentage of annual income, if you look at how much inflation was brought down, if you look at how much the stabilization of the currency was improved. I think that the continued work toward hooking the Russian economy into a global economic system based on markets is a very sound thing. The we had great long talks about what could be done and what kind of assistance The United States and others could provide to recognize that there are certain dislocations which come from these changes so that the the people of Russia will know that there is an effort being made to deal with those problems. But I also have to tell you that I believe that that the people will begin to benefit in ways that they could not see perhaps last year in the coming year when we have more trade and more investment. And as people around the world and and in The United States in particular see that the president is serious about this, I think the benefits will begin to flow. That plus constructing the kind of social support system and job retraining, unemployment, all those things that just have to be put together and are not easy to put together when you don't have one. I think these things will help a lot. The other point I'd like to make to you sir, is that from my point of view, President Yeltsin has been unfairly criticized in some quarters for his relationship with The United States. The implication that somehow we have tried to direct the course of Russian policy or it is just not accurate and not true. The people of Russia have to define their own future. All I have tried to do is to say that as long as we share the same values and the same vision, as long as we share a dream of of political freedom and economic freedom and respect for our neighbors, I want to be an equal partner because I believe this is a very great nation and that the world, the whole world and particularly Europe has a real interest in seeing Russia succeed and seeing this reform movement succeed. So I think our relationships in that sense have been quite correct all along and some have sought to miss, characterize them in a way that I think is not accurate.
Video Transcript AI Summary
Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Presidents, one near the end of his term, the other being Putin seemed indifferent to the American president, who had championed Yeltsin and liberalization and expanded NATO. Speaker 1: Putin conveys a huge amount through body language. He tries to show you that he's the alpha male in the room through the way he spreads his legs, through the way he slouches a bit in his chair. Speaker 2: And this is not what Clinton was used to when it came to Russia. He was used to having somebody he could relate to, and Putin is a cold fish. And Clinton didn't respond well to him. If mister Clinton was hoping for a foreign policy triumph, he won't get it here. Speaker 0: Later that day, Clinton received a warmer reception from Boris Yeltsin Yeltsin and issued a warning about Putin. Speaker 3: Bill Clinton looked hard into Yeltsin's eyes and said, I'm a little bit concerned about this young man that you have turned over the presidency to. He doesn't have democracy in his heart. And I will never forget the fa the expression that came over Yeltsin. Speaker 0: Yeltsin's confidants say by the end of his life, he would come to agree with Clinton. Speaker 3: Before Boris Yeltsin died, he told intimates that it was a great mistake for him to have selected Putin as his successor.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Well what’s the problem? Didn’t the Russian people love NATO expansion, economic liberalism, and de-nuclearization? As usual, the United States “sells liberalism” but what they mean is economic exploiting by Jewish capitalist. And Russia was no different. It didn’t take long for the “Semibankirschina” (7 bankers) to own a majority of the assets, and they exploited the Russian people accordingly. And yes most of them were Jews. 🧵 4/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This led into the Russian financial crisis, and ultimately paved the way for a more nationalistic leader to come in. The people were aware of who their exploiters were. They also saw how chummy Yeltsin was with these Jewish oligarchs. Yeltsin was nervous he would be killed during the political unrest, so he needed a strong leader to take over for him, that would also agree to “pardon him.” That politically savvy, and strong leader, was Vladimir Putin. 🧵 5/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

One of the first things Putin did as president was meet with 20 or so of the rich men in Russia. (The predominantly Jewish oligarchs.) He told them flat out, the days of exploitation are done. They could still be rich, but they would have to stay out of his way, and the people would be served first. 🧵 6/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now, these Jewish billionaires did not take to that too kindly, but they shortly found out that Putin was not someone they could simply buy with money, or blackmail with Jeffrey Epstein schemes. Putin started dismantling these Jewish oligarchs from power one by one… -Vladimir Gusinsky -Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Khordorkovsky- Jew ✡️ -Boris Berezovsky- Jew ✡️ -Mikhail Prokhorov- Jew ✡️ This isn’t to say, he randomly singled out Jewish oligarchs. There are still Russian Jewish oligarchs today, but they respect the power that Putin holds. He only went after the ones that were undermining him and Russia, and in doing so he was able to return some assets to the state, and take control of some Of the media companies. 🧵 7/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Now some of you are thinking, well those are dictatorial actions. And “he should allow those oligarchs to exploit the people since you know that’s what democracy works.” But you still believe that democracy is “rule of the people.” It is not. Our modern day democracies are rule by media bosses with a mixture of lobbyist during the political process. (Rule of money rather) As such, the interest of a nation are ground down, and the nation is ran by “oligarchs” or in the case of the United States we call them Jewish billionaires. In 2007, Putin lays out his criticisms of NGO’s, the U.S. abuse of power and continued military intervention, the need to refrain from “nato expansion”, and called for a multipolar world. Effectively, after turning Russia around, he told the Jewish led west, he was not going to be pushed around. He also opposed their Talmudic new world order goal, and he has been correct about the detrimental effects of foreign intervention that the U.S. continues to engage in at the behest of the jews… From then on, our Jewish media bosses, state department, and war lords, had it out for Putin.. and they have been trying to overthrow him ever since. 🧵 8/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Спикер подчёркивает, что безопасность охватывает военно-политические, экономические и гуманитарные аспекты, и баланс явно нарушен. Он говорит: "ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран", и что "вскрыли бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ" и "формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных" НПО. По его словам, "гуманитарная сфера ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека", но "это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться." Такое вмешательство, по его мнению, "не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными." Он призывает ОБСЕ действовать по задачам и строить отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения и доверия. Россия, с тысячелетней историей, сохраняет независимую внешнюю политику и хочет сотрудничать с ответственными партнерами ради справедливого мироустройства для всех. Speaker notes: English translation of the Russian summary: Speaker emphasizes that security encompasses military-political, economic, and humanitarian aspects, and the balance is clearly broken. He states: "OSCE is trying to turn into a vulgar instrument of pursuing external political interests of one or a group of countries against others," and notes that "the bureaucratic apparatus of the OSCE has been exposed" and that "formally independent, but purposefully financed, and thus controlled" NGOs exist. According to him, "the humanitarian sphere of the OSCE is to assist member states at their request in upholding international norms in the field of human rights," but "this does not mean interference in internal affairs of other countries, and certainly not forcing these states how they should live and develop." Such interference, in his view, "does not contribute to the maturation of genuine democratic states and, on the contrary, makes them dependent and, as a consequence, unstable." He calls on the OSCE to act according to its tasks and to build relations with sovereign states on the basis of respect and trust. Russia, with a thousand-year history, maintains an independent foreign policy and wants to cooperate with responsible partners for a just world order for all, not for the chosen ones.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Я подчеркну это все аспекты безопасности: военно-политические, экономические, гуманитарные, причем в их взаимосвязи. Сегодня что мы видим на практике? Мы видим, что этот баланс явно нарушен. ОБСЕ пытаются превратить в вульгарный инструмент обеспечения внешнеполитических интересов одной или группы стран в отношении других стран. И под эту задачу вскрыли и бюрократический аппарат ОБСЕ, который абсолютно никак не связан с государствами и учредителями. Вскроили под эту задачу процедуры принятия решений и использования так называемых неправительственных организаций. Формально независимых, но целенаправленно финансируемых, а значит подконтрольных. Согласно основополагающим документам, в гуманитарной сфере ОБСР призвана оказывать странам-членам по их просьбе содействие в соблюдении международных норм в области прав человека. Это важная задача, мы ее поддерживаем. Но вовсе это не означает вмешательство во внутренние дела других стран, тем более не навязывание этим государствам того, как они должны жить и развиваться. Очевидно, что такое вмешательство отнюдь не способствует вызреванию подлинных демократических государств и наоборот делает их зависимыми и как следствие нестабильными в политическом и в экономическом плане. Мы рассчитываем на то, что ОБСЕ будет руководствоваться своими непосредственными задачами и выстраивать отношения с суверенными государствами на основе уважения, доверия. Уважаемые дамы и господа, в заключение хотел бы отметить следующее. Мы очень часто, и я лично очень часто, слышу призывы к России со стороны наших партнеров, в том числе и со стороны европейских партнеров, играть более и более активную роль в мировых делах. В этой связи позволю себе сделать одну маленькую ремарку вряд ли нас нужно подталкивать и стимулировать к этому. Россия страна с более чем тысячелетней историей, и практически всегда она пользовалась привилегией проводить независимую внешнюю политику. Мы не собираемся изменять этой традиции и сегодня. Вместе с тем, мы хорошо видим, как изменился мир, реалистично оцениваем свои собственные возможности и свой собственный потенциал. Конечно, нам бы также хотелось иметь дело с ответственными и тоже самостоятельными партнерами, с которыми мы вместе могли бы работать над строительством справедливого и демократического мироустройства, обеспечивая в нем безопасность и процветание не для избранных, а для всех.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2008, Jewish puppets John McCain (funded by the bronfman family) and Barrack Obama both have the same foreign policy and talking points when it comes to dealing with Putin. He’s a dictator, and the “west” needs to stand up to him… Meanwhile they slyly discuss how more Eastern European nations need to come under NATO (world Jewish control.) A no go for a nationalist like Putin. 🧵 9/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker argues Russia is a nation fueled by petrodollars and a KGB apparatchik run government, saying, "I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b." He calls Georgia's aggression unacceptable and links it to energy, noting "a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey" and that "the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe." He cites solidarity from Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine in Tbilisi, and warns Russia aims to revive the "old Russian empire." The United States will "support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine" into NATO, while Russia is "in violation of their ceasefire agreement" and has stationed troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He recalls a Georgian poster "Vladimir Putin, our president" and says "watch Ukraine" as Crimea and Sevastopol are cited; "we are their friend and ally." Senator McCain and I agree.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And Russia has now become a nation fueled by petrodollars that is basically a KGB apparatchik run government. I looked into mister Putin's eyes, and I saw three letters, a k, a g, and a b. And their aggression in Georgia is not acceptable behavior. I do believe that we need to bolster our friends and allies, and that wasn't just about a a problem between Georgia and Russia. It had everything to do with energy. There's a pipeline that runs from the Caspian through Georgia through Turkey. And, of course, we know that the Russians control other sources of energy into Europe, which they have used from time to time. It's not accidental that the presence of Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Ukraine flew to Georgia, flew to Tbilisi, where I have spent significant amount of time with a great young president, Misha Sakashvili. And they showed solidarity with them, but also they are very concerned about the Russian threats to regain their status of the old Russian empire. Now I think the Russians ought to understand that we will support. We, The United States, will support the inclusion of Georgia and Ukraine and and the the natural process inclusion into NATO. We also want to make it very clear that the Russians are in violation of their ceasefire agreement. They have stationed additional troops in Abkhazia and South Ossetia. By the way, I went there once, and we went inside and drove in, and there was a huge poster. And this is this is Georgian territory, and there was a huge picture of Vladimir Putin, and it said, Vladimir Putin, our president. It was very clear, the Russian intentions towards Georgia. They were just waiting to seize the opportunity. So this is a very difficult situation. We wanna work with the Russians, but we also have every right to expect the Russians to behave in a fashion in keeping with a with a with a country who respects international boundaries and the norms of international behavior. And watch Ukraine. This whole thing is a got a lot to do with Ukraine, Crimea, the base of the Russian fleet in Sevastopol, and the breakdown of the political process in Ukraine between Temushchenko and Yushchenko is a very serious problem. So watch Ukraine, and let's make sure that we that the Ukrainians understand that we are their friend and ally. Senator, do you have a major difference with what he just said? No. Actually, think senator McCain and I agree for

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2012, when Hillary Clinton and our state department was lying to our faces about what Assad was doing and why, Putin and Russia were backing Assad. Saying that if Assad fell, Syria could fall into a perpetual civil war, and that they didn’t believe the reports of Assad using “chemical weapons.” Fast forward to now where Syria is a mess and the only country that benefited from Assads fall was Israel. Now it’s easy to see why the jews in our government wanted to get rid of Putin. 🧵 10/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Where we both remain acutely concerned about the Assad regime's campaign of violence against their own citizens. Norway and our other European allies have been strong, consistent voices on behalf of the Syrian people, and I commend them for their advocacy. The Assad regime's continued brutality is galvanizing international opinion. There has been a crescendo of condemnation, not only from the world, but in particular from the region. After the Security Council statement, we've seen movement in rapid succession from the Arab League, the GCC, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and others. The United States will continue to work with our partners to turn this growing consensus into increased pressure and isolation for the Assad regime. In particular, we urge those countries still buying Syrian oil and gas, those countries still sending Assad weapons, those countries whose political and economic support give him comfort in his brutality to get on the right side of history. President Assad has lost the legitimacy to lead, and it is clear that Syria would be better off without him. Yesterday, The United States imposed new sanctions, and ambassador Ford delivered a clear message to the Syrian government. Immediately stop the violence, withdraw your security forces, respond to the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people for a democratic transition in concrete and meaningful ways. Now it is something that we are
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In gears to Syria. Our president has said that you're backing an evil guy there. He said Assad is an evil guy. Do you believe that? In Speaker 1: what? That Assad is an evil person? Speaker 0: Yes. Speaker 1: Let's talk objectively. Has Assad made mistakes? Yes, probably. And more than a few. What about the people who oppose him? Are they angels or something? Who is it that's killing people over there? Executing children? Who's cutting off heads? Are these the kind of people we should support? Speaker 0: We all saw the video of the suffering, dying children. Do you deny? Because Assad denies that those tapes are real. Do you believe those tapes are fake? Speaker 1: That's false information. As of now, we're absolutely convinced that this was a provocation. Assad did not use those weapons, and all of this was done by people who then wanted to blame him. Speaker 0: The bodies of the victims were autopsy. The autopsies were witnessed by officials from the World Health Organization and from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, and they concluded that the victims were attacked with sarin gas. Are are we really to believe that the whole thing was staged, that everybody was in on it? Speaker 1: The answer is very simple, and you know it. It could have been used by someone, but not Assad.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

In 2014, the U.S. state department led by jews like Victoria Nuland, staged a coup against the duly elected president Victor Yanukovych. What was Yanukovychs crime? He was too pro Russian, and was not necessarily going to push the boundaries for NATO expansion. So you can see the international jews went to work, with George Soros funding dissidents, the Jewish American media machine saying Yanukovych was not elected properly, and Jewish state department rep Victoria Nuland even handing out cookies to Ukrainian dissidents. This led to Putin invading and annexing the Crimea. 🧵 11/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the 1989 revolutions, you funded dissident activities and civil society groups in Eastern Europe, including Poland and the Czech Republic; are you doing similar work in Ukraine? He replies that he set up a foundation in Ukraine before its independence from Russia, and that the foundation has functioned ever since and played an important part in events now. He says Ukraine can assert independence from Russia and move toward the West, though Putin will try to destabilize it; the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent, and with freedom, free media, and a flourishing economy, his regime would be unsustainable. He is asked about antisemitism in Ukraine; he notes antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world, and there is antisemitism.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That many people recognized about you was that you, during the revolutions of nineteen eighty nine, funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe and Poland, The Czech Republic. Are you doing similar things in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of, Russia, and the foundation has been, functioning ever since. And it played an important part in events now. Speaker 0: Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia, and an alignment, with the West? Not not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a kind of orientation toward the West, or will the Russians always stop them? Speaker 1: No. Putin will try to destabilize, Ukraine, but the Ukrainians, the large majority of Ukrainians are determined to be independent of of Russia. It won't be easy because Putin, has, staked his regime on destabilizing Ukraine because it's a threat to to his regime in Russia. If you have freedom, free media, and so on, and a flourishing economy, that would, make his regime, unsustainable. Speaker 0: He accuses the Ukrainians of being antisemitic, of them being full of antisemitic fascists. You operate in Ukraine. You're of Jewish origin. Have you detected virulent antisemitism in Ukraine? Speaker 1: Well, antisemitism is part of the DNA of that part of the world. So there is antisemit

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Remember the “Russian Collusion hoax” of 2017? Did you know that research was funded by a Jew named Paul Singer?? 🧐 Obviously Trump was acquitted, but the intended effect was missed by many. It was to be associated with Russia, is a crime. Remember that Trump ran on “warming relations” With the Russians. Well that was pretty much iced by this fake scandal, and so it worked. 🧵 12/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Then we have the 2nd impeachment hoax. Also involving Ukraine/Russia, but what was the crux of the matter? That Trump was going to withhold weapons from Ukraine…. A no no for our Jewish oligarchs. Thus this scandal provided the same effect yet again. Trump affirms his support of Ukraine, and distances himself from Russia, and everyone is afraid to tell the truth about Russia, or they will be labeled a “foreign agent” because Ukraine is our potential NATO ally. Well it’s not our ally. It’s manufactured state created by NATO and currently ran by a coke head Jew Zelensky …. Did you also know that the guy that “leaked” scandalous phone call for Trumps 2nd impeachment was also Jewish? What are the odds…. 🧵 13/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Never forget how Zelensky came to power in Ukraine and who funded his rise… Before he was killed in Ukraine, American journalist Gonzalo Lira laid out exactly how Zelensky was manufactured and funded by Israeli Jewish billionaire Kolomoisky. And that same billionaire Kolomoisky, was the Jew who had a controlling interest in Burisma… the gas company that was paying Hunter Biden 50k a month. Oh a tangled web the Jews weave to blackmail/ buy influence… 🧵 14/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
Zelensky is 'the cokehead of Kyiv' and 'a manufactured political figure' created by Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch Igor Kolomoyski, owner of OnePlusOne Media, which financed and produced 'Servant of the People.' 'Servant of the People' hired Zelensky, a well known actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, to play the role of the President. Kolomoyski created a party called 'Servant of the People' and financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire; 'he's the finger puppet of Kolomsky.' Kolomoyski also financed Hunter Biden to the tune of $50,000 a month on Burisma's Board of Directors in 2014. 'Hunter Biden' and Zelensky are 'spiritual cousins' bankrolled by the same guy. The laptop mentions a 10% kickback to 'the old man.' The White House is freaking out over Ukraine; Westerners exploited Ukraine; Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe due to corruption.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You see, Zelensky, the president of Ukraine, well, the cokehead of Kyiv, because he is a cokehead, the cokehead of Kyiv is actually a manufactured political figure. He was manufactured by a Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch called Igor Kolomoyski. Igor Kolomoyski was the man who owns OnePlusOne Media here in Ukraine, And OnePlusOne Media is the company that financed and produced the TV show Servant of the People. Servant of the People hired Zelenskyy, a well known actor in Ukraine, an actor with zero political experience or even any political interest, well, they hired him to play the role of the President in this show Servant of the People. Servant of the People had huge ratings, but a lot of people say that it was really weird the amount of propaganda and PR that was done for the show. It was disproportionate to any other show of any channel. The amount of PR positive press and all the rest of it, it was really pushed on the people. Some people say it was completely astroturf. Some people who know how to speak Ukrainian and who have watched the show have told me that it's a mildly enjoyable show, but no big deal. But anyway, the show was hugely popular, and it ran from 2015 to 2018, and almost seamlessly. Kolomoisky, the oligarch, created a party called Servant of the People, same name as the TV show, and their candidate was Zelensky, a man with no previous political experience and indeed no previous political interest. Kolomoisky financed Zelensky to the point that Zelensky today is a billionaire. How many actors do you know are billionaires? I don't think that Tom Cruise is a billionaire and he's the most successful actor in the world, if he's just an actor. Zelensky is more than just an actor. He's the finger puppet of Kolomoisky, this oligarch. And do you know who Kolomoisky also financed, to the tune of $50,000 a month, plus additional benefits of different sorts? Hunter Biden. Yes, in 2014, Burisma, the Ukrainian oil company gas company, hired Hunter Biden to be on its Board of Directors to the tune of $50,000 a month. Who do you think controls Burisma? Kolomovsky, the same guy who manufactured Zelensky as President of Ukraine. Yeah, I bet you didn't know that. Zelensky and Hunter Biden are spiritual cousins. They are bankrolled by the same guy. It's funny because both of them have drug addictions, pretty serious ones, both of them get their money from Kolomovsky, and both of them are intimately involved in Ukraine. But here's the difference, of course: Zelenskyy doesn't have a dad who's President of The United States, now does he? Why do you think the White House is freaking out so badly over Ukraine? In Ukraine, there are all kinds of secrets. In Ukraine, well, see, the more unsavory people in the Washington establishment have used Ukraine as their private piggy bank, to the detriment of the Ukrainian people. They have financially raped Ukraine, stripping it of monies and assets, monies and assets needed by the people of Ukraine. This is part of the reason that Ukraine is one of the poorest countries in Europe, if not the poorest country in Europe, of the corruption, because of how Westerners have exploited it, Western politicians have exploited it. Hunter Biden? $50,000 a month. And you say to yourself, well, thousand isn't that much. Yeah, but $50,000 a year is the median household income in The United States. In Ukraine, a much poorer country, $50,000 a year, easily solve the problems of a good four or five families in Ukraine, the financial problems of those four or five families in Ukraine, for a year. And Hunter Biden was getting that money per month, just for himself. Although, of course, in the Hunter Biden emails there's talk that seems to be true that the old man would get a 10% kickback of whatever Hunter Biden was getting. That was in the laptop. Oh yeah. Look it up. You don't have to take my word for it. You don't have to take my word for any of what I'm telling you. Look it up yourself and you'll find it. It's very easy to find. Kolomovsky, the Ukrainian Israeli Cypriot oligarch, was financing Zelensky, was financing Joe Biden. God alone knows who else he was financing, and he was just one. There's a whole rotten bunch of these people here in Ukraine, and they were all busy paying off the West so that they could carry on their little evil deeds and whatnot. If you want to know why the West is freaking out over Ukraine, you have to understand that they are all terrified that the truth will come out in Ukraine.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

After the Jews had their Zelensky puppet installed, and they their Jewish Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, they finally pushed Putin to the breaking point. He then invaded Ukraine in 2022. And the lying Jewish controlled mass media tells us, “Putin is crazy” and he is slaughtering Slavs. But he’s not. He’s been very strategic in trying to limit loss of life. And our lying media leaves out the fact that this was a totally Jewish provoked war, for NATO power expansion. They also always leave out the fact that the jews and the U.S. state department (one and the same) overthrew the Ukrainian regime in 2014…. 🧵 15/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

And if Putin is such an oppressive awful leader, like our Jewish media tells us, why then is Russia still allowed to be Russian? Putin has outlawed Gay Marriage, Transgender madness, and no one is going to jail for being proud to be a “White Russian.” In other words, Putin has shielded his people from the pernicious Jewish influence that is destroying the west right now. Under Putin, the Russian economy has done quite well from where it was in 1999. Also the debt situation and natural resource situation in Russia is great. Further the Russian Orthodox Church has done exceptionally well under Putins leadership. Meanwhile many brainwashed Christians in the west are serving Jews for the expansion of Israel while our nation fails. Putin even allowed for Edward Snowden to seek Asylum in Russia and has protected him against our blood thirsty government and its Jewish controllers… 🧵 16/18

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Is Putin an out an out antisemite? No. He is not. He even has Jewish friends and the like, but clearly he is a nationalist, and he is opposed to the Jewish new world order. While he may not name them explicitly, he names them implicitly…. Like in these 2 clips where he describes the “American media propaganda machine” the “bankers”, and who really blew up Nordstream… 🧵 17/18

Video Transcript AI Summary
In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the war of propaganda, it is very difficult to defeat The United States because The United States controls all the world's media and many European media. The ultimate beneficiary of the biggest European media are American financial institutions. Don't you know that? So it is possible to get involved in this work, but it is cost prohibitive, so to speak. We can simply shine the spotlight on our sources of information, and we will not achieve results.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But but here's a question you may be able to answer. You worked in Germany, famously. The Germans clearly know that their NATO partner did this, but they and it damaged their economy greatly. It may never recover. Why are they being silent about it? That's very confusing to me. Why wouldn't the Germans say something about it? Speaker 1: This also confuses me. But today's German leadership is guided by the interests of the collective West rather than its national interests. Otherwise, it is difficult to explain the logic of their action or inaction. After all, it is not only about Nord Stream 1, which was blown up, and the Nord Stream 2 was damaged, But one pipe is safe and sound, and gas can be supplied to Europe through it. But Germany does not open it. We're ready, please.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

So the jews and the west will continue do what they can to “pray for Putins death” as Krassenstein says below. But America should see through the propaganda. We need a leader very much like Putin if we are to ever overcome our Jewish overlords. If not, we will continue to see non white immigration, transgender lunacy, and wars in the Middle East (and Ukraine) for Israel… If you enjoyed this thread, Consider subscribing to the page! 🧵 18/18

Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 1:53 PM
Saved - August 12, 2025 at 5:03 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Final Solution” document from Hitler to exterminate all the Jews?…. doesn’t exist. Documents of SS discussions on how to reduce the death rate in the camps…. Readily available. 🤔 https://t.co/w7I6c1t3dz

Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 11, 2025 at 3:34 AM
Saved - August 11, 2025 at 6:32 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“The Poles now admit that that building (the Auschwitz gas chamber) was built in 1948…. 3 years after the war was over.” -David Irving https://t.co/xJmBriDDuS

Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker plans to film Auschwitz with the BBC, saying "this isn't just somebody with an eight millimeter camera" and "they're gonna be marketing their film to television corporations." He will stand in the "gas chamber at Auschwitz 1" and point out "oh, no holes in the roof," explaining why he's "banned from the Auschwitz site" for asking about "the heaps of coke which don't exist." He cites Tom Bauer: "450,000 Hungarian Jews were shipped off to Auschwitz. Within the space of three weeks, they've been cremated and gassed." He asks where the bodies went: "a mountain of meat"—"45,000 cubic meters"—"no sign" on aerial photographs, though "the actual operating instructions" exist. He argues "nobody was gassed" because "that building was built by the Poles as they now admit in 1948," notes "the gas chamber door's got a handle on the inside," and recalls "millions of schoolchildren" were shown the site.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First of I was going to Auschwitz with the BBC television team and this isn't just somebody with an eight millimeter hi eight camera. This is the BBC. They're gonna be marketing their film to television corporations around the world. I'm gonna be standing there in their so called gas chamber at Auschwitz 1, and I'm going to be pointing out, oh, no holes in the roof. So that rather makes a mockery of your eyewitnesses who said that they saw the SS men clambering up on the top and dropping the pellets through the holes in the roof. Oh, look at that door over there. It's got a glass pane in it. A pane of glass and a gas chamber in the door, and there's a two inch gap under the wooden doors, a drafty gas chamber, this one. Right? I'll be asking questions like that, and they and they know they can't stand that. And so this is the reason that I'm banned from the Auschwitz site, because I'll be asking the questions about the heaps of coke which don't exist. What happened to the bodies? I'll be asking questions like that. I'll be saying, Tom Bauer, the famous British historian and journalist who wrote that recent book about the Swiss gold, Tom Bauer, he described how in May 1944, 450,000 Hungarian Jews were shipped off to Auschwitz. Within the space of three weeks, they've been cremated and gassed. 450,000 people, as I've written a letter to the Sunday Times, of course, 450,000 people. This is an awful lot of meat. It's 45,000 tons of meat if you're gonna be tasteless about it. So what did they do with this mountain of meat after they gassed it? Either they cremated it, they burned it, or they buried it, they plowed it under. And you gotta be tasteless. You gotta ask these questions. If you're going to get rid of 45,000, four four hundred and fifty thousand bodies, you've got a a mountain of flesh of 45,000 cubic meters to to dispose of. If you're bet gonna bury it, you're have a pit of 45,000 cubic meters, which is the size of several football fields, which will be visible from the air. And we have the aerial photographs taken of Auschwitz in precisely those weeks when there's no such pits visible. Are you gonna cremate them, and it's gonna take 60 kilograms of coke on average to cremate everybody in the gas chain was in the crematorial that was supplied to Auschwitz? We know that because we had the actual operating instructions of these crematoria and their efficiency charts and all the details that went came from the manufacturers. So we know how many tons of coke are going to be needed. Tens of thousands of tons of coking coal, and there's no sign of that on the aerial photographs either. But nobody asks these questions because if they do, of course, it's off with his head. Put him in prison. And if I go to that building with the BBC television cameras, I'm gonna be pointing out about the the inside of the doors. I'll say, what a funny thing. That gas chamber door's got a handle on the inside. Now I was in Pentonville Prison for contempt of court three or four years ago, and I can't remember having had a handle on the inside of my cell door. Yet we're being told that 800 people packed into that room, according to the eyewitnesses, were so stupid that it never occurred to him to open the door with a handle that the Nazis had very kindly provided on the inside. And everybody's believed it for the last fifty years, and tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands, nay, millions of schoolchildren have been bussed across Europe to that site and told to go in that building and shutter because that's where millions of Jews were killed by the Nazis during World War two. And only now is the truth beginning to come out that nobody was gassed in that building because that building was built by the Poles as they now admit in 1948, three years after World War two was over.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 3, 2025 at 11:27 PM
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 10:16 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

C-SPAN host- “I think Tucker Carlson might be the first guest to come with a rubber band on his (left) wrist.” Tucker Carlson- “I always wear one. My father wore one.” So when did he upgrade to the red Kabbalah bracelet? 🤔 https://t.co/e0aNYXpfDD

Video Transcript AI Summary
Tucker Carlson always wears a rubber band on his wrist, finding it handy and fun. He says he's worn one almost every day of his life. His father also wore one, keeping rubber bands from the Los Angeles Times on the car's stick shift. Carlson never takes his rubber band off, replacing it as needed. He replaced his current one that morning at C-SPAN, taking it from a pile on the receptionist's desk.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A very long time, I think Tucker Carlson might be the first guest who ever arrived on the set with a rubber band on his wrist. Speaker 1: Oh, yes. Because it's it's handy for thwacking your kids when you need to and fun to play with, I always wear one. Speaker 0: Do you always wear a rubber band? Speaker 1: Yes, ma'am. I've worn it. Yeah, every day, almost all my life. Speaker 0: And how did she get started? Speaker 1: My father wore one and when we were riding in the car when we were literally had one of those stick shifts on the steering column, it would always be covered with rubber bands from the Los Angeles Times every morning. Speaker 0: So as you get dressed, you slip on your Speaker 1: rubber No, just I never take it off. Speaker 0: You don't take it off. How soon do they wear out? Speaker 1: I just replaced this this morning at C SPAN, in fact. I showed up and I was looking at a pile of them on your receptionist desk and I took one. Speaker 0: That's the side effect of getting so many newspapers. Next call is for Tucker Carlson.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 4, 2025 at 6:45 AM
Saved - August 4, 2025 at 9:58 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Dick Carlson- (Tucker Carlson’s dad) “This is interesting, I’ve never mentioned this because nobody ever asked me, but I was Monica Lewinsky’s book agent.” 🤔 https://t.co/ll7HgZ27Sg

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is friends with Scooter Libby, whom he considers a person of great integrity. Libby was once his lawyer, through Leonard Garment. The speaker represented Monica Lewinsky in her book deals and sold her book. Scooter Libby drew up the contract for him when he represented Monica, a fact that was kept secret. Monica's mother married Peter Strauss, former director of the Voice of America, after Strauss's wife died. Strauss contacted the speaker to help Monica find legitimate ways to make money to pay her legal fees, as her father was not forthcoming. The speaker spent two weeks with Monica in New York, reviewing hundreds of offers. He then approached a publisher and an author, which led to the book deal.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Woolsey anyway is a friend of Scooters. I've been a friend of Scooters for years. Scooter Libby is a a person in my view of great integrity and and character. He was my lawyer one time before he went into the government. He was he and Leonard Garment were partners in a law firm, Deckard, Price, and Rhodes. Speaker 1: Former counsel to Richard Nixon. Yeah. Leonard Garment. Speaker 0: Yes. Leonard, a great guy in my view and a and a good friend of mine, and that's how I met Scooter through Leonard. Actually, Scooter represented me This is interesting. I've never mentioned this because nobody ever asked me but I represented Monica Lewinsky in her book deals. I was her book agent and I sold the book that my storybook. Anyway, I did And I did a couple of other things for her having to do with representing her, not a press representation. I stayed out of the press, but sort of quasi legal representation. And when I drew up the contract with Monica, it was Scooter Libbey who drew it up for me. So I mean Speaker 1: nothing How she get into that? Speaker 0: Well, Monica's mother married this is we talk about coincidences. Married a fellow who had been Peter Strauss, who had been director of the Voice of America in the Carter administration. Peter Strauss, fine guy, from New York, owned Strauss Communications which had radio stations and newspapers, and, Monica's mother after the scandal broke within about six or seven months that summer. I didn't know Monica's mother and I didn't know Monica, but I knew Peter Strauss. Peter Strauss wife Ellen Salzberger had died two or three years before. Peter's older and Peter married Monica's mother and then Peter called me and said that summer, the summer of the scandal had broken around December as I remember, called me and asked me if I would come to New York and talk to Monica because they were trying to find ways that Monica could legitimately and in a minimal amount of embarrassment make money to help pay for her legal fees and I I could see what the problem was because Peter has children, grown children. Peter was then, sorry, 75 and the fact that she had these enormous fees, hundreds of thousands of dollars, probably was difficult with his family I would imagine. Only guessing at that And her father, who's a physician in Los Angeles, was not forthcoming about paying for the fees. So I went up and I went I spent two weeks with Monica across the hall in the Essex House in a hotel in New York under assumed names and I went through all of her mail and all of the offers and of which they were hundreds and hundreds of offers of different kinds, some ridiculous, some not, in an attempt to find a way to make money so she could pay these legibles and she had just taken on two new attorneys here in Washington actually and Demaras and what's his name? Anyway so I succeeded and I approached a publisher ultimately and an author and anyway, we did the book and and so on. Now why was I telling you all of that? Because Scooter Libbey drew up the contract as with me as her book agent, but though we kept it secret. But Speaker 1: This is a
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 3, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 10:34 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
In a 1999 CSPAN call, a caller confronted Tucker Carlson about his association with Bill Kristol, labeling him a neocon and expressing disdain for both. Carlson acknowledged his connection, while the caller emphasized the need for true conservatives like Pat Buchanan, feeling vindicated by the exchange.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

CSPAN caller 1999- “You (Tucker Carlson) work for Bill Kristol (neocon Jew) don’t you? Tucker Carlson- “I do. Happily.” Caller- “That guy, He’s not a republican, he’s a disgrace. Pat Buchanan just ripped him on a talk show. We don’t need republicans like you or Bill Kristol, we need conservatives like Pat Buchanan.” Caller vindicated.

Video Transcript AI Summary
A caller expresses support for Pat Buchanan and disdain for Bill Kristol, threatening to leave the Republican party if Buchanan goes. The caller admits to not reading Buchanan's book but claims to know its contents through Buchanan's appearances. Kristol's associate notes Buchanan's flirtation with the Reform Party and his meeting with Lenora Fulani, calling it a "bizarre public unraveling." A quote from Buchanan is read, stating women are "physically unequipped to compete in the worlds of athletics and arms." It's noted that Buchanan's long history of public opinions makes him vulnerable to such resurfaced quotes. Another caller expresses disappointment in Carlson and Kristol for attacking Buchanan, clarifying they are not part of the "Buchanan brigade." The caller expresses concern about the Clinton administration giving away U.S. sovereignty, citing the UN's involvement with national parks. Kristol's associate acknowledges the appeal of Buchanan's message regarding authoritarian tendencies in the Clinton administration but questions Buchanan's suitability as a messenger, given his recent actions.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You you work for Bill Crystal. Correct? Speaker 1: I do. Happily. Speaker 0: Yeah. That guy, he's not a republican. He's he's a disgrace. Pat Buchanan just ripped him yesterday on one of the talk shows. And I'm a Pat Buchanan backer, and I think the republican party's gonna rue the day. We don't need republicans like you and Bill Crystal. We need Republicans and conservatives like Pat Buchanan, and I think the Republican is gonna rue the day that you ever mess with Pat because when he goes, I go, and a lot of other people go. Speaker 2: Caller, have you read the book? Speaker 0: No. I have not, but I've listened to Pat over the last week reading the episodes that people are talking about and pretty much know what the book's about because I must have seen them 15 times in all the different shows. And he really tells it like it is. He actually explains more like all these other idiots who just, you know, take it out of context like Bill Crystal doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. Speaker 2: Alright. Thanks. Mister Carlson. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, there are a lot of people who who feel like Pat Buchanan represents something important in the Republican party, and and those are the people who should be on the phone to Pat. Call him at Homan McLean and say, gee, Pat, you know, stay. But it's Buchanan himself, as you know, who began these noises about going to the reform party and and of course went to New York and and had lunch with Lenora Fulani, long time leftist, and in general began this kind of bizarre public unraveling that we've been watching for the past week and a half. It really begins with Pat. Speaker 2: Washington Post pulls out four quotes this morning in their piece that was on the front page. Here's from a 1983 newspaper column, less equipped psychologically to stay the course in the brawling area of business, commerce, industry, and the professions. Women are physic physically unequipped to compete in the worlds of athletics and arms. Speaker 1: It's I mean, this is the problem, this is not unique to Pat, but with running for office when you spend a lifetime putting your opinions out there. You know, obviously, most most candidates for any office spend a lot of time trying to cloak their opinions. Pat has a lot of his out there, so quotes like this always revisit him. Speaker 2: Lin Wood, Washington, you're next. Speaker 3: Hi. I'm a real big fan of Tucker Carlson's and also Pat Buchanan. And Tucker, I think you gotta get outside the beltway, buddy. You know, the American people and I'm a I'm a Reagan Republican. I didn't vote Republican until Ronald Reagan. And I I have to tell you that I'm really disappointed in you and Bill Crystal who I I really do hold in high esteem to attack Pat Buchanan the way he is, and I wasn't I'm certainly not a Buchanan brigade or whatever they call him. Speaker 2: Carla, are you an America firster? Speaker 3: I'm sorry? Speaker 2: Are you an America firster? That's one of the themes of his book. Speaker 3: Well, Tucker brings brings up a good point. America first has the connotations of father what is it? Coughlin? Speaker 2: Coughlin. Speaker 3: Coughlin. Thank you. And and the and the Bundes. But but I'm not in in that regard. But I am am sort of frightened of the way the Clinton administration has given away our sovereignty, just in in incremental pieces. One being the the National Park system and and what has happened with the UN taking over certain of our national parks. Speaker 2: Let's let Tucker Carlson respond, sir. Speaker 1: I think that callers like this are are responding to the good parts of Pat's message. I mean, Buchanan has long pointed out that there are authoritarian tendencies in the Clinton administration. I think that's true by any objective measure. The question is, is Pat Buchanan, you know, the person to carry that message? And I I think more and more just witness the events of the last week. I mean, if if Pat Buchanan is this, you know, pure conservative, then I'm you know, the question is why is he going to the reform party and and making these alliances with discredited figures like Lenora Fulani Speaker 0: and
Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 21, 2024 at 6:32 AM
Saved - August 3, 2025 at 9:00 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explored the controversial figure of David Duke, examining his past as a Ku Klux Klan member and his claims of being misrepresented by the media. I noted that while he advocates for European American rights, the media's focus on his Klan affiliation seems disproportionate compared to their treatment of Democrats with similar ties. I also discussed his views on racial integration and his controversial opinions on Zionism, questioning whether he deserves the label of a white supremacist or if he is simply advocating for a declining demographic.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Mirror mirror on the wall, who is the most cancelled man of all? This is a difficult question of course, but surely David Duke is in the running. I wanted to know why the media continued asking Trump to disavow him. What was their strange hatred with this man I had never really heard of. I did some digging myself, to see who he is and who really was…. 🧵 1/7

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Let’s address some of the most controversial “facts” from his Wikipedia page first. It says that he was in the Ku Klux Klan. That is true. He definitely was in it as a young man however, he did leave the Klan and said he never condoned any violence, and left once he figured out it wasn’t aligned with his values. In this clip from 2006, he roast Wolf Blitzer for mentioning the Ku Klux Klan 11 times in his introduction, but never calling out democrats that were also in the Klan. “I resent the introduction you made of me. You mentioned the Ku Klux Klan 11 times, but you left out that I was a congressman, a teacher, and a person with a doctorate in history. You introduce many former communists from all over the world, and you don’t introduce them as former communists. I think you are biased because you are a former lobbyist for AIPAC.” 🧵 2/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Mister Duke defends his presence at a Holocaust conference in Tehran, claiming bias from the interviewer due to his alleged support for Israel. He denies hating Jews, but accuses the Israeli lobby of manipulating American foreign policy, leading to wars in the Middle East that serve Israel's interests, not America's. Duke believes freedom of speech is essential to understanding the Holocaust and criticizes the imprisonment of historians with dissenting views. While suggesting a two-state solution for Israelis and Palestinians, he insists Zionist influence in American policy hinders fair resolutions. He alleges that Zionist media and political power control American policy, citing Jewish ownership of media conglomerates and financial influence on politicians. Duke disputes a quote attributed to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about wiping Israel off the map, claiming it's a misrepresentation used to incite hatred against Iran. He asserts Israel dominates US policy, using it as a proxy, and accuses figures like Pearl and Wolfowitz of formulating the Iraq war for Israel's strategic objectives.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Mister Duke, thanks very much for coming in. What do you say to those who say, who charge, and there are many, that you're there in Tehran at this Holocaust conference simply because you hate Jews? Speaker 1: Well, first off, mister Blitzer, I resent the introduction you made of me. You mentioned the Ku Klux Klan 11 times. That was over thirty, well, thirty years ago in my life. And since that time, I got elected to the house of representatives. I became and I received a full doctorate. I've been a teacher. I have one of the best selling books in the world. And I don't you interview many former communists and governments all over the world, and you don't introduce them by saying former communist and not certainly not 11 times. I think you're biased because you're a former lobbyist for APAC. You're a Jewish extremist, supporter of Israel, so you wanna bias anyone who criticizes Zionism. Speaker 0: Well, do you hate Jews? Speaker 1: No. I don't. Do you hate people who want don't wanna be controlled? Do you do you hate Americans who don't want the Israeli lobby to have Americans fight and die and thousands maimed because Israel wants it in the Middle East? We have a war in Iraq because Israel wanted that war, not for American interests. They lied to us about weapons of mass destruction, and now they're trying to get American to war against Iran. And I think it'd be a tragedy for this country, a tragedy for the world. And you don't like what I say against Zionism, so you wanna talk about the Ku Klux Klan rather than the issues facing the world. Do you do Terrorism of the Israeli state, for instance. Speaker 0: Do you believe, mister Duke, that there was a holocaust? Speaker 1: I believe, sir, that the only way we can know whether there was a holocaust or the nature of it is freedom of speech. I don't think we should be locking people in prison in Europe, even elderly people in their eighties, because they dare to have a different opinion about an historical event. The American government shouldn't be saying that the Iran conference the Iran conference was a conference for freedom of speech. I heard many mainstream Holocaust speakers at this conference. Many. This conference allowed freedom of speech on the issue. The American government and Tony Blair and George Bush should be saying it's a disgrace that David Irving, a worldwide historian with books in almost every library of the world, is in prison right now in Austria because he said something the Zionists don't like about the second world war. Speaker 0: Do you believe, in a two state solution to the Israeli Palestinian conflict, a new state of Palestine living side by side with the state of Israel? Speaker 1: I think that's probably the best solution. I think you have to ask the people who live there of both of both Israel and the Arab countries. But I know one thing. You can't impose a solution from the the from the Zionist domination of American foreign policy. Pearl and people like Wolfowitz, Fife, Wormser, Crystal, Abrams, we can go on and on. It sounds like a Jewish wedding. They have set American policy, and they've hurt American interests in The Middle East. Just as I've said for years, as Walt and Meersheimer of Harvard have said, it's a fact. And we are dying right now in Iraq because we're there for Israel's interest. If you've no oil out of this out of this war, I said, I went around the world, around the country Speaker 0: before this Let me let me interrupt for a moment, mister Duke. As far as I know, the president of The United States, who's the commander in chief, is not Jewish. The vice president of The United States is not Jewish. The secretary of defense is not Jewish. The national security, adviser to the president, not Jewish. The director of the CIA, not Jewish. Are these people, simply tools of the Zionist conspiracy? Speaker 1: They're not tools of a conspiracy, but they are definitely tools of the Zionist media and political power. Even the Washington Post said that 60% of the contributions for the Republican Party come from Jewish Plus, if any politician in America dares to criticize Israel, millions will go to his opponents, and he will be attacked in the media where Zionists have incredible power. Even the chronicle, the Jewish Los Angeles Times, excuse me, not the Los Angeles Times, the the Jewish Times of Los Angeles stated that four of the five conglomerates of the media largest media conglomerates are owned by Jews, and the fifth is even more pro Israel than some of those conglomerates. We have a controlled media in The United States and that's why we're not hearing the truth about this conference. This conference is about the fact that there must be freedom of speech and this is insane that people are being criticized. This this conference is being criticized when there are people in prison right now for freedom of their conscience. Speaker 0: If not, there's a future Speaker 1: think that David Erbang should be in prison right now in Austria? I'm asking you a question, sir. Speaker 0: Well, I'm Do you think David Erbang should be in prison in Austria Speaker 1: for for voicing Speaker 0: opinion? We invited you on, and the question is, if we invited you on, why is there a Zionist conspiracy if we're letting you on on television right now? How do you explain that? Speaker 1: Well, how do I explain that? I I think that you can't affect the news. You've got I think you have to put some spin on what's happening. Speaker 0: But we didn't have to invite you on CNN. Speaker 1: You wanna you you it's an attack mode. Always an attack mode when you when people like myself come on there. But you thought you could handle me with your 11 connotations of the Ku Klux Klan. Speaker 0: I love you. Let can't handle. Speaker 1: Alright. Look. You can't handle the truth. And the fact is you are an agent, mister Zionist. You work for APAC. Listen. The lobby in this country that controls Israel Speaker 0: Mister Dukes, I'm gonna read to you what Mahmouda Khazeenaja the president I'm gonna read to you what Mahmoud of Iran, has said, and then you can respond if you agree or disagree with him. Israel must be wiped off the map, and God willing, with the force of God behind it, we shall soon experience a world without The United States and Zionism. That's what he said on October 2005 according to Al Jazeera. Speaker 1: Alright. First off, that's a complete misquote. He never said wipe off the map. And he was talking about the Zionist control of The United States. In fact, I I heard his last speech, and I read articles all over the world where he said Israel would be wiped off the map. He said Israel would have a change in government just as the Soviet Union changed. He the obviously, the Russian people weren't killed. Israel wasn't wiped out. And this was to garner hatred against Iran. Speaker 0: But what about if what he says when he Speaker 1: says maybe even nuclear strike against Iran? Speaker 0: When he says we should soon experience a world without The United States what is when he says we should soon experience a world without The United States and Zionists. Speaker 1: Without he would I I I know what the translation was. He was referring to the to the control of the world. Israel uses The United States as its proxy. They use The United States as that as that Mahatma said in from Malaysia. Israel is able to dominate our policy through their money, through their media control, and they're leading us to disaster. Richard Pearl and Paul Wolfowitz were the formulators of the Iraq war. Pearl, Wormser and Feith wrote a paper for Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel calling for war against Iraq, Iran, and Syria. And that's exactly what we did. They made up the lies of weapons of mass destruction because Americans were not willing to die in in thousands and spend billions of dollars for Israel's strategic objectives. Speaker 0: David, that's a reality. We have to leave it there. There's so many Speaker 1: lies that are going on. Speaker 0: The satellite is about to go down. So we have to leave it right there. But you're in Tehran? Well, people Speaker 1: can find information. David.surecom. Speaker 0: Theywill.com. Plenty of opportunities to hear what you have to say.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

So we’ve established he was in the Klan when he was a young man, but is that why the media really hates him? They didn’t show that same animosity to democrat klansmen… Why do they make sure every president has to “disavow” David Duke from Bush Sr. To Donald Trump? Some examples of segments on Duke from the mainstream media are below. 👇 🧵 3/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
David Duke announced his senate candidacy, claiming the speaker's agenda as his own. Newt Gingrich stated that every Republican should repudiate David Duke. When asked if the speaker would prefer a Democrat over David Duke if necessary to defeat him, the speaker said yes, depending on who the Democrat was. The speaker emphasized the need to answer quickly, noting past criticism for not rebuking Duke fast enough. The speaker then stated "Rebuked. Rebuked. Done. Done."
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Let me ask you about this one. David Duke announced his senate candidacy claiming your agenda for his own or essentially saying glad that you spoke out. Speaker 1: Are you ready before you ask the question? Speaker 0: Newt Gingrich said, every Republican should repudiate this guy no matter what it takes. Speaker 1: And I do. Are you ready? Speaker 0: I would like a Democrat over David Duke if it was what was necessary to defeat him? Speaker 1: I guess depending on who the Democrat, but the answer would be yes. Look. The answer is as quick as you can say it. In fact, I want to answer you before you Speaker 0: answer the question. Speaker 1: Because last time, with another person in your position, I did it very quickly, they said he didn't do it fast enough. Rebuked. Is that okay? Rebuked. Rebuked. Done. Done.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states they could not possibly support David Duke due to racism and recent troubling statements involving bigotry. They emphasize that they can never support David Duke for these reasons. They ask not to be drawn into a runoff regarding this issue.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Could not possibly, support David Duke because of the racism and because of the, very recent statements that are very troubling in terms of bigotry and and all of this. We can never in any way support David Duke for the reasons I gave. And so please don't try to draw me into a runoff in that
Video Transcript AI Summary
In the 1970s, David Duke, a Ku Klux Klan grand wizard, aimed to mainstream the Klan's racist ideas by resigning from the Klan and founding the National Association for the Advancement of White People. He ran for public office, eventually joining the Republican Party. In 1989, Duke's white supremacist views became a focal point when he ran for the Louisiana State Legislature. Despite his past and the GOP's embarrassment, Duke won the election. The national party censured Duke, and President Bush defended his involvement in the local election. In 1990, Duke ran for US Senate, finding a base of support among those feeling unheard by major parties. A political ad highlighted Duke's Klan past. Duke lost the senate bid but ran for governor of Louisiana the following year. Despite efforts to derail his campaign and reminders of his Klan past, many voters were willing to overlook it due to anger with other politicians.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Since then, but I'd like to go deeper than that. What are your views on the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacists? Speaker 1: I totally disavow the Ku Klux Klan. I totally disavow David Duke. There's a reason why that was one of the first questions asked in the Republican debate last night, and there's a reason why an apparent protester had his sign reading Trump Duke twenty sixteen ripped out of his hands at Trump's rally Speaker 2: in New Speaker 1: Orleans tonight. Are at this moment right now in the campaign where white supremacists are turning to Donald Trump as the political leader who will mainstream their ideas. One of the last times this sort of thing happened was with a guy who's now back in the news for supporting Donald Trump. His name, David Duke. Speaker 2: The only way people can judge the Klan is by, you know, from our own lips, what we can say about it. And I'm here to say that anybody wants to be a Klansman, the way to do it is not by being violent, but by being legal and trying to work within the system. Speaker 1: In the 1970s David Duke was a grand wizard of the Ku Klux Klan, a young leader with the goal of mainstreaming the Klan's racist ideas. Speaker 2: There's plenty of other places in this country that I could live maybe with some Negroes that are integrationists. What are we talking about? I don't want to live with Negroes. Speaker 1: But in order to effectively go mainstream, the hood had to go. Duke resigned from the Klan, and he founded a new group, the National Association for the Advancement of White People. He also started running for public office, first as a Democrat, but soon after an unsuccessful bid for president, he switched to the Republican Party, running for a seat in the Louisiana State Legislature in 1989. I think there's a lot Speaker 2: of racial hatred today, but I think it's coming from the other side. There's more minority racism today, I think, than than coming from the, members of the white majority in America. Speaker 1: Duke's white supremacist views became a focal point in the race. Speaker 3: The newsletter for Duke's white rights organization regularly carries ads for neo Nazi literature and articles urging readers to run for political office to promote a white agenda. The New Orleans telephone directory lists the same address for Duke's residents and the Ku Klux Klan. Speaker 1: Yet many Louisiana voters embrace Duke. Speaker 2: You got my full support. Think it's good. Yeah, it's about time. And you know what? Behind the white people, so it's sticking together. Speaker 1: But the notion of a former Klansman running for office in 1989 was too much for the standard bearers of the Republican Party. Speaker 3: The GOP is embarrassed that Duke is running as a Republican. There is concern that a victory for him would tarnish the party's image with black voters. Speaker 1: That concern went all the way to the White House. Speaker 2: I'm I'm shocked about it. In fact, I heard that, George Bush is sending out a letter to my district supporting my opponent. Speaker 3: I Both Duke and his opponent for a seat in the state legislature, businessman John Treen, are running as Republicans. President Bush sent this letter to voters in the district asking them to support Treen. Speaker 1: Yet those efforts weren't enough to dissuade voters. Duke won by less than 300 votes. Republican Party chairman Lee Atwater, the brains behind George H. W. Bush's infamous Willie Horton campaign ad, wanted Duke kicked out of the party. Speaker 2: Mister Lee Atwater should simply have said, well, the people have spoken. The Republican party is available for anybody. Speaker 1: The national party censured Duke, and president Bush defended his involvement in the local election. Speaker 4: Maybe there was some feeling in Metairie, Louisiana anna that the president of The United States involving himself in a state legislative election was improper or overkill. I can't deny that, but what I can't affirm is I did what I did because of principle. Speaker 1: Duke's political aspirations only grew. In 1990, he ran for US senate and found a base of support. Speaker 2: One reason why the welfare system is out of control is because we have a massive illegitimate welfare birth rate in this country. Mean, they're literally breeding faster than you can they can raise your taxes to pay for them all. Speaker 5: He's a symbol of frustration for these people. They don't feel that, that major parties are answering their their questions. You got Speaker 2: a lot of good ideas that we've been seeing for a long time. It's time for somebody to do it. Speaker 1: Yet Duke's days as a Klansman played out in a political ad by the Democratic senator he hoped to unseat. Speaker 6: David Duke led the Ku Klux Klan as an adult. Speaker 7: There's no more truly representative symbol of a white race than the Fowry Cross. It is our symbol. My victory. Victory. My Speaker 1: Duke lost his bid for senate, but that didn't deter him from running for governor of Louisiana the following year, And a few familiar themes reappeared. Speaker 8: The nomination of a former grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan as the Republican candidate for governor has the political establishment and a lot of others in a state of anxiety. Speaker 1: Efforts from local political leaders to derail Duke's campaign didn't seem to matter. Speaker 6: The voters of Louisiana have heard all that before. They've seen television images of Duke at Ku Klux Klan cross burning. And yet a growing number of voters like Lori Roy are willing to overlook that because they are angry with other politicians. Speaker 2: Everybody overlooks us.
Video Transcript AI Summary
David Duke, despite efforts to shed his Klan image, ran for Louisiana legislature, persuading over half the voters in one election. Analysts attribute his win to better campaigning and voicing what voters wanted to hear: rights for white people. Duke founded the National Association for the Advancement of White People after leaving the Klan, advocating for equal rights for everyone, not just a "chosen few." Despite being repudiated by his party and labeled a racist, Duke garnered significant voter support. He campaigned against affirmative action and welfare, accusing his opponent, Jay Bennett Johnston, of past segregationist views and current discrimination against whites. Duke later ran for governor, predicting victory despite past failures and opposition. He expressed confidence in securing a large percentage of both Republican and Democratic votes. Groups like the Louisiana Coalition Against Racism and Nazism opposed his candidacy, believing his image would prevent him from winning. Duke claimed to be a simple man verbalizing harsh realities, confident in his chances for the Governor's Mansion.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: David Duke has been trying to shed his image as a cross burning Klansman for almost ten years now. He's still having difficulty doing that with a lot of people. Speaker 1: This this is not the issue of this campaign. It's not a Jewish, Christian, issue or or controversy. It's not a black white controversy. I'm an individual standing up for equal rights for everybody. Speaker 0: He did persuade a little more than half of the voters who went to the polls this weekend that he should be elected to the Louisiana legislature. Political analysts say there are several reasons why Duke won. First of all, he was a better campaigner than his opponent. And second, he was saying what a lot of voters wanted to hear, that white should have rights as well as minorities. When Duke left the Klan, he founded the National Association for the Advancement of White People. Speaker 1: It's not a question of being against minorities at all. It's simply a question of of making sure that our rights are also protected. That if we're gonna have civil rights in America, we must have civil rights for everyone and not a chosen few. Speaker 2: David Duke has been repudiated by his party, vilified by his opponents, exposed as a racist in this TV commercial. Speaker 3: My victory. My victory. My Speaker 2: And yet a large number of voters support Duke in his race against the incumbent Democrat, Jay Bennett Johnston, who calls Duke a lying racist. Duke, who campaigns against affirmative action and welfare mothers, claims that Johnston was once a segregationist. Speaker 3: He still seems to be for racial discrimination. Only now, it's against whites instead of blacks. Speaker 2: The polls indicate Johnson is clearly the front runner in this race, but the polls have notoriously underestimated David Duke before. He's expected to get a lot of votes Saturday. And if he does lose, the message of his campaign will linger long after the election. Speaker 4: Former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke is officially running for the governor of Louisiana. Shunned by fellow Republicans and turned down by voters in the last election, Duke still predicts victory this fall. Gary Mattingly of WDSU reports. Speaker 5: David Duke is not letting his controversial past stop him from getting to the Governor's Mansion. The state representative from suburban New Orleans is the latest in a field of candidates trying to win that post. Duke tried unsuccessfully to get into the US Senate, but his showing was impressive, getting more than 40% of the vote. This time, Duke says he's more confident the votes will be there to take him over the top. Speaker 3: I can guarantee you that the Republican vote will not be split. I'll receive 85% of the Republican vote in this election, plus a great percentage of the democratic vote. Speaker 5: Once again, Duke will have to contend with the groups trying to block his candidacy. Reverend James Stovall is with the Louisiana Coalition Against Racism and Nazism. We think that the image of David Duke is such that he will not get the vote again that he did once before. Speaker 3: In truth, I'm a simple man and quite unremarkable in my talents. Yet I'm smart enough to recognize the harsh realities and maybe dumb enough to verbalize that out understanding out loud. Every political rule I break, but I'm not broken. Speaker 5: While Duke failed in his attempt to make it to the US senate, this time he feels his chances are very good for making it to the Governor's Mansion.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Is it because he’s a white supremacist? Here he is in multiple clips saying he is not a white supremacist, he is simply looking to be an advocate for European Americans rights in the US. He founded the National Association for Advancement of White people. His reasoning behind this was that every other racial group in the US had an advocacy group except for white people. Let’s be honest, he’s right. This is the first one of these organizations I’ve ever heard of. 🧵 4/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker states the book "Racial Understanding" is about the foundations of America being European, and that the country is losing the roots and values it was built upon. He claims that the European Christian foundations of America are under relentless attack, and that Europeans must defend their rights and heritage. He defines European civilization as the way "we" live, the foundation of the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the writings of Shakespeare, the philosophies of Goethe, Solzhenitsyn, Dotezsky, and the music of Wagner and Beethoven. When asked about the similarity between the title of the book, "My Awakening," and "Mein Kampf," the speaker says "My Awakening" is a very generic title.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Racial Understanding and this book is about that. Speaker 1: You begin chapter one. Chapter one is entitled An American Son and you begin with the following sentence. I was born in the nation our European forefathers built. If the opening sentence of a book conveys the tone of the book, what is the tone of that, what is being conveyed here? Speaker 0: That the foundations of America indeed are European, the people who wrote our constitution, our declaration of independence, who gave us what we call The United States. And that today, in multicultural society we're going toward, that we seem to be losing the roots and values that our country is built upon. I mentioned in the book, for instance, that in the city of New Orleans, where I grew up, when I grew up, the city was quite different than it is now. People could actually use the public schools safely and get a good education. They can't today. And very recently, the school last year, in fact, the New Orleans School Board removed the name of George Washington from a public school after he was called an immoral example for our children. So obviously, think that the heart and soul, the European Christian foundations of America, I think, are under relentless attack today, and that that we, Europeans, must defend our rights and our heritage the same way that black people do, the same way that Jewish people advance Jewish interests or Israeli interests. We need to defend, you know, our heritage as well. Speaker 1: When you say you use the term European heritage and and the civilization. What are some of the hallmarks? How would you define what that European civilization in America is? Speaker 0: You know, it's kinda hard to just define it in a sentence or two because European civilization is the way we live. It's the foundation of our constitution in The United States, again, written all by by Europeans. The Declaration of Independence, the the writings of Shakespeare, the philosophies of, Goethe, or or so many other great people of our Western civilization, our our Solzhenitsyn, our Dotezsky, the mute the music of a of a Wagner or a a Beethoven. I mean, all these go into what you'd you'd say would be European civilization. Speaker 1: The title of my book, of your book, My Awakening, there any connection perhaps or is it wrong to put between the similarity between this title and another familiar book by a gentleman who you have also written about Mein Kampf, My Struggle, My Battle. Speaker 0: Well, no, think My Awakening is, you know, is a very generic title, in fact. But actually, what I
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker addresses distortions in the press, specifically claims that their book is a white supremacist text. They state they don't believe in racial supremacy or any supremacist doctrine, and advocate for equal rights. The speaker believes the races are profoundly different physically, mentally, psychologically, historically, and culturally, and that these differences have a tremendous impact on society. They deny being motivated by hate, claiming instead a deep love for the traditions and values of Western Christian civilization.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Understanding of what I believe and why I believe the way I believe because there's so many distortions in the press. For instance, in fact, some people are calling this book a supremacist book, a white supremacist book. But in the book I very carefully point out that I don't believe in racial supremacy or that type or any sort of supremacist doctrine. I believe in equal rights for all. I do think there are differences, but I, you know Differences? In in different ways that we are. The races are very profoundly different. Physically, mentally, psychologically, historically, culturally. And these differences have tremendous impact on society. But, you know, a lot of people have this image that I'm motivated by hate, and I think that once they read this book, they'll realize that my motivation is not hatred at all. It's really a deep and abiding love for the traditions and values of of Western Christian civilization. How would you
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker is unsure if Steve Scalise spoke to the group they founded, as they were in Russia researching their doctoral dissertation at the time. The speaker clarifies that their involvement with the Klan was 37 years ago. They state that Robert Byrd was also in the Klan, but many people were friends with him. The speaker denounces violence and says they left the Klan to avoid association with it, and that they have never supported white supremacism. The speaker claims the European American Unity and Rights Organization (EURO) was dedicated to civil rights and stopping discrimination, asserting that it advocated for the best-qualified people to be engaged and for every people's right to preserve their heritage, freedom, and values. The speaker confirms they founded EURO.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Did Steve Scalise speak to the group that you founded? Speaker 1: Frankly, I'm not sure. I was in Russia at the time doing research for my doctoral dissertation. I since got a PhD. And I was in Moscow, in fact, in the National Archives almost every day. I did a telephone hookup. And by the way, we've to make something really clear here. You know, they say, former Klan leader or whatever, this was thirty seven years ago in my life, okay? And But true. Speaker 0: I mean, admittedly, over a long time period, but true. Speaker 1: It's not also true that Robert Byrd was in the Klan. But a lot of people were friends of Robert Byrd, right, in the Senate, Democrats and Republicans. It's really a biased situation because I denounced first of all, it was never violent, but I denounced even then violence. I left it because I didn't want to be associated with that kind of taint. I've never supported white supremacism. You ought to read about it in the paper. This wasn't a hate group. In fact, the European American Unity and Rights Organization was an organization in its charter dedicated to choose civil rights and stopping discrimination against people, if the best qualified people should be engaged, and that every people have the right to preserve their heritage, their freedom, and their values. Speaker 0: You've you've founded Euro. Did think you founded Euro. This is a huge story. It's a nation.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Did the media Uber cancel him because of his racial beliefs? Let’s dig further into those. Here he is describing reading a book “Race and Reason.” This book fundamentally altered his view on the integration of schools in America. In that book the author predicted that forced integration would cause white flight, more racial tension, and less quality education overall. Obviously this is controversial, but given how bad our school system and inner city school system has turned out, it cannot be ruled out as simply crazy. 🤪 he even cites a former civil rights leader who said integration was a mistake. 🧵 5/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker initially believed racial integration would benefit the country, improve education, foster peace, reduce Black poverty and crime, and was supported by prominent figures. However, a class assignment required the speaker to argue against racial integration, leading to a book called Race and Reason by Carlton Putnam. Putnam, a Yankee, argued that integration would not improve racial relations, but instead cause white flight, harm cities, and damage education. This book began the speaker's "odyssey" toward racial understanding and had a transformative effect.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: For it. And what I read said that that integration was gonna be a very positive thing for our country, that it was gonna help our educational system, it'd be progressive, that it would bring love, peace, and brotherhood, that it would it would it would also lessen black poverty, lessen black crime, lessen black illegitimacy, all the problems the black community had during that period. And I believed all that. And also, it seemed like all the the top people, the people in sports, and the people in politics, and the really famous and well respected people all said, well, you know, it's only right. We need to force we need to integrate the schools, and we need to break down the racial barriers, and so forth. And I believed that. And, in fact, I was very sympathetic toward the integrationist movement. Speaker 1: What happened? Speaker 0: Well, I was in very little, these little things, I guess, that change our lives. I was in one of my classes, the teacher assigned us to do certain reports and defend certain positions in class. And what she all had us take a position or some sort of issue that we had we were passionate about or we agreed with. And I took the position, the case, in favor of racial integration. And everybody in the class took a position that they agreed with, basically. And then the teacher at the last moment said, okay, I'm going teach you how to do proper research and teach you how to, you know, challenge yourself and ask questions. He says, now I want you to take and do the opposite of the subject you chose. So now I had to do a report called The Case Against Racial Integration. And that began an odyssey. And it led me eventually to a book called Race and Reason by Carlton Putnam. And Putnam very eloquently, here's a guy who was in fact a Yankee, in fact the book's called A Yankee View. And Carlton Putnam argued very eloquently that integration of education would not help racial relations. It would cause white flight, that it would ultimately hurt our cities, it would damage our educational quality across America, and it wouldn't achieve the objectives that that the Liberals said that it would. And that became began it didn't really change me completely, but that began my my odyssey, I guess, toward racial understanding. Speaker 2: Is it accurate to say then that this book Speaker 1: had a transformative effect on you?
Video Transcript AI Summary
Forced integration of education over the last 30 years has led to an implosion of major cities and the destruction of the educational system. America used to be number one in education but is now in last place, and there is more racial tension today than ever before. The speaker believes that some predictions made by Jefferson, Lincoln, and Carlton Putnam were accurate, and that forced integration has not been good for blacks or whites. Lincoln believed integration hurt both races. James Meredith, once a key figure in the civil rights movement, now believes integration has damaged the black community.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Life are probably the same. And if you really look at what Jefferson said and what Lincoln said on the issue, I think his predictions were were pretty strong. I mean, we've had a situation in in terms and also Carlton Putnam. I mean, over the last thirty years of forced integration of education, yes, we've had an implosion of our major cities. We've had a destruction of our educational system. I mean, America used to be number one in the industrialized world in education, now we're about last place. We've had I think we have more racial tension today than we've ever had. When I was a young man, I talk about in the book how I used to work on cars in a black garage. My dad used to get his automobile fixed. And very few young white people can do that today and go down to the inner city without endangering their lives, seriously. So I think that I think that maybe a lot of the predictions these people made were, were accurate. And I do think that, that some of the premises that I came to believe were false. I don't think forced integration has been really good either for blacks or for whites. And in fact, Lincoln said that himself. He said that he thought the races suffered on each side, that integration really hurt both races. And other blacks have said this as well. I mean, James Meredith, who was the, at one time, the pinnacle of the civil rights movement, has come to believe that integration has damaged the black community, beheaded, in fact, the black community in a lot of areas. Have critics pointed out on occasion that

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This is definitely more likely to get you cancelled, but let’s move on to his possible “antisemitism.” Let’s be honest, this will get you cancelled above all else. Here’s where he crosses the line you can’t cross. He states that he believes we have a Zionist occupied government working to support Israel, while also working to undermine, and wipe out the European American. The thought is this is why Hollywood (a Zionist Jewish institution) pushes egalitarianism, and multiculturalism while also working to destroy European nationalism. They do this because Jews have been expelled most often from white Christian counties, and tend to thrive in diverse ethnic countries. He further demonstrates how the Zionist control the federal reserve banks, and many positions of political power within this country. He specifically calls out Jewish supremacism beliefs as being dangerous and quotes directly from the Talmud (Jewish holy book) to highlight where the beliefs come from. 🧵 6/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
Scientists, according to a survey, believe there are genetic differences between whites and blacks that influence IQ, but the public is unaware due to the media's egalitarianism. The media is dominated by liberals, specifically Jews, evidenced by the high percentage of Jewish writers, producers, and directors in Hollywood, as well as Jewish ownership and control of major news magazines and newspapers. This media control might be harmful, raising the question of what would happen if a group like Saddam Hussein supporters had similar influence. The media supports Israel, sending billions in aid, yet a double standard exists compared to situations like Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait. The same media supports Israel, a nation preserving Jewish interests and denying Palestinian civil rights, while also supporting integration and multiculturalism in America.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In the world, these are similar patterns that exist in almost every black nation in the world. And that's what's interesting about this. Richter, I point out Rothman and Lichter, many other scientists in this I talk about in this book, they did a survey of scientists on some of these racial issues. And they found that a majority of scientists believed that there was a genetic difference between whites and blacks, that had a profound influence on things like IQ and different other patterns. But the public just doesn't know about these things. Mean, I the public is simply unaware because the popular media has got this egalitarian. The popular media is totally devoted to what they call egalitarianism, and it just simply hasn't, it just has never really offered the people this other point of view. Speaker 1: Why is that? Speaker 0: Because I think the, the people who dominate the media in this country are devoted to a liberal, point of view, a liberal position. Speaker 1: Who dominates the media? Speaker 0: Well specifically, liberals and in terms of an ethnic group, specifically Jews. Speaker 1: The argument's been made before. What would you cite as evidence of the Speaker 0: Well, evidence is overwhelming, really. Mean, I can cite so many. I can I can talk about a a book, for instance, by the Ben Stein, was a former the son of the of Herbert Stein, economic adviser to to Nixon, who was himself Jewish, talking about how Hollywood about 85% of the writers and producers and directors in Hollywood are Jewish? I mean, we can just look at the overwhelming facts and figures. They're amazing. I have them in my book. You have three major news magazines in America, Time, Newsweek, and Users of World Report. And all three of those magazines are owned and basically dominated by Jews. You have you have three most powerful newspapers in this country or the New York Times, the Washington Post, and, The Wall Street Journal, and all three of them also have have Jewish ownership and control. And you can just go on and on. It's just an amazing phenomenon that exists in this country. And, this might not be harmful, but I would just ask people, what if Saddam Hussein or Iraqis who supported Saddam Hussein had this this tremendous media, control? The ironic thing that I see in all this control or domination is that while the media in this country supports Israel dramatically, I mean, so I mean, we they support Israel and support $8,000,000,000 or so a year going to Israel. In fact, remember with the we have the thing going on in Kosovo right now. You know, in the 1980s, Israel invaded Lebanon. And there were approximately 40,000 civilians who died as a result of that Israeli invasion. The United Nations, including the Security Council, voted that Israel should be removed from Lebanon. And in fact, that was United Nations sanctions. But The United States did not come in and say to Israel, if you don't, you know, remove your your troops or withdraw back to Israel, we're gonna bomb you. We they didn't say we're gonna, you know, we're we're gonna go in there and force you to go back. And yet we had a very similar situation with Saddam Hussein where he invaded Kuwait, and, of course, the whole world was marshaled against them. So I think there is a double standard there. And the same media that supports Israel, and Israel is a nation based on the preservation of the Jewish people and and Jewish interests, basically, in that region. And it denies the civil rights of the Palestinian people dramatically. It's the same media that supports the the integration of America and and so called multiculturalism here. Speaker 1: You have approximately 200 pages in your Speaker 0: book on
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims there is racism against European Americans, who have a low birth rate of 1.6, causing their population to decline. They state that the global population explosion is primarily African. They believe globalists and Zionists are orchestrating mass immigration into white nations, because white people no longer control media, banking, or foreign policy. The speaker alleges that Zionists are the biggest political contributors and that every Federal Reserve Chairman and Vice Chairman for the last three decades has been a Jewish Zionist. They accuse Zionists of displacing, murdering, and torturing people to steal their land in Israel. The speaker asserts that Jews have taken over the American elite, referencing an article about Jewish people "getting in." They claim that if they were president, they wouldn't support globalist agendas or wars for Israel, Iraq, and Afghanistan. They identify Goldman Sachs as a Zionist institution that controls international banking and influences the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve, also contributing to both Democrats and Republicans.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: But it's racism, vicious hate propaganda and racism against the European American. And as far as eugenics or as far as limiting births, the real population explosion, black people have a much higher birth rate than whites. Mexicans have a much higher birth rate than even African Americans. European Americans have about a 1.6 birth rate, which means we're losing a quarter of our people every generation. The population explosion in the world is an African explosion. The United Nations just recently put out a statistic showing that in Africa by 02/1950, there'll be 1,300,000,000 Africans. That's And almost entirely because of the massive birth rate. So I don't believe that these globalists are intentionally trying to limit the birth rates of African of Africans or African Americans or whatever. The truth is that the only people on the planet who are losing their numbers, and of course it's only white nations that are being massively invaded by immigration which the globalists and the Zionists have set up and dominated in The United States, Canada, Australia, every European nation today is under attack. And I believe that's because our people don't any longer have control over the media. They have no longer control over the banking system, the Federal Reserve Bank. They no longer have control over our foreign policy or even our politics. The biggest contributors in politics are absolutely Zionists. I can prove that and document that. And the Federal Reserve, we've had three decades now of Federal Reserve Chairman. In fact, I have a graphic that I uploaded to your site today. Hopefully, your engineer can put it up with the Federal Reserve, the Fed. And over the last three decades, every Federal Reserve Chairman and Vice Chairman has been a Jewish supremacist, a Jewish Zionist. There's no argument about that. Not a single non Jewish head of the Federal Reserve banking system, and that is the ultimate banking power in the world. You wanna talk about international finance? There's no more powerful force in the world than the Federal Reserve. Now these are all Jewish activists. I don't say every Jew, and I agree with you that not every Jew, is acting against European Americans or against people of the world. But we do know that Zionism is absolutely a Jewish supremacist phenomenon. It is a racist phenomenon. They kicked 600,000 people out of their lands, stole their land, violated them, murdered them, tortured them, periodically kill thousands of women and children, maimed them in Israel, and they are the power. But for them to have the power, Israel wouldn't exist and the Jewish supremacism wouldn't exist except for the fact that the Jews basically have I believe this they've taken over the American elite. Now when I say this, this is another graphic that I've had uploaded already. I'll show you a graphic from the New York Times. Mr. Brooks, David Brooks, one of their elitum columnists, in which he literally talks about an article or a thing called The Chosen Getting In. And he literally speaks about a Jewish taking over for the American elite and how the Jews have become the American elite. So if you wanna talk about the elite in this country, I believe they are tribalists. And I am not an image I'm not a mirror image of Al Sharpton because it is I believe it's my people that are going to become a minority in the world. Now I respect all people. And if I were president of The United States, I wouldn't be having this globalist agenda. And I certainly wouldn't be invading these countries in these wars for Israel and Iraq and Afghanistan. I certainly wouldn't be be supporting the Goldman Sachs of the world. That's the biggest predator, the most evil predator international bank in the world. It is a Zionist institution and it not only controls international banking or has a great effect of it. It literally picks who's going to be in our treasury department basically and the people who who have power in the Federal Reserve. It is a Zionist operation and it's also the chief corporate contributor. Take a look at the Goldman Sachs. Again, the the the this what I've showed you. So chief corporate contributor of both Democrats and Republicans in The United States Of America. Speaker 1: Debate you there. I'll just interject for one minute, and you can come back for two minutes, then we'll continue. Sure. Let me just interject. When I say mirror image, I meant from his perspective, he promotes all the race based stuff. From your white perspective, that's going on. And I'm saying the rhetoric out of Mecha, La Raza. La Raza means
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that Jewish Zionists control major media outlets like the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, and New York Times. They allege these individuals promote a double standard, condemning segregation and advocating for gun control in America while supporting Israel's segregated society and allowing Jewish citizens to carry submachine guns. The speaker states that this media supports immigration policies in Israel that favor Jewish people, while denouncing similar efforts to maintain a European American majority in the US. They claim the NAACP was founded by Zionist Jews and that Jewish groups organized changes to American immigration policy. The speaker insists that criticizing this "supremacism" is not antisemitic, citing Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor, as a Jewish individual who opposes it. They encourage listeners to discuss these issues to protect their rights and heritage in America and promotes their book, which they say documents these claims.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: American taxpayers' money. The ironic thing is that the same element in this country, in the media, which also runs, you know, your major networks. Let's take newspapers for instance. You've got the Wall Street Journal, you've got the Washington Post, the New York Times, all three have Jewish Zionists who run those organizations. Alright? The ironic thing is that the same people who support this supremacist attitude in Israel and preserving the Jewish people are the same people who tell us that as European Americans, we are being evil. They wanna preserve our culture and our way of life in our own country. Now, if you ever thought it was a little bit ironic, isn't it amazing the same media that condemns segregation or condemns segregation in the South and elsewhere in this country between white and black, is the same media that supports Israel which has segregated schools, segregated settlements, even segregated towns in that nation. The same media that's all in favor of gun control for American citizens taking away your right to keep and bear arms as provided by our constitution, is the same media that supports Israel which allows Jewish citizens to carry submachine guns if they desire to. The same media that says that if you are a European American and you wanna defend your border, that you wanna protect the integrity of your country, that you wanna keep this nation a European nation, the same media that says that's horrible and that's evil, is the same media that supports Israel which specifically allows immigration only to people of Jewish descent. Are you starting to get the contradictions? The same media and we've got to become aware of this media. When people talk about immigration, ladies and gentlemen by the way, the civil rights movement, the African Americans haven't done it to us. They haven't even let it. In fact, Martin Luther King, his major speech writer was Jerry Levinson, another big supporter of Israel. Alright. Again, a supporter of the racist state of Israel. The NAACP was founded by basically 15 communist, Zionist Jews, and only one black. And in this country or even our immigration policy was specifically organized and changed primarily by the American Jewish Congress and other major Jewish groups. I document this in my book. I have quotes from Jewish sources about this. Now by saying these things, first off, I'm not being antisemitic because I'm not opposing all Jews. There are some Jews themselves who oppose this supremacism. For instance, Israel Shahak. Israel Shahak was a survivor of the Second World War and and the Holocaust. He has written a book called the Jewish religion. He's an Israeli person who wants peace and justice, and he says the same thing I say. Okay? There but there is an element of supremacism among them that needs to be fought if in fact we are gonna find our rights and heritage or secure them in this country. So you're not being antisemitic to talk about it, you've got to begin to talk about what's going on in America. Now my book in the immigration chapter which I hope you've all read and by the way we've got copies here tonight for those that want some. And that in this book, in the immigration chapter, I quote and I show that from 1918 to 1924 in the
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims that if current trends continue, the U.S. and Europe will experience conditions similar to those under "Jewish-led Bolshevism" in Russia, including gulags and the destruction of European people. They assert that "European mankind" is being wiped out because they are seen as competitors. The speaker references a New York Times column discussing the "Jewish takeover of America," and accuses Hollywood, which they say is run by non-European Christians, of pushing drugs and degeneracy. They state that the term "anti-Semitism" has been redefined to mean anti-Zionist or anti-Jewish supremacism. They claim that most Jews support Jewish tribalism and have been propagandized to hate Gentiles. The speaker alleges that "organized Jews" were instrumental in opening U.S. borders through immigration law changes in 1967, enabling a "divide and conquer strategy." They argue it is not racist to defend against a takeover by a hostile group. They state that while not all Jews share this ideology, most are taught to support other Jews, while Europeans are discouraged from uniting for their own interests.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You're talking about. We're we're gonna have in our country and Europe, if this continues to go on, exactly the same kind of conditions that went under Jewish led Bolshevism in Russia. We're gonna see those gulags, and we're gonna see those camps, and we're gonna see the destruction of our people. They're already doing it. I mean, you've got to understand, European mankind right now is being steadily wiped out. And that's because they see our people as their chief competitor in the world. And they know that if they destroy the elite in America now I want to give another one of my graphics to illustrate this. Here's a graphic from the New York Times. It's David Brooks, again, one of their lead columnists. He literally talks in there about the replacement of the American elite and the Jewish, quote, the Jewish takeover of America. That's the real elite. Now this elite is not trying to destroy Jews. In fact, they support even the Jewish state in Israel. They're not trying to do anything. In fact, you talked about the problems with our family. How about Hollywood that pushes drugs on our kids? I'm talking about hard drug use that increases every kind of degeneracy and destructiveness on our who runs Hollywood? It's not European Christians. And what they've done is they've made anti Semitism a term simply to mean anti Zionist supremacism or anti Jewish supremacism. Not all Jews are supremacists, but most Jews support Jewish tribalism. They would support Jewish power. You know, they've been propagandized too by their Jewish leaders. They have been taught to hate Gentiles. They have been taught that Gentiles are all out to kill them. They have been taught that the Jews have to stick together. And because of that racism, which is preached to the Jews, it's preached in modern media, It's preached in, in our media, by the way. We're taught to feel guilty because because the fact that some Europeans didn't wanna be destroyed by these Jewish Bolsheviks. The Second World War is a good example of that. They were already killing tens of millions of our people. Tens of millions of our people before the second world war, and we went on the side of the Bolsheviks in that war. Killed 54,000,000 people. That wasn't a good war. That was a destructive war against European mankind. That war could have been avoided. And they're leading us right now. They're all concerned about what's going overseas. The problem the real problem we have is not the ISIS threat. We wouldn't even have the ISIS threat except the fact that organized Jews were the point men for the propaganda and the direct organizations and the control of the critical critical process that literally opened our borders. Jacob Javas, the senate that that led the senator the Jewish senator that led the fight for the opening of our borders to change their immigration law in '67 wrote a whole pamphlet, open the gates. He didn't he wasn't talking about open the gates of Israel. He was talking about open the gates of America so that the Jewish divide and conquer strategy would do that. That's that's the fact. There has been a takeover. It is an ethically driven takeover. It is not racist. It is certainly not supremacist for any people on this planet whether it be whites, blacks, yellows, anybody to defend themselves from a takeover by a hostile predatory group. Now I agree not all Jews have this ideology but most Jews are taught intrinsically to help and support other Jews. And Europeans are taught that they should never band together for their own interest. That's because that's how they've taken over. Here's going to break. Long segment.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Well what do you think? Is he a Nazi White Supremacist? Or someone advocating for white rights in a country where the white population is steadily declining? Is he a mixture of both? Did he deserve to be cancelled? One thing is for certain, he is undoubtedly correct about the Zionist influence in American politics today. If Israel says jump, we say how high. He has correctly pointed that out, and like him or not, that is why he has been buried. 🧵7/7

Video Transcript AI Summary
The blood in our veins is the same blood that fought at the Alamo and Valley Forge, wrote Shakespeare and Beethoven, invented electricity, and spread Christianity. This blood laid the foundations of our country, and now that heritage is in danger. The enemies of our heritage, the masters of hate, accuse us of hate. But we endure attacks and fight against the media, government, money, and political privilege, not out of hate, but out of deep love.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The simple truth is this. The simple truth is that the blood in our veins, not only the people in this room, but the people at home listening, the blood in our veins is the same blood that fought at the Alamo. It's the same blood that stood up in Valley Forge in the freezing weather for our freedoms. It's the same blood that wrote the sonnets of Shakespeare or the great works of Beethoven are the words of Tolstoy or Doctor. Esky. It's the same magnificent blood that gave us the power of flight. The same blood that invented electricity, the same blood that gave us a telegraph, the telephone, the same blood that enables us to be able to be seen in this room because of electric light. It's the same blood that wrote the works of homer, the same blood that gave us the faith of Christianity that spread throughout Europe and the world because our people were the ones that carried this faith forward and defended it. It's the same blood, ladies and gentlemen, that laid all the foundations that we love and we hold dear in our country. And now that blood is in danger. That heritage is in danger. I will close by saying the media, the enemies of our heritage, those who hate our heritage, the masters of hate, the ones who throw foul upon our heritage and our culture and our traditions and our values and our streets, they like to use the word hate against us. I would not go through what I've gone through in my life. I would not take the barbs of the media, the incessant attacks against my character over the years, the threats against my life or my family, the things I've gone through, the hours of thankless work. I would not do these things by a week in a mere emotion such as a hate. I do these things and we do these things tonight and we put up with the barbs of the media and we fight against the current of the times and the current of the media and the powers that exist of government and money and political privilege. We fight against those powers in this world, not because we hate anything, but because we have such a deep and abiding love.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 I appreciate your support!

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@naturalaristo Every time…

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@LanceHogan Thanks!

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@ThinkingBrute I’ve got another thread on Hutton Gibson (Mel Gibsons father) that shows how he was defamed etc.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@jakeshieldsajj Seems like a good one. Whether people like him or not, clearly he was right about white replacement, and calling out our Zionist occupied government more than 20 years ago.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@LegitAudioBooks Exactly.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@vRoosterv Probably right about that.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@LBCowpunk I’ll check em out.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@andrewj081981 It’s also a control tactic. The Zionist want trump to know who the boss is. If he aligns himself with someone that is pro white and, anti Israel, they will not allow him to be president.

Uncommonsince76
Posted - August 1, 2025 at 3:01 AM
Saved - August 1, 2025 at 7:34 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

jewish man gets shoved by a 100 lb girl. What does he do? He films it and gets the federal government involved to destroy her life. “Fuck Israel”, is free speech. And trying to clamp down on it, will only increase antisemitism. Especially when combined with Jewish behavior.

@amuse - @amuse

TERROR: Florida State University co-ed believes Jews are subhuman and begins to attack a Jewish peer at the gym wearing an IDF shirt, screaming "F*ck Israel, Free Palestine" and physically assaults him. https://t.co/kQatFktbWW

Uncommonsince76
Posted - July 30, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Saved - July 30, 2025 at 10:41 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The “Anthrax Letters” that were used to connect 9/11 to Iraq, and justify a 10 trillion dollar war, were most certainly done by Israel. The anthrax itself was likely smuggled by Jewish microbiologist Phillip Zack. He has been wiped from most internet searches, but you can some info on Wikispooks.

@ShieldsClips - Fight Back Podcast

The “Anthrax Letters” after 9/11 were obviously done by Israel https://t.co/bHAIeSf1kh

Uncommonsince76
Posted - January 17, 2025 at 7:22 PM
Saved - July 23, 2025 at 5:34 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Listen to Hitler describe how high level Freemasons, Jewish Bankers, the Jewish Press, and Jewish revolutionaries led to both World War 1, and the overthrow of the Russian Tsar in the Russian revolution. Was he wrong? 🧐 1923 speech. Credit- @UncutSpeech https://t.co/nc9rlUs0Ix

Uncommonsince76
Posted - July 13, 2025 at 8:08 PM
Saved - July 13, 2025 at 11:05 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You mean the allies never found 1 single “death camp” it was only reported on the side of the jewish communist Bolsheviks???? That’s weird. https://t.co/M8wkK0QtYG

Uncommonsince76
Posted - July 5, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Saved - July 6, 2025 at 12:47 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I see a stark divide in perspectives. Some suggest retreating to isolated land, while others adamantly oppose that idea, aiming for a complete erasure of identity. The wealthy have evaded these issues for years, but now it feels like an unavoidable fight for survival is on the horizon.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

White People- “Let’s just buy some land in the middle of nowhere to avoid global Zimbabwe” Jews- “Absolutely not. We desire the complete eradication of your identity, sovereignty, and Race.” The wealthy White people have been able to escape this for decades, but those days are coming to an end. You will have no choice but to fight. It is an existential threat.

@ADLSouthCentral - ADL South Central

We are extremely concerned about white supremacist efforts to expand their influence in Arkansas. + https://forward.com/news/733168/return-to-the-land-arkansas-jews-eric-orwoll/

No Jews allowed: White supremacists are building a segregated community in Arkansas, but is it legal? Return to the Land is creating whites-only housing communities, with the aim of putting land “back under the control of Europeans.” forward.com
Uncommonsince76
Posted - June 28, 2025 at 10:19 PM
Saved - June 29, 2025 at 5:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’ve shared a series of posts discussing various societal changes and issues in America, attributing them to Jewish influence. Topics include the removal of prayer in schools, the use of state funds for religious schools, immigration policies post-1965, the feminist movement, abortion advocacy, and shifts in academic perspectives on race. I also touch on the role of Jewish individuals in corporate leadership, censorship regarding race discussions, Hollywood's impact on culture, and the Iraq war. I invite support for my work through donations or subscriptions.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why can’t you pray in American Schools anymore? -because Jews sued to have it removed. 🧵 1/14 https://t.co/4Ou4PcKMzT

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why can’t state funds be used for “religious schools?” -because the Jewish led ACLU made sure to tear down states rights. 🧵 2/14 https://t.co/lJljFOyFHB

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why did the United States bring in immigrants from all over the world post 1965 even though most Americans did not want it? -because a jew Emmanuel Cellar had the immigration act of 1965 pass, which encouraged immigrants from all over.. 🧵 3/14 https://t.co/aQ3b4ZEFAl

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who pushed feminism into the minds of women in the 60’s and told them it was empowering to work and not have kids? -Betty Friedman, a Jew wrote the feminine mystique, and this movement was predominantly led by Jews. 🧵 4/14 https://t.co/93bKFQkXKn

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who pushed and helped fund abortion even con invented the abortion pill? Jewish organizations and Jewish scientists like Gregory Pincus. 🧵 5/14 https://t.co/JHe5ddyZu3

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who pushed for intelligent White people to have less kids because of “overpopulation”? -Jewish social scientist like Paul Erlich 🧵 6/14 https://t.co/b5qWkoqmRs

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who pushed in Academia that “Race is a Social construct” but at the same time if you are White you are a colonizer and evil? -Jews in educational roles and literary roles like Franz Boas, and all the authors of these anti-White books. 🧵 7/14 https://t.co/jYZDKoOaU0

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who used the NAACP as a vehicle to breakdown White solidarity and racial within the nation while placating Black interest? -Jews. 🧵 8/14 https://t.co/fqNt7iKB0i

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who used their power on Corporate boards to get White people out of top jobs? -Jews like Larry Fink the CEO of Blackrock. 🧵 9/14 https://t.co/YOPK0mD7Jh

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who censors people and says it’s Hate speech to say “It’s okay to be White? -Jews at the ADL 🧵 10/14 https://t.co/COgI0tqolU

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who has been dominating Hollywood for decades and slowly but surely degrading American culture? -jews who founded Hollywood and reshaped Americas thinking with the media power. 🧵 11/14 https://t.co/JPkQx5gCbB

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why is porn legal in the U.S.? -Samuel Roth, a Jew, sued for it to be legal in the U.S. 🧵 12/14 https://t.co/YvZsyENxlq

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Who were the primary neocons behind the Iraq war? -Short answer, jews who wanted to eliminate multiple threats to Israel… 🧵 13/14 https://t.co/kVigrtgvCE

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why isn’t America, America anymore? I’ll let you decide … If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 Or subscribe on X! I appreciate your support! 🧵 14/14

Uncommonsince76
Posted - June 20, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Saved - June 21, 2025 at 5:18 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared my perspective on the Holocaust, arguing that it is a fabricated narrative. I pointed out that the Red Cross documented 271,000 deaths in camps, and there were no orders from Hitler for a "final solution." I mentioned that evidence like the absence of Zyklon B residue at Auschwitz and discrepancies in survivor accounts raise questions. I also noted that many deaths were due to starvation and disease, not extermination. I believe the portrayal of the Holocaust is largely influenced by propaganda and that questioning it leads to severe consequences.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why the Holocaust is a Lie. -the Red Cross kept detailed records of all the deaths in the concentration camps. (271k) -the allies broke the codes to the SS communications, and never heard anything about a Holocaust -there is no order from Hitler for a “final solution.” -Goebbels wrote in his diary that the end goal was to deport the Jews to Madagascar -American executive expert Fred Leucther scraped the bricks of the Auschwitz gas chamber and found no Zyklon B residue. -Paul Rassinier, a French communist, was in a concentration camp alongside Jews, and wrote about his experience being completely different. -it was physically impossible to gas and cremate 6 million Jews in the time it was reported. -the “death camps” were all found on the Soviet side after the war. How did Hitler know where the iron curtain would be? -using Jewish sources, the worldwide Jewish population numbers did not decrease -Rudolf Hoss who “admitted” to the 6 million extermination death, was tortured at Nuremberg - many Jews and other inmates did die, as you see from some of the allies pictures, but it was a combination of starvation and Typhus, which was rampant at the end of the war. -there is no evidence of mass graves or mountains of Ash that would have existed from a mass killing operation -the highest Inmate number tattooed on a Holocaust survivor is 135,913 -Jewish producers in Hollywood create fictional Holocaust stories year in and year out to keep you in your psychological prison. Even Schindler’s list is mostly fiction based on a book called “Schindlers Ark. -the Germans were fighting and losing a 2 front war. Killing their own labor force in the most complex way imaginable would never have even entered their minds, nor was it possible with fuel, gas etc. -the door leading into the “Auschwitz gas chamber” is a wooden door. Legitimately physically impossible to run an execution gas chamber with one of them. -the “gas chamber lie” was war propaganda created by the British initially in their psychological war department. It is written in their archives. -when a German questions the Holocaust, he goes to prison, when a Jew says he’s a victim of the Holocaust, he gets a reparations check.

Uncommonsince76
Posted - June 18, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Saved - June 19, 2025 at 6:49 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've been noticing a pattern among those advocating for the Iran War. I’ve listed several individuals, all of whom share a common background. It’s intriguing to see this connection and I’m curious if others are observing the same trend.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Guys, I think I’m starting to notice a pattern of the type of people who are really pushing for this Iran War. Let me know if you see the pattern too!…. Roseanne Barr-Jew ✡️ 🧵 1/10 https://t.co/4NnW1rjhkp

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Mark Levin- Jew ✡️ 🧵 2/10 https://t.co/kAYCr3EsaM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Arynne Wexler- Jew ✡️ 🧵 3/10 https://t.co/dnD2r9k5kY

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Shawn Farash- Jew ✡️ 🧵 4/10 https://t.co/y7vTGJiahU

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Eyal Yakoby- Jew ✡️ 🧵 5/10 https://t.co/7Jfzy7KFn5

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Bill Kristol- Jew ✡️ 🧵 6/10 https://t.co/93nr2O4oMp

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Laura Loomer- Jew ✡️ 🧵 7/10 https://t.co/vCUaUcoY4R

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Randy Fine- Jew ✡️ 🧵 8/10 https://t.co/aDVBY5Hz6l

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Bill Ackman- Jew ✡️ 🧵 9/10 https://t.co/IhyyZboidu

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Joe Lonsdale- Jew✡️ 🧵 10/10 https://t.co/wmziuLqU66

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

What a strange pattern. Anyone else see it? 🧐

Uncommonsince76
Posted - June 15, 2025 at 8:39 PM
Saved - June 15, 2025 at 10:58 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews kill Trump. Blame Iran. Get White men to die in a Jewish war. Palantir chosen JD Vance becomes president. Total Jewish supremacy…

Uncommonsince76
Posted - May 2, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Saved - May 3, 2025 at 2:38 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Why are all these big Tech companies discriminating against White men? Could it be that the companies are ran by…. -Sundar -Satya -Aman -Shantanu The Jewish plan to flood this country with Indians is further along than you think. https://t.co/SST5EpNSXU

Uncommonsince76
Posted - April 15, 2025 at 1:13 PM
Saved - April 15, 2025 at 2:31 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

How did Hitler know 100 years ago that Jews would use the Stock exchange system to send our jobs overseas to maximize profits rather than caring about the middle class? https://t.co/KZx57Vs7JD

Video Transcript AI Summary
The stock exchange became the conductor of the national economy, owned exclusively by Jews, with token Christians used to maintain the pretense that these institutions are natural to all people. Europe began to divide into Western and Central/Eastern halves. England and France industrialized with relatively few Jews. The masses concentrated in cities did not come into direct contact with this foreign nation, and aversion did not find sufficient nourishment. The Jews of England, numbering 50 to 60,000, Europeanized themselves with ease and remained hidden from the common man, preventing antisemitism from gaining power. Because of this, democracy was introduced, outweighing intelligence and true energy by the sheer dead weight of the masses. The small class of Jewish intelligence hidden in the British people manipulated the broad masses, who served the purposes of this small class without realizing it.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In parallel with this, however, there was a gradual monetization of the entire labor force. The share system came into being. And as a result, the stock exchange gradually became the conductor of the entire national economy, but the owners of this institution were and are without exception, Jews. I say without exception because the few more than who participate in it as non Jews are in the end nothing more than token Christians who are needed to keep up the pretense to the broad masses that these institutions are natural to all peoples and their economies, while in reality, they are institutions which correspond exclusively to the essence of the Jewish people and thus also spring from it. At that time, Europe stood at a crossroads. It began to divide into two halves, Western Europe on the one hand and Central And Eastern Europe on the other. Western Europe First advanced in industrialization, especially in England, crowds of agricultural laborers, sons of farmers, or ruined farmers themselves poured into the cities and formed a new fourth estate. But there is one important fact here which many failed to take into account. England, like France, had relatively few Jews. The consequence of this, however, was that the great masses concentrated in the cities did not come into direct contact with this foreign nation, and the aversion which would necessarily arise did not find sufficient nourishment. Finally, the Jews of England, who at that time numbered scarcely 50 to 60,000, were able to Europeanize themselves with playful ease to such an extent that they remained hidden from the primitive eye of the common man. And he could not notice them as pillars of the economy, but especially as the bearers of great capital. They no longer appeared as foreigners, but as Englishmen themselves. This prevented antisemitism from gaining fundamental power in these countries. The same was true of France precisely because of this, however. It was possible to introduce in these countries the system known as democracy. Precisely in these countries, it was possible to establish a form of government that could mean nothing but the outweighing of intelligence and true energy by the sheer dead weight of the masses. In other words, it was possible there for the small class of Jewish intelligence here hidden in the British people to manipulate the broad masses with playful ease in such a way that the latter, unaware of whom they were obeying, served the purposes of this small class. There
Uncommonsince76
Posted - April 14, 2025 at 4:14 AM
Saved - April 14, 2025 at 4:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
The stock market is portrayed as a tool for Jewish control, benefiting them while harming others. I express frustration over hedge fund managers and companies prioritizing profit over the welfare of Americans, suggesting that Jewish interests manipulate the economy for their gain. There's a belief that this leads to the betrayal of the nation by upper-class Whites, who are incentivized to support mass immigration and outsourcing. I argue that the focus on economic growth is irrelevant if it comes at the expense of the White population's decline.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Stock market is just a Jewish Casino. It works perfectly for Jews, because it allows them to control and manipulate companies and countries for their own interest, rather than the people’s interest. It’s the ultimate parasitism. Just like Blackrock does today with pushing DEI and the like. It also explains why most hedge fund Managers are Jews, along with Wall Street Generally. The worst part is, in a lot of cases it’s your money, not theirs. The Jews have manipulated you into giving money to their managed index funds and hedge funds, where they tell companies how to effectively do what’s best for everything anti Christian and anti White. You are paying for your own destruction. Do you think Jews care about the health of America? No. The reason for the Wall Street backlash on the tariffs is because it might hurt portfolio returns for Jews like Bill Ackman and David Sacks. This is also how the Jews ensnare the upper class Whites into betraying their own Nation and own people. Give the goys a few shares in a company, and watch them fight over how to move the jobs overseas and get the cheapest labor possible. This is why the “right wing” is promoting mass legal immigration. They don’t care about the people, they care about money, and they care about what’s good for Jews. The U.S. is in a never ending debt cycle. If we don’t pump in more people, how will it be sustained? It won’t. This is why the Jews who kill off White People and tell them not to have kids within the country, then turn around and say, “we need to import more labor.” Perfect symmetry for them. Cheap labor for their stocks, White destruction for their security. This plan ran perfectly when most of the jobs were shipped overseas, and then the Jewish Sackler family started handing out OxyContin like candy in Appalachia. “Don’t have a job anymore White families? How bout getting hooked on drugs and ODing!” Total Jewish supremacism. If in 5 years the S&P 500 is up 80% but the White population is down another 20%, will it be good for America? Until the demographics are dealt with there is no purpose in caring about the economy. What are we trying to do, onshore factory jobs so Mexicans who shouldn’t be here in the first place can have them?

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker claims the stock exchange became the conductor of the national economy, controlled exclusively by Jews, with non-Jewish participants serving as tokens. Europe was dividing into Western and Central/Eastern halves. England and France industrialized with relatively few Jews. Masses concentrated in cities did not come into direct contact with this foreign nation, and aversion did not find sufficient nourishment. The Jews of England, numbering 50-60,000, Europeanized themselves, remaining hidden from the common man and appearing as Englishmen. This prevented antisemitism from gaining power. Because of this, democracy was introduced, outweighing intelligence and energy by the masses. A small class of Jewish intelligence, hidden in the British people, manipulated the broad masses, who unknowingly served their purposes.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: In parallel with this, however, there was a gradual monetization of the entire labor force. The share system came into being. And as a result, the stock exchange gradually became the conductor of the entire national economy, but the owners of this institution were and are without exception, Jews. I say without exception because the few more than who participate in it as non Jews are in the end nothing more than token Christians who are needed to keep up the pretense to the broad masses that these institutions are natural to all peoples and their economies, while in reality, they are institutions which correspond exclusively to the essence of the Jewish people and thus also spring from it. At that time, Europe stood at a crossroads. It began to divide into two halves, Western Europe on the one hand and Central And Eastern Europe on the other. Western Europe First advanced in industrialization, especially in England, crowds of agricultural laborers, sons of farmers, or ruined farmers themselves poured into the cities and formed a new fourth estate. But there is one important fact here which many failed to take into account. England, like France, had relatively few Jews. The consequence of this, however, was that the great masses concentrated in the cities did not come into direct contact with this foreign nation, and the aversion which would necessarily arise did not find sufficient nourishment. Finally, the Jews of England, who at that time numbered scarcely 50 to 60,000, were able to Europeanize themselves with playful ease to such an extent that they remained hidden from the primitive eye of the common man. And he could not notice them as pillars of the economy, but especially as the bearers of great capital. They no longer appeared as foreigners, but as Englishmen themselves. This prevented antisemitism from gaining fundamental power in these countries. The same was true of France precisely because of this, however. It was possible to introduce in these countries the system known as democracy. Precisely in these countries, it was possible to establish a form of government that could mean nothing but the outweighing of intelligence and true energy by the sheer dead weight of the masses. In other words, it was possible there for the small class of Jewish intelligence here hidden in the British people to manipulate the broad masses with playful ease in such a way that the latter, unaware of whom they were obeying, served the purposes of this small class. There
Uncommonsince76
Posted - April 12, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Saved - April 12, 2025 at 8:43 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Remember how early last year we learned the Manhattan Institute was a Jewish funded organization designed to infiltrate the right wing and channel its energy into being pro Israel/anti Hamas???? No reason, just asking. https://t.co/QzkHFGR4uI

Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 30, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Saved - April 1, 2025 at 3:07 PM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Never forget to give credit to all the people who helped lock us down and force people to take poison shots cloaked as vaccines. What do you notice about most of the people who pushed this along? What do they have in common??? 🤔 https://t.co/0i3NkJoDFb

Video Transcript AI Summary
During the COVID pandemic, the director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The deputy director of the CDC was Anne Shoaljit, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The CDC Chief Of Staff was Sherry Berger, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The CDC Chief Medical Officer was Mitchell Wolf, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The director of the CDC of the Washington office was Jeff Resick, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The COVID Czar was Jeff Zanes, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The COVID Senior Advisor was Andy Slavitt, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The assistant of health secretary was Rachel Levine, who is transgender, has dual citizenship with Israel, and is Jewish. The head of Pfizer vaccines was Albert Lewis, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The Pfizer Chief Scientist was Michael Dostin, who had dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish. The Moderna Chief Scientist was Paul Zacks, who had dual citizenship in Israel and is Jewish. The BlackRock CEO was Larry Faith, who had dual citizenship in Israel and is Jewish. BlackRock president Michael Rosen also has dual citizenship with Israel and is Jewish.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: When COVID was being enacted. I'm gonna read off the staff of who's in charge of this in, CDC. The director of the CDC was Rochelle Walensky, dual citizenship with Israel. She's a Jew. Deputy director of the CDC, Anne Shoaljit, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC Chief Of Staff, Sherry Berger, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC Chief Medical Officer, Mitchell Wolf, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. CDC Director of the Washington office. I'm gonna This is this is pertinent to the topic. We're talking about COVID. Right? This Yeah. This is this is pertinent to COVID, so I love you, Jennifer. Yeah. Please. So director of the CDC of the Washington office, Jeff Resick, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. COVID Czar, Jeff Zanes, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew. COVID Senior Adviser, Andy Slavitt, dual citizenship with Israel, Jew, ho, assistant of health secretary for human services for our country, the assistant of health secretary, Rachel Levine, transgender dual citizenship with Israel s Jew. Speaker 1: Can I Speaker 0: ask that you Exactly? Okay. We'll keep on going. Ahead of Pfizer vaccines, Albert Lewis, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Pfizer Chief Scientist Michael Dostin, dual citizenship with Israel Jew. Moderna Chief Scientist, Paul Zacks, dual citizenship in Israel do. BlackRock everyone know BlackRock? BlackRock CEO, Larry Faith, dual citizenship in Israel do. I said we're willing to sacrifice our ego, our reputation You have nice and our lives. Yes, ma'am. And I love you, and I appreciate your patience. BlackRock president Ra Ra Speaker 1: Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Speaker 0: Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Speaker 1: Ra Ra Ra Ra Speaker 0: Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Ra Emert, Michael Rosen, also a business with Israel Jew, Head Advisor of the World Economic Core, Yvonne Ferrari, Josephine, and that's what he's talking about. Christopher, you need to stop.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 30, 2025 at 4:54 PM
Saved - March 30, 2025 at 6:37 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I explore the theory that Jewish individuals were involved in the assassination of JFK and the subsequent cover-up. I point out various connections, such as James Angelton's alleged ties to Israel, the Jewish identities of key figures like Jack Ruby and Arlen Specter, and the influence of Jewish media in shaping narratives. I mention the Dallas Citizens Council's Jewish leadership and suggest that documents exist indicating Jewish involvement, which the media has allegedly ignored. I conclude by inviting support for my work.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If JFK was killed by Jews so that Israel could have Nuclear weapons, there would be obvious signs. Recently revealed documents would Show that James Angelton was working on Behalf of Israel behind JFK’s back…. 🧵 1/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The man who shot Oswald would be Jewish, and would have obvious ties to the Jewish Mob like Jack Rubenstein. 🧵 2/14 https://t.co/1RD9eBE1oE

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The person who came up with the ridiculous magic bullet theory would be a Jew like Arlen Specter. 🧵 3/14 https://t.co/hyhdSD4aMX

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The person who shot the famous Zapruder film would be a Jew like Abraham Zapruder. He would then turn that film into 1.5 million dollars but try to make sure the public didn’t see it. 🧵 4/14 https://t.co/Ys1EHgTWu5

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Another Jew CD Jackson, would buy the film and do his best to cover it up, but unfortunately for the Jews it was subpoenaed in a court Case by Jim Garrison. 🧵 5/14 https://t.co/XLlejxajME

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would then have to use their media power to control the counter narrative and make sure people focus wholly on the CIA. Jews like Robert Groden and Ralph Schoenman would get the first opportunity to plant this counter narrative on a Jewish network controlled by the Jew Bill Paley. (CBS) 🧵 6/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Even modern day Jewish commentators would continue to either push Oswald, the CIA, or that it doesn’t matter at all. 🧵 7/14 https://t.co/uinxOow9G3

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would use their substantial media power to push the CIA counter narrative even on the big screen with films shot by the Jew Oliver Stones JFK. Interestingly that movie was produced by a known Jewish spy Arnon Milchen who helped smuggle weapons from the U.S. to Israel. 🧵8/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be obvious signs of tension between JFK and Ben Gurion over nuclear weapons, and LBJ would look the other way once he got into office. 🧵 9/14 https://t.co/GiAsu4V2um

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The only man indicted Clay Shaw would have ties to a company known as Permindex, a shadow company used to finance different illicit activities for Jews like Tibor Rosenbaum. Also, his defense was funded by the Stern family, large shareholders in NUMEC, the company that allowed enriched uranium to be smuggled to Israel. 🧵 10/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

A leading Jewish member of the IDF Yitzhak Rabin would be in Dallas the day of the JFK assassination, and he was… 🧵 11/14 https://t.co/Ufrtq58G8G

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Dallas Citizens council. Which would set up the driving route and be one of the prime reasons for Kennedy being there, would be led by 2 key figures that dominated that council were Jewish. ✡️ Their public relations man, ✡️ Sam Bloom specifically would be involved. Also Sam Blooms name and phone number would be found in Jack Rubys home after Ruby Shot Oswald. Sam Bloom would also the former head of the very synagogue that Jack Ruby attended…. 🧵 12/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be literal Documents that say “our new backers are Jews, and they will take care of Kennedy” but Jewish controlled media would not even report on it, even now. Kosher controlled conservatives Glenn Beck who’s still spends time ignoring obvious evidence of Israeli involvement… and spends it all focusing on the CIA… 🧵 13/14

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If the Jews killed JFK, and wanted to cover it up even to this day, they would just need to do all these things If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 14/14 I appreciate your support!

Uncommonsince76
Posted - December 30, 2024 at 8:05 PM
Saved - March 26, 2025 at 12:19 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I argue that if there were a conspiracy by Jews to undermine the White race, it would be openly discussed and documented, like the Kalergi Plan. I suggest that Jewish intellectuals promote ideas like multiculturalism and open borders to dilute White identity. I point out the influence of Jewish-led corporations and political figures in shaping immigration policies and media narratives. I claim that this agenda includes promoting self-hatred among Whites and creating societal divisions through various means, including education and media.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If there really was a Jewish conspiracy to destroy the White race, Jews would talk about it openly and try to claim it is “inevitable.” 🧵 1/20 https://t.co/LbiBXEFPmw

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

There would be a Plan written down in a book like The Kalergi Plan, which is written in the book practical Idealism. It would describe the way to break down the White race so they could be ruled over by Jews. 🧵 2/20 https://t.co/SYljWiOo3w

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The Term “melting Pot” would be made up by a Jew, to convince the masses it is a good thing to lose ethnic majorities of your own countries. 🧵 3/20 https://t.co/rJAsM06Hgf

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish intellectuals would be openly hostile to any sort of White or European identity like Max Hormheimer and Noel Ignatiev 🧵 4/20 https://t.co/msusYtpIC3

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish led corporations like Blackrock would use their financial power to force more Anti White DEI programs in companies. 🧵 5/20 https://t.co/XyInS5wzFP

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would get into important political positions and then use their power to open the borders like Alejandro Mayorkas. But also Jews like Merrick Garland would label you a White supremacist if you spoke up about your replacement. 🧵 6/20 https://t.co/WKb2hLLnQg

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

“Immigration disasters” would be happening all over the world in White western nations, but it would not be happening in Nonwhite nations. 🧵 7/20 https://t.co/TwoyhkLaQH

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You would Jewish intellectuals promoting open borders as a positive for the world, “Europe is not going to be the monolithic cultural countries they once were, and Jews are going to be at the center of leading this Multiculturalism.” -Barbara Lerner Spectre ✡️ 2015 🧵 8/20 https://t.co/EihGKmIsSb

Video Transcript AI Summary
Europe is experiencing a resurgence of antisemitism because it hasn't learned to be multicultural. Europe is undergoing a transformation from the monolithic societies of the last century, and Jews are at the center of this. Jews will be resented for their leading role in Europe's shift to multiculturalism. Without that leading role and transformation, Europe will not survive.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think there's a resurgence of anti Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're going to be part of the throes of that of that transformation which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Jews are going be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.
Video Transcript AI Summary
One speaker states that 20th-century Jewish movements aimed to lessen the power of Europeans in America because they felt that power represented a threat. They wanted the United States to become less Christian and less European. According to the speaker, Jewish activists believe that a homogeneous European society could easily evolve towards Nazis. A multicultural society prevents any single ethnic group from gaining too much power, thus preventing coalitions. Multiculturalist ideology was allegedly invented by Jewish intellectuals like Horace Kallen, who favored the idea of the United States being composed of separate ethnic groups. The speaker claims that this makes the United States safer for Jews by preventing a large, dominant white majority. When Jews arrived in the US, they viewed American culture negatively, finding it too white and reminiscent of Nazi Germany.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: That they wanted to No. Speaker 1: They wanted to get more. They wanted to mean, wanted third world immigration. Again, my my view has been that one of the constants of Jew twentieth century Jewish immigration, of Jewish election movements has been to lessen the power of Europeans in America. Speaker 0: And why is that? Speaker 1: And because they felt that that power represented a threat to them, especially in the long run. Speaker 0: They wanted to have The United States become less Christian, less Speaker 1: Less European. Why is Because and then you can easily find Jewish activists who say that when they talk about immigration but the idea is that if you have a homogeneous European society, you can easily evolve towards Nazis, in other words, but if you have a society where each ethnic group has a sort of, you know, only a very very limited power, then that could never happen. You can never have a coalition. Speaker 0: They wanted a multicultural Speaker 1: A multicultural society which also rationalized Judaism. Speaker 0: And in fact, you said the multiculturalist ideology was in fact invented by Jewish intellectuals? Yeah. Was it Horace Kallen? What? Speaker 1: He's a philosopher. Speaker 0: Who's that person? Speaker 1: Horace Kallen, k a l l e n. He very famous. He was he was a Zionist. He was very strongly identified Jews often. He he didn't like this melting pot idea, which actually was advanced by an earlier generation of Jewish intellectuals. But Callan liked the idea that The United States would be composed of these groups, you know, of ethnic groups that Speaker 0: would sort of stay separate, like like Jews have always had. So it'll so it it makes The United States safer for people to be Jews if there's not a large dominant white majority. Speaker 1: Absolutely. Because, you know, again, when when Jews came to this country, they they saw American culture in negative terms. Speaker 0: Mhmm. And I looked too much like Nazi Germany. Speaker 1: Yeah. It's too white. They they actually did a like a survey or something back in the sixties. They talked to the Jews. You know, what they asked them would it be possible that that it could happen here and you didn't have to say what it was. It is the Holocaust. In other words, something horrible happened to Jews. So that's sort Speaker 0: of

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would have to be deeply involved in shaping immigration policy like Emmanuel Cellar who helped pass the Hart Cellar act. This act changed the US immigration policy from a European one to worldwide. 🧵 9/20 https://t.co/rDohtVntXl

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would have to use their intellectual power to control the minds of the youth through education. They would get into many Ivy League president positions, and push DEI and anti White studies. (Picture dated, I believe currently it is only 50% Jewish controlled) You’d Even kick out the black liberal Ivy League presidents if they don’t support Israel and Jews enough like Claudine Gay… 🧵 10/20

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would then start using their media power to promote race mixing and destruction of White people. Elevating mixed race stats in Hollywood etc. 🧵 11/20 https://t.co/9AxxWFGhc0

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would also use their media power to justify the White replacement. They would call it a “migrant crisis” and say it is related to “global warming.” 🧵 12/20 https://t.co/Wc0DCid5AX

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If outright open borders start becoming rejected, Jews would then need to capture the right wing and billionaire class to sell whites on white replacement as “good for them” because they are capturing the top global intelligence . Even when it is exposed as a giant fraud. 🧵 13/20

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would need to use their political power to subvert the right wing and start supporting smart “Indians” to replace them. 🧵 14/20 https://t.co/lkM1DVlX9N

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Breaking down the Whites with immigration is good, but the Jews would also need to break them down internally. They would promote feminism, degeneracy and porn. Even leading the civil rights movement would help your cause. Not because you care about building strong black communities, but so you can tear down tight knit racially defined communities. 🧵 15/20

Video Transcript AI Summary
The NAACP recruited Rosa Parks in advance to be the ideal plaintiff in a lawsuit against the bus line. They instructed her to sit in a specific place on the bus so they could sue. This was not a spontaneous act, but a planned effort to create a strong basis for a lawsuit with Rosa Parks as an attractive plaintiff. This planning makes her story even cooler.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The cool story of Rosa Parks, right, which is that the NAACP had in fact recruited her for, like, in advance, and they said she'll be an ideal plaintiff. And they had actually said, go sit on the bus in this particular place, and then we'll have a lawsuit against the against the bus line. So that I mean, that's true. I don't know what he actually said. It it is true that that was not it wasn't like she spontaneously sat down on the bus, and and then they sued. That that but that doesn't take away from her story. In fact, think it makes it a cooler story. I think it's cool that they actually were like, okay. We're gonna plan this out. We're gonna get a good good basis for a lawsuit. Rosa Parks is an attractive phase for the plaintiff. And and

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish Hedge Fund managers would help devastate White workers and create the Rust Belt by “maximizing shareholder value” then the Jewish Sackler family would kill them off with the Opioid crisis. 🧵 16/20 https://t.co/N4qNzK6vgF

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

White male suicide would be high and increasing from their lack of economic opportunities and strong communities, but you would never hear about it from the Jewish controlled media. 🧵 17/20 https://t.co/PdgmgiAkTb

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jews would need to teach Whites to hate themselves, saying they are even racist from Birth. If that doesn’t work, they can also warn the intelligent Whites not to procreate because of the incoming “population bomb” like Paul Erlich…. 🧵 18/20 https://t.co/Wzxi9UzSgn

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jewish intellectuals would need to create a theory that “Race is a social construct” like Franz Boas. Amazingly, they would also maintain that Israel needs to be a Jewish ethnostate, yet no one would speak of the hypocrisy. 🧵 20/20 https://t.co/xaO4Q8P7vq

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If Jews want to eradicate the White race from this earth, they just need to keep doing what they are doing. If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 Or subscribe on X! 🧵 20/20 I appreciate your support!

Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 8:42 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found an unredacted file confirming that Angleton collaborated with the Israelis to secretly arm them with nuclear weapons. It also states this information must remain private to protect our relationship with Israel. This feels like a significant revelation.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

And Boom!! 💥 an unredacted file that confirms Angleton was working with the Israelis behind Kennedy’s back to arm Israel with Nuclear weapons…. Also says this information can never be public because it will damage our relationship with Israel…. This is as much of a smoking gun that you’re gonna get.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

GROUNDBREAKING: JFK Files 🚨 Unredacted Church Committee Exposes CIA's Secret Role in Atmoic Weapons Transfer, Arming Israel with Nuclear Technology Against JFK's Wishes • The unredacted files reveal that Mr. Angleton (CIA), confirms that atomic technology and/or knowledge was transferred to Israel against the wishes of JFK. This is a GROUNDBREAKING revelation, as this secret transfer provides a clear motive for wanting JFK eliminated. JFK did not want Israel to have nuclear weapons and took significant steps to prevent it, including diplomatic pressure, demands for inspections, and warnings about the consequences for U.S.-Israel relations. Details of the Transfer: • The unredacted portions disclose that the transfer involved not just technology but also knowledge of atomic matters, facilitated through intermediaries like scientists (e.g., a Dr. Wilfred) and possibly journalists (e.g., Tad Szulc). Angleton admits to having met with Israeli scientists and officials, including Ben Wells, and discusses the involvement of PLUTONIUM, a key material in nuclear weapons development. • Israeli Nuclear Program: The files indicate that Israel had acquired plutonium for its nuclear program, which aligns with historical knowledge of Israel’s development of nuclear capabilities, particularly through its Dimona reactor. • Angleton expressed concern about the implications of this transfer, noting that it was done clandestinely and that the U.S. government (or at least some parts of it) might NOT have been fully informed. He mentions the need to keep the matter secret and the potential fallout IF IT BECAME PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE. Well… the cat is out of the bag now. We all know now. STAY TUNED… Alerts on… there is More.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

Unredacted JFK Files: The FBI Probe Angleton over their Concerns that a Foreign Nation (Possibly Israel) may have had Involvement in Assassinating JFK The unredacted portions of this document reveal the FBI's investigation into Mr. Angletan's relationships and knowledge of https://t.co/lxphMlRCOX

Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 8:36 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I can't stress enough how crucial these unredacted documents are. They were mentioned on Tucker Carlson's show and clearly implicate Israel, which explains their redaction for over 60 years. MJTruthUltra is doing excellent work on this, especially regarding James Angleton's 1975 testimony on the Israeli nuclear program.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Can’t overstate how important these unredacted documents are. These are the exact documents that were brought up on @TuckerCarlson show a few weeks back, and yes they very much implicate Israel, and thus why they have been redacted for 60 plus years. @MJTruthUltra is doing great work on these! “One of the JFK related documents still redacted to this day, is that of CIA director of counter intelligence James Angleton, and his 1975 testimony about the Israeli nuclear program.”

Video Transcript AI Summary
James Angleton's 1975 testimony to the Church Committee regarding the Israeli nuclear program is currently withheld in the JFK collection, despite the Assassination Records Review Board determining it to be assassination-related. The redactions in the 13-page document clearly pertain to Israel. Angleton controlled the Oswald file and had contact with the Israelis. The declassification of this testimony is a test of the seriousness of current efforts to release JFK assassination documents. The Israeli nuclear program, specifically the Demona project, is relevant because of Angleton's activities in 1963. Profound conflicts existed between Israel and the Kennedy White House concerning the nuclear program, with Kennedy pressing for on-site inspections that the Israelis resisted. This contention occurred while Angleton controlled the Oswald file, making the testimony pertinent to the public record.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The things that's test that's withheld and is in the JFK collection right now is the testimony of James Angleton in 1975 to the church committee about the Israeli nuclear program. This is a 13 page document, and it's heavily redacted to this day. And the redactions clearly pertain to Israel. Now is this an assassination related document? Absolutely. The the assassination records review board said this is a assassination related document. It meets the statutory definition. K? If the president and this effort are serious, that testimony will be declassified because Angleton controlled the Oswald file on the one hand, and he was a contact with the Israelis on the other. So it belongs in the public record. That's another test of is this serious effort. Speaker 1: So let me ask you why in the world would the Demona project, the Israeli nuclear program, which has never officially been admitted by anybody but Israel, what would that conceivably have to do with the assassination of JFK? Speaker 0: Well, it it relates to what Angleton was doing in 1963. Okay? There were profound conflicts between Israel and the Kennedy White House over the the nuclear program. Kennedy was pressing for on-site inspections, which the Israelis resisted because on-site inspections would have realized that they had a bomb making program. So this was a real bone of contention between the Israeli government and the Kennedy administration in the summer of nineteen sixty three at a time when Oz when Engelton controlled the Oswald file. So just the juxtaposition of those facts means that everything about it should be on the public record. And

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: JFK Files Unredacted JFK Files: Angleton Discusses Ben-Gurion and Israeli Secret Ties — Destabilizing the Middle East and Nuclear Ambitions The newly revealed details in James Angleton’s 1975 Church Committee testimony pulls back the curtain on how deeply the CIA was intertwined with Israeli intelligence, detailing operations Angleton ran and greenlit by the founding father of Israel, Ben-Gurion. • Angleton admits the CIA collaborated with Soviet bloc and Arab entities but preferred Israeli intelligence for its adaptability. —— Redacted: “more flexible… with the Agency in effect throughout the period of your…” Unredacted: “more flexible. • It had to deal with the Arabs in a lot of places, and obviously the 60s didn’t go through as planned.” This hints at Israeli intelligence’s role in Arab relations and a mysterious failed plan in the 1960s, possibly tied to the 1967 Six-Day War. —— Redacted: “President or the Secretary of State I assume are still in Africa…” Unredacted: “President or the Secretary of State I assume are still in Africa, I dealt with the underdeveloped areas in connection with Africa, and so on.” • Angleton reveals his role in CIA operations in Africa, involving Israeli intelligence. —— Redacted: “obligated from the bill… certain matters…” Unredacted: “obligated from the bill, and there were obligations to Israel, commitments from the U.S., to Israel on certain matters.” This confirms a formal U.S.-Israel agreement from 1951, likely for intelligence or military support. —— Redacted: “nature and handling of Israeli…” Unredacted: “nature and handling of Israeli culture in 1974, is there any connection between culture and…” This STRONGLY Suggests Israeli cultural programs were a cover for CIA espionage. IN A NUTSHELL… this is what I think what was going on. Angleton and Ben-Gurion were masterminding a clandestine U.S.-Israel pact to dominate the Middle East, using the 1951 agreement as a cover to likely trade nuclear secrets for Israeli loyalty against the Soviets. Their secret alliance aimed to destabilize Arab nations, with Angleton’s paranoia and Ben-Gurion’s ambitions likely led to the potential motive to assassinate JFK. Stay Tuned… Alerts on. There’s ALOT more.

@MJTruthUltra - MJTruthUltra

UPDATE: JFK Files — Whoa 🤯 Unredacted JFK Files: Angleton’s Israeli Account—Hints a Secret Agenda to Control Global Migration Flows • The unredacted text reveals the shadowy origins of the CIA’s “Israeli account”. • The 2022 version hid explosive details about a covert https://t.co/5bymK34O6U

Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 5:51 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 8:30 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

@IanCarrollShow @scotthortonshow @davincentjames @NickJFuentes @Gentilenewsnet @RyLiberty Total vindication

Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 20, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Saved - March 21, 2025 at 8:18 AM

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Interviewer- “Did you kill the president?” Lee Harvey Oswald- “No Sir, I’m just a patsy.” https://t.co/OYEhheCVe8

Video Transcript AI Summary
An individual requests legal representation, stating police have denied it. He claims ignorance of the situation, identifying himself as a Black man who works in the building where the incident occurred. He states he was taken in due to living in Missouri.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Please. I like some legal representation. The police officers have not allowed me to to have any. Go ahead. I, I don't know what this is all about. I'm just a black guy. What do I do to keep the I'm just a black guy. Sir? Shoot I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir. Back up, man. Come on, president. No. They've taken me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. What time do you think of that? I'm just a party. President.
Uncommonsince76
Posted - March 19, 2025 at 6:49 PM
Saved - March 19, 2025 at 10:24 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I discuss the controversial Zapruder film, which was never meant for public viewing due to its implications against the official narrative of JFK's assassination. I explore connections between key figures like Abraham Zapruder, Clay Shaw, and the media, suggesting a cover-up involving Jewish individuals and organizations. I argue that the film's release undermined the Warren Commission's findings and that Oswald was merely a scapegoat. I also highlight the role of Jack Ruby in silencing Oswald and suggest that the motivations behind JFK's assassination relate to his stance on Israel's nuclear ambitions.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

You were never supposed to see this film. 🎥 The Jewish Freemason that took it, Abraham Zapruder, was just using it as a means to make money. That’s why he sold the rights to Life magazine the day after for 150k, (1.5 million in today’s dollars). He had one specific request. (Supposedly) That frame 313 (the kill shot) was never shown to the public because it was too gruesome. This is clearly a lie, and when analyzed appropriately, it leads you directly back to the perpetrators. 🧵 1/12

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The real reason they couldn’t let the public see this film, was because it obviously destroys the fake magic bullet theory, and the idea Oswald made a next to impossible shot on his own. Once you see Kennedys head flying back you can tell he wasn’t shot in back of the head. Further, why would Life magazine give out 1.5 million dollars for something they were never going to show the public? They wouldn’t. They were helping cover it up. CD Jackson was the publisher at Life magazine at the time, (likely Jewish) and had experience in the psychological warfare department in the Office of War information during world war 2. If we weren’t supposed to see it how did we get the Zapruder film anyway? 🧵 2/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
A bullet fired from a sixth-floor window struck JFK in the upper back, exited his throat, and then hit Governor Connally in the back, shattering a rib as it passed through his chest. The same bullet then exited Connally's chest, broke his right wrist, and lodged in his thigh, remaining almost intact until removed. Investigators claim a single bullet caused six wounds while remaining largely intact. However, some argue that the bullet's trajectory is impossible, suggesting the possibility of more than one bullet.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Bullet was fired from a rifle on a Sixth Floor window. First, it entered JFK's upper back and traveled downward, exiting through his throat. Then it struck the governor in the back, shattering a rib as it tore through his chest. The bullet continued, exiting the governor's chest and hitting his right wrist, breaking a bone. Finally, it lodged itself into the governor's thigh where it stayed until removed by doctors in almost perfect condition. Now investigators claimed that this is what happened. A single bullet caused six wounds while staying intact. But many argue that the bullet's trajectory is impossible. The angles just don't add up, leaving us wondering if there was actually more than one bullet.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Jim Garrison subpoenaed for the tape in his trial against Clay Shaw, (the only person indicted for the JFK conspiracy.) While the trial was unsuccessful, Garrison did the world a huge favor by helping reveal the tape to the public. This vital piece helped destroy the Warren Commission. It should be pointed out that the family that funded Clay Shaw’s defense was a wealthy ✡️ Jewish Family known as the Stern Family. The stern family had ties to Tibor Rosenbaum, but more specifically they were investors in the Apollo Nuclear plant. ☢️ (more on nuclear weapons later.) But also Clay Shaw had links to the Mossad. How was Clay Shaw tied into Israel/Mossad? A company called Permindex. Now in the Oliver Stone movie 🎥 JFK, Permindex is mentioned as a CIA front, but this incorrect. It is most likely a Mossad money laundering operation, initially financed by Jewish man ✡️ Rabbi Tibor Rosenbaum. Rosenbaum was instrumental in helping the new state of Israel with security and worked for the Mossad directly. Further Rosenbaum’s main bank is connected to Jewish mobster Meyer Lansky.🇮🇱 Further, Clay Shaw was on the board of this Mossad Company Permindex. 🧵 3/12

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

A few more things about Zapruder. Do you think he was just really lucky? No chance. Remember, Abraham Zapruder was a Ukrainian ✡️Jewish Freemason. He also had an office in the nearby Dal-Tex building where witnesses suggested some actual shots came from. This makes sense. Remember Oswald is the patsy, but further the Texas Book Depository building where they staged Oswald’s gun was also a distraction. Oswald worked in the building so it was perfect. The Dal-Tex Building also had connections to ✡️Marty Friedman, another Jewish garment manufacturer like Zapruder, and co owner of the building, ✡️ was Jewish man David Weissblatt, a big supporter of the ADL. Do you think that’s a coincidence? 🧵 4/12

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Back to the Zapruder Film. Do you know the public was told about it in 1963? Dan Rather got up on CBS news and described viewing the film, but they didn’t show it of course. And he described it just like the Warren Commission would want him to. A precise lie. They already know what needs to be said in order for it to match the warren commission. He specifically says that Kennedys head flies forward because he was shot in the back of the head by Oswald. 🤥 But who owned and started CBS? Who would green light this obvious lie? Williams S. Paley. Another Jewish Zionist. And guess what. He served in the same Office of War information department as CD Jackson during world war 2. You know, the guy mentioned early on who “bought” the Zapruder film so it wouldn’t be seen by the public? 🧵 5/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
The motion picture depicts President Kennedy's assassination and the shooting of Governor John Connolly. The open-top convertible, carrying Secret Service agents, the Connollys, and the Kennedys, turned onto Elm Street in front of the building where the assassin was positioned. About 35 yards from the building, President Kennedy raised his hand to his face. He lurched forward, indicating he was hit by the first shot. Governor Connolly turned towards Kennedy, seemingly asking what was wrong, when he was struck by a bullet and fell. His wife covered him protectively. Another bullet hit President Kennedy's head, causing it to jolt forward. Mrs. Kennedy stood up and then climbed onto the trunk of the car. The car, with a Secret Service agent on the bumper, sped away. The three shots occurred within approximately five seconds. The FBI possesses this footage, which lasts about twenty seconds.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Just returned from seeing a complete motion picture of the moments preceding and the moments of president Kennedy's assassination and the shooting of Texas governor John Connolly. Here is what the motion picture shows. The automobile, the black Lincoln convertible with the top down, carrying in the front seat two Secret Service agents. In the middle or jump seat, Governor and Mrs. Connolly, and in the rear seat, President and Mrs. Kennedy, made a turn off of Houston Street on the fringe of Downtown Dallas onto Elm Street. This was a left turn and was made right in front of the building from which the assassin's bullet was fired. After making the turn and going about 35 yards from the corner of the building, six stories up in which the assassin had a window open and keep in mind here that President Kennedy and Governor Connolly are seated on both on the same side of the car, on the side facing the building. Mrs. Kennedy and Mrs. Connolly are on the side of the car away from the assassin. About 35 yards from the base of the building, President Kennedy in the film put his hand up to the right side of his face, the side facing the assassin. He seemingly wanted to brush back his hair or perhaps rub his eyebrow. Mrs. Kennedy, at this moment, was looking away or looking straight ahead. She was not looking at her husband. At that moment, when the president had his right hand up to this side of his face, he lurched just a bit forward. It was obvious that the first shot had hit him. Mrs. Kennedy was not looking at him and nor did she appear to know at that instant that her husband had been hit. Governor Connolly, in the seat immediately in front of the president, Apparently, they heard the shot or sensed that something was wrong because Governor Connolly, with his coat open, his button was undone, turned in this manner with his hand outstretched back toward the president. And the governor had a look on his face that would indicate he perhaps was saying, what's wrong, or what happened, or can I help, or something? But as Governor Connolly was turned this way, his white shirt front exposed well to the view of the assassin, the governor was obviously hit by a bullet, and he fell over to the side. Governor Connolly's wife immediately, seemingly instantaneously, placed herself over her husband in a protective position it appeared. And as Governor Connolly fell back, Governor President Kennedy was still leaned over at that moment. Another bullet obviously hit the head of the president. The president's head went forward violently in this matter. Mrs. Kennedy, at that instant, seemed to be looking right square at her husband. She stood up. The president slumped over to the side, and I believe brushed against Mrs. Kennedy's dress. Mrs. Kennedy immediately turned and flung herself on the trunk of the automobile, face down on the trunk, almost on all fours. The first lady appeared to be either frantically trying to get the Secret Service man who was riding on the bumper of the car, the single Secret Service man riding on that bumper, to come into the car or to tell him what had happened. Or perhaps from the picture it appeared she might have been trying to get out of the car some way. The car never stopped. The Secret Service man in the front seat had a telephone in his hand. Its acceleration increased rapidly, and it disappeared under an underpass. The three shots, the first one hitting the president, the second one hitting Governor Connolly, and the third one hitting the president, consume possibly five seconds, not much more than that, if any. That is the scene shown in about twenty seconds of film that the FBI has in its possession. The film was taken by an amateur photographer who was in a very advantageous

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

Garrison ruined the information control party. Once parts of the public started to see the Zapruder film, pressure was building that the warren commission was garbage. Now the Zapruder film wasn’t seen by the large swaths of the American public until 1975, but what does the Jewish media do when they present it to the public? They bring up Jewish ✡️ analyst to instruct them exactly how to think about it with the new evidence. In other words they are controlling the counter narrative to make sure it leads to the CIA. Jewish man ✡️ Geraldo Rivera is discussing the standard assassination theory along with the new CIA theory with another Jewish ✡️ man Ralph Schoenman. Further they have another discussion with Jewish man ✡️ Robert Groden. Now they have complete and total control of the standard narrative, and the counter narrative. And of course this is by design along with our Jewish controlled press. It’s either Oswald or “the CIA.” No one is looking at the Israeli Mob connections, nor the Mossad, which is right where they should be looking. 🧵 6/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the Zapruder film, an amateur film capturing the Kennedy assassination. Abraham Zapruder, a Dallas dress manufacturer, filmed the motorcade in Dealey Plaza. The speaker warns viewers about the graphic nature of the footage, calling it the "execution of President Kennedy." The film shows the motorcade entering Dealey Plaza. As the car passes a sign, Kennedy is shot, followed by Governor Connolly. The speaker points out the backward motion of Kennedy's head upon impact. The Warren Commission concluded that Lee Harvey Oswald, acting alone, fired all shots from behind. However, the speaker claims the backward head movement suggests a shot from the front. The speaker states that the film shows Kennedy being hit from the front.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He desperately wanted to understand how it could have happened. For two years, he, like most Americans, believed in the official version, the warrant commissioned version of what happened. But the day he first saw that eight millimeters of Pruda film, that amateur film that was made, that was the day he stopped believing. Robert, welcome and I wish you could set up the Zapruder film a bit for us and we'll get right into it. Speaker 1: Okay. Abraham Zapruder was a Dallas Dress Manufacturer and it was pure accident that he brought the camera with him that day. He almost didn't. And he was looking for a good vantage point and he picked a point on Elm Street in Daley Plaza in Downtown Dallas. As the motorcade passed in front of him, he got what is frame for frame the most valuable historical document of all time. Speaker 0: It's become very chic among television producers to put a disclaimer at the head of any film. The film you're about to see might be shocking, it might be horrifying, you might not want your kids to watch it. And I think the unfortunate net effect of that is to make more people watch it. Well, I'm telling you right straight out that if you are at all sensitive, if you're at all queasy, then don't watch this film. Just put on the late night movie because this is very heavy. It's the film shot by the Dallas dress manufacturer Abraham Zapruder, and it's the execution of President Kennedy. And Bob and Dick, would you please narrate what we're seeing as we show this Speaker 1: film? This is commercial footage leading into Dealey Plaza. This is the car on Main Street. Speaker 0: So this film was taken by actual newsmen. This was spliced together with the Abraham Zapruder film? Yes. Alright. So this is the beginning of the motorcade. What you're seeing now Speaker 1: is in slow motion so that you can grasp what is happening. This is a film taken by Marie Muchmore that leads into the Sapruder film. It's for time continuity. The president is waving to the crowd here. Speaker 0: And Jacqueline Kennedy, of course, is sitting alongside him in the open car. Speaker 1: Right. This is from Warvel Nix's film. This this is originally eight millimeter footage, and they're heading now toward Elm Street. They're on Houston Street now. They're gonna make a left hand turn. It's on the corner where they're gonna make the turn there that the book depository was. Now this is the Zapruder film. Okay. Speaker 0: So the cars are coming along now into Deeley Plaza? Yes. These are the lead motorcycles of the motorcade. Alright. Now with the president and Missus County is also governor Connolly. Right. Right. Speaker 1: Now before he goes behind the sign, the president is waving to the crowd. When he comes out from behind the sign, he is shot, then governor Connolly is shot. Speaker 0: He's already been hit. He's already been hit. And now Speaker 1: At the bottom of the screen, the headshot. Speaker 0: That's the shot that blew off his head. It's the most horrifying thing I've ever seen in the movies. Speaker 1: Now the Warren Commission said that all of the shots were fired from behind by Lee Harvey Oswald, a lone assassin, firing at the president. And as you could see clearly, the head is thrown violently backwards, completely consistent with the shot from the front right. Now this is an extreme blow up of just the president from the film. Alright. Coming out behind the sign, he shot He's hit from the He's Speaker 0: hit here. From the front too. Speaker 1: He's hit here. From the front. Now Jackie doesn't realize what's happened yet. She goes to his aide. And now? He said Again, the violent backward motion, totally consistent with 80% of the witnesses which said the shot came Speaker 0: from
Video Transcript AI Summary
Ruby stated he was involved in a plot to kill John Kennedy and shot Oswald after a phone call from Fort Worth. He told the doctor he didn't want to die and claimed he was framed to kill Oswald. According to official history, Ruby contracted a cold in prison and died of lung cancer approximately 24 hours later. This timing is considered extraordinary, given that a hearing to assess his sanity at the time of Oswald's murder was about to take place. Ruby would have had the opportunity to express his views in public court, as he attempted to do with the Warren Commission. FBI reports, commission documents, and exhibits allegedly show the CIA is the common denominator linking all these people together.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: And these documents are a report of a series of confidential examinations carried out on Ruby while he was in Dallas County Jail. And Ruby states categorically that he was involved in a plot to kill John Kennedy, that he shot Oswald upon receiving the phone call from Fort Worth, and he says his last words to the doctor were, I did not I do not want to die, but I am not insane. I was framed to kill Oswald. Speaker 1: Now Ruby, according again to official history, contracted a cold a cold while in prison, and approximately twenty four hours later, he died the Of Speaker 0: lung cancer. Speaker 1: Of lung cancer. Right. Speaker 0: Rather an extraordinary timing considering that he was just about to have a hearing in which his sanity at the time of the murder of Oswald was to be assessed when Ruby would have had an opportunity in public court to advance his views as he attempted to express them to the Warren Commission. Speaker 1: Your basic point is that the CIA is the common denominator linking all these people together. Speaker 0: Well, that's not a question of my point. That's what the FBI reports and the commission documents and exhibits show. Have you

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

This is not the only example of controlled opposition, and intentional disinformation regarding the Kennedy shooting. Let’s go through some more. The most obvious one, is the Oliver Stone movie JFK. Oliver stone is Jewish. ✡️ His father’s original last name was Silverstein. Further the screenplay writer on the film was a Jewish ✡️ man named Zachary Skylar. The book written by Jim Garrison was published by a Jewish ✡️ publisher Sheridan Square, that had ties to Jewish ✡️ communist Irving Kristol. Irving Kristol is Bill Kristol father. Bill Kristol is one of the founders of the Jewish ✡️ neocon movement that led to the Iraq war. While i do think Jim Garrison was trying to do the right thing, I believe he couldn’t see past the gatekeeping and truly believed it was the CIA. 🧵 7/12

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

The worst part about the movie JFK 🎥, and I’m not making this up, is that the film producer was Arnon Milchen. Milchen was film producer and Israeli spy, 🕵️ and also has many implications in laundering weapons… But the JFK movie is not the only misinforming propaganda, take modern day Jewish ✡️ talk show Ben Shapiro. In his series “Debunked” he spends 5 minutes explaining why the Warren Commission and single bullet theory actually do make sense, and all the conspiracy theories are nonsense. His evidence for this is citing another author by the name of Gerald Posner. Posner has a Jewish ✡️ wife, and recently posted on his X account that we need a 2nd ADL type of organization. Posner may be Jewish himself, but I cannot confirm it. Anyway, his main JFK theory, is a story of how when you get shot in the back of the head, the force can actually force your head to fly back like Kennedy’s. Total and complete nonsense. 🧵 8/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
Many JFK assassination conspiracy theories rely on false information or speculation. A 1979 House Select Committee report suggested a possible conspiracy, contradicting the Warren Commission, but relied on flawed acoustical data. Some believe a shooter was on the Grassy Knoll, but evidence shows the shots came from the Texas Book Depository. Police found Oswald's rifle there, matching prior photos, palm prints, and coat fibers. Bullets recovered matched the gun. The Zapruder film, though silent, captured the assassination. Oliver Stone's film *JFK* falsely suggested the headshot threw Kennedy back and to the left, but physics explains this recoil effect. The "magic bullet" theory was tested by the Discovery Channel, which duplicated the bullet's path. Despite claims Oswald couldn't have fired three shots quickly, he was a trained marksman, and the distance to Kennedy was relatively short, making it an easy shot. Oswald had motive: a troubled childhood, psychiatric issues, interest in Marxism, and disciplinary problems in the Marines.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The assassination of JFK has spawned an enormous number of conspiracy theories. Many rely on patently false information. Others are completely speculative. More life was given to these conspiracy theories thanks to a report from the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979, which found that JFK might have been killed as the result of a conspiracy, rejecting the findings of the so called Warren Commission. That committee report relied on bad acoustical data in the main. They used a tape that suggested that more shots had been fired than just the three that Oswald fired. It actually was the echo of the shot that was appearing on the acoustical data. Nonetheless, today, only a small minority of Americans believe that Oswald acted alone. Speaker 1: Was there more than one assassin firing in Dealey Plaza? On Tuesday night, we will ask whether regardless of the actual number of gunmen, there was a conspiracy leading to the president's murder. Speaker 0: Let's begin with the most easily debunked claim. There are lot of folks who believe that there was another shooter on the so called Grassy Knoll and that Kennedy was actually shot from the front from the Grassy Knoll. That's not true. The shots that hit Kennedy and Connolly were fired from behind from the Texas Book Depository. Police found the rifle belonging to Oswald, an Italian Carcano m ninety one thirty eight bolt action rifle on the Sixth Floor of the depository. The rifle was present in prior photos of Oswald. He bought the rifle in March. Physical evidence, palm print, and coat fibers matched Oswald. The bullets recovered at the scene matched Oswald's gun. The assassination was famously captured by Abraham Zapruder. The film became the most famous film in American history. It lasted twenty six point six seconds and was silent. Later, the film would feature in Oliver Stone's extraordinarily dishonest propaganda piece JFK, particularly the famous back end to the left seat, in which attorney Jim Garrison insists there must have been a shooter in front of the limousine because JFK's headshot throws him back and to the left. It's totally inconsistent with the shot from the depository. Again, back and to the left. Back and to the left. Physics explains just why JFK's head snapped in this direction. First, for a split second, JFK's head actually does launch forward. After the bullet exits JFK's head, his head snaps back. This is due to the so called recoil effect, as explained by doctor Nicholas Nalley, a senior research scientist at IMSG Inc. Author Gerald Posner says, quote, it's almost a jet effect. As that propels out his head, it has much more force than the force of the bullet moving in, and it shoots him in the opposite direction. It shoots out to the right, front, and left violently. Then there is the question of the so called magic bullet, the bullet that struck JFK and then traveled through governor Connolly. In 02/2004, the Discovery Channel aired an episode of unsolved history in which they attempted to duplicate the shot, and they found that the bullet traveled precisely the same path suggested by the single bullet theory. What about the theory that Oswald could not have shot JFK because it would have taken an extraordinary feat of marksmanship to get off three shots in the amount of time allotted for it? Well, first of all, Oswald joined the marines and qualified as a sharpshooter with a rifle range score of two twelve. In 1959, when he was nearly done with the marines, he still shot a one ninety one and qualified as a marksman. That meant he could hit a 10 inch target eight times out of 10 from 200 yards away. He was actually just 88 yards from JFK when he shot him. This was, to put it bluntly, a very, very easy kill shot for Lee Harvey Oswald. If you've ever been to Dealey Plaza and you've actually mapped out the distance, it looks like they are right next to each other. Any theory that exonerates Oswald is nonsense. Oswald clearly fired the killer shots. He had all the motive in the world for doing so. Oswald never knew his father. Mother was apparently a raging narcissist. He was dragged around 21 different homes in his first seventeen years of life. According to author Gerald Posner, Oswald punched and tried to stab his mother even though he slept in her bed until he was almost 11. He threatened his brother and sister-in-law with a knife. He was sent at 13 for a psychiatric examination. He became interested in Marxism as a teenager, joined the marines at 17, and was court martialed and found guilty twice. He apparently had a breakdown while serving in the marines, weeping and firing shots into the night while on guard duty.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

We’ve covered all the Zionist Jewish gatekeepers over the years, but what was the why for hit? The why, was that JFK did not want Israel to have a nuclear program, and the Israelis saw that as existential. If you read the letters between JFK and Ben Gurion, the point of contention is obvious. Once JFK was shot, the most Israeli friendly president Lyndon Johnson took his place. If that sounds crazy to you, dig a little deeper. As soon as Lyndon Johnson came to power, he looked the other way on Israel’s nuclear ambitions. Further he looked the other way when Israel attacked the USS liberty. 🚢 Yes Israel actually attacked one of our aircraft carriers as a way to draw us into war with Egypt. Johnson covered it up. Israel claimed it was a case of mistaken identity. 🧵 9/12

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

That’s why the Jewish Mob had Jack Rubenstein kill Oswald, Because Oswald would have beat the charges with the flimsy case, and it could have also led back to who actually killed Kennedy. He shot Oswald on live tv 📺2 days later when Oswald was being Transferred from City to County Jail. Jack Ruby, he is the key. When you focus on him, all the connections flow vividly. The standard story you will hear with Jack Ruby is that he was a low level person in the mafia, and just killed Oswald because of his love for Kennedy. Keep in mind, he didn’t go see Kennedy the day he was riding through Dallas, so this theory that he loves Kennedy is out of left field. But further, stop thinking of the Mafia as only Italians. Our Jewish controlled media wants you to think that, and it has mostly worked, but the Mob was mostly Jewish. Jack Ruby did have Jewish mob connections to both Meyer Lansky and Hyman Larner in Chicago, Both ✡️ Jewish mobsters with Lansky being the head of the operation. Further, the night before the Kennedy assassination, the FBI recorded that Ruby and Lawrence Meyers were together. Lawrence Meyers was another Jewish ✡️ mobster. Here’s where it gets really wild. Where was Ruby the day of the JFK assassination? He stated he was working as a translator for Israeli Newspapers 🗞️. Whether he was or wasn’t, he knew they would cover for him. Why was Ruby in Texas in the first place? It appears that he moved down there to help smuggle airplane parts out of TX to Israel… 🧵 10/12

Video Transcript AI Summary
Lee Oswald has been shot in the stomach at point blank range in the basement of Dallas police headquarters. A man with a gun is present, causing absolute panic. Detectives have drawn their guns.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Captain Spritz. There is a person. There is Lee. He's been shot. He's been shot. Lee Oswald has been shot. There's a man with a gun. Absolute panic. Absolute panic here in the basement of Dallas police headquarters. Detectives have their guns drawn. There is no question about it. Oswald has been shot at point blank range fired into his stomach. He is shot. He is shot.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

That’s why when Oswald was arrested he said “I’m just a patsy.” He was right. He was the Patsy. 🧵 11/12 https://t.co/s8zKd96pQk

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man states he likes legal representation but has been denied it by police officers. He doesn't know what is happening, but mentions "killing a black guy." He asks if someone is with the president and states he works in the building. When asked if he was in the building at the time, he confirms he works there. He denies shooting presidents, claiming he is being taken in because he lives in Missouri. He then calls someone a Nazi and mentions the president.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Taken place. I like some legal representation. The police officers have not allowed me to to have any. I I don't know what this is all about. Killing a black guy. What's the idea of people to get him to die? Sir? Are you with the president? I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, I work in that building, yes, sir. Back up, man. You're shooting presidents. No. They're taking me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. What time do please I'm just a Nazi. President.

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

If you appreciated this thread, consider donating to this page via buymeacoffee.com/Uncommonsince76 🧵 12/12 I appreciate your support!

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

I have a longer more in depth thread here if you want a deeper dive. https://t.co/tPMpPqwv4u

@Uncommonsince76 - Uncommon Sense

When Lee Harvey Oswald was asked if he killed JFK, he simply said. “No sir, I’m just a patsy.” Oswald was telling the truth. The forces behind Kennedys death, are the same forces leading us to war with Iran right now… Let’s expose them. 🔎 👀 🧵 1/25 https://t.co/wiRT80EF1Z

Video Transcript AI Summary
A man states he wants legal representation, claiming police officers have not allowed him any. He says he doesn't know what is going on. An officer asks if he shot the president and if he was in the building at the time. The man replies that he works in the building, so naturally he was there. He claims he is being taken in because he lives in Missouri and that he is just a patsy.
AI Similar Videos
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Place. I like some legal representation. These police officers have not allowed me to to have any. I I don't know what this is all about. Got a black guy. Sir? Did shoot the president? I work in that building. Were you in the building at the time? Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, Back up, man. Come on, man. They're taking me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri. I'm just a patsy. President.
View Full Interactive Feed