TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @UngaTheGreat
reSee.it AI Summary
I report that in Minnesota, fraudsters, mainly from the Somali diaspora, siphoned over $250 million from a federal child nutrition program during COVID with fake meal sites. The money funded luxury cars, private villas in the Maldives, overseas properties in Kenya, and first-class trips, with some funds wired back to Somalia and East Africa. It’s been described as the largest pandemic relief fraud in U.S. history.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
In Minnesota, fraudsters, primarily from the Somali diaspora, stole over $250 million from a federal child nutrition program during the COVID era by falsely claiming to feed thousands of hungry children through fake meal sites. Instead, many used the cash for luxury cars, private villas in the Maldives, overseas properties in Kenya, and even first-class trips popping champagne — all while some funds were wired back to Somalia and East Africa. It's been called the largest pandemic relief fraud in U.S. history.
Video Transcript AI Summary
First class plane tickets, luxury cars, fine jewelry, all these lavish things allegedly bought by Minnesota fraudsters with taxpayer money intended for hungry children. New documents obtained by NewsNation show hundreds of millions of dollars worth of funds were spent in the fraud scheme engulfing Minnesota’s social services programs, prompting an investigation by the House Oversight Committee. The committee’s chairman, congressman James Comer, told NewsNation he thinks this could potentially be an organized scheme expanding beyond Minnesota.
Speaker 1 also suggested that this is happening in other states with other social programs and other groups. Rich McHugh, reporting for NewsNation, noted that the new documents reveal how millions of dollars of taxpayer funds built from Minnesota’s welfare scandal were spent, with the indicted individuals “living large” and “burning large amounts of cash.”
According to the coverage, when the indictments were first announced in September 2022, the revelations were shocking even then. The reports describe purchases of houses in Minnesota, resort property, and real estate in Kenya and Turkey, as well as luxury cars, commercial property, jewelry, and much more. A Maldives honeymoon is described as part of the lifestyle, and there was footage of the group popping champagne. The documents show investments in waterfront properties and real estate—“entire buildings in Kenya”—as well as Porsches. The scammers were young and reportedly very wealthy, texting each other images and messages, including “a box full of cash” valued at a quarter of a million dollars, and a note saying, “you are gonna be the richest 25 year old, inshallah.” They wired millions to China and to Kenya, and one text reportedly said, “please send 1,000 to Mogadishu Baccarat,” which appears to reference a market in Somalia once controlled by Al Shabaab, the site of the 1993 Black Hawk Down incident.
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen (Treasury Secretary Scott Besson is referred to in the transcript as the speaker) said they are investigating and will try to find any links of this money going to Somalia and to Al Shabaab, and they plan to look at more scrutiny on all monies going back to Somalia. The report emphasizes that this investigation is just beginning, with ongoing scrutiny and potential broader implications beyond Minnesota.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: First class plane tickets, luxury cars, fine jewelry, all these lavish things allegedly bought by Minnesota fraudsters with taxpayer money intended for hungry children. New documents obtained by NewsNation show hundreds of millions of dollars worth of funds were spent in the fraud scheme engulfing Minnesota's social services programs. The case prompting an investigation by the House Oversight Committee. The chairman of that committee, congressman James Comer, telling me he thinks that this could potentially be an organized scheme and and expanding beyond Minnesota.
Speaker 1: I would go out on a limb and say that, I would say this is happening in in other states with other social programs with other groups.
Speaker 0: Our Rich McHugh has been all over this one all week long and has some brand new reporting on what he's learning tonight. Rich?
Speaker 2: Hi, Blake. Yeah. Finally, we were seeing firsthand how they were spending these these millions and millions of dollars of taxpayer funds that were built from Minnesota and from the welfare scandal there. And let's just say that they were living large, they were burning large amounts of cash. You know, when these indictments were first announced in September 2022, it was shocking even then.
Speaker 3: They used this money that was supposed to be used for feeding children to buy houses in Minnesota, resort property and and real estate in Kenya and Turkey, luxury cars, commercial property, jewelry, and much more.
Speaker 2: But now these documents we've just obtained reveal the scope of this. You know, a gorgeous honeymoon in The Maldives. There's video of them popping champagne. They bought waterfront properties, real estate, in fact, entire buildings in Kenya, Porsches. These scammers were young and filthy rich, texting each other pictures like this.
A box full of cash in this case, it's a quarter of $1,000,000, and texting, you are gonna be the richest 25 year old, inshallah. They wired millions to China and to Kenya. One text, they said, please send 1,000 to Mogadishu Baccarat, which appears to be a reference to a market in Somalia once controlled by the Al Qaeda affiliate Al Shabaab, also the site of the nineteen ninety three Black Hawk Down incident where we lost 18 service members. Now treasury secretary Scott Besson, he said they're investigating, and they're gonna try and find any links of this money going to Somalia and to Al Shabaab. And just this morning, he said they're gonna be looking at more scrutiny on all monies going back to Somalia.
Blake?
Speaker 0: Yeah. Investigating indeed, and it feels like this one is just beginning. Rich McHugh, live for us once again tonight. Rich, thank you.
reSee.it AI Summary
I opened the first hearing of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency, emphasizing our commitment to uncovering waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government. We need full transparency to address the staggering $36 trillion national debt and its crippling interest payments. This issue transcends party lines; it’s an American problem that demands urgent reform. Together, we will expose the tremendous problems and present actionable plans for improvement.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
DOGE House Subcommittee: 'Federal Government Takes Your Money, Fails You, and Never Pays the Price' Marjorie Taylor Greene opens the first hearing of the Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency (@DOGECommittee): “This committee will be laser focused on bringing full transparency to waste, fraud and abuse within the federal government, and presenting the plans to fix the tremendous problems we expose.” @RepMTG addresses the staggering $36 trillion U.S. national debt, its crippling interest payments, and the urgent need for transparency and reform. “We as a country are $36 trillion in debt. That is such a stunning amount of money, it's absolutely staggering to even comprehend how we as a people, we as a country, found ourselves here. This is not a Democrat problem. This is not a Republican problem. This is an American problem.” @mtgreenee @DOGE
Video Transcript AI Summary
We're launching the Oversight Subcommittee on Doge to bring transparency to waste, fraud, and abuse in the federal government. Our national debt is $36 trillion, an American problem fueled by compounding interest. By 2025, interest payments will exceed our military budget, reaching $1.8 trillion by 2035. These payments don't benefit Americans; they enslave us to our creditors.
This debt stems from Congress and presidential administrations, betraying the American people. Doge emerged from public anger over this. Unlike private businesses, the federal government isn't accountable for its spending. It takes our tax dollars regardless of its performance. Congress's low approval reflects this disgust. This committee will address this crisis, working with President Trump, Elon Musk, and the Doge team to combat waste, starting with improper payments in Medicaid and Medicare.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Today, we begin the first hearing on the Oversight Subcommittee on Doge. This committee will be laser focused on bringing full transparency to waste, fraud, and abuse within the federal government and presenting the plans to fix the tremendous problems we expose. We as a country are $36,000,000,000,000 in debt. That is such a stunning amount of money. It's absolutely staggering to even comprehend how we as a people, we as a country, found ourselves here.
This is not a Democrat problem. This is not a Republican problem. This is an American problem. To make it clear for everyone, not only are we $36,000,000,000,000 in debt, but the com the compounding interest on our debt is also growing out of control. Even if we decided to defund the entire federal government, we cannot escape our debt and the compounding interest owed on our debt, which grows bigger and bigger every year.
In 2025, interest payments are projected to be $952,000,000,000, which is more than our entire military budget. In 2026, it will be $1,000,000,000,000, and by 2035, '1 point '8 trillion dollars. Over the next decade, total interest payments are projected to be $13,800,000,000,000. These interest payments don't serve a single American. They don't build a bridge, a road, provide disaster relief, or fund a single part of the behemoth that is the federal government.
These interest payments pay our masters who own our debt, and the American people are in debt slavery to everyone who owns our debt. Our crippling national debt and massively growing interest on our debt will destroy us. Not destroy one political party or the other, it will destroy all of us together. It drives inflation making life unaffordable for Americans struggling to financially survive. It is crippling small businesses struggling to be successful.
Our massively growing debt and interest are the chains and shackles harnessed to every American and their children and every generation to come. But first, let us be brutally honest about how this massive debt came to be in the first place. It came from congress and from elected presidential administrations. And I believe enslaving our nation in debt is one of the biggest betrayals against the American people by its own elected government. This American the American people's anger over this betrayal is what gave birth to the concept of Doge, the Department of Government Efficiency.
In fact, Doge became a major part of president Trump's campaign and led to his overwhelming victory in November. Every day, Americans go to work. They run businesses. They have to earn their paycheck. No one guarantees it.
And if they don't do a good job, they get fired. They also have to pay their bills, credit card debts, balance their checkbooks, and scrap and save every penny they can in order to plan for that rainy day and hopefully retirement one day. Private businesses only survive on hard earned income by serving their customers so well that their customers pay them for the services and products they consume. If that business fails, its employees lose their jobs and paychecks, and the owners lose their business and everything they risked along with it. Many go bankrupt in this process and lose everything.
No one bails them out. They only survive by excellent customer service and smart financial management. This is the real world that most Americans live, work, and survive in every day. This is the pursuit of happiness, and this is how you pursue the American dream. However, the federal government, government employees, and unelected bureaucrats do not live by the same rules as the great American people and private businesses.
The federal government's income is the American people's hard earned tax dollars, their literal blood, sweat, and tears. And taxes are collected by law at gunpoint. Don't pay your taxes, and you go to jail. The federal government does not have to provide excellent customer service to earn its income. It takes your money whether you like it or not.
And federal employees receive their paycheck no matter what, whether veterans receive their benefits or not, whether your mail shows up or not, and whether your tax dollars are used to help Americans in need or sent to foreign countries, for foreign people for foreign causes. No matter how bad the federal government fails the American people, it still takes your money. It still pays its own federal employees, and it never ever goes out of business. There are no consequences for bad customer service, total failure, and for enslaving the American people against their will and the ever growing and future all consuming national debt. Congress has a dismal approval rating that ranges between 1220%.
I don't blame the American people one bit for their sentiment and disgust. The American people will be watching this committee and how we tackle one of the biggest problems of our time. While we are a committee made up of the opposite far reaching corners of congress, we were each elected to serve and represent the American people and how their hard earned tax dollars are spent. We as Republicans and Democrats can still hold tightly to our beliefs, but we are going to have to let go of funding them in order to save our sinking ship. This is not a time for political theater and partisan attacks.
The American people are watching. The legislative branch can't sit on the sidelines. In this subcommittee, we will fight the war on waste shoulder to shoulder with president Trump, Elon Musk, and the Doge team. This week, we turn our attention to improper payments by the federal government, including in Medicaid and Medicare. I'm looking forward to what we find out and how to solve this crisis.
reSee.it AI Summary
I came across an analysis by Ed Dowd, a former BlackRock executive, suggesting that COVID-19 vaccines may have led to between 7.3 million and 15 million deaths worldwide, along with 29 to 60 million disabilities. He estimates that if 18% of vaccinated individuals experience injuries, this could range from 500 million to 900 million affected globally. This perspective raises significant concerns about the impact of vaccination on public health.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Global Vaccine Impact: Study Reveals Up to 15M Deaths, 60M Disabilities Worldwide Ex-BlackRock exec Ed Dowd reveals a startling analysis, claiming COVID-19 vaccines have resulted in millions of deaths and disabilities globally. “… 5 billion people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort. If you apply the range of the death rate in the US that I gave you earlier, you get a range of globally, 7.3 million to 15 million died from the vaccine… … disabilities, when you look at the ratio of four to one, you multiply the 7 million and the 15, possibly 15 million times four, you get a range of… 29 to 60 million disabled globally,” “… then injuries, if you take 18% of the vaccinated, just using the Pfizer. So again, this could be money, but we get a range of at the high end, 900 million, 500 million at the low end,” @BretWeinstein
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1 estimates that approximately 5,000,000,000 individuals globally received a vaccine. Applying the US death rate range, they estimate 7,300,000 to 15,000,000 deaths globally from the vaccine. This aligns with Dennis Rancourt's estimate of 17,000,000. Using a 4 to 1 ratio, they estimate 29,000,000 to 60,000,000 people disabled globally. Factoring in 18% of the vaccinated population based on Pfizer data, they estimate 500,000,000 to 900,000,000 people injured, but not disabled, globally.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: What else do we need to know?
Speaker 1: Alright. So let me roll these up into the global estimates. And it's it's now, you know, we're using some back of
Speaker 0: the envelope math, which is what we do as portfolio managers and analysts on Wall Street. So this is I gave
Speaker 1: you the US numbers, which we've done a lot of work on. So how do you estimate global? Well, you make some assumptions. So we estimate that around 5,000,000,000 individuals that's been widely reported got the vaccine on the planet.
Speaker 0: So 5,000,000,000 got which vaccine?
Speaker 1: Just all vaccines. So that's that's why we give these huge ratings.
Speaker 0: Including the Sinovacs and the Sputnik and
Speaker 1: Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Well, not yes. That that that's that's why that's why we give these wide ranges because we don't wanna over, overestimate.
But
Speaker 0: k.
Speaker 1: So 5,000,000,000, people on the planet got a vaccine of some sort. If you apply the range of the death rate, in the US that I gave you earlier, you get a, a range of globally 7,300,000 to 15,000,000 died from the vaccine. And that
Speaker 0: 7,000,000 to 15,000,000?
Speaker 1: Yeah. And so let's let's there's been a study by Dennis Rancourt. He we've looked at his methodology. It's different than what we do. We're not saying it's wrong.
It's it's it's it's an estimate, and he came up with 17,000,000, which I think you talked about. So our upper our upper range is right there with Dennis Rancourt. Okay? Disabilities, when you look at the ratio of 4 to 1, you multiply the 7,000,000 and the 15 plus 15,000,000 times 4, you get a range of 29 to, let me see. I gotta look at the numbers.
29 to 60,000,000 disabled globally. Okay?
Speaker 0: 29 to 60,000,000 disabled globally.
Speaker 1: Correct. And then injuries, if you take 18% of the vaccinated just using the the Pfizer. So that, again, this could be money, but we get a range of, at the high end, 900,000,000, 500,000,000 at the low end. Injured.
Speaker 0: 500,000,000 to 900,000,000 who had an injury that has not disabled?
Speaker 1: Yeah. Correct.
reSee.it AI Summary
I expressed my distrust in the FBI, DOJ, and Secret Service, citing personal experiences that have led me to this conclusion. I believe the Warren Commission was largely a cover-up and hope that President Trump will release all documents related to the Kennedy assassination on his first day in office. This transparency could enlighten the public and encourage important questions that often go unasked.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Senator Ron Johnson: 'I Don't Trust the FBI, DOJ, or Secret Service' “I don't trust the FBI. I don't trust department justice. I don't trust the Secret Service. They'd give me all kinds of reasons not to trust them. I have first hand knowledge, not to trust them… … you know, the Warren Commission was by and large set up to cover up what happened and I would hope the president Trump, who said that to Mike Pompeo talked him out of releasing all the documents that were supposed to be released on the Kennedy assassination. I would hope the first day in office, he released the truth to the American public in terms of what happened, because I think that will probably also open up people's eyes and help us ask some questions that people don't necessarily want to have asked.” @SenRonJohnson
Video Transcript AI Summary
Speaker 1, a government official, expresses dedication to uncovering the truth about historical cover-ups, particularly regarding the JFK assassination. They express distrust in agencies like the FBI and emphasize the importance of transparency. They hope for the release of all relevant documents to the public. The speaker questions the motives behind past cover-ups and stresses the need for full honesty and accountability.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: You know, you've you're in government right now. You know, this is the type of story we're used to as you pointed out, you know, with the assassination of John f Kennedy, of Robert Kennedy. These files always seem to be buried. Can you guarantee to the public right now that we are not gonna live through another one of these events where suddenly this thing will just get packaged up, sent to a vault somewhere? I mean, do you feel like we're gonna get the truth here as as the American public?
Because, you know, we're sitting at a time where we keep asking every president, will you release the file so we know what actually happened in the JFK assassination and they don't. Are there like, do you get a sense? Yeah. I mean, I'm sure now you're in government. It's gotta be weird being there.
We always forget that, you know, at least guys like yourself that aren't career politicians that you find yourself in this position where these decisions are made. Are there people around you you think that would like to see this all buttoned up and hidden from the public? Or is everyone bipartisan, you know, involved in wanting transparency right now? Can we expect transparency?
Speaker 1: Well, right now everybody's saying that. I mean, I will tell you I am absolutely dedicated doing everything I can to, you know, uncover and expose the full truth so we know what happened here. I can't say that's true of the agencies. I don't trust the FBI. I don't trust the Department of Justice.
I don't trust the secret service. They they give me all kinds of reasons not to trust them. I have firsthand knowledge not to trust them. So, I mean, we know that, you know, the Warren Commission was by and large set up to cover up what happened.
Speaker 0: Yeah.
Speaker 1: And I would think, I would hope that president Trump, who who said that Mike Pompeo talked him out of releasing all the documents that were supposed to be released on the Kennedy assassination, I would hope the first day in office, he re released the truth to the American public in terms of what happened. Because I think that will probably also open up people's eyes and help us ask some questions that people don't necessarily wanna have asked. Yeah. Again, you can't explain this. This is such a such an amateurish attempt to protect a presidential candidate.
It it just it it boggles the mind. It's like it it almost you almost feel like it something happened here on purpose. Can't say that for sure, but I can certainly understand why people would think that, which again, just underscores the need to be fully transparent, fully honest, and provide a full accounting so people can make sense of this.
Speaker 0: Yeah. It
Speaker 1: just it it it I don't think people can be that incompetent quite honestly.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Full @HighWireTalk Video 🔻 https://rumble.com/v58l64d-senator-johnson-gives-new-details-on-trump-assassination-attempt.html
SENATOR JOHNSON GIVES NEW DETAILS ON TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT
Sen. Ron Johnson joins Del live to discuss the findings of his preliminary report regarding the attempted assassination of former President Trump and breaks down the published timeline of failure from
rumble.com
reSee.it AI Summary
The last few years have exposed the extreme nature of corrupt forces, awakening many to their actions. These external forces seek total control and are willing to do anything. The optics of their actions may appear to be something, but it took too long for them to take action. - Donald Trump Jr. #CorruptForces #PureEvil
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
'There's Nothing They Won't Do,' Warns Donald Trump Jr. About the Corrupt Forces “It was the extreme nature of the last few years, maybe the last eight years, that I think woke up a lot of people to exactly what was going on… … we're sort of in this same fight against these external forces that at this point, honestly, to me scream, you know, just pure evil. It's just total control. There's nothing they'll they won't do.” “… it's the optics like they're appearing to do something… even if they're appearing to do something… Why did it take three and a half years?” @DonaldJTrumpJr @rustyrockets
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses censorship and suppression, noting a shift in awareness in recent years. They criticize Wikipedia for spreading misinformation and mention being falsely labeled as a Russian agent. Another speaker questions the media's treatment of political opponents and policies, highlighting inconsistencies in coverage. They argue that Biden's border policy is ineffective and criticize the lack of action on issues like human trafficking and the fentanyl crisis. Overall, they believe media coverage is misleading and lacks focus on critical issues.
Translation: The speakers criticize censorship, misinformation, and media bias, highlighting inconsistencies in coverage of political opponents and policies. They argue that Biden's border policy is ineffective and call for more attention to urgent issues like human trafficking and the fentanyl crisis.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I think it's a great start. You know, I I think a lot of the forces that you're talking about in censorship and suppression, I think a lot of that's been going on probably for decades. It it was the extreme nature of the last few years, maybe the last 8 years, that that I think woke up a lot of people to exactly what was going on. When we started speaking, I said there's probably not a lot we would have agreed on politically or otherwise 8, 10 years ago, and yet we're sort of in this same fight, against these external forces that at this point, honestly, to me scream, you know, just pure evil. It's just total control.
There there's nothing they'll they won't do. And, you know, as as we talk this week, you said, yo, on my Wikipedia page, I don't check it because I think Wikipedia is literally the the basis that everyone else uses to to spread misinformation and create censorship in an artificial means. But, yeah, I'm I'm still, you know, an agent of Russia, even though that's been totally disproven, and even though a Hillary cam Clinton campaign pushed these lies. And our 3 letter agencies blindly bought into that. And they leaked the information to, you know, establishment media.
In that case, the New York Times, which writes an article that they use as the basis for an investigation to try to destroy a presidency, which is, as far as I'm concerned, an affront on democracy. But according to them, that's actually saving democracy somehow. We we don't know how, but they they will tell us that ad nauseam.
Speaker 1: It's difficult to wrench your head out of the domestic environment that all of us inhabit. I mean primarily culturally. And for a moment, consider that if we heard of a foreign country where a political opponent was being subject to criminal investigation while simultaneously having their previous policies plagiarized, policies which, whilst in office, Donald Trump was significantly condemned. I'm talking about the travel ban and various attempts to curtail or otherwise control immigration. While that while Donald Trump was in office, he was attacked by the same media now that are attempting to significantly amplify and support Biden's recent executive order when it comes to the border.
Now you seem to be saying, Don, that that is both an inept policy rather than pure faith.
Speaker 0: It's a lie. It's just optics. Right? The Biden border policy is 4 1,000 guaranteed amnesty every day with all sorts of loopholes for additional people. And just so we're clear, you know, Obama's homeland guy said a thousand a day would be overwhelming.
So now we're at 4x plus all of the loopholes. So it's it's the optics that they're appearing to do something, But I'd ask, even if they're appearing to do something, maybe that's a start. Why did it take three and a half years? Did we did we think there was any good to come from, I don't know, the human trafficking, the child sex trafficking, the fentanyl crisis that, you know, has killed, you know, kills, let's call it a 100000 Americans a year, a 100000, just so we understand what that is. That's 2 Vietnams a year.
2 Vietnams a year. Vietnam was, you know, 10 plus year war. 2 a year, and we barely talk about it as a crisis. I mean, that's where we are. Where's the media talking about that?
Because, you know, they will make it seem like they're trying to do something, and it's all smoke and mirrors. It's nonsense.
reSee.it AI Summary
Former NBA champion Matt Barnes and journalist Sage Steele have expressed concerns about the lack of consistent and trustworthy information regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. Steele emphasized the need for more time and information before making such an important decision. Barnes questioned the potential long-term effects, stating that they were essentially "guinea pigs." Both Barnes and Steele shared their experiences of being mandated to receive the vaccine to keep their jobs, highlighting the injustices associated with COVID-19 mandates.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
“We Were The Guinea Pigs”: Former NBA Champ Questions Long-Term Effects of COVID Jabs Matt Barnes, a former NBA champion, and Sage Steele, a highly respected journalist and sports analyst, recently shared their experiences during the COVID jab mandates. Both expressed concerns about the lack of consistent and trustworthy information at the time. Steele clarified, “I wasn’t anti-the-shot… I just need more time,” emphasizing her desire for more information before deciding on such an important decision. @Matt_Barnes22 echoed this sentiment, stating, “We were the guinea pigs… whatever they put in us, we were the guinea pigs,” questioning the potential long-term effects of the COVID jabs. --- “I was never a conspiracy theorist. I just want truth. And when I see lies, immediately, then you go, well, what else have you lied to me about?” - @SageSteele --- In September 2021, Steele shared on a podcast that she felt "defeated" by the requirement to receive a mandatory COVID-19 vaccine to keep her job, following a mandate by her employer, Disney, in July 2021. Similarly, Barnes, a studio analyst for NBC Sports California, expressed a comparable experience. During an appearance on VladTV, he stated, "I was forced to do it to keep my job." It’s reassuring to hear these two speak out and address the injustices associated with COVID-19 mandates.
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speakers discuss being pressured to get the vaccine to keep their jobs, feeling like guinea pigs, and questioning the lack of information and consistency. They express concerns about potential side effects and the need for more research. Despite complying to keep their jobs, they emphasize the importance of truth and individual choice in making healthcare decisions. They also touch on the possibility of future events and the impact of uncertainty on their bodies.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Like All
Speaker 1: these side effects that they're talking about now were in and, you know, you and I, we were almost forced to do it if we wanted to keep our jobs at the time.
Speaker 0: Forced to do it to keep my job. Yeah. So same
Speaker 1: thing with me. You know, they Showtime and ESPN. You guys wanna work, you gotta get this, them, just like, damn.
Speaker 0: So you did it?
Speaker 1: I did it.
Speaker 0: How'd you feel about
Speaker 1: that? I just did I I think I like it. We just didn't know enough. It was so fast for this pandemic to hit, and all of a sudden within the first 4 to 6 months, they have something that's gonna keep you safe from it. Like, to me, that's just it it sounds foolish, to be honest with you.
But, you know, like I said, sometimes you have to go with the bullshit. And I feel like that was part of the bullshit.
Speaker 0: Listen, that's all I said too, was I wasn't anti the shot. Mhmm. It was like, I just need more time. And a quick Google search taught me that it's like, 6 to 9 years before the FDA approves the vaccine. And we're all of a sudden, and then it's political.
And then, okay, if Trump says do it, then it's evil. But if Biden says it and you don't, then you're evil. And, like, then you then you go, wait. This just isn't consistent. All I want is truth and consistency.
And all I wanted to do was was wait. I'm like, can you give me 6 months? Because I feel like there'll be more research. Mhmm. And it was, no, September 30, 2021 or you're out.
And so I did it to keep my job. I need my job and I love my job. Exactly. And I think that that's that's the big picture for me. It was one of the reasons why I stood up and ended up leaving.
Mhmm. But the big picture is people just want facts.
Speaker 1: That's it.
Speaker 0: And then let me make my own decision based on my body.
Speaker 1: I feel like we were the guinea pigs of this, whatever they put in us. We were the guinea pigs. Like, normally, we don't have to be the guinea pigs, but we were a guinea pig, and we don't know how, especially, you know, I'm mid forties now. I just turned 44 a couple weeks ago. It's just, like, how's this gonna affect me?
Is it, you know, these aches that I'm starting to have all of a sudden or this this or the headaches I'm starting to get all of a sudden? Is it from you know what I mean? So it's just like what is it? Is this me getting old or is it, you know, something I had to I took 3 shot or excuse me, 2 shots. I almost took the 3rd.
Speaker 0: So the main one and then one booster. Mhmm. Yeah, me too.
Speaker 1: Yeah. In
Speaker 0: order to keep my job. Again In
Speaker 1: order to keep my job.
Speaker 0: Literally all it was. Yeah. But I think, you know, so many people maybe the silver lining is that people are doing more research and not just taking orders from anybody and learning, especially if it's not just you and and you have a family and you have kids and we're making decisions for them too. I do think that if there's a next time, which there probably will be, that I don't believe any of it was an accident. That's a topic for another show or maybe a sip.
Speaker 1: Cheers to that.
Speaker 0: Thank you. We will continue that.
Speaker 1: But to be honest with you, Sage, to be like now, I don't even wanna know if there's bad stuff in it. You know? Because it's in my body now.
Speaker 0: It's already
Speaker 1: there. What can what can I do now?
Speaker 0: Well, although I always say, okay. It's been that long, and I haven't had a booster in 2 years, so, it's it's gotta be out of me by now. Wouldn't I feel it by now?
Speaker 1: I would hope.
Speaker 0: Like, that's the hope. And I think, again, I was never a conspiracy theorist. Mhmm. I just want truth. More information.
And when I see lies immediately, then you go, well, what else have you lied to me about?
reSee.it AI Summary
Dr. Harvey Risch raises concerns about the global push to vaccinate every individual against COVID-19. He suggests that the rapid production and distribution of vaccines served as a cover for the bio-warfare industry, rather than solely focusing on public health. Dr. Risch believes that the vaccination campaign aimed to protect the bio-weapons industry's reputation and justify dual-use research.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Dr. Harvey Risch Exposes Global COVID Vaccination Agenda “I’m talking today about what I consider the crushingly obsessive push to COVID vaccinate every living person on the planet.” Dr. Risch asserts that the rapid production and mass global distribution of the COVID-19 vaccines in months was essentially a smokescreen to provide legitimacy and cover for the bio-warfare industry, illustrating that it could offer countermeasures despite its history of epic failures. He concludes that something other than public health was being advanced in the vaccination campaign—protecting the bio-weapons industry’s reputation and basic dual-use research justification. @DrHarveyRisch @SenRonJohnson
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses the push for global COVID vaccination, linking the virus to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. They suggest the pandemic was caused by bioengineering and funded by various organizations. The speaker questions the delay in developing vaccines for bioweapons, theorizing that the vaccination campaign aims to justify the bioweapons industry's existence. They claim the vaccines are meant to show the industry's dual-use research and cover up its true nature. The speaker concludes that the vaccines serve as a defense to prove the industry's supposed public benefit, regardless of any negative effects.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: I'm talking today about what I consider the crushingly obsessive push to COVID vaccinate every living person on the planet. So we all know circumstantially at least that the virus that leaked leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology in fall 2019, the initial cases paralleled the Wuhan Subway Line 2, which passes by the WID. The virus contains a unique 19 nucleotide genetic sequence that also exists in Moderna patents from 2017, and various other biological and spy intelligence information evidence that overwhelmingly implicates the WIV as the source of the leak. So this virus, the COVID 19 pandemic virus exists because it was bioengineered. The WIV scientists used Ralph Barrick's genetic manipulation techniques technology at their insecure BSL 2 Lab.
So this was reckless work at the WIV that was funded by NIH through the DASHAC EcoHealth Alliance Money Laundry as well as by large DOD and USAID grants. Now, this work and the WIV leak was what I consider to be the fruit of our bioweapons industry that has been performing secretive and nefarious biological weapons development for the last 70 years. The recognition of the possible possible accidental or intentional unleashing of an infectious agent capable of killing large numbers of humanity led to the bioweapons treaty of 1975 that president Ford signed. The treaty prohibits the development of offensive bioweapons. However, the one loophole in the treaty is that small quantities of offensive bioweapons are allowed to be developed in order to do research on vaccine countermeasures.
Now this loophole was then exploited by our bioweapons industry for the last 50 years. The bioweapons, treaty limited offensive bioweapons to agents that would address vaccine development, so called dual use agents or dual use research. And this was the premise and motivation of the various virology grant applications like diffuse and so on submitted to DOD and NIH funders. This was the permitted rationale for the develop development of offensive bio weapons in that it would lead to work on vaccine countermeasures. Now fast forward to 2019.
Many 1,000,000,000 of dollars spent on the bioweapons industry over the past decades for all of this work on offensive bioweapons, where are the successful commercial vaccines to show for it? So there's been lots of vaccine research that's been carried out for known harmful organisms, but minimally, if at all, for these gain of function bioweapons agents. And for COVID, it took a year of shoddy research to produce and test the first batch of commercial vaccines for SARS CoV 2. And how is a year delay even remotely acceptable for a military defense against a bioweapon that spreads across populations in weeks, a year to develop a vaccine that for a back for pandemics that occur in waves in in weeks. And and these vaccines are supposed to be deployed before a pandemic occurs, not in the middle of 1.
So my hypothesis, what I believe, is that both the virus origin cover up and the forced vaccination of the entire planet were orchestrated to protect the integrity of the bioweapons industry. Once the general public understood the reckless and cavalier behavior of this industry that had operated under a false and misrepresented pretense of vaccine development that has never been successfully commercial commercially realized, it would then clamor to shut down the industry. And so the suppression of knowledge of the industry's reckless involvement in the Wuhan leak is an obvious cover up. And we have proof of that cover up from the FOIA documents involving Fauci Collins, Jeremy Ferrara and others. And my conclusion then is the reason why the whole population had to be vaccinated is to show that the bioweapons industry supposedly did have a rationale of vaccine development as part of its claimed dual use research.
The vaccines then are are the evidence that the bioweapons industry was properly justified from the beginning. Without a successful vaccine to show for itself in the time of the pandemic crisis, especially one caused by a leak from a bioweapons industry source itself, it would be clear to everyone that the rationale for the industry's existence was a fraud in the first place. And so the COVID vaccines themselves supplied the defense against the charge that the bioweapons industry was not actually dual use, but offense offensive only violating the 1975 treaty. So the vaccines had to be dramatically pushed out to be the universal solution to show that the bioweapons industry was actually working for the public good. And in this context, it did not matter what collateral damage the vaccines caused.
All it had to be was the the public thinking, public thought of of this theater that the industry had been doing its worst work to produce usable vaccines, not offensive bioweapons.
reSee.it AI Summary
Glenn Greenwald criticizes media bias in reporting on Trump and Russiagate, expressing his concern over journalists becoming political operatives. He finds the coverage offensive and highlights the danger of aligning with political narratives.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Glenn Greenwald: Journalistic Integrity Compromised in Trump Era Reporting Glenn Greenwald calls out media bias during the coverage of Trump's presidency and Russiagate. "I was repulsed by [Russiagate]... it just offended me journalistically," Greenwald states, criticizing corporate media's transformation into political operatives and highlighting the peril of journalists aligning with political narratives. @ggreenwald @megynkelly
Video Transcript AI Summary
In this video, the speaker reflects on their past political views and how they were perceived by others. They discuss their negative opinion of Donald Trump's candidacy and their frustration with the Russiagate narrative. They express their journalistic concerns about the lack of evidence supporting the allegations against Trump and criticize the media for promoting these claims without substantiation. The speaker emphasizes the importance of questioning narratives and rejecting bias in journalism, stating that journalists should not be afraid to challenge politically convenient or harmful narratives. They differentiate between being a journalist and a political operative or activist.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yeah. You know, I remember, you know, not to be super complimentary, but, like, I think it was 2013 or 14 or something when I was very much considered to be on the left. You were Fox and people assumed you were on the right. I remember, like, political did a profile of you or some outlet like that, and they talked to me about it because I had recently seen an interview that you had conducted with a republican conservative senator that was incredibly adversarial. And I said something like, You would never ever see a Democratic Party politician interviewed this way on MSNBC or CNN.
And if you go and look at The earliest writings that I would publish about Donald Trump's candidacy in 2015 and 2016, it was extremely negative. But in 2016 in mid 2016, when This narrative emerged of Russiagate, and for me, it was like a rejuvenation of McCarthy, you know, scripts from the CIA, like, what is Donald Trump in Moscow? What is this allegiance, this secret loyalty that Trump has to the Kremlin? You know, I was repulsed by it in part because it did resonate for me, this kind of 19 fifties attack on people's loyalties based on nothing. But also just as a journalist, evident from an evidentiary perspective, there was never any substantiation to these allegations that Trump had collaborated with or conspired with the Kremlin and the hacking of the DNC email and John fired with the Kremlin and the hacking of the DNC email and John Podesta's email, which is the central conspiracy that led to everything, let alone things like the Steele dossier.
And it just offended me journalistically, you know, that I would watch these leaks every day from the CIA and the FBI be trumpeted by the New York Times and the Washington Post for which they showered themselves with Pulitzers Even though there was so clearly never any evidence to it, and so it just became, you know, an obsession of mine to say that every day and, of course, The perception emerged, well, I must love Donald Trump. And think about what that perception says that journalists can't, you know, go against a certain narrative or question the evidentiary basis for it unless they somehow secretly love the party or the the candidate that Their questioning helps. And for me, that was never the case. I was never a fan of Trump, to put that mildly. But at the same time, Russiagate, to me was so journalist of the offensive.
And if you can't do that as a journalist, if you can't question a narrative that may be politically helpful helpful for you or reject 1 or if you, you know, aren't willing to affirm a narrative that might be politically harmful to you, There's no point in calling yourself a journalist. You're just a political operative or an activist. That's the difference.
reSee.it AI Summary
Intelligence reports reveal that at least 12 employees of the U.N.'s Palestinian refugee agency had direct links to Hamas's recent attack on Israel. These employees held critical roles, coordinating logistics and actively participating in the assault. The infiltration extends beyond individuals, with an estimated 1,200 staff having connections to militant groups. The revelation has led to international consequences, including the suspension of aid by the U.S. and others, raising concerns about the agency's integrity. A video shows the similarities between Hamas's military training and the tactics used in the attack.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
REPORT: Over 10% of U.N. Agency Staff Links to Hamas Attack Intelligence reports unveil a shocking connection between U.N. agency staff and a recent terrorist attack. These reports, reviewed by The Wall Street Journal, indicate that at least 12 employees of the U.N.’s Palestinian refugee agency had direct links to Hamas’s attack on Israel. Among these employees, several were involved in critical roles, including coordinating logistics for the attack and actively participating in the assault, which resulted in significant casualties. “The institution as a whole is a haven for Hamas’ radical ideology,” stated a senior Israeli government official, highlighting the severity of the infiltration within the U.N. agency. This infiltration is not limited to a few individuals; approximately 1,200 of the agency’s 12,000 Gaza staff are estimated to have connections to militant groups, indicating a deep-rooted issue. This revelation has led to significant international consequences, including the suspension of aid by the U.S. and others, raising questions about the agency’s integrity. VIDEO (via @WSJ): “A coalition of Palestinian militant groups led by Hamas posted videos of their annual military training to social media for years. The exercises looked nearly identical to the tactics Hamas used in its attack on Israel on Oct. 7.”
Video Transcript AI Summary
Hamas militants had been preparing for the October 7th attack on Israel for years, as shown in training videos posted on social media. These videos, similar to the actual attacks, depicted blowing up fences, raiding military bases, taking hostages, and using white pickup trucks in organized convoys. The joint room coalition, led by Hamas, conducted annual training exercises in Gaza, with one location just 2 miles from the Israeli border crossing. Despite the warnings and evidence of these tactics, Israeli officials seemed to have ignored or missed them. The attacks on October 7th were the deadliest in Israel's history, with militants breaching the border fence and invading Israeli Defense Forces bases, taking hostages and causing significant damage.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: The Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th seemed to come out of nowhere. But in reality, Palestinian militants can be seen preparing for it in plain sight in training videos like these for years. These videos which were widely posted to social media, look nearly identical to the attacks on the 7th that killed more than 1200 Israelis. Since December of 2020, a loose coalition of Palestinian militant groups led by Hamas called the joint room, posted videos to telegram of their annual training exercises. The journal reviewed hundreds of posts and had military experts analyze them.
They show participants blowing up border fences, raiding military bases, taking hostages, and traveling in convoys of white pickup trucks. These annual training sessions took place every December at outdoor locations throughout Gaza. One location is less than 2 miles away from the era's border crossing. 1 of the Israeli bases militants attacked on October 7th. Arab, Israeli, and Western media even covered the training events.
By 2023, joint room militants appear to be more sophisticated in their tactics, and their annual event was moved up to mid September, a change from previous years. Still Israeli officials seem to have ignored or missed these warnings that mirror the tactics Hamas would use just a few weeks later. Perhaps the most sophisticated aspect of the October 7th attacks, was Hamas's ability to breach the Israeli border fence. It's a tactic they had been honing for years and flaunting on social media. In 2020 training footage posted to Telegram, we see members of the joint room coalition using remote devices to blow up buildings.
In the following years, they practice the same skill. Now with gates and concrete barriers like those seen on October 7th. Once militants broke through the border on October 7th, they invaded a number of bases belonging to Israeli Defense Forces or the IDF. Joint room training footage shows Hamas and other Palestinian militants went to great lengths to perfect this tactic. They created mock IDF bases that featured watchtowers, domes, and gates.
Exactly like those seen in the structures, militants attacked in early October. In footage from the 7th, we can see a militant thrown explosive into an IDF base along the border. We see them practice a similar maneuver in dozens of training videos since 2020. On October 7th, militants divided into teams, taking cover like this as they seized bases. It's another tactic they drilled over several years.
Analysts who watch this footage say that from 2020 to 2023, training participants gradually look more coordinated, evolving into SWAT like teams that move and shoot like military infantry, much like we saw on October 7th. As the attack unfolded on 7th, militants took more than 200 Israeli civilians and IDF soldiers hostage. Here at the 2020 joint room event, participants simulate seizing an Israeli soldier from a tank. The same tactic is repeated in 2021 exercises. And by 2022, it evolves into a group hostage taking scenario.
A recurring image through the events of October 7th, is the highly organized convoys of white pickup trucks that Hamas and other militants used to carry out the attacks. Acts. In a training video shared on Telegram in September 2023, just weeks before the attack, the same white pickup trucks full of Hamas militants can be seen pulling into the 2023 trading site. And this September 10th Telegram post describes joint room leadership touring observation points along the border wall. The same pickup trucks are seen shuttling the entourage in photos of the inspection.
When asked whether Israel took any measures to guard against the tactics seen in these videos and posts. The IDF said it is focused on eliminating the threat from Hamas and will look into such questions at a later staged. Despite these examples and the warnings they may have offered, Israeli officials failed to ward off what led to the deadliest attacks in the country's history.
reSee.it AI Summary
According to Dr. Peter McCullough, there is significant underreporting of vaccine-related deaths. He highlights CDC data showing over 11,150 Americans died soon after COVID-19 vaccination. Dr. McCullough estimates up to 600,000 vaccine-related deaths in the U.S. and 17 million globally. He suggests that COVID-19 deaths may be overstated, with actual figures potentially ten times lower than reported.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Dr. Peter McCullough: ‘Vaccine-Related Deaths Greatly Underreported’ Deaths and injuries from COVID-19 jabs intensify amidst alarming statistics. Dr. Peter McCullough highlights concerning numbers: over 11,150 Americans reportedly died soon after COVID-19 vaccination, according to CDC data. “The deaths that have occurred after the vaccine are of great concern,” states Dr. McCullough, elaborating on estimates suggesting up to 600,000 vaccine-related deaths in the U.S. and a staggering 17 million globally. Comparatively, COVID-19 deaths might be significantly overstated, with actual figures potentially ten times lower than reported. @P_McCulloughMD
Video Transcript AI Summary
Various sources from around the world have revealed concerning numbers regarding the COVID-19 vaccines. The CDC reports that about 115 Americans have died shortly after receiving the vaccine, while over 18,000 deaths have been reported to them. However, it is believed that these numbers are underreported, possibly by a ratio of 30 to 1. Estimates suggest that around 506,000 individuals may have died from the vaccine in the United States alone. Globally, the death toll could be as high as 17 million. Despite these figures, no country has removed the vaccines from the market. Additionally, there is a belief that the number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 may have been overstated by 10 times or more. Comparatively, the number of deaths from the vaccine is believed to be five times higher than the actual deaths from the disease. The focus should be on preventing premature deaths and providing everyone with a chance of survival without having to risk their lives with a vaccine.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So when you look at these numbers, and I mean, we get numbers from the Cleveland Clinic, from the nation of Australia, from nations in Europe, from places here in America. And the numbers, study after study when when they're actually revealed and the truth is told, these jabs were not good news, were they?
Speaker 1: They weren't. In fact, the deaths that have occurred after the vaccine, are of great concern. Our CDC reports about 115 Americans have died right in the vaccine center or a few hours, afterwards. That's the reason why they have crash carts, with defibrillators, in the vaccine centers and then that, transition to the the pharmacies. CDC verifying Over 18,000 Americans reported to them have died, and and the people reporting, like myself, believe the vaccines that have caused the death, and that's underreported, probably 30 to 1.
So that's how we get to somewhere between 5,06,000, individuals may have died of the vaccine in the United States. In the 1st year alone, Pantazatkos and Seligman from Colombia Came in with an estimate that was concordant as well as Mark Skidmore from Michigan State University using other methods. Worldwide, Dennis Rancourt from Montreal, 17,000,000 could be the death toll. And Steve, not a single country has taken these off the market.
Speaker 0: Not a single country is taking it off the market. Some don't force you to get it anymore. I'm not forced to get it here. But but there's there's another part of this, and I wanna ask about something else. But, the other part of this goes back to the people that actually died from COVID.
You believe was overstated by 10 times maybe more, which means that our people that actually died from COVID in America would be a 120,000, not 1,200,000. Most of those were people who were past, the actuarial tables. Anyway, older people, not just not just counting their deaths, but a 120,000 people that were, you know, on their way to the end anyway or close, are the ones that died. So if you compare that to 600,000 people that you believe died from getting the injections from Pfizer and Moderna and so forth, that would be 5 times as many people died from getting the injection as to actually died from the disease. Remarkable.
Speaker 1: It's true. Former president Trump said, let's not let the cure be worse than the disease. In this case, In fact, that happened. There was an analysis from Scott McLaughlin early April of 2021, when the vaccines were rolled out to the nursing homes, and in fact, people did die of the in the nursing homes within a few hours of taking the vaccines in the McLaughlin report. What we're really interested in is premature death.
Even those who are, supporting the vaccines will say, listen. We we have to trade lives with the vaccine to, you know, events against lives lost due to the virus. I think that's an unethical trade off. Personally, I don't think anybody should be marched into a vaccine center and, and and try to wager the rest of their life with the injection. But even those who make that case yeah, Steve.
Even those who make that case, if we look at this, it's it's not a favorable Trade off here. You know, COVID is treatable. The methods have improved. Everyone needs a chance of survival. They shouldn't have to risk their lives with a shot.
reSee.it AI Summary
Tucker Carlson highlights the misrepresentation of historical events, such as the Kennedy assassination and 9/11, and questions the government's knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack. He believes these inaccuracies have shaped our understanding of history. This raises ethical concerns about decision-making. Matt, who is grateful for the grassroots effort that led to his content being shared with Tucker Carlson, invites others to join the conversation and engage with like-minded individuals in the Free Thinker Community.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Tucker Carlson: ‘A Lot of Lying’ in Major Historical Events Tucker Carlson discusses the frequent misrepresentation of significant events, such as the Kennedy assassination and 9/11, and how these inaccuracies have changed our view of history. “I’m embarrassed to say I sort of bought the conventional view of most things up until several years ago,” Tucker points out how the U.S. government knew about the Pearl Harbor attack before it happened but did nothing to stop it. “I think it’s really clear...the U.S. government knew or had an understanding, there was a very high likelihood that our Pacific fleet would be hit,” He argues that the government let Pearl Harbor happen on purpose to make the United States join World War II. “… that’s a monstrous crime, you should never allow your countrymen to be killed. I just can’t even imagine that.” Tucker views this as a serious betrayal, raising ethical concerns about such decision-making. @MattAttack009_ @TCNetwork
Video Transcript AI Summary
The speaker discusses their shift in perspective on conspiracy theories and their belief that many major historical events have been distorted by lies. They mention the Kennedy assassination, 9/11, and the attack on Pearl Harbor as examples. They express concern over the US government's alleged knowledge and allowance of the Pearl Harbor attack, leading to the death and capture of servicemen. They question how President Roosevelt could live with such actions and emphasize the need to reconsider our relationship with the state. The speaker finds this topic important and believes there is evidence to support their claims.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Yes. Of course.
Speaker 1: Of all the conspiracies out there in the world, all the conspiracy theories, And even if maybe it's one that's not provable, but something you think about, which one's your favorite rabbit hole to go down?
Speaker 0: Well, it's funny. You know? I I I'm embarrassed to say I sort of bought the conventional view of most things up until several years ago when the evidence just, you know, forced me, to reassess because it was just so obvious that there was a lot of lying going on, A lot. And I have since become convinced based on, overwhelming amount of evidence that a lot of the biggest stories in certainly last 100 years, maybe longer, have been really distorted. Like, we don't actually know, what happened, but we know that people have been lying about it consistently, and then those lies solidify into history and if they're not questioned by anybody.
So, I mean, I could go down a long list. It's not just the Kennedy assassination or 911, both of which are you know, clearly, there's a lot going on there in both cases. You know, I'm really bothered, honestly, by the attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. I think it's really clear, both common sense dictates, but also there was a senate inquiry into it during the Second World War, which is kinda suppressed Because the war was on. But the fact that the US government knew or had an understanding, there was a very high likelihood that Our Pacific fleet would be hit and 1,000 would die in Pearl Harbor Japan I mean, Pearl Harbor Hawaii by Japan.
They allowed that. And then they allowed all the, you know, US servicemen in the Philippines, in Corregidor, and Manila to be killed and captured, which they were. I mean, they actually Roosevelt and His war staff, war planning staff allowed that to happen. I think it's clear. And that's a monstrous crime.
You should never allow your countrymen to be killed. I just can't even imagine that. And I'm sure that Roosevelt, I have no doubt, told himself, you know, we're doing this for a higher good, and they wanted to get involved in the war in Europe. They needed It couldn't be a voluntary war. We had to be responding to an attack, and, clearly, they allowed that.
And I don't I can't imagine how Roosevelt lived with himself. He didn't live much longer, actually. And I and I'm I just think it's a really big deal. If the US government would do that or a president would do that, Like, we need to rethink our relationship to the state. I in my opinion, no one ever talks about that, but I think it's entirely real.
And there's a lot of evidence that it is. So, yeah, I'm interested in that.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
See more from @MattAttack009_ 🔻 https://x.com/MattAttack009_/status/1737653379591967185?s=20
@MattAttack009_ - Matt Kim
Thursday 12pm EST. Live. I didn’t do this. You did. Somebody shared my content and it landed in the hands of @TuckerCarlson . It was a grassroots effort, and I’m so humbled by it. We grow together. We make a difference together. We speak truth together. I want to invite you all to be a part of the conversation. Join the chat on Rumble. Engage with other like minded individuals. Be a part of our Free Thinker Community. Free Thinker Army. Because the day will come when we REALLY need one another. Love you guys! You motivate me. Inspire me. I appreciate you. Matt
reSee.it AI Summary
In a recent interview, Christine Anderson expressed concerns about the potential power of the WHO. She highlighted the possibility of the organization seizing governing powers during a pandemic, despite being unelected and unaccountable to the people. Anderson criticized the influence of wealthy individuals who have allegedly bought their way into the organization. The fight for personal freedoms seems to be at stake.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Christine Anderson: The "Unelected Body" Could Dictate Personal Freedoms @VigilantFox: “What happens if the WHO attains more power?” @AndersonAfDMdEP: “… if it goes through what they want… in case of a pandemic, they should be or will be authorized to seize the government governing powers of the member states… what you have is an unelected body that is not responsible politically or otherwise, to the people, the people that have no real repercussions… you have a bunch of multi-billionaires that bought their way… via, you know, donations…” @VigilantNews
Video Transcript AI Summary
The WHO's new treaty and amendments are causing concern as they could potentially seize governing powers during a pandemic. This unelected body, funded by billionaires, could dictate when people can leave their homes, wear masks, and receive mRNA shots. It is seen as undemocratic and not in the best interest of the people. The United States government proposed changes to the treaty, but most were withdrawn due to public outrage. However, the WHO continues to pursue their agenda, finding alternative methods to achieve their goals.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: So the whole deal with the WHO and their new treaty or whatever amendments they plan on implementing there, that's the very same problem it's just another issue. So instead of having the EU being anti democratic and pretty much dictating to people, the WHO is trying to do the same thing or supposed to be empowered to do the same thing because what will happen if it goes through what they want is in the case of a pandemic, they should be or will be authorized to seize the governing powers of of the member states. So what you have is an unelected body, that is not responsible politically or otherwise to the people. The people have no repercussions. They cannot say well, the next time I won't vote for them anymore because they never even elected them in the 1st place.
So you have a bunch of multi billionaires that bought their way in via donations into that body and they will in the future, yeah be empowered or have the possibility to tell you when you can leave your house, whether you have to wear a mask, what kind of mRNA shot you have to take and how many of them and in what frequency they will be able to tell you, well guess what, you can't go to work anymore. And by the way, bus riding no, you can't do that. So that has nothing, nothing whatsoever to do with democracy. Nothing whatsoever and this is what they are not only planning to do, they've already, it's underway and once again what you see here is people being gaslighted, into thinking well it's just for our health and it's just for our own good when in reality it isn't. It is the exact opposite.
So, and we've been on this. I mean they tried that I think was the last year or the year before at the World Health Assembly or whatever. The United States government, they proposed 14 amendments or changes of the treaty. But due to the public outrage, they decided to withdraw 12 of them. So the only one that they're really stuck was the one where they changed like the, the time that has to pass until a new amendment goes into effect and they managed to do that.
And I think it's now instead of 18 months, it will only be 12 months. But when that was done, I said, they won't stop at this. They will continue to do that and that's what we're seeing. They're just doing it another way but the effect is going to be the same.
@UngaTheGreat - UngaTheGreat
Full Interview ⬇️ @VigilantFox@VigilantNews@AndersonAfDMdEP ‘The Fight Is On’ With Christine Anderson: A Vigilant Fox Exclusive Interview https://vigilantnews.com/post/the-fight-is-on-with-christine-anderson-a-vigilant-fox-exclusive-interview
‘The Fight Is On’ With Christine Anderson: A Vigilant Fox Exclusive Interview
Will there be accountability for the crimes of COVID, or will they be swept under the rug?
vigilantnews.com