TruthArchive.ai - Tweets Saved By @VaccineMole

Saved - June 7, 2025 at 1:32 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m alarmed by recent findings from German scientists revealing unknown impurities in the DMG-PEG 2000 LNP excipient used in Moderna vaccine batches. The FDA mandates reporting of such impurities, yet they remain undisclosed, raising serious safety concerns. It’s troubling to think that individuals supporting these vaccines might struggle to find peace of mind, especially with the new mRNA COVID-19 Moderna mNEXSPIKE vaccine also containing this excipient. I question why the FDA allows these unidentified impurities to be injected into the population without clear safety data.

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🔥BOOM! German scientists found two unknown impurities/contaminants with varying amounts in DMG-PEG 2000 LNP excipient Moderna Vaccines batches. FDA requires manufacturers to report unidentified/unknown impurities, yet aren't disclosed publicly, raising safety concerns/distrust. Sources: https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939641125001390 https://fda.gov/media/71727/download

Impurity profiling of PEGylated myristoyl diglyceride, DMG-PEG 2000, a functional excipient used in mRNA lipid nanoparticle formulations Lipid nanoparticles have gained significant attention during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly due to their role in mRNA vaccine delivery. However, … sciencedirect.com

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

How can individuals who endorse these products find peace of mind, knowing that unverified pharmaceutical substances lacking safety data are being administered to people? People should now be aware that the new mRNA COVID-19 Moderna mNEXSPIKE vaccine also contains the DMG-PEG 2000 LNP excipient. @US_FDA, why are these unidentified impurities with uncertain quality and safety being permitted for injection into the population?

Saved - March 4, 2025 at 11:14 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I’m excited to share that a recent study published on February 1, 2024, shows N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) is effective against all SARS-CoV-2 variants tested in human lung cells and a humanized mouse model. The study highlights that NAC treatment inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection and offers advantages over current therapies, which often lead to variant emergence. It explains that NAC’s antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties help counteract viral pneumonia. The findings support using NAC and similar antioxidant drugs as safe and accessible treatments for COVID-19.

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

🔥 EXCELENT NEWS: Recent study published Feb 1, 2024, demonstrates N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), a well-known OTC supplement, is effective against all SARS-COV-2 variants studied in both human lung cells & humanized mouse model -"Treatment with NAC inhibits SARS-CoV-2 infection in vivo" -Overcomes "current therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 only target viral proteins, which promotes the emergence of variants that evade vaccine-induced immunity or resistance to antiviral drugs" -"reduction in ROS levels induced by prolonged IKE administration and GSH or NAC treatment impaired the SARS-CoV-2 viral cycle" -"The mechanistic explanation has been given that the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-thrombotic effects of NAC counteract viral pneumonia" "our results demonstrate the direct antiviral effects of NAC on lung epithelial cells in addition to its immunomodulatory effects. We therefore support the use of NAC and other antioxidant drugs as safe and accessible anti-SARS-CoV-2 therapies against current and future variants" Source: https://academic.oup.com/jmcb/article/16/3/mjae004/7596546

Saved - January 22, 2025 at 1:54 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I found it noteworthy that a 22-year-old man developed cardiac mesothelioma and died months after receiving the Pfizer BNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, which contained DNA plasmids with SV40 sequences. Also, there's an intriguing article discussing the link between mesothelioma and SV40.

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

Noteworthy to consider the development of cardiac mesothelioma cancer and subsequent death in a 22-year-old man, as reported by scientists, occurring few months after Pfizer BNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, found to contain DNA plasmids with SV40 sequences https://academic.oup.com/ehjcr/article/7/3/ytad100/7056750 Oh, then there's this interesting & curious article about mesothelioma & SV40... https://mesothelioma.net/mesothelioma-simian-virus-40/

Mesothelioma and the Simian Virus 40 | A Potential Cause The SV40 virus has been proposed as a possible cause of or factor in the development of mesothelioma, although it remains controversial. mesothelioma.net
Saved - November 23, 2024 at 8:13 PM
reSee.it AI Summary
I've expressed my concerns about Pfizer's transparency regarding the DNA and undisclosed peptides in their Covid-19 vaccines, highlighting the potential implications. I've also noted that Pfizer's claims and related studies will be archived for future reference. However, I've encountered issues with Wayback archiving these claims, but I found an updated archive link from November 2024. Additionally, I've faced challenges with Wayback blocking access to Dr. Sandeep Chakraborty's paper, which I've archived for easier access.

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

Dear @Pfizer @AlbertBourla you're deceiving the public about the DNA amount & undisclosed small peptides of the T1 oncogenic protein found in the Pfizer-BNTech Covid-19 vaccines as scientists show Sooner or later, you will answer for this @IamBrookJackson @barnes_law

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

The respective @Pfizer claims & referenced studies will be archived for future evidence @Pfizer claims https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.pfizer.com/about/responsibility/misinformation Dr. Sandeep Chakraborty https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379962204_The_bloodstream_of_mRNA_vaccinated_individuals_both_Pfizer_and_Moderna_shows_DNA_expression_vector_contamination_including_SV40_and_kanamycin-resistant_gene_sequences Kevin et. al https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/375065939_DNA_fragments_detected_in_monovalent_and_bivalent_PfizerBioNTech_and_Moderna_modRNA_COVID-19_vaccines_from_Ontario_Canada_Exploratory_dose_response_relationship_with_serious_adverse_events König et. al https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9279/7/3/41 @JesslovesMJK @Kevin_McKernan

Wayback MachineHamburger iconInternet Archive logoWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconDonate iconUser iconUpload iconSearch iconSearch iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org
Wayback MachineHamburger iconInternet Archive logoWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconDonate iconUser iconUpload iconSearch iconSearch iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org
Wayback MachineHamburger iconInternet Archive logoWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconDonate iconUser iconUpload iconSearch iconSearch iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org
Wayback MachineHamburger iconInternet Archive logoWeb iconTexts iconVideo iconAudio iconSoftware iconImages iconDonate iconEllipses iconDonate iconUser iconUpload iconSearch iconSearch iconSearch iconDonate icon web.archive.org

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

For some reason wayback is having problems in archiving @Pfizer claims page as of today I found a working updated archive from 17 Nov 2024 working, please check: Link for future evidence https://web.archive.org/web/20241117215407/https://www.pfizer.com/about/responsibility/misinformation @IamBrookJackson @barnes_law

Fighting Misinformation | Pfizer The spread of rumors and falsehoods can be dangerous. Learn about Pfizer’s dedication to helping people find accurate, science-based health information. web.archive.org

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

Just realised Wayback is blocking the link from Dr.Sandeep Chakraborty paper due to rights issues,which makes no sense since the paper is publicly available I archived it at http://archive.today, here's the direct link: https://archive.ph/Xpn2c

Saved - October 13, 2024 at 2:00 AM
reSee.it AI Summary
I shared the tragic story of John Cross, an NHS pharmacist who took his own life after suffering severe complications from a COVID vaccine. Despite enduring permanent pain and numbness, his claim for support was rejected because doctors deemed him not disabled enough. John felt he couldn't burden others and was frustrated by the bureaucratic process, which he found to be unfair and dismissive. The lack of communication and support from medical professionals deeply affected him, ultimately leading to his psychological breakdown.

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

1/2 "NHS Pharmacist,took own life after suffering paralysing complications from COVID Jab" "John Cross had catastrophic reaction,permanent pain/numbness" "Doctors urged him to make claim from government scheme,was rejected...in their opinion,John wasn't disabled enough..." https://t.co/NoKAeJatwe

Video Transcript AI Summary
The family of NHS pharmacist John Cross, who died by suicide after suffering complications from a COVID vaccine, are calling for reform of the government's vaccine damage compensation scheme. Cross suffered a rare neurological complication that left him paralyzed and breathing through a tube. After seven months in the hospital, he was left with permanent pain and numbness. His family says that he came home weak and traumatized, and despite treatment, he had relapses. His doctors urged him to claim compensation, but his claim was rejected because, according to the scheme's medical assessor, he wasn't disabled enough, even though the assessor agreed the vaccine was the cause of his condition. Faced with more treatment, he took his own life. His family believes he did not want to be a burden.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: A family of an NHS pharmacist who took his own life after suffering paralyzing complications from a COVID jab are calling for urgent reform of the government's compensation scheme for vaccine damage. Now John Cross was told by the scheme's medical assessor that the vaccine had caused his rare neurological effects. But sometime next year, our science and medical correspondent, Thomas More, has this exclusive report and a warning that it contains content you may find distressing, including references to suicide. Speaker 1: And what I want to say is thank you very much to everybody that's looked after me, of course, I'll be fine doctors and find nurses. Speaker 2: Paralyzed and breathing through a tube in his neck, John Cross had a catastrophic reaction to a COVID vaccine. Speaker 0: How are you feeling? Good. You doing a little rest? Probably. Speaker 2: The jab had triggered a rare neurological complication. In hospital for 7 months, he got back on his feet but was left with permanent pain and numbness. Speaker 3: Dad's face is is just you can tell you can hear his giggle in your head. Speaker 2: Once a fun, fit dad, he came home weak and traumatized. And despite regular treatment to replace his blood plasma, he had several debilitating relapses. His doctors urged him to make a claim from the government scheme that compensates for damage caused by a range of vaccines, but it was rejected. Speaker 4: Dad was so upset and so frustrated at the result. There's no way that that dad could put his full experience in that application form about being being in hospital for 7 months during the height of the pandemic, being ventilated for 3 weeks, trying different treatments to try and find improvement in his condition. The box was tiny for what dad had been through. Speaker 1: And his Speaker 2: family really important to John. Speaker 1: Really. If you Speaker 3: look at that picture there Speaker 2: The scheme's medical assessor agreed the vaccine had been the cause. But in their opinion, John wasn't disabled enough for a payout. His mental health suffered, and faced with more treatment for another flare up, in October last year, he took his own life. Speaker 3: I can only presume that he did not want to be a burden. I'm very angry that that that

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

2/2 "he did not want to be burden,very angry John went through enough with illness/recovery without going through trauma of this bureaucracy" "They didn't talk to him at all,examined him,listen & reject it in most sort high handed unfair manner, which broke him psychologically" https://t.co/Gb6TS1znH2

Video Transcript AI Summary
John, an NHS pharmacist, experienced significant issues following his vaccination. His family is angry that he had to endure bureaucratic trauma on top of his illness and recovery. The family's lawyer states that 350 people have been rejected from the vaccine damage payment scheme (VDPS) because they didn't meet the 60% disability threshold, which was originally designed for industrial injuries, not the complex impacts suffered by John. The family believes the system needs to be overhauled to be fair and transparent. They cite a two-year delay in John's case, during which he wasn't examined or consulted, and his rejection broke him psychologically. John believed in vaccination and saw the VDPS as vital for public confidence. The Department of Health stated that the COVID inquiry will consider VDPS reform in hearings next year and that qualified independent medical assessors undertake claim assessments. John's family feels the system failed him and wants accountability. They urge the government to take action.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: He did not want to be a burden. I'm very angry that that that John went through enough with the illness and the recovery without going through the trauma of this bureaucracy. Speaker 1: The family's lawyer has tracked applications to the vaccine damage payment scheme since the pandemic. He says 350 people have been rejected because they weren't 60% disabled, a threshold originally set for industrial injuries such as amputation and not for complex physical and mental impact suffered by John. Speaker 2: It does need to be overhauled because, I feel that it's just comparing apples and pears all the time. There was 2 years delay, in actually making even an initial decision. They didn't talk to him at all. They didn't examine him. They didn't listen to him, and then they they rejected it in the most sort of high handed and unfair manner, which really just, you know, broke him psychologically. Speaker 1: John, an NHS pharmacist, strongly believed there were significant errors in his assessment. Speaker 0: When dad was Speaker 1: His family wants proper accountability for what he went through, and the vaccine scheme overhauled to make it fair and transparent. Speaker 3: He believed in the idea of vaccination, and I think he saw the vaccine damage scheme as a vital part of that to give people confidence that if the worst happened, there would be support. Speaker 1: The Department of Health said the ongoing COVID inquiry will consider reform of the VDPS in hearings due to start next year. In a statement, it added, assessments of claims are undertaken by qualified independent medical assessors who use the medical records and the information provided by the claimant's health care providers to make their assessment. Speaker 4: That's the last time I saw dad alive. Speaker 0: That was the last time, really. Speaker 4: Yeah. Because I Speaker 1: Little comfort to John's family. They feel the system let him down. Speaker 4: He was our dad. He was he was a really wonderful man. And it's not just a story. The government, they need to hear it. Don't tell me how bad you feel for me or us. Don't send us your sympathies. Do something. Speaker 1: Thomas More, Sky News.
Saved - October 9, 2023 at 5:01 AM

@VaccineMole - VaccineMole

Australia one of countries with highest mRNA Covid-19 vaccination rates: Thousands lining up for compensation, claiming the COVID vaccine made them sick, millions already paid in compensation for some...

Video Transcript AI Summary
Chris Nimis, a previously healthy man, developed a chronic neurological disorder called CIDP after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine. He experienced symptoms such as headaches, tingling fingers, facial palsy, and paralysis from the waist down. Seeking justice, he is claiming $1 million in compensation through the government's COVID-19 vaccine claim scheme. Tanya Nielsen is assisting injured Australians in claiming compensation for recognized vaccine side effects, including heart issues from the Pfizer vaccine and Gillian Barre syndrome from AstraZeneca. The scheme has already paid $7.7 million to 147 individuals, with more applications in progress. Chris Nimis is advocating for interim payments and a simplified system before the scheme closes next year.
Full Transcript
Speaker 0: Back on his feet after a harrowing ordeal. Speaker 1: Well, it did was go and take a vaccine. Speaker 0: Now Chris Nimis is fighting for justice. Speaker 1: I couldn't walk. I couldn't work. Speaker 0: The once healthy forty nine year old became wheelchair bound after developing a chronic neurological disorder called CIDP. He says the symptoms began 2 weeks after having his first AstraZeneca vaccination in 2021. They included headaches, tingling fingers, facial palsy, and stolen mobility. Speaker 1: I was paralyzed completely from the waist down. Speaker 0: Mister nemeth is still unwell. And claiming 1,000,000 of dollars in compensation under the federal government's COVID 19 vaccine claim scheme. He's one of more than 3000 unlucky Australians maintaining COVID vaccines made them ill. Speaker 1: We've just had a settlement of 2,200,000 for a very deserving applicant. Speaker 0: Tanya Nielsen is helping 100 injured Australians claim for rare, but recognized vaccine side effects like heart issues from the Pfizer vaccine and Gillian Barre syndrome from AstraZeneca. Speaker 1: Over 12 months in which to get an outcome, And these are applicants who might not be able to work, so they don't have an income. Speaker 0: So far, the claims scheme has paid 147 people's $7,700,000 with more than 2000 applications in progress. Chris Nimis wants interim payments and a simpler system. The scheme closes early next year. Jackie Crist 7 news.
View Full Interactive Feed